Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRETREATED FEEDSTOCK
[0001] The present invention relates to a process for producing a pretreated
feedstock, more particularly to a process for producing cellulose-containing
pretreated
feedstock.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Fuel ethanol is currently produced from feedstocks such as cornstarch,
sugar cane, and sugar beets. However, the production of ethanol from these
sources
cannot expand much further due to limited farmland suitable for the production
of such
crops and competing interests with the human and animal food chain. The use of
fossil
fuels, with the associated release of carbon dioxide and other products, in
the conversion
process is a negative environmental impact of the use of these feedstocks
[0003] The production of fuel ethanol from cellulose-containing feedstocks,
such
as agricultural wastes, grasses, forestry wastes, and sugar processing
residues has
received much attention due to the availability of large amounts of these
inexpensive
feedstocks and the cleanliness of ethanol as a fuel compared to gasoline. In
addition, a
byproduct of the cellulose conversion process, lignin, can be used as a fuel
to power the
cellulose conversion process, thereby avoiding the use of fossil fuels.
Studies have
shown that, taking the entire cycle into account, the use of ethanol produced
from
cellulose generates close to nil greenhouse gases.
[0004] The cellulosic feedstocks that may be used for ethanol production
include
agricultural wastes such as corn stover, wheat straw, barley straw, canola
straw, and
soybean stover. Grasses such as switch grass, miscanthus, cord grass, and reed
canary
grass may also be used.
[0005] Cellulose consists of a crystalline structure that is very resistant to
breakdown, as is hemicellulose, the second most prevalent component of these
feedstocks. The conversion of cellulosic fibers to ethanol requires liberating
cellulose
and hemicellulose from lignin or increasing the accessibility of cellulose and
1
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
hemicellulose within the cellulosic feedstock to cellulase enzymes,
depolymerizing
hemicellulose and cellulose carbohydrate polymers to free sugars and,
fermenting the
mixed hexose and pentose sugars to ethanol.
[0006] The feedstock is conveyed into the plant and the feedstock particles
are
typically reduced to a desired size suitable for handling in subsequent
processing steps.
[0007] Among well-known methods used to convert cellulose to sugars is an acid
hydrolysis process involving the use of steam and acid at a temperature, acid
concentration and length of time sufficient to hydrolyze the cellulose to
glucose
(Grethlein, 1978, J. Appl.Chem. Biotechnol. 28:296-308).
[0008] An alternative method of cellulose hydrolysis is.an acid prehydrolysis
(or
pre-treatment) followed by enzymatic hydrolysis. In this sequence, the
cellulosic
material is first pretreated using the acid hydrolysis process described
above, but at
milder temperatures, acid concentration and treatment time. This pretreatment
process is
thought to increase the accessibility of cellulose within the cellulosic
fibers for
subsequent enzymatic conversion steps, but results in little conversion of the
cellulose to
glucose itself. In the next step, the pretreated feedstock is adjusted to an
appropriate
temperature and pH and then submitted to enzymatic conversion by cellulase
enzymes.
[0009] The hydrolysis of the cellulose, whether by acid or by cellulase
enzymes,
is followed by the fermentation of the sugar to ethanol, which is then
recovered by
distillation.
[0010] The efficient conversion of cellulose from cellulosic material into
sugars
and the subsequent fermentation of sugars to ethanol are faced with major
challenges
regarding commercially viability. In particular, the feedstock particles are
often too large
to be efficiently handled or processed. One desirable type of handling system
that
requires small particles is pumping. In dry processes, for particle size
reduction, water is
not added to the feedstock. Dry processes which include grinding, milling or
crushing,
require large amounts of power that adds to the cost of the overall process.
Furthermore,
dry processing to a small particle size suitable for pumping is unlikely to be
successful
2
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
for feedstocks having high or variable moisture contents. Some feedstocks
containing
20% or higher moisture frequently blind the milling equipment, and it does not
provide a
sustainable or suitable size reduction. The alternatives are wet grinding
processes or
apparatus that make use of equipment such as using refiners or hydropulpers;
however,
wet grinding also requires costly equipment and high power usages.
Furthermore, wet
grinding produces a material that is very dilute and costly to handle and
process.
[0011] A second problem with the conversion process is that the acid
requirement
in the pretreatment process is very high. Many feedstocks, such as straws and
corn
stover, contain a high native alkalinity that requires the addition of 0.5% to
6% w/w (of
the feedstock) of sulfuric acid to achieve an efficient hydrolysis of the
hemicellulose and
exposure of the cellulose surface area. A significant amount of this acid
serves to offset
the alkalinity inherent within the feedstock. This high acid usage not only
increases the
cost of the process, but can also cause degradation of the xylose and other
products
during the pretreatment process.
[0012] WO 02/070753 (Griffin et. al.) describes a leaching process comprising
contacting the feedstock with water for at least two minutes to leach out the
salts, protein,
and other impurities, followed by removal of the water and soluble compounds.
The
process of Griffin et. al. removes alkali from lignocellulosic feedstocks,
thereby
decreasing the acid requirement for pretreatment. Griffin requires particle
size reduction,
but the processes consume a high level of power and, in combination with the
equipment
required to carry out the leaching process, result in increased overall
process costs.
[0013] The use of presses for dewatering biomass is known in the art. For
example, US 4,436,028 (Wilder) describes the use of a hammermill to greatly
reduce
particle size followed by a two-roll mill exerting severe pressure to decrease
the moisture
content of waste material. Similarly, US 4,525,172 (Eriksson) teaches the
dewatering of
biomass using presses with sieving drums. However, these methods do not result
in the
grinding, shearing, or particle size reduction of the biomass during pressing
or
dewatering. This results in high capital and operating costs without achieving
the
necessary particle size reduction.
3
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[0014] US 4,543,881 (Anderson) discloses an apparatus for dewatering peat
which includes an outer tubular roll and a smaller inner roll received in the
outer roll.
The smaller inner roll rotates so that its outer surface moves along the inner
surface of the
outer tubular roll, thereby compressing peat placed between the rolls to
effect dewatering.
By operating the rolls at different speeds, shear forces and compression
forces act on the
peat. However, the purpose of the roll compression apparatus is to dewater the
peat and
not to reduce particle size.
[0015] US 2,828,081 (Collins) describes the use of roll presses to separate
cork
from phloem tissue on dry bark. A dried cork-rich fraction is passed through a
differential speed roller mill that, through shearing action, breaks up the
cork aggregates
without substantially reducing the cork particle size. This process is not
designed for size
reduction of the particles of the material. As well, bark is not suitable for
ethanol
production.
[0016] In order to address the need for further particle size reduction of
biomass,
various approaches have been taken. For example, US 6,036,818 (Odmark)
describes a
pulp dewatering device having two rolls through which the pulp is pressed (a
roll press).
As the pulp passes through the rolls, a doctor blade disintegrates and guides
the pulp out
of the press, and the pulp is further disintegrated by a screw disintegrator.
US 5,451,296
(Pikulin), teaches the use of a thickening unit (e.g. a twin roll press) to
remove excess
liquid from low consistency pulp. The resulting high consistency pulp is
conveyed to a
comminuting unit, such as a fluffer, to generate pulp particles of 10 mm or
less. The roll
presses used in either US 6,036,818 or US 5,451,296 do not convey grind,
shear, or
reduce the particle size of the pulp. Rather, additional equipment is required
to
accomplish particle size reduction, thus increasing both equipment and energy
costs for
the overall process.
