Language selection

Search

Patent 2540787 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2540787
(54) English Title: DIGITAL SIGNATURES ON A SMARTCARD
(54) French Title: SIGNATURES NUMERIQUES SUR UNE CARTE INTELLIGENTE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04L 9/32 (2006.01)
  • G07F 7/10 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MULLIN, RONALD C. (Canada)
  • VANSTONE, SCOTT A. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • CERTICOM CORP. (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • CERTICOM CORP. (Canada)
(74) Agent: BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2008-09-16
(22) Filed Date: 1997-04-14
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-10-16
Examination requested: 2006-04-05
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/632,845 United States of America 1996-04-16

Abstracts

English Abstract

A digital signature scheme for a "smart" card utilizes a set of prestored signing elements and combines pairs of the elements to produce a new session pair. The combination of the elements is performed partly on the card and partly on the associated transaction device so that the exchange of information between card and device does not disclose the identity of the signing elements. The signing elements are selected in a deterministic but unpredictable manner so that each pair of elements is used once. Further signing pairs are generated by implementing the signing over an anomalous elliptic curve encryption scheme and applying a Frobenius Operator to the normal basis representation of one of the elements.


French Abstract

Un schéma de signatures numériques pour carte « intelligente » se sert d'un ensemble d'éléments de signature préstockés et combine des paires d'éléments pour produire une nouvelle paire de sessions. La combinaison des éléments est effectuée en partie sur la carte et en partie sur le dispositif de transaction connexe, de manière que l'échange d'information entre la carte et le dispositif ne divulgue pas l'identité des éléments de signature. Les éléments de signature sont choisis de façon déterministe, mais non prévisible, de manière telle que chaque paire d'éléments est utilisée à une reprise. Des paires de signatures supplémentaires sont générées en effectuant la signature sur un schéma de chiffrement à courbe elliptique irrégulière et en appliquant l'opérateur de Frobenius à la représentation de base normale de l'un des éléments.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



16
Claims:

1. A method of generating signature components for use in a digital signature
scheme,
said signature components including private information and a public key
derived from said
private information, said method comprising the steps of storing private
information and
related public key as an element in a set of such information, cycling in a
deterministic but
unpredictable fashion through said set to select at least one element of said
set without
repetition and utilizing said one element to derive a signature component in
said digital
signature scheme.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein a pair of said elements are selected
from said
set and said pair of elements are combined to provide said signature
components.

3. A method according to claim 2 wherein one of said selected pair of elements
is
utilized to produce private information and a public key derived from said one
of said
selected set of elements prior to combination with the other of said elements.

4. A method according to claim 3 wherein a computation to combine said pair of

elements comprises initiating on a first computing device, a first set of
steps in a
computation to inhibit recognition of information in said elements and produce
a partially
completed computation; transferring said partially completed computation to a
second
computing device; and performing a second set of steps in said computation on
said second
computing device.

5. A method according to claim 2 wherein said pairs of elements are selected
by
generating a pair of indices indicating respective locations of said elements
in said set.

6. A method according to claim 5 wherein said indices are obtained from an
ordered
array arranged to provide each possible combination of indices.



-17-

7. A method according to claim 6 wherein said indices are selected from a
counter that
increments with each signature.

8. A method according to claim 7 wherein output from said counter is modified
to
provide a non-sequential selection of said indices.

9. A computer readable medium comprising computer executable instructions for
performing the method according to any one of claims 1 to 8.

10. A system for generating signature components for use in a digital
signature scheme,
said signature components including private information and a public key
derived from said
private information, said system being configured for: storing private
information and
related public key as an element in a set of such information, cycling in a
deterministic but
unpredictable fashion through said set to select at least one element of said
set without
repetition, and utilizing said one element to derive a signature component in
said digital
signature scheme.

11. A system according to claim 10 wherein a pair of said elements are
selected from
said set and said pair of elements are combined to provide said signature
components.
12. A system according to claim 11 wherein one of said selected pair of
elements is
utilized to produce private information and a public key derived from said one
of said
selected set of elements prior to combination with the other of said elements.

13. A system according to claim 12 comprising a first computing device and a
second
computing device, wherein a computation to combine said pair of elements
comprises
initiating on said first computing device, a first set of steps in a
computation to inhibit
recognition of information in said elements and produce a partially completed
computation;
transferring said partially completed computation to said second computing
device; and
performing a second set of steps in said computation on said second computing
device.



