Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02626862 2013-02-01
1
Improved Dispersions of High Carboxyl Polyamides Into Polyesters Using An
Interfacial
Tension Reducing Agent
10
Field Of Invention
This invention relates to a polymer composition useful for plastic packaging.
Background of the Invention
Products sensitive to oxygen, particularly foods, beverages and medicines,
deteriorate or
spoil in the presence of oxygen. One approach to creating an oxygen free
environment is
to package such products in a container comprised of at least one layer of a
so-called
"passive" gas barrier film that is a physical barrier and reduces or
eliminates the
transmission of oxygen through the container wall but does not react with
oxygen. For
instance, layers of thermoplastic polyester (PET) are often supplemented with
additional
layers of packaging material to prevent oxygen permeation.
Adding a barrier layer of gas barrier film increases the overall passive-
barrier of the
package to other gases as well. Ethylvinyl alcohol (EVOH), polyvinylidene
dichloride
(PVDC), and polyamides like poly(m-xylylene adipamide) (MXD6), are examples of
films commonly used for this purpose due to their excellent gas barrier
properties. These
materials are often used in beer packaging because the low permeation rate
(high passive
barrier) keeps the oxygen away from the product as well as keeping the carbon
dioxide in
the beverage. Distinct layers of differing materials are no t preferred
because the
multilayer construction adds cost.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
2
It is therefore preferable to blend all the components into a single layer,
called a
monolayer construction. The monolayer construction does not work for most
compositions due to poor aesthetics. For example, a monolayer of poly(m-
xylylene
adipamide) (MXD6) blended into PET (polyethylene terephthalate or its
crystallizable
copolymers) has unacceptable haze at desirable barrier levels of the MXD6.
This is
particularly the case for the walls of stretch blow molded and reheat stretch
blown
containers or stretched film wraps. In the reheat stretch blown container, for
example,
the MXD6 is dispersed into the PET and the composition subsequently injection
molded
into an amorphous article called a preform. The preform is a container itself
and is
generally tube shaped with one closed end and optionally threads to receive
the screw
cap around the opening of the other end. In the case of the preform for a jar,
the length
of the tube is so small that the preform resembles a diaphragm or disk.
The preform can then be stretched, also known as orienting the material, into
the shape of
the container. Depending upon the process, the preform can be stretched after
injection
or extrusion molding but before it cools below the glass transition
temperature or the
major component (usually the polyester). Alternatively, the cold molded
preform can be
stretched after being reheated to above the glass transition or softening
temperature of the
composition making up the preform. The unstretched preform of MXD6 dispersed
into
PET is typically transparent with very little haze. However, upon stretching,
or being
pulled, pushed out or even squished, the subsequent thinned wall has a
tremendous
amount of haze. This haze is such that it renders an uncoloured monolayer
bottle with
stretched walls made from polyester-polyamide blends unmarketable.
According to United States Patent No. 6,288,161, haze and colour are caused by
a change
in the refractive index of the materials when the polymers are oriented.
Orientation
enlarges the size of MXD6 domains so that the size of enough domains are
greater than
the minimum wavelength of visible light (approximately 400nm) resulting in
increased
light scattering.
Table 1 of United States Patent No. 6,288,161 shows a fourfold increase in
haze when
the article is oriented (stretched) to a 9 drawdown ratio. Tables 2 and 3 of
United States
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
3
Patent No. 6,288,161 show even larger haze differences caused by the reheat
stretch blow
molding of the container wall.
United States Patent No. 6,288,161 teaches overcoming the haze by using a low
stretch
process to limit the degree of orientation so that the MXD6 domains are less
than the
minimum wavelength of visible light. Low stretch is achieved through a process
called
extrusion blow molding. Low stretch extrusion blow molding is inferior to high
stretch
processes such as reheat blow and injection stretch blow mold because of the
economics
and the significantly greater barrier properties associated with the higher
stretch ratios
(drawdowns). There exists therefore a need for a low haze mono-layer high
stretched
wall comprised of a polyester and a polyamide, preferably MXD6.
United States Patent No. 6,444,283 discloses that the haze of a film of
polyester blended
with a polyamide increases with increasing amounts of polyamide. United States
Patent
No. 6,444,283 teaches that the reduction of the haze of a film comprising
polyester
blended with a polyamide can be reduced by using a polyamide with a number
average
molecular weight less than 15000 and an amino to carboxyl end group ratio
greater than
or equal to 1Ø At present, there is no commercial grade of MXD6, the
preferred
polyamide, available at the required molecular weight taught in United States
Patent No.
6,444,283.
Japanese Patent Application H10-7893 to Harada et al, teaches that good
transparency of
a polyester/nix polyamide blend can be obtained without a compatibilizer when
the end
groups satisfy the equations of
1) 50 < a-b < 300 and
2) a+b <300,
where a is the number of amino end groups in micro equivalents per gram and b
is the
number of carboxyl end groups in micro equivalents per gram. Harada et al
teaches that
if in formula 1) a-b is less than 50 a resin with a clearly improved
transparency of the
blended resin composition can not be obtained. For a-b to be greater than 50,
the number
of amino end groups must therefore exceed the number of carboxyl end groups.
When
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
4
the number of amino groups exceeds the number of carboxyl group s, the amino
to
carboxyl end group ratio is by definition greater than 1Ø
WO 2004/069909 teaches that the haze can be visually masked by adding a
colorant to
absorb the light at the wavelengths corresponding to the size of incompatible
domains,
such as polyamide, dispersed in the polyester. Because this technique requires
a colorant
its use is limited to coloured bottles.
There exists, therefore, a need for an uncoloured polyester-polyamide
composition which
does not produce an unacceptable visual haze when stretched.
United State Patent Application 2004/0013833 Al discloses a compatibilized
polymer
blend comprising polyamide, PET or PET containing copolymer, and at least one
compatibilizer. Preferred compatibilizers of United State Patent
Application
2004/0013833 Al include, but are not limited to, polyester ionomers, are the
polycondensation reaction products of an aromatic dicarboxylic acid or its
ester¨forming
derivative, a diol or its ester forming derivative, and an ester forming
compound
comprising an ionic sulfonate group disclosed in United States Patent No.
6,500,895 Bl.
Japanese Patent Application 0 3181246 A, is aimed at improving the impact
resistance of
multi-layer structures. The application discloses a composition of the
sulfonated
polyester and MXD6 and claims:
1) a multilayer structure consisting of at least two layers of a m-
xylilenediamine
group containing polyamide (A) layer and a thermoplastic polyester (B1) or
polycarbonate (B2) layer, which contains, with respect to the total diol
and/or the total
dicarboxylic acid, 0.1 ¨ 20 mol.% of a diol and/or dicarboxylic acid
represented by the
formula X-R
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
Where X is a diol or dicarboxylic acid, and R is -S03Y, -COOY, -OY, -P0(0Y)2, -
PO3Z,
-SO3 -000 -0
N N
5 Z, Z, and Z
-SO3 -000 -0
Where Y is a monovalent metal and Z is a bivalent metal.
The authors of Japanese Patent Application 0 3181246 state that the
composition relates
to multilayer structures, especially to co-injection stretched multilayer
structures and
compositions, with considerably improved impact-resistant delamination
properties and
that the divalent metals perform better than the monovalent metals.
United States Patent No. 5,300,572 discloses a moldable polyester resin
composition and
molded articles there from include, based on the total weight of all resin
compositions:
A) between 2 to 98% by weight of a compatabilizing metal sulfonate group-
containing
aromatic polyester copolymer which is the polycondensation reaction product of
(a) an
aromatic dicarboxylic acid or its ester-forming derivative, (b) a diol
compound or its
ester-forming derivative, and (c) an ester-forming compound containing a metal
sulfonate
group; B) between 2 to 98% by weight of an additive resin which is one of (B-
I) an olefin
copolymer which is the copolymerization reaction product between an olefin
with a least
one of an a,b-unsaturated carboxylic acid or its derivative and a vinyl
alcohol or its ester,
(B-II) a polyamide resin; and optionally (C) between 0 to 96% by weight of a
non-
compatabilizing aromatic polyester resin, and again the bivalent metal is the
preferred
comp atibiliz er.
United States Patent No. 5,300,572 discloses neither the role of the end
groups nor the
use of the modified polyester and polyamide composition in a stretched article
such as
the wall of a reheat stretch or even extrusion blow container.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
6
There exists therefore a need for a polyester/polyamide composition that can
create a low
haze stretched wall monolayer container.
Japanese Patent Application JP 2663578-B2 to Kamatsu advocates the use of
sodium
isophthalate sulfonate copolymerized into the polyester to compatibilize
polyester and
polyamide blends. The examples provided in Japanese Patent Application JP
2663578-
B2 are all based on sodium sulfoisophthalate and show only a reduction in haze
and
increased haze with increased amounts of MXD6.
HI PCT Application WO 2005/023530 claims the use of cobalt and zinc to
reduce the
increased color from blending a polyester, an ionic compatibilizer and
partially aromatic
polyamide. The application teaches that the divalent metal is more effective
than
monovalent metals and has examples showing that the domains of MXD6 dispersed
into
a copolymer with sodium isophthalic acid are approximately 200nm.
The cobalt compounds useful in WO 2005/023530 include cobalt acetate, cobalt
carbonate, cobalt chloride, cobalt hydroxide, cobalt naphthenate, cobalt
oleate, cobalt
linoleate, cobalt octoate, cobalt stearate, cobalt nitrate, cobalt phosphate,
cobalt sulphate,
cobalt (ethylene glycolate), and mixtures of two or more these, among others.
As a
transition metal catalyst for active oxygen scavenging, a salt of a long chain
fatty acid is
preferred, cobalt octoate or stearate being the most preferred. For colour
control WO
2005/023539 prefers cobalt acetate. However, information in the market is that
beer
companies for example, do not desire cobalt in their packages for perceived
marketing
concerns.
None of the above mentioned prior art discloses a technique to achieve
dispersed
particles with average particle size less than 200nm w hen stretched, a good
colour
composition which will not experience substantially increased haze with
increasing
amounts of dispersed material, or has an acceptable haze upon manufacturing
and has
good colour, particularly in the absence of cobalt.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
7
Summary of Invention
Disclosed is a stretched wall of a container comprised of at least one
stretched layer with
said stretched layer comprising a polyamide polymer, a crystallizable
polyester and an
interfacial tension reducing agent, wherein the polyamide polymer comprises a
reaction
product selected from the group consisting of the reaction product of amino
caproic acid
with itself and the reaction product of A-D where A is a residue of a
dicarboxylic acid
comprising adipic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, 1,4
cyclohexanedicarboxylic
acid, or naphthalenedicarboxylic acid and where D is a residue of a diamine
comprising
m-xylylene diamine, p-xylylene diamine, hexamethylene diamine, ethylene
diamine, or
1,4 cyclohexanedimethylamine, wherein the amino to carboxyl end group ratio of
the
polyamide polymer is less than 1.0 when the relative viscosity of the
polyamide polymer
is less than 2.0, and less than 0.30 when the relative viscosity is in the
range of 2.0 to 2.3
and less than 0.20 when the relative viscosity is greater than 2.3, and at
least 85% of the
crystallizable polyester's acid units are derived from the group consisting of
terephthalic
acid, 2,6 naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, the dimethyl ester of terephthalic
acid, or the
dimethyl ester of 2,6 naphthalene dicarboxylic acid.
It is further disclosed that the polyamide polymer is preferably MXD6 or nylon
6, with
the interfacial tension reducing agent comprises a metal sulfonate and/or
lithium and that
the amino to carboxyl end group ratio of the polyamide polymer be less than
0.20.
Also disclosed is a polymer composition comprising a polyamide polymer, a
crystallizable polyester and an interfacial tension reducing agent, wherein
the polyamide
polymer comprises a reaction product selected from the group consisting of the
reaction
product of amino caproic acid with itself and the reaction product of A-D
where A is a
residue of a dicarboxylic acid comprising adipic acid, isophthalic acid,
terephthalic acid,
1,4 cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, or naphthalenedicarboxylic acid and where D
is a
residue of a diamine comprising m-xylylene diamine, p-xylylene diamine,
hexamethylene diamine, ethylene diamine, or 1,4 cyclohexanedimethylamine,
wherein
the amino to carboxyl end group ratio of the polyamide polymer is less than
1.0 when the
relative viscosity of the polyamide polymer is less than 2.0, and less than
0.30 when the
relative viscosity is in the range of 2.0 to 2.3 and less than 0.20 when the
relative
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
8
viscosity is greater than 2.3, and at least 85% of the crystallizable
polyester's acid units
are derived from the group consisting of terephthalic acid, 2,6 naphthalene
dicarboxylic
acid, the dimethyl ester of terephthalic acid, and the dimethyl ester of 2,6
naphthalene
dicarboxylic acid and, an interfacial tension reducing agent.
It is further disclosed that the polyamide polymer of the composition is
preferably MXD6
or nylon 6, with the interfacial tension reducing agent comprises a metal
sulfonate and or
lithium and that the amino to carboxyl end group ratio of the polyamide
polymer be less
than 0.20.
This invention further discloses a process for making a stretched wall of a
container
comprising the steps of A) selecting an article comprised of a polyamide
polymer, a
crystallizable polyester and an interfacial tension reducing agent, wherein
the polyamide
polymer comprises a reaction product selected from the group consisting of the
reaction
product of amino caproic acid with itself and the reaction product of A-D
where A is a
residue of a dicarboxylic acid comprising adipic acid, isophthalic acid,
terephthalic acid,
1,4 cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, or naphthalenedicarboxylic acid and where D
is a
residue of a diamine comprising m-xylylene diamine, p-xylylene diamine,
hexamethylene diamine, ethylene diamine, or 1,4 cyclohexanedimethylamine,
wherein
the amino to carboxyl end group ratio of the polyamide polymer is less than
1.0 when the
relative viscosity of the polyamide polymer is less than 2.0, and less than
0.30 when the
relative viscosity is in the range of 2.0 to 2.3 and less than 0.20 when the
relative
viscosity is greater than 2.3, and wherein at least 85% of the crystallizable
polyester's
acid units are derived from the group consisting of terephthalic acid, 2,6
naphthalene
dicarboxylic acid, the dimethyl ester of terephthalic acid, and the dimethyl
ester of 2,6
naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, and wherein the polyamide is present from 1 to
15 parts
per 100 parts polyamides plus crystallizable polyesters plus interfacial
tension reducing
agents in the composition; B) adjusting the temperature of the article so that
the
temperature of the article is within the range of the glass transition
temperature of the
crystallizable polyester and 10 C below the melt point of the crystallizable
polyester, and
C) applying a force to the article so as to increase the dimension of the
article in at least
one direction.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
9
It is further disclosed that the polyamide polymer used in the process to make
a stretch
article is preferably MXD6 or nylon 6, with the interfacial tension reducing
agent
comprising a metal sulfonate and or lithium and that the amino to carboxyl end
group
ratio of the polyamide polymer be less than 0.20.
