Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
METHODS OF LIMITING LEAK OFF AND DAMAGE IN HYDRAULIC
FRACTURES
Technical Field of the Invention
10011 This invention relates to improving the production of fluids from wells
penetrating
subterranean formations. More particularly, this invention relates to methods
using stabilized
aqueous dispersions of water inert polymers in treatment fluids to improve
fluid efficiency
during hydraulic fracture treatments while minimizing or preventing proppant
pack damage.
Background of the Invention
10021 Hydraulic fracturing of oil or gas wells is a technique routinely used
to improve or
stimulate the recovery of hydrocarbons. In such wells, hydraulic fracturing is
usually
accomplished by introducing a proppant-laden treatment fluid into a producing
interval at high
pressures and at high rates sufficient to crack the rock open. This fluid
induces a fracture in the
reservoir as it leaks off in the surrounding formation and transports proppant
into the fracture.
After the treatment, proppant remains in the fracture in the form of a
permeable and porous
proppant pack that serves to maintain the fracture open as hydrocarbons are
produced. In this
way, the proppant pack forms a highly conductive pathway for hydrocarbons
and/or other
formation fluids to flow into the wellbore.
10031 Typically, viscous fluids or foams are employed as fracturing fluids in
order to provide a
medium that will have sufficient viscosity to crack the rock open, adequately
suspend and
transport solid proppant materials, as well as decrease loss of fracture fluid
to the formation
during treatment (commonly referred to as "fluid loss"). While a reduced fluid
loss allows for a
better efficiency of the treatment, a higher fluid loss corresponds to fluids
"wasted" in the
reservoir, and implies a more expensive treatment. Also, it is known that the
degree of fluid loss
can significantly depend upon formation permeability. Furthermore fluid
efficiency of a fracture
1
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
fluid may affect fracture geometry, since the viscosity of the fluid might
change as the fluid is
lost in the formation. This is the case for polymer-based fracturing fluids
that concentrate in
lower permeability formations as the fracture propagates due to leak off of
the water in the
formation, while the polymer molecules remain in the fracture by simple size
exclusion from the
pores of the reservoir. The fluid in the fracture increases in viscosity as
the fracture propagates
and the fracture generated will also increase in width as well as in length.
In the case of
viscoelastic surfactant (VES) based fluids, the fracturing fluid does not
concentrate since the
fracturing fluid is lost in the formation and typically the fractures
generated are long and very
narrow. Hence, fluid efficiency affects fracture geometry.
10041 For VES based fluids, excessive fluid loss results in fractures that are
narrower than
desired. Also, excessive fluid loss may translate into significant job size
where hundreds of
thousands of additional gallons of water may be pumped to generate the
required length of
fracture and overcome low fluid efficiency. Fracturing fluids should have a
minimal leak-off
rate to avoid fluid migration into the formation rocks and minimize the damage
that the
fracturing fluid or the water leaking off does to the formation. Also the
fluid loss should be
minimized such that the fracturing fluid remains in the fracture and can be
more easily
degraded, so as not to leave residual material that may prevent hydrocarbons
to flow into the
wellbore.
10051 Early fracturing fluids were constituted of viscous or gelled oil but,
with the
understanding that formation damage due to water may not be as important as
originally
thought, aqueous fracturing fluids mainly consisting of "linear" polymeric
gels comprising guar,
derivatized guar, cellulose, or derivatized cellulose were introduced. In
order to attain a
sufficient fluid viscosity and thermal stability in high temperature
reservoirs, linear polymer gels
were partially replaced by cross-linked polymer gels such as those based on
guar crosslinked
with borate or polymers crosslinked with metallic ions. However, as it became
apparent that
crosslinked polymer gel residues might not degrade completely and leave a
proppant pack with
an impaired retained conductivity, fluids with lower polymer content were
introduced. In
addition, some additives were introduced to improve the cleanup of polymer-
based fracturing
fluids. These included polymer breakers. Nonetheless the polymer based
fracturing treatments
2
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
leave proppant pack with damaged retained conductivity since the polymer
fluids concentrate in
the fracture while the water leaks off in the reservoir that may impair the
production of
hydrocarbons from the reservoir.
[006[ Other fracturing fluids with improved cleanup, i.e. that leave a
proppant pack with
higher retained conductivity, have been developed. Examples are fluids that
use viscoelastic
surfactants (VES) as viscosifiers. The viscoelastic surfactant molecules, when
present at a
sufficient concentration, may aggregate into overlapping worm- or rod-like
micelles, which
confer the necessary viscosity to the fluid to carry the proppant during
fracturing. At very high
shear rate however, the viscosity may decrease. Also, the surfactant worm- or
rod-like micelles
tend to disaggregate by contact with hydrocarbons and, if no surfactant
emulsion is effectively
formed, the surfactant molecules are normally carried along the fracture, to
the well bore, during
the hydrocarbon backflow.
[0071 Yet another approach to limit the damage of the proppant pack, is to use
water based
treatments with friction reducers (referred as slickwater treatments), and
pump the fracturing
fluids at much higher rates in the formation. The proppant is carried to the
formation due to the
high flow rates. The limitation of the treatments is that the maximum proppant
concentration
that can be placed is limited to a small concentration since the fluid has low
viscosity. Another
limitation is very low fluid efficiency and therefore the size of the
slickwater treatments.
[008[ Based on reservoir simulations and field data, it is commonly observed
that production
resulting from a fracturing treatment is often lower than expected. This
phenomenon is
particularly the case in tight gas formations. Indeed, production can be
decreased significantly
by concentrated polymer left in the fracture due to leak off of the fracturing
fluid during
treatment. Filter cakes may result in poor proppant pack cleanup due to the
yield stress
properties of the fluid. This may happen when a crosslinked polymer based
fluid is pumped that
leaks off into the matrix and becomes concentrated, and extremely difficult to
remove. Breaker
effectiveness may thus become reduced, and viscous fingering inside the
proppant pack may
occur which further results in poor cleanup. Furthermore, the filter cake
yield stress created by
3
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
the leak off process can occlude the fracture width and restrict fluid flow,
resulting in a
reduction in the effective fracture half-length.
10091 Accordingly, there is a need for methods for treating subterranean
formations using
fluids which enable efficient pumping, which significantly decrease and
control the leak off
relative to conventional fracturing treatments in order to reduce the damage
to the production,
while having good cleanup properties as well as improved fluid efficiency
(i.e. providing less
expensive and time-consuming treatment). These needs are met, at least in
part, with the
following invention.
Summary of the Invention
100101 Disclosed are methods for treating a formation penetrated by a wellbore
which improves
fluid loss control during treatment. In some aspects, the methods are
slickwater treatments
which include preparing an aqueous fluid comprising at least one water inert
polymer, where a
viscosifier is not added to the aqueous fluid to substantially increase the
fluid viscosity, then
injecting the aqueous fluid into the wellbore at a pressure equal to or
greater than the
formation's fracture initiation pressure, and thereafter injecting into the
wellbore a proppant
laden fluid at a pressure equal to or greater than the formation's fracture
initiation pressure. In
some embodiments of the invention, the water inert polymer includes one or
more emulsion
polymers, while in other embodiments, the water inert polymer may be at least
one latex
polymer. When the water inert polymer is formed of a plurality of latexes,
they may be a
mixture of latexes of different particle sizes. Some methods of the invention
use a fluid which
may have a normalized leak off coefficient (C,v/sgrt(K)) equal to or less than
about 0.0022,
preferably equal to or less than about 0.0010. A conventional fluid loss
additive may or may not
be used in conjunction with the treatment fluid and/or the proppant laden
fluid.
100111 The water inert polymer may form a film on fracture faces, and the film
may optionally
be at least partially degraded during and/or subsequent to injecting the
proppant laden fluid.
When the film is degraded, it may be degraded with a breaker, such as a
delayed breaker, a
conventional oxidizer, an oxidizer triggered by catalysts contained in the
film, a latent acid, or
4
CA 02600251 2010-10-26
79628-96
formation fluids. Also, the water inert polymer may or may not substantially
enter the formation
pores. Methods of the invention may use a fluid further including one or more
of the following:
a gas component, acid particles, colloidal particles, at least one friction
pressure reducing agent,
and the like.
100121 In another aspect of the invention, the methods are formation
treatments which include first
preparing an aqueous pad fluid containing at least one water inert polymer and
a viscosifier,
injecting the aqueous fluid into the wellbore at a pressure equal to or
greater than the
formation's fracture initiation pressure, and injecting a proppant laden fluid
at a pressure equal
to or greater than the formation's fracture initiation pressure. While any
suitable water inert
polymer may be used, the polymer may be one or more latex or emulsion
polymers. A
conventional fluid loss additive may or may not be incorporated into the
fluids, as well as any
other commonly used additives or components. Some methods of the invention use
a fluid
which may have a normalized leak off coefficient equal to or less than about
0.0022, preferably
equal to or less than about 0.0014, more preferable equal to or less than
about 0.0010. Some
examples of viscosifiers useful in the fluids include viscoelastic
surfactants, natural polymers,
derivatives of natural polymers, synthetic polymers, biopolymers, and the
like, or any mixtures
thereof. The water inert polymer may form a film on fracture faces, which may
be subsequently
degraded. The water inert polymer may or may not substantially enter formation
pores.
100131 In yet another aspect, disclosed are methods for reducing matrix damage
to a formation
during a treatment operation, by first preparing an aqueous treatment fluid
formed of at least one
water inert polymer, and injecting the fluid at a pressure equal or greater
than the formation's
fracture initiation pressure. The fluid may or may not include a viscosifier
such as a polymer or
viscoelastic surfactant.
CA 02600251 2010-10-26
79628-96
[0013a] In one embodiment, the invention relates to a
method of fracturing a formation penetrated by a wellbore,
the method comprising: a. preparing an aqueous fluid
comprising at least one water inert polymer, provided that
no viscosifier is added to the aqueous fluid to
substantially increase the fluid viscosity; b. injecting the
aqueous fluid into the wellbore at a pressure equal to or
greater than the formation's fracture initiation pressure;
and c. thereafter injecting into the wellbore a proppant
laden fluid at a pressure equal to or greater than the
formation's fracture initiation pressure.