[0017] US 4,728,044 (Duill and Brummer) discloses a system for grinding and
drying damp initial material. The starting material is pre-comminuted by a
hammer mill
while being dried with hot gas. Following further drying in a rising main, the
material is
further comminuted in the nip between the rollers of a high-pressure roll. The
finished
4
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
material emerges as dried and ground raw material. Although the process is
suitable for
the grinding and drying of materials such as raw cement meal, cement clinker,
ore, coal
and the like, the further processing of feedstock to produce ethanol is not
addressed.
None of the suitable feedstocks for ethanol production are mentioned.
[0018] US 4,237,226 (Grethlein) describes milling of dry oak wood chips in a
laboratory setting using a Wiley mill to produce a sawdust-like product. The
ground
chips pass through a screen of 60 mesh, then are slurried in water at a ratio
of water to
solids of 18.5 to 1 by weight prior to feeding the slurry to a continuous
pretreatment
reactor. The Wiley mill is not suited for use with fiber with over 20%
moisture content,
and exhibits high power consumption. Furthermore, there is no disclosure of
commercial-scale equipment that may be used to carry out these processing
steps.
[0019] Millett et al. (Biotechnol. & Bioeng. Symp. No. 6 (1976) 125-153)
disclose several physical treatments for the preparation of feedstocks,
including dry ball
milling, wet ball milling and vibratory ball milling. The production of fine
particles by
dry ball milling adds substantially to the cost of the process, while wet ball
milling for 72
hours increased the digestibility of cellulose by rumen bacteria. However, 72
hours is not
a practical treatment time in a production process, and there is no mention of
subsequent
pretreatment or enzymatic hydrolysis. Vibratory ball milling of dry spruce and
aspen
chips for 30 minutes at 220 C was found to increase the rate of enzymatic
hydrolysis.
However, this treatment adds considerable expense to the process.
[0020] US 3,554,453 (Thale et al.) discloses an apparatus for shredding
fibrous
articles such as groundwood, compressed webs and flat pieces of sulfite and
semi-
chemical pulp. The apparatus contains a shredding roller and a holding roller,
each with
interdigitating toothed discs for shredding the fibrous material as it
advances between the
rollers. The action of the toothed discs on the rollers generates defibered
material and
does not result in pressing of the material.
[0021] US 4,683,814 (Plovanich et al.) discloses an apparatus and a dry
process
for dewatering cellulosic biomass, which utilizes a pair of smooth opposed
rolls operating
at different speeds. Due to the differential roller speeds, the compressed
biomass is
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
heated, which results in additional moisture removal, and particle size
reduction.
Furthermore, moisture collects on the roll rotating at the higher rate and
compressed
material adheres to the roll rotating at the lower rate. This allows moisture
to be
collected from the roll rotating at the higher speed and compressed material
to be
collected from the roll rotating at the lower speed. Although the process
provides an
effective means for the dewatering of biomass, the process of Plovanich et al.
only
removes a minority of the alkalinity of the feedstock. Moreover, Plovanich et
al. do not
teach the production of a cellulosic feedstock having a particle size suitable
for pumping.
[0022] The process for extracting sugar from sugar cane feedstocks is well
known. This involves washing the sugar cane surface to remove impurities,
coarsely
chopping the stalks into smaller pieces, and crushing the sugar cane pieces in
a series of
roller mills to extract the juice. The juice is collected from the presses and
further
processed to produce sugar. The residue from the cane stock after juice
extraction
(bagasse) is usually burned at the mill.
[0023] In order for a continuous pretreatment of cellulosic feedstocks to be
economically and commercially viable, the pretreatment system must be amenable
to the
pretreatment of a variety of feedstocks; the alkalinity of the feedstock must
be reduced
from its native levels, so as to decrease the acid requirements and
degradation of sugar
products by acid; and the feedstock particle size must be reduced, without
requiring
excessive power or capital equipment, such that the particles can be pumped in
aqueous
medium.
[0024] The development of such a system remains an important component of the
overall process to convert cellulosic feedstocks to glucose and subsequently
to ethanol.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0025] The present invention relates to a process for producing a pretreated
feedstock, more particularly to a process for producing cellulose-containing
pretreated
feedstock.
6
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[0026] It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for
producing a
pretreated feedstock with improved efficiency.
[0027] The present invention provides a process for producing a pretreated
feedstock, the process comprising the steps of:
a) providing a feedstock selected from the group consisting of grasses, cereal
straws, stover, and combinations thereof, wherein at least about 80% of the
feedstock has a particle length of between about 2 and about 40 cm;
b) wetting the feedstock in an aqueous stream to about 0.25 to about 10 times
the
maximum water holding capacity of the feedstock to produce a wet feedstock;
c) pressing the wet feedstock through one roll press or a series of roll
presses to
remove at least a portion of water and soluble substances from the wet
feedstock
and to shear the wet feedstock to produce a pressed feedstock having a
particle
size, such that when the pressed feedstock is slurried to produce a slurried
feedstock, the slurried feedstock is capable of being pumped at a solids
concentration of about 8% to about 20%,
wherein the one roll press, or one or more than one roll press in said series,
comprises rolls with circumferential v-shaped grooves, and
wherein the pressed feedstock has a consistency of at least about 35% dry
solids
after passing through a nip point in the one roll press or a nip point in one
or more
than one roll press in said series;
d) slurrying the pressed feedstock particles to produce a slurried feedstock
having
a solids concentration of about 8% to about 20% and pumping the slurried
feedstock into a pretreatment reactor; and
e) carrying out dilute acid pretreatment of the slurried feedstock, at a
temperature
of about 160 C to about 280 C to produce the pretreated feedstock.
7
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[0028] The present invention is also directed to the method as just described,
wherein, after the step of slurrying (step d), the feedstock is pretreated at
a temperature of
about 170 C to about 260 C and at pH of about 0.8 to about 2.0 for a period of
0.1 to 30
minutes. Furthermore, the pretreated feedstock may be hydrolyzed by cellulase
enzymes
to produce glucose, which may subsequently be fermented to ethanol. Prior to
the step of
pressing (step c), the feedstock may be partially leached.
[0029] The present invention is also directed to the invention as described
above,
wherein, in the step of providing (step a), the cereal straw is selected from
the group
consisting of wheat straw, barley straw, rice straw, canola straw, and oat
straw, and the
stover is selected from the group consisting of corn stover and soybean
stover.
Preferably, in the step of providing (step a), at least about 80% of the
feedstock has a
particle length of between about 2 and about 30 cm.
[0030] The present invention is also directed to the invention as described
above,
wherein, in the step of pressing (step c), the one roll press or one or more
than one roll
press in the series creates additional shear to reduce the feedstock particle
size, and
wherein the additional shear is created by a difference in diameter or a
difference in
speed of the rolls in the one roll press, or in one or more than one roll
press in the series.
[00311 Preferably, the series of roll presses comprises 3 roll presses,
although 2
roll presses can be used as well.
[0032] The present invention is also directed to the invention as described
above,
wherein a series of presses are used, and wherein the step of wetting (step b)
comprises
countercurrent washing of the feedstock with pressate collected from at least
one roll
press in the series.
[0033] The present invention is also directed to the invention as described
above,
wherein, in the step of wetting (step b), the liquid is at a temperature of
between about
20 C and about 95 C, or between about 30 C and about 85 C.
[0034] The present invention is also directed to the invention as described
above,
wherein, in the step of slurrying (step d), the slurried feedstock has a
consistency of
8
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
between about 10% and about 18% dry solids, or between about 12% and 15% dry
solids.
