Language selection

Search

Patent 2550408 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2550408
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR IMPROVING ENZYMATIC DEGUMMING OF VEGETABLE OILS AND REDUCING FOULING OF DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING EQUIPMENT
(54) French Title: AMELIORATION DU DEGOMMAGE ENZYMATIQUE D'HUILES VEGETALES ET ENCRASSEMENT REDUIT DES INSTALLATIONS DE TRAITEMENT AVAL
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C11B 1/02 (2006.01)
  • C11B 3/00 (2006.01)
  • C11B 3/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DAYTON, CHRIS L. G. (United States of America)
  • STALLER, KERRY P. (United States of America)
  • BERKSHIRE, THOMAS L. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • BUNGE OILS, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • BUNGE OILS, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2011-05-10
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2004-12-17
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2005-07-14
Examination requested: 2007-04-18
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2004/042780
(87) International Publication Number: WO2005/063950
(85) National Entry: 2006-06-16

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/531,192 United States of America 2003-12-19

Abstracts

English Abstract




A process controls enzymatic degumming characteristics which cause fouling of
post-reactor equipment of industrial scale processing of edible oils. An anti~-
fouling agent including an organic or mineral acid is added after the reactor
and before any post-~reactor equipment such as heat exchangers and
centrifuges. Typically the anti-fouling agent is added at greater than about
100 ppm of the oil, and typically the pH of the aqueous phase of the oil is
between about 3.5 and 4.2.


French Abstract

Cette invention concerne un processus permettant de maîtriser les caractéristiques de dégommage qui provoquent un encrassement du matériel post-réacteur utilisé dans le traitement des huiles alimentaires à l'échelon industriel. On ajoute un agent anti-salissures comprenant un acide organique ou minéral en aval du réacteur et en amont de tout matériel post-réacteur tel qu'échangeurs de chaleur ou centrifugeuses. On ajoute en général une dose d'agent anti-salissures supérieure à quelque 100 ppm d'huile et le pH de la phase aqueuse de l'huile se situe normalement entre 3,5 et 4,2 environ.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




CLAIMS

1. A process for reducing fouling of industrial scale edible
oil processing equipment, comprising:

reacting a crude vegetable oil source of edible vegetable
oil with an enzyme thereby cleaving fat components of the
crude vegetable oil source to provide cleaved and hydrated
sites of the phospholipid to provide a reacted edible oil that
is an enzymatically treated edible oil;

thereafter adding a post-reaction anti-fouling component
to the reacted edible oil to provide a post-reaction mixture
thereof, wherein said anti-fouling component is an organic or
mineral acid suitable for use with food for human consumption
added in an amount between 100 ppm and 300 ppm and reduces the
pH of said reacted edible oil's aqueous phase to a pH of 4.5
or less;

passing a flow of said post-reaction mixture reacted
edible oil and anti-fouling component into and through post-
reaction equipment; and

thereby reducing or preventing calcium or magnesium
citrate salt fouling on working surfaces of the post-reaction
equipment through the action of said anti-fouling component
present within said reacted edible oil of the post-reaction
mixture while post-reaction mixture is within the downstream
post-reaction.

2. The process in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
anti-fouling component is citric acid, phosphoric acid, maleic
acid or malic acid

3. The process in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
reacted edible oil's aqueous phase is reduced to between about
3.5 and 4.2 pH.


14



4. The process in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
reacting is characterized by shear mixing.

5. The process in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
anti-fouling component is present at a level of at least about
100 ppm.

6. The process in accordance with claim 5, wherein said
level of the anti-fouling component is between about 100 ppm
and about 200 ppm.

7. The process in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
passing into the downstream processing equipment is completed
in not more than one minute after said adding of anti-fouling
component.

8. The process in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
enzyme of the reacting step is selected from the group
consisting of phospholipase A-1, A-2, B, C and D.

9. The process in accordance with claim 1, wherein said
passing into the post-reaction equipment is completed in 45
seconds or less after said adding of the antifouling
component.



Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02550408 2009-06-08

PROCESS FOR IMPROVING ENZYMATIC DEGUMMING OF VEGETABLE OILS
AND REDUCING FOULING OF DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING EQUIPMENT
Description
Background of the Invention

Field of the Invention

[002] This invention generally relates to processes for
improving enzymatic degumming of vegetable oils. The process
reduces fouling in post-reaction equipment. The invention is
especially suitable for use in production lines within which
edible oil is treated to prepare edible oil of salad oil

quality. More particularly, the invention relates to process
enhancements that create conditions in the oil being processed
for minimizing build-up on equipment through which the thus
treated oil passes.

Description of Related Art

[003] Vegetable-based edible oils long have been processed
into salad oils. A principal procedure in such processing is
the so-called caustic process. In such a process, crude
vegetable oil may or may not be filtered and may or may not be
acid or water degummed. The filtration of crude oil is only
utilized when "clear and brilliant" food grade lecithin is
produced from a water degumming process. Degumming of crude
oil with the aid of an acid, burns the lecithin yielding a

1


CA 02550408 2009-06-08

product that is not desirable. In the water degumming
process, crude oil is combined with water and degummed crude
is prepared, with gums being removed and collected as desired.
Water degumming can remove about two-thirds of the gums
present in the crude oil. Typically, phosphoric acid is
injected into the degummed crude, followed by sodium hydroxide
in order to provide caustic treated oil, with soapstock being
removed and collected as desired. Next, silica is added to
the caustic treated oil, and spent silica is removed.
Bleaching earth then is added to the silica treated oil to
provide bleached oil, spent clay being removed. Then water is
added to the bleached oil in a deodorizing process, with a
distillate being separated. A drawback of such caustic
processes is relatively low yields, plus the multiple steps
that are followed to achieve desired salad oil quality oil.
[004] The role of phosphoric acid is to treat the lecithin
components in the oil. This process includes an add-back
neutralization of the phosphoric acid which is needed to
neutralize free fatty acids, yielding sodium soaps which
separate out. It is recognized that taking an approach
different from caustic oil refining could have advantages in
the oil processing industry.

[005] Approaches have been proposed whereby edible oil
products are processed into salad oil products by an enzymatic
approach during which fatty acids remain in the oil rather
than following the separation approach of caustic refining,
and the fatty acid content is transformed and stays in the
vegetable oil until it is separated, such as by
configuration.
[006] In the oil refining art, references such as Aalrust
et al. U.S. Patent No. 5,264,367, teach enzymatic treatment of
edible oils. In such approaches, phosphorus-containing
components of an edible vegetable or animal oil that has been
wet refined are reduced

2


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
by enzymatic decomposition by contacting the oil with an
aqueous solution of phospholipases Al, A2 or B and then
separating the aqueous phase from the treated oil. This is
said to reduce the phosphorus level in the oil to a
substantial degree. While enzymatic treatment processes show
good potential, the present invention achieves improvements
over these processes. This invention provides means for
improving oil degumming processes.

[007] The present invention provides a novel type of
process which facilitates the use of enzymes in edible oil
refining, including degumming operations. The invention
incorporates a post-reaction addition to reduce fouling. More
specifically, anti-fouling component is added promptly
downstream of the enzyme reactor. The anti-fouling component
imparts enhanced processing properties to the degummed oil.
[008] The art of enzymatic degumming has developed to
provide, for example, the ability to hydrate selected cleavage
sites of a lecithin or fatty acid natural oil component which
needs to be degummed. Those enzymes having an Al
characteristic cleave the Al site of the triglyceride
molecule, enzymes having an A2 characteristic cleave at the A2
or B, or middle site, and those of a C characteristic cleave
at the A3 site, which in these types of triglycerides have the
undesirable phosphorus atom.

[009] Heretofore, it has not been appreciated that
enzymatic degumming operations of this type bring with them an
undesirable build-up of residue on blades and other working
surfaces of downstream equipment such as heat exchangers and
centrifuge equipment. The combination of a post-reactor
addition of an anti-fouling component and the enzymatic
refining approach result, according to the invention, in high
yield and smooth operating industrial-scale edible oil
processing plants.

