Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 1 PCT/US2005/015329
POLYMERIC STRUCTURES AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAME
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to polymeric structures comprising a PVOH
processed
hydroxyl polymer composition comprising a hydroxyl polymer comprising at least
a polyvinyl
alcohol (PVOH) hydroxyl polymer, fibrous structures comprising such polymeric
structures and
methods for making same.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In recent years, formulators of fibrous structures have attempted to move away
from
wood-based cellulosic fibers to polymeric fibers. Polymeric fiber-containing
fibrous structures
are known in the art. See for example, EP 1 217 106 Al.
However, such prior art attempts to make polymeric fiber-containing fibrous
structures
have failed to achieve the intensive properties of their wood-based cellulosic
fiber-containing
fibrous structure cousins.
Accordingly, there is a need for a polymeric structure and/or a fibrous
structure
comprising a polymeric structure in fiber form that exhibits intensive
properties substantially
similar to or better than wood-based cellulosic fiber-containing fibrous
structures.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention fulfills the need described above by providing a
polymeric structure
and/or a fibrous structure comprising a polymeric structure in fiber form that
exhibits
substantially similar or better intensive properties as compared to wood-based
cellulosic fiber-
containing fibrous structures.
In one aspect of the present invention, a polymeric structure comprising a
PVOH
processed hydroxyl polymer composition comprising a hydroxyl polymer
comprising at least a
PVOH hydroxyl polymer, wherein the polymeric structure exhibits a stretch at
peak load of at
least about 5% and/or at least about 8% and/or at least about 10% and/or a
stretch at failure load
of at least about 10% and/or at least about 13% and/or at least about 20%, is
provided.
In another aspect of the present invention, a fibrous structure comprising a
polymeric
structure in the form of a fiber in accordance with the present invention,
wherein the fibrous
structure exhibits a stretch at peak load of at least about 5% and/or at least
about 8% and/or at
least about 10% and/or a stretch at failure load of at least about 10% and/or
at least about 13%
and/or at least about 20%, is provided.
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
2
In even another aspect of the present invention, a fibrous product comprising
one or more
fibrous structures in accordance with the present invention is provided.
In still another aspect of the present invention, a method for making a
polymeric
structure, the method comprising the steps of:
a. providing a PVOH polymer melt composition comprising a hydroxyl polymer
comprising at least a PVOH hydroxyl polymer; and
b. polymer processing the PVOH polymer melt composition to form a polymeric
structure;
wherein the polymeric structure exhibits a stretch at peak load of at least
about 5% and/or
at least about 8% and/or at least about 10% and/or a stretch at failure load
of at least about
10% and/or at least about 13% and/or at least about 20%, is provided.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a polymeric structure in fiber
form
produced in accordance with a method of the present invention, is provided.
In even still another aspect of the present invention, a method for making a
fibrous
structure, the method comprising the steps of:
a. providing a PVOH polymer melt composition comprising a hydroxyl polymer
comprising at least a PVOH hydroxyl polymer;
b. polymer processing the PVOH polymer melt composition to form a polymeric
structure in fiber form; and
c. incorporating the polymeric structure in fiber form into a fibrous
structure;
wherein the fibrous structure exhibits a stretch at peak load of at least
about 5% and/or at
least about 8% and/or at least about 10% and/or a stretch at failure load of
at least about
10% and/or at least about 13% and/or at least about 20%, is provided.
In even yet another aspect of the present invention, a fibrous structure
comprising two or
more fibers at least one of which comprises a polymeric structure in fiber
form, wherein the
fibrous structure comprises a first region comprising associated fibers and a
second region
comprising non-associated fibers, is provided.
In still yet another aspect of the present invention, a fibrous product
comprising one or
more fibrous structures comprising a first region comprising associated fibers
and a second region
comprising non-associated fibers, is provided.
In even still yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for making
a fibrous
structure, the method comprising the steps of:
a. providing a fibrous structure comprising two or more fibers at least one of
which
comprises a polymeric structure in fiber form; and
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
3
b. associating the two or more fibers with each other such that a fibrous
structure
comprising a first region comprising associated fibers and a second region
comprising
non-associated fibers is formed, is provided.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a polymeric structure, a fibrous
structure
comprising such a polymeric structure in fiber form, a fibrous product
comprising one or more
such fibrous structures, method for making such a polymeric structure, method
for making such a
fibrous structure comprising a polymeric structure in fiber form and a
polymeric structure in fiber
form produced by such a method.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of a method for making a polymeric
structure in accordance
with the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration of a camera set-up suitable for use in the
Lint/Pilling Test
Method described herein.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE 1NVENTION
DEFINITIONS
"Polymeric structure" as used herein means any physical structure produced by
polymer
processing the PVOH polymer melt composition of the present invention.
Nonlimiting examples
of such polymeric structures include fibers, films and foams. Such polymeric
structures,
especially when in fiber form, may be used, optionally along with other
physical structures such
as cellulosic fibers and thermoplastic water-insoluble polymer fibers, to form
fibrous structures.
Preferably the polymeric structure of the present invention as a whole has no
melting point or in
other words the polymeric structure is a non-thermoplastic polymeric
structure. It is also
desirable that the polymeric structure of the present invention be
substantially homogeneous.
"Fail Stretch" as used herein is defined by the following formula:
Length of Polymeric StructureF, - Length of Polymeric Structure, X 100%
Length of Polymeric Structure,
wherein:
Length of Polymeric StructureFL is the length of the polymeric structure at
failure load;
Length of Polymeric Structure, is the initial length of the polymeric
structure prior to stretching.
"Peak Stretch" as used herein is defined by the following formula:
Length of Polymeric StructureP-1 - Length of Polymeric Structure, X 100%
Length of Polymeric Structure,
wherein:
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
4
Length of Polymeric StructurePL is the length of the polymeric structure at
peak load;
Length of Polymeric Structure, is the initial length of the polymeric
structure prior to stretching.
The Strength of the Polymeric Structure is determined by measuring a polymeric
structure's Total Dry Tensile Strength (both MD and CD) or "TDT". TDT or
Stretch is measured
by providing one (1) inch by five (5) inch (2.5 cm X 12.7 cm) strips of
polymeric structure and/or
fibrous product comprising such polymeric structure in need of testing. Each
strip is placed on an
electronic tensile tester Model 1122 commercially available from Instron
Corp., Canton,
Massachusetts. The crosshead speed of the tensile tester is 2.0 inches per
minute (about 5.1
cm/minute) and the gauge length is 1.0 inch (about 2.54 cm). The tensile
tester calculates the
stretch at Peak Load and the stretch at Failure Load. Basically, the tensile
tester calculates the
stretches via the formulae described above. The Stretch at Peak Load, as used
herein, is the
average of the Stretch at Peak Load for MD and CD. The Stretch at Failure
Load, as used herein,
is the average of the Stretch at Failure Load for MD and CD.
