Language selection

Search

Patent 2542174 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2542174
(54) English Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BI-PLANAR BACKWARD WAVE OSCILLATOR
(54) French Title: PROCEDE ET APPAREIL POUR OSCILLATEUR A ONDES REGRESSIVES BIPLANAIRE
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H03B 9/08 (2006.01)
  • H01J 25/40 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DAYTON, JAMES A., JR. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MANHATTAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • MANHATTAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC (United States of America)
  • DAYTON, JAMES A., JR. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: OLDHAM, EDWARD H.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2004-08-12
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2005-02-24
Examination requested: 2009-06-15
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2004/026296
(87) International Publication Number: WO2005/017938
(85) National Entry: 2007-01-10

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/494,089 United States of America 2003-08-12
60/494,095 United States of America 2003-08-12
10/772,444 United States of America 2004-02-06

Abstracts

English Abstract



The disclosure relates to a sub-millimeter
backward wave oscillator (100). More specially, the
disclosure relates to a miniature backward wave oscillator
(100) having a biplanar interdigital circuit (115, 125). In
one embodiment the interdigital circuit (115, 125) includes
diamond and is coated with an electro-conductive material.


Image


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne un oscillateur à ondes progressives sous millimétriques. Cette invention concerne plus spécialement un oscillateur à ondes régressives miniature possédant un circuit interdigité biplanaire. Dans un mode de réalisation de cette invention le circuit interdigité comprend un diamant et est revêtu d'un matériau électroconducteur.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




CLAIMS

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:


1. A backward wave oscillator comprising an input for receiving electrons
emitted
from an electron source, an interdigital circuit, and an electron collector
for receiving the
electrons emitted from the electron source; wherein the interdigital circuit
defines a biplanar
circuit.

2. A portable backward wave oscillator for providing oscillations at a sub-
millimeter
wavelength comprising:

an electron beam generator comprising a directional source of electrons, a
collector of
electrons, and means for accelerating electrons emitted from said source in
the direction of said
collector;

magnetic field focusing means for focusing the beam of electrons;

a slow wave circuit disposed intermediate said source and said collector, said
circuit
having a bi-planar, interdigital, periodical geometric structure of synthetic
diamond with the
surfaces adjacent the beam being overlaid by gold, the interdigital structure
including two sets of
digits, each set in a different plane, said electron beam passing between said
two planes to
thereby interact with the full propagation strength of the electro-magnetic
energy induced in said
slow wave circuit by said beam; and

a control circuit for electrically tuning the frequency of the oscillations.

3. The backward wave oscillator of Claim 2 having a size and weight acceptable
for
hand held operation.

4. The backward wave oscillator of Claim 2 including a circuit for
decelerating the
electrons from said source that were accelerated in the direction of said
collector after such
electrons have passed said slow wave circuit; and






wherein the voltage of said collector is depressed relative to the voltage of
said source.
5. The backward wave oscillator of Claim 2 wherein said planes are parallel.

6. A portable, backward wave oscillator for providing oscillations at a sub-
millimeter frequency comprising:

an electron beam generator comprising a source of electrons, a collector of
electrons, and
means for accelerating electrons emitted from said source toward said
collector;

a slow wave circuit disposed intermediate said source and said collector
through which
the electron beam passes, said circuit having a bi-planar, interdigital,
periodical geometric
structure of an electrically non-conducting material with the surfaces
adjacent the beam being
metalized;

a magnetic field focusing circuit for focusing the beam of electrons; and
a control circuit for electrically tuning the frequency of the oscillations.

7. The oscillator of Claim 6 wherein said source of electrons is directional.

8. The oscillator of Claim 6 wherein said control circuit includes means for
selecting
the voltage of said source.

9. The oscillator of Claim 6 wherein said focusing circuit substantially
prevents the
focused beam from striking said slow wave circuit.

10. The oscillator of Claim 6 wherein the electron beam passes between the two

planes of said bi-planar slow wave circuit.

11. The oscillator of Claim 6 wherein said interdigital circuit includes a set
of digits
in each of two different planes.

12. The oscillator of Claim 11 wherein the planes are parallel.



31


13. The oscillator of Claim 6 wherein the electron beam passes through the
full
propagation strength of the electro-magnetic energy induced in said slow wave
circuit by the
beam.

14. The oscillator of Claim 6 wherein the non-conducting material of said
structure is
diamond.

15. The oscillator of Claim 14 wherein the diamond is synthetic.

16. The oscillator of Claim 6 wherein the metal for the metalized surfaces is
selected
from the group consisting of gold, silver, platinum, and copper.

17. In a device for providing electromagnetic oscillations comprising:

an electron beam generator comprising a source of electrons, a collector of
electrons, and
means for accelerating electrons emitted from said source in the direction of
said collector; and

a slow wave circuit disposed intermediate said source and said collector, said
electron
beam passing in sufficient proximity to said slow wave circuit to induce
electro-magnetic wave
oscillations in said slow wave circuit and to interact with said induced
oscillations for providing
electro-magnetic oscillations,

the improvement wherein said slow wave circuit is bi-planar.

18. The device of Claim 17 wherein said source is directional.

19. The device of Claim 17 wherein the oscillator is a backward wave
oscillator.
20. The device of Claim 17 wherein the oscillations are sub-millimeter.

21. The device of Claim 17 having a size and weight acceptable for hand held
operation.

22. In a device for producing electro-magnetic oscillations at a sub-
millimeter
wavelength comprising an electron beam generator for inducing electro-magnetic
oscillations in
32


an associated slow wave circuit, the improvement wherein the electron beam
interacts with the
full propagation strength of the induced electro-magnetic oscillations.

23. The device of Claim 22 having a size and weight acceptable for hand held
operation.

24. In a device for providing electromagnetic oscillations at a sub-millimeter
wavelength comprising an electron beam generator for inducing electro-magnetic
oscillations in
an associated slow wave circuit, the improvement wherein the electron beam
interacts with more
that an evanescent form of the induced electro-magnetic oscillations.

25. The device of Claim 24 wherein the oscillator is a backward wave
oscillator.
26. In a device for providing electromagnetic oscillations comprising an
electron
beam generator for inducing electro-magnetic oscillations in an associated
slow wave circuit
disposed intermediate said source and said collector,

the improvement wherein the electron beam interacts with the full propagation
strength of
the induced electro-magnetic oscillations; and

wherein said slow wave circuit is non-helical.

27. The device of Claim 26 wherein the oscillations are sub-millimeter and the
device
is portable.

28. In a device for providing sub-millimeter electro-magnetic oscillations
comprising
an electron beam generator and a slow wave circuit, the improvement wherein
the efficiency of
said device is greater than one percent.

29. The device of Claim 28 wherein the oscillator is a backward wave
oscillator and
is portable.

33


30. In a device for providing sub-millimeter wavelength electro-magnetic
oscillations
comprising an electron beam generator, a magnetic field focusing means for
focusing the
electron beam and a slow wave circuit, the improvement wherein the device is
portable.

