Language selection

Search

Patent 2550624 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2550624
(54) English Title: SELF-SUPPORTED OPTICAL CORRELATOR
(54) French Title: CORRELATEUR OPTIQUE AUTOPORTE
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G06E 3/00 (2006.01)
  • G02B 7/00 (2021.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BERGERON, ALAIN (Canada)
  • DESNOYERS, NICHOLA (Canada)
  • BOURQUI, PASCAL (Canada)
  • DOUCET, MICHEL (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE (Canada)
(74) Agent: ROBIC AGENCE PI S.E.C./ROBIC IP AGENCY LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2012-05-22
(22) Filed Date: 2006-06-19
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2007-12-19
Examination requested: 2011-04-21
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A self-supported optical correlator has a first holder having two opposite ends, one of the opposite ends being provided with anchor points, the other end being provided with a light source. The correlator also has a second holder having two opposite ends, one of which is provided with anchor points, the other being provided with a light receiving element, and a plurality of intermediary holders, each having two opposite ends provided with anchor points, at least one of the intermediary holders being provided with a spatial light modulator for projecting an image and another of the intermediary holders being provided with another spatial light modulator for projecting a filter. Each of the intermediary holders is provided with optical components secured within the holders. The said anchor points are adapted to secure the first, second and intermediary holders together linearly end to end; so that when the intermediary holders are assembled end to end, and the first holder is assembled at one extremity and the other holder is assembled at another extremity, the resulting assembly forms said optical correlator. The optical components are toleranced, and the anchor point serve to assemble a structure which does not require additional adjustments.


French Abstract

Un corrélateur optique autoportant comprend un premier support présentant deux extrémités opposées, une de ces extrémités opposées étant pourvue de points d'ancrage, l'autre extrémité comportant une source lumineuse. Le corrélateur comprend aussi un deuxième support présentant deux extrémités opposées, une de ces extrémités étant pourvue de points d'ancrage, l'autre comportant un élément récepteur de lumière, et de multiples supports intermédiaires. Chaque support intermédiaire présente deux extrémités opposées pourvues de points d'ancrage, au moins un des supports intermédiaires comportant un modulateur de lumière spatiale pour projeter une image, et un autre support intermédiaire comportant un autre modulateur de lumière spatiale pour projeter un filtre. Chacun des supports intermédiaires est muni d'éléments optiques fixés dans les supports. Lesdits points d'ancrage sont adaptés pour fixer ensemble le premier support, le deuxième support et le support intermédiaire en ligne, bout à bout. De cette manière, lorsque les supports intermédiaires son assemblés bout à bout, et que le premier support est assemblé à une extrémité et l'autre support, à une autre extrémité, l'ensemble résultant forme ledit corrélateur optique. Les éléments optiques comportent des tolérances, et le point d'ancrage sert à assembler une structure ne nécessitant pas de réglages supplémentaires.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




13

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:


1. A self-supported optical correlator, comprising:
a first holder having two opposite ends, one of said opposite ends being
provided with anchor points, the other of said opposite ends being provided
with a
light source;
a second holder having two opposite ends, one of said opposite ends being
provided with anchor points, the other of said opposite ends being provided
with a
light receiving element,
a plurality of intermediary holders, each having two opposite ends, each of
said holders being provided with anchor points at each opposite end, at least
one
of said intermediary holders being provided with a spatial light modulator for

projecting an image and another of said intermediary holders being provided
with
another spatial light modulator for projecting a filter,
each of said intermediary holders being provided with optical components,
said optical components being secured within said holders,
said anchor points being adapted to secure said first, second and
intermediary holders together linearly end to end;
wherein, when said intermediary holders are assembled end to end, and
said first holder is assembled at one extremity and said other holder is
assembled
at another extremity, said
resulting assembly forms said optical correlator.


2. A self-supported optical correlator according to claim 1, wherein each of
said first, second and intermediary holders have an opaque outer surface, and
a
hollow inside, said inside defining a longitudinal optical axis.