"Machine direction" (or MD) is the direction parallel to the flow of the
polymeric
structure being made through the manufacturing equipment.
"Cross machine direction" (or CD) is the direction perpendicular to the
machine direction
and parallel to the general plane of the polymeric structure.
"Fiber" as used herein means a slender, thin, and highly flexible object
having a major
axis which is very long, compared to the fiber's two mutually-orthogonal axes
that are
perpendicular to the major axis. Preferably, an aspect ratio of the major's
axis length to an
equivalent diameter of the fiber's cross-section perpendicular to the major
axis is greater than
100/1, more specifically greater than 500/1, and still more specifically
greater than 1000/1, and
even more specifically, greater than 5000/1.
The fibers of the present invention may be continuous or substantially
continuous. A
fiber is continuous if it extends 100% of the MD length of the fibrous
structure and/or fibrous
product made therefrom. In one embodiment, a fiber is substantially continuous
if it extends
greater than about 30% and/or greater than about 50% and/or greater than about
70% of the MD
length of the fibrous structure and/or fibrous product made therefrom.
The fiber can have a fiber diameter as determined by the Fiber Diameter Test
Method
described herein of less than about 50 microns and/or less than about 20
microns and/or less than
about 10 microns and/or less than about 8 microns and/or less than about 6
microns.
The polymeric structures of the present invention, especially fibers of the
present
invention, may be produced by crosslinking hydroxyl polymers together. In one
embodiment, the
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
polymeric structure, especially in fiber form, formed as a result of the
crosslinking, as a whole,
exhibits no melting point. In other words, it degrades before melting.
Nonlimiting examples of a
suitable crosslinking system for achieving crosslinking comprises a
crosslinking agent and
optionally a crosslinking facilitator, wherein the hydroxyl polymer is
crosslinked by the
crosslinking agent.
The fibers comprising a hydroxyl polymer may include melt spun fibers, dry
spun fibers
and/or spunbond fibers, staple fibers, hollow fibers, shaped fibers, such as
multi-lobal fibers and
multicomponent fibers, especially bicomponent fibers. The multicomponent
fibers, especially
bicomponent fibers, may be in a side-by-side, sheath-core, segmented pie,
ribbon, islands-in-the-
sea configuration, or any combination thereof. The sheath may be continuous or
non-continuous
around the core. The ratio of the weight of the sheath to the core can be from
about 5:95 to about
95:5. The fibers of the present invention may have different geometries that
include round,
elliptical, star sbaped, rectangular, and other various eccentricities.
In another embodiment, the fibers comprising a hydroxyl polymer may include a
multiconstituent fiber, such as a multicomponent fiber, comprising a hydroxyl
polymer of the
present invention along with a thermoplastic, water-insoluble polymer. A
multicomponent fiber,
as used herein, means a fiber having more than one separate part in spatial
relationship to one
another. Multicomponent fibers include bicomponent fibers, which are defined
as fibers having
two separate parts in a spatial relationship to one another. The different
components of
multicomponent fibers can be arranged in substantially distinct regions across
the cross-section of
the fiber and extend continuously along the length of the fiber.
A nonlimiting example of such a multicomponent fiber, specifically a
bicomponent fiber,
is a bicomponent fiber in which the hydroxyl polymer represents the core of
the fiber and the
thermoplastic, water-insoluble polymer represents the sheath, which surrounds
or substantially
surrounds the core of the fiber. The polymer melt composition from which such
a fiber is derived
preferably includes the hydroxyl polymer and the thermoplastic, water-
insoluble polymer.
In another multicomponent, especially bicomponent, fiber embodiment, the
sheath may
comprise a hydroxyl polymer and a crosslinking system having a crosslinking
agent, and the core
may comprise a hydroxyl polymer and a crosslinking system having a
crosslinking agent. With
respect to the sheath and core, the hydroxyl polymer may be the same or
different and the
crosslinking agent may be the same or different. Further, the level of
hydroxyl polymer may be
the same or different and the level of crosslinking agent may be the same or
different.
One or more substantially continuous or continuous fibers of the present
invention may be
incorporated into a fibrous structure, such as a web. Such a fibrous structure
may ultimately be
incorporated into a commercial product, such as a single- or multi-ply fibrous
product, such as
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 6 PCT/US2005/015329
facial tissue, bath tissue, paper towels and/or wipes, feminine care products,
diapers, writing
papers, cores, such as tissue cores, and other types of paper products.
"Ply" or "Plies" as used herein means a single fibrous structure optionally to
be disposed
in a substantially contiguous, face-to-face relationship with other plies,
forming a multi-ply
fibrous product. It is also contemplated that a single fibrous structure can
effectively form two
"plies" or multiple "plies", for example, by being folded on itself. Ply or
plies can also exist as
films or other polymeric structures.
"Basis Weight" as used herein is the weight per unit area of a sample reported
in lbs/3000
ft2 or g/m2.
Basis weight is measured by preparing one or more samples of a certain area
(m2) and
weighing the sample(s) of a fibrous structure and/or film according to the
present invention on a
top loading balance with a minimum resolution of 0.01 g. The balance is
protected from air drafts
and other disturbances using a draft shield. Weights are recorded when the
readings on the
balance become constant. The average weight (g) is calculated and the average
area of the
samples (mZ). The basis weight (g/mZ) is calculated by dividing the average
weight (g) by the
average area of the samples (m2).
"Caliper" as used herein means the macroscopic thickness of a fibrous
structure, fibrous
product or film. Caliper of a fibrous structure, fibrous product or film
according to the present
invention is determined by cutting a sample of the fibrous structure, fibrous
product or film such
that it is larger in size than a load foot loading surface where the load foot
loading surface has a
circular surface area of about 3.14 inz. The sample is confined between a
horizontal flat surface
and the load foot loading surface. The load foot loading surface applies a
confining pressure to
the sample of 15.5 g/cmz (about 0.21 psi). The caliper is the resulting gap
between the flat surface
and the load foot loading surface. Such measurements can be obtained on a VIR
Electronic
Thickness Tester Model II available from Thwing-Albert Instrument Company,
Philadelphia, PA.
The caliper measurement is repeated and recorded at least five (5) times so
that an average caliper
can be calculated. The result is reported in millimeters. In one embodiment of
the present
invention, the fibrous structure exhibits an average caliper that is less than
its bulk caliper
"Apparent Density" or "Density" as used herein means the basis weight of a
sample
divided by the caliper with appropriate conversions incorporated therein.
Apparent density used
herein has the units g/cm3.
"Weight average molecular weight" as used herein means the weight average
molecular
weight as determined using gel permeation chromatography according to the
protocol found in
Colloids and Surfaces A. Physico Chemical & Engineering Aspects, Vol. 162,
2000, pg. 107-
121.
