Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
Iron-Containing Polymer Suitable for Regenerating Diesel Exhaust Particulate
Traps
The present invention concerns iron-containing additives for fuels, especially
diesel fuel, and
a process for preparing same. The additives promote the combustion of
carbonaceous material,
in particular in the regeneration of diesel exhaust particulate traps, and
show excellent
suitability for use in fuels and especially in diesel engine on-board dosing
devices.
Carbonaceous fuels, whether of mineral (e.g. petroleum) or biological (e.g.
animal and / or
plant) origin, are a ubiquitous source of energy. In particular, much of the
world is reliant on
liquid carbonaceous fuels for powering vehicles, and for domestic and
industrial power
generation and heating. Efficient release of the energy contained within such
fuels is
dependent upon their effective combustion. Even in combustion devices of
modern design,
the chemical process of combustion typically does not run to completion, with
the effect that a
proportion of carbonaceous material is emitted not as carbon dioxide, but as
one or more less
oxidised species. In particular, particulate emissions comprising solid,
carbon-rich matter are
a well known by-product of incomplete combustion. The release of even small
quantities of
such emissions is under increasing environmental scrutiny.
A number of metals have been used, or proposed for use, as fuel additives to
improve the
combustion of carbonaceous material originating from the fuel. One such metal
is iron.
Combustion improvement in this way allows reductions in emissions,
particularly particulate
or smoke emissions, but may also be used to allow device operation at lower
excess air levels,
so reducing heat losses through the escaped gases and improving the efficiency
of the system.
The diesel engine has proved a popular choice for powering many devices,
including inter
alia forms of transport such as road vehicles, trains and marine craft. The
ever-increasing
emphasis on engine efficiency has imposed increasingly stringent emissions
standards on
diesel-powered transportation devices, especially road vehicles. Today, the
engineer must
typically deploy a range of emissions control strategies to meet modern
legislative and social
emissions targets.
One established strategy for the control of particulate emissions from diesel
engines is the use
of a particulate trap (also known as a particulate filter) within the exhaust
system of the
CONFIRMATION COPY
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
2
engine. The trap typically comprises a filter element, with pore size selected
to generally
permit through-flow of exhaust gases but retain the small particles of
incompletely-burned
material that constitute the 'particulate' element of diesel emissions. In
this way, the natural
efficiency of the modern diesel engine is augmented by an exhaust filtration
process which
traps a substantial proportion of the small quantity of particulate still
produced by the engine.
The gases leaving the exhaust system (the 'tailpipe emissions') are thus
substantially free of
particulate, enabling the engineer to reach very low particulate emissions
targets.
The action of the particulate trap in filtering out particulate material in
time leads to clogging
of the filter element. If left unattended, the gaseous flow through the filter
becomes hindered
to such an extent that significant back-pressure builds up in the exhaust
system, affecting the
operation of the engine. In addition, the effective filtration of further
particulate is inhibited.
For these reasons, the filter element must in turn be cleaned of collected
particulate to
preserve efficient function. This cleaning process is typically known in the
art as
'regeneration'.
Regeneration of the filter is itself effectively achieved through a combustion
process. Several
alternative approaches have been developed.
So-called 'active' systems rely on the periodic application of external energy
(such as heat) to
raise the temperature of the collected particulate to the point where its
spontaneous ignition
will occur in the trap. Diesel engines run on a lean air : fuel stoichiometry,
and the exhaust
gas contains significant quantities of oxygen (left over from the air intake
charge) which is
available to combust the ignited particulate in situ. In such systems, the
trap is therefore
periodically a second combustion chamber, wherein the particulate is further
combusted to
gaseous products before leaving the tailpipe.
, In contrast, 'passive' systems do not rely on external energy, but instead
promote the in situ
combustion of the collected particulate in other ways. Of these systems, the
use of catalytic
fuel additives has become accepted as a practical way to promote regeneration
of particulate
traps. Additives based on metals having the catalytic property of promoting
ignition of the
particulate at lower gas temperatures have been used commercially for this
purpose.
Spontaneous ignition of the particulate normally only occurs at temperatures
of around 600
degrees Centigrade. Such temperatures are typically only reached (unassisted)
by the exhaust
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
3
gases ctunng prolonged high speed, high load operation of the engine. The
presence of a
catalytic additive lowers that spontaneous ignition temperature significantly,
promoting
ignition over a wider range of typical exhaust gas temperatures. In
consequence, regeneration
is effected under a wider engine operating envelope, without the need for
external energy
sources. Depending on the degree of ignition promotion, the ignition and burn-
off of trapped
particulate may occur in a cyclic ('stochastic') fashion or continuously.
A number of metals have been used, or proposed for use, in trap regeneration
additives. Of
these metals, iron has proved particularly suitable. On the one hand, iron
promotes
regeneration sufficiently to allow long-term trap operation. On the other
hand, iron is
environmentally benign. During combustion, the iron in iron-containing
compounds is
converted to iron oxides, which become entrained in the particulate matter
formed by
incomplete combustion in the combustion chamber. When this particulate is
thereafter trapped
on the filter element, the iron is ideally positioned in situ amongst the
carbonaceous material
to be ignited, so enabling the ignition-promoting effect. The resulting
tailpipe emissions
ultimately release iron oxide, a naturally occurring substance, into the
atmosphere.
However, the practical use of iron-containing additives has become associated
with problems,
which have limited the use of iron as a fuel additive.
Firstly, the introduction of iron compounds into diesel fuel has been
associated with the
formation of deposits on the engine fuel injectors. Diesel engine injectors
have long been
known to be susceptible to carbonaceous deposits, believed to be formed from
the oxidation
products of natural components of the diesel fuel, However, the use of an iron-
containing
additive has been observed to give additional deposit problems. The mechanism
of this
deposit formation is not fully understood, but involves the formation of
deposits on the
carefully-engineered surfaces of the injector parts. As a result, the spray
pattern of the fuel
upon injection is altered unfavourably, resulting in less complete combustion,
and ultimately
poorer emissions performance and loss of engine power. In addition, more
advanced engines
typically require more finely-engineered injectors built to finer tolerances,
and must also meet
more stringent emissions standards.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
4
To take better advantage of iron's beneficial combustion-improver and trap
regeneration
properties, an iron-containing additive is required which shows a lower
tendency towards fuel
injector fouling.
Secondly, the iron-containing additive must be sufficiently soluble or
dispersible within the
fuel to actually reach the combustion chamber. Fuel distribution networks are
typically
complex and involve storage at intermediate depots and fuel service stations.
Fuel may remain
for days or even weeks in such environments. Similarly, on board the vehicle
or other
transportation device, the additive must remain evenly distributed in the fuel
within the fuel
tank. Additive which is lost from the bulk fuel through precipitation or
sedimentation will be
unable to effect regeneration, and can also cause filter blockage in the fuel
system.
The tendency of an additive to remain well distributed within the fuel over
time is hereinafter
referred to as its "stability". To take better advantage of iron's beneficial
properties as an
additive, an iron-containing additive is required which shows greater
stability in fuel, =
particularly under typical storage conditions in the distribution network and
the fuel tank.
In particular, an iron-containing additive is required which shows greater
stability in the
presence of other fuel components known to cause regeneration additives to
precipitate or
sediment out of the fuel. Certain lubricity additives deployed in modern
diesel fuel are known
to prompt known regeneration additives (based on various metals, including
iron) to
precipitate or sediment out of the fuel.
Whilst trap regeneration additives are occasionally added to the bulk fuel in
the distribution
network, increasingly they find application in 'on board' additive dosing
systems. These
systems comprise devices that supply additive from a separate tank to the fuel
system on
board the vehicle (or other device), avoiding the need for the additive to be
added to the fuel
further upstream. In this way, a particular engine and trap combination can be
optimised for
use with a single, defined additive. Thus, for example, some diesel engine
vehicles in current
production are equipped with on board dosing devices, whereby additive held in
concentrate
form in a discrete storage tank on board the vehicle is dosed, 'via suitable
means, into the fuel
on board the vehicle. Vehicle management systems control the level of dosage
and monitor
system operation. The additive tank contains sufficient additive to permit
long-term operation,
and can be replenished as necessary.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
Such on board dosing systems likewise require additive which is stable in the
bulk fuel.
In addition, however, on board storage requires the additive concentrate to
possess a viscosity
5 low enough to be compatible with the on board dosing device, and to hold
a concentration of
additive sufficient to permit long-term operation on a relatively small volume
of concentrate.
Space on board the modern vehicle (or other transportation device) is at a
premium, and the
on board additive tank and dosing device must both be small. In addition,
complexity adds
cost and must be kept to a minimum. Higher pressure devices (necessary for
effective dosing
of more viscous liquids) must be avoided.
These desired physical properties create conflicting demands on the additive
concentrate, and
have proved difficult to satisfy in practice. To obtain greater stability, the
iron has typically
been stabilised by associating it with long-chain organic species. In doing
so, the molecular
weight of the overall molecule or complex is increased, leading to higher
concentrate
viscosities and proportionately lower iron contents. Reducing this viscosity
to manageable
levels also requires greater dilution, leading to lower iron concentration
levels which require
larger additive tanks.
=
To take advantage of iron's beneficial trap regeneration properties, an iron-
containing
additive is required which not only shows greater stability but also exhibits
lower viscosity in
highly concentrate form, better satisfying the physical limitations of on
board dosing systems.
In addressing the above problems of injector fouling and conflicting physical
properties, it is
also essential that the resulting iron-containing additive remains effective
in its primary
function as a combustion improver or trap regeneration additive.
The present invention provides a solution to these problems in the form of a
specific iron-
containing polymeric material, obtainable by the process as also hereinafter
described. The
polymeric material unexpectedly demonstrates a reduced tendency towards fuel
injector
fouling, and provides a more favourable balance of physical properties both in
the fuel and in
concentrate form.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
6
In particular, despite its polymeric nature, the polymeric material shows
excellent stability in
diesel fuel, in particular in the presence of de-stabilising elements such as
lubricity additives.