Preferably, after the step of pressing (step c) and before the step of
slurrying (step d), the
pressed feedstock has a consistency of at least about 35% dry solids. In the
step of
slurrying (step d), at least about 70%, 80% or 89% of the feedstock particles
may be 2.4
cm or less in length.
[0035] The present invention is also directed to the invention as described
above,
wherein, in the step of pressing (step c), one or more than one other press or
one or more
than one other dewatering device is used in combination with the one roll
press or the
series of roll presses, wherein the one or more than one other press or the
one or more
than one other dewatering device is not a roll press. If other press types or
dewatering
devices besides roll presses are used in combination with the one roll press
or the series
of roll presses, the consistency of the feedstock after pressing the wetted
feedstock is
preferably at least about 35% dry solids.
[0036] Furthermore, the present invention is also directed to the invention as
described above, wherein the process is a continuous process with continuous
feeding of
the feedstock and continuous withdrawal of the pretreated feedstock.
[0037] The wet treatment process of the present invention overcomes the
disadvantages of the prior art, as it requires much less power input than a
dry grinding
process. The invention also mitigates the risk of blinding dry milling
equipment with
feedstock having a high moisture content. Furthermore, the presses require
much less
power input and cost much less than other wet grinding equipment, such as
refiners or
hydropulpers. The process of the present invention produces a feedstock that
is
pumpable with a minimal amount of aqueous solution.
[0038] In addition, by using a wet process, a significant portion of the
salts,
alkali, and protein are removed from the feedstock. This decreases the acid
requirement
and potentially increases the xylose yield. These benefits are consistent with
those
achieved by WO 02/070753 (Griffin) using a leaching of the feedstock, but
without the
contact times and equipment used in a leaching process.
9
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2012-05-22
[0039] Therefore, the invention offers significant advances in the production
of
sugar from lignocellulosic feedstocks.
[0040] This summary of the invention does not necessarily describe all
required
features of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0041] These and other features of the invention will become more apparent
from
the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings
wherein:
[0042] Figure 1A shows an example of a feedstock handling system in
accordance with the present invention. Figure 1B shows a roll press comprising
three
rollers. Figure 1C shows a cross section of the tooth profile that may be
present on the
outer surface of the rollers in the roll press.
[0043] Figure 2 shows results of an analysis of wheat straw particle length
following processing according to the present invention. Particle length
measurements
were determined following coarse chopping after a single (left bar), double
(middle bar)
or triple (right bar) pass through the mill. 100 fibers were randomly selected
and
manually measured with a ruler to estimate the particle length distribution.
[0044] Figure 3 shows results of an analysis of wheat straw particle size
following processing according to the present invention. Particle size is
determined using
standard square mesh sieves. The sieves separate the straw on the basis of the
particle
diameter, not length. Three samples each of the coarsely chopped (left bar),
single (left-
middle bar), double (right-middle bar), and triple (right bar) milled material
were passed
through sieves of varying sizes, and the results averaged for each type of
material.
[0045] Figure 4 shows the amount of water-soluble potassium and total nitrogen
(total Kjedahl nitrogen; TKN) found in the dry feedstock (left bar) or after
single (left-
middle bar), double (right-middle bar) or triple (right bar) passes through
the mill. The
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
dissolved components were determined before and after pressing and are
expressed as a
percent of the original content.
[0046] Figure 5 shows the medium consistency (MC ) pump current during
testing of single pass wheat straw.
[0047] Figure 6 shows the MC pump current during testing of combined
double and triple pass wheat straw.
11
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0048] The present invention relates to a process and apparatus for handling
wet
feedstock, more particularly to a process and apparatus for handling wet
cellulose-
containing feedstock.
[0049] The present invention provides a process that allows for the crushing
and
shearing of feedstock and the removal of much the soluble salts, protein,
sugars, alkaline
compounds, and organic acids from the feedstock. The wetted feedstock
undergoes
pressing using one roll press, or a series of roll presses. The result is that
the particle size
is reduced and moisture is pressed out of the wetted feedstock. Soluble
components thus
released may be collected during pressing and shearing of the feedstock and
the pressed
and sized feedstock can then be subjected to pretreatment or pretreatment
combined with
subsequent treatment steps for its conversion to sugars. The process may be
used as a
continuous process, so that the feedstock may be fed, and prepared feedstock
withdrawn,
in a continuous manner. However, the process may also be used for batch
processing.
The process of the present invention removes potential inhibitors from the
feedstock, and
also decreases the acid requirement during pretreatment.
[0050] The present invention provides a process for producing a pretreated
feedstock comprising:
a) providing a feedstock selected from the group consisting of grasses, cereal
straws, stover, and combinations thereof, wherein at least 80% of the
feedstock
has a particle length of between about 2 and about 40 cm;
b) wetting the feedstock in an aqueous stream to about 0.25 to about 10 times
the
maximum water holding capacity of the feedstock to produce a wet feedstock;
c) pressing the wet feedstock through one or a series of roll presses to
remove at
least a portion of water and soluble substances from the wet feedstock and to
shear the wet feedstock to produce a pressed feedstock having a particle size
such
that, when the pressed feedstock is slurried to produce a slurried feedstock,
the
12
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
slurried feedstock is capable of being pumped at a solids concentration of
about 8
to about 20%,
wherein the one roll press, or one or more than one roll press in said series,
comprises rolls with circumferential v-shaped grooves, and
wherein the pressed feedstock has a consistency of at least about 35% dry
solids
after passing through a nip point in the one roll press or a nip point in one
or more
than one one roll press in said series;
d) slurrying the pressed feedstock particles to produce a slurried feedstock
having
a solids concentration of about 8% to about 20% and pumping the slurried
feedstock into a pretreatment reactor; and
e) carrying out dilute acid pretreatment of the slurried feedstock at a
temperature
of about 160 C to about 280 C to produce the pretreated feedstock.
[0051] The process of the invention is effective on a wide variety of
feedstocks,
including: (1) stover, such as corn stover or soybean stover; (2) cereal
straws, such as
wheat straw, barley straw, canola straw, oat straw, and rice straw; (3)
grasses such as
switch grass, miscanthus, cord grass, and reed canary grass; and any
combination thereof.
These feedstocks are available in large quantity at low cost and contain high
levels of
carbohydrates, which correspond to a high potential ethanol yield.
[0052] The feedstock is usually conveyed into the ethanol plant in bales or
other
convenient form. The bales may be coarsely broken up to create particles that
can be
handled by the one roll press or the series of roll presses using any method
known in the
art. For example, the feedstock may be broken up in a coarse size reduction
process
using a hammer mill, a rotary shredder, shear shredder, knife hog, tub
grinder, wood
chipper-like device, or any other device that reduces the particle size of the
entering
solids. The size of the reduced feedstock is suitable for handling in the
system of the
present invention, i.e., at least 80% of the reduced feedstock has a particle
length of about
2 to about 40 cm, or any amount therebetween. Preferably, at least 80% of the
feedstock
13
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
may have a length of about 2 to about 30 cm, or about 4 to about 25 cm, or any
amount
therebetween.
[0053] In the process of the present invention, the feedstock is wetted in an
aqueous stream prior to pressing. The aqueous stream can be any suitable
liquid that
wets the feedstock and thereby permits it to be pressed by the one or more
roll presses.
