Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1
1 Surfactant System Method
2
3 1) Field of the Invention
4
This invention relates to the formulation and
6 application of water based microemulsions and
7 microemulsion forming surfactant systems. More
8 particularly the invention relates to the use of
9 lactates - esters of lactic acid - as co-surfactants
in microemulsion and microemulsion forming systems.
11
12 2) Introduction and.Background Information.
13
14 During the drilling process for the exploration of
oil and gas reserves the downhole conditions require
16 a wide range of wellbore fluids for both the
17 drilling and completion operations. The drilling
18 process utilises complex drilling mud formulations
19 which may be based either on water or oils
(predominantly on mineral or synthetic oils).
21 Completion operations also require the use of a
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
2
1 range of fluids, from fresh water to highly
2 saturated brines.
3
4 Oil-based muds are superior to water-based muds and
are used particularly where drilling is difficult.
6 For example, oil-based muds are used exclusively in
7 North Sea oil exploration and production operations,
8 as a consequence of the practice of directional and
9 horizontal drilling. In other geographical locations
where environmental legislation permits its use the
11 use of diesel is often the preferred base fluid due
12 to its preferential rheological properties and
13 economic advantages. Particularly in the North Sea
14 more expensive "synthetic" or "low tox(icity)" base
oils or vegetable oils may be used as alternatives
16 based, for example, on various esters, alpha olefins
17 or plant oils.
18
19 Oil-based muds are oil continuous and consist of an
oil, which may be of mineral or synthetic origin,
21 plus detergent plus variable amounts of colloidal
22 clay and weighting agent (e.g. bentonite). Other
23 additivies such as rheology control agents,
24 polymers, biocides and corrosion inhibitor chemicals
are also employed. During drilling mud is pumped
26 continuously to the drill head. The oil itself
27 lubricates and cools the drill bit, whilst the
28 colloidal clays act as wall-building agents, acting
29 to stabilise the wellbore. Oil and synthetic based
fluids are also used to overcome borehole stability
31 problems which may be caused by the hydration and
32 swelling of clays in drilled shale zones when in
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
3
1 contact with water. These demands require a fluid
2 possessing a density sufficient to withstand
3 hydrostatic pressures as the well is drilled deeper
4 whilst minimizing the swelling of the drilled shale
zones. Mud returning to the surface acts as a fluid
6 transport system carrying the rock cuttings back to
7 the surface, which vary extensively in their
8 geologies depending on the character of the rock
9 formation being drilled.
11 Water based muds are sufficient in simple drilling
12 projects and for lower temperature wells in moderate
13 depths. These systems require the use of wetting
14 agents to disperse drilled solids and weighting
materials. Surfactants are also often employed.
16 These serve to improve fluid tolerance to ion
17 contamination and to increase inhibitive properties
18 of the fluid in drilled shales. These mud systems
19 are also used to alter and control and / or enhance
temperature stability, corrosiveness and foaming
21 tendencies of the drilling fluid.
22
23 Muds are predominantly invert emulsion systems ie.
24 oil continuous systems containing a saturated
internal water phase stabilised by emulsifiers and
26 oil wetting agents which also reduce the viscosity
27 of the mud. Due to cost, safety, and performance
28 capabilities the oil based muds are predominantly
29 used in preference to water based muds.
31 As a result of these drilling operations a "cake" of
32 oily drilling mud and produced cuttings is left
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
4
1 behind on all.surfaces downhole and the surfaces are
2 left in an oil wet, rather than a water wet,
3 condition. These surfaces not only include the
4 wellbore casing and other such equipment but also
the surface of the formation itself. This situation
6 poses a number of difficulties for completion and
7 post completion workover operations designed for
8 reworking a well and thence stimulating and
9 optimising production. For example, cementing and
gravel packing procedures require a water wet
11 surface in order to allow efficient cement bonding.
12 The removal of oily residues and solid particulate
13 material is also required to allow the unhampered
14 economic running of further engineering downhole eg.
screening exercises. Once the completion process is
16 finalised the formation and screens in place must be
17 permeable in order to allow either oil production or
18 the processes of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) by the
19 pumping of produced water into the formation for
example.
21
22 In a similar fashion tanks that have been holding
23 oily materials and oily wastes from the above
24 processes are required to be cleaned thoroughly
before drilling mud changeovers and before the
26 storage and circulation of brines in the completion
27 process in order to avoid cross contamination
28 events. In addition the oily wastes themselves may
29 require remediation treatment.
31 The wellbore cleaning methods employed use a whole
32 variety of wellbore cleanup and completion fluids to
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 displace drilling fluids once the producing zones
2 have been drilled and isolated in the wellbore. The
3 result is an extremely complicated process using
4 multiple spacers of many different types. Large
5 volumes of organic based fluids are often required
6 as pre-treatments and considerable amounts of waste
7 (typically circa 1000 - 3000bbls) are produced in
8 the process. There are also often problems and
9 complications where different spacers and fluids mix
at their interfaces with the same result of
11 producing complex mixtures of waste for treatment
12 and/or disposal.
13
14 Currently and historically organic based solutions
and blends of organic solvent products eg. Shellsol
16 (Trade Mark) (manufactured by Shell Chemicals) and
17 Super Pickle (Trade Mark) (manufactured by We1lFlow
18 Technologies) are often utilised. Sometimes these
19 solvents have relatively low flash points and, for
example, may comprise of (synthetic) base fluids,
21 diesel, terpenes, xylene, benzene or toluene or
22 mixtures thereof which simply act as an organic
23 solvent to dissolve the organic materials and free
24 the residues contained on the surface of the
wellbore.
26
27 Often additives are included within the organic
28 solvent to enhance their cleaning performance and to
29 contribute other properties e.g. US Patent
Specification No. 5333698 is based on a non-toxic
31 white mineral oil with additives such as wetting
32 agents, viscosifiers, weighting agents, particulate
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
6
1 agents etc. Other solvents may also be used. For
2 example, US Patent Specification No. 5773390
3 outlines the use of terpene alcohols as solvent
4 additives in cleaning systems but these systems are
not claimed as being microemulsions or microemulsion
6 forming systems and the surfactants used are not
7 microemulsion forming surface active agents. More
8 commonly used as co-solvents in other examples in
9 this field are xylene, toluene, and benzene and
mixtures thereof.
11
12 Some previous patents outline the addition of salts
13 dissolved in organic solvents e.g. US Patent
14 Specification No. 4514310 which outlines the use of
N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone as a non-aqueous solvent to
16 dissolve a density increasing salt eg. CaBr2 or KSCN
17 and to enable miscibility with water. Again other
18 additives such as viscosity increasing polymers may
19 be incorporated. US Patent Specification No. 5556832
is similar using eg. acetates in dissolving zinc
21 halides and alkaline earth metal halides. Also PCT
22 Patent Specification No. W00177252 discloses the use
23 of a non-aqueous wellbore fluid with formulations of
24 specific ionic liquids in order to enable and
enhance electrical conductivity allowing electrical
26 telemetry operations to be carried out allowing, for
27 example, data logging procedures to be carried out
28 remotely during the process.
29
However, the use of these non-aqueous fluids and the
31 techniques described above may not render the
32 wellbore surface sufficiently water wet and
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
7
1 additional aqueous surfactant washing procedures,
2 pills and spacers may be required following the use
3 of such an organic washing pill.
4
For these reasons aqueous systems of chemicals are
6 utilised in such well treatment processes. For
7 example, British Patent Specification No. 2367315
8 outlines the use of polyol, polysaccharide,
9 weighting agent, and water to form a silica free
aqueous solution.
11
12 Sequestering agents such as sodium gluconate, EDTA
13 and NTA are often incorporated into these
14 formulations to complex with metal cations which may
be present in the contaminating wellbore material
16 and which often interfere with the efficiency of the
17 surfactant formulations used.
18
19 US Patent Specification No. 6140277 outlines the use
of chelating agents N-cis-l3-docosenoic-N,N-bis(2-
21 hydroxymethyl)-N-methyl ammonium chloride, HEDP,
22 ATMP, TTPMP, EDTA, CDTA, DPTA, and NTA, and enzyme
23 systems eg. alpha- and beta-amylase in a
24 viscoelastic surfactant (VES) matrix.