Upon addition to the fuel, the polymeric material remains distributed within
the bulk fuel for
extended periods, particularly at the elevated fuel temperatures typically
seen in a diesel
vehicle fuel tank, and which occur in operation of the engine through the
partial recycling of
excess warm fuel from the injection system via the fuel return line. A more
uniform supply of
regeneration additive within the fuel is enabled.
Furthermore, despite its polymeric nature, the polymeric material of the
invention
unexpectedly shows lower viscosity (at comparable iron concentrations) in
concentrate form
when compared with conventional iron salts used hitherto as regeneration
additives. As a
result, concentrates containing higher iron contents can be prepared, which
better suit the
requirements of on board dosing systems.
Furthermore, the polymeric material of the invention provides excellent
regeneration of diesel
exhaust particulate traps.
These advantages are further explained and demonstrated in the examples
presented
hereinafter.
United States Patent No. 3,551,352 describes a catalytic inorganic polymer of
silicon, oxygen
and an iron group metal, and a method of making same. The polymer is described
as a
chemical combination comprising iron, oxygen and silicon in an amorphous,
inorganic high
molecular weight polymer-like material containing multiple and random Si-O-Si,
Si-O-Fe,
and Fe-O-Fe linkages. The catalyst finds utility in the conversion of
mercaptans to disulfides
in the processing of light petroleum distillates such as gasoline, a process
known as
'sweetening'. The presence of silicon in such a composition is clearly taught
as essential.
European Patent Application No. 1 344 813 describes the use of metal
monocarboxylate salts
as trap regeneration additives having improved storage stability. The
monocarboxylate has a
defined, branched structure with the preferred structure being neocarboxylate.
Iron
neodecanoate is exemplified. Other simple iron compounds are exemplified as
comparatives,
namely iron oleate, iron 2-ethylhexanoate and ferrocene (iron-
bis(cyclopentadieny1)).
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
7
Neither of the above disclosures point towards the iron-containing polymeric
material of the
present invention, nor the combination of advantages it provides.
The review article by Donald M. Kurtz, Jr. of University of Georgia entitled
"Oxo- and
Hydroxo-Bridged Diiron Complexes : A Chemical Perspective on a Biological
Unit"
(referenced as Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 585-606) summarises a number of known
aspects of
complexes based around the Fe-O-Fe `diiron' structural unit. The article
comments that the
nature of the diiron species that results from hydrolysis of Fe(III)(aq) at pH
> 1 was
controversial in 1974, and at the time of that article still had not been
resolved. A variety of
different bridging structures for the basic Fe-O-Fe unit have been postulated
and/or evidenced.
The polymeric material of the present invention possesses a polymeric backbone
consisting
essentially of alternating iron and oxygen atoms, to which are co-ordinated
specific organic
ligands. The detailed structure of the backbone is not determined, given the
variety of possible
bridging structures within the repeating (Fe-O-Fe-0-) linkages, and the added
complexity
brought about by polymerisation. Thus, the material of the present invention
may be as
usefully defined in terms of its process of preparation.
In a first aspect therefore, the present invention provides a process for the
preparation of an
iron-containing polymer suitable for use as an additive in fuel, comprising
the following
steps :
i) obtaining or preparing an aqueous solution of one or more
iron (III) salts;
ii) adding
thereto a weak base, in a stepwise manner, whilst continuously
stirring the reaction medium over the course of base addition;
iii) wherein the total amount of base added over the course of step ii) is
such as
to provide a molar ratio of iron to total base added in the range of 1:2.5 to
1:3.5, and to obtain a wet precipitate;
iv) reacting the wet precipitate from step iii) under reflux, in an organic
solvent, with a tertiary nitrogenous base and one or more polycarboxylic
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
8
acids and/or derivatives thereof, the water evolved over the course of the
reaction being removed;
v) wherein at least one polycarboxylic acid and/or derivative employed in
step
iv) comprises a branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing at least
14 carbon atoms, and wherein the total amount of all polycarboxylic acids
and/or derivatives thereof employed in step iv) is such as to provide the
reaction mixture with a molar ratio of iron to total carboxylic groups
(including any derivatives thereof) in the range of 1:1 and 3:1; and
vi) removing the resulting solid polymer material.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides the iron-containing polymer
obtainable by,
or obtained from, the process of the first aspect.
In particular, the present invention provides an iron-containing polymer
consisting of a
polymeric backbone from which a plurality of co-ordinating ligands depend, the
backbone
consisting of alternating iron and oxygen atoms in a chain-like structure
optionally also
bearing hydroxyl groups as pendant or bridging groups, and the co-ordinating
ligands being
polycarboxylate ligands and optionally also water molecules, wherein the
polycarboxylate
ligands comprise ligands having branched hydrocarbyl substituent groups
containing at least
14 carbon atoms.
In a third aspect, the present invention provides an additive concentrate
comprising the
polymer of the second aspect and an organic solvent compatible therewith.
Further aspects of the invention include various fuel compositions, processes
and methods as
hereinafter described and claimed.
The preferred features and embodiments of the invention will now be described.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
9
The process (first aspect of the invention)
The process may be conducted using either one or more iron (II) or,
preferably, one or more
iron (III) salts (optionally in combination with one or more iron (H) salts)
as starting material
to provide the iron content of the polymer. If an iron (II) salt is chosen or
included, the
process requires an extra step ia) to oxidise the iron (II) to iron (III)
before the subsequent
steps are performed. This oxidation step may be conducted in situ in aqueous
solution,
preferably by exposure to air (for example, by bubbling air through the
solution) or other
oxidising agent.
The use of iron (III) salts obviates the need for this oxidation step ia) and
is preferred from a
process viewpoint. Nevertheless, the iron salt(s) of choice may be more
practically available
in Fe (II) form and thus, in an additional aspect, the invention also claims
the process as
generally described under the first aspect, but wherein step i) employs one or
more iron (II)
salt(s) (or a mixture of iron (II) and iron (II) salts) and wherein an
additional step ia) permits
or causes the oxidation of iron (II) ions to iron (III) ions by exposure to
air and/or other
oxidising agent. The process otherwise then proceeds as generally stated
above.
The first part of the process is conducted in aqueous solution. The iron
salt(s) used as starting
material may thus generally be selected from those iron salts which readily
form aqueous
solutions upon addition to water. The salts may contain water of
crystallisation. Preferred
salts in the present process include the iron (III) salts of nitrate, halide,
sulphate, acetate,
acetylacetonate and oxalate as well as their iron (II) counterparts. More
preferably, only iron
(II) or iron (III) nitrate or halide is used in step i), wherein the halide
salts are preferably iron
(II) or iron (III) chloride or bromide. Most preferably, the iron salt is only
iron (III) nitrate or
an iron (III) halide, in particular iron (III) chloride or bromide. Iron (III)
nitrate is most
preferred.
The aqueous solution of the iron salt may be simply prepared by dissolving the
salt in water
under gentle stirring and, if necessary, under gentle heating to the desired
concentration. Such
practices are routine to the laboratory chemist.
Step ii) of the process employs a weak base. The essential purpose of the weak
base is to
prompt the formation of the iron intermediate product as hereafter described.
In this
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
specification and claims, the term 'weak base' should be interpreted to mean a
base suitable
for use in aqueous solution and which, when present in aqueous solution, does
not ionise fully
therein according to the equilibrium equation:
5 B:(aq) H20 4¨> BH+(ac) Off(aq)
wherein B: represents the base and BH+00 represents the ionized form thereof.
Thus, a Weak
base is one where non-ionised base (B:) remains in aqueous solution.
10 Preferably, the weak base is one or more carbonates or hydrogen
carbonates of sodium,
potassium, magnesium, calcium or a quaternary ammonium cation. More
preferably, the weak
base is sodium or potassium carbonate or hydrogen carbonate, particularly
sodium hydrogen
carbonate; or ammonium carbonate or hydrogen carbonate, particularly ammonium
carbonate.
The base may be added to the aqueous solution of iron salt either in solid
form, or as an
aqueous solution. If to be added as an aqueous solution, the solution can
first be simply
prepared dissolving the base in water under gentle stirring and, if necessary,
under gentle
heating to the desired concentration. Such practices are routine to the
laboratory chemist. If
added in solid form, the base may usefully first be ground or pulverised, to
aid its dissolution
in the aqueous reaction medium.
Importantly, the addition of the weak base must take place in a stepwise
manner, under
continual stirring of the reaction medium over the course of the base
addition. As explained
hereafter, the addition of base leads to reaction of the iron cations to form
an intermediate
product of particular structure. The formation of this structure is controlled
by this manner of
base addition.
Stepwise addition of the weak base ensures that this base is introduced
progressively, and this
progressive addition coupled with the continual stirring ensures that the
added base is
continually distributed throughout the solution. The formation of local
regions of high base
concentration (and hence high pH) is thus avoided. Avoiding local regions of
high base
concentration has been found to be important to obtaining the correct
intermediate product.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
11
In setting up the reaction hardware, the laboratory chemist should thus employ
equipment
which will allow the entire reaction mixture to be continually stirred during
the base addition
step. Formation of the intermediate product, as explained below, provides a
convenient way
of confirming the presence of adequate mixing conditions.
The relative proportions of aqueous iron and weak base are likewise important
to obtaining
the correct intermediate product. The total amount of weak base added over the
course of step
ii) of the reaction is such as to provide a molar ratio of iron to total base
added in the range of
1:2.5 to 1:3.5. Preferably this ratio range is 1:2.75 to 1:3.25, more
preferably 1:2.9 to 1:3.1.
Optimally, the ratio is 1:3. In this specification and claims, this ratio
should be understood to
mean "moles of iron : moles of total base added", wherein "moles of iron"
refers to the total
number of moles of aqueous iron present in the starting solution obtained or
prepared in step
i), and "moles of total base added" refers to the total number of molar
equivalents of base
added in step ii).
Thus, for example, in a reaction between aqueous iron (III) nitrate and sodium
hydrogen
carbonate, the total addition of 3 moles of sodium hydrogen carbonate to 1
mole of iron (III)
nitrate would provide a ratio of 1 mole of aqueous iron: 3 moles of base
(hydrogen carbonate
anions), each mole of iron (III) nitrate providing 1 mole of aqueous iron, and
each mole of
sodium hydrogen carbonate providing 1 mole of monobasic hydrogen carbonate.
