Language selection

Search

Patent 2559624 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2559624
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR BIOSOLID DISPOSAL AND METHANE GENERATION
(54) French Title: PROCEDE D'EVACUATION DE BIOSOLIDES ET DE GENERATION DE METHANE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C02F 11/04 (2006.01)
  • A62D 3/02 (2007.01)
  • B09B 3/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BRUNO, MICHAEL S. (United States of America)
  • DUSSEAULT, MAURICE B. (Canada)
  • BILAK, ROMAN (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • GEOENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGIES LLC (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • TERRALOG TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Canada)
  • TERRALOG TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: LEUNG, JASON C.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2010-08-31
(22) Filed Date: 2001-10-02
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2003-02-13
Examination requested: 2006-08-25
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/917,417 United States of America 2001-07-27

Abstracts

English Abstract




A method for the disposal of biosolids (A3), such as municipal sewage waste,
comprising injecting the biosolids
(A3) into a subsurface injection formation (A4). The method can include
recovering methane generated from the degradation of the
bisolids (A3).





French Abstract

Une méthode d'élimination des biosolides (A3), comme les déchets des égouts municipaux, comprenant l'injection des biosolides (A3) dans une zone d'injection souterraine (A4). La méthode peut comprendre la récupération du méthane produit pas la dégradation des biosolides (A3).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





19
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method for the disposal of biosolids, the method comprising:
a) providing a supply of biosolids;
b) creating a slurry of the biosolids suitable for injecting;
c) selecting an injection formation below a ground surface comprising a
natural gas formation in a gas accumulation zone;
d) injecting the biosolids slurry into the injection formation at a pressure
sufficient to create and maintain fractures within the selected injection
formation; and
e) allowing degradation of the injected biosolids slurry.
2. The method of claim 1, where the injection formation is separated from the
ground surface by one or more pairs of alternating layers of high permeability
and low
permeability.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, further comprising monitoring pressure in the
one or more than one of the alternating layers of high permeability and low
permeability above the injection formation during a time selected from the
group
consisting of before biosolids injection, during biosolids injection, after
biosolids
injection and a combination of before biosolids injection, during biosolids
injection
and after biosolids injection.
4. The method of any one of claims 1-3, where allowing degradation of the
injected biosolids slurry, generates a gas selected from the group consisting
of carbon
dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and combinations of the preceding.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising decreasing the rate of the
generated carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide or combination of
the
preceding by performing an action selected from the group consisting of
blending at
least one waste stream with the provided biosolids, inoculating the biosolids
with at
least one species of bacteria, changing the temperature of the biosolids,
changing the
salinity of the biosolids, adding at least one chemical to the biosolids and a
combination of the preceding.




20
6. The method of claim 5, where the chemical added to the biosolids is
potassium.
7. The method of any of claims 1-6, where the supply of biosolids is derived
from at least one source selected from the group consisting of municipal
sewage
waste, waste water treatment waste, animal waste, non-human-non-animal
industrial
waste and a combination of the preceding.
8. The method of any of claims 1-7, where the injection formation is at least
about 100 meters below the ground surface.
9. The method of any of claims 1-7, where the injection formation is from
between about 500 and about 3,000 meters below the ground surface.
10. The method of any of claims 1-9, where the injection formation has a
temperature and the temperature of the injection formation is greater that
about 25°C.
11. The method of any of claims 1-10, where the injection formation has a
porosity greater than about 15%.
12. The method of claim 2, where at least one low permeability layer of the
one or more alternating layers of high permeability and low permeability
comprises
shale.
13. The method of claim 2, where the one or more pairs of alternating layers
of high permeability and low permeability is at least three pairs of
alternating layers
of high permeability and low permeability.
14. The method of any of claims 1-13, further comprising creating fractures
within the injection formation before injecting the biosolids into the
injection
formation.
15. The method of any of claims 1-14, further comprising transporting the
selected biosolids to an injection site by pipe before injecting the
biosolids.