A process for making an article is also disclosed, said process comprising the
steps of A)
Drying a crystallizable polyester, wherein at least 85% of the crystallizable
polyester's
acid units are derived from the group consisting of terephthalic acid, 2,6
naphthalene
dicarboxylic acid and their respective dimethyl esters; B) Drying a polyamide
polymer
comprised of a reaction product selected from the group consisting of the
reaction
product of amino caproic acid with itself and the reaction product of A-D
where A is a
residue of a dicarboxylic acid comprising adipic acid, isophthalic acid,
terephthalic acid,
1,4 cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, or naphthalenedicarboxylic acid and where D
is a
residue of a diamine comprising m-xylylene diamine, p-xylylene diamine,
hexamethylene diamine, ethylene diamine, or 1,4 cyclohexanedimethylamine,
wherein
the amino to carboxyl end group ratio of the polyamide polymer is less than
1.0 when the
relative viscosity of the polyamide polymer is less than 2.0, and less than
0.30 when the
relative viscosity is in the range of 2.0 to 2.3 and less than 0.20 when the
relative
viscosity is greater than 2.3, C) Melt blending the crystallizable polyester,
the polyamide
polymer and an interfacial tension reducing agent selected from the group
consisting of
functionalized and non-functionalized interfacial tension reducing agents into
a liquid;
and D) Forming the liquid into an article selected from the group consisting
of a sheet, a
film, a preform, and a tube.
It is further disclosed that the polyamide polymer used to make the article is
preferably
selected from the group consisting of MXD6 and nylon 6, with the interfacial
tension
reducing agent comprises a metal sulfonate and or lithium and that the amino
to carboxyl
end group ratio of the polyamide polymer be less than 0.20.
It is further disclosed that the drying steps of the process of making the
article are best
done when the polyamide and the polyester are dried in the same vessel at the
same time,
with the preferred method of drying being conducted when the polyamide polymer
and
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
polyester are dried in the same vessel in the form of a compartmentalized
pellet having at
least two compartments wherein the first compartment is comprised of the
polyester and
the second compartment is comprised of the polyamide.
5 Description of the Figures
Figure 1 depicts a scanning electron microscope photomicrograph (SEM) of
polyamide domains dispersed in a polyester matrix in the absence of the
interfacial
tension reducing agent, such as lithium sulfoisophthalate derived from lithium
sulfoisophthalic acid (LiSIPA). As detailed in the test method section, the
sample was
10 prepared by removing the polyamide with cold formic acid and exposing
the sample to a
scanning electron microscope.
Figure 2 depicts the graphical representation of the distribution of the
domains
corresponding to the polyester-polyamide system of Figure 1.
Figure 3 depicts a scanning electron microscope photomicrograph of polyamide
domains dispersed into a polyester matrix in the presence of an interfacial
tension
reducing agent - lithium sulfoisophthalate derived from lithium
sulfoisophthalic acid
(LiSIPA). As detailed below, the sample was prepared by removing the polyamide
with
cold formic acid.
Figure 4 depicts the graphical representation of the distribution of the
domains
corresponding to the polyester-polyamide system of Figure 3.
Figure 5 depicts a resin pellet with two compartments or zones in the core-
sheath
configuration.
Figure 6 depicts a resin pellet with two compartments or zones in the core-
sheath
configuration where the core is encapsulated, surrounded, or enclosed by an
outer sheath
layer.
Figure 7 depicts a resin pellet with three compartments or zones in a multi-
layered
or sandwich configuration.
Figure 8 depicts a resin pellet of three compartmentalized zones configured in
two
concentric layers surrounding a core.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
11
Detailed Description of the Invention
The deficiencies of the colour and haze created when melt blending polyamides
with
polyesters can be significantly reduced when the polyester is melt blended
with the
polyamide in the presence of an interfacial tension reducing agent and the
amino to
carboxyl end group ratio of the polyamide is less than 1.0, but preferably
less than 0.75,
when the relative viscosity is less than 2.0 and an amino to carboxyl end
group ratio of
less than 0.30 when the relative viscosity is in the range of 2.0 to 2.3 and
less than 0.20
then the relative viscosity is greater than 2.3. While the prior art teaches
that haze
increases when the polyamide has a low amino to carboxyl end group ratio the
opposite
has been found to occur when the melt blending is done in the presence of an
interfacial
tension reducing agent. In fact, the haze and colour formation are reduced as
the amino
to carboxyl end group ratio of the polyamide decreases.
It has been observed that the interfacial tension reducing agent combined with
the
polyester and polyamide as taught in this invention reduces the size of the
domains of the
polyamide dispersed in the unstretched polyester matrix over the prior art.
Because the composition increases the surface area of the polyamide, it is
believed that
this composition can be used to reduce the amount of polyamide used as an
oxygen
scavenger. However, to be used as an oxygen scavenger, the composition would
need to
contain a polyamide which reacts with oxygen. This is usually accomplished by
adding a
transition metal catalyst, usually a copper or cobalt compound, to the
composition.
The polyamides suitable for this invention can be described as comprising the
repeating
unit of amino caproic acid or A-D, wherein A is the residue of a dicarboxylic
acid
comprising adipic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, 1, 4-
cyclohexanedicarboxylic
acid, or nap hthalene dicarboxylic acid, and D is a residue of a diamine
comprising m-
xylylene diamine, p-xylylene diamine, hexamethylene diamine, ethylene diamine,
or 1, 4
cyclohexanedimethylamine.
These polyamides can also be described as the comprising at least one reaction
product
selected from the group consisting of the reaction product of amino caproic
acid with
CA 02626862 2013-02-01
12
itself ancUor the reaction product of a residue of a dicarboxylic acid
comprising adipic
acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid,
or
naphthalene dicarboxylic acid with a residue of a diamine comprising m-
xylylene
diamine, p-xylylene diamine, hexamethylene diamine, ethylene diamine, or 1,4
cyclohexanedimethylamine.
Those skilled in the art will recognize many of the combinations as well known
commercially available polyamides. The reaction product of the residue of
sebacic acid
with hexamethylene diamine is nylon 6.10 and the reaction product of the
residue of
adipic acid and hexamethylene diamine is nylon 6.6. Nylon 6.12 is another
nylon which
benefits from the invention. Nylon 6 is a special type of polyamide having the
formula
of H2N-(CH2)5-COOH and is made by the opening of caprolactam and then reacting
or
polymerizing the resulting amino caproic acid with itself. Nylon 6 is a
suitable
polyamide polymer, as is the reaction product of the residues of adipic acid
and m-
xylylene diamine, known as poly-m-xylylene adipamide. This composition is
commercially known as 1\4XD6 or nylon MXD6.
The polyamide could also be modified and would have a 0.01 ¨ 15 mole percent
of the
respective acid or diamine replaced with an interfacial tension modifying
compound such
as sulfonated isophthalic acid, discussed below. United States Patent No.
3,328,484
describes such modified co-polyamides.
The distinguishing feature of the polyamide used in the 'composition is that
the ratio of
the number of amino end groups to the number of carboxyl end groups be less
than 1.0,
preferably less than 0.51, preferably less than 0.20, and even more preferable
less than
0.10. As demonstrated in the Experimental section, the lower the ratio, the
better the
results with the best experimental results being obtained at 0.0395, the
lowest ratio
tested. Thus, less than 0.03 is also preferred. If all the end groups were
carboxyl end
groups, the amino to carboxyl end group ratio would bp at its minimum value of
0Ø
This could be accomplished by reacting the amino end groups with an entity
which
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
13
would then place a different end group at the end of the polymer chain. This
technique is
known as end capping.
The ratio of the amino end groups to carboxyl end groups is also known as the
amino to
carboxyl end group ratio and is the number of amino end groups divided by the
number
of carboxyl end groups. For the equation to work the number of respective end
groups
must be expressed in the same units, e.g. mmol/kg or milliequivalents/kg (meq/
kg, or
even microEqu/g, and Equivalents/kg). Methods to quantify the number of the
amino
end groups and carboxyl end groups are well known in the art and are discussed
in the
test method section.
The molecular weight of the polyamide is not so critical, but the preferred
number
average molecular weight (Mn) in the range of 2,000 to 27,000, with one
preferred range
being about 13,000 to 27,000. However, the molecular weight more preferably in
the
range of about 5,000 to 16,000, and even more preferably 6,000 to 12,000, with
a
polyamide with a molecular weight in the range of about 8,500 to 10,000 being
the most
preferred.
Number average molecular weight can be determined by the equation 2,000,000
divided
by the total number of end groups, where the total number of end groups is the
number of
amino end groups plus the number of carboxyl end groups expressed in
milliequivalents/kilogram (meq/kg) or microequivalents/gm (neq/g).. In the
case of the
end capped polymer the molecular weight is 2,000,000 divided by the total
number of
end groups.
Relative viscosity (R.V.) is another measure of the length of the polyamide
polymer
chain. The relative viscosity (often denoted as TO is a synonym of "viscosity
ratio" and is
the ratio of the viscosity of a solution of the polymer (often denoted as TO
to the viscosity
of the solvent used (often denoted TO. Its determination is detailed in the
test method
section. Suitable polyamides have a relative viscosity in the range from 1.4
to 2.9, with
1.5 to 2.3 being more preferred, 1.5 to 1.9 even more preferred, with 1.7 to
1.9 being the
most preferred.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
14
When the relative viscosity is greater than 1.84 (Mn>12,000), the amino to
carboxyl end
group ratio can be less than 0.51, with 0.40 being more preferred, less than
0.20 even
more preferred and less than 0.06 and less than 0.03 even more preferred.
For MXD6, the industry accepts that the number average molecular weight for
the
polyamide has been correlated to the relative viscosity by the equation
Mn = 16,200 x (R.V. ¨1.1)
where R.V. is the Relative Viscosity of the polyamide.
United States Patent No. 6,239,233 describes how one can make the polyamide of
this
invention. According to United States Patent No. 6,239,233 one can place a
mixture of
178.7g (1.224 moles, 2% molar excess) of adipic acid units and 210 g of
distilled water
in a 500 ml flask and then purge it for about 30 minutes with argon. Quickly,
163.4 g
(1.2 moles) of m-xylylenediamine can be a dded to the flask. The flask should
be
equipped with an inlet for nitrogen, a metal stirrer, and a short distillation
column. The
flask is then placed in a Belmont metal bath preheated to 110 C for 30
minutes. The
temperature is then raised progressively to 275 C over 60 minutes. The
inventors of
United States Patent No. 6,239,233 report that if the solution is heated at
275 C for 30
minutes, a low melt viscosity, clear polyamide can be obtained with an
inherent viscosity
of 0.458 (PM-95), amino end groups of 0.01 meq/g, COOH end groups of 0.22
meq/g
and a melting endotherm of 238 C. This polyamide would have an amino to
carboxyl
end group concentration of 0.01 divided by 0.22, or 0.045. A polyamide with an
amino
to carboxyl end group concentration of 0.045 or less is suitable for this
invention.
Several other techniques to make the polyamide follow: One preferred process
is a batch
process using a stirred steel autoclave operating at a pressure between 2 and
10 bars,
preferably between 3 and 8 bars and especially preferred between 4 and 6 bars.
A two
step pressure profile is then applied. The raw materials are placed in the
vessel and then
heated to 120 C inside the autoclave. After rea ching a pressure of 2 bars,
water is
distilled off, until a ca. 90 w.% mixture is obtained. During distillation,
the temperature is
increased to 155 ¨ 165 C. The mixture is then further heated until the
desired pressure
of 4 bars is reached. At 4 bars the remaining water is distilled off and
temperature is
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
increased to 245 ¨ 250 C. Afterwards the pressure is reduced to atmospheric
pressure.
If the viscosity needed for pelletizing has not yet been reached one can use a
post melt
condensation phase at 245 ¨265 C under reduced pressure or nitrogen flow for
5-30
minutes. After reaching the proper viscosity the polyamide is discharged from
the vessel
5 as a strand through a water bath and is cut into pellets.
The temperature of the contents inside the autoclave should not exceed 265 C
during the
whole condensation process. The relative viscosity measured after pelletizing
is in the
range between 1.45 and 1.70.
A suitable continuous process can be performed by heating salt solutions of
adipic acid
and meta-xylylene diamine at a temperature of 210 to 330 C, preferentially 250
to 300
C, more preferably 260 to 280 C, then preferably separating the prepolymer
batchwise
or preferably in a continuous way and recycling the separated meta-xylylene
diamine.
The prepolymer is then kept under a pressure between 1 and 20 bar, preferably
between
1.5 and 15 bar, and most preferably between 4 and 6 bar at a temperature
between 230 to
330 C, especially preferably between 260 to 280 C and polycondensed.
Another process comprises heating a salt solution of the diamine and the
dicarboxylic
acid under a pressure between 2 and 10 bar, preferably 4 and 6 bar within a
residence
time of 60 seconds, with at least 95% degree of conversion and a maximum of 7
weight
percent water. This polymer can be achieved by running the salt solution
through a in
sectioned tubular designed evaporation zone, in which by heating and water
evaporation
a two phase flow is developed; thereby driving the major amount of solution
water into
the gas phase. The used aqueous solutions have normally a monomer content of
30 to 70
w.%, preferably 45 to 65 w.%.
Yet another process consists of running the aqueous salt solution with a
temperature of
50 to 100 C batchwise or preferably continuously into an evaporation zone,
where the
salt solution is heated under a pressure of 2 to 10 bar, preferably 4 to 6 bar
to a
temperature of 250 to 300 C, preferably 260 to 280 C. The residence time in
the
evaporation zone is normally 1 to 300 seconds, preferably 30 to 120 seconds
and
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232 PCT/1B2006/053922
16
especially preferred 30 to 60 seconds. At the exit of the evaporation zone the
conversion
ranges from 80 to 100%, preferably 90 to 99.5%, especially preferred 95 to
99%,
particularly 96 to 98 % and, depending on the pressure used, the water content
is
normally 0.01 to 10 w.%, preferably 0,1 to 5 w.%, with 1 to 3 w.% especially
preferred.
The evaporation zone is favourably designed as a pack of tubes, in which the
diameter of
the single tubes is periodically tubular or "split shaped" formed. Further it
was proved to
be advantageous to run the mixture of prepolymer and steam before separating
the phases
through a tubular "substance exchange zone", which is modified with fixtures.
Here the
pressure and temperature conditions of the evaporation zone are kept constant.
The
fixtures, for example, are carrier materials like Raschig rings, metal rings
and especially
carrier material made of wire gauze to create a large surface area. In this
design, the
phases, prepolymer and steam, come into close contact. This reduces the amount
of meta-
xylylene diamine set free by the steam. The residence time in this "substance
exchange
zone" is normally 1 to 5 minutes. The two phase mixture of steam and
prepolymer is
separated after leaving the evaporation zone and "substance exchange zone"
respectively.
The generated vapours contain water and traces of meta -xylylenediamine, which
is
liberated by the evaporation of the water. Thereby only extremely small
amounts of
meta-xylylene diamine are contained in the gas phase. (<0.1 w.% based on the
polymer
throughput). The vapours can be fed into a column and rectified to regain the
meta-
xylylene diamine. Appropriate columns are carrier material columns, bubble-cap
columns or sieve-plate columns with 5 to 15 theoretical plates. The column is
run under
the same pressure conditions as the evaporation zone. Preferably the rectified
meta-
xylylene diamine is fed back to the polymerization zone.