Analogously,
in a reaction between aqueous iron (III) nitrate and ammonium carbonate, the
total addition of
1.5 moles of ammonium carbonate to 1 mole of iron (III) nitrate would also
provide a ratio of
1 mole of aqueous iron : 3 moles of base, each mole of ammonium carbonate
providing 2
molar equivalents of base in view of the dibasic nature of the carbonate anion
(as compared to
the monobasic hydrogen carbonate anion). The ratio for other weak bases can be
calculated
analogously.
In conducting steps i) to iii) of the process of this invention, it is
preferred to use an aqueous
solution of iron (III) nitrate or an iron (III) halide as the starting
material, and to add thereto
sodium hydrogen carbonate or ammonium carbonate as the weak base.
In general, the stepwise addition of the correct relative amount of weak base
under continual
stirring leads to a highly exothermic reaction. The resulting solution
effervesces and thereafter
gives up a coloured precipitate from the aqueous medium. This precipitate is
the desired, wet
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
12
intermediate rich in iron. Consequently, the colour of the precipitate is
brown or reddish
brown to the normal eye.
From spectroscopic analysis, this intermediate has been determined to be a
ferric oxide
hydrate of polymeric structure, having a polymeric backbone consisting of
alternating iron
and oxygen atoms in a chain-like structure. The Fourier Transform infra-red
(FT-IR)
spectrum of this ferric oxide hydrate shows the characteristic signal of the
bridging oxygen
species -(Fe-O-Fe)- at an absorbance of 721 crn* In addition, the presence of
intermolecular
hydrogen bonded water molecules is identified at an absorbance of 3374 cm*
Thermo-
gravimetric analysis (TGA) identifies the presence of 4 to 5 molecules of
water per `diiron'
(Fe-O-Fe) backbone unit.
These results indicate the intermediate is a polymer corresponding to the
following two
generalised unit structures:
OH2 OH 2
*1/4 I
*11,1,1 I% \\\ 0 H 2
iõ
Fe-0 "Fe
H20e
H20
OH OH
In particular, the presence of the water molecules within the hydrate, readily
determined by
FT-1R, appears important to the structure of the intermediate and achieving
the subsequent
reaction steps. The presence of co-ordinated water appears to stabilise the
polymeric structure
of the intermediate, permitting solvation and subsequent reaction with the
correct ligands. The
absence of this co-ordinated water, caused for example by drying or removal of
volatiles at
the end of step iii), renders the intermediate insoluble and incapable of
adequate reaction with
the desired ligands. The removal of water appears to cause an irreversible
reconfiguration of
the polymer structure, preventing effective re-solvation and reaction. As the
review article by
Donald M. Kurtz Jr (supra) shows, the possibility of numerous bridging
structures between
consecutive iron atoms may also account for the important role of water
molecules in
maintaining the appropriate intermediate structure.
In addition, the presence of hydroxyl groups may give rise to bridging
structures.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
13
For this reason, the wet precipitate obtained at the end of steps ii) and iii)
should be used wet
in step iv). Thus, at the end of step iii), the aqueous reaction medium can
simply be decanted
away and the wet precipitate used directly in step iv) or, preferably, first
washed with water,
for example with successive aliquots of water whilst supported on a filter
medium, but
without drying. The resulting washed precipitate appears as a dark red or
reddish brown mass
or paste to the normal eye, and can be used directly in step iv) of the
reaction.
In the second part of the process, the ferric hydrate intermediate is refluxed
in an organic
solvent with a nitrogenous base and one or more polycarboxylic acids and/or
derivatives
thereof, the water evolved over the course of the reaction being removed. This
part of the
reaction achieves the co-ordination of the correct ligands to the polymeric
intermediate.
Water is evolved over the course of the reaction step iv). Preferably, this
water is removed
continuously over the course of the reaction step iv), for example by
distillation using suitable
apparatus, such as a Dean-and-Stark assembly, which condenses and collects the
distilled
water away from the reaction mixture. In this prefered embodiment, the
reaction is driven
both by temperature and by the continual removal of the evolved water.
However, for reasons of manufacturing practicality the water evolved over the
course of the
reaction may also be allowed to collect in the reaction mixture before being
removed at the
end of step iv), for example by conventional liquid separation techniques. In
this embodiment,
the completion of the reaction in step iv) results in a two-phase liquid, one
phase being
aqueous and containing any aqueous bi-products, and the other (organic)
solvent phase
containing the desired polymer material. Separation of the aqueous phase may
then be
effected, leaving the polymer to be recovered from the solvent phase.
The choice of solvent for this part of the process is driven primarily by
practicality. Thus,
conventional organic media which provide boiling characteristics suitable for
reflux reactions
evolving water to be removed can be employed. Such solvents include the
aromatic solvents
toluene, xylene and commercially available mixed aromatic solvents such as the
Solvesso and
Shellsol series of industrial solvents; and the aliphatic solvents hexane,
heptane and other
alkanes. Toluene is the preferred solvent. Alternatively, the reflux reaction
can be conducted
in the aromatic or aliphatic solvent intended to be the eventual diluent in
the additive
concentrate.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
14
The reflux is conducted at temperatures slightly above the normal boiling
point of the chosen
solvent, and above 100 degrees Centigrade, in order to drive the azeotropic
removal of water.
Thus, for example, when the solvent is toluene, the reflux reaction can
usefully be carried out
by heating to between 120 and 130 degrees Centigrade. Suitable temperatures
for other
solvents can be selected analogously.
The one or more polycarboxylic acids and/or derivatives used in step iv) of
the invention react
to form the co-ordinating ligands on the polymer backbone. It is essential to
the invention that
at least some of the polycarboxylic acids and any derivatives used in the
reaction comprise at
least one branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing at least 14, and
preferably at least
16, carbon atoms. Mixtures of acids may be used, provided that the requisite
substituents are
present on at least some of these acids.
As used within this specification and claims, the term 'hydrocarbyl
substituent' means a
monovalent chemical substituent having hydrocarbonaceous character, and
consisting of
carbon and hydrogen atoms (and optionally heteroatoms such as oxygen, nitrogen
and sulphur,
provided that the presence of such heteroatoms does not affect the
hydrocarbonaceous
character of the substituent). In each of the prefered embodiments of the
polycarboxylic acid
and/or any derivative thereof used in step iv), the hydrocarbyl substituent
consists of carbon
and hydrogen atoms (only), wherein the hydrocarbyl substituent is preferably a
monovalent
saturated (i.e. alkyl), or more preferably mono or poly-unsaturated
substituent.
For optimal performance of the polymer it is preferred that all (or at least
essentially all) of
the polycarboxylic acids and any derivatives thereof used in step iv) comprise
at least one,
and preferably only one, branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing at
least 14 carbon,
preferably at least 16, carbon atoms.
Thus, where a single acid or derivative is used, it is essential that the acid
or derivative carries
at least one, and preferably only one, branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent
containing at
least 14, preferably at least 16, carbon atoms.
However, where more than one acid or derivative or both is used, it is
preferred that the
mixture of polycarboxylic acids or derivatives respectively (or any mixture of
both) used in
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
step iv) consists essentially of acids or derivatives (or both, where both are
present) carrying
at least one, and preferably only one, branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent
containing at
least 14, preferably at least 16, carbon atoms.
5 Thus, for example, where a technical grade mixture of polycarboxylic
acids is used, such as a
commercial mixture of octadecenyl succinic acids containing a mixture of
isomeric acids
differing in the structure of their octadecenyl substituent, it is preferred
that such a mixture
consists essentially of branched-chain isomers of octadecenyl succinic acid.
However, small
amounts of straight chain isomers can be tolerated in such mixtures, provided
the overall
10 properties of the polymer are not adversely affected.
The maximum size of such branched-chain substituents is 160 carbon atoms,
preferably 80
carbon atoms. More preferably, the branched-chain substituents contain no more
that 30
carbon atoms, and most preferably no more than 24 carbon atoms. Branched-chain
15 substituents containing 18 carbon atoms are most preferred.
The reaction proceeds via the conversion of the carboxylic acid groups (or the
derivatised
forms thereof) into carboxylate groups, which then co-ordinate with the
polymer backbone as
hereafter described. Thus, the exact nature of any carboxylic derivative used
is unimportant,
provided that in the presence of water and the tertiary nitrogenous base, the
derivative reacts
or reverts to carboxylate form. Thus, for example, derivatives such as esters
and anhydrides
are especially suitable for this purpose. Anhydrides are most preferred.
Where a mixture of more than one derivative is used, the derivatives therein
may be the same
chemical derivative of different polycarboxylic acids, or may be different
chemical
derivatives of the same polycarboxylic acid, or may be both. Likewise, where
mixtures of at
least one acid and at least one derivative are used, the derivative(s) therein
may be derived
from polycarboxylic acid(s) different to those acid(s) also present in the
mixture, or may be
chemical derivatives of the same acid(s) present in the mixture, or may be
both.
Preferably, the polycarboxylic reactant used in step iv) is a mixture of
polycarboxylic acids,
or a mixture of polycarboxylic anhydrides, or a mixture . of both. More
preferably, the
polycarboxylic reactant used in step iv) is a mixture of dicarboxylic acids,
or a mixture of
dicarboxylic anhydrides, or both. In combination with these preferred and more
preferred
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
16
embodiments, it is also preferred that each of these mixtures consists
essentially of, and
preferably consists of, polycarboxylic acids or polycarboxylic anhydrides (and
especially
dicarboxylic acids or dicarboxylic anhydrides) which carry only one branched-
chain
hydrocarbyl substituent containing at least 14, and more preferably containing
between 16
and 20, carbon atoms.
Most preferably, the polycarboxylic reactant used in step iv) is a mixture of
dicarboxylic acids,
or dicarboxylic anhydrides, or a mixture of both, wherein each acid is a
substituted succinic
acid and each dicarboxylic anhydride is a substituted succinic anhydride, and
wherein the
mixtures consist essentially of (and preferably consist of) succinic acids and
anhydrides which
carry only one branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing at least 14,
and more
preferably at least 16, carbon atoms.