31. The device of Claim 30 having a size and weight acceptable for hand held
operation.

32. In a device for providing sub-millimeter wavelength electro-magnetic
oscillations
comprising an electron beam generator, a magnetic field focusing means for
focusing the
electron beam and a slow wave circuit, the improvement wherein the device
weighs less than
about 500 grams.

33. The device of Claim 32 having an efficiency greater than about one
percent.
34. In a device for providing electro-magnetic oscillations comprising an
electron
beam generator, magnetic field focusing means for focusing the electron beam
and a slow wave
circuit having an interdigital structure of an electrically non-conducting
material with metalized
surfaces adjacent the beam, the improvement wherein said non-conducting
material is synthetic
diamond.

35. The device of Claim 34 wherein the oscillator is a sub-millimeter backward
wave
oscillator.

36. In a device for providing electro-magnetic oscillations comprising an
electron
beam generator, magnetic field focusing means for focusing the electron beam
and a slow wave
circuit having an interdigital structure of an electrically non-conducting
material with metalized
surfaces adjacent the beam, the improvement wherein said non-conducting
material is a synthetic
material.

37. The device of Claim 36 wherein said material is diamond.
34


38. The device of Claim 36 having a size and weight acceptable for hand held
operation and an efficiency greater than about one percent.

39. In a device for providing electro-magnetic oscillations comprising an
electron
beam generator, magnetic field focusing means for focusing the electron beam
and a slow wave
circuit and a collector, the improvement including a circuit for decelerating
the electrons from
said source that were accelerated in the direction of said collector after
such electrons have
passed said slow wave circuit and the depressing of the voltage of said
collector relative to the
voltage of said source.

40. The device of Claim 39 wherein the oscillator is a backward wave
oscillator and
is portable.

41. The device of Claim 39 wherein said slow wave circuit is bi-planar and
comprised
of synthetic material.

42. A backward wave oscillator for providing oscillations at a sub-millimeter
wavelength, said oscillator having a size and weight acceptable for hand held
operation and
producing at least one milliwatt of power at an efficiency of at least one
percent comprising:

an electron beam generator comprising a directional source of electrons, a
collector of
electrons having a voltage depressed relative to the voltage of said source,
and means for
accelerating electrons emitted from said source in the direction of said
collector and for
decelerating the electrons from said source after such electrons have passed
said slow wave
circuit;

a slow wave circuit disposed intermediate said source and said collector, said
circuit
having a bi-planar, interdigital, periodical geometric structure of synthetic
diamond with the
surfaces adjacent the beam being overlaid by a metal selected form the group
gold, silver and



copper, the interdigital structure including two sets of digits in different
but parallel planes, said
electron beam passing between said two parallel planes to thereby interact
with the full
propagation strength of the electro-magnetic energy induced in said slow wave
circuit by said
beam; and

magnetic field focusing means for focusing the beam of electrons to
substantially prevent
the impact of the beam with said slow wave circuit a voltage control circuit
for electrically
tuning the frequency of the oscillations.


36

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
Method and Apparatus for Bi-planar Backward Wave Oscillator
Claim of Priority

[00011 The instant application claims the benefit of the filing date of
Application
No. 10/772,444 filed February 6, 2004; Provisional Application Nos. 60/494,089
and
60/494,095 filed August 12, 2003. Each of the above-identified Applications is
incorporated herein in its entirety.

Back~-round
[0002] A backward wave oscillator (BWO) is a tunable source of coherent
radiation. In a conventional backward oscillator an electron gun sends a beam
of
electrons into a slow-wave structure. The output power of the electron beam is
extracted
near the electron gun. Because of their wide tuning range, the backward wave
oscillators
have been used in a variety of applications including as local oscillators in
heterodyne
receivers for the detection of sub mm radiation.

[0003] Nominally, the sub mm wave regime ranges from 300 to 3000 GHz where
electromagnetic radiation has a wavelength between 1.0 and 0.1 mm. Above the
sub mm
band is the infrared region where wavelengths are typically reported in
microns and the
electromagnetic waves behave similar to light waves. Below the sub mm band is
the

mm wave band (ranging from 30 to 300 GHz) and the microwave band (ranging from
I
to 30 GHz). In the mm and microwave bands, the electromagnetic waves behave
similar
to the ordinary low frequency electric currents and voltages with the very
important
distinction that the circuit dimensions are comparable to a wavelength. In the
sub mm
band, electromagnetic radiation has the properties of both microwaves and
light.
Structures that are suitable for microwaves become unreasonably small for sub
mm
devices while standard optical configurations become far too large.


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
[0004] Added to the dimensional complexity are several physical constraints in
the sub mm band imposed by significant atmospheric attenuation and by greatly
increased electrical conduction losses. Atmospheric attenuation is greatly
enhanced by
the presence of vibrational and rotational resonances of naturally occurring
molecular
gasses, while the roughness of metal surfaces significantly increases
conduction losses.
Because many of the issues regarding size and losses become exceedingly
important at
frequencies well below 300 GHz, the sub mm regime is frequently extended to
100 GHz.

[0005] Conventionally, vacuum electron devices have dominated the microwave
and mm wave regimes for applications where power and efficiency are important
system
parameters. However, within the sub mm regime, conventional microwave
structures are
usually not applicable. Solid state devices are used as low power signal
sources in the
microwave and low mm wave regimes, but are not applicable in the sub mm band.
Gas
lasers can be operated in the sub mm band, but they can only be tuned to
discrete
frequencies and they are generally very large devices. Presently, there is no
commercially available electronically tunable signal source in the sub mm
band.

[0006] Therefore, an object of the instant disclosure is to provide a BWO
having
an interdigital slow-wave circuit.

[0007] Another object is to provide a BWO comprising diamond.
[0008] Still another object of the disclosure is to provide a novel spatial
relationship between the electron beam of a BWO and the slow-wave circuit.

[0009] Another object of the disclosure is to provide a BWO having an
interaction impedance of greater than 1, preferably greater than 10 and most
preferably
greater than 100.

2


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
[0010] A further object of the disclosure is to provide a miniature BWO
weighing less than 10 kg and preferably less than 1 kg.

[0011] A still further object of the disclosure. is to provide an interdigital
circuit
for use in a BWO.

[0012] Still another object of the disclosure is to provide a BWO structure
integrated with an electron source.

[0013] A further object of the disclosure is to provide a coupling interface
between an electron source and the BWO.

[0014] Another object of the disclosure is to provide an integrated BWO having
field emission cathode as an electron source.

[0015] A still further object of the disclosure is to provide a BWO having an
electron beam positioned between a first plane and a second plane; each of the
first and
the second plane defining at least one of a focus electrode, a first anode, a
second anode
(or a slow-wave circuit) and one or more collector.

[0016] Another object of the disclosure is _to provide an apparatus comprising
an
electron source directing an electron beam to a focus electrode, a first anode
and a second
anode, whereby the electrons are collected by one or more collectors.

[0017] Still another object is to disclose a method for fabricating a BWO
having
an interdigital circuit.