[0013b] In a further embodiment, the invention relates to
a method of fracturing a formation penetrated by a wellbore,
the method comprising: a. preparing an aqueous fluid
comprising at least one water inert polymer and a
viscosifier; b. injecting the aqueous fluid into the
wellbore at a pressure equal to or greater than the
formation's fracture initiation pressure; and c. thereafter
injecting into the wellbore a proppant laden fluid at a
pressure equal to or greater than the formation's fracture
initiation pressure; wherein the leak off coefficient for
the aqueous fluid is less than about 0.0022.
[0013c] In a still further embodiment, the invention
relates to a method for reducing matrix damage to a
formation during a treatment operation, the method
comprising injecting into a wellbore penetrating the
formation, an aqueous treatment fluid comprising at least
one water inert polymer, the fluid injected at a pressure
equal or greater than the formation's fracture initiation
pressure, wherein the leak off coefficient for the aqueous
fluid is less than about 0.0022.
5a
CA 02600251 2011-08-12
54138-35
[0013d] In another embodiment, the invention relates to a method of treating a
subterranean formation penetrated by a wellbore, comprising: a. preparing an
aqueous fluid comprising at least one water inert polymer, provided that no
viscosifier
is added to the aqueous fluid to substantially increase the fluid viscosity;
b. injecting
the aqueous fluid into the wellbore at a pressure equal to or greater than the
formation's fracture initiation pressure; and c. thereafter injecting into the
wellbore a
proppant laden fluid at a pressure equal to or greater than the formation's
fracture
initiation pressure.
[0013e] In a further embodiment, the invention relates to a method of treating
a
subterranean formation penetrated by a wellbore, the method comprising: a.
preparing an aqueous fluid comprising at least one water inert polymer,
provided that
no viscosifier is added to the aqueous fluid to substantially increase the
fluid
viscosity; b. injecting the aqueous fluid into the wellbore at a pressure
equal to or
greater than the formation's fracture initiation pressure; and c. thereafter
injecting
into the wellbore a proppant laden fluid at a pressure equal to or greater
than the
formation's fracture initiation pressure; wherein the water inert polymer
forms a film
on fracture faces, and the method further comprising degrading the film
subsequent
to injecting the proppant laden fluid and wherein the film is degraded with
breaker,
the breaker selected from the group consisting of delayed breakers,
conventional
oxidizers, oxidizers triggered by catalysts contained in the film, latent
acids, or
formation fluids.
[00139 In a still further embodiment, the invention relates to a method of
treating a subterranean formation penetrated by a wellbore, the method
comprising:
a. preparing an aqueous fluid comprising at least one water inert polymer and
a
viscosifier; and b. injecting the aqueous fluid into the wellbore at a
pressure equal to
or greater than the formation's fracture initiation pressure; wherein the leak
off
coefficient for the aqueous fluid is less than about 0.0022.
5b
CA 02600251 2011-08-12
54138-35
[0013g] In another embodiment, the invention relates to a method for reducing
matrix damage to a formation during a treatment operation, the method
comprising
injecting into a wellbore penetrating the formation, an aqueous treatment
fluid
comprising at least one water inert polymer, wherein the leak off coefficient
for the
aqueous fluid is less than about 0.0022.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0014] Figure 1 shows, by graphical representation, the measured viscosity of
fluids with and without emulsion type water inert polymer.
5c
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
100151 Figure 2 illustrates fluid loss improvements for fluids containing
emulsion water inert
polymer blended with conventional fracturing pad fluids.
100161 Figure 3 represents normalized leak-off coefficients (CW/Sgrt(K)) for
pad fluids with and
without emulsion type water inert polymers.
100171 Figure 4 indicates the effect of removing an emulsion based film using
an ammonium
persulfate breaker.
100181 Figure 5 shows the theology of a 25 ppt crosslinked guar system
containing 2 gpt of a
liquid clay stabilizer solution and a nanolatex based water inert polymer.
[oo191 Figure 6 is a plot of normalized C,,, coefficients measured on
different cores at 85 F with
various amounts of latex water inert polymer.
100201 Figure 7 shows the same data as Figure 6, reported as normalized Cw,
coefficient versus
latex water inert polymer concentration.
100211 Figure 8 graphically represents a plot of normalized C,,, coefficients
for different latex
water inert polymers, and blends thereof.
[00221 Figure 9 illustrates the results of a conventional static fluid loss
test using 1" cores for
pad fluids with and without a latex water inert polymer.
100231 Figure 10 illustrates the additional advantage of using a latex water
inert polymer in
conjunction with a fluid loss additive.
100241 Figure 11 shows leak off rates for VES based pad fluids with and
without emulsion
water inert polymers.
Detailed Description
100251 The description and examples are presented solely for the purpose of
illustrating the
preferred embodiments of the invention and should not be construed as a
limitation to the scope
and applicability of the invention. While the compositions of the present
invention are
6
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
described herein as comprising certain materials, it should be understood that
the composition
could optionally comprise two or more chemically different materials. In
addition, the
composition can also comprise some components other than the ones already
cited. In the
summary of the invention and this detailed description, each numerical value
should be read
once as modified by the term "about" (unless already expressly so modified),
and then read
again as not so modified unless otherwise indicated in context. Also, in the
summary of the
invention and this detailed description, it should be understood that a
concentration range listed
or described as being useful, suitable, or the like, is intended that any and
every concentration
within the range, including the end points, is to be considered as having been
stated. For
example, "a range of from 1 to 10" is to be read as indicating each and every
possible number
along the continuum between about 1 and about 10. Thus, even if specific data
points within the
range, or even no data points within the range, are explicitly identified or
refer to only a few
specific, it is to be understood that inventors appreciate and understand that
any and all data
points within the range are to be considered to have been specified, and that
inventors
possession of the entire range and all points within the range.
100261 In embodiments of the disclosed method, fluid loss control during
fracture treatments
may be improved by the use of water inert polymers, which includes water inert
polymer
particles. As a result of including the polymers, the efficiency of the
fracture treatments are
surprisingly improved. As used herein, "water inert polymers" refers to
polymers which during a
well treatment time period, have no substantial affinity for water, are not
significantly water
interactive, nor do they substantially expand or increase (as in size, volume,
or numbers) beyond
a normal or original limit. Water inert polymers differ from hydratable
polymers, which at least
partially dissolve in water and are commonly used in treatment fluids as
viscosifying agents.
Water inert polymers also differ from hydrophilic swelling polymers
(oftentimes referred to as
"superabsorbing particles", "hydrogels", "water swellable polymers", "water
swellable
particles" and the like) based on synthetic polymers that are unable to
hydrate, but when
interacting with water, may swell up to many times their original size, such
as those described in
U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,058. As used herein, the term "ppt" describes the
concentration of a
7
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
material, or materials, in pounds per thousand gallons fluid. Also, the term
"gpt" is defined as
gallons per thousand gallons of fluid.
100271 Although not bound by or limited to any particular theory or mechanism
of operation,
fluid loss control during treatments may be improved by the use of water inert
polymers due to
film forming. For example, a substantially water impermeable film, also
referred to as a
"membrane" for purposes herein, may be deposited on the fracture face as a
result of
dehydration or agglomeration of the water inert polymer. The formation of a
water inert polymer
based film arises from "coalescence" of the polymer or polymer particles, such
as latex particles
or emulsion particles, which are normally separated by stabilizing forces
(electrostatic or steric)
augmented with a stabilizing surfactant. These forces may be overcome upon
evaporation or
dehydration of the continuous liquid carrier phase. See "An Overview of
Polymer Latex Film
Formation and Properties", P.A. Steward, J. Hearn, & M.C. Wilkinson, Advances
in Colloid and
Interface Science, 85 (2000) 195-267). Thus, the water inert polymer is
delivered to the
formation fracture faces dispersed and stabilized in an aqueous medium, the
water and
stabilizing the surfactant is then substantially removed by loss into the
formation while the water
inert particles remain within or near the fracture region, thus forming a film
on the fracture
faces. The water inert particles may or may not substantially enter pores on
the formation
fracture faces.
100281 In some embodiments, after placement of proppant in the fracture using
a proppant laden
fluid which may or may not contain a viscosifier, the film formed from the
water inert polymers
may be broken down or degraded during flowback and/or production stages. Film
degradation
may be achieved by delayed breakers (such as conventional oxidizers or by
oxidizers triggered
by a catalyst contained in the film), by hydrolysis of a latent acid such as
polylactic acid (PLA)
or polyglycolic acid (PGA) based fibers deposited with the film, by
temperature, by instability
of the film in formation fluids, by dissolution of the film in formation
fluids, and the like.
Formation production may be increased because little or no filter cake of
highly concentrated
polymer is formed which typically reduces the available fracture width,
promotes viscous
fingering, generates a high yield stress fluid and alters the pack porosity
and permeability. Also,
less matrix damage from leak off of damaging fluid exists. Further, breaker
efficiency can be
8
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
optimized in conjunction with the placement of the water inert polymer.
Methods of the
invention may significantly limit the damage caused by a high leak off during
wellbore
treatments using conventional treatment fluids, such as slickwater, polymer
based fracturing
fluids, viscoelastic surfactant based fracturing fluids, or foamed fluids, for
example.
100291 Another advantage provided by the invention is a potential decrease in
the time and
resources required to complete treatment operations. For example, a typical
slickwater fracturing
operation requires on the order of approximately 500,000 gallons of water be
pumped into the
wellbore over the course of treatment. In a typical polymer based treatment,
commonly, on the
order of approximately 100,000 gallons of water is required. These water
volumes may be
reduced by half or more, which may also translate into collateral decreases in
job time, overall
power output requirements, as well as fluid ingredient consumption. In those
instances where
requisite water volumes are not readily available, methods of the invention
overcome such a
limitation since resource consumption may be significantly reduced.
[00301 Yet another advantage of methods of the invention is a reduction in
matrix damage due
to a decrease in the amount of fluid which leaks off into the formation.
