Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
SYSTEMS AND METHODS PROVIDING AUTOMATED
DECISION SUPPORT FOR MEDICAL IMAGING
Cross-Reference to Related Application
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional
Application Serial No. 60/555,620, filed on Maroh 23, 2004,
which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to systems and
methods for providing automated decision support for medical
imaging. More specifically, the present invention relates
to systems and methods for processing a medical image to
automatically identify the anatomy and view (or pose) from
the medical image and automaticalllT assess the diagnostic
quality of the medical image.
Background
In the field of medical imaging, various imaging
modalities and systems are used for generating medical
images of anatomical structures of individuals for screening
and evaluating medical conditions. These imaging systems
include, for example, CT (computed tomography) imaging, MRI
(magnetic resonance imaging), NM (nuclear magnetic)
resonance imaging, X-ray systems, US (ultrasound) systems,
PET (positron emission. tomography) systems, etc. For each
of these modalities, a specific part of the human body is
targeted for imaging, which can be performed in various
ways. With ultrasound, sound waves from a transducer are
1
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
directed towards a specific part of the body (the heart, for
example). In MRI, gradient coils are used to "select" a
part of the body where nuclear resonance is recorded. The
part of the body targeted by the imaging modality usually
corresponds to the area that the physician is interested in
exploring. Each imaging modality may provide unique
advantages over other modalities for screening and
evaluating certain types of diseases, medical conditions or
anatomical abnormalities, including, for example,
cardiomyopathy, colonic polyps, aneurisms, lung nodules,
calcification on heart or artery tissue, cancer micro
calcifications or masses in breast tissue, and various other
lesions or abnormalities.
Typically, physicians, clinicians, radiologists, etc,
will manually review and evaluate medical images (X-ray
films, prints, photographs, etc) reconstructed from an
acquired image dataset, to discern characteristic features
of interest and detect, diagnose or otherwise identify
potential medical conditions. For example, CT image data
that is acquired during a CT examination can be used to
produce a set of 2D medical images (X-ray films) that can be
viewed to identify potential abnormal anatomical structures
or lesions, for example. Depending on the skill and
knowledge of the reviewing physician, clinician,
radiologist, etc., however, manual evaluation of medical
images can result in misdiagnosed medical conditions due to
simple human error. Furthermore, when the acquired medical
2
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
images are of low diagnostic quality, it can be difficult
for even a highly skilled reviewer to effectively evaluate
such medical images and identify potential medical
conditions.
Summary of the Invention
In general, exemplary embodiments of the invention
include systems and methods for processing a medical image
to automatically identify the anatomy and view (or pose)
from the medical image and automatically assess the
diagnostic quality of the medical image. For example, in
one exemplary embodiment, a method for automated decision
support for medical imaging includes obtaining image data,
extracting feature data from the image data, and
automatically performing anatomy identification, view
identification and/or determining a diagnostic quality of
the image data, using the extracted feature data.
In another exemplary embodiment of the invention,
automated anatomy identification, view identification and/or
image quality assessment are performed using associated
classifiers that process the extracted feature data. The
classifiers can be implemented using machine learning
methods, model-based methods, or any combination of machine
learning and model-based methods.
In another exemplary embodiment of the invention,
automated anatomy identification, view identification and/or
image quality assessment can be performed by using the
extracted feature data to query a database of known cases to
3
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
identify similar cases and use information associated with
the identified similar cases to perform the respective
functions. Training data extracted from the database of
know cases can be used to train classifiers for performing
such functions.
In another exemplary embodiment of the invention,
automated anatomy identification, view identification and
image quality assessment are performed by using the
extracted feature data to query a database of templates
derived from information of known cases to identify similar
templates and use information associated with the identified
similar templates to perform the respective functions.
In yet another exemplary embodiment of the invention,
feature extraction, automated anatomy identification, view
identification and image quality assessment are performed in
real-time during image acquisition, wherein the results of
image quality assessment are presented to a user in real-
time during image acquisition. For imaging modalities, such
as ultrasound imaging (e. g., 2-D echocardiography) for heart
imaging, a sonographer has very limited time to acquire
images during a stress stage. By providing a real-time
quality assessment of the image acquisition, the sonographer
can determine whether the acquired images are of sufficient
diagnostic quality, thereby allowing for changes in image
acquisition, if necessary.