3


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
Summary of the Invention

[0010] In accordance with the present invention, processes
are provided which have characteristics to improve enzymatic
degumming of vegetable oils. These processes have as a

principal component the use of an anti-fouling component or
additive after the primary degumming reaction, that is after
the enzyme and the edible oil are reacted so as to cleave in
accordance with the specific characteristics of the enzyme.
The preferred anti-fouling additive is a food grade acid.
[0011] A general object and aspect of the present invention
is to provide a process which improves the operational
characteristics to a considerable degree and without
substantial variation in an industrial-scale edible oil
degumming operations that incorporate very advantageous enzyme
reaction approaches.

[0012] Another aspect or object of this invention is that
it provides degummed edible oils in an efficient manner and
reduces down time which is caused by the enzymatic approach
that brings yield advantages.

[0013] Another aspect or object of this invention is that
it provides salad oil quality edible oils through an enzymatic
degumming approach while addressing a serious processing issue
through significantly reducing fouling in post-reactor
processing equipment.

[0014] Other aspects, objects and advantages of the present
invention, including the various features used in various
combinations, will be understood from the following
description according to the preferred embodiments of the
present invention, taken in conjunction with the drawings in
which certain specific features are shown.

4


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
Brief Description of the Drawings

[0015] Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of an overall
processing sequence according to the prior art, beginning with
the edible oil in the reaction chamber or hold tank;

[0016] Fig. 2. is a flow chart of a typical industrial-
scale process which follows the present invention

[0017] Fig. 3 is a perspective view, partially cut away, of
a high shear reactor which is especially suitable for reacting
enzyme with the edible oil in a very efficient and
advantageous manner;

[0018] Fig. 4 is a perspective view, partially cut away, of
an operational mixing device and approach which can be
preferred for use in the process, showing flow interaction and
operational details; and

[0019] Fig., 5 is a schematic illustration of a processing
sequence suitable for incorporating the invention.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0020] As required, detailed embodiments of the present
invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be
understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary
of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms.
Therefore, specific details disclosed herein are not to be
interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims
and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the
art to variously employ the present invention in virtually any
appropriate manner.

[0021] The present invention is directed toward refining of
edible oils by a procedure which includes a degumming
operation. Production includes cleavage into hydrated sites
by an enzyme reaction and subsequent handling of the oil in a
manner to control undesired build up which reduces the
operational efficiency of downstream equipment.

. 5


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
[0022] In enzymatic degumming, heat exchange units and
centrifuge equipment downstream of the retention reactor foul
quickly with released calcium and magnesium salts or soaps.
The natural pH of the enzymatic reaction contributes to the
rapid fouling. By injecting a relatively small amount of
anti-fouling component after the reactor and before downstream
equipment, for example in the heat exchangers, fouling is
eliminated or, at least, very significantly reduced.

[0023] Enzymatic degumming of vegetable oil with certain
versions of phospholipase A-1 requires a reaction pH of
between 4.0 and 5Ø Optimum pH for this reaction is between
4.5 and 5Ø However, in the optimum pH range, calcium and/or
magnesium released during the enzymatic reaction combine with
the buffering or chelating acids used to control the reaction
conditions, typically leading to salt formation and fouling of
equipment coming into contact with same.

[0024] Without benefit of the present invention, the
combined calcium and magnesium salts would precipitate on hot
surfaces such as heat exchangers and centrifuge disk stacks.
For the heat exchangers, if this fouling were not prevented,
several hours of washing with a strong hot solution of acid
would be required to clear up the deposits. For the
centrifuge, the buildup would have to be removed manually by
disassembling the unit and physically scraping each disk. The
cleaning process for the centrifuge typically can require 40
worker-hours to complete.

[0025] It can be appreciated that the fouling can be much
less if the reaction is run closer to pH 4Ø However, this
brings with it the considerable disadvantage that the rate of
reaction is slower at lower pH levels. Furthermore, it is
difficult to keep the pH from slipping below 4.0 in such
situations, in which event the reaction stops completely.
Thus, a straightforward addition of acidic media to lower pH
levels has serious production issues.