3. A self-supported optical correlator according to claim 2, wherein said of
said
first, second and intermediary holders and said optical components are
toleranced.

4. A self-supported optical correlator according to claim 2, wherein said
optical
correlator is mechanically insulated from environmental vibration.



14

5. A self-supported optical correlator according to claim 2, wherein
connections at said anchor points further include thermal connections.


6. A self-supported optical correlator according to claim 2, wherein said
first,
second and intermediary holders are tubular.


7. A self-supported optical correlator according to claim 2, wherein said
optical
correlator is adapted to be laterally stacked.


8. A self-supported optical correlator according to claim 2, further
comprising a
control unit, said control unit introducing a tag in an image and in a filter,
so that
when an optical correlator electronic driver receives an image-filter pair,
said tag is
extracted in order to ensure correlation between said filter and said image.


9. A self-supported optical correlator according to claim 2, wherein said
correlator uses two look-up tables applied to an image and a filter, a first
look-up
table being of normal polarity and a second look-up table being of reversed
polarity, said first and second look-up tables being used alternately.


10. A self-supported optical correlator, comprising:
a first holder having two opposite ends, one of said opposite ends being
provided with anchor points, the other of said opposite ends being provided
with a
light source,
a second holder having two opposite ends, one of said opposite ends being
provided with anchor points, the other of said opposite ends being provided
with a
light receiving element,
at least one intermediary holder, each of said at least one intermediary
holder having two opposite ends, each of said at least one holder being
provided
with anchor points at each opposite end, at least one of said at least one
intermediary holder being provided with a spatial light modulator for
projecting an
image and another spatial light modulator for projecting a filter,



15

each of said at least one intermediary holder being provided with optical
components, said optical components being secured within said holders,
said anchor points being adapted to secure said first, second and
intermediary holders together linearly end to end;
wherein, when said at least one intermediary holder are assembled, and
said first holder is assembled at one extremity and said other holder is
assembled
at another extremity, said resulting assembly forms said optical correlator.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02550624 2006-06-19

1
SELF-SUPPORTED OPTICAL CORRELATOR
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an optical correlator, and more specifically
to such
a correlator which is self-supported, and can be joined to other such optical
correlators in a laterally stacked fashion.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Various screening tasks require massive computing capabilities. Although
computing devices have shown ever increasing processing power, there is still
a
need for high speed computing, especially when it comes to the screening of
images. Optical correlators could eventually fill the gap between the
applications
and the processing requirements.

An optical correlator takes advantage of the powerful capabilities of light to
perform real-time computation. As illustrated in Figure 7 (Prior Art), a light
beam
incoming from a laser source is directed through a first set of lenses to
expand its
diameter. The light passes through a first spatial light modulator on which an
image is displayed. Then, the modulated beam will undergo a first Fourier
transform by passing through another lens. The Fourier transform is performed
simply by the propagation of the light and as such is realised very rapidly.

It is an inherent property of a lens to perform a Fourier transform on an
input
image that will be observed at the front focal plane of the lens, provided
that this
image is displayed at the back focal plane of the lens. The optically-computed
2D
Fourier transform signal will cross the filter plane. It is on this second
spatial light


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

2
modulator that the reference template corresponding to the searched object
(the
target) will be displayed. In fact, it is the Fourier transform of the
reference
template that is recorded. So after travelling trough this second spatial
light
modulator, a multiplication of two Fourier transforms is obtained. In the
spatial
domain this corresponds to a correlation. In order to achieve the conversion
between the frequency and the spatial domains, a second Fourier lens is used
and
the beam exits the optical system in a parallel way. The camera is the last
component of the correlator and detects the intensity all over the correlation
plane.
Basically, the system processing speed is limited only by the refresh rate of
the
io electro-optic components (spatial light modulator, camera), because the
computation itself is performed using the light.