The obtained prepolymers, which depending upon the degree of conversion of low
molecular weight polyamide and low amount of non-converted salts, will
normally have
a relative viscosity = < 1. 2, are then introduced into the polymerization
zone. In the
polymerization zone, the obtained melt can be polycondensed at a temperature
between
245 and 285 C, preferably between 255 and 275 C and a pressure from 2 to 10
bar,
especially from 4 to 6 bar.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
17
In another process the obtained polyamide can be exposed to a discharge zone
during
simultaneous removal of rest water. Appropriate discharge zones are, for
example,
extruders. The melt, which is now liberated from (free of) water, can be
pelletized. After
polycondensation, the melt can be treated in any one of the well known post-
treatments,
for example, under water pelletizing (spherical and cylindrical chips) or
strand
pelletizing. The obtained resin can also be subjected to an extraction, which
can be
performed batchwise or continuously. Water, C1-C8-alkanols like methanol or
ethanol
can be used as extractants. Water is preferred. In one preferred process the
polyamide is
pelletized to spherical chips using under water pelletizing. The relative
viscosity after
leaving the extruder is in the range of 1.45 to 1.55.
The extracted polyamide can then undergo a solid phase (or solid state)
polymerization
(SSP) for final adjustment of the relative viscosity. This can be performed
under vacuum
or under an inert gas such as nitrogen or argon, preferably nitrogen. The
temperature can
vary over a range, normally between 120 and 230 C, preferably between 130 and
210
C, with 140 to 190 C especially preferred.
The final relative viscosities after SSP are in the range of 1.55 and 2.00,
preferably in the
range of 1.60 to 1.9 and especially in the range of 1.65 and 1.75. After SSP
the water
content is usually less than 250 ppm.
It is noted that in the case of nylon 6, the end groups are by definition the
same value. In
order to create the high number of carboxyl end groups, one would have to
react an
additional dicarboxylic acid to the polymer which would raise the number of
carboxyl
groups while at the same time reducing the number of amino end groups.
In all of the above cases, it would be preferable to avoid the pelletizing
step and combine
the polyamide with the polyester by introducing the polyamide into a zone of a
compartmentalized pellet with the polyester introduced into another. This
pellet
construction is described later.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
18
The preferred amount of polyamides in the composition is between 1 and 15
parts per
100 parts of the polyesters plus polyamides in the composition, preferably
between 3 and
8 parts per 100 parts of the polyesters plus polyamides in the composition,
with the most
utility occurring between 4 and 7 parts of polyamides per 100 parts of
polyesters plus
polyamides and 6 to 10 parts polyamides per 100 parts polyesters plus
polyamides. The
words polyesters and polyamides are used to indicate the fact that there may
be more
than one species of either the polyester or polyamide in the composition. Also
as noted
below, if the interfacial tension reducing agent is part of a polyester
polymer chain, then
the interfacial tension reducing agent is also a polyester and is included the
calculation to
determine the amount of "the polyesters" in the composition.
It is also contemplated to provide materials in a masterbatch where there is a
highly
concentrated amount of polyamide which is let down with polyester later. The
masterbatch would contain between 50 and 95% be weight polyamide with the
remainder
being the polyester and interfacial tension reducing agent.
Polyesters suitable for this invention are the film forming polyesters made
from the
reaction of a diol with a dicarboxylic acid, or its corresponding ester.
Various
copolymers of multiple diols and diacids may also be used. Polyesters
containing
repeating units of only one chemical composition such as ethylene
terephthalate are
homopolymers. Polymers with two or more chemically different repeat units in
the same
macromolecule are termed copolymers. The diversity of the repeat units depends
on the
number of different types of monomers present in the initial polymerization
reaction. In
the case of polyesters, copolymers include reacting one or more diols with a
diacid or
multiple diacids, and are sometimes also referred to as terpolymers.
The term copolymer refers to any polymer with three or more monomers. In the
case of
PET, the homopolymer is polyethylene terephthalate made from terephthalic acid
and
ethylene glycol monomers. The addition of isophthalic acid, diethylene glycol,
cyclohexane dimethanol or all of them make the PET a copolymer.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
19
It is well known that the polymerization of the dicarboxylic acid with
ethylene glycol
will also have approximately 1 mole of diethylene glycol for the 100 moles of
a
dicarboxylic acid, 99 moles of ethylene glycol. This is because the di-
ethylene glycol is
formed in-situ, and although not charged directly into the reactor it will
usually be
present in the polymer. It is noted the primary repeating unit of polyethylene
terephthalate is ethylene terephthalate, as it is found in the polymer chain.
It is the
reaction product of ethylene glycol with terephthalic acid or its derivative,
the dimethyl
ester of terephthalic acid, known as dimethyl terephthalate. The nomenclature
follows
with the other phthalates as well. Ethylene isophthalate has the glycol from
ethylene
glycol and the isophthalate acid moiety which is derived from isophthalic
acid. This
isophthalate moiety can come from or be derived from isophthalic acid or the
dimethyl
ester of isophthalic acid - dimethyl isophthalate; ethylene sulfoisophthalate
is treated the
same way with the sulfoisophthalate being derived from the corresponding
sulfoisophthalic acid (SIPA) or the dimethyl ester of the sulfoisophthalic
acid, dimethyl
sulfoisophthalate (DMSI). As described below the DMSI is often added to the
reactors
as the bis-hydroxy ester of the sulfoisopthalate as well.
Suitable dicarboxylic acids include those comprising from about 4 to about 40
carbon
atoms. Specific dicarboxylic acids include, but are not limited to,
terephthalic acid,
isophthalic acid, 2,6 naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, cyclohexanedicarboxylic
acid,
cyclohexanediacetic acid, dipheny1-4,4'-dicarboxylic acid, 1,3-
phenylenedioxydiacetic
acid, 1,2-phenylenedioxydiacetic acid, 1,4-phenylenedioxydiacetic acid,
succinic acid,
glutaric acid, adipic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, and the like. Specific
esters include,
but are not limited to, phthalic esters and naphthalene dicarboxylic diesters.
Although
the above list refers primarily to dicarboxylic acids, it is well known in the
art that one
can make the equivalent polyester from the corresponding dimethyl ester.
Therefore, the
phrase derived from a dicarboxylic acid includes polyesters manufactured using
the
dimethyl ester of the dicarboxylic acid; e.g. derived from terephthalic acid
refers to the
terephthalate moiety whether the polyester was manufactured using terephthalic
acid or
dimethyl terephthalate. The same nomenclature applies to the other monomers as
well,
such as sulfonates, isophthalates, naphthalates, and sulfoisophthalates.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
These acids or esters may be reacted with an aliphatic diol preferably having
from about
2 to about 24 carbon atoms, a cycloaliphatic diol having from about 7 to about
24 carbon
atoms, an aromatic diol having from about 6 to about 24 carbon atoms, or a
glycol ether
having from 4 to 24 carbon atoms. Suitable diols include, but are not limited
to, ethylene
5 glycol, 1,4-butenediol, trimethylene glycol, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,4-
cyclohexanedimethanol,
diethylene glycol, resorcinol, and hydroquinone.
Polyfunctional comonomers can also be used, typically in amounts of from about
0.01 to
about 3 mole percent. Suitable comonomers include, but are not limited to,
trimellitic
10 anhydride, trimethylolpropane, pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA), and
pentaerythritol.
Polyester-forming polyacids or polyols can also be used. Blends of polyesters
and
copolyesters may also be useful in the present invention.
The esterification or polycondensation reaction of the carboxylic acids or
esters with
15 glycol typically takes place in the presence of a catalyst. Suitable
catalysts include, but
are not limited to, antimony oxide, antimony triacetate, antimony ethylene
glycolate,
organomagnesium, tin oxide, titanium alkoxides, dibutyl tin dilaurate, and
germanium
oxide. These catalysts may be used in combination with zinc, manganese, or
magnesium
acetates or benzoates. Catalysts comprising antimony are preferred.
The polyesters of this invention may also contain small amounts of phosphorous
compounds, such as phosphates, and a catalyst such as a cobalt compound, that
tends to
impart a blue hue. Also, small amounts of other polymers such as polyolefins
can be
tolerated in the continuous matrix. It has been discovered that while cobalt
salts may be
used to reduce colour formation and are taught by WO 2005/023530 Al, the use
of
cobalt salts is not necessary to reduce the colour formation when the
polyamide has an
amino to carboxyl end group ratio less than 0.81 and the interfacial tension
reducing
agent is the lithium salt (metal sulfonate), in particular lithium
sulfoisophthalate, derived
from lithium sulfoisophthalic acid (LiSIPA). Alternative colouring agents
known in the
art will also work. Thus the composition of this invention can be void of
cobalt.
Another alternative to colorant addition is to add a stabilizer to the
polyamide.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
21
Polyesters of this invention can be prepared by virtually any polymerization
procedure
suitable for polycondensation polymers. The polyester polymers and copolymers
may be
prepared by melt phase polymerization involving the esterification, or
corresponding
transesterification of the diester of the monomers followed by melt phase
polymerization
vacuum. The melt phase polymerization can be done in a batch, continuous or
semi-
continuous manner, or even a combination.
After completion of the melt phase polymerization, the polyester is either
made into a
form such as a film or part or stranded and cut into smaller chips, such as
pellets. The
polyester is usually then crystallized and subjected to a solid phase (solid
state)
polymerization (SSP) step to achieve the intrinsic viscosity necessary for the
manufacture
of certain articles such as bottles. The crystallization and polymerization
can be
performed in a tumbler dryer reactor in a batch-type system. The solid phase
polymerization can continue in the same tumble dryer where the polymer is
subjected to
high vacuum to extract the polymerization by-products
Alternatively, the crystallization and polymerization can be accomplished in a
continuous
solid state polymerization process whereby the polymer flows from one vessel
to another
after its predetermined treatment in each vessel. The crystallization
conditions are
relative to the polymer's crystallization and sticking tendencies. However,
preferable
temperatures are from about 100 C to about 150 C. In the case of
crystallisable
polyesters, the solid phase polymerization conditions are generally 10 C
below the melt
point of the polymer. In the case of non-crystallisable polyesters, the solid
phase
polymerization temperature is 10 C below temperature where the polymer begins
sticking to itself. Traditional solid phase polymerization temperatures for
crystallisable
polymers range from about 200 C to about 232 C, and more preferably from
about 215
C to about 232 C. Those skilled in the art will realize that the optimum
solid phase
polymerization temperature is polymer specific and depends upon the type and
amount of
copolymers in the product. However, determination of the optimum solid phase
polymerization conditions is frequently done in industry and can be easily
done without
undue experimentation.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
22
The solid phase polymerization is carried out for a time sufficient to raise
the intrinsic
viscosity to the desired level, which will depend upon the application. For a
typical
bottle application, the preferred intrinsic viscosity (I.V.) is from about
0.65 to about 1.0
deciliter/gram, as determined by the method described in the methods section.
The time
required to reach this I.V. from about 8 to about 21 hours.
One suitable class of polyesters for the practice of this invention is the
crystallizable
terephthalate or naphthalate polyesters defined as a polyester with more than
85 mole %
of its acid units being derived from terephthalic acid or 2,6 naphthalene
dicarboxylic acid
or their respective dimethyl esters. It is generally accepted that to keep the
polymer
crystallizable the comonomer content is usually kept below about 15 to 20 mole
%.
The term crystallizable polyester means that the polyester, such as
polyethylene
terephthalate can become semi-crystalline, either through orientation or heat
induced
crystallinity. No plastic is completely crystalline and the crystalline forms
are more
accurately described as semi-crystalline. The term semi-crystalline is meant
to describe a
polymer that exhibits X-ray patterns that have sharp features of crystalline
regions and
diffuse features characteristic of amorphous regions. It is well known in the
art that
semi-crystalline should be distinguished from the pure crystalline and
amorphous states.
One preferred crystallizable polyester is PET, which is the group of
polyesters consisting
of polyethylene terephthalate, copolymers of polyethylene terephthalate
including
copolymers of polyethylene terephthalate modified with metal salt of
sulfoisophthalate
derived from the di-ester or di-carboxylic acid of sulfoisophthalate (SIPA) in
the
approximately 1:1 stoichiometric reaction of acids, or their di -esters, with
ethylene
glycol.
Specific copolymers of interest are the crystallizable polyethylene
terephthalates which
have at least one sulfoisophthalate as an acid moiety and at least one other
acid moiety
derived from the comonomers selected from the group consisting of isophthalic
acid or
its diester, 2,6 naphthalene dicarboxylic acid or its diester, and cyclohexane
dimethanol.
The preferred sulfoisophthalate is lithium sulfoisophthalate with the levels
of lithium
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
23
sulfoisophthalate within the range of 0.05 and 2.0 mole percent based upon the
acid
moieties of the polyesters in the composition. While greater than 2.0 mole
percent is not
deleterious to the intended effect, greater than 2.0 mole percent achieves
little or no
additional improvement.
Another preferred crystallizable polyester is polytrimethylene terephthalate
(PTT). It can
be prepared by, for example, reacting 1,3-propanediol with at least one
aromatic diacid or
alkyl ester thereof Preferred diacids and alkyl esters include terephthalic
acid (TPA) or
dimethyl terephthalate (DMT). Accordingly, the PTT preferably comprises at
least about
80 mole percent of either TPA or DMT. Other diols which may be copolymerized
in
such a polyester include, for example, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, 1,4-
cyclohexane dimethanol, and 1,4-butanediol. In addition to the interfacial
tension
reducing agent such as the metal salt of sulfoisophthalic acid, other aromatic
and
aliphatic acids which may be used simultaneously to make a copolymer include,
for
example, isophthalic acid and sebacic acid.
Preferred catalysts for preparing PTT include titanium and zirconium
compounds.
Suitable catalytic titanium compounds include, but are not limited to,
titanium alkylates
and their derivatives, titanium complex salts, titanium complexes with
hydroxycarboxylic
acids, titanium dioxide-silicon dioxide-co-precipitates, and hydrated alkaline-
containing
titanium dioxide. Specific examples include tetra-(2-ethylhexyl)-titanate,
tetrastearyl
titanate, diisopropoxy-bis(acetyl-acetonato)-titanium, di-n-butoxy-
bis(triethanolaminato)-
titanium, tributylmonoacetyltitanate, triisopropyl monoacetyltitanate,
tetrabenzoic acid
titanate, alkali titanium oxalates and malonates, potassium
hexafluorotitanate, and
titanium complexes with tartaric acid, citric acid or lactic acid. Preferred
catalytic
titanium compounds are titanium tetrabutylate and titanium tetraisopropylate.
The
corresponding zirconium compounds may also be used.
Another preferred crystallizable polyester is polyethylene naphthalate, also
known as
PEN. It is made by the reaction of 2,6 naphthalene dicarboxylic acid or its
diester (2,6
dimethyl naphthalate) with ethylene glycol.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
24
It is also contemplated that the crystallizable polyester of the present
invention may
comprise recycled polyester or materials derived from post consumer or post
industrial
recycled polyester, such as polyester monomers, catalysts, and oligomers.
It is essential for this invention that the composition contains at least one
interfacial
tension reducing agent which reduces the interfacial tension between the
polyester and
the polyamide. In order to understand the criticality of the interfacial
tension reducing
agent, it is necessary to understand the role of the interfacial tension
reducing agent plays
in the polyester-polyamide dispersion.
The polyester-polyamide dispersion can be described as a multi-phase system
consisting
of a dispersed polymer and a matrix phase polymer. The dispersed polymer is
the
discontinuous phase, with many small particles scattered throughout the matrix
polymer.
The matrix polymer is a continuous phase, where the polymer is not broken up
into
discrete units, but is constantly in contact with itself In other words, there
is usually
only one matrix phase, but many particles of the dispersed polymer.