6


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
[0026] The invention allows for the enzymatic reaction to
be run at its optimum pH for performance, in most instances
between 4.5 and 5.0 pH. After exit from the enzyme degumming
reactor, the anti-fouling agent is added, such addition being
shortly before flow of oil to post-reactor equipment. Post-
reactor injection of the anti-fouling agent or component
provides an enzyme degummed oil and agent mixture having a pH
that is dropped to a lower level after the de gumming reaction
is complete. This level has been found to be a non-fouling
level.

[0027] With regard to the anti-fouling agent or component,
same preferably is an organic or mineral acid which is
suitable for use in food processing. The acids should lower
the pH to 4.5 or below and may act as a metal chelator.
Examples include citric acid, maleic acid, malic acid,
phosphoric acid, and so forth.

[0028] An organic or mineral acid compatible with the
vegetable oil and having a pKa less than 4.0 is preferred.
This anti-fouling agent or component is injected into the line
and leaves the enzymatic reactor before the mixture enters the
heat exchanger(s) and/or centrifuge(s) or other downstream
equipment.

[0029] Flow is controlled to be proportional to the oil
flow and to bring the aqueous phase of the mixture downstream
of the reactor to a pH between about 2 and 4.5 preferably
between about 3.5 and 4.2, most preferably between about 3.8
and about 4Ø In many instances, maintaining the aqueous
phase at about 4.0 pH is a very suitable target. Lower pH
numbers will also achieve the desired effect, but are wasteful
of acid and downstream neutralizing agents.

[0030] Concerning the anti-fouling agent, it is preferred
to use citric acid to control the pH in the f low from the
enzyme degumming reactor. Such an acid is advantageous for
this purpose and often is readily available in industrial-

7


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
scale oil processing plants. Other vegetable-oil compatible
acids such as phosphoric acid, malic acid or maleic acid could
also be used, depending on cost and availability. The acid
must be sufficiently strong to lower the pH of the mixture
aqueous phase to below 4.5, typically at 4.0 or just below,
but not damage the oil by reactive or oxidative attack.

[0031] Referring to the enzyme activity which can proceed
within the reactor, a phospholipase mode of action at
different cleavage sites can be summarized as follows:
Phospl\olipase A,

PhospholipaseA2 CH2-O-~;l
C` -R,
R2 -C 10-CH
o ! 0
/0-

Phaspholfpase C Phospholipase Q

[0032] The X substiuent can be any of hydrogen, choline,
ethanolamine, serine, inositol, and the like.
[0033] An enzyme mode of action for lecithin is shown in
the following reaction sequence.

8


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
O
ii
CI-I2-O-C-R1 CH2-O-H
0 1 enzyme O I O
11
R2- -O-C-H R,--O-C-I + H-O-C-R,
LQ.
-
(=}-P-OCH2 Cli2-0-P-0-X
O- 6-
Lecithin Lyso-Lecithin FFA

[0034] This illustrates a general enzyme mode of action
which is typical of the enzyme reaction processes with respect
to which the present invention is practiced. This particular
illustration shows an enzyme reaction of lecithin into lyso-
lecithin and free fatty acid.

[0035] Structures of lipids, namely lecithin and fats in
general, can be shown as follows, wherein each of R1, R2 and R3
etc. represent different fatty acid chains, and wherein X
represents hydrogen, choline, ethanolamine, serine, inositol,
and the like. Reaction sites are available in these
structures.