These and other exemplary embodiments, features and
advantages of the present invention will be described or
4
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
become apparent from the following detailed description of
exemplary embodiments, which is to be read in connection
with the accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for providing
automated decision support for medical imaging according to
an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating methods for
automated decision support for medical imaging according to
exemplary embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram .illustrating methods for
implementing automated decision support for medical imaging
using database query methods according to exemplary
embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating methods for
implementing automated decision support for medical imaging
using template-based methods according to exemplary
embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating methods for
implementing automated decision support for medical imaging
using classification according to exemplary embodiments of
the invention.
Detailed Description of Exemplary Embodiments
FIG. 1 illustrates a high-level block diagram of a
system (100) for providing automated decision support for
medical imaging, according to an exemplary embodiment of the
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
invention. In general, the exemplary system (100)
comprises a data processing module (101) that implements
various methods for analyzing medical image data (10) in one
or more imaging modalities (e.g., ultrasound image data, MRI
data, nuclear medicine data, etc.) to automatically extract
and process relevant information from the medical image data
to provide various decision support functions) for
evaluating the medical images. In the exemplary embodiment,
the data processing module (101) comprises an automatic
feature analysis module (102), an anatomy identification
module (103), a view identification module (104) and an
image quality assessment module (105).
In general, the feature analysis module (102)
implements methods for automatically extracting one or more
types of features/parameters from input medical image data
and combining the extracted features/parameters in a manner
that is suitable for processing by the decision support
modules (103, 104 and/or 105). The system (100) can process
digital image data (10) in the form of raw image data, 2D-
reconstructed data (e. g., axial slices), or 3D-reconstructed
data (volumetric image data or multiplanar reformats), 4D-
reconstructed data, or other image modalities/formats. It
is to be understood that methods implemented by the feature
extraction module (102) will vary depending on the imaging
modalities and/or automated decision support methods that
are supported by the CAD system (100), as well as the
types) of anatomical structures under consideration.
6
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
The anatomy identification module (102) implements
methods for using the extracted features/parameters to
automatically identify anatomical objects (heart chambers,
kidneys, etc) in the image dataset and label the images)
with the appropriate anatomy identification. In another
exemplary embodiment, the anatomy identification module
(102) implements methods for determining (for each
anatomy/view ID label) a confidence or likelihood measure
that the identified anatomy/view is properly labeled. The
results of anatomy identification for a medical image can be
used by other automated methods such as the view
identification and quality assessment methods, or other
application that provide automated diagnosis, therapy
planning, etc.
The view identification module (103) implements methods
for using the extracted features/parameters to automatically
identify the view of an acquired image. In other words, the
view identification module (104) implements methods for pose
estimation and label a medical image with respect to what
view of the anatomy the medical image contains. By way of
example, for cardiac ultrasound imaging, the American
Society of Echocardiography (ASE) recommends using standard
ultrasound views in B-mode to obtain sufficient cardiac
image data - the apical two-chamber view (A2C), the apical
four-chamber view (A4C), the apical long axis view (ALAX),
the parasternal long axis view (PLAX), the parasternal short
axis view (PSAX). Ultrasound images of the heart can be
7
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
taken from various angles, but efficient analysis of cardiac
ultrasound images requires recognizing the position of the
imaged heart (view) to enable identification of important
cardiac structures. In accordance with an exemplary
embodiment of the invention, view identification module
(103) implements methods for identifying an unknown cardiac
image as one of the standard views. In addition, the view
identification module (103) may implements methods for
determining (for each view label) a confidence or likelihood
measure that the identified view is properly labeled.
