Language selection

Search

Patent 2640857 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2640857
(54) English Title: METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR COATING SULFUR BLOCKS
(54) French Title: PROCEDES ET COMPOSITIONS DE REVETEMENT DE BLOCS DE SOUFRE
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C09K 15/32 (2006.01)
  • C09D 183/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FRIESEN, DONALD E. (Canada)
  • RADOK, ALEXANDER (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • SECURE ENERGY SERVICES INC. (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • CCS CORPORATION (Canada)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2014-02-04
(22) Filed Date: 2008-10-09
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2009-04-10
Examination requested: 2013-02-07
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/979,003 United States of America 2007-10-10

Abstracts

English Abstract

The invention relates to methods and compositions for coating blocks of elemental sulfur for storage. The method of coating a sulfur block against atmospheric exposure comprises the steps of: a) preparing a coating composition comprising an effective blend of silicone and aqueous sodium silicate; b) applying the coating composition to the elemental sulfur to create a continuous barrier between the elemental sulfur and the atmosphere; and c) allowing the coating composition to cure. The composition for sealing elemental sulfur against atmospheric exposure comprises an effective blend of silicone and aqueous sodium silicate.


French Abstract

L'invention a trait à des procédés et des compositions pour revêtir des blocs de soufre élémentaire pour le stockage. Le procédé de revêtement d'un bloc de soufre contre l'exposition atmosphérique comprend les étapes suivantes : a) préparation d'une composition de revêtement comprenant un mélange efficace de silicone et de silicate de sodium aqueux; b) l'application de la composition de revêtement sur le soufre élémentaire pour créer une barrière continue entre ce dernier et l'atmosphère; et c) la polymérisation de la composition. La composition pour sceller le soufre élémentaire contre l'exposition atmosphérique comprend un mélange efficace de silicone et de silicate de sodium aqueux.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




CLAIMS

1. A method of coating a sulfur block against atmospheric exposure comprising
the
steps of: a) preparing a coating composition comprising an effective blend of
silicone
and aqueous sodium silicate; b) applying the coating composition to the
elemental sulfur
to create a continuous barrier between the elemental sulfur and the
atmosphere; and c)
allowing the coating composition to cure.

2. A method as in claim 1 wherein the coating composition is blended to
produce a
viscosity sufficient to adhere to a vertical surface of a sulfur block to a
thickness of at
least 1 mm during and after curing.

3. A method as in any one of claims 1-2 wherein the silicone:sodium silicate
mixture
is 25:75 (w/w) to 75:25 (w/w).

4. A method as in claim 3 wherein the silicone:sodium silicate mixture is
50:50 (w/w)
to 30:70 (w/w).

5. A method as in claim 3 wherein the silicone:sodium silicate mixture is
50:50 (w/w).
6. A method as in any one of claims 1-5 wherein the sodium silicate for step
a) is 30-
40 wt% in water.

7. A method as in any one of claims 1-6 wherein step a) further includes
adding a
coloring agent to the coating composition.

8. A method as in any one of claims 1-7 wherein the coating composition is
applied to
the sulfur block by spraying, brushing or rolling.

9. A method of sealing elemental sulfur against atmospheric exposure
comprising the
steps of applying a coating composition comprising a silicone:sodium silicate
mixture
ranging from 25:75 (w/w) to 75:25 (w/w) to a sulfur block to create a
continuous barrier
between the elemental sulfur and the atmosphere wherein the coating
composition has a
viscosity sufficient to adhere to a vertical surface of a sulfur block to a
thickness of at
least 1 mm during and after curing.

10. A composition for sealing elemental sulfur against atmospheric exposure
comprising an effective blend of silicone and aqueous sodium silicate.