For example, the liquid may be water, mill water, or recycled wash liquor
(pressate)
obtained from earlier feedstock processing. In the latter case, wetting of the
feedstock
may comprise counter-current washing of the roll presses with the resulting
liquor used to
wet the feedstock upon entry into the plant.
[0054] The feedstock may be wetted using any method known in the art. For
example, the feedstock may be wetted by spraying the liquid onto the
feedstock, by
immersion in a tank of liquid, or by passing the feedstock through a tank of
liquid.
[0055] The amount of liquid used is chosen so as to be enough to wet the
feedstock and provide some extra liquid for the removal of impurities, but is
not in such
excess as to produce dilute streams that increase handling expenses. The
optimal amount
of liquid required to adequately wet the feedstock will vary based on the
physical
properties of the feedstock and the feedstock particle size. An acceptable
amount of
water is about 0.25 to about 10 times the maximum water holding capacity of
dry
feedstock, or any amount therebetween. For example, the amount of water added
may be
about 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0 and 10 times
the maximum
water holding capacity of dry feedstock, or any amount therebetween. More
preferably,
the amount of water added is about 1.5 to about 3 times the maximum water
holding
capacity of dry feedstock, or any amount therebetween. The maximum water
holding
capacity of a feedstock is determined by measuring the weight of water which
is absorbed
by a known mass of loosely packed feedstock until the point at which
additional water
added to the feedstock is free water. This point is measured as the point in
which the
water forms a thin continuous layer over the feedstock. In determining the
maximum
water holding capacity of a feedstock, it is preferable that the feedstock is
mechanically
disrupted into particles of about the same size. Furthermore, as would be
evident to a
14
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
person skill in the art, it is preferred that the maximum water holding
capacity of a
feedstock be determined on a loosely packed and not tightly packed feedstock.
As an
example, if 1 kg of feedstock (dry basis) holds 4000 g of water, the maximum
water
holding capacity of the feedstock is 4000 g/kg. The acceptable amount of water
is then
1000 g to 40,000 g per kg feedstock.
[0056] Alternatively, an acceptable ratio of water to solids may be from about
2.5:1 to about 100:1, by weight, or any amount therebetween. More preferably
the ratio
of water to solids is from about 2.5:1 to about 25:1, by weight, or any amount
therebetween. For example the ratio of water to solids may be about 2.5:1,
5:1, 7.5:1,
10:1, 12.5:1, 15:1, 17.5:1 20:1, 22.5:1 or 25:1, by weight, or any amount
therebetween.
A typical ratio of liquid to feedstock is about 2.5:1 to about 10:1, or any
amount
therebetween, for example 2.5:1, 5:1, 7.5:1, or 10:1 by weight.
[0057] The addition of water followed by pressing removes a significant amount
of the alkalinity and nitrogen and potassium from the feedstock. This
decreases the acid
usage in pretreatment and may increase the xylose yield.
[0058] The feedstock may be wetted as part of a sand removal process or a
leaching process prior to pressing. Sand removal has the advantage of
preserving the roll
presses from abrasion due to the presence of sand on the feedstock. For sand
removal,
water is combined with the feedstock at the ratio as described above, i.e.,
about 0.25 to
about 10 times the maximum water holding capacity of dry feedstock, or any
amount
therebetween, more preferably about 1.5 to about 3 times the maximum water
holding
capacity of dry feedstock, or any amount therebetween. In this process,
feedstock
wetting may be carried out over a rotating drum with a screen, or some other
equipment
familiar in the art. The filtrate, which contains sand, water, and soluble
impurities, is
settled to remove the sand, while the liquor can be reused to wash feedstock
newly
conveyed to the plant. In a non-limiting example, sand removal is carried out
by
introducing the sand-containing filtrate to a hydroclone.
[0059] Regardless of whether sand is removed or not, the temperature of the
liquid for wetting the feedstock may be any temperature in the range of about
20 C to
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
about 95 C, for example a temperature of 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60,
65, 70, 75,
80, 85, 90 or 95 C, or any amount therebetween. In general, warmer
temperatures may
result in a more efficient extraction of soluble components by the liquid. The
temperature range of the liquid may be about 30 C to about 85 C, or any
temperature
therebetween.
[0060] The wetted feedstock is then subjected to size reduction. This is
accomplished by conveying the feedstock through one or a series of roll
presses. Each
roll press used in the process of the present invention may be a roll press
that is
commercially available (e.g. from Edwards Engineering Corp. Houston Texas;
Bundaberg Foundry Engineers Ltd., Bundaberg Australia; or Fulton Iron and
Manufacturing LLC, St. Louis Missouri), and may comprise a suitable number of
rolls,
for example, but not limited to, three (see for example Figure 1 B) or four
rolls (see Figure
IA; roll presses 40, 50 and 60). Additionally, the roll press may be a
modified roll press
as described in more detail below.
[0061] The present invention may use either one, or more than one roll press
in
series, to deliver adequate particle size reduction. For example, the process
of the present
invention may use from one to seven roll presses, or any amount therebetween;
for
example, 1 or 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 roll presses in series, may be used. In a
more specific
example, the process uses two to four roll presses in series. Preferably, the
process uses
two or three roll presses in series. The roll presses in the series may be
arranged one
behind the other in succession (see Fig. IA), or other process equipment may
be
interposed between the presses.
[0062] Furthermore, one or more than one other types of presses or dewatering
devices could be used in combination with the one roll press or the series of
roll presses.
Such press types or dewatering devices may include, but are not limited to,
belt presses,
filter presses, screw presses and centrifuges.
[0063] Without wishing to be limiting in any manner, each roll press (3) may
have three or four rolls (Figure 1B). In this configuration, three of the four
rolls are set in
a triangular pattern with first and second lower rolls (2A and 2B,
respectively) at the
16
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
bottom, side by side, and a third top roll (4) at the top between the bottom
rolls.
Preferably, the first and second rolls (2A, 2B) are supported by bearing
journals fixed to
the supporting frame of the roll press, and the top roll (4) may be mounted on
a set of
guide plates that allows the roll (4) to move up and down. The top roll (4)
may also have
hydraulic cylinders mounted on each end for application of the crushing,
shearing or
crushing and shearing force between the top and bottom rolls. If the roll
press comprises
four rolls, then the fourth roll acts as a feed roller. A series of roll
presses, each
comprising four rolls, is shown in Figure IA.
[0064] Referring to Figure 1 B, in a non-limiting example, during operation of
the
press (3), the wet feedstock is crushed twice, once between the top roll (4)
and the first
lower roll (2A) and then between the top roll (4) and the second lower roll
(2B). The
feed opening (8A) between the top roll (4) and the first lower roll (2A) and
the discharge
opening (8B) between the top roll (4) and the second lower roll (2B) are each
set to a
desired clearance. The feedstock is guided through the press by guidance
device (9).
[0065] The rolls of the press may be constructed of any suitable material, for
example, but not limited to, stainless steel. The dimensions of each roll may
vary as
required, but may, for example, which is not to be considered limiting, be
from about
0.75 m to about 4 m long, or any value therebetween, with a diameter of from
about 0.45
m to about 2 m, or any value therebetween.
[0066] One or more than one of the presses comprise press rolls with
circumferential grooves having a "vee" shape (v-shape) cross-section cut into
the outer
surface of each roll (6; Figure 1 Q. The provision of roll presses with such
circumferential grooves enhances drainage and shearing of the wet feedstock.
