Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
1
ELECTROMAGNETIC TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED
MATERIALS
The invention relates to a process and apparatus for the treatment of
contaminated materials, for example, hydrocarbon contaminated matrices,
using electromagnetic radiation. The invention relates particularly, but
not exclusively, to the continuous microwave treatment of oil
contaminated drill cuttings.
Electromagnetic radiation includes, inter alia microwave and radio
frequency radiation, as well as other frequencies of radiation, such as
infra red or visible light.
`Hydrocarbon contaminated matrix', or `oil contaminated matrix' is used
herein to mean a matrix, often of solid materials, for example rock
chippings, soil, sludge, filter cake, etc, which comprises a water content
and which is contaminated with hydrocarbons. The hydrocarbons could
be any natural or synthetic hydrocarbon, such as natural or synthetic oils.
The hydrocarbons might be naturally present in the rock. An example of
an oil contaminated matrix is oil contaminated drill cuttings. Drill
cuttings are made up of a mixture of rock fragments, oil and water, and
are produced in significant quantity during the exploration and production
of oil and gas. Depending on the hardness of the rock being drilled, a
bore can be drilled at a rate of between 30 and 50 feet per hour. Bores
are often 3 to 5 km in depth, and can be 83/,inches, 15 inches or 171/,
inches in diameter. It is estimated that the 56 sites in the North Sea alone
produce over a million tons of waste drill cuttings per year.
During drilling for oil and/or gas, a 'drilling mud' is pumped to the drill
bit, which acts as a lubricant, as well as a coolant and a means to
transport drill cuttings to the surface. Drilling muds are generally oil
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
2
based, especially in difficult drilling conditions such as those experienced
in the North Sea. In less challenging geological areas, water based or
synthetic drilling muds may be used.
The oil contaminate in the drill cuttings is mainly derived from the
drilling mud itself, rather than naturally occurring oil, and might
comprise 5-30% by weight of the cuttings. Whilst the use of water based
muds causes less issues in the final disposal of the drill cuttings, as such
cuttings have little oil content, oil based muds are necessary when the
geological situation demands it, for example where the rock is hard, or
where complicated bores are required to be drilled.
Oil contaminated drill cuttings (sometimes referred to herein as OCDC)
produced on off shore oil or gas drilling rigs were historically disposed
of by dumping them into the sea. However, drill cuttings now pose a
more difficult disposal problem on rigs, because environmental
regulations often mean that they cannot be discharged into the sea.
Regulations vary from country to country. For example, current UK
regulations require less than 1% oil by weight in drill cuttings for sea
disposal.
The majority of drilling platforms have little storage capacity, so once
sea disposal has ceased the majority of material will have to be
transported to shore for disposal. Transportation of waste to shore is
expensive and can be difficult and dangerous in poor weather. Storage of
large amounts of waste on rigs for extended periods is not possible,
because once a rig's buffer storage capacity has been reached it is
necessary to stop drilling until cuttings can be transported to shore.
Stopping drilling is expensive.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
3
On shore the contaminated drill cuttings are also subject to legislative
control regarding disposal in land based environments such as landfill
sites. It is therefore often necessary to process the OCDC on land to
reduce the concentration of oil contamination or to render the residual oil
immobile so that it does not cause environmental harm.
We consider it to be desirable to treat oil contaminated drill cuttings in-
situ on the oil production/exploration platform, so as to reduce the
amount of oil contaminant, preferably to a level that would allow the
disposal of the drill cuttings into the sea. However, this poses a problem
of providing treatment apparatus which does not take up too much of the
limited space available on the rig.
Whilst the present invention has been made in the context of off-shore
drilling platforms, and the invention has especial significance there, it
will be appreciated that it could be used on land, and for purposes other
than removing oil from a substrate, for example treating contaminated
soil, or treating polluted land.
Furthermore, oil based drilling muds are themselves relatively high value
materials. We consider it desirable to provide a process and apparatus
that is able to recover at least a portion of used oil based drilling mud
from drill cuttings. The more oil that can be recycled, the less needs to
be shipped out to and stored on the rig itself, meaning rigs can run longer
without needing to re-supply and at lower cost.
The most common treatment processes currently in use are based on
thermal treatment. Such processes include incineration, thermal
desorption or processes where mechanical energy is used to generate heat.
In such processes it is normal to heat cuttings to a temperature sufficient
to remove any water present in the cuttings, and then raise the
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
4
temperature until oil contaminant within the cuttings is burnt or boiled
away.
According to a first aspect of the invention we provide a method for
separating a hydrocarbon content from a hydrocarbon contaminated
matrix, comprising the steps of: controlling a.water content of a feed
material comprising the hydrocarbon contaminated matrix; continuously
conveying the feed material into a treatment cavity; exposing the feed
material in a treatment area of the treatment cavity to electromagnetic,
preferably microwave, radiation arranged to cause rapid heating of at
least a portion of the water content to form steam, wherein the rapid
steam formation results in thermal desorption of at least a portion of the
hydrocarbon content from a treated material; and continuously removing
the treated material from the treatment cavity.
Rather than a method of separating or extracting a hydrocarbon content
from a hydrocarbon contaminated matrix, we may provide a method of
reducing the hydrocarbon content in a hydrocarbon contaminated matrix.
The hydrocarbon may be oil, whether natural or synthetic.
It has been proposed in laboratory studies to use microwave energy to
reduce oil levels in oil contaminated drill cuttings [Shang et al.
`Treatment of Oil-Contaminated Drill Cuttings by Microwave Heating in
a High-Power Single-Mode Cavity', Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44,
6837-6844], [Shang et al. 'Microwave treatment of oil-contaminated
North Sea drill cuttings in a high power multimode cavity', Separation
and Purification Technology, 2006, 49, 84-90].
In these studies precise knowledge of electromagnetic field strength in
laboratory cavities enabled test samples to be placed in the position of
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
maximum field strength. However the heating of the cutting is localised
in the machine, and a significant temperature gradient formed across the
cavity leading to the uneven treatment of oil. The system was not really
usable satisfactorily.
5
The design of a useful continuous microwave treatment system is not
described in prior art. We have appreciated that the use of such a system
is advantageous over other heating methods for a number of reasons,
including selective heating specifically to lessen the oil level, as opposed
to the heating of the entire sample. This permits contaminant removal at
reduced bulk temperatures, and consequential energy savings.
One embodiment of the invention relates to a process that permits
effective microwave treatment of OCDC on a continuous basis (as
opposed to a batch basis) where the designs of a material feed system,
material handling system and treatment cavity integrate to ensure that
contaminated material is consistently treated. The materials output from
the treatment process in some embodiments comprise a steam/vapour from
which, optionally, oil can be recycled back into the drilling mud, and a
solid phase with a low oil loading that can be disposed of or reused as
required.
Furthermore, apparatus designed in accordance with the invention can be
arranged to have a small `footprint', that is, to take up a small amount of
space on a rig or in other situations with limited space. The apparatus
can fit into an ISO container.
A water content of the oil contaminated matrix, or of the bulk feed
material (e.g. OCDC) may be measured. The water content of the feed
material may be controlled by blending a material of known water content
with the oil contaminated matrix. The material of known water content
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
6
preferably comprises treated material (with reduced oil content, and
possibly reduced water content, in comparison with the untreated feed
material).
The water content of the feed material is controlled such that the
dielectric properties of the feed material as a bulk composite substance
are in the range s' = 2.5 to 4.5 or 0.1 to 20 and s" = 0.1 to 10.