In this preferred embodiment, the substituent on each succinic acid or
anhydride may be
derived from polymerised olefins, such as polyethylene, polypropylene or
(preferably)
polybutylene such as polyisobutene. A preferred substituent is derived from
polyisobutene of
number average molecular weight (as measured by gel permeation chromatography
(`GPC')
against polystyrene standards) in the range of 450 to 2250, preferably 750 to
1300. Such
polyisobutenes can be made by conventional polymerisation techniques known in
the art, and
thereafter attached to maleic anhydride via well-known chlorination or thermal
reaction routes
to give the preferred polyisobutenyl-succinic acid(s) or anhydride(s).
However, particularly advantageous properties within the above embodiment are
obtained
when branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent contains between 16 and 20 carbon
atoms.
Prefered reactants are mixtures of hexadecenyl-succinic acids and/or
anhydrides thereof, or
mixtures of hexadecenyl-substituted succinic acids and/or anhydrides thereof,
or mixtures of
both. Preferably, mixtures of anhydrides are used. A mixture of octadecenyl-
substituted
succinic acid anhydrides is most preferred. Such mixtures consist essentially
of acids or
derivatives respectively carrying single hexadecenyl and octadecenyl
substituents possessing
a branched-chain structure, such as are obtained from the reaction of maleic
anhydride with
commercial mixtures of olefins having at least one internal double bond. Thus,
such mixtures
consist essentially of mixtures of isomeric compounds, the isomers differing
in the exact
nature of the branched structure of their substituent.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
17
A further highly-preferred embodiment of the present invention is that
obtained by employing
in step iv) one or more dicarboxylic acid anhydride derivatives of the
structure (I) :
CH3
(y112)x
0
(I)
0
C 0
(CH2)y
CH3
wherein x and y are independent integers whose sum is 9 to 29, preferably 11
to 21, and more
preferably 11 or 13. Mixtures of such materials may again be derived from the
maleation of a
mixture of internal olefins of different chain lengths, or from maleation of
an isomeric
mixture of internal olefins of the same chain length. The internal olefins may
be generated in
situ by the acid- catalysed isomerisation of terminal olefins, prior to
reaction with the maleic
anhydride.
The nature of the branched-chain hydrocarbyl polycarboxylate ligand is an
important feature
of the present invention. Only polymers with ligands originating from
polycarboxylic acids
(or derivatives thereof) having branched-chain substituents with at least 14.
(preferably, at
least 16) carbon atoms provide the combination of advantages previously
described, for the
following reasons.
Firstly, the process of the invention proceeds poorly when carboxylic acids or
derivatives
carrying shorter branched chain substituents are used in step iv). Thus, as
illustrated in the
examples which follow, acids carrying branched chain substituents with less
than 14 carbon
atoms give poor yields in the process of the invention. These yields are too
low to be
practicable, and may result from steric factors consequential to side
branch(es) on a short
main chain. In contrast, longer chain substituents give greatly-increased
yields.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
18
Secondly, monocarboxylic acids carrying only straight chain substituents do
not bring the
necessary advantageous properties to the polymer, if used as co¨ordinating
ligands. Thus,
despite having long hydrocarbyl chains, comparative polymers prepared from
such straight-
chain ligands show poor solubility in concentrate form, and rapidly
precipitate out, as also
illustrated in the examples which follow. Such materials are not practicable
for use in additive
concentrates, either in on-board storage applications or even for supply to
fuel manufacturers
in concentrates for use in bulk (refinery or terminal) fuel-blending
operations.
The tertiary nitrogenous base serves as a promoter for the reaction. It is
essential that a tertiary
nitrogen compound is used, as secondary or primary nitrogenous bases possess
replaceable
hydrogen atoms and can thus react directly with the carboxylic groups (or
derivatives thereof)
of the polycarboxylic acid reactant(s) to form amides and/or imides, this side-
reaction
depleting the reaction medium of base and disrupting the primary reaction. Any
tertiary
nitrogenous base can be employed, although the preferred bases are tertiary
hydrocarbyl
amines, such as trialkyl amines. Triethyl amine is especially preferred.
Alternatively, tertiary bases such as N-substituted morpholines or piperidines
may be used.
The amount of tertiary nitrogenous base to be added to the reaction medium can
be chosen in
accordance with normal laboratory practices. However, typically the tertiary
nitrogenous base
is employed in amounts such that the molar ratio of this base to total
carboxylic groups
(including any derivatives thereof) originating from the polycarboxylic acids
and/or
derivatives thereof is in the range of 1:1 to 3:1, more preferably 1:1 to 2:1,
and most
preferably is 2:1.
During the reflux reaction, the carboxylic acid(s) (and/or derivatives
thereof) attach to the
polymeric backbone by virtue of the formation of carboxylate groups, which
thereafter co-
ordinate with the iron atoms present in the polymer backbone. In this
reaction, the water
present within the intermediate structure appears important not only for
holding the polymer
chain in an open configuration, permitting solvation and reaction, but also
appears to act as
promoter or reactant to permit the formation of carboxylate groups. Thus, for
example, where
polycarboxylic anhydrides such as succinic anhydrides are used, the presence
of water
permits the opening of the anhydride ring into a dicarboxylate structure,
whereupon both
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
19
carboxylate groups can complex with iron atoms in the polymer backbone in
multidentate
ligand fashion.
The structural result of this carboxylate formation and subsequent co-
ordination is essentially
a series of bridging (g-carboxylato) groups on adjacent iron atoms along the
polymer
backbone. Thus, each individual pt-carboxylato group can generally be depicted
as:
OH2 OH2
/ I \\0//, OH
* I ,,,,,, //4
44,1 =%\ 2
I =
Fe's 'Fe'
[H20 I1
0 0
0.L.,2 1 V w n 1_1
..2
wherein the two oxygens of an individual carboxylate group co-ordinate to
adjacent iron
centres (i.e. a `diiron' unit). In addition, however, the essential use
ofpo/ycarboxylic acids (or
derivatives) as the source of the carboxylate groups for this invention
results in the side-chain
('R') regions of adjacent (pt-carboxylato) groups themselves being connected
within the
remainder of the polycarboxylic acid molecule, thus creating a higher-order
repetitive unit.
Thus, for example, the use of a mono-substituted succinic anhydride reactant
results in the
formation of succinic dicarboxylate. Each succinic dicarboxylate molecule is
thereafter able
to complex to four adjacent irons, via the formation of two adjacent (.1-
carboxylato) groups
spanned by the remainder of the succinic acid moiety, creating a four iron
structural 'unit'.
It is this polycarboxylic acid-derived repetitive structure, in combination
with the presence of
the defined branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent group(s) on at least a
proportion (and
preferably on all) of the polycarboxylic acid(s), which appears essential to
obtaining the
beneficial combination of properties of the polymer of the present invention.
The process of
this invention offers a particularly advantageous route to such materials.
Within all aspects of the invention, it is particularly preferred that the or
each polycarboxylate
ligand is a dicarboxylate ligand. Dicarboxylate ligands have been found to be
particularly
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
advantageous in the invention, and have been found to give particularly
favoured polymers,
by virtue of the formation of the repeating four iron structural unit.
Likewise, it is particularly preferred that the carboxylate groups within each
polycarboxylate
5 (preferably dicarboxylate) ligand are closely positioned relative to each
other. This facilitates
the co-ordination of each carboxylate group to adjacent iron centres. Within
all aspects of the
invention, it is particularly preferred that within a ligand molecule the
carbonyl carbon atoms
of each carboxylate group are connected to each other by at most 6, more
preferably by at
most 4, and most preferably by only 2 or 3 chemical bonds. Thus, in the
example of a succinic
10 acid, the two carbonyl carbons are connected by three chemical bonds.
Within the bridging (u-carboxylato) groups, the molar ratio of iron to total
carboxylate groups
is 2:1. Thus, in step iv) of the reaction, it is optimal that the total amount
of all polycarboxylic
acids and/or derivatives thereof (i.e. the total amount of all species
contributing carboxylate
15 groups to the reaction) used is such as to provide the reaction mixture
with a molar ratio of
iron to total carboxylate groups of 2:1. Some tolerance around this optimum is
permitted,
namely between the range of 1:1 and 3:1.
Since the polymer backbone has some capability to co-ordinate with additional
carboxylate
20 centres, the presence of a moderate quantity of carboxylate in excess of
that required to
provide the optimum 2:1 ratio can be accommodated. However, the presence of
greater
amounts of carboxylate will ultimately prove wasteful and result in free acid
being present
within the mixture at the end of reaction, complicating retrieval of the
polymer.
However, the presence of lesser amounts of carboxylate will prevent the
completed formation
of the sought-after structural unit. To ensure the presence of a substantial
number of bridging
(j1-carboxylato) groups on the polymer, the total amount of all polycarboxylic
acids and/or
derivatives thereof (i.e. the total amount of all species contributing
carboxylate groups to the
reaction) used in step iv) is such as to provide the reaction mixture with a
molar ratio of iron
to total carboxylate groups within the range of 1:1 to 2:1, more preferably
1:1.5 to 2:1. The
ratio of 2:1 is most preferred.
In the reflux reaction, the rate of conversion of the free acid (absorbance at
1705 cnil by FT-
IR) to bridging (u-carboxylato) group can be monitored by FT-1R to ascertain
the progress of
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
21
the reaction. These changes in the FT-IR spectra appear to correspond with a
shift in bond
energy when the un-coordinated alternating iron-oxygen backbone in the
intermediate
becomes coordinated with the bridging ii-carboxylate. This co-ordination
causes shifts in
wavenumber for the Fe-0 and the carbonyl peaks respectively, which signals
decrease by
approximately 20 to 30 cm-1, and 145 cm-I, respectively. Thus, in the case of
the reaction
using octadecenyl succinic anhydride for example, the FT-IR peak for Fe-0 in
the
intermediate is typically about 721 cm-1, and moves to about 704 cm-1, whilst
the carbonyl
peak likewise moves to about 1560 cm -I as the bridging ( -carboxylato) group
forms. In
analogous reactions with hexadecenyl succinic anhydride and polyisobutylenyl
anhydride, the
Fe-0 peak moves to approximately 699 and 692 cm-I respectively, whilst the
carbonyl peak
again shifts to about 1560 cm-I.