The
moisture content of the wet feedstock is reduced, thereby removing soluble
substances
and increasing the consistency of the feedstock. The shearing of the feedstock
by the
grooves allows for efficient particle size reduction to produce a pumpable
feedstock.
[0067] The spacing (5) between the grooves may be from about 1.0 cm to about
10.0 cm, or any value therebetween, and the groove depth may be from about 1.0
cm to
about 10.0 cm, or any value therebetween. The top roll (4) is set such that
the grooves of
17
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
the three rolls mesh with each other, but the rolls are not in contact (8A and
8B; Figure
113). The clearance between the roll nip points may be from about 0.0001 cm to
about
0.1 cm, or any value therebetween. Meshing of the grooves (6) and crushing
load
between rolls provides the majority of shearing action.
[0068] It should be appreciated that, if a series of presses are utilized, in
order to
produce the required particle size reduction, it is not necessary that all of
the presses
contain rolls with circumferential grooves. For example, it is contemplated
that adequate
shearing and moisture reduction could be achieved if one or more of the
presses comprise
rolls having circumferential grooves, while the remaining roll presses have
smooth rolls.
[0069] The rolls of the press apply pressure to the feedstock as it is fed
through
the roll press(es). The pressure applied to the rolls may be adjusted as
necessary to create
additional shear to reduce particle size. A suitable pressure range for
removal of the
pressate and reduction of feedstock particle size is in the range of about
2400 to about
3000 psi or any value therebetween. For example, the press nip pressure may be
of about
2400, 2500, 2600, 2700, 2800, 2900 or 3000 psi, or any value therebetween.
[0070] The roll presses may be modified to increase the degree of milling of
the
feedstock. Increased milling of the feedstock may be achieved by using rolls
of varying
diameter rotating at the same speed. The difference in diameter may be of
about 1.2 cm
to about 20.0 cm, or any value therebetween; more specifically, the diameters
may differ
by about 1.5 cm to about 10.0 cm, or about 1.5 to about 2.5 cm, or any amount
therebetween. Alternatively, rolls of the same diameter may be used, but the
rolls are
rotated at different speeds. In this case, the difference in speed between the
rollers may
be from 0% to about 10%, or any value therebetween; in a more specific
example, the
speeds may differ by about 3.5% to about 10%, or any value therebetween. The
use of
rollers of different diameters, rollers rotating at different speeds, or the
use of both rollers
having different diameters and rotating at different speeds results in
efficient feedstock
particle size reduction, and may result in the use of fewer roll presses to
achieve the
desired feedstock particle size. Furthermore, the gap between the rolls may be
adjusted
as desired to create additional shear.
18
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[00711 As a result of passing through one roll press or a series of roll
presses, the
feedstock particle size is reduced to a size suitable for handling. The
particles are of a
size such that, when the pressed feedstock is subsequently slurried, the
resulting slurry
can be pumped at a dry solids concentration of about 8 to about 20%, or any
amount
therebetween. Preferably, the particles are of a size such that the slurried
feedstock can
be pumped at a solids concentration of about 10% to about 18% dry solids or
any range
therebetween, or about 12% to about 15% dry solids, or any range therebetween.
Preferably, the feedstock is of a size appropriate to be slurried and pumped
using medium
consistency pumps (such as a Sulzer MC Pump). Once the feedstock exits one or
a
series of roll presses, the majority of the feedstock particles may be about
10 cm or less in
length. Preferably, at least about 70%, 80% or 89% of the feedstock particles
are of a
length of 2.4 cm or less. For example from about 70% to about 89%, or any
amount
therebetween, of the feedstock particles are of a length from about 0.05 to
about 2.4 cm
or any amount therebetween.
[00721 As set forth above, pressing of the wetted feedstock results in an
increase
in the consistency of the feedstock. If only one roll press is used, the
consistency of the
feedstock is at least about 35% dry solids, or from about 35% to about 95% or
any
amount therebetween dry solids, after passing through one nip point of the
press. For
example, the consistency of the feedstock may be from about 35% to about 60%,
or any
amount therebetween If a series of roll presses are used, then the consistency
of the dry
solids is at least about 35%, or from about 35% to about 60%, or from about
35% to
about 95%, or any amount therebetween, dry solids, after passing through a nip
point of
at least one (i.e., one or more than one) roll press in the series. By way of
illustration,
and with reference to Figure 1 B, the consistency of the feedstock after
passing between
the top roll (4) and the first bottom roll (2A) or after passing between the
top roll (4) and
the second bottom roll (2B) is at least about 35%. Preferably, after the step
of pressing
and before the step of slurrying, the consistency of the feedstock is at least
about 35%.
For example, with reference to Figure 1A, the consistency of the feedstock is
at least
about 35% after exiting the third roll press, for example at 60.
19
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2012-05-22
[0073] It should be appreciated that, after the moisture content of the wetted
feedstock is reduced in a roll press, or other type of press or dewatering
device which is
optionally used in combination with the one press or series of roll presses,
the moisture
content of the feedstock may be increased prior to entering a downstream press
or
dewatering device. For example, an aqueous stream may be added to the
discharge of the
upstream press, the inlet of a downstream press, or dewatering device, or any
point in
between.
[0074] As a further step after pressing or slurrying, the feedstock may be
subjected to additional leaching. This is carried out by contacting the
feedstock with
water for a period of time adequate to allow a portion of the soluble
components in the
feedstock to dissolve, followed by separating at least a portion of the
aqueous solution
from the feedstock solids.
[0075] Following pressing, the feedstock is slurried in water. The amount of
water added to the feedstock is typically chosen as the minimum that allows
the feedstock
to be pumped. This is typically to achieve a consistency or solids
concentration of about
8% to about 20%, or any value therebetween. For example, the consistency or
solids
concentration may be about 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, or 20%, or any value
therebetween.
Preferably, the reduced feedstock is slurried to produce a feedstock slurry
having a
consistency of about 10 to 18%, or about 12 to 15%, or any range therebetween.
[0076] Alternatively, the amount of water added to the feedstock may be from
about 2.5 to about 10 parts water per part solid, by weight, or any value
therebetween.
For example, the ratio between water to solid, by weight, may be from about
2.5:1, 3:1,
3.5:1, 4:1, 4.5:1, 5:1, 5.5:1, 6:1, 6.5:1, 7:1, 7.5:1, 8:1, 8.5:1, 9:1, 9.5:1
or 10:1 or any
amount therebetween. For example which is not to be considered limiting, the
reduced
feestock is slurried in 5 or 6 parts water per part solids (5: 1 or 6:1).
[0077] The slurried feedstock is then subjected to a dilute acid pretreatment
process. The pretreatment process converts hemicellulose, or a portion
thereof, to sugars
and may convert a portion of the cellulose to sugar. A non-limiting example of
such a
treatment includes steam explosion, as described in U.S. 4,461,648 (Foody).
Generally,
CA 02583256 2012-05-22
dilute acid pretreatment conditions for lignocellulosic feedstocks comprise a
temperature
in the range of about 160 C to about 280 C, or any amount therebetween, for
example
160, 170, 180, 190, 200, 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 260, 270 or 280 C, for a
period of
about 0.1 to about 30 minutes, or any amount therebetween, including 0.1, 0.5,
1, 5, 10,
15, 20, 25, or 30 min, and at a pH of about 0.8 to about 2.0, or any amount
therebetween,
for example a pH of 0.8, 1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8 or 2Ø The low pH for
pretreatment requires
the addition of acid to the feedstock. The acid used for pretreatment may be
any type of
suitable acid known in the art, including, but not limited to, sulfuric acid,
sulfurous acid,
or phosphoric acid. Sulfuric acid is preferred due to its low cost and,
following recovery,
its use in fertilizer in the form of sulfate salts. Prominent pretreatment
processes carried
out with dilute acid include those described by Grethlein (US 4,237,226) and
in Sassner
et al. (Appl. Biochem. Biotech., 2005, 121-124:1101-1117).
