Language selection

Search

Patent 2673018 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2673018
(54) English Title: BACKING SHEET FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES AND METHOD FOR REPAIRING SAME
(54) French Title: FEUILLE SUPPORT POUR MODULES PHOTOVOLTAIQUES ET SON PROCEDE DE REPARATION
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H01L 31/18 (2006.01)
  • H01L 31/049 (2014.01)
  • B32B 27/08 (2006.01)
  • B32B 27/26 (2006.01)
  • B32B 43/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • TEMCHENKO, MARINA (United States of America)
  • AVISON, DAVID WILLIAM (United States of America)
  • MANNARINO, FRANK ANTHONY (United States of America)
  • LIM, SAMUEL (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MADICO, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • MADICO, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L., S.R.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2008-02-01
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2008-11-27
Examination requested: 2012-09-19
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2008/001351
(87) International Publication Number: WO2008/143719
(85) National Entry: 2009-06-17

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/901,982 United States of America 2007-02-16
12/011,962 United States of America 2008-01-30

Abstracts

English Abstract

The present invention provides a protective backing sheet for photovoltaic modules. The backing sheets of the current invention possess excellent weather resistance, heat resistance, color retention, adhesion between layers and encapsulant, and scratch resistance. The backing sheet can minimize the deterioration in the performance of the solar module due to moisture permeation. It also can achieve desirable photoelectric conversion efficiency over a long period of time. Additionally the described backing sheet, or alternately referred to backskin, can be made in an aesthetically pleasing form.


French Abstract

L'invention porte sur une feuille support protectrice pour modules photovoltaïques. Ladite feuille présente une excellente résistance aux intempéries, à la chaleur, et aux éraflures, une conservation des couleurs, et une bonne adhérence entre les couches et les encapsulants. Ladite feuille réduit au minimum la détérioration des performances du module solaire due à la pénétration de l'humidité. Elle présente par ailleurs l'efficacité de conversion photoélectrique souhaitable pendant une longue période et peut de plus être réalisée sous une forme esthétique.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





15



What is claimed is:

1. A backing sheet for a photovoltaic module comprising:
a layer comprising an organic solvent soluble and/or water dispersible,
crosslinkable amorphous fluoropolymers.

2. The backing sheet of claim 1 where the fluoropolymer is a
fluorocopolymer of chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE) and one or more alkyl vinyl
ethers.

3. The backing sheet of claim 2 further comprising a crosslinking agent
mixed with the flourocopolymer.

4. The backing sheet of claim 3 further comprising a layer comprising one or
more of polyester, polycarbonate, polyolefin, polyurethane, a liquid. crystal
polymer,
aclar, aluminum, sputtered aluminum oxide polyester, sputtered silicon dioxide
polyester,
sputtered aluminum oxide polycarbonate, and sputtered silicon dioxide
polycarbonate.

5. The backing sheet of claim 4 wherein the layer comprising the
crosslinking agent mixes with the flourocopolymer is applied to the polyester
layer
without adhesive.

6. The backing sheet of claim 5 further comprising an EVA layer.

7. The backing sheet of claim 6 wherein the fluorocopolymer layer has a
thickness of less than 1mil.

8. The backing sheet of claim 6 wherein the fluorocopolymer layer has a
thickness of greater than 1mil.

9. The backing sheet of claim 4 further comprising silica, titanium oxide,
aluminum oxide, zinc oxide, beryllium oxide, mica, clays, boron nitride,
aluminum
nitride, titanium nitride, carbon black, and/or organic pigments.

10. A backing sheet for a photovoltaic module comprising:
a layer comprising a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and hydrocarbon
olefins with reactive OH functionality.

11. The backing sheet of claim 10 further comprising a crosslinking agent
mixed with the flourocopolymer.

12. The backing sheet of claim 11 further comprising a layer comprising one
or more of polyester, polycarbonate, polyolefin, polyurethane, liquid crystal
polymer,
aclar, aluminum, of sputtered aluminum oxide polyester, sputtered silicon
dioxide
polyester, sputtered aluminum oxide polycarbonate, and sputtered silicon
dioxide
polycarbonate.





16



13. The backing sheet of claim 11 wherein the layer comprising the
crosslinking agent mixes with the flourocopolymer is applied to the polyester
layer
without adhesive.

14. The backing sheet of claim 13 further comprising an EVA layer.

15. The backing sheet of claim 13 further comprising an ionomer layer.

16. The backing sheet of claim 12 further comprising a layer of a
fluorocopolymer of chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE) and one or more alkyl vinyl
ethers.