21
16. The method of any of claims 1-15, further comprising monitoring pressure
in the injection formation at a time selected from the group consisting of
before
injecting the biosolids into the injection formation, during the injection of
the
biosolids into the injection formation, after injecting the biosolids into the
injection
formation and a combination of the preceding.
17. The method of any of claims 1-16, further comprising increasing the rate
of degradation of the biosolids by performing an action selected from the
group
consisting of blending at least one waste stream with the provided biosolids,
inoculating the biosolids with at least one species of bacteria, changing the
temperature of the biosolids, changing the salinity of the biosolids, adding
at least one
chemical to the biosolids and a combination of the preceding.
18. The method of claim 17, where the chemical added to the biosolids is
potassium.
19. The method of any of claims 1-18, further comprising allowing methane
to be generated by the degradation of the injected biosolids and recovering
methane
generated by the degradation of the injected biosolids, after injecting the
biosolids
into the injection formation.
20. The method of claim 19, further comprising increasing the rate of
methane generation by performing an action selected from the group consisting
of
blending at least one waste stream with the provided biosolids, inoculating
the
biosolids with at least one species of bacteria, changing the temperature of
the
biosolids, changing the salinity of the biosolids, adding at least one
chemical to the
biosolids and a combination of the preceding.
21. The method of claim 20, where the chemical added to the biosolids is
potassium.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02559624 2001-10-02
METHOD FOR BIOSOLID DISPOSAL AND METHANE GENERATION
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims priority from United States patent 6,409,650 titled
"Method For Biosolid Disposal And Methane Generation," issued June 25, 2002.
BACKGROUND
Over 10 million tons of biosolids from municipal sewage sludge are generated
each year in the United States alone. The prevailing methods for the disposal
of biosolids
biosolids include the application of the biosolids to surface land
application, such as to crop
land, range land or forests, composting and landfill disposal. Each of these
methods is
associated with disadvantages.
For example, one disadvantage of the application of biosolids to surface lands
is the resistance of persons living in the area of the application because of
concerns about
nuisances such as odor and wind-blown dust from the site of application.
Biosolids
application to surface land and landfills also creates risks for contamination
of potable surface
water and groundwater.
Further disadvantageously, weather conditions can delay the application of
biosolids to surface land, and tracking biosolids to the application site
creates pollution and
nuisances. Additionally, the capacity for the disposal of biosolids by
application to surface
lands and landfills is limited and the associated costs are generally high.
Also, greenhouse
gasses, such as methane and carbon dioxide, are generated by the decomposition
of the
biosolids and these gases are released into the atmosphere at the sites of
surface land
application and most landfills.
Therefore, there is a need for an additional method for the disposal of
biosolids that provides less risk for environmental contamination.
Additionally, there is a
need for a additional method for the disposal of biosolids that is less
expensive. Further,
there is a need for an additional method for the disposal of biosolids that
does not permit the
release of carbon dioxide and other green house gases into the atmosphere.
Also, there is a
need for an additional method for the disposal of biosolids that can produce
usable byproducts
from biosolids.

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
2
SUMMARY
According to one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a
method for the disposal of biosolids. The method comprises, first, providing a
supply of
biosolids. Then, a slurry of the biosolids suitable for injecting is created
and an injection
formation below a ground surface is selected. Next, the biosolids slurry is
injected into the
injection formation at a pressure sufficient to create and maintain fractures
within the selected
injection formation. Then, the injected biosolids slurry is allowed to
degrade.
In a preferred embodiment, the supply of biosolids can be derived from at
least
one source selected from the group consisting of municipal sewage waste, waste
water
treatment waste, animal waste, non-human-non-animal industrial waste and a
combination of
the preceding. In another preferred embodiment, the injection formation is at
least about 100
meters below the ground surface. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the
injection
formation is from between about 500 and about 3,000 meters below the ground
surface.
In a preferred embodiment, the injection formation has a temperature and the
temperature of the injection formation is greater that about ZS°C. In
another preferred
embodiment, the injection formation has a porosity greater than about 15 9b .
In a particularly
preferred embodiment, the injection formation is separated from the ground
surface by one or
more pairs of alternating layers of high permeability and low permeability.
In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises monitoring pressure
in the one or more than one of the alternating layers of high permeability and
low
permeability above the injection formation during a time selected from the
group consisting
of before biosolids injection, during biosolids injection, after biosolids
injection and a
combination of before biosolids injection, during biosolids injection and
after biosolids
injection. In a preferred embodiment, at least one low permeability layer of
the one or more
alternating layers of high permeability and low permeability comprises shale.
In a
particularly preferred embodiment, the one or more pairs of alternating layers
of high
permeability and low permeability is at least three pairs of alternating
layers of high
permeability and low permeability.
In a preferred embodiment, the injection formation comprises a natural gas
formation in a gas accumulation zone, In another preferred embodiment, the
degeneration of
the biosolids generates a gas selected from the group consisting of carbon
dioxide, sulfur
dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and combinations of the preceding. In a particularly
preferred

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
3
embodiment, the method further comprises decreasing the rate of the generated
carbon
dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide or combination of the preceding by
performing an
action selected from the group consisting of blending at least one waste
stream with the
provided biosolids, inoculating the biosolids with at least one species of
bacteria, changing
the temperature of the biosolids, changing the salinity of the biosolids,
adding at least one
chemical to the biosolids and a combination of the preceding.
In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises creating fractures
within the injection formation before injecting the biosolids into the
injection formation. In
another preferred embodiment, the method further comprises transporting the
selected
biosolids to an injection site by pipe before injecting the biosolids. In a
particularly preferred
embodiment, the method further comprises monitoring pressure in the injection
formation at a
time selected from the group consisting of before injecting the biosolids into
the injection
formation, during the injection of the biosolids into the injection formation,
after injecting the
biosolids into the injection formation and a combination of the preceding.
In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises increasing the rate of
degradation of the biosolids by performing an action selected from the group
consisting of
blending at least one waste stream with the provided biosolids, inoculating
the biosolids with
at least one species of bacteria, changing the temperature of the biosolids,
changing the
salinity of the biosolids, adding at least one chemical to the biosolids and a
combination of
the preceding. In another preferred embodiment, the chemical added to the
biosolids is
potassium. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the method further
comprises allowing
methane to be generated by the degradation of the injected biosolids and
recovering methane
generated by the degradation of the injected biosolids, after injecting the
biosolids into the
injection formation. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the rate of
methane generation
is increased by performing an action selected from the group consisting of
blending at least
one waste stream with the provided biosolids, inoculating the biosolids with
at least one
species of bacteria, changing the temperature of the biosolids, changing the
salinity of the
biosoIids, adding at least one chemical to the biosolids and a combination of
the preceding.
In another preferred embodiment, the chemical added to the biosolids is
potassium.
In a preferred embodiment, the degradation of the biosolids generates a gas
selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen
sulfide and
combinations of the preceding, and where the method further comprises
decreasing the rate