[0018] Still another object of the disclosures is to provide a BWO where the
electron source and the interdigital circuit are fabricated of the same
diamond.
[0019] In still another embodiment, the disclosure relates to an electron gun
integrated with a slow-wave circuit.

3


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
[0020] A still further object of the disclosure is to provide a BWO requiring
a
substantially lower operation voltage as compared with the conventional BWO.

[0021] A further object of the disclosure is to provide a BWO having
substantially higher interaction efficiency between the slow-wave guide and
the electron
beam.

[0022] These and other objects will be discussed in relation with the
following
drawings.

4


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
Detailed Description of the Drawings

[0023] Figs. lA-C are schematic representations of one embodiment of the
disclosure;

[0024] Figs. 2A-2B are schematic representations of the slow-wave guide
circuit
according to one embodiment of the disclosure;

[0025] Figs. 3A-B are schematic representations of the backward wave
oscillator
according to the same embodiment of the disclosure;

[00261 Fig. 4 shows the dispersion relation (w-[i diagram) for the biplanar
interdigital circuit;

[0027] Fig. 5 shows the interaction impedance as a function of the height of
the
beam tunnel;

[0028] Fig. 6 schematically represents an exemplary configuration for a
backward wave oscillator;

[0029] Fig. 7 shows the effect on the dispersion diagram resulting from the
variation of the height of the dielectric fingers;

[0030] Fig. 8 shows the effect on attenuation due to the variation in finger
height;
[0031] Fig. 9 shows the effect on impedance due to the variation in finger
height;

[0032] Fig. 10 shows the impedance for an electron beam of about 12.5 microns
averaged over the beam width for an exemplary embodiment having the 10%
bandwidth
design;



CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
[0033] Fig. 11 shows the field intensity as a function of transverse position
(z) at
center operating frequency for (3L = 100 degrees;

[0034] Fig. 12 shows the field intensity as a function of y at (iL of 100
degrees;
[0035] Fig. 13 shows the start oscillation current as a function of circuit
length
for an embodiment of the disclosure having the 10% bandwidth design;

[0036] Fig. 14 shows the start oscillation current as a function of circuit
length
for an embodiment of the disclosure having the 20% bandwidth design;

[0037] Fig. 15 shows the impact of circuit length on efficiency with constant
current of 0.5 mA for the 20% bandwidth design;

[0038] Fig. 16 shows the electronic efficiency for an embodiment of the
disclosure having 10 % bandwidth design and using a 1.5 mA electron beam;

[0039] Fig. 17 shows electronic efficiency for an exemplary embodiment using
20% bandwidth design with 1.5 mA beam;

[0040] Fig. 18 shows output power for an exemplary embodiment using a 10%
bandwidth design with 1.5 mA beam;

[0041] Fig. 19 shows output power for an exemplary embodiment using a 20%
bandwidth design with 1.5 mA;

[0042] Fig. 20 shows typical emission characteristics for a Spindt-type field
emitter;

[0043] Fig. 21 shows the electron gun circuit and collector for the 1.8 kV
(low
frequency) embodiment;

6


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
[0044] Fig. 22 shows the electron gun circuit and collector for the 6.6 kV
(high
frequency) case;

[0045] Fig. 23 shows the assembly of a backward wave oscillator according to
one embodiment of the disclosure;

[0046] Figs. 24A-B show the magnetic fields generated by a pair of NdFeB 50
bar magnets;

[0047] Fig. 25 shows an exemplary circuit fabrication process according to one
embodiment of the disclosure;

[0048] Fig. 26 illustrates a cross-sectional area showing metalization pattern
according to one embodiment of the disclosure;

[0049] Fig. 27 schematically illustrates a 3-D view of biplanar interdigital
circuit
with metal undercut according to one embodiment of the disclosure;

[0050] Figs. 28A-E show field plots of the interdigital circuit shown in Fig.
27;
[0051] Fig. 29 is a field plot of a single period of the interdigital circuit
according
to another embodiment of the disclosure; and

[0052] Fig. 30 shows a top view of the circuit with an exemplary undercut.
7


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
Detailed Description

[0053] Figs. lA-1C are schematic representations of one embodiment of the
disclosure. More specifically, Figs. lA-1C show a biplanar interdigital
backward wave
oscillator circuit where the interdigital circuit is separated into two pieces
that are
positioned on closely-spaced parallel planes. The space between the two planes
defines a
path for the electron beam that passes through the propagation path of the
electromagnetic wave. This is a completely novel approach and in contrast to
the
conventional system where the electron beam propagated through an evanescent
wave
that resides above the planar circuit.

[0054] Referring to Fig. 1 A, electron beam 105 is shown interposed between
plates 110 and 120 of the biplanar interdigital slow-wave circuit. Each of
plates 110 and
120 defines circuit 115 and 125 respectively. The electron path 105 is shown
as a round
electron beam. The circuits 115 and 125 are shown more prominently in Fig. 1B.
With
reference to Fig. 1B, it should be noted that the top and bottom plates
(respectively, 110
and 120) are parallel. The apparent angle is added to show perspective. Fig. 1
C is a
schematic illustration of the cross-sectional view of the backward wave
oscillator 100.
The slow-wave circuits 115 and 125 appear as overlapping digits in Fig. 1C. As
will be
discussed in greater detail, in one embodiment, the body of device 100 can be
constructed
from diamond.

[0055] In one embodiment, the biplanar digital circuit can be designed to
operate
at about 300 GHz. In designing the apparatus 100, the first step is to define
the
dimensions of the circuit for optimal performance.

[0056] Figs. 2A and 2B represent a computer generated model of the circuit
according to one embodiment of the disclosure. As shown in Fig. 2, the
backward wave
oscillator 200 is enveloped by the conducting walls 210 and the circuit is
infinitely

8


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
periodic in the beam propagation direction (the x-direction). The conducting
walls 210
can be made of diamond with relative permittivity of 5.5. The interdigital
"fingers" 215
can also be made of diamond. A thin layer of metal 220 can be deposited on the
diamond
circuit 215. In one embodiment, the structure can be surrounded by diamond.
However,
the use of conducting layer boundaries greatly facilitates computations of the
sensitivity
of various parameters and has been demonstrated to have negligible influence
on the
frequency of operation.

100571 Figs. 3A and 3B are schematic representations of the backward wave
oscillator according to another embodiment of the disclosure. The schematic of
the
circuit that defines the device dimensions is shown in Fig. 3A and 3B, and a
set of
preliminary dimensions utilized during the so-called parameter study are
listed in Table
1. These dimensional parameters can be adjusted to arrive at different designs
as
described herein.