26 Alternatively, US Patent Specification No.
27 2001047868 discloses the use of acids and cationic
28 salts in aqueous systems. Such solutions may also
29 comprise other enzymes and oxidisers. Acid
treatments and combinations of oxidisers are also
31 disclosed in US Patent Specification No. 4934457. In
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
8
1 this example both aqueous hydrogen peroxide, naphtha
2 and hydrochloric acid are used.
3
4 Surfactants are often used in the completion process
to form isolating "pills" which are pumped between
6 the drilling and completion fluids. The function of
7 these surfactant formulations is to minimise the
8 contamination of the completion flUid by the
9 drilling mud that it will displace. Surfactants are
also used in the completion fluid itself to reduce
11 corrosion and to increase its water wetting
12 properties in the producing zones.
13
14 More commonly used surfactant based formulations
will comprise chemical pills which are usually
16 complex emulsion forming formulations of
17 surfactants. These blends therefore tend to be a
18 mixture of surfactants and other additives such as
19 organic solvents which independently or together are
oil or water continuous emulsion forming systems
21 when diluted and dispersed on site in water or
22 brines.
23
24 US Patent Specification No. 5710111 discloses the
use of a non-aqueous (invert oil continuous)
26 emulsion system using unhalogenated organic fluid as
27 a wellbore fluid. US Patent Specification No.
28 5846913 discloses another oil and water-in-oil (W/O)
29 emulsion where the oil phase comprises a
biodegradable alkane which is used as a wellbore
31 fluid.
32
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
9
1 Polymers may also be used in emulsion systems. PCT
2 Patent Specification No. W00194742 discloses the use
3 of a polymer emulsion for sealing and isolation
4 applications in the wellbore and includes certain
water-in-oil (W/O) microemulsion systems stabilised
6 by polymers and cross-linking agents. The use of
7 polymers is also outlined in US Patent Specification
8 No. 6279656 forming a water soluble "shell" with
9 cross-linking agents. In US Patent Specification No.
5706895 a polymer based system is enhanced with a
11 foam fluid for use in workover, completion and in
12 kill fluids. In this instance a non cross-linked
13 polymer is used in conjunction with a surfactant.
14 There are several disadvantages in using emulsion
forming surfactant systems outlined below.
16
17 Microemulsion systems of certain types are known in
18 the prior art. More commonly these microemulsion
19 systems are designed specifically to have acidic
properties or are combined with acids and are used
21 for wellbore cleanup operations and in the processes
22 of acid fracturing of formations and the treatment
23 of subterranean formations in order to stimulate and
24 increase productivity. In these instances it is the
acidising properties which are important as one of
26 the main modes of action in carrying out the
27 procedures. Such disclosures are made in US Patent
28 Specification No. 5008026 outlining a water
29 continuous system using glycol ethers as a "mutual
solvent" and glycols and alcohols as co-solvent.
31 Similarly US Patent Application Publication No.
32 2002/0132740 outlines the use of acid based
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 microemulsions for a range of oil industry
2 applications - the formulations outlined therein
3 containing up to 60%wt acid. US Patent Specification
4 No. 5034140 outlines a similar system but this is an
5 oil continuous acid internal system using a
6 hydrocarbon carrier fluid for addition to an acid
7 treatment fluid.
8
9 Because such products are highly acidic, aggressive,
10 and highly reactive or contain other strong
11 oxidising or reducing agents their use can entail
12 some very deleterious risks and hazards to both
13 personnel and equipment. These systems are, by their
14 very nature, extremely corrosive or caustic for
example and special procedures need be observed with
16 regards to storage, transport, handling and use.
17 Although Health & Safety should be paramount other
18 protocols need to be considered such that screens
19 and other such engineering equipment is not damaged
through their use. In addition when such chemicals
21 are used the potential adverse environmental effects
22 from spillages of these formulations could also have
23 ramifications on environmental compliance and
24 performance.
26 Alternatively, some chemical formulations require
27 the use of highly toxic chemicals as part of their
28 constituents eg. butoxy ethanol (ethylene glycol
29 butyl ether). While these chemicals may not pose a
significant threat to the marine or aquatic
31 environment they certainly pose a potential health
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
11
1 and safety threat being severely toxic and poisonous
2 to personnel handling the chemicals.
3
4 Certain other microemulsion systems have been used
in the past in wellbore cleanup and other such oil
6 and gas industry operations. The disclosures are
7 very similar to the above and once again typically
8 combine surfactant with alcohols, glycols and glycol
9 ethers which are predominant as co-surfactants and
co-solvents necessary for the formulations to work.
11 US Patent Specification No. 5762138 and European
12 Patent Specification No. 0566394 both disclose the
13 use of microemulsion well cleaning formulations. US
14 Patent Specification No. 5762138 incorporates an
"anti-sludging" surfactant. The solvents used in
16 this case are glycols and glycol ethers, and an
17 alcohol is used as the co-solvent. This formulation,
18 like those above, is primarily an acidic formulation
19 and may therefore also be used for fracture
acidising. European Patent Specification No. 0566394
21 is very similar but also incorporates a foaming
22 agent additive component. British Patent
23 Specification No. 2347682A uses a simple surfactant
24 and alcohol as co-surfactant combination. These
combinations tend to be less effective at removing
26 synthetic base muds from surfaces. Strictly solvent
27 based or surfactant based formulations both suffer
28 from a lack of cleaning efficiency and both produce
29 significant volumes of emulsion wastes which are an
expensive industry problem in their own right.
31
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
12
1 Almost all of the above mentioned products are
2 mirrored in other industries for use as cleaning
3 agents for hard surface cleaning application such as
4 the inks and printing sectors.
6 As stated above the primary purpose of wellbore
7 cleaning chemicals is to remove oil, drilling mud
8 and associated particulate material which
9 contaminates the wellbore and other surfaces in
tanks and systems. As the state of the art
11 formulations are traditionally emulsion forming
12 systems used at low active ingredient concentrations
13 the cleaning process is predominantly achieved by
14 the process of immiscible displacement rather than
by solubilisation and other modes of action. This in
16 turn means that some of the surfaces may remain as
17 oil wet surfaces if the wetting properties of the
18 surfactant formulation are found to be lacking.
19
Emulsion forming surfactant systems have performance
21 disadvantages in that they have relatively high
22 interfacial surface tension properties when compared
23 to microemulsion based systems. As such emulsion
24 systems are less efficient cleaners than
microemulsion forming surfactant based systems and
26 larger volumes of washing fluid are required which
27 carries incurred time, volume, transport and cost
28 disadvantages with their use.
29
There are further substantial practical
31 disadvantages of using emulsion forming surfactants
32 in that the systems naturally produce emulsion type
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
13
1 wastes. These emulsions may be stable and therefore
2 very difficult to separate especially when
3 quantities of fine solids are present such as
4 colloidal clays and bentonite as is the case in
waste drilling muds. Oily sludge also has a tendency
6 to float or be suspended in water continuous systems
7 and this can significantly interfere with
8 engineering and the operations of recycling the
9 cleaning fluids. Large quantities of oily water and
sludge is usually therefore produced as a result of
11 these cleaning processes. In some instances for
12 cleaning out mud pits for example only hot water is
13 often used. This produces an even larger volume of
14 waste requiring treatment and disposal.
16 Very stringent global environmental legislation is
17 becoming the trend in the industry and this dictates
18 that such (hazardous) wastes must be treated prior
19 to discharge offshore or brought back from remote
regions or from offshore to land based waste
21 treatment and disposal facilities. Economic
22 treatment is not always achievable and many
23 operators are beginning to implement zero discharge
24 policies. As such, large volumes of this type of
waste require transport to shore and treatment and
26 disposal by waste'management companies in this
27 fashion at considerable cost to operators. The
28 extensive logistics required to perform this
29 operation are also expensive and carry considerable
associated health and safety risks, especially when
31 the lifting and transportation of skips is required.
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
14
1 This latter operation is also severely hampered by
2 adverse weather conditions.
3
4 Many of the microemulsion products currently
available on the market are temperature sensitive.
6 Wellbore cleanup operations in particular are
7 typically carried out at high temperatures downhole
8 of circa 70 - 150 C. Most microemulsion systems are
9 inherently temperature sensitive and indeed it has
been well known for many years by those skilled in
11 the art that phase behaviour can be altered, and
12 phase separation of microemulsion systems can be
13 readily achieved, by simply altering the
14 temperature.