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
4
of the generated carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide or
combination of the
preceding by performing an action selected from the group consisting of
blending at least ot~
waste stream with the provided biosolids, inoculating the biosolids with at
least one species of
bacteria, changing the temperature of the biosolids, changing the salinity of
the biosolids,
adding at least one chemical to the biosolids and a combination of the
preceding. In another
preferred embodiment, the chemical added to the biosolids is potassium.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a
method for the disposal of biosolids. The method comprises, first, providing a
supply of
biosolids. Then, a slurry of the biosolids suitable for injecting is created
and an injection
formation is selected that is separated from a ground surface by one or more
gaits of
alternating layers of high permeability and low permeability. Next, the
biosolids slurry is
injected into the injection formation and allowed to degrade. Then, pressure
in the one or
more than one of the alternating layers of high permeability and low
permeability above the
injection formation is monitored during a time selected from the group
consisting of before
biosolids injection, during biosolids injection, after biosolids injection and
a combination of
before biosolids injection, during biosolids injection and after biosolids
injection.
In a preferred embodiment, the supply of biosolids is derived from at least
one source selected from the group consisting of municipal sewage waste, waste
water
treatment waste, animal waste, non-human-non-animal industrial waste and a
combination of
the preceding. In another preferred embodiment, the injection formation is at
least about 100
m below the ground surface. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the
injection formation
is from between about 500 and about 3,000 meters below the ground surface. In
another
preferred embodiment, the injection formation has a temperature and the
temperature of the
injection formation is greater that about ZS°C.
In a preferred embodiment, the injection formation has a porosity greater than
about 15 % . In another preferred embodiment, at least one low permeability
layer of the one
or more alternating layers of high permeability and low permeability comprises
shale. In a
particularly preferred embodiment, the one or more of alternating layers of
high permeability
and low permeability is at Least three pairs of alternating layers of high
permeability and low
permeability.
In a preferred embodiment, the injection formation comprises a natural gas
formation in a gas accumulation zone. In another preferred embodiment, the
biosolids slurry

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
is injected into the injection formation at a pressure sufficient to create
and maintain fractures
within the selected injection formation. In a particularly preferred
embodiment, allowing
degradation of the biosolids generates a gas selected from the group
consisting of carbon
dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and combinations of the preceding
In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises decreasing the rate
of the generated carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide or
combination of the
preceding by performing an action selected from the group consisting of
blending at least one
waste stream with the provided biosolids, inoculating the biosolids with at
least one species of
bacteria, changing the temperature of the biosolids, changing the salinity of
the biosolids,
adding at least one chemical to the biosolids and a combination of the
preceding. In another
preferred embodiment, the method further comprises creating fractures within
the injection
formation before injecting the biosolids into the injection formation. In a
particularly
preferred embodiment, the method further comprises transporting the selected
biosolids to an
injection site by pipe before injecting the biosolids.
In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises monitoring pressure
in the injection formation at a time selected from the group consisting of
before injecting the
biosolids into the injection formation, during the injection of the biosolids
into the injection
formation, after injecting the biosolids into the injection formation and a
combination of the
preceding. In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprises
increasing the
rate of degradation of the biosolids by performing an action selected from the
group
consisting of blending at least one waste stream with the provided biosolids,
inoculating the
biosolids with at least one species of bacteria, changing the temperature of
the biosolids,
changing the salinity of the biosolids, adding at least one chemical to the
biosolids and a
combination of the preceding. :n a particularly preferred embodiment, the
chemical added to
the biosolids is potassium.
In a preferred embodiment, the method further comprises allowing methane to be
generated by the degradation of the injected biosolids and recovering methane
generated by
the degradation of the injected biosolids, after injecting the biosolids into
the injection
formation. In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprises
increasing the
rate of methane generation by performing an action selected from the group
consisting of
blending at least one waste stream with the provided biosolids, inoculating
the biosolids with
at least one species of bacteria, changing the temperature of the biosolids,
changing the

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
6
salinity of the biosolids, adding at least one chemical to the biosolids and a
combination of
the preceding. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the chemical added to
the biosolids is
potassium.
In a preferred embodiment, the degradation of the biosolids generates a gas
selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen
sulfide and
combinations of the preceding, and where the method further comprises
decreasing the rate
of the generated carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide or
combination of the
preceding by performing an action selected from the group consisting of
blending at least one
waste stream with the provided biosolids, inoculating the biosolids with at
least one species of
bacteria, changing the temperature of the biosolids, changing the salinity of
the biosolids,
adding at least one chemical to the biosolids and a combination of the
preceding. In another
preferred embodiment, the chemical added to the biosolids is potassium.
FIGURES
The features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become
better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims
and
accompanying figure where:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of the method for the
disposal of biosolids according to the present invention.
DESCRIPTION
In one embodiment, the present invention is a method for the disposal of
solids, such as biosolids, comprising injecting the biosolids into deep
underground
formations. The injected biosolids are then allowed to undergo biodegradation,
using the
natural geothermal heat in the deep subsurface. Hiodegradation produces carbon
dioxide,
sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, methane and other gases. The generated
carbon dioxide is
absorbed by formation waters because it is highly soluble in water, and more
soluble than
methane. The residue from the biodegradation is a carbon-rich solid material
that becomes
permanently sequestered in the underground formation.
In a preferred embodiment, methane generated by the degrading biosolids is
removed for conversion into usable energy, or storage for subsequent use. In
another
preferred embodiment, the rate of biodegradation is increased or the rate of
methane
production is increased or the rate of carbon dioxide or other undesirable
degradation
products is decreased by altering environmental conditions in the formation or
by adding

