Language selection

Search

Patent 2505536 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2505536
(54) English Title: FLARE STACK SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE SECURITE DE TORCHE DE BRULAGE, ET METHODE D'UTILISATION
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F23G 5/50 (2006.01)
  • E21B 41/00 (2006.01)
  • F23G 7/08 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PICKLES, IAN (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • IAN PICKLES
(71) Applicants :
  • IAN PICKLES (Canada)
(74) Agent: SANDER R. GELSINGGELSING, SANDER R.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2005-04-28
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2005-10-29
Examination requested: 2010-03-24
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2,465,735 (Canada) 2004-04-29

Abstracts

English Abstract


In the context of an oil or gas well site flare system, a safety system is
provided so that in the event of a flammable gas release at the well, the
safety
system can be activated to extinguish the sources of ignition. Activation of
the
safety system does not prevent the continued venting or exiting of flare gases
from
the flare stack. In a system aspect, the safety system comprises a source of
purge
gas connected to a flare stack and actuator means. When the actuator means is
actuated, a flow of purge gas commences from said source info said flare stack
while allowing said flammable gases to continue to exit out said flare stack.
Other
system and method aspects are also provided.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN
EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS BEING CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS
FOLLOWS:
1. A flare stack safety system, for connection to a flare line
carrying flammable gases from a well to a flare stack, the safety system
comprising:
a source of purge gas connected to said flare line; and
actuator means;
wherein when the actuator means is actuated, a flow of purge gas
commences from said source into said flare line while allowing said flammable
gases to continue to exit out said flare stack.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the source of purge gas
comprises a storage vessel containing a purge gas.
3. The system of claim 1 further comprising a purge line
connecting said source of purge gas to said flare line.
4. The system of claim 2 further comprising a purge line
connecting said source of purge gas to said flare line.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the actuator means comprises a
normally closed purge valve.
8

6. The system of claim 4 wherein the actuator means comprises a
normally closed purge valve.
7. The system of claim 3 further comprising at least one check
valve mounted in the purge line.
8. The system of claim 6 further comprising at least one check
valve mounted in the purge line.
9. The system of claim 1 further comprising at least one check
valve mounted in the flare line.
10. The system of claim 8 further comprising at least one check
valve mounted in the flare line.
11. A flare stack safety system, for connection to a flare stack
receiving flammable gases from a well, the safety system comprising:
a source of purge gas connected to said flare stack; and
actuator means;
wherein when the actuator means is actuated, a flow of purge gas
commences from said source into said flare stack while allowing said flammable
gases to continue to exit out said flare stack.
9

12. The system of claim 11 wherein the source of purge gas
comprises a storage vessel containing a purge gas.
13. The system of claim 11 further comprising a purge line
connecting said source of purge gas to said flare stack.
14. The system of claim 12 further comprising a purge line
connecting said source of purge gas to said flare stack.
15. The system of claim 11 wherein the actuator means comprises
a normally closed purge valve.
16. The system of claim 14 wherein the actuator means comprises
a normally closed purge valve.
17. The system of claim 16 further comprising at least one check
valve mounted in the purge line.
10

18. A method of preventing well fires caused by gases or fluids
inadvertently discharged around a well, comprising:
sensing a gas or fluid leak at the well;
turning off an ignition source adjacent a flare stack;
purging said flare stack by injecting a purge gas into said stack; and
allowing well gases to continue to exit out said flare stack.
11

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02505536 2005-04-28
"FLARE STACK SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE"
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The field of present invention relates generally to flare systems used
at oil and gas well sites and, more particularly, to flare stack safety
systems for use
during snubbing operations, well testing and other well completion operations.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
During the insertion of piping and tools into live well bores, and the
extraction of piping and tools from live well bores, known as "snubbing", it
is
conventional that a flare stack is often burning nearby, to receive gases from
the
well and thereby relief the well pressures that are present during the
snubbing
operations.
However, at times failures occur in pressure control systems due to
equipment malfunction or, more commonly, human error. During such an event,
large plumbs of flammable gas or fluids may escape from the pressure control
equipment and/or blow out from the well and drift or move towards the flare
stack -
occasionally with disastrous results such as a well fire initiated by the
flare system.
Undesirable gas plumes due to failures can also occur during numerous other
operations, such as during piping wash-outs, coil tubing operations, rig blow
out
preventor (BOP) failures, or wellhead equipment failures.
Flare stacks for oil and gas well operations tend to be fairly simple
systems with basic controls. Typically, an ignition source such as a pilot
flame is