The quality assessment module (105) implements methods
for using the extracted features/parameters to assess a
level of diagnostic quality of an acquired image data set
and determine whether errors occurred in the image
acquisition process. In other exemplary embodiments of the
invention, the results of anatomy and/or view identification
may be used for quality assessment. Moreover, methods can
be implemented for providing real-time feedback during image
acquisition regarding the diagnostic quality of the acquired
images, allowing for changes in the image acquisition. In
addition, methods can be implemented for determining a
quality measure within a predefined range of values to
provide an indication as the quality level of the acquired
images based on some specified criteria
The system (100) further comprises a database (106) of
previously diagnosed/labeled medical images, a template
database (107) and a classification system (108), which can
8
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
be used singularly, or in combination, by one or more of the
various automated decision support modules (102 105) of the
data processing~system (101) to perform their respective
functions. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, the
various modules (103), (104) and (105) implement database
querying methods to use extracted feature data to search for
similar labeled cases in the database (106). The database
(106) may comprise a plurality of labeled/diagnosed medical
images for various clinical domains, which are indexed using
a mufti-dimensional indexing scheme based on relevant
features/parameters. In such instance, the
features/parameters extracted from an image dataset under
consideration can be compared to the feature data of known
cases in the database (106) according to some metrics or
criteria identify the particular anatomy or view, or help
identify the quality of the image extracted.
In another exemplary embodiment, the various modules
(103), (104) and (105) can implement template-based methods
to use extracted feature data to search for similar
templates in template database (107). In particular,
various templates can be constructed using information
obtained from the database of cases (106). For example,
feature data over a plurality of known cases for a given
identity and view can be processed using statistical
techniques to derive feature data for a template
representative over the set of related cases. In this
instance, the features/parameters extracted from an image
9
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
dataset under consideration can be compared to the feature
data for templates in the database (107) according to some
metrics or criteria identify the particular anatomy or view,
or help identify the quality of the image extracted.
In another exemplary embodiment, the various modules
(103)y (104) and (105) can implement classification methods
that utilize the classification module (108) to process
extracted feature data to classify the image dataset under
consideration. In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1, the
classification module (108) comprises a learning engine
(109) and knowledge base (110) to implement a principle
(machine) learning classification system. The learning
engine (109) includes methods for training/building one or
more classifiers using training data that is learned from
the database (106) of previously diagnosed/labeled cases.
The classifiers are implemented by the various decision
support modules (102105) for performing their respective
functions.
The processing results generated by the various modules
of the data processing module (101) can be persistently
stored in a repository (112) in association with the
corresponding image dataset. The processing results may
comprise meta information for superposition of markers,
segmentation, color or intensity variations, and so forth,
which can be rendered as overlays on the associated image
data.
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
The system (100) further comprises an image rendering
and visualization system (111) to process digital image data
(10) of an acquired image dataset (or a portion thereof) and
generate and display 2D and/or 3D images on a computer
monitor. More specifically, the imaging system (111) may be
any application that provides 3D/2D rendering and
visualization of image data (10), and which executes on
general purpose or specific computer workstation having a
monitor. Moreover, the imaging system (111) comprises a
GUI (graphical user interface), for example, which enables a
user to navigate through a 3D image or a plurality of 2D
slices.
The data processing system (101) and image rendering
and visualization system (111) may be implemented as a
single application that executes in a computing system
(e.g., workstation). Alternatively, the systems (101) and
(111) may be independent tools that are distributed over a
computer network, wherein known communication protocols such
as DICOM, PACS, etc. are used for communicating between the
systems and transmitting image data over the network.
It is to be appreciated that exemplary methods for
automatic anatomy and view identification and image quality
assessment are powerful tools that provide substantial
assistance and decision support in medical imaging
acquisition and evaluation. Indeed, when medical images are
acquired, it is important to properly label the images with
proper anatomy and view so that a physician can perform a
11
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
proper diagnosis. Currently, labeling is done manually,
either by a technologist acquiring the scan, or by the
physician. With exemplary labeling methods described
herein, the system automatically identifies the anatomy and
view being imaged, which provide various advantages. For
instance, automated anatomy identification improves
physician workflow by eliminated manual labeling.
Moreover, automated anatomy identification facilitates
automated quality control, and other automated computer
applications that aid in diagnosis, therapy planning, or
other applications.
Further, automated view identification methods
according to the invention could provide significant
workflow enhancement for medical imaging applications, such
as 2-D echocardiography, and specifically stress-echo. In
stress-echo, the sonographer has a very limited time (90
seconds or so for exercise stress) to acquire images from
four different views. To save time, the sonographer often
just records for a significant portion of the 90 seconds,
and then proceed to label the views after imaging is done.