Table 1- Preliminary 300 GHz biplanar interdigital circuit dimensions (See
Fig. 3)
Dimensions (microns)
vaneridge 37.75
vanew 18.4
vanel 151
vaneth 4
diridge 75.5
p 36.8
xS 18.4
zS 18.4
diht 46
ridgeht 20
ygap 25

[0058] To perform the parameter study, each dimensional parameter was varied
by multiplying it by a factor from 0.5 to 1.5 or in some cases 2.1. For
example, the plots
showing the variations to diht are labeled diht = 1, 0.5, 0.6, etc. This
implies that the
standard value of diht (46 microns) was multiplied by 1, 0.5, 0.6, etc. The
dispersion, on
axis interaction impedance and attenuation were computed for each of the
parameters

9


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
through this range of variations with the other parameters held at their
nominal values.
The results of the preliminary study show that diamond height (Diht) is
compatible with
transverse dimension of electron gun, thereby eliminating the need for
additional masking
and etching steps.

[0059] One of the more significant parameters for frequency control is
"vanel."
(See Fig. 3A.) The plot of frequency as a function of phase shift (the w-(3
diagram) for
variations of vanel is shown in Fig. 4. For the range of parameters provided,
variations of
this configuration are shown to be operable to as high as 600 GHz.

[0060] A critical aspect for determining the strength of the coupling between
the
electron beam and the slow wave circuit is interaction impedance. The
impedance can be
expressed as:

jlE0 1zdS
K 2'8zP S (1)

[0061] Where JEoI is the magnitude of the fundamental n = 0 harmonic, P is the
total power, and S is the cross sectional area of the beam. For this circuit,
JEoI was
calculated by performing a spatial Fourier analysis along x (the direction of
beam
propagation) at discrete locations for z and y over the beam cross-sectional
area. The
average of these values over the beam cross section must be taken for the
impedance.

[0062] The average involves a discrete spatial summation over z and y, or:
fI E IZda r JEJEZ IZ Az0y
= Z y (2)
S S



CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296

[0063] where Az and Ay are the width of the discrete coordinate locations. At
the
time of the parameter variations, the cross section of the beam was not known.
Thus, the
on-axis interaction impedance was calculated for all variations.

[0064] Fig. 5 shows the interaction impedance as a function of the height of
the
beam tunnel. Of particular interest is the variation of impedance as a
function of ygap
(see Fig. 3A) or the beam tunnel height. This crucial parameter defines the
dimensions of
the space through which the electron beam must pass. Impedance increases as
the height
of the gap decreases; a value of 25 microns was chosen as a compromise between
efficient electromagnetic operation and the requirements of low beam
interception. As
will be discussed, the 25 micron dimension for ygap was compatible with the
proposed
design of the electron gun and the beam focusing system. The computations also
showed
that interaction efficiency increases as the beam tunnel height is reduced
while beam
interception is reduced as the tunnel height is increased.

[0065] Fig. 6 schematically represents an exemplary configuration for a
backward wave oscillator according to one embodiment of the disclosure. This
structure
can be constructed, among others, with several lithographic steps. The process
can be
further simplified by modeling the electron gun and the slow wave circuit. For
example,
the stepped configuration in the electron gun and the collector insulators
tend to reduce
electrical breakdown along the dielectric surfaces. It will be shown later
that the electron
gun can be designed so that the electric field in the gun is approximately 20
V/mil (8
kV/cm), which is well below the classic threshold for this effect of 127 V/mil
or 200
V/mil. This enables the electron gun insulator to have a smooth surface,
simplifying the
lithographic process used for fabricating the silicon molds. In addition, the
embodiments
provided herein enable the design of a much smaller BWO.

[0066] Referring to the exemplary miniature sub-mm BWO 600 of Fig. 6A, the
face view shows cold cathode emitter 610 positioned at one end of the BWO 600
while
11


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296

the collector 680 is positioned at the opposite end. Using a cold cathode
source such as
Spindt-type, field emission cathode is optional and other electron emitting
sources can be
used without departing from the principles of the disclosure. The field
emission cathode
is a preferred choice because it can create much higher current density as
compared with
thermionic cathode. The secondary electron emission suppression cavity 630 is
positioned proximal to the electron source. Its purpose is to prevent
electrical breakdown
due to cascading secondary emission long the diamond surface. In another
embodiment,
the electron gun is designed with smooth walls (thereby obviating the need for
a

suppression cavity.)

[0067] Conventional means can be used for coupling the electron source (e.g.,
electron gun) to the slow wave circuit. For example, the electron gun can be
coupled to
the slow wave circuit using mechanical means. In one embodiment, the entire
electron
gun and the slow wave circuit can be fabricated as one structure, eliminating
problems of
alignment.

[0068] The focusing lens 640 is placed at the output of the BWO to serve as
the
entry element for a quasi optical transmission system. The BWO can also be
coupled to
standard WR-3 waveguide by adapting conventional microwave techniques. The

waveguide is not visible in Figure 6.

[0069] The interdigital wave circuit 660 is shown as an integrated unit with
fingers 625 protruding toward the center of the circuit. In one embodiment,
the
interdigital wave circuit (or slow wave circuit) is fabricated as
complementary halves
prior to its assembly. The body of the interdigital circuit can be fabricated
from a
material of exceptional thermal conductivity. Exemplary materials include
synthetic
diamond. Synthetic diamond is particularly suitable as it provides high
thermal
conductivity enabling efficient heat transmission. Diamond also has a high
dielectric

12


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
strength to withstand the electron gun voltages and very a low loss tangent to
minimize
RF losses.

[0070] To improve performance, certain surfaces of the interdigital circuit
can be
coated with electroconductive material such as gold, silver or copper. An
optional
coating layer can be interposed between the diamond structure and the
conductive coating
(e.g., Ag, Cr or Mo). The coating layer may be provided to enhance the bonding
between gold and the diamond structure.

[0071] The secondary electron emission suppression cavity 630 is comprised of
corrugated diamond, so constructed to interrupt cascading secondary electron
emission
from causing electrical breakdown. It can be fabricated at the same time as
the electron
gun and the slow wave circuit.

[0072] Fig. 7 shows the effect of the dispersion diagram resulting from the
variation of the height of the dielectric fingers. The slope of this curve
represents the
group velocity of a wave propagating on the circuit while the slope of a
straight line
drawn from the origin to a point on the curve determines the phase velocity,
the more
steep the line, the higher the voltage. The point where the phase velocity
line crosses the
dispersion curve determines the operating point of the device and the electron
velocity
and, hence, the voltage of the electron beam.

100731 Fig. 8 shows variation in attenuation due to finger height (see finger
height 625 in Fig. 6). Referring to Fig. 8, it can be seen that the
attenuation at higher
frequencies is reduced by increasing the finger height. This is advantageous
because it
enables increasing this parameter to coincide with the height of the walls of
the electron
gun in order to eliminate one of the lithographic steps in the fabrication
process.

[0074] The preceding Figures illustrate that group velocity becomes negative
as
the phase shift per cavity exceeds 60 to 80 degrees. Therefore, when the phase
shift per
13


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
cavity exceeds this value, the group velocity of the wave is traveling in the
opposite
direction to the electrons; hence, the term backward wave. The peak of the
dispersion
diagram generally represents a point of unstable operation. This is
illustrated in Fig. 9 by
the nearly vertical plots of impedance in the vicinity of the peak in the
dispersion curves.