Matrix damage can occur
to some extent when viscoelastic surfactant based viscosifiers are used, or in
the case of
slickwater operations where the fluid has no significant proppant carrying
capacity. In these
cases, the leak off may be controlled by the viscosity of the fluid itself and
the permeability of
the reservoir. This advantage is particularly applicable for formations as low
as 0.001 milli-
Darcy (mD) permeability to as high as 1 Dsarcy permeability.
100311 In some method embodiments of the invention, a polymer based aqueous
fracturing fluid
is introduced into the wellbore, but does not form a significant filter cake.
In the case of
conventional fluids where a significant filter cake is typically formed, the
higher the leak off the
more concentrated the polymer in the fracture will be, which increases viscous
fingering effects
and reduces significantly the effectiveness of breakers. Also the filter cake
may behave as a
yield stress fluid and becomes difficult to clean and remove from the
fracture. By using film
forming water inert polymer, the leak off may be significantly reduced and the
polymer is
9
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
concentrated in the fracture, improving the retained proppant pack
conductivity and reducing the
flow initiation pressure of the fracturing fluid during flowback.
100321 Methods of the invention are suitable for treating formations
containing petroleum
products, such as oil and gas, as well as injection wells. Although the
invention may be
practiced in any suitable formation condition, the most practical temperature
range of
application is from about 20 C to about 180 C. In preferred applications,
formation
permeability is about 100 Darcy or less.
[0033] In some embodiments of the invention, a film which is substantially gas
permeable is
formed. Such a gas permeable film may develop from the "coalescence" of water
inert polymer
particles, but only to such an extent that gas may permeate the film. Other
practical means for
forming such films will be readily known to those of skill in the art. For
purposes herein, the
term gas permeable film means a thin polymer film which selected gas molecules
will pass,
either through capillary pores in the film.
[0034] Because the water inert polymer does not impart substantial viscosity,
in some
embodiments the water inert polymer will be blended with a fluid (PAD fluid)
containing a
viscosifier and then may coat fracture faces with a substantially impermeable
film as the fracture
is created. The treatment (pad) fluids may be, among other things, linear,
crosslinked, gelled, or
foamed fluids formed with typical viscosifiers (i.e. polymers or viscoelastic
surfactants) and
additives known to those of skill in the art. When used in treatments, the pad
(neat fluid) is
commonly pumped first, or in some cases subsequent to a pre-PAD fluid, to
create fractures and
establish propagation (i.e. the fracture grows up and down as well as out).
Then, a proppant
laden slurry fluid is pumped into fractures, and may continue to extend the
fractures and
concurrently carry and place the proppant deep into the fractures. Nonlimiting
examples of
viscosifiers useful in pad fluids include conventional hydratable polymers
such as guar and its
derivatives, polyacrylamide and its derivatives, cellulose and its
derivatives, xanthan,
viscoelastic surfactants, sphingan heteropolysaccharides, and the like. Fluids
using a water inert
polymer in conjunction with a viscosifier are particularly useful for pad
applications. In another
embodiment, the water inert polymer will be used along with the first stage of
a slickwater
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
treatment with or without the friction reducers conventionally used with such
treatments. The
water inert polymer will then coat fracture faces with a substantially
impermeable film as the
fracture extends.
[0035] Some embodiments of the invention are based upon a three-step
treatment. First is the
introduction of the so-called pad or treatment fluid into the wellbore and
formation, in which the
water inert polymer is used to form a film, temporarily or permanently, which
is substantially
water impermeable. The film may form on the fracture faces due to dehydration
and/or
agglomeration of the water inert polymer. In the second step, which may or may
not be
simultaneous with the first step, conventional fracturing treatment fluid and
proppant stages are
introduced into the formation, showing minimal (significantly reduced) leak
off due to the
presence of the film. The third step is to achieve film breakdown during the
flowback and
production stages. Breakdown may be achieved by delayed breakers such as
conventional
oxidizers or by oxidizers triggered by a catalyst contained in the film, by
hydrolysis of a latent
acid such as PLA particles, granulated particles or fibers deposited with or
after the film is
placed, by temperature, by instability of the film in the presence of produced
fluids, and the like.
[0036] The water inert polymers useful in embodiments of the invention are
dispersed and
stabilized in an aqueous medium. Any suitable means of stabilizing and
dispersing the polymer
in an aqueous medium may by used. The actual technique used is not
particularly important as
long as the polymer, or polymer particle, remains dispersed in the aqueous
medium at least for
the time period necessary for delivery to the formation.
]0037] As the water inert polymers encounter the formation rock in early
stages of the
treatment, it should be compatible with conventional fracturing fluids and not
the rheological
properties of a pad treatment. The water inert polymers should also be
compatible with
conventional additives, including, but not limited to, clay control additives,
iron control
additives, foamers, scale control additives, pH buffers, temperature
stabilizers, and the like.
Water inert polymers useful in the invention may provide reduced leak-off by
forming a film to
create a substantially water impermeable film on the fracture faces. The water
inert polymers
should be substantially removable. In order to allow for improved production
the permeability
II
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
of the fracture faces should be restored at least partially or locally such
that the flow from the
formation to the fracture can be resumed. Common breakers typically used
includes
conventional oxidizers with or without a catalyst, conventional enzymes,
acids, latent acids such
as PLA or PGA, or the like, and elevated temperature.
100381 In some embodiments, the water inert polymer may be a latex resin (also
termed latex
polymer) stabilized in an aqueous medium. As used herein, the terms "latex
resin", "latex", or
"latex polymer" refers to a dispersion of a water inert polymer which may be
prepared by
polymerization techniques such as, for example, by emulsion polymerization,
and further,
includes polymers prepared by these techniques where the average diameter size
of the
dispersed polymer ranges from the nano scale, such as nanolatexes, to
microgels which are on
the order of from about 10-3 microns to about 103 microns in diameter,
including any functional
diameter therebetween. The latex polymer may be an aqueous emulsion of finely
divided
polymer particles. Any practical blend of latex size may be used in accordance
with the
invention, such as a blend of a latex polymer and a nanolatex polymer. For
purposes of this
disclosure, the terms "latexes" and "lattices" have the same meaning.
100391 Latex polymers are prepared synthetically by polymerizing monomers that
have been
emulsified with surfactants. For example, in preparing latex by emulsion
polymerization,
typically a surfactant is dissolved in water until a critical micelle
concentration (CMC) is
reached. The interior of the micelle provides the site necessary for
polymerization. In some
preparations, a monomer (like styrene, hydroxyl ethyl acrylate, methyl
methacrylate, and the
like) and a water-soluble free radical initiator are added and the whole batch
is mixed to form
the polymer. Core-shell latexes are also useful in some embodiments of the
invention. Readily
known to those of skill in the art, preparation of core-shell latexes is
commonly performed by
two-stage emulsion. In the first stage a water inert polymer is formed as the
core by emulsion
polymerization. In a second stage, polymerization of a shell surrounding the
core is prepared by
emulsion polymerization. Typically latex resins (polymers) are stabilized in
the aqueous
environment by surfactants, functionality of the shell in a core-shell latex,
or combination of
surfactant and functionality of the shell. Nonlimiting examples of latex
types, which may be
useful, include latexes of acrylic copolymers, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl
acetate, polyvinyl
12
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
esters such as vinyl versatic acid, crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol, vinyl
acetate, polyvinyl
pyrrolidone, polystyrene, polystyrene butadiene copolymers, and the like. Any
suitable latex
may be used according to the invention. Some examples of latexes which may be
useful include,
but are not necessarily limited to, latexes available from Hexion Specialty
Chemicals, Inc.,
Columbus, OH 43215, such as RHODOPAS LS500, RHODOPAS D2400, RHODOPASS
D2600, Schlumberger D500, or Schlumberger D600G.When incorporated as a water
inert
polymer, the latex polymer amount may vary from about 0.1% to about 50% by
weight, based
upon total fluid weight, The lower limit of the latex amount being no less
than about 0.1, 0.5, 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 15 % by weight, based upon total fluid weight,
and the upper limit
being no greater than 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, or 20 % by
weight, based upon total
fluid weight. Preferably the latex is incorporated in an amount from about 1%
to about 20% by
weight, based upon total fluid weight, more preferably from about 5% to about
15% by weight,
based upon total fluid weight.
100401 Another approach is the use of an emulsion, where the water inert
polymer is emulsified
in the aqueous medium. As used herein, an "emulsion" refers to a dispersion of
water inert
polymers or water inert polymer particles in an aqueous medium with which the
water inert
polymers or water inert polymer particles will not readily mix. Some emulsions
useful in the
invention are mixtures of polymer and liquid, in which the polymer is
dispersed in the liquid as
small, microscopic or ultramicroscopic droplets (see colloid). Emulsions are
stabilized by agents
(emulsifiers) that form films at the droplets' surface and/or impart
mechanical stability. Less-
stabilized emulsions eventually separate spontaneously into two layers; more-
stabilized ones
can be destroyed by inactivating the emulsifier, by dehydration of the
emulsifier, by
concentrating the emulsion or by heating. Nonlimiting examples of emulsion
types which may
be useful in the invention include emulsions of polyethylene (PE), high
density polyethylene
(HDPE), polypropylene, polyethylene/polypropylene mixtures, paraffin,
polyvinyl alcohol,
epoxy polymer, polyurethane, crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol, crosslinked
polyvinyl alcohol /
polyvinyl acetate mixtures, and the like.
100411 When incorporated as a water inert polymer, the emulsion polymer amount
may vary
from about 0.1 % to about 50% by weight, based upon total fluid weight, The
lower limit of the
13
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
emulsion amount being no less than about 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, or 15 % by weight,
based upon total fluid weight, and the upper limit being no greater than 50,
45, 40, 35, 30, 25,
24, 23, 22, 21, or 20 % by weight, based upon total fluid weight. Preferably
the emulsion is
incorporated in an amount from about 1% to about 20% by weight, based upon
total fluid
weight, more preferably from about 5% to about 15% by weight, based upon total
fluid weight.
100421 Any suitable emulsion polymer may be used. Some examples of emulsions
which may
be useful according to the invention include, but are not necessarily limited
to, those emulsions
available from ChemCor, Chester, NY, 10918, USA, such as PolyEMULSION 330N35
which is
a 35% solids, nonionic emulsion of Honeywell Corporation's AC 330 high density
polyethylene, or polyEMULSION 629N40, that is a non-ionic, fine particle size
emulsion of
Honeywell Corporation's AC-629 polyethylene.