17. The backing sheet of claim 13 wherein the fluorocopolymer layer has a
thickness of less than 1mil.

18. The backing sheet of claim 13 wherein the fluorocopolymer layer has a
thickness of greater than 1mil.

19. The backing sheet of claim 11 further comprising one or more of silica,
titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, zinc oxide, beryllium oxide, mica, clays,
boron nitride,
aluminum nitride, titanium nitride, carbon black, and organic pigments.

20. A backing sheet for a photovoltaic module comprising:
a layer comprising a terpolymer of vinylidene fluoride, tetrafluoroethylene,
and
hexafluoropropylene.

21. The backing sheet of claim 20 further comprising a layer comprising one
or more of polyester, polycarbonate, polyolefin, polyurethane, liquid crystal
polymer,
aclar, aluminum, of sputtered aluminum oxide polyester, sputtered silicon
dioxide
polyester, sputtered aluminum oxide polycarbonate, and sputtered silicon
dioxide
polycarbonate.

22. The backing sheet of claim 21 further comprising an EVA layer.

24. The backing sheet of claim 21 further comprising an ionomer layer.

25. The backing sheet of claim 21 further comprising a layer of
fluorocopolymer of chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE) and one or more alkyl vinyl
ethers.

26. The backing sheet of claim 25 wherein the fluorocopolymer layer has a
thickness of less than 1mil.

27. The backing sheet of claim 25 wherein the fluorocopolymer layer has a
thickness of greater than 1mil.

28. The backing sheet of claim 20 further comprising silica, titanium oxide,
aluminum oxide, zinc oxide, beryllium oxide, mica, clays, boron nitride,
aluminum
nitride, titanium nitride, carbon black, and/or organic pigments.



17

29. A method of repairing the backing sheet of a photovoltaic module
comprising:
applying a formulation comprising an amorphous fluorocopolymer of
chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE) and one or more alkyl vinyl ethers to an area
on the
backing sheet in need of repair.
30. The method of repairing the backing sheet of claim 29 wherein the
formulation is comprised of two components, wherein the first component is
comprised
of a mixture of a crosslinker and a solvent, and the second component is
comprised of a
mixture of a solvent and a fluorocopolymer.
31. The method of claim 29 wherein the formulation is applied to the backing
sheet at ambient temperature or moderately elevated temperature.
32. The method of claim 29 wherein the formulation is applied to the backing
sheet at ambient temperature or moderately elevated temperature by spraying.
33. The method of claim 30 wherein the first and second components are
placed in a twin-chamber syringe equipped with static mixer and applied
through an
applicator and/or brush attached to the syringe.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 1 PCT/US2008/001351
BACKING SHEET FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES AND METHOD FOR
REPAIRING SAME

Background of the Invention
Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to photovoltaic modules. More
specifically
the present invention related to the protective backing sheets.
Description of Related Art
[0002] Solar energy utilized by photovoltaic modules is among the most
promising alternatives to the fossil fuel that is being exhausted this
century. However,
production and installation of the photovoltaic modules remains an expensive
process.
Typical photovoltaic modules consist of glass or flexible transparent front
sheet, solar
cells, encapsulant, protective backing sheet, a protective seal which covers
the edges of
the module, and a perimeter frame made of aluminum which covers the seal. As
illustrated in Figure 1, a front sheet 10, backing sheet 20 and encapsulant 30
and 30' are
designed to protect array of cells 40 from weather agents, humidity,
mechanical loads and
impacts. Also, they provide electrical isolation for people's safety and loss
of current.
Protective backing sheets 20 are intended to improve the lifecycle and
efficiency of the
photovoltaic modules, thus reducing the cost per watt of the photovoltaic
electricity.
While the front sheet 10 and encapsulant 30 and 30' must be transparent for
high light
transmission, the backing sheet must have high opacity for aesthetical
purposes and high
reflectivity for functional purposes. Light and thin solar cell modules are
desirable for a
number of reasons including weight reduction, especially for architectural
(building
integrated PV) and space applications, as well as military applications
(incorporated into
the soldier outfit, etc). Additionally light and thin modules contribute to
cost reduction.
Also reduction in quantity of consumed materials makes the technology
"greener", thus
saving more natural resources.
[0003] On means to manufacture light and thin solar cells is to incorporate
light
and thin backing sheets. The backside covering material however, must also
have some
moisture resistance to prevent permeation of moisture vapor and water, which
can cause
rusting in underlying parts such as the photovoltaic element, wire, and
electrodes, and
damage solar cells. In addition, backing sheets should provide electric
isolation,


