Language selection

Search

Patent 2631381 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2631381
(54) English Title: HIGH-CARBON CHAIN LINK FENCE FOR MINING INDUSTRY
(54) French Title: CLOTURE A MAILLES LOSANGEES A HAUTE TENEUR EN CARBONE POUR L'INDUSTRIE MINIERE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E04H 17/02 (2006.01)
  • E21D 11/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MONTECINOS, HECTOR PAREDES (Chile)
(73) Owners :
  • NV BEKAERT SA
(71) Applicants :
  • NV BEKAERT SA (Belgium)
(74) Agent: ROBIC AGENCE PI S.E.C./ROBIC IP AGENCY LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2011-07-26
(22) Filed Date: 2008-05-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2008-11-21
Examination requested: 2008-05-16
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/924,556 (United States of America) 2007-05-21

Abstracts

English Abstract

The present invention relates to a chain link type fence. The chain link type fence can be used in the mining industry, such as in a mining tunnel for tunneling and shotcrete applications. A chain link fence arranged according to the present invention advantageously can have a relatively lower weight, can be more easily manipulated and installated, can have a relatively lower thickness, and can have an increased strength and breaking load.


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne une clôture de type à mailles losangées. La clôture de type à mailles losangées peut être utilisée dans l'industrie minière, comme un tunnel de mine pour des applications de béton projeté et de creusement de tunnel. Une clôture à mailles losangées arrangée selon la présente invention peut avantageusement avoir un poids relativement inférieur, peut être facilement manipulée et installée, peut comporter une épaisseur relativement inférieure et peut avoir une force et une force de rupture améliorées.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. Use of a chain link type of fence to reinforce a tunnel, said chain link
type of
fence having steel wires having a carbon content ranging from 0.45 percent by
weight to 0.57 percent by weight and having a diameter ranging from about 3.50
mm to about 4.0 mm.
2. Use according to claim 1, wherein said steel wires have a composition
corresponding to SAE1050.
3. Use according to claim 1, wherein said chain link type of fence comprises
meshes, said meshes having a square form Y mm x Y mm, where Y ranges from
about 60 mm to about 90 mm.
4. Use according to claim 1, wherein said steel wires have a diameter of about
4.0 mm or less.
7

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02631381 2010-07-23
HIGH-CARBON CHAIN LINK FENCE FOR MINING INDUSTRY
Field of the Invention
[00021 The present invention relates to a chain link type fence. The present
invention also relates to the use of a chain link type fence in the mining
industry, such as in a mining tunnel.
Background of the Invention
[0003) A chain link fence is perhaps the most economical type of fencing
available.
A conventional chain link fence is usually made of plain low carbon steel
that has a carbon content of 0.15 per cent by weight or lower. The
following types of chain link fence are common:
[0004) -- a chain link fence with meshes having a square form with a size of
100 mm x 100 mm, formed by a steel wire having a diameter of 5.10 mm;
[0005) -- a chain link fence with meshes having a square form with a size of
50 mm x 50 mm, formed by a steel wire having a diameter of 4.20 mm.
[0006) These existing conventional chain link fence types are widely used but
have
the following drawbacks:
[00071 -- the chain link fences have a relatively high weight and hence are
difficult to manipulate;
[0008) - the chain link fences are made with thick steel wire having a
relatively large diameter, which results in thick meshes;
[0009] -- the chain link fences have a relatively low strength.
I

CA 02631381 2010-07-23
[0010] When used in the mining industry, these existing conventional chain
link
fences may not provide a sufficient reinforcement, as illustrated by FIGURE
1.
[0011] FIGURE 1 shows a prior art chain link fence 10 reinforcing the ceiling
12 of
a mine. Due to the low strength of chain link fence 10, this fence 10 is not
able to maintain the integrity of the ceiling 12 and hold stone material 14
for
a sufficiently long period of time. Because of the weakness of the chain link
fence 10, the fence 10 fails at its weakest spot and the stone material 14
pours down into the mine.
[0012] US patent US-A-2,188,869 discloses a so-called high-carbon fence. The
exact carbon content, however, is not mentioned. Nor is the disclosed
fence a chain link fence. Furthermore, the applications mentioned in US
'869 are not tunneling applications, such as in mining, and do not use
shotcrete.
[0013] German utility model DE-U-296 06 610 discloses a hexagonal mesh for use
in tunnels and mining. However, the utility model is silent with respect to
the carbon content of the mesh.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0014] An object of the present invention is to provided a use of a chain link
type of
fence to reinforce a tunnel, the chain link type of fence having steel wires
having a carbon content ranging from 0.45 percent by weight to 0.57 percent
by weight and having a diameter ranging from about 3.50 mm to about 4.0
mm.
2