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
7
substances or bacteria, or by adjusting the biochemical properties of the
biosolids slurry that
is injected into the formation. The present method provides significant cost
savings and
environmental benefits over current technologies for the disposal of
biosolids.
As used in this disclosure, the term "biosolids" is defined as solid particles
of
matter that are dominantly comprised of organic material by weight.
The method of the present invention will now be discussed in greater detail.
First, a suitable supply of biosolids is provided. In a preferred embodiment,
the biosolids
have sufficient concentration of biodegradable organic matter to generate
exploitable
quantities of methane. It is not necessary that all the wastes be
biodegradable or even organic
as other solid components of the injected biosolids slurry will become
permanently entombed
in the injection formation.
In a preferred embodiment, the biosolids disposed of by the present method
will be derived from municipal sewage or waste water treatment wastes, such as
produced by
a major metropolitan area. Municipal sewage wastes comprise human biowastes,
household
scraps, sanitary paper products and other biological components, as well as
mineral matter
and small amounts of chemical products, such as solvents, acids, alkalies and
heavy metals,
introduced into the waste stream through the municipal sewer system such as
solvents, acids,
alkalies and heavy metals.
Another suitable source of the biosolids is animal wastes from sites where the
animals are raised or housed. The animal wastes can be mixed with other
organic materials
such as sawdust or straw, or it may be mixed with mineral wastes. Still other
suitable
sources of biosolids are pulp and paper mill sludges, waste oil products
including greases and
waxes, and wastes which are rich in organic debris dredged from harbors or
estuaries.
After providing a suitable supply of biosolids, a suitable underground
formation, designated the "injection formation" in this disclosure, is
selected below a suitable
ground surface injection site. Preferably, the formation is a high porosity,
high permeability
sand formation, significantly below usable groundwater, if present. In a
particularly
preferred embodiment, the porosity is greater than about 15 % . In a
particularly preferred
embodiment, the injection formation is below any groundwater which could be
removed for
human use and below multiple, thick and clearly defined layers of alternating
low
permeability, fluid flow barriers and high permeability fluid absorption
zones. The high
permeability layers will preferably be sand of high porosity. The low
permeability layers

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
8
will preferably comprise shales and other rocks containing clay minerals that
have absorptive
capacity. In a preferred embodiment, there should be at least two alternating
layers of high
permeability and low permeability separating any usable groundwater, if
present, and the
deeper injection formation. In a particularly preferred embodiment, there
should be at least
five alternating layers of high permeability and low permeability separating
any usable
groundwater, if present, and the deeper injection formation.
The total available storage volume of an injection formation can be calculated
based on the approximate average thickness and area of the injection
formation, the average
porosity of the injection formation and the mechanical compressibility of the
injection
formation, as will be understood by those with skill in the art with reference
to this
disclosure.
In another preferred embodiment, the injection formation will be at least
about
100 m below the ground surface. This depth is generally deep enough to insure
that the
injected biosolids will be sequestered, even without thick and clearly defined
layers of
alternating low permeability, fluid flow barriers and high permeability fluid
absorption zones.
specific, and deep enough to ensure that the injected biosolids will not pose
a potential threat
to the environment or to water supplies, and near enough to the surface to
allow biosolids
injection in a cost-effective manner. In a particularly preferred embodiment,
the injection
formation is between about 500 m and about 3000 m below the ground surface.
The injection site typically requires less than 10,000 m2 of surface land,
unlike
the larger areas required for surface landfills. Further, use of the surface
land itself
according the present method is only temporary, and after the disposal
activity is complete,
the surface land can be returned to other uses.
The injection site and injection formation for use in the present method
should
be selected to additionally protect ground and ocean waters by properly
selecting an
appropriate geological interval which does not outcrop or interact with near
surface
formations. Geochemical analysis of formation fluids can be used to verify
that particular
injection formations contain only ancient fluids and are not in communication
with shallower
water sources.
It is also preferred that the selected injection formation has pre-existing
natural
gas because this implies that the injection formation is overlain by a
suitable methane
accumulation zone and is capped by an unfractured layer of relatively low
permeability so as