-9-



11. A composition as in claim 10 wherein the silicone:sodium silicate mixture
is 25:75
(w/w) to 75:25 (w/w).

12. A composition as in claim 11 wherein the silicone:sodium silicate mixture
is 50:50
(w/w) to 30:70 (w/w).

13. A method as in claim 12 wherein the silicone:sodium silicate mixture is
50:50
(w/w).

14. A composition as in any one of claims 9-13 further comprising a coloring
agent.

15. A composition as in any one of claims 9-14 wherein the sodium silicate is
30-40
wt% in water.

-10-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02640857 2008-10-09
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR COATING SULFUR BLOCKS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The invention relates to methods and compositions for coating blocks of

elemental sulfur for storage.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Raw sulfur is obtained in large quantities from several sources
including sour
natural gas processing, heavy oil upgrading and light oil during refining.
[0003] The vast majority of the hydrogen sulphide removed from the sour gas
and oil is
converted into elemental sulfur. Elemental sulfur is at various times, sold
and shipped in
molten liquid form, processed into one of several solid particles for handling
and where
logistics and/or lack of demand dictate, poured and solidified into
aboveground storage
blocks. Molten (liquid) sulfur is red in color and when solid is a bright
yellow color.
[0004] Elemental sulfur may be sold to customers around the world and is used
primarily in the manufacture of sulfuric acid for a variety of uses including
the
manufacture of phosphate fertilizers. A smaller proportion of the sulfur
market/supply is
also used in making products including pharmaceuticals, plastics and rubber.
[0005] Importantly, when the sulfur production rate is higher than the demand
for sulfur,
sulfur is most often stored in blocks near or at a plant site where the sulfur
originated
with the result that permanent or very long-term storage of sulfur in some
locations is
required. At such storage facility sites, sulfur blocks may be as much as 20 m
in height,
200m wide and have lengths greater than 500m. Smaller size blocks may also be
made.
Industry forecasts generally indicate an increasing surplus of sulfur in
traditional markets
such as Canada and Kazakhstan.
[0006] The long-term storage of sulfur blocks as described above poses a
number of
problems as discussed below.
- 1 -
I

I
CA 02640857 2008-10-09
[0007] One problem is fugitive dust emissions from the degradation of sulfur
blocks by
exposure to the weather, including degradation by sunlight, wind, rain and
atmospheric
freeze/thaw cycles.
[0008] In addition, degradation may occur by various sulfur consuming bacteria
such as
thiobacilli oxidans that is omnipresent in the environment and will naturally
populate
sulfur surfaces. Metabolites from these organisms include sulfuric acid.
[0009] Thus, as a result of these degradation mechanisms, the sulfur itself
and the
various by-products make their way into the surrounding environment, including
the
surrounding soil and ground water leading to various levels and types of
contamination
of the groundwater and the surrounding land. Furthermore, any precipitation
that comes
into contact with the sulfur and that is trapped by the blocks or in a
containment facility
requires testing and treatment prior to release of the contaminated water back
to the
environment.
[0010] Further still, in addition to the environmental issues associated with
sulfur block
degradation, another problem associated with sulfur blocks is that they are
often
perceived as unsightly due to the bright yellow color of the elemental sulfur.
Large piles
of sulfur are often visible from a great distance and as a result, there is a
negative public
perception to the presence of sulfur in or around a community.
[0011] Finally, there is a fire-risk associated with large and dormant piles
of sulfur. While
relatively difficult to ignite, burning sulfur is a highly undesirable and
polluting reaction
that is potentially fatal to people and may be highly contaminating to the
environment
depending on the severity of a fire.
[0012] As a result, there has been a need for a technology to minimize the
above
problems relating to the short, medium and long-term storage of sulfur. More
specifically,
there has been a need for effective coating compositions that can minimize the
risk of
degradation, that have long-term stability when exposed to the weather
elements, that
can enhance the visual appearance of the sulfur blocks and that can minimize
the fire-
risk associated with the long-term storage of sulfur blocks. In addition,
there has been a
need for a coating system that is relatively inexpensive and that can be
readily removed
from the sulfur blocks for ultimate recovery of the sulfur.
- 2 -
I