CA 02631381 2008-05-16
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0017] FIGURE 1 illustrates a failure mode of a prior art chain link fence.
[ools] FIGURE 2 illustrates a chain link fence in a mining tunnel, according
to an
embodiment.
[0019] FIGURE 3 illustrates a chain link fence in a mining tunnel, according
to an
embodiment.
[0020] FIGURE 4 is a top view of a testing configuration for a chain link
fence,
according to an embodiment.
[0021] FIGURE 5 is a side view of the testing configuration of FIGURE 4.
Detailed Description
[0022] The present invention relates to a chain link fence. The fence can be
used
in the mining industry, such as in tunneling and shotcrete applications.
Aspects of the present invention include: (1) lowering the weight of chain
link fences, (2) facilitating the manipulation and installation of chain link
fences, (3) lowering the thickness of a chain link mesh, and (4) increasing
the strength and breaking load of a chain link mesh.
[0023] According to an embodiment, a chain link fence can be made of steel
wires
having a steel composition with a carbon content of 0.45 per cent by weight
or more. For example, a chain link fence can be made of steel wires having
a steel composition with a carbon content of 0.45 to 0.70 per cent by
weight. In another example, a chain link fence can be made of steel wires
having a steel composition with a carbon content of 0.45 to 0.57 per cent by
weight. In another example, a chain link fence can be made of steel wires
having a steel composition with a carbon content of 0.45 to 0.55 per cent by
weight. In another example, a chain link fence can be made of steel wires
having a steel composition that corresponds to SAE 1050.
[0024] According to an embodiment, a chain link fence can be made with meshes
that have a square form of Y mm x Y mm. For example, Y can range from
about 60 mm to about 90 mm. In another example, Y can range from about
3

CA 02631381 2008-05-16
65 mm to about 85 mm. In another example, Y can range from about 70
mm to about 80 mm. In another example, Y can be about 75 mm.
[0025] According to an embodiment, a chain link fence can be made from steel
wires having a relatively small diameter. For example, a chain link fence
can be made from steel wires that have a diameter of about 4.0 mm or less.
In another example, a chain link fence can be made from steel wires that
have a diameter of about 3.00 mm to about 4.00 mm. In another example,
a chain link fence can be made from steel wires that have a diameter of
about 3.25 mm to about 4.00 mm. In another example, a chain link fence
can be made from steel wires that have a diameter of about 3.50 mm to
about 4.00 mm. In another example, a chain link fence can be made from
steel wires that have a diameter of about 3.50 mm to about 3.80 mm.
[0026) In another example, a chain link fence can be made from steel wires
having
a diameter of 3.66 mm and a composition corresponding to SAE 1050 to
form a chain link fence with mesh squares having a size of 75 mm. Such a
chain link fence weighs 2.5 kg / m2. In contrast, a 10006 fence, which is a
fence with a mesh size of 100 mm x 100 mm made from wire having a
diameter 5.10 mm, would weigh 3.5 kg / m2. Furthermore, a 5008 fence,
which is a fence with a mesh size of 50 mm x 50 mm made from wire
having a diameter of 4.20 mm, would weigh 4.8 kg / m2.
[0027] A chain link fence arranged according to the embodiments and examples
described herein can have a lower weight per square meter. By using
smaller diameter wire, a chain link fence can be provided with a lower
thickness and weight. Furthermore, because the chain link fence has a
relatively lower thickness, the chain link fence has a relatively high
flexibility
and can be more easily formed. By using wires made from a steel
composition with a relatively high carbon content, the chain link fence can
have an increased strength, such as tensile strength, and higher breaking
load, despite the use of steel wires with a relatively small diameter. Thus,
because the chain link fence is lighter and thinner, such a chain link fence
can be easily manipulated and installed while providing a chain link fence
with an increased strength and breaking load.
4