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
7
"Plasticity" as used herein means at least that a polymeric structure and/or
fibrous
structure exhibits a capability of being shaped, molded and/or formed.
"Fibrous product" as used includes but is not limited to a wiping implement
for post-
urinary and post-bowel movement cleaning (toilet tissue), for
otorhinolaryngological discharges
(facial tissue), and multi-functional absorbent and cleaning uses (absorbent
towels).
"Lint" and/or "Pills" as used herein means discrete pieces of a polymeric
structure,
especially a fibrous structure and/or fibrous product that become separated
from the original
polymeric structure and/or fibrous structure and/or fibrous product typically
during use.
Traditional toilet tissue and toweling are comprised essentially of short
cellulose fibers.
During the wiping process - both wet and dry, these short fibers can detach
from the structure and
become evident as lint or pills. The present invention employs essentially
continuous fibers vs.
traditional discrete, short cellulose fibers. Generally speaking, fibrous
structures of the present
invention resist linting vs. their cellulose cousins due to the continuous
nature of the fibers.
Furthermore, fibrous structures of the present invention will resist pilling
vs. their cellulose
cousins provided the bonding and fiber strength and stretch are sufficient
enough to prevent free
fiber breakage and entanglement with adjacent fibers during the wiping
process.
"Intensive Properties" and/or "Values of Common Intensive Properties" as used
herein
means density, basis weight, caliper, substrate thickness, elevation, opacity,
crepe frequency, and
any combination thereof. The fibrous structures of the present invention may
comprise two or
more regions that exhibit different values of common intensive properties
relative to each other.
In other words, a fibrous structure of the present invention may comprise one
region having a first
opacity value and a second region having a second opacity value different from
the first opacity
value. Such regions may be continuous, substantially continuous and/or
discontinuous.
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
8
"Dry spinning" and/or "Solvent spinning" as used herein means that polymeric
structures
are not spun into a coagulating bath, unlike wet spinning.
"Associated" as used herein with respect to fibers means that two or more
discrete fibers
are in close proximity to one another at one or more positions along the fiber
lengths, but less
than their entire lengths such that one fiber influences the actions of the
other fiber. Nonlimiting
examples of means for associating fibers include bonding together (adhesively
and/or chemically
and/or electrostatically) and/or fusing together such that at the point of
association one fiber unit
is formed.
"Non-associated" as used herein with respect to fibers means that the fibers
are not
associated as defined herein.
METHODS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
The methods of the present invention relate to producing polymeric structures
such as
fibers, films or foam from a PVOH polymer melt composition comprising a
hydroxyl polymer
comprising at least a PVOH hydroxyl polymer and/or to producing fibrous
structures comprising
a polymeric structure in fiber form.
In one nonlimiting embodiment of a method in accordance with the present
invention, as
described below, a PVOH polymer melt composition is polymer processed to form
a fiber. The
fiber can then be incorporated into a fibrous structure.
Any suitable process known to those skilled in the art can be used to produce
the polymer
melt composition and/or to polymer process the polymer melt composition and/or
to produce the
polymeric structure of the present invention. Nonlimiting examples of such
processes are
described in published applications: EP 1 035 239, EP 1 132 427, EP 1 217 106,
EP 1 217 107,
WO 03/066942 and US 5,342,225.
A. PVOH Polymer Melt Composition
"PVOH polymer melt composition" as used herein means a composition that
comprises a
melt processed hydroxyl polymer comprising at least a melt processed PVOH
hydroxyl polymer.
"Melt processed hydroxyl polymer" as used herein means any polymer that
contains greater than
10% and/or greater than 20% and/or greater than 25% by weight hydroxyl groups
and that has
been melt processed, with or without the aid of an external plasticizer and/or
with or without the
presence of a pH adjusting agent. More generally, melt processed hydroxyl
polymers include
polymers, which by the influence of elevated temperatures, pressure and/or
external plasticizers
may be softened to such a degree that they can be brought into a flowable
state (all melt
processing operations/processes), and in this condition may be shaped as
desired.
The PVOH polymer melt composition may be a composite containing a blend of
different
polymers, wherein at least one is a melt processed hydroxyl polymer according
to the present
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 9 PCT/US2005/015329
invention, and/or fillers both inorganic and organic, and/or fibers and/or
foaming agents. In one
embodiment, the PVOH polymer melt composition comprises two or more different
melt
processed hydroxyl polymers according to the present invention. As used
herein, "different melt
processed hydroxyl polymers" includes without limitation, melt processed
hydroxyl polymers that
contain at least one different moiety relative to another melt processed
hydroxyl polymer and/or
melt processed hydroxyl polymers that are members of different chemical
classes (e.g., PVOH
versus starch versus chitosan).
The PVOH polymer melt composition may already be formed or a melt processing
step
may need to be performed to convert a raw material hydroxyl polymer into a
melt processed
hydroxyl polymer, thus producing the PVOH polymer melt composition. Any
suitable melt
processing step known in the art may be used to convert the raw material
hydroxyl polymer into
the melt processed hydroxyl polymer.
The PVOH polymer melt composition may comprise a) from about 30% and/or 40%
and/or 45% and/or 50% to about 75% and/or 80% and/or 85% and/or 90% and/or
99.5% by
weight of the PVOH polymer melt composition of a hydroxyl polymer comprising
at least a
PVOH hydroxyl polymer; b) a crosslinking system comprising from about 0.1% to
about 10% by
weight of the PVOH polymer melt composition of a crosslinking agent; and c)
from about 0%
and/or 10% and/or 15% and/or 20% to about 50% and/or 55% and/or 60% and/or 70%
by weight
of the PVOH polymer melt composition of an external plasticizer (e.g., water).
B. Polymer Processing
"Polymer processing" as used herein means any operation and/or process by
which a
polymeric structure comprising a processed hydroxyl polymer is formed from a
PVOH polymer
melt composition. Nonlimiting examples of polymer processing operations
include extrusion,
molding and/or fiber spinning. Extrusion and molding (either casting or
blown), typically
produce films, sheets and various profile extrusions. Molding may include
injection molding,
blown molding and/or compression molding. Fiber spinning may include spun
bonding, melt
blowing, continuous fiber producing and/or tow fiber producing.
A "processed hydroxyl polymer" as used herein means any hydroxyl polymer that
has
undergone a melt processing operation and a subsequent polymer processing
operation.
C. Polymeric Structure
The PVOH polymer melt composition can be subjected to one or more polymer
processing operations such that the PVOH polymer melt composition is processed
into a
polymeric structure such as a fiber, film or foam comprising the hydroxyl
polymer and a
crosslinking system according to the present invention.
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
Post Treatment of Polymeric Structures
Once the PVOH polymer melt composition has been processed into a polymeric
structure,
such as a fiber, a film, a foam, or a plurality of fibers that together form a
fibrous structure, the
structure may be subjected to post-treatment curing and/or differential
densification.
