Language selection

Search

Patent 2518681 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2518681
(54) English Title: SYSTEM FOR POSITIONING A WORKPIECE
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE POSITIONNEMENT D'UNE PIECE A TRAVAILLER
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B27B 31/06 (2006.01)
  • B27B 31/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BOYD, MURRAY (Canada)
  • WEBSTER, SANDY (Canada)
  • DAVYDUKE, ROLAND (Canada)
  • POBUDA, RONALD H. (Canada)
  • FLATMAN, CARL (Canada)
  • MITCHELL, RORY M. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • USNR KOCKUMS CANCAR HOLDINGS ULC (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • BOYD, MURRAY (Canada)
  • WEBSTER, SANDY (Canada)
  • DAVYDUKE, ROLAND (Canada)
  • POBUDA, RONALD H. (Canada)
  • FLATMAN, CARL (Canada)
  • MITCHELL, RORY M. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2013-11-19
(22) Filed Date: 2005-09-09
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2006-03-09
Examination requested: 2010-08-20
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2,480,976 Canada 2004-09-09

Abstracts

English Abstract

A system for positioning a workpiece in an optimized position. In one embodiment a marking device places a mark on the workpiece prior to the workpiece passing through a scanner cooperating with an optimizer. The optimizer determines the optimized position of the workpiece. The orientation of the workpiece is identified by a first camera. The mark may be used as a point of reference such that the workpiece may be positioned in the optimized position by rotating the workpiece relative to the orientation of the mark. A turning mechanism rotates the workpiece to position it in the optimized position. A further camera identifies the orientation of the mark while the workpiece is being rotated. A processor compares in real time the orientation of the workpiece with the optimized position to determine if the workpiece is in the optimized position.


French Abstract

Un système pour placer une pièce en position optimale. Dans un mode de réalisation, un dispositif marque la pièce avant qu'elle passe dans un scanneur qui est relié à un optimiseur afin de déterminer la position optimale de la pièce. L'orientation de la pièce est détectée par une première caméra. La marque peut être utilisée comme point de repère pour faire tourner la pièce jusqu'en position optimale en fonction de l'orientation de la marque. Un mécanisme fait tourner la pièce afin de la placer en position optimale. Pendant que la pièce tourne, une autre caméra détecte l'orientation de la marque. Un processeur compare, en temps réel, l'orientation de la pièce avec la position optimale afin de déterminer si la pièce est bien en position optimale ou non.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A system for rotationally positioning a log which is translating
downstream along a
feedpath, the system comprising:
a first identifying means along the feedpath, the first identifying means
configured
to detect a rotational orientation of the log about its longitudinal axis;
a turning mechanism downstream of the first identifying means along the
feedpath, the turning mechanism configured to selectively rotate the log about
its
longitudinal axis while advancing the log along the feedpath;
a second identifying means downstream of the first identifying means, the
second identifying means positioned to detect actual rotational positions of
the log
while the log is being rotated and advanced by said turning mechanism, wherein

the second identifying means includes a first detector positioned proximal to
the
turning mechanism; and
a processor adapted to receive information from said first identifying means
and
said second identifying means and to compare the actual rotational positions
to one or
more desired rotational positions, said processor further adapted to control
rotation of the
log by said turning mechanism based at least on said actual rotational
positions until the
log exits the turning mechanism.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the information from the first and second
identifying means includes three-dimensional log shape data.
3. The system of claim 1 further comprising an optimizing scanner located
upstream
of the log turner, the optimizing scanner configured to calculate an optimized
rotational
position for the log.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein said first identifying means comprises an
optimizing scanner configured to calculate an optimized rotational position
for the log.
11