-18-


14. A system according to claim 11 wherein said pairs of elements are selected
by
generating a pair of indices indicating respective locations of said elements
in said set.

15. A system according to claim 14 wherein said indices are obtained from an
ordered
array arranged to provide each possible combination of indices.

16. A system according to claim 15 comprising a counter, wherein said indices
are
selected from said counter that increments with each signature.

17. A system according to claim 16 wherein output from said counter is
modified to
provide a non-sequential selection of said indices.

18. A system according to claim 11 implemented on a programmable SMART card
having an integrated circuit embedded within the body of said card.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02540787 2007-03-05

DIGITAL SIGNATURES ON A SMART CARD
The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for generating
digital signatures.
It has become widely accepted to conduct transactions, such as fmancial
transactions or exchange of documents, electronically. In order to verify the
transaction,
it is also well-known to "sign" the transaction digitally so that the
authenticity of the
transaction can be verified. The signature is performed according to a
protocol that
utilizes the message, ie. the transaction, and a secret key associated with
the party. The
recipient can verify the signature using a public key of the signing party to
recover the
message and compare it with the transmitted message. Any attempt to tamper
with the
message or to use a key other than that of the signing party will result in an
incompatibility between the sent message and that recovered from the signature
or will
fail to identify the party correctly and thereby lead to rejection of the
transaction.
The signature must be performed such that the signing party's secret key
cannot be determiined. To avoid the complexity of distributing secret keys, it
is
convenient to utilize a public key encryption scheme in the generation of the
signature.
Such capabilities are available where the transaction is conducted between
parties having
access to relatively large computing resources but it is equally important to
facilitate such
transactions at an individual level where more limited computing resources are
available.
Automated teller machines (ATMs) and credit cards are widely used for
personal transactions and as their use expands, so the need to verify such
transactions
increases. Transaction cards, i.e. credit/debit cards or pass cards are now
available with
limited computing capacity (so-called "Smart Cards") but these do not have
sufficient
computing capacity to implement existing digital signature protocols in a
commercially
viable manner.
As noted above, in order to generate a digital signature, it is necessary to
utilize a public key encryption scheme. Most public key schemes are based on
the Diffie
Heliman Public key protocol and a particularly popular implementation is that
known as
digital signature standard (DSS). The DSS scheme utilizes the set of integers
Zp where p
is a large prime. For


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

2
adequate security, p must be in the order of 512 bits although the resultant
signature may
be reduced mod q, where q divides p-l, and may be in the order of 160 bits.

The DSS protocol provides a signature composed of two components r, s.
The protocol requires the selection of a secret random integer k referred to
as the session
key f r o m the set of integers (0, 1 , 2, ... q-1), i.e.

kE{0,1,2,...q-1}.
The component r is then computed such that
r={[i'' mod p} mod q

where (3 is a generator of q.
The component s is computed as
s = [ k'' (h(m)) + ar] mod q
where m is the message to be transmitted,
h(m) is a hash of that message, and
a is the private key of the user.

The signature associated with the message is then s,r which may be used
to verify the origin of the message from the public key of the user.

The value [ik is computationally difficult for the DSS implementation as
the exponentiation requires multiple multiplications mod p. This is beyond the
capabilities of a "Smart Card" in a commercially acceptable time. Although the
computation could be completed on the associated ATM, this would require the
disclosure of the session key k to the ATM and therefore render the private
key, a,
vulnerable.

It has been proposed to precompute pk and store sets of values of r and k
on the card. The generation of the signature then only requires two 160 bit
multiplications and signing can be completed within'/z second for typical
applications.
However, the number of sets of values stored limits the number of uses of the
card before
either reloading or replacement is required. A problem that exists therefore
is how to