Curing of the structure may occur before and/or after densifying a region of
the structure.
Preferably curing occurs before densifying a region of the structure.
In one embodiment, the structure produced via a polymer processing operation
may be
cured at a curing temperature of from about 110 C to about 200 C and/or from
about 120 C to
about 195 C and/or from about 130 C to about 185 C for a time period of from
about 0.01 and/or
I and/or 5 and/or 15 seconds to about 60 minutes and/or from about 20 seconds
to about 45
minutes and/or from about 30 seconds to about 30 minutes prior to densifying a
region of the
structure. Alternative curing methods may include radiation methods such as
UV, e-beam, IR and
other temperature-raising methods.
Further, the structure may also be cured at room temperature for days, either
after curing
at above room temperature or instead of curing at above room temperature.
The structure prior to being densified may comprise non-associated
substantially
continuous or continuous fibers comprising a hydroxyl polymer. Further, the
substantially
continuous or continuous fibers may comprise crosslinked hydroxyl polymers.
Even further yet,
the structure may comprise from about 10% and/or from about 15% and/or from
about 20% to
about 60% and/or to about 50% and/or to about 40% by weight of the structure
of moisture.
Before differential densification, the structure may be in the form of a non-
associated
structure, especially if the structure comprises one or more fibers. The
structure in such non-
differential densified form is inferior in intensive properties, especially
tensile (stretch), than its
wood-based cellulosic fibrous structure cousins.
Accordingly, the structure of the present invention may be subjected to
differential
densification via a differentially densifying operation. Such differential
densification can occur
on-line in a continuous process that includes forming the structure and then
differentially
densifying the structure. Alternatively, the differential densification can
occur off-line in a non-
continuous process.
Any differentially densifying process known to those of ordinary skill in the
art may be
used to differentially densify the structures of the present invention.
As a result of differential densification, the structure comprises two or more
regions that
exhibit different densities as compared to the other.
In one embodiment, the differentially densifying process comprises the step of
imparting
plasticity into a structure in need of differential densification such that
regions of different density
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 1 I PCT/US2005/015329
can be created in the structure. In other words, the differentially densifying
process comprises the
step of imparting plasticity into a structure in need of differential
densification such that a pattern
can be created in the structure. The pattern is designed to impart regions of
different densities in
the structure. Exposing the structure in need of differential densification to
a humid environment,
such as from about 20% to about 95% and/or from about 40% to about 90% and/or
from about
50% to about 85% and/or from about 65% to about 80% relative humidity for a
sufficient time,
such as at least 1 second and/or at least 3 seconds and/or at least 5 seconds,
can impart sufficient
plasticity to the structure to permit differential densification to be created
in the structure.
In one embodiment, the differentially densifying process comprises subjecting
the
structure to a patterned roller such that the pattern on the roller is
imparted to the structure, thus
causing the structure to become differentially densified.
In another embodiment, the differentially densifying process comprises
contacting the
structure, which is in contact with a patterned belt/fabric with pressure from
a smooth roller thus
imparting the pattern of the belt/fabric to the structure causing the
structure to become
differentially densified.
The differentially densifying of a structure in accordance with the present
invention
preferably occurs after the structure has been formed, not concurrent with the
formation of the
structure.
The structure of the present invention may be differentially densified more
than once. For
example, a structure may be differentially densified, then cured, and then
differentially densified
again according to the present invention.
In another embodiment, the structure may comprise two or more "plies" of
structure
which can then be differentially densified as a multi-ply structure.
The structure may be differentially densified, then differential densified
again and then
cured.
Alternatively, the structure of the present invention may be cured, then
differentially
densified according to the present invention
Curing of the structure, in accordance with the present invention, may occur
at any point
in time relative to any differentially densifying process. It may occur before
(preferably
immediately before), after (preferably immediately after), before and after
(preferably
immediately before and immediately after), or not at all.
The differentially densifying process may occur once or a plurality of times.
Ultrasonics may also be used to aid in differential densification of the
structure, especially
in conjunction with a patterned roller. The ultrasonics may be generated by
any suitable
ultrasonic device. For example, a horn or ultrasonic wave generator that is
capable of imparting
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 12 PCT/US2005/015329
energy to the structure such that the structure deforms according to the
pattern on the patterned
roller can be used.
In still another embodiment, the step of differentially densifying comprises
contacting the
fibrous structure with a structure-imparting element comprising a pattern in
the presence of
humidity and applying a force to the fibrous structure and/or structure-
imparting element such
that the fibrous structure takes the shape of the pattern on the structure-
imparting element to form
a differential densified polymeric structure.
In yet still another embodiment, step of differentially densifying the fibrous
structure
comprises sandwiching the fibrous structure between two belts in the presence
of humidity,
wherein at least one of the belts is a structured belt comprising a pattern
and applying a force to at
least one of the belts such that the fibrous structure takes the shape of the
pattern on the structured
belt to form a differential densified polymeric structure.
A nonlimiting example of a differential densification process for
differentially densifying
a structure in accordance with the present invention is provided below.
Differential Densification Example
A PVOH polymer melt composition containing approximately 40% water is extruded
from a twin screw extruder. Crosslinker and other additives are introduced
into the PVOH
polymer melt composition and mixed via in-line static mixers. The PVOH polymer
melt
composition with additives is then pumped to a meltblown style spinnerette
where fibers are
extruded and attenuated into fine fibers. Crosslinkers and additives used are
urea glyoxal adduct
("UGA"), ammonium sulfate, and acrylic latex. Total additives are typically
10% or less on a wt
% basis of dry hydroxyl polymer. The attenuated fibers are dried with
entrained hot air and
deposited on a collector belt. The collector belt is typically set at 22-25"
from the end of the
spinneretfe and the structure, a fibrous structure, formed on the coalector
belts is a non-associated
fibrous structure.
Fig. 1 schematically illustrates one embodiment of a differential
densification operation
10. After forming, the non-associated fibrous structure 12 is subjected to an
environmentally
controlled humid environment, such as in a humidity chamberl4. Typical
relative humidity range
is 70-78%. As the fibrous structure 12 is conveyed through the chamber 14, the
fine starch fibers
are plasticized, allowing differential densification to be possible. Upon
exiting the chamber 14,
the plasticized fibrous structure 12' is passed through a patterned nip 16 to
associate regions of
the fibrous structure, thus producing an associated fibrous structure 12". The
associated fibrous
structure regions 18 correspond to the pattern utilized on either the carrier
belt (not shown) or the
roller itself 20. One patterned belt employed has been a square weave open
mesh belt, available
from Albany International Inc and known as style "Filtratech 10". Nip pressure
varies depending
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
13
on the pattern employed, but is typically in the 200 - 300 pli range. The
fibers present in the
fibrous structure are now associated and the fibrous structure exhibits
excellent handling
properties. After a curing period for the crosslinking system and additives to
react, the associated
fibrous structure exhibits dry and wet properties acceptable for disposable
fibrous products and
can be used as a variety of disposable implements, especially toilet tissue or
toweling.