The optical correlator principle has been known since the work of Vander Lugt.
Since then, a lot of work has been spent on generating filters to enhance
specific
recognition performances such as multiple target recognition with composite
filters,
enhanced discrimination with phase-only filters, or rotation invariant
recognition
with circular harmonic filters. Various optical correlator types have also
been
proposed such as a Vander Lugt correlator. In this correlator architecture,
similar
to the one illustrated in Figure 7, the image is displayed in the input plane
whereas
the filter is displayed in the frequency plane. The correlation is acquired at
the
output plane. The filter was at that time recorded on a spatial carrier. A
Joint
Transform correlator (JTC) was also proposed. In a JTC, both the image and the
reference template are recorded in the input plane. The interference pattern
is
recorded in the frequency plane and sent back to the input plane to obtain the
correlation in the frequency plane, after a second pass through the
correlator.
Despite extended work on optical correlator filters and architectures, it did
not
result in solutions which address the critical opto-mechanical structure
required to
obtain satisfactory optical correlation performances.

Various architecture implementations have been proposed for optical
correlators,
such as "Coherent Optical Correlator" (United States Patent 4,277,137), and
the


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

3
optical correlator principle taught in "Holographic Information Storage and
Retrieval" (United States Patent 3,608,994). Architectures have also been
proposed to make the overall system more compact, such as "Compact 2F Optical
Correlator" (United States Patent 5,073,006).

These solutions usually result in optical set-ups where each individual
optical
element is inserted in a holder fixed on an optical table. This results in
excessive
production cost.

1o Furthermore, although optical correlator architectures were addressed in
these
patents, little or no consideration was devoted to the opto-mechanical
structure
that influences production cost and ease of alignment.

Nowadays, optical correlators are not widely spread either in terms of
commercial
applications or availability as commercial products. This is mainly due to the
high
production cost related to the aforementioned opto-mechanical structure and to
the difficulty of alignment of the optical correlator.

Lack of market penetration has also left unaddressed other considerations of
optical correlation implementation, such as heat dissipation and heat
stabilization.
The possibility to achieve multichannel optical correlators has been addressed
in
United States Patent 3,802,762. However, this possibility is limited by the
availability of powerful laser sources that can drive multiple correlators
simultaneously and by the interference that can be produced between the
various
channels.


CA 02550624 2011-05-12

4
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to an optical correlator which solves the
above-mentioned deficiencies of the prior art.

In accordance with the invention, there is provided a self-supported optical
correlator, comprising:
a first holder having two opposite ends, one of said opposite ends being
io provided with anchor points, the other of said opposite ends being provided
with a
light source;
a second holder having two opposite ends, one of said opposite ends being
provided with anchor points, the other of said opposite ends being provided
with a
light receiving element,
a plurality of intermediary holders, each having two opposite ends, each of
said holders being provided with anchor points at each opposite end, at least
one
of said intermediary holders being provided with a spatial light modulator for
projecting an image and another of said intermediary holders being provided
with
another spatial light modulator for projecting a filter,
each of said intermediary holders being provided with optical components,
said optical components being secured within said holders,
said anchor points being adapted to secure said first, second and
intermediary holders together linearly end to end;
wherein, when said intermediary holders are assembled end to end, and
said first holder is assembled at one extremity and said other holder is
assembled
at another extremity, said
resulting assembly forms said optical correlator.

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a self-
supported optical correlator, comprising:


CA 02550624 2011-05-12

a first holder having two opposite ends, one of said opposite ends being
provided with anchor points, the other of said opposite ends being provided
with a
light source;
a second holder having two opposite ends, one of said opposite ends being
5 provided with anchor points, the other of said opposite ends being provided
with a
light receiving element,
at least one intermediary holder, each of said at least one intermediary
holder having two opposite ends, each of said at least one holder being
provided
with anchor points at each opposite end, at least one of said at least one
1o intermediary holder being provided with a spatial light modulator for
projecting an
image and another spatial light modulator for projecting a filter,
each of said at least one intermediary holder being provided with optical
components, said optical components being secured within said holders,
said anchor points being adapted to secure said first, second and
intermediary holders together linearly end to end;
wherein, when said at least one intermediary holder are assembled, and
said first holder is assembled at one extremity and said other holder is
assembled
at another extremity, said resulting assembly forms said optical correlator.