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

3
generate sufficient sets of values within the storage and/or computing
capacity of the
card.
One possibility is to use a smaller value of p but with the DSS scheme this
will jeopardize the security of the transaction.
An alternative encryption scheme that provides enhanced security at
relatively small modulus is that utilizing elliptic curves in the finite field
2' . A value of
m in the order of 155 provides security comparable to a 512 bit modulus for
DSS and
therefore offers significant benefits in implementation.
Diffie Hellman Public Key encryption utilizes the properties of discrete
logs so that even if a generator j3 and the exponentiation J3'' is known, the
value of k
cannot be determined. A similar property exists with elliptic curves where the
addition of
two points on a curve produces a third point on the curve. Similarly,
multiplying any
point on the curve by an integer k produces a further point on the curve.
However,
knowing the starting point and the end point does not reveal the value of the
integer 'k'
which may then be used as a session key for encryption. The value kP, where P
is an
initial known point, is therefore equivalent to the exponentiation (3''.
In order to perform a digital signature on an elliptic curve, it is necessary
to have available the session key k and a value of kP referred to as a
"session pair". Each
signature utilizes a different session pair k and kP and although the
representation of k
and kP is relatively small compared with DSS implementations, the practical
limits for
"Smart Cards" are in the order of 32 signatures. This is not sufficient for
commercial
purposes.
One solution for both DSS and elliptic curve implementations is to store
pairs of signing elements k, kP and combine stored pairs to produce a new
session pair.
For an elliptic curve application, this would yield a possible 500 session
pairs from an
initial group of 32 stored signing elements. The possibilities would be more
limited
when using DSS because of the smaller group of signing elements that could be
stored.
In order to compute a new session pair, k and kP, from a pair of stored

signing elements, it is necessary to add the values of k, e.g. k, + k2 -> k
and the values of
k,P and k2P to give a new value kP. In an elliptic curve, the addition of two
points to


CA 02540787 2007-03-05

4
provide a third point is performed according to set formula such that the
addition of a
point kiP having coordinates (x,y) and a point kiP having coordinates (x2y2)
provides a
point k3P whose x coordinate x3 is given by:

X3 = 1 22 Xim32 xl x2.
x1 x2 xi xz

This computation may be significantly simplified using the normal basis
representation in a field 172m, as set out more fully in PCT Publication No.
WO 99/49386: However, even using such advantageous techniques, it is still
necessary
to utilize a finite field multiplier and provide sufficient space for code to
perform the
computation. This is not feasible within the practical limits of available
"Smart" cards.
As noted above, the ATM used in association with the card has sufficient
computing power to perform the computation but the transfer of the coordinates
of k1P
and k2P from the card to the terminal would jeopardize the integrity of
subsequent digital
signatures as two of the stored signing elements would be known.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the
above disadvantages and facilitate the preparation of additional pairs of
values from a
previously stored set.

In general terms, one aspect of the present invention proposes to compute
on one computing device an initial step in the computation of a coordinate of
a point
derived from a pair of points to inhibit recognition of the individual
components, transfer
such information to another computing device remote from said one device,
perform at
least such additional steps in said derivation at such other device to permit
the completion
of the derivation at said one device and transfer the result thereof to said
one computing
device.

Preferably, the initial step involves a simple field operation on the two sets
of coordinates which provides information required in the subsequent steps of
the
derivation.


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

Preferably also the additional steps performed at the other device complete
the derivation.
In a preferred embodiment, the initial step involves the addition of the x
coordinates and the addition y coordinates to provide the terms (x, x2) and
(y,(Dy2).
5 The addition of the coordinates is an XOR operation that can readily be
performed on the card and the results provided to the terminal.
In this manner, the coordinates (x,y) representing kP in a stored signing
element are not disclosed as insufficient information is provided even with
subsequent
uses of the card. Accordingly, the x coordinate of up to 500 signatures can be
generated
from an initial set of 32 stored signing elements.
The new value of k can be computed on the card and to avoid computing
the inverse k"', alternative known masking techniques can be utilized.
A further aspect of the present invention provides a method of generating
additional sets of points from the initial set that may be used individually
as a new value
of kP or in combination to generate still further values of kP.
According to this aspect of the invention, the curve is an anomalous curve
and the Frobenius Operator is applied to at least one of the coordinates
representing a
point in the initial set to provide a coordinate of a further point on the
elliptic curve. The
Frobenius Operator 0 provides that for a point (x,,y,) on an anomalous curve,
then 0

(x,,y,) is a point (x,2,y,Z) that also lies on the curve. In general,
QS'(x,y,) is a point x", y2'
that also lies on the curve. For a curve over the field 2' , there are m
Frobenius Operators
so for each value of kP stored in the initial set, m values of kP may be
generated, referred
to as "derived" values. The new value of k associated with each point can be
derived
from the initial relationship between P and OP and the initial value of k.
For a practical implementation where 32 pairs of signing elements are
initially retained on the card and the curve is over the field 2155, utilizing
the Frobenius
Operator provides in the order of 4960 possible derived values and by
combining pairs of
such derived values as above in the order of 10' values of kP can be obtained
from the
initial 32 stored signing elements and the corresponding values of k obtained
to provide
107 session pairs.