HYDROXYL POLYMERS
Hydroxyl polymers in accordance with the present invention include any
hydroxyl-
containing polymer that can be incorporated into a polymeric structure of the
present invention,
preferably in the form of a fiber.
In one embodiment, the hydroxyl polymer of the present invention includes
greater than
10% and/or greater than 20% and/or greater than 25% by weight hydroxyl
moieties.
Nonlimiting examples of hydroxyl polymers in accordance with the present
invention
include polyols, such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl alcohol derivatives,
starch, starch
derivatives, chitosan, chitosan derivatives, cellulose derivatives such as
cellulose ether and ester
derivatives, gums, arabinans, galactans, proteins and various other
polysaccharides and mixtures
thereof.
The hydroxyl polymer preferably has a weight average molecular weight of from
about
10,000 to about 40,000,000 g/mol. Higher and lower molecular weight hydroxyl
polymers may
be used in combination with hydroxyl polymers having the preferred weight
average molecular
weight.
Well known modifications of natural starches include chemical modifications
and/or
enzymatic modifications. For example, the natural starch can be acid-thinned,
hydroxy-ethylated
or hydroxy-propylated or oxidized.
"Polysaccharides" herein means natural polysaccharides and polysaccharide
derivatives
or modified polysaccharides. Suitable polysaccharides include, but are not
limited to, gums,
arabinans, galactans and mixtures thereof.
CROSSLINKING SYSTEM
The crosslinking system of the present invention may further comprise, in
addition to the
crosslinking agent, a crosslinking facilitator.
"Crosslinking facilitator" as used herein means any material that is capable
of activating a
crosslinking agent thereby transforming the crosslinking agent from its
unactivated state to its
activated state. In other words, when a crosslinking agent is in its
unactivated state, the hydroxyl
polymer present in the PVOH polymer melt composition does not undergo
premature crosslinking
("unacceptable" crosslinking) as determined according to the Shear Viscosity
Change Test
Method described herein.
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
14
When a crosslinking agent in accordance with the present invention is in its
activated
state, the hydroxyl polymer present in the polymeric structure may, and
preferably does, undergo
acceptable crosslinking via the crosslinking agent as determined according to
the Initial Total Wet
Tensile Test Method described herein.
The crosslinking facilitator may include derivatives of the material that may
exist after the
transformation/activation of the crosslinking agent. For example, a
crosslinking facilitator salt
being chemically changed to its acid form and vice versa.
A crosslinking system may be present in the PVOH polymer melt composition
and/or
may be added to the PVOH polymer melt composition before polymer processing of
the PVOH
polymer melt composition.
Nonlimiting examples of suitable crosslinking facilitators include acids
having a pKa of
between about 0 and about 6 and/or between about 1.5 and about 6 and/or
between about 2 and
about 6 or salts thereof. The crosslinking facilitators may be Bronsted Acids
and/or salts thereof,
preferably ammonium salts thereof.
In addition, metal salts, such as magnesium and zinc salts, can be used alone
or in
combination with Bronsted Acids and/or salts thereof, as crosslinking
facilitators.
Nonlimiting examples of suitable crosslinking facilitators include acetic
acid, benzoic
acid, citric acid, formic acid, glycolic acid, lactic acid, maleic acid,
phthalic acid, phosphoric acid,
sulfuric acid, succinic acid and mixtures thereof and/or their salts,
preferably their ammonium
salts, such as ammonium glycolate, ammonium citrate and ammonium sulfate.
Nonlimiting examples of suitable crosslinking agents include polycarboxylic
acids,
imidazolidinones and other compounds resulting from alkyl substituted or
unsubstituted cyclic
adducts of glyoxal with ureas, thioureas, guanidines, methylene diamides, and
methylene
dicarbamates and derivatives thereof; and mixtures thereof.
TEST METHODS
All tests described herein including those described under the Definitions
section and the
following test methods are conducted on samples that have been conditioned in
a conditioned
room at a temperature of 73 F 4 F (about 23 C 2.2 C) and a relative
humidity of 50% 10%
for 24 hours prior to the test. Further, all tests are conducted in such
conditioned room. Tested
samples and felts should be subjected to 73 F 4 F (about 23 C 2.2 C) and a
relative humidity
of 50% 10% for 24 hours prior to capturing images.
A. Lint/Pilling Test Method
i. SAMPLE PREPARATION
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
Prior to the testing, fibrous product samples, 4.5" x 16" strips of fibrous
product, are
conditioned according to Tappi Method #T4020M-88.
Each fibrous product sample (6 samples if testing both sides, 3 samples if
testing a single
side) is first prepared by removing and discarding any pieces of the sample
which might have
been abraded in handling. For fibrous products formed from multiple plies of
fibrous structure,
this test can be used to make a lint measurement on the multi-ply fibrous
product, or, if the plies
can be separated without damaging the fibrous product, a measurement can be
taken on the
individual plies making up the fibrous product. If a given sample differs from
surface to surface,
it is necessary to test both surfaces and average the scores in order to
arrive at a composite lint
score. In some cases, fibrous products are made from multiple-plies of fibrous
structures such
that the facing-out surfaces are identical, in which case it is only necessary
to test one surface.
Each sample is folded upon itself to make a 4.5" CD x 4" MD sample. For two-
surface
testing, make up 3 (4.5" CD x 4" MD) samples with a first surface "out" and 3
(4.5" CD x 4" MD)
samples with the second surface "out". Keep track of which samples are first
surface "out" and
which are second surface "out".
Obtain a 30" x 40" piece of Crescent #300 cardboard from Cordage Inc. (800 E.
Ross
Road, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45217). Using a paper cutter, cut out six pieces of
cardboard of
dimensions of 2.5" x 6". Puncture two holes into each of the six pieces of
cardboard by forcing
the cardboard onto the hold down pins of the Sutherland Rub tester.
Center and carefully place each of the cardboard pieces on top of the six (two
surface
testing) or three (single surface testing) previously folded samples. Make
sure the 6" dimension of
the cardboard is running parallel to the machine direction (MD) of each of the
samples.
Fold one edge of the exposed portion of the sample onto the back of the
cardboard.
Secure this edge to the cardboard with adhesive tape obtained from 3M Inc.
(3/4" wide Scotch
Brand, St. Paul, Minn.). Carefully grasp the other over-hanging tissue edge
and snugly fold it over
onto the back of the cardboard. While maintaining a snug fit of the sample
onto the cardboard,
tape this second edge to the back of the cardboard. Repeat this procedure for
each sample.