100431 The water inert polymer may also be a water reducible polymer. By
"water reducible" it
is meant that the polymer is dispersible in water upon neutralization. Such
polymers shall
commonly be rendered water dispersible though ionic, nonionic, ionic/nonionic
hydrophilic
functionality. Nonlimiting examples include low acid number water dispersible
polymers, which
may have ionic, or mixed ionic / nonionic stabilization.
10044] The aqueous medium of fluids useful of the invention may be water or
brine. Where the
aqueous medium is a brine, the brine is water comprising an inorganic salt(s),
organic salt(s), or
mixture(s) thereof. Preferred inorganic salts include alkali metal halides,
more preferably
potassium chloride or ammonium chloride. The carrier brine phase may also
comprise an
organic salt more preferably sodium or potassium formate, or tetra-methyl
ammonium chloride.
Preferred inorganic divalent salts include calcium halides, more preferably
calcium chloride or
calcium bromide. Sodium bromide, potassium bromide, or cesium bromide may also
be used.
100451 Fluids useful in the invention may also include a viscosifier that may
be a polymer that is
either crosslinked or linear, a viscoelastic surfactant, or any combination
thereof Some
nonlimiting examples of suitable polymers include guar gums, high-molecular
weight
polysaccharides composed of mannose and galactose sugars, or guar derivatives
such as
hydropropyl guar (HPG), carboxymethyl guar (CMG), and
carboxymethylhydroxypropyl guar
14
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
(CMHPG). Cellulose derivatives such as hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) or
hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) and carboxymethylhydroxyethylcellulose (CMHEC)
may also be
used in either crosslinked form, or without crosslinker in linear form.
Xanthan, diutan, and
scleroglucan, three biopolymers, have been shown to be useful as viscosifying
agents. Synthetic
polymers such as, but not limited to, polyacrylamide and polyacrylate polymers
and copolymers
are used typically for high-temperature applications. Nonlimiting examples of
suitable
viscoelastic surfactants useful for viscosifying some fluids include cationic
surfactants, anionic
surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, amphoteric surfactants, nonionic
surfactants, and
combinations thereof. Also, associative polymers for which viscosity
properties are enhanced by
suitable surfactants and hydrophobically modified polymers can be used, such
as cases where a
a charged polymer in the presence of a surfactant having a charge that is
opposite to that of the
charged polymer, the surfactant being capable of forming an ion- pair
association with the
polymer resulting in a hydrophobically modified polymer having a plurality of
hydrophobic
groups, as described published U.S. Pat. App. No. US 2004209780, Harris et.
al.
100461 In some method embodiments, the viscosifier is a water-dispersible,
linear, nonionic,
hydroxyalkyl galactomannan polymer or a substituted hydroxyalkyl galactomannan
polymer.
Examples of useful hydroxyalkyl galactomannan polymers include, but are not
limited to,
hydroxy-C1-C4-alkyl galactomannans, such as hydroxy-C1-C4-alkyl guars.
Preferred examples
of such hydroxyalkyl guars include hydroxyethyl guar (HE guar), hydroxypropyl
guar (HP
guar), and hydroxybutyl guar (HB guar), and mixed C2-C4, C2/C3, C3/C4, or
C2/C4 hydroxyalkyl
guars. Hydroxymethyl groups can also be present in any of these.
100471 As used herein, substituted hydroxyalkyl galactomannan polymers are
obtainable as
substituted derivatives of the hydroxy-C1-C4-alkyl galactomannans, which
include: 1)
hydrophobically-modified hydroxyalkyl galactomannans, e.g., C1-C18-alkyl-
substituted
hydroxyalkyl galactomannans, e.g., wherein the amount of alkyl substituent
groups is preferably
about 2% by weight or less of the hydroxyalkyl galactomannan; and 2)
poly(oxyalkylene)-
grafted galactomannans (see, e.g., A. Bahamdan & W.H. Daly, in Proc. 8PthP
Polymers for
Adv. Technol. Int'l Symp. (Budapest, Hungary, Sep. 2005) (PEG- and/or PPG-
grafting is
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
illustrated, although applied therein to carboxymethyl guar, rather than
directly to a
galactomannan)). Poly(oxyalkylene)-grafts thereof can comprise two or more
than two
oxyalkylene residues; and the oxyalkylene residues can be C1-C4 oxyalkylenes.
Mixed-
substitution polymers comprising alkyl substituent groups and
poly(oxyalkylene) substituent
groups on the hydroxyalkyl galactomannan are also useful herein. In various
embodiments of
substituted hydroxyalkyl galactomannans, the ratio of alkyl and/or
poly(oxyalkylene) substituent
groups to mannosyl backbone residues can be about 1:25 or less, i.e. with at
least one substituent
per hydroxyalkyl galactomannan molecule; the ratio can be: at least or about
1:2000, 1:500,
1:100, or 1:50; or up to or about 1:50, 1:40, 1:35, or 1:30. Combinations of
galactomannan
polymers according to the present disclosure can also be used.
100481 As used herein, galactomannans comprise a polymannose backbone attached
to galactose
branches that are present at an average ratio of from 1:1 to 1:5 galactose
branches:mannose
residues. Preferred galactomannans comprise a 1-'4-linked (3-D-mannopyranose
backbone that
is 1-+6-linked to a-D-galactopyranose branches. Galactose branches can
comprise from 1 to
about 5 galactosyl residues; in various embodiments, the average branch length
can be from 1 to
2, or from 1 to about 1.5 residues. Preferred branches are monogalactosyl
branches. In various
embodiments, the ratio of galactose branches to backbone mannose residues can
be,
approximately, from 1:1 to 1:3, from 1:1.5 to 1:2.5, or from 1:1.5 to 1:2, on
average. In various
embodiments, the galactomannan can have a linear polymannose backbone. The
galactomannan
can be natural or synthetic. Natural galactomannans useful herein include
plant and microbial
(e.g., fungal) galactomannans, among which plant galactomannans are preferred.
In various
embodiments, legume seed galactomannans can be used, examples of which
include, but are not
limited to: tara gum (e.g., from Cesalpinia spinosa seeds) and guar gum (e.g.,
from Cyamopsis
tetragonoloba seeds). In addition, although embodiments of the present
invention may be
described or exemplified with reference to guar, such as by reference to
hydroxy-Ci-C4-alkyl
guars, such descriptions apply equally to other galactomannans, as well.
100491 When incorporated, the polymer based viscosifier may be present at any
suitable
concentration. In various embodiments hereof, the gelling agent can be present
in an amount of
from about 10 to less than about 60 pounds per thousand gallons of liquid
phase, or from about
16
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
15 to less than about 40 pounds per thousand gallons, from about 15 to about
35 pounds per
thousand gallons, 15 to about 25 pounds per thousand gallons, or even from
about 17 to about
22 pounds per thousand gallons. Generally, the gelling agent can be present in
an amount of
from about 10 to less than about 50 pounds per thousand gallons of liquid
phase, with a lower
limit of polymer being no less than about 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
or 19 pounds per
thousand gallons of the liquid phase, and the upper limited being less than
about 50 pounds per
thousand gallons, no greater than 59, 54, 49, 44, 39, 34, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26,
25, 24, 23, 22, 21, or
20 pounds per thousand gallons of the liquid phase. In some embodiments, the
polymers can be
present in an amount of about 20 pounds per thousand gallons. Hydroxypropyl
guar,
carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar, carboxymethyl guar, cationic functional
guar, guar or
mixtures thereof, are preferred polymers for use herein as a gelling agent.
Fluids incorporating
polymer based viscosifiers preferably have a viscosity value of at least about
100 centipoise at a
shear rate of about 100 s 1, at treatment temperature.
100501 As a viscoelastic surfactant based viscosifier, any suitable
viscoelastic surfactant may be
used in accordance with the invention. Preferably the viscoelastic surfactant
is an ionic VES. By
ionic it is meant that the VES may be cationic, anionic or zwitterionic
depending on the charge
of its head group. When the surfactant is cationic, it is associated with a
negative counterion,
which can be an inorganic anion such as a sulfate, a nitrate, a perchlorate or
a halide such as Cl",
Br" or with an aromatic organic anion such as salicylate, naphthalene
sulfonate, p and m
chlorobenzoates, 3,5 and 3,4 and 2,4-dichlorobenzoates, t-butyl and ethyl
phenate, 2,6 and 2,5-
dichlorophenates, 2,4,5-trichlorophenate, 2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenate, p-methyl
phenate, m-
chlorophenate, 3,5,6-trichloropicolinate, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichlorpicolinate,
2,4-
dichlorophenoxyacetate. When the surfactant is anionic, it is associated with
a positive
counterion, for example, Na+ or K+. When it is zwitterionic, it is associated
with both negative
and positive counterions, for example, Cl- and Na+ or K+. Fluids incorporating
VES based
viscosifiers preferably have a viscosity value of at least about 50 centipoise
at a shear rate of
about 100 s"1, at treatment temperature.
100511 The viscoelastic surfactant may be, for example, of the following
formulae: R-Z, where
R is the hydrophobic tail of the surfactant, which is a fully or partially
saturated, linear or
17
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
branched hydrocarbon chain of at least 14 carbon atoms and Z is the head group
of the
surfactant which can be -NR1R2R3+, -S03-, -COO-, or, in the case where the
surfactant is
zwitterionic, -N+(Rl)(R2)R3-COO" where R1, R2 and R3 are each independently
hydrogen or a
fully or partially saturated, linear or branched, aliphatic chain of at least
one carbon atom; and
where R1 or R2 can comprise a hydroxyl terminal group; or NR1R2O, where the
surfactant is not
charged, but an amine oxide.
