Language selection

Search

Patent 2654617 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2654617
(54) English Title: REVISING CONTAINERIZED PROCESSING LOGIC FOR USE IN INSURANCE CLAIM PROCESSING
(54) French Title: REVISION DE LA LOGIQUE DE TRAITEMENT DES FLUX CONTENEURISES POUR L'ADAPTER AU TRAITEMENT DES DEMANDES DE REGLEMENT
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G06Q 40/08 (2012.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • THOLL, ROB (Canada)
  • LEUNG, RAYMOND (Canada)
  • RUSSELL, CLAYTON (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • TELUS HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • EMERGIS INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: LAMBERT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2017-11-14
(22) Filed Date: 2009-02-18
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2010-08-18
Examination requested: 2014-02-18
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A system and method for revising one or more hierarchies of an insurance plan,
the insurance
plan for use in adjudicating one or more insurance claims. The method and
system comprising
obtaining one or more claims from a claims queue, the claims queue for storing
claims selected
for review. The system and method comprising accessing at least one of a set
of benefit codes or
a set of adjudication rules associated with the insurance plan of the obtained
one or more claims,
wherein at least some of the set of benefit codes or the set of adjudication
rules are structured in
a plurality of containers. The system and method comprising reconfiguring
selected content of
the at least one of a set of benefit codes or the set of adjudication rules in
view of identified
reasons for review of the one or more claims; and storing the reconfigured at
least one of a set of
benefit codes or the set of adjudication rules in a memory for subsequent use
as at least one of a
redeployed version of the insurance plan or a revised said at least one of a
set of benefit codes or
the set of adjudication rules for use in development of other insurance plans
for adjudication of
claims other than the one or more claims obtained from the claims queue;
wherein the revised
insurance plan, once deployed, is adapted for use by an adjudication engine
for processing
insurance claims received by the adjudication engine.


French Abstract

Linvention décrit un système et une méthode de révision dune ou plusieurs hiérarchies dun régime dassurance, le régime dassurance visant une utilisation dans lajustement dune ou plusieurs demandes de règlement. La méthode et le système comprenant lobtention dune ou plusieurs demandes dune file de demandes, la file de demandes pour stocker les demandes choisies pour une révision. Le système et la méthode comprenant laccès à au moins un ensemble de codes de prestations ou un ensemble de règles applicables aux décisions associé au régime dassurance du ou des règlements obtenus, dans lequel au moins certains de lensemble de codes de prestations ou lensemble des règles applicables aux décisions sont structurés dans une pluralité de contenants. Le système et la méthode comprenant la reconfiguration du contenu sélectionné du au moins un ensemble de codes de prestations ou lensemble de règles applicables aux décisions dans le but didentifier des raisons pour la révision de la ou des demandes; et le stockage du au moins un ensemble de codes de prestations ou de lensemble de règles applicables aux décisions reconfigurés dans une mémoire pour une utilisation ultérieure alors quau moins une des versions redéployées du régime dassurance ou une version révisée dudit au moins un dun ensemble de codes de prestations ou de lensemble de règles applicables aux décisions à utiliser dans lélaboration dautres régimes dassurance pour le jugement des demandes autres que la une ou les demandes obtenues de la file de demandes; dans laquelle le régime dassurance révisé, une fois déployé, est conçu pour une utilisation par un moteur applicables aux décisions pour traiter les demandes de règlement reçues par le moteur applicables aux décisions.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method for modifying a hierarchy-based insurance plan for validation
as a modified
insurance plan through iterative revision or reconfiguration of one or more
hierarchies of the
insurance plan, the insurance plan used for adjudication of one or more
insurance claims over the
Internet as machine-to-machine interaction involving a computer server
operating as a web
service and a plurality of provider devices, the method comprising the steps
of:
obtaining by a review engine of the web service a claim adjudicated by an
adjudication
engine of the web service implementing the insurance plan from a claims queue
of the web
service, the claims queue for storing claims selected as a basis to review
identified errors of the
adjudication engine when implementing the insurance plan, the claim sent from
the adjudication
engine to the claims queue when the adjudication engine makes note of the
errors when the claim
cannot be automatically adjudicated according to the one or more hierarchies,
associated with the
insurance plan being a set of benefit codes to define a benefit hierarchy and
a set of adjudication
rules structured to define a rule hierarchy;
selecting by a user via a user interface of the review engine of the web
service at least one
modification option of the insurance plan from a) a claim by claim basis using
an override
specific to the claim, b) plan data including the benefit hierarchy or the
rule hierarchy associated
with the claim, c) a template hierarchy including a template benefit hierarchy
used to develop the
benefit hierarchy, or d) a template rule hierarchy used to develop the rule
hierarchy;
performing by the review engine of the web service modification of the
insurance plan
using the at least one modification option, as selected, by either
implementing a modification as
the override, implementing a modification in at least one of the benefit
hierarchy or the rule
hierarchy, or implementing a modification in at least one of the template
benefit hierarchy or the
template rule hierarchy for subsequent use as the modified insurance plan
containing said
iterative revision and reconfiguration of the one or more hierarchies;
re-adjudicating the claim by the adjudication engine of the web service using
the
modified insurance plan to produce re-adjudicated results of the claim; and
validating the modification by the review engine by presenting the re-
adjudicated results
to the user and receiving indication of acceptability from the user via the
user interface;
125

wherein the modified insurance plan after the validation, once redeployed, is
configured
for use by the adjudication engine for processing insurance claims
subsequently received over
the Internet by the adjudication engine external to the claims queue.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of benefit codes are structured
in a plurality of
benefit containers including a primary benefit container and a plurality of
secondary benefit
containers, each of the plurality of secondary benefit containers coupled to
the primary benefit
container by a respective benefit container reference, each of the plurality
of secondary benefit
containers containing one or more benefit codes configured for processing
claim content of the
claim, each of the one or more benefit codes coupled to their respective
secondary benefit
container by a respective benefit reference.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of adjudication rules is
structured in a plurality of
rule containers including a primary rule container and a plurality of
secondary rule containers,
each of the plurality of secondary rule containers coupled to the primary rule
container by a
respective container reference, each of the plurality of secondary rule
containers containing one
or more adjudication rules configured for processing claim content of the
claim, each of the one
or more adjudication rules coupled to their respective secondary container by
a respective rule
reference of the rule references, such that the primary rule container has a
list to define an
execution order of the corresponding container references of each of the
plurality of secondary
rule containers referenced by the primary rule container.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising reconfiguring the benefit
hierarchy by
performing at least one of: adding an additional benefit container reference
to the primary benefit
container; modifying a container benefit parameter of at least one of the
benefit container
references; or deleting at least one of the existing benefit container
references.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising reconfiguring the rule
hierarchy by performing
at least one of: adding an additional rule container reference to the primary
rule container;
modifying a rule container parameter of at least one of the rule container
references; or deleting
at least one of the existing rule container references.
126

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising reconfiguring the benefit
hierarchy by
performing at least one of: adding an additional benefit reference to at least
one of the secondary
benefit containers; modifying a benefit reference parameter of at least one of
the benefit
references; or deleting at least one of the existing benefit references.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein at least one of the rule references or
the rule container
references is defined to include at least one of an effective date or an
expiry date, such that
modifying inclusion or exclusion of rule objects associated with the rule
references in the rule
container is determined by the modification to the effective date or the
expiry date.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the rule container reference is said at
least one of the
effective date or the expiry date.
9. The method of claim 4, wherein reconfiguration of the benefit hierarchy
includes a
change to a reference of a benefit code selected from the group comprising: a
change in an
effective date of the reference; a change in an expiry date of the reference;
a change in a benefit
object version associated with the reference; a change to a definition content
of benefit codes or
benefit containers; and a change in an ordering of the references in a
respective benefit container.
10. A computer server operating as a web service for modifying a hierarchy-
based insurance
plan for validation as a modified insurance plan through iterative revision or
reconfiguration of
one or more hierarchies of the insurance plan, the insurance plan used for
adjudication of one or
more insurance claims over the Internet as machine-to-machine interaction
involving the server
and a plurality of provider devices, the server comprising:
a review engine of the web service for obtaining a claim adjudicated by an
adjudication
engine of the web service implementing the insurance plan from a claims queue
of the web
service, the claims queue for storing claims selected as a basis to review
identified errors of the
adjudication engine when implementing the insurance plan, the claim sent from
the adjudication
engine to the claims queue when the adjudication engine makes note of the
errors when the claim
cannot be automatically adjudicated according to the one or more hierarchies,
associated with the
127

insurance plan being a set of benefit codes structured to define a benefit
hierarchy and a set of
adjudication rules structured to define a rule hierarchy, the review engine of
the web service
configured for
receiving a selection of a user via a user interface of at least one
modification option of
the insurance plan from a) a claim by claim basis using an override specific
to the claim, b) plan
data including the benefit hierarchy or the rule hierarchy associated with the
claim; and c)
template hierarchy including a template benefit hierarchy used to develop the
benefit hierarchy
or a template rule hierarchy used to develop the rule hierarchy;
performing modification of the insurance plan using the at least one
modification option
as selected, by either implementing a modification as the override,
implementing a modification
in at least one of the benefit hierarchy or the rule hierarchy, or
implementing a modification in at
least one of the template benefit hierarchy or the template rule hierarchy for
subsequent use as
the modified insurance plan containing said iterative revision and
reconfiguration of one or more
hierarchies; and
validating the modification by presenting re-adjudicated results to the user
and receiving
indication of acceptability from the user via the user interface, the re-
adjudicated results received
from the adjudication engine after re-adjudication of the claims using the
modified insurance
plan;
wherein the modified insurance plan after the validation, once redeployed, is
configured
for use by the adjudication engine for processing insurance claims
subsequently received over
the Internet by the adjudication engine external to the claims queue.
11. The server of claim 10, wherein the set of benefit codes are structured
in a plurality of
benefit containers including a primary benefit container and a plurality of
secondary benefit
containers, each of the plurality of secondary benefit containers coupled to
the primary benefit
container by a respective benefit container reference, each of the plurality
of secondary benefit
containers containing one or more benefit codes configured for processing
claim content of the
claim, each of the one or more benefit codes coupled to their respective
secondary benefit
container by a respective benefit reference.
128

12. The server of claim 10, wherein the set of adjudication rules is
structured in a plurality of
rule containers including a primary rule container and a plurality of
secondary rule containers,
each of the plurality of secondary rule containers coupled to the primary rule
container by a
respective container reference, each of the plurality of secondary rule
containers containing one
or more adjudication rules configured for processing claim content of the
claim, each of the one
or more adjudication rules coupled to their respective secondary container by
a respective rule
reference of the rule references, such that the primary rule container has a
list to define an
execution order of the corresponding container references of each of the
plurality of secondary
rule containers referenced by the primary rule container.
13. The server of claim 10 further comprising reconfiguring the benefit
code hierarchy by
performing at least one of: adding an additional benefit container reference
to the primary benefit
container; modifying a container benefit parameter of at least one of the
benefit container
references; or deleting at least one of the existing benefit container
references.
14. The server of claim 10 further comprising reconfiguring the rule
hierarchy by performing
at least one of: adding an additional rule container reference to the primary
rule container;
modifying a rule container parameter of at least one of the rule container
references; or deleting
at least one of the existing rule container references.
15. The server of claim 10 further comprising reconfiguring the benefit
hierarchy by
performing at least one of: adding an additional benefit reference to at least
one of the secondary
benefit containers; modifying a benefit reference parameter of at least one of
the benefit
references; or deleting at least one of the existing benefit references.
16. The server of claim 14, wherein at least one of the rule references or
the rule container
references is defined to include at least one of an effective date or an
expiry date, such that
modifying inclusion or exclusion of rule objects associated with the rule
references in the rule
container is determined by the modification to the effective date or the
expiry date.
129

17. The server of claim 16, wherein the rule container reference is said at
least one of the
effective date or the expiry date.
18. The server of claim 13, wherein reconfiguration of the benefit
hierarchy includes a
change to a reference of a benefit code selected from the group comprising: a
change in an
effective date of the reference; a change in an expiry date of the reference;
a change in a benefit
object version associated with the reference; a change to a definition content
of benefit codes or
benefit containers; and a change in an ordering of the references in a
respective container.
19. The server of claim 10, wherein an execution order of the benefit codes
is associated with
the ordering of the container references in the primary benefit container.
20. The server of claim 11, wherein an execution order of the adjudication
rules is associated
with the ordering of the container references in the primary rule container.
130

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02654617 2016-02-12
REVISING CONTAINERIZED PROCESSING LOGIC FOR USE IN INSURANCE
CLAIM PROCESSING
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to reconfiguration of insurance plan
definitions used in
insurance claim processing.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] It is recognised in the health care industry that in order to
service patient
population, health care providers, by necessity, have become participants in
many networks. This
requires the complex management of many fee schedules, rule sets, and service
code definitions,
a process that is commonly outside of the capabilities of most practice
management systems. The
process is then left up to the carrier adjudicating the insurance claims,
creating further
inefficiencies and added costs to health plans. Further, it is recognised that
there are many
industry efforts in place to reduce cost, as well as constant Federal and
State legislative changes,
electronic transaction code sets, and privacy and security requirements.
Therefore, health claims
processing has become a costly and time consuming endeavour in the current
health care
industry.
[0003] For example, the current healthcare claims system is the source
where
inefficiencies contribute in administrative overhead and delays. Furthermore,
providers are
suffering from bad debt expenses on patient payment amounts. In addition the
current medical
claims system is fraught with the high potential for errors and omissions
resulting in more cost to
process claims. Providers realise that the reduction of their Account
Receivables balance and
reconciliation time is desirable. This reduction can happen through more
direct eligibility
verification, streamlined management of many network relationships, and faster
payment. For
payers, a key to more efficient plan management is increasing their
membership. This
membership increase can happen through a value proposition which includes
increasing auto-
adjudication rates by reducing rejected claims and eliminating many of the
steps required in
order to accomplish today's claims administration. There is a need for the
implementation of a
tool for helping to increase auto-adjudication rates of an adjudication engine
in the processing of
1