CA 02640857 2008-10-09
[0013] A review of the prior art indicates that no such coating compositions
have been
created or used. For example, while the following references teach various
coating
compositions, none are directed to inexpensive and effective compositions
described by
the present invention. More specifically, US Patent 4,238,536 discloses a
method of
coating coal with a gel; US Patent 6,344,236 discloses an acrylic copolymer
coating
composition; US Patent 5,330,788 discloses a temporary acrylic polymer or
copolymer
coating composition; US Patent 4,087,572 discloses a method of preventing
environmental erosion with an organic polymer latex and a silicone; and US
Patent
2,854,347 discloses a method of erosion control of mineral products with
rubber
compounds.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0014] In accordance with the invention, there is provided a method of sealing
elemental
sulfur against atmospheric exposure comprising the steps of: a) preparing a
coating
composition comprising an effective blend of silicone and aqueous sodium
silicate and;
b) applying the coating composition to the elemental sulfur to create a
continuous barrier
between the elemental sulfur and the atmosphere.
[0015] In various embodiments the silicone:sodium silicate composition is
25:75 (w/w) to
75:25 (w/w), preferably 50:50 (w/w) to 30:70 (w/w) and more preferably 50:50
(w/w).
[0016] The method may further include adding a coloring agent to the coating
composition.
[0017] The invention also provides a composition for sealing elemental sulfur
comprising
an effective blend of silicone and aqueous sodium silicate.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0018] In accordance with the invention, effective sealing and coating
compositions for
coating sulfur blocks are described together with methods of coating sulfur
blocks to
provide an effective and removable weather-resistant barrier to the sulfur
blocks, which
at the same time allows the sulfur to 'breathe'.
- 3 -
I

CA 02640857 2008-10-09
[0019] As described below, preferred compositions for preparing sulfur block
coatings in
accordance with the invention include those that:
a. can be readily applied onto the exterior surfaces of sulfur blocks to
provide an even coating;
b. are heat and cold resistant to and beyond normal atmospheric
temperatures;
c. have good adherence to the sulfur;
d. are resistant to the penetration of water and sulfur
bacteria;
e. allow for gases but not water to pass through the coating composition;
f. can be readily removed from the sulfur blocks;
g. are fire-resistant;
h. are relatively inexpensive; and
i. can be colored.
[0020] Suitable compositions in accordance with the invention include
effective mixtures
of silicone and sodium silicates. In addition, the mixtures may include
appropriate
coloring agents. Neutral browns/greens/blues are preferred colors but any
color is
possible and may be selected in accordance with the invention.
[0021] The practical range of blends of silicone:silicates are 25:75 (w/w) to
75:25 (w/w),
preferably 50:50 (w/w) to 30:70 (w/w) and more preferably 50:50 (w/w). A
preferred
blend of 50:50 wt% silicone:silicates provides effective liquefying/heat-
spraying
properties enabling the use of the composition with conventional spraying
equipment. In
addition, this composition after application onto a sulfur block can be
readily removed by
scraping. Silicone:silicates blends in the range of 50:50 wt% and 30:70 wt%
were
particularly fire-resistant. Coloring agents may be added to the composition
to impart
desired colors. Alternatively, paints may be applied to the exterior of a
cured coating.
- 4 -
I

CA 02640857 2008-10-09
Sodium Silicate
[0022] Sodium silicate is a highly effective sealant. Commercial solutions of
sodium
silicate typically include approximately 40 wt% sodium silicate in water. The
solutions
have the appearance of clear water and can be applied to surfaces as paint.
Silicone
[0023] Silicone, or more specifically polymerized siloxanes or polysiloxanes,
are mixed
inorganic-organic polymers with the general chemical formula [R2Si0], where R
=
organic groups such as methyl, ethyl, and phenyl. These materials consist of
an
inorganic silicon-oxygen backbone (...-Si-O-Si-O-Si-0-...) with organic side
groups
attached to the silicon atoms. In some cases organic side groups can be used
to link two
or more of these -Si-0- backbones together. By varying the -Si-0- chain
lengths, side
groups, and crosslinking, silicones can be synthesized with a wide variety of
properties
and compositions and can vary in consistency from liquid to gel to rubber to
hard plastic.
Curing of silicones is highly variable and is based on the specific chemistry
of the
silicones. One class of silicones is moisture curing silicones that cure upon
exposure to
atmospheric moisture. In accordance with the invention, silicate/silicone
solutions having
sufficient viscosity to enable effective working properties and that result in
a rubbery
cured product while maintaining acceptable non-flammability properties are
within the
scope of the invention as understood by those skilled in the art.
[0024] Compositions in accordance with the invention are prepared by mixing
appropriate volumes of sodium silicate (in water) with the silicone to create
the desired
wt% mixtures in the cured product. The water in the sodium silicate solution
will promote
composition curing (and will be substantially vaporized during curing) over a
time period
sufficient to enable acceptable composition working times. Generally,
compositions in
accordance with the invention will be a balance between the desired properties
of final
cured consistency (flexible rubber to hard rubber), fire-resistance and
working time.
Increasing silicate concentration in the final composition will generally
improve fire
resistance properties and working time but will result in a product that is
more rigid and
less viscous. In contrast, increasing silicone concentration will result in a
more flexible
coating (thereby providing a thicker coating) but that will have decreased
fire resistance.
Increased silicone concentration is also more expensive. Conventional
residential
- 5 -
I