Preferably the bulk dielectric properties of the feed material are s' = 3.5
and c" = 0.5. Suitable dielectric properties are required in order to
produce the effect of rapid water heating. The material must have a
suitably high absorbance to be heated-in an electric field, but not so high
that penetration depth is limited. However, the values are frequency
dependent, and so vary depending on the radiation applied. Those quoted
above are for microwaves.
The microwave radiation may have a power of at least 1kW, optionally at
least 5kW, and may have a power in the range 5kW to 1MW. In an
industrial application, a suitable power might be least 50kW, or
preferably 100kW to 500kW, as lower powers would require higher
residence times. Powers of between 500kW and up to approx. 1MW
might also be used. When power is referred to, this is the TOTAL power
of a system, and covers the use of a number of lower power parallel
units.
The microwave radiation may have a frequency of 896MHz, or
thereabouts. The precise frequency chosen to be used is dependant to
some extent to the geographical region where the process is being
operated. The useable range may extend from 1MHz to 2.45GHz.
Regulations control the use of frequencies to be used, but it may be that
in remote areas (e.g. on an oil rig in the sea) regulations reserving certain
frequencies for specific purposes /specific legal entities may not apply.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
7
Ultimately the choice of frequency used is related to the required
penetration depth and the dielectric properties of the material to be
treated.
The feed material may be exposed to the microwave radiation for a length
of time in the range 0.1 to 2 seconds (this is typical to OCDC) or from
0.1 to 10 seconds in a more general treatment of contaminated materials
sense, so as to rapidly heat up the water content of the matrix (e.g. the
water content of, or surrounding, the rocks of the OCDC).
The method may further comprise the step of passing or sweeping inert
gas though the treatment cavity substantially to remove vapours from a
treatment area, the vapours having been produced during exposure of the
feed material to the microwave radiation. By `inert' we mean a gas which
will not react with the feed material under the conditions present in the
treatment area. Examples of suitable gases are nitrogen, steam, as well
as a noble gas.
According to a second aspect of the invention we provide an apparatus for
reducing a contaminant, e.g. hydrocarbon, content in a hydrocarbon (or
other contaminant) contaminated matrix, the apparatus comprising a
microwave or other electromagnetic wave treatment cavity having a
material treatment area, a material feeder arranged in use continuously to
convey a feed material into and out of the treatment area, and a
microwave (or other electromagnetic wave) emitter arranged in use to
expose feed material in the treatment area to microwave or other
electromagnetic radiation in order to cause rapid heating of at least a
portion of a water content of the hydrocarbon or other contaminant
contaminated matrix to form steam so as to remove at least a portion of
the hydrocarbon or other contaminant content from the matrix.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
8
Rather than a method of separating or extracting a hydrocarbon content
from a hydrocarbon contaminated matrix, we may provide a method of
reducing the hydrocarbon content in a hydrocarbon contaminated matrix.
The hydrocarbon may comprise oil, whether natural or synthetic.
The treatment cavity preferably comprises an applicator having an inlet
and an outlet, and the treatment is located between the inlet and the
outlet. The applicator may be a tunnel applicator.
The shape of the applicator is preferably arranged to improve the
uniformity of an electric field which is formed within the treatment area
when the apparatus is in use treating a material. It is preferred to use a
feed material having a known or even a controlled water content. The
shape of the applicator may be optimised using knowledge of the water
content of the bulk feed material.
The applicator may comprise a waveguide arranged to direct microwave
radiation from the microwave emitting means into the treatment area.
The applicator may comprise a self cancelling step. The applicator may
further comprise chokes arranged to resist the escape of microwave
radiation from the inlet and outlet.
The material feeder may comprise a trough conveyor for conveying feed
material through the treatment cavity. The conveyor may be spaced from
a base wall of the treatment cavity.
The material feeder may comprise a material blender arranged to mix
additional material, e.g. dry or drier material, into the contaminated
material to produce a feed material of controlled water content. The
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
9
additional, dry or drier, material may comprise treated material (material
that has been treated by the apparatus).
The apparatus may further comprise a gas flow, or gas circulation
mechanism arranged in use to pass inert gas through the treatment area.
The gas flow mechanism may circulate inert gas through the treatment
area and recover and re-circulate inert gas. The gas flow or circulation
mechanism may be arranged to introduce inert gas to the applicator (e.g.
tunnel applicator) at the inlet and at the waveguide of the applicator. The
gas flow or circulation mechanism may be arranged to remove gas from
the applicator through perforations in a wall of the applicator (e.g. tunnel
applicator).
The apparatus may further comprise a separator adapted to separate at
least some vapour produced in the treatment area from the inert gas.
In another aspect of the invention we have realised that it is desirable to
provide a method and apparatus for removing vapours generated within a
microwave (or other electromagnetic radiation) cavity from the
microwave cavity. Such vapours might damage the microwave cavity
through the formation of a plasma if not removed.
According to a third aspect of the invention we provide a method of
microwaving a substrate comprising removing vapours from a treatment
area of a microwave treatment cavity.
The method may comprise the steps of: exposing a sample within the
treatment area to microwave radiation so as to produce gas and/or vapour;
and passing a purging gas, optimally inert gas, through the cavity to
remove vapours from the treatment area.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
Alternatively/additionally we may apply a low pressure to the cavity and
suck out vapours.
The sample may be an oil contaminated matrix.
5
The purging gas is preferably steam or nitrogen. By "inert gas" is meant
a gas which does not react significantly with the sample. The gas may
also not react significantly with the extracted vapour.
10 The gas may be swept through the cavity and the sample exposed to
microwave radiation simultaneously or substantially simultaneously. The
gas may be swept through the cavity after the sample is exposed to
microwave (or other) radiation. This includes beginning sweeping gas
through the cavity as the sample is exposed to radiation, and continuing
sweeping gas through the cavity after the sample is exposed to radiation.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention we provide microwave (or
other electromagnetic wave) application* apparatus comprising a
microwave treatment cavity and a gas purging system arranged in use to
pass a purging gas through the cavity to remove from a treatment area
vapours produced during the application of microwaves (or other
electromagnetic waves) to a substrate.
According to a fifth aspect of the invention we provide a method of
microwaving a feed material in a microwave cavity comprising
controlling the water content of the feed material.
The method may comprise measuring or determining a water content of an
oil contaminated material; and
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
11
adding a material of a known water content to the oil contaminated
material, such that the feed material produced has a controlled water
content.
According to a sixth aspect of the invention we provide a method for
reducing an oil content of an oil contaminated matrix, comprising the
steps of:
controlling dielectric properties of a feed material comprising the
oil contaminated matrix;
continuously conveying the feed material into a treatment cavity;
exposing the feed material in a treatment area of the cavity to
microwave radiation arranged to cause rapid heating of at least a portion
of a water content of the feed material to form steam, wherein the rapid
steam formation results in thermal desorption of at least a portion of the
oil content from the matrix; and
continuously removing the treated matrix from the treatment
cavity.