[0078] The pretreated feedstock may then be subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis
with cellulase enzymes, to convert the cellulose to glucose. Without wishing
to be bound
by theory, the pretreatment increases the susceptibility of the feedstock to
hydrolysis by
cellulase enzymes. Cellulase enzymes can typically tolerate a range of pH of
about 3 to
7; therefore, the pretreated feedstock is generally neutralized prior to
enzymatic
hydrolysis. Adjustment of the pH after pretreatment can be carried out using
ammonia
gas, ammonia dissolved in water (ammonium hydroxide), sodium hydroxide, lime,
sodium carbonate or potassium hydroxide. A pH more favorable to the cellulase
enzymes is, for example, within the range of about 4.5 to about 5.0, or any
value
therebetween, for example a pH of 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 or 5Ø The pH-
adjusted,
pretreated feedstock can then be subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis using
cellulase
enzymes.
[0079] By the term "cellulase enzymes", "cellulase", or "enzymes", it is meant
enzymes that catalyse the hydrolysis of cellulose to products such as glucose,
cellobiose,
and other cellooligosaccharides. Cellulase is a generic term denoting a
multienzyme
mixture, produced by a number of microorganisms, comprising exo-
cellobiohydrolases
21
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
(CBH), endoglucanases (EG) and P-glucosidases (PG). Among the most widely
studied,
characterized, and commercially produced cellulases are those obtained from
fungi of the
genera Aspergillus, Humicola, and Trichoderma, and from the bacteria of the
genera
Bacillus and Thermobifida. The cellulase enzymes may be produced by genetic
engineering techniques, which are well-known to those of skill in the art. In
a non-
limiting example, the pretreated feedstock described above may be submitted to
hydrolysis by cellulase enzymes produced by Trichoderma.
[0080] In a preferred embodiment, the sugar is fermented to ethanol.
Fermentation may be carried out by yeast, bacteria or other microbes, or an
enzyme
mixture, capable of fermenting the product stream to a desired efficiency and
yield. In a
preferred embodiment, the fermentation is carried out using a genetically
engineered
yeast, for example, but not limited to, Saccharomyces or Pichia, or bacteria,
for example,
but not limited to, Zymomonas or E. coli capable of fermenting the pentose
sugars xylose,
arabinose, or a combination thereof, in addition to the hexose sugars glucose,
mannose,
galactose, or a combination thereof. Alternatively, the sugar in the product
stream is
fermented to lactic acid. Those skilled in the art are familiar with the
requirements in
fermentation of sugar to produce ethanol, organic acids, or sugar alcohols.
[0081] With reference to Figure 1A, a non-limiting example of the overall
process
system is shown. The feedstock, for example bales of wheat straw are shredded
and
wetted with water at 0.25 to 10 times the maximum water holding capacity of
the wheat
straw. The feedstock is washed over an inclined rotating drum with a screen
(20). Sand
and liquor containing soluble solids pass through the screen. The stream of
sand and
liquor is sent to a hydroclone or settling tank (30) to remove the sand. The
liquor may be
reused to wash incoming feedstock, or processed for other uses.
[0082] The screened, wetted feedstock is moved onto a first conveyor belt (1).
The feedstock may be wetted by liquor from the pressate (43, 70 or both) of
the first or
second or both, roll press (40, 50), respectively. The wet feedstock is
conveyed to the
first roll press (40), where it is crushed and pressed. The pressate (43),
which contains
small particles and liquor, may be sent (via line 45) to the inclined rotating
drum with a
22
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
screen (20) via first pump (48). Prior to being sent to the rotating drum
(20), the pressate
(43) may be sent to a first swirl tank (47). The pressate solids are recovered
and
combined with the feedstock feeding into the first roll press (40). The
liquor, which
contains soluble protein, sugars, and salts, may be collected and potentially
used as a
byproduct. The liquor can also be sent for further processing, for example,
but not
limited to, protein recovery and concentration.
[0083] The once-pressed solids are conveyed by a second conveyor (42) to the
second roll press (50). The solids are wetted by pressate (80) from a third
roll press (60).
The wet solids pass through roll press (50). The pressate (70), which contains
small
particles and liquor, is fed by second pump (56) to a solids removal screen
(75) to recover
solids. The pressate (70) may pass through a second swirl tank (54) before
being
introduced to the solids removal screen (75). The pressate solids recovered by
the screen
(75) are fed to a conveyor (77) and introduced to the first conveyor (1)
feeding the first
roll press (40). The liquor (82) may be introduced to a washer liquor tank
(92) and
pumped to a clarifier (94) to remove fines. The clarified liquor (96) may then
be fed back
to the first conveyor (1).
[0084] The twice-pressed solids are conveyed along a third conveyor (52)
toward
a third roll press (60). The solids are wetted with process or imbibition
water (7). The
pressate (80) from third press (60) contains small particles and liquor. This
pressate (80)
containing small particles is added to the feedstock solids feeding the second
roll press
(50) via third pump (62). This permits leaching of the feedstock with a three-
stage
countercurrent washing/wetting of the feedstock. Optionally, the pressate (80)
may pass
through a third swirl tank (63).
[0085] At the conclusion of the third press, the feedstock particles have been
sheared to a size suitable for pumping. The crushed fiber from the third roll
press (60) is
then sent by conveyor system (84) to a holding bin (86) where it is held for a
fixed period
of time. The crushed fiber is then introduced via conveyor (88) to a mix tank
(90) where
it is slurried to produce a feedstock slurry having a consistency of 8% to
20%, or 10% to
18%, or 12% to 15%, or any amount therebetween. Alternatively, the crushed
fiber from
23
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
the third roll press (60) may be slurried in about 4.5 to about 8 parts water
per part solid,
by weight, or any amount therebetween, for example about 4.5, 4.8, 5.0, 5.2,
5.4, 5.6, 5.8,
6.0, 6.2, 6.4, 6.6, 6.8, 7.0, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6, 7.8, or 8.0 parts water per part
solid, or any
amount therebetween, for example about 5 parts.
[0086] The slurry is then submitted to further processing (100), which
involves a
step of pretreatment in a pretreatment reactor. In the pretreatment reactor,
the slurry is
subjected to dilute acid prehydrolysis, and the resulting pretreated slurry is
then
submitted to enzymatic hydrolysis to convert the cellulose to sugars as
described earlier.
[0087] The present invention will be further illustrated in the following
examples.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Use of roll press system to decrease particle size of wheat straw
[0088] Initial size reduction of wheat straw was performed using a wood
chipper-
like device. The average length of the straw was reduced to about 15 cm. The
chopped
straw was stored until required for press trials, with about 1/3 in a covered
truck bed, and
the remainder in an outdoor bin. Heavy rain was experienced for two days
during the
trial.
[0089] The mill was of a four-roll type, with a "floating" hydraulically
damped
top roll. The clearance between the roll nip points was set to 0.0001" (one
ten thousandth
of an inch). The rolls were of stainless steel construction, 0.76m (30") long,
with a
diameter of 0.457 m (18"). The rolls were circumferentially grooved, with a
spacing of
1.3 cm (0.5") between the grooves. The groove depth was not recorded. The mill
was
driven via a 480 V, 74 A, 60 hp, 1775 rpm electric motor. The motor was
connected to a
gearbox, but the gear reduction ratio and the final roll rpm were not stated.