CA 02673018 200PCT/US2008/001351

WO 2008/143719 2 PCT/US2008/001351
mechanical protection, some UV stability, adherence to the encapsulant and
ability to
attach output leads.
[0004] Currently used protective backing sheets are typically laminates.
Figure 2
provides an illustration of a typical laminate backing sheet 20. The laminate
consists of
films of polyvinylfluorides 22, which is most commonly Tedlar , polyesters
(PET) 24,
and copolymers of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) 26 as key components. The EVA
layer
26 bonds with the encapsulant layer 30 in the module and serves as a
dielectric layer and
has good moisture barrier properties. It is dimensionally stable. White EVA
allows
significant power boost. The polyester layer 24 is very tough, has excellent
dielectric
properties, is dimensionally stable, and also has good moisture barrier
properties. The
polyvinylfluoride layer 22 serves as a very weatherable layer.
[0005] Even though these films have met performance standards in the required
tests and during actual use, they exhibit certain limitations such as high
cost and limited
availability of the Tedlar films. Another drawback of prior art materials
such as PVF
(Tedlar(g), ECTFE (Halar ) and other fluoropolymers, is that such materials
cannot be
processed at ambient or moderately elevated temperatures. For example, PVF
film is
produced by a casting process from dispersion, using high boiling solvents
(usually
dimethyl acetamide for oriented Tedlar and propylene carbonate for Tedlar
SP). The
boiling point of dimethyl acetamide is 164-166 C and the boiling point of
propylene
carbonate is 200 C. The dispersion must be processed at 160 C and 90% of
solvent
content or greater to ensure adequate film formation. Higher temperatures are
unacceptable due to PVF resin thermal instability: its fusion and
decomposition
temperatures are so close, that PVF can decompose during the baking. As a
result, there
is always a residual solvent in Tedlar film. DuPont reports that residual
amounts of
dimethyl acetamide (DMAC) ranging from 0.05 to 1.0 wt% will be present in all
oriented
Tedlar PVF films.
[0006] Alternatively, ECTFE (Halar ) films are produced by melt extrusion at
350 C-375 C. As a result, they cannot be easily compounded with pigments,
clays, etc.
and are also expensive.
[0007] U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,370 suggests that manufacturing and module mounting
costs could be reduced by using, as the backskin material, a thermoplastic
olefin
comprising a combination of two different ionomers, e.g., a sodium ionomer and
a zinc
ionomer, with that combination being described as producing a synergistic
effect which

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 3 PCT/US2008/001351
improves the water vapor barrier property of the backskin material over and
above the
barrier property of either of the individual ionomer components. Also, the
patent
discloses use of an ionomer encapsulant with the dual ionomer backskin.
[0008] However, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) reports that
ionomer resins contain free and bound methacrylic acid, which requires using
stainless
steel tooling during melt processing, thus increasing the manufacturing costs.
PVMaT
Improvements in the Solarex Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing Technology
Annual
Subcontract Report May 5, 1998 - April 30, 1999, National Renewable Energy
Laboratory, January 2000 = NREL/SR-520-27643.
Summary of the Invention
[0009] The present invention provides a protective backing sheet for
photovoltaic
modules. The backing sheets of the current invention possess excellent weather
resistance, heat resistance, color retention, adhesion between layers and
encapsulant, and
scratch resistance. The backing sheet can minimize the deterioration in the
performance
of the solar module due to moisture permeation. It also can achieve desirable
photoelectric conversion efficiency over a long period of time. Additionally
the
described backing sheet, or alternately referred to backskin, can be made in
an
aesthetically pleasing form.
[0010] The backing sheets of the present invention are produced by utilizing
liquid coatings application technology, followed by lamination with EVA, and
can be
tailored according to the application requirements. Furthermore, advantages of
solar cell
modules utilizing the described backskin material include a significant
reduction in
manufacturing costs.
[0011] The liquid coatings formulations used in the backskins overcome one or
more of the deficiencies of the prior art backskins. The backskin can be made
thinner
than currently available backskins. The backing materials include more readily
available
materials which can be processed at ambient or moderately elevated
temperatures. These
liquid coatings can be applied directly on the second layer of laminate, thus
eliminating
the need for an adhesive. Additionally, they can be easily compounded with
additives
such as pigments, clays, etc.
[0012] In one aspect, a backing sheet for a photovoltaic module is described
having a layer comprising an organic solvent soluble, crosslinkable amorphous
fluoropolymers. The fluoropolymer may be a fluorocopolymer of
chlorotrifluoroethylene