16 The applicants have found that, if the operational
17 temperature rises to above the cloud points of
18 (microemulsion) surfactant systems, they phase
19 separate and often do not achieve comparable levels
of cleaning efficiency as those systems which are
21 not temperature sensitive and which do not phase
22 separate. In the latter case the surfactants remain
23 active in aqueous solution maintaining their
24 chemical cleaning, surface activity, surface tension
reduction and detergency capabilities.
26
27 In summary a significant problem encountered by the
2'8 systems of the prior art has been the large volumes
29 of surfactant solution required in order to achieve
efficient cleaning. In order to improve efficiency
31 co-surfactants have been employed which in many
32 instances are environmentally unfriendly. The
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 amounts of co-surfactant employed have generally
2 been small compared with the amount of surfactant
3 utilised. However, the large amounts of surfactants
4 employed results in expensive systems. Moreover,
5 the systems of the prior art in general are not
6 suitable for use and/or perform poorly in brine
7 conditions.
8
9 3) Summary of the Invention.
11 According to the invention there is provided a
12 microemulsion cleaning composition comprising a
13. surfactant and a lactate co-surfactant.
14
Preferably, the lactate comprises a lactate ester.
16
17 Optionally, the microemulsion cleaning composition
18 further comprises an organic solvent.
19
Suitably, the microemulsion cleaning composition
21 further comprises water or brine.
22
23 Advantageously, the microemulsion cleaning
24 composition comprises a chemical builder or a
mixture thereof. The chemical builder or a mixture
26 thereof enhances oil and water microemulsions and
27 can be of any chemical identity and set at any
28 desired concentration.
29
Suitably, the microemulsion cleaning composition
31 comprises a sequestering or complexing agent or
32 mixtures thereof.
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
16
1 Suitably, the microemulsion cleaning composition
2 comprises a floculating or coagulating agent or
3 mixtures thereof.
4
Preferably, the microemulsion cleaning composition
6 comprises a corrosion inhibitor or a mixture of
7 corrosion inhibitors.
8
9 Advantageously, the microemulsion cleaning
composition comprises a weighting agent or a mixture
11 thereof.
12
13 Advantageously, the microemulsion cleaning
14 composition comprises a viscosifier and/or a gelling
agent or mixtures thereof.
16
17 In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the
18 lactate ester comprises from 4 to 12 carbon atoms.
19 Preferably, the lactate ester comprises a methyl, an
ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, hexyl or ethylhexyl
21 lactate. More preferably, the lactate ester
22 comprises butyl lactate. These products are
23 manufactured under the trade names Purasolv ML, EL,
24 NPL, IPL, BL and EHL by Purac.
26 The invention also extends to a microemulsion
127 forming system comprising a microemulsion cleaning
28 composition as hereinbefore defined.
29
The invention also extends to the use of lactate
31 ester or blend of lactate esters as co-surfactant in
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
17
1 the preparation of a microemulsion cleaning
2 composit'ion.
3
4 The invention also extends to a method for cleaning
comprising treating an item to be cleaned with a
6 microemulsion or a microemulsion forming cleaning
7 composition as hereinbefore defined.
8
9 Suitably, the material or surface to be-cleaned
comprises petroleum based contaminated materials or
11 any filter cake. Suitably, solids and liquid
12 fractions are separated following cleaning.
13
14 The microemulsions/microemulsion forming systems of
the invention comprise a surfactant or surfactant
16 blend, lactate ester(s) and water/brine and
17 optionally solvent. Uniquely the formulations do not
18 make use of alcohol, glycol and glycol ether
19 components in the systems as co-surfactant, co-
solvent or mutual solvent.
21
22 The invention finds application in, inter alia,
23 industrial hard surface cleaning applications
24 especially the inks and printing industries and the
oil and gas industry. In particular, within the
26 latter sector the formulations have relevance in
27 open and cased downhole applications such as well
28 treatment fluids for the removal of mud residues in
29 wellbore/downhole cleanup, filter cake removal and
near wellbore damage treatment and in well
31 stimulation operations as part of the drilling,
32 completion and workover processes and for the
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
18
1 remediation of surface systems e.g. the cleaning of
2 mud pit tanks, waste drill mud cuttings, fine mud
3 solids, containers or the washing down of
4 engineering equipment and contaminated surfaces and
as degreasing operations.
6
7 The formulations of the invention also have
8 applications in the destabilisation of emulsion
9 systems and act as emulsion breakers with the
capability of splitting emulsion wastes into
11 distinct oil, water, and clean solids phases. In
12 addition the formulations can be used in the
13 production of microemulsion based drilling muds
14 (which may or may not be Oil Based Muds - OBMs) and
they may be used to enhance the slurrification of
16 oily materials for re-injection or for facilitated
17 transport operations.
18
19 The invention allows for multiple pass treatments
utilising the technology and can also allow for a
21 single pass aqueous treatment (requiring no
22 additional acid or caustic based systems or organic
23 based pre- or post-treatment systems). There are
24 very considerable cost and time savings as a result
of employing the formulations and methods disclosed
26 by the invention whilst also minimising the volumes
27 of waste produced from the cleaning operations.
28 Significant environmental advantages are also
29 apparent.
31 When cleaning with such surfactant formulations the
32 products may be formulated to be temperature
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
19
1 insensitive and as such the technology may operate
2 at both low and elevated temperatures at the point
3 of operation without inducing changes in physico-
4 chemical behaviour and/or phase separation. The
formulations can be used cold without having to heat
6 the systems but at the same time are able to operate
7 efficiently at high temperatures with even better
8 performance. This leads to the production of robust
9 products for use under field conditions.
11 Because the system may not require pre-treatments
12 this allows the chemical technology and the cleaning
13 operation to operate efficiently from a time and
14 cost perspective rendering a cleaned surface free
and devoid of oil and oil-contaminated residues in a
16 single pass. This ensures that the surfaces are left
17 water wet allowing, for example, improved cementing
18 and other unhampered continued wellbore completion
19 operations to be carried out successfully. Mud pits
and fluid holding tanks may also be cleaned
21 effectively using such products avoiding cross
22 contamination events.
23
24 The formulations of the invention may also be
employed as part of a multiple spacer (multiple pass
26 treatment) process in conjunction with other fluids.
27 An aquatic or organic pre- and / or post-treatment
28 may be carried out if required as appropriate to
29 increase cleaning capability still further. Uniquely
the chemical treatment surfactant products may be
31 used more effectively at increased active ingredient
32 concentrations in order to produce less waste from
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 the cleaning process. For example typically the
2 surfactant pill may range from only 50 - 100 barrels
3 in volume when*used for some wellbore cleanup and
4 displacement applications.
5
6 The invention provides advanced (cleaning)
7 formulations and a more cost and time efficient
8 method for carrying out these kinds of operation in
9 the field. The formulations and system of the
10 invention also improve on product performance and
11 overcome many of the problems and the chemistries of
12 the prior art, including environmental performance.
13
14 The invention finds application in methods for the
15 cleanup of contaminating oil, drilling fluid, drill
16 cuttings and drilling mud in downhole cleanup
17 operations and in the remediation of surface systems
18 including the cleaning of drilling mud pits,
19 engineering systems and surfaces used in industrial
20 operations using the formulations outlined herein.
21 The microemulsions technology of the invention may
22 be applied to these operations as a single pass
23 process or one that does not require the use of an
24 organic based pre-treatment chemical system.
26 The formulations of the invention also improve on
27 the cleaning capability and efficiency of the
28 surfactant technology and formulations currently
29 used in such industrial processes without
necessarily requiring the use of potentially
31 dangerous and hazardous chemicals.
32
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
21
1 The formulations of the invention also improve the
2 efficiency of applications in the destabilisation of
3 emulsion systems and act as emulsion breakers with
4 the capability of splitting emulsion wastes into
distinct oil, water, and clean solids phases. In
6 addition the formulations can be used in the
7 production of microemulsion based oil based and
8 water based drilling muds and they may be used to
9 enhance the slurrification of oily materials for re-
injection or for facilitated transport operations.
11
12 The formulations of the invention can also be
13 adapted to be temperature insensitive microemulsion
14 cleaning formulations.