Following the reflux reaction, the final solid polymeric product is removed
from the reaction
medium. If desired, the medium containing the product may first be filtered,
and the solid
product is thereafter typically recovered by removing the solvent under
vacuum. The material
may be further washed with solvent if so required, for example to remove any
impurities.
Following the preparation of the final polymeric product, its metal content
can also be
determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) spectrometry. The figure thus
obtained
experimentally can be compared to that theoretically derived from the expected
repetitive
, structure, to confirm the formation of the desired product.
The product (second aspect of the invention)
The product of the invention is that material obtainable by, and preferably
obtained by, the
process of the first aspect of the invention.
In particular, the product contains the general, repetitive 01-carboxylato)
group structure
hereinbefore described and derived from the polycarboxylate ligands. Given the
hydrated
nature of the intermediate product, it is likely that the final product also
retains an element of
hydration within its co-ordination sphere, even when contained within organic
solvent in
concentrate form. However, this is not considered to inhibit the performance
of the final
polymer.
. .
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
22
Thus, the product may be generally described as an iron-containing polymer
consisting of a
polymeric backbone from which a plurality of co-ordinating ligands depend, the
backbone
consisting of alternating iron and oxygen atoms in a chain-like structure
optionally also
bearing hydroxyl groups as pendant or bridging groups, and the co-ordinating
ligands being
polycarboxylate ligands and optionally also water molecules, wherein the
polycarboxylate
ligands comprise ligands having branched hydrocarbyl substituents containing
at least 14
carbon atoms.
Within the polymer, it is important to note (as explained in respect of the
process aspect of the
invention) that more than one kind of substituted polycarboxylate ligand can
be present. Thus,
the polymer may be prepared from mixtures of polycarboxylic acids and/or
derivatives
thereof, giving rise to polymers possessing a variety of polycarboxylic
ligands and/or
substituent groups. Thus, whilst it is essential that the polycarboxylate
ligands on the polymer
comprise some ligands having at least one branched-chain hydrocarbyl
substituent containing
at least 14, (preferably at least 16) carbon atoms, it is not essential that
all ligands have such
substituents. Mixtures of ligands may thus be used, provided that the
requisite substituents are
present on at least some of these acids.
However, for optimal performance of the polymer it is preferred that all (or
at least essentially
all) of the polycarboxylate ligands comprise at least one, and preferably only
one, branched-
chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing at least 14 carbon, preferably at
least 16, carbon
atoms.
Thus, where a polycarboxylate ligand is used, it is essential that the ligand
carries at least one,
and preferably only one, branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing at
least 14,
preferably at least 16, carbon atoms.
However, where more than polycarboxylate ligand is used, it is preferred that
this mixture of
ligands consists essentially of ligands carrying at least one, and preferably
only one,
branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing at least 14, preferably at
least 16, carbon
atoms.
Thus, for example, where a technical grade mixture of polycarboxylic acids is
used in step iv)
of the reaction, such as a commercial mixture of octadecenyl succinic acids
containing a
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
23
mixture of isomeric acids differing in the structure of their octadecenyl
substituent, it is
important that the acid mixture consists essentially of branched-chain isomers
of octadecenyl
succinic acid, so that the ligand mixture consists essentially of branched-
chain isomers of
octadecenyl succinate. However, small amounts of straight chain isomers can be
tolerated in
such mixtures, provided the overall properties of the polymer are not
adversely affected.
The maximum size of the branched-chain substituent(s).on the ligand(s) is 160
carbon atoms,
preferably 80 carbon atoms. More preferably, the branched-chain substituents
contain no
more that 30 carbon atoms, and most preferably no more than 24 carbon atoms,
especially 18
carbon atoms.
Preferably, the polycarboxylate ligands present on the polymer are a mixture
of dicarboxylate
ligands, preferably consisting essentially of, and more preferably consisting
of, dicarboxylate
ligands having only one branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing at
least 14, and
more preferably at least 16, ideally between 16 and 20, carbon atoms.
Most preferably, the polycarboxylate ligands present on the polymer are a
mixture of
dicarboxylate ligands consisting essentially of (and most preferably
consisting of) succinate
ligands which carry only one branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent containing
at least 14,
and more preferably at least 16 carbon atoms.
In this preferred succinate embodiment, the substituent on each succinate
ligand may be
derived from polymerised olefins, such as polyethylene, polypropylene or
(preferably)
polybutylene such as polyisobutene. A preferred substituent is derived from
polyisobutene of
number average molecular weight (as measured by GPC, using polystyrene
standards) in the
range of 450 to 2250, preferably 750 to 1300. Such polyisobutenes can be made
by
conventional polymerisation techniques known in the art, and thereafter
attached to maleic
anhydride via well-known chlorination or thermal reaction routes to give the
preferred
polyisobutenyl-succinic acid(s) or anhydride(s).
However, particularly advantageous properties within the above succinate
embodiment are
obtained when branched-chain hydrocarbyl substituent on the ligand contains
between 16 and
20 carbon atoms. Such ligand mixtures preferably consist essentially of
succinates carrying
single hexadecenyl and octadecenyl substituents possessing a branched-chain
structure, such
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
24
as are obtained from the reaction of maleic anhydride with commercial mixtures
of olefins
having at least one internal double bond. Thus, such mixtures consist
essentially of mixtures
of isomeric compounds, the isomers differing in the exact nature of the
branched structure of
their substituent.
A further highly-preferred embodiment of the present invention is that polymer
bearing
succinate ligands derived from one or more dicarboxylic acid anhydride
derivatives of the
structure (I) below, wherein x and y are independent integers whose sum is 9
to 29, preferably
11 to 21, and more preferably 11 or 13.
Structure (I) :
CH3
(CH2)x
HC40
0 (I)
H,CH
C 0
(CH2)y
CH3
Mixtures of such materials may again be derived from the maleation of a
mixture of internal
olefins of different chain lengths, or from maleation of an isomeric mixture
of internal olefins
of the same chain length. The internal olefins may be generated in situ thy
the acid- catalysed
isomerisation of terminal olefins, prior to reaction with the maleic
anhydride.
Most preferably, each dicarboxylic ligand is the dicarboxylate of a branched-
chain substituted
succinic acid structure, preferably an octadecenyl- or hexadecenyl-succinic
acid or
polyisobutenyl-succinic acid structure. Most preferably, each dicarboxylic
ligand is the
dicarboxylate of an octadecenyl-succinic acid. In this respect, the preferred
succinic acid
structures are those described hereinbefore in relation to the process of the
first aspect.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
The polymer can be further characterised by reference to the FT-IR peaks
described
hereinbefore in relation to the process.
As described above, the polymer of the present invention takes the form of a
polymeric
5 backbone of alternating iron and oxygen atoms, co-ordinated with
depending ligands. The
polymer thus differs fundamentally from particular forms of iron oxide (such
as crystalline
particles) in which arrays of iron and oxygen atoms form a lattice-like
structure, with many
iron and oxygen atoms internal to the lattice being fully co-ordinated only to
each other.
10 The concentrate (third aspect of the invention)
The final product can thereafter be blended into concentrate form suitable for
use as an
additive.
15 Thus, in a further aspect the present invention concerns an additive
concentrate comprising
the polymer described above, or the polymer obtainable or obtained by the
process described
above, in an organic solvent compatible therewith.
The polymer concentrate of the invention can be made to concentration levels
suitable for use
20 in bulk fuel manufacture or blending operations at refineries or fuel
terminals. In such
concentrates, the polymer is typically present in concentrations containing up
to 25 % iron by
weight, and preferably between 5 and 20 %, more preferably between 5 and 15 %
by weight,
per weight of concentrate.
25 Additionally, the polymer concentrate of the invention can be made to
high concentration
levels suitable for long-term use in on board dosing systems. As previously
explained, such
dosing systems require the concentrate to remain homogeneous for extended
periods, to
permit consistent operation of the trap regeneration system. In such
concentrates, the polymer
is also typically present in concentrations containing up to 30 % iron by
weight, and
preferably between 5 and 25 %, more preferably between 5 and 20 % by weight,
per weight of
concentrate.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
26
Suitable solvents for the concentrate of the invention include aromatic
solvents such as the
commercial mixed aromatic solvents Solvesso and Shellsol, and aliphatic
solvents such as
isoalkanes, including Isopar L. Other suitable solvents known in the additives
art may be used.
The concentrate can be simply prepared by mixing or blending the selected
solvent and
polymer in a suitable laboratory or industrial mixing device, such as a waring
blender or
blending plant.
In the concentrate aspect of the invention, the additional presence in the
concentrate of
hydrocarbyl alcohol causes a further advantageous improvement in concentrate
stability, i.e.
the ability of the concentrate to remain homogeneous over time in storage. In
this respect, C1
to C20 alkanols are particularly preferred. Isodecyl alcohol has been found to
be highly
advantageous when present in the polymer in concentrate form, especially in
combination
with aliphatic solvents such as Isopar L.
Other aspects of the invention
The polymer of the invention, and the concentrate containing it, are useful in
fuel as an
additive promoting the combustion of carbonaceous material originating from
the fuel.
Thus, in a further aspect, the invention provides a fuel composition
comprising a fuel (being
derived either from a petroleum source or from oils or fats of animals and/or
plants, or being a
mixture of both) and the polymer of the second aspect of the invention,
wherein the polymer
is present in the fuel composition in an amount effective to improve the
combustion of
carbonaceous material originating from the fuel when the fuel composition is
.used in a
combusting device.
The fuel is preferably either a diesel fuel or a fuel for use in domestic or
industrial power
generation or heating. Preferably, the polymer is used in this aspect to
reduce the amount of
particulate or smoke emissions generated during combustion within the primary
combustion
chamber of the device. This use in turn permits the operation of the device at
lower air: fuel
ratios, so reducing heat losses through the flue and increasing the efficiency
of useful heat
transfer in the system.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
27
In use as an additive, the polymer is typically added in concentrate form to
assist handling.