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
insurance claims, such that the tool is configured as flexible enough to
implement revised
plans/benefits and associated adjudication rules and benefit code
configurations more rapidly
and/or at lower costs than current insurance plan systems, based on errors
encountered during the
adjudication process.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] It is an object of the present invention to provide a benefit and
rule
reconfiguration environment to obviate or mitigate at least some of the above-
presented
disadvantages.
[0005] There is a need for the implementation of a tool for helping to
increase auto-
adjudication rates of an adjudication engine in the processing of insurance
claims, such that the
tool is configured as flexible enough to implement revised plans/benefits and
associated
adjudication rules and benefit code configurations more rapidly and/or at
lower costs than
current insurance plan systems, based on errors encountered during the
adjudication process.
Contrary to current systems, there is provided a system and method for
revising one or more
hierarchies of an insurance plan, the insurance plan for use in adjudicating
one or more insurance
claims. The method and system comprising obtaining one or more claims from a
claims queue,
the claims queue for storing claims selected for review. The system and method
comprising
accessing at least one of a set of benefit codes or a set of adjudication
rules associated with the
insurance plan of the obtained one or more claims, wherein at least some of
the set of benefit
codes or the set of adjudication rules are structured in a plurality of
containers. The system and
method comprising reconfiguring selected content of the at least one of a set
of benefit codes or
the set of adjudication rules in view of identified reasons for review of the
one or more claims;
and storing the reconfigured at least one of a set of benefit codes or the set
of adjudication rules
in a memory for subsequent use as at least one of a redeployed version of the
insurance plan or a
revised said at least one of a set of benefit codes or the set of adjudication
rules for use in
development of other insurance plans for adjudication of claims other than the
one or more
claims obtained from the claims queue; wherein the revised insurance plan,
once deployed, is
adapted for use by an adjudication engine for processing insurance claims
received by the
adjudication engine.
- 2 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[0006] A first aspect provided is method for revising one or more
hierarchies of an
insurance plan, the insurance plan for use in adjudicating one or more
insurance claims, the
method comprising the steps of: obtaining one or more claims from a claims
queue, the claims
queue for storing claims selected for review; accessing at least one of a set
of benefit codes or a
set of adjudication rules associated with the insurance plan of the obtained
one or more claims,
wherein at least some of the set of benefit codes or the set of adjudication
rules are structured in
a plurality of containers; reconfiguring selected content of the at least one
of a set of benefit
codes or the set of adjudication rules in view of identified reasons for
review of the one or more
claims; and storing the reconfigured at least one of a set of benefit codes or
the set of
adjudication rules in a memory for subsequent use as at least one of a
redeployed version of the
insurance plan or a revised said at least one of a set of benefit codes or the
set of adjudication
rules for use in development of other insurance plans for adjudication of
claims other than the
one or more claims obtained from the claims queue; wherein the revised
insurance plan, once
deployed, is adapted for use by an adjudication engine for processing
insurance claims received
by the adjudication engine.
[0007] A further aspect provided is system for revising one or more
hierarchies of an
insurance plan, the insurance plan for use in adjudicating one or more
insurance claims, the
system comprising: a claims queue for obtaining one or more claims there from,
the claims
queue for storing claims selected for review; a claims module adapted for
accessing at least one
of a set of benefit codes or a set of adjudication rules associated with the
insurance plan of the
obtained one or more claims, wherein at least some of the set of benefit codes
or the set of
adjudication rules are structured in a plurality of containers; a
reconfiguration module adapted
for reconfiguring selected content of the at least one of a set of benefit
codes or the set of
adjudication rules in view of identified reasons for review of the one or more
claims; and a
deployment module adapted for storing the reconfigured at least one of a set
of benefit codes or
the set of adjudication rules in a memory for subsequent use as at least one
of a redeployed
version of the insurance plan or a revised said at least one of a set of
benefit codes or the set of
adjudication rules for use in development of other insurance plans for
adjudication of claims
other than the one or more claims obtained from the claims queue; wherein the
revised insurance
plan, once deployed, is adapted for use by an adjudication engine for
processing insurance claims
received by the adjudication engine.
- 3 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[0008] A further aspect provided is a memory for storing data for access
by an
application program being executed on a data processing system, comprising: a
data structure
stored in said memory, said data structure including information resident in a
database used by
said adjudication engine program and including: a set of adjudication rules
stored in said
memory appropriate to processing a received claim of an adjudication engine,
the set of
adjudication rules structured in a plurality of containers including a primary
rule container and a
plurality of secondary rule containers, each of the plurality of secondary
rule containers being
coupled to the primary rule container by a respective container reference,
each of the plurality of
secondary rule containers containing one or more adjudication rules adapted
for processing the
claim content of the received claim, each of the one or more adjudication
rules being coupled to
their respective secondary container by a respective rule reference, the set
of adjudication rules
defining a rule hierarchy; wherein processing the content of the received
claim with the one or
more adjudication rules is facilitated by an execution order defined by the
ordering of the
container references in the primary rule container.
[0009] A further aspect provided of the data structure is a set of
benefit codes stored in
said memory appropriate to the received claim, the set of benefit codes
structured in a plurality
of benefit containers including a primary benefit container and a plurality of
secondary benefit
containers, each of the plurality of secondary benefit containers being
coupled to the primary
benefit container by a respective benefit container reference, each of the
plurality of secondary
benefit containers containing one or more benefit codes adapted for processing
the claim content
of the received claim, each of the one or more benefit codes being coupled to
their respective
secondary benefit container by a respective benefit reference, the set of
benefit codes defining a
benefit hierarchy.
[0010] The application program can be any of the engines, such as a
composer engine, a
reconfiguration engine, a reconfiguration engine and a plan engine.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described in
conjunction
with the following drawings, by way of example only, in which:
- 4 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[0012] Figure 1 is a schematic of a claim processing environment;
[0013] Figure 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the
environment of
Figure 1;
[0014] Figure 3 is a block diagram of a structured memory of the
environment of Figure
1;
[0015] Figure 4 shows an example claim of the environment of Figure 1;
[0016] Figure 5a is example grammar logic of the rule engine of Figure 2;
[0017] Figure 5a is an example parameterized rule using the logic of
Figure 5a;
[0018] Figure 6a shows an example embodiment of a rule data structure of
Figure 3;
[0019] Figure 6b shows a further embodiment of the rule data structure of
Figure 6a;
[0020] Figure 6c shows an example embodiment of a service code data
structure of
Figure 3;
[0021] Figure 7 is an example interface of the rule engine 20 of Figure
2;
[0022] Figure 8 is another example interface of the rule engine 20 of
Figure 2;
[0023] Figure 9 is another example interface of the rule engine 20 of
Figure 2;
[0024] Figure 10 is an embodiment of the rule and service code data
structure of Figure
3;
[0025] Figure 11 is an example configuration of the rule engine of Figure
2;
[0026] Figure 12a is an example configuration of the rules of Figure 3;
[0027] Figure 12b is an example configuration of the rule blocks of
Figure 3;
[0028] Figure 13 shows a block diagram of a computer device for
implementing the
components of the environment of Figure 1;
- 5 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[0029] Figure 14 is a flow-chart of steps performed by the adjudication
engine of the
environment of Figure 2;
[0030] Figure 15 is a flow-chart of steps performed by the composer
engine of the
environment of Figure 2;
[0031] Figure 16 is a diagram of an example management process for the
environment of
Figure 1;
[0032] Figure 17 is an example configuration of a modification process of
rule and/or
benefit hierarchies of the system of Figure 2;
[0033] Figure 18 is an example block diagram of modifications performed
by a plan
engine of the system of Figure 2;
[0034] Figure 19 is an example block diagram of an embodiment of the plan
engine of
Figure 18;
[0035] Figure 20 shows an example workflow of the plan engine of Figure
18;
[0036] Figure 21 is a flow chart of steps performed by the plan engine of
Figure 2;
[0037] Figure 22 is a block diagram of an example configuration of the
engines of Figure
2;
[0038] Figure 23 is an example configuration of engines of Figure 2;
[0039] Figure 24 is an example configuration of a reconfiguration engine
of the
environment of Figure 2;
[0040] Figure 25 is an example interface provided by the engine of Figure
24
[0041] Figure 26 is a flow-chart of steps performed by the engine Figure
24; and
[0042] Figures 27-78 are example user screen shots generated by the rule
engine of
Figure 2.
- 6 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENT(S)
System 10
[0043] Referring to Figure 1, shown is the basic workflows involved with
an insurance
claim 12 (e.g. dental, vision, drug, etc, or a combination thereof). The
process starts with a
person 14 going to a medical office 15 to get insured services performed (e.g.
dental) and/or for
the purchase of insured products (e.g. drugs) . The office 15 submits the
electronic claim 12 over
a communications network 11 to the recipient's insurance carrier 16. The
carrier 16 adjudicates
the claim 12 via an adjudication system 18 and returns to the dental office 15
the amount that it
will cover the performed services/ purchased products. The Recipient 14 then
has to pay the
office 15 the difference if there is any. The adjudicated claim 12 is stored
in a database 224 and
later read into a payment processing system 24. Payment processing 24 can
either EFT or
generate a cheque to the payee 26 indicated on the claim 12. the carrier 16
also has a carrier
database 28 coupled to the database 224, for supplying updates to any
carrier/recipient specific
information used during the adjudication 18 and/or payment 24 processes.
Further, the carrier 16
can also provide a forms interface 22 for use by the recipient 14 and/or the
dental office 15, as
desired, in completing the electronic forms of the claim 12 for submission
over the network 11
(e.g. intra and/or extranet). The carrier 16 may also share/integrate certain
data with the database
224 through an integration server 30.
[0044] Referring to Figure 2, shown is a block diagram of main components
of the
system 10 of Figure 1. The system 10 has an adjudication engine 40 of the
adjudication system
18 that obtains rules 100 and benefits 103a s defined in a deployed plan 42,
from the data base
224, for use in adjudication of received claims 12 that reference the plan 42.
A plan manager 44
is used to deploy the plan 42, taking into account customized rules 100 and
benefits 103 (see
Figure 3) as supplied from a rule engine 200 used to compose and/or otherwise
organize the rules
100 into a rule hierarchy 260 and the benefits 103 into a benefit hierarchy
360, further described
below. The Plan Manager 44 application lets users create and manage plan 42
coverage
templates that are used as the basis of plan administration. Plans 42 are
built by combining
benefit blocks 326,328 with rules 100 (organized in blocks 226,228) (see
Figure 3) and business-
specific parameter-value groupings to create a unique coverage specification
(e.g. the deployed
- 7 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
plan 42 resident in the memory 224). Once a valid plan 42 reaches its Active
Date, the plan can
be promoted to a production server for access by the plan manager 44.
[0045] A module interface 46 is used by the adjudication engine 40 to
load and execute
adjudication rules 100 and associated benefits 103, as defined in the deployed
plan 42. Through
this design, all adjudication rules 100 and associated benefits 103 will fire
their respective points
in the order of execution (e.g. sequential as listed), as defined in the
blocks 226,228,326,328
and/or their relationship models 260,360. The adjudication rules 100 discussed
here are the ones
attached to the plan 42. For example, the deployed plan 42 consists of
elements such as but not
limited to: adjudication rules 100 (and their associated block 226,228
configuration via
references 227,229); a list of service codes 103 (and their associated block
326,328 configuration
via references 327,329); a fee guide for defining the fees payable for
services/products accepted
in the claim 12 as processed via the adjudication 18 and payment 24 processing
(see figure 1);
and a set of fiscal parameters (e.g. co-insurance, maximum and COB)that are
used to customize
the rules 100 and/or service codes 103 in the deployed plan 42 that is used in
claim 12 processing
by the adjudication engine 40. Accordingly, it is recognised that the rules
100 and their
associated service codes 103 (via the configuration defined in the hierarchies
260,360) provide
for the implementation of the deployed plan 42 used in processing the claims
12. For example,
the rules 100 are used to determine whether a given service code 103 can be
paid by the plan 42,
upon review and processing of the claim 12 information by the adjudication
engine 40.
[0046] Referring to Figure 3, shown is a further embodiment of the memory
224,
including the benefit hierarchy 360 and the rule hierarchy 260, as well as
their respective data
structures consisting of patent/child (e.g. independent/dependent) blocks
326,328, benefits 103
and blocks 226,228 and rules 100, as further described below. It is recognised
that the memory
224 can also include claims information 51, carrier/member/recipient
information 49, payment
information 57, provider information 59, fee schedules 48, and pended/quality
control
information 61, as desired.
Claim 12 Concept Overview
[0047] Referring to Figures 1,2, and 4, there are many different
definitions of a claim 12
based on the perspective of the viewer. The following example definition and
design of the claim
- 8 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
12 is from the perspective of the adjudication engine 40 for use in
adjudication processing 18
using the configured rules 100 and/or benefit codes 103 of the plan 42
associated with the claim
12. A claim-item 60 can a procedure or product code (e.g. dental teeth
cleaning). There can be
multiple procedure codes on a single claim 12. Multiple procedure codes can
sometimes be
packaged together under 1 procedure code, as desired. The claim description 62
can be a unique
combination of: Patient (registered with a specific carrier 231 and associated
plan 42); Provider
(of the insured service(s)/product(s) of the plan 42; and Service date (a
measure of when the
insured service(s)/product(s) took place). For example, the claim description
62 can describe a
visit and resultant outcome of the patient to the provider. Note that multiple
claims in a day (e.g.
service date) are possible. A transaction 64 can be made up of one or more
individual claim
descriptions and can, for example: be a box of receipts all submitted at once;
extend across
multiples patients and providers; possibly represent a single EDI (CDA) claim
with multiple
service dates; and/or can represent a claim submitted on a periodic frequency
(e.g. Labour Force
Reentry (LMR) type claims pertaining to retraining/rehabilitation of the
patient over an extended
period of time).
Adjudication Engine 40
[0048] The adjudication engine 40 of the adjudication system 18 is
configured to access
or otherwise obtain rules 100 and benefits 103 as defined in a deployed plan
42, from the data
base 224, for use in adjudication of received claims 12 that reference the
plan 42. As further
described below, the rules 100 and benefits 103 are configured as rule and
benefit objects in
respective hierarchies 260, 360.
[0049] The adjudication engine 40 can have a comparison module 41
configured for
comparing the claim date to each of the an effective date and an expiry date
of the container
references 229, in order to determine if the respective secondary rule
container 228 is part of the
set of adjudication rules for use in processing the received claim 12, such
that the non-matching
dates exclude the respective secondary rule container 228 from being included
in an execution
order as listed in the corresponding primary rule container 226. Further, the
adjudication engine
40 can have the comparison module 41configured for comparing the claim date to
the effective
date and/or a expiry date of the rule references 227, in order to determine if
the respective
- 9 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
adjudication rules 100 associated with the rule references 227 is/are part of
the set of
adjudication rules 100 for use in processing the received claim 12, such that
the non-matching
dates exclude the respective adjudication rule 100 from being included in the
execution order of
their respective secondary rule container 228.
[0050] Further, the adjudication engine 40 can have the comparison module
41
configured for comparing the claim date to each of the an effective date and
an expiry date of the
benefit container references 329, in order to determine if the respective
secondary benefit
container 328 is part of the set of benefit codes 103 for use in processing
the received claim 12,
such that the non-matching dates exclude the respective secondary benefit
container 328 from
being included in an execution order as listed in the corresponding primary
benefit container
326. Further, the adjudication engine 40 can have the comparison module 41
configured for
comparing the claim date to the effective date and/or a expiry date of the
benefit references 327,
in order to determine if the respective benefit codes 103 associated with the
benefit references
327 is/are part of the set of benefit codes 103 for use in processing the
received claim 12, such
that the non-matching dates exclude the respective benefit codes 103 from
being included in the
execution order of their respective secondary benefit container 328.
[0051] Accordingly, as further described below, the adjudication engine
40 uses date
matching of the references 227,229,327,329 with the claim date, in order to
assemble the set of
adjudication rules appropriate to the content of the received claim 12. The
comparison module
41 may be part of the adjudication engine 41, as shown, and/or may be part of
the database 224
or other third party (not shown).
[0052] Referring to Figure 3, the adjudication engine 40 during the
adjudication process
18 (see Figure 1) determines that claims 12 that cannot be automatically
adjudicated according to
the hierarchies 260, 360 as defined in the deployed plan 42 associated with
the received
claims12. Accodiingly, in the case of error(s) occurring during the
adjudication process 18, the
adjudication engine 40 makes note of the adjudication error(s) and sends the
adjudication
interrupted claim 12 to a Pended Claims queue 53. Pended claims 12 are
determined by the
engine modules and rules, according to the plan 42. Paper claims also has the
ability to flag a
-10-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
claim 12 to be pended to the claims queue 53 for an adjudicator to view, via
the review engine
50, as further described below.
[0053] Further, fraud claim(s) 12 can also be detected by the engine 40
during
adjudication and are flagged as such and sent to the claims queue 53 also for
review by the
review engine 50. For example, the last step on the engine 40 can decide if
the claim 12 has
completed adjudication or not. If it is, and the fraud-flag had been set
during the adjudication
process 18, in view of application of the plan 42 to the contents of the
received claim 12 by the
adjudication engine 40,the claim 12 can be put into a special state in the
claims queue, such that:
the claim 12 is not ready for payment; and the claim12 is not ready for
Quality Control, for
example.
[0054] As further described below, anti-Fraud determination of claims 12
in the queue 53
can be managed by a screen(s) 102 in the review engine 50. This can be a table
driven feature
with a custom module in the engine 50 to execute the logic for review and
possible
revsion/reconfiguration of the claim 12 and/or the hierarchies 260,360
associated with the claim
12. The table data can be updated in real-time, and it is understood that Anti-
Fraud can
sometimes make mistakes and either miss, or catch too many claims 12, at least
initially.
However, based on the potential for revision/reconfiguration of the
hierarchies 260,360, via the
review engine 50, in view of the analysis of the queued claim 12, it is
understood that iterative
updates/revisions 54 of the hierarchies 260,360 (e.g. of the plan(s) 42) may
provide for increases
in auto adjudication levels for the received claims 12, in view of iterative
updates/revisions 54 of
the hierarchies 260,360 based on claim review (by a claim module 536 ¨ see
Figure 24) of the
claims 12 submitted to the claims queue 53.
Adjudication Rules 100
[0055] The Rules 100 can be used by the adjudication engine 40 to
determine whether a
given service code 103 is authorized to be paid by a plan 42 deployed on
behalf of the carrier
231 (see Figure 6a).
Rule Grammar
-11 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[0056] Reference is next made to Figure 5a and 11, which illustrates the
generalized
structure of a Rule 100. Each rule 100 is a discrete logical expression that,
when evaluated,
returns a condition of either "TRUE" or "FALSE". One example of the rule 100
is a logical
structure of IF {condition(s)} THEN {action(s)}statement. The defined grammar
logic 212 is
available to a composer module 202 of the rule engine 200 for use in
creating/amending the rules
100 for a new plan 42 and/or for facilitating editing of rules 100 in an
existing plan 42 obtained
from the memory 224 (see Figure 3). Rules 100 are evaluated by the
adjudication engine 40
when claims 12 are submitted by an insured person as will be described below
and are used to
process claims 12. The complete set of rules 100 in the rules database 224 is
the complete set of
business logic that will be analysed by the adjudication engine 40 in
processing a claim 12. An
action or method 104 of the grammar logic 212 can be performed by the
adjudication engine 40
if the condition 102 of the rule 100 is "TRUE". The action 104 is not
performed if the condition
102 of the rule 100 is "FALSE".
[0057] Conditions 102 of the grammar logic 212 are expressions that
result in a true or
false answer. The expressions 102 can be comprised of the rule elements
described in a Business
Object Model (BOM) file. Conditions 102 can be as simple as (OBJ.A = 1). A
rule 100 can also
have multiple conditions 102 joined together by logical operators and each
condition can be
nested with other conditions. An exemplary more complicated rule 100 with
several logical
operators and nested conditions is the following:
((OBJ1.A+OBJ1.B=2) OR ((OBJ1.D=10) AND (OBJ2.E=OBJ2.F)) OR (OBJ.FUNCTION(A,B)
=25
[0058] The elements of the grammar logic 212 that comprise conditions and
actions can
be specific to the implementation and are described in a Business Object Model
(BOM) file. The
BOM file is an XML file that provides the rule engine 200 with information on
rule elements of
the grammar logic 212 available for use creating/editing/deleting the rules
100, such as but not
limited to:
= Business objects such as a claim
= Attributes associated with business object such as a recipient
- 12 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Methods associated with each business object such as calculations based
on the
recipient's claim history
= Data types associated with each rule element
= Global functions such as those used to manipulate or compare data
= Actions such as pay or refuse the claim (or line item of the claim)
= Operators for comparisons and arithmetic
[0059] The rules 100 in the BUM have customizable labels and descriptions
that the user
will see when interacting with the tool. Changes to the BUM are easily
implemented by
interacting with a rule composer interface (e.g. interface 102 coupled to the
composer module
202) and may not require an application code update. The rule composer
interface 102 (see
Figure 13) is in communication with thr rule engine 200 which performs the
functionality upon
instruction by the user. The BOM is a system file that may not be normally
modified directly by
the user without using the rule composer interface 102.
[0060] An example rule 100a is shown in Figures 5a,b. The rule 100a
includes an
expression 106 and an action 108. When the rule 100a is evaluated by the
adjudication engine
40, the adjudication engine 40 will determine whether the expression 106 is in
a FALSE
condition or a TRUE condition. If the expression is in the TRUE condition,
then the
adjudication engine 40 will execute the action 104 specified in the rule 100.
If the expression is
in the FALSE condition, then the adjudication engine 40 will take no action.
[0061] In rule 100a, the expression 106 includes a literal value 112, an
operator 110 and
a parameter value 114. The literal value 112 represents the "StartDate" of the
employee
submitting the claim 12. It will be appreciated that the literal value 112 of
a rule 100 may be any
literal value 112 that is available in the database 224. Other literal values
112, for example, may
correspond to an employment start date, an employment end date, employment
status (e.g. full-
time, part-time, contract) or other literal values 112 as will be understood
in the art. The literal
values 112 may be set to a default value in the rule 100 creation process (via
the rules engine
200) and be edited when a rule 100 is attached to the plan 42, as further
described below.
- 13 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[0062] It is recognised that business objects are objects to which
information is attached,
as utilized by the rule engine 200. A claim 12 (see Figure 1) is an example of
a business object.
Attached to the claim 12, as received by the adjudication engine 40 (see
Figure 2), is information
such as the identity of the claim's recipient and the service for which the
claim 12 is being made,
as well as the carrier 231 that is responsible (i.e. for providing the
configuration of the rules 100
and/or for payment of the claim 12, once adjudicated) for the claim 12.
Business objects provide
the context in which the rules 100 would be evaluated during adjudication of
the claim 12 by the
adjudication engine 40. It is recognised that methods can also be attached to
the business
objects, in order to perform calculations in the context of the business
object or retrieves
information about the business object that is not available as an attribute.
It is recognised that the
attributes and methods attached to the business object are referenced in the
rule(s) 100 using a
syntax of the rule grammar of the grammar logic 212, such as objectattribute
and object.method
syntax respectively.
[0063] Attributes are the pieces of information attached to a business
object. The
attributes can have values that can be used for comparisons or calculations,
depending on the
data type, in order to assist in execution of the rules 100 when processing of
the received
business object (e.g. claim 12) by the adjudication engine 40.
[0064] The methods and functions associated with the business object
(e.g. via the rules
100) are used to return a calculated value and/or a true/false logic decision,
return a state, and/or
perform action(s). Operators are uses when comparing two or more values and/or
in joining two
or more conditions. The logical operators AND, OR, AND NOT, OR NOT, and NOT of
the
grammar logic 212 are used in the rules 100, as input through the user via the
rules manager 202.
Other operators of the grammar logic 212 can be such as but not limited to:
EQUALS; NOT
EQUALS; etc. An example of a rule 100 in the rule hierarchy 260 is shown in
Figure 9.
Rule Blocks 228 and Superblocks 226
[0065] Referring to Figures 2,3, the blocks 226, 228 and rules 100 are
used as rule
objects in the hierarchy 260, thus providing for multiple instances of the
same rule object in any
particular rule hierarchy 260 (i.e. specific instances of coupled blocks
226,228 and rules 100)
configuration.
-14-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[0066] A Rule Block 228 is a logical grouping of Rules 100, such that
specific instances
of the Rule Blocks 228 have a name and description but may not have any
inherent processing
logic. A Rule Super Block 226 is a logical grouping of Rule Blocks 228. Rule
Super Blocks
226, such that specific instances of the Rule Blocks 226 have a name and
description but may
not have any inherent processing logic. A name and description in a second
language can be
supported. The Rule Super Block 226 can be used to define the execution order
of the blocks
228 listed/referenced 229 therein (e.g. each referenced block 228 in the list
of blocks 228 in the
super block 226 is processed in sequential order).
[0067] The organization of adjudication rules 100 is represented by Rule
Containers 226,
228 (e.g. Super Blocks and Blocks) and the Rules 100 within them. The
adjudication rules 100
and their organization in the hierarchy 260 are stored as data organised via
the blocks 226,228
within the database 224. The rule data is then used by the adjudication engine
40 to process
claims 12 received. Referring to Figure 6a, the rule hierarchy 260 consists of
Carriers 231, Rule
Containers 226, 228, and Rules 100. Carrier 231 is the root container for the
Rule Hierarchy
260. Rule Objects refer to both Rules 100 and Rule Containers 226,228, such
that Rule Super
Blocks 226 contain Rule Blocks 228 and Rule Blocks 228 contain Rules 100, for
example, as a
container relationship structure used to organize and define the rule
hierarchy 260.
[0068] The term Rule 100 refers to a specific implementation of the
processing logic of a
business policy. A Rule Block 226,228 is a logical grouping of Rules 100.
Rules 100 belong to a
Rule Block 226,228 by way of a reference 227,229 (also referred to as Rule
Inclusions). Rule
Objects exist at the specified level in the hierarchy 260 (specific
configuration of the blocks 226,
228 and rules 100 through the references 227,229. The Rule Hierarchy 260 is
built on references
227 to Rule Objects rather than containing the Rule Objects; where Rule
Objects only exist once
in the database, regardless of how many times they appear in the Rule
Hierarchy 260. For
example, a named rule 100 (e.g. an instance of the rule 100) is an example of
a rule object that is
then referenced 227 in the containers 226,228 of the hierarchy 260. Also, it
is recognised that
named containers 226,228 (e.g. an instance of the container 226,228) is an
example of a rule
object that is then referenced 229 in the containers 226,228 of the hierarchy
260. The use of
references 227,229 provides for efficient reuse of common Rules 100 and Rule
Containers
- 15 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
226,228 in a large Rule Hierarchy 260. When changes are required on a Rule
Object, the
changes need only be applied to the single instance rather than in multiple
copies.
[0069] Referring to Figure 6a, the rules 100 are organized into a
collection of primary
226 and secondary 228 containers, also referred to as superblocks 226 and
blocks 228. It is
recognised that a particular rule 100 may exist only once in the database 224
but can be found in
multiple containers 226,228 by one or more references 227,229, such that the
reference 227 is a
link between a rule 100 and a secondary container 228 and a reference 229 is a
link between a
secondary container 228 and a primary container 226. Accordingly, rule objects
can exist only
once in the database 224, regardless of how many times the appear in the rule
hierarchy 260,
since the rule hierarchy 260 can be built on references to the rule objects
rather than containing
the rules objects themselves. One advantage in using references 227,229 is
that it can allow for
reuse of common rules 100 and rule containers 226,228 in a complex rule
hierarchy 260, such
that when changes/modifications are done on a rule object, the
changes/modifications are only
applied to the single instance of the rule object rather than to multiple
copies of the rule objects.
[0070] It is recognised that the rules 100 linked via references 227 to
the secondary
containers 228 are also included in the primary containers 226 via the
references 229, e.g. a
primary container 226 contains all contents of the linked 229 secondary
containers 228 (e.g. as a
child of the primary container 226) and the contents of the secondary
containers 228 are the
linked 227 rules 100 (e.g. the rules 100 are children of the secondary
containers 228). Hence, the
described relationship between the containers 226, 228 and the rules 100 can
be such that each
rule is a dependent/child of the associated secondary container 228 and each
secondary container
in turn is a dependent/child of the primary container 226. As well, each
primary container 226 is
a dependent/child of one or more carriers 231, as shown by example in Figure
6a.
References 227,229, 327,329
[0071] Referring to Figure 12a,b, a Rule Version is a specific
implementation of a Rule
100 using the rule grammar. Different implementations may be valid at
different points in time in
time span 301 ordering of the rules 100 and corresponding blocks 228. A
version date 300 of a
rule version determines which implementation is applicable over the history of
the Rule 100. A
Rule 100 is a member of a Rule Block 228 by way of the reference 227 and those
references can
- 16 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
be called Rule Inclusions. The order of Rule Inclusions 227 within a Rule
Block 228 determines
the order of processing by the adjudication engine 40 of the rules associated
via the hierarchy
260 for the particular plan 42 associated (e.g. via a plan ID associated with
the patient name of
the claim 12) with the received claim 12 for processing (see Figure 3). The
chronological
dependency of Rule Inclusions 227 for a Rule 100 within a Rule Block 228 is
called a Rule
Timeline 302.
[0072] A Rule Block 228 is a member of a Rule Super Block 226 by way of
the
reference 229 and those references can be called Rule Block Inclusions 229.
The order of Rule
Block Inclusions 229 within a Rule Super Block 226 can determine the order of
processing by
the adjudication engine 40. It is recognised that Rule Block Inclusions 229
may or may not have
a time dependency.
[0073] Accordingly, rule processing order by the adjudication engine 40
is configured in
the hierarchy via the references 227,229. For example, Rule Inclusions 227 can
have an
effective date and expiry date (e.g. on the timeline 302). These dates specify
the start and end of
when the Rule 100 is considered to belong to the Rule Block 228. The Rule
Inclusions 227 that a
claim 12 will encounter during processing depends on a service date of the
claim 12, as well as
the plan ID for associating the clams 12 with the rules 100 and benefits 103
related to the claims
via the corresponding deployed plan 42. Each Rule 100 referenced by the Rule
Inclusions 227
may have multiple versions of the logic implementation. The rule version 300
used for a claim
12 can be the most recent one relative to the claim 12 service date. Each
version 300 can have a
distinct Version Date that specifies the start date of the version 300. The
end date of a Rule
Version 300 is implied by the start date of the next version, for example or
can be independently
specified, as desired. Rule Inclusions 227 may or may not point to a specific
Rule Version 300,
where the version 300 used during claim 12 processing can be determined by the
claim 12 date.
[0074] Further, a benefit Version is a specific implementation of a
benefit 103. Different
implementations may be valid at different points in time in time span 301
ordering of the benefit
103 and corresponding blocks 328. A version date 300 of a benefit version
determines which
implementation is applicable over the history of the benefit 103. A benefit
103 is a member of a
benefit Block 328 by way of the reference 327 and those references can be
called benefit
-17-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Inclusions. The order of benefit Inclusions 327 within the Block 328 can
determines the order of
processing by the adjudication engine 40 of the benefits associated via the
hierarchy 360 (as well
as linked to specific rules via links 240 ¨ see Figure 10) for the particular
plan 42 associated (e.g.
via a plan ID associated with the patient name of the claim 12) with the
received claim 12 for
processing (see Figure 3). The chronological dependency of benefit Inclusions
327 for a benefit
103 within a Block 328 is called a Timeline 302.
[0075] A Block 328 is a member of a Super Block 326 by way of the
reference 329 and
those references can be called Block Inclusions 329. The order of benefit
Block Inclusions 329
within a benefit Super Block 326 can determine the order of processing by the
adjudication
engine 40. It is recognised that Block Inclusions 229 may or may not have a
time dependency.
[0076] Accordingly, benefit processing by the adjudication engine 40 is
configured in the
hierarchy via the references 327,329. For example, Inclusions 327 can have an
effective date
and expiry date (e.g. on the timeline 302). These dates specify the start and
end of when the
benefit 103 is considered to belong to the Block 328. The Inclusions 327 that
a claim 12 will
encounter during processing depends on a service date of the claim 12, as well
as the plan ID for
associating the clams 12 with the rules 100 and benefits 103 related to the
claims 12 via the
corresponding deployed plan 42. Each benefit 103 referenced by the Inclusions
327 may have
multiple versions of the logic implementation. The benefit version 300 used
for a claim 12 can
be the most recent one relative to the claim 12 service date. Each benefit
version 300 can have a
distinct benefit Version Date that specifies the start date of the benefit
version 300. The end date
of a benefit Version 300 is implied by the start date of the next benefit
version, for example or
can be independently specified, as desired. Inclusions 327 may or may not
point to a specific
benefit Version 300, where the benefit version 300 used during claim 12
processing can be
determined by the claim 12 date.
[0077] Figure 12a illustrates the Timeline 302 and Version 300 concepts
with example
rules 100. The definition of Rule A has three versions 300 with Version Dates
of 2002/01/01,
2003/07/01 and 2005/01/01. Rule A is included in the example Rule Block 228
from 2002/01/01
to 2004/01/01 and again from 2006/01/01 with no expiry date. Between
2004/01/01 and
2006/01/01 Rule A is not included in the Rule Block 228. The first claim 12
with a date of
- 18 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
2003/01/01 will see the first version 300 of Rule A. The second claim 12 with
a date of
2003/10/01 will see the second version 300 of Rule A. The third claim 12 will
not see any
version 300 of Rule A because the Rule Inclusion 227 is not in effect at that
time. Accordingly,
the rule inclusion 227 can be used to coordinate which rule 100 at which time
is relevant for use
in adjudication processing 18 (see Figure 1) based matching the date of the
rule inclusion 227
with the claim date.
[0078] When multiple Rule Versions 300 exist for a given Rule Inclusion
227, the
appropriate version date can be shown as child nodes under the Rule Inclusion
227. The version
300 dates shown can fall between the start and end of the respective time span
302 dates. For
example, a Rule 100 can have multiple versions 300 grouped under different
version dates (e.g.
2000/03/22 and 2007/04/08). For each time span 302 the appropriate version
dates can be
displayed as child nodes of the Rule 100 rule inclusion 227 node of the
hierarchy 260 (see Figure
6a).
[0079] Figure 12b illustrates the Timeline 302 and Version 300 concepts
with example
blocks 228. The definition of block A has three versions 300 with Version
Dates of 2002/01/01,
2003/07/01 and 2005/01/01. Block A is included in the example super Block 226
from
2002/01/01 to 2004/01/01 and again from 2006/01/01 with no expiry date.
Between 2004/01/01
and 2006/01/01 block A is not included in the super Rule Block 226. The first
claim 12 with a
date of 2003/01/01 will see the first version 300 of block A. The second claim
12 with a date of
2003/10/01 will see the second version 300 of block A. The third claim 12 will
not see any
version 300 of block A because the Inclusion 229 is not in effect at that
time. Accordingly, the
inclusion 229 can be used to coordinate which block 228 at which time is
relevant for use in
adjudication processing 18 (see Figure 1) in the corresponding superblock 226,
based matching
the date of the inclusion 229 with the claim 12 date.
[0080] When multiple Rule Versions 300 exist for a given Inclusion 229,
the appropriate
version date can be shown as child nodes under the Inclusion 229. The version
300 dates shown
can fall between the start and end of the respective time span 302 dates. For
example, a block
228 can have multiple versions 300 grouped under different version dates (e.g.
2000/03/22 and
- 19 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
2007/04/08). For each time span 302 the appropriate version dates can be
displayed as child
nodes of the inclusion 229 node of the hierarchy 260 (see Figure 6a).
[0081] It is recognised that similar use of references 327, 329 for the
benefits 103 can be
said for Figures 12a,b, whereby the benefit inclusion 327 can be used to
coordinate which benefit
103 at which time is relevant for use in adjudication processing 18 (see
Figure 1) based matching
the date of the benefit inclusion 227 with the claim 12 date. Further, it is
recognised that, the
inclusion 329 can be used to coordinate which block 328 at which time is
relevant for use in
adjudication processing 18 (see Figure 1) in the corresponding superblock 326,
based matching
the date of the inclusion 329 with the claim 12 date.
Benefit Blocks 328 and Superblocks 326
[0082] As mentioned above, the plans 42are built by combining, via links
240 between
rules 100 and benefits 103 (see Figure 10), benefit blocks 326,328 with rules
100 and associated
rule blocks 226,228 and business-specific parameter-value groupings to create
a unique coverage
specifications, which are applied to the received claims 12 as processed by
the adjudication
engine 40, see Figure 3. Once a valid plan 42 reaches its Active Date, the
plan 42 can be
promoted to a production server (e.g. storage 224) for eventual access by the
adjudication engine
40, once deployed in the storage 224 (see Figure 3). Accordingly, the Plan 42
is a grouping of
various attributes (e.g. of the hierarchies 260, 360) to assist in determining
whether a dental
service (or other insured products/services) of the claim 12 is covered and
any restrictions on the
reimbursement, a result of the adjudication processing 18.
[0083] Referring to Figure 6c, a benefit hierarchy 360 allows users to
create unique plan
42 configurations from a shared set of plan and benefit data, as well as to
provide for instruction
to the adjudication engine 40 in adjudication of the claims 12 that are
associated with the
respective deployed plan 42. The benefit hierarchy 360 can crosses multiple
lines of business
such as dental, drug, medical, and vision. Generally, each benefit super-block
326 can contain
only blocks 328 of benefits 103 of the same business. However, for reporting
purposes users can
define super-blocks 326 that cross multiple lines of business. There can be
basic elements in the
benefit hierarchy 360, such as but not limited to: Benefit-Super-Blocks 326,
Benefit-Blocks 328,
-20 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
and Benefits 103, which are linked to one another similarly to the arrangement
of the rule blocks
226,228 and rules 100 (see Figures 6a,b), using references 327,329, as further
described below.
[0084] Benefit Super-blocks 326 represents a grouping of benefit blocks
328 used to
create an overall coverage list for the plan 42, such that the benefit super
blocks 326 can be used
to define the execution order of the blocks 328 listed/referenced 329 therein
(e.g. each referenced
block 328 in the list of blocks 328 in the super block 326 is processed (e.g.
in sequential order as
listed in the blocks 326). The Super Benefit Block 326 can be identified as an
Inclusive or
Exclusive grouping, for example. A Super Benefit Block 326 can include an
Identifier, a Label
Name, a Type and a Description. The Benefit Super-blocks 326 can be the
highest object in the
hierarchy 360, and are assigned to a plan 42, or as an override to an
enrolment hierarchy (not
shown). Super-blocks 326 can be assigned to the plan 42 and/or become a plan
component. A
super-block 326 can contain any number of benefit blocks 328, via references
329. Benefit
blocks 328 can be included or excluded, and are time-lined via the references
329, allowing them
to change over time if required. Benefit Super-Blocks 326 can be created in a
number of
different types, such as but not limited to: Coverage - include or exclude
specific benefit blocks
328; Override - include or exclude benefits 103 and override plan coverage;
Fiscal - assign
specific Coinsurance, Deductible, and Maximum methods/functions; and
Adjudication - assign
specific rules 100 (for example, Pricing, COB, etc.) depending on business
requirements.
[0085] A Benefit block 328 represents a grouping of other benefit blocks
328 or a logical
grouping of benefit/service codes 103. A Benefit Block 326 can include an
Identifier, a Label
Name, a Type and a Description. These blocks 328 can represent industry-level
categorization or
carrier-specific groupings. Benefit blocks 328 can be created once and may be
referenced by
multiple plans 42. Benefit blocks 328 can be time-lined, meaning that a
benefit block 328 can
contain a different number of benefits 103 over time, as referenced by the
references 327,
providing for a benefit 103 that is no longer covered to remove itself from
the block 328 (and in
turn any associated plans 42 will no longer cover the benefit 103).
[0086] Benefits 103 generically refer to a claimable item such as a
dental procedure or a
pharmacy prescription, for example. A benefit code 103 is a re-usable
component. Each benefit
103 can be defined only once, and can have a relationship 327 with multiple
blocks 328. Each
-21-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
benefit 103 is defined with attributes such as benefit code, label, and line
of business
(dental/medical etc.). Most benefit codes 103 can be derived from the CDA
industry standards,
for example. Accordingly, benefit objects can exist only once in the database
224, regardless of
how many times the appear in the rule hierarchy 360, since the benefit
hierarchy 360 can be built
on references to the benefit objects rather than containing the benefit
objects themselves. One
advantage in using references 327,329 is that it can allow for reuse of common
benefits 103 and
benefit containers 326,328 in a complex benefit hierarchy 360, such that when
changes/modifications are done on a benefit object, the changes/modifications
are only applied
to the single instance of the benefit object rather than to multiple copies of
the benefit objects.
[0087] A Benefit Block 326,328 is identified as a Type to indicate what
the grouping is
supporting. The following are valid types of benefit blocks 326,328, for
example but not limited
to: Coverage List ¨ groupings to create the coverage list of service codes
103, such that these
groupings can be made in benefit blocks 328 that will support the coinsurance
structure of a
policy; Plan ¨ groupings created to support the fiscal restrictions within a
plan 42, for example:
if frequency is to be attached to 'exams', the Plan Specialist will group
benefit blocks 326,328
and/or service codes 103 together an create a benefit block label 'exams',
which can then allow
the Plan Specialist to create a rule 100 using this label to set up
parameterized values and
structure the frequency as required by the policy of the plan 42; and Adj
Logic ¨ groupings
created to support the dental (or other insurance types) interaction rules 100
required by the
insurance industry (e.g. can be carrier specific, for example).
[0088] Parameterized Values of the benefit codes 103 can be attributes
within a plan 42or
Rule 100 (e.g. via link 240 ¨ see Figure 10) where the user can enter in a
specific value. Benefit
Inclusion is a term used to identify that a particular service code 103 or
grouping of service
codes 103 are additionally being covered outside of the defined plan 42¨
coverage list. Benefit
Exclusion is a term used to identify that a particular service code 103 or
grouping of service
codes 103 are additionally being excluded from coverage outside of the defined
plan 42 ¨
coverage list. Plan Components references functionality that is coded in the
adjudication engine
42 to perform various functions related to the service codes 103 and rules 100
associated with the
plan 42 used to assist in adjudication of the received claim(s) 12.
- 22 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[0089] The contents of benefit blocks 328 are used to define a list of
service codes 103
that are consider as eligible dental (or other insurance types) services for
reimbursement. Benefit
Block 326,328 labels are concise and make business sense. Benefit blocks
326,328 are intended
to be re-used in the benefit hierarchy 360, and can also identify the
coinsurance groupings of the
covered insured services. Benefit block labels, when re-used for the fiscal
coinsurance
groupings, can be returned in a claims experience log (not shown).
[0090] As discussed above for use of references 227,229 with rules 100
and rule blocks
226,228, the benefit blocks 326,328 and benefit codes 103 can also use similar
references
327,329 to Set Expiry Dates for Benefit(s) 103 in a Block 328, and Set
Effective Dates for
Benefits 103 in a Block 328. As well, the references 329 can be used to set
the respective linked
block(s) 328 with the super block(s) 326, thereby facilitating the time
dependent and/or version
300 dependent inclusion of the codes 103 in the blocks 328 and/or time
dependent and/or version
300 dependent inclusion of the blocks 328 in the superblocks 326, as desired,
see Figure 12b.
[0091] Accordingly, it is recognised that a super-block 326 may contain
any number of
benefit blocks 328. Benefit blocks 328 can be included or excluded and are
time-lined 302 using
the references 329, thus providing for the contents of the blocks 326 to
change over time, if
desired. For example, selecting a new expiry date for all selected blocks 328
will provide for the
specified blocks 328 (via the reference(s) 329) will no longer be functional
in this super block
326 after the expiry date has lapsed. Also, for example, selecting a new
effective date for all
selected blocks 328 will provide for the specified blocks will not be
functional in this super block
326 until the effective date has been reached. Further, benefit super blocks
326 can be
interpreted (e.g. sequentially) in the specified order in the hierarchy 360,
in ascending order;
benefits 103 that are part of an excluded block 328 are ignored if they are
part of a later included
block 328, for example.
[0092] It is recognised that the above described benefit hierarchy 360 is
used by a plan
manager 44 to assemble the rules 100 and benefit codes 103 (as ordered by the
blocks
226,228,326,328 and associated references 227,229,327,329 to create a specific
plan version 42
that is then stored for use by the adjudication engine 40 in processing the
received claims 12 that
are associated with the specific plan version 42 as deployed in the memory
224.
- 23 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Rule Hierarchy 260 and Benefit Hierarchy 360
[0093] As shown in Figure 6a,b, rules 100 are grouped into blocks 228 and
superblock
226 for processing by the engine 40 and for visualization by the user when
using the rule/benefit
composer engine 200. A superblock 226 can be the highest container in the
hierarchy 260 (other
than the specific carrier 231) such that each of the other blocks 226,228 and
rules 100 related to
the superblock 226. There may be no limit on the number of blocks 226,228 so a
particular rule
hierarchy 260 can theoretically have any number of tiers (e.g. having block
226 to block 226
links, block 226 to block 228 links, block 228 to block 228 links, and block
228 to rule 100 links,
as well as block 226 to rule 100 links where appropriate). The grouping of
rules 100 into blocks
228 and superblocks 226 is dependent on the wishes of the user. As an example,
a user of th
engine 200 may wish to configure the hierarchy260 to have a superblock 226 for
standards set by
the Canadian Dental Association and a second superblock 226 for customized
business logic for
processing claims 12. As another example, a user may wish to have a superblock
226 for
different insurance types such as dental, automobile, life insurance as will
be appreciated. The
superblock 226 node contains child nodes representing a first level of rule
blocks 228. The first
level of rule blocks 228 may contain additional rule blocks 228 or rules,
depending on how many
container levels the hierarchy 260 is configured for.
[0094] The rule hierarchy 260 can be both an interactive visual
representation (e.g. with
the user via the composer engine 200) of the relationship(s) between rule
objects, and a data
structure in the rules database 224 which describes the relationship between
rule objects for use
by the adjudication engine 40 in processing of the claims 12. It will be
appreciated that each rule
object (i.e. superblock 226, blocks 228 and rules 100) may exist only once in
the database 224
but is referenced by each other rule objects that it is related to in a parent
or child relationship of
the hierarchy 260. For example, in a situation where there is only one
superblock 226, each
other rule object is referenced 229 in the database 224 by the superblock 226.
The reference(s)
227, 229 may be implemented via generic fields in a data record that stores
data (for e.g.
attributes) of the blocks 226,228. In another embodiment, a data record of the
blocks 226,228
may reference 227,229 a (e.g. dynamic) table that contains references 227, 229
to each of the
other rule objects that are in a child relationship with the block. The
references 227, 229 to rule
objects may be in the form of a globally unique identifier or GUID, or other
type of identifier,
- 24 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
which is a type of identifier used in the engine 200,40 applications in order
to provide a reference
number which is unique in any context (hence, "globally"), for example, in
defining the internal
reference for a type of access point in a set of stored instructions for
execution by the computer
processor 150 in Figure 13, or for creating unique keys in a database. The
reference 227 to a rule
100 can also indicate whether a rule object is a child or parent of another
rule object (e.g. rule
block 228).
[0095] The benefit hierarchy 360 can be both an interactive visual
representation (e.g.
with the user via the composer engine 200) of the relationship(s) between
benefit objects, and a
data structure in the database 224 which describes the relationship between
benefit objects for
use by the adjudication engine 40 in processing of the claims 12. It will be
appreciated that each
benefit object (i.e. superblock 326, blocks 328 and benefit 103) may exist
only once in the
database 224 but is referenced by each other benefit objects that it is
related to in a parent or
child relationship of the hierarchy 360. For example, in a situation where
there is only one
superblock 326, each other benefit object is referenced 329 in the database
224 by the superblock
326. The reference(s) 327, 329 may be implemented via generic fields in a data
record that
stores data (for e.g. attributes) of the blocks 326,328. In another
embodiment, a data record of
the blocks 326,328 may reference 327,329 a (e.g. dynamic) table that contains
references 327,
329 to each of the other benefit objects that are in a child relationship with
the block. The
references 327,329 to benefit objects may be in the form of a globally unique
identifier or GUID,
or other type of identifier, which is a type of identifier used in the engine
200,40 applications in
order to provide a reference number which is unique in any context (hence,
"globally"), for
example, in defining the internal reference for a type of access point in a
set of stored
instructions for execution by the computer processor 150 in Figure 13, or for
creating unique
keys in a database. The reference 327 to a benefit 103 can also indicate
whether a benefit object
is a child or parent of another benefit object (e.g. benefit block 328).
[0096] Figure 6b illustrates the structural data relationship between
rule objects. Rule
objects refer collectively to superblocks 226, blocks 228 and rules 100. As
shown, each rule
object may exist once in the rules database 224. It is to be appreciated that
the rule objects may
exist in a single database 224 or in multiple databases that reference each
other. As shown,
superblock 226 references two blocks 228a and 228b. Block 228a references rule
2 and 3, and
- 25 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
block 228b references rule 1 and rule 3. Superblock 226 also references rules
1, 2 and 3 by its
own reference to blocks 228a, 228b. In another embodiment, superblock 226 may
directly
reference rules 100 in addition to blocks 228a, 228b. Further block 228b
refers to block 228c
which refers to rule "n".
[0097] When a user interacts with the tool 12 and changes the
hierarchical relationship
between rule objects, a rule engine 200 implements the change by changing the
references in the
rules database 224 as is described below. It will be appreciated that if any
of the rule objects are
moved and/or deleted, the structural relationship depicted in Figure 3b will
be altered by the rule
engine 200, a new data structure (e.g. rule hierarchy 260) will exist in the
rules database 224 or
collection of rules databases 224.
[0098] An exemplary rule hierarchy 260 is illustrated in Figure 7. As
shown, the rule
hierarchy 260 has a superblock 226 entitled 'MSIMed', several blocks 228 and
several rules 100.
A user is able to expand the rule hierarchy 260 (e.g. using a hierarchy module
204 of the engine
2000 ¨ see Figure 11) by clicking on the '+' buttons and is able to contract
the hierarchy 260 by
clicking on the '-' buttons via the interface 102 (see Figure 13). In this way
a user is able to
precisely focus on a particular rule 100, a block 228 or a superblock 226 as
desired. The rule
hierarchy 260 can be a graphical tree view that is similar to a folder tree
view of a file system as
displayed on the display 152, for example. The nodes on the tree view
represent the Rule
Objects in the rule hierarchy 260 in a parent-child relationship.
[0099] The order in which rules 100 and rule block 228 are evaluated by
the adjudication
engine 40 can affect the adjudication result of the claims 12. New rules 100
and rule blocks 228
can be placed at the bottom of the hierarchy 260 by default, for example. To
rearrange the order
of the rules 100 in the hierarchy 260 using the engine 200, a user can drag
and drop rule objects
wherever desired so that the new rule object is in the target node. When a
user moves a rule
object, the rule engine 200 instructs component modules (e.g. module 202, 204,
206, 208, 210)
of the engine 200 to modify the data relationship between the moved rule
objects and to render a
new visual rule hierarchy 260 to the screen as is described below.
[00100] One example implementation of the rule hierarchy 260 is where
individual rules
100 can only exist at the bottom most rule container 228 level and that rule
containers 226,228
- 26 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
that contain a rule object 100 (e.g. via references 227,229) cannot be moved
to a different level
of the hierarchy 260. These reference limitations, as managed by the Hierarchy
manager 204,
help to reduce the complexity of maintaining the hierarchy 260 of circular
references 227, as
desired. It is recognised that there can be a number of hierarchy levels
containing secondary
containers 228 (i.e. a secondary container references 227 another secondary
container 228 which
then references 227 the rules 100, e.g. Block 228b references Block 228c which
references the
rules 100).
[00101] Further, the benefit hierarchy 360 has a superblock 326, several
blocks 328 and
several benefits 103, for example. A user is able to expand the benefit
hierarchy 360 (e.g. using
a hierarchy module 204 of the engine 200 ¨ see Figure 11) by clicking on the
'+' buttons and is
able to contract the hierarchy 360 by clicking on the '-' buttons via the
interface 102 (see Figure
13). In this way a user is able to precisely focus on a particular benefit
103, a block 328 or a
superblock 326 as desired. The benefit hierarchy 360 can be a graphical tree
view that is similar
to a folder tree view of a file system as displayed on the display 152, for
example. The nodes on
the tree view represent the benefit Objects in the benefit hierarchy 260 in a
parent-child
relationship.
[00102] The order in which benefits 103 and benefit blocks 326,328 are
evaluated by the
adjudication engine 40 can affect the adjudication result of the claims 12.
New benefits 103 and
blocks 328 can be placed at the bottom of the hierarchy 360 by default, for
example. To
rearrange the order of the benefits 103 in the hierarchy 360 using the engine
200, a user can drag
and drop benefit objects wherever desired so that the new benefit object is in
the target node.
When a user moves a benefit object, the engine 200 instructs component modules
(e.g. module
202, 204, 206, 208, 210) of the engine 200 to modify the data relationship
between the moved
benefit objects and to render a new visual benefit hierarchy 360 to the screen
152 as is described
below.
[00103] One example implementation of the benefit hierarchy 360 is where
individual
benefits 103 can only exist at the bottom most benefit container 328 level and
that benefit
containers 326,328 that contain a benefit object 103 (e.g. via references
327,329) cannot be
moved to a different level of the hierarchy 360. These reference limitations,
as managed by the
- 27 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Hierarchy manager 204, help to reduce the complexity of maintaining the
hierarchy 360 of
circular references 327, as desired. It is recognised that there can be a
number of hierarchy
levels containing secondary containers 328 (i.e. a secondary container
references 327 another
secondary container 328 which then references 327 the benefits 103, e.g. Block
328 references
Block 328 which references the benefits 103).
Composer Rule/Benefit Engine 200
[00104] Reference is next made to Figure 11, which illustrates the Engine
200 of the
claims processing environment 10. The engine 200 is for, such as but not
limited to, creating,
editing, organizing and maintaining adjudication rules 100 in a hierarchical
relationship 260
and/or creating, editing, organizing and maintaining adjudication benefit
codes 103 in a
hierarchical relationship 360, as well as links 240 ¨ see Figure 10 ¨between
the rules 100 and
benefit codes 103 (it is recognised that the links 240 can also be established
between the rules
100 and the blocks 326,328 and/or between the benefits 103 and the blocks
226,228, as desired).
[00105] The engine 200 includes a composer module 202 for creating,
editing, deleting
and saving individual rules 100 and benefits 103, as well as other objects of
the hierarchies
260,360. A user of the engine 2000 interacts with the interfaces 102,152 (see
Figure 13) to
create, edit, delete and save adjudication rules 100 and benefits 103, as well
as the relationships
(e.g. parent/child) between blocks 226, blocks 228, and rules 100, as well as
the relationships
(e.g. parent/child) between blocks 326, blocks 328, and benefits 103 ,as well
as their execution
order as organized by the ordering of the references 227,229,327,329 within
the respective
blocks 226,228,326,328. The composer module 202 performs functions as dictated
by the user
via the interface 102 and the composer module 202 saves adjudication rules 100
into the local
database 124 in the form of the rules hierarchy 260. The composer module 202
performs
functions as dictated by the user via the interface 102 and the composer
module 202 saves
adjudication benefit codes 100 into the local database 124 in the form of the
benefit hierarchy
360. The engine 200 can also use the composer module 202, for example, to
transfer completed
hierarchies 260,360 to the storage 224 for use in deployment of the plan 42.
[00106] The engine 200 can also includes a compiler 206 for converting
rule and benefit
statements into an extensible mark-up language such as XML or into machine
readable code, for
-28-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
subsequent use in adjudication of the claims 12 by the adjudication engine 40,
whereby the links
240 are used to couple the rules 100 with the benefits 103, for benefits 103
associated with
specific rules 100 as is known in the art. In an embodiment of the tool, the
compiler 206
converts a rule 100 into XML whenever the user interacts with a compile button
(not shown) on
the user interface 102. XML is a general-purpose specification for creating
custom markup
languages. It is classified as an extensible language, because it allows the
user to define the
mark-up elements. XML's purpose is to aid information systems in sharing
structured data of the
database 224, especially via the Internet, to encode documents, and to
serialize data. In another
embodiment, the engine 200 interprets a rule 100 statement in real time and
renders an error
message if the rule does not meet the syntax standards required and enforced
by the engine 200.
[00107] It is also recognised that the engine 200 can also be used for,
such as but not
limited to, creating, editing, organizing and maintaining the benefit codes
103 in the hierarchical
relationship 360. The engine 200 includes the composer module 202 for
creating, editing,
deleting and saving individual rules 100 and/or benefit codes 103. The
composer module 202
performs functions as dictated by the user and thrcomposer module 202 saves
benefit codes 103,
and their configuration, into the database 224. The engine 200 also includes a
compiler 206 for
converting benefit code 103 statements into an extensible mark-up language
such as XML or into
machine readable code. In an embodiment of the tool, the compiler 206 converts
the codes 103
into XML whenever the user interacts with a compile button (not shown) on the
user interface
102. In another embodiment, the engine 200 interprets code 103 statements in
real time and
renders an error message to the interface 102 if the code statement 103 does
not meet the syntax
standards required and enforced by the engine 200. . The engine 200 can also
use the composer
module 202, for example, to transfer completed hierarchies 260,360 to the
storage 224 for use in
deployment of the plan 42.
[00108] The order in which codes 103 and blocks 328 are evaluated by the
adjudication
engine 40 can affect the adjudication result of the claims 12. New codes 103
and blocks 328 are
placed at the bottom of the hierarchy 360 by default, for example. To
rearrange the order, a user
can drag and drop code objects (e.g. codes 103, blocks 326, blocks 328)
wherever desired so that
the new code object is in the target node. When a user moves a code object,
the rule engine 200
instructs component modules of the engine 200 to modify the data relationship
between the
- 29 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
moved code objects and to render a new visual code hierarchy 360 to the screen
(e.g. interface
102) as is described below.
[00109] One example implementation of the code hierarchy 360 is where
individual codes
103 can only exist at the bottom most code container 328 level and that
containers 326,328 that
contain a code object 103 (e.g. via references 327,329) cannot be moved to a
different level of
the hierarchy 360. These reference limitations, as managed by the Hierarchy
manager 204, help
to reduce the complexity of maintaining the hierarchy 360 of circular
references 327, as desired.
It is recognised that there can be a number of hierarchy levels containing
secondary containers
328 (i.e. a secondary container references 327 another secondary container 328
which then
references 327 the codes 103.
[00110] Accordingly, the engine 200 can be considered a GUI application
for defining
plans 24, for eventual deployment in the database 224 for specified
carrier/patient relationships.
The engine 200 provides for grammar logic 212 to be based on operators,
methods, business
objects, and their attributes. Data types may be defined and enforced within
the grammar logic
212 definitions, so that, for example, a date can only be compared to a date.
The adjudication
engine 40 can export its plan 42 configuration to the composer engine 200
(e.g. into the local
memory 124) so that the exported plans 42 can be edited by the composer engine
200, for
example. As well, the composer engine 200 is configured so that it can export
any changed plan
42 definitions (e.g. content and/or configuration of the hierarchies 260,360)
back to the database
224 and have those exported items (e.g. plan components, rule sets benefit
sets, rule/benefit
blocks, and individual rules 100 /benefits 103, as well as links 240 there-
between) re-evaluated
and compiled into code (e.g. Java byte code) for use by the engine 40 in
adjudication of received
claims 12 that pertain to the now redeployed plan 42. It is also recognised
that the redeployed
plan 42 could also be reconfigured by the plan manager 44 (e.g. for specified
inclusion/exclusion
of blocks 226,228,326,328, rules 100, benefits 103, links 240) by using the
edited plan 42
returned/exported by the engine 200 back to the database 224.
Composer Module 202
[00111] The composer module 202 of the rule engine 200 can provide a
graphical view of
the rule database called a Rule Map of the rule hierarchy 260 (see Figure 7),
as well as a benefit
-30-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
map of the code hierarchy 360, not shown. The Rule Map shows the current Rule
Organization
and active Rules 100 based on the system date. The Rule Map provides access
through the Rule
Containers 226, 228 to individual Rules 100 for viewing and editing.
Management of the Rule
Container hierarchy 260 can be done through drag/drop and cut/paste features
on Rule Map via
the rule manager 202, and/or through the hierarchy manager 204, further
described below.
[00112] The composer module 202 is used to manage the rule inclusions 227
within a
Rule Block 228, for example. As described with reference to Figure 12a, the
Timeline 302
feature is applicable to the organization of Rules 100 within Rule Blocks 228.
The Timeline 302
keeps track of where and when Rules 100 are included in the Rule Block 228.
This means that a
snapshot of the rule data that is in effect at any point in time is available.
The point in time can
be in the past or future. This feature is useful for processing claims 12 that
have been back dated
and for implementing changes that are future dated, as the rule hierarchy 260
provides guidance
for instructing the engine 40 in processing claims 12 using appropriate rules
100 and/or benefits
103 where the claim service date matches the effective/expiry date(s) of the
associated references
227,229,327,329.
[00113] It is recognised that timelines 302 are not the same as Rule
Versions 300, where:
Rule Versions 300 track the history of changes to the definition of a rule
100. Timelines 302
track when and where a Rule 100 is used and do not specify a particular Rule
Version 300, for
example. However, it is recognised that the timelines 302 can also be used to
specify particular
rule versions 300, when desired.
[00114] The Rule Map of the hierarchy 260 can show the Rule 100
organization that is in
effect at the current time as determined by the clock (or other defined
chronological time) of the
user interface 102. The Rule Map displays Rule Inclusions 227 depending on
their status, for
example using color and font style differences/distinctions (e.g. Expired Rule
Inclusions 227 can
be displayed in grayed type, unreleased Rule Inclusions 227 can be displayed
in normal type, and
released Rule Inclusions 227 are displayed in bold type).
[00115] The composer module 202 can provide a detailed view and
addition/modification
of the Rule Inclusions 227 over time. This view can be logically segmented
into Time Spans.
Each Time Span can represent a period in which the Inclusions 227 are static.
The boundary
-31-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
between Time Spans represent the point in time where at least one Inclusion
227 changes. Time
spans can be calculated in memory by the application and may not necessarily
map one for one
with records in a Rule-Rule Block table of the hierarchy 260. For example, A
Rule Dependency
Map is displayed on each composer module 202 window (displayed in the
interface 102) next to
the a Text/Tree View of the rule 100. The Dependency Map can show the all Rule
Blocks 228
that reference 227 that rule 100 and in turn the Rule Super Blocks 226 that
reference 229 the
Rule Blocks 228 (see Figure 7 for example). It is recognised that composer
module 202 can
configure and display to the user (via the interface 102) current and
historical views of the Rule
Blocks 226,228.
[00116] It is to be appreciated that a rule statement may be referenced by
any number of
blocks 228 or superblocks 226; however, each rule 100 will only exist once in
the rules database
224.
Dependency Manager 208
[00117] The engine 200 includes a Dependency Manager 208 for tracking the
relationship
between rules 100 and blocks 228 and superblocks 226. The advantage of using
references to
rules 100 rather than actual copies is the ability to share common rule
objects. Changes made to
a rules object are automatically picked up by all the references to the rule
object. It is
appreciated, however, that with the possibility of any number of references to
a rule object it may
be difficult to keep track of the dependencies. The dependency manager 208 is
operable to
manage the dependencies of each rule object and to visually display the
dependency relationship
as a dependency map for the convenience of the user. The dependency map 242
helps a user
keep track of rule dependencies by mapping the rule hierarchy 260 from the
bottom up. Each
rule container (or rule block 226,228) is shown with its parent container and
so on up the family
tree. An exemplary dependency map 242 is illustrated in Figure 8. As shown,
rule 240 is named
'00TEST' and is connected to two different rule blocks 228, namely '01.04A
SERVICE RULE
SET' and '03.02A SERVICE RULE SET'. As shown, the dependency map 242 is shown
to the
left of the rule editor window 244, although it is to be appreciated that the
dependency map 242
may be located in any location on the visual interface. As the user edits the
rule 246, the user is
able to visualize that each reference to the rule 246 will also be modified.
- 32 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00118] The engine 200 includes a Dependency Manager 208 for tracking the
relationship
between benefits 103 and blocks 328 and superblocks 326. The advantage of
using references to
benefits 103 rather than actual copies is the ability to share common benefit
objects. Changes
made to a benefits 103 object are automatically picked up by all the
references to the rule object.
It is appreciated, however, that with the possibility of any number of
references to a benefit
object it may be difficult to keep track of the dependencies. The dependency
manager 208 is
operable to manage the dependencies of each benefit object and to visually
display the
dependency relationship as a dependency map for the convenience of the user.
The benefit
dependency map helps a user keep track of benefit dependencies by mapping the
benefit
hierarchy 360 from the bottom up. Each benefit container (block 326,328) is
shown with its
parent container and so on up the family tree.
Search Module 210
[00119] The rule engine 200 also includes a search module 210 for allowing
a user to find
a particular rule 100(as well as blocks 226,228) in the rules database 224 for
editing, deletion or
for analysis. When the user interacts with a searching window on the user
interface 102, the rule
module 202 communicates with the searching module 210 and instructs the
searching module to
find rules 100 /blocks 226,228 that correspond to the searching criteria pre-
entered by the user.
The searching module 210 queries with the rule database 224 with the searching
criteria. If one
or more rules 100 /blocks 226,228 are returned from the database 224, the
searching module
renders the results as a list of rules 100 /blocks 226,228 on the visual
interface 102. If no rules
100 /blocks 226,228 are returned from the database 224 that match the
searching criteria, the
searching module 210 notifies the user that no rules 100 /blocks 226,228 were
found.
[00120] The rule engine 200 also includes the search module 210 for
allowing a user to
find a particular benefit 103 (as well as blocks 326,328) in the rules
database 224 for editing,
deletion or for analysis. When the user interacts with a searching window on
the user interface
102, the module 202 communicates with the searching module 210 and instructs
the searching
module to find benefits 103 /blocks 326,328 that correspond to the searching
criteria pre-entered
by the user. The searching module 210 queries with the rule database 224 with
the searching
criteria. If one or more rules benefits 103 /blocks 326,328 are returned from
the database 224,
-33 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
the searching module renders the results as a list of benefits 103 /blocks
326,328 on the visual
interface 102. If no benefits 103 /blocks 326,328 are returned from the
database 224 that match
the searching criteria, the searching module 210 notifies the user that no
benefits 103 /blocks
326,328 were found.
Hierarchy Module 204
[00121] The rule engine 200 also includes a hierarchy module 204 for
managing the child-
parent relationships in the rules database 224 and the visual representation
of the hierarchy 260
on the interface 102. The rule engine 200 also includes the hierarchy module
204 for managing
the child-parent relationships in the database 224 and the visual
representation of the hierarchy
360 on the interface 102.
[00122] Users of the tool interact with rule/benefit objects via the
interface 102, an
example of which is shown in Figure 9. As shown, a user is able to click on
the components of a
rule object with a mouse cursor. For example, if the user wishes to change
parameter
'20000101', the user is able to click on the parameter and directly change its
value by typing on
the keyboard. Once the user is satisfied with the new value, the user can
choose to save the rule
100 in the memory 124 associated with the engine 200. The interaction is
processed by the
module 202 which is operable to save the new rule 100 /benefit 103 object in
the rules database
224. Likewise, when a user moves a rule 100 /benefit 103 to another location
in the hierarchy
260, 360, the module 202 instructs the hierarchy module 204 to change the
references to the rule
100 / benefits 103 in the rules database 224. The dependency module 208 also
manages the
dependency relationship and renders the new dependency relationship to the
visual interface 102
as a dependency map 242 when the user wishes to view the dependency map 242
for a particular
rule 100/ benefit 103.
[00123] The dependency module is also adapted for coupling the
adjudication rules 100 to
the secondary rule container 228 by the rule reference 227 associated with the
content of the
secondary rule container 228 and is adapted for coupling the secondary rule
container 228 to the
primary rule container 226 by the container reference 229 associated with the
content of the
primary rule container 226, such that the adjudication rules 100, the
containers 226,228, and the
- 34 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
rule and container references 227,229 define the rule hierarchy 260 for
representing the set of
adjudication rules.
Business Management Process 400
[00124] Referring to Figure 16, shown is an example workflow of the
adjudication
environment 10, showing the major components of a business management process
400 for
facilitating the adjudication of claims 12 submitted by insured products
and/or service providers
15 (e.g. dentists, doctors, pharmacies, etc.) on behalf of the patient 14
(e.g. recipient), for
example. In addition to the components of the environment 10 of Figure 1, the
example
management process 400 includes components such as but not limited to: a fee
guide
maintenance 402 for monitoring updates to fee guides used by the adjudication
engine 40, such
that the fee guides map prices to service codes 103 (e.g. government and/or
carrier 231 specific);
the above mentioned rule and benefit hierarchy 260, 360 creation process
implemented by the
composer engine 200; a plan creation and/or enrolment process (collectively
referred to as a
deployment process 404) as implemented by the plan management engine 44 for
facilitating
deployment of plans 42 to the database 224 using rule and benefit hierarchies
260, 360 created
by the composer engine 200, as further described below; a member enrolment and
management
process 406 for enrolling providers 15, patients 14, patient groupings (e.g.
companies and other
organizations), etc.; a provider update process 408 for maintaining relevant
provider 15
information; a claims receiving process 410 configured to receive the claims
12 from a variety of
provider/patient sources and for distributing the received claims to the
adjudication process 18
for processing by the adjudication engine 40 in view of the appropriate
deployed plan(s) 42
stored in the memory 224; a claims management process 412 for reviewing by a
review engine
50 the performance of the adjudication process 18 (e.g. level of received
claims 12 that had
specified types of error(s) during the adjudication process 18) and for
modifying 414 the
deployed plan 42 and potentially the rules creation process (i.e. operation of
the composer engine
200) based on the results generated by the review engine 50; and an inquiry
process 416 for
providing status and other historical process information for the claims 12
(e.g. reports for
transacted claims 12 ¨ e.g. EOBs - as well as status for claim transactions in
progress). It is
recognised that all of the processes of the business management process 400
can be coupled for
- 35 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
interaction with one or more memories 224 (e.g. databases), in order to access
data required for
implementation of the respective process as well as to store the results of
the respective process.
[00125] Further, as shown in Figure 1, it is recognised that the
components of the business
management process 400 can communicate with one another via one or more
communication
networks 11, including otherwise than as shown. Further, it is recognised that
the interactions
between the components and/or between the components and the database(s) 224
can be message
based (e.g. request ¨ response), such that or each class of message that forms
part of the
workflow of the process 400 can be defined as a message that carries out the
required steps for
the process triggered by the workflow. The result of the completion of the
workflow in response
to the request message can be a synchronous or asynchronous response message
returned to the
requestor (or forwarded to another recipient as configured/defined/specified).
For example, an
application or functional acknowledgement can be returned in response to the
request message.
Plan Management Engine 44
[00126] Referring to Figure 17, shown is an example deployment process 420
for
implementation by the plan engine 44, for using the hierarchies 260,360 (e.g.
association of
defined blocks 226,228,326,328, references 227,229,327,329, rules 100,
benefits 130, and links
240) developed by the composer engine 200. The deployment process 420 can be
implemented
as a Batch/Real-time process for providing the deployed plans 42 to the
database 224 for use by
the adjudication engine in processing of the received claims 12. Accordingly,
newly
published/assigned plans 42or changes/modifications to existing plans 42 are
replicated to
database 224, so the engine 40 can adjudicate accordingly. As discussed above,
the deployed
plan can consist of a list of, such as but not limited to: Adjudication Rules
100 (embodied in the
hierarchy 260), a list of Service Codes 103 (embodied in the hierarchy 360), a
Fee Guide and a
set of "fiscal" and other type parameters, for example. For example, the plan
42 defines a set of
criteria that need to be checked to determine if a particular service code 103
or package code can
be carried out (e.g. on a tooth). An example is that a tooth must exist in
order for it to be
extracted. The criteria are implemented in the rules 100, such that
application of the rules 100 via
the hierarchy 260 (i.e. by the adjudication engine 40) are used to determine
whether a given
- 36 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
service code 103 can be paid by the plan 42, in view of the level of detailed
claim information
(e.g. claim content) submitted in the claim 12.
[00127] It is recognised the role of the composer engine 200 in the
environment 10 is to
facilitate Adjudication Rules List Creation to define and combine rule 100
into defined rule
Blocks 226,228.(e.g. rule hierarchies 260) and Service Code Coverage List
Creation to define
and combine Service Codes 103 into defined Benefit Blocks 326,328 .(e.g.
benefit hierarchies
360. The role of the plan engine 44 in the environment 10 is to facilitate the
assembly of various
blocks 226,228,326,328, rules 100, and benefits 103 from the created
hierarchies 260,360 (e.g.
used as template hierarchies 260, 360) of the composer engine 200 and then to
customize the
template hierarchies 260, 360 through modification (e.g. addition, deletion,
override, etc.) of the
included blocks 226,228,326,328, rules 100, and benefits 103 in the plan
hierarchies 260, 360
customized for a specific carrier 231, provider 15, and/or class of recipient
14. This modification
can be implemented by a user (e.g. plan administrator) of the plan engine 44
via the specification
of parameters and new/changes to the references 227,229,327,329, rules 100,
benefits 130, and
links 240 of the template hierarchies 260,360 created by the composer engine
200. Once
finalized, i.e. the modification of the template hierarchies 260,360 is
completed, the plan 42
containing the modified hierarchies 260,360 is stored in the database 224 as
the deployed plan
42, for subsequent use by the adjudication engine 40. It is recognised that
the functionality and
modules of the engines 44,200 can be as shown, combined, and/or further
subdivided other than
as shown, as desired. It is also recognised that the engines 44, 200 can be
hosted on the same or
different computer devices 101. For example, the engines 44, 200 could be
hosted on a server
device 101 for access over the network 11 by a client device 101 of a user of
the functionality of
the engines 44, 200.
[00128] Further , it is recognised that any impact on Overrides can be
determined at the
level of the change and lower. For example, for a Member Plan Change ¨ only
the overrides at
the Member + Recipient level could be impacted. (etc.). The impact on
Overrides can be to
those override at a lower level that may not include the Plan Assignment. The
Level can inherit
the Plan Assignment from the level of the Change. For Example: a Plan
Assignment change at a
Class Level can have an impact on all Member records in the same Class, which
do not have a
Plan Assignment at the Member Level but do have Plan Overrides Assigned.
- 37 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00129] It is also recognised that related Overrides are any overrides
using a block label
that existed in the 'old' plan'and' in the 'new' plan. Un-related overrides
can be any overrides
using a block label that existed in the 'old' plan and NOT in the 'new' plan.
Benefit Coverage
Overrides may not be identifiable in this process as they are carried over to
the New Plan to
remain active. The Overrides available for 're-open' can be those that belong
to the Old Plan and
have the same Expiry Date as the Old Plan Expiry Date.
[00130] It is also recognised that the modification to the blocks
226,228,326,328 content,
via the references 227,229,327,329 can be dated to have an override effective
and/or expiry date.
Accordingly, these modifications (e.g. as embodied in the references
227,229,327,329) are
considered temporary modifications (e.g. overrides) as the configuration of
the hierarchy
260,360 will revert back to the pre-modified state when the chronological date
is outside of the
override effective and/or expiry date. Further, upon accessing the information
details of the
existing plan 42 and/or template hierarchies 260,360, the plan engine 44 can
provide for a
display on the interface 102 all current and/or previous overrides and their
associated
effective/expiry date(s), where available, to the user of the plan engine 44.
Parameter Values 52
[00131] Carriers 231 that want to include or exclude service codes 103
from a plan 42
(e.g. a plan not yet deployed however is loosely defined using the hierarchies
260,360 created
by the composer engine 200) can create lists of inclusions and exclusions for
use by the plan
engine 44 when creating the final plan 42 for deployment. The inclusions and
exclusions can
become parameters 52 of the deployed plan 42. This can inhibit the need to
create new package
identifiers for each Carrier 231. A deployed plan 42 contains a number of
"fiscal" parameters 52
that determine how the claim 12 will be adjudicated. Items such as co-
insurance, maximum and
COB are examples of "fiscal" parameters 52. Parameterized Values 52 can be
used to minimize
hard-coding and maximize component re-use of the rule and benefit objects
created by the
composer engine 200. Parameterized values 52 can be defined globally but they
can be assigned
to plan and/or as override parameters 52 in the hierarchies 260,360. It is
recognised that literal
values 112, operators 110, and parameter values 114, as shown in Figures
5a,5b, are hereafter
referred to as parameters 52.
- 38 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00132] Example override details (e.g. parameters 52) of the template
hierarchies 260,360
can be details such as but not limited to: Elig. Prof. $ - the amount
determined to be eligible after
plan coverage and rules, but prior to the application of deductibles,
coinsurance and maximum;
Lab Elig. $ - the amount determined to be eligible after plan coverage and
rules, but prior to the
application of deductibles, coinsurance and maximum; Exp. Elig. $ - the amount
determined to
be eligible after plan coverage and rules, but prior to the application of
deductibles, coinsurance
and maximum; Ded. Prof $ - the amount of the deductible applied (professional
eligible amount,
labl eligible amount, and lab2 eligible amount); Coins. % - the percentage at
which the claim
item was adjudicated; Max $ - the out of pocket amount due to a reduction in
payment because a
plan maximum was reached; Lab Ben. $ - the amount payable (after deductible,
coinsurance and
maximum) for the Lab amount portion of the claimed professional fee; Exp. Ben
$ - the amount
payable (after deductible, coinsurance and maximum) for the Expense amount
portion of the
claimed professional fee; Benefit Amount - the amount payable (after
deductible, coinsurance
and maximum) for the Professional amount portion of the of the claimed
Professional Benefit
amount; Adjudicated Service Code - enables the user to override the
adjudicated service code
that was used; and the estimated Benefit Amount.
Member Categories 54
[00133] Referring to Figure 18, shown are example Groups / Divisions /
Units or
Members for selection by the plan engine 44 in assigning the deployed plans 42
to, as well as
modification of some of the Plan Parameters 52 in the deployed plan 42, for
the deployment
process 404 (see Figure 16). For example, carriers 231 wish to have Plans 42
set up for groups
within a company or an organization. Each group can be made up of members and
their
dependents. Members are be enrolled with the Carrier 231 before they can be
assigned a plan 42,
or can be dynamically assigned, as desired, such as upon the delivery of the
member's first claim
12 to the adjudication process 18. Typically the plan 42 is assigned/deployed
to a group;
occasionally the plan 42 is assigned/deployed to a member or dependent.
[00134] The member categories 54 include member types such as but not
limited to:
carrier 231; company; department; unit; subscriber; and recipient 14. It is
recognized that the
modifications implemented by the plan engine 44 can be associated/assigned to
each/any of the
- 39 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
member category types 54, as desired. For example, the plan engine 44 can
modify the template
hierarchies 260,360 in order to make deployed plans 42 specific to different
individual recipients
14 (e.g. company president, floor supervisor, shop floor worker), such that
the various
maximums, minimums, services, products, etc. of the deployed plan 42 have
customized
parameter values 52 and/or blocks 226,228,326,328, and/or references
227,229,327,329, and/or
rules 100, and/or benefits 130, and/or links 240 specific to the individual.
It is recognised that
this level of customization afforded by use of the template hierarchies
260,360, through
modification by the plan engine 44, provides for ease of customization for
plan 42 deployment
(and redeployment in the case of modifying an existing deployed plan 42). It
is also recognised
that the use of the containers and references structure of the hierarchies
260,360 provides for
reuse of the basic defined rules 100 and benefits 103 through creation of
multiple instances and
combinations of those instances. Accordingly, the update of rule 100 and/or
benefit 103
content/logic is more easily propagated through all of the various deployed
plans 42 that use the
updated rule 100 and/or benefit 103 (for example done via the composer engine
200 in the event
of a government and/or carrier policy change).
[00135]
The Plan engine 44 can create, modify, and/or maintain the plan components
that
the plan 42 is composed of. Referring to Figure 19, the plan engine 44 can
have a number of
components to facilitate modification of the hierarchies 260, 360 obtained
from the memory 224
(e.g. template hierarchies 260,360 provided by the composer engine 200, a
deployed plan having
previously configured hierarchies 260,360, etc.). For example, the plan engine
44 has a data
module 440 for obtaining the hierarchies 260, 360 (e.g. from the database 224)
and for storing
them in a local memory 428; a deployment module 438 for deploying the modified
hierarchies
260,360 as the deployed plan in the memory 224; a benefit module for accessing
the hierarchy
360 and for updating the contents of the associated benefits 103, blocks
326,328 and references
327,329; a rule module 432 for accessing the hierarchy 260 and for updating
the contents of the
associated rules 100, blocks 226,228 and references 227,229; a parameter
module for updating
the parameters 52 of the hierarchies 260,360, for example using ranges of
predefined parameters
52 stored in a memory 435 (e.g. a series of parameter tables or other data
construct associated
with various carriers and/or governmental agencies); and an assignment module
430 for
assigning the appropriate member categories 54 to elements (e.g. blocks,
rules, benefits, etc.) of
the hierarchies 260,360. It is shown that the modules 430,432,434 communicate
via the module
- 40 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
436 with the contents of the memory 428, however it is recognised that the
modules 430,432,434
can communicate directly with the contents of the memory 428, as desired. Once
deployed, the
plan 42 is available for use by the adjudication engine 40 for processing the
received claims 12.
[00136] Each of the plan 42 components references potentially many
parameterized values
52 with default values that can be overridden by Plan engine 44 in the act of
publishing/deploying the plan 42, including potential override by the Plan
Assignment module
436 in the act of assigning the to be deployed plan 42 to one or more specific
enrolment entities.
The components of the plan 42 can include components of the hierarchies
260,360 such as but
not limited to: Benefit Super Block 326 for Coverage that can be used to
determine if a specific
benefit 103 is covered under the plan 42 or not; Benefit Super Block 326 for
Adjudication Logic
that can be used to restrict the allowable choices for parameterized values 52
of type benefit
block 328 ¨ adjudication logic, such as those used in predefined interaction
rules, where this type
of block 326 can be ignored by the adjudication engine 40 and therefore used
as a convenience
for the Plan Manager and Plan Assignment user interfaces 102 of the plan
engine 44 (e.g. if not
set, all benefit blocks 326,328 are displayed as plan components for potential
modification);
Benefit Super Block 326 for Plan that can be used to restrict the allowable
choices for
parameterized values 52 of type benefit block ¨ plan, such as those used by
coinsurances or
frequency rules 100, where this type of block 226 can be ignored by the
adjudication engine 40
and therefore used as a convenience for the Plan Manager and Plan Assignment
user interfaces
102 of the plan engine 44 (if not set, all benefit blocks 326,328 are
displayed as plan components
for potential modification); Rule Super Block 226 for Adjudication Logic can
be used to select
the complete adjudication logic built using Rules Composer engine 200; Rule
Super Block 226
for Carrier Specific Adjudication Logic that can be used to select the carrier
231 specific
adjudication logic built using Rules Composer engine 200, if any is used;
and/or other blocks
226,228,326,328 and references 227,229,327,329, as desired.
Benefit module 430
[00137] Referring to Figures 19 and 20, this sub-component or perspective
within the Plan