16 In summary this invention relates to the design and
17 methods for using surfactant formulations and more
18 specifically to water based microemulsions and
19 microemulsion forming surfactant systems essentially
comprising a surfactant or surfactant blend,
21 lactate(s) - esters of lactic acid - and water or
22 brine and optionally solvent. Uniquely the
23 formulations do not make use of alcohol, glycol and
24 glycol ether components in the systems as co-
surfactant, co-solvent or mutual solvent.
26
27 An oil-in-water (0/W) microemulsion is defined as a
28 thermodynamically stable, single-phase mixture of
29 oil, water and surfactant, such that the continuous
phase is water (which may contain dissolved salts)
31 and the dispersed phase consists of a monodispersion
32 of oil droplets, each coated with a close-packed
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
22
1 monolayer of surfactant molecules - each micro
2 structure is referred to as a micelle. The inherent
3 thermodynamic stability of these systems arises from
4 the fact that, due to the presence of the surfactant
monolayer, there is no direct oil-water contact.
6 Oil-in-water microemulsions are often optically
7 transparent since the micelles formed are so small
8 that they do not scatter light.
9
The capability for the surfactant systems to form
11 microemulsions is an important feature of the
12 present invention. Fundamental distinctions exist
13 between microemulsions and ordinary emulsions.
14 Emulsions and microemulsions are similar only in the
superficial sense that they can be described as
16 mixtures of oil, water and an amphipathic substance,
17 usually called a surface active agent (soap,
18 surfactant, emulsifier, dispersant, detergent etc).
19
Microemulsions by definition are thermodynamically
21 stable. That is to say, for a particular composition
22 (type and amount of each component), and within
23 particular environmental constraints, the
24 microemulsion system is preferred over a system of
separate phases of oil, water and surfactant. The
26 corollary of this argument is that microemulsions
27 form spontaneously when their constituents are mixed
28 together. Once formed, microemulsions remain so
29 (characterised macroscopically as transparent single
phases), unless some property is changed. For
31 example, increasing or decreasing the temperature
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
23
1 beyond certain limits, may lead to phase separation
2 in some systems.
3
4 Emulsions, by contrast, are not thermodynamically
stable. Emulsions form only by input of mechanical
6 energy (e.g. by shaking, sonication or shearing),
7 and the emulsion system can only be maintained by
8 continuous input of energy; when the energy input is
9 withdrawn the emulsion phase separates over a period
of time, yielding distinct organic and aqueous
11 phases (the surfactant may be distributed between
12 the two phases, or sometimes exists as a third
13 phase). There are no "windows" of environmental
14 conditions in which such systems form
microemulsions.
16
17 Although the applicants do not wish to be bound by
18 any theorem, it is believed that microemulsion
19 systems may exist because the surfactants form a
close-packed monolayer at the oil-water interface,
21 which effectively excludes direct oil-water contact.
22 Surfactants may not therefore stabilise
23 microemulsions if they cannot saturate an oil-water
24 interface. Typically, emulsion forming surfactants
only partially coat the interface, leaving uncoated
26 areas exposed to bulk continuous phase solvent.
27
28 For example, water-continuous emulsions usually
29 consist of oil droplets only partially covered with
surfactant; the uncoated surfaces are therefore
31 directly exposed to the continuous aqueous phase.
32 This is thermodynamically unfavourable; the oil
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
24
1 droplets aggregate by coalescing at their exposed
2 surfaces, increasing the surface area:volume ratio
3 and hence minimising oil:water contact. The outcome
4 of extensive droplet coalescence is therefore bulk-
phase separation. In microemulsions there are no
6 uncoated surfaces and thus there is no driving force
7 for coalescence and phase-separation. The
8 microemulsion system is the more energetically
9 favourable position for that chemical system under
those environmental conditions.
11
12 The rate of phase separation of an emulsion can
13 actually be relatively slow; emulsions can be
14 created which only completely phase separate after
several weeks or even months. Nevertheless the
16 fundamental distinction between emulsion and
17 microemulsion systems remains. Indeed, the
18 interesting properties of microemulsions, both in
19 general and in the context of the specific
applications described here, arises from the
21 thermodynamic properties arising from total
22 oil:water exclusion arising from interfacial close-
23 packing of the surfactant molecules.
24
Apparent from gross physical differences, which can
26 be determined by visual examination (microemulsions
27 show no tendency to phase separate and are usually
28 optically transparent, whereas emulsions are
29 opalescent or turbid and inevitably phase-separate),
the two can be distinguished by measuring the
31 surface tension at the oil-water interface. The
32 surface tension at plain oil-water interfaces is
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 typically of the order of 50 mNm-1. Emulsions formed
2 by mixing oil water and " ordinary "(i.e. non-
3 microemulsion-forming) surfactants are typically
4 characterised by interfacial surface tensions of the
5 order of 20-50 mNm-1, whereas microemulsions are
6 characterised by far lower surface tensions
7 typically below 20 mNm-1 and can be of the order of
8 10-3 to 10-6mNm1, these latter values reflecting the
9 absence of direct oil-water contact.
11 It is partly these properties described above which
12 are attributable to rendering microemulsion systems
13 much more efficient in their cleaning, mobilising
14 and emulsion destabilisation capabilities when
compared to normal emulsion forming surfactant
16 systems and this has been demonstrated in PCT Patent
17 Application No. PCT/GB00/00841.
18
19 Indeed even the modes of operation of microemulsions
can be argued as being essentially different from
21 emulsion systems. Whereas emulsion forming
22 surfactants often only operate to displace oil or to
23 partially disperse oil in water microemulsion
24 forming surfactants, on the other hand, may not only
displace and disperse oil acting as a detergent but
26 may also disperse the oil acting as an emulsifier to
27 the extent of completely dissolving or solubilising
28 the oil or water into the continuous solvent medium.
29
The present invention therefore exploits
31 microemulsion systems. The invention exploits a
32 number of features whereby as an aqueous solution of
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
26
1 an O/W microemulsion-forming surfactant system can
2 absorb oil from a bulk oil phase forming an 0/W
3 microemulsion, so can the same solution absorb oil
4 from an oil-coated solid surface or (fine) solid
particulates with the same result. Furthermore, in
6 the oil-in-water (O/W) microemulsion environment,
7 any oil is effectively encapsulated within the
8 surfactant monolayer, and is therefore no longer in
9 direct contact with the original surface or solid.
Oil contaminated surfaces are thus rendered
11 completely water wet as a result of the
12 microemulsification process. In effect it can be
13 envisaged that the contaminating oil is simply
14 dissolved and solubilised within the aqueous solvent
via a process of microemulsification as described
16 above.
17
18 In addition if microemulsion systems are used in a
19 cleaning operation the modes of action of both
microemulsion forming surfactant and an organic
21 solvent may be combined to further increase cleaning
22 capability. In this fashion the applicants have
23 demonstrated that the synergies of this combination
24 of modes of action may even outperform pure organic
solvents or pure surfactant systems when used
26 independently in their cleaning capabilities for
27 many industrial cleaning applications.
28
29 The mode of action of the systems outlined herein
may therefore be three fold. First, the penetration
31 of the contaminating oil layer through the solvent
32 microemulsion mechanism, secondly the action of
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
27
1 microemulsification of the oil components into the
2 aqueous phase, and finally by water wetting of the
3 underlying solid surfaces through the surfactant /
4 detergent action.
6 Another advantage of these systems is that
7 microemulsions also increase in their cleaning
8 efficiency when the Active Ingredient (AI)
9 concentrations are increased unlike emulsion systems
that often demonstrate no increase in cleaning
11 efficiency on increasing concentrations above their
12 Critical Micellar Concentration (CMC). In turn lower
13 volumes of higher AI concentrations may be used in
14 microemulsion based cleaning formulations in
comparison to emulsion based systems. This
16 capability has significant ramifications on waste
17 minimisation, improved time requirements, cost
18 reductions and on associated health and safety
19 aspects.
21 One specific advantage of using microemulsion
22 systems is that commercially available flocculating
23 and coagulating agents can be successfully
24 incorporated and utilised within the formulations as
required in order to augment the operating system.
26 This does not result in the breakdown in the
27 stability of the microemulsion system.