The mill was
instrumented with needle gauges showing the motor amps and the nip pressure
between
the rolls.
[0090] Straw was manually loaded into a stainless steel wire mesh basket. A
sample of the feed straw was obtained from each basket for initial moisture
content
24
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
measurement, particle size analysis and chemical composition. The basket had a
capacity
of 1 cubic meter, sufficient for 50 kg of loosely packed straw. The exact
weight of each
basket used was recorded. The basket was immersed in approximately 4900 liters
of
water in a 5500 liter tank for 20 minutes. The initial and final water level
were recorded
for each basket and a sample of the vat contents obtained to estimate the
amount of water
removed with the straw, and to allow calculation of the amount of straw
materials
dissolved per basket. After the 20 minute soak, the basket was withdrawn from
the vat
and allowed to drain for about 10 minutes.
[0091] A sample of the soaked and drained straw was taken from each basket for
moisture content analysis. Approximately half of the basket (-25 kg oven dried
straw)
was manually loaded on a 1.5 ft by 8 ft conveyor belt, and the belt hoisted to
the feed
hopper on the mill. The speed of the belt was manually controlled to maintain
a level in
the feed hopper. The average time required to feed the straw on the belt was
measured
for five trials. A sample of the pressed straw was taken for moisture content
measurement, particle size analysis and chemical composition. A sample of mill
pressate
was obtained for dissolved and undissolved solids analysis. The process was
repeated for
the second half of the basket.
[0092] Prior to the start of the double pass material, a gas powered water
pump
was obtained, and the leaching vat was emptied and refilled. Single pass
material was
again prepared by processing 8 baskets of straw through a single mill pass,
with the
pressed material stored in the plant overnight. The single pass material was
then reloaded
into baskets, soaked and drained, as previously described, and run through the
mill for a
second pass.
[0093] The triple pass material was produced in a similar fashion.
[0094] The single, double, and triple pass straw was analyzed for pump
testing.
Samples of the feed and pressed straw were also submitted for inorganic and
nitrogen
analysis. The leachate and pressate were analyzed for dissolved and total
solids. In
addition, the straw was analyzed for moisture content and particle size.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[0095] The particle size was measured in two ways. For the initial wheat straw
sample and a sample from each of the mill passes, 100 randomly chosen fibers
were
measured with a ruler, and the average length calculated. Secondly, portions
of the straw
were oven dried and a 20 gram sample of the oven dried straw were subjected to
particle
size analysis using a set of five standard sieves, with the amount of straw
retained on
each sieve weighed. The mass of material retained on each screen was recorded.
Three
samples each of the coarsely chopped, single, double, and triple milled
material were
analyzed, and the results averaged for each type of material.
[0096] Medium Consistency (MC ) pump testing was also performed on single,
double, and triple pass cane press straw. The double and triple pass straw was
combined
for analysis. The tests were conducted by adding the wet, pressed straw to a
known
volume of water in the standpipe. The total water volume in the standpipe was
calculated
as the sum of the initial water volume, the seal water leakage rate, and the
volume of
water in the wet straw. Samples of straw were taken from each drum of material
and
analyzed for solids content. The drums were weighed, so that the dry mass of
straw
could be calculated. The liquid to solids ratio was then calculated as the
total water
volume divided by the oven dry weight of straw mass.
Power consumption
[0097] The required time for feeding 25 kg oven dried straw was consistently
between 20 to 35 seconds, and the average measured time from five trials was
30
seconds. The dry fiber throughput of the test mill is estimated to be 2.5 - 3
tonnes per
hour. While feeding straw to the mill, the motor current draw averaged about
55A, which
is 75% of the rated full load, and the nip pressure increased by only 100-200
psig, or
about 8%, over the no load value. The true upper throughput boundary is thus
not
known.
[0098] Using a motor current draw average of 55 A, with a range from 50-57 A,
and a motor voltage of 480 V, a feed time of 30 seconds (0.0083 hrs) for 25
oven dried
kg of straw, the specific power consumption is calculated as:
26
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[0099] (55 A * 480 V) * (1 KW / 1000 W) * 0.0083 hr / 0.025 tonne straw = 8.8
KWhr / tonne straw.
[00100] Note that the Fulton mill has a higher throughput and a lower energy
requirement than the currently used hammermill. The largest mills that are
currently in
service were driven by 1200 hp motors, and were capable of processing 9000
tonnes of
sugar cane per day.
Particle length distribution
[00101] The results of the particle length distribution are shown graphically
in
Figure 2 for the pressed wheat samples. From observation of the press while in
operation, it was apparent that a fraction of the straw is bypassing the
grooved section of
the rolls, and was escaping the mill prematurely along the sides of the rolls.
This could
be avoided by installation of steel scrapers along side the rolls. It is this
fraction that is
responsible for the oversized material. The fraction of oversized material is
reduced by
successive mill passes without dramatically changing the average fiber length.
[00102] It should be noted that in analysis of particle length distribution
using
sieves, the straw is separated on the basis of the particle diameter, not
length. While the
sizes do not represent the true average fiber length of the material, previous
work has
shown a correlation between the average particle length and the sieve size for
hammermilled straw. Visual inspection of the sieved samples showed that a
similar trend
held for the pressed straw material - larger particles were retained on the
larger mesh
screens, while the shorter particles were retained on the smaller screens. The
results are
presented in Figure 3, which provides an indication of the distribution of
fiber sizes, and
the amount of fines that are produced.
[00103] The results shown in Figures 2 and 3 indicate that successive mill
passes
reduce both the amount of oversize material and the amount of material
retained on the
largest sieve. Additionally, the average particle size tends towards the roll
groove
spacing of 1.3 cm. Also, the fines content, classified as material smaller
than 0.85 mm, is
only slightly increased by successive passes through the mill.
27
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[00104] The production of milled wheat straw fines is not entirely addressed
by
Figure 2 and Figure 3, since some fraction of the fines will be carried by the
mill
pressate. Samples of the pressate were analyzed for undissolved solids - that
is, wheat
straw fines - but the size distribution of the solids was not determined.
Visual inspection
of the mill pressate indicated the majority of the wheat straw particles in
the pressate
were very small, on the order of 0.2 cm or less. The weight percent of
undissolved solids
in the mill pressate is presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Weight percent undissolved solids in mill pressate
Sample Wt % Undissolved
Single pass 0.85
Double pass 1.20
Triple pass 1.70
[00105] Using the moisture content of the feed and pressed straw, the total
amount
of pressate generated can be calculated. When combined with the data on the
undissolved solids in the pressate, the total amount of fines lost in the
pressate can be
calculated on a dry straw basis. This is presented in Table 2.
Table 2: Percent of feed straw lost as fines in the pressate
Sample % feed as fines in pressate
Single pass 2.0
Double pass 2.5
Triple pass 3.9
[00106] Fines recovery is a standard procedure for the sugar cane industry,
and the
normal method is to screen the mill pressate.
Soluble Component Analysis
[00107] The composition of the non-structure components of wheat straw is
shown
in Figure 4.
28
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[00108] The soluble potassium salts show a 90% decrease due to leaching. The
nitrogen content, which is related to the protein content of the straw, is
reduced by about
40% after three passes through the cane press. The silica, ash and calcium
content of the
straw are unaffected by the leaching and pressing operation, under the
conditions of this
test.