5. The system of claim 1 wherein said turning mechanism comprises at least
two
pairs of turning rolls, at least one pair of said pairs of turning rolls
positioned on each side
of a conveyor, said pairs of tuning rolls adapted to engage and rotate the log
whereby
contact of said pairs of turning rolls with uneven surfaces of the log is
maintained despite
abrupt surface irregularities disturbing contact of one turning roll of said
pairs of turning
rolls from the surface of the log.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein said first identifying means comprises a
three-
dimensional scanning system configured to detect the three-dimensional shape
of the log.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein the second detector comprises a three-
dimensional
scanning system, and wherein the second detector is operable to scan the log
until the log
exits the log turner.
8. The system of claim 7 wherein the processor is adapted to correlate the
three-
dimensional shape data from the first identifying means with three-dimensional
shape data
from the second detector to determine the rotational orientation of the log.
9. The system of claim 1, the second identifying means further comprising a
second
detector positioned downstream of the first detector.
10. The system of claim 9 wherein said first and second detectors include
cameras, and
wherein said first and second detectors are in communication with said
processor.
11. The system of claim 10 wherein the one or more desired rotational
positions
includes an optimized position, and wherein said first and second detectors
identify the
orientation of an inherent feature occurring along the log at predetermined
intervals and
transmit said identification to said processor for processing in real time.
12. The system of claim 11 wherein said processor compares in real time
said
orientation of said feature with the optimized position of the log to
determine if the log
requires further rotation prior to exiting said turning mechanism whereby the
log is
maintained in the optimized position.
12


13. The system of claim 12 wherein said processor transmits information to
said
turning mechanism to control rotation of said workpiece such that the
optimized position
of the log is achieved and maintained.
14. The system of claim 1 wherein the processor is further adapted to
calculate a
rotational correction based at least on the information received from said
first and second
identifying means.
15. The system of claim 9 wherein said information includes video images of
a feature
of the log.
16. The system of claim 9 wherein said information includes video images of
an object
on the log.
17. The system of claim 7 wherein said information includes a three-
dimensional
shape of the log.
18. The system of claim 10 wherein said processor includes means for
correlating at
least one feature of the log in said information from said first and second
identifying
means so as to track rotational orientation of the log about its longitudinal
axis.
19. The system of claim 10 wherein said processor includes means for
tracking at least
one object on the log in said information from said first and second
identifying means so
as to track rotational orientation of the log about its longitudinal axis.
20. The system of claim 1 wherein said first identifying means comprises a
first three-
dimensional scanner, and wherein said second identifying means comprises a
second
three-dimensional scanner, and wherein said processor includes means for
tracking
changes in rotational orientation of the log about its longitudinal axis by
correlating three-
dimensional shape data from the first three-dimensional scanner with three-
dimensional
shape data from the second three-dimensional scanner.
13


21. A method for rotationally positioning a log into an optimal rotational
orientation comprising the steps of:
translating the log downstream along a feedpath;
detecting, by a first identifying means located along the feedpath, a
rotational orientation of the log about its longitudinal axis;
selectively rotating the log in a turning mechanism about the longitudinal
axis of
the log while advancing the log downstream, wherein said turning mechanism is
provided
downstream of said first identifying means along the feedpath;
detecting actual rotational positions of the log by a second identifying means

downstream of the first identifying means while the log is being rotated and
advanced
along the feedpath by said turning mechanism, wherein the second identifying
means
includes a first detector proximal to the turning mechanism;
determining, based at least on data from the first identifying means and the
second
identifying means, whether the log is in an optimized rotational position by
transmitting
data from the first identifying means and the second identifying means to a
processor
adapted to receive said data, and processing of said data in said processor to
determine
deviations of said actual rotational positions of the log from one or more
desired rotational
positions; and
controlling rotation of the log in said turning mechanism by said processor,
based
at least on said actual rotational positions, until the log exits the log
turner.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the one or more desired rotational
positions
includes an optimized rotational position, the method further comprising
providing an
optimizing scanner upstream of said turning mechanism along the feedpath, the
optimizing
scanner configured to calculate the optimized rotational position.
23. The method of claim 21 wherein said data includes three-dimensional log
shape
data.
14