In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a
self-
supported optical correlator, comprising a housing for receiving a light
source at
one extremity and a light receiving element at another extremity, said housing
being further adapted to receive optical components therein, said optical
components being toleranced and forming an optical correlator, said housing
being further adapted to receive therein a display for projecting an image in
an
optical axis and a display for projecting a filter in said optical axis, said
housing
being tubular and having an opaque outer surface.


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

6
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be better understood after having read a
description of a
preferred embodiment thereof, made in reference to the following drawings in
which:

Figure 1 is a cross-sectional view of an optical correlator according to a
preferred
embodiment thereof;

io Figure 2 is a perspective view of the correlator of Fig. 1;

Figure 3 is a partial cross-sectional view of the correlator of Fig. 1;
Figure 4 is a representation of a plurality of correlators stacked together;
Figure 5 is a schematic representation of tagging;

Figure 6 is a schematic representation of a polarity LUT application;

Figure 7 (Prior art) is a schematic representation of a typical correlator;
and
Figure 8 is a schematic representation of a system using a correlator.

DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

The tubular optical correlator optomechanical structure proposes a self-
supported
tubular architecture illustrated in a preferred embodiment in Figures 1 and 2.
However, although a combined structure is illustrated in the accompanying
Figures, the present invention also concerns an overall structure which may
differ.


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

7
For example, as will be understood hereinafter, there may be more or less
individual holders.

One advantage of the structure of the present invention is that it combines
the
component holder and the optical structure into a single structure that
reduces the
overall number of components.

To that effect, the tubular optical correlator optomechanical structure
consists in a
single tubular assembly structure 10, where the holders of the optical
components
1 o are used at the same time as building blocks for the tubular optical
correlator
structure.

More specifically, the tubular optical correlator preferably consists in a
first and
second holders. The first holder 11 has two opposite ends 111, 113. A first
opposite end 111 is provided with anchor points 1 and the other opposite end
113
is provided with a light source 6, preferably a laser.

The second holder 16 has two opposite ends 115, 117. A first opposite end 115
is
provided with anchor points 1 and the other opposite end 117 is provided with
a
light receiving element 5, such as a camera.

The optical correlator 10 further preferably includes a plurality of
intermediary
holders 12, 13, 14, 15 which are longitudinally assembled together. Each
holder
12, 13, 14, 15 has anchor points 1 at each opposite end, and is further
provided
with optical components 2.

At least one intermediary holder is provided with a display 3 for projecting
an
image, and another intermediary holder is provided with a display 3 for
projecting a
filter. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the displays are of course
adapted to the invention, and include spatial light modulators.


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

8
Preferably, the holders 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 have an opaque outer surface, and
are
preferably tubular.

An example of an intermediary optical component holder is illustrated in
Figure 3
where the optical components are inserted in a monoblock tubular structural
element. The multiple structural elements are assembled together as
illustrated in
Figure 1. Each structural element is attached to the adjacent ones at anchor
points. Combined together, all the building blocks generate a single self-
supported
structure illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. No supplementary holding plate or
external
io structure is required to further position and support the component
holders.

Figure 3 illustrates a single structural element or tubular optical correlator
module.
The optical design of the correlator is toleranced. This means that the
optical
components may be slightly displaced either laterally or longitudinally,
within a
mechanical tolerance, without affecting significantly the correlation
obtained. The
maximum displacement is different for each element of the optical correlator.
The
optomechanical support must respect fabrication tolerances that are compatible
with the maximum displacement permitted for the various optical components.
Doing so the optical design prescriptions are respected when using the
optomechanical support. The optical components of Figure 3 are constrained by
the housing. Consequently alignment does not require translation or tilt
mechanisms reducing the number of components and the time required to align
the system.