O
011
CH2-O--R1 CH2-O-C- R1
I R2-C-O-C-II Rz C-0-C-H
O
CH2-O-P-O- - -C-
C.T.T .z O C; Tt3
6-

Lecithin Fat
9


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
[0036] A typical prior art enzyme reaction sequence is
shown in Fig. 1. A supply of degummed oil is represented by
vessel 11. An agent such as citric acid is introduced at 12,
and the flow continues through an intensive mixer 19a such as
a model MX-90 of Alpha Laval. This then flows to an acid
retention location 13. Flow then is to a heat exchanger 14,
known in the industry as an "economizer". Caustic addition is
shown at introducer 15, followed by flow through another
intensive mixer 19b. Water can be added at 16 before flowing
into a cooler 17 to provide heat exchange action. Enzyme
addition is shown at 18 for degumming the oil with the
assistance of disperser 21. The disperser can be a multi-
stage in-line disperser DispaxTM Reactor, available from IKA.
In this prior art approach, the acid(typically an organic
acid) introduced at 12 and the caustic (typically sodium
hydroxide) introduced at 15 make up a buffer solution at a pH
of 4.5 to 5.2. This buffered pH range is valuable to achieve
optimum enzyme performance when same is added at 18.
Typically the caustic is added at about 1.5 molar equivalents
of the added acid.
[0037] Fig. 2 illustrates a processing incorporating line a
preferred embodiment of the present invention. The
description above concerning Fig. 1 is applicable to the Fig.
2 details through the flow into the disperser 21. A typical
disperser such a DispaxTM Reactor of IKA is illustrated in Fig.
3 and Fig. 4. Preferred dispersers are powerful high
mechanical shear mixers, such as an IKA works 100 horsepower
DispaxTM Reactor. Such produces a very stable mechanical
emulsion and no emulsifiers are required due to the high
mechanical shear force utilized. The emulsion allows the
enzyme to react with the phospholipids, transforming them into
water-soluble lyso-phospholipids. After such disperser flow,
enzyme and oil can be within a tank 22, which can be called a
retention tank or a reaction tank.



CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
[0038] In keeping with the invention, an anti-fouling agent
or component is added at -23 by a suitable injection mechanism.
This addition lowers the pH to below 4.5 as discussed
elsewhere herein, such lowering being before the oil flow
reaches downstream equipment, typically one or more heat
exchangers, centrifuges and other oil processing equipment.
In the illustrated preferred embodiment, the lowered pH
condition is present as the oil flows through heat exchanger
or economizer 14, through a preheate r 24, and into and through
a centrifuge 25. It is believed that at least the economizer
and the preheater assist in mixing and/or dispersing the anti-
fouling agent into the oil. The flow out of the downstream
centrifuge will be the refined vegetable oil surge 26 through
one channel, which is separated from soapstock and/or
secondary gums 27.
[0039] Without this aspect of adding the anti-fouling agent
at such location upstream of the heat exchangers and
centrifuge, fouling of these post-reaction components had been
experienced. Such fouling resulted in dramatic increases in
back pressure within these components. Experience with this
condition has been so severe that the centrifuge or
centrifuges would begin to become unbalanced, causing
vibration. Experience also indicates that adding anti-fouling
agent or component before the centrifuge location but after
the heat exchangers, such as the preheater and economizer, did
not provide a solution to the fouling problem. Instead, the
centrifuge and the plate and frame heat exchangers experienced
unacceptable fouling.
[0040] It also has been determined that the effectiveness
of the anti-fouling agent or component addition will vary with
the concentration of this agent or component. Typically, the
anti-fouling agent concentration should be at least 100 ppm.
A value as high as 300 ppm works well, but is not as cost
effective as lower levels. A reasonable working range is
11


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
between about 100 ppm and about 200 ppm, a preferred range
being between about 125 ppm and about 175 ppm. Between about
140 ppm and about 160 ppm is especially preferred for
effectiveness and cost considerations.
[0041] Another component in achieving an anti-fouling
effect is the length of time that the anti-fouling agent is in
the oil before this oil flow reaches the centrifuge.
Traversing this flow path section should be completed in not
longer than about one minute, preferably not longer than about
45 seconds, most preferably not longer than about 30 seconds.
[0042] Anti-fouling agent addition typically is carried out
with a pump. Preferably flow from the pump combines with
continuous oil flow to add correct concentrations of the anti-
fouling agent so the needed pH drop occurs to a range where
potential fouling components are soluble. For example, when
citric acid is the anti-fouling agent, calcium and magnesium
citrates remain soluble.