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 4 PCT/US2008/001351
(CTFE) and one or more alkyl vinyl ethers, including alkyl vinyl ethers with
reactive OH
functionality. The backing sheet can include a crosslinking agent mixed with
the
flourocopolymer.
[0013] The backing sheet may also include additional layers, such as a
polyester
layer. For another example, the backing sheet of may also include an EVA
layer. Other
optional additional layers may include one or of coextruded polyester with
EVA,
polycarbonate, polyolefin, polyurethane, liquid crystal polymer, aclar,
aluminum, of
sputtered aluminum oxide polyester, sputtered silicon oxide or silicon nitride
polyester,
sputtered aluminum oxide polycarbonate, and sputtered silicon oxide or silicon
nitride
polycarbonate
[0014] The fluorocopolymer layer of the backing sheet can be applied to the
polyester layer, or other type of layer with or without an adhesive. Also, it
can be applied
as a single layer or multiple layers. In one embodiment, the fluorocopolymer
layer has a
thickness of less than 1 mil. In another aspect, the fluorocopolymer has a
layer that is
greater than lmil. In another embodiment, the backing sheet includes silica.
[0015] In another aspect of the invention, a backing sheet for a photovoltaic
module is described. The backing sheet has a layer comprising a copolymer of
tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and hydrocarbon olefins with reactive OH
functionality. The
backing sheet may further include a crosslinking agent mixed with the
flourocopolymer.
In one embodiment the fluorocopolymer layer has a thickness of less than I
mil. In
another embodiment, the fluorocopolymer layer has a thickness of greater than
lmil. In
another embodiment, the backing sheet also has an ionomer layer.
[0016] The fluorocopolymer may be or include a terpolymer of one or more
fluoromonomers. In one embodiment the terpolymer comprises vinylidene
fluoride,
tetrafluoroethylene, and hexafluoropropylene.
[0017] Again, the backing sheet may also include additional layers, such as a
polyester layer. The fluorocopolymer layer may be applied to the polyester
layer with or
without adhesive. The fluorocopolymer layer may be applied as a single layer
or as a
combination of clear and pigmented multiple layers. The polyester film can be
additionally corona or chemically treated to improve adhesion. The backing
sheet of
may also include an EVA layer. In another embodiment the backing sheet
contains silica.
Other optional additional layers may include one or of polycarbonate,
coextruded
polyester with EVA, polyolefin, polyurethane, liquid crystal polymer, aclar,
aluminum, of


CA 02673018 20oPCT/US2008/001351

WO 2008/143719 5 PCT/US2008/001351
sputtered aluminum oxide polyester, sputtered silicon oxide or silicon nitride
polyester,
sputtered aluminum oxide polycarbonate, and sputtered silicon oxide or silicon
nitride
polycarbonate, sputtered aluminum oxide Lumiflon , sputtered aluminum oxide
Zeffle ,
sputtered silicon oxide or silicon nitride Lumiflon, sputtered silicon oxide
or silicon
nitride Zeffle.
[0018] In another aspect, a method of repairing the backing sheet of a
photovoltaic module is provided. The method includes the step of applying a
formulation
comprising an amorphous fluorocopolymer of chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE) with
one
or more alkyl vinyl ethers, including alkyl vinyl ethers with reactive OH
functionality to
an area on the backing sheet in need of repair. In one embodiment the
formulation is
applied to the backing sheet at ambient temperature or moderately elevated
temperature.
In another embodiment, the formulation is comprised of a first and second
component
that are placed in a twin-chamber syringe equipped with static mixer and
applied through
an applicator attached to the syringe.
[0019] In one embodiment the first component of the formulation is comprised
of
a mixture of a crosslinker and a solvent, and the second component is
comprised of a
mixture of a solvent and a fluorocopolymer.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0020] For a better understanding of the present invention, reference may be
made
to the accompanying drawings.
[0021] FIG. 1 represents an expanded view of the components of a typical
photovoltaic module.
[0022] FIG. 2 represents one embodiment of the typical backing sheet.
[0023] FIG. 3 is a graph showing tensile strength as a function of exposure to
"Damp Heat" for Lumiflon-based back sheet as compared to Tedlar-based back
sheet.
[0024] FIG. 4 is a graph showing elongation at break as a function of exposure
to
"Damp Heat" for Lumiflon-based back sheet as compared to Tedlar-based back
sheet.
[0025] FIG. 5 is a graph showing UV stability of Lumiflon-based back sheet as
compared to Tedlar-based back sheet.
[0026] FIG. 6 illustrates an example of an applicator used with the patch kit.
Detailed Description
[0027] The present invention provides a protective backing sheet for
photovoltaic
modules. In one embodiment, the backing sheets are produced by utilizing
liquid