engine 44 is used to add/delete/modify the grouping of the benefits 103
appropriately into the
benefit blocks 328. These blocks 328 are then included and/or excluded
together to form the top
-41-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
level benefit super block(s) 326. The block(s) 326for coverage type defines
the list of covered
benefits 103. The block(s) 326 are used for various purposes depending on its
type for coverage,
adjudication logic, or plan. The coverage override type defines those benefits
103 that are being
included or excluded for the specific benefit override being assigned, e.g.
via the Assignment
module 436.Each benefit 103 can be added/modified/deleted, if needed, using
the functionality
and modules of the composer engine 200 (e.g. using a business grammar that is
supported by a
rule evaluation adjudication engine module within the adjudication engine 40).
[00138] For example, using the module 430, the user can gain access to
plan details, such
as but not limited to: Plan Id - Plan Name ¨ Plan Description; Benefit Super
Block ¨ Coverage;
Super Benefit Block Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Benefit Super Block ¨ Plan; Super
Benefit Block
Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Benefit Super Block ¨ Adjudication; Super Benefit
Block Id ¨
Benefit Block Name; Coverage tab, Provincial Plan information, Consultant
Review
requirements, and carrier 231 Alternate Coverage information; Pricing
information; Year (e.g.
effective/expiry dates of the plan 42; Specialty (e.g. dental, vision, drug,
etc.); Province or other
regional jurisdiction; Adjudication Rules via the super blocks 226; and/or
Fiscal
information/parameters 52.
[00139] It is recognised that for each of the accessed plan details on the
user interface 102,
the module 430 can display the appropriate Super Block ID & Name; and
associated appropriate
Rule Block ID & Name. It is also recognised that the modification of the
hierarchy 360
information would include changes to the references 327,329 of the benefit
objects, including
changes such as but not limited to: changes in the effective date of the
references 327,329;
changes in the expiry date of the references 327,329; changes in the benefit
object version
associated with the references 327,329; changes to the definition content of
the benefit codes 103
and/or the benefit blocks 328; and/or inclusion or exclusion of the references
327,329 in the
respective block 326,328, as well as changes to the ordering of the references
327,329 in the
respective block 326,328.
[00140] For example, the module 430 can be used to modify benefits 103
within the block
328, add/delete Benefit Code(s) 103 to a Block 328, add/delete Blocks 328 to a
super block 326,
add/remove Benefit Code(s) 103 from a Block 326, set Expiry Date for
Benefit(s) in a Block
- 42 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
328, Set Effective Date for Benefits 103 in a Block 328, set Expiry Date for
block(s) 328 listed
in a Block 326, Set Effective Date for block(s) 328 listed in a Block 326. It
is recognised that, as
described above, the inclusion of blocks 328 in blocks 326 and the benefits
103 in blocks 328 is
coordinated in the hierarchy 360 via the listing of the references 327,329 in
the appropriate
blocks 326,328.
[00141] If finished, then the deployment module 438 can be used to save
the modified
Plan 42 and then the saved plan 42 is deployed to the database 224.
Rule module 432
[00142] Referring to Figures 19 and 20, this sub-component or perspective
within the Plan
engine 44 is used to add/modify/delete the rules that implement the actual
complex business
logic within the adjudication engine 40. These rules 100 are then included
and/or excluded
together and are grouped (via modifications to the references 227) into the
rule blocks 228.
These blocks 228 are in turn are then included and/or excluded together and
grouped (via
modifications to the references 229) into one or more rule super block 226,
which can define the
complete set of business logic to be evaluated (e.g. including order of
execution of the listed
blocks 228) when this specific block 226is selected. Each rule 100 can be
added/modified/deleted, if needed, using the functionality and modules of the
composer engine
200 (e.g. using a business grammar that is supported by a rule evaluation
adjudication engine
module within the adjudication engine 40).
[00143] For example, using the module 430, the user can gain access to
plan details, such
as but not limited to: Plan Id - Plan Name ¨ Plan Description; Benefit Super
Block¨ Coverage;
Super Benefit Block Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Benefit Super Block ¨ Plan; Super
Benefit Block
Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Benefit Super Block ¨ Adjudication; Super Benefit
Block Id ¨
Benefit Block Name; Coverage tab, Provincial Plan information, Consultant
Review
requirements, and carrier 231 Alternate Coverage information; Pricing
information; Year (e.g.
effective/expiry dates of the plan 42; Specialty (e.g. dental, vision, drug,
etc.); Province or other
regional jurisdiction; Adjudication Rules via the super blocks 226; and/or
Fiscal
information/parameters 52.
-43 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00144] It is recognised that for each of the accesed plan details on the
user interface 102,
the module 430 can display the appropriate Super Block ID & Name; and
associated appropriate
Rule Block ID & Name. It is also recognised that the modification of the
hierarchy 260
information would include changes to the references 227,229 of the benefit
objects, including
changes such as but not limited to: changes in the effective date of the
references 227,229;
changes in the expiry date of the references 227,229; changes in the benefit
object version
associated with the references 227,229; changes to the definition content of
the rules 100 and/or
the benefit blocks 228 (e.g. selecting specific versions 300 of the rule
objects ¨ e.g. rules 100);
and/or inclusion or exclusion of the references 227,229 in the respective
block 226,228, as well
as changes to the ordering of the references 227,229 in the respective block
226,228.
[00145] For example, the module 432 can be used to modify rules 100 within
the block
228, add/delete rules 100 to a Block 228, add/delete Blocks 228 to a super
block 226,
add/remove rules 100 from a Block 226, set Expiry Date for rules 100 in a
Block 228, Set
Effective Date for rules 100 in a Block 228, set Expiry Date for block(s) 228
listed in a Block
226, Set Effective Date for block(s) 228 listed in a Block 226, and add/delete
versions 300 of the
rule objects in the corresponding blocks 226,228. It is recognised that, as
described above, the
inclusion of blocks 228 in blocks 226 and the rules 100 in blocks 228 is
coordinated in the
hierarchy 260 via the listing of the references 227,229 in the appropriate
blocks 226,228.
[00146] If finished, then the deployment module 438 can be used to save
the modified
Plan 42 and then the saved plan 42 is deployed to the database 224.
Parameter module 434
[00147] Referring to Figures 19 and 20, this sub-component or perspective
within the Plan
engine 44 is used to add/delete/modify or otherwise define the parameterized
values 52 used
within rules 100 and benefits 103, as well as the references 227,229,327,329
where appropriate.
This modification of the parameters 52 provides for a generic set of rules
100/ benefits 103 to be
defined (e.g. the template hierarchies 260,360) and then reused with different
specific values 52
that are assigned/associated for plan 42 deployment.
-44 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00148] It is recognised that the override of the Effective date of the
references
227,229,327,329 may not be prior to the 'inherited' Plan 42 Effective Date and
may not be after
the Plan 42 Expiry Date. Further, the override Expiry Date may not be prior to
the 'inherited'
Plan 42 Effective Date and may not be after the Plan 42 Expiry Date.
Accordingly, the
created/modified Date Range must be within the Plan 42 Effective and Expiry
Date Range.
Assignment module 436
[00149] Referring to Figures 19 and 20, this sub-component or perspective
within the Plan
engine 44 is used to add/delete/modify (e.g. override values, override
references
227,229,327,329, etc.) the member categories 54 that are associated with the
plan 42 to be
deployed. For example, before the Plan Assignment Process can begin, the User
of the plan
engine 44 determines at what level the Plan Assignment is to be performed
(e.g. Carrier, Group,
Division, Unit/Class, Member, Recipient of the categories 54). The User
determines which of
the existing Base Plans 42 (e.g. template hierarchies 260,360, already
deployed plans 42, etc.)
are most appropriate to use. The User determines what 'overrides' to the Base
Plan are desired.
[00150] For example, depending on whether or not it is a Single Plan
Assignment or a
Bulk Plan Assignment will determine what path to Select. For example, for a
Single Member-
Recipient Assignment, the user can perform a Member Enrolment search until the
appropriate
record is found. Once the record is selected, the user can request Plan
Assignment via the
module 436 and be presented with the Plan Assignment screen 102 to enter in
the details. For a
Single Assignment to a record within the Group Hierarchy
(Group/Division/Class), the user can
perform a Group Enrolment search until the appropriate record is found. Once
the record is
selected, the user can request the Plan Assignment via the module 436 and be
presented with the
Plan Assignment screen 102 to enter in the details. For a Bulk Plan
Assignment, the User can
input the details of the appropriate level desired via the module 436, e.g.
Insurer + Group +
Division, Or Insurer + Group + Class. The user can then be presented with a
data entry screen
102, which provides for the user to enter the appropriate Division/Class codes
via the module
436. Once the keyed list is complete, the user can select the Plan Assignment
screen 102 and
enter in the details via the module 436.
Review Engine 50
- 45 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00151] Referring to Figure 16, shown is an example claims management
process 412 for
reviewing by a review engine 50 the performance of the adjudication process 18
(e.g. level of
received claims 12 that had specified types of error(s) during the
adjudication process 18) and for
modifying/revising 414 the deployed plan 42 and potentially the rules creation
process (i.e.
operation of the composer engine 200) via updates/revisions 55 (see Figure 22)
based on the
results generated by the review engine 50. It is recognised that based on the
potential for
revision/reconfiguration of the hierarchies 260,360, via the review engine 50,
in view of the
analysis of the queued claim 12, it is understood that iterative
updates/revisions 55 of the
hierarchies 260,360 (e.g. of the plan(s) 42) may provide for increases in auto
adjudication levels
for the received claims 12, in view of iterative updates/revisions 55 of the
hierarchies 260,360
based on claim review (by a claim module 536 ¨ see Figure 24), of the claims
12 submitted to
the claims queue 53.
[00152] Referring to Figure 22, shown is an example interaction of system
10
components, including the engines 44,50,200 with one another and with content
(e.g. plans 24
and hierarchies 260,360) in the database 224. It is recognised that the review
engine 50
coordinates any updates/revisions 55 to deployed plans 42 and/or to the
template hierarchies
260,360 (i.e. those created by the composer engine 200) used in the
development of the deployed
plans 42.
[00153] It is recognised that the update/revision information/data 55 can
be performed
directly by the review engine 50, can be sent to the composer engine 200 to
facilitate
review/updates performed by the composer engine 200, can be sent to the plan
engine 200 to
facilitate review/updates performed by the plan engine 200, or a combination
thereof. Also, it is
recognised that the updates and/or revisions 55 can be performed on a claim 12
by claim 12 basis
(e.g. using manual overrides specific only to that claim 12 instance), can be
performed on the
plan 42 itself that is associated with the reviewed claim (e.g. the plan data
¨ including the plan
hierarchies 260,360), and/or can be performed on the template hierarchies
260,360 (e.g. those
hierarchies 260,360 used to develop the plan 42 under review).
[00154] Referring to Figure 23, shown are example processes 412,414 for
implementation
by the review engine 50, for facilitating the revision 55 of the hierarchies
260,360 /plan 42 (e.g.
-46 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
association of defined blocks 226,228,326,328, references 227,229,327,329,
rules 100, benefits
130, and links 240 ¨ see Figure 10) developed by the composer engine 200
and/or plan engine
44, in response to analysis of claims 12 forwarded to a claims queue 53 by the
adjudication
engine 40 (for currently pended claims 12) and/or an administration entity
(not shown) that is
responsible for quality control/audit procedures of already transacted claims
12 (e.g. no longer in
the adjudication process 18). The processes 412,414 can be implemented as
Batch or Real-time
processes for providing the revised/updated plans 42 and/or template/generic
hierarchies 260,360
to the database 224, for use by the adjudication engine 40 in processing of
the subsequently
received claims 12, for use by the plan engine 44 for making changes (e.g. in
the assignment of)
the revised plan 42, and/or for use by the composer engine 200 for making
changes to the
template hierarchies 260,360.
[00155] Accordingly, changes/modifications to existing plans 42 and/or the
template
hierarchies 260,360 are replicated to database 224, so the engine 40 can
adjudicate accordingly
with the revised plan 42. As discussed, the revised plan 42 can consist of
revised items, such as
but not limited to: Adjudication Rules 100 (embodied in the hierarchy 260), a
list of Service
Codes 103 (embodied in the hierarchy 360), a Fee Guide and a set of "fiscal"
and other type
parameters, for example. For example, the revised plan 42 defines a set of
criteria that need to be
checked to determine if a particular service code 103 or package code can be
carried out (e.g. on
a tooth). An example is that a tooth must exist in order for it to be
extracted. The criteria are
implemented in the rules 100, such that application of the rules 100 via the
hierarchy 260 (i.e. by
the adjudication engine 40) are used to determine whether a given service code
103 (as defined
in the hierarchy 360) can be paid by the revised plan 42, in view of the
reviewed level of detailed
claim information (e.g. claim content) in the reviewed claim 12 or claims 12.
[00156] It is recognised the role of the composer engine 200 in the
environment 10 is to
facilitate Adjudication Rules List Creation to define and combine rule 100
into defined rule
Blocks 226,228.(e.g. rule hierarchies 260) and Service Code Coverage List
Creation to define
and combine Service Codes 103 into defined Benefit Blocks 326,328 .(e.g.
benefit hierarchies
360, for example for use as template hierarchies 260,360 for use in plan 42
customization and
deployment, as described above. Further, the role of the plan engine 44 in the
environment 10 is
to facilitate the assembly of various blocks 226,228,326,328, rules 100, and
benefits 103 from
-47 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
the created hierarchies 260,360 (e.g. used as template hierarchies 260, 360)
of the composer
engine 200 and then to customize the template hierarchies 260, 360 through
modification (e.g.
addition, deletion, override, etc.) of the included blocks 226,228,326,328,
rules 100, and benefits
103 in the plan hierarchies 260, 360 customized for a specific carrier 231,
provider 15, and/or
class of recipient 14. This modification can be implemented by a user (e.g.
plan administrator)
of the plan engine 44 via the specification of parameters and new/changes to
the references
227,229,327,329, rules 100, benefits 130, and links 240 of the template
hierarchies 260,360
created by the composer engine 200. Once finalized, i.e. the modification of
the template
hierarchies 260,360 is completed, the plan 42 containing the modified
hierarchies 260,360 is
stored in the database 224 as the deployed plan 42, for subsequent use by the
adjudication engine
40. It is recognised that the functionality and modules of the engines 44,
50,200 can be as
shown, combined, and/or further subdivided other than as shown, as desired. It
is also
recognised that the engines 44, 50, 200 can be hosted on the same or different
computer devices
101. For example, the engines 44, 50, 200 could be hosted on a server device
101 for access
over the network 11 by a client device 101 of a user of the functionality of
the engines 44, 50,
200.
[00157] Further, the role of the review engine 50 in the environment 10 is
to facilitate the
revision 55 of various blocks 226,228,326,328, rules 100, and benefits 103
from the created
hierarchies 260,360 (e.g. used as template hierarchies 260, 360, parameterized
and deployed in
the plan 42 under revision) and then to revise the hierarchies 260, 360
through revision 55 (e.g.
addition, deletion, modification, override, etc.) of the included blocks
226,228,326,328, rules
100, and benefits 103 in the plan hierarchies 260, 360 customized for a
specific carrier 231,
provider 15, and/or class of recipient 14. This revision 55 of the hierarchies
260,360 is done in
view of errors or other deficiencies recognised/identified in claims 12
obtained from the claims
queue 53, and can be implemented by a user (e.g. plan/claim administrator) of
the review engine
50 via the revision 55 of parameters 52and revisions/changes 55 to the
references
227,229,327,329, rules 100, benefits 130, and links 240 of the hierarchies
260,360 of the plan 42
under review.
[00158] Once finalized, i.e. the revision 55 of the hierarchies 260,360 is
completed, the
revised plan 42 containing the modified hierarchies 260,360 is stored in the
database 224 as the
-48-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
revised deployed plan 42, for subsequent use by the adjudication engine 40. It
is recognised that
the functionality and modules of the engines 44, 50, 200 can be as shown,
combined, and/or
further subdivided other than as shown, as desired. It is also recognised that
the engines 44, 50,
200 can be hosted on the same or different computer devices 101. For example,
the engines 44,
50, 200 could be hosted on a server device 101 for access over the network 11
by a client device
101 of a user of the functionality of the engines 44, 50, 200.
Queues 53
[00159] The claims 12 for review can be forwarded to the claims queue 53
by the
adjudication engine 40 (for currently pended claims 12) and/or an
administration entity (not
shown) that is responsible for quality control/audit procedures of already
transacted claims 12
(e.g. no longer in the adjudication process 18). There can be 2 types of
workflow queues,
personal and group (of adjudicator) based queues. When claims 12 are pended by
the
adjudication engine 40, they are put into group based queues 53. People can be
assigned group
based queues 53 and can use 'the engine 50 functionality to pull the claim 12
off the general
queue 53 for subsequent review. It is also recognised that the engine 50 can
be automated to pull
any claims 12 off the queue 53 for subsequent analysis/review by the modules
of the engine 50,
e.g. a personal review.
[00160] The queue 53 can also contain claims 12 submitted due to potential
fraud
considerations, as identified by the engine 40 and/or other third party
entities (not shown) of the
environment 10. As further described below, anti-Fraud determination of claims
12 in the queue
53 can be managed by a screen(s) 102 in the review engine 50. This can be a
table driven feature
with a custom module in the engine 50 to execute the logic for review and
possible
revision/reconfiguration of the claim 12 and/or the hierarchies 260,360
associated with the claim
12 (e.g. through the modules 536,530,532,534, for example). The table data can
be updated in
real-time, and it is understood that Anti-Fraud can sometimes make mistakes
and either miss, or
catch too many claims 12, at least initially. However, based on the potential
for
revision/reconfiguration of the hierarchies 260,360, via the review engine 50,
in view of the
analysis of the queued claim 12, it is understood that iterative
updates/revisions 55 of the
hierarchies 260,360 (e.g. of the plan(s) 42) may provide for increases in auto
adjudication levels
- 49 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
for the received claims 12, in view of iterative updates/revisions 55 of the
hierarchies 260,360
based on claim review (by a claim module 536 ¨ see Figure 24) of the claims 12
submitted to the
claims queue 53.
[00161] Further, the contents of the claims queue 53 can also be based on
claims 12
submitted to the queue 53 for Quality Control purposes. For example, the
environment 10 could
be configured to see a certain % of claims 12 touched by each adjudicator
and/or the adjudication
engine 40. The actual number of claims 12chosen for submission to the claims
queue 53 due to
QC can be based on some time period.
[00162] It is recognised that the contents of the claim queue 53 can be
submitted based on
an automated, semi-automated, and/or manual claim selection process. In the
case of an
automated process, the adjudication engine 40 submits claims 12 to the claims
queue 53 based on
the mismatch of the claim 12 content processing with the plan 42 content
associated with the
claim 12. In the case of manual or semi-automated, the workflow of claims
submitted to the
queue 53 can be managed by an administrator type role (not shown). It is
recognised that, based
on the potential for revision/reconfiguration of the hierarchies 260,360, via
the review engine 50,
in view of the analysis of the queued claim 12, it is understood that
iterative updates/revisions 55
of the hierarchies 260,360 (e.g. of the plan(s) 42) may provide for increases
in auto adjudication
levels for the received claims 12, in view of periodic (e.g. as a result of
the review of the claims
12 over time from the queue 53) iterative updates/revisions 55 of the
hierarchies 260,360 based
on claim review (by a claim module 536 ¨ see Figure 24) of the claims 12
submitted to the
claims queue 53.
Engine 50 Modules
[00163] The engine 50 can revise/reconfigure (e.g. create, modify, and/or
maintain) the
plan components that the plan 42 is composed of, in view of the review results
of the claim(s) 12
obtained from the claim queue 53. Referring to Figure 24, the engine 50 can
have a number of
components to facilitate revision of the hierarchies 260, 360 obtained from
the memory 224 (e.g.
template hierarchies 260,360 provided by the composer engine 200, a deployed
plan having
previously configured hierarchies 260,360, etc.). For example, the engine 50
has a claim module
536 for obtaining the claim(s) 12 from the claim queue 53 and for analysing
any errors identified
- 50 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
in the obtained claim(s) 12. For example, the errors identified in the
obtained claim(s) 12 can be
one or more error categories such as but not limited to: claims adjudication ¨
review claims 12
pended from the engine 40; quality control ¨ verify accuracy of transacted
claims 12 touched by
claims adjudicators and/or the engine 40; and/or anti-fraud ¨ review claims
flagged as (possibly)
fraudulent. The engine 50 can also have a validation module 538 for
facilitating validation of the
revisions/reconfigurations 55 of the hierarchies 260,360 associated with the
claims 12 received
from the queue 53. Further, the engine 50 can have a data module 540 for
obtaining the
hierarchies 260, 360 (e.g. from the database 224) and for storing them in a
local memory 528 (for
example) for subsequent revision/reconfiguration using the updates 55.
[00164] Further, the engine 50 can have a deployment module 538 for
deploying the
modified hierarchies 260,360 as the deployed plan in the memory 224, a benefit
module 530 for
accessing the hierarchy 360 and for updating the contents of the associated
benefits 103, blocks
326,328 and references 327,329 based on the generated
revisions/reconfigurations 55 of the
claims module 536 in view of the analysis of the claim(s) 12 obtained from the
queue 53.
Further, the engine 50 can have a rule module 532 for accessing the hierarchy
260 and for
updating the contents of the associated rules 100, blocks 226,228 and
references 227,229 based
on the generated revisions/reconfigurations 55 of the claims module 536 in
view of the analysis
of the claim(s) 12 obtained from the queue 53. Further, the engine 50 can have
a parameter
module 534 for updating the parameters 52 of the hierarchies 260,360, for
example using ranges
of predefined parameters 52 stored in a memory 535 (e.g. a series of parameter
tables or other
data construct associated with various carriers and/or governmental agencies)
based on the
generated revisions/reconfigurations 55 of the claims module 536 in view of
the analysis of the
claim(s) 12 obtained from the queue 53. It is shown that the modules
530,532,534 communicate
via the module 538 with the contents of the memory 528, however it is
recognised that the
modules 530,532,534 can communicate directly with the contents of the memory
528, as desired.
Once deployed, the revised plan 42 is available for use by the adjudication
engine 40 for
processing the received claims 12 and/or for reprocessing the appropriate
claims 12 from the
queue 53.
[00165] It is recognised that the modules 530,532,534 can be referred to
collectively as
reconfiguration modules.
- 51 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00166] Each of the plan 42 components references potentially many
parameterized values
52 with default values that can be revised by engine 50 in the act of
reconfiguring and deploying
the revised plan 42. The components of the plan 42 can include components of
the hierarchies
260,360 such as but not limited to: Benefit Super Block 326 for Coverage that
can be used to
determine if a specific benefit 103 is covered under the plan 42 or not;
Benefit Super Block 326
for Adjudication Logic that can be used to restrict the allowable choices for
parameterized values
52 of type benefit block 328 ¨ adjudication logic, such as those used in
predefined interaction
rules, where this type of block 326 can be ignored by the adjudication engine
40 and therefore
used as a convenience for the Plan Manager and Plan Assignment user interfaces
102 of the
engine 50 (e.g. if not set, all benefit blocks 326,328 are displayed as plan
components for
potential revision); Benefit Super Block 326 for Plan that can be used to
restrict the allowable
revision choices for parameterized values 52 of type benefit block ¨ plan,
such as those used by
coinsurances or frequency rules 100, where this type of block 226 can be
ignored by the
adjudication engine 40 and therefore used as a convenience for the Plan
Manager and Plan
Assignment user interfaces 102 of the engine 50 (if not set, all benefit
blocks 326,328 are
displayed as plan components for potential revision); Rule Super Block 226 for
Adjudication
Logic can be used to select the complete adjudication logic built using Rules
Composer engine
200; Rule Super Block 226 for Carrier Specific Adjudication Logic that can be
used to select the
carrier 231 specific adjudication logic built using Rules Composer engine 200,
if any is used;
and/or other blocks 226,228,326,328 and references 227,229,327,329, as
desired.
[00167] It is recognised that the modules 530, 532, 534 can be hosted
independently by
the review engine 50 and/or can be hosted by the other engine(s) 44, 200 and
therefore called by
the engine 50, when needed. For example, the review engine 50 can use the
functionality of the
composer engine 200, when updates/revisions 55 are applied to the rules 100,
benefits 103,
blocks 227,228,327,328, and/or the references 227,229,327,329, as desired.
Claim Module 536
[00168] The claim module 536 is configured for obtaining the claim(s) 12
from the claim
queue 55 and for analysing any errors identified in the obtained claim(s) 12.
For example, the
errors identified in the obtained claim(s) 12 can be one or more error
categories such as but not
- 52 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
limited to: claims adjudication ¨ review claims 12 pended from the engine 40;
quality control ¨
verify accuracy of transacted claims 12 touched by claims adjudicators and/or
the engine 40;
and/or anti-fraud ¨ review claims flagged as (possibly) fraudulent. Further,
error levels can be
communicated to the user via the user interface 102 that describes if there
are any problems with
the claim 12 (e.g. identified by the adjudication engine 40). Based on the
error level of the
response (> 0) various revision/reconfiguration actions can be taken by the
claim module 536.
[00169] Referring to Figure 25, the claim module 536 provides the details
of the Claim(s)
12 (e.g. pended) to the user interface 102. the use of the engine 50 can, for
example, review the
claim information 550, procedure information 552, associated parameter 52
information 554, as
well as any rule 100 and/or benefit 103 information 556 (e.g. any aspect of
the hierarchies
260,360 content that is related to the particular information 550,552,554
being reviewed in
association with the identified error and/or quality control/anti-fraud reason
for the claim 12
being submitted to the claim queue 53.
[00170] For example, view and potential edit ability the following
Procedure List 552 can
be performed by the user in consultation with the user interface 102, namely:
Actions; Engine
Messages ¨ Exemptions; EOB Correspondence; View Eligibility; View Transaction
Details; and/
or View Claim Experience. For example, the screen 102 can also display the
change list as a
summary of the revisions 55, including such as but not limited to; User ¨
identifies who made the
data change; Date ¨ identifies what date the change was made; Field ¨
identifies the field of the
data change; Old Value 52 or rule 100 or benefit 103 or reference
227,229,327,329 or link 240 ¨
identifies what the Value 52 or rule 100 or benefit 103 or reference
227,229,327,329 or link 240
was before the change; and new Value 52 or rule 100 or benefit 103 or
reference
227,229,327,329 or link 240 ¨ identifies what the Value 52 or rule 100 or
benefit 103 or
reference 227,229,327,329 or link 240 was after the change.
[00171] A claim Actions tab 558, see Figure 25, provides for users of the
engine 50 to
perform various functions against the current claim 12 under review, as
obtained from the queue
53. The available actions 558 can depend on the current user's role and the
claim's 12 current
state. Saving information on the Actions tab can automatically save changes to
the hierarchies
260,360 associated with the reviewed claim 12 (e.g. data concerning
Eligibility, Member
- 53 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Eligibility, Pre-determination, and Claim Details, for example). To perform an
action on the
reviewed claim 12, the user, for example: under services, clicks to select
Claim 12; opens the
claim 12 on which one wants to perform the action (e.g.
revisions/reconfigurations 55; selects the
Actions tab, where the current user's role and the claim's current state can
dictate the available
actions (e.g. the degree and what ability to implement changes to the claim 12
and/or the
associated hierarchies 260,360); clicks to select the appropriate action, and
enters/selects any
necessary changes (e.g. parameter 52, references 227,229,327,329, etc.); and
clicks Save to save
the changes as the updates/revisions 55.
[00172] Other revisions/reconfigurations 55 possible are for Merge/Unmerge
of Patients
14 in the plan 42. For example, The engine 50 can have a screen dedicated to
Merging and
Unmerging patients, where: Merge two (or more) patient records are found to
actually be the
same patient, where merging patients is a matter of choosing one record to use
on a go forward
basis, expire duplicate records and link back to chosen record accordingly
(note, one may need to
evaluate and decide if any claims 12 need to be re-processed because of
revisions/reconfigurations 55 related to the patient merge/unmerge); and
Unmerge where it is
found that a previously performed merge was in fact performed in error and the
records need to
be set back to their original state, involving the steps of update 55 patient
record to make it active
and unlink merge field and update 55 so that it accurately reflects the
products and services
performed for that patient (note - identify any claims 12 that may have to be
re-adjudicated
because of this error situation).
Validation Module 538
[00173] This validation module 538 functionality allows the user to
collect the
revised/reconfigured claim 12 and/or associated hierarchy 260,360 details and
submit them to the
adjudication engine 40, for example. The adjudication results 13 are presented
back to the user to
determine if the changes 55 made resulted in the desired adjudication results.
[00174] The validation module 538 facilitates validation of the
revisions/reconfigurations
55 of the hierarchies 260,360 associated with the claims 12 received from the
queue 53. For
example, the user can save the revisions/reconfigurations 55 done via the
modules 530,532,534
and then send the claim(s) 12 for re-adjudication to the engine 40, using the
revised plan 42
- 54 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
incorporating the revisions/reconfigurations 55. The user can then verify or
otherwise validate
that the re-adjudication claim 12 results are desirable and therefore mark or
otherwise flag (e.g.
release) the associated revisions/reconfigurations 55 as deployed for
subsequent adjudication of
other claims 12 (those not in the queue 53), as desired, or can mark or
otherwise flag (e.g.
release) the revisions/reconfigurations 55 only for use in re-adjudication of
the claims 12
obtained from the queue 53. The adjudication engine 40 will implement the
revised plan 42 for
the claims 12, as dictated by the marking of the revisions/reconfigurations
55.
Benefit module 530
[00175] Referring to Figure 24, this sub-component or perspective within
the engine 50,
for example, is used to add/delete/modify the grouping of the benefits 103
appropriately into the
benefit blocks 328. These blocks 328 are then included and/or excluded
together to form the top
level benefit super block(s) 326. The block(s) 326for coverage type defines
the list of covered
benefits 103. The block(s) 326 are used for various purposes depending on its
type for coverage,
adjudication logic, or plan. The coverage revision type defines those benefits
103 that are being
included or excluded for the specific benefit revision being validated, e.g.
via the validation
module 538.Each benefit 103 can be added/modified/deleted, if needed, using
the functionality
and modules of the engine 50 (e.g. using a business grammar that is supported
by a rule
evaluation adjudication engine module within the adjudication engine 40).
[00176] For example, using the module 530, the user can gain access to and
revise plan
details, such as but not limited to: Plan Id - Plan Name ¨ Plan Description;
Benefit Super Block ¨
Coverage; Super Benefit Block Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Benefit Super Block ¨
Plan; Super
Benefit Block Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Benefit Super Block ¨ Adjudication;
Super Benefit
Block Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Coverage tab, Provincial Plan information,
Consultant Review
requirements, and carrier 231 Alternate Coverage information; Pricing
information; Year (e.g.
effective/expiry dates of the plan 42; Specialty (e.g. dental, vision, drug,
etc.); Province or other
regional jurisdiction; Adjudication Rules via the super blocks 226; and/or
Fiscal
information/parameters 52.
[00177] It is recognised that for each of the accessed/revised plan
details on the user
interface 102, the module 530 can display the appropriate Super Block ID &
Name; and
- 55 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
associated appropriate Rule Block ID & Name. It is also recognised that the
modification of the
hierarchy 360 information would include changes/revisions to the references
327,329 of the
benefit objects, including changes/revisions such as but not limited to:
changes in the effective
date of the references 327,329; changes in the expiry date of the references
327,329; changes in
the benefit object version associated with the references 327,329; changes to
the definition
content of the benefit codes 103 and/or the benefit blocks 328; and/or
inclusion or exclusion of
the references 327,329 in the respective block 326,328, as well as changes to
the ordering of the
references 327,329 in the respective block 326,328.
[00178] For example, the module 530 can be used to revise benefits 103
within the block
328, add/delete Benefit Code(s) 103 to a Block 328, add/delete Blocks 328 to a
super block 326,
add/remove Benefit Code(s) 103 from a Block 326, set Expiry Date for
Benefit(s) in a Block
328, Set Effective Date for Benefits 103 in a Block 328, set Expiry Date for
block(s) 328 listed
in a Block 326, Set Effective Date for block(s) 328 listed in a Block 326. It
is recognised that, as
described above, the inclusion of blocks 328 in blocks 326 and the benefits
103 in blocks 328 is
coordinated in the hierarchy 360 via the listing of the references 327,329 in
the appropriate
blocks 326,328.
[00179] If finished, then the deployment module 538 can be used to save
the modified
Plan 42 and then the revised plan 42 is deployed to the database 224.
[00180] Overrides (e.g. updates/revisions 55) of references
227,229,327,329 content and
other content of the hierarchies 260,360, as well as specific rules 100 and/or
benefits 103 can be
manual (i.e. specific only to the claim 12 or set of claims 12 being reviewed
from the queue 53),
can be applied to revise the deployed plan 42 so that other claims 12 other
than the reviewed
claims 12 of the queue 53 will be affected (i.e. their adjudication by the
engine 40 will take into
account any changes to the hierarchies 260,360 relevant to the other claims
12), and/or can be
applied to revise the template hierarchies 260,360 used to develop the plan 42
under review (i.e.
the plan 42 associated with the claim 12 or set of claims 12 being reviewed
from the queue 53)
so that other plans 42 other than the reviewed plan 42 will be affected (i.e.
claim 12 adjudication
by the engine 40 will take into account any changes to the hierarchies 260,360
of the other plans
42).
- 56 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00181] It is also recognised that related revisions 55 can be any
revisions 55 using a
block label that existed in the 'old' plan 'and' in the 'revised' plan. Un-
related revisions 55 can
be any revisions 55 using a block label that existed in the 'old' plan and NOT
in the 'revised'
plan. Benefit Coverage revisions 55 may not be identifiable in this process as
they are carried
over to the New Plan to remain active. The revisions 55 available for 're-
open' can be those that
belong to the Old Plan and have the same Expiry Date as the Old Plan Expiry
Date.
[00182] It is also recognised that the revisions 55 to the blocks
226,228,326,328 content,
via the references 227,229,327,329 can be dated to have an revision effective
and/or expiry date.
Accordingly, these revisions 55 (e.g. as embodied in the references
227,229,327,329) can be
considered temporary revisions 55 (e.g. overrides) as the configuration of the
hierarchy 260,360
will revert back to the pre-revision 55 state when the chronological date is
outside of the revision
effective and/or expiry date. Further, upon accessing the information details
of the reviewed
plan 42 and/or template hierarchies 260,360, the engine 50 can provide for a
display on the
interface 102 all current and/or previous revisions 55 and their associated
effective/expiry
date(s), where available, to the user of the engine 50.
Rule module 532
[00183] It is recognised that the engine 50 may display Rule/benefit
details relevant to the
claim 12 obtained from the queue 53. Referring to Figure 24, this sub-
component or perspective
within the engine 50, for example, is used to revise (e.g. add/modify/delete)
the rules 100 that
implement the actual complex business logic within the adjudication engine 40.
These rules 100
are then included and/or excluded together and are grouped (via revisions 55
to the references
227) into the rule blocks 228. These blocks 228 are in turn are then included
and/or excluded
together and grouped (via revisions 55 to the references 229) into one or more
rule super block
226, which can define the complete set of business logic to be evaluated (e.g.
including order of
execution of the listed blocks 228) when this specific block 226 is selected.
Each rule 100 can
be revise (e.g. add/modify/delete), if needed, using the functionality and
modules of the engine
50 (e.g. using a business grammar that is supported by a rule evaluation
adjudication engine
module within the adjudication engine 40).
- 57 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00184] For example, using the module 530, the user can gain access to and
revise plan
details, such as but not limited to: Plan Id - Plan Name ¨ Plan Description;
Benefit Super Block ¨
Coverage; Super Benefit Block Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Benefit Super Block ¨
Plan; Super
Benefit Block Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Benefit Super Block ¨ Adjudication;
Super Benefit
Block Id ¨ Benefit Block Name; Coverage tab, Provincial Plan information,
Consultant Review
requirements, and carrier 231 Alternate Coverage information; Pricing
information; Year (e.g.
effective/expiry dates of the plan 42; Specialty (e.g. dental, vision, drug,
etc.); Province or other
regional jurisdiction; Adjudication Rules via the super blocks 226; and/or
Fiscal
information/parameters 52.
[00185] It is recognised that for each of the accessed and revised plan
details on the user
interface 102, the module 530 can display the appropriate Super Block ID &
Name; and
associated appropriate Rule Block ID & Name. It is also recognised that the
modification of the
hierarchy 260 information would include changes to the references 227,229 of
the benefit
objects, including changes/revisions such as but not limited to: changes in
the effective date of
the references 227,229; changes in the expiry date of the references 227,229;
changes in the
benefit object version associated with the references 227,229; changes to the
definition content
of the rules 100 and/or the benefit blocks 228 (e.g. selecting specific
versions 300 of the rule
objects ¨ e.g. rules 100); and/or inclusion or exclusion of the references
227,229 in the respective
block 226,228, as well as changes to the ordering of the references 227,229 in
the respective
block 226,228.
[00186] For example, the module 532 can be used to revise rules 100 within
the block
228, add/delete rules 100 to a Block 228, add/delete Blocks 228 to a super
block 226,
add/remove rules 100 from a Block 226, set Expiry Date for rules 100 in a
Block 228, Set
Effective Date for rules 100 in a Block 228, set Expiry Date for block(s) 228
listed in a Block
226, Set Effective Date for block(s) 228 listed in a Block 226, and add/delete
versions 300 of the
rule objects in the corresponding blocks 226,228. It is recognised that, as
described above, the
inclusion of blocks 228 in blocks 226 and the rules 100 in blocks 228 is
coordinated in the
hierarchy 260 via the listing of the references 227,229 in the appropriate
blocks 226,228.
- 58 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00187] If finished, then the deployment module 438 can be used to save
the modified
Plan 42 and then the saved plan 42 is deployed to the database 224.
Parameter module 534
[00188] Referring to Figure 24 , this sub-component or perspective within
the engine 50,
for example, is used to revise (e.g. add/delete/modify) or otherwise redefine
the parameterized
values 52 used within rules 100 and benefits 103, as well as the references
227,229,327,329
where appropriate. This revision 55 of the parameters 52 provides for a
generic set of rules 100/
benefits 103 to be defined (e.g. the template hierarchies 260,360) and then
reused with different
specific values 52 that are assigned/associated for plan 42 revision, in view
of claims 12 obtained
from the queue 53.
Example Revisions 55 to Plan 42 Content
[00189] The engine 50 will display on the user interface 102 details of
(e.g. parameters 52,
claim data, and/or related portions of the hierarchies 260,360): Date of
Service; Tooth Code;
Submitted Procedure Code; Tooth Surfaces; Professional Fee Claimed Amount;
Professional
Labl Claimed Amount; Professional Lab 2 Claimed Amount; Eligible Fee Claimed
Amount;
Eligible Labl Claimed Amount; Eligible Lab 2 Claimed Amount; Deductible;
Coinsurance;
Benefit Fee Claimed Amount; Benefit Labl Claimed Amount; Benefit Lab 2 Claimed
Amount;
Adjudicated Procedure Code; Pay as Procedure Code; Claimed Units; Paid Units;
COB$?; and
Proc Type.
[00190] As discussed above in relation to the modules 530,532,534, the
engine 50 can
facilitate revision/reconfiguration 55 to the following example fields (e.g.
associated parameters
and structured of the hierarchies 260,360); Date of Service; anatomy/product
(e.g. tooth) Code;
Submitted product/Procedure Code; Paid product/Procedure Code; Professional
Fee Claimed
Amount; Professional Labl Claimed Amount; Professional Lab 2 Claimed Amount;
Electronic Device 101
[00191] Referring to Figure 13, a generic electronic device 101 can
include input devices
102, such as a keyboard, microphone, mouse and/or touch screen by which the
user interacts
- 59 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
with the visual interface 102. It will also be appreciated that the engine 40,
44, 50, 200 resides
on an electronic device 101, for example as separate devices 101 for the
engine 40 and the
engine 200, and/or the engine 44, for example. A processor 150 can co-ordinate
through
applicable software (e.g. the engines 40, 44, 50, 200) the entry of data and
requests into the
memory 124,224, 528 and then display the results on a screen 152. A storage
medium 46 can
also be connected to device 101, wherein software instructions and/or member
data is stored for
use by the engine 40, 44, 5, 200. As shown, the device 101 also includes a
network connection
interface 154 for communicating over the network 11 with other components of
the environment
(see figure 1), e.g. the engine 200 can communicate to the database 224, the
engine 40 can
communicate with the database 224, the engine 50 can communicate with the
database 224, the
engine 44 can communicate with the database 224, and the engines 40, 44, 50,
200 can
communicate with one another.
[00192] The stored instructions on the memory 124 (for example the modules
of the
respective engine 40, 44, 50, 200) can comprise code and/or machine readable
instructions for
implementing predetermined functions/operations including those of an
operating system, the
engine 40, 44, 50, 200 configuration, or other information processing system,
for example, in
response to commands or inputs provided by a user of the engine 40, 44, 50,
200. The processor
150 (also referred to as module(s) for specific components of the engines 40,
44, 50, 200) as used
herein is a configured device and/or set of machine-readable instructions for
performing
operations as described by example above.
[00193] As used herein, the processor/modules in general may comprise any
one or
combination of, hardware, firmware, and/or software. The processor/modules act
upon
information by manipulating, analyzing, modifying, converting or transmitting
information for
use by an executable procedure or an information device, and/or by routing the
information with
respect to an output device. The processor/modules may use or comprise the
capabilities of a
controller or microprocessor, for example. Accordingly, any of the
functionality provided by the
systems and processes of FIGS. 1-26 may be implemented in hardware, software
or a
combination of both. Accordingly, the use of a processor/modules as a device
and/or as a set of
machine readable instructions is hereafter referred to generically as a
processor/module for sake
of simplicity.
- 60 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00194] It will be understood by a person skilled in the art that the
memory 124,224,528
storage described herein is the place where data is held in an electromagnetic
or optical form for
access by a computer processor. In one embodiment, storage 124,224,528 means
the devices and
data connected to the computer through input/output operations such as hard
disk and tape
systems and other forms of storage not including computer memory and other in-
computer
storage. In a second embodiment, in a more formal usage, storage 124,224,528
is divided into:
(1) primary storage, which holds data in memory (sometimes called random
access memory or
RAM) and other "built-in" devices such as the processor's Li cache, and (2)
secondary storage,
which holds data on hard disks, tapes, and other devices requiring
input/output operations.
Primary storage can be much faster to access than secondary storage because of
the proximity of
the storage to the processor or because of the nature of the storage devices.
On the other hand,
secondary storage can hold much more data than primary storage. In addition to
RAM, primary
storage includes read-only memory (ROM) and Li and L2 cache memory. In
addition to hard
disks, secondary storage includes a range of device types and technologies,
including diskettes,
Zip drives, redundant array of independent disks (RAID) systems, and
holographic storage.
Devices that hold storage are collectively known as storage media.
[00195] Referring to Figure 13, the engines 40, 44, 50, 200 reside on and
are implemented
by one or more generic electronic devices 101. Generic device 101 may be a
server that makes
available the engine 40, 44, 50, 200 to the user over the network 11. As
known, device 101 may
include input devices 102, such as a keyboard, microphone, mouse and/or touch
screen by which
the user of the engine 40, 44, 50, 200 interacts with the engine 40, 44, 50,
200 via the visual
interface 102. A processor 152 can co-ordinate through applicable software the
entry of data and
requests into the memory 124,224 and then display/present the results on a
screen as visual
representation 102,152. Further, it is recognised that the visual
representation 102,152 (e.g. the
hierarchies 260,360) can be presented (as a result of operation of the engine
40, 44, 50, 200 ) to
the user on their client (e.g. of the engine 40, 44, 50, 200 implemented on a
networked server)
electronic device 101 via the network 11. A storage medium 46 can also be
connected to device
101, wherein software instructions, applications 14, member data, and other
data is stored for use
by the engine 40, 44, 50, 200 , for execution by the respective processor(s)
150.
- 61 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00196] The software instructions may comprise code and/or machine
readable
instructions for implementing predetermined functions/operations including
those of an
operating system, the engine 40, 44, 50, 200 , or other information processing
system, for
example, in response to commands or inputs provided by a user and/or the
provider of the engine
40, 44, 50, 200. The processor 150 (also referred to as module(s) for specific
components of the
engine 40,44,200) as used herein is a configured device and/or set of machine-
readable
instructions for performing operations as described by example above. Some or
all of the
modules of the engine 40, 44, 50, 200 may be distributed across a network as
applications or
reside on the electronic device 101. As is understood, some or all of the
modules of the engine
40, 44, 50, 200 may also be downloadable to the electronic device 101.
[00197] As used throughout, the processor/modules on the device 101 of the
engine 40,
44, 50, 200 in general may comprise any one or combination of, hardware,
firmware, and/or
software. The processor/modules act upon information by manipulating,
analyzing, modifying,
converting or transmitting information for use by an executable procedure or
an information
device, and/or by routing the information with respect to an output device.
The
processor/modules may use or comprise the capabilities of a controller or
microprocessor, for
example. Accordingly, any of the functionality provided by the systems and
processes of FIGS.
1-26 may be implemented in hardware, software or a combination of both.
Accordingly, the use
of a processor/modules as a device and/or as a set of machine readable
instructions is referred to
generically as a processor/module for sake of simplicity.
Database 224
[00198] A database or tables 224 is a further embodiment of memory as a
collection of
information that is organized so that it can easily be accessed, managed, and
updated. In one
view, databases can be classified according to types of content:
bibliographic, full-text, numeric,
and images. In computing, databases are sometimes classified according to
their organizational
approach. As well, a relational database is a tabular database in which data
is defined so that it
can be reorganized and accessed in a number of different ways. A distributed
database is one that
can be dispersed or replicated among different points in a network. An object-
oriented
- 62 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
programming database is one that is congruent with the data defined in object
classes and
subclasses.
[00199] Computer databases 224 typically contain aggregations of data
records or files,
such as sales transactions, product catalogs and inventories, and customer
profiles. Typically, a
database manager provides users the capabilities of controlling read/write
access, specifying
report generation, and analyzing usage. Databases and database managers are
prevalent in large
mainframe systems, but are also present in smaller distributed workstation and
mid-range
systems such as the AS/400 and on personal computers. SQL (Structured Query
Language) is a
standard language for making interactive queries from and updating a database
such as IBM's
DB2, Microsoft's Access, and database products from Oracle, Sybase, and
Computer Associates.
[00200] Memory storage is the electronic holding place for instructions
and data that the
computer's microprocessor 150 can reach. When the computer 101 is in normal
operation, its
memory 124,224 usually contains the main parts of the operating system and
some or all of the
application programs and related data that are being used. Memory is often
used as a shorter
synonym for random access memory (RAM). This kind of memory is located on one
or more
microchips that are physically close to the microprocessor in the computer.
Example Operation of the Adjudication Engine 40
[00201] Referring to Figure 14, shown is an example operation 350 of the
adjudication
engine 40 for processing insurance claims 12 using a set of adjudication
rules. At step 352, the
adjudication engine 40 receives the claim 12 for processing, the received
claim 12 having claim
content including a claim date. At step 354, the adjudication engine accesses
the set of
adjudication rules in the database 224 appropriate to the content of the
received claim 12. The
set of adjudication rules is structured in a plurality of containers including
a primary rule
container 226 and a plurality of secondary rule containers 228, each of the
plurality of secondary
rule containers 228 being coupled to the primary rule container 226 by a
respective container
reference 229. Each of the plurality of secondary rule containers 228 contains
one or more
adjudication rules 100 adapted for processing the claim content of the
received claim 12, such
that each of the one or more adjudication rules 100 is coupled to their
respective secondary
container 228 by their respective rule reference 227, wherein the set of
adjudication rules
- 63 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
defines the rule hierarchy 260. At step 356, the adjudication engine 40
processes the content of
the received claim 12 with the one or more adjudication rules 100 facilitated
by an execution
order defined by the ordering of the container references 229 in the primary
rule container 226.
At step 358, the result of the processed claim is used to determine subsequent
settlement of the
received claim 12.
[00202] It is recognised in step 356, the processing of the claim content
can include
accessing a set of benefit codes 103 appropriate to the received claim 12,
such that the set of
benefit codes 103nis structured in a plurality of benefit containers including
a primary benefit
container 326 and a plurality of secondary benefit containers 328. Each of the
plurality of
secondary benefit containers 328 is coupled to the primary benefit container
326 by their
respective benefit container reference 329. Each of the plurality of secondary
benefit containers
328 contains one or more benefit codes 103 adapted for processing the claim
content of the
received claim 12, such that each of the one or more benefit codes 103 is
coupled to their
respective secondary benefit container 328 by their respective benefit
reference 327, wherein the
set of benefit codes 103 defines the benefit hierarchy 360.
[00203] It is also recognised that an optional step is 360 is comparing
the claim date to the
effective date(s) and/or expiry date(s) of the container references
227,229,327,329, in order to
determine if the respective secondary rule containers 228 are part of the set
of adjudication rules
for use in processing the received claim 12, such that the non-matching dates
exclude the
respective secondary rule container 228 from being included in the execution
order. As well,
part of the optional step can include comparing the claim date to the
effective date(s) and/or
expiry date(s) of the container references 227,229,327,329, in order to
determine if the respective
rules 100 are part of the set of adjudication rules for use in processing the
received claim 12,
such that the non-matching dates exclude the respective rules 228 from being
included in the
execution order of their secondary containers 228. It is recognised that
similar comparisons can
be done for the inclusion/exclusion decision making for the benefit codes 103
and the secondary
benefit containers 328, as desired.
Example Operation of the Composer Engine 200
- 64 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
[00204] Referring to Figure 15, shown is an example operation 370 of the
composer
engine 200 for generating a set of adjudication rules for use in processing an
insurance claim, the
set of adjudication rules representing the hierarchy 260. At step 372,
defining adjudication
rule(s) 100. At step 374, defining a secondary rule container 228 and coupling
the adjudication
rule 100 to the secondary rule container 228 by a rule reference 227
associated with the content
of the secondary rule container 228. At step 376, defining a primary rule
container 226 and
coupling the secondary rule container 228 to the primary rule container 226 by
a container
reference 229 associated with the content of the primary rule container 226,
such that the
adjudication rule 100, the containers 226,228, and the rule and container
references 227,229
defining the rule hierarchy 260 for representing the set of adjudication
rules. At step 378, storing
the set of adjudication rules in the memory 124,224; wherein the set of
adjudication rules is
configured to facilitate the processing of content of the insurance claim 12
with the adjudication
rule by an execution order defined by the ordering of the container reference
229 in the primary
rule container 226. At step 380, adding parameter values to the adjudication
rules. It is
recognised that similar steps can be done to the above, in order to include
benefit codes in a
benefit hierarchy 360 linked 240 to the rules 100, as described by example
above.
Example Operation of the Plan Engine 44
[00205] Referring to Figure 21, operation 361 of the plan engine 44 is
shown, for
modifying benefit coverage including a plurality of benefit codes 103 of an
insurance plan 42,
such that the insurance plan 42 is for use in adjudicating one or more
insurance claims 12 by the
adjudication engine 40. At step 362, the engine 44 accesses a set of benefit
codes 103 structured
in a plurality of benefit containers 326,328 including a primary benefit
container 326 and a
plurality of secondary benefit containers 328, each of the plurality of
secondary benefit
containers 328 being coupled to the primary benefit container 326 by a
respective benefit
container reference 329, each of the plurality of secondary benefit containers
328 containing one
or more benefit codes 103 adapted for processing a claim content of the one or
more insurance
claims 12, each of the one or more benefit codes 103 being coupled to their
respective secondary
benefit container 328 by a respective benefit reference 327, the set of
benefit codes 103 defining
a benefit hierarchy 360. At step 364, the engine 44 selects the primary
benefit container 326 for
inclusion in the insurance plan 42. At step 366, the benefit module modifies
the benefit
- 65 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
hierarchy 360 by performing at least one of adding an additional benefit
container reference 329
to the primary benefit container 326, modifying a container benefit parameter
52 of at least one
of the benefit container references 329, or deleting at least one of the
existing benefit container
references 329. At step 368, the deployment module 438 stores the modified
insurance plan 42
in the memory 224; wherein the stored modified insurance plan 42 is adapted
for subsequent use
in adjunction of appropriate insurance claims 12 received by the adjudication
system 18.
[00206] It is recognised that step366 can be substituted instead for
accessing a set of
adjudication rules structured in a plurality of containers including a primary
rule container 226
and a plurality of secondary rule containers 228, each of the plurality of
secondary rule
containers 228 being coupled to the primary rule container 226 by a respective
container
reference 229, each of the plurality of secondary rule containers 228
containing one or more
adjudication rules 100 adapted for processing the claim content of the
received claim 12, each of
the one or more adjudication rules 100 being coupled to their respective
secondary container 228
by a respective rule reference 227, the set of adjudication rules defining the
rule hierarchy 260.
[00207] It is recognised that step366 can be substituted instead for
selecting the primary
rule container 226 for inclusion in the insurance plan 42, modifying the rule
hierarchy 260 by
performing at least one of adding an additional rule container reference 229
to the primary rule
container 226, modifying a rule container parameter 52 of at least one of the
rule container
references 229, or deleting at least one of the existing rule container
references 229.
[00208] It is recognised that step366 can be substituted instead for
modifying the benefit
hierarchy 360 by performing at least one of adding an additional benefit
reference 327 to at least
one of the secondary benefit containers 328, modifying a benefit reference
parameter 52 of at
least one of the benefit references 327, or deleting at least one of the
existing benefit references
327.
[00209] In view of the above, it is recognised that modification of the
plan 42 can include
any modifications to any of the references 227,229,327,329 (either existing or
added or deleted)
in any order (i.e. blocks 228,328 content is modified before blocks 226,326
content is modified,
blocks 226,228 content is modified before blocks 326,328 content is modified,
blocks 326,328
content is modified before blocks 226,228 content is modified, etc.).
- 66 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Example Operation of the Reconfiguration/Review Engine 50
[00210] Referring to Figure 26, operation 560 of the engine 50 is shown,
for revising one
or more hierarchies 260,360 of an insurance plan 42, the insurance plan 42for
use in adjudicating
one or more insurance claims 12. At step 562, obtaining one or more claims 12
from a claims
queue 53, the claims queue 53 for storing claims 12 selected for review (e.g.
due to adjudication
error(s) , fraud considerations, and/or quality control considerations). At
step 564; accessing at
least one of a set of benefit codes 103 or a set of adjudication rules 100
associated with the
insurance plan 42 of the obtained one or more claims 12, wherein at least some
of the set of
benefit codes 103 or the set of adjudication rules 100 are structured in a
plurality of containers
226,228,326,328. At step 566, reconfiguring selected content of the at least
one of a set of
benefit codes 103 or the set of adjudication rules 100 in view of identified
reasons for review
(e.g. due to adjudication error(s) , fraud considerations, and/or quality
control considerations) of
the one or more claims 12. At step 568 storing the reconfigured at least one
of a set of benefit
codes 103 or the set of adjudication rules 100 in a memory 224,528 for
subsequent use as at least
one of a redeployed version of the insurance plan 42 or a revised said at
least one of a set of
benefit codes 103 or the set of adjudication rules 100 for use in development
of other insurance
plans 42 for adjudication of claims 12 other than the one or more claims 12
obtained from the
claims queue 53, wherein the revised insurance plan 42, once deployed, is
adapted for use by an
adjudication engine 40 for processing insurance claims 12 received by the
adjudication engine
40.
[00211] In view of the above described system 10, it is recognised that
the system 10 is
not limited to dental type insurance, but other forms of insurance as well.
The features of the
system 10 include such as but not limited to: 1) the rule composer 200
creating containerized rule
and benefit hierarchies 260,360; 2) the adjudication engine 40 using the
containerized data
structure 260,360 in claim 12 adjudication; management/assignment of the plans
42, using the
containerized rule and benefit hierarchies 260,360 output of the rule composer
200; and 4)
leveraging the containerized rule and benefit hierarchies 260,360, in the
context of claim
adjudication review 412, to revise/update 414 the containerized rule and
benefit hierarchies
260,360 of the respective plan 42 for subsequent use by the adjudication
engine 40 (i.e. to
increase auto adjudication levels). Further, the aspect of the plan manager 44
can be generalized
- 67 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
to include the creation of additional components to the hierarchies 260,360.
The composer 200
is used to generate "template" hierarchies 260,360 for use by the plan manager
44 in
customization and deployment of the customized hierarchies 260,360 as a plan
42 for use by the
adjudication engine 40. The plan manager 44 can also add to (e.g. create) or
otherwise amend
the "template" hierarchies 260,360 to generate the customized hierarchies
260,360, as needed
during the plan management/assignment processes.
Example Implementation of the Reconfiguration/Review Engine 50
[00212]
Referring to the following pages, the engine 50 is referred to as a claim
manager,
which is used as an application, i.e. a set of instructions stored on a
computer readable medium
that is executable by a computer processor (see Figure 13). It is also
recognised that all example
display screens could be configured for display on the user interface 102 of
the device(s) 101
associated with use of the engine 50 by the user. The engine 50 is used to
reconfigure/revise the
configured adjudication rules 100 and benefits 103 in their configured
hierarchy 260,360 (e.g. of
the deployed plan 42) iv view of the reviewed associated claim 12 or set of
claims obtained from
the claim queue 53, for use by the adjudication engine 40, see Figure 2. It is
recognised that the
following example is only meant as one embodiment of a number of possible
embodiments of
the contents and functionality of the engine 50 and it's modules, as well as
any described
interaction with other engines (e.g. the rule composer aka the composer engine
200 and the plan
engine 44 aka the plan manager).
-68-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
=
1 INTRODUCTION
The Claim Manager application allows users to manage dental claim information
in a java-based
graphical user interface (GUI). Claims enter the system either automatically
through electronic
data interchange (EDI) or through manual entry outside of Claim Manager.
Access to claim information depends on the user's role and team, and the
claim's current
ownership and status.
1.1 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Claim Manager is comprised of java applets that are displayed in a web browser
(e.g., Internet
Explorer). Each functional Claim Manager task opens in a new browser window.
Claim Manager currently supports Internet Explorer v6Ø For Claim Manager to
properly
function, pop-ups must be allowed; refer to the web browser's documentation
for details on
allowing pop-ups.
Claim Manager requires Java runtime version 1.5.0_11.
1.2 APPLICATION VERSION
This manual supports Claim Manager version 1-2-1.
Select About from the Help menu to display the application's current build
(version). Refer to
Figure 27.
2 CLAIM MANAGER WORKSPACE
Claim Manager's main workspace is comprised of 3 distinct sections. The screen
displayed in
Figure 28 is a sample of the user management screen; the content of each
section is relative to
the user's current process:
- 69 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
2.1 WORKSPACE TOP
The top section of Claim Manager lets users select high-level parameters to
determine the
information displayed in the lower sections.
= Available selections, tabs, fields, and buttons are dependant on the
user's current task.
= Tab labels (in this example Read Only Claims and Procedure (R/0)) are
dynamic and
change according to the type of data selected in the lower sections. For
example, if a
claim with the status Closed is selected, the tab labels will display Closed
Claims and
Procedure (RIO) etc.
= The information field (see "Group No. 5651 / Division No..." etc. in
Figure 2 below)
displays member and recipient attributes whenever a user interacts (edit,
review, or audit)
with a specific member's claim.
The screen displayed in Figure 29 is a sample of the claim management screen;
the content of
each section is relative to the user's current process. In this case, the user
could click Next to
display the next claim in the user's queue.
2.1.1 SERVICES
The Services menu lets users select from the available functional areas of the
Claim Manager
application. The list of displayed services depends on the current user's role
and permissions (see
3 Roles for details on roles). See 15.1 Selecting A Service for details.
This menu may contain:
Claims: Available to all users.
Claim Search: Available to Super Managers, Managers, Claims Examiner Level 1,
Quality
Control Level 1, and Auditor Level 1.
Admin: Available to Super Managers, Managers, Claims Examiner Level 1, Quality
Control
Level 1, and Auditor Level 1. Refer to Figure 30.
2.1.2 FORMS
Each service offers a set of forms (or screens) that allow users to work on
specific aspects of the
Claim Manager application.
Claims Service: Claims, Transaction Management.
Claim Search Service: Claim Search.
Admin Service: User Management, Team Management, QC Management, Audit
Management,
and Routing Management. Refer to Figure 31.
- 70 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
2.2 WORKSPACE MIDDLE
The middle section of Claim Manager allows users to review or enter data
relevant to the section
below.
= Available selections, tabs, fields, and buttons are dependent on the
user's current role and
task. See 5 Claim Ownership and Re-Assignment for details.
The example in Figure 32 is a sample of the claim management screen; the
content of each
section is relative to the user's current process and/or the status of the
current claim.
2.3 WORKSPACE BOTTOM
The bottom section of Claim Manager displays editable fields, actions,
searches, reports,
dependant on the current process.
The screen displayed in Figure 33 is a sample of the claim management screen;
the content of
each section is relative to the user's current process:
3 ROLES
Each user is assigned to a role which specifies the tasks that the user can
access in Claim
Manager. When users log in to the system, their role automatically determines
the information
and functions available.
Users can belong to multiple teams; see Section 4 Teams for more information.
Refer to Figure
34.
3.1 SUPER MANAGER
This is an administrative role. Super Managers can:
= Search and view claims.
= Manage and assign all users and teams.
= Set Quality Control and Audit criteria.
= Manage pending queues by re-assignment.
= Add internal notes.
= Manage claim routing for specific insurers.
3.2 MANAGER
This role is mostly administrative. Managers can perform all Level 1 functions
within teams to
which they are assigned.
- 71 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Managers can:
= Search and view claims for the teams to which they are assigned.
= Manage and assign relevant users and teams.
= Set Quality Control and Audit criteria.
= Manage pending queues by re-assignment.
= Add internal notes.
= Manage claim routing for specific insurers.
3.3 CLAIMS EXAMINER
Manage claims examiner users and teams, manage pended claims, including
changes to existing
information and manual pricing overrides.
3.3.1 CLAIMS EXAMINER LEVEL 1
Claims Examiner Manager. Manage pended claims, change existing information,
and perform
manual overrides; administer users within their teams; view Quality Control
and Audit criteria.
3.3.2 CLAIMS EXAMINER LEVEL 2
Manage pended claims, change existing information, and perform manual
overrides.
3.3.3 CLAIMS EXAMINER LEVEL 3
Junior Claims Examiner. Manage pended claims, and change existing information.
3.3.4 CLAIMS EXAMINER LEVEL 4
Dental Consultant. Add notes to claims, and re-assign claims to another Claims
Examiner.
3.4 AUDITOR
Manage audit users and teams, check and verify flagged claims, and specify
Audit criteria. May
add notes and include instructions for Claims Examiners.
3.4.1 AUDITOR LEVEL 1
Auditor Manager. Check and verify flagged claims; administer users within
their teams; edit
Audit criteria; add notes and include instructions for Claims Examiners.
3.4.2 AUDITOR LEVEL 2
Check and verify flagged claims. May add notes and include instructions for
Claims Examiners.
3.5 QUALITY CONTROL
Manage quality control users and teams, review a random sampling of claims for
accuracy, and
specify Quality Control criteria. May add notes and include instructions for
Claims Examiners.
- 72 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
3.5.1 QUALITY CONTROL LEVEL 1
Quality Control Manager. Review a random sampling of claims for accuracy;
administer users
with in their team; edit Quality Control criteria; add notes and include
instructions for Claims
Examiners.
3.5.2 QUALITY CONTROL LEVEL 2
Review a random sampling of claims for accuracy. May add notes and include
instructions for
Claims Examiners.
4 TEAMS
Within each role, teams (or queues) are assigned specific claims: all members
of a team/queue
are configured to work from the list of claims. A role may have many teams,
but each team can
only belong to a single role.
Teams are usually structured by responsibility of work assignment by location.
For example, if
there are two claim offices, two teams would be required. Business rules may
require additional
teams to properly disperse the workload. See 14.5 Routing Management for
further details.
Only users with the Super Manager, Manager, Claims Examiner Level 1, Quality
Control Level
1, or Auditor Level 1 role can create and manage teams.
= Super Managers can add users to any team; Super Managers cannot be
assigned to teams.
= Managers can be assigned to any team.
= Claims Examiners can only be assigned to Claims Examiner teams.
= Quality Control users can only be assigned to Quality Control teams.
= Audit users can only be assigned to Audit teams.
= Managers and Claims Examiners Level 1, Quality Control Level 1 and
Auditor Level 1
can alter the users on their teams.
- 73 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
=
CLAIM OWNERSHIP AND RE-ASSIGNMENT
Users take ownership of a claim when they open it for editing, select Next to
display the next
claim in their queue, or a claim is re-assigned to them.
= Ownership is released when the user perform an action to close or re-
assignment the
claim.
= Claims that are not associated with the current user's team can only be
re-assigned by a
user in the Super Manager role. Claims cannot be re-assigned beyond their
initial role; for
example, a claim assigned to an Audit team can be re-assigned to other Audit
teams, but
cannot be re-assigned to a Claims Examiner or Quality Control team.
= Claims with a benefit dollar amount greater than the current owner's
dollar amount restriction
cannot be re-assigned.
Role Create Read Update Delete
Super Manager
Manager
Claims
Examiner
Quality Control
Auditor
= Super Manager
Can re-assign claims to/from Claims Examiner, Manager, Quality Control, or
Auditor
teams, and to any specific user within those teams.
= Manager
Can re-assign claims from their teams to Claims Examiner, Manager, Quality
Control, or
Auditor teams, and to any specific user within those teams.
= Claims Examiner
Can re-assign claims from their teams to Claims Examiner or Manager, and to
any
specific user within those teams.
= Quality Control
Can re-assign claims from their teams to Claims Examiner, Manager, or Quality
Control
teams, and to any specific user within those teams. Claims re-assigned to
Claims
- 74 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Examiners and Managers must be re-opened for editing by the user to whom they
are
assigned.
= Auditor
Can re-assign claims from their teams to Claims Examiner, Manager, or Auditors
teams,
and to any specific user within those teams. Claims re-assigned to Claims
Examiners and
Managers must be re-opened for editing by the user to whom they are assigned.
6 CLAIM STATES
All claim states can be searched and displayed.
6.1 PENDED
The claim can be edited or managed by users in the appropriate role. The
Pended status allows
the Re-assign, Hold, Internal Note, Refuse, Reverse, Re-Adj. (Pend), and Re-
Adj. (Close)
actions. See 8.3 Claim Actions for details.
When users perform actions on a pended claim, the claim is closed and checked
against its
associated audit or quality control criteria. If the claim matches any
predefined audit or quality
control criteria, it will have a state of semi closed and will be sent to the
appropriate teams for
review.
6.2 SEMI-CLOSED
The claim has been adjudicated but was marked for audit or quality control
checking based on
the pre-defined audit or quality control criteria, and has not yet been
released to the payment
process.
6.2.1 QUALITY CONTROL OR AUDIT QUEUE
When a claim is in the Quality Control or Audit Team's pending queue it is in
a semi-closed
state. The user may perform the following actions (see 8.3 Claim Actions for
details):
= Re-assign the claim to a Quality Control or Claim Examiner team and any
user within
that team.
= Hold, to retain ownership and move the claim back into the queue.
= Release/Close, to remove the claim from the pending queue.
= Re-open to a Claim Examiner.
= Add an internal note.
6.2.2 READY FOR PAYMENT
Claims that are ready for payment have been adjudicated (and possibly
released) from an Audit
or Quality Control pending queue, but have not been released to the Payment
process. A claim
may be held from the payment process if an associated claim (from the same
transaction) is
-75-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
being held in Pending.
= A semi-closed claim is moved to a closed state when it is released/closed
from a Quality
Control or Audit queue, and is selected by the end-of-day process for release
to the
Payment process.
6.3 CLOSED
Claim is complete. The Closed status allows the Internal Note, Reverse, and Re-
open actions.
See 8.3 Claim Actions for details.
6.4 PAID
The claim has been paid. Users in the role Manager, Claims Examiner Level 1,
and Claim
Examiner Level 2 may perform the following actions (see 8.3 Claim Actions for
details):
= Re-assess or reverse the claim.
= Specify explain codes for the claim.
All users with access to the claim can add notes.
7 OPENING CLAIMS IN YOUR QUEUE
All users assigned a queue can step through their list of claims by clicking
Next, making and
saving any changes, then clicking Next again to display the next claim in
their queue. Claims in
the queue are sorted in reverse chronological order: the oldest claim in your
queue is opened
first.
To open the next claim in your queue:
1. Under Services, click to select Claim.
2. Select the Claims form.
3. Select a team queue from the drop-down list of teams to which you
are assigned. The
queue selected here will determine the available claims.
4. Click Next. Claim details are displayed.
Depending on the current user's role and the current claim's status, fields
may be
editable or display only.
See 11.1 Eligibility, 11.2 Member Eligibility, 11.3 Claim Details, 8.3 Claim
Actions, 11.4
Predetermination, 11.5, 11.6 Change Log, or 11.7 Claims Experience for details
on viewing or
modifying claims. Refer to Figure 35.
8 CLAIM ACTIONS
- 76 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Access to claim information depends on the user's role and team, and the
claim's current
ownership and status. Claim searches can be performed via the Claims form or
the Claim Search
form, depending on the current user's role and process requirements.
8.1 RE-ASSIGNING CLAIMS
This functionality allows users to re-assign a claim within their team. It
also allows users in the
role of Super Manager, Manager, Claims Examiner Level 1, Quality Control Level
1, and
Auditor Level 1 to distribute the work loads amongst the teams by re-
assignment.
The re-assignment functionality is available on claims with a status of pended
or semi-closed.
Claims can be re-assigned to another team or user's queue. Claims that are not
associated with
the current user's team can only be re-assigned by a user in the Super Manager
role. For re-
assignment rules, see 5 Claim Ownership and Re-Assignment.
Claims can be re-assigned via:
= The Claim form. For details on re-assigning claims via the Claim form,
see 8.3 Claim
Actions.
= The Admin form. For details on re-assigning claims via the Admin form,
see 14.1.3 Re-
Assigning User Claims.
= The Claim Search form. See 8.3.1 Re-Assign for details.
Only users logged in as a Super Manager, Manager, Claims Examiner Level 1,
Quality Control
Level 1, or Auditor Level 1 have access to the Claim Search form.
To re-assign a claim via the Claim Search form:
1. Under Services, click to select Claim Search
2. Select the Claim Search tab.
3. Search for the required claim. See 15.2 Searching for an overview of
searching; see
9.1 Claim Search Criteria for details on available search criteria.
4. Click to select the desired claim in the search results list.
5. Enter a Queue/Team to which this claim will be re-assigned. See Extended
Searches
15.3.2 Team Lookup for details on finding a team.
6. Optionally, enter a User to which this claim will be re-assigned. See
Extended
Searches 15.3.1 User Lookup for details on finding a user.
7. Click Re-Assign. If the Queue/Team and User entries were valid and the
benefit
dollar amount exceeds the current user's dollar amount restrictions, the claim
is
automatically re-assigned and the results list is updated. Refer to Figure 36.
8.2 CLOSING AND RELEASING CLAIMS
- 77 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Only claims in a Semi-Closed state can be closed and released. See 6 Claim
States for details.
Users with the role Super Manager, Manager, and all levels of Quality Control
and Auditor have
the ability to perform this function.
To re-assign a claim via the Claim Search form:
8. Under Services, click to select Claim Search
9. Select the Claim Search tab.
10. Search for the required claim. See 15.2 Searching for an overview of
searching; see
9.1 Claim Search Criteria for details on available search criteria.
11. Click to select the desired claim in the search results list.
12. Click Close/Release.
The claim's status is automatically changed. Click Refresh to update the claim
list.
See 14.1.4 Closing and Releasing Claims for details on closing claims via the
Admin form.
8.3 CLAIM ACTIONS
The Actions tab allows users to perform various functions against the current
claim. The
available actions depend on the current user's role and the claim's current
state. Saving
information on the Actions tab automatically saves changes on Eligibility,
Member Eligibility,
Pre-determination, and Claim Details tabs.
To perform an action on a claim:
13. Under Services, click to select Claim.
14. Open the claim on which you want to perform the action. See 7 Opening
Claims in
Your Queue or 9 Searching for Claims for details on opening claims.
15. Select the Actions tab. The current user's role and the claim's current
state dictate the
available actions.
16. Click to select the appropriate action, and enter/select any necessary
parameters.
17. Click Save to save your changes. Refer to Figure 37.
8.3.1 RE-ASSIGN
This functionality allows users to re-assign a claim within their team. Re-
assignment also allows
users in the role of Super Manager, Manager, Claims Examiner Level 1, Quality
Control Level 1,
and Auditor Level 1 to distribute work loads among various teams.
= The re-assignment functionality is available on claims with a status of
pended or semi-
closed.
= Claims can be re-assigned to another team or user's queue. Claims that
are not associated
with the current user's team can only be re-assigned by a user in the Super
Manager role.
Claims cannot be re-assigned beyond their initial role; for example, a claim
assigned to a
- 78 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Claims Examiner team can be re-assigned to other Claims Examiner teams, but
cannot be
re-assigned to an Audit or Quality Control team.
= Claims that are not associated with the current user's team can only be
re-assigned by a
user in the Super Manager role.
= Claims that exceed the current owner's dollar amount restrictions cannot
be re-assigned.
See 5 Claim Ownership and Re-Assignment.
To re-assign a claim:
18. Click to select the Re-Assign action.
19. Enter a Queue/Team to which this claim will be re-assigned. See Extended
Searches
15.3.2 Team Lookup for details on finding a team.
20. Optionally, enter a User to which this claim will be re-assigned. See
Extended
Searches 15.3.1 User Lookup for details on finding a user.
21. Optionally, enter descriptive Note text.
22. Click Save to save your changes.
8.3.2 HOLD
Pended claims can be put on hold for a defined period. This functionality
changes the priority of
the claim in the pended queue. When a user cannot complete their changes to a
claim, they can
change the position of the claim in the pending queue by placing it on hold
for an specified
period. The claim will return to the user's pended queue based on the hold
period.
This functionality is available on claims with a status of pended or semi-
closed.
To place a claim on hold:
23. Click to select the Hold action.
24. Select a Hold Period from the drop-down list, or specify a Date until
which the claim
will be on hold. Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
25. Optionally, enter explanatory text in the Note field.
26. Click Save to save your changes.
8,0.3 INTERNAL NOTE
This functionality allows users to enter information that they wish to remain
with the claim. It
can be used to track inquiries against the results, add explanatory text, etc.
All users have access to internal notes.
To add an internal note:
27. Click to select the Internal Note action.
28. Enter explanatory text in the Note field.
29. Click Save to save your changes.
- 79 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
8.3.4 REFUSE
Refuse a pended claim, disregarding adjudication results. Refused claims must
include an
explanatory Note and Explain Code, and are not part of claims experience.
Refused claims
cannot be reversed or re-assessed.
This functionality allows users to change the status of a claim to refuse and
clear the claim from
the Claim Examiners queue.
A refusal status generates an EOB statement. Typically this action would be
supported with a
request for a questionnaire to be produced.
To refuse a claim:
30. Click to select the Refuse action.
31. Select an Explain Code if desired.
32. Enter explanatory text in the Note field.
33. Click Save to save your changes.
8.3.5 RELEASE/CLOSE
Only claims in a Semi-Closed state can be released/closed. The claim remains
visible in the
history.
To release/close a claim:
34. Click to select the Release/Close action.
35. Select an Explain Code if desired.
36. Enter explanatory text in the Note field if desired.
37. Click Save to save your changes.
8.3.6 RE-ASSESS
The application allows a user to re-assess a closed claim or predetermination,
disregarding
adjudication results. Re-assessed claims must include an explanatory Note and
Explain Code.
This functionality allows users to cancel an active claim experience record.
The process updates
the original claim with the reversal claim identifier. This action will also
create a negative dollar
amount against the original claims payee (Provider or Member). A copy of the
original claim is
placed in the user's pending queue with a new claim identifier. The original
claim submit date is
retained, so the claim is filtered to the top of the queue. When the user
functions the Next
button, the re-assess claim is presented and the appropriate changes can be
made.
To re-assess a claim:
38. Click to select the Re-assess action.
39. Select an Explain Code for this reversal.
40. Enter explanatory text in the Note field.
- 80 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
41. Click Save to save your changes.
Note: A user can also suppress EOB to withhold the entire EOB package or
suppress
overpayments in the case when a member has returned the payment for a claim
that was
originally paid in error.
8.3.7 RE-OPEN
A claim in a semi-closed or closed state can be reopened into a pended state
for modifications.
To re-open a closed claim:
42. Click to select the Re-Open action.
43. Specify a Team and User to which the re-opened claim will be assigned.
44. Enter explanatory text in the Note field and/or select an explain code.
45. Click Save to save your changes.
8.3.8 RE-ADJ. (PEND)
Re-adjudication (Pended) re-adjudicates a Pended claim and resets its status
to Pended. Re-
adjudication claims must include an explanatory Note and Explain Code.
This functionality allows the user to modify the claim details and submit it
to the adjudication
engine. The results are presented back to the user to ensure that the changes
made resulted in the
desired adjudication results.
To re-adjudicate a Pended claim:
46. Click to select the Re-Adj. (Pend) action.
47. Select an Explain Code if desired.
48. Enter explanatory text in the Note field if desired.
49. Click Save to save your changes.
8.3.9 RE-ADJ. (CLOSE)
Re-adjudication (Close) re-adjudicates a Pended claim and sets its state to:
= Semi-closed, if the claim is flagged for audit.
= Closed, if the claim is processed without errors or flags.
= Pended, if the claim has errors that require resolution.
Re-adjudication claims must include an explanatory Note and Explain Code.
This functionality removes the claim from the pended state and confirms it as
active claims
experience. After the user has modified the claim and reviewed the
adjudication results, this
action will close the claim and move on to the next claim in the pending
queue.
- 81 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
To re-adjudicate a closed claim:
50. Click to select the Re-Adj. (Close) action.
51. Select an Explain Code if desired.
52. Enter explanatory text in the Note field if desired.
53. Click Save to save your changes.
8.3.10 REVERSE
Reverse a pended or closed claim or predetermination, disregarding
adjudication results.
Reversing a closed claim results in a same-day reversal; reversing a paid
claim or
predetermination results in a full claim reversal.
Reversed claims must include an explanatory Note and Explain Code.
This functionality allows users to cancel an active claim experience record.
The process updates
the original claim with the reversal claim identifier. This action will also
create a negative dollar
amount against the original claims payee (Provider or Member).
To reverse a claim:
54. Click to select the Reverse action.
55. Select an Explain Code for this reversal.
56. Enter explanatory text in the Note field.
57. Click Save to save your changes.
Note: A user can also suppress EOB to withhold the entire EOB package or
suppress
overpayments in the case when a member has returned the payment for a claim
that was
originally paid in error. Refer to Figure 38.
8.3.11 DELETE OR REFUSE LINE ITEMS
A user can delete or refuse line items prior to the claim being paid or after
being paid. In the
case of after the claim being previously paid, the Reverse and Reassess action
is needed before
being able to perform the delete and refuse actions.
To delete or refuse a line item:
58. Open the claim.
59. Select the Procedure tab.
60. Select the Actions tab.
61. Select Refuse or Delete.
62. Select Save.
- 82 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Note: A user can also unrefuse and undelete if needed.
Note: A user can also add an explanatory note if needed. Refer to Figure 39.
9 SEARCHING FOR CLAIMS
Claim searches can be performed via the Claims form or the Claim Search form,
depending on
the current user's role and process requirements.
To search for a claim:
63. Under Services, click to select Claim.
64. Select the Claims form.
65. Select a team queue from the drop-down list of teams to which you are
assigned. The
queue that is selected here will determine the available claims.
66. Select the Claim Search tab. Refer to Figure 40.
The user has various options when entering search criteria such as selecting
to display the current
user's (Owned By Me) or team's (Current Team) claims, or enter relevant search
criteria and
click Search. The search results will match all entered criteria; if the
search does not contain the
required claim, try the search again with less criteria.
9.1 CLAIM SEARCH CRITERIA
If more than one search criteria field is specified, the displayed results
will contain only items
that match all specified entries. For example, if Member Id. 10098 and Last
Name Smith are
entered as search criteria, the search may fail even if Member ID 10098 exists
but does not have
a matching Last Name of Smith.
= Claim Id.
The unique system-generated number that identifies the claim in Claim Manager.
This is
the identifier that is provided on the paper claims EOB outputs and Provider
Reconciliation Statements. For EDI transaction identifiers, please refer to
EHIP
Reference number.
= Claim Type
Select the type of claim on which to search: Claim, Predetermination, Prior
Day Reversal,
Same Day Reversal or COB (Co-ordination of benefits) Claim.
= EHIP Reference
The system-generated internal reference number that identifies the transaction
to which
- 83 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
the claim is associated. This is the identifier that is provided in an EDI
response to the
Provider. The Provider is obligated to print a copy for the Member, so the
EHIP
Reference number will also be communicated in this format. For paper claims
identifiers
please refer to Claim Id.
= Reference
The external reference number that identifies the transaction to which the
claim is
associated. This identifier is the external reference number from the incoming
claim
transaction. In EDI it is commonly referred to as the 'Office Sequence'
number, and for
Paper Claims it is the identifier generated by the Data Entry application.
= Transaction ID
The unique system-generated number that identifies the transaction in Claim
Manager.
= Claim State
The claim's current state. Select from Pended, Semi-Closed, or Closed. See 6
Claim
States for details.
If no state option is selected, the search returns all claims that meet the
other search
criteria regardless of the claim's state.
= Group No.
The unique group identification number assigned to identify a policyholder. To
search for
a specific Group number, click E to open an extended search. See Extended
Searches (0
Group) for details.
= Team
The team to which the claim is assigned. To search for a specific Team, click
I] to open
an extended search. See Extended Searches (15.3.2 Team) for details.
= User
The User Id. of the person to which the claim is currently assigned. To search
for a
specific User number, click El to open an extended search. See Extended
Searches
(15.3.1 User) for details.
= Insurer No.
The number that identifies the insurer associated with the claim. To search
for a specific
Insurer number, click El to open an extended search. See Extended Searches
(15.3.3
Insurer) for details.
= Member No.
The number that identifies a unique plan member. To search for a specific
Member Id.
number, click El to open an extended search. See Extended Searches (15.3.6
Member)
for details.
= First Name
The plan member's first name.
= Last Name
The plan member's last name.
- 84 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Received Date
For a paper claim, the received date is set by the Paper Reimbursement
application. For
an EDI claim, Received Date is the same as ED! Submitted Date.
= Submit Date
Specify a date range on which the claim was submitted. Dates must be entered
in the
form DD-MMM-YYYY. If only a From date is entered, the To date defaults to the
current date.
= Service Date
Specify a date range on which the service was performed. Dates must be entered
in the
form DD-MMM-YYYY. If only a From date is entered, the To date defaults to the
current date.
= DE User ¨ The user ID of the person who created a paper claim
= Source ¨ Indicates if the source of the claim was paper or electronic.
Refer to Figure 41.
9.2 CLAIM SEARCH RESULTS
Search results contain only items that match all specified search criteria.
= Pended claims older than five (5) days are displayed in red.
= By default, claims are displayed in ascending order by the date on which
they were
submitted. To sort the search results by another criteria, select from the
available options
in the Sort By drop-down list and re-perform the search.
Click to select any claim in the search results. Depending on the current
user's role and the
claim's status, various actions may be performed on the claim; see 8.3 Claim
Actions for details.
9.2.1 DISPLAYING ALL CLAIMS IN A TRANSACTION
Each claim is associated with a transaction; electronically submitted
transactions usually consist
of a single claim, whereas paper-based transactions often contain multiple
claims in a single
transaction.
To display all claims in the transaction associated with your current claim
selection:
67. Click to select the desired claim.
68. Click Claims in Transaction. The search results list displays all claims
in the
transaction associated with the previously selected claim. If the selected
claim is part
of an electronic transaction, only that claim will be displayed.
For more information on transactions, see 13 Transaction.
9.2.2 OPENING CLAIMS
To open a claim for display or modification (depending on the current user's
role and the claim's
- 85 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
status):
69. Click to select the desired claim.
70. Click Open.
71. The claim's detail information automatically populates all fields under
all tabs with
the claim's information. Depending on the current user's role and the current
claim's
status, fields may be editable or display only. See 11.1 Eligibility, 11.2
Member
Eligibility, 11.3 Claim Details, 8.3 Claim Actions, 11.4 Predetermination,
11.5
- 86 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Messages, 11.6 Change Log, or 11.7 Claims Experience for details on viewing or