28
29 This has been demonstrated with many microemulsion
systems using a range of flocculating agents at
31 recommended concentrations of up to 25mlL-1
32 flocculant without interfering with the surfactant
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
28
1 phase behaviour. Examples of both cationic (eg.
2 Alcomer 230L, Alcomer 630, Magnafloc 1697, Magnafloc
3 1597) and anionic (Alcomer 110, Magnafloc 919,
4 Alcomer 120, Magnafloc E10, Magnafloc E24)
flocculating agents have been used manufactured and
6 supplied by Ciba Speciality Chemicals.
7
8 The same results cannot be achieved when using
9 normal (O/W) emulsion forming surfactant systems due
to the fact that there is still significant direct
11 oil-water contact at the interface. Furthermore, the
12 use of such chemicals would not be expected to
13 confer any specific.benefit in solvent based systems
14 since flocculating agents are inactive in oil-based
media.
16
17 Builders, sequestering agents, corrosion inhibitors
18 and other performance enhancing chemicals, which may
19 be either water or oil soluble, may also be included
to optimise and enhance the performance of the
21 microemulsion systems applied. Again these chemical
22 agents can be used without interfering with the
23 stability of the microemulsion systems used.
24
Builders have been successfully used in the past
26 with emulsion forming surfactants. These builders
27 are traditionally and more preferably phosphate
28 based. Builders serve to improve levels of
29 detergency, combat water hardness and partly act as
complexing agents in the surfactant systems. Typical
31 examples in decreasing order of efficiency are
32 sodium hexametaphosphate, tetra-potassium
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
29
1 pyrophosphate (TKPP), and sodium tripolyphosphate
2 ( STPP ) .
3
4 The amount of phosphate that may be utilised in such
formulations is governed by international
6 environmental legislation due to known adverse
7 effects of phosphates on ecosystems. Builders can
8 be used effectively with microemulsion systems in
9 order to improve performance but one advantage of
the microemulsion systems outlined herein is that,
11 due to their enhanced cleaning performance and their
12 increased salt insensitivity, these systems may not
13 even require the incorporation of builders to
14 increase their detergency and thus phosphates may be
eliminated from the formulations entirely. Less
16 effective phosphate free builders are also available
17 but accordingly these also may not be necessary in
18 such a formulation eg. sodium metasilicate or sodium
19 carbonate.
21 As outlined above these characteristics mean that
22 the cleaning action of 0/W microemulsion forming
23 systems and 0/W microemulsion systems is different
24 from conventional surfactant formulations. At higher
active matter concentrations the major mode of
26 cleaning action is by miscible displacement instead
27 of immiscible displacement. This technique renders
28 the cleaned surfaces water wet. At lower active
29 matter concentrations as aqueous rinsing is employed
immiscible displacement is also used in the cleaning
31 action. These O/W microemulsion formulations
32 therefore again offer the advantage of a combination
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 of cleaning modes of action supplying a multifaceted
2 approach to the cleaning applications addressed
3 using the technology described herein.
4
5 Organic solvents are also not necessarily required
6 in the systems outlined in this invention rendering
7 the formulations more environmentally sound and less
8 hazardous to transport and use which may have
9 significant advantages from an environmental and a
10 health and safety point of view. The simple mode of
11 action of microemulsification in situ may be
12 sufficient in many of these applications. This
13 factor can be viewed as a very positive advantage
14 especially when the technology is employed in
15 offshore environments or in environmentally
16 sensitive areas.
17
18 However, it is a further advantage with the
19 microemulsion systems described herein that more
20 suitable and more effective organic solvent
21 additives may be incorporated in the formulations to
22 further increase their cleaning efficiency.
23
24 Biodegradable natural plant extracts and new
25 synthetic alternatives may also be suitably employed
26 within the formulations to increase the cleaning
27 performance while maintaining environmental and
28 health and safety compliance in the field. A great
29 deal of work has recently been carried out by many
30 chemical producing companies to produce and promote
31 the use of "green" environmentally sound and
32 environmentally sustainable organic solvents. For
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
31
1 example natural plant extracts may be used as is the
2 case with citrus terpenes etc. Also oxygenated
3 solvents are preferred eg. BP oxygenated solvents
4 marketed under the trade name HyKleen and the
Uniqema solvent brand marketed under the trade name
6 ArivaSol to name but a few examples. These products
7 may be non-toxic, can be up to and over 85% readily
8 biodegradable and have flash points up to 99 C and
9 above.
11 Anionic surfactants suitable for use in forming the
12 microemulsions and microemulsion forming systems in
13 accordance with the present invention may be
14 selected from the group comprising fatty acid soaps,
alpha olefin sulphonates, sulphonates, amine
16 ethoxylates, amine salts of linear alkyl benzene
17 sulphonic acid, aromatic sulphonates comprising
18 alkyl cumene, xylene, benzene and toluene sulphates
19 or sulphonates, earth metal salts of olefin
sulphonate and alcohol and alcohol ethoxylate
21 sulphates and sulphonates, sulphosuccinates and
22 sulphosuccimates and blends of such anionic
23 surfactants. The use of anionic surfactants is not
24 limited to these.
26 Nonionic surfactants suitable for use in forming the
27 microemulsions and microemulsion forming systems in
28 accordance with the present invention may be
29 selected from the group comprising ethoxylated and
propoxylated surfactants consisting of condensation
31 products of ethylene oxide with aliphatic alcohols
32 and of alkyl amines in either straight or branched
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
32
1 chain configuration, sugar based surfactants, alkyl
2 polyglucosides, alkyl glucosides, and blends of such
3 nonionic surfactants. The use of non-ionic
4 surfactants is not limited to these.
6 Cationic surfactants suitable for use in forming the
7 microemulsions and microemulsion forming systems in
8 accordance with the present invention may be
9 selected from the group comprising quarternaries,
halogenated amines, complex amides, amido amines and
11 blends of such cationic surfactants. The use of
12 cationic surfactants is not restricted to these.
13
14 Zwitterionic surfactants suitable for use in forming
the microemulsions and microemulsion forming systems
16 in accordance with the present invention may be
17 selected from the group comprising betaine
18 surfactants eg. alkyl dimethyl betaines or
19 cocoamidopropyl betaines and blends of such
zwitterionic surfactants. The use of zwitterionic
21 surfactants is not restricted to these.
22
23 Organic solvents suitable for use in forming the
24 microemulsions and microemulsion forming systems in
accordance with the present invention may be
26 selected from the group comprising aromatic
27 hydrocarbons, limonene, d-limonene, citrus terpenes,
28 terpenes, terpinol, pinenes, xylene, toluene,
29 benzene, alkyl benzenes, and propionates preferably
n-propyl, n-butyl, and/or n-pentyl propionate,
31 pentanes, paracymene, n-alkyl pyrrolidones,
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
33
1 dimethyl piperidone, propylene carbonate, ethers,
2 di-butyl ether, butyl butyrate, amyl acetates,
3 acetate, acetates, oleates, stearates, heptanoate,
4 laurates, caprylates, adipates, butyrates, iso-
butyrates, esters, di-basic esters, phenyl esters
6 (eg. Arivasol) di-ethers, olefins, alpha olefins,
7 xylene, toluene, benzene, alkyl benzenes,
8 isoparrafins, ketones, acyclic amides, cyclic
9 amides, lactones, ketones, sulphoxides, cyclic
carbonates, oxygenated solvents, Arivasol and
11 mixtures thereof. The use of organic solvents is not
12 restricted to these.
13
14 Generally, the lactic acid ester derivatives
typically comprise a functional group - lactate
16 group - and an alkyl group (which may be branched or
17 linear in nature) with a range Cl - C12, more
18 preferably Cl - C10 and most preferably C4 - C8 (C4
19 being the most suitable in the commercial range).
The products typically have a closed cup flash point
21 of 609C and above - the large majority of these
22 products therefore are classified as non-flammable
23 and as such have good health and safety advantages.
24 All products are more than 60% biodegradable and as
such are classified as being readily biodegradable.
26 The products are also non-toxic providing
27 significant environmental benefits. Most of the
28 products are only slightly miscible/soluble with
29 water (typically 45g/L or less) and as such have
heretofore been recommended for use within organic
31 solvent cleaning systems only.