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
9
to inhibit further upward methane movement. This configuration allows for
accumulation of
gases generated by degradation of the biosolids and removal of the gases for
use as a fuel.
It is further preferred that injection sites selected for use with the present
method have existing gas collection and measurement infrastructure, and long
histories of
contained injection operations. For example, preferred injection formations
include oil and
gas trapping anticlines which over geologic time have proven to be completely
isolated.
The overlying low permeability layers, when present, above the preferred
injection formation provide a permeability barrier to upward migration, as can
be evidenced
by historical oil/water accumulations, where the oil migrates upward until it
is impeded by a
permeability barrier. The at least one additional overlying high permeability
layer acts as a
fluid flow sink in the unlikely event of a well casing cement failure or a
breach of a tow
permeability layer.
For example, if the well casing cement fails or a low permeability layer is
breached and fluid migrates above the low permeability layer, the high
permeability layer
immediately above absorbs the excess pressure and migrating fluid. Pressure
will then
decline slightly in the injection formation and increase in the overlying
layer. These pressure
changes and fluid migration can be identified by monitors located in both
zones, and periodic
wellbore tracer surveys. Further groundward migration of the waste material
will not occur
unless the second higher high permeability layer also becomes highly
pressurized. For
material to migrate upwards from the injection formation, the process of
breach and
absorption in the layers above the injection formation would have to be
repeated for each set
of high permeability and low permeability layers above the injection
formation.
As an example, a suitable underground formation for injection of biosolids
according to the present invention would be a 100 m thick, unconsolidated
sandstone
formation lying between 1000 m and 3000 m below the ground surface, where the
sands are
poorly sorted and range in texture from very fine to coarse grained. An
approximately 300
m thickness low permeability formation material would be present in the 1,000
m interval
immediately above the injection formation, which are interbedded with high
permeability
formations providing additional geologic barriers and safety zones and which
could be easily
monitored.
The injection formation would have been used as a gas storage field for at
least
ten years, the geology of the area would be well characterized and injectiviry
into the

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
injection formation would have been established. A nearby well would
preferably be present
which could be used as an observation well for monitoring purposes. Further
preferably,
there would be no groundwater extraction wells in the area and groundwater
would be
regularly and extensively monitored.
In another preferred embodiment, the present invention includes creating and
maintaining fractures within the selected injection formation by the injection
of waste slurry
under high pressure, such as parting pressure, as will be understood by those
with skill in the
art with reference to this disclosure.
After selection of a suitable injection formation and injection site, the
injection
equipment and associated facilities are located in an area adjacent to the
injection site.
Injection equipment preferably occupies a surface area of 10,000 m2 or less,
with no
additional surface construction or road work required. All slurry equipment
and tanks are
preferably fully enclosed.
The preferred biosolids slurry formation and injection apparatuses should be
environmentally secure in the handling of waste material. Further preferably,
they should be
able to screen waste streams on a continuous basis to avoid introduction of
any oversize
material into the wellbore that could lead to blockage, as welt as to monitor
and register
injection parameters such as rate, total volumes, pressure, density and
temperature in real-
time. Additionally preferably, they should include variable speed controls
linked to the
monitoring systems that permit the control and optimization of the slurry-
forming
components so as to maintain consistent slurry quality and delivery rate of a
biosolids slurry
with the best physical attributes feasible.
Suitable cased and perforated wells are prepared or existing wells modified
and
extended into the injection formation, and into the methane accumulation zone
if desired. All
wells used in the present method are designed to seal against fluid and gas
migration and are
periodically tested to ensure that migration is not taking place. The capacity
for each well is
preferably in the range of 500 to 2000 m' per day of biosolids slurry. By
selecting multiple
deep injection targets, and alternating between multiple wells and intervals,
a single site can
provide large-scale biosolids management capacity for many years.
In a preferred embodiment, each well used in the present invention has several
layers of protection. An outer steel casing (called the surface casing)
extends from the
surface to the lowermost depth of any usable groundwater. This steel casing ;s
surrounded

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
11
by cement. One or more additional steel casing strings (called the production
casing) extends
from the surface to the depth of the selected injection formation. This casing
is also
surrounded by cement.
The biosolids to be disposed are pumped down a steel tubing past a packer
located at an appropriate depth, for example, a depth of about 1,500 m to
2,000 m. Outside
the tubing is an annular region filled with fluid. The pressure of this fluid
will be constantly
monitored to immediately detect any leak in the tubing. If material injected
down the tubing
does leak into the annular region, the material is still contained within an
outer steel casing,
which is in turn surrounded try a cement sheath.
After selection of a suitable injection formation and preparation of the
injection
site, the biosolids are transported to the injection site. The transport can
be by road based
transport. In a preferred embodiment, however, the biosolids are transported
by pipe from
the source directly to the injection site, which is located as close to the
source of material as
practical.
Next, an aqueous slurry is prepared of the biosolids to be injected into the
selected injection formation. Creation of this slurry is particularly
preferred to allow the
injection of the biosolids. In summary, the biosolids are sized, screened and
mixed with
water to produce an aqueous biosolids slurry that is a consistent mix with no
oversized
particles, and is suitable for injection into a perforated cased wellbore and
injection
formation.
In a preferred embodiment, a biosolids slurry is designed to generate methane
efficiently under the conditions present in the selected injection formation.
This is
accomplished by measuring the chemical and biological properties of the
available biosolids
stream, the physical conditions in the target stratum, and adjusting the
physical and chemical
properties of the slurry to achieve efficient methane generation.
After the biosolids are injected into the injection formation and locked in by
the natural stresses present in the injection formation and the low
permeability zones
immediately above the injection formation, the injected material is allowed to
undergo
degradation under anaerobic conditions. Given a solids mixture undergoing
anaerobic
digestion, an estimate of degradation can be obtained from first order
kinetics:
w - WCe. k r
(1)