modifying claims.
CLAIM SEARCH FORM
The claim search form allows users to search for claims (see 9 Searching for
Claims for details)
and display claim count details.
10.1 CLAIM COUNTS
To display a count of claims based on Team, User, or Received Date:
72. Under Services, click to select Claim Search.
73. Select the Claims Counts tab.
74. Select to display claims By Team, By User, or By Submit date. Team and
User claims
are sorted in descending alphabetical order; Received Date claims are sorted
in
reverse chronological order.
75. Click any claim to select it, and click Drill Down to open the claim in
the Claim
Search tab to view or modify details. Refer to Figure 42.
11 CLAIMS FORM
The claims form displays information at a claim level.
11.1 ELIGIBILITY
The Eligibility tab displays information that matches the submitted
information to the
information in GAMA. Available editable fields depend on the user's role and
the claim's
current status. Changes to information on the Eligibility tab will only be
saved when the user
performs an action on the claim and saves; see 8.3 Claim Actions for more
details.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer for which claims from
this
member are eligible. See Extended Searches (15.3.3 Insurer) for details on
finding an
insurer number.
= Group No.
The identification number of the specific group to which claims for this
insurer assigned.
See Extended Searches (0 Group) for details on finding a Group number.
= Member No.
The unique identification number of the plan member. See Extended Searches
(15.3.6
Member) for details on finding a specific Member Id.
-87-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Recipient Id.
The claim recipient's identification number. See Extended Searches (15.3.7
Recipient)
for details on finding a specific Recipient Id.
= CPR Provider Id.
The Central Provider Registry (CPR) identification number. This is the unique
identifier
generated by the Emergis Central Provider Registry application. It identifies
who the
servicing Provider is for the claim in view. Upon selecting a CPR Provider Id.
here, the
system automatically populates all Office/Provider fields. See Extended
Searches (Error!
Reference source not found. Error! Reference source not found.) for details on