CA 02505536 2005-04-28
provided at the outlet of the flare stack. Such a pilot flame is typically
left on
constantly so that, in the event that flammable gases are vented to the flare
stack,
the ignition source will start combustion of such vented gases. In case of an
emergency, quickly shutting off the pilot may not be sufficient to avert
disaster
because the remaining fuel (typically propane) in the line to the pilot would
still have
enough pressure to keep the pilot flame burning for a short time (often few
minutes).
A further complicating factor is that during workover and completion
operations is it generally not desirable to shut off the flow of gases to the
flare
system when the pressure control equipment has failed. Shutting off the flow
of
venting flammable flare gases, from the well to the flare stack, would only
exaggerate the well pressure that would be desirable to relieve. However, such
a
continued flow of gases through the flare stack would also allow the flare to
continue burning, long after the fuel to the pilot flame is shut off and the
pilot flame
itself has extinguished.
What is needed is a safety system which will eliminate the danger of
ignition of escaping flammable vapors, by the flare stack system, while still
allowing
the flow of vented gases out through the flare stack.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of one embodiment of a flare
stack safety system;
Figure 2 is a schematic representation of a second embodiment of a
flare stack safety system;
2

CA 02505536 2005-04-28
Figures 3a and 3b are perspective views of the embodiment of Figure
1;
Figure 4 is a schematic representation of a third embodiment of a flare
stack safety system; and
Figure 5 is a schematic representation of a fourth embodiment of a
flare stack safety system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Reference is to be had to the Figures in which identical reference
numbers identify similar components.
Figures 1, 3a and 3b show one embodiment of a flare stack safety
system 10. A flare line 12 carries flammable flare gases from the well to a
flare
stack 14 for combustion. Preferably, the flare line 12 enters the flare stack
14
substantially near the bottom. The flare stack 14 has an ignition source 16 to
initiate the combustion of the flammable flare gases. The ignition source 16
can be
electronic, a pilot light or pilot flame operated with a fuel gas, or any
other
equivalent ignition source. In this embodiment the ignition source 16 is a
pilot
flame created by a burner 18 supplied with fuel gas through a pilot line 20.
A purge line 22 connects a source of purge gas 30 (which in this
embodiment is a storage vessel 30 containing said purge gas) to the flare line
12
just prior to the junction of the flare line 12 with the flare stack 14. In
another
embodiment (not shown) the source of purge gas 30 connects directly to the
flare
3

CA 02505536 2005-04-28
line 12. In yet another embodiment (also not shown), the source of purge gas
30
connects directly to the flare stack 14. In the preferred embodiment, the
purge line
22 branches and also connects to the pilot line 20.
Preferably, check valves 24 are mounted in the purge line 22 to direct
the flow of purge gas such that when actuator means or purge valve 32 is
actuated
or opened, flow of purge gas commences from the source 30 into the flare line
12
and pilot line 20. More, preferably, a check valve 24 is mounted in the flare
line 12
to direct the flow of flammable flare gas from the well into the flare stack
14. These
check valves 24 are illustrated schematically as a spring-loaded balls and
also
function to prevent flare gases from entering purge line 22 and prevent purge
gasses from backing up into the flare line 12 towards the well. The check
valves 24
can be any suitable check valve, including ball and seat style valves or
flapper style
valves.
The purge valve 32 is preferably a quick opening valve which is left
closed during normal operations and opened to actuate the system 10 during an
emergency. More preferably, the purge valve 32 is left in a normally closed
position
during normal operations. A suitable valve would be a butterfly valve or ball
valve.
Alternatively the purge valve 32 could be a pressure activated valve or an
electronically actuated valve that can be opened from a variety of locations
on the
well site.
Storage vessel 30 contains a purge gas, preferably a non-combustible
pressurized inert gas, more preferably nitrogen (N2). Another suitable purge
gas
would be carbon dioxide (C02). Preferably, storage vessel 30 further comprises
4

CA 02505536 2005-04-28
bottles 34 of purge gas connected to lengths of pre-charge piping 36. The pre-
charge piping 36 may be connected in a line (see FIG. 3b) or it may be looped
and
in the form of a bundle (not shown). Advantageously, the pre-charged piping 36
stores the desired volume of purge gas under pressure. Typically, the amount
of
purge gas required to extinguish the flare stack 14 is dependent upon the rate
or
velocity of the flammable flare gas flow from the flare line 12. Other
variables may
also impact the amount of purge gas required in a particular situation.
OPERATION
Referring to the preferred embodiment (see FIGS. 1, 3a and 3b), and
during normal well operations, the purge valve 32 is closed or in its non-
actuated
state, thereby keeping the pressurized purge gas in the storage vessel or
source
30. In the event of an emergency at the well site involving a flammable gas or
liquid
release, purge valve 32 is actuated. Flow of purge gas, from the source 30, is
immediately begun into the flare line 12 and pilot line 20 through the purge
line 22
and past the check valves 24.
The flow of purge gas from the purge line 22 through the flare line 12
and then into the flare stack 14 mixes with, or displaces, the combustible
flare
gases and extinguishes the pilot light 16 and flare stack 14, so as to
eliminate the
undesirable ignition sources. Advantageously, the flow of purge gases mixing
with
the flare gases makes the mixture non-combustible, typically by reducing the
concentration of flare gases below that of their lower explosive limit (LEL).
More
advantageously, in a low flammable gas rate situation, the purge gases may
even
5