32
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
34
1 Lactate esters suitable for use as co-surfactants
2 include Lactic acid butyl ester, B,utyl-(S)-Lactate,
3 Butyl-(S)-(-)-2-Hydroxy Propionate, 2-Ethylhexyl-S-
4 Lactate, Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 2-ethylhexyl
ester, (S)-2-ethylhexyl lactate, 2-Ethylhexyl
6 lactate L'-lactic acid 2 ethylhexyl ester, n-Propyl-
7 S-Lactate, Propyl-S-(-)-2-Hydroxy Propionate, Propyl
8 Lactate, Propyl-S-(-)-Lactate, Isopropyl-S-Lactate,
9 Isopropyl Lactate, Isopropyl-S-(-)-2-Hydroxy
Propionate, Lactic acid Isopropyl Ester, Isopropyl-
11 S-(-)-Lactate, Ethyl-S-Lactate, Ethyl Lactate,
12 Ethyl-S-(-)-2-Hydroxy Propionate, Lactic acid Ethyl
13 Ester, Ethyl-S-(-)-Lactate, Methyl Lactate.
14
Lactic acid butyl ester, Butyl-(S)-Lactate and
16 Butyl-(S)-(-)-2-Hydroxy Propionate are preferred
17 lactates for use as co-surfactants.
18
19 As disclosed above the primary mode of action of
traditional aqueous emulsion forming surfactant
21 systems is by dispersion and immiscible
22 displacement. However, with the types of
23 microemulsion system disclosed herein the mode of
24 immiscible displacement is combined and / or
replaced with miscible displacement and
26 solubilisation and (if solvent is present) solvent
27 microemulsion action. One of the methods of the
28 invention therefore exploits the ability of these
29 dynamic O/W microemulsion systems (microemulsion
forming preparations of surfactants and additives)
31 to spontaneously absorb oil from surfaces and
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 materials and to encapsulate this oil by forming 0/W
2 microemulsions in situ.
3
4 As described previously the method of solubilisation
5 of oil and thus of cleaning of the oil contaminated
6 surfaces can be controlled simply by placing an
7 upper limit on the microemulsion Active Ingredient
8 (AI) content. If using a microemulsion as a cleaning
9 agent the concentration of Active Ingredient in the
10 formulation may be adjusted to determine the level
11 of cleaning efficiency desired.
12
13 The surfactant cleaning treatments described herein
14 can also be applied and further enhanced by using an
15 O/W microemulsion itself to carry out the cleaning
16 process rather than just an aqueous surfactant
17 system capable of solubilising the oil to be removed
18 into a microemulsion. In this case the invention
19 exploits the capabilities of microemulsion cleaning
20 systems to combine an aqueous surfactant and a
21 solvent washing system as one in a continuous water
22 based medium. This multiple mode of cleaning action
23 has been clearly demonstrated by the applicants to
24 greatly improve the cleaning capabilities and
25 performance of products used with the appropriate
26 choice of solvent.
27
28 A dramatic decrease in surface tension also takes
29 place when using microemulsion systems - far more so
30 than when employing traditional emulsion forming
31 surfactants.
32
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
36
1 The products and formulations described herein are
2 typically applied in the same way as is the case
3 with traditional cleaning formulations whether they
4 be organic or aqueous in nature, including but not
limited to their use in augmenting automated
6 engineering, pressure jetting, scrubbing, spraying
7 and circulatory systems.
8
9 The formulations disclosed herein may be applied as
a single pass treatment method requiring no organic
11 based pre-treatment. Alternatively they may be
12 applied as part of a multiple stage cleaning
13 process. Thus any cleaned surfaces which may contain
14 residual 0/W microemulsion can be extracted by
aqueous or organic solvent-rinsing. Organic rinsing
16 (for example using acetone) may be applicable to
17 industrial applications where water residues are
18 required to be absent following the water based
19 wash. When rinsing with an aqueous composition the
deep penetration of the Winsor IV realm into the
21 water-corner of the phase diagrams is of
22 significance since the 0/W microemulsion can be
23 diluted out simply by rinsing with water or brine
24 without resulting in loss of stability in the
system. Thus in every case this dilution does not
26 lead to phase separation of the residual 0/W
27 microemulsion.
28
29 The applicants have demonstrated that the
(temperature insensitive) microemulsion systems
31 described herein outperform the use of systems
32 comprising co-solvents such as glycol and glycol
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
37
1 ether combinations eg. ethylene glycol, diethylene
2 glycol, and polyethylene glycol or terpene alcohols
3 eg. pine oil and terpineol.
4
Due to the efficiency of these aqueous cleaning
6 formulations, the cleaning method employed may
7 render the use of an initial organic based solveht
8 wash un-necessary in the wellbore cleanup and
9 completion process. This has obvious time, cost
saving, and waste minimisation advantages in the
11 whole process when applied in the field.
12
13 If a solvent washing process is required as a pre-
14 treatment then this process may also be enhanced by
incorporating temperature stable microemulsions
16 technology. A temperature stable water-in-oil (W/0)
17 microemulsion system should be used which will not
18 only greatly improve the washing process but will
19 also result in the use of less solvent. This may
reduce operating costs and minimise waste production
21 as well as reduce both health and safety and also
22 environmental risks. Of course these microemulsion
23 systems may also be recycled and/or split in a
24 similar and conventional fashion to other
microemulsion systems by way of a controlled change
26 in a suitable environmental or chemical variable.
27
28 Data presented later in the application will also
29 show that it is advantageous for the industrial
cleaning applications listed here to use O/W
31 microemulsion and 0/W microemulsion forming systems
32 of the invention as the cleaning agent. Many
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
38
1 microemulsion systems of these types cannot be
2 blended as 100% Active Ingredient (AI) liquid
3 concentrates ie. containing no water - especially if
4 either the surfactant product is a solid or if one
of the other chemical constituents is a solid. More
6 significant to these applications described herein
7 near to 100% AI concentrate microemulsions can be
8 supplied for dilution and use in the field using
9 these products and chemical components.
11 Problems are often encountered when diluting
12 microemulsion systems of the prior art in the field.
13 As the concentrate is diluted with water or brine
14 impractical regions are often encountered in the
phase diagram such as gel regions, liquid crystals,
16 mesomorphous phases and multiple phase windows etc -
17 the simple act of dilution may therefore result in
18 phase separation of the microemulsion system.
19 However, products of the invention as exemplified
below can be used at any concentration as desired.
21
22 Many surfactant systems are sensitive to the
23 addition of salt if sea water is used as the diluent
24 in the dilution process in offshore environments.
These systems are therefore not suitable and
26 practical for use in the field as they are not
27 robust and dynamic enough in their physico-chemical
28 characteristics to remain as stable fluid single
29 phase Winsor IV microemulsions under the field
conditions stipulated. Compositions of the
31 invention, however, are salt tolerant to reasonable
32 degrees and may not form these impractical phases
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
39
1 during the dilution process. Because the systems
2 described herein are also often less susceptible to
3 temperature fluctuations they offer another
4 advantage such that they are more robust and are
more practically applied in the field.
6
7 Further practical advantages of microemulsion
8 formulations are that emulsion wastes are not
9 produced as a result of the cleaning process. This
has ramifications on cost, operational efficiency
11 and practicality. Solid fines settle out well from
12 0/W microemulsion systems due to the efficiency of
13 the cleaning capabilities of microemulsions and due
14 to the fact that all the oil has been solubilised
into the aqueous phase, even from the fine
16 particulate material, which is so often the cause of
17 practical problems.
18
19 Because the solids settle out from the wash solution
under gravity or by the use of enhanced methods such
21 as centrifugation the wash solution way be recycled
22 and reused for further washing treatments. This
23 avoids the recycling of solids through the washing
24 system which in turn increases cleaning efficiency
and reduces the risk of potential engineering
26 blockage, damage, and downtime.
27
28 4) Description of the associated figures, eg.
29 drawings, graphs and tables.