[0075) In an exemplary embodiment, the results of the parameter sweep were
used to design a biplanar interdigital circuit to operate at 300 GHz with both
10 and 20%
bandwidths optimized for impedance. The following dimensions were fixed during
the
design and optimization process:

ygap = 25 microns
vaneth = 4 microns

0.5 ygap + vaneth + diht = 100 microns; (diht = 83.5 microns)

[0076] In addition, the maximum voltage was set at about 6000 V and the
minimum phase shift per period at about 85 degrees. Two embodiments were
completed,
both with a center frequency of 300 GHz. The first had a 10% bandwidth
operating from
285 -315 GHz. The second embodiment had a 20% bandwidth operating from 270-330
GHz. The circuit dimensions for each exemplary design are listed below in
Table 2 as
follows:

14


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
Table 2 - 300 GHz biplanar interdigital circuit dimensions
Parameter 10% BW Design 20% BW Design
vaneridge 44.0 44.0
vanew 17.2 16.4
vanel 183.4 175.0
vaneth 4.0 4.0
diridge 87.5 87.5
p 34.4 32.8
xS 17.2 16.4
zS 22.3 21.3
diht 83.5 83.5
ridgeht 23.0 23.0
ygap 25.0 25.0

[00771 For the purposes of defining the electron beam requirements for the
device and estimating efficiency and start oscillation current, the
interaction impedance
averaged over the electron beam (as described in Equations 1 and 2) can be
computed.
The average impedance was calculated as a function of beam width (in z-
direction), while
keeping the beam height (in y-direction) constant at about 12.5 microns. All
simulations
assumed a rectangular beam. The average impedance is plotted in Figure 10 for
the 10%
bandwidth design as a function of beam width for several frequencies. Zero
beam width
corresponds to the on-axis impedance. The frequencies correspond to the values
of PL =
70, 80, 100 and 110 degrees. The 12.5 micron case is slightly higher than the
on-axis
case because the fields increase with proximity to the fingers. The impedance
falls off
rather slowly as beam width is increased indicating that the device can
operate very
efficiently with a rectangular or sheet beam.

[0078] The magnitude of the n=-1 space harmonic of the Ez field is plotted in
Fig. 11 as a function of z for y between -6.25 and 6.25. The beam center is
assumed to
be at y=z=0. The field is symmetric in z, thus it is shown for only positive
values of z.
Fig. 12 shows the field versus y for values of z between 0 and 80 microns.
Although the


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296

field increases at certain values of y with increased z, it also decreases for
certain values
of y with increased z. The result is that the average decreases with
increasing z.

[0079] The approximate start oscillation conditions were also calculated. The
start oscillation current is plotted in Figure 13 for the 10% bandwidth design
and in
Figure 14 for the 20% design as a function of total circuit length 1. Figures
13-14
illustrate that for the 10 and 20% bandwidth design embodiments, limiting the
beam
current to 0.5 mA and the circuit length to 5 mm may be unsuitable.
Furthermore, in
order to reach maximum efficiency it may be necessary to operate at twice the
start
oscillation current. The circuit length may be extended optionally. The
altemative of
increasing the beam current may be more attractive from the standpoint of
increasing
efficiency as can be seen from Figure 15, which shows the results of
computations with
0.5 mA electron beams. From the results shown in Figs. 13-14, it can also be
seen that
minimizing the length of the circuit can result in maximizing the electronic
efficiency.
For example, where 1 is about 5 mm, Figs. 13 and 14 show that a current of
about 1.5 mA
may be needed to operate at twice the start current over the entire bandwidth.
The
electronic efficiency and output power are plotted for a 1.5 mA current in
Figs. 16-19. It
can be seen that the narrow band design can deliver more power. The design
database
disclosed herein enables one of ordinary skill to determine the minimum
circuit length for
any value of beam current.

[00801 Electron Gun and Collector Design - The design of an electron gun
capable of providing the current specified in the 300 GHz design above was
performed
using the EGUN Code (See "SLAC-166," W.B. Harmannsfeldt, Standford Linear
Accelerator Center, 1973). The results are represented at Figs. 21 and 22. The
gun was
designed to fit the specified dimensions and the limitations of the proposed
fabrication
process, which as a lithographic process allows only vertical and horizontal
surfaces. s
will be discussed in relation with Fig. 25, the electron gun can be designed
to produce
only horizontal and vertical surfaces. The gun was designed to operate
immersed in a

16


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
constant magnetic field. The design was also controlled by a limitation of
voltage along
the insulating surface within the vacuum of no more than 20 V/mil (8 kV/cm).
Most
importantly, to meet the exemplary operation conditions described above, the
electron
gun must pass a beam of 1.5 mA at voltages ranging from 1.8 kV to 6.6 kV
through a
beam tunnel only 25 microns high.

[0081] The cathode selected for the gun design was a Spindt-type thin film
field
emitter. This cathode type has demonstrated current densities as high as 2000
A/cm2 for
small arrays delivering low total currents. Emission of 100 A from individual
emitting
tips has been observed; however, this is considerably diminished for large
arrays of

several thousand tips. The preceding analysis show that (i) reasonably uniform
output
power is available over the 10% and 20% bandwidths (Figs. 18-19); (ii) field
configuration is favorable for application of sheet electron beam (Fig. 11);
(iii) higher
output power and efficiency can be obtained with shorter circuit, but it will
require a
higher start oscillation current (Figs. 13-19); (iv) higher interaction
impedance and higher
attenuation compete at high end of frequency band (Figs. 8 and 9); and (v)
higher
frequency circuits are readily scaleable (Fig. 4).

100821 The field emitter produces an electron beam with significant transverse
velocity. It has been established that the transverse energy as an
approximately Gaussian
distribution with a FWHM value determined by the product of the gate voltage
and a
geometric factor normalized to a specific operating point. The emission model
utilized is
characterized by the emission curve shown in Fig. 20. The applications
disclosed herein
were conducted with the FWHM geometric factor referenced to 76 V, rather than
64. An
emission model was constructed that contained 99% of the beam current and was
introduced into the EGUN code. The beam was transmitted through a 25 micron
beam
tunnel. A minimum start oscillation current of 0.7 mA can be used for a 5 mm
circuit
length. The beam current can be doubled by increasing beam width without
increasing
current density or magnetic field.

17


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
[0083] In an embodiment according to the principles disclosed herein, the
electron gun provides a beam of constant current over a voltage range of about
1.8 to 6.6
kV. The gun may also be formed as an integral part of the CVD diamond slow
wave
circuit body. An electron gun was designed with two anodes. The first anode is
kept at a
constant potential with respect to the cathode of the lowest voltage (1.8 kV
in this case)
so that electron emission is unaffected by variations in the beam voltage. The
slow wave
circuit serves as the second anode and its voltage varies from 1.8 kV to 6.6
kV with
respect to the cathode.