CA 02640857 2013-06-21
silicone caulking materials from a local hardware store were utilized in
preparing test
compositions.
Methods of Application
[0025] In order to effectively apply the silicone:silicates coating
compositions, it is
preferred that the silicone:silicate compositions are applied at a temperature
of at least
C. While with appropriate equipment the compositions may be applied at lower
temperatures, practically temperatures above 5 C are preferred. A texture gun
or an air
spray gun with a wide nose can be used for spraying the silicone and sodium
silicate
solution in addition to brushing equipment.
Surface Preparation
[0026] The coating compositions should be applied to clean surfaces. If
necessary, the
outer surfaces of the sulfur blocks should be cleaned of debris such as dust
and dirt and
should be dry.
Application
[0027] The silicone:silicate solutions may be applied by spraying, rolling,
brushing or the
like. Multiple coats of the solution may be applied and will usually require
approximately
2 hours drying time between applications depending on the atmospheric
conditions.
[0028] Silicone:silicate compositions may be applied by appropriate spraying
equipment
that may heat the composition to promote curing of the composition. Brushing
or rolling
of a silicone:silicates composition may also be used.
[0029] Ideally, thicknesses in the range of 1-5 mm and preferably 3mm will
provide both
satisfactory coating and performance properties at a reasonable price.
Examples
[0030) A mixture of silicone: silicates
was
prepared to a final concentration of 50:50 (silicone:silicates) wt%. The
liquid mixture
was applied to a sulfur block that had been cleared of surface debris by
brushing. The
semi-solid mixture (having a rubbery texture) was applied by brush to both the
vertical
and horizontal surfaces and fully solidified on the sulfur block within
approximately 12
- 6 -

CA 02640857 2008-10-09
hours. No significant dripping or creep of the mixture was observed on the
vertical
surfaces. Within 24 hours, the coating had the appearance of a hard stone-like
surface.
The coating was flexible and could be broken by hand with difficulty. Small
sulfur blocks
(a few kilograms each) coated with the coating composition as described above
are
hereinafter referred to as control blocks.
[0031] Other blocks were prepared with 25:75 wt% (silicone: silicates). The
composition
prior to coating showed acceptable working viscosity and resulted in a harder
but thinner
coated surface after curing. A further set of blocks were prepared with 75:25
wt%
(silicone: silicates). The composition showed acceptable working viscosity and
resulted
in a more rubbery surface after curing.
Burn Test
[0032] Control blocks were subjected to direct heating of the coating with an
open flame
placed against the coating. This test showed insignificant combustion when the
open
flame was directly against the coating. The coating would quickly self-
extinguish when
the open flame was removed. The surface temperature of the coating during this
test
was 1380 C.
[0033] The coating could subsequently be scraped from the sulfur blocks with a

scraping tool and brushed from the control blocks for disposal.
Freeze/Thaw Cycle Test
[0034] In this test, control blocks were a) immersed in water for 24 hours; b)
towel-dried
and placed in a -20 C freezer for 16 hours and c) stored at 20 C for 24
hours. The
above cycle was repeated 10 times. Mass change data was collected as well as
photographic data.
[0035] These tests showed that after 10 cycles, the coating on the control
blocks did not
crack. In some samples, the underlying sulfur block would crumble but the
coating
remained intact.
Sunlight/Heat Test
[0036] Control blocks were placed in an enclosure and subjected to full
spectrum visible
light and an ultraviolet source. The enclosure was temperature and humidity
controlled
cycling between 90 C and 100% humidity to 0 C and 20% humidity over a 7 day
- 7 -
I