This is a cumbersome process, and could be improved by
automatically identifying the views.
The results of anatomy identification and/or view
identification can be used to perform automatic image
quality assessment process according to an exemplary
embodiment of the invention. The quality check would assess
the quality of the acquired images, and also whether there
12
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
are any errors in how the image was acquired. For example,
in 2-D echocardiography, it is difficult to properly image
the apex from the apical window. Typically, images will be
acquired with the apex foreshortened, that is, the
transducer is angled so that the apex appears thicker than
it actually is, which gives an impression of a thicker
myocardium at the apex. However, other clues in the image
may suggest that the apex was indeed foreshortened.
For example, foreshortening can be identified by
measuring the distance on the ultrasound image from the base
of the left ventricle to the apex, and the thickness of the
myocardium at the apex. This distance can be compared to
the distance acquired in previous exams, or with typical
values associated with hearts of the same size of the
patient, and than assessed to determine the existence, if
any, of foreshortening. In addition, the thickness of the
myocardium at the apex is another metric that can be
evaluated to identify potential foreshortening. If the
apical myocardium is significantly thicker than the rest of
the heart, then it can be concluded that the view may have
been foreshortened. Another approach would be to have a set
of images which are foreshortened, and another set of
correctly acquired images with no foreshortening, which are
stored in a database. Using a similarity metric, the
database can be searched to determine whether a current
image is more similar to the set of foreshortened images or
correctly acquired images.
13
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
Another problem could be identification of motion
artifacts in MRI. Because MRI are acquired in "k-space",
and not real space, motion during image acquisition can
result in strange results. By analyzing the quality of the
images, motion artifacts can be identified.
In addition to searching for problems, the automatic
image quality assessment can be implemented to provide
general feedback on the diagnostic quality of an image. For
example, with 2-D echocardiography, particularly stress-
echo, the sonographer has very limited time to acquire
images during a stress stage. It is important for the
sonographer to acquire, as quickly as possible, diagnostic
quality images at multiple views. Many times, because of
the time pressure of a stress-echo, diagnostic quality
images are not obtained, and the images are useless. By
providing a quality check, the sonographer can be assured
that images are being acquired of diagnostic quality. The
advantage of doing such a quality check is that feedback can
be provided back to the operator of the imaging device in
real time, allowing for changes in acquisition. This could
be very important in a medical situation. If the feedback
is provided quickly, there may be an opportunity to re-image
the patient before he is sent home or discharged. In
addition, there may be other advantages. For example, again
in stress-echo, another application would be to
automatically select the images of highest quality for the
cardiologist to review. Often in stress-echo, the
14
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
sonographer acquires up to four (and sometimes'more) loops
of data for each view, where each loop represents a heart
cycle, or at least the systole portion of the heart cycle.
Typically, either the sonographer or cardiologist selects
which of the loops provides the best images from a
diagnostic standpoint, and uses them. By providing a
quality check, this could be done automatically.
Referring now to FIG. 2, a flow diagram illustrates
methods for providing automated decision support for medical
imaging, according to exemplary embodiments of the
invention. For purposes of illustration, exemplary methods
for automated decision support will be described with
reference to the exemplary system of FIG. 1. Initially, a
physician, clinician, radiologist, etc., will obtain a
medical image dataset comprising one or more medical images
of a region of interest of a subject patient (step 200).
The image dataset may be obtained using a medical imaging
system for real-time acquisition and processing of raw image
data, such as raw CT data (radon data) which is acquired
during a CT scan or raw data that is acquired using other
imaging modalities. Alternatively, the image dataset may be
obtained by accessing a previously acquired, and
persistently stored image dataset. The digital image data
(10) may comprise one or more 2D slices or three-dimensional
volumetric images, which are reconstructed from the raw
image data and persistently stored. As noted above, an
exemplary CAD process can support one or more imaging
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
modalities such as MRI, PET, etc. Image data can be 2D
(e.g. X-ray Mammography images), 3D (e.g. CT, MRI, PET), 4D
(Dynamic 3D MRI, multiple views of a beating heart acquired
with a 3D Ultrasound probe), etc.