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 6 PCT/US2008/001351
coatings application technology. In the preferred embodiment the liquid
coating
application is followed by lamination with EVA. The process can be tailored
according
to the application requirements.
[0028] In another embodiment, an encapsulating material is provided. The
encapsulating material has excellent weather resistance, heat resistance, and
UV stability,
adhesion to backing material and to other components of solar module,
electrical isolation
and excellent color retention without yellowing. The described encapsulating
material is
applied by spraying, thus eliminating vacuum lamination process at elevated
temperatures
and reducing the manufacturing costs.
[0029] In another aspect methods for quick and easy repair of torn or
otherwise
damaged backskin are provided using a "patch kit". The method and patch kit
allow for
fast application of aesthetically pleasing, robust coating over scratched
backing sheet
without using extreme temperatures and pressures. Also, such "patch kit"
allows for fast
and efficient repair "in-situ". The coating of the patch kit applied in
accordance with the
method of the present invention meet all the requirements of IEC 60664-1, IEC
61730,
IEC 1646, and ASTM F 1249. In the preferred embodiment of this aspect of the
invention, the "patching" formulation is applied by using a twin-chamber
syringe
equipped with static mixer and applicator.
[0030] The liquid coatings formulations used in the present invention can be
applied at ambient temperature or moderately elevated temperature. The primary
component of the liquid coatings formulations are fluoropolymers, and
preferably organic
solvent soluble or water dispersible, crosslinkable amorphous fluoropolymers.
[0031] Preferred components of coatings include fluorocopolymers with the
following structure :

H H
I I I I H H
3Tt) C C C
I I b I ~ c
a OR H Q
CH2 4
[0032] OH

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 7 PCT/US2008/001351
F H H H
4T) I I I I I H I ()b I a H O c I CH2

C2H5 4
[0033] OH
[0034] and
F F H F
I ~ I I I
-c c
I A IZ
~
~

[0035] o H
[0036] Fluoropolymers that can be utilized in the liquid formulations include,
but
is not limited to, Lumiflon (Asahi Glass) and Zeffle (Daikin). Other
materials include
FluoroPelTM and FluoroThane TM (Cytonix Corporation), FluoroLinkTM Polymer
Modifiers (Solvay Solexis). Additional components in the liquid coating
formulations
include crosslinking agents, catalysts, solvents, and optionally, fillers and
inorganic
materials such as boron nitride (Zyp Coatings).
[0037] One particularly preferred fluoropolymer is Lumiflon , developed by
Asahi Glass in 1982. Lumiflon is an amorphous fluorocopolymer of
chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE) with several specific alkyl vinyl ethers (VE).
[0038] A combination of the alkyl vinyl ether monomers and hydroxyl groups
provides the polymer with significant properties, such as solubility,
compatibility to
pigment, crosslinking reactivity, adhesiveness to the substrate, hardness and
flexibility.
[0039] Another preferred fluoropolymer is Zeffle resins (Daikin), which are
copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and hydrocarbon olefins that are
organic solvent
soluble. More particularly, Zeffle is a solvent-based, copolymer of
tetrafluoroethylene
and hydrocarbon olefins with reactive OH functionality formulated for use as a
base resin
in high performance paints and coatings.

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 8 PCT/US2008/001351
[0040] In another embodiment, the fluoropolymer is a terpolymer. The
terpolymer may contain one or more different fluoromonomers. For one example,
the
terpolymer contains vinylidene fluoride, tetrafluoroethylene, and
hexafluoropropylene.
DyneonTM THV is one such terpolymer and provides a combination of performance
advantages, such as low processing temperature, ability to bond to elastomers
and
hydrocarbon-based plastics, flexibility and optical clarity. As a clear film
it can be used
as a front sheet to replace glass. The addition of pigment provides a film
that can be used
as a backing sheet for a photovoltaic module.
[0041] Organic solvents which may be used in this invention for the formation
of
the liquid coating formulations include but are not limited to organic
solvents such as
methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), toluene,
xylene,
methanol, isopropanol, ethanol, heptane, ethyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, n-
butyl acetate,
n-butyl alcohol or mixtures thereof. Preferred solvents include xylene,
cyclohexanone
and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). The appropriate solvent is one in which all
components
dissolve and one in which the boiling point is low enough to minimize or
remove the
presence of residual solvent in the coating.
[0042] Optional pigments and fillers which may be used in this invention for
the
formation of the protective coatings include but are not limited to titanium
dioxide,
carbon black, Perylene pigments, pigments, dyes, mica, polyamide powders,
boron
nitride, zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, silica, UV absorbers, corrosion
inhibitors, and
desiccants. One preferred pigment is titanium dioxide Ti-Pure R-105(DuPont).
One
preferred hydrophobically modified silica is Cab-o-sil TS 720 (Cabot).
Pigments, UV
absorbers and corrosion inhibitors function to impart opacity and
weatherability.
Orgasol Ultrafine is a preferred polyamide powders (Arkema Inc) and can be
included
for gloss reduction. Carbon black, pigments and dyes can be included to alter
the color of
the backing sheet. Mica can be included to impart flame retardancy. Boron
nitride,
aluminum nitride, and/or aluminum oxide can be included to improve thermal
conductivity. Cloisite Nanoclays (Southern Clay Products), 3MTM Glass Bubbles
and
desiccants are preferably included to improve moisture barrier properties.
Silica and/or
boron nitride can be included to improve dielectric properties. Silica may
also be included
to reduce gloss and to impart flame retardancy
[0043] Crosslinking agents are preferably used in the formation of the
protective
coatings include to obtain organic solvent insoluble, tack-free film.
Preferred