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

6
Preferably, the stored values of kP are in a normal basis representation.
The application Frobenius Operator then simply requires an "i" fold cyclic
shift to obtain
the value for an 0' operation.
According to a further aspect of the invention, there is provided a method
of generating signature components for use in a digital signature scheme, said
signature
components including private information and a public key derived from said
private
information, said method comprising the steps of storing private information
and related
public key as an element in a set of such information, cycling in a
deterministic but
unpredictable fashion through said set to select at least one element of said
set without
repetition and utilizing said one element to derive a signature component in
said digital
signature scheme.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example
only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a programmable credit card;
Figure 2 is a schematic representation of a transaction performed between
the card and network;
Figure 3 is a schematic representation of the derivation of a session pair
from a pair of stored signing elements;

Figure 4 is a schematic representation of one step in the transmission of
information shown in Figure 2;

Figure 5 is a schematic representation of a preferred implementation of the
derivation of a session pair from two pairs of stored values; and
Figure 6 is a schematic representation of a selection unit shown in Figure
1.

The System

Referring therefore to Figure 1, a programmable credit card 10 (referred to
as a'SMART' card) has an integrated circuit 12 embedded within the body of
card 10.
The integrated circuit includes a logic array 14, an addressable memory 16
and a communication bus 18. The memory 16 includes a RAM section 20 to store


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

7
information, a pair of cyclic shift registers 22 for temporary storage of
information and
programming code 24 for control of the logic array 14 and communication bus
18. The
array 14 includes an arithmetic unit 26 to provide modular arithmetic
operation, e.g.
additional and multiplication, and a selection unit 28 controlled by the
programming code
24. It will be appreciated that the description of the card 10 is a schematic
and restricted
to that necessary for explanation of the preferred embodiment of the
invention.
The card 10 is used in conjunction with a terminal 30, for example an
automated teller machine (ATM), that is connected to a network to allow
financial
transactions to be conducted. The termina130 includes a keypad 32 to select
options and
tasks and has computing capabilities to perform the necessary functions in
conjunction
with the card 10.

Access to the termina130 is obtained by inserting card 10 into a reader 34
and entering a pass code in a conventional manner. The pass code is verified
with the
card 10 through communication bus 18 and the termina130 activated. The keypad
32 is

used to select a transaction, for example a transfer of funds, between
accounts and
generate a message through the network to give effect to the transactions, and
card 10 is
used to sign that transaction to indicate its authenticity. The signature and
message are
transmitted over the network to the intended recipient and upon receipt and
verification,
the transaction is completed.

The Card
The RAM section 20 of memory 16 includes digital data string
representing a private key, a, which remains secret with the owner of the card
and a
corresponding public key Q = aP where P is the publicly known initial point on
the
selected curve. The RAM section 20 also includes a predetermined set of
coordinates of
points, kP, on an elliptic curve that has been preselected for use in a public
key
encryption scheme. It is preferred that the curve is over a finite field 2',
conveniently,
and by way of example only, 2155, and that the points kP are represented in
normal basis
representation. The selected curve should be an anomalous curve, e.g. a curve
that
satisfies y2 + xy = x3 + 1, and has an order, e. Each point kP has an x
coordinate and a y


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

8
coordinate and is thus represented as two 155 digital data strings that are
stored in the
RAM 20. By way of example, it will be assumed that the RAM 20 contains 32 such
points identified generically as kP and individually as koP, k,P ... k31P.
Similarly, their
coordinates (x,y) will be individually designated xoyo ... x31Y31-
The points kP are precomputed from the chosen parameters of the curve
and the coordinates of an originating point P. The k-fold addition of point P
will provide
a further point kP on the curve, represented by its coordinates (x,y) and the
value of k
cannot be determined even if the coordinates of points P and kP are known.
RAM 20 therefore contains the values of k associated with the respective
points kP so that a set of stored signing elements k,kP is available for use
in the signing
of the transaction.

Si nin

To sign a message m generated by the transaction, one session pair ~.; ~-P
is required and may be obtained from RAM 20 as set out more fully below.
Assuming
that values ~-, ~.P have been obtained, the signing protocol requires a
signature r,s) where

r is the data string representing the x-coordinate, xj reduced mod q
(q is a preselected publicly known divisor of e, the order of the
curve, i.e. q/e,
.);and
s =[k"'(h(m)) + ar] mod q where h(m) is a q-bit hash of the message
m generated by the transaction.