The amount of concentrate added per unit of fuel is normally such as to
provide to the fuel
with a specified or target fuel iron content. For use as a combustion improver
additive in
marine diesel fuels, the concentrate may be added for example in amounts such
as to provide
the fuel with between 20 and 100, more preferably between 30 and 50, ppm of
irori by weight,
per weight of fuel. For use as a combustion improver in heating oil, the
concentrate may be
added for example in amounts such as to provide the fuel with between 5 and
50, more
preferably between 10 and 30, ppm of iron by weight, per weight of fuel.
The polymer of the invention, and the concentrate containing it, find
particular utility in diesel
fuel as an additive promoting regeneration of diesel exhaust particulate
traps.
Thus, in a further aspect, the invention provides a diesel fuel composition
for use in a diesel
engine system comprising an exhaust particulate trap, comprising:
a. diesel fuel, being derived either from a petroleum source, or from oils
or fats of animals and/or plants; or being a mixture of both; and
b. the polymer of the second aspect of the invention,
wherein the polymer is present in the fuel composition in an amount effective
to promote
regeneration of the particulate trap in operation of the engine system.
For general use as a regeneration additive in diesel engines, especially for
passenger cars, the
concentrate may be added for example in amounts such as to provide the fuel
with between 1
and 20, more preferably between 2 and 12, ppm of iron by weight, per weight of
fuel. Higher
levels of iron may be used, up to 25 or 30 ppm of iron by weight, per weight
of fuel, but may
not provide additional advantages for regeneration.
Where the concentrate is used in bulk fuel manufacture or blending operations,
the treated
fuel so produced finds primary utility in diesel engine systems comprising an
exhaust
particulate trap. In this aspect, the invention additionally provides a method
of regenerating a
diesel exhaust particulate trap fitted to a diesel engine-powered device,
comprising the
operation of said engine on the fuel composition defined above.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
28
The diesel fuel (a.) to be treated with additive may be a petroleum-based
diesel fuel oil. Such
diesel fuel oils generally boil within the range of from 110 C to 500 C, e.g.
150 C to 400 C.
The fuel oil may comprise atmospheric distillate or vacuum distillate, cracked
gas oil, or a
blend in any proportion of straight run and thermally and/or refinery streams
such as
catalytically cracked and hydro-cracked distillates.
Other examples of diesel fuel oils include Fischer-Tropsch fuels. Fischer-
Tropsch fuels, also
known as FT fuels, include those described as gas-to-liquid (GTL) fuels,
biomass-to-liquid
(BTL) fuels and coal conversion fuels. To make such fuels, syngas (CO + H2) is
first
generated and then converted to normal paraffins by a Fischer-Tropsch process.
The normal
paraffins may then be modified by processes such as catalytic
cracking/reforming or
isomerisation, hydrocracking and hydroisomerisation to yield a variety of
hydrocarbons such
as iso-paraffins, cyclo-paraffins and aromatic compounds. The resulting FT
fuel can be used
as such or in combination with other fuel components and fuel types to arrive
at a fuel
suitable for use as diesel fuel.
Suitable examples of diesel fuel derived from oils or fats of animals and/or
plants are those
derived from rapeseed oil, coriander oil, soyabean oil, cottonseed oil,
sunflower oil, castor oil,
olive oil, peanut oil, maize oil, almond oil, palm kernel oil, coconut oil,
mustard seed oil,
jatropha oil, beef tallow and fish oils. Further examples include oils derived
from corn, jute,
sesame, shea nut, ground nut and linseed oil and may be derived therefrom by
methods
known in the art. Rapeseed oil, which is a mixture of fatty acids partially
esterified with
glycerol is available in large quantities and can be obtained in a simple way
by pressing from
rapeseed. Recycled oils such as used kitchen oils are also suitable.
Also suitable are alkyl ester derivatives of the fatty acid constituents of
animal and plant oils
and fats. Such esters can be obtained conventional means, for example by trans-
esterification,
or by saponification followed by re-esterification. Consideration may be given
to the
following, for example as commercial mixtures: the ethyl, propyl, butyl and
especially methyl
esters of fatty acids with 12 to 22 carbon atoms, for example of lauric acid,
myristic acid,
palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, elaidic acid,
petroselic acid, ricinoleic
acid, elaeostearic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, eicosanoic acid,
gadoleic acid, docosanoic
acid or erucic acid, which have an iodine number from 50 to 150, especially 90
to 125.
Mixtures with particularly advantageous properties are those which contain
mainly, i.e. to at
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
29
least 50 wt% methyl esters of fatty acids with 16 to 22 carbon atoms and 1, 2
or 3 double
bonds. The preferred lower alkyl esters of fatty acids are the methyl esters
of oleic acid,
linoleic acid, linolenic acid and erucic acid.
Commercial mixtures of the stated kind are obtained for example by cleavage
and
esterification of animal and vegetable fats and oils by their
transesterification with lower
aliphatic alcohols. For production of alkyl esters of fatty acids it is
advantageous to start from
fats and oils which contain low levels of saturated acids, less than 20%, and
which have an
iodine number of less than 130. Blends of the following esters or Oils are
suitable, e.g.
rapeseed, sunflower, coriander, castor, soyabean, peanut, cotton seed, beef
tallow etc. Alkyl
esters of fatty acids based on a variety of rapeseed oil, the fatty acid
component of which is
derived to more than 80 wt% from unsaturated fatty acids with 18 carbon atoms,
are preferred.
Whilst many of the above oils may be used, preferred are vegetable oil
derivatives, of which
particularly preferred biofuels are alkyl ester derivatives of rapeseed oil,
cottonseed oil,
soyabean oil, sunflower oil, olive oil, or palm oil, rapeseed oil methyl ester
being especially
preferred.
At present, fuels derived from oils or fats of animals and/or plants are most
commonly used in
combination with petroleum-derived fuels. The present invention is applicable
to mixtures of
such fuels in any ratio. For example, at least 2% and preferably at least 5%,
more preferably
at least 25%, for example more than 50% by weight of these fuel mixtures may
be derived
from a plant or animal source.
The diesel fuel may be a fuel for a road vehicle. Such fuels are typically
classified in Europe
by various well-known industry standards and can contain low or very low
sulphur contents,
such as at most 5Oppm sulphur, or even at most 1 Oppm of sulphur or less by
weight, per
weight of fuel.
The fuel may alternatively be a marine diesel fuel, in particular having one
or more of the
following characteristics:
(i) a 95% distillation point (ASTM D86) of greater than 330 C,
preferably greater than
360 C, more preferably greater than 400 C, and most preferably greater than
430 C;
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
(ii) a cetane number (measured by ASTM D613) of less than 55, such as less
than 53,
preferably less than 49, more preferably less than 45, most preferably less
than 40,
(iii) an aromatic content of greater than 15% wt, preferably greater than 25%
and more
preferably greater than 40%; and
5 (iv) a Ramsbottom carbon residue (by ASTM D 524) of greater than 0.01%
mass,
preferably greater than 0.15% mass, more preferably greater than 0.3% mass,
such as
1% or 5% mass, and most preferably greater than 10% mass.
=
As described earlier, such diesel fuels (and particularly such marine diesel
fuels) may in
10 particular contain streams such as streams produced from fluid catalytic
cracking, such
materials usually having a density @ 15 C of 850 to 970, such as 900 to 970
kg/m3 and
characterised by low cetane number values, typically ranging from 10 or lower
to around 30
to 35; from thermal cracking processes, like visbreaking and coking, such
streams typically
having a density range @ 15 C of 830 to 930 kg/m3 and a cetane value of 20 to
50; and from
15 hydrocracking that uses severe conditions, e.g. temperature in excess of
400 C coupled with
pressures of 130 bars or greater, to produce streams characterised by cetane
number from 45
to 60 and having a density range @ 15 C from 800 to 860 kg/m3.
Typically, marine fuels accord with the standard specification ASTM D-2069 and
may be
20 either distillate or residual fuels as described within that
specification, and may in particular
have sulfur contents of greater than 0.05%, preferably greater than 0.1%, more
preferably
greater than 0.2% and particularly greater than 1% or even 2% by weight,
especially in the
case of residual fuel oils, and a kinematic viscosity at 40 C in cSt of at
least 1.40.
25 The fuel compositions of the invention may also contain other additives.
A particular
advantage of the composition of the invention is the resistance to
destabilisation that the
polymer offers when the fuel composition additionally comprises a lubricity
additive,
particularly where such additive is the mono- or bis-glycol (or polyglycol)
ester of a
polycarboxylic acid (and especially of a dicarboxylic acid, such as a dimer of
unsaturated
30 fatty acids such as oleic acid). Such compositions show improved
stability and provide the
fuel user with more reliable operation in the method aspect stated above.
The lubricity additive is typically present in amounts in the range of 25 to
500 ppm,
preferably 50 to 250 ppm, and more preferably 100 to 200 ppm by weight per
weight of fuel.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
31
As an alternative to the above, where the concentrate is used in on board
dosing systems the
invention provides additional aspects.
Firstly, the invention provides a method of regenerating the diesel exhaust
particulate trap of a
diesel engine-powered device fitted with on board means for the storage of
additive and the
dosing of fuel therewith, comprising the use of the additive concentrate of
claim 22 as the
stored additive, and the dosing of same into the fuel in amounts effective to
promote
regeneration of the particulate trap in operation of the engine.
Secondly, the invention additionally provides a method of reducing particulate
emissions
from the diesel engine system of a diesel engine-powered device, comprising:
a. if necessary, the addition to the diesel engine system of a diesel
exhaust
particulate trap;
b. the fitting to the device of on board means for the storage of additive
and the dosing of fuel therewith; and
c. the use therein of the additive concentrate of claim 22,
wherein the on board means dose the additive concentrate into the fuel in an
amount effective
to promote regeneration of the particulate trap in operation of the engine
system.
The device in these aspects may be any device employing diesel-engine power.
Thus, whilst
such devices include inter alia forms of transport such as road vehicles,
trains and marine
craft, the devices also include stationary engine devices such as generators,
pumps and
traction equipment, and in particular devices used in restricted or highly
pollution-controlled
enviroments such as mines and factories.