Turn over each sample and tape the cross direction edges of the sample to the
cardboard
for the dry lint/pilling test. One half of the adhesive tape should contact
the sample while the other
half is adhering to the cardboard. Repeat this procedure for each of the
samples. If the sample
breaks, tears, or becomes frayed at any time during the course of this sample
preparation
procedure, discard and make up a new sample with a sample strip.
For the wet lint/pilling test, tape the leading cross direction edge of the
sample to the
cardboard and a table top upon which the sample is placed. Position the sample
on the cardboard
such that the trailing edge of the sample is approximately 1/4" from the
cardboard edge. The
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
16
leading edge of the sample is taped to the cardboard and table top such that
the opposite (trailing)
edge of the cardboard is positioned at the edge of the table top.
There will now be 3 first surface "out" samples on cardboard and (optionally)
3 second
surface "out" samples on cardboard.
ii. FELT PREPARATION
Obtain a 30" x 40" piece of Crescent #300 cardboard from Cordage Inc. (800 E.
Ross
Road, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45217). Using a paper cutter, cut out six pieces of
cardboard of
dimensions of 2.25" x 7.25". Draw two lines parallel to the short dimension
and down 1.125"
from the top and bottom most edges on the white side of the cardboard.
Carefully score the length
of the line with a razor blade using a straight edge as a guide. Score it to a
depth about half way
through the thickness of the sheet. This scoring allows the felt/cardboard
combination to fit tightly
around the weight of the Sutherland Rub tester. Draw an arrow running parallel
to the long
dimension of the cardboard on this scored side of the cardboard.
Cut six pieces of a black felt (F-55 or equivalent from New England Gasket,
550 Broad
Street, Bristol, Conn. 06010) to the dimensions of 2.25" x 8.5" x 0.0625".
Place the felt on top of
the unscored, green side of the cardboard such that the long edges of both the
felt and cardboard
are parallel and in alignment. Also allow about 0.5" of the black felt to
overhang the top and
bottom most edges of the cardboard. Snugly fold over both overhanging felt
edges onto the
backside of the cardboard with Scotch brand tape, alternatively, the felt can
be snugly fit to the
cardboard when attaching the felt/cardboard combination to the weight,
discussed below. Prepare
a total of six of these felt/cardboard combinations.
For the wet lint/pilling test, the felt/cardboard combination includes a 9"
strip of Scotch
brand tape (0.75" wide) that is placed along each edge of the felt (parallel
to the long side of the
felt) on the felt side that will be contacting the sample. The untapped felt
between the two tape
strips has a width between 18-21 mm. Three marks are placed on one of the
strips of tape at 0, 4
and 8 centimeters from the trailing back edge of the felt.
All samples must be run with the same lot of felt.
iii. FELT/CARDBOARD/WEIGHT COMPONENT
The felt/cardboard combination is associated with a weight. The weight may
include a
clamping device to attach the felt/cardboard combination to the weight. The
weight and any
clamping device totals five (5) pounds. The weight is available from Danilee
Company, San
Antonio, TX. The weight has an effective contact area of 25.81 emZ (4 in2) and
provides a contact
pressure of about 1.25 psi.
iv. CONDUCTING DRY LINT/PILLS TEST
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
17
The amount of dry lint and/or dry pills generated from a fibrous product
according to the
present invention is determined with a Sutherland Rub Tester (available from
Danilee Company,
San Antonio, TX). This tester uses a motor to rub a felt/cardboard/weight
component 5 times
(back and forth) over the fibrous product, while the fibrous product is
restrained in a stationary
position. The gray value of the felt is measured before and after the rub
test. The difference
between these two gray values is then used to calculate a dry lint score
and/or a dry pill score.
The Sutherland Rub Tester must first be calibrated prior to use. First, turn
on the
Sutherland Rub Tester pressing the "reset" button. Set the tester to run 5
strokes at the lower of
the two speeds. One stroke is a single and complete forward and reverse motion
of the weight.
The end of the rubbing block should be in the position closest to the operator
at the beginning and
at the end of each test.
Prepare a calibration sample on cardboard as described above. In addition,
prepare a
calibration felt on cardboard as described above. Both of these calibration
articles will be used for
calibration of the instrument and will not be used in the acquisition of data
for the actual samples.
Place the calibration sample/cardboard combination on the base plate of the
tester by
slipping the holes in the board over the hold-down pins. The hold-down pins
prevent the sample
from moving during the test. Clip the calibration felt/cardboard combination
onto the weight
component described above with the cardboard side contacting the pads of the
weight. Make sure
the calibration felt/cardboard combination is resting flat against the weight.
Hook this weight onto
the tester arm of the Sutherland Rub Tester gently placing it on top of the
calibration
sample/cardboard combination. The calibration felt must rest level on the
calibration sample and
must be in 100% contact with the calibration sample surface. Activate the
Sutherland Rub Tester
by pressing the "start" button.
Keep a count of the number of strokes and observe and make a mental note of
the starting
and stopping position of the calibration felt covered weight in relationship
to the calibration
sample. If the total number of strokes is five and if the position of the
calibration felt covered
weight is the same at the end as it was in the beginning of the test, the
tester is calibrated and
ready to use. If the total number of strokes is not five or if the start and
end positions of the
calibration felt covered weight are different, then instrument may require
servicing and/or
recalibration. During the actual testing of samples, monitor and observe the
stroke count and the
starting and ending points of the felt covered weight.
v. CONDUCTING WET LINT/PILLS TEST
Wet lint/pills are determined by pulling, during one pass, a wetted
felt/cardboard/weight
component over a sample.
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 18 PCT/US2005/015329
To wet the felt, pipet 0.6 ml of deionized water onto the felt, distributing
the water as
evenly as possible between the 4 and 8 cm marks as represented on the tape
attached to the felt.
Wait 10 seconds and then place the felt/cardboard/weight component on the
center of the sample.
After 1 second, pull the felt/cardboard/weight component by the leading edge
horizontally until
the felt/cardboard/weight component is completely off the table. Pull the
weight in a manner to
avoid placing any additional force on the felt/cardboard/weight component
other than the
horizontal pull force. The process of pulling the felt/cardboard/weight
component takes about 0.5
to 1.5 seconds. The pulling process should occur as a substantially continuous
or continuous
motion.
Carefully remove the felt/cardboard combination from the felt/cardboard/weight
component and allow to dry before capturing the image. Then complete image
analysis
operations and calculations on the felt and/or sample as described below.
vi. IMAGE CAPTURE
The images of the felt (untested), sample (untested) and felt (tested) are
captured using a
Nikon Digital Camera (DIX) with a Nikon Nikkor 24-85 mm f2.8-f4 D 1 F AF lens
(set to 85 mm
maximum zoom) and Nikon Capture software installed on an appropriate computer.