Pumpability Testing
[00109] Medium Consistency (MC ) pump testing of single, double, and triple
pass cane press straw was performed. For the single pass material, the final
liquid to
solids ratio achieved was 6.1:1. The test was halted when all the single pass
straw had
been consumed by the test. The only data that is available from active
instruments during
this test are the MC pump amperages, the standpipe level reading, and the
discharge
pressure from MC pump #1 (P20408). Of these, the standpipe level is only of
interest in
the calculation of the liquid to solids ratio, and the MC pump #1 discharge
pressure is
manually controlled at approximately 65 psig by varying the pump speed and the
gate
valve on the MC pump #1 recirculation line. The amperage for MC pump #1 is
controlled by these same means, with a target value close to 100% full load
amps. The
only independent parameter is the amperage for MC pump #2. The current draw
for the
two MC pumps during this trial is presented in Figure 5. The current for MC
pump #2
increased by only 2%, from 66 to 68% full load amps (%FLA), during this test.
[00110] A similar test was conducted using the combined double and triple pass
material. The test was halted at a final liquids-to-solids ratio of 5.9:1 due
to an overflow
in the standpipe. Again, it may have been possible to push to higher solids
consistencies.
The current draw for the two MC pumps is presented in Figure 6. MC pump #2
shows
the same 2% current increase from 66 to 68% FLA.
Summary
[00111] Roll press test work was conducted using a Fulton press. The equipment
was evaluated on the basis of power consumption, throughput, and particle size
reduction. Approximately 300 kg each of single, double and triple pass
material was
prepared. Chemical analysis of the straw was conducted to determine the
endogenous
salts removed during the pressing operation.
29
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
[00112] The wheat straw particle size was reduced from an initial coarsely
chopped average length of approximately 15 cm to approximately 70% being 1.5
cm or
less during the first pass, and with the remaining 30% of the straw having
lengths up to
6cm. Successive passes through the press reduced the percentage of oversized
material,
but only slightly reduced the median size of particles produced. There was a 3-
fold
increase in the amount of fines collected in the mill pressate from singly to
triply pressed
material.
[00113] Pump testing of the pressed straw showed behavior similar to hammer
milled wheat straw. The final liquid to solids obtained was on the order of
6:1. The
pumpability of the material seemed independent of the number of cane press
passes in
that single and double pass material behaved similarly.
[00114] The average amount of dissolved material in the vat leachate and mill
pressate was only 2.5% of the initial dry straw mass. Readily soluble
potassium salts
were removed; calcium, ash, and silica were reduced by less than 10%. The
total
Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) was reduced by about 40%.
[00115] The estimated throughput of the press used for the testing was 2.5 to
3
tonnes oven-dried straw per hour. This rate was based on a feed time of about
30 seconds
for 25 kg of straw, but the mill may have been run below capacity. The
specific energy
consumption for press operation was calculated to be on the order of 9
kWhr/tonne of
straw. The amount of power required to chop the straw to a similar particle
length with a
hammer mill is 70 kWhr/tonne.
[00116] The pressed straw had an average moisture content of 45%. This value
was not affected by the number of passes through the mill. Previous testing
produced a
value of 43% solids with an applied pressure of 2500 psi in a hydraulic press,
similar to
the average recorded cane press nip pressure of 2900 psi recorded for this
trial.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
Example 2: Use of roll press system with enhanced shear to optimize particle
size of
wheat straw
[00117] Initial size reduction of wheat straw is done using a wood chipper-
like
device. The average length of the straw is reduced to about 15 cm. The chopped
straw is
stored until required for press trials.
[00118] The mill is of a four-roll type, with a "floating" hydraulically
damped top
roll. The clearance between the roll nip points is set to about 0.0001" (one
ten thousandth
of an inch). The rolls are of stainless steel construction, 0.76 in (30")
long, with a
diameter of 0.457 m (18") or 0.432 in (17"). The rolls are circumferentially
grooved,
with a spacing of 1.3 cm (0.5") between the grooves. The mill is driven via a
480 V, 74
A, 60 hp, 1775 rpm electric motor. The mill is instrumented with needle gauges
showing
the motor amps and the nip pressure between the rolls.
[00119] The shear produced by the rolls of the press is increased by either a)
using
a top roll with a diameter of 0.432 in (17") compared to 0.457 in (18") for
the bottom
rolls, or b) driving the top roll at a speed approximately 5% faster than that
of the bottom
rolls. Either of these situations results in a speed differential between the
rolls, leading to
increased shear applied to the feedstock.
[00120] Straw is manually loaded into a stainless steel wire mesh basket. A
sample of the feed straw is obtained from each basket for initial moisture
content
measurement, particle size analysis and chemical composition. The basket has a
capacity
of 1 cubic meter, sufficient for 50 kg of loosely packed straw. The exact
weight of each
basket used is recorded. The basket is immersed in approximately 4900 liters
of water in
a 5500 liter tank for 20 minutes. The initial and final water level are
recorded for each
basket and a sample of the vat contents obtained to estimate the amount of
water removed
with the straw, and to allow calculation of the amount of straw materials
dissolved per
basket. After the 20 minute soak, the basket is withdrawn from the vat and
allowed to
drain for about 10 minutes.
(00121] A sample of the soaked and drained straw is taken from each basket for
moisture content analysis. Approximately half of the basket (-P25 kg oven
dried straw) is
31
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
CA 02583256 2012-05-22
manually loaded on a 1.5 ft by 8 ft conveyor belt, and the belt hoisted to the
feed hopper
on the mill. The speed of the belt is manually controlled to maintain a level
in the feed
hopper. The average time required to feed the straw on the belt is measured
for five
trials. A sample of the pressed straw is taken for moisture content
measurement, particle
size analysis and chemical composition. A sample of mill pressate is obtained
for
dissolved and undissolved solids analysis. The process is repeated for the
second half of
the basket.
[00122] Prior to the start of the double pass material, the leaching vat is
emptied
and refilled. Single pass material is again prepared by processing 8 baskets
of straw
through a single mill pass. The single pass material is then reloaded into
baskets, soaked
and drained as previously described and run through the mill for a second
pass.
[00123] The triple pass material is produced in a similar fashion.
[00124] Samples of the feed and pressed straw are submitted for inorganic and
nitrogen analysis. The leachate and pressate are analyzed for dissolved and
total solids.
The straw is also analyzed for moisture content and particle size. The
particle size is
measured in two ways. For the initial wheat straw sample and a sample from
each of the
mill passes, 100 randomly chosen fibers are measured with a ruler, and the
average length
calculated. Secondly, portions of the straw are oven dried and a 20 gram
sample of the
oven dried straw are subjected to particle size analysis using a set of five
standard sieves,
with the amount of straw retained on each sieve weighed. The mass of material
retained
on each screen is recorded. Three samples each of the coarsely chopped,
single, double,
and triple milled materials are analyzed, and the results averaged for each
type of
material.
[00125] Results obtained using a) a top roll with a diameter of 0.432, and b)
a top
roll speed approximately 5% faster are similar to those set out in Example 1.
[00126] The present invention has been described with regard to one or more
embodiments. However, it will be apparent to persons skilled in the art that a
number of
32
CA 02583256 2007-02-27
WO 2006/026863 PCT/CA2005/001374
variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of
the
invention as defined in the claims.
33
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