Preferably however, the devices are road vehicles, trains and marine craft, in
particular diesel
engine road vehicles such as trucks and passenger cars.
A variety of on board means for storage and additive dosing are known in the
art. Such
equipment comprises an additive reservoir in fluid communication with a dosing
device, the
dosing device in turn being in fluid communication with the fuel system of the
engine and
=
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
32
serving to dispense the dose of additive into the fuel. The dosing device may
dispense
additive continuously, for example into the fuel line, or discontinuously, for
example into the
engine fuel tank at periodic refuelling events. The device may be suitably
adapted to improve
dispersion of the additive upon addition to the fuel. The frequency of dosing,
and the metered
quantity of additive to be dosed, may be controlled by electronic systems on
the vehicle, or by
mechanical means.
Alternatively, the additive may be sprayed directly into the exhaust system of
the engine, or
into each combustion chamber of the engine during its non-combustion phase,
such addition
being moderated by the engine management system and the particulate signature
of the engine.
A particular utility of the polymer of the present invention is its ability to
form highly
concentrate solutions having viscosities suitable for deployment in simple
dosing devices.
The invention also provides the use of the polymer concentrate in a fuel
dosing system on
board a diesel engine-powered device equipped with a diesel exhaust
particulate trap, to
promote regeneration of the trap in operation of the engine.
The invention will now be further explained by means of the following, non-
limiting
examples.
Examples
The following examples illustrate the process of preparation of the iron-
containing polymer
and the concentrate, and explain and demonstrate the advantages of the polymer
of the
invention. These examples are presented in the following sequence:
A. Preparative examples:
Example 1 ¨ example preparation of the iron-containing polymer (from Fe (III)
chloride)
Example 2¨ further examples (and comparative examples) of iron-containing
polymers
prepared from Fe (III) chloride
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
33
Example 3 ¨ preparation of additive concentrates comprising the polymers
Example 4¨ example preparations of the iron-containing polymer (from Fe (III)
nitrate)
B. Working examples:
Example 5 ¨ demonstration of the polymer's improved ability to remain
distributed within the
bulk fuel over time (stability)
Example 6¨ demonstration of the viscosity advantage provided by the polymer
concentrate
Example 7 ¨ demonstration of the polymer's lower tendency to cause fuel
injector deposits
=
Example 8 ¨ demonstration of the polymer's ability to regenerate a particulate
trap
The examples are presented as illustrative of the invention only.
A. Preparative examples
Example 1 ¨ example preparation of the iron-containing polymer (from Fe (III)
chloride)
An aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (16.8g (0.2mol) of NaHCO3 in 30m1 of 1120) was
added
drop-wise to an aqueous solution of FeC13 (10g (0.062mo1) of FeC13 in 10m1 of
1120) in a
250m1 glass beaker, with continuous stirring over the course of the addition.
The highly
exothermic reaction resulted in an effervescing orange solution, which gave up
an insoluble
brown precipitate on completion of the weak base addition.
Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FT-IR) on a sample of the
precipitate showed the
characteristic signal of the diiron bridging species Fe-0-Fe (at approximately
721 cm-I) as
well as intermolecular hydrogen bonded water molecules (at approximately 3374
cm-I).
This intermediate product was transferred to a 250m1 round-bottomed flask to
which was
added toluene (100m1), octadecenyl-succinic anhydride (5.43g, 0.0155mo1) and
triethyl amine
(5.72m1, 0.03 1 mol). A Dean-and-Stark apparatus was attached, and the
reaction mixture
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
34
refluxed for approximately, six (6) hours until all the resulting water had
been removed. The
product of reaction, now dissolved in the toluene, was filtered through a
sinter funnel and the
solvent removed in vacuo to yield a dark brown solid material containing 27%
iron by mass,
as measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) spectrometry. This material is
designated
Polymer 1.
The octadecenyl-succinic anhydride reactant employed in the above reaction
contained a
mixture of isomers having C18 branched chain hydrocarbyl substituents,
obtained as a
commercial product of the reaction between maleic anhydride and a mixture of
C18 olefin
isomers having one or more internal double bonds.
During the reflux reaction, the anhydride ring is believed to open by the
action of the residual
water present. The conversion of the resulting carboxylic acid groups into
bridging (i1-
carboxylato) groups, as promoted by the tertiary nitrogenous base, can be
monitored by
Fourier Transform infra-red spectroscopy (FT-IR) to follow the progress of the
reaction. The
acid group absorbance peak (at 1705 cm-I) transforms into the (j1-carboxylato)
peak at an
absorbance of 1559 cm-I. At the same time, the Fe-O-Fe peak at 721 cm-I shifts
to
approximately 704 cm-1 as the Fe-0 backbone becomes co-ordinated with the
dicarboxylate
species.
In the base addition stage of the process, the iron from the iron (III)
chloride starting material
was transformed into the polymeric iron intermediate in a conversion rate of
approximately
78 %. Consequently, in the reflux reaction, the molar ratio of iron (78 % of
0.062 moles) to
total carboxylic groups (0.031 moles) was proportionately less than 2.
Example 2 ¨ further examples (and comparative examples) of iron-containing
polymers
prepared analogously to Polymer 1.
The preparative process of example 1 above was repeated eight times, with the
exception that
in each case the octadecenyl-succinic anhydride reactant was substituted by
one of the
alternative carboxylic acids or derivatives listed below, each being used in
such individual
amounts as to provide the same total number of moles of carboxylic groups as
used in
example 1. Thus, a series of analogous polymer compositions were prepared
differing only in
their ligand structure. The following polymers were prepared:
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
Designation Type of Carboxylic reactant
v(Fe-O) v(C=0)
Example
Polymer 2 Of the invention Hexadecyl-succinic anhydride 699 1560
Polymer 3 Of the invention Polyisobutenyl-succinic 692 1560
anhydride *
Polymer 4 Comparative Dodecenyl-succinic anhydride 700 1539
Polymer 5 Comparative Oleic acid 698 1521
Polymer 6 Comparative Lauric acid 698 1541
Polymer 7 Comparative Decanoic acid 698 1523
Polymer 8 Comparative Neo-decanoic acid 696 1542
Polymer 9 Comparative Isostearic acid 695 1541
*polyisobutylene group having a number average molecular weight (Mn) of 950,
as
measured by GPC against polyisbutylene standards.
5 The v(Fe-O) cm-1 and v(C0) cm-1 values in the table represent those
absorbances (as
measured by FT-IR) characterising each final polymer, i.e. after co-ordination
with the
respective carboxylate species.
These examples and comparative examples are used in examples 5 and 7 hereafter
to assist
10 the demonstration of the advantages provided by the present invention.
When comparing polymer iron contents as measured by ICP spectrometry, and
calculating the
weight percentage conversions of iron from the iron (III) chloride reactant
into polymer-
bound iron, it was apparent that the conversion achieved in the preparation of
Polymer 8
15 (using neodecanoic acid) was poor, with only 20 % of the iron in the
Fe(III)chloride reactant
being converted into polymer, in contrast to the iron conversions in the
preparations of
Polymer 7 (decanoic acid) and Polymer 6 (lauric acid) which both exceeded 99
%. Similarly,
dodecenyl-succinic anhydride (Polymer 4) showed a poor conversion of only 28%.
Thus, in
respect of the (comparative) short branched-chain carboxylic acid reactants,
the process steps
20 of the invention showed poor conversion (and hence, poor yield). This
comparison suggests
steric hindrance by substituent groups near the carboxylic acid group(s)
inhibits the
conversion process. The poor results obtained with neodecanoic acid and
dodecenyl succinic
anhydride make these materials unfeasible as starting materials for the
present process.
25 In contrast, the same process when applied to the preferred longer-chain
branched
polycarboxylic reactants of the invention showed much higher iron conversions
of 78 % for
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
36
Polymer 1 (branched-chain octadecenyl-succinic anhydride) and 93 % for Polymer
2
(branched-chain hexadecenyl-succinic anhydride). Similarly, the iron
conversion of even the
less preferred branched polycarboxylic reactant of the invention (Polymer 3;
polyisobutenyl-
succinic anhydride; 49 % iron conversion by ICP) indicates improved conversion
over
neodecanoic acid (20%) and dodecenyl-succinic anhydride (28%), despite the
presence of a
greater number of substituent side branches.
Example 3 ¨ preparation of additive concentrates comprising the polymers
To compare the relative solubilities of the above polymer examples, a series
of concentrates
were prepared by blending each respective polymer in aromatic solvent
(SolvessoTm 150 ¨
available commercially from the ExxonMobil Chemical group of companies) to a
level of 1%
polymer by weight (0.5% by weight in the cases of Polymers 6 and 8).
The concentrates were prepared using a series ofl 00m1 volumetric flasks, into
which were
weighed the requisite amount of each polymer. The majority of Solvesso 150 was
added, each
flask shaken, and then made up to the mark with the remaining solvent. The
concentrate
samples were then transferred to sealed glass containers.
These tests showed Polymers 6 and 7 to be poorly soluble in concentrate form,
even at these
relatively low concentration levels. When warmed to 60 degrees Centigrade and
then allowed
to cool overnight, the Polymer 6 and Polymer 7 concentrates both precipitated
material from
solution, demonstrating the inability of polymers derived from straight-chain,
saturated
monocarboxylate ligands to provide the physical properties sought by this
invention.
Example 4 ¨ example preparations of the iron-containing polymer from Fe (III)
nitrate
The following two preparations illustrate the process of the invention,
employing Fe (III)
nitrate and either an aqueous solution of weak base, or weak base added in
solid form.
Example 4A (aqueous base) :
An aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (84g (1.0mol) of NaHCO3 in 150m1 of H20) was
added
drop-wise to an aqueous solution of FeNO3 (125g (0.31mol) of FeNO3 in 50m1 of
H20) in a
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
37
suitable glass beaker, with continuous stirring over the course of the
addition. The highly
exothermic reaction resulted in an effervescing orange solution, which gave up
an insoluble
brown precipitate on completion of the weak base addition. The precipitate was
then washed
with water (4 x 500m1 washes) through a size 5 filter paper in a large Buchner
funnel, to leave
a dark brown paste.