24. The method of claim 23 wherein said first identifying means comprises a
first
three-dimensional scanning system.
25. The method of claim 24 wherein said first detector comprises a second
three-
dimensional scanning system.
26. The method of claim 24 wherein said first identifying means further
includes an
optimizing scanner configured to calculate the optimized rotational position.
27. The method of claim 21, the second identifying means further comprising
a second
detector downstream of the first detector, the first and second detectors
operable to detect
the rotational position of the log until the log exits said turning mechanism.
28. The method of claim 27 wherein said first and second detectors detect
said actual
rotational positions at predetermined intervals and transmit the data to said
processor for
processing in real time.
29. The method of claim 21, further comprising comparing by said processor,
in real
time, at least one or more of the actual rotational positions and an optimized
rotational
position to determine whether the log is in the optimized position.
30. The method of claim 29 further comprising calculating by the processor,
based at
least on said comparing, a rotational correction to adjust the rotation of the
log by the log
turning mechanism to achieve or maintain the optimized position of the log.
31. The method of claim 25 wherein processing said data includes
correlating the
three-dimensional shape data from the first identifying means with the three-
dimensional
shape data from the second identifying means.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02518681 2005-11-16
SYSTEM FOR POSITIONING A WORKPIECE
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of devices for positioning a workpiece in
a
sawmill, and more particularly, it relates to a system for positioning a
workpiece into an optimized
position to produce the highest value or yield of lumber.
Background of the Invention
Conventional log turners known as "flying log turners", typically comprise a
pair of
four to five foot long vertically oriented spiked rolls which are located on
each side of a
transporting conveyor. The log turner rotates a workpiece, such as a log, as
the workpiece travels
towards the infeed of a primary breakdown machine, such as canters, bandmills
or circular Scragg
saws. The spiked rolls of the log turner are movable laterally towards and
away from the
centreline of a workpiece, longitudinally along the length of the workpiece in
an open-and-close
operation, and vertically upwards and downwards to engage, manipulate, and
rotate the workpiece.
The pair of rolls moves in an open-and-close operation to control the location
along the length of
the log where the rolls contact and manipulate the log position. Each roll, or
set of rolls also moves
in the vertical direction.
Other conventional log turners known as knuckle turners provide a less
accurate
method of turning logs. If accurate turning feedback was achieved, this would
be a more cost-
effective method of turning the logs as compared to flying log turners.
As a workpiece travels along the conveyor en route to the primary breakdown
machines, an optimizer, using data from a scanner, determines an optimized
position of the
workpiece such that the workpiece, when processed in accordance with the
desired angular

CA 02518681 2005-09-09
rotation of the optimized position, may generate the highest value or yield of
lumber. To position
the workpiece in the optimized position, motion control data generated by the
optimizer and
associated programmable logic controller (PLC) initiates movement of the log
turner to rotate the
workpiece in order to attain the optimized position. In flying log turners
lateral and longitudinal
displacement of the spiked turning rolls brings the rolls into contact with
the surface of the
workpiece. The vertical displacement of each spiked roll allows the workpiece
to be rotated about
its longitudinal axis. The log turner rotates the workpiece until the
optimized position is achieved.
During the turning process, surface irregularities such as protruding knots or

indentations on the surface of the workpiece may affect proper contact of the
spiked rolls with the
1B workpiece, thereby inhibiting proper rotation of the workpiece to
position it in the optimized
position. This turning inaccuracy results in a significant reduction in lumber
recovery.
Furthermore, even if the optimized position is achieved, movement of the
transport conveyor on
which the workpiece travels may not maintain the workpiece in the optimized
position. Precision
in workpiece rotation and workpiece positioning is made even more difficult
given the high speed
at which the log turner performs its function. By providing a system to
improve the accuracy of
workpiece positioning, lumber volume and value will thereby increase.
The scanner/optimizer decides what angular orientation the log needs to be in
to get
the highest value breakdown solution from the log. Motion control data is sent
from the Optimizer
to the PLC control system allowing the rolls to contact the log, and by moving
the rolls in opposite
vertical directions; the log can be rotated to the desired angular position.
During the log turning process, approximately eight feet along the length of
the log
is in contact with the turning rolls. Because the outer surface of the log
typically exhibits many
geometric defects such as knots, cat-face, etc., smooth & consistent contact
with the turning rolls
is impeded. This in turn results in the target angular position of the log not
being reached. For
example, as the rolls pass over a knot that is sticking out, optimal contact
with the log is sacrificed
2