CA 02505536 2005-04-28
create an area which moves along the stack 14 where the concentration of
flammable flare gases is at or near zero. Even more advantageously, the flow
of
purge gases also cools the flare stack 14 down.
What results is a quick, within a few seconds, purging of flare stack 14
and pilot line 20 with purge gas from the source 30. Advantageously, the
ignition
source 16 is also cut off from its fuel gas by the entry of purge gas into the
pilot line
20, and is thereby extinguished and cooled. The purging and extinguishing of
the
flare stack 14 and burner 18 precludes the availability of either as a further
source
of ignition to escaping flammable gases or fluids from the well. More
advantageously, because the vented gases are still able to flow from the well,
through the flare line 12, into the flare stack 14, the well pressure can be
relieved
while having eliminated the danger of igniting the escaped flammable vapors
from
the well.
SECOND EMBODIMENT
Figure 2 illustrates a second, slightly different, embodiment wherein
the ignition source 16 is an electronic igniter 50 maintained constantly in
the on
position through use of switch or control labeled A. Accordingly there is no
pilot line
nor does the purge line 22 connect to the ignition source. The purge valve 32
is
controlled by switch B. When switch B is actuated, it accomplishes the
following
tasks: the purge valve 32 is opened and the ignition source 16 is cut off.
Accordingly, in the event of an emergency at the well site switch B is
actuated which overrides the ignition source 16, closing it off while at the
same time
6

CA 02505536 2005-04-28
opening the purge valve 32. Switch B can be manually activated or it can be
tied
into a flammable gas detector which will set off switch B automatically as
well as
sound an audible alarm.
THIRD EMBODIMENT
Figure 4 illustrates a third embodiment of the flare stack safety system
10, wherein a plurality of flare stacks 14a, 14b are shown, each connected to
the
purge line 22 of the flare stack safety system 10.
FOURTH EMBODIMENT
Figure 5 illustrates a fourth embodiment of the flare stack safety
system 10 wherein the purge line 22 connects directly to the flare stack 14
(rather
than to the flare line 12 as in the previous embodiments). In the event of an
emergency at the well site involving a flammable gas or liquid release, purge
valve
32 is actuated to open. Flow of purge gas, in this embodiment, is immediately
begun into the flare stack 14 and also the pilot line 20 through the purge
line 22 and
past the check valves 24.
7

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2012-12-13
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2012-12-13
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2012-04-30
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2011-12-13
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2011-06-13
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2011-01-25
Letter Sent 2010-04-14
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2010-03-24
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2010-03-24
Request for Examination Received 2010-03-24
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2009-04-22
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2009-04-14
Small Entity Declaration Request Received 2009-04-14
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2008-04-22
Small Entity Declaration Request Received 2008-04-22
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2005-10-29
Inactive: Cover page published 2005-10-28
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2005-08-10
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2005-06-21
Inactive: IPC assigned 2005-06-21
Inactive: IPC assigned 2005-06-21
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2005-05-31
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-05-31
Application Received - Regular National 2005-05-31

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2012-04-30

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2011-03-04

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2005-04-28
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2007-04-30 2007-03-19
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2008-04-28 2008-04-22
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2009-04-28 2009-04-14
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2010-04-28 2010-03-24
Request for examination - small 2010-03-24
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 2011-04-28 2011-03-04
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
IAN PICKLES
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2005-04-28 1 20
Description 2005-04-28 7 252
Claims 2005-04-28 4 76
Representative drawing 2005-10-06 1 5
Cover Page 2005-10-17 1 34
Drawings 2005-04-28 6 896
Filing Certificate (English) 2005-05-31 1 157
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2007-01-02 1 111
Reminder - Request for Examination 2009-12-30 1 125
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2010-04-14 1 179
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2012-03-06 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2012-06-26 1 173
Correspondence 2005-08-10 1 43
Fees 2007-03-19 1 40
Fees 2008-04-22 2 66
Correspondence 2008-04-22 2 66
Correspondence 2009-04-14 1 50
Fees 2010-03-24 1 43
Correspondence 2011-01-25 2 83
Fees 2011-03-04 1 42