Next, the image dataset will be processed to determine
or otherwise. extract relevant feature data from the image
dataset (step 201) which is utilized to perform one or more
decision support functions such as automatic anatomy
identification, view identification and/or image quality
assessment (step 2'02). As noted above, the relevant
features/parameters that are extracted/determined from the
image dataset will vary depending on the imaging modality,
the supported clinical domains, and the methods implemented
for providing automated decision support, and one of
ordinary skill in the art can readily envision various types
of feature data or parameters that can be extracted or
determined from medical image data for use with automated
anatomy and view identification methods and image quality
assessment methods according to exemplary embodiments of the
invention. For example, various parameters related to
optical density and contrast can be extracted Feature
extraction can implement known segmentation and/or filtering
methods for segmenting features or anatomies of interest by
reference to known or anticipated image characteristics,
such as edges, identifiable structures, boundaries, changes
or transitions in colors or intensities, changes or
transitions in spectrographic information, etc, using known
16
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
methods. These features could include any kind of
characteristic that could be extracted from the image, such
as a particular shape or texture. Further, various types
of feature data can be obtained across images, such as
motion of a particular point, or the change in a particular
feature across images. In other embodiments, feature data
may include gradient feature data that is computed from
image data along various axes (x,y,z), distributions of
pixel intensities, or other statistical features, or
combinations of different features.
Methods for automatic anatomy identification, automatic
view identification and image quality assessment (step 202)
according to exemplary embodiments of the invention can be
implemented using one or more techniques including a
database query approach (e. g., FIG. 3), a template
processing approach (e. g., FIG. 4) and/or classification
(e.g., FIG. 5) that utilize the extracted features to
provide automated decision support functions.
The image dataset will be labeled or otherwise
classified based on the processing results obtained (step
203). For instance, for anatomy and view identification, a
medical image will be labeled with the appropriate anatomy
and view identification. In addition, for each anatomy/view
ID label, a confidence or likelihood measure that the
identified anatomy/view is properly labeled. Moreover, for
image quality assessment, the medical images may include a
quality score (within a predefined range) that provides an
17
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
indication a diagnostic quality level of the medical
images.
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating methods for
implementing automated decision support for medical images
using database query methods according to exemplary
embodiments of the invention. The methods of FIG. 3 may be
implemented by the modules (103), (104) and/or (105) of FIG.
1 and in step 202 of FIG. 2. In one exemplary embodiment,
a query can be formulated using the feature data extracted
from the image dataset and the database of known cases
would be accessed (step 300) and searched using the query.
The extracted feature data comprising the query would be
compared to features of known cases to identify similar
cases (step 301). The content of the identified cases would
then be used to determine the most likely anatomy or view
for the subject image, or to determine the quality of the
acquired image (step 302).
For example, consider the problem of identifying the
apical four-chamber view in echocardiography. A set of
typical apical four chamber views would reveal a number of
features, such as the presence of four chambers, and a
general shape for the heart. It is also described by the
lack of other features, such as the absence of the aortic
outflow track (which would lend itself to the so-called
apical five chamber view). These features could be
extracted from a test image, and compared to a set of
features from the known view.
18
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
The same concept would be used in anatomy
identification. For example, consider an ultrasound image
of a kidney. Features would be extracted and compared with
a database of cases representing all kinds of anatomy,
including liver, gall bladder, kidney, etc. One could even
have right and left kidneys in the database. Based on a
comparison with these known cases, and the most likely
anatomy would be reported.
Methods for indexing a database of images, and using
low-level features to search the database can be implemented
using the techniques disclosed in commonly assigned U.S.
Patent Application Serial No. 10/703,024, filed on November
6, 2003, entitled "System and Method for Performing
Probabilistic Classification and Decision Support Using
Multidimensional Medical Image Databases", which is
incorporated herein by reference. In one embodiment, the
database could be constructed with either the images, or
with just the feature representations of the images. The
system could identify similar images, and then determine
anatomy, view and/or quality based on the content of the
similar images.