CA 02518681 2005-09-09
and therefore the targeted position is not achieved. Depending on log
geometry, log diameter and
products being manufactured, this turning inaccuracy can have a significant
impact on lumber
recovery.
Summary of the Invention
It is an object of the present invention to provide a system of positioning a
workpiece into an optimized position whereby rotational accuracy of a
workpiece may be
monitored, maintained, and/or corrected so that positional or rotational
errors at primary
breakdown may be avoided, thereby improving overall lumber recovery.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a marking device to
place a
mark on an end of the workpiece to assist the system in monitoring,
maintaining, and/or correcting
the position of the workpiece such that the optimized position may be achieved
and maintained.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a means for
identifying the
orientation of the mark in real-time as the workpiece is transported through
the turning mechanism
such that any necessary corrective angular repositioning may be timely
performed to ensure that
the orientation of the mark prior to the workpiece leaving the turning
mechanism coincides with
the optimized position of the workpiece.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a evaluator to
determine in
real-time if there are any positional differences between the orientation of
the mark and the
optimized position while the workpiece is being rotated and transported
towards the primary
breakdown machine.
3

CA 02518681 2005-09-09
It is a further object of this invention to provide a mechanism for
transmitting
corrective positioning information to control the operation of the turning
mechanism to adjust the
position of the workpiece such that the optimized position may be achieved and
maintained.
The present invention is a system for positioning a workpiece into an
optimized
position. The system includes a marking device adapted to place a mark on the
workpiece prior to
the workpiece passing through an optimizer. A first identifying means
identifies the orientation of
the mark as a point of reference such that the workpiece may be positioned
into the workpiece's
optimized position by rotating the workpiece relative to the orientation of
the mark. A turning
mechanism rotates the workpiece. A second identifying means identifies the
orientation of the
mark while the workpiece is being rotated. An optimizer or other processor
receives information
from the first identifying means and from the second identifying means to
determine if the
workpiece is in the optimized position. A PLC or other processor controls
rotation of the
workpiece such that the optimized position of the workpiece may be achieved.
The marking device may be a spray paint marking device for placing a spray
paint
line on an end of the workpiece. A first camera identifies the orientation of
the mark. This maybe
prior to the workpiece exiting the optimizer. The optimizer determines the
optimized position of
the workpiece. A workpiece turning mechanism such as one including a pair of
turning rolls, one
turning roll on each side of a conveyor, rotates the workpiece to its
optimized position. The
turning rolls may be spiked to grasp the workpiece without slipping. The
turning rolls may also
displace horizontally to engage the workpiece. They may also rotate about a
vertical axis to assist
in transporting the workpiece along the conveyor. The pair of turning rolls
displace vertically
relative to one another, upwards and downwards, causing the workpiece to
rotate where
sandwiched between the rolls. A second camera may be positioned within the
turning mechanism.
A third camera may be positioned adjacent to the turning mechanism. The second
and third
cameras identify the orientation of the mark in real-time, continually or at
predetermined time
4

CA 02518681 2005-09-09
intervals while the workpiece is being rotated. The real time orientation of
the mark is transmitted
to the processor which compares the real time orientation of the mark with the
desired optimized
position of the workpiece to determine if the workpiece is in the optimized
position. To position
or maintain the workpiece in the optimized position, the processor transmits
information to the
turning mechanism to control rotation of the workpiece such that the optimized
position of the
workpiece may be achieved and maintained.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Various other objects, features and attendant advantages of the present
invention
will become fully appreciated as the same becomes better understood when
considered in
conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters
designate the
same or similar parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
Figure 1 is a detailed plan view of the infeed, scanner/optimizer, conveyor
and
turning roll portions of the present invention;
Figure 1 a is a schematic plan view of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a detailed side elevational view of the invention illustrated in
Figure 1;
Figure 3 is an enlarged plan view of a portion of the turning roll mechanism;
Figure 4 is a sectional view taken on line 4-4 of Figure 3; and
Figure 5 is an enlarged view of a portion of Figure 3.
5