Technically,
therefore, the dispersed component may be considered many phases, as each
particle is
its own phase. However, in that description, each particle has the same
equilibrium
properties of the other particle. For the purposes of this invention, the term
dispersed
phase or dispersed polymer refers to the totality of discrete particles of the
discontinuous
component present in the continuous phase.
It is believed that the polyamide is dispersed into the polyester matrix
forming discrete
particles in the polyester. And, while not to be bound by any theory, it is
also believed
that the inferior dispersion of polyester/polyamide system is due to the high
interfacial
tension (IFT) existing between the two polymers.
For a closed system (see An Introduction to the Principles of Surface
Chemistry,
Aveyard, R. and Haydon, D.A. 1973), the differential expression for the
internal energy
U of the system has been described as
dU = dQ + dW
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
where dQ is the heat taken up by the system and dW is the change in work. The
relation
is then isolated for dW which reduces the equation to
dW = -pdV + ydA
where dV is the change in volume and y is the interfacial tension, and dA is
the change in
5 interfacial area (the area of the interface between the two components).
In the liquid-
liquid system, such as exists with the mixture of melted polyester/polyamide,
there is no
volume change (dV=0), and the equation reduces to the change in work as a
function of
the interfacial tension and the change in interfacial area.
dW = ydA
The lower the interfacial tension, therefore, the higher the area of contact
between the
two materials. A higher area of interfacial contact for a given amount of
material is only
achieved by creating smaller particles of the dispersed material into the
matrix material.
A higher interfacial contact area requires a smaller diameter, and
consequently a greater
number of particles. The effectiveness of the interfacial tension reducing
agent can be
directly established by the average particle size. The lower the average
dispersed particle
size, the lower the interfacial tension and the more effective the interfacial
tension
reducing agent.
This increase in surface area and corresponding decrease in domain size and
subsequent
increase in the number of domains is believed to increase the barrier, improve
the
aesthetics (reduced haze) and also increase the amount of oxygen scavenging
ability
when the polyamide has been activated to react with oxygen. This activation is
often
done by exposing the polyamide to a transition metal catalyst, usually in its
positive
valence state.
Other ways to increase the surface area exist. These include increasing the
amount of
shear during the melt blending process, varying the viscosity ratios,
attempting to cross
link or graft the materials. While the inventors are familiar with all of the
above
techniques, no technique has been as successful as directly modifying at least
one of the
polymers to reduce the interfacial tension between the two polymers.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
26
The interfacial tension between two polymers in their liquid state is
difficult to determine
due to the high temperatures involved. One technique is to use a spin
tensiometer.
However, in the absence of sophisticated equipment it is much easier to make
two
separate polymer dispersions, one modified, the other unmodified, using the
same
amount of work (torque, screw design, temperatures) and compare the difference
in
average particle size of the dispersed material.
The immediate effect of the reduction in interfacial tension can be seen by
reducing the
haze caused by the nylon domains in the stretched article or by comparing the
average
polyamide particle size of an unmodified polyester-polyamide dispersion with a
modified
polyester-polyamide system. Comparing the average domain sizes easily
determines
whether the interfacial tension has been reduced. It is noted that some of the
interfacial
tension reducing agents create an inherent haze themselves, so care must be
taken using
haze as indicator of the effectiveness of the interfacial tension reducing
agent. If the
practitioner uses haze as the indicator, the practitioner must compare the
haze at varying
levels of nylon with the haze of a control with no nylon.
It is necessary that the composition have an effective amount of interfacial
tension
reducing agent existing either separately in the composition or reacted into
the polymer
chain of the polyester, polyamide or both. A combination of the separate
interfacial
tension reducing agent and a polyester or a polyamide, or both being modified
with an
interfacial tension reducing agent are contemplated. The interfacial tension
reducing
agents need not be the same. Combinations are also contemplated
Preferably, the interfacial tension reducing agent is derived from a co-
monomer that has
been reacted into the polymer chain. To be a co-monomer, the interfacial
tension
reducing agent is functionalized with at least one end group which allows the
interfacial
tension reducing agent to react with at least one of the other polymers or
polymer co-
monomers in the composition.
In the case of polyesters, these can be the polar co-monomers used to create
polyester
ionomers. In the case of polyamides, the interfacial tension reducing agent
can be the
CA 02626862 2013-02-01
27
polar co-monomers used to create polyamide ionomers. Examples of these co-
monomers
are the monovalent and/or divalent salt of the respective sulfonate described
in United
States Patent No. 6,500,895 (B1). Also included are the monovalent and
bivalent metal salts
described in the following formulas found in Japanese Patent Application 0
3281246 A.
One way to describe the various metal salts is to use the term functionalized
metal
sulfonate to describe a compound of the form R-S03M, where M is the metal ion
and R
is an aliphatic, aromatic, or cyclic compound with at least one functional
group that
allows the functionalized metal salt to react with the polyester or polyamide,
or their
respective monomers or oligomers where M designates. the metal ion,
Functionalized
metal sulfonates included in this invention are the lithium and sodium salts
of sulfonated
comonomers, including aliphatic and aromatic alcohols, carboxylic acids,
diols,
dicarboxylic acids, and multifunctional alcohols, carboxylic acids, amines and
diamines.
In contrast, non-functional metal sulfonates are those of the R-S03M, and R
does not
have functional group. The phrase metal sulfonate therefore refers to both
functional and
non-functional metal sulfonates. An example of this sulfonated polystyrene or
polyolefins which are known to act as interfacial tension reducing agents in
the polyester-
polyamide systems.
In general, the interfacial tension reducing agent exists in functionalized
form of the form
X-R, where X is an alcohol, carboxylic acid or epoxy, most preferably a
dicarboxylic
acid or diol and R is R is ¨S03M, -COOM, -OM, -P03(M)2, with M being a metal
in a
+1 or +2 valence state which can be selected from the group consisting of Li,
Na, Zn, Sn,
K and Ca and X-R is copolymerized into the polyester polymer to modify the
interfacial
tension. The amount of X-R needed will exceed 0.01 mole percent with respect
to the
total number of respective dicarboxylic acid or diol moles in the polymer
composition. It
is possible for X-R to include both a diol or dicarboxylic acid. In that case,
the mole
percent is based upon the total number of moles of respective diols,
dicarboxylic acids, or
polymer repeating units.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
28
The functionalized interfacial tension reducing agent may contain 2 or more R
groups. R
is combined directly to the aromatic ring of X, which could be a diol, a
dicarboxylic acid,
or a side chain such as a methylene group. The following structure is an
example,
COOH
41/R
COOH
Where R is ¨503M, -COOM, -OM, - P03(M)2 with M designating a metal in a +1 or
+2
valence state which can be selected from the group consisting of Li, Na, Zn,
Sn, Ca and
K. When R is ¨503M, the compound is known as sulfonate, an organic sulfonate,
or
more specifically, sulfoisophthalic acid. If this entity is the interfacial
tension reducing
agent, then the polyester would contain acid units derived from a metal salt
of
HI sulfoisophthalic acid, wherein the metal can be selected from the group
consisting of
lithium, sodium, zinc, tin, calcium and potassium.
The dicarboxylic acids represented by X may be each ortha, meta, or para. They
comprise for instance aromatic dicarboxylic acids such as terephthalic acid,
isophthalic
acid, orthophthalic acid, naphthalene dicarboxylic acid, diphenylether
dicarboxylic acid,
dipheny1-4,4-dicarboxylic acid etc..
X may also be aliphatic. In that event, aliphatic dicarboxylic acids such as
oxalic acid,
malonic acid succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic
acid, azelaic
acid, sebacic acid, etc. are suitable. Cycloaliphatic dicarboxylic acids
such as
cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid and one or more species of these can be used.
Also
included is isethionic acid. Specifically contemplated are mixtures of the
dicarboxylic
acids as well.
X can also represent an alcohol, preferably a diol of the structure:
CA 02626862 2013-02-01
29
OH
CR
OH
Where R is ¨S03M, -COOM, -OM, - P03(M)2 where M is a metal in a +1 or +2
valence
state which can be selected from the group consisting of Li, Na, Zn, Sn, K,
and Ca.
The diols represented by X may also be aliphatic glycols such as ethylene
glycol, 1,3
propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,9-nonanediol,
diethylene
glycol, trimethylene glycol and cyclo aliphatic diols such as cyclohexane
diol,
cyclohexanedimethanol and one or more species in combination can be used.
Among
these, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol and cyclohexanediol are preferred.
Other functionalized interfacial tension reducing agents which can be used to
decrease
the interfacial tension include hydroxyl terminated polyethers, such as
polyethylene
glycol (Carbowax) and cyclic amides such as ethoxylated dimethyl hydantoin. In
addition, polyesters can be reacted with epoxy terminated compounds, including
epoxy
ten-ninated polyethers, to produce a polyether side chain attached to the
polymer.
While many metals work and the prior art teaches that bi-metals are preferred,
it has
unexpectedly been discovered that lithium, a monovalent metal, performs much
better
than sodium. In fact, the lithium salt produces a dispersion with average
domains lower
than levels previously measured. As described below, the lithium
sulfoisophthalate
without a cobalt compound has better colour than the sodium sulfoisophthalate
blended
with the same amount of MXD6 in the presence of a cobalt salt as described in
WO
2005/023530 Al. Therefore a composition void of cobalt is one embodiment of
the
composition, articles, and processes claimed. As demonstrated by the
experimental results
of this specification, when the article containing the composition is
stretched, the polyamide
domains dispersed in the polyester matrix in the presence of the lithium salt
do not stretch
as much as the polyester
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
matrix. This means that in the stretched article, there are far fewer domains
have a
diameter falling in the range of visible light (approximately 400nm to 700nm).
COOH
SO3Li
COOH
5 Lithium sulfoisophthalic acid (LiSIPA) or sulfonic acid lithium salt
modified isophthalic acid.
Of the salt forms, the di-carboxylic acid, di-ester, or pre-reacted low
molecular weight
oligomers such as the bis-hydroxyethyl ester of lithium sulfoisophthalate are
preferred. It
is also possible that the interfacial tension reducing agent, in this case the
lithium
10 sulfonate, occur in the diol form as well. Possible alternatives are
ethylene glycol with
the sulfonate group at the end of the pendant chain. It has even been proposed
to place
the sulfonate at the end of the polyester molecule. This can be accomplished
by reacting
or copolymerizing the polyester with the sulfonated salt of benzoic acid or
other
monofunctional species such as isethionic acid, either in the melt reactor or
in an
15 extruder.
In order to be reacted into, also known as copolymerized with, either polymer,
the
modifying agent must have at least one functional group. Examples of these
functional
groups are carboxylic acid ( -COOH), alcohol (-OH), the ester of the
carboxylic acid,
20 epoxy termination, the diamine, or amine end groups.
Because a high I.V. polyester would have two functional end groups, a high
I.V.
polyester containing a metal sulfonate in its backbone is an interfacial
reducing agent
when blended with a polyamide and polyester that does not contain a metal
sulfonate.
25 Should the high I.V. polyester have both ends terminated, it would be
considered a non-
functionalized interfacial tension reducing agent.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
31
The non -functionalized interfacial tension reducing agents are those
compounds which
contain the polar group, in particular the lithium salt, but do not have any
functional end
groups which allow the interfacial tension reducing agent to react with the
polyester or
polyamide. The lithium salt of sulfonated polystyrene is an example. In the
three
component system, the mole percent of the interfacial tension reducing agent
is the mole
percent based upon all the acid groups of the polyester.
As taught below, the polymer is preferably modified with the interfacial
tension reducing
agent. This modification is done by copolymerizing the interfacial tension
reducing
agent into the polymer chain.
The composition can comprise the critical elements which exist in a two
component
form. In addition to the two critical components, other compounds may, of
course, be
present in the composition. In one embodiment of the two component form, an
interfacial tension reducing agent is copolymerized with the polyester polymer
to make
the polyester both a polyester and an interfacial tension reducing agent. Thus
the single
polyester molecule contains two elements of the claimed invention ¨ a
polyester and an
interfacial tension reducing agent. The polyamide could be void of an
interfacial tension
reducing agent. Alternatively an interfacial tension reducing agent can also
be
incorporated into the polyamide. In another embodiment of the two component
form, the
interfacial tension reducing agent is copolymerized with the polyamide polymer
to make
the polyamide both a polyamide and an interfacial tension reducing agent. Thus
the
single polyamide molecule contains two elements of the claimed invention ¨ a
polyamide
and an interfacial tension reducing agent. The polyester could be void of an
interfacial
tension reducing agent. Alternatively an interfacial tension reducing agent
can also be
incorporated into the polyester.
The critical elements of the composition can also be present as more than two
components. Again, in addition to the critical components, other compounds
may, of
course, be present in the composition. For instance, one embodiment is a
polyester
without an interfacial tension reducing agent copolymerized with the polymer,
a
polyester with an interfacial tension reducing agent copolymerized with the
polymer, and
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
32
the polyamide without an interfacial tension reducing agent copolymerized with
the
polyamide. Another embodiment is a polyester without an interfacial tension
reducing
agent copolymerized with the polymer, a polyester with an interfacial tension
reducing
agent copolymerized with the polymer, and a polyamide with an interfacial
tension
reducing agent copolymerized with the polyamide. Another embodiment is a
polyester
without an interfacial tension reducing agent copolymerized with the polymer,
a
polyester with an interfacial tension reducing agent copolymerized with the
polymer, a
polyamide with an interfacial tension reducing agent. copolymerized with the
polyamide
and a polyamide without an interfacial tension reducing agent.copolymerized
with the
polyamide. As can be seen by the described embodiments, the interfacial
tension
reducing may be a third component, such as sulfonated polystryrene, a
polyester or a
polyamide; may be copolymerized with the polyester and/or the polyamide.
It is preferred that for low molecular weight polyamides having a number
average
molecular weight, Mn, less than or equal to 12,000 (R.V. less than or equal to
1.84) that
only a portion of the interfacial tension reducing agent be copolymerized with
the
polyamide polymer. Put another way, at least a portion of the interfacial
tension
reducing agent is not copolymerized with the polyamide polymer when the
molecular
weight is less than or equal to 12,000 or the relative viscosity of the
polyamide polymer
is less than 1.84. . More specifically, at least some of the moieties derived
from lithium
or sodium sulfoisophthalic acid must not be copolymerized with the polyamide
polymer
when the molecular weight is less than or equal to 12,000 or the relative
viscosity of the
polyamide polymer is less than 1.84. The moities not copolymerized with the
polyamide
are preferably copolymerized with the polyester.
While often there is no upper limit to the amount of interfacial tension
reducing agent,
levels of the interfacial tension reducing agent needed to decrease the
interfacial tension
range from 0.01 mole percent to 15 mole percent with respect to the total
number of
moles of the respective acid or diol moiety in the composition. For example, a
typical
homopolymer polyester has 100 mole percent terephthalate derived from
terephthalic
acid and almost 100 mole percent ethylene derived from ethylene glycol, with
the
remaining glycol being diethylene derived from diethylene glycol which is
derived in situ
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
33
during the manufacturing process. A 100 moles of polymer with 5 mole percent
of the
ionic dicarboxylic acid co-monomer, such as lithium sulfoisophthalic acid
would contain
95 moles of terephthalate derived from terephthalic acid, 5 moles lithium
sulfoisophthalate and approximately 100 moles of ethylene derived ethylene
glycol.
Similarly, it may be advantageous to use another comonomer such as isophthalic
acid.