[00521 In other embodiments a cleavable viscoelastic surfactant of the
following formula may
be used, which is disclosed in the International Patent Application
W002/064945: R-X-Y-Z,
where R is the hydrophobic tail of the surfactant, which is a fully or
partially saturated, linear or
branched hydrocarbon chain of at least 18 carbon atoms, X is the cleavable or
degradable group
of the surfactant which is an acetal, amide, ether or ester bond, Y is a
spacer group which is
constituted by a short saturated or partially saturated hydrocarbon chain of n
carbon atoms
where n is at least equal to 1, preferably 2 and, when n is equal to or
greater than 3, it may be a
straight or branched alkyl chain, and Z is the head group of the surfactant
which can NRIR2R3+,
-S03 -COO- or, in the case where the surfactant is zwitterionic, N+(RIR2R3-COO-
) where R1,
R2 and R3 are each independently hydrogen or a fully or partially saturated,
linear or branched,
aliphatic chain of at least one carbon atom, possibly comprising a hydroxyl
terminal group. Due
to the presence of the cleavable or degradable group, cleavable surfactants
are able to degrade
under downhole conditions.
100531 A nonlimiting example of a suitable cationic viscoelastic surfactant
useful for the
implementation of the invention is the N-erucyl-N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-N-
methyl ammonium
chloride. In an aqueous solution of appropriate ionic strength, such as
comprising 4wt% KCl or
3wt% NH4C1, this viscoelastic surfactant forms a gel containing worm-like
micelles that
entangle at surfactant concentrations above about lwt%. These worm-like
micelles collapse to
form spherical micelles when the gel is exposed to hydrocarbons, resulting in
a loss of viscosity.
100541 Nonlimiting examples of some suitable anionic viscoelastic surfactants
useful for the
implementation of the invention are monocarboxylates RCOO- such as oleate
where R is C17H33
or di- or oligomeric carboxylates such as those disclosed in the International
Patent Application
18
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
WO 02/11874. These mono-, di- or oligomeric carboxylates form viscoelastic
gels when in
alkaline solution in the presence of added salts such as potassium chloride
(KC1) or sodium
chloride (NaCl). Worm-like micelles of said gel degrade to spherical micelles
when the gel is
broken by hydrocarbon.
100551 Some examples of zwitterionic surfactants suitable for the
implementation of the
invention can be betaine surfactants having the general formula R-N(R1R2)-Z
where Z is an
alkyl group or R-CN(R1R2R3)-Z where Z is an acyl group. The hydrophobic group
R can be
aliphatic or aromatic, straight or branched, saturated or unsaturated. The
anionic group Z of the
surfactant can be -R'-S03-, -R'-COO- where R' is a saturated aliphatic chain.
R1, R2 and R3 are
each independently hydrogen or an aliphatic chain of at least one carbon atom.
[00561 Advantageously, the VES concentration is below about 10 wt %,
preferentially, below
about 5 wt % and below about 20xc* where c* is the overlap concentration of
the VES. More
preferentially, it is comprised between about 0.2xc* and about 5xc*. This
corresponds to VES
concentrations far below the viscoelastic surfactant concentration used in
viscoelastic surfactant
fracturing fluids of the prior art, which are of the order of from about 30xc*
to about 40xc*.
100571 VES viscosified fluids used in some embodiments of the invention are
hydrocarbon-
responsive so that gel structures break down on contact or mixing with
hydrocarbons. The long
VES micelles, which form the gel network, degrade on contact with hydrocarbons
to form
spherical micelles. Then, the viscosity of the VES gel decreases to value of
about 100 mPa-s or
below, preferentially, about 20 mPa-s, at a high shear rate.
100581 The fluids used in embodiments of the invention have a leak-off rate,
which is below the
leak-off rate of pure VES fluids of equivalent rheology. This is a very
significant advantage, and
as a result, the responsive fluid of the invention can be used. The fluid loss
properties of the
fluid can be further enhanced by the addition of colloidal particles, due to a
synergistic effect
between the fluid loss control additives and the water inert polymer
molecules. Colloidal
suspensions are typically dispersion of discrete very small particles,
spherical or elongated in
shape, charged so that the repulsion between the same charged particles
stabilizes the dispersion,
such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,081,439 (Sullivan, et al.).
Disturbance of the charge
19
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
balance due for instance by removing the water, changing the pH or adding salt
or water-
miscible organic solvent, causes the colloidal particles to aggregate
resulting in the formation of
a gel. The particles are less than 1 micron in size, and typically in the
range from about 10 to
about 100 nanometers. Commercial solutions of colloidal particles typically
include silica (also
known as silica sol) and oxides of aluminum, antimony, tin, cerium, yttrium
and zirconium. The
particles are mostly spherical and particle sizes may range from about 8 nm to
about 250 nm but
elongated particles, with a length up to 300 nm are also available and were
found to be also
acceptable for the invention. The particles may have a negative or positive
charge. To be
effective as fluid loss control agent, the solution of colloidal particles are
typically added at a
concentration between about 0.1 and 0.5% (ratio of volume of colloidal
solution to the total
volume).
100591 Included in fluids comprising the water inert polymer may be an
optional acid particulate
matter. The acid particulate matter may become embedded in, or be in adjacent
contact with, the
film deposited on the formation face during the placement of the film. The
acid particulate
matter may degrade, for example through hydrolysis or other formation factor
or triggering
event, to evolve acid monomers. The acid monomers may serve any of several
functions
including, but not limited to, film breaking, film void creation, pH decrease,
and the like, or any
combination thereof. As used herein, the term "dehydration" means
substantially separating an
aqueous medium from the acid particulate matter, notwithstanding the actual
composition of the
aqueous medium. The acid particulate matter used to form the packer generally
comprises a
solid acid particle that degrades, melts, or releases upon exposure to
particular factors. Such
factors include, but are not necessarily limited to time, temperature,
pressure, hydration, or pH.
As used herein, the term "acid particle" means an acid material which may be
an acid monomer
in an amorphous or crystalline solid state (solid acid), an acid contained
within a solid capsule,
shell, or coating (encapsulated acid), and the like. An acid particle may also
comprise a polyacid
in a solid form, amorphous or crystalline, which is the condensation product
of certain organic
acid precursors (acid monomers). Such organic acids are condensed by removal
of water to form
the polyacid.
CA 02600251 2010-10-26
79628-96
100601 Acid and acid ester particles useful in some embodiments of the
invention may be solid
or encapsulated. Any suitable acid or acid ester may be used. Examples of
suitable acids for
forming acid particles of the invention, which may be either solid acids or
encapsulated liquid
acids, include, but are not limited to, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid,
phosphoric acid,
phosphoric acid, nitric acid, formic acid, acetic acid, sulfamic acids, citric
acid, glycolic acid,
lactic acid When encapsulated, the acids may be encapsulated in accordance
with the methods
described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5, 373,901, 5,604,186, 6,357,527 and 6,761,220 B2.
Other acids such as
maleic acid, boric acid, oxalic acid, sulfamic acid, fumaric acid, other
mineral acids, other organic
acids, and the like. Sulfamic acid, boric acid, citric acid, oxalic acid,
maleic acid, and the like, are
some examples of suitable solid acids forming solid acid particles. The acid
particle matter may be
of any suitable particle size, range of particle size, grade of particles, or
plurality of particle sizes,
ranges, or grades. The acid particles may be manufactured in various solid
shapes, including, but not
limited to spheres, granules, fibers, beads, films, ribbons, strips,
platelets, and the like.
100611 Some acid particles useful-'in the invention hydrolyze under known and
controllable
conditions of temperature, time and/or pH to evolve the organic acid
precursors. Any acid
particle which is prone to such hydrolysis may be used in the invention. One
example of a
suitable acid particle is a solid polyacid formed from the solid cyclic dimer
of lactic acid (known
as "lactide"), which has a melting point of 95 to 125 C, (depending upon the
optical activity).
Another is a polymer of lactic acid, (sometimes called a polylactic acid (or
"PLA"), or a
polylactate, or a polylactide). Another example is the solid cyclic dimer of
glycolic acid (known
as "glycolide"), which has a melting point of about 86 T. Yet another example
suitable as solid
acid-precursors are those polymers of hydroxyacetic acid (glycolic acid)
("PGA"), with itself or
other hydroxy-, carboxylic acid-, or hydroxycarboxylic acid-containing
moieties described in
U.S. Patent Nos. 4,848,467; 4,957,165; and 4,986,355. Another example is a
copolymer of
lactic acid and glycolic acid. These polymers and copolymers are polyesters. A
particular
advantage of these materials is that the solid polyacids and the generated
acids are non-toxic and
21
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
are biodegradable. The solid polyacids are often used as self-dissolving
sutures. Some acid
particles can also be formed by encapsulation of acid precursors such as
esters, mono glycerides,
diglycerides, triglycerides, polyacrylate copolymers polymethacrylate
copolymers.
100621 Mixtures of one or more acid particles may be used in some embodiments.
The mixtures
may be purely physical mixtures of separate particles of separate components.
The mixtures
may also be manufactured such that one or more acid particle and one or more
solid acid-
reactive materials is in each particle; this will be termed a "combined
mixture". This may be
done, by non-limiting examples, by coating the acid particle material with a
solid acid-
precursor, or by heating a physical mixture until the solid acid-precursor
melts, mixing
thoroughly, cooling, and comminuting. For example, it is common practice in
industry to co-
extrude polymers with mineral filler materials, such as talc or carbonates, so
that they have
altered optical, thermal and/or mechanical properties. Such mixtures of
polymers and solids are
commonly referred to as "filled polymers". In any case it is preferable for
the distribution of the
components in the mixtures to be as uniform as possible. The choices and
relative amounts of
the components may be adjusted for the situation to control the acid particle
hydrolysis rate.
]0063] The amount of acid particle used will be dependent upon the particular
requirements and
environment presented. The preferred concentration range of acid particles is
between from
about 0.1 pounds per gallon of fluid (ppg) and about 8.34 ppg (between about
0.01 and about 1.0
kg/L). The most preferred range is between about 0.80 ppg and about 2.50 ppg
(between about
0.1 and about 0.3 kg/L). One skilled in the art will know that for a given
particle shape, flow
rate, rock properties, etc. there is an optimum concentration, that can be
calculated by one of
ordinary skill in the art.
100641 A gas component may optionally be incorporated into the fluids used in
some method
embodiments of the invention. The gas component of the fluids of the present
invention may be
produced from any suitable gas that forms an energized fluid or foam when
introduced into the
aqueous medium. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,937,283 (Blauer et al.).