CA 02518681 2005-09-09
Detailed Description of Embodiments of the Invention
With reference to the Figures wherein similar characters of reference denote
corresponding parts in each view, a system 10 according to the present
invention includes a
scanner/optimizer 15, a processor 20, a marking device 25, a first and a
second mark orientation
identifying means 30 and 35, and a turning mechanism 40.
As seen in Figures 1 and la, a plurality of logs, referred to herein
alternatively as
workpieces 5, located on an infeed 12 are transported by suitable means, such
as a chainway or
other conveyor, in downstream direction of flow A on a feedpath towards a
conveyor 14. Marking
device 25 mounted along infeed 12 makes or places a mark 28 on each workpiece
5.
Alternatively, marking device 25 may be positionable along conveyor 14 so that
marking device
25 places mark 28 on workpiece 5 prior to workpiece 5 passing through
scanner/optimizer 15. In
one embodiment, not intended to be limiting, marking device 25 is a spray
paint marking device
for placing a visually observable spray paint line on an end 7 of workpiece 5.
Alternatively,
marking device 25 may be a cutting means for making a superficial visual cut
mark on end 7 of
workpiece 5. It will be recognized that there are many different marks and
marking devices within
the scope of the present invention that may be used to provide a suitable mark
on workpiece 5 as a
reference point to provide information regarding the rotational position of
workpiece 5. Further,
as better described below, natural features or objects or irregular shapes
occurring on or along the
workpiece may serve as a mark for the purposes of tracking the rotational
orientation of the
workpiece.
Workpieces 5, which are marked on ends 7, are then transported on conveyor 14
in
downstream direction B towards and through scanner/optimizer 15.
Scanner/optimizer 15 detects,
analyzes, and classifies the geometrical information and surface
characteristics or features of each
workpiece 5 and determines an optimized cutting solution to obtain optimal
lumber production
from each workpiece 5. Based on the optimized cutting solution,
scanner/optimizer 15 calculates
6

CA 02518681 2005-09-09
an optimized position for each workpiece 5 such that workpiece 5 may be
rotated into its position
prior to processing in a downstream machine center such as a canter, gangsaw,
etc. The optimizer
=
may determine the optimized position of workpiece 5 simultaneously with first
identifying means
30 identifying the orientation of mark 28 on end 7 of workpiece 5. In one
embodiment, first
identifying means 30 is a first vision camera such as a video camera mounted
adjacent to and in
proximity with scanner/optimizer 15 such that end 7 of workpiece 5 may be
photographed or
scanned prior to end 7 passing through scanner/optimizer 15. Data relating to
the orientation of
mark 28 identified by first identifying means 30 is then transmitted to
processor 20. The
optimized position calculated by scanner/optimizer 15 is also transmitted to
processor 20.
Typically, processor 20 is a computer or a PLC system capable of controlling
turning mechanism
40 to rotate and position workpiece 5 into its optimized position. The
orientation and position of
mark 28 identified by first identifying means 30 serves as a reference point
to assist processor 20
in controlling the rotation of turning mechanism 40 to position workpiece 5 in
the optimized
position, as described below.
As seen in Figures 3 to 5, turning mechanism 40 comprises a plurality of
turning
rolls 45 located on each side of conveyor 14. Turning rolls 45 are typically
spiked to enable
turning rolls 45 to engage the surface of workpiece 5 to rotate workpiece 5.
As seen in Figure 3,
only two pairs of turning rolls 45, one pair on each side of conveyor 14, are
illustrated and is not
intended to be limiting as two turning rolls 45, one on each side of conveyor
14, or four or more
even numbered pairs of turning rolls 45 may be employed. Each pair of turning
rolls 45 may
simulta eously rotate about their vertical axis C and/or displace in direction
D laterally of the
direction of flow B, towards and away from the centreline of workpiece 5.
Rotation of turning
rolls 45 about veitical axis C assists with the transport of workpiece 5 along
conveyor 14. Lateral
displacement of turning rolls 45 in direction B allows turning rolls 45 to
engage the surface of
workpiece 5 of varying widths. To rotate workpiece 5, turning rolls 45 may
also independently
displace vertically upwards and downwards in direction E along their
corresponding vertical axes
C, to thereby rotate workpiece 22 in a clockwise or counter-clockwise
direction about its
7