The dielectric properties may comprise a water content.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of
example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic view of a continuous microwave treatment
apparatus;
Figure 2a shows the oil and water contents of a range of samples of
drill cuttings;
Figure 2b shows the dielectric properties of selected drill cutting
samples at 2.45 GHz and 20 C;
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
12
Figure 3 shows the temperature of drill cuttings samples during
microwave treatment in a multimode cavity at 1kW. The maximum
operating temperature of optical fibre thermocouples used to
determine temperature was 300 C;
Figure 4 is a schematic view of a feed material feeding system;
Figure 5 shows example particle size distributions for different
wet/dry compositions of feed material;
Figure 6 is a schematic view of a tunnel applicator for continuous
processing of drill cuttings;
Figure 7 is a schematic representation of a tunnel applicator,
showing hot spots in the electric field;
Figure 8 shows a perspective view of a microwave treatment
cavity;
Figures 8a and 8b respectively show elevational drawings of a top
portion and bottom portion of a laboratory scale microwave
treatment cavity;
Figure 9 is an illustration of the effects of tunnel and load heights
on electric field distribution within the microwave cavity;
Figure 10 shows (a) Electric field distribution (M/a) and (b)
dissipated power as a function of the belt radius;
Figure 11 shows an embodiment of an optimised tunnel applicator;
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
13
Figure 12 shows a layout of a gas handling system;
Figure 13 shows the effect of steam stripping and microwave-
enhanced steam stripping on oil removal from drill cuttings;
Figure 14 shows residual oil levels obtained using gas stripping
after microwave treatment;
Figures 15 and 16 show an embodiment of a microwave cavity;
Figures 17 and 18 show an embodiment of a gas handling system;
Figure 19 shows residual oil content plotted against applied power
for a constant throughput of 160kg/hr in an exemplary system;
Figure 20 shows residual oil content plotted against throughput for
a constant applied power of 15kw in the exemplary embodiment;
Figure 21 shows gas chromatograms of (a) original oil from
untreated drill cuttings and (b) recovered oil after microwave
treatment;
Figure 22 shows a gas chromatogram of residual oil extracted from
treated drill cuttings;
Figure 23 shows energy requirement as a function of the levels of
remediation attained using an applied power of 15kw; and
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
14
Figure 24 shows the variation of residual oil content with energy
input for three processing scenarios (single mode batch, multimode
batch, and continuous) utilising 15kw of microwave power.
An overview of a system 1 for continuously separating oil from oil
contaminated drill cuttings on an offshore oil/gas exploration rig is shown
in Figure 1. The system comprises feed means 7 (or a material feeder 7)
for feeding a feed material 5 comprising untreated drill cuttings 6 (which
comprise a mixture of water, oil and rock) into a microwave treatment
cavity 3. Condensing means 9 is provided adjacent the outlet of cavity 3
and is arranged to separate an inert purging, or sweep, gas 11 from a
recovered oil and water mixture 13. A separator 15 is provided to
separate the mixture 13 into oil 14 and water 16. An extraction or
recirculation system 17 is provided to filter and clean the gas 11 and to
return it to the feed inlet 12 of the microwave cavity 3. The extraction
system 17 comprises a pump 18 to pump the gas 11 through the cavity 3,
and a clean gas inlet 20, for introducing new gas to the recirculated gas.
A feedback system 21 is provided to feed treated cuttings 19 back to
handling system 7 as dry, treated material 22.
In use, the feed material 5 is fed into cavity 3 on a conveyor 10, e.g. a
conveyor belt. The feed material 5 is exposed to microwave radiation in
a treatment area 8 (bounded by broken lines), which (as is described in
more detail below) causes rapid and preferential heating of water within
the feed material. This in turn causes thermal desorption of the oil
component of the feed material, leaving substantially oil-free solid treated
drill cuttings 19. The gas sweep 11 passing through the cavity 3 aids
vapour removal to the condenser 9. Oil recovered by the condenser can
be recycled into drilling mud (which may require the addition of some
additives) whilst the treated solid material 19 is suitable for disposal (or
for a feedback "dry" material 22 for blending back into the feed material
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
5 to control its water content - see later). Treated material has less than
1% by weight of material on the conveyor of oil and can be disposed of
directly into the sea.
5 A throughput of 5 to 10 tonnes/hour can be achieved, but a throughput
within the range of 250kg/hour to 1 tonne/hour is satisfactory for most
offshore rigs. These sorts of performance can be achieved with a
microwave generator having a power of around 100kW, with a power
density of over 1W/mm' (10'W/m'). The system is small and compact,
10 allowing it to fit easily onto a rig despite the restricted space. An
industrial scale model could be simply freighted in an ISO freight
container. The exact process footprint is variable as the system can be
arranged in a large number of ways due to its modular nature, e.g. it
could be arranged vertically with minimal use of -a horizontal conveyor.
15 The feed system could also be relatively far away from the treatment
cavity. This flexibility makes it particularly useful on an offshore rig.
The composition of the feed material and the intensity and uniformity of
the electromagnetic radiation (which depends at least in part on the shape
of the microwave cavity itself), both influence the effective removal of
oil. . The feed material preparation and feed system 7 and the
electromagnetic treatment cavity 3 are both engineered to ensure that
contaminated material is consistently and uniformly treated. The means
for the removal of evolved gases and vapours, optionally to allow those
gases to be recovered and recycled is considered separately inventive.
Principles of the treatment
The treatment method is based on the observation that if water within the
material to be treated (e.g. water within the rocks of drill cuttings) is
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
16
heated rapidly to steam then heat transfer mechanisms heat the oil
contaminant resulting in thermal desorption of the oil. The water in the
rocks is driven out of the rock and carries oil from the surface of the
rocks as it goes. The by products of oil desorption escape from the
treated material with the steam. Note that thermal desorption of oil is
due to microwave heating of the water content of the drill cuttings. The
oil is not directly heated itself by the microwave radiation (or this is not
the effect relied upon).
How a material absorbs electromagnetic radiation depends on the
dielectric properties of that material. The solid mineral phases of the
drill cuttings generally do not possess dielectric properties that are
conducive to microwave heating. The contaminating hydrocarbon phases
are essentially transparent to the electromagnetic energy so these phases
are not heated directly to a significant extent. However, water is a good
absorber of electromagnetic energy, and particularly microwave energy.
The main influence on dielectric properties of the drill cuttings is
connected to the water content of the cuttings. In other materials than
OCDC other properties might affect the dielectric properties as well as
the water content. Properties include rock type, soil type, organic
content, organic species, temperature, density, metal content and others.
In addition, particle size influences the bulk properties of the material and
may have an influence on the success of any treatment regime.
Liquid levels within a material to be treated are partly dependent on the
mineralogy of the cuttings. Water can be present in a material to be
treated in a number of forms that can be broadly defined as 'bound' and
'free'. `Bound' water is contained within the rock fragments themselves,
while 'free' water can be considered as external to the rock fragments.
There is always at least some water present in drill cuttings as rocks are
drilled well below the water table. The water is not usually seawater.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
17
Rapid heating of the water phase leads directly to the removal of
contaminating hydrocarbon phases from the solid through a number of
mechanisms:
(a) Steam-distillation: mixtures of oil and water, if well agitated such that
both components are exposed to atmosphere, will boil at a temperature
below the boiling point of either pure substance, in this case around
85 C. If no sweep gas (mentioned in more detail later), or if an inert
sweep gas is used, the water is quickly removed as steam, and hence this
mechanism cannot sustain itself beyond the initial stages of the treatment.
However the use of steam rather than an inert gas (and as nitrogen or a
noble gas) allows for continual renewal of the water and thus enables oil
removal to continue at temperatures below its boiling point for the
duration of the treatment.
(b) Stripping: steam from generated from water within the cuttings can
act to strip the oil from the contaminated cuttings. Contaminating
surface oil is literally `blown off' the cuttings by escaping steam. This
effect has been known to break rocks, although this is not the aim of the
process. This effect can be improved by using a hot inert sweep gas, as
the results in Figure 13 show.