For example, if one could substitute 2 moles of the terephthalate with 2 moles
of
isophthalate and create a polymer with 2 moles isophthalate, 93 moles
terephthalate, 5
moles sulfoisophthalate and approximately 100 moles ethylene to make 100 moles
of
polymer repeat unit.
In the three component blend system, the moles of acid are the moles of acid
in the
modified polymer plus the moles of acid in the compatible unmodified polymer.
For
example, if there were two polyesters present, one containing
sulfoisophthalate, and the
other did not, the mole percent of the sulfoisophthalate would be the moles of
sulfoisophthalate divided by the moles of acid moieties of the two polyesters
added
together.
It is also well known that di-ethylene glycol is formed in-situ in the
manufacture of
polyester and about 1-3 percent of the total moles of glycol derived repeat
unit will be
diethylene derived from diethylene glycol. Therefore, the polyester
compositions are
typically 97 mole percent ethylene and 3 mole percent di-ethylene.
The amount of interfacial tension reducing agent is determined empirically.
Generally, a
small amount is needed and approaches a critical amount beyond which
additional
amounts have no affect. In the surface science field, this amount is referred
to as the
Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC). As seen in the examples, a small amount
of
sulfonated material has a significant effect, but at a certain amount, around
0.4 or 0.7
mole percent of the acid moieties in the case of lithium sulfoisophthalate
derived from
lithium sulfoisophthalic acid, no increase in effectiveness is seen by
increasing the
amounts of the interfacial tension reducing agents. Levels above the CMC would
be the
functional equivalent of the CMC as it pertains to reducing the interfacial
tension of the
polyester-polyamide. Unlike other salts, the lithium salt, in particular shows
an optimum
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
34
level at approximately between 0.3 and 1.0 moles per 100 moles polymer repeat
unit.
This can also be expressed as 0.4 to 1.0 mole percent of the acid or glycol
moiety to
which the lithium salt is attached.
Typical levels for a metal sulfoisophthalate derived from the metal
sulfoisophthalic acid
are in the range of about 0.01 to about 15 mole percent, with the range of
about 0.05 to
about 10 mole percent being more preferred, with the range of about 0.1 to 5
mole
percent also preferred, with the range of about 0.2 to about 4 mole percent
and about 0.4
to about 2 mole percent also being good operational ranges. The amount of
sulfonate
HI interfacial interfacial tension reducing agent is determined by
measuring the amount of
sulphur in the polymer and metal. For the case of the sulfonates belongin to
the class of
isophthalates, they can be described as being a metal sulfoisophthalate
derived from the
metal sulfoisophthalic acid or glycol, wherein the metal is selected from the
group
consisting of lithium, sodium, potassium, calcium, zinc, and manganese.
Polyesters modified with the interfacial tension reducing agent employed in
the present
invention can be prepared by polymerization procedures. The traditional
techniques can
be divided into the ester, acid, and modified processes. In the ester process,
the dimethyl
ester of the carboxylic acid or acids is reacted with the glycol or glycols in
the presence
of heat and the methanol removed yielding the bis-hydroxyethyl ester of the
acids. The
bis-hydroxyethyl ester is then polymerized in its liquid form by subjecting
the material to
vacuum and heat to remove the glycols and increase the molecular weight. A
typical
process for the object polymer with an interfacial tension reducing agent
would start with
these ratios: 98 moles of dimethyl terephthalate, 2 moles of dimethyl sodium
salt of
sulfoisophthalate and 220 moles of glycol, typically ethylene glycol. Of the
220 moles of
glycol, 120 are excess which are removed during processing. It should be noted
that it is
possible to obtain the sulfonated co-monomer in either its bis-(hydroxyethyl)
or dimethyl
ester form.
For clarification, the phrase copolymerized with at least X percent of a
specific acid
means that the compound is considered as part of the acid group of the
polymer, such as
terephthalic or isophthalic acid. It provides the reference to determine how
many moles
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
of the compound to use. The phrase does not mean that the compound must be
added to
the process as an acid.
For example, lithium sulfoisophthalic acid could be
copolymerized into polyethylene terephthalate as the acid with two carboxylic
end
groups, as the dimethyl ester of the carboxylic acid, as the bis-hydroxy ester
of the
5 dimethyl ester, as very low molecular weight oligomers of a glycol acid
polymer where
the acid moieties are at least in part, the sulfoisophthalate salt, or as the
di-alcohol.
The phrase "copolymerized salt of the acid" should not limit the claim to only
using the
acid form, but should be read to mean that the compound is one of the acid
derived
10 groups in the polymer.
The phrase "copolymerized with" means that the compound has been chemically
reacted
with the polymer, such as in the polymer chain or as a pendant group. For
example, a
polyester copolymerized with lithium sulfoisophthalate, or modified by
copolymerizing
15 at least 0.01 mole percent sulfoisophthalate into the polyester, means that
sulfoisophthalate is bonded to the polymer, including bound into the polymer
chain, with
at least one chemical bond. The phrases are indifferent to how the material is
incorporated into the polymer. A
polyester copolymerized with lithium
sulfoisophthalate, or modified by copolymerizing at least 0.01 mole percent
lithium
20 sulfoisophthalate into polyester refers to a polyester containing the
lithium
sulfoisophthalate whether that lithium sulfoisophthalate was incorporated
using but not to
limited to lithium sulfoisophthalic acid, lithium sulfobenzoic acid, the
dimethyl ester of
lithium sulfoisophthalic acid, the methyl ester of lithium sulfobenzoic acid,
the di-alcohol
of lithium sulfoisophthalate, the lithium sulfohydroxy benzene, the lithium
salt of
25 hydroxy benzene sulfonic acid, or oligomers or polymers containing the
lithium
sulfoisophthalate.
While the preceding paragraph used lithium as an example, the same would be
true for
the sodium and other metal salts. It should be noted that the references to
lithium in this
30 specification should not limit the claims to just the lithium salt.
While lithium is the
preferred metal, the use of the polyamides within the specified amino to
carboxyl (acid)
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
36
end group ratio has been effectively demonstrated with other metals as
demonstrated in
the examples.
The phrases "and derivatives" and "and its derivatives" refer to the various
functionalized forms of the interfacial reducing agent which can be
copolymerized into
the polymer. For example, lithium sulfoisophthalate "and its derivatives"
refers
collectively and is not limited to lithium sulfoisophthalic acid, the dimethyl
ester of
lithium sulfoisophthalic acid, the bis-hydroxyethyl ester of lithium
sulfoisophthalic acid,
the di-alcohol of lithium sulfoisophthalate, low molecular weight oligomers,
and high
I.V. polymers containing lithium sulfoisophthalate in the polymer chain.
The same nomenclature applies to the glycol or alcohol containing the
interfacial tension
reducing agent.
In the acid process, the starting materials are the di-carboxylic acids, with
water being the
primary by-product. The charge ratio in a typical acid process is 98 moles
terephthalic
acid, 2 moles of a metal salt of sulfoisophthalic acid (e.g. lithium
sulfoisophthalic acid -
LiSIPA), and 120 moles of glycols, typical ethylene glycol. After reaction of
the glycols
with the acids, the material is subjected to the same polymerization process
conditions as
the ester process. In practice, many of the salts degrade and are therefore
added in as a
pre-reacted bis-hydroxy ester form as described in the examples.
The modified processes are variations of either process; combining the
intermediary
product at certain steps. For example, the acid process may be used with just
terephthalic
acid to produce its low molecular weight intermediate and the ester process
used to
produce the bis-hydroxyethyl ester of the homopolymer sulfonated polyester.
These two
intermediates are then combined and polymerized to a more random copolymer.
Another
variation is to add the finished modified polymer to the melt reactor and let
the melt
process depolymerise the modified polymer and then form a random copolymer.
While
the three component system, of PET, PET ¨ ionomer, and polyamide has not been
found
to be as effective as the more random copolymer of the two component system
(PET-
ionomer, polyamide), the three component system is considered a part of this
invention.
CA 02626862 2013-02-01
37
Another technique for manufacturing the modified polymer is to completely
trans-
esterify a modified polyester with a large amount of interfacial tension
reducing moieties
into a unmodified polyester to create a blockier copolymer. This can be done
using other
techniques such as a long residence time and/or high temperature extrusion.
Other methods of incorporating similar co-monomers are listed in United States
Patent
Numbers 3,936,389, 3,899,470, 5,178,950, and United States Statutory Invention
Registration H1760.
In the process of making the composition, the polyester, polyamide, and
interfacial
tension reducing agent are melt blended by any of the known techniques and
then
molded, formed or cast into an article. Melt blending involves heating the
separate
materials so that at least the polyester and the polyamide are liquid and
exposing the
liquids to shear stress. This can occur in an extruder or a heated vessel and
can be done
continuously or in a batch operation. If the interfacial tension reducing
agent is not
bound into the polyamide or polyester, the temperature should be sufficient to
liquefy it
as well. The actual blending could occur in a stirred vessel or extruder, such
as injection
molding machine. After the material is melt blended it is shaped into an
article.
Examples of the articles are films, fibers, pellets, preforms, and injection
molded shapes.
Often these articles are further treated to make a different article such as a
bottle,
container, tray, or stretched film. In some cases, the composition is
introduced as a layer
in the article and becomes a layer in the final produced article.
To make the article, the melt blend will pass through a nozzle or die. In the
case of films
or sheets, the blended composition is pushed through a die and usually onto a
roll. In the
case of a preform or injection molded part, the melt blended composition is
pushed into
the mold and takes the shape of the mold. In the case. of the pellet, the melt
blended
composition is pushed through a hole making a strand that is cut. In the case
of the fiber,
the strand remains uncut and is wound onto a bobbin.
CA 02626862 2013-02-01
38
Because the polyamide and polyester are both hydroscopic, it is preferable to
dry both of
them prior to melt blending. In general, neither material should contain more
than
250ppm water when melt blending. However, the final amount of moisture removed
from the materials prior to drying is up to the practitioner. Therefore, for
the purposes of
this specification, the verb drying, or to dry, or drying, or drying step
refers removing
moisture from the polymer when the polymer is below its melt point. Drying
does not
refer to removing moisture in contact with the polymer, such as surface
moisture during
pelletizing. Drying does not refer to removing moisture to at or below a
specified level.
It is merely the removal of moisture below the melt point. Drying is done most
efficiently by exposing the polymer, generally in the form of pellets, to a
high
temperature, but below the melt point of the polymer, in the presence of
dehumidified air
or inert gas such as nitrogen.
One technique is to dry the polyester and/or the polyester with the
interfacial tension
reducing agent separately from the polyamide and then melt blend the
components in the
same extruder. Another expression is to dry the polyester in the absence of
any
polyamide, or dry the polyester in a vessel void of polyamide. While some
polyamide
could be tolerated with the polyesters, the level should not exceed 1 percent
by weight of
the polymers in the drying vessel. Thus, the polyester could be dried in a
vessel
substantially void of any polyamide, where substantially void means that there
is less
than 1 percent polyamide by weight of the vessel contents. This type of drying
could be
done in the same vessel, just at different times; or the drying could be done
in two
separate vessels. It is even possible to dry the material in one location,
package the
material in moisture tight containers and use the material at a different
location. This is
often referred to as pre-drying and is a drying technique contemplated.
One may only dry the polyester or only dry the polyamide.
WO 2005/110694 Al teaches that the most efficient way to dry the polyamide and
polyester is to do so together in the same vessel. However, simultaneously
drying
polyester in the presence of polyamide creates colour formation. WO
2005/110694 Al
teaches to use and make the
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
39
compartmentalized pellet with at least two zones, with the first zone
comprising the
polyesters and the second zone comprising the polyamides to minimize colour
formation
during drying. Figures 5 through 8 demonstrate different embodiments of a
compartmentalized pellet.
In the three component system, the compartmentalized construction would be
used by
placing the polyester in one compartment, preferably the sheath as depicted by
numeral 2
in Figure 5 and numeral 22 in Figure 6, the polyamide in another compartment,
preferably the core as depicted by numeral 1 in Figure 5 and numeral 21 in
Figure 6, with
the interfacial tension reducing agent present any compartment. The components
are
then blended to produce the composition when the compartmentalized pellet is
melt
extruded. It is noted that complete separation of the polyester and polyamide
is not
essential for the compartmentalized construction.
To be a compartmentalized pellet, the volume of the compartment must be at
least 0.001
percent of the total volume of the pellet. In practicality, 0.01 volume
percent is more
preferred, with at least 0.1 volume percent the most preferred. The percentage
of the
volume of the compartmentalized zone (core) relative to the whole pellet is
the ratio of
the radius of the core squared to the radius of the cylindrical portion of the
pellet squared.
A preferred embodiment is the core-sheath design wherein the core comprises m-
xylylene adipamide polyamide (MXD6) and the sheath comprises a polyester,
specifically crystallizable polyethylene terephthalate with an Intrinsic
Viscosity (I.V.)
between 0.4 and 1.2 dl/g.
The preferred process of melt blending the components comprises drying a
compartmentalized pellet, wherein the pellet has a first compartment and a
second
compartment, where the first compartment of the pellet comprises the polyester
and the
second compartment comprises the polyamide. The interfacial tension reducing
agent,
preferably a metal sulfonate salt such as lithium sulfonate, lithium
sulfoisophthalate or
sodium sulfoisophthalate can be present in either compartment, a different
compartment
or the interfacial tension reducing agent can be added separately during melt
extrusion.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
If the interfacial tension reducing agent is incorporated into the backbone
of, or
copolymerized with the polyester molecule, then the interfacial tension
reducing agent
would be present in the compartmentalized pellet in the compartment containing
the
polyester, since the polyester is both the polyester with the interfacial
tension reducing
5 agent incorporated into its backbone. Alternatively, the
compartmentalized pellet may
contain the polyester in a sheath and the polyamide in the core, with the
interfacial
tension reducing agent being present in a separate form. In the case of a two
pellet
system, the pellet containing the interfacial tension reducing agent may be
dried in a
separate vessel or in the same vessel as the compartmentalized pellet.
After drying the pellets, the polyester, polyamide, and interfacial tension
reducing agent
are melt blended and then molded, formed or cast into an article. Melt
blending involves
heating the separate materials so that the polyester, polyamide and if not
bound in the
polymer, the interfacial tension reducing agent, are above their respective
melt
temperatures and then mixing them together under shear force, such as exists
in an
extruder. The actual blending could occur in a stirred vessel or extruder,
such as
injection molding machine. After the material is melt blended it is shaped
into one of the
articles discussed earlier.
Regardless of when the interfacial tension has been introduced into the
composition, the
molded article is generally not hazy. However, once the article is stretched
into a further
article, usually a container sidewall, the spherical domains will elongate,
become
ellipsoidal, and at least one diameter of the ellipse will become large enough
to interfere
with the visible light. Mathematically expressed, one of the diameters of the
ellipse will
be greater than approximately 400nm but less than approximately 720nm;
corresponding
to the wavelength range of visible light.
References to the container sidewall and container wall of this invention also
refer to the
lid, bottom and top sides of the container, and a film that may be wrapped
around the
product such as meat wraps. The container wall may be completely stretched or
have
stretched and unstretched portions. For example, a reheat blown or injection
stretch
blown bottle is a container with a highly stretched portion in the middle of
the wall, with
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
41
the wall having successfully lower stretch until the wall is unstretched in
the neck and
thread areas. For clarity, the thread, neck, and sealing portions where the
cap is applied
are considered part of the wall of a container. In a reheat blown bottle the
threads and
neck area are generally unstretched. A preform or parison is also a container
with at least
one wall. Although an intermediate product, the preform is capable of
containing a
packaged content.