Preferably, the gas
component comprises a gas selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, air,
argon, carbon
dioxide, and any mixtures thereof. More preferably the gas component comprises
carbon
22
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
dioxide, in any quality readily available. The gas component may assist in the
fracturing and
acidizing operation, as well as the well clean-up process. The fluid may
contain from about 10%
to about 90% volume gas component based upon total fluid volume percent,
preferably from
about 30% to about 80% volume gas component based upon total fluid volume
percent, and
more preferably from about 40% to about 70% volume gas component based upon
total fluid
volume percent.
100651 When a gas component is used in some method embodiments of the
invention, any
surfactant or foaming agent for which its ability to aid the dispersion and/or
stabilization of the
gas component into the base fluid to form an energized fluid as readily
apparent to those skilled
in the art may be used. Viscoelastic surfactants, such as those described in
U.S. Patent Nos.
6,703,352 (Dahayanake et al.) and 6,482,866 (Dahayanake et al.), are also
suitable for use in
fluids of the invention. In some embodiments of the invention, the surfactant
is an ionic
surfactant. Examples of suitable ionic surfactants include, but are not
limited to, anionic
surfactants such as alkyl carboxylates, alkyl ether carboxylates, alkyl
sulfates, alkyl ether
sulfates, alkyl sulfonates, a-olefin sulfonates, alkyl ether sulfates, alkyl
phosphates and alkyl
ether phosphates, and anionic surfactants containing at least one
ethylenglycol unit. Examples of
suitable ionic surfactants also include, but are not limited to, cationic
surfactants such as alkyl
amines, alkyl diamines, alkyl ether amines, alkyl quaternary ammonium, dialkyl
quaternary
ammonium and ester quaternary ammonium compounds. Examples of suitable ionic
surfactants
also include, but are not limited to, surfactants that are usually regarded as
zwitterionic
surfactants and in some cases as amphoteric surfactants such as alkyl
betaines, alkyl amido
betaines, alkyl imidazolines, alkyl amine oxides and alkyl quaternary ammonium
carboxylates.
The amphoteric surfactant is a class of surfactant that has both a positively
charged moiety and a
negatively charged moiety over a certain pH range (e.g. typically slightly
acidic), only a
negatively charged moiety over a certain pH range (e.g. typically slightly
alkaline) and only a
positively charged moiety at a different pH range (e.g. typically moderately
acidic), while a
zwitterionic surfactant has a permanently positively charged moiety in the
molecule regardless
of pH and a negatively charged moiety at alkaline pH. In some embodiments of
the invention,
the surfactant is a cationic, zwitterionic or amphoteric surfactant containing
an amine group or a
23
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
quaternary ammonium group in its chemical structure ("amine functional
surfactant"). A
particularly useful surfactant is the amphoteric alkyl amine contained in the
surfactant solution
Aquat 944 (available from Baker Petrolite of 12645 W. Airport Blvd, Sugar
Land, 77478
USA). In other embodiments of the invention, the surfactant is a blend of two
or more of the
surfactants described above, or a blend of any of the surfactant or
surfactants described above
with one or more nonionic surfactants. Examples of suitable nonionic
surfactants include, but
are not limited to, alkyl alcohol ethoxylates, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, alkyl
acid ethoxylates,
alkyl amine ethoxylates, sorbitan alkanoates and ethoxylated sorbitan
alkanoates. Any effective
amount of surfactant or blend of surfactants may be used in aqueous energized
fluids of the
invention. Preferably the fluids incorporate the surfactant or blend of
surfactants in an amount of
about 0.02 wt% to about 5 wt% of total liquid phase weight, and more
preferably from about
0.05 wt% to about 2 wt% of total liquid phase weight.
[00661 In some embodiments, the fluids used may further include a crosslinker.
Adding
crosslinkers to the fluid may further augment the viscosity of the fluid.
Crosslinking consists of
the attachment of two polymeric chains through the chemical association of
such chains to a
common element or chemical group. Suitable crosslinkers may comprise a
chemical compound
containing a polyvalent metal ion such as, but not necessarily limited to,
chromium, iron, boron,
aluminum, titanium, antimony and zirconium.
100671 The fluids used in some method embodiments of the invention may include
an
electrolyte which may be an organic acid, organic acid salt, or inorganic
salt. Mixtures of the
above members are specifically contemplated as falling within the scope of the
invention. This
member will typically be present in a minor amount (e.g. less than about 30%
by weight of the
liquid phase).
100681 The organic acid is typically a sulfonic acid or a carboxylic acid, and
the anionic
counter-ion of the organic acid salts is typically a sulfonate or a
carboxylate. Representative of
such organic molecules include various aromatic sulfonates and carboxylates
such as p-toluene
sulfonate, naphthalene sulfonate, chlorobenzoic acid, salicylic acid, phthalic
acid and the like,
where such counter-ions are water-soluble. Most preferred organic acids are
formic acid, citric
24
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
acid, 5-hydroxy- l -napthoic acid, 6- hydroxy- l -napthoic acid, 7-hydroxy- l -
napthoic acid, 1-
hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid, 3-hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid, 5-hydroxy-2-naphthoic
acid, 7-hydroxy-
2-napthoic acid, 1, 3-dihydroxy-2-naphthoic acid, and 3,4- dichlorobenzoic
acid.
100691 The inorganic salts that are particularly suitable include, but are not
limited to, water-
soluble potassium, sodium, and ammonium salts, such as potassium chloride and
ammonium
chloride. Additionally, magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, calcium bromide,
zinc halide,
sodium carbonate, and sodium bicarbonate salts may also be used. Any mixtures
of the
inorganic salts may be used as well. The inorganic salts may aid in the
development of increased
viscosity that is characteristic of preferred fluids. Further, the inorganic
salt may assist in
maintaining the stability of a geologic formation to which the fluid is
exposed. Formation
stability and in particular clay stability (by inhibiting hydration of the
clay) is achieved at a
concentration level of a few percent by weight and as such the density of
fluid is not
significantly altered by the presence of the inorganic salt unless fluid
density becomes an
important consideration, at which point, heavier inorganic salts may be used.
In a preferred
embodiment of the invention, the electrolyte is potassium chloride. The
electrolyte is preferably
used in an amount of from about 0.01 wt% to about 12.0 wt% of the total liquid
phase weight,
and more preferably from about 1.0 wt% to about 8.0 wt% of the total liquid
phase weight.
100701 Fluids used in some embodiments of the invention may also comprise an
organoamino
compound. Examples of suitable organoamino compounds include, but are not
necessarily
limited to, tetraethylenepentamine, triethylenetetramine,
pentaethylenhexamine,
triethanolamine, and the like, or any mixtures thereof. When organoamino
compounds are used
in fluids of the invention, they are incorporated at an amount from about 0.01
wt% to about 2.0
wt% based on total liquid phase weight. Preferably, when used, the organoamino
compound is
incorporated at an amount from about 0.05 wt% to about 1.0 wt% based on total
liquid phase
weight. A particularly useful organoamino compound is tetraethylenepentamine.
100711 Friction reducers may also be incorporated into fluids used in the
invention. Any friction
reducer may be used. Also, polymers such as polyacrylamide, polyisobutyl
methacrylate,
polymethyl methacrylate and polyisobutylene as well as water-soluble friction
reducers such as
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
guar gum, guar gum derivatives, hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, and polyethylene
oxide may be
used. Commercial drag reducing chemicals such as those sold by Conoco Inc.
under the
trademark "CDR" as described in U. S. Pat. No. 3,692,676 (Culter et al.) or
drag reducers such
as those sold by Chemlink designated under the trademarks "FLO 1003, 1004,
1005 & 1008"
have also been found to be effective. These polymeric species added as
friction reducers or
viscosity index improvers may also act as excellent fluid loss additives
reducing or even
eliminating the need for conventional fluid loss additives.
100721 Breakers, in addition to those described above, may optionally be used
in some methods
of the invention. The purpose of this component is to "break" or diminish the
viscosity of the
fluid so that this fluid is even more easily recovered from the formation
during cleanup. With
regard to breaking down viscosity, oxidizers, enzymes, or acids may be used.
Breakers reduce
the polymer's molecular weight by the action of an acid, an oxidizer, an
enzyme, or some
combination of these on the polymer itself. In the case of borate-crosslinked
gels, increasing the
pH and therefore increasing the effective concentration of the active
crosslinker (the borate
anion), will allow the polymer to be crosslinked. Lowering the pH can just as
easily eliminate
the borate/polymer bonds. At pH values at or above 8, the borate ion exists
and is available to
crosslink and cause gelling. At lower pH, the borate is tied up by hydrogen
and is not available
for crosslinking, thus gelation caused by borate ion is reversible. Preferred
breakers include 0.1
to 20 pounds per thousands gallons of conventional oxidizers such as ammonium
persulfates,
live or encapsulated, or potassium periodate, calcium peroxide, chlorites, and
the like. In oil
producing formations the film may be at least partially broken when contacted
with formation
fluids (oil), which may help de-stabilize the film.
100731 A fiber component may be included in the fluids used in the invention
to achieve a
variety of properties including improving particle suspension, and particle
transport capabilities,
and gas phase stability. Fibers used may be hydrophilic or hydrophobic in
nature, but
hydrophilic fibers are preferred. Fibers can be any fibrous material, such as,
but not necessarily
limited to, natural organic fibers, comminuted plant materials, synthetic
polymer fibers (by non-
limiting example polyester, polyaramide, polyamide, novoloid or a novoloid-
type polymer),
26
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
fibrillated synthetic organic fibers, ceramic fibers, inorganic fibers, metal
fibers, metal
filaments, carbon fibers, glass fibers, ceramic fibers, natural polymer
fibers, and any mixtures
thereof. Particularly useful fibers are polyester fibers coated to be highly
hydrophilic, such as,
but not limited to, DACRON polyethylene terephthalate (PET) Fibers available
from Invista
Corp. Wichita, KS, USA, 67220. Other examples of useful fibers include, but
are not limited to,
polylactic acid polyester fibers, polyglycolic acid polyester fibers,
polyvinyl alcohol fibers, and
the like. When used in fluids of the invention, the fiber component may be
included at
concentrations from about 1 to about 15 grams per liter of the liquid phase of
the fluid,
preferably the concentration of fibers are from about 2 to about 12 grams per
liter of liquid, and
more preferably from about 2 to about 10 grams per liter of liquid.