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 9 PCT/US2008/001351
crosslinking agents include but are not limited to DuPont Tyzor organic
titanates,
silanes, isocyanates, and melamine. Aliphatic isocyanates are preferred to
ensure
weatherability as these films are typically intended for over 30 years use
outdoor.
[0044] For one example, liquid formulations for Lumiflon -based coatings
compositions can be prepared by mixing a Lumiflon solution, pigment,
crosslinker and a
catalyst. Tin dibutyl dilaureate, is used to accelerate the crosslinking
reaction between
Lumiflon (polyol) and isocyanate in an organic solvent. Such compositions are
prepared
by mixing preferably 3 to 80, and even more preferably around 46 parts by
weight of
Lumiflori solution, 5 to 60 (more preferably around 17) parts by weight of
pigment, and
20 to 80 (more preferably around 32) parts by weight of organic solvent (a
mixture of
MEK and xylene or cyclohexanone).
[0045] The backing sheet may also include additional layers. The additional
layers may be applied to the fluorocopolymer layer with or without adhesive.
The
optional additional layers may include, for example, one or of polyester, EVA,
polycarbonate, polyolefins, polyurethanes, acrylics, polyimides, polyamides, '
liquid
crystal polymer, aclar, aluminum, of sputtered aluminum oxide polyester,
sputtered
silicon oxide or silicon nitride polyester, sputtered aluminum oxide
polycarbonate, and
sputtered silicon oxide or silicon nitride polycarbonate, clear fluoropolymers
and clear
fluorocopolymers, coextruded layer of a polymers such as polyester and EVA,
and
polybutadiene.
[0046] Example 1.
[0047] Example 1 illustrates the preparation of a Lumiflori -based protective
backing sheet according to the present invention. Lumiflon used in this
example is LF
200 grade, obtained from Asahi Glass as a 60% solution in xylene (200g).
Pigment used
in this example is Ti-Pure R-105, obtained from DuPont (76.2g). The
crosslinker is
Desmodur N3300, obtained from Bayer (21.4g). The pigment is mixed with
Lumiflon
solution using high shear mixer, followed by solvent and the crosslinker
addition.
[0048] The formulation is then applied. The liquid formulation is transferred
from the pan to the film by applicator roll and metered off by Mayer Rod to
obtain the
desired coating weight. The coating is applied directly on a Mylar (DuPont)
(5mil)
polyester film. No adhesive is required and in this example none is used. The
coating is
applied at a coating weight of 10 - 120 g/mZ, preferably 30-90 g/m2, and more
preferably
30 -45 g/m2.


CA 02673018 20oPCT/US2008/001351

WO 2008/143719 10 PCT/US2008/001351
[0049] The dry coating consists of 60-65% by weight of Lumiflon and 35% by
weight of pigment. In this example, the polyester film coated with Lumiflori -
based
formulation is laminated with EVA (vinyl acetate content 4%) using polyester-
urethane
laminating adhesive. The laminate is then vacuum laminated with an EVA
encapsulant
and module.
[0050] Table 1 show the properties of Lumiflon and Zeffle based protective
backing sheets as compared to a backing sheet prepared with Tedlar SP.
[0051] Table 1
Thickness Water Vapor g/(100in2 = Partial
Thickness Voltage
Sample of outer Transmission day) 100F Discharge
m max, VDC
layer pm Test 100% RH Test
Tedlar SP 25.4 IEC 60994-1,
178 ASTM F1249 0.195 820
/Polyester/EVA IEC 61730
Lumiflon / 12.7 IEC 60994-1,
165 ASTM F 1249 0.174 860
Polyester/EVA IEC 61730
Zeffle /Polyester 12.7 IEC 60994-1,
165 ASTM F1249 0.143 860
/EVA IEC 61730