As
schematically illustrated in Fig. 2, the camera 22 attached to a Kodak camera
stand/lighting set-up
(not shown) having four incandescent lamps 24 (Polaroid MP-4 Land Camera model
44-22, 120
volt 150 watts each) that are directed at the felt 26 positioned 31 cm (12.2
inches) under the lens
of the mounted camera. The individual incandescent lamps 24 are positioned
27.94 cm (11
inches) apart. Each pair of incandescent lamps 24 are positioned 88.9 cm (35
inches) apart. The
incandescent lamps 24 are positioned 56.83 cm (22 3/8 inches) above the felt
26. The camera is
connected via an appropriate cable to the computer. The camera should be
turned on in PC mode.
Turn the button to macro on the camera lens and flip the switch to the orange
mark on the lens
base. Adjust zoom to its maximum level of 85 mm. Turn the auto focus feature
off. The Nikon
Capture software needs to be in operating order to capture images. The
settings for the Nikon
Capture software are as follows: Exposure 1- manual exposure mode, 1/30 second
shutter speed,
f/6.3 aperture and 0EV exposure compensation; Exposure 2 - center weighted
meter mode, ISO
125 sensitivity and incandescent white balance; Storage Settings - raw (12
bit) data format, no
compression, color image type and large (3008 x 1960) image size; Mechanical -
single shooting
mode, single area AF area mode, manual focus mode. A calibration
felt/cardboard combination is
placed under the camera such that the felt is centered under the lens of the
camera. Manually
focus the camera on the felt. Take an image. The exposure difference needs to
be in the range of
+2.5 to +2,75. Save the image as a TIFF file (RGB) 8-bit. This image is used
to perform the lint
and pilling calculations in the Image Analysis Software (Optimas 6.5).
Additional images of the
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 19 PCT/US2005/015329
sample/cardboard combination (untested) and the felt/cardboard combination
(tested) need to be
captured in the same manner. Also, an image of a known length standard (e.g.,
a ruler) is taken
(exposure difference does not matter for this image).
vii. IMAGE ANALYSIS
The images captured are analyzed using Optimas 6.5 Image Analysis software
commercially available from Media Cybernetics, L.P. Imaging set-up parameters,
as listed
herein, must be strictly adhered to in order to have meaningfully comparative
lint score and pill
score results.
First, an image with a known length standard (e.g., a ruler) is brought up in
Optimas, and
used to calibrate length units (millimeters in this case).
For dry testing, the tested felt image has a region of interest (ROI area) of
approximately
4510 mm2 (82 mm by 55 mm). The exact ROI area is measured and recorded
(variable name:
ROI area).
For wet lint/pills testing, the tested felt image has 2 regions of interest
(ROI areas):
1) the "wetted" region (between the 4-8 cm marks on the tape) and 2) the
"dragged" region
(between the 0-4 cm marks on the tape). Each ROI area is approximately 608 mmz
(38 mm x 16
mm). The exact ROI area is measured and recorded (variable name: ROI area).
An image of an untested black felt is opened, and the average gray value
(using the same
ROI of the untested felt as the tested felt) is measured and recorded
(variable name: untested felt
Gray Value avg).
The tested sample luminance is saturated white (gray value = 255) and constant
for
samples of interest. If believed to be different, measure the tested sample in
a similar fashion as
was done for the untested felt, and record (variable name: untested sample
Gray Value avg).
The luminance threshold is calculated as the numerical average of the untested
felt Gray
Value avg and untested sample Gray Value avg.
The tested felt image is opened, and the ROI is created and properly
positioned such that
the ROI surrounds the region of the tested felt image to be analyzed. The
average luminance for
the ROI is recorded (variable name: ROI Gray Value avg).
Pills are determined as follows: Optimas creates boundary lines in the image
where pixel
luminance values cross through the threshold value (e.g., if the threshold a
Gray Value of 155,
boundary lines are created where pixels of higher and lower value exist on
either side. The
criteria for determining a pill is that it must have an average luminance
greater than the threshold
value, and have a perimeter length greater than 2 mm for dry pills, and 0.5 mm
for wet pills. The
pill areas present in the ROI are summed (variable name: Total Pilled Area).
viii. CALCULATIONS
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 20 PCT/US2005/015329
The data obtained from the image analysis is used in the following
calculations: Pilled
Area % = Total Pilled Area / ROI area
Avg. Pill Size (Area Weighted Avg., mm2) =I (Pilled Areas)2 /Total Pilled Area
Lint Score = unpilled felt Gray Value avg - untested felt Gray Value avg
where: unpilled felt Gray Value avg = [(ROI Gray Value avg * ROI area )-
(pilled Gray Value avg * pilled area)] / Total Unpilled Area
Total Area Lint & Pill Score = ROI Gray Value avg - untested felt Gray Value
avg
By taking the average of the lint score on the first-side surface and the
second-side
surface, the lint is obtained which is applicable to that particular web or
product. In other words,
to calculate lint score, the following formula is used:
Dry Lint Score = Dry Lint Score, IS' side + Dry Lint Score, 2"d side
2
Dry Pill Area % = Dry Pill Area%, Is' side + Dry Pill Area %, 2"a side
2
Wet Lint Score =[(Wetted Area Lint Score + Dragged Area Lint Score)15' side +
(Wetted Area Lint Score + Dragged Area Lint Score)2d side]
2
Wet Pill Area % = [(Wetted Area Pill Area % + Dragged Area Pill Area %)1S'
side +
(Wetted Area Pill Area% + Dragged Area Pill Area %)2 d side]
2
B. Shear Viscosity of a Polymer Melt Composition Measurement Test Method
The shear viscosity of a polymer melt composition of the present invention is
measured
using a capillary rheometer, Goettfert Rheograph 6000, manufactured by
Goettfert USA of Rock
Hill SC, USA. The measurements are conducted using a capillary die having a
diameter D of 1.0
mm and a length L of 30 mm (i.e., L/D = 30). The die is attached to the lower
end of the
rheometer's 20 mm barrel, which is held at a die test temperature of 75 C. A
preheated to die test
temperature, 60 g sample of the polymer melt composition is loaded into the
barrel section of the
rheometer. Rid the sample of any entrapped air. Push the sample from the
barrel through the
capillary die at a set of chosen rates 1,000-10,000 seconds"'. An apparent
shear viscosity can be
calculated with the rheometer's software from the pressure drop the sample
experiences as it goes
from the barrel through the capillary die and the flow rate of the sample
through the capillary die.
The log (apparent shear viscosity) can be plotted against log (shear rate) and
the plot can be fitted
by the power law, according to the formula
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
21
r1= K-yn'1, wherein K is the material's viscosity constant, n is the
material's thinning index and y
is the shear rate. The reported apparent shear viscosity of the composition
herein is calculated
from an interpolation to a shear rate of 3,000 sec 1 using the power law
relation.