finding a specific Provider Id.
= Member Outstanding Balance
How much money the member owes.
11.2 MEMBER ELIGIBILITY
The Member Eligibility tab contains the submitted information and is available
for all claims
other than predeterminations. Self-Admin claims are not matched to the
information in GAMA;
the information on this tab will be used by the insurer directly.
Claims Examiners may add member eligibility values for self-admin claims as
required. None of
the Member Eligibility fields are mandatory; rather, they allow the entry of
information that was
not previously in the
system.
If the claim is in a pended state because it failed the `self-admin'
eligibility check, a Claims
Examiner can change the values to reflect those provided on the paper claim
form.
Changes to information on the Member Eligibility tab will only be saved when
the user performs
an action on the claim and saves; see 8.3 Claim Actions for more details.
11.2.1 MEMBER ELIGIBILITY
= Group No.
The identification number of the specific group from which unassigned claims
for this
insurer will be routed.
= Division No.
The external identification number of the division.
= Class No.
The external identification number of the class.
= Member No.
The plan member's identification number.
= Effective Date
The date on which this member will become active. Dates must be entered in the
form
DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Expiry Date
The date on which this member will become inactive. Dates must be entered in
the form
DD-MMM-YYYY.
- 88 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Family Flag
Select the family type for this member: Single, Family, Couple, Single Parent,
Dependant
Only.
= Card Sequence Version
The sequence or version number associated with a card which details the
member's plan.
11.2.2 MEMBER DETAILS
= First Name
The plan member's first name.
= Middle Name
The plan member's middle name.
= Last Name
The plan member's last name.
= DOB
The plan member's date of birth. Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-
YYYY.
= Language
The plan member's primary language of communication. Select English or French.
= Address
Enter the plan member's address information, including street address(es),
City,
Province/State, and Postal/Zip Code.
11.2.3 RECIPIENT DETAILS
= First Name
The recipient's first name.
= Middle Name
The recipient's middle name.
= Last Name
The recipient's last name.
= DOB
The plan member's date of birth. Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-
YYYY.
= Gender
The recipient's gender. Select from Male, Female, or Unknown.
= School Name
The name of the recipient's school, if the recipient is a student.
= Relationship Code
Select the recipient's relationship to the plan member: Member, Spouse,
Dependant,
Student, Disabled.
= Exception Code
Select the recipient eligibility exception code: Student, Disabled, Disabled
Student, or
N/A (not applicable).
11.3 CLAIM DETAILS
- 89 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
The Claim Details tab displays the submitted and adjudicated results of the
claim. If the claim is
pended, the details reflect the adjudication results at the time of
adjudication. This may not be the
same result received when releasing from pending, dependent on whether or not
any changes
have been made to the Plan, Member coverage, etc.
Available editable fields depend on the user's role and the claim's current
status. Changes to
information on the Claim Details tab will only be saved when the user performs
an action on the
claim and saves; see 8.3 Claim Actions for more details.
= Predet. No.
The number provided on the claim transaction indicating that services have
already been
submitted on a predetermination transaction. This is the EHIP Reference number
of a
previously adjudicated predetermination transaction.
The process of adjudicating a predetermination will generate a Predet No. to
be submitted
when the services are performed.
= Initial Lower
Enter Y (yes) or N (no) to indicate if the appliance is the first insertion.
= Initial Lower Date
If the Initial Lower is set to N, this date will represent when the original
appliance was
inserted. This value must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Ortho Flag
Enter Y (yes) or N (no) to indicate whether the submitted services were for
Orthodontic
purposes
= Initial Upper
Enter Y (yes) or N (no) to indicate if the appliance is the first insertion.
= Initial Upper Date
If the Initial Upper is set to N, this date will represent when the original
appliance was
inserted. This value must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Materials Forwarded
Enter Y (yes) or N (no) to indicate whether or not supporting documentation
was sent.
= Man. Pros. Material
Enter the appropriate code to indicate what type of material was used for the
mandibular
service.
= Max. Pros. Material
Enter the appropriate code to indicate what type of material was used for the
maxillary
service.
= Accident Date
A date entered indicating the services on the claim were required because of
an accident.
This date represents when the accident occurred. This value must be entered in
the form
DD-MMM-YYYY.
11.4 PREDETERMINATION
- 90 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
The Predetermination tab only appears when a predetermination claim is opened.
This tab
displays estimated information that was entered via EDI prior to the pended
claim entering the
system. Paper-based claims will not display any field information, and can be
modified as
required.
Available editable fields depend on the user's role and the claim's current
status. Changes to
information on the Predetermination tab will only be saved when the user
performs an action on
the claim and saves; see 8.3 Claim Actions for more details.
The following fields represent what values where submitted in the incoming
transaction
(EDI/Data Entry). These values may have been used in the adjudication process
to assist in the
determination of the result.
= Est. Treatment Start Date
The estimated date on which the claim's treatment will start. This value must
be entered
in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Treatment Duration
The estimated number of months over which the treatment will be delivered.
= Number of Payments
The estimated number of payments.
= Payment Mode
Select the anticipated payment mode.
= First Exam Fee
The fee charged for the first orthodontic examination.
= Diagnostic Phase Fee
The fee charged for the diagnostic phase of the examination.
= Initial Payment
The amount of the initial payment.
= Payment Amount
The anticipated amount of periodic payments.
- 91 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
11.5 MESSAGES
The Messages tab lists all messages (both internal and external) provided
during the adjudication
process. The messages recorded include those from Rule Composer Actions, if
executed. The
payment process selects the appropriate messages to display on the Explanation
of Benefits.
Messages can be associated with either the claims or procedures.
Each time a claim is re-adjudicated, Claim Manager updates the message list.
Claims Examiners
may review, add, or delete messages for claims in a Pended state. Messages for
claims in any
other state are read-only.
Note: A Claim Examiner could delete an EOB message and use an external note in
its place, if
the Claim Examiners expertise determines the system determined EOB message is
not
applicable. Refer to Figure 43.
11.5.1 REVIEWING MESSAGES
Messages with a status of pend-review or pend-fix are displayed with an
asterisk (*) in the OA
column, and must be reviewed.
To review a message:
76. Click to select a message containing an asterisk in the OA column. Examine
the
message, and ensure that any required business processes are completed.
77. Click Review.
11.5.2 ADDING MESSAGES
To add a message to a pended claim:
78. Click to select the message type from the drop-down list.
= Ext-Note
This is a free form note entered by the user. It is printed on the EOB
statements generated by the outputs process.
= EOB
This is a template message that is defined by the carrier and can be attached
to
the claim. It is intended to explain the results of the adjudication logic.
= Question
This is a template questionnaire. It is a series of questions selected by the
User
to request additional information before adjudication can be completed. A
separate page is created in the Outputs process listing all of the questions
selected.
79. Based on your initial selection, enter text in the Ext-Note Text field or
select from the
available Messages.
- 92 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
80. Click Add Message to save your selections and append the message to the
claim.
11.5.3 DELETING MESSAGES
Only messages originating from Claim Manager can be deleted.
To delete a message from a claim's message log:
81. Click to select the message in the list.
82. Click Delete.
11.6 CHANGE LOG
The Change Log tab lists all data changes that have occurred since the claim
entered the system.
11.7 CLAIMS EXPERIENCE
The Claims Experience tab lists all claims (including closed and semi-closed)
associated with the
current recipient.
To display a claim from the Claims Experience list:
83. Click to select the desired claim in the list.
84. Click Open. The system automatically displays the claim details and opens
the
Eligibility tab. The claims form displays information at a claim level. See 11
Claims
Form for details.
11.8 PAYEE
The Payee tab enables a user to override the default payee and change the
payee to another party
by using a list of payees associated with the member. The user can also select
an Override
checkbox. If the flag is checked then it is used as the final adjudication
value, where as if the
flag is not checked then it is used as an initial value but can be changed by
the rules of
adjudication.
The Validate step only checks Canadian addresses by comparing Postal Code,
Province and
Street Address. To assist the user when searching for an address, the user can
search on one of
the following combinations:
1. Postal Code Only,
2. City and Address,
3. Province and Address. Refer to Figure 44.
11.9 RECIPIENT ACCUMULATORS
- 93 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
The Recipient Accumulator tab gives the user a view to the accumulators
associated with the
current recipient. The Recipient Accumulator tab also provides a link for the
user (based on
permissions) to the Benefit Maintenance screen, where the user can create or
update recipient
accumulators.
There are three ways to access the Benefit Maintenance Screen:
1. Select Recipient Accumulators from the services menu in the upper
left part of the
screen.
2. In the Recipient Accumulator tab, select open from the Recipient
Accumulator list
located on the lower right hand side of the screen.
3. From the Eligibility tab.
Refer to Figure 45.
12 PROCEDURES
The Procedures form displays details at a claim item level.
To display procedure information:
85. Find and open a claim. See 7 Opening Claims in Your Queue or 9 Searching
for
Claims for details on opening claims.
86. Click the Procedure tab. Depending on the current claim's state, this tab
may be titled
Procedure, Procedure (R/0), or Predetermination Procedure.
All available procedure information associated with this claim is displayed.
Refer to Figure 46.
87. Modify submitted fields as required.
The Data Entry application enforces some validation rules (such as ensuring
that the tooth
number and tooth surfaces fields contain values). These edits are not repeated
by the Claim
Manager application users should use this as a guideline of required data.
= Tooth No.
The tooth code submitted. May represent a tooth number, quadrant, or
sextant.
- 94 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Surface
The submitted surface code. Although the system primarily functions on
CDA codes this will represent the true submitted service code.
= Submit Service Code
The originally submitted service code.
= Claimed Prof. $
The amount claimed for the professional fee.
= Claimed Exp. $
The amount claimed for expense services. This is determined based on the
accompanying service code (lab1/2). If the service code submitted in this
field is an expense code, then the related fee is considered an expense fee.
= Claimed Lab $
The amount claimed for lab services. This is determined based on the
accompanying service code (lab1/2). If the service code submitted in this
field is a lab code, then the related fee is considered a lab fee.
= COB $
Represents the accumulative amount of the primary payer's reimbursement
for the submitted service, if the claim is a COB.
88. Click Save to save your changes.
12.1 PROCEDURE OVERRIDE DETAILS
The procedure Items tab allows users to enter benefit amounts based on
estimated costs. If any of
the required fields are not completed, the system display an error prompting
for entry.
Claim Manager determines a final Benefit Amount through the following
calculation:
((Elig. Prof. ¨ Ded. Prof.) * Coins.%) * Copay)
Therefore, the Elig. Prof., Ded. Prof., Coins. %, and Copay are mandatory
fields and must
contain valid data.
To calculate the benefit amount for a procedure:
89. Click to select the Override Details tab.
90. Enter as many manual override details as available.
= Elig. Prof. $
The amount determined to be eligible after plan coverage and rules, but prior
to the application of deductibles, coinsurance and maximum.
= Lab Elig. $
The amount determined to be eligible after plan coverage and rules, but prior
to the application of deductibles, coinsurance and maximum.
- 95 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Exp. Elig. $
The amount determined to be eligible after plan coverage and rules, but prior
to the application of deductibles, coinsurance and maximum.
= Bed. Prof. $
The amount of the deductible applied (professional eligible amount, labl
eligible amount, and lab2 eligible amount).
= Coins. %
The percentage at which the claim item was adjudicated.
= Max $
The out of pocket amount due to a reduction in payment because a plan
maximum was reached.
= Lab Ben. $
The amount payable (after deductible, coinsurance and maximum) for the Lab
amount portion of the claimed professional fee.
= Exp. Ben $
The amount payable (after deductible, coinsurance and maximum) for the
Expense amount portion of the claimed professional fee.
= Benefit Amount
The amount payable (after deductible, coinsurance and maximum) for the
Professional amount portion of the of the claimed Professional Benefit
amount.
= Adjudicated Service Code
Enables the user to override the adjudicated service code that was used.
91. Click Calculate to determine the estimated Benefit Amount.
12.2 PROCEDURE LIST
To display all procedures associated with the currently open claim:
92. Click to select the Procedure List tab.
All procedures associated with the claim are listed.
93. Click to select a procedure in the displayed list.
94. Depending on the current user's role and the claim's current state, you
can click Open
to open the procedure for editing or click View to display the procedure
details.
12.3 MATCHING PREDETERMINATION CLAIMS
To display all predetermination claims that match the currently open claim:
95. Click to select the Matching Predet. Tab.
All matching predetermination claims are displayed.
96. Click to select a predetermination claim in the displayed list
-96 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
97. The available options depend on the current user's role and the claim's
current state:
= Click Use to associate the predetermination claim with the current claim.
= Click Un-Use to disassociate this predetermination claim from the current