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating methods for
implementing automated decision support for medical images
using template-based methods according to exemplary
embodiments of the invention. In one exemplary embodiment,
a query can be formulated using the feature data extracted
from the image dataset and the database of templates would
19
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
be accessed (step 400) and searched using the query. The
extracted feature data comprising the query would be
compared to features of the templates to identify similar
templates (step 401). The content of the identified
templates would then be used to determine the most likely
anatomy or view for the subject image,. or to determine the
quality of the acquired image (step 402). As noted above,
the database of known cases could be used to construct
templates. For example, templates could be constructed for
different cardiac views: apical four chamber, apical two
chamber, etc. The system could then assess similarity to
each of these templates, which provides a simpler
operational approach then searching a database.
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating methods for
implementing automated decision support for medical images
using classification according to exemplary embodiments of
the invention. In this exemplary embodiment, the feature
data extracted from the image dataset would be input to
classifiers (step 500) that are trained or designed to
process the feature data to classify the image data (step
501). The classification results would be used to determine
the most likely anatomy or view, or assess image quality
(step 502).
For example, a bank of classifiers could be constructed
to classify the images based on the features extracted.
That is, a set of classifiers would be "learned" based on a
database of cases. These classifiers would use the set of
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
features as an input, and classify the image as belonging to
a particular anatomy, view, or level of quality. In the
exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1, the classification system
(108) includes the knowledge base (110) that is used to
process the extracted features/parameters and classify the
images. The knowledge base (110) maintains one or more
trained classification models, parameters, and/or other data
structures of learned knowledge, etc,.
It is to be understood that the term "classifiers" as
used herein generally refers to various types of classifier
frameworks, such as hierarchical classifiers, ensemble
classifiers, etc. In addition, a classifier design can
include a multiplicity of classifiers' that attempt to
partition data into two groups and organized either
organized hierarchically or run in parallel and then
combined to find the best classification. Further, a
classifier can include ensemble classifiers wherein a large
number of classifiers (referred to as a "forest of
classifiers") all attempting to perform the same
classification task are learned, but trained with different
data / variables / parameters, and then combined to produce
a final classification label. The classification methods
implemented may be "black boxes" that are unable to explain
their prediction to a user (which is the case if classifiers
are built using neural networks, example). The
classification methods may be "white boxes" that are in a
human readable form (which is the case if classifiers are
21
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
built using decision trees, for example). In other
embodiments, the classification models may be "gray boxes"
that can partially explain how solutions are derived (e. g.,
a combination of "white box" and "black box" type
classifiers).
It is to be understood that the systems and methods
described herein in accordance with the present invention
may be implemented in various forms of hardware, software,
firmware, special purpose processors, or a combination
thereof. For example, the systems and methods described
herein can be implemented in software as an application.
comprising program instructions that are tangibly embodied
on one or more program storage devices (e. g., hard disk,
magnetic floppy disk, RAM, CD Rom, DVD, ROM and flash
memory), and executable by any device or machine comprising
suitable architecture. In addition, because the constituent
system modules and method steps depicted in the accompanying
Figures can be implemented in software, the actual
connections between the system components (or the flow of
the process steps) may differ depending upon the manner in
which the application is programmed. Given the teachings
herein, one of ordinary skill in the related art will be
able to contemplate these and similar implementations or
configurations of the present invention.
It is to be further understood that systems and methods
according to the present invention may be implemented as
extensions to conventional CAD methods or other automated
22
CA 02560839 2006-09-22
WO 2005/096226 PCT/US2005/009646
diagnostic methods for processing image data. Further, it
is to be appreciated that the exemplary systems and methods
described herein. can be readily implemented with 3D medical
imaging and CAD systems or applications that are adapted for
a wide range of imaging modalities (CT, MR.I, etc.) for
diagnosis and evaluation. In this regard, although exemplary
embodiments may be described herein with reference to
particular imaging modalities or particular anatomical
features, nothing should be construed as limiting the scope
of the invention.
Although illustrative embodiments of the present
invention have been described herein with reference to the
accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the
invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and
that various other changes and modifications may be affected
therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the
scope or spirit of the invention. All such changes and
modifications axe intended to be included within the scope
of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
23