The use of a tubular architecture provides a rigid self-supported structure
that can
be further mechanically isolated from the apparatus housing. This will prevent
the
environmental vibrations to affect the mechanical stability of the optical
correlator.
All building blocks are thermally connected, as illustrated in Figure 1,
yielding a
short stabilisation period for the tubular optical correlator structure.
Moreover, the
use a rugged tubular shape minimizes the thickness of the external structure


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

9
illustrated in Figure 3 required for a given rigidity when compared to other
structures such as cubic or otherwise. With less material, the structure
exhibits a
smaller thermal inertia reducing consequently the period required to reach the
thermal equilibrium of the tubular optical correlator.
s
The tubular architecture illustrated in Figure 2 is preferably, as mentioned
above,
composed of holders exhibiting symmetry of revolution. These modules
necessitate mostly turning machining that is cheaper and faster to fabricate
than
more complex shapes.

The outer walls of the tubular optical correlator optomechanical structure are
opaque, as illustrated in Figure 3, and cover completely the optical path. The
light
emerging from the optical path is thus confined within the holding structure.
Doing
so, and taking advantage of the self-supported structure, multiple tubular
1s structures can be laterally stacked along each other (see Figure 4) without
mutually interfering. The tubular optical correlator architecture can thus be
easily
stackable.

The tubular optical correlator further contains an electronic control unit
making
use of a digital communication and addressing scheme that introduces onboard
image, filter and correlation tagging to uniquely identify source information
and
corresponding results

Based on this tubular optical correlator structure, real-life applications
require
some more specific items related to signal communication and driving
electronic
components. In a typical correlator the image and the filter are sent
together, then
after a certain lapse of time the correlation results is acquired. This
process is
based on a basic clock and is a continuous process. When the main control
system send images and filters to the correlator there is an uncertainty about
the
correlation retrieval identification. Due to potential delays in processing
time, in
copy time, in transfer time or simply in display time, the correlation
retrieved could


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

come from the current image-filter pair sent, from the previous one, or from
the
ones sent some frames ago.

To obviate this uncertainty, according to a preferred embodiment of the
invention,
5 a tag is inserted in the image (Itag) and in the filter (Ftag) as
illustrated in Figure 5.
When the optical correlator electronic driver receives the image-filter pair,
the tag
is extracted and copied on the following correlation (Ctag). When the
correlation is
sent back to the control system there is no temporal uncertainty between the
filter
and the image that were correlated and the corresponding result.
Many optical correlators use spatial light modulators that are driven with
alternative polarity mode. Among others, this is done with liquid crystal
technologies. The image is displayed first in a positive polarity, then in the
following frame the image is displayed in inverted polarity. This prevents
electrolysis of the liquid crystal display. However, inverting the signal
polarity
usually implies using the driving electronic components at a slightly
different
operation point yielding different response curves. Driving the spatial light
modulator active medium with this signal can thus yield to a different
response
curve for the positive and the negative polarity.

To compensate for this effect, the present invention proposes the use of two
look-
up tables that can be used and applied alternatively to the positive polarity
and the
negative polarity frame.

Figure 6 illustrates the temporal sequence of the look-up table
implementation. At
Time 1, a first set of look-up tables is applied to the image and filter.
Then, at Time
2, the set of look-up tables corresponding to the reverse polarity is applied
to the
image and filter. Following this, at Time 3, the polarity is reversed back to
the initial
state and the first set of look-up tables is applied again. The look-up tables
are
A0 applied over time with the same sequence. Once the look-up tables applied,
the
image and the filter are displayed on their respective spatial light modulator
(SLM)


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

11
destination. This makes the response more uniform and provides better temporal
stability to optical correlation.