CA 02518681 2005-09-09
longitudinal axis G, as shown by arrow F. Turning rolls 45 are actuated by
conventional actuator
means such as hydraulic means while the rotational, lateral, and vertical
movement of turning rolls
45 are controlled by processor 20. Processor 20 transmits information by
conventional means to
turning mechanism 40 to control actuation of rolls 45 so as to selectively
rotate and position
workpiece 5 into the optimized position.
Second identifying means 35 monitors the position of mark 28 as workpiece 5 is

rotated by turning mechanism 40. Second identifying means 35 may include a
second vision
camera such as a video camera, wherein the second camera may be mounted within
turning
mechanism 40. In another embodiment, at least two second identifying means 35
are mounted
within turning mechanism 40, as seen in Figure 3. A third identifying means
50, in a preferred
embodiment including a third vision camera, is positioned along conveyor 14
where workpiece 5
exits turning mechanism 40. For simplicity, and not intending to be limiting,
only a single second
identifying means 35 and a single third identifying means 50 are illustrated
in Figure la.
Second and third identifying means 35 and 50 identify the orientation of mark
28
continually or at predetermined length or time intervals, such as every 5
seconds, and transmits the
orientation information for the mark such as mark 28 to processor 20.
Processor 20 performs an
evaluation in real time of any positional differences between the desired
optimized position of
workpiece 5 and the real time position of workpiece 5, as indicated by
reference to the orientation
of the mark such as mark 28. If the orientation of the mark indicates that
workpiece 5 is not in the
optimized position, processor 20 calculates the required angular rotation of
workpiece 5 so as to
position workpiece 5 into the optimized position and transmits such corrective
information to
turning mechanism 40. Any positional errors of workpiece 5 are thus corrected
on a continual
basis until workpiece 5 exits turning mechanism 40. If the orientation of mark
28 indicates
workpiece 5 is in the optimized position, processor 20 and turning mechanism
40 cooperates to
maintain workpiece 5 in the optimized position by making any necessary
adjustments if workpiece
5 is displaced, for example, by the movement of conveyor 14.
8

CA 02518681 2005-09-09
Video images may be used to track the movement of the log or workpiece by
identification of an object or other feature such as a patch of bark 5a in the
image and tracking the
relative movement of that object or feature or unique characteristic of the
log, frame to frame.
This may also be accomplished using mathematical techniques such as
correlation or phase
correlation, or object tracking techniques known in the art. To obtain a
correct movement a range
measurement must be added to determine if translation is occurring. This range
measurement can
also provide log diameter for side to side translation and geometric
correction to the video image.
If video information is taken in several locations the log can be tracked very
accurately and the log
can be rotated to the correct optimized location for log breakdown in the
downstream machine
center. The tools can also be adjusted to correct for translations that the
log has made during
rotation and transportation process before the machine center.
The same can be done using the three-dimensional shape of the log. The
original
log is scanned using a three-dimensional scanning system and that data
correlated with the original
three-dimensional shape data to determine rotation and location.
These are just examples and many methods may be used to measure the log
rotation
and provide feedback to allow for precise rotation and correct tool placement
of the machine
center.
The system would then, in real time, calculate and communicate corrective
positioning information to the motion control system that is controlling the
log turners, so any
potential angular orientation error could be corrected on a continuous basis
during the log turn
process. If tracked further in the process, exact location of the log may be
determined and the
cutting tools adjusted accordingly.
9