C. Shear Viscosity Chan2e Test Method
Viscosities of three samples of a single polymer melt composition of the
present invention
comprising a crosslinking system to be tested are measured by filling three
separate 60cc
syringes; the shear viscosity of one sample is measured immediately (initial
shear viscosity) (it
takes about 10 minutes from the time the sample is placed in the rheometer to
get the first
reading) according to the Shear Viscosity of a Polymer Melt Composition
Measurement Test
Method. If the initial shear viscosity of the first sample is not within the
range of 5-8
Pascal=Seconds as measured at a shear rate of 3,000 sec-1, then the single
polymer melt
composition has to be adjusted such that the single polymer melt composition's
initial shear
viscosity is within the range of 5-8 Pascal=Seconds as measured at a shear
rate of 3,000 sec" and
this Shear Viscosity Change Test Method is then repeated. Once the initial
shear viscosity of the
polymer melt composition is within the range of 5-8 Pascal=Seconds as measured
at a shear rate of
3,000 sec-1, then the other two samples are measured by the same test method
after being stored
in a convection oven at 80 C for 70 and 130 minutes, respectively. The shear
viscosity at 3000
sec-1 for the 70 and 130 minute samples is divided by the initial shear
viscosity to obtain a
normalized shear viscosity change for the 70 and 130 minute samples. If the
normalized shear
viscosity change is 1.3 times or greater after 70 minutes and/or is 2 times or
greater after 130
minutes, then the crosslinking system within the polymer melt composition is
unacceptable, and
thus is not within the scope of the present invention. However, if the
normalized shear viscosity
change is less than 1.3 times after 70 minutes and/or (preferably and) is less
than 2 times after 130
minutes, then the crosslinking system is not unacceptable, and thus it is
within the scope of the
present invention with respect to polymer melt compositions comprising the
crosslinking system.
Preferably, the crosslinking system is acceptable with respect to polymeric
structures derived
from polymer melt compositions comprising the crosslinking system as
determined by the Initial
Total Wet Tensile Test Method.
Preferably, the normalized shear viscosity changes will be less than 1.2 times
after 70
minutes and/or less than 1.7 times after 130 minutes; more preferably less
than 1.1 times after 70
minutes and/or less than 1.4 times after 130 minutes.
D. Initial Total Wet Tensile Test Method
An electronic tensile tester (Thwing-Albert EJA Materials Tester, Thwing-
Albert
Instrument Co., 10960 Dutton Rd., Philadelphia, Pa., 19154) is used and
operated at a crosshead
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 PCT/US2005/015329
22
speed of 4.0 inch (about 10.16 cm) per minute and a gauge length of 1.0 inch
(about 2.54 cm),
using a strip of a polymeric structure of 1 inch wide and a length greater
than 3 inches long. The
two ends of the strip are placed in the upper jaws of the machine, and the
center of the strip is
placed around a stainless steel peg (0.5 cm in diameter). After verifying that
the strip is bent
evenly around the steel peg, the strip is soaked in distilled water at about
20 C for a soak time of
seconds before initiating cross-head movement. The initial result of the test
is an array of data
in the form load (grams force) versus crosshead displacement (centimeters from
starting point).
The sample is tested in two orientations, referred to here as MD (machine
direction, i.e.,
in the same direction as the continuously wound reel and forming fabric) and
CD (cross-machine
direction, i.e., 90 from MD). The MD and CD wet tensile strengths are
determined using the
above equipment and calculations in the following manner:
Initial Total Wet Tensile = ITWT (gWinch) = Peak LoadMD (gf) / 2(inchWidth) +
Peak LoadCp (gf) / 2 (inchWidtn)
The Initial Total Wet Tensile value is then normalized for the basis weight of
the strip
from which it was tested. The normalized basis weight used is 36 g/mZ, and is
calculated as
follows:
Normalized {ITWT} ={ITWT} * 36 (g/m 2) / Basis Weight of Strip (g/mZ)
If the initial total wet tensile of a polymeric structure, especially a
fibrous structure and/or
fibrous product comprising a polymeric structure comprising a crosslinking
system of the present
invention is at least 3 g/2.54 cm (3 g/in) and/or at least 4 g/2.54 cm (4
g/in) and/or at least 5
g/2.54 cm (5 g/in), then the crosslinking system is acceptable and is, along
with its corresponding
polymeric structure and/or fibrous structure and/or fibrous product, within
the scope of the present
invention.
E. Fiber Diameter Test Method
A polymeric structure comprising fibers of appropriate basis weight
(approximately 5 to
20 grams/square meter) is cut into a rectangular shape, approximately 20 mm by
35 mm. The
sample is then coated using a SEM sputter coater (EMS Inc, PA, USA) with gold
so as to make
the fibers relatively opaque. Typical coating thickness is between 50 and 250
nm. The sample is
then mounted between two standard microscope slides and compressed together
using small
binder clips. The sample is imaged using a lOX objective on an Olympus BHS
microscope with
the microscope light-collimating lens moved as far from the objective lens as
possible. Images
are captured using a Nikon Dl digital camera. A Glass microscope micrometer is
used to
calibrate the spatial distances of the images. The approximate resolution of
the images is I
m/pixel. Images will typically show a distinct bimodal distribution in the
intensity histogram
corresponding to the fibers and the background. Camera adjustments or
different basis weights
CA 02564144 2006-10-24
WO 2005/108658 23 PCT/US2005/015329
are used to achieve an acceptable bimodal distribution. Typically 10 images
per sample are taken
and the image analysis results averaged.
The images are analyzed in a similar manner to that described by B.
Pourdeyhimi, R. and
R. Dent in "Measuring fiber diameter distribution in nonwovens" (Textile Res.
J. 69(4) 233-236,
1999). Digital images are analyzed by computer using the MATLAB (Version. 6.3)
and the
MATLAB Image Processing Tool Box (Version 3.)The image is first converted into
a grayscale.
The image is then binarized into black and white pixels using a threshold
value that minimizes the
intraclass variance of the thresholded black and white pixels. Once the image
has been binarized,
the image is skeltonized to locate the center of each fiber in the image. The
distance transform of
the binarized image is also computed. The scalar product of the skeltonized
image and the
distance map provides an image whose pixel intensity is either zero or the
radius of the fiber at
that location. Pixels within one radius of the junction between two
overlapping fibers are not
counted if the distance they represent is smaller than the radius of the
junction. The remaining
pixels are then used to compute a length-weighted histogram of fiber diameters
contained in the
image.
All documents cited in the Detailed Description of the Invention are, in
relevant part,
incorporated herein by reference; the citation of any document is not to be
considered as an
admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated
and described,
it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and
modifications can be
made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is
therefore intended to
cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are
within the scope of this
invention.