Stretching occurs when the molded article, film or fiber is heated or cooled
to the
elongation temperature of the composition. The elongation temperature is a
temperature
at which the article can be stretched and is usually the range of the 10 C
below the
article's glass transition temperature and 10 C below its melt point. The
article is then
usually restrained at least one point and subjected to a force which pulls or
elongates the
article. The article can be pulled or stretched in one or two, or in the case
of a bubble, or
bottle, three directions. A fiber or a uni-axial stretched film is an example
of uniaxial
stretching. A stretched fiber is pulled in the direction of its length to
build strength. A
film will be placed in machine called a tenter frame which has a sequence of
gears that
move progressively faster, thus stretching the film between each gear or other
attaching
mechanism.
In the case of bottles, bi-axially oriented films, or blown films, the article
is stretched in
at least two directions. In the case of a blown bottle or reheat blow or
reheat stretch blow
bottle, the preform is held steady at the threads and pressure such as
compressed air is
introduced into the article, also known as a preform or parison. The
compressed air will
then expand the article to take on the shape of the blow mould surrounding the
article.
Depending upon the design of the article and the mould, the article will have
varying
degrees of stretch in the two directions.
In films, there are some techniques which simultaneously stretch the article
in the
machine and transverse directions. However, in industrial practice it is more
common to
stretch the film first one way, then the other.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
42
It is this stretched article where this composition is particularly useful. By
lowering the
interfacial tension so that the diameter of the domains of dispersed polymer
are extremely
small, the article can be stretched to higher levels, and still maintain a
reduced haze
appearance because the more of the stretched particles are still below the
400nm or the
wavelength of light.
The amount of stretch, also known as draw, is described as the stretch ratio
or the area of
stretch. In the case of a uniaxial stretch, the ratio is the length of the
stretched article
divided by the length of the unstretched article, where both lengths are
measured in the
direction of stretch. A 2 cm specimen stretched to 8 cm would have a stretch
ratio of 4.
For a bi-axially stretched article, the ratio is often described as the
stretch ratio of
direction one multiplied by the stretch ratio of direction two, where
direction one is
perpendicular to direction two. Thus a an article stretched 3 times in one
direction and 3
times in the other direction (perpendicular to the first direction) has a
stretch ratio of 3x3
or 9. However, an article with a stretch ratio of 2 in one direction and 4.5
in the
perpendicular direction also has a stretch ratio of 9.
Another technique to measure stretch ratio, draw ratio, or drawdown ratio is
to trace or
scribe a circle onto a plane of the article, measure the area of the circle,
stretch the article,
then measure the new area circumscribed by the enlarged circumference of the
old circle.
The stretch ratio is then the area of the new stretched circle divided by the
area of the
unstretched old circle. That stretch ratio can also be determined by using the
ratio of the
respective diameters or respective radii.
In the case of the three dimensional stretch, the change in volume or area of
a sphere
could be used to determine the stretch ratio.
Regardless of the technique used to measure the stretch ratio, stretching the
molded
article causes the dispersed component to stretch as well. Even if the
dispersed
component does not stretch, the domain surrounding the dispersed component
will
elongate. If the elongation of the domain whether it is completely filled with
the
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
43
dispersed material or not is greater than approximately 400nm but less that
about 720nm,
then the stretched article will have an increased Hunter Haze value, where
haze is the
measure of the amount of light deviation from the direction of transmittance
by at least
2.5 degrees.
If enough of the particles have diameters between 400 and 720 nanometers, then
the haze
will be detectable by the human eye. As discussed below, the standard
deviation of the
particle size distribution becomes important as well.
It is therefore important that the diameter of the dispersed particle be small
enough so
that when stretched, the longest dimension of the dispersed particle and the
domain
encompassing the particle be less than 400nm. For an article which stretches 3
in one
direction and 3 in another, the maximum particle size in unstretched article
should be
400nm divided by 3, or 133nm. For the article stretched 2 x 4.5, the particle
size should
be less than or equal to 400 divided by 4.5, or 89 nm. The target average
diameter of the
dispersed particles in the unstretched matrix phase could then be easily
expressed as 400
divided by longest dimension of stretch. For example, if the final stretch
dimension was
7 x 2, then the goal would be to modify the interfacial tension so that the
average particle
diameter in the unstretched article would be 400 divided by 7, or 57nm. It is
not only
important that the average diameter be below a certain size, but that the
distribution be
narrow enough to reduce the number of dispersed particles which will exist
between 400-
700nm after stretching. The goal is to minimize the number of domains in the
visible
region, therefore reducing the average domain size is important, but reducing
the wide
distribution is also important.
Because the particles occur in a distribution, the average particle diameter
is used. Given
the ranges of stretch ratios, the average diameter of the dispersed particles
in the
unstretched container should be less than 125 nm, more preferably less than
100 nm,
even more preferably less than 80nm. For articles to be stretched into high
stretch, high
strength materials, average particle diameters of less than 90nm should be
used, with
particle size less than 70nm preferred, and particle size less then 60nm even
more
preferred, with the best appearance occurring with an average particle
diameter less than
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
44
50nm. Not all the particles need to be below 400nm in the stretched bottle for
the bottle
to have low or acceptable haze. However, the goal is to have as many domains
as
possible below 400nm.
When the composition of a crystallizable polyester, a polyamide with a low
amino to
carboxyl end group ratio, and a lithium sulfoisophthalate interfacial tension
reducing
agent, is stretched, the polyamide domains stretch far less than the stretch
of the article.
The thickness of the wall of the container of this invention can range from
0.01mm in the
case of a film to the thickness of a preform which is usually less than 6.5mm.
In the case
of the bottle, the stretched wall usually has a thickness of 0.2 to 0.9 mm. A
container
wall can also consist of layers of varying thickness, the thickness of the
layers is usually
between 0.02 and 0.2mm. A monolayer, which is the preferred wall of the
container,
consists of one layer. A monolayer of the polyester-polyamide dispersion would
consist
of one layer. This does not mean that monolayer could not have a label wrapped
around
it. It would still be a mono-layer bottle. In contrast, the multilayer bottle
would contain
at least one layer of the composition.
Analysis of the dispersion at this point shows the polyamide dispersed into
the polyester
matrix phase. There are many techniques to analyse the dispersion
characteristics.
However, the location of the measurement on the article is critical. The
dispersion
characteristics, including domain size of the dispersed polyamide, in the
unstretched
article can be measured in the unstretched area of the stretched article. The
unstretched
area can exist in an unstretched area of the wall, such as the thread, neck,
and certain
sealing surfaces or it can be measured on the article before stretching.
Measuring the
size of the dispersed particles in the article before stretching the article
yields the same
value as measuring the size in the unstretched portion after stretching.
Therefore, if the
stretched wall does not have an unstretched portion, the size of dispersed
particles prior
to stretching are to be used. In many instances, the measurement in the
examples were
made on the preform or parison prior to stretching.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
Measuring the domains in a stretched section of the wall is self evident and
is usually
made in the area of the highest stretch as that area is most likely to have
largest number
of domains in the visible light region.
5 In SEM technique, a fractured sample is treated with cold formic acid to
remove the
polyamide from the PET and the sample subjected to scanning electron
microscopy
(SEM). Based upon contrast, the domains where the polyamide once was can be
readily
determined and measured. (See Figures 1 and 3). Figures 1 and 3 demonstrate
the
contrast between the matrices. The domains can be measured by hand or by
computer
10 techniques.
Since the molded sample is unstretched, the particles are present as spheres.
The SEM
picture can be analyzed either manually or with various computer pro grams.
The
average particle size can then be easily calculated from the picture. The
average would
15 be determined by summing the diameters of all the particles in the
picture and dividing
by the number of particles in the picture.
Similarly, a distribution analysis as shown in Figures 2 and 4 can be done, by
making a
histogram of the number of particles corresponding to a given diameter. The
data can
20 also be normalized to a make a particle density function. Such
normalization would be
done by taking the number of particles per area observed and then multiplying
or
dividing by the factor desired to normalize the results.
For example, if one wanted to normalize the observation of 250 particles per
100 square
25 nano-meters to the number of particles for 1000 square nano-meters, one
would multiply
250 by 10, which is the factor of 1000 square nano-meters divided 100 square
nano-
meters.
The percent of stretch is defined the domain stretch ratio divided by the
polyester stretch
30 ratio in the same direction can be determined as follows.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
46
The domain stretch ratio is the average length of the domains after stretching
in the
measured direction divided by the average length of the domains prior to
stretching.
Since the unstretched domain is spherical, any radius or direction can be
used.
For some containers, it is not essential to measure the domain diameter in the
axis of the
stretch because the stretch in another axis yields the same result. In the
bottle sidewall,
the analysis can be done on the domain running parallel to the wall edge, or
perpendicular to the line of sight. The largest stretch is likely in the hoop
or outward
radial direction. Note, that the same measurement would be obtained if the
analysis
viewed the domain perpendicular to the line of sight, parallel to the axial
direction. This
is because the largest part of domain is the same at both angles of view. Only
if the
analysis was taken perpendicular to the line of sight, but parallel to the
hoop direction
would the maximum domain diameter be different.
The polyester or matrix stretch ratio is the change in amount the matrix has
been
stretched coincident in the approximate area where the domain is measured. The
easies
to way to measure the stretch ratio for the percent of stretch calculation is
to place a line
on the article of known length. The article is stretched, presumably in the
direction of the
line and the new length is then measured. The polyester stretch ratio is the
length of the
stretched line divided by the length of the unstretched line.
The percent stretch is then the domain stretch ratio divided by the matrix or
polyester
stretch ratio. As shown in Series 9, the percent of stretch of the traditional
sodium
isophthalate interfacial tension reducing agent was 91 while the percent of
stretch using
the lithium salt was 71.
The colour and brightness of a thermoplastic article can be observed visually,
and can
also be quantitatively determined by a HunterLab ColorQuest Spectrometer. This
instrument uses the 1976 CIE, a*, b* and L* designation of colour and
brightness. An a*
coordinate defines a colour axis wherein plus values are toward the red end of
the colour
spectrum and minus values are toward the green end.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
47
The b* coordinate defines a second colour axis, wherein plus values are toward
the
yellow end of the visible spectra and minus values are toward the blue end of
the visible
spectra.
Higher L* values indicate enhanced brightness of the material.
Based upon the above discussion, the preferred composition is a polyester
modified with
lithium sulfoisophthalate, in particular a crystallizable polyethylene
terephthalate or its
copolymers, blended with a polyamide polymer, preferably MXD6 or nylon 6
having an
HI amino to carboxyl end group ratio of less 0.06 and a relative viscosity
of approximately
1.695.
Another preferred embodiment is a blend of a crystallizable polyethylene
terephthalate or
its copolymers, a polyamide (in particular MXD6 or nylon-6) with an amino to
carboxyl
end group ratio of less 0.06 and a relative viscosity of approximately 1.695
and a separate
interfacial tension reducing agent. Such separate interfacial tension reducing
agent could
be a metal salt of sulfonated polystyrene or a metal salt of sulfonated
polyester.
The preferred article is the monolayer stretched wall of a container. This
wall can be
stretched from a preform, the hollow tube with a closed end or an extrusion
blow process
wherein the composition is extruded into a continuous tube and a mold
surrounds the
tube, pinching the tube closed at one end. Air is then injected into the other
end
expanding an stretching the tube in the shape of the container.
The haze of the stretched wall is a critical attribute. At no point in the
stretched wall
should the Hunter haze exceed certain preferred haze expressed as Hunter Haze
%, or
percent Hunter haze per millimetre wall thickness. Preferably the wall should
have less
than 20 percent Hunter haze per mm, with less than 16 percent Hunter haze per
millimetre even more preferred, with less than 14 percent Hunter haze per
millimetre
even more preferred, with less than 12 percent Hunter haze per millimetre even
more
preferred, with less than 10 percent Hunter haze per millimetre even more
preferred, with
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
48
less than 9 percent Hunter haze per millimetre even more preferred, and less
than 8.5
percent Hunter haze per mm the most preferred.
Experimental
The following examples demonstrate the functionality of this invention. In
Examples 1
through 3, 100 grams of polyamide pellets with the end group and molecular
weights
provided in Table I were dried separately and melt blended with 1900 grams of
a
crystallizable polyester having the characteristics demonstrated in Table I.
Note that the
crystallizable polyester in examples 2 and 3 contained the interfacial tension
reducing
agent at the mole percents indicated polymerized into the backbone of the
polymer.
Examples 2A and 2B are Crystar 3919/089 available from E.I. Dupont Nemours,
USA.
The crystallizable polyester with the interfacial reducing agent, lithium
sulfoisophthalate,
copolymerized into the backbone used in Examples 3A and 3B were prepared in
the
following manner.
Crystallizable polyesters containing various amounts lithium sulfonate in the
form of
lithium isophthalate derived from lithium sulfoisophthalic acid (LiSIPA) were
manufactured by placing 7567 gms of terephthalic acid, 157 gms of isophthalic
acid, and
2974 gms of ethylene glycol into a vessel of pre-reacted oligomers from the
previous
batch. The contents were held under 3.38 bar pressure at 262 C. After 35
minutes, 45.4
gms of 1% lithium by weight mixture of lithium acetate in ethylene glycol and
18.1 gms
of 1% phosphorous by weight mixture of phosphoric acid diluted in ethylene
glycol was
charged to the reactor. The contents were held in this vessel under agitation
for 3 hours
with an oil temperature of 271 C, content temperature increasing from 248 C to
263 C, at
3.38 bar. During the time water was removed from the vessel.
After reacting for 3 hours, a portion of the contents were transferred to a
second vessel.
The amount remaining in the first vessel was approximately the same amount as
was in
the vessel when the raw materials were first charged. Once in the second
vessel, 146
gms of a 5% bis-hydroxyethyl ester of lithium sulfoisophthalic acid ¨ 95%
ethylene
glycol solution and 1044 gms of ethylene glycol were added to the material
transferred
from the first vessel to the second vessel. The contents of the second vessel
were
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
49
agitated at atmospheric pressure and 244 C. After 30 minutes another 146 gms
of the
bis-hydroxy ester of lithium sulfoisophthalic acid, 1044 gms of ethylene
glycol were
added to the second vessel. After 30 minutes of mixing, 38.6 gms of 0.47% by
weight
cobalt mixture of cobalt acetate and ethylene glycol were added to the second
vessel.
After 3 minutes of mixing 206 gms of a 1% antimony by weight mixture of
antimony
oxide in ethylene glycol was added to the vessel. After 45 minutes the
pressure was
reduced to 100 torr, and after another 26 minutes, the pressure reduced to 1.0
torr. 40
minutes later the pressure was 0.2 torr and held for 20 minutes before
discharging the
ingredients and pelletizing the material.
This amorphous material was combined with several other similarly produced
batches
and then solid phase polymerized in a batch rotating vacuum vessel at 0.1 mmHg
and
232 C until a 0.802 I.V. (dl/gm) was reached. The amount of lithium
sulfoisophthalate
was varied for the resulting mole percentages. The amount of lithium
sulfoisophthalate
reported in the tables is based upon measuring the amount of sulfur in the
polymer using
X-RAY and not upon the amount charged.