CA 02518681 2013-03-14
In interpreting both this specification and the claims that follow, all terms
should
be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In
particular, the terms
"comprises" and "comprising" should be interpreted as referring to elements,
components, or
steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements,
components, or steps
may be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or
steps that are not
expressly referenced. The term "mark" is meant to include orientation marks
added to a log, and
to other inherent orientation objects and features including unique or non-
symmetrical log shape
which may be tracked to determine if a rotational orientation of a log has
changed or if a preferred
or optimized rotational orientation of a log has been obtained.
In this fashion, rotation position and location errors are reduced to thereby
improve overall lumber value recovery. Placing a reference mark on the log
prior to the turner
rolls is described above. This may be in the form of a vertical line painted
on the end of the
log somewhere on the log infeed. A camera reads the orientation of the paint
mark at frequent
intervals during the turn process. The sub-system that looks at the vertical
paint spray mark
calculates an angular orientation and communicates this to the optimization
system at
predetermined intervals (every 6" to 12", for example along the log). The same
error rotation
correction could be accomplished using log image or shape recognition. Other
methods would
also work.
As will be apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the foregoing
disclosure, many alterations and modifications are possible in the practice of
this invention.
The scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set
forth in the
examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the
description as a
whole.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2013-11-19
(22) Filed 2005-09-09
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2006-03-09
Examination Requested 2010-08-20
(45) Issued 2013-11-19

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2012-03-15 R30(2) - Failure to Respond 2013-03-14

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $473.65 was received on 2023-09-08


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if standard fee 2024-09-09 $624.00
Next Payment if small entity fee 2024-09-09 $253.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2005-09-09
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2005-11-16
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-02-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2007-09-10 $100.00 2007-08-21
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2008-09-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2008-09-09 $100.00 2008-09-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2009-09-09 $100.00 2009-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2010-09-09 $200.00 2010-08-11
Request for Examination $800.00 2010-08-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2011-09-09 $200.00 2011-08-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2012-09-10 $200.00 2012-08-29
Reinstatement - failure to respond to examiners report $200.00 2013-03-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2013-09-09 $200.00 2013-08-08
Final Fee $300.00 2013-09-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2014-09-09 $200.00 2014-08-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2015-09-09 $250.00 2015-08-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2016-09-09 $250.00 2016-08-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2017-09-11 $250.00 2017-09-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2018-09-10 $250.00 2018-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2019-09-09 $250.00 2019-08-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2020-09-09 $450.00 2020-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2021-09-09 $459.00 2021-09-03
Registration of a document - section 124 2021-10-25 $100.00 2021-10-25
Registration of a document - section 124 2021-11-05 $100.00 2021-11-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2022-09-09 $458.08 2022-09-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2023-09-11 $473.65 2023-09-08
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
USNR KOCKUMS CANCAR HOLDINGS ULC
Past Owners on Record
BOYD, MURRAY
COE NEWNES/MCGEHEE INC.
DAVYDUKE, ROLAND
FLATMAN, CARL
MITCHELL, RORY M.
POBUDA, RONALD H.
USNR/KOCKUMS CANCAR COMPANY
WEBSTER, SANDY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 2006-02-13 1 15
Description 2005-09-09 10 543
Abstract 2005-09-09 1 25
Claims 2005-09-09 7 282
Drawings 2005-09-09 5 120
Cover Page 2006-03-03 2 53
Description 2005-11-16 10 541
Claims 2013-03-14 5 202
Description 2013-03-14 10 530
Cover Page 2013-10-16 2 53
Assignment 2006-01-13 6 288
Correspondence 2009-01-13 5 191
Correspondence 2008-10-10 1 15
Correspondence 2009-01-13 6 218
Correspondence 2005-10-20 1 28
Assignment 2005-09-09 4 113
Correspondence 2005-11-07 2 97
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-11-16 5 166
Assignment 2005-11-16 5 252
Fees 2011-08-16 1 37
Assignment 2007-02-14 59 2,052
Fees 2007-08-21 1 37
Correspondence 2008-07-24 6 193
Correspondence 2008-10-15 1 25
Correspondence 2008-10-10 5 176
Assignment 2008-09-09 38 2,109
Correspondence 2008-09-09 5 175
Correspondence 2008-11-05 1 15
Correspondence 2008-11-05 1 20
Fees 2008-09-09 7 212
Fees 2009-09-04 1 201
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-09-15 6 245
Prosecution-Amendment 2010-08-20 2 89
Fees 2012-08-29 1 28
Correspondence 2012-07-16 6 273
Correspondence 2012-07-31 1 14
Correspondence 2012-07-31 1 22
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-03-14 10 460
Correspondence 2013-09-06 1 36