[0043] It has been found that the present invention will be
beneficial irrespective of the specific enzyme used in the
operation. Phospholipases can be used, including A-1, A-2, B,
C and D. The amount of enzyme will depend on the
concentration of the enzyme as it is supplied from its
manufacturer, as well as the activity of the enzyme. A
typical maximum amount would be about 1% by weight. The
concentration of enzyme is primarily a function of the enzyme
and the oil and is not particularly relevant to action of the
anti-fouling agent and process.

[0044] An overall flow chart for a process according to the
invention is found in Fig. 5. With the present invention,
enzyme typically is dosed at a level on the order of between
about 20 ppm and about 60 ppm using a high shear mixer, such
as shown in the drawings, to mix the enzyme with the oil. The
oil then is kept at a temperature of about 45 C. A low water
content of only 2 percent is all that is required of the oil

12


CA 02550408 2006-06-16
WO 2005/063950 PCT/US2004/042780
being processed by this physical processing approach. This
reduces drying costs.
[0045] By the use of the anti-fouling agent or component in
accordance with the invention, the pH is kept advantageously
low. This prevents calcium citrates from forming and
precipitating out. Such calcium citrate deposits and other
possible formed salts will form undesirable deposits
downstream. For example, citrate deposits will otherwise form
on working components of downstream equipment.

[0046] The finished oil has a phosphorus content which
typically is below 2 ppm. After this enzymatic degumming and
physical refining, the oil has a phosphorus content of no more
than between about 2 and about 5 ppm. In comparison, chemical
refining by the caustic process noted above leaves a

phosphorus content on the order of no lower than 8 to 10 ppm.
Thus the process practiced with the aid of the present
invention has the advantage of requiring less silica, such
typically being incorporated in order to adsorb the phosphorus
remaining after degumming.

[0047] It will be understood that the embodiments of the
present invention which have been described are illustrative
of some of the applications of the principles of the present
invention. Numerous modifications may be made by those

skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and
scope of the invention, including those combinations of
features that are individually disclosed or claimed herein.

13

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2011-05-10
(86) PCT Filing Date 2004-12-17
(87) PCT Publication Date 2005-07-14
(85) National Entry 2006-06-16
Examination Requested 2007-04-18
(45) Issued 2011-05-10

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2006-06-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2006-12-18 $100.00 2006-12-01
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-03-15
Request for Examination $800.00 2007-04-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2007-12-17 $100.00 2007-12-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2008-12-17 $100.00 2008-12-01
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2009-12-17 $200.00 2009-12-02
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2010-12-17 $200.00 2010-11-17
Final Fee $300.00 2011-02-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2011-12-19 $200.00 2011-11-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2012-12-17 $200.00 2012-11-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2013-12-17 $200.00 2013-11-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2014-12-17 $250.00 2014-11-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2015-12-17 $250.00 2015-11-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2016-12-19 $250.00 2016-11-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2017-12-18 $250.00 2017-11-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2018-12-17 $250.00 2018-11-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2019-12-17 $450.00 2019-11-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2020-12-17 $450.00 2020-11-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2021-12-17 $459.00 2021-10-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2022-12-19 $458.08 2022-10-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2023-12-18 $473.65 2023-10-24
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BUNGE OILS, INC.
Past Owners on Record
BERKSHIRE, THOMAS L.
DAYTON, CHRIS L. G.
STALLER, KERRY P.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 2011-04-13 1 8
Cover Page 2011-04-13 1 42
Claims 2009-06-08 2 61
Description 2009-06-08 13 599
Drawings 2006-06-16 5 789
Abstract 2006-06-16 2 67
Claims 2006-06-16 3 112
Claims 2010-03-18 2 62
Drawings 2010-03-18 5 114
Description 2006-06-16 13 604
Representative Drawing 2006-08-31 1 7
Cover Page 2006-09-01 1 40
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-04-18 1 41
Prosecution-Amendment 2010-03-18 11 378
PCT 2006-06-16 4 191
Assignment 2006-06-16 3 99
Correspondence 2006-08-25 1 28
Assignment 2007-03-15 5 188
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-12-22 2 76
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-06-08 11 431
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-09-23 2 73
Correspondence 2011-02-23 1 44