In this signature, even though r is known, s contains the secret k and the
private key, a, and so inhibits the extraction of either.

The generation of s requires the inversion of the value k and since k is
itself to be derived from the stored set of values of k, it is impractical to
store
corresponding inverted values of possible k's. Accordingly, a known masking
technique
is used to generate components r, s' and u of a signature. This is done by
selecting an
integer, c, and computing a value u= ck. The value s' = c(h(m) + ar) mod q.


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

9
The signature value s can then be obtained by the recipient computing slu-'
= k-' [h(m) + ar].
The signature (r,s',u) can be computed on the card 10 and forwarded by
bus 18 to the terminal 30 for attachment to the message m.

Generation of Session Pair

As noted above, in order to generate the signature (r,s), it is necessary to
have for session pair k and P. Security dictates that each session pair is
only used once
and it is assumed that the number of signing elements stored in RAM 20 is
insufficient
for commercial application.
In the preferred embodiment, two techniques are used to generate
additional session pairs to the stored signing elements. It will be
appreciated that each
technique may be used individually although the combination of the two is
preferred.
(i) Frobenius Operator
The first technique involves the use of the Frobenius Operator to derive
additional session pairs from the stored signing elements and is shown in
Figure 3. The
Frobenius Operator denoted 0 operates on a point P having coordinates (x,y) on
an
anomalous elliptic curve in the finite field 2' such that QS'P =(xZi,y2i ).
Moreover, the

point QS'P is also on the curve. In the field 2155, there are 155 Frobenius
Operators so each
point kP stored in memory 20 may generate 155 points on the curve by
application of the
Frobenius Operators. Thus, for the 32 values of kP stored, there are 4960
possible values
of kP available by application of the Frobenius Operator.
To derive the value of QS'P, it is simply necessary to load the x and y
coordinates of a point kP into respective shift registers 22 and perform an i-
fold cyclic
shift. Because the coordinates (x,y) have a normal basis representation, a
cyclic shift in
the register 22 will perform a squaring operation, and an i-fold cyclic shift
will raise the
value to the power 2'. Therefore, after the application of i clock cycles, the
registers 22
contain the coordinates of QS'(kP) which is a point on the curve and may be
used in the

signing protocol. The 155 possible values of the coordinates (x,y) of QS'(kP)
may be


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

obtained by simple cyclic shifting. The representations in the registers 22
may then be
used to obtain r.
Where the use of Frobenius Operator provides sufficient values for
commercial use, only one coordinate is needed to compute the value of r and so
only a
5 single shift register is needed. However, as will be described below,
further session pairs
can be derived if both the coordinates are known and so a pair of registers is
provided.
For each value of QS'(kP), it is necessary to obtain the corresponding value
of kO(P) = XP. k is a constant that may be evaluated ahead of time and the
values of its
first m powers, X,' computed. The m values are stored in RAM 20.

10 In general, QS'(kP) -> X'kP so the value of k associated with QS'(kP) is
X'k.
Since k is stored for each value of kP in RAM 20 and k is also stored, the new
value of k,
i.e. a,'k, can be computed using the arithmetic unit 26.

As an alternative, to facilitate efficient computation of kand avoid
excessive storage, it is possible to precompute specific powers of k and store
them in
RAM 20. Because m is 155 in the specific example, the possible values of i can
be

represented as an 8-bit binary word. The values of X2 -a )27 are thus stored
in RAM 20
and the value of ~, represented in binary. The prestored values of k 2' are
then retrieved as
necessary and multiplied mod e by arithmetic unit 26 to provide the value of
k'. This is
then multiplied by k to obtain the new value associated with 0'(kP).
It will be seen therefore that new session pairs k, kP may be derived
simply and efficiently from the stored signing elements of the initial set.
These session
pairs may be computed in real time, thereby obviating the need to increase
storage
capacity and their computation utilizes simple arithmetic operations that may
be
implemented in arithmetic unit 26.