CA 02640857 2008-10-09
period. After recovery, the control blocks were immersed in water to measure
any mass
change.
[0037] These tests showed that the control blocks had satisfactory
sunlight/ultraviolet
resistance as no appreciable change in the coating was observed at the
conclusion of
this test.
Abrasion Test
[0038] Control blocks were subjected to a stream of blown sand onto one side
of the
blocks simulating sand-carrying wind up to 50km/hour.
[0039] These tests showed that the control blocks had satisfactory abrasion
resistance
as no appreciable degradation in the coating was observed during the test.
Specifically,
sand particles were observed bouncing off the coating without eroding the
coating
surface.
[0040] While the present invention has been described and illustrated with
respect to
preferred embodiments and preferred uses thereof, it is not to be so limited
since
modifications and changes can be made therein which are within the full,
intended scope
of the invention as understood by those skilled in the art.
- 8 -
I

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2640857 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2014-02-04
(22) Filed 2008-10-09
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2009-04-10
Examination Requested 2013-02-07
(45) Issued 2014-02-04

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2010-09-13 FAILURE TO COMPLETE 2010-10-06

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $473.65 was received on 2023-07-11


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if standard fee 2024-10-09 $624.00
Next Payment if small entity fee 2024-10-09 $253.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2008-10-09
Expired 2019 - Reinstatement - failure to complete $200.00 2010-10-06
Expired 2019 - The completion of the application $200.00 2010-10-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2010-10-12 $100.00 2010-10-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2011-10-11 $100.00 2011-07-11
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2012-04-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2012-10-09 $100.00 2012-10-05
Advance an application for a patent out of its routine order $500.00 2013-02-07
Request for Examination $800.00 2013-02-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2013-10-09 $200.00 2013-10-09
Final Fee $300.00 2013-11-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2014-10-09 $200.00 2014-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2015-10-09 $200.00 2015-09-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2016-10-11 $200.00 2016-10-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2017-10-10 $200.00 2017-09-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2018-10-09 $250.00 2018-10-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2019-10-09 $250.00 2019-09-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2020-10-09 $250.00 2020-09-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2021-10-12 $255.00 2021-10-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2022-10-11 $254.49 2022-07-11
Registration of a document - section 124 2022-12-06 $100.00 2022-12-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2023-10-10 $473.65 2023-07-11
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SECURE ENERGY SERVICES INC.
Past Owners on Record
CCS CORPORATION
FRIESEN, DONALD E.
RADOK, ALEXANDER
TERVITA CORPORATION
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Change of Agent 2022-12-06 6 224
Office Letter 2023-01-09 1 191
Office Letter 2023-01-09 1 190
Abstract 2008-10-09 1 15
Description 2008-10-09 8 330
Claims 2008-10-09 2 51
Cover Page 2009-04-07 1 30
Description 2013-06-21 8 329
Cover Page 2014-01-09 1 30
Correspondence 2008-11-12 1 17
Correspondence 2010-10-06 3 81
Maintenance Fee Payment 2017-09-12 1 33
Assignment 2008-10-09 3 89
Fees 2011-07-11 2 70
Correspondence 2010-06-11 1 20
Fees 2010-10-06 1 201
Correspondence 2011-01-10 3 86
Correspondence 2011-01-17 1 15
Correspondence 2011-01-17 1 21
Assignment 2012-04-10 3 95
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-03-21 2 49
Correspondence 2012-08-02 3 134
Correspondence 2012-08-14 1 15
Correspondence 2012-08-14 1 22
Prosecution-Amendment 2012-10-05 1 46
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-02-07 2 60
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-02-20 1 16
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-06-21 3 90
Fees 2013-10-11 1 45
Correspondence 2013-11-15 1 47
Correspondence 2013-11-13 4 131
Correspondence 2013-11-26 1 19
Fees 2014-09-04 1 43
Maintenance Fee Payment 2015-09-25 1 45
Fees 2016-10-03 1 33