[00741 Embodiments of the invention may use fluids further containing other
additives and
chemicals that are known to be commonly used in oilfield applications by those
skilled in the
art. These include, but are not necessarily limited to, materials such as
surfactants in addition to
those mentioned hereinabove, breaker aids in addition to those mentioned
hereinabove, oxygen
scavengers, alcohols, scale inhibitors, corrosion inhibitors, fluid-loss
additives, bactericides, and
the like. Also, they may include a co-surfactant to optimize viscosity or to
minimize the
formation of stabilized emulsions that contain components of crude oil, or as
described
hereinabove, a polysaccharide or chemically modified polysaccharide, natural
polymers and
derivatives of natural polymers, such as cellulose, derivatized cellulose,
guar gum, derivatized
guar gum, or biopolymers such as xanthan, diutan, and scleroglucan, synthetic
polymers such as
polyacrylamides and polyacrylamide copolymers, oxidizers such as persulfates,
peroxides,
bromates, chlorates, chlorites, periodates, and the like.
100751 Conventional propped hydraulic fracturing methods, with appropriate
adjustments if
necessary, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, are used in the
methods of the
invention. One preferred fracture stimulation treatment according to the
present invention
typically begins with a conventional pad stage to generate the fracture,
followed by a sequence
of stages in which a viscous carrier fluid transports proppant into the
fracture as the fracture is
propagated. Typically, in this sequence of stages the amount of propping agent
is increased,
normally stepwise. The pad and carrier fluid can be, and usually are, a gelled
aqueous fluid,
27
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
such as water or brine thickened with a viscoelastic surfactant or with a
water soluble or
dispersible polymer such as guar, hydroxypropylguar or the like. The pad and
carrier fluids may
contain various additives. Non-limiting examples are fluid loss additives,
crosslinking agents,
clay control agents, breakers and the like, provided that the additives do not
affect the stability
or action of the fluid.
100761 The procedural techniques for pumping fracture stimulation fluids down
a wellbore to
fracture a subterranean formation are well known. The person that designs such
fracturing
treatments is the person of ordinary skill to whom this disclosure is
directed. That person has
available many useful tools to help design and implement the fracturing
treatments, one of
which is a computer program commonly referred to as a fracture simulation
model (also known
as fracture models, fracture simulators, and fracture placement models). Most
if not all
commercial service companies that provide fracturing services to the oilfield
have one or more
fracture simulation models that their treatment designers use. One commercial
fracture
simulation model that is widely used by several service companies is known as
FracCADETM.
This commercial computer program is a fracture design, prediction, and
treatment-monitoring
program designed by Schlumberger, Ltd. All of the various fracture simulation
models use
information available to the treatment designer concerning the formation to be
treated and the
various treatment fluids (and additives) in the calculations, and the program
output is a pumping
schedule that is used to pump the fracture stimulation fluids into the
wellbore. The text
"Reservoir Stimulation," Third Edition, Edited by Michael J. Economides and
Kenneth G.
Nolte, Published by John Wiley & Sons, (2000), is an excellent reference book
for fracturing
and other well treatments; it discusses fracture simulation models in Chapter
5 (page 5-28) and
the Appendix for Chapter 5 (page A- 15)).
100771 Embodiments of the invention may also include placing proppant
particles that are
substantially insoluble in the fluids of the formation. Proppant particles
carried by the treatment
fluid remain in the fracture created, thus propping open the fracture when the
fracturing pressure
is released and the well is put into production. Suitable proppant materials
include, but are not
limited to, sand, walnut shells, sintered bauxite, glass beads, ceramic
materials, naturally
occurring materials, or similar materials. Mixtures of proppants can be used
as well. If sand is
28
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
used, it will typically be from about 20 to about 100 U.S. Standard Mesh in
size. Naturally
occurring materials may be underived and/or unprocessed naturally occurring
materials, as well
as materials based on naturally occurring materials that have been processed
and/or derived.
Suitable examples of naturally occurring particulate materials for use as
proppants include, but
are not necessarily limited to: ground or crushed shells of nuts such as
walnut, coconut, pecan,
almond, ivory nut, brazil nut, etc.; ground or crushed seed shells (including
fruit pits) of seeds of
fruits such as plum, olive, peach, cherry, apricot, etc.; ground or crushed
seed shells of other
plants such as maize (e.g., corn cobs or corn kernels), etc.; processed wood
materials such as
those derived from woods such as oak, hickory, walnut, poplar, mahogany, etc.
including such
woods that have been processed by grinding, chipping, or other form of
particalization,
processing, etc. Further information on nuts and composition thereof may be
found in
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Edited by Raymond E. Kirk and Donald F.
Othmer,
Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Volume 16, pages 248-273 (entitled "Nuts"),
Copyright
1981.
100781 The concentration of proppant in the fluid can be any concentration
known in the art, and
will preferably be in the range of from about 0.05 to about 3 kilograms of
proppant added per
liter of liquid phase. Also, any of the proppant particles can further be
coated with a resin to
potentially improve the strength, clustering ability, and flow back properties
of the proppant.
EXAMPLES
Examplesl through 3:
100791 In these examples the water inert polymer, in the form of an emulsion,
is blended with a
conventional fracturing fluid during early stages of the treatment (pad), and
the rheology of the
fluid with and without the water inert polymer is compared to ensure that
adequate viscosity is
developed and maintained for fracturing. The pad fluid contained 40 ppt guar
gum supplied by
Economy Polymers and Chemicals, Houston, TX 77245-0246, the guar being
crosslinked with a
borate crosslinker (4 ppt of Boric Acid, with a pH adjusted to - 11 using a
30% weight aqueous
solution of caustic soda). The emulsion added was ChemCor PolyEMULSION 330N35.
The
graph in Figure 1 shows the viscosity, measured using a conventional Fann 50
rheometer, of the
29
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
pad fluid containing no emulsion (Example 1), 1% by weight of ChemCor HDPE
PolyEMULSION 330N35 emulsion based upon total fluid weight (Example 2), and
2.5% by
weight of ChemCor HDPE Po1yEMULSION 330N35 emulsion based upon total fluid
weight
(Example 3). The pad fluid also included DI water, contained a 50% by weight
aqueous solution
of tetra methyl ammonium chloride clay stabilizer added at 2 gpt, and 1 gpt of
a 85% by weight
solution of triethanol amine high temperature stabilizer.
100801 The fluids of Examples 2 and 3 showed improved viscosity stability and
rheology up to
250 F. This also illustrates that the water inert polymer emulsion is not
degrading fluid
performance and is therefore compatible with the pad fluid and conventional
additives, such as
clay stabilizers and temperature stabilizers, used in fracturing operations.
Also tested and
providing like rheology trends was ChemCor's polyEMULSION 629N40 emulsion
polymer.
Examples 4 through 7:
100811 In examples 4 through 7, and referring to Figure 2, the fluid loss is
measured on samples
with a water inert polymer, in the form of an emulsion, blended with
conventional fracturing pad
fluids, and fluid loss is determined for the fluid with and without the water
inert polymer. The
pad fluids contained 25 ppt guar gum supplied by Economy Polymers and
Chemicals, the guar
being crosslinked with a borate crosslinker (4 ppt of Boric Acid, with a pH
adjusted to - 11 with
caustic soda). The pad fluid also included DI water, contained a 50% by weight
aqueous
solution of tetra methyl ammonium chloride clay stabilizer added at 2 gpt, and
1 gpt of a 85% by
weight solution of triethanol amine high temperature stabilizer. In examples 5
through 7, the
emulsion added was ChemCor Po1yEMULSION 330N35.
100821 The fluids were evaluated on a static fluid loss cell using 1" diameter
cores of varied
permeability at temperature with 1200 psi total pressure and 200 psi back
pressure, for a net
pressure of 1000 psi. The cores (Nugget sandstones cores) of permeability
1.4mD without
emulsion (Example 4), with I% by weight of emulsion based upon total fluid
weight (Example
5) (core permeability 2.1 mD), with 5% by weight of emulsion based upon total
fluid weight
(Example 6) (Core permeability 3.2 mD), and 10% by weight of emulsion based
upon total fluid
weight (Example 7) (Core permeability 2.7 mD). As shown in the curves of
Figure 2, these
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
examples illustrate how the inclusion of a water inert polymer at increased
concentration into
the pad fluid significantly and progressively decreases fluid leak-off.
Examples 8 through 15
100831 For examples 8 through 15, pad fluids, formulated in accordance with
the pad fluids of
examples 1 and 4 above, with and without either ChemCOR PolyEMULSION 330N35 or
po1yEMULSION 629N40, were tested at different temperatures and normalized leak-
off
coefficients (Cõ/sgrt(K)) determined and reported in Figure 3. C, is discussed
in Navarrete, R.