(ii) Combining Pairs

A further technique, illustrated schematically in Figure 4, to increase the
number of session pairs of k and kP available, and thereby increase the number
of
signatures available from a card, is to combine pairs of stored signing
elements to


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

11
produce a new derived value. The addition of two points k,P and kZP will
produce a third
point k3P that also lies on the curve and may therefore be used for
signatures.
The addition of two points having coordinates (x,,y,)(x2y2) respectively on
a curve produces a new point having an x coordinate x3 where


X3 - Yr YzZ YImY2 x, x2
X,E)X2 XI X2

In the finite field 2m, y 1 y2 and x 1 x2 is an XOR field operation that
may be performed simply in logic array 16. Thus the respective values of xl
,x2 and y, ,y2
are placed in respective ones of registers 22 and XOR'd. The resultant data
string is then
passed over communication bus 16 to the termina130. The termina130 has
sufficient
computing capacity to perform the inversion, multiplication and summation to
produce
the value of x3. This is then returned to register 22 for signature. The
potential disclosure
of x3 does not jeopardize the security of the signature as the relevant
portion is disclosed
in the transmission of r.

The value of k,+k2 is obtained from the arithmetic unit 26 within logic
array 16 to provide a value of k3 and hence a new session pair k3, k3P is
available for
signature.

It will be appreciated that the value for y3 has not been computed as the
signing value r is derived from x3 rather than both coordinates.

It will be noted that the values of x, and xz or y, and y2 are not transmitted
to terminal 30 and provided a different pair of points is used for each
signature, then the
values of the coordinates remains undisclosed.

At the same time, the arithmetic functions performed on the card are
relatively simple and those computationally more difficult are performed on
the terminal
30.



CA 02540787 1997-04-14

12
Preferred Implementation of Generating Session Pairs
The above technique may of course be used with pairs selected directly
from the stored signing elements or with the derived values obtained using the
Frobenius
Operator as described above. Alternatively, the Frobenius Operator could be
applied to
the value of kP obtained from combining pairs of the stored signing elements
to provide
m possible values of each derived value. This may be accomplished by
cyclically
shifting the coordinates of the derived value in respective registers 22 as
described above.
To ensure security and avoid duplication of session pairs, it is preferred
that only one of the stored signing elements should have the Frobenius
Operator applied,
as in the preferred embodiment illustrated in Figure 5.
In this arrangement, the coordinates x,,y, of one of the stored signing
elements is applied to the registers 22 (step I in Figure 5) and cyclically
shifted i times to
provide QS' k,P (step II).

The respective coordinates, x0,,y0,, are XOR'd with the coordinates from
another of the stored values k2P (step III) and the summed coordinates
transmitted to
ATM 30 (step IV) for computation of the coordinate x3 (step V). This is
retransmitted to
the card 10 (step VI) for computation of the value r.
The value of k, is retrieved and processed by arithmetic unit 26 (step VII)
to provide X'k and added to k2 to provide the new value k3 for generation of
signature
component s as described above. In this embodiment, from an original set of 32
stored
signing elements stored on card 10, it is possible to generate in the order of
107 session
pairs. In practice, a limit of 106 is realistic.

Selection of Pairs Stored Signing Elements

The above procedure requires a pair of stored signing elements to be used
to generate each session pair. In order to preserve the integrity of the
system, the same
set cannot be used more than once and the pairs of stored values constituting
the set must
not be selected in a predictable manner.


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

13
This selection function is performed by the selection unit 28 whose
operation is shown schematically in Figure 6.
Selection unit 28 includes a set of counters 40,42,44 whose outputs
address respective look up tables 46,48,50. The look up tables 46,48,50 map
the
successive outputs of the counters to pseudo random output values to provide
unpredictability for the selection stored signing elements.
The 32 stored values of k and kP are assigned nominal designations as
elements in a set 52 ranging from -15 to +15 with one designated oo. To ensure
that all
available combinations of stored values are used without repetition, the
nominal
designations are grouped in 16 pairs in an ordered array 54 such that the
difference (mod
31) in the assigned values of a pair uses all the numbers from 1 to 30. oo is
grouped with
0. This array provides a first row of a notional matrix.
Successive rows 54a,b,c,etc. of the notional matrix are developed by
adding 1 to each assigned designation of the preceding row until 15 rows are
developed.
In this way a matrix is developed without repetition of the designations in
each cell. By
convention oo + 1 = w.

Counter 42 will have a full count after 15 increments and counter 40 will
have a full count after 14 increments. Provided the full count values of
counters 40,42
are relatively prime and the possible values of the counter 44 to select
Frobenius Operator
are relatively large, the output of counters 40,42,44 are mapped through the
tables
46,48,50 respectively to provide values for row and column of the notional
matrix and the
order i of the Frobenius Operator to be applied. The mapping provided a non-
sequential
selection from the array 54.
The output of table 48 selects a column of the array 54 from which a
designation associated with a starting pair can be ascertained. In the example
of Figure 6,
the output of counter 42 is mapped by table 48 to provide an output of 3,
indicating that
column 3 of array 54 should be selected. Similarly, the output of counter 40
is mapped
through table 46 to provide a count of 3 indicating that values in row 3 of
the matrix
should be used.