Examples lA and 1B are the comparative examples demonstrating the detrimental
effect
of lowering the amino to carboxyl end group ratio without using an interfacial
tension
reducing agent. lA and 1B show the haze dramatically increasing as the amino
to
carboxyl end group ratio is reduced. This is true, even though the molecular
weight of
the polyamide with the lower ratio is also lower. The opposite impact of the
presence of
the interfacial tension reducing agent is demonstrated by comparing Examples
2A with
2B and 3A with 3B which both demonstrate that regardless of the metal type,
the haze is
reduced when the amino to carboxyl end group is reduced. The superiority of
the Li salt
is demonstrated by comparing the color of the lithium (Series 3) and the
sodium (Series
2).
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
Table I - Impact of an Interfacial Tension Reducing Agent on Polyester Blended
with a
Polyamides of Varying Amino to Carboxyl End Group Ratio (AEG/CEG)
Example lA 1B 2A 2B 3A 3B
Polyamide (wt % of polymer 5 5 5 5 5 5
components)
R.V. 2.32.5(a) 1.695 2.32.5(a) 1.695 2.32.5(a) 1.695
Amino End Group (AEG) 16 12 16 12 16 12
(mmol/kg)
Carboxyl End Group 68 196 68 196 68 196
(CEG) (mmol/kg)
AEG/CEG (Amino to 0.24 0.0612 0.24 0.0612 0.24 0.0612
Carboxyl End Group Ratio)
Mn based on Total End 23810 9615 23810 9615 23810 9615
Group (TEG)
Polyester and Interfacial 95 95 95 95 95 95
Tension Reducing Agent (wt
% of polymer components)
TPA mole % (b) 97.5 97.5 98.2 98.2 98.3 98.3
IPA mole %(b) 2.5 2.5 0 1.2 1.2
LiSIPA mole (b)% 0 0 0 0.5 0.5
NaSIPA mole) % 0 0 1.72 1.72
Cobalt (ppm) 0 0 40 40 25 25
Preform
Average Domain Size (nm) 239 405 71.9 58.6 47.6 44.93
Stretched Bottle Sidewall
Polymer Stretch Ratio in 2.91 3.09 3.36 3.36 2.73 2.73
Hoop direction
Hunter b* 11.83 12.96 10.59 8.35 8.3 5.7
Thickness (mm) 0.3 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.31
Domain Size (nm) 799 1146 220 234 93.2 68
Domain Stretch Ratio in 3.34 2.8 3.06 4.0 1.96 1.5
hoop direction
Polymer Stretch Ratio in 2.91 3.09 3.36 3.36 2.73 2.73
Hoop direction
Percent of Stretch 115 90 91 119 71 55
Haze (%) 12.09 21.6 5.7 3.9 6.1 4.9
% Haze/mm 40 74 20 14 21 16
(a) Typical Measured Values for MXD6 6007
(b) mole % of the acid groups refer to acid moiety derived from the
abbreviation. For
5 example, TPA mole % refers to the number of moles of terephthalate
(derived from
terephthalic acid (TPA) in the polymer. The same is true of the other monomers
and
when this nomenclature is found in the other
tables.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
51
Series 4, (Table II) establishes that cobalt is not needed. In Example 4A a
polyester
modified with sodium sulfo-isophthalate interfacial tension reducing agents
was
produced in a two vessel reactor train. The following demonstrates how the
polymer
containing 0.5 mole percent sodium sulfoisophthalate was made. The same
procedure
was used for the 2.0 mole percent.
8933.0 gms of dimethyl terephthalate, 69.7 gms di -methyl sodium
sulfoisophthalate,
7175 gms ethylene glycol and 261g manganese acetate were added to the first
vessel.
The ingredients were heated to 214 C at a rate of 0.4 C per minutes and the
methanol
removed. After the removal of 3660 ml of methanol, the ingredients were
transferred to
the second vessel and the batch temperature increased to 226 C. 67 gms of
phosphite
stabilizer were added and mixed for 5 minutes. 140 gms of isophthalic acid
were then
added to the batch. After stirring for 15 minutes, 77 gms of Cobalt Acetate,
and 173 gms
of glycolated antimony oxide were added and the vessel placed under a vacuum
of 0.13
millibar. The batch was continually agitated and the temperature increased to
256 C.
The resulting polymer was discharged and pelletized after reaching the desired
intrinsic
viscosity. The polymer produced in this particular batch had an I.V. of 0.53
dl/gm, 14
carboxyl end group number (equivalent milligms per gram of polymer) and a melt
point
of 246.9 C.
The molecular weight of the material was increased by solid phase polymerizing
several
melt batches in a rotating vacuum vessel. The solid phase polymerization was
accomplished by placing 5 melt batches of the same molecular constituency into
the
vessel. The vessel pressure was reduced to 0.13 millibar, the temperature set
at 225 C,
and the vessel slowly rotated so the material tumbled on itself. After 12
hours of
tumbling, the temperature was increased to 230 C for 6 hours, and then
increased to
235 C for 2 hours. The pellets were then cooled and discharged. The final
Intrinsic
Viscosity was 0.82 dl/gm.
Example 4B is very similar to 4A, except that the formulation was adjusted to
yield a
polymer having 2 mole percent sodium isophthalate.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
52
In example 4C, no cobalt was used. The polyester containing 0.5 mole percent
lithium
sulfonate was made in the same manner as Example 3, except that the cobalt
acetate was
replaced with a non-cobalt colour package. The colour package was added at the
beginning of the reaction and consisted of 3.03 ppm on the basis of the final
polymer
yield of SB138 (Solvent Blue 138) and 1.60ppm on the basis of the final
polymer yield
5V50 (Solvent Violet 50). Both colorants are available from Colorchem
International as
Amaplast Violet PC and Amaplast Blue HB. These colorant levels were selected
to yield
the similar L*,a*, b* as the cobalt acetate.
The modified polyesters of 4B and 4C were dried separately, then melt blended
with 7%
by weight MXD6 nylon (Grade 6007 from Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Japan) and
injection molded into preforms and subsequently blown into a bottle. Example
4A was
combined with MXD6 nylon (Grade 6001 from Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Japan) and
made into a bottle in a similar manner. Example 4D used an MXD6 with much
lower
molecular weight and amino to carboxyl end group ratio with a polyester
composition
containing the following additives in addition to those listed in the table:
12ppm P(as
phosphoric acid), 250 ppm Sb, 30 ppm FeP (iron phosphide), 50 ppm Li(as
acetate),
SB138(2.42 ppm) and 5V50 (1.60ppm) Not only does it have a measured
superiority
over the others, it was considered the best aesthetic bottles by all who
visually examined
the bottles.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
53
TABLE II Elimination of Cobalt
Example 4A 4B 4C 4D
Polyamide (wt % of 6001, 7% 6007, 7% 6007, 7% 5
polymer
components)
R.V. 2.1(a) 2.3-2.5(a) 2.3-2.5(a) 1.72
AEG (mmol/kg) 38(a) 14 14 11
CEG (mmol/kg) 98(a) 64 64 162
AEG/CEG 0.388 0.219 0.219 0.0612
(Amino/Carboxyl
end Group Ratio)
Mn based on 14,706 25,641 25,641 11,560
Total End
Groups
Polyester (wt % of
polymer
components)
TPA mole % 97.71 95.55 98.3 98.3
IPA mole % 1.79 2.45 1.2 1.2
LiSIPA mole % 0 0 0.5 0.5
NaSIPA mole % 0.5 2.0 0 0
Cobalt (ppm) 25-40(c) 25-40(c) 0.0 0.0
Bottle Hunter b* 14.91 15.58 12.49 4.73(b)
(a) Typical Values
(b)Average of three bottles
(c) Cobalt Ranges depending upon final resin color prior to blending with
MXD6.
Example Series 5: The Overall Effect of the Low Amino to Carboxyl End Group
Ratio.
In 5A, 94.6 parts of the resin manufactured in a manner similar to Example 3
with 20ppm
Cobalt added as Cobalt Acetate was melt blended with 5.4 parts of MXD6 nylon
and
injected into a preform. The MXD6 nylon had a relative viscosity of 1.599,
9
mmol/kg Amino End Groups (AEG), 228 mmol/kg Carboxyl (Acid) End Groups (CEG),
(AEG/CEG=0.0395) and number average molecular weight of 8,439. The average
diameter of the domains in the unstretched preform was 53.8 +/- 20.4 nm.
Unexplainably
and surprisingly the average diameter of the domains in the stretched portion
was 89.9
+/- 40.2 nm.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
54
Example 5B repeated 5A, but with a different MXD6 having a relative viscosity
of 1.989,
9 mmol/kg Amino End Groups, 133 mmol/kg Carboxyl (Acid) End Groups,
(AEG/CEG=0.0677) and number average molecular weight of 14,598. The average
diameter of the domains in the unstretched preform was 49.6 +/- 22.5 nm. The
average
diameter of the domains in the stretched portion was 94.3 +/- 77.3 nm.
Example 5C is a comparative example according to the teachings of the prior
art. A low
molecular weight, high amino to carboxyl end group ratio MXD6 was melt blended
with
a polyester without the interfacial tension reducing agent. The MXD6 polyamide
with
relative viscosity of 1.687, 199 mmol/kg Amino End Groups, 33 mmol/kg Carboxyl
(Acid) End Groups, (AEG/CEG=6.03) and number average molecular weight of 8,621
The polyester was Cleartuf0 MAX, an 0.84 I.V. crystallizable polyethylene
terephthalate
containing 1.7 -1.8 mole percent isophthalate derived from isophthalic acid
and injected
into a preform. The average diameter of the domains in the unstretched preform
was
87.37 +/- 24.9 nm. The average diameters of the domains in the stretched
portion were
308.8 +/- 83.2 3 nm. This is the expected result noting that 308/87 = 3.54,
is the
approximate stretch in one direction experienced by the preform.
Example 5E and 5F show the superiority of using the polyamide with the low
amino to
carboxyl end group ratio as opposed to the high amino to carboxyl end group
ratio as
taught in the prior art. Example 5E is the comparative example according to
the prior art.
In 5E the polyamide of 5C (AEG/CEG = 6.03) was mixed with a polyester
containing 0.5
mole % lithium sulfoisophthalate. In 5F, the polyamide with an AEG/CEG =
0.0647
(less than 1.0) was added to the polyester of 5E. The improvement in haze with
the same
amount of polyamide demonstrates that the low AEG/CEG is superior to the high
AEG/CEG when used in the presence of an interfacial tension reducing agent.
Series 6 demonstrates the use of the composition in the compartmentalized
pellet. In
Example 6A, polyester and polyamide having the same characterization of
Example 5F
were placed into the compartmentalized pellet construction. The polyamide was
in the
core and the polyester in the sheath. The compartmentalized pellets were then
heated to
210 to 215 C in a stirred vessel with nitrogen passing through the pellets.
The pellets
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232 PCT/1B2006/053922
were held at this condition until the intrinsic viscosity of the total pellet
reached
approximately 0.81 dl/g. In practice this was about 10-14 hours. The pellets
were then
injection molded into a preform and stretched into a bottle. In Series 6B, a
polyamide of
much higher relative viscosity was used. As can be seen in Table III, the haze
of the
5 bottle made from the compartmentalized structure had haze equivalent to
the components
added separately.
Table III - Supporting Examples and Compartmentalized Pellet
Example 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F 6A 6B
Polyamide (wt % 5.4 4.9 5 5 5 5 5 5
of polymer
components)
R.V. 1.599 1.989 1.687 2.38- 1.687 1.68 1.68 2.428
2.5(3)
AEG 9 9 199 14 199 13 13 13
(mmol/kg)
CEG 228 133 33 64 33 201 201 89
(mmol/kg)
AEG/CEG 0.0395 0.0677 6.03 0.219 6.03 0.0647 0.0647 0.146
(Amino/Carbo
xyl end Group
Ratio)
Total End
Groups
Polyester (wt % 94.6 95.1 95 95 95 95 95 95
of polymer
components)
IPA mole % 1.2 1.2 1.7(1') 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
1.2
LiSIPA mole 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
%
NaSIPA mole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
%
Cobalt (ppm) 20 20 0 25 25 25 25 25
Stretched Bottle
Sidewall
Haze (%) 3.47 5.19 5.4 5.4 3.7 2,6 2.8 4.44
(a) Range of Values Measured for various lots
10 (b) Typical Values of the resin type used.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
56
Test Methods
Intrinsic Viscosity
The intrinsic viscosity of intermediate molecular weight and low crystalline
poly(ethylene terephthalate) and related polymers which are soluble in 60/40
phenol/tetrachloroethane can be determined by dissolving 0.1 gms of polymer or
ground
pellet into 25 ml of 60/40 phenol/tetrachloroethane solution and determining
the viscosity
of the solution at 30 C +/- 0.05 relative to the solvent at the same
temperature using a
Ubbelohde 1B viscometer. The intrinsic viscosity is calculated using the
Billmeyer
equation based upon the relative viscosity.
The intrinsic viscosity of high molecular weight or highly crystalline
poly(ethylene
terephthalate) and related polymers which are not soluble in
phenol/tetrachloroethane
was determined by dissolving 0.1 gms of polymer or ground pellet into 25 ml of
50/50
trifluoroacetic Acid/Dichloromethane and determining the viscosity of the
solution at 30
C +/- 0.05 relative to the solvent at the same temperature using a Type OC
Ubbelohde
viscometer. The intrinsic viscosity is calculated using the Billmeyer equation
and
converted using a linear regression to obtain results which are consistent
with those
obtained using 60/40 phenol/tetrachloroethane solvent. The linear regression
is
I.V. in 60/40 phenol/tetrachloroethane =
0.8229 x IV in 50/50 trifluoroacetic Acid/Dichloromethane + 0.0124
Mole % of Acid and Glycol Moieties In the Polymer
The mole % of the acid and glycol moieties can be determined by digesting the
polymer
into its constituents and derivatizing the monomers in a methanol solution
containing an
internal standard and zinc acetate as a catalyst. The acids are derivatized to
the dimethyl
ester of the carboxylic acid, with the glycols moieties existing as the
glycol.
Quantification is then determined using the internal standard technique.
The derivatizing solution is prepared by dissolving 0.30 g of zinc acetate
into a solution
of 3.0 g reagent grade of Tetraethylene Glycol Dimethyl Ether and
approximately 500m1
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
57
of methanol in a 1000m1 volumetric flask. After dissolution, the flask is
filled to the
mark with methanol and shaken for complete mixing.
The sample is digested by weighing 0.2 +/- 0.02 g of polymer and transferring
to a
reactor containing 4 ml of the derivatizing solution. Securely seal the
reactor place in
oven or otherwise heat to 220 C +/- 5 C for 2 hours, maximum of 2.5 hours.
Remove
the reactor from the oven or heat from the reactor and allow to cool to room
temperature.
Transfer the solution to a 10m1 volumetric flask, rinsing the walls of the
reactor twice
with chloroform or dichloromethane until all the crystals are in solution.
Fill the flask to
the mark with chloroform or dichloromethane.
The techniques for the internal standard method are known in the art of using
chromatography. While the number of samples depend upon the equipment,
typically 4
standard solutions are made of varying compositions of the acids and glycols.
These
standards are then placed into the chromatograph machine and a calibration
curve
established. After the calibration curve established, the unknown sample is
analyzed by
the chromatograph.
Once the amount of acids and glycols are determined which is usually in weight
percent
of the sample, the amount of mole percent of the component in the polymer is
merely a
standard mathematical conversion.