claim.
= Click Delete to mark the predetermination claim as inactive.
Refer to Figure 47.
12.4 PROCEDURE MESSAGES
Messages with a status of pend-review or pend-fix are displayed with an
asterisk (*) in the OA
column, and must be reviewed.
To review a message:
98. Click to select a message containing an asterisk in the OA column. Examine
the
message, and ensure that any required business processes are completed.
99. Click Review.
12.4.1 ADDING MESSAGES
To add a message to a current claim item:
100. Click to select the message type from the drop-down list.
= Ext-Note
This is a free form note entered by the user. It is printed on the EOB
statements generated by the outputs process.
= EOB
This is a template message that is defined by the carrier and can be attached
to
the claim. It is intended to explain the results of the adjudication logic.
= Question
This is a template questionnaire. It is a series of questions selected by the
User
to request additional information before adjudication can be completed. A
separate page is created in the Outputs process listing all of the questions
selected.
101. Based on your initial selection, enter text in the Ext-Note Text field or
select from
the available Messages.
102. Click Add Message to save you selections and append the message to the
claim.
1 2.4. 2 DELETING MESSAGES
Only messages originating from Claim Manager can be deleted.
To delete a message from a claim's message log:
- 97 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
103. Click to select the message in the list.
104. Click Delete.
- 98 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
13 TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT
Each claim in the system is associated with a transaction; electronically
submitted transactions
usually consist of a single claim, whereas paper-based transactions often
contain multiple claims
in a single transaction. Refer to Figure 48.
13.1 TRANSACTION SEARCH
To find and display transaction information:
105. Under Services, click to select Claim.
106. Select the Transaction Management form.
107. Select a team queue from the drop-down list of teams to which you are
assigned.
108. Select the Transaction Search tab.
109. Enter relevant search criteria:
= Submit Dt.
Enter the date that the claim was submitted to the Adjudication Engine. This
value must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= EHIP Reference
The system generated number assigned when a transaction is divided into one
or many claims.
= Reference Id.
The number provided by the external submitting source to enable tracking
results.
= Transaction Id.
The system generated number that uniquely identifies the transaction.
110. Click to select a transaction in the search results list.
111. Click Open to display transaction details.
13.2 TRANSACTION PAYMENTS
This tab displays the details relevant to when the transaction was selected
for release to the
payment process. A transaction cannot be released until all claims within the
transaction are no
longer in a pended state.
13.3 TRANSACTION CLAIM LIST
This tab displays a list of all claims included in the current transaction.
Depending on the current
user's role and the claim's current state, you can click Open to open the
claim for editing.
- 99 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
13.4 TRANSACTION ACTIONS
The Actions tab allows users to perform various functions against the current
transaction. The
available actions depend on the current user's role and the transaction's
current state.
To perform an action on a transaction:
112. Under Services, select the Transaction Management form.
113. Open the transaction on which you want to perform the action. See 13.1
Transaction Search for details on opening transactions.
114. Select the Actions tab. The current user's role and the claim's current
state dictate
the available actions.
115. Click to select the appropriate action, and enter/select any necessary
parameters.
116. Click Save to save your changes.
Refer to Figure 49.
13.4.1 REVERSE
At the transaction level, EDI and Paper claims can be reversed. Refused claims
cannot be
reversed.
Reversed claims must include an Explain Code.
To reverse a claim:
117. Click to select the Reverse action.
118. Select an Explain Code for this reversal.
119. Enter explanatory text in the Note field if desired.
120. Click Save to save your changes.
13.4.2 RE-ASSESS
At the transaction level, only EDI claims can be re-assessed. Refused claims
cannot be re-
assessed.
Re-assessed transactions must include an Explain Code.
To re-assess a transaction:
121. Click to select the Re-Assess action.
122. Select an Explain Code for this re-assessment.
123. Enter explanatory text in the Note field if desired.
124. Click Save to save your changes.
- 100 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
14 ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS
Users assigned the role of Manager or Level 1 (Claims Examiner, Auditor, or
Quality Control)
can manage user, team, quality control, and audit information for users and
teams to which they
are assigned. Users in the role of Super Manager can perform administrative
tasks for all users
and teams.
= Super Managers can create the Manager user roles and assign users to
teams.
= The Manager can perform administrative tasks for the users and teams to
which they have
been assigned by the Super Manager. The Manager may only assign users within
their
roles (e.g., Claims Examiner teams can be assigned only to the Claims Examiner
Level 1
user role, etc).
= Level 1 roles can perform administrative tasks for all users within their
teams.
14.1 USER MANAGEMENT
14.1.1 SEARCH USER PROFILES
To display a user's role and name information:
125. Under Services, select Admin.
126. Select the User Management form.
127. Select the User Search tab.
128. Enter relevant search criteria and click Search. The search results will
match all
entered criteria; if the search does not contain the required user, try the
search again
with less criteria.
= User
The login name of the user.
= First Name
The first name of the user.
= Last Name
The last name of the user.
= Role
Select the user's role. See 3 Roles for details.
= Team
The name of the team to which the user is assigned. See 4 Teams for details.
129. Click to select a user in the search results list, and click Open. The
User
Management fields are automatically populated with the selected user's
information.
Refer to Figure 50.
14.1.2 TEAM ASSIGNMENT
Within each role, teams are assigned specific claims in a queue: all members
of a team are
configured to work from the same queue. A role may have many teams, but each
team can only
- 101 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
belong to a single role.
To display and modify a user's team assignment:
130. Under Services, select Admin.
131. Select the User Management form.
132. Search for and select a user profile. See 14.1.1 Search User Profiles for
details.
133. Select the Assigned Teams tab.
All teams to which the current user has access are displayed. Each user must
be
assigned a default team membership.
Click to select a team, and click Toggle Membership to change the user's team
assignment setting: Y (included), or N (excluded).
Refer to Figure 51.
14.1.3 RE-ASSIGNING USER CLAIMS
All claims are assigned to a team and (optionally) a specific user within a
team.
To re-assign a claim:
134. Search for and select the claim.
= All claims assigned to a specific user can be displayed by searching for
and
selecting the user (see 14.1.1 Search User Profiles), then selecting the User
Claims tab.
= To search for a specific claim, select Claim under Services (see 9
Searching
for Claims).
135. Specify a team and (optionally) a user to which the claim will be re-
assigned. See
Extended Searches (15.3.2 Team and 15.3.1 User) for details on finding a team
or
user.
136. Click Re-Assign.
The claim's assignment is automatically changed. Click Refresh to update the
claim
list.
Refer to Figure 52.
14.1.4 CLOSING AND RELEASING CLAIMS
Only claims in a Semi-Closed state can be closed and released. Super Managers
cannot close or
release claims. See 6 Claim States for details.
To close and release a claim:
- 102 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
137. Search for and select the claim.
= All claims assigned to a specific user can be displayed by searching for
and
selecting the user (see 14.1.1 Search User Profiles), then selecting the User
Claims tab.
= To search for a specific claim, select Claim under Services (see 9
Searching
for Claims).
138. Click to select a specific claim.
139. Click Close/Release.
The claim's status is automatically changed.
See 8.2 Closing and Releasing Claims for details on closing claims via the
Claim Search form.
14.2 TEAM MANAGEMENT
Within each role, teams are assigned specific claims in a queue: all members
of a team are
configured to work from the same queue. A role may have many teams, but each
team can only
belong to a single role.
14.2.1 ADD OR MODIFY TEAMS
Only users logged in as Super Manager can add or modify team parameters. Only
the
Description field can be modified for existing teams.
To add a team:
140. Log in as a Super Manager.
141. Under Services, select Admin.
142. Select the Team Management form.
143. Click Clear to remove existing field details.
144. Enter team parameters:
= Team
Enter the name of the team.
= Role
Select the team's role: Claims Examiner, Quality Control, or Auditor. See 3
Roles for details on roles.
= Description
Enter descriptive text to identify this team's function.
Refer to Figure 53.
145. Click Save to save your changes.
14.2.2 SEARCH AND MODIFY TEAM PROFILES
- 103 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
To display and modify a team details:
146. Under Services, select Admin.
147. Select the Team Management form.
148. Enter relevant search criteria and click Search. The search results will
match all
entered criteria; if the search does not contain the required team, try the
search again
with less criteria.
= Team
The name of the team to which the user is assigned. See 4 Teams for details.
= Role
Select the team's role: Claims Examiner, Quality Control, or Auditor. See 3
Roles for details on roles.
149. Click to select a team in the search results list.
150. Click Open. The Team Management fields are automatically populated with
the
selected team's information.
14.2.3 TEAM MEMBER ASSIGNMENT
151. Under Services, select Admin.
152. Select the Team Management form.
153. Search for and select the team. See 14.2.2 Search and Modify Team
Profiles for
details.
154. Select the Team Members tab.
All available users are listed. To search within the list of users, enter
relevant search
criteria and click Search.
= User
The login name of the user.
= First Name
The first name of the user.
= Last Name
The last name of the user.
155. Click to select a user, and click Toggle Membership to change the user's
team
assignment setting: Y (included), or N (excluded).
Refer to Figure 54.
14.2.4 RE-ASSIGNING TEAM CLAIMS
All claims are assigned to a team and (optionally) a specific user within a
team.
- 104 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
To re-assign a claim:
156. Search for and select the claim.
= All claims assigned to a specific team can be displayed by searching for
and
selecting the team (see 14.2.2 Search and Modify Team Profiles), and
selecting the Team Claims tab.
= To search for a specific claim, select Claim Search under Services (see 9