CA 02631381 2008-05-16
[0028) A further advantage of a chain link fence arranged according to the
embodiments and examples described herein is that less material, such as
projected concrete or shotcrete, needs to be used because the fence is
thinner. This provides a savings in cost due to the decreased use of
materials.
[0029] According to an embodiment, a tunnel can be reinforced by a chain link
fence that is configured according to any of the embodiments and examples
described herein.
[0030] According to an embodiment, a method of using a chain link fence to
reinforce a tunnel can be practiced by providing a chain link fence
according to any of the embodiments and examples described herein and
reinforcing the tunnel with the chain link fence.
[0031] FIGURE 2 illustrates a chain link fence 20 that is used in a mine 22,
according to an embodiment. For example, the chain link fence 20 can be
used to reinforce the ceiling and/or wall of a tunnel in the mine 22. In the
example of FIGURE 2, the chain link fence 20 is used to reinforce a ceiling
about two side walls of a tunnel in a mine 22 in front of an open end of the
tunnel.
[0032] FIGURE 3 illustrates a chain link fence 30 that is used in a mine 32,
according to an embodiment. For example, chain link fence 32 can be
used to reinforce the ceiling and/or wall of a tunnel in the mine 32. In the
example of FIGURE 2, the chain link fence 30 is used to reinforce a ceiling
about two side walls of a tunnel in a mine 32 in front of an open end of the
tunnel.
[0033] FIGURE 4 is a top view of a testing configuration for a chain link
fence,
according to an embodiment. As shown in the example of FIGURE 4, a
chain link fence 40 can be connected to a testing frame 42 and a localized
load 50 can be applied to a center 44 of the fence 40. The tested chain link
fence 40 can be a 1 m x 1 m sample that is fixed to the testing frame 42.
The test can be arranged to simulate a load of rocks, such as a fence would
be loaded with in an underground mine.

CA 02631381 2008-05-16
[0034] FIGURE 5 is a side view of the testing configuration of FIGURE 4. As
shown in the example of FIGURE 5, the displacement of the fence 40
caused by the load 50 can be measured, along with the amount of the load
50 itself.
[0035] Conventional fences, such as chain link fences made out of 5.10 mm
diameter low carbon wire that form square meshes with a size of 100 mm,
have breaking loads that typically range from 3.8 tons to 5.1 tons.
[0036] An example of a chain link fence made out of steel wire with a
composition
corresponding to SAE 1050 with a diameter of 3.76 mm that form square
meshes with a size of 75 mm have breaking loads that range from 4.9 tons
to 6.2 tons.
[0037] The foregoing description of embodiments of the invention has been
presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to
be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and
modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or
may be acquired from practice of the invention. The embodiments were
chosen and described in order to explain the principals of the invention and
its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the
invention
in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the
particular use contemplated. Other embodiments of the invention will be
apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification
and practice of the invention disclosed herein.
6

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2019-05-16
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-12-04
Letter Sent 2018-05-16
Grant by Issuance 2011-07-26
Inactive: Cover page published 2011-07-25
Inactive: Final fee received 2011-03-14
Pre-grant 2011-03-14
Amendment After Allowance (AAA) Received 2011-02-16
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2010-12-09
Letter Sent 2010-12-09
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2010-12-09
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2010-12-06
Inactive: Correspondence - MF 2010-08-10
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2010-07-23
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2010-01-25
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2010-01-25
Inactive: Cover page published 2008-11-24
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2008-11-21
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2008-11-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2008-10-24
Inactive: IPC assigned 2008-10-24
Inactive: Office letter 2008-06-25
Inactive: Filing certificate - RFE (English) 2008-06-19
Letter Sent 2008-06-19
Letter Sent 2008-06-19
Application Received - Regular National 2008-06-19
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2008-05-16
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2008-05-16

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2011-05-05

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NV BEKAERT SA
Past Owners on Record
HECTOR PAREDES MONTECINOS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2011-06-20 1 24
Description 2008-05-15 6 241
Abstract 2008-05-15 1 11
Drawings 2008-05-15 3 170
Claims 2008-05-15 1 25
Representative drawing 2008-10-26 1 14
Description 2010-07-22 6 233
Claims 2010-07-22 1 16
Claims 2011-02-15 1 16
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2008-06-18 1 177
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2008-06-18 1 103
Filing Certificate (English) 2008-06-18 1 157
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2010-01-18 1 112
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2010-12-08 1 163
Maintenance Fee Notice 2018-06-26 1 180
Correspondence 2008-06-18 1 14
Correspondence 2010-08-09 1 46
Correspondence 2010-12-08 1 93
Correspondence 2011-03-13 2 56