[0084] The slow wave circuit analysis presented above called for an electron
beam of 1.5 mA to achieve a minimum of two times the start oscillation current
at all
cases. After a large number of trials with EGUN, a cathode consisting of an
array of 100
tips in a 2 x 50 configuration with 1.5 micron spacing was adopted. The
spacing and the
current per tip of 15 pA are both well within the parameters that are
typically achieved by
SRI. The oblong cathode makes use of the field distribution within the slow
wave circuit
to provide the required current while limiting the current density, which
facilitates beam
transmission. The slow wave circuit geometry would allow a cathode at least
twice as
wide as this if necessary. The field emitter must be diced to fit into the
lithographically
controlled dimensions formed by the end of the BWO body in order to accurately
center
the emitter in the gun for transmission through the slow wave structure. In
one
embodiment, the lithographically determined transverse dimensions of the BWO
body
serves to align the cathode. In another embodiment, the focus electrode can
make contact
with the gate and the base contact can be made at he rear of the cathode. The
gun design
is illustrated in EGUN generated drawings in Fig. 21, for the 1.8 kV
embodiment and of
Fig. 22 for the 6.6 kV embodiment.

[00851 The vertical scale in Figs. 21-22 is exaggerated. The bottom of the
figure
is the centerline 2100 of the gun axis (2100 is pointing at the location of
the field
emission cathode). Because this structure and the electron beam are
rectangular in shape,

18


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296

the model has been constructed using rectangular coordinates. Because EGUN is
a two-
dimensional code, the model can compute the effects of the vertical and axial
dimensions;
the model can be constructed with the transverse dimension extending to
infinity. The
current density is modeled as described above. Figs. 21 and 22 can be better
understood
in relation with Fig. 23.

[0086] Referring to Fig. 21, the model simulates the electron beam
trajectories in
a low voltage, low frequency case where the first anode and the second anode
are at
approximately the same potential. In Fig. 21, 2100 identifies the cathode;
2114 shows
the location of the focus electrode; 2113 is the first anode; 2116 is the
dielectric space
between the first anode and the second anode (interchangeably, slow-wave
circuit); 2115
is the slow-wave circuit; vertical lines 2112 and 2117, respectively,
represent
equipotential lines between cathode and first anode and between slow-wave
circuit and
the collector; 2118 is the diamond dielectric standoff; 2121 points at the
collector and
2120 designates the electron beam envelop. Finally, 2119 shows the insulation
between
the slow-wave circuit and the collector. In Fig. 21, the distance '1/2 ygap'
is the distance
between the bottom edge 2101 to the bottom of first anode 2113.

[0087] The envelope.of the electron beam contains 99% of the beam current. The
gun and slow wave circuit are immersed in a uniform field of 5000 Gauss. The
focus
electrode, the first anode and the circuit all share the same distance from
the centerline,
which is '/z ygap (see also Fig. 3). Similarly, the top line of Figs. 21-22 is
at a distance
from the centerline equal to '/2 ygap + diht + vaneth = 100 microns. Fig. 22
represents a
similar simulation as in Fig. 21 except that in Fig. 22 the 6600 V, high
frequency
embodiment is shown.

[0088] The cathode can be mounted at the left of Figs. 21-22 and can be placed
against the focusing electrode that provides electrical contact to the cathode
gate and
serves to shape the electron beam. In both figs. 21 and 22, the focus
electrode can be

19


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
positioned at the extreme left of the Figs. while the collector can be
positioned at the right
end.

[0089] In one embodiment, the focus electrode of the gun can make contact with
the gate of the field emitter and the back of the field emitter can define the
base
connection. The collector is not formed lithographically, and therefore, can
be designed
as a reentrant structure to enhance the capture of the spent beam. The
collector is
attached to the diamond insulating surface at the extreme right of the figure.
The
collector has been biased to 90% of the cathode to circuit potential. The
controlling
magnetic field can carry the electron beam through the slow wave circuit and
into the
collector. The collector can be fabricated from isotropic (POCO) graphite,
which is
commonly used in the fabrication of space traveling-wave tubes (TWT), because
of its
very low secondary electron yield. The collector may be simply a piece of
graphite with
a large aspect ratio hole or it might be two pieces of flat graphite with, for
example, 50 V
bias for suppressing secondary electrons.

[0090] MaQneticCircuit - In one embodiment, the magnetic field can receive the
electron beam with two parallel bar magnets to allow the electrical
connections to the
BWO and the RF output to come through the sides of the structure. The magnetic
circuit
can be formed by two rectangular bar magnets with iron pole pieces at each end
and
supported by an aluminum or stainless steel framework. A view of an exemplary
embodiment of the component parts of the BWO electron gun, magnets, slow wave
circuit and collector is shown in Fig. 23. Referring to Fig. 23, the exploded
view shows
bar magnets 3010 having interposed between them mating biplanar interdigital
structures
(circuits) 3040. Spindt cathode 3030 is positioned opposite the collector 3020
to provide
electron beam (not shown). In one embodiment, the magnets are supported by a
non-
magnetic frame (not shown) that centers the BWO within the magnetic field. The
magnetic material can be made thicker to increase the magnetic flux. In
another



CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
embodiment, the minimum spacing between the magnets can be 2.5 mm, which would
accommodate a short section of standard WR3 waveguide

[0091] Referring to the embodiment of Fig. 23, a mounting structure is formed
on the mating bi-planar structures 3040. In one embodiment, the structure is
fabricated as
complementary halves and then combined to form a BWO. Referring to the
exploded
view of Fig. 23, a diamond dielectric standoff 3011 is shown between focus
electrode
3009 and first anode 3012. The dielectric insulation between first and second
anode is
identified as 3013. Slow wave circuit 3015 is shown as having a plurality of
interdigital
structures (fingers) coated with a conductive material. The slow-wave circuit
3015 can
also act as a second anode. The frequency of the oscillator can be controlled
by varying
the voltage difference between the first anode and the slow-wave circuit. Bar
magnets
3010 receive the assembled BWO which, in the exemplary embodiment of Fig. 23,
includes Spindt Cathode 3030 and Collectors 3020. The lower the potential
difference
between the first and second anode, the lower the frequency of the oscillator.

[0092] With reference to the assembled view of Fig. 23, after the electrons
pass
through the complementary structures of first anode 3011 and slow-wave circuit
3015,
they are captured by collector 3020. The collector 3020 can be biased to be
closer in
potential to the cathode than to the first or second anodes. As the electrons
impact
collector electrodes 3020, little heat is generated and much of the power of
the electron
beam is captured by the collectors 3020. In an exemplary embodiment, the
Spindt
cathode is receives -6.6 kV, first anode is set to -4.8kV and slow-wave
circuit 3015 is
grounded to zero potential. The embodiment shown in Fig. 23 is pardcularly
advantages
over the conventional devices in that it is substantially smaller. In one
embodiment, the
device is measured to be about 30 gm. (conventional devices are about 20 kg).