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
12
where W = mass of volatile injected solids that have not degraded after time
t, Wo= mass of
solids deposited, k = decay coefficient, and t = time. In general the value of
k will depend
on a variety of factors including pH, temperature, salinity, mixing amount,
and to some
extent the concentration of solids. Typical values for the exponent k are on
the order of 10'',
yielding a value for W of between 40-6096 degradation per year. For continuous
injection,
the amount of material remaining after some time t is determined by
integration of equation
1. The mass of gas produced will in general be equal to the amount of volatile
injected solids
degraded and is typically composed mainly of methane (50-6096), carbon dioxide
(30-4090),
nitrogen, and hydrogen.
In addition to the mechanical protection provided by the injection well
design,
and the natural protection provided by the selection of an appropriate
injection formation with
multiple overlying barrier and buffer zones, the present method preferably
includes a
continuous real-time recording and display of pressure response in the
injection zone, in the
first overlying high permeability zone, as well as in the wellbore annulus, to
ensure
containment of biosolids in the injection formation. Any breach or deviation
from anticipated
injection behavior will be noted while material is still far below the
groundwater, allowing
immediate remedial action. Additional process monitoring can include several
types such as
pressure recording and analysis, temperature recordings, surface deformation
measurements
and analysis, and microseismic monitoring, such as monitoring pressure in one
or more than
one of the alternating layers of high permeability and low permeability above
the injection
formation during a time selected from the group consisting of before biosolids
injection,
during biosolids injection, after biosolids injection and a combination of
before biosolids
injection, during biosolids injection and after biosolids injection, as will
be understood by
those with skill in the art with reference to this disclosure. The monitoring
is preferably
performed at several depths below the groundwater base.
Preferably, fluid injection into the injection formation is episodic in order
to
facilitate the monitoring of formation behavior. Bottom-hole pressure in the
injection
formation is preferably monitored continuously during daily injection and
nightly shut-in.
This pressure information is analyzed to evaluate changing formation flow and
mechanical
properties and injectivity, and to determine formation parting pressure and
material
containment, as will be understood by those with skill in the art with
reference to this
disclosure. Additional biosolids will not be injected if pressure in the
injection formation

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
13
remains abnormally high. As will be understood by those with skill in the art,
in order for
fluid to migrate out of the injection formation, a breach must occur and the
pressure in the
injection formation must be higher than the pressure in an adjacent formation.
In addition to
the continuous pressure monitoring and analysis, the present method preferably
includes
shutting down the injection well periodically to perform extensive well tests,
tracer surveys
and injection formation tests to evaluate well integrity and hydraulic
isolation in the near
wellbore area.
In another preferred embodiment, the present method includes recovering the
methane generated from the degradation of the injected biosolids. The methane
can then be
used as a clean fuel. Alternatively, the methane produced can be left
underground as a stored
supply of future energy. Recovery of the methane is preferably done by
injecting the
biosolids into an appropriate geologic formation with a trapping mechanism.
Preferably, the
biosolids are injected downdip below the water-oil or water-gas contact in a
geologic
formation. The generated methane and carbon dioxide will then migrate upwards
due to
gravity segregation.
Methane and carbon dioxide produced by the degradation of biosolids
according to the present invention will percolate through formation water
where much of the
carbon dioxide will be sequestered underground by dissolution in the saline
formation water,
and where the high quality methane will accumulate in the gas trap. The
difference in
sequestration is due to the much higher solubility of carbon dioxide in water
relative to
methane (a ratio of at least 1U:1) at temperature and pressure conditions
typical for deep
geologic formations. Methane, in particular, is a potent greenhouse gas. By
injecting
biosolids into the deep subsurface, gas release to the atmosphere is
eliminated and carbon is
permanently sequestered in deep saline formations.
Recovered methane from deep injection formations used according to the
present invention is of higher quality than that generated in surface
digesters or from surface
landfills for two reasons. First, by percolating through formation waters in
the injection
formation, the carbon dioxide component of the generated gases will be
significantly
absorbed due to the much higher solubility of carbon dioxide relative to
methane. Second,
the methane generated according to the present invention is at higher pressure
than methane
generated by surface landfills and requires less compression for storage or
use.