(c) Boiling: it will be shown that, even at low power, temperatures in
excess of 250 C are obtainable within the microwave cavity, which are
sufficient for thermal desorption of all but the heaviest components of the
oil. There may also be some superheating effects at higher powers, for
example in chalk-based cuttings having a high level of bound water. It is
known that the microwave absorbing properties of free and bound water
are very different, with bound water absorbing increasing amounts of
energy at higher temperatures.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
18
Promoting cases (a) and (b) is of interest since they inherently require
less microwave energy than (c). The water content is critical in driving
the mechanism for oil removal.
Variability in feed material in terms of mineralogy, oil and water content
means that a number of technical challenges must be overcome to develop
an effective treatment system. Typical variability of water and oil
concentration in drill cuttings is demonstrated in Figure 2a. It can be
seen that in this example water content in a sample can vary between
approximately 13% and 5% by weight, and oil content varies even more
widely between approximately 18% and 6% by weight. These
percentages by weight were taken after the drill cuttings had been treated
to remove excess oil, using a standard solvent extraction (DCM)
procedure. The oil content is of obvious importance since this determines
the quantity of oil that needs to be removed during the process, if the aim
is to reduce the oil content to a low enough level to make it feasible to
dispose of the rock cuttings without further treatment, e.g. by dumping
the cleaned rock in the sea, or a landfill site, or using it in the
construction industry (e.g. to make roads).
In addition, the cuttings can vary in physical appearance from soil-like to
a viscous liquid depending on the liquid content and the particle size.
The water content also impacts on the agglomerated particle size, thus
impacting upon heat and mass transfer within a bed of cuttings.
As previously explained, the dielectric properties of a material (in this
case OCDC) relate to the ability of the material to absorb microwave
energy. In OCDC water is the main microwave absorber, and so the
water content (along with the electric field distribution) determines where
microwave energy is dissipated within the sample and the extent to which
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
19
the energy penetrates into its depth. Figure 2b shows the measured
dielectric properties of drill cuttings from a number of different samples.
It can be seen that dielectric properties vary significantly from sample to
sample.
Figure 3 shows the temperature of chalk and sandstone-based drill
cuttings samples over time, during microwave treatment in a multimode
cavity at 1kW. The temperature/time profiles shown are non-linear, and
are potentially very interesting. Although a thorough analysis of each
region has not yet been conducted, there are a number of general
conclusions that can be drawn from the data. Firstly, it is possible to
superheat the water in the cuttings to form steam even at very low power
levels such as 1kW, a likely consequence of the very low thermal
conductivity of the cuttings. Secondly, it can be seen that higher
temperatures are achieved much more quickly with the chalk-based
cuttings, which is likely to be due to the presence of bound water.
Finally, it appears that temperatures far in excess of 300 C might be
achieved in a single mode cavity, which would result in thermal
decomposition of the oil. The times taken to achieve temperatures
sufficient to turn water to steam are relatively long in Figure 3, as a
result of the low power indication used.
The rate at which a material is heated depends on a number of factors,
including the dielectric properties, and in particular the water content of
the material itself, as well as on the power of the radiation that is being
applied. The power absorption density per unit volume within a load is
described by equation (1).
P. - 27r. f .&.s".E.' (1)
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
where:
P, is the power density (watts/m')
f is the frequency of the applied energy (Hertz)
&. is the permittivity of free space (8.854x10-12 F/m)
5 e" is the dielectric loss factor of the material
E. is the magnitude of the electric field inside the material (volts/m)
It can be seen that power density is affected by c", (material dielectric loss
factor) and the frequency of radiation, as well as the magnitude of the
10 electric field applied to the material. The water content of the OCDC
significantly influences the dielectric loss factor and subsequently the
power density/heating rate of the material. In order to design an effective
and consistent process we have found it necessary to control the
composition of the feed material, and to provide a microwave cavity
15 having a shape suitable for irradiating a material of those known
characteristics with a reasonably uniform field (to ensure that each
portion of the feed material experiences a similar magnitude of applied,
electric field) for a given frequency of radiation. That is, we aim to
ensure that the electric field within the cavity is reasonably uniform, to
20 provide a reasonably uniform power density.
In the continuous microwave process described herein the field intensity
is controlled to promote thermal desorption rather than pyrolysis so that
the oil can be recovered and re-used.
Characteristics of the Feed system
We have come to realise that effective microwave treatment requires
consistent feed material of specific and consistent properties. This is
because the properties of the material being treated affect the structure of
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
21
the electric field produced within the treatment cavity: the cavity is tuned
to the material it is to treat.
As discussed above, the properties of drill cuttings vary widely between
samples. In order to produce a consistent feed material we have realised
that it is necessary to control the composition of untreated drill cuttings in
some way. We do this by modifying the water content of the cuttings, by
making a sample wetter or drier as necessary. In many embodiments only
the water content need be controlled, as it is the water content that is
most relevant to the dielectric properties of the feed material. But we do
not exclude controlling other things as well.
To make the liquid-like cuttings more amenable to microwave treatment
dry material 23 is blended with the wet cuttings 6 to produce a crumble-
like feed material. This is shown schematically in Figure 4. The dry
material is in fact treated cuttings 19, and the feed system 7 comprises a
feedback means (shown schematically at 21 in Figure 1) for recycling dry
treated material into the dry material feed 23, as a mechanism to control
the properties of the feed material to the system.
The water content of the untreated cuttings may be measured to assist in
controlling the water content of the feed material. If desired, the water
content of the treated cuttings may also be measured, although this is not
necessary as treated cuttings generally have a low and fairly consistent
water content. The feedback system may be arranged to adjust the
amount of dry material blended into the wet cuttings based on the
measured water content of those cuttings.
The plastic nature of the blended material means it cannot be stored in a
static condition without causing deformation of the particles, loss of
flowability and reduction of permeability. For this reason a continuous
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
22
mixer 25 is used to make the process work reliably. A double-shaft
paddle mixer can be used to blend and mix the two feed components. The
mixture is introduced onto a conveyor (see Fig 1) and carried into the
microwave cavity 3 directly from the mixer 25. The drier, fed-back,
material is mixed with the wetter, unmicrowaved, material to produce a
feed material of substantially uniform bulk composition.
Two screw feeders 23a and 6a are used to control the flow feed rates of
the wet and dry feed components. As well as impacting on the dielectric
properties of the feed material, the ratio of wet/dry material in the feed
material impacts upon the particle size, and hence the permeability of the
feed material. By permeability, or porosity, we mean the ratio of the
non-solid volume (pores and liquid) of the material to the total volume
(including
the solid and non-solid parts). High permeability for example, within the
range of 0.3 to 0.6 of the drill cuttings, is beneficial to ensure the oil
mist can be expelled from the material and removed through movement of
the interstitial air.
A high permeability also helps to optimise mass transfer. A "crumble"
type mixture is created by mixing the raw and dried drill cuttings, which
produces agglomerated balls of the raw (wet) material surrounded by dry
(treated) that achieves an easy flowing and highly gas permeable material
with reasonably regular particle size.
We have discovered that in many cases (but not all) a threshold 'dry
fraction' exists, above which the particle size of the blended material is
relatively consistent. In order to produce a blended feed which will be
amenable to solids handling and microwave treatment, Figure 5
demonstrates that a minimum of 30% dry material should be blended in
with wet feed to ensure a feed material in which the majority of particles
are of a similar size. The 30% is somewhat arbitrary based on the water
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
23
and oil content of a particular single sample. If the feed is relatively dry,
then no back blending would be required. If it is very wet then more
blending would be required. The exact ratio of wet to dry cuttings will
partly depend on the properties of the cuttings themselves. The optimum
water content of feed material is 3 to 8%, for example 5%, by weight.