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 Various embodiments of the invention will now be
2 described, by way of example only, having regard to
3 the accompanying examples and drawings in which:
4
5 Figure 1 is a ternary phase diagram (Sodium
6 Alkyl Ether Sulphate, Butyl Lactate and 0.58M
7 NaCl at 25 C)
8
9 Figure 2 is a ternary phase diagram (Secondary
10 alkane sulphonate, Water and Butyl Lactate at
11 25 C);
12
13 Figure 3 is a pseudoternary phase diagram
14 (SDS:Butyl Lactate at 1:1 Ratio, Water and d-
15 limonene at 25 C);
16
17 Figure 4 is a pseudoternary phase diagram
18 (Sodium Alkyl Ether Sulphate:Butyl Lactate at
19 1:1 Ratio, or 0.58M NaCl and d-limonene at
20 25 C)
21
22 Figure 5 is a'pseudoternary phase diagram
23 (AOT:Butyl Lactate at 1:1 Ratio, Water and DF1
24 Base Oil at 25 C);
26 Figure 6 is a pseudoternary phase diagram
27 (Sodium Alkyl Ether Sulphate:Butyl Lactate:AOT
28 at 1:1:0.6 Ratio, 0.58M NaCl and DF1 Base Oil
29 at 25 C)
31 Table 1 is a Table of sample products of the
32 invention, and
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
41
1 Table 2 is a Table of Fann 35 rheometer sleeve
2 test results demonstrating product cleaning
3 efficiencies by plotting the %wt OBM removal
4 over time.
6 5) Detailed description of the invention.
7
8 As shown in the drawings, surfactant behaviour can
9 be quantified in terms of triangular phase diagrams.
For example the phase diagram for the system water /
11 sodium sulphosuccinate + butyl lactate / DF1 base
12 oil is shown in Figure 5. Here, sodium
13 sulphosuccinate and butyl lactate is a mixture of
14 the anionic surfactant sodium dioctyl
sulphosuccinate (AOT) and butyl lactate (BL). BL
16 acts as a co-surfactant, enhancing the O/W
17 microemulsion-forming properties of AOT. As long as
18 the AOT and BL are held at constant ratio, they can
19 be treated as a single component for the purpose of
constructing the phase diagram. The oil used was DF1
21 Base Fluid, a typical synthetic base fluid used in
22 the preparation of oil based drilling muds in the
23 North Sea.
24
The apexes of the phase diagram each correspond to
26 one of the components in pure form - oil, water, or
27 surfactant at the stated ratio. Any point on one of
28 the axes corresponds to a mixture of two of those
29 components in a defined ratio (given in percent
weight; %wt). Any point within the phase diagram
31 corresponds to a mixture of the three components in
32 a defined ratio.
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
42
1 The physical state of the mixture at equilibrium can
2 be mapped on to the phase diagram. The phase
3 diagrams in Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 for example are
4 characterised by a prominent single phase O/W
microemulsion region, known as a Winsor IV system,
6 which extends from the surfactant/water axis towards
7 the surfactant/oil axis. Outside of the Winsor IV
8 region is an area which corresponds to equilibrium
9 multi-phase regions commonly known as Winsor I, II,
or III regions. Alternatively the region was a gel,
11 liquid crystal or a multi-phase system.
12
13 Many previously known types of microemulsion could
14 be described as being "static" oil holding
microemulsions. This is to say that, through
16 blending the components of the system with the
17 correct combination of chemical constituents in the
18 right order, a stable single phase 0/W microemulsion
19 system may be formed. However, these static types of
microemulsions using such combinations of
21 ingredients will not form a single phase
22 microemulsion if they are combined in slightly
23 different proportions or in a different order. Once
24 a single phase microemulsion has been formed in
these static systems any significant change in
26 environmental variable or any variation in the
27 amounts of any one of the chemical components to the
28 system will result in phase separation and multi
29 phase systems. As a result static microemulsion
systems are extremely susceptible to slight
31 environmental and chemical changes and they
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
43
1 therefore may have very limited use in industrial
2 applications such as those described here.
3
4 The majority of the microemulsion systems described
herein are very different in their capabilities.
6 These microemulsion systems are "dynamic" in nature.
7 The result is extremely large Winsor IV regions or
8 "windows" especially at low AI concentrations. This
9 factor is extremely important for the practical and
cost efficient application of these systems in the
11 field which, in the past, has been a hindrance to
12 their commercialisation.
13
14 In dynamic systems microemulsions can be formed by
mixing the constituents together in any order and in
16 any number of different proportions within this
17 window of opportunity in the phase diagram providing
18 a virtually endless number of formulation options
19 and AI concentrations within given environmental
parameters. Once again this has significant
21 practical benefits in the field with regards to ease
22 and time of product manufacture and the products
23 themselves are very robust. As a result dynamic
24 systems can be applied as an aqueous surfactant
system which is then capable of solubilising oil
26 into the system by microemulsification forming an
27 O/W microemulsion during the cleaning process.
28 Alternatively the products may be applied as an 0/W
29 microemulsion cleaning formulation with organic
solvent already present therein.
31
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
44
1 The following examples are presented to demonstrate
2 both the optimisation of 0/W microemulsion
3 formulations for use in the field and the increase
4 in cleaning efficiency achieved. In the following
examples, waste muds were treated using the standard
6 Fann 35 (spinning bob) procedure outlined below
7 developed as a standard international wellbore
8 cleanup laboratory test.
9
It should be noted that all levels and chemical
11 components outlined in the following examples are
12 intended to be illustrative only. As described above
13 anyone skilled in the art.of this area of technology
14 will recognise that both the levels and specifics of
the formulations of each component applicable in the
16 formulations can be readily varied to suit the needs
17 of any given implementation.
18
19 Examples:
21 Optimisation of surface active constituents in
22 microemulsion (forming) surfactant solution
23 formulations for use in the field.
24
In the past it has been documented that the
26 combination of certain surfactants or the use of
27 single impure surfactants can exhibit reduced
28 temperature instability of microemulsion systems to
29 certain extents. Typically these systems can be
stable for a temperature range of circa 5 C to 75 C.
31 This has been achieved by combining the opposite
32 temperature dependence of ionic and anionic
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 surfactants eg. alcohol ethoxylate surfactants and
2 Aerosol-OT (AOT). This is still used in this
3 industry today combining, for example, butoxy
4 ethanol (BE) with alkyl benzene sulphonic acid. In
5 the latter case the systems are typically stable up
6 to 60 - 70 C.
7
8 The more commonly used ethoxylated nonionic
9 surfactants are well known to become more
10 hydrophobic and less hydrophilic with increasing
11 temperature. In other words the preferred monolayer
12 curvature becomes more negative and the systems tend
13 to form W/O microemulsion systems. The reverse
14 happens when reducing the temperature for these
15 nonionic systems. It is thought that this response
16 is due to the increasing dehydration of the
17 ethoxylated groups on increasing the temperature.
18
19 With ionic surfactants it has been shown that the
20 opposite effect can be true. ie. by increasing the
21 temperature the preferred monolayer curvature
22 becomes more positive and the systems tendency is to
23 form O/W microemulsion systems. It has been
24 postulated by researchers in the past that this may
25 be due to increased counterion dissociation at
26 increased temperatures.
27
28 Using this knowledge it is possible to formulate
29 microemulsion products to enhance their temperature
30 stability. Alternatively it has been well documented
31 that microemulsion surfactant systems can be readily
32 split and recycled by exploiting their phase
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
46
1 behaviours and by passing the system through its
2 Phase Inversion Temperature (PIT). The PIT is the
3 temperature which corresponds to the phase inversion
4 from, for example, an 0/W to a W/O microemulsion.
For example when using anionic surfactants an 0/W
6 microemulsion may be formed at a set temperature,
7 but on lowering the temperature, the system may be
8 split to release the oil component contained
9 therein.
11 The inventors have been able to demonstrate that the
12 addition of a range of performance enhancing
13 chemicals may be incorporated into microemulsion
14 (forming) surfactant systems in order to optimise
cleariing capability, chemical performance and
16 cleaning efficiency at both low and elevated
17 temperatures. These chemical additives can be added
18 to the microemulsion systems without compromising
19 their stability or environmental profile. Indeed
only relatively small concentrations of added
21 chemical may be required in order to greatly improve
22 the overall performance of the technology. In
23 addition these chemical additives are readily
24 available at industrial scales, are well tested and
understood, and are cost effective.