[0052] Table 2 show the properties of Lumiflori based protective backing
sheets
as compared to a backing sheet prepared with oriented Tedlar .
[0053] Table 2
Thickness Water Vapor g/(100in2 = Partial
Thickness Voltage
Sample of outer Transmission day) 100F Discharge
m max, VDC
layer m Test 100% RH Test
Tedlar IEC 60994-1,
267 ASTM F 1249 0.12 1020
/Polyester/EVA 38 IEC 61730
Lumiflon / IEC 60994-1,
241 ASTM F 1249 0.12 1015
Polyester/EVA 13 IEC 61730

[0054] The results illustrate that Lumiflon and Zeffle -based coatings at a
0.5mil
thickness demonstrate superior barrier properties (lower moisture permeability
and higher
voltage resistance) than non-oriented Tedlar SP at a thickness of lmil, which
is twice the
thickness of the Lumiflon and Zeffle layers. Additionally, the Lumiflon
based
backing sheets are more cost-effective than the Tedlar based backing sheets.

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 11 PCT/US2008/001351
[0055] Table 3 illustrates the weatherability of Lumiflon based protective
backing sheets as compared to a backing sheet prepared with oriented Tedlar .
Samples
were placed into an environmental chamber at conditions of 85 C and 85%
Relative
Humidity ("Damp Heat") for 2000 hrs. The weatherability of the outer layer was
estimated by measuring adhesion between outer layer and polyester, tensile
strength and
elongation at break as a function of exposure to "Damp Heat" according to ASTM
D 903-
98 peel adhesion test, ASTM D 3359 cross cut tape adhesion test, and ASTM
D882. The
following abbreviations in Table 3 apply: TB is tear bond; 5B = 0% of coating
removed;
4B = less than 5% of coating removed; 3B = 5-15 % of coating removed; 2B = 15-
35% of
coating removed; 1B = 35-65% of coating removed; and OB = greater than 65% of
coating removed.

[0056] Table 3
HOURS
OUTER LAYER

500 1000 1500 2000
edlar 38 m B TB TB TB
umiflon 13 m 5B 5B 5B 4B

[0057] As illustrated in Table 3, the weatherability of thin Lumiflon -based
back
sheet is comparable to one of oriented Tedlar -based back sheet.
[0058] Figures 3 and 4 show that the tensile strength and elongation at break
of
Lumiflon -based back sheet depreciates much less than those of Tedlar -based
back
sheet as a function of exposure to "Damp Heat".
[0059] To evaluate UV stability, samples were placed into the Atlas ci 4000
Xenon Weather-Ometer, equipped with Xenon Arc Lamp for duration of 4600 hrs,
measuring L*a*b* regularly. b*-value represents "yellowing" of the material.
As is
represented in Figure 5, UV stability of Lumiflon -based back sheet is
comparable to
Tedlar -based back sheet.

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 12 PCT/US2008/001351
[0060] Example 2
100611 Example 2 illustrates the preparation of an alternate embodiment of a
Lumiflon -based protective backing sheet according to the present invention.
Lumiflon
used in Example 2 is LF 200 grade, obtained from Asahi Glass as a 60% solution
in
xylene (150g). Pigment used in this example is Ti-Pure R-105, obtained from
DuPont
(57g). Hydrophobically modified silica used in this example is Cab-o-sil TS-
720 (lOg)
obtained from Cabot. The crosslinker used is Desmodur N3300, obtained from
Bayer
(16 g). The catalyst used in this example is dibutyl tin dilaureate (0.15 g of
0.1%solution
in MEK) obtained from Aldrich. The pigment and silica are mixed with Lumiflon

solution using high shear mixer, followed by solvent, crosslinker and catalyst
addition.
[0062] The formulation is then applied. The liquid formulation is transferred
from the pan to the film by applicator roll and metered off by Mayer Rod to
obtain the
desired coating weight. The coating is applied directly on a Mylar (DuPont)
(5mil)
polyester film. No adhesive is required and in this example none is used. The
coating is
applied at a coating weight of 10 - 120 g/m2, preferably 30-90 g/m2, and more
preferably
30 -45 g/m2.
[0063] Table 4.