However water contents in the range 1% to 15% may be acceptable in
some circumstances.
The behaviour of the blended materials when treated with microwaves is
equivalent to that of non-mixed cuttings, i.e. the distribution of liquids
from the mixing of the wet and dry materials does not adversely affect the
ability of the microwave process to remove the oil.
The sensitivity of the electromagnetic design of the cavity to the dielectric
properties of the material justifies the approach to produce a consistent
feed material, as both the mass flow rate through the system and the
water content of the blended material affect the design of the magnetic
cavity.
Features of the microwave treatment cavity
The microwave cavity is designed taking into account the dielectric
properties of both the feed material and the treated material, as well as
the electric field strength required for the treatment of the material.
The rate of energy input to the material to be treated should be
maximised, as it is necessary to convert water to steam as quickly as
possible. This is achieved by passing a relatively small stream of material
through a zone of, uniform, high electric field strength, resulting in the
rapid heating of the water. By 'uniform', we mean a field of
characteristics such that when a stream of material has passed through the
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
24
field each particle within the stream received substantially the same
electromagnetic treatment. That is, material passing through the cavity is
substantially uniformly treated. It will be seen that the field itself does
not necessarily have a uniform distribution within the treatment area.
The strength of the electric field should be as high as possible, but not
exceed the break down voltage in air. We have used radiation where the
magnitude of the electric field portion is approximately 107V/m
Water absorbs microwave radiation most efficiently when the radiation
has a frequency in the order of 18GHz. However, due to restrictions in
the commercial use of microwave radiation, the only frequencies that are
available for use in the UK are 2.45GHz, 896MHz and 433MHz. We use
895MHz, although systems using either 2.45GHz or 433MHz would also
produce good results. The frequency of the electromagnetic radiation
impacts on cavity design, as it impacts on the dimensions of the cavity
that are needed to produce a relatively uniform field. From equation (1) it
can be seen that frequency is directly proportional to power density, Pd
and frequency is directly proportional to 1/penetration depth. This implies
that penetration of electromagnetic energy into thick beds of material
requires lower frequencies. The precise frequency is dependant to some
extent to the geographical region where the process is being operated.
The total useable range extends from 1MHz to 2.45GHz, and it is laws
and regulations that permit certain frequencies to be used, and prohibit
the use of other frequencies, rather than technical necessity. As stated
previously, RF, or other electromagnetic radiation, might be used rather
than microwave.
It is envisaged that the residence time of the material in the treatment
cavity (high field strength zone) would be from fractions of a second
(such as 1/101") to 1 or 10 seconds. The residence time in the treatment
zone 8 is dependant on the conveyor belt speed. The throughput of the
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
process is dependant, to some extent, on the dominant hydrocarbon
removal mechanisms in the process (identified earlier). The residence
time could even be less than 0.ls, for example 0.05 second.
5 To achieve such residence times the electromagnetic power (microwave)
applied should be in the range of 5kW to approximately 2MW. Higher
powers result in more rapid heating of the water content of the feed
material being treated.
10 A `tunnel applicator' is shown schematically in Figure 6. The apparatus
comprise a microwave treatment cavity 3 having a waveguide 29 and a
self-cancelling step 31. The step 31 is arranged to encourage the
formation of a more uniform field within treatment zone 8, as is well
known.
The `tunnel' design allows a continuous process to be used, as a load can
be fed into one end of the tunnel and out of the other, through treatment
area 8. A trough belt 27 carries blended feed material into and out of the
treatment cavity 3. The belt 27 is continuous and returns below the
microwave cavity (shown schematically at 28). The belt material is such
that it can withstand high temperatures, and is reasonably transparent to
microwaves. The belt is supported on rollers (see Figure 11), which are
also reasonably transparent to microwaves. Hence substantially the only
absorber of radiation within the cavity is the water within the material
being treated.
The belt extends from the cavity on the downstream end for a distance
sufficient to allow for vapour recovery, if necessary.
A trough-belt system is used as it provides many advantages over a flat
belt system, which can have material handling problems such as load
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
26
falling off the belt sides. The trough belt also provides the best option in
terms of the uniformity of the electric field.
The cavity 3 is designed to result in the generation of a sufficient electric
field strength and effective treatment zone 8, taking into account the
properties of the feed material. If the field strength is too low then the
energy will not be sufficient to turn the water rapidly into steam. If
water is not rapidly heated to steam (for example, in less than 5 seconds)
then the oil removal mechanisms described above do not work effectively.
The microwave emitter may operate continuously, or may be pulsed;
either term falls within the bounds of the term `continuous' as used
herein.
Features of the Electromagnetic Design
During cavity design, the prevention of localised areas of high field
strength and the field uniformity were the parameters used to assess the
feasibility of each simulated cavity. The field needs only to be
sufficiently uniform to provide substantially uniform treatment. In
addition, if the conveyor belt does not extend to the edges of the cavity
the field need not be uniform beyond the edges of the belt. The exact
cavity dimensions stem from an iterative simulation process in which the
likely effectiveness of different cavity dimensions were assessed.
The following problems were encountered while conducting experiments
in a TE,o, single mode cavity. Different cavities were used, each with
different dimensions.
= Hot spots developed in within the cavity causing non-uniform
treatment.
= Smaller diameter loads gave more uniform treatment, but allowed
less throughput. Large diameter loads allowed for greater
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
27
throughput at the same power density, however requiring more
power.
The above problems could be resolved by eliminating the variation of the
electric field in one dimension (see Figure 7), in this case, the y direction
perpendicular to the direction of material movement. This can be done
using a rectangular tunnel applicator.
An existing tunnel applicator, used for the treatment of ore, was used to
investigate the operation of a tunnel applicator during the treatment of oil
contaminated drill cuttings. This tunnel had the following features:
= It was fed orthogonally (i.e. perpendicularly to the direction of
travel) with TEto waveguide such that the polarisation in the
waveguide is perpendicular to the direction of material movement.
= Variation in the electric field across the tunnel, in the x-direction,
was eliminated by making the tunnel just the right width to obtain a
single mode distribution.
= Variation in the direction of material movement (z-direction) is not
a major issue, since each particle should at some point encounter
the same electric field strength.
= The variation of concern (often the only variation of concern) is
that perpendicular to the direction of travel (y-direction). Variation
in this direction leads to non-uniform treatment of the sample as a
result of the sample travelling through a hot spot.
The above design was improved by the addition of a self-cancelling
reflection step to provide a more uniform field distribution in the vertical
plane.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
28
The step is a quarter of a wavelength deep, resulting in a total of half a
wavelength being cancelled out in the step. Due to the reflection of the
microwaves multiple hot spots are generated throughout the y-direction
(Figure 7(b)). The result is the net effect shown in Figure 7(c), which is
more uniform than what can be obtained without a step (which would be
closer to the distribution in the area labelled `B' in Figure 7(c)). Given
that the power in each of the regions A and B is high enough the electric
field strength will be strong enough, resulting in uniform treatment of the
sample moving through any one region in the z direction for a given
residence time. Therefore, for a high power density, the residence time in
each region should be relatively small. The field does not have to
particularly uniform in the y-direction, as long as there is sufficient
overlap between all of the hot spots, while in the x-direction then less
than 10% variation would be desirable. It is important to note that this
field uniformity relates to this type of design. A different cavity design
might require different levels of uniformity.