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
14
As can be appreciated, once the injection formation is filled and the methane
extracted, if desired, the equipment used for injection of biosolids and
recovery of methane
can be removed and the site abandoned. This returns the surface land to the
condition it was
in previously and leaves the site unimpaired.
In a preferred embodiment, the present method includes increasing the rate of
biodegradation of the injected biosolids. This is done by altering
environmental conditions in
the injection formation or by adding substances or bacteria, or by adjusting
the biochemical
properties of the biosolids slurry that is injected into the formation, or by
a combination of
these actions, to optimize the biodegradation process. In another preferred
embodiment, the
present method includes decreasing the rate of production of undesirable
products such as
carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide.
For example, the rate of biodegradation can be increased by adjusting the
temperature and salinity of the aqueous slurry so that the resulting physical
properties of the
biosolids in the subsurface provides an optimum environment for
biodegradation, given the
species of bacteria present in the biosolids and native to the injection
formation. In another
preferred embodiment, biodegradation rates can be increased by adding
appropriate natwal or
genetically engineered bacteria to the biosolids prior to injection, or after
injection. The
inoculation can be used to increase the decomposition rate of the biosolids
into methane under
the specific temperature and pressure conditions at the injection formation
depth, or to inhibit
the production of undesirable decomposition products, such as carbon dioxide,
sulfur dioxide
and hydrogen sulfide. Further, nutrients and other chemical or organic agents,
such as those
that alter acidity, pH, or oxidation potential, Eh, can be added to the
biosolids slurry for the
same purposes.
For example, bacteria that are relied upon to promote biodegradation of the
injected biosolids can have high potassium requirements. Extrinsic potassium,
such as
soluble salt potassium chloride l,KCI), can be added to an injected biosolids
slurry to promote
bacterial growth.
In general, it is preferred that chemicals added to the injected biosolids
slurry
be only weakly soluble in water or insoluble so that any added chemical is not
removed
during the water expulsion that accompanies compaction of the injected
material in the
formation. A suitable source of potassium for addition to the biosolids
slurry, therefore,

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
would be finely ground potash feldspar which contains potassium that is slowly
liberated in
situ under the influence of aqueous exposure, high temperatures and bacterial
action.
For example, biodegradation in an injection formation can be limited by the
supply of phosphorous present in one injected biosolids slurry. In order to
improve
biodegradation, a second waste stream rich in phosphorous can be blended with
the first
waste stream or injected separately, either simultaneously or alternating with
the first
biosolids slurry. For example, a waste source rich in phosphorous can come
from a chemical
plant or from phosphorus-rich gypsum wastes ("phospho-gyp").
In another example, some waste streams contain sterile biosolids due to their
alkalinity, such as waste streams from paper production facilities. In order
to promote
bacterial degradation of the wastes, a second waste stream which is acidic can
be blended
with the first stream to adjust the pH of the streams to promote bacterial
degradation of the
injected slurry.
In yet another example, natural or genetically engineered bacteria can be
added
to an injected biosolids slurry to improve degradation. In a preferred
embodiment, the
bacteria added are anaerobic species because of the low concentration of
oxygen in the
injection formations used in the present invention. In a particularly
preferred embodiment,
the bacteria are methanogenic.
Additionally, a plurality of biosolids having different compositions can be
blended together to maximize biosolid degradation in the injection formation,
or to maximize
the rate and quantity of methane generation, or to decrease the rate and
quantity of generation
of less desirable decomposition products such as carbon dioxide, sulfur
dioxide or hydrogen
sulfide. For example, a sowce of animal waste that is rich in organic material
can be
blended with a source of waste materia such as a pulp residue, sawdust from a
plywood mill,
thermally treated wastes, or other waste that is less rich in organic
material, and that is also
sterile. The two waste streams are blended in the optimum proportions, as will
be
understood by those with skill in the art, with reference to knowledge of the
in situ conditions
at the injection formation and with reference to this disclosure.
The temperature in the injection formations used in the present invention can
vary from 25°C (e.g. I km deep injection formation in Montana, US) to
100°C (3 km deep
injection formation in West-Central California, US). However, suitable
thermophilic bacteria
can be used with injection formations having considerably higher temperatures.
Pressure also

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
16
varies at the injection formation depths anticipated by the present invention,
such as from
about 10 MPA at a depth of 1 km depth to about 40 MPa at depths of between
about 3 to 4
km. Therefore, bacteria added to the biosolids slurry must be chosen to be
suitable to the
temperature and pressures that will be encountered in a specific injection
formation.
The method for the disposal of biosolids, according to the present invention,
therefore, has several advantages over the currently used techniques. First,
the present
method reduces the potential and real impact on surface waters and groundwater
that can be
associated with surface application of biosolids, because the biosolids are
injected
significantly below any usable source of groundwater. Second, the present
method requires
significantly less surface Land area than land application for disposal of an
equivalent volume
of biosolids. Third, the present method does not permanently alter the surface
land after the
disposal at the site is completed. Fourth, because the biosalids can be pumped
to local sites
for disposal, the present method significantly reduces or eliminates truck
traffic to distant
disposal sites and, therefore, reduces the noise and environmental
contamination associated
with heavy truck traffic.
Fifth, the present method reduces the amount of methane and carbon dioxide
released into the atmosphere as compared to surface application of biosolids.
Sixth, methane
produced by the degradation of biosolids according to the present method can
be collected for
use as an energy source. Seventh, biosolids disposal according to the present
method can
reduce the cost of biosolids management significantly compared with
conventional surface
application methods due to the reduced or eliminated need for trucking the
biosolids to a
distance site for disposal.
Referring now to Figure 1, there is shown a schematic diagram of one
embodiment of the method for the disposal of biasolids according to the
present invention.
A1 represents the surface facilities (storage, sizing, screening, mixing,
blending, process
monitoring and pumping equipment) for the formulation of suitable biosolids
slurry mixtures
for injection into a injection formation.
A2 represents the injection well (or one injection well in an array of
injection
wells) that is cased and cemented in such a manner so as to withstand the
injection pressures
implemented over the life of the facility.
A3 represents the injected biosolids slurry that has been placed and has
rapidly, through excess water expulsion, become solidified by the great weight
of the