Searching for Claims).
157. Specify a team and (optionally) a user to which the claim will be re-
assigned. The
specified team and user must have the necessary permissions to take ownership
of the
claim.
See Extended Searches (15.3.2 Team and 15.3.1 User) for details on finding a
team or
user.
158. Click Re-Assign.
The claim's assignment is automatically changed.
Refer to Figure 55.
14.3 QC MANAGEMENT
Quality Control can be performed on claims based on specified criteria. Only
managers with the
appropriate permissions can view, edit, or define Quality Control parameters.
14.3.1 VIEW QC GROUPS
To display QC group details:
159. Under Services, select Admin.
160. Select the QC Management form.
161. Select the QC Groups tab. All currently defined groups are displayed.
162. Click to select a group from the display list. The selected group's
details
automatically populate the group information section.
Refer to Figure 56.
14.3.2 DEFINE GROUPS FOR QUALITY CONTROL
To define a group of claims for Quality Control:
163. Under Services, select Admin.
164. Select the QC Management form.
- 105 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
165. Select the QC Groups tab. All currently defined groups are displayed.
166. Click New.
167. Enter or select all mandatory fields (displayed in blue) and any optional
fields.
= Group Id.
The identification number of the specific group within Claim Manager that
will be Quality Controlled. See Extended Searches (0 Group) for details on
finding a Group Id.
= Group No.
The external identification number of the specific group.
= Effective Date
The date on which Quality Control will begin for claims assigned to this
group. Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Expiry Date
The date on which Quality Control will end for claims assigned to this group
Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Daily %
A percentage of this group's claims that will be Quality Controlled. This
percentage specification must be a number between 1 and 100.
= Daily Max.
A maximum count on the number of claims that can be selected for QC
approval. If reached, this field entry supersedes the Daily % entry.
= >Eligible Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for QC approval.
= >Benefit Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for QC approval.
= Source.
Indicates if the source of the claim was paper or electronic.
= Queue/Team
The team to which this group's claims will be assigned for QC approval. See
Extended Searches (15.3.2 Team) for details on finding a Team.
= Reason
Select a reason for why the specified claims are being selected for QC
approval: Default, New User, New Group, General, or Other.
= Description
Enter text to describe the QC group.
168. Click Save to save your changes and return to the View screen.
14.3.3 EDIT QC GROUPS
To edit a group's details:
- 106 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
169. Under Services, select Admin.
170. Select the QC Management form.
171. Select the QC Groups tab.
172. Click to select a group from the displayed list. The selected group's
details
automatically populate the group information section.
173. Click Edit.
174. Modify necessary fields. Mandatory fields are displayed in blue. See
14.3.2
Define Groups for Quality Control for field details.
175. Click Save to save your changes and return to the group view screen.
14.3.4 VIEW QC USERS
To display a list of user's under Quality Control:
176. Under Services, select Admin.
177. Select the QC Management form.
178. Select the QC Users tab.
179. Click to select a user from the display list. The selected user's details