For example, the mole percent of acid moieties derived from terephthalic acid
will be the
weight of the dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) measured on the chromatograph
divided by
the molecular weight of the DMT divided by the total moles of dimethyl esters
of
dicarboxylic acids in the sample. The moles of each dimethyl ester of a
dicarboxylic acid
is merely the weight measured divided by its respective molecular weight.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
58
Therefore,
%Moles ¨ MolesDMT
DAR' M01eS TOTAL
Where:
% MolesDNIT = Mole percent of DMT (This also equals the equivalent moles of
the TPA
before derivatization of the sample.)
and
moles TOTAL ¨ L Moles
ALL METHYL ESTERS
Where:
MolesToTAL = Total of number of moles of di methyl esters (equivalent to moles
of acid)
in the
sample
MolesA =
Number of moles of the individual di methyl esters which is equivalent to
the number of moles of each acid.
Relative Viscosity
The relative viscosity of the polyamide, including MXD6, was measured with
samples of
1 g polyamide in 100 ml 96 wt % sulphuric acid relative the 96 wt % sulphuric
acid
solvent by using a Ubbelohde viscometer 2 Type 50120 (Schott) according to DIN
EN
ISO 1628-1 and ISO 307 ¨ 1984. The static bath where the viscometer is
immersed
should be at 25 +/- 0.05 C. The dissolution of the polyamide into the
sulphuric acid
should occur at temperatures no greater than 30 C. When the dissolution is
completed,
cool to about 25 C and dilute the solution to the volumetric mark with solvent
and mix
well. The temperature of the solution during dilution shall lie between 23 an
27 C.
The Hunter Haze measurement
The measurements were taken through the bottle side-walls. A HunterLab
ColorQUEST
Sphere Spectrophotometer System with assorted specimen holders, and green,
gray and
white calibration tiles, and light trap can used to measure haze and color.
The HunterLab
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
59
Spectrocolorimeter integrating sphere sensor is a color and appearance
measurement
instrument. Light from the lamp is diffused by the integrating sphere and
passed either
through (transmitted) or reflected (reflectance) off an object to a lens. The
lens collects
the light and directs it to a diffraction grating that disperses it into its
component wave
lengths. The dispersed light is reflected onto a silicon diode array. Signals
from the
diodes pass through an amplifier to a converter and are manipulated to produce
the data.
Haze data is provided by the software. It is the calculated ratio of the
diffuse light
transmittance to the total light transmittance multiplied by 100 to yield a
"Haze %" (0%
being a transparent material, and 100% being an opaque material). Samples
prepared for
either transmittance or reflectance must be clean and free of any surface
scratches or
abrasion. The size of the sample must be consistent with the geometry of the
sphere
opening and in the case of transmittance; the sample size is limited by the
compartment
dimension. Each sample is tested in four different places, for example on the
bottle
sidewall or representative film area.
A Panametrics Magna-Mike 8000 Hall Effect Thickness Gauge or similar apparatus
can
be employed to measure the bottle sidewall thickness.
Component Separation and Determination of the Amount of Components in the
Compartmentalized Pellet
The amount of each component in the pellet can be determined by dissolving
approximately one component away from the other. To separate the polyamide
from the
polyester, one gram of pellets is placed into a flask with 50 ml of formic
acid and placed
into an ultrasonic bath. The flask solution is shaken by the ultrasonic bath
maintained at
30 C temperature with a 110hz sonification frequency for at least 15 minutes
to dissolve
the polyamide component. Thereafter, the material is then washed two times
with
deionized water during vacuum filtration. The pH of the water should be
checked, and if
acidic, the washing step is repeated until non-acidic. The amount of PET can
be directly
weighed and the polyamide amount determined by difference. If the polyamide
core
contains other compounds which are not soluble in formic acid, the solution
can be
filtered and the polyamide precipitated from the formic acid by adding water.
The
sample is then dried and the amount of polyamide determined by direct
weighing.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
Once separated from each other, the individual crystallinity or intrinsic
viscosity of the
component can be determined. In the case of I.V., the reported I.V. should be
the
average of six analysis.
5 Dispersed Domain Size Analysis.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
The sample is prepared by cutting the preform or wall of the container and
10 putting the cut pieces in liquid nitrogen for five minutes. The pieces
are then
broken with a sharp blow. One piece of the perform or piece of the wall is cut
into a slice at the specified angle. The slice is placed into a 50 cc. beaker
and
covered with approximately 25 cc of > 96% formic acid (available as ACS
reagent [64-18-6] from Fluka, Aldrich or Merck) and stirred at room
15 temperature. The sample is removed after one hour and the slice washed
with
water until the water is a neutral pH. The sample is then washed with acetone.
After washing in acetone, the specimen is placed into an agar auto sputter
coater
(model 108 A, s.n. Al OS) and plated with gold in order to make it conductive.
20 Typical conditions for the agar auto sputter coater are to use an Argon
flow, at
20 mA current for 30 seconds using gold metal.
The coated specimen is then placed into the SEM holder and photo taken. A
typical SEM machine is SEM Leo Electronic Microscopy Ltd, model LEO 1450
25 VP,s.n. 01-22 used in vacuum chamber modality with Secondary Electron
Detection 1 acquiring system. Other settings are
Tension EHT: 20 KV
Focal distance, also known as working distance or WD: 10-11 mm
Spot size (dimensionless): 200-300 decreasing to 80 at large
30 magnifications
Filament current: 3-3.5A depending upon filament age.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
61
The dimensions and distribution of polyamide domains are measured using
Lucia M software (available from Nikon, Japan) in automatic or manual mode.
Typically, more than 250 domains are measured over approximately 10 different
pictures, with the number of domains analyzed per picture increasing with
better
dispersions. A statistical analysis on the domains is then carried out to
determine
the mean, the median and the distribution of the domains as in Figure 4, and
frequency of domains at a given size interval per unit area for each sample.
End Group Analysis
The polyamide contains a carboxyl end group and an amino end group. The
shorthand is
often expressed as AEG = amino end group content, CEG = carboxylic (or acid)
end
group content.
The end group concentrations are defined as amount of end groups (in mol) per
mass unit
polyamide, for example "X" mmol end groups per kg polyamide. The conversion to
different units of expression is well known in the art. For the purposes of
calculating the
ratio it is only important that both AEG and CEG be expressed in the same
units. The
following analytical tests provide the number of end groups in the units
noted. It should
be pointed out that for both measurements, the polyamide should have less than
0.3%
water. If not, drying at 70 C in vacuo is necessary. The equipment used in the
analysis
must also be dry with no residual acids or bases on their surfaces.
The measurement of the amino end groups (AEG) is performed by titration of a
solution
of the polyamide in the presence of an indicator. The polyamide is dissolved
by warming
a mixture of phenol and methanol (e.g. 75 w.% phenol and 25 w.% methanol) and
then
adding a known amount of polyamide is added to the solution and held until it
is
dissolved.
The indicator solution is made by dissolving 65 mg of benzyl orange and 35 mg
of
methylene blue to 50m1 of methanol in a 100m1 volumetric flask. After
dissolution,
methanol is added to reach the 100m1 mark on the flask.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
62
The titrant solution is a methanol containing perchloric acid solution in
ethylene glycol.
It is made by pipetting 1.72m1 perchloric acid into a 1000m1 volumetric flask
followed by
100m1 of methanol. The 1000m1 flask is then filled to the 1000m1 mark with
ethylene
glycol and shaken to provide good mixing.
The standard solution is made by dissolving 0.04g of 6-aminohexanoic in ca.
50m1 of the
phenol/methanol solution at 50-60 C in a 250m1 beaker. The solution is then
quantitatively transferred to a 250m1 volumetric flask and the flask filled to
the 250m1
mark with the solvent mixture. .
The "f' factor of the quantitative equation is determined by pipetting 25 ml
of the
standard solution into a 100m1 Erlenmeyer flask. A magnetic stir bar is placed
into the
flask and an ascension pipe attached to the flask. The flask is then placed on
a heated
magnetic stir plate preheated to 105 C. The solution is then boiled under
reflux for 20
minutes. The boiling temperature of the solution is about 90 C. Afterward the
solution
is cooled to room temperature (23 C) and 3 drops of the indicator solution are
added.
The solution is then titrated with the perchloric acid solution under stirring
until the
colour changes from green to red.
The amount of perchloric acid solution consumed in ml is Vi.
The consumption of the solvent solution without the standard is then
undertaken as
follows: 25 ml of the solvent solution is pipetted into a 100m1 Erlenmeyer
flask. A
magnetic stir bar is placed into the flask and an ascension pipe attached to
the flask. The
flask is then placed on a heated magnetic stir plate preheated to 105 C. The
solution is
then boiled under reflux for 20 minutes. The boiling temperature of the
solution is about
90 C. Afterward the solution is cooled to room temperature (23 C) and 3 drops
of the
indicator solution are added. The solution is then titrated with the
perchloric acid
solution under stirring until the colour changes from green to red.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
63
The amount of the perchloric acid solution consumed in ml is VO. If the
consumption is
higher than 0.1m1, the solvent mixture must be replaced and all the materials
made using
the solvent mixture also replaced.
The "f' factor of the perchloric acid solution is
f= (Ws /MW)/(1000*(V1-V0)); mmol NH2/m1 solution
where
Ws is the exact weight of the 6-aminohexanoic acid in g
MW is the molecular weight of the 6-aminohexanoic acid (131.18 g/mol)
The amino end groups of the polyamide are determined by placing approximately
1 g of
polyamide whose weight (Wp) is known to 0.0001g into a 100m1 Erlenmeyer flask
and
pipetting 25 ml of the solvent solution into the flask. A magnetic stir bar is
placed into
the flask and an ascension pipe attached to the flask. The flask is then
placed on a heated
magnetic stir plate preheated to 105 C. The solution is then boiled under
reflux for 20
minutes. The boiling temperature of the solution is about 90 C. Afterward the
solution
is cooled to room temperature (23 C) and 3 drops of the indicator solution are
added.
The solution is then titrated with the perchloric acid solution under stirring
until the
colour changes from green to red. The amount of perchloric acid consumed in ml
is V2.
The number of amino groups (AEG) is
AEG = [(V2-V0) * "f' * 1000 / Wp] (mmol NH2/ kg polyamide)
Where
V2 is volume of perchloric acid solution consumed by the sample titration
VO is the volume of perchloric acid solution consumed by the solvent
'T' is the factor determined previously
Wp is the exact weight of the sample to the nearest 0.0001g
The amino end group concentration can be calculated from the consumption of
the
perchloric acid.
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
64
The measurement of the carboxylic end groups can also be carried out by
titration of a
solution of the polyamide by usage of an indicator as well. The polyamide is
dissolved in
benzyl alcohol (phenylmethanol) by warming, e.g. boiling (ca. 245 C) under a
nitrogen
reflux.
A suitable indicator or indicator mixture (e.g. propanolic solution of cresol
red) is added
to the hot solution (180 C) . This solution is immediately titrated with an
alcoholic
potassium hydroxide solution (KOH dissolved in a mixture of methanol, 1,-
propanol and
1-hexanol), until color changes. The carboxylic end group concentration can be
calculated from the consumption of the potassium hydroxide.
The titrant solution is prepared by dissolving 5.51 KOH in a volumetric flask
with
methanol filled to the 100m1 mark. 20m1 of the KOH-methanol solution are
pipetted into
a 1000m1 volumetric flask. The flask is then filled with 430 ml of 1-propanol
and 550m1
of 1 hexanol. The concentration of this solution is about 0.02 N.
The indicator solution is made by dissolving 100mg of cresol red into 100m1 of
1-
propanol.
The solutions are tested by pipetting 25m1 of benzyl alcohol into an
Erlenmeyer flask
with a stir bar. An ascension pipe (for reflux) with a joint for nitrogen is
attached to the
Erlenmeyer flask and the system flushed with nitrogen. The benzyl alcohol in
the
Erlenmeyer flask is then heated on a magnetic stirrer at a slight boil (245 C)
for 25
minutes. The flask is then removed from the stirrer, the ascension pipe
removed, allowed
to cool to 180 C and 6 drops of the indicator solution are added. The solution
is titrated
immediately with the KOH-solution until the colour changes from yellow to
violet. The
temperature of the solution during titration should not be less than 140 C.
The
consumption of the KOH-solution is VO (m1) and should be less than 0.4m1. If
the
consumption is greater than 0.4m1, the solvents must be replaced with new
ones.
The "f' factor must be determined for the titrate solution. This is done by
using a
polyamide standard of a known COOH. In this case, Ultramid AS2503 from BASF,
DE
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
was used with a COOH of 80.5 mmol/kg. Approximately lg, (accurate to 0.0001g)
of
the polyamide standard is placed into a 100m1 Erlenmeyer flask. 25m1 of benzyl
alcohol
are pipetted into the flask with a stir bar. An ascension pipe (for reflux)
with a joint for
nitrogen is attached to the Erlenmeyer flask and the system flushed with
nitrogen. The
5 benzyl alcohol-polyamide is then heated on a magnetic stirrer at a slight
boil (245 C) for
25 minutes. The flask is then removed from the stirrer, the ascension pipe
removed,
allowed to cool to 180 C and 6 drops of the indicator solution are added. The
temperature of the solution during titration should not be less than 140 C.
The solution
is titrated with the KOH-solution until the colour changes from yellow to
violet.
The "f' factor is then
"f'= CEG * W / (V1-V0)
Where:
'T' = factor of the titrate solution
CEG = mEqu./kg of the standard polyamide COOH end groups, in this case
AS2503
V1 = consumption of the titrate solution in ml
VO = consumption of the titrate solution in system
W = exact weight of the AS2503 sample
Example, using the 80.5 mmol/kg value for the standard polyamide
W= 1.0100 g
V1 =4.16 ml
VO = 0.14 ml
"f' = 80.5 * 1.0100 / (4.16 ¨ 0.14) =20.23
The value of "f' should be in the range between 18 and 22, otherwise the
measurement
must be repeated.
The COOH end groups (CEG) of the sample polyamide are determined by placing
approximately lg, (accurate to 0.0001g) of the polyamide into a 100m1
Erlenmeyer flask.
25m1 of benzyl alcohol are pipetted into the flask with a stir bar. An
ascension pipe (for
CA 02626862 2008-04-22
WO 2007/049232
PCT/1B2006/053922
66
reflux) with a joint for nitrogen is attached to the Erlenmeyer flask and the
system
flushed with nitrogen. The benzyl alcohol-polyamide is then heated on a
magnetic stirrer
at a slight boil (245 C) for 25 minutes. The flask is then removed from the
stirrer, the
ascension pipe removed, allowed to cool to 180 C and 6 drops of the indicator
solution
are added. The solution is immediately titrated with the KOH-solution until
the colour
changes from yellow to violet. The temperature of the solution during
titration should
not be less than 140 C. The amount of titrant solution consumed is V2 in ml.
The COOH end groups is then
"f' = CEG * W / (V1-V0)
CEG = [(V2 ¨ VO) * "f']/W
Where:
'T' = factor of the titrate solution determined earlier
CEG = mmol/kg
V2 = consumption of the titrate solution in ml by the sample
VO = consumption of the titrate solution in system (m1)
W = exact weight of the polyamide sample (g).
Example
W = 1.0150 g
V2 = 4.11 ml
VO = 0.16 ml
'T' = 20.23 previously determined
CEG = [(4.11 ¨ 0.16) * 20.23]/1.015 = 78.3 mmol/kg