[0093] A calculation demonstrating feasibility of achieving the required
magnetic.
field and to provide an estimate of the magnet weight was performed using the

21


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
MAXWELL code (Maxwell, Ansoft Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA. The weight of the
magnetic circuit was found to be approximately 29 grams. The magnetic field
achieved
by this exemplary configuration is demonstrated in Fig. 24. Specifically, Fig.
24(A)
shows the magnetic fields generated by a pair of NdFeB 50 bar magnets 18 mm
long, 5.0
mm wide and 5.25 mm thick and separated by 2.5 mm. Only the fields between
0.35 and
0.75 Tesla (3500 - 7500 Gauss) are depicted in the contour plot of Fig. 24A.
Figure 24B
shows the magnetic field on axis.

[0094] Additional computations were conducted to design a miniature 300 GHz
backward wave oscillator, voltage tunable over a frequency range of at least
10% with a
power output of at least 10 mW. As a result of the experiments, it was
discovered that a
power output in excess of 20 mW can be obtained over a 20% tuning range at 300
GHz
with a power input of less than 1.275 W. For these experiments, the circuit
was analyzed
using both SmCo28 (a material typically used in the tube industry) and NdFeB50
as
permanent magnets. Ordinary vacuum devices reach relatively high temperatures
in
operation, requiring the use of a magnetic material such as SmCo, which has
excellent
temperature stability. However, the low heat dissipation for the diamond BWO
will
cause negligible heating of the magnetic circuit. NdFeB provides higher
magnetic fields,
greater mechanical strength and can be produced in larger forms than SmCo. It
is useable
at temperatures up to 200 C and is frequently employed in automotive
applications.

[0095] Fabrication - Exemplary processes for fabricating a backward wave
oscillator suitable for use with the instant disclosure have been disclosed in
U.S. Patent
Application No. 10/772,444 filed February 6, 2004 (entitled "Free-Standing
Diamond
Structure and Methods") the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its
entirety for
background information.

[0096) Fig. 25 shows an exemplary circuit fabrication process according to one
embodiment of the disclosure. Step 1 in Fig. 25 is to create a silicon
negative of the

22


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
diamond structure. This can be accomplished, among others, by utilizing
silicon on
insulator (SOI) wafers. An SOI wafer is a silicon wafer in which a layer of
silicon
dioxide has been imbedded. The depth of the oxide layer can typically be
controlled over

a wide range of dimensions to a tolerance of one micron (or another desired
tolerance).
Using lithography, the wafers can be patterned as shown in Step 1 to create a
two level
silicon structure. The oxide layer can be used as a stop etch layer which can
result in a
smooth surface uniformly distributed across the wafer on which to deposit the
chemically
vapor deposited (CVD) diamond in step 2. It will be possible to produce a
large number
of silicon molds with a single lithographic operation.

[0097] The diamond can be deposited on the silicon mold in Step 2. The
diamond will be supported structurally by a coating of epoxy applied in Step
3, and in
Step 4 the silicon substrate will be etched away chemically to reveal the
diamond
structure. The three-dimensional Bi-Planar Interdigital structures may be
selectively
metallized. The surfaces requiring metallization are shown in Figure 25. The
.metallization will be performed with a physical vapor deposition process.
Masking
techniques can be used to ensure that the vertical surfaces of the
interdigital circuit and
the horizontal base of the entire structure remain free of metallization.

[0098] Masking the base of the structures from evaporant can be achieved by
applying a physical shadow mask before deposition. The focus electrode - 151
anode
spacing (2.4 mm) and the 1 s' anode - 2 d anode spacing (5.4 mm) allow the use
of a
physical shadow mask in these areas. The shadow mask placement can be
performed
with the use of a microscope to ensure complete coverage of the base. The use
of a
physical shadow mask can result in some deposited material on the base which
will be
removed after deposition with a laser.

[0099] The vertical walls and horizontal base area of the slow wave circuit
may
also remain free of inetallization. The spacing between the digits in the slow
wave circuit
23


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
prevents the use of a shadow mask or a spun on photo mask. To ensure the
region below
the top surface of the slow wave circuit remains free of metallization the
deposition will
be performed by either sputter deposition or resistive evaporation in a
background of Ar
gas, for example, with a partial pressure of about 10-3 Torr. Deposition in Ar
at an

elevated pressure range will accomplish the complete coating of three
dimensional
structures such as the focus electrode and 1 s' and 2 d anode while preventing
the coating
of the area within the slow wave circuit below the top surface. It is well
known that
physical vapor deposition performed in an elevated pressure environment
results in
conformal coating of three dimensional structures. Simultaneously, the
interdigital
spacing in the slow wave circuit is less than the required minimum spacing to
allow
evaporant to penetrate the region.

[00100] Deposition of metal in an elevated background may result in a reduced
density metal layer and potentially poor adhesion. It may be necessary to
apply a DC
bias in the 1-3kV range during deposition in the elevated Ar background to
achieve an
ion-plating effect. This will ensure good adhesion of the metal layer to the
diamond
interdigital structure surface. It may be necessary to deposit an interlayer
of Cr to
promote adhesion.

[00101] Step 6 shows the joining of the circuit halves. This process can be
done
with liquid crystal fabrication technology. The two circuit halves are brought
into close
proximity and aligned using stepping motor driven fixtures. For highly
developed

manufacturing processes, such as computer displays, tolerances of 3 microns
can be
maintained over 15 inches. In one embodiment, the two structures are then
joined using
high tack, low out-gassing, LN cured glues that have been developed in the
industry for
this particular purpose. The glue can be applied using a silk screening or
offset printing
process. For the small structures required for the BWO circuits, alignment
tolerances of
less than one micron are predicted. For high volume production, tooling for
improved
tolerances can be obtained. In one embodiment, the electron gun can be
manufactured as

24


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296

an integral part of the slow wave circuit while in another embodiment, the
electron gun
may be attached after the slow wave circuit has been assembled.

[00102] A matching silicon structure may be processed to produce a mating CVD
diamond circuit half. Two circuit halves with identical spacing between levels
as shown
in Step 1 will not produce the desired structure. As shown in Step 6 there can
be a spacer
between the circuit halves. To achieve the desired dimensions, the spacer can
be equal to
the height of the beam tunnel plus twice the metallization thickness. This
will be

accomplished by processing a two layer SOI wafer to produce a three layer
silicon mold
for the other circuit half. In one embodiment, the BWO is operated inside a
vacuum
chamber. In another embodiment both halves are fabricated from two layer SOI
wafers
for purposes of symmetry and to gain the advantage of fabricating them from
the same
wafer in the same lithographic process. In another embodiment, the BWO is
configured
to have a vacuum tight structure with diamond walls.

[00103] The fabrication procedures described above are a significant departure
from conventional vacuum electron device technology, which are based in part
on the
high vacuum requirements imposed by thermionic electron sources that are
easily
poisoned by trace contaminants. Conventional devices also handle relatively
high power
and must tolerate high temperatures. The BWO embodiments disclosed here can
dissipate at most approximately one Watt of power and will utilize a field
emission
cathode which is not as susceptible to poisoning. The power that is dissipated
will be
conducted from the device using diamond, the highest thermal conductor known.
While
typical vacuum electronic devices operate at high temperatures, the
embodiments
disclosed herein can be essentially at ambient temperature. The materials that
will be in
vacuum are all compatible with that environment. The backward wave oscillator
can
require high voltage for its operation, which will require maintaining
sufficient vacuum
to prevent gaseous breakdown.



CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
-[00104] Fig. 26 illustrates a cross-sectional area showing metalization
pattern
according to one embodiment of the disclosure. Appropriate masking techniques
can be
applied to create the necessary patterns.

[00105] Fig. 27 is a schematic representation of a section of biplanar slow
wave
circuit according to one embodiment of the disclosure. Referring to Fig. 27,
BWO 2700
is shown to have biplanar interdigital circuit 2710. In one embodiment, each
plane of the
biplanar interdigital circuit comprises diamond. Also shown in Fig. 27 is,
conductive
coating 2720 deposited on the fingers of the interdigital circuit. While
various coating
compositions can be used for this application, in one embodiment the coating
is gold,
silver, copper, chromium or a composite thereof.

[00106] Figs. 28A-E show arrow plots of the electrical and magnetic fields and
the
surface currents for a single period of the interdigital circuit shown in Fig.
27. Figs. 28A-
B show the electric fields from different perspectives, Fig. 28C shows the
magnetic
fields, and Figures D and E show the surface currents from different
perspectives.

Finally, Fig. 29 is a contour plot of the surface currents in a single period
of the
interdigital circuit according to another embodiment of the disclosure.

[00107] ManufacturingTolerances and Gold Undercut - In depositing the gold
film on the circuit fingers (see Step 5 of Fig. 25) it may be desirable not to
allow the
metal to deposit on the sides of the fingers. An undercut of metal on the
edges of the
fingers can be considered. The undercut was assumed to be 0.5 microns on each
side. A
top view of the circuit with undercut is shown in Fig. 30 indicating the
location of the
undercut edges. The undercut is exaggerated (2 microns) in Fig. 30 in order to
demonstrate the position of the undercutting. The effect of the predicted
undercut of 0.5
micron may be insignificant.

[00108] Power Balance - The extremes of power balance for the 300 GHz
backward wave oscillator are presented in Table 3 below for the 10% bandwidth
26


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296
embodiment. While the power output is relatively uniform over the frequencies,
the DC
power input and RF losses changed over the same range of frequencies.

Table 3 - Study of typical power balances for 20% BW embodiment.

Low Frequency (1.8 High Frequency (6.6
k kV)
Power Output 20 mW 26 mW
RF Losses 39 mW 191 mW
Beam Interception (1%) 27 mW 99mW
Collector Dissipation 261 mW 958 mW
(90% de ression
Total Dissipation 327 mW (5.8%) 1.248 W (2.0%)
(Efficiency)

[00109] A typical power balance of an exemplary embodiment is as follows:
= Power output is 24 mW at 1.8kV and 30 mW at 6.6kV;

= RF circuit losses are 53 mW at 1.8kV and 137 mW at 6.6kV;

= Beam interception (1%) is 27 mW at 1.8kV and 99 mW at 6.6kV;

= Collector dissipation (90% efficiency). is 260 mW at 1.8 kV and 963 mW at
6.6kV;

= Total power dissipated is 340 mW at 1.8 kV and 1.199 w at 6.6 kV;
= Overall efficiency is 6.6% at 1.8 kV and 2.4% at 6.6 kV.

[001101 Design of a 600 GHz BWO - The principles disclosed herein with respect
to the 300 GHz design were repeated for 10 and 20% bandwidth BWO's centered at
600
GHz. The dimensions of the 600 GHz case as shown in Table 4 were nearly half
of the
300 GHz design shown in Table 2. However, the cathode used is exactly the same
as for
the 300 GHz case. The twice start oscillation current for the worst case is
about 1.8

27


CA 02542174 2007-01-10
WO 2005/017938 PCT/US2004/026296

mA. About 99% of the beam can be contained within the beam tunnel but the
magnetic
field must be increased to 9000 Gauss.

[00111] Table 4 - The 600 GHz Circuit Dimensions (microns)
Parameter 10% BW 20% BW
Vaneridge 22.0 21.9
Vanew 8.6 8.2
Vanel 91.7 87.5.
Vaneth 2.0 2.0
Diridge 43.8 43.8
P 17.2 16.4
Xs 8.6 8.2
Zs 11.2 10.7
Diht 41.8 41.8
Ridgeht 11.5 11.5
Y a 12.5 12.5

[00112] The development of a field emission cathode with on chip focusing to
reduce transverse velocities can enhance this design.

[00113] Although the principles of the disclosure have been disclosed in
relation
to exemplary embodiments, it is noted that the principles of the disclosure
are not
limited thereto and the principles include any permutation or variation not
specifically
disclosed herein.

28

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 2004-08-12
(87) PCT Publication Date 2005-02-24
(85) National Entry 2007-01-10
Examination Requested 2009-06-15
Dead Application 2014-11-12

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2013-11-12 R30(2) - Failure to Respond
2014-08-12 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Reinstatement of rights $200.00 2007-01-10
Application Fee $200.00 2007-01-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2006-08-14 $50.00 2007-01-10
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-02-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2007-08-13 $100.00 2007-07-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2008-08-12 $100.00 2008-07-16
Request for Examination $800.00 2009-06-15
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2009-08-12 $200.00 2009-06-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2010-08-12 $200.00 2010-07-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2011-08-12 $200.00 2011-06-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2012-08-13 $200.00 2012-07-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2013-08-12 $200.00 2013-07-04
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MANHATTAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Past Owners on Record
DAYTON, JAMES A., JR.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 2007-01-10 1 21
Cover Page 2007-03-07 1 39
Abstract 2007-01-10 2 70
Claims 2007-01-10 7 245
Description 2007-01-10 28 1,206
Drawings 2007-01-10 32 814
Representative Drawing 2012-03-15 1 33
Drawings 2012-10-29 33 661
Description 2012-10-29 28 1,189
Claims 2012-10-29 3 86
Correspondence 2006-04-12 4 159
PCT 2006-03-08 4 122
Correspondence 2006-10-05 1 26
Correspondence 2007-01-10 4 108
Correspondence 2007-03-07 1 35
Assignment 2007-01-10 9 299
PCT 2007-01-10 2 70
Assignment 2007-02-19 3 105
Fees 2007-07-09 1 38
Fees 2008-07-16 1 33
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-06-15 1 33
Correspondence 2009-08-10 1 18
Correspondence 2009-09-28 1 13
Fees 2009-06-17 1 41
Fees 2009-07-15 1 36
Fees 2009-07-15 1 39
Correspondence 2009-08-17 1 26
Fees 2007-07-15 1 39
Fees 2009-07-15 1 40
Fees 2010-07-16 1 34
Fees 2011-06-22 1 33
Prosecution-Amendment 2012-04-27 6 262
Fees 2012-07-16 1 34
Prosecution-Amendment 2012-10-29 45 1,022
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-05-09 3 124
Fees 2013-07-04 1 35