After step optimisation, as described above, the following other factors
must be considered:
= Increasing the width of the cavity to a maximum whilst ensuring an
even electric field distribution. A large width is desirable in order
to allow a large throughput. However, to achieve an even field
strength across the whole width (horizontal) the actual dimensions
must be related to the frequency of the microwave energy. If the
width were too wide then the field strength would fall away to zero
at the extremes. Too narrow and we would not be able to pass a
reasonable amount of material through the treatment zone.
= Optimising the position of the belt relative to the cavity height
= Assessing the sensitivity of the design to a change in feed
properties (eg dielectric properties, particle size).
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
29
The cavity also is designed to maximise the headspace above the material
being treated to aid removal of the vapours. As much headspace as
possible is required, without compromising the power density. Build up
of vapours within the system would result in oil and water deposition onto
the internal surfaces of the treatment cavity, and possible damage to the
cavity.
In addition there is a need to account for the effect of the belt radius (i.e.
belt bending) in a trough conveyor belt and the cross-section of the drill
cuttings on the belt.
A set of chokes, incorporated into the whole cavity design, prevents
microwave leakage from the applicator from the inlet and outlet of the
tunnel.
The cavity was designed for a feed material of particular dielectric
properties. The median power density divided by the standard deviation
was the key parameter used to differentiate each simulation based on its
likely effectiveness. The properties chosen in the simulations represent
an average for blended drill cuttings, based on the measurements taken of
untreated drill cuttings, along with mixing laws and assumptions for the
granulated materials. The simulations are based on a feed material
having a dielectric constant s' = 3.5 and a dielectric loss factor s" = 0.5.
The optimum design yields field distributions where uniformity is
obtained across the width of the cavity and multiple hot spots provide
vertical uniformity. Even slight changes in the cavity dimensions or feed
properties can result in a loss of the favourable field configurations as
demonstrated in Figure 9. The figure shows the areas of electric field
strength within the cavity. Zone of high electric field strength appear in
darker colours (hot spots). It can be seen that even changing the cavity
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
configuration and load placement only slightly alters the distribution of
the electric field.
Two potential embodiments were investigated in terms of optimising their
5 electric field strength:
1. Belt runs along the bottom of the cavity
2. Belt runs above the bottom of the cavity, supported by
microwave-transparent rollers
10 Figure 10 illustrates (a) Electric field distribution (M/a) and (b)
dissipated power as a function of the belt radius for both design cases for
both cases.
If the belt would allow a rectangular cross-section of material to be
15 formed inside the cavity then Case 1 (labelled as the improved ideal case
design) offers the best performance. However, when the radius of the belt
is taken into consideration the field uniformity is adversely affected (as
shown by a marked decrease in M/o, the median power density divided by
the standard deviation), and design Case 2 is the one that should be
20 adopted, as Case 2 tolerates the curvature of the belt in the corners,
whereas the alternative design is not very robust in this respect. Of note
is that the applied power assumed for the simulations is 0.5W, which
indicated that 95%+ of the forward power is dissipated within the
material without any need for external tuning devices.
A perspective view of a laboratory scale tunnel applicator is shown in
Figure 8. The step 31 results in a number of areas of well-defined, very
even and very high electric field strength by reflecting radiation input
using the waveguide 29 in a well known manner. A conveyor belt (not
shown) passes material through the field at a constant speed, such that the
CA 02669497 2012-02-16
31
treatment is as even as possible, with no bias towards the centre or edges of
the material
on the belt.
The chokes 33 ensure that electromagnetic energy does not escape from the
treatment
cavity. These chokes are a function of the material in the tunnel and
therefore the design
of the cavity can be asymmetric to take account of the different material
properties on the
conveyor belt both pre and post treatment.
The laboratory scale cavity is approximately 2.2m in length and 100mm in width
and
height (excluding chokes and waveguide), and is capable of being operated to
produce
treated cuttings at a rate of 200kg/hour. Figures 15 and 16 show this cavity.
Dimensions
of the cavity are given in Figures 8a (top section 3a) and 8b (bottom section
3b).
Figure 11 shows an optimised tunnel applicator for the treatment of drill
cuttings, for an
industrial scale system. If the degree of sagging between the rollers
adversely impacts on
the field distribution, the rollers might be replaced with skid plates.
As explained above, the cavity has been optimised for specific material
dielectric
properties, and deviations from those properties in feed material would
perturb the
electric field irrespective of how careful the design. For this reason the
feed material
properties are carefully controlled by the feed unit 7. In addition, the
height of material
on the conveyor can be adjusted to remedy such variations provided that
sufficient cross-
sectional area is available for extraction of vapours.
Although the power density (109 W/m) is sufficient to remove oil and water
without the
aid of a sweep gas, a sweep gas is advantageous in the
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
32
transportation of vapours away from the cavity, as described in more
detail below.
Gas/Vapour handling
We have found that the rate of oil removal is significantly improved when
microwaves are applied in conjunction with a sweeping gas. For
example, an inert gas such as nitrogen or steam, or other gas which will
not react with the OCDC, is passed through the treatment cavity to assist
in vapour removal during or shortly after. Figure 13 compares the use of
sweeping steam across cuttings to remove oil (steam stripping) with steam
stripping in conjunction with microwave treatment. It can be seen that
for a given treatment time the percentage of oil removed is at least 20%
higher if sweeping steam is used as well compared with if stream
stripping alone is used.
Any inert gas, such as nitrogen, could be employed as a sweep gas
instead of steam. Similar results to those shown in Figure 13 were
obtained with nitrogen gas. It was found that gas stripping alone
achieved only a 20% reduction in oil levels whereas the removal
efficiency was in excess of 90% when microwaves were applied.
The microwave process could be used without a sweep gas, which would
lessen the degree of design complexity of an industrial scale system. A
study was performed whereby microwave energy was applied to a bed of
drill cuttings for a set time. Nitrogen sweep gas was introduced to the bed
of cuttings after the microwaves had been applied, i.e. the sweep gas
passes through hot cuttings. Figure 14 shows the results of this
experiment, where the residual oil levels are shown against the time for
which the sweep gas was applied after microwave treatment ceased.
CA 02669497 2012-02-16
33
Time zero in Figure 14 corresponds to the application of microwaves only. It
can be seen
that increasing the length of time after treatment for which sweep gas is
applied reduces
the residual oil level in treated drill cuttings. It is evident therefore that
sweep gas is
beneficial to the overall separation process, but it does not necessarily need
to be
combined with the application of microwave energy. The bed of drill cuttings
is a
relatively poor heat conductor hence a significant quantity of the energy
dissipated within
the bed remains several minutes after the microwaves are applied. Clearly the
continued
evolution of volatiles after microwave treatment is significant, and should
not be
overlooked in the design of the continuous system, however the gas-solid
contact
achievable in batch laboratory experiments is difficult to achieve in a
continuous process.
The continuous process can comprise of two distinct elements; a microwave
application
step followed by a gas sweeping step.
In the pilot scale process the sweep gas is inserted both at the materials
input to the
treatment cavity and along the electromagnetic waveguide (via an input in a
side of the
cavity (shown at 45 in Fig 17). Figure 18 shows the pilot scale gas handling
system, 46. .