C., Caweizel, K. E., and Constien, V. G.: "Dynamic Fluid Loss in Hydraulic
Fracturing Under
Realistic Shear Conditions in High- Permeability Rocks," SPE Production and
Facilities, pp
138-143 (August, 1996). To determine leak-off rates, experiments were
conducted in a
conventional static fluid loss cell at 1200 psi total pressure and a back
pressure of 200 psi,
giving a total net pressure across the core of 1000 psi. The core was held at
constant
temperature, as indicated in Fig. 3, and the fluid collected at the discharge
of the core. The rate
of fluid leaking off through the core was measured as a function of time. The
slope of the
volume leaking off as a function of the square root of time was measured and
reported as being
the C,,, coefficient. The C,,, coefficient was divided by the square root of
the permeability (an
indication of the diameter of the pore size of the core used) to normalize the
leak-off rate. Using
this normalization approach, the C,,, coefficients for a given system will be
consistent over the
range of permeabilities tested. As shown in Fig. 3, the inclusion of a water
inert polymer into the
pad fluid significantly improves significantly fluid leak-off. C,,, is
expressed in units of ft/mm'12,
while Cõ / Sqrt (K) in units of ft/(mm1/2 *milli-DarcyU2)
Examples 16 and 17
(00841 Fluid loss tests using a conventional static fluid loss cell, with
cores 1" in diameter and
3.61 mD permeability, at 185 F, 1200 psi total pressure, and 200 psi back
pressure, were run
with and without persulfate breaker to evaluate film removal. Figure 4
displays the fluid loss of
a 40 ppt crosslinked gel formed from guar gum from Economy Polymers and
Chemicals
crosslinked with 5 ppt of boric Acid, along with ChemCOR po1yEMULSION 629N40
added at
10% by weight based total fluid weight, where the pH of the solution was
adjusted to pH - 11
31
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
using a 30% solution by weight of caustic soda solution. The aqueous fluids
contained 2 gpt
liquid clay stabilizer (a 50% solution by weight of tetra methyl ammonium
chloride in water
solution) and a high temperature stabilizer at 2 gpt liquid (a 25% solution by
weight of triethanol
amine) In example 16, ammonium persulfate was incorporated in the fluid at 5
ppt and placed in
a first cell (Example 16) at the time indicated by the arrow on Figure 4. No
persulfate was
placed in a second cell (Example 17), and the fluid loss rate was not
significantly changed.
Potassium periodate was also evaluated in similar fashion and proved to be
effective.
100851 In Examples 18 through 39, water inert polymers formed of latexes were
evaluated
illustrating their performance according to the invention.
Examples 18 through 23
[00861 Several available latex polymers were evaluated for their rheological
effect on treatment
fluids. They included nanolatex of acrylic copolymer latexes of VA/ VeOVA, MMA
(vinyl
acetate, vinylester of versatic acid, methyl methacrylate), etc. In these
cases the latexes did not
have enough viscosity to create the fracture itself; however, blended with
conventional
fracturing fluids they showed good rheology. For example Figure 5 shows the
rheology of a 25
ppt crosslinked guar system prepared with 2 gpt of a liquid clay stabilizer
solution. The 25 ppt
gel was crosslinked with 4 ppt boric acid and the pH was adjusted to 11 with
caustic soda. In all
cases, the latex polymer studied was added to the fluid at a rate of 10% by
weight, based upon
total fluid weight.
100871 Latex 1 (Example 18) is a nanolatex of acrylic copolymers, RhodoPASS
LS 5000
supplied by Rhodia, latexes 2 (Example 19) and 3 (Example 20) are formed from
vinyl acetate
and vinylester of versatic acid, available as AV29 from Rhodia, latex 5
(Example 22) is based
upon vinyl alcohol, vinyl versatate and dibutyl maleate, while latex 6
(Example 23) is formed
from methyl methacrylate, acrylic acid, and 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate. The
rheology of the
fracturing fluid with and without the latexes is consistent and would allow
for opening a fracture
in the rock.
32
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
100881 The latexes were also tested under different temperature with various
loadings and the
data were consistent across a large range of temperature. Temperatures ranged
from 85 F to
200 F using concentrations from 1 % to 20 % by weight, based upon total fluid
weight.
Examples 24 through 28
100891 Figures 6, 7 & 8 represent the values of fluid loss measured for
different cores using
different latex concentrations at different temperatures. For example, figure
6 is a plot of the C,,,
coefficients measured on 5 different cores at 85 F with various amount of
latex, examples 24
through 28. The C,v coefficient have been normalized by the square root of the
permeability of
the core to take into account the estimated pore diameter of the core. Each
point corresponds to
a static fluid loss experiment run as described above for a 25 ppts gel (Guar
from Economy
Polymers & Chemicals) crosslinked with 5 ppt boric acid and where the pH was
adjusted to pH
with a 30% solution by weight of caustic soda. The fluid loss was measured and
recorded
at 85 F, and C,,, coefficient calculated and normalized against the square
root of the permeability
of the core and the data plotted for different latex concentrations. No latex
was used for example
24. The latex used in examples 25 through 28 is a latex of vinyl acetate and
VeOVA (branched
alcohol) of average particle size - 2 micrometer, supplied as AV29 from
Rhodia. The latex was
incorporated into the above fluids at the concentrations given in Figure 6.
Figure 6 shows that
increasing latex concentration lowers the fluid loss coefficient, and improves
fluid efficiency.
Figure 7 is the same data as Figure 6, but reported differently. In Figure 7,
the fluid loss
coefficients are reported as a function of the latex concentration, thus
further illustrating the
advantage of incorporating water inert polymer to improve fluid efficiency.
Note that in
example 24, the C, / Sqrt (K) is about 0.0014, and the addition of latex
reduced this value to less
than 0.0014, in all cases. For example 25, C,,, / Sqrt (K) was about 0.0008,
about 0.0004 for
example 26, about 0.0003 for example 27, and about 0.0002 for example 28.
Examples 29 through 33
100901 The graph in Figure 8 is similar with that of Figure 6, but differs in
that different latexes,
and blends of latexes, were used as film forming materials. Each point
corresponds to a static
fluid loss experiment run as described above for a 25 ppt gel (Guar from
Economy Polymers &
33
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
Chemicals) crosslinked with 5 ppt Boric Acid, and where the pH was adjusted to
pH - 10 with a
30% solution by weight of caustic soda. The fluid loss was measured and
recorded at 85 F, the
C,,, coefficient calculated and normalized against the square root of the
permeability of the core
and the data plotted for different latex concentration or combination. In one
case, a blend of
latexes was used, where the latexes had different particle size. The latex A
is a nanolatex acrylic
copolymer from Rhodia supplied as RhodoPASS LS 5000, having an average
particle size of
about 0.06 micrometer, while the latex AV29 from Rhodia is a latex of vinyl
alcohol and other
branched alcohols of about 2 micrometer average particle size. The data show
that using a blend
of two different latexes of different particle size increased significantly
the efficiency of the film
forming material, since the fluid loss coefficient of the film formed with 10%
by weight of a
latex A correspond to the same value as the fluid loss coefficient of a film
formed with 2.5% of
the latex blend with 2.5% nanolatex (example 33).
Examples 34 through 36
[00911 Figure 9 illustrates the results of a conventional static fluid loss
test using 1" cores. The
fluid loss was run at 1000 psi net pressure at 125 F with a 25 ppt guar from
Economy Polymer
and Chemicals crosslinked with 5 ppt of Boric Acid and where the pH of the
solution was
adjusted using a 30 % solution by weight of caustic soda to a value close to
10.5. The different
fluid loss cells each contained the 25 ppt crosslinked gel, blended in a
conventional liquid
solution of clay stabilizer (a 50% solution by weight of tetra methyl ammonium
chloride) and
from the left to the right, no other additives (example 34), 15% by weight of
AV22 latex
available from Rhodia (a latex of VA/ VeOVA of 2 micrometer in average
particle size)
(example 35), and 20 % by weight of the same latex (example 36). The
experiment was run over
4 hours and the cores were removed from the fluid loss cell and the pictures
were taken. The
picture on the left shows a conventional filter cake built from the 25 ppt
crosslinked gel, while
the pictures on the right show a much thinner film formed upon dehydration of
the fluid and
concentration of the latexes.
Examples 37 through 39
34
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
100921 Referring now to Figure 10, examples 37 through 39 illustrate the
additional advantage
of using a latex water inert polymer in conjunction with a fluid loss
additive. The fluids were
evaluated on a static fluid loss cell using 1" diameter cores of varied
permeability at temperature
.The fluid loss was run at 1000 psi net pressure at 100 F with a 25 ppt guar
from Economy
Polymer and Chemicals crosslinked with 5 ppt of Boric Acid and where the pH of
the solution
was adjusted using a 30 % solution by weight of caustic soda to a value close
to 10.5. The
different fluid loss cells contained each the 25 ppt crosslinked gel a
conventional liquid solution
of clay stabilizer (a 25% solution by weight of tetra methyl chloride). The
cores used were of
different but close permeabilities: (Nugget sandstones cores) 1.2 mD with the
fluid loss additive
(example 37), 2.6 mD with the 10% by weight latex suspension (example 38), and
2 mD with
the mixture of fluid loss additive and the 10% suspension of latex (example
39). As shown in
the curves of Figure 10, these examples illustrate the synergy between the
solid particles of the
fluid loss additives with the latex particles, since the leak off is
significantly reduced when the
two components are added simultaneously. The fluid loss with conventional
fluid loss additive
is further improved when used with a water inert latex polymer. In this
example the latex used is
Latex Terpo 600B from Rhodia and the fluid loss additive used is a
conventional mixture of
starch and mica.
Examples 40 and 41
100931 Referring to Figure 11, and examples 40 and 41, here the fluids were
evaluated on a
static fluid loss cell using 1" diameter cores of varied permeability at
temperature. The fluid loss
was run at 1000 psi net pressure at 100 F with a 10% by weight of viscoelastic
surfactant (VES)
based viscosifier solution. The VES solution included about 60% by weight (Z)-
13 docosenyl-
N-N- bis (2-hydroxyethyl) methyl ammonium chloride, about 13% by weight
propane-1,2-diol,
about 20% by weight propan-2-ol, and about 7% water. The VES solution was
evaluated
without (example 40) and with a 5% by weight of ChemCOR PolyEMULSION 330N35
(example 41). The cores had peremeability values of about 2.3 mD. The
different fluid loss cells
each contained a conventional liquid solution of clay stabilizer (4% by weight
of Potassium
Chloride). As shown in the curves of Figure 11, these examples illustrate that
the fluid loss is
significantly decreased for VES carrying fluids with the use of a film forming
material.
CA 02600251 2007-09-06
Attorney Docket No. 56.0959
Inventors: Richard Hutchins,
Marie Noelle Dessinges, Carlos Abad, Erik Nelson
[00941 Although the methods have been described here for, and are most
typically used for,
hydrocarbon production, they may also be used in injection wells and for
production of other
fluids, such as water or brine. The particular embodiments disclosed above are
illustrative only,
as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent
manners apparent to
those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein.
Furthermore, no limitations
are intended to the details herein shown, other than as described in the
claims below. It is
therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be
altered or modified
and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the
invention. Accordingly,
the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
36