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

14
The assigned designations for a particular row are then obtained by adding
the row value to the values of the starting pair. This gives a new pair of
assigned
designations that indicate the locations of elements in set 52. The signing
elements are
then retrieved from the set 52.
One of those pairs of signing elements is then output to a shift register 22
and operated upon by the designated Frobenius Operator 0. The value of the
Frobenius
Operation is obtained from the output of table 50 which maps counter 44. The
value
obtained from table 5 sets the shift clock associated with register 22 so that
the contents
of the register 22 are cyclically shifted to the Frobenius value 0 indicated
by the output
of table 50.

Accordingly, a new value for kP is obtained. The associated value of k can
be computed as described above with the arithmetic unit utilizing the output
of table 50 to
determine the new value of X. Accordingly, a derived value is obtained.

The derived value and signing element are then combined as described at
(ii) above with respect to Figures 4 and 5 to provide a new session pair k, kP
for use in
the signing process.

The use of the counters 40,42 provides input values for the respective
tables so that the array 54 is accessed in a deterministic but unpredictable
fashion. The
grouping of the pairs in the array 54 ensures there is no repetition in the
selected elements
to maintain the integrity of the signature scheme.
Counter 44 operates upon one of the selected pairs to modify it so that a
different pair of values is presented for combination on each use, even though
multiple
access may be made to the array 54.

The counters 40,42,44 may also be utilized to limit the use of the Smart
Card if desired so that a forced expiry will occur after a certain number of
uses. Given
the large number of possible signatures, this facility may be desirable.

Alternative structures to the look up tables 46,48,50 may be utilized, such
as a linear feedback shift register, to achieve a mapped output if preferred.

In summary, therefore, pairs of signing elements from an initial set of
stored values can be selected in a deterministic and unpredictable manner and
one of


CA 02540787 1997-04-14

those elements operated upon by the Frobenius Operator to provide additional
values for
the elements. The elements may then be combined to obtain a new session pair
with a
portion of the computation being performed off card but without disclosing the
value of
the elements. Accordingly, an extended group of session pairs is available for
signing
5 from a relatively small group of stored values.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2008-09-16
(22) Filed 1997-04-14
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1997-10-16
Examination Requested 2006-04-05
(45) Issued 2008-09-16
Expired 2017-04-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $800.00 2006-04-05
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2006-04-05
Application Fee $400.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1999-04-14 $100.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2000-04-14 $100.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2001-04-17 $100.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2002-04-15 $200.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2003-04-14 $200.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2004-04-14 $200.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2005-04-14 $200.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2006-04-18 $200.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2007-04-16 $250.00 2007-03-15
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 11 2008-04-14 $250.00 2008-04-01
Final Fee $300.00 2008-07-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2009-04-14 $250.00 2009-03-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2010-04-14 $250.00 2010-03-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2011-04-14 $250.00 2011-03-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2012-04-16 $450.00 2012-03-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2013-04-15 $450.00 2013-03-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2014-04-14 $450.00 2014-04-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2015-04-14 $450.00 2015-04-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2016-04-14 $450.00 2016-04-11
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CERTICOM CORP.
Past Owners on Record
MULLIN, RONALD C.
VANSTONE, SCOTT A.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2007-03-05 6 181
Description 2007-03-05 15 682
Abstract 1997-04-14 1 18
Description 1997-04-14 15 681
Claims 1997-04-14 2 45
Drawings 1997-04-14 5 55
Representative Drawing 2006-05-26 1 6
Cover Page 2006-05-26 1 37
Claims 2007-10-31 3 97
Cover Page 2008-09-03 1 38
Correspondence 2006-05-04 1 13
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-03-05 12 399
Assignment 1997-04-14 4 135
Correspondence 2006-04-26 1 37
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-09-05 2 57
Fees 2007-03-15 1 27
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-05-01 2 62
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-10-31 6 164
Correspondence 2008-07-02 1 37
Fees 2008-04-01 1 25
Assignment 2009-04-21 4 140
Fees 2009-03-18 1 32