The tubular optical correlator is further equipped with a digital
communication link
and addressing scheme. When interfacing with a control system, the use of
analog
video signal in the correlator requires video resampling that may induce
slight jitter
in the video signal can translate in slight modification of the image and
filter
positions or smoothing of the edges of the image and the filter. With a pixel-
to-
pixel addressing scheme each pixel of the memory is addressed to a single
pixel
1o on the spatial light modulator without spatial resampling. This provides
more stable
image and filter display as well as better conformity between the information
to be
displayed and the signal actually displayed.

A complete system is illustrated in Fig. 8. A camera 30, or any other external
sensor, captures an image such as scene 40. The output of the camera is sent
to
the input SLM. The driving electronics 21 apply a filter at filter SLM, and
are further
connected to the camera 5 for collecting the result of the correlation. The
driving
electronics further control the other aspects of correlation, such as tagging
and
using look-up tables. Alternately, the external sensor 30 could be connected
to the
driving electronics 21, which would in turn be connected to the input SLM.

As mentioned previously, the invention has been described made with reference
to
a preferred embodiment thereof. However, the invention does contemplate a
variety of different structures for the holder. For example, one could
envisage a
holder made of two pieces, each piece being in the shape of a half-pipe. The
pieces are machined to form receivers to receive the various components
therein,
so that when the half-pipes are joined together to form a tube, the components
fit
within the receivers and align in order to form the optical correlator.
Furthermore,
although a plurality of intermediate holders have been described, there may be
as
little as one, provided that the design allows for the insertion of the
various
components.


CA 02550624 2006-06-19

12
Although the present invention has been explained hereinabove by way of a
preferred embodiment thereof, it should be pointed out that any modifications
to
this preferred embodiment within the scope of the appended claims is not
deemed
to alter or change the nature and scope of the present invention.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2012-05-22
(22) Filed 2006-06-19
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2007-12-19
Examination Requested 2011-04-21
(45) Issued 2012-05-22

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $624.00 was received on 2024-05-21


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if standard fee 2025-06-19 $624.00
Next Payment if small entity fee 2025-06-19 $253.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2006-06-19
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-04-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2008-06-19 $100.00 2008-05-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2009-06-19 $100.00 2009-04-01
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2010-06-21 $100.00 2010-03-10
Request for Examination $800.00 2011-04-21
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2011-06-20 $200.00 2011-05-18
Final Fee $300.00 2012-03-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2012-06-19 $200.00 2012-05-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2013-06-19 $200.00 2013-05-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2014-06-19 $200.00 2014-05-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2015-06-19 $200.00 2015-05-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2016-06-20 $250.00 2016-05-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2017-06-19 $250.00 2017-05-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2018-06-19 $250.00 2018-05-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2019-06-19 $250.00 2019-06-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2020-06-19 $250.00 2020-05-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2021-06-21 $459.00 2021-05-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2022-06-20 $458.08 2022-05-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2023-06-19 $473.65 2023-05-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2024-06-19 $624.00 2024-05-21
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE
Past Owners on Record
BERGERON, ALAIN
BOURQUI, PASCAL
DESNOYERS, NICHOLA
DOUCET, MICHEL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2007-12-06 1 48
Abstract 2006-06-19 1 30
Description 2006-06-19 12 468
Claims 2006-06-19 3 109
Drawings 2006-06-19 5 96
Representative Drawing 2007-11-21 1 10
Claims 2011-05-12 3 94
Description 2011-05-12 12 465
Cover Page 2012-05-01 1 48
Fees 2011-05-18 1 53
Correspondence 2006-07-28 1 26
Assignment 2006-06-19 3 78
Correspondence 2006-10-10 6 145
Assignment 2007-04-17 6 185
Assignment 2006-06-19 5 141
Fees 2008-05-13 1 42
Fees 2010-03-10 1 53
Fees 2009-04-01 1 59
Correspondence 2010-08-10 1 46
Correspondence 2011-02-22 1 24
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-04-21 2 58
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-05-12 8 253
Correspondence 2011-05-12 1 80
Correspondence 2012-02-02 1 75
Correspondence 2012-03-05 2 63
Fees 2012-05-11 1 56