automatically populate the user information section.
14.3.5 DEFINE USERS FOR QUALITY CONTROL
To define a user for Quality Control:
180. Under Services, select Admin.
181. Select the QC Management form.
182. Select the QC Users tab.
183. Click New.
184. Enter or select all mandatory fields (displayed in blue) and any optional
fields.
= User Type
Select whether the user is working with electronic Claim Manager claims
(CM-User) or with paper-based reimbursement (PR-USER).
= User
The login name of the user that will be Quality Controlled. See Extended
Searches (15.3.1 User) for details on finding a User Id.
= Effective Date
The date on which Quality Control will begin for claims assigned to this user.

Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Expiry Date
The date on which Quality Control will end for claims assigned to this user.
Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
- 107 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Daily %
A percentage of this user's claims that will be Quality Controlled. This
percentage specification must be a number between 1 and 100.
= Daily Max.
A maximum count on the number of claims that can be selected for QC
approval. If reached, this field entry supersedes the Daily % entry.
= >Eligible Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for QC approval.
= >Benefit Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for QC approval.
= Source.
Indicates if the source of the claim was paper or electronic.
= Queue/Team
The team to which selected claims will be assigned for QC approval. See
Extended Searches (15.3.2 Team) for details on finding a Team.
= Reason
Select a reason for why the specified claims are being selected for QC
approval: Default, New User, New Group, General, or Other.
= Description
Enter text to describe the QC user.
Refer to Figure 57.
185. Click Save to save your changes and return to the View screen.
14.3.6 EDIT QC CRITERIA
To edit a QC user's details:
186. Under Services, select Admin.
187. Select the QC Management form.
188. Select the QC Users tab.
189. Click to select a user from the display list. The selected user's details

automatically populate the user information section.
190. Click Edit.
191. Modify necessary fields. Mandatory fields are displayed in blue. See
14.3.5
Define Users for Quality Control for field details.
192. Click Save to save you changes and return to the user view screen.
14.3.7 VIEW QC INSURERS
To display insurers that have been defined for Quality Control:
- 108 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
193. Under Services, select Admin.
194. Select the QC Management form.
195. Select the QC Overall tab.
196. Click to select an insurer from the display list. The selected insurer's
Quality
Control details automatically populate the Overall information section.
14.3.8 DEFINE INSURERS FOR QUALITY CONTROL
Overall Quality Control ranges and limits can be applied to the claims for a
specific insurer.
To define an insurer's claims for Quality Control:
197. Under Services, select Admin.
198. Select the QC Management form.
199. Select the QC Overall tab.
200. Click New.
201. Enter or select all mandatory fields (displayed in blue) and any optional
fields.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to insurer for which claims will be Quality

Controlled. See Extended Searches (15.3.3 Insurer) for details on finding an
insurer number.
= Effective Date
The date on which Quality Control will begin for claims assigned to this
insurer. Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Expiry Date
The date on which Quality Control will end for claims assigned to this
insurer.
Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Daily %
A percentage of this user's claims that will be Quality Controlled. This
percentage specification must be a number between 1 and 100.
= Daily Max.
A maximum count on the number of claims that can be selected for QC
approval. If reached, this field entry supersedes the Daily % entry.
= >Eligible Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for QC approval.
= <Benefit Amt.
The minimum amount of benefits selected for QC approval.
= >Benefit Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for QC approval
= Source.
Indicates if the source of the claim was paper or electronic.
- 109 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Queue/Team
The team to which selected claims will be assigned for QC approval. See
Extended Searches (15.3.2 Team) for details on finding a Team.
= Reason
Select a reason for why the specified claims are being selected for QC
approval: Default, New User, New Group, General, or Other.
= Description
Enter text to describe the QC Overall profile.
Refer to Figure 58.
202. Click Save to save your changes and return to the View screen.
14.3.9 EDIT QC CRITERIA
To edit a QC Overall profile's details:
203. Under Services, select Admin.
204. Select the QC Management form.
205. Select the QC Overall tab.
206. Click to select an Overall profile from the display list. The selected
insurer's
Quality Control details automatically populate the user information section.
207. Click Edit.
208. Modify necessary fields. Mandatory fields are displayed in blue. See
14.3.8
Define Insurers for Quality Control for field details.
209. Click Save to save your changes and return to the user view screen.
14.3.10 DISPLAY QC SUMMARY
To display the results of each day's Quality Control batch runs:
210. Under Services, select Admin.
211. Select the QC Management form.
212. Select the QC Summary tab. All available QC batch information is
displayed.
213. To search the list for a specific batch, enter a Run Date (DD-MMM-YYYY)
and
click Search.
Refer to Figure 59.
14.4 AUDIT MANAGEMENT
Claims can be assigned for audit based on geographic area, provider, and
member.
- 110 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
14.4.1 VIEW PROVIDER AREAS
To display all Provider Areas that are currently defined for audit:
214. Under Services, select Admin.
215. Select the Audit Management form.
216. Select the Audit Provider Area tab. All currently defined Provider Areas
are
displayed.
217. Click to select a Provider Area from the displayed list. The selected
area's details
automatically populate the Audit Provider Area information section.
14.4.2 DEFINE PROVIDER AREA FOR AUDIT
To define the claims that will be assigned for audit based on a specific area:
218. Under Services, select Admin.
219. Select the Audit Management form.
220. Select the Audit Provider Area tab.
221. Click New.
222. Enter or select all mandatory fields (displayed in blue) and any optional
fields.
= Postal Code
Enter the postal code for this area. All claims that originate in the
specified
postal code area will be selected for audit. A full postal code (for example,
T2E7N5) limits the area to a specific location, whereas a partial postal code
(for example, T2) encompasses all areas within the T2 geographical location.
= Effective Date
The date on which auditing will begin for claims originating in this area.
Dates must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Expiry Date
The date on which auditing will end for claims originating in this area. Dates

must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= >Claimed Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for audit.
= Procedures
Enter a full procedure code¨or a comma-separated list of full procedure
codes¨for which claims in this area will be selected for audit.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer for which claims from

this area will be selected for audit. See Extended Searches (15.3.3 Insurer)
for
details on finding an insurer number.
= Queue/Team
The team to which selected claims will be assigned for audit. See Extended
Searches (15.3.2 Team) for details on finding a Team.
- 111 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Reason
Select a reason for why the specified claims are being selected for audit:
Default, New Member, Fraud Suspicion, or Other.
= Description
Enter text to describe the audit area profile.
Refer to Figure 60.
223. Click Save to save your changes and display the View screen.
14.4.3 EDIT PROVIDER AREA
To edit an Audit Provider Area's details:
224. Under Services, select Admin.
225. Select the Audit Management form.
226. Select the Audit Provider Area tab.
227. Click to select a Provider Area from the displayed list. The selected
area's details
automatically populate the Audit Provider Area information section.
228. Click Edit.
229. Modify necessary fields. Mandatory fields are displayed in blue. See
14.4.2
Define Provider Area for Audit for field details.
230. Click Save to save your changes and return to the Audit Provider Area
view
screen.
14.4.4 VIEW PROVIDERS DEFINED FOR AUDIT
To display details on providers that have been defined for audit:
231. Under Services, select Admin.
232. Select the Audit Management form.
233. Select the Audit Provider tab.
234. Click to select a Provider from the display list. The selected provider's
details
automatically populate the Audit Provider information section.
14.4.5 DEFINE PROVIDER FOR AUDIT
To define a provider for audit:
235. Under Services, select Admin.
236. Select the Audit Management form.
237. Select the Audit Provider tab.
238. Click New.
239. Enter or select all mandatory fields (displayed in blue) and any optional
fields.
- 112 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Provider Id.
The unique identification number for the provider from which claims will be
selected for audit. See Extended Searches (Error! Reference source not
found. Error! Reference source not found.) for details on finding a specific
Provider Id.
= Effective Date
The date on which auditing will begin for claims from this provider. Dates
must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Expiry Date
The date on which auditing will end for claims from this provider. Dates must
be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= >Claimed Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for audit.
= Procedures
Enter a full procedure code¨or a comma-separated list of full procedure
codes¨for which claims in this area will be selected for audit.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer for which claims from

this provider will be selected for audit. See Extended Searches (15.3.3
Insurer)
for details on finding an insurer number.
= Queue/Team
The team to which selected claims will be assigned for audit. See Extended
Searches (15.3.2 Team) for details on finding a Team.
= Reason
Select a reason for why the specified claims are being selected for audit:
Default, New Member, Fraud Suspicion, or Other.
= Description
Enter text to describe the audit area profile.
Refer to Figure 61.
240. Click Save to save your changes and display the View screen.
14.4.6 EDIT PROVIDER'S AUDIT DETAILS
To edit Provider's audit details:
241. Under Services, select Admin.
242. Select the Audit Management form.
243. Select the Audit Provider tab.
244. Click to select a Provider from the displayed list. The selected
Provider's details
automatically populate the Audit Provider information section.
245. Click Edit.
- 113-

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
246. Modify necessary fields. Mandatory fields are displayed in blue. See
14.4.5
Define Provider for Audit for field details.
247. Click Save to save your changes and return to the Audit Provider view
screen.
14.4.7 VIEW MEMBERS DEFINED FOR AUDIT
To display details for plan members that have been defined for audit:
248. Under Services, select Admin.
249. Select the Audit Management form.
250. Select the Audit Member tab.
251. Click to select a plan member from the display list. The selected
member's details
automatically populate the Audit Member information section.
14.4.8 DEFINE MEMBER FOR AUDIT
To define a plan member for audit:
252. Under Services, select Admin.
253. Select the Audit Management form.
254. Select the Audit Member tab.
255. Click New.
256. Enter or select all mandatory fields (displayed in blue) and any optional
fields.
= Member Id.
The unique identification number of the plan member for which claims will be
selected for audit. See Extended Searches (15.3.6 Member) for details on
finding a specific Member Id.
= Effective Date
The date on which auditing will begin for claims from this member. Dates
must be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Expiry Date
The date on which auditing will end for claims from this member. Dates must
be entered in the form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= >Claimed Amt.
The dollar value after which claims will be selected for audit.
= Procedures
Enter a full procedure code¨or a comma-separated list of full procedure
codes¨for which claims in this area will be selected for audit.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer for which claims from

this member will be selected for audit. See Extended Searches (15.3.3 Insurer)

for details on finding an insurer number.
- 114 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Queue/Team
The team to which selected claims will be assigned for audit. See Extended
Searches (15.3.2 Team) for details on finding a Team.
= Reason
Select a reason for why the specified claims are being selected for audit:
Default, New Member, Fraud Suspicion, or Other.
= Description
Enter text to describe the audit area profile.
Refer to Figure 62.
257. Click Save to save your changes and display the View screen.
14.4.9 EDIT MEMBER'S AUDIT DETAILS
To edit a member's audit details:
258. Under Services, select Admin.
259. Select the Audit Management form.
260. Select the Audit Member tab.
261. Click to select a plan member from the display list. The selected
member's audit
details automatically populate the Audit Member information section.
262. Click Edit.
263. Modify necessary fields. Mandatory fields are displayed in blue. See
14.4.8
Define Member for Audit for field details.
264. Click Save to save your changes and return to the view screen.
14.5 ROUTING MANAGEMENT
Routing rules are defined for each insurer to ensure that all claims are
properly routed to the
correct team. Rules are processed in descending order for each claim: if the
claim does not match
the first routing rule, it is checked against the next rule etc. until all
rules have been processed.
Claim routing information is only available to users in the role of Super
Manager, Manager, and
Claims Examiner Level 1.
14.5.1 VIEW ROUTING RULES FOR AN INSURER
To display all Routing Rules that are currently defined for an insurer:
265. Under Services, select Admin.
266. Select the Routing Management form.
267. Select an insurer from the drop-down list. All rules for the selected
insurer are
displayed in the results list.
268. Click to select a rule from the displayed list. The selected rule's
details
automatically populate the Routing Control section.
- 115 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
Refer to Figure 63.
14.5.2 CHANGING THE RULE PRECEDENCE FOR AN INSURER
To change the order of rule operations for an insurer:
269. Under Services, select Admin.
270. Select the Routing Management form.
271. Select an insurer from the drop-down list. All rules for the selected
insurer are
displayed in the results list.
272. Click to select a rule from the displayed list.
273. Click the Move Up or Move Down button to move the selected rule to the
desired
location.
274. Click Delete to remove any unnecessary or erroneous rule.
275. Click Save to save your changes and display the View screen.
14.5.3 DEFINING ROUTING RULES FOR AN INSURER
To define a new routing rule:
276. Under Services, select Admin.
277. Select the Routing Management form.
278. Select an insurer from the drop-down list. All rules for the selected
insurer are
displayed in the results list.
279. Click New.
280. Enter or select all mandatory fields (displayed in blue) and any optional
fields.
= Queue.
The team to which selected claims will be assigned. See Extended Searches
(15.3.2 Team) for details on finding a Team.
= Description
Enter text to describe the rule.
= Effective Date
The date on which this rule will become active. Dates must be entered in the
form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Expiry Date
The date on which this rule will become inactive. Dates must be entered in the

form DD-MMM-YYYY.
= Group No.
The identification number of the specific group from which unassigned claims
for this insurer will be routed. See Extended Searches (0 Group) for details
on
finding a Group number.
- 116 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Div No.
The external identification number of the division from which unassigned
claims for this insurer will be routed. See Extended Searches (15.3.4
Division)
for details on finding a Division number.
= Class No.
The external identification number of the class from which unassigned claims
for this insurer will be routed. See Extended Searches (15.3.5 Class) for
details on finding a Class number.
= Provider Province
The two-digit province code for the provider from which unassigned claims
for this insurer will be routed:
Alberta - AB
British Columbia - BC
Manitoba - MB
New Brunswick - NB
Newfoundland and Labrador - NL
Northwest Territories - NT
Nova Scotia - NS
Nunavut - NU
Ontario - ON
Prince Edward Island - PE
Quebec - QC
Saskatchewan - SK
Yukon - YT
= Member Province
The two-digit province code for the member from which unassigned claims
for this insurer will be routed.
281. Click Save to save your changes and return to the View screen.
- 117 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
15 COMMON TASKS
All Claim Manager Users have access to the following core set of functions.
15.1 SELECTING A SERVICE
By default, Claim Manager displays the Claims form upon login. Users can
select to display a
different form, and/or specify a new default via the Services Menu.
To select a service:
282. Click the Services menu to display a drop-down list of the available
services
(dependant on the current user's role).
283. Click to select from the list of available services. A new window is
opened with
the selected forms loaded.
Refer to Figure 64.
15.1.1 SETTING THE DEFAULT FORM
Each user can specify which form will display at login. To specify a new form
as the default:
284. Open the form that you want to display as the default initial screen.
285. Select Set current form as the default from the Services menu.
The default form will be displayed upon the user's next login.
15.2 SEARCHING
Regardless of which task a user is performing, the searching function is
similar throughout Claim
Manager:
286. Enter relevant search criteria.
287. Click Search.
288. Sort results by any of the primary column headings.
289. Click to select an item in the search results.
If more than one search criteria field is specified, the displayed results
will contain only items
that match all specified entries. For example, if Member Id. 10098 and Last
Name Smith are
entered as search criteria, the search may fail even if Member ID 10098 exists
but does not have
a matching Last Name of Smith.
The available search criteria on each search screen is relative to the user's
current process. The
screen displayed below is a sample of the claim search screen. This example
would allow users
- 118 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
to enter or select search criteria in any or all of the available fields. The
user could then click
Search to generate a list of all results that match the specified criteria.
From the search results, a
claim can be selected to Open for display or editing.
Refer to Figure 65.
15.2.1 WILDCARDS
By default, there is an implicit wildcard at the beginning and end of entry
fields. Searches will
display all results that match exactly the entered characters, as well as any
that contain the
entered characters plus other text. For example, searching on the name Smith
would return all
instances of Smith, Smithee, Hammersmith, etc. Similarly, entering 1 in a
numeric entry field
(e.g., Claim Id.) would return all claims that have a 1 anywhere in the Id.
15.3 EXTENDED SEARCHES
Whenever a field displays an associated El, you can click that button to
perform a search on that
field. A new window is displayed with search criteria fields available to
narrow results choice.
Once a selection is made and the Use button is clicked, the system
automatically populates the
originating screen's field.
15.3.1 USER LOOKUP
This extended search screen allows a user search based on:
= First Name
The first name of the user.
= Last Name
The last name of the user.
= Team
The name of the team to which the user is assigned. See 4 Teams for details.
= Role
Select the user's role. See 3 Roles for details.
= User Id.
The login name of the user.
Refer to Figure 66.
15.3.2 TEAM LOOKUP
This extended search screen allows a user search based on:
= Team
The name of the team. See 4 Teams for details.
- 119 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Role
Select the team's role. See 3 Roles for details.
= User Id.
The login name of the user.
Refer to Figure 67.
15.3.3 INSURER LOOKUP
Automatically lists all of the insurers that the current user is allowed to
access. If the list contains
too many results, the search criteria fields at the top of the screen allow
users to search within the
results list for specific data.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer.
= Insurer Label
The display name of the insurer.
= Insurer Description
The textual description of the insurer.
Refer to Figure 68.
Group Lookup
Automatically lists all of the groups that the current user is allowed to
access. If the list contains
too many results, the search criteria fields at the top of the screen allow
users to search within the
results list for specific data.
= Group No.
The identification number of the specific group within Claim Manager.
= Group Label
The display name of the group.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer.
Refer to Figure 69.
15.3.4 DIVISION LOOKUP
Automatically lists all of the divisions that the current user is allowed to
access.
= Division No.
The external identification number of the division.
- 120 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Division Label
The display name of the division.
= Group No.
The identification number of the specific group within Claim Manager.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer.
Refer to Figure 70.
15.3.5 CLASS LOOKUP
Automatically lists all of the classes that the current user is allowed to
access.
= Class No.
The external identification number of the class.
= Class Label
The display name of the class.
= Group No.
The identification number of the specific group within Claim Manager.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer.
Refer to Figure 71.
15.3.6 MEMBER LOOKUP
Automatically lists all of the members that the current user is allowed to
access.
= Recipient Id.
The claim recipient's identification number.
= Member No.
The plan member's identification number.
= Birthday
The birth date of the plan member. This value must be entered in the form DD-
MMM-
YYYY. For example, 24-09-1960.
= Gender
Select the plan member's gender: Male, Female, or Unknown.
= First Name
The plan member's first name.
= Last Name
The plan member's last name.
- 121 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Middle Name
The plan member's middle name.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer.
Refer to Figure 72.
15.3.7 RECIPIENT LOOKUP
= Recipient Id.
The claim recipient's identification number.
= Member No.
The primary member's identification number.
= Relationship Cd.
Select the recipient's relationship to the primary plan member: Member
(cardholder),
Spouse, Dependant (child), Student, or Disabled.
= Birthday
The birth date of the recipient. This value must be entered in the form DD-MMM-

YYYY. For example, 24-09-1960.
= Gender
Select the recipient's gender: Male, Female, or Unknown.
= First Name
The recipient's first name.
= Last Name
The recipient's last name.
= Middle Name
The recipient's middle name.
= Insurer No.
The identification number assigned to a specific insurer.
Refer to Figure 73.
15.3.8 EXPLAIN CODE LOOKUP
= Message Prefix
Select a message prefix on which to search: audit, QC, auReopen, cAction, cob,

qcReopen, quest, reassess, refuse, reject, reopen, or reverse.
= Message Id.
The message identification number.
- 122 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
= Message Type
Select a message type on which to search: audit, QC, auReopen, cAction, eob,
qcReopen,
quest, reassess, refuse, reject, reopen, or reverse.
= Short Text
Enter some or all of the short textual description associated with the explain
code.
Refer to Figure 74.
15.3.9 PROVIDER LOOKUP
= CPR Provider Id.
The Central Provider Registry (CPR) identification number.
= Provider Role Code
The provider's role identification number.
= Provider Role Desc.
The textual description of the provider's role.
= CDA Provider Code
The nine-digit Canadian Dental Association provider identification.
= Work Location Id.
The provider's office identification number.
= Ext. Location Id.
The identification number assigned to an office location by an external
organization.
Refer to Figure 75.
15.3.10 PAYEE CODE LOOKUP
= Payee Code
The entity who is receiving the payment.
Member ID
The number that identifies a unique plan
member.
Refer to Figure 76.
15.3.11 ADDRESS LOOKUP
= Payee ID
The identifier of the entity receiving the payment.
Refer to Figure 77.
- 123 -

CA 02654617 2016-02-12
15.3.12 ADDRESS SEARCH
Line 1
Is the address of the payee, is mandatory and can be used in combination with
a city or province
in the search criteria.
Line 2
Is the second address line and is not mandatory.
City
Is mandatory, if the province is not part of the search criteria.
Province
Is mandatory, if the city is not part of the search criteria.
Postal Code
Is an optional field that can be used on its own as a search criteria.
Refer to Figure 78.
- 124 -

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2017-11-14
(22) Filed 2009-02-18
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2010-08-18
Examination Requested 2014-02-18
(45) Issued 2017-11-14

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $624.00 was received on 2024-01-31


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if standard fee 2025-02-18 $624.00
Next Payment if small entity fee 2025-02-18 $253.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2009-02-18
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2010-05-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2011-02-18 $100.00 2011-02-11
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2012-02-20 $100.00 2012-02-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2013-02-18 $100.00 2013-02-11
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2014-02-18 $200.00 2014-02-12
Request for Examination $800.00 2014-02-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2015-02-18 $200.00 2015-02-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2016-02-18 $200.00 2016-01-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2017-02-20 $200.00 2017-01-18
Final Fee $948.00 2017-09-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2018-02-19 $200.00 2017-12-12
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2018-10-16
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2018-10-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2019-02-18 $250.00 2018-12-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2020-02-18 $250.00 2019-11-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2021-02-18 $255.00 2021-02-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2022-02-18 $254.49 2022-01-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2023-02-20 $263.14 2023-02-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2024-02-19 $624.00 2024-01-31
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
TELUS HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.
Past Owners on Record
EMERGIS HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.
EMERGIS INC.
LEUNG, RAYMOND
RUSSELL, CLAYTON
THOLL, ROB
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Maintenance Fee Payment 2019-11-22 1 33
Representative Drawing 2010-07-22 1 15
Maintenance Fee Payment 2021-02-18 1 33
Maintenance Fee Payment 2022-01-04 1 33
Maintenance Fee Payment 2023-02-17 1 33
Abstract 2009-02-18 1 34
Description 2009-02-18 148 17,592
Claims 2009-02-18 5 246
Cover Page 2010-08-05 2 60
Claims 2016-02-12 6 296
Description 2016-02-12 124 5,955
Drawings 2017-02-16 78 34,068
Claims 2017-02-16 6 292
Assignment 2010-05-18 4 134
Correspondence 2009-03-25 1 18
Final Fee 2017-09-29 2 46
Cover Page 2017-10-17 2 61
Assignment 2009-02-18 4 84
Correspondence 2010-05-18 3 84
Correspondence 2010-06-10 1 16
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-08-19 2 44
Examiner Requisition 2016-08-19 3 202
Maintenance Fee Payment 2024-01-31 1 33
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-02-18 2 49
Examiner Requisition 2015-08-12 8 497
Amendment 2016-02-12 213 40,449
Amendment 2017-02-16 10 424