The input point at the waveguide ensures a positive gas pressure at this point
and thereby
reduces the potential for hydrocarbon and water phases to condense on the
quartz
window that acts as a barrier to stop potentially materials damaging the
microwave
generator. If water were to condense on the quartz window, then that water
would heat up
as microwaves are applied, and might cause the window to melt. The flow of gas
down
the waveguide also helps to overcome problems with arcing. The co-current flow
allows
for rapid removal of the vapours from the areas of high electric field
strength.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
34
A schematic gas handling system suitable for use in an industrial version
of the process is shown in Figure 12. The system can remove the oil and
water vapours from the cavity, promote the continued evolution of
vapours after microwave treatment and collect the oil and water .for
separation. Gas may be removed through perforations in a tunnel wall,
such as the roof, as well as at the outlet, shown schematically at 40 in
Figure 12.
The gas handling systems are designed to be as flexible as possible, to
allow the exact pressures and flows required in each practical situation to
be determined experimentally for various operating conditions. New gas
can be added in to the recovered gas 11 at valve 42 if desired. An
exhaust gas outlet 44 is provided.
15 A low pressure drop condenser is placed between the microwave
treatment unit and a centrifugal fan to collect the oil and water vapours.
With a thermal desorption mechanism the only gas discharged will be
nitrogen, which can be recycled or purged.
20 If significant pyrolysis occurs in the treatment process then a gas
scrubbing system can be incorporated.
Example
An exemplary laboratory scale system similar to that shown in Figure 1
will now be discussed.
EXPERIMENTAL AND MATERIALS
A continuous pilot-scale system consists of a 5-30 kW variable power
microwave generator, which delivers microwaves at 2.45GHz to a cavity
via several sections of WR430 waveguide and an automatic E-H tuner.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
The tuner works by varying the geometry in the E and H planes to match
the impedance of the microwaves with that of the cavity, with an
algorithm used to vary the geometry so as to minimise the reflected
power. Any reflected power is absorbed in a circulator, which uses a cold
5 water load, and this protects the magnetron and power supply from
excessive returned microwave energy. A stream of cold nitrogen was
introduced at 2 1/min down the waveguide entrance to the cavity, which
was done to provide a positive pressure and prevent oil and water vapours
from passing through the waveguide to the microwave generator.
Drill cuttings are fed from a feed hopper into a twin shaft mixer, where
dry material could be introduced to control the moisture content of the
feed to the microwave cavity. The mixer deposits the cuttings onto a
conveyor belt made from woven Nomex' fibres (other flame resistant
materials may be used), and formed into a trough to contain the process
material. A heated nitrogen stream at 10 1/min was introduced at the
material feed to act as a sweep gas, and also to provide an inert
atmosphere within the cavity to prevent combustion of the oil vapour.
A top section of the cavity and chokes contains perforations which permit
the withdrawal of evolved vapours whilst containing the microwave field.
An extraction hood covers the perforated sections and the end of the
choking section, and the vapours are drawn through a condenser to
recover the oil and water. Dry drill cuttings are discharged at the end of
the conveyor belt, and collected for analysis and disposal.
The oil and moisture contents of the treated and untreated drill cuttings
were measured, and used to determine the degree of treatment. Water
contents were measured using the Dean and Stark method (International
standard ASTM D-95), which involves reflux distillation with toluene and
separation of the water phase. Oil content measurement was carried out
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
36
using solvent extraction, which is a technique for extracting organics
from solid samples with liquid solvents. The organics were extracted
using Dichloromethane (DCM) at elevated temperatures and pressures to
increase the efficiency of the extraction process. Increased temperature
accelerates the extraction kinetics, while elevated pressure keeps the
solvent below its boiling point, thus enabling safe and rapid extractions.
The hydrocarbon content of the organic phase was determined using Gas
Chromatogram techniques.
The drill cuttings were obtained from North Sea drilling operations, and
contained 10% oil and 10% water. Dry clay was added to reduce the oil
and water content of the cuttings to 7%, which altered the consistency of
the cuttings from a slurry to a more permeable, agglomerated granular
material.
Continuous treatment tests were carried out over a period of several
hours, with three samples of treated material taken for analysis for each
set of experimental conditions. The recovered oil was collected at the end
of the complete test sequence.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effects of microwave power
Experiments were performed at power levels of 5, 10 and 15kW with the
material throughput fixed at 160 kg/hr. In all the tests the reflected power
achieved a stable value between 0.5 and 0.7 kW. The bulk residual oil
contents of the processed cuttings were measured, and these results are
shown in Figure 19, which shows the residual oil content plotted against
power for a constant throughput of 160 kg/hr.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
37
It can be seen that increasing the applied power results in improved oil
removal, with the residual oil level decreasing steadily as the applied
power is increased. Given that the reflected power remained relatively
unchanged, almost all of the applied power was dissipated within the drill
cuttings in the microwave cavity. It is known that the contaminant oil is
effectively transparent to microwaves as it has a dielectric loss factor of
less then 0.1 at room temperature and a frequency of 2.45 GHz. The
effect of increasing the applied power is to increase the power density in
the absorbing phases within the material, which is the water that is
contained within the pore structure of the rock cuttings. Previous studies
showed the remediation mechanism to be the rapid conversion of
interstitial water to steam in the first instance, which then entrains the
contaminant oil from the surface of the cuttings and into the sweep gas.
This appears to be the most thermodynamically attractive mechanism as
the microwave energy can be targeted into the water phase alone, rather
than heating the entire matrix of rock fragments, oil and water.
It is possible to calculate the minimum energy required to remove the
contaminant oil by assuming that all of the applied microwave energy
raises the temperature of the water to 100 C and subsequently overcome
the latent heat of vaporisation. Based on the latent heat of water of
2000kJ/kg and an average heat capacity of 4.2 kJ/kg.K, the minimum
amount of energy required to convert all of the water to steam in a
throughput of 160kg/hr can be established, and this figure is 45 kWh per
tonne of drill cuttings. An applied power of 7.3 kW is the theoretical
minimum at this throughput, and it can be seen in Figure 19 that power
levels at or below 7.3 kW do not include significant levels of
remediation, whereas at higher powers the residual oil levels are much
lower.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
38
The power levels required to reach the 1% environmental discharge
threshold are approximately double the thermodynamic minimum, and this
is likely to be due to the fact that some of the power is reflected, some
goes into superheating the water above 100 C before steam is formed,
and some will inevitably be dissipated within the surrounding rock
fragments and oil. Nonetheless, to desorb the oil by conventional heating
uses much more energy because temperatures in excess of 250 C are
required, and the entire matrix of rock, oil and water must be heated to
this temperature. The minimum energy requirements for a conventional
heating process using the same feedstock as with this work are estimated
in Table 1, assuming that al the oil vaporises at 250 C.
Temperature Specific Latent Heat kg Substance
Substance Range Heat of per kg Energy Required
Capacity Vaporisation Cuttings
C kJ/kg.K kJ/kg - kJ/kg cuttings kWh/tonne
Rock Fragments 20-250 2 - 0.86 395.6 109.9
Oil 20-250 2 800 0.07 88.2 24.5
Water 20-100 4.2 2000 0.07 163.5 45.4
Steam 100-250 1 - 0.07 10.5 2.9
657.8 182.7
Table 1 - Minimum energy requirements for a conventional heating
process.
On a theoretical basis the conventional thermal desorption process
requires four times as much energy as the microwave treatment process.
Effect of throughput
The throughput of drill cuttings was varied by changing the speed of the
conveyor belt. The applied power was kept constant at 15kW, and the
throughput varied between 110 and 220 kg/hr. This correspond to belt
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
39
speeds of 10 - 20 mm/s and residence times within the electric field of 5
- 10 seconds. The bulk residual oil content was determined for each set
of conditions, and these results are shown in Figure 20, which shows the
residual oil content plotted against throughput for a constant applied
power of 15kW. The dotted line represents environmental discharge
threshold of 1% oil on cuttings.