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
17
overburden rocks. After all the methane possible has been generated by the
biodegradation
process, A3 becomes a dense and relatively tow permeability stratum that is
rich in carbon
and other organic molecules that were not biodegradable at the conditions in
the injection
formation. The sequestered carbon and other organic molecules will not enter
the atmosphere
creating greenhouse effects.
A4 represents the injection formation into which the biosolids slurry, A3, was
injected. A4 is of sufficient porosity and permeability as to accommodate the
excess slurry
fluids without long-term pressure build-up or interaction with shallow, usable
groundwaters.
In general, the stratum A4 will be chosen as a laterally continuous saatum of
sufficient pore
volume and flow path connectivity with adjacent strata to take all the water
expelled from the
biosolids slurry during the compaction process.
AS represents the evolution and upward movement path of the methane
generated by the biodegradation process. Such movement occurs naturally
because the
methane is of a specific gravity that is far less than that of any
interstitial water, and therefore
tends to rise through the porous medium, displacing liquid from the pores.
A6 represents the porous and permeable strata where the methane collects
through the upward migration and pore liquid displacement process, and from
which strata
the generated methane can be extract; d for use. This zone, A6, is a "trap"
for the evolved
methane because of a suitable geological structure, which can be in the form
of structural
closwe with folded beds that form an inverted bowl, as shown, or can be in the
form of a
change of rock type, not shown, in a combination of the two, or in some other
suitable
disposition of permeable and low-permeability strata.
A7 represents the rocks overlying the injection formation that are of
sufficiently low permeability that gas cannot flow upward through the pore
space. Also, the
overlying rocks A'7 are non-fractured, or are minimally fractured so that the
methane cannot
escape to strata of higher elevation.
A8 represents one or more conventional gas wells that extract the methane
from the accumulation site A6. The gas wells, A8, either exist at the site
before the disposal
operation begins or are specifically installed as cased, cemented wells,
perforated so that the
gas can flow into the wellbore. Depending on the configuration of the strata,
the methane
extraction wells A8 may be vertical, horizontal or inclined_

CA 02559624 2001-10-02
18
A9 represents a surface facility for power generation that can use the
extracted
methane as a clean energy source. Alternately, the extracted methane can be
shipped directly
to consumers for home use or industrial users for other purposes.
Although the present invention has been discussed in considerable detail with
reference to certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments are possible.
For example,
the method of the present invention can be applied to the disposal of solids
other than
biosolids. Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should not be limited
to the
description of preferred embodiments contained in this disclosure.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2010-08-31
(22) Filed 2001-10-02
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2003-02-13
Examination Requested 2006-08-25
(45) Issued 2010-08-31
Expired 2021-10-04

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $800.00 2006-08-25
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2006-08-25
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2006-08-25
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2006-08-25
Application Fee $400.00 2006-08-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2003-10-02 $100.00 2006-08-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2004-10-04 $100.00 2006-08-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2005-10-03 $100.00 2006-08-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2006-10-02 $200.00 2006-08-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2007-10-02 $200.00 2007-08-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2008-10-02 $200.00 2008-09-19
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2009-04-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2009-10-02 $200.00 2009-09-30
Section 8 Correction $200.00 2010-01-05
Final Fee $300.00 2010-04-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2010-10-04 $200.00 2010-06-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2011-10-03 $250.00 2011-09-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2012-10-02 $250.00 2012-09-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2013-10-02 $250.00 2013-09-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2014-10-02 $250.00 2014-09-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2015-10-02 $250.00 2015-07-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2016-10-03 $450.00 2016-09-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2017-10-02 $450.00 2017-09-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2018-10-02 $450.00 2018-08-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2019-10-02 $450.00 2019-08-13
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GEOENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Past Owners on Record
BILAK, ROMAN
BRUNO, MICHAEL S.
DUSSEAULT, MAURICE B.
TERRALOG TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
TERRALOG TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2001-10-02 2 82
Description 2001-10-02 18 975
Claims 2001-10-02 3 119
Drawings 2001-10-02 1 43
Representative Drawing 2006-11-15 1 40
Cover Page 2006-11-16 1 65
Claims 2008-11-04 4 144
Description 2008-11-04 19 1,013
Representative Drawing 2010-08-09 1 39
Cover Page 2010-08-09 1 64
Fees 2010-06-29 1 36
Correspondence 2006-10-13 1 39
Assignment 2001-10-02 3 100
Correspondence 2006-11-01 1 18
Fees 2007-08-08 1 38
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-05-06 3 93
Fees 2008-09-19 1 44
Correspondence 2008-09-19 2 82
Correspondence 2008-10-14 1 17
Correspondence 2008-10-14 1 22
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-11-04 13 523
Assignment 2009-04-16 5 258
Fees 2009-09-30 1 36
Correspondence 2010-01-05 1 45
Correspondence 2010-04-20 1 34
Prosecution-Amendment 2010-06-10 2 47
Change of Agent 2015-09-14 2 58
Office Letter 2015-09-30 1 20
Office Letter 2015-09-30 1 25