Thickness g/(100in2
Water Vapor Voltage
Thickness of outer = day) Partial
Sample Transmission max,
m layer m 100F Discharge Test
Test VDC
100% RH
Lumiflon IEC 60994-1,
241 ASTM F 1249 0.12 1015
/Polyester/EVA 13 IEC 61730
Lumiflon silica/ IEC 60994-1,
241 ASTM F 1249 0.12 1060
Polyester/EVA 13 IEC 61730
[0064] As illustrated in Table 4, Example 2, which includes the addition of
silica,
results in 45 V (max permissible voltage) increase over the Lumiflon based
back sheet
without silica, and in 40V increase over Tedlar based back sheet.
[0065] Example 3
[0066] Example 3 illustrates the preparation of another embodiment of the
present
invention; a Lumiflon -based "patch kit" formulation.
[0067] The Lumiflon based patch kit formulation is preferably prepared from a
formulation comprising 2 separate components: A and B.

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 13 PCT/US2008/001351
[0068] Component A comprises of a mixture of a crosslinker (Isocyanate
Desmodur N3300 (2.5g, Bayer)) and a solvent (in this Example, xylene).
[0069] Component B is comprised of a mixture of a solvent, pigment and a
fluorocopolymer. In this Example Component B is prepared as follows. A
dispersing
agent (Disperbyk 111 (0.25g, BYK- Chemie)) is mixed with xylene, 14.1 g of
Lumiflori
LF 200, pigment Ti-Pure R101 (IOg, DuPont), Orgasol 2002D (4.7 g, Arkema Inc)
and a mixture of coloring agents (Microlith Blue, Microlith Yellow, Microlith
Brown and
Orasol Black). Different coloring agents can be added to match the color of
the torn
backing sheet.
[0070] In use, components A and B are placed into a twin-chamber syringe
equipped with static mixer. The formulation is applied over damaged piece of
backing
sheet by using an applicator. One such applicator is available from Brandywine
Associates and is illustrated in Figure 6 where 50 is the mixer, 52 is an
applicator tip, and
54 is the applied patch kit formulation. However, any type of applicator, such
as a brush,
may be used to apply the formulation.
[0071] The patch kit is compatible with many backing sheets, such as those
prepared of prior art materials such as Tedlar /Polyester/EVA or backing sheet
made in
accordance with the present invention. The applied formulation to a Tedlar
based backing
sheet was subjected to partial discharge test. The results of this test are
summarized in
Table 5.
[0072] Table 5. Results of Partial Discharge Test

Outer layer Partial
Laminate Thickness mil Voltage max, VDC
thickness mil Discharge Test
Tedlar /Polyester/EVA 10.5 1.5 IEC 60994-1, 1020
IEC 61730
Tedlar /Polyester/EVA IEC 60994-1,
10.5 1.5 1020
patched IEC 61730

[0073] Additionally, this formulation demonstrated excellent adhesion to
underlying layers of the backing sheet material, namely, 5B, by cross- cut
tape test ASTM
D 3359-97.
[0074] There will be various modifications, adjustments, and applications of
the
disclosed invention that will be apparent to those of skill in the art, and
the present

PCT/US2008/001351
CA 02673018 2009-06-17
WO 2008/143719 14 PCT/US2008/001351
application is intended to cover such embodiments. Although the present
invention has
been described in the context of certain preferred embodiments, it is intended
that the full
scope of these be measured by reference to the scope of the following claims.
[0075] The disclosures of various publications, patents and patent
applications
that are cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 2008-02-01
(87) PCT Publication Date 2008-11-27
(85) National Entry 2009-06-17
Examination Requested 2012-09-19
Dead Application 2015-02-03

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2014-02-03 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2009-06-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2010-02-01 $100.00 2009-06-17
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2009-08-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2011-02-01 $100.00 2010-11-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2012-02-01 $100.00 2012-01-18
Request for Examination $800.00 2012-09-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2013-02-01 $200.00 2013-01-15
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MADICO, INC.
Past Owners on Record
AVISON, DAVID WILLIAM
LIM, SAMUEL
MANNARINO, FRANK ANTHONY
TEMCHENKO, MARINA
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2009-06-17 2 66
Claims 2009-06-17 3 121
Drawings 2009-06-17 3 59
Description 2009-06-17 14 672
Representative Drawing 2009-09-18 1 6
Cover Page 2009-09-25 2 42
Correspondence 2009-09-15 1 18
PCT 2009-06-17 1 56
Assignment 2009-06-17 5 259
Assignment 2009-08-26 6 223
Correspondence 2009-08-26 4 124
Correspondence 2009-10-16 1 18
Assignment 2009-12-15 9 323
Correspondence 2010-02-09 1 16
Prosecution-Amendment 2010-02-16 4 140
Prosecution-Amendment 2012-09-19 4 182