The trend in Figure 20 shows that decreasing the throughput at constant
power leads to a linear decrease in residual oil content, and hence
improves the overall cuttings treatment process. Decreasing the
throughput increases the residence time in the area of the cavity which
supports the high intensity electric fields, which allows more of the
available electromagnetic energy to be dissipated within the water phase.
The environmental discharge threshold can be achieved using 15kW and
process throughputs below 150 kg/hr. Throughputs which are higher than
this mean that the residence time in the electric field is too low for the
creation of sufficient volumes of steam to remove the required levels of
contaminant oil. When the process throughput is continually decreased
below 150 kg/hr the residual oil levels reduce further, and can fall to
below 0.1%, which is the current threshold for classification as a
hazardous material in the UK. The reflected power levels were again
found to be relatively constant across the range of throughputs studied,
with values of 0.4 - 0.7 kW recorded. It is postulated that decreasing the
throughput below 100 kg/hr at 15kW will result in an increase in the
reflected power as the residence time in the microwave cavity is likely to
extend beyond that required to remove the water, meaning that the
remaining cuttings effectively become microwave transparent. The
electric field distribution is a strong function of the dielectric constant
and dielectric loss factor of the process material. When the water is
removed the dielectric loss factor decreases to below 0.1, meaning that
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
much of the 15kW of available microwave power will be transmitted
through the material with very little being absorbed.
Quality of recovered oil
5
The base-oil in the drilling mud was characterised using Gas
Chromatography. The oil and water recovered from the condenser were
collected and the two phases allowed to separate under gravity. Three
samples of the oil phase were removed for analysis, and typical results
10 are shown in Figure 21, which shows Gas Chromatograms of (a) original
oil from untreated drill cuttings and (b) recovered oil after microwave
treatment.
The peaks shown in the chromatogram in Figure 21a indicate an
15 abundance of C8 - C16 hydrocarbons, with small traces of C17 - C20 at
longer elution times. In Figure 21b, the chromatogram of the recovered
oil indicates the presence of some lighter hydrocarbons than were evident
in the original oil, and less of the heavier hydrocarbons. Overall the
composition is similar, and is not likely to have a significant impact on
20 the oil properties for recycling within the drilling mud system.
Nonetheless the presence of lighter hydrocarbons indicates that some
thermal upgrading of the oil has occurred, possibly due to pyrolysis or
steam cracking caused by localised areas of peak electric field strength
within the cavity. Analysis of the residual oil in the treated drill cuttings
25 was also carried out and this shows greater abundance of the heavier
species, which is shown in the chromatogram in Figure 22.
Energy requirements
30 The levels of remediation achieved were evaluated against the total
microwave energy applied to the system, and this is shown in Figure 23,
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
41
which plots energy requirement as a function of the levels of remediation
attained using an applied power of 15kW.
Applying more microwave energy leads to an improvement in the
remediation process as the residual oil content decreases with increasing
energy input. In this case the 1% environmental discharge limit can be
achieved using around 100 kWh per tonne of drill cuttings. Significantly
cleaner cuttings can be produced at higher energy inputs of the order of
140 kWh per tonne, which correspond to longer residence times within
the microwave field.
The results shown in Figures 19 and 20 indicate that both higher applied
powers and longer residence times in the microwave field are beneficial
to the remediation process. The results obtained do not allow the effects
of heating rate to be established, since tests would need to be evaluated
using different power densities at equivalent energy inputs. For example,
it is not possible to determine whether a high power and short residence
time is better than a low power and a long residence time. The effect of
power density can be evaluated by comparing the results of the continuous
testwork with those obtained from batch microwave experiments in single
mode and multimode cavities.
Comparison with Batch Processing
Batch tests have previously been carried out using single mode and
multimode apparatus. These batch processes were compared with the
continuous process described herein. In all cases the applied power was
15kW, and the residence time or treatment time was varied. The results
are shown in Figure 24, where the three cavities are compared based on
the microwave energy used in each case.
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
42
Figure 24 shows the variation of residual oil content with energy input for
three processing scenarios utilising 15kW of microwave power.
All three microwave cavities are able to induce significant levels of
remediation of the contaminated drill cuttings. The cavity which supports
the lowest power density is the multimode cavity, and it can be seen from
Figure 24 that the energy requirements are of the order of 450 kWh per
tonne to reduce the oil content to 2%. The tests in the multimode cavity
showed that the 1% discharge threshold is difficult to achieve, and our
previous work also supports this observation. A summary of the
experimental conditions used is shown in Table 2, along with the power
densities which are supported in each of the three different cavities.
Processing Strategy Multimode Single Mode Continuous
Applied Power kW 15 15 15
Throughput k lhr - - 160
Sample Volume cm' 100 100 -
Mean Power Density /m' 4 x 106 7.5 x 107 1.4 x 108
Table 2 -- Power densities in multimode, single mode and continuous
microwave applicators.
The results obtained with the single mode cavity showed that the 1%
discharge threshold could be achieved, and that the remediation process
occurs using lower energy inputs than were evident in the multimode
cavity. This is because the single mode cavity supports a power density
which is an order of magnitude higher than that in the multimode cavity
(see Table 2), and this leads to an increased heating rate. The microwave
power is dissipated within the water phase, causing superheating of the
water and rapid conversion into steam. At lower power densities the
heating rate is proportionately lower, meaning that the beneficial effects
of rapid steam formation are reduced due to heat transfer losses and
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
43
recondensation of some of the steam before it can act as an entraining
gas.
The average power density supported by the continuous system is
1.4 x 108 W/m3, which is approximately double that supported by the
single mode cavity. It can be seen in Figure 24 that the effect of energy
input on oil removal with the two cavities is roughly comparable up to the
1% threshold, but the continuous cavity allows much lower levels of
residual oil to be achieved. The single mode treatment is a batch process,
and the dielectric constant and loss factor of the drill cuttings decrease
with time as water is lost. At low oil levels there is a correspondingly
small amount of water within the sample, and its dielectric loss factor is
low. This means that it is difficult to concentrate sufficient microwave
energy into the sample, and results in a high reflected power towards the
end of the batch test. This was observed in practice, with over 80% of the
applied power reflected at the end of the single mode test, which
corresponds to less than 3kW of power absorbed. It is thought that the
increasing reflected power during the tests accounts for inability of the
single mode treatment to remediate the drill cuttings to levels
significantly below 1% oil.
Although embodiments of the invention have been described in relation to
OCDC, it will be appreciated that the invention is equally applicable to
removing oil from other contaminated matrices, such as soil. The
invention may be used to recondition brownfield/ex-industrial sites or
reduce pollution on beaches after an oil spill, or remove oil from
processed hydrocarbon containing materials.
The treatment described herein can be used to remove a broad range of
organic species such as benzene, diesel, and kerosene derivatives as well
as hydrocarbons. The treatment system will work very effectively for
CA 02669497 2009-05-13
WO 2008/059240 PCT/GB2007/004344
44
hydrocarbons up to diesel and kerosene, or similar molecules, and will
work to a lesser extent for heavier species.
Although we have talked about removing contaminants, such as oil,
typically from the surface of solid material such as stone, the invention is
not necessarily limited to removing contaminants. The material to be
driven off may have always been present - the invention could be used to
separate a materials susceptible to separation in this way. The invention
may be used to obtain either the driven off material, or the material that
is left behind. For example, the invention could be used to obtain a
material driven from a substrate by water to steam expansion, for
example oil may be obtained from shale in this way.