26
27 Formulation Cleaning Evaluation Tests
28
29 In order to fully evaluate the cleaning capabilities
of some of the microemulsion forming surfactant
31 formulations and microemulsion systems enhanced by
32 the methods described a standard rheometer spindle
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
47
1 sleeve test (known as the "Fann-35" test or the
2 "spinning bob" test) was used as a comparable
3 measurement test. A comprehensive suite of tests
4 using a variety of Oil Base Muds (OBMs) using
synthetic base oils was carried out comparing
6 lactate ester based compositions of the invention
7 compared to more traditional microemulsion systems
8 using alcohol and / or glycol / glygol ether
9 components. This type of test is chosen as an
international standard means of determining the
11 ability of chemical products to remove a variety of
12 oil based drilling muds used in the field from a
13 metal surface.
14
The test method is as follows:
16
17 1) A spindle is cleaned with water and detergent.
18 It is rinsed with acetone, padded dry and is
19 placed in an oven for 15 minutes to dry
completely. The spindle is removed and allowed
21 to cool to ambient temperature. The clean, dry
22 spindle is then weighed to 2 decimal places.
23
24 2) The rheometer spindle is immersed into a
prepared mud sample (to a designated line on
26 the'spindle) for 30 seconds.
27
28 3) The spindle is removed from the mud sample and
29 is left for 30 seconds for the excess mud to
drain off.
31
32 4) The sleeve with the mud is weighed.
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
48
1 5) The sleeve is attached to the rheometer and
2 the spindle is immersed into a solution of
3 water/sea water/brine (to the second line) and
4 dosed with the surfactant formulation at the
required concentration. The spindle is rotated
6 at the desired speed for a given time period.
7
8 6) The spindle is then removed from the solution
9 and is left for 30 seconds for the excess
solution (and mud) to drain off.
11
12 7) The spindle is then reweighed and calculations
13 can be carried out to provide figures to
14 indicate the %wt mud recovered over set.time
periods. The mud and wash solutions must be
16 kept in the fridge at a standard 4 C throughout
17 whenever not in use in the test.
18
19 The results of the Fann 35 tests carried out by way
of examples are shown in Tables 1 and 2. In each
21 test the formulations are all used at the same
22 Active Ingredient (AI) concentration maintaining
23 comparability and on the same drilling muds so as to
24 keep the tests representative. In summary a number
of significant points should be noted with regard to
26 these results:
27
28 The microemulsion washing systems outlined herein
29 are the most efficient cleaning systems by a
significant margin cleaning over a much shorter time
31 period when compared to more conventional and
32 currently available surfactant based cleaning
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
49
1 products. The water based microemulsion systems
2 described herein therefore require a much reduced
3 exposure time. In all cases the microemulsion
4 systems of the present invention are capable of
removing over 90-100% of the drilling mud compared
6 to circa 70-90% for conventional microemulsion
7 systems. In addition most of the mud removal is
8 carried out within the first 2-3 minutes of the test
9 whereas the more conventional systems often require
a much longer time period in order to cause their
11 full effect.
12
13 The applicants have also demonstrated that the
14 replacement of more traditional organic solvents eg.
toluene and pine oils with the use of more recently
16 developed environmentally sound biodegradable
17 alternatives does not result in a reduced level of
18 cleaning capability in these aqueous systems. The
19 application of more environmentally sound products
has not resulted in any sacrifice of product
21 performance.
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
1 The following are:
2 Table 1. Product Examples
omposition
xample omponent Details (%wt)
1 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 5.00
utyl lactate 5.00
0.58M NaCl 90.00
2 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 5.00
butoxy ethanol 5.00
0.58M NaC1 90.00
3 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 5.00
butyl diglycol 5.00
0.58M NaC1 90.00
4 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 4.00
utyl lactate 4.00
exyl acetate 2.00
0.58M NaCl 90.00
5 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 3.60
utyl lactate 3.60
entyl proprionate 2.80
0.58M NaCl 90.00
6 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 4.05
utyl lactate 4.05
OT 0.90
0.58M NaCl 91.00
7 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 2.03
utyl lactate 2.03
OT 0.45
0.58M NaCl 95.50
8 Sodium alkyl ether sulphate 3.34
PnB 3.34
OT 1.67
0.58M NaCl 91.65
9 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 4.05
utyl lactate 4.05
OT 0.90
ovatec base fluid 8.00
0.58M NaCl 83.00
10 sodium alkyl ether sulphate 4.05
utyl lactate 4.05
OT 0.90
F1 base fluid 8.00
0.58M NaCl 83.00
3
4
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
51
1 Table 2. Fann 35 rheometer sleeve test results
2 demonstrating product cleaning efficiencies by
3 plotting the %wt OBN removal over time.
4
I Novatec
BM Example
ime
(mins) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 80.2 38.8 23.7 53.5 79.3 70.2 60.3 56.4 40.8 71.9
1.0 90.1 81.2 60.6 84.5 88.4=85.2 86.7 60.0 87.8 85.9
2.0 91.5 86.3 78.3 97.6 91.5 93.2 90.1 82.1 91.0 91.6
3.0 91.1 87.1 83.3 98.2 93.5 95.0 89.3 84.2 94.3 94.6
4.0 91.9 86.7 82.6 99.1 94.8 97.8 89.3 84.7 94.7 94.6
5.0 90.9 86.5 83.1 99.1 94.8 97.8 89.3 85.0 95.3 94.6
7.0 92.9 87.1 83.5 99.1 95.1 97.8 89.8 85.1 94.6 94.6
10.0 92.9 87.7 83.9 99.1 95.6 97.8 90.1 85.5 94.6 95.9
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
52
I
ersaclean
BM Example
ime
(mins) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 22.3 10.1 11.2 34.5 11.0 18.7 24.0 14.8 14.5 18.9
1.0 55.8 51.7 28.0 58.1 36.1 57.3 63.5 20.9 60.5 63.4
2.0 88.9 80.6 44.9 85.2 73.1 89.7 89.7 60.0 89.3 87.5
3.0 97.2 85.9 57.9 96.4 98.6 94.6 90.4 72.6 96.5 94.6
4.0 98.0 86.3 67.3 97.6 98.6 98.1 91.3 85.8 97.5 97.1
5.0 98.0 86.7 75.5 99.5 98.6 98.1 92.2 86.5 99.0 99.0
7.0 98.0 87.3 77.0 99.5 98.6 98.1 92.5 88.1 99.0 99.0
10.0 98.0 88.3 78.5 99.8 98.6 98.1 93.4 89.8 99.0 99.0
1 The examples given in Table 1 correspond to the
2 results and data given in Table 2. Examples 2, 3,
3 and 8 were comparative examples. These were
4 microemulsion systems that do not contain a lactate
ester co-surfactant. In comparison it is shown from
6 the results that their cleaning performance is not
7 as good typically removing under 90% of the oil
8 based mud (OBM) residue. The microemulsion
9 formulations of the invention with a lactate ester
co-surfactant removed over 90% of the residue
11 eventhough the same surfactants were employed.
12
13
14
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
53
1 Phase diagram examples.
2
3 The phase diagrams in Figures 1 to 6 are given by
4 way of example to show the variety of surfactants
that can be used in conjunction with lactate
6 ester(s) to form effective microemulsion and
7 microemulsion forming systems.
8
9 Extremely large Winsor IV regions were apparent e.g.
Fig. 2 indicating the huge degree of variation that
11 can exist in any formulation indicating the great
12 degree of flexibility that the products of the
13 invention give to formulating microemulsion and
14 microemulsion forming systems using lactate ester
components - In Fig 2. the Winsor IV region occupied
16 virtually the whole area of the phase diagram.
17 Traditionally Winsor IV areas are considerably
18 smaller within the phase diagram. From a commercial
19 perspective much less surfactant is needed e.g. Fig
2. In this case up to 85%wt of the formulation was
21 lactate ester based and only 15%wt of the
22 formulation was surfactant - importantly this ration
23 could therefore be used to make up a microemulsion
24 system at any active ingredient concentration in
water.
26
27 The examples also demonstrate that both freshwater
28 and brine based microemulsion systems can be formed
29 e.g. Figs 1 and 2.
31 The diagrams also show that a large variety of oil
32 types may be microemulsified within the systems of
CA 02629288 2008-05-09
WO 2006/051255 PCT/GB2005/004012
54
1 the invention e.g. Figs 3 - 6 microemulsifying
2 citrus terpenes (as a potential co-solvent for
3 example) and heavier base oils.
4