This intermediate product was transferred to a round-bottomed flask to which
was added
toluene (500m1), the octadecenyl-succinic anhydride used in example 1 (27.15g,
0.0775mo1)
and triethyl amine (28.6m1, 0.155mo1). A Dean-and-Stark apparatus was
attached, and the
reaction mixture refluxed for approximately five (5) hours until all the
resulting water had
been removed. The product of reaction, now dissolved in the toluene, was
filtered through a
size 4 filter paper and then through a size 5 paper in a Buchner funnel, and
the solvent
removed in vacuo to yield a dark brown solid. This material is designated
Polymer 10.
As in Example 1, the conversion of the resulting carboxylic acid groups into
bridging (p..-
carboxylato) groups, as promoted by the tertiary nitrogenous base, can be
monitored by
Fourier Transform infra-red spectroscopy (FT-IR) to follow the progress of the
reaction. The
acid group absorbance peak (at 1705 cm-1) transforms into the ( -carboxylato)
peak at an
absorbance of approximately 1559 cm-1. At the same time, the Fe-O-Fe peak at
721 cm-1
shifts to approximately 704 cm-1 as the Fe-0 backbone becomes co-ordinated
with the
dicarboxylate species.
Example 4B (solid base) :
To an aqueous solution of FeNO3 (125g (0.31mol) of FeNO3.9H20 in 250m1 of H20)
was
added (NH4)2CO3 (24g, 0.25mo1) in solid form, in stepwise 5g additions, with
continuous
stirring over the course of the addition. The base addition resulted in an
effervescing orange
solution which on complete addition gave up an insoluble brown precipitate.
The precipitate was then washed with water (3x3000m1) on a centrifuge. The
resulting dark
brown paste was transferred to a 2 litre round bottom flask to which was added
toluene
(500m1), the octadecenyl-succinic anhydride used in Example 1 above (27.15g,
0.0775mo1)
and triethyl amine (28.6m1, 0.155mo1). A Dean-and-Stark apparatus was
attached, and the
reaction mixture refluxed for approximately 10hrs until all the water was
removed. The
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
38
product, now dissolved in toluene, was filtered successively through size 4
and size 5 filter
papers in a Buchner funnel and the solvent thereafter removed in vacuo to
yield a dark brown
solid, yield 43.69g.
This material is designated Polymer 11.
Polymer 11 was made up into a 23% m/m concentrate in Isopar L (146.3g) and
then filtered
using a size GF/A filter and then a GF/F filter in a Buchner funnel. As a
final step the
concentrate was passed through a GF/F filter attached to a suitable syringe.
The resulting
filtered concentrate had an iron content by ICP = 7.99 %.
B. Working examples
Example 5 ¨ demonstration of the polymer's improved ability to remain
distributed within the
bulk fuel over time (stability)
A series of seven test fuel samples comprising a common Class I petroleum-
derived diesel
fuel having the characteristics stated below were prepared by respective
treatment with one of
Polymers 1 to 5 inclusive, 8 and 9. Polymers 6 and 7 were excluded from the
test as
impractical, in view of their previously-determined poor solubility in
concentrate form.
Each respective polymer was added, in concentrate form, to a different sample
of fuel in such
amounts as to provide a level of iron within that fuel sample of either 10 or
25 ppm (parts per
million by weight, per weight of fuel). In this way the relative stability of
the different
polymers could be compared at constant fuel iron content. In industrial
applications,
regeneration additives are typically used at a prescribed fuel iron content.
The level of 10 ppm
iron represents a high but viable treat rate, whilst the level of 25 ppm iron
represents an over-
treat situation for trap regeneration, such as when too much additive is
inadvertently added
through accident or poor operating controls.
A second series of fuel samples were prepared, identical to the first series
except for the
additional presence in all samples of 200 ppm (weight/weight) of a commercial
lubricity
additive composed of an ethoxylated fatty acid dimer. These tests were run to
investigate the
destabilising effect of the latter additive type on the iron polymer of the
invention.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
39
The two series of nine treated fuel samples were heated to 80 degrees
Centigrade under static
storage conditions, and observed. This raised temperature reflects the
temperature of warmed
fuel in a diesel vehicle fuel tank during use, the recycling of (excess) fuel
warmed from
contact with the fuel injection system causing the bulk fuel temperature in
the tank to rise.
The results are shown in Table 1, below. In each case the time recorded was
that period
during which no precipitation/sediment, phase separation or haze was observed,
indicating
loss of stability of the respective polymer in that example. When a sample
reached 32 days
stability, the test was discontinued further.
Fuel Polymer Polymer Stability of fuel sample
(days)
sample used in test treat rate
(ppm, w/w) Without lubricity With lubricity
Extent of
additive additive
destabilisation
1A . 1 10 20 18
10%
2A 2 10 18 18
0%
3A 3 10 32 15
53%
_
4A 4 10 9 1
89%
5A 5 10 9 13
-44%
6A 8 10 32 13
59%
7A 9 10 13 1
92%
1B 1 25 18 32
-44%
2B 2 25 32 32
0%
3B 3 25 32 32
0%
4B 4 25 20 1
95%
5B 5 25 6 6
0%
6B 8 25 32 10
69%
7B 9 25 20 1
95%
Footnote : fuel samples 4A to 7A, and 4B to 7B, are comparative examples.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
Example 5 fuel characteristics:
Characteristic Unit
Density Kg/m3 811.1
KV, 40 C cSt 1.942
KV, 20 C cSt 2.843
Cetane number 58.1
Sulphur % (w/w) <0.0005
Fuel distillation parameters
IBP C 175
10% C 206.1
50% C 235.2
95% C 279.1
FBP = C 291.8
At 10 ppm fuel iron content, the polymers of the invention provided the best
combination of
(i) high stability and (ii) low destabilisation in the presence of lubricity
additive. Of these
5 examples, Polymers 1 and 2 showed the best resistance to destabilisation.
Polymer 3 showed
the best stability of all in otherwise untreated fuel, but also demonstrated
proportionally-more
destabilisation in the presence of the lubricity additive.
Of the comparative examples at 10 ppm fuel iron content, only Polymer 8
(neodecanoate)
10 demonstrated high stability in the absence of lubricity additive.
However, the deterioration
seen with this material in the presence of lubricity additive was greater than
for any example
of the invention. Furthermore, as previously demonstrated in example 2, the
yield of Polymer
8 was extremely poor, rendering the Polymer unviable for practical use.
15 At 25ppmm fuel iron content, the polymers of the invention again
provided the best
combination of (i) high stability and (ii) low destabilisation in the presence
of lubricity
additive.
The polymers of the invention again showed outstanding stability in the
presence of lubricity
20 additive, in contrast to all but one of the comparative additives.
Whilst polymer 5 showed no
further deterioration in the presence of lubricity additive, its baseline
stability was poor at
only 6 days.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
41
Example 6¨ demonstration of the viscosity advantage provided by the polymer.
The preparation of high concentration solutions of the polymer, such as are
ideal for use in on
board dosing systems, demonstrates the concentrate viscosity advantage
provided by the
present invention.
Three concentrates were prepared by conventional laboratory blending. In each
case, the
solvent used was Isopar L' which is a commercially-available aliphatic
solvent.
Into the first concentrate was blended the conventional iron neodecanoate used
in Example 7.
This iron salt was added in an amount sufficient to provide the resulting
concentrate with an
iron content of 6 % (by weight, per weight of solvent). The kinematic
viscosity (KV) of the
resulting concentrate at -30 degrees Centigrade was 1738 centiStokes (cSt).
This temperature
reflects a low ambient temperature, as might be encountered in Northern
European winters.
Such a high viscosity creates operational difficulties for concentrates which
must be doped in
finely-metered aliquots in an on-board dosing system.
The second and third concentrates were prepared using Polymer 10 of Example
4A, to iron
contents of 7.3 and 8.5 % respectively. The KV values of the resulting
concentrates, even at
the lower temperature of -40 degrees Centigrade, were only 32.6 and 79.3
respectively.
Compared to the conventional iron salt, the low temperature viscosities of the
concentrates of
the invention were greatly improved, even in the face of higher iron contents
and lower
temperatures. Such concentrates thus offer a more concentrated, usable form of
iron highly
suitable for trap regeneration in diesel engine devices dependent upon on
board dosing
systems.
Example 7 ¨ demonstration of the polymer's lower tendency to cause fuel
injector deposits
The diesel fuel injector fouling tendency of the polymer was investigated
using the known test
described in detail in the paper entitled "Injector Deposit Test For Modern
Diesel Engines" by
0. Graupner and T. Klaua of Siemens VDO Automotive AG, R. Caprotti and A.
Breakspear
of Infineum UK, and A. Schik and C. Rouff of APL Automobil Prueftechnik GmbH.
This
paper was presented at, and thereafter published in print in the proceedings
of, the 5th
International Colloquium of the Technische Akademie Esslingen, held on 12-13
January 2005.
CA 02678087 2014-06-19
42
The published proceedings, edited by Wilfried J Bartz, are available under the
international
reference ISBN 3-924813-59-0.
In summary, this test (like other injector fouling tests) investigates the
tendency of deposits to
accumulate on the critical surfaces of the injector parts which open to permit
fuel into the
combustion chamber of the diesel engine. Such deposits can obstruct and or
alter the spray
pattern of the fuel, so adversely affecting the air-fuel mixing and combustion
processes, and
hence reducing power output from the engine.
This particular test is especially applicable to modern high pressure
injection systems and
records the change in engine torque (if any) produced by the engine caused by
running the
fuel of interest through the test protocol. A loss of torque over the course
of the test relates to
a deleterious build-up of injector deposits during the test. In comparative
tests, the relative
effects on torque can be used to deduce the relative tendencies of different
substances to cause
injector fouling.
Polymer 10 and an existing iron regeneration additive (an iron salt of
neodecanoic acid) were
compared in the above test using a common reference fuel characterised in the
table below.
The modern reference fuel per se was of good quality and showed little
tendency to cause
injector fouling ¨ over the course of the twenty hour test, the drop in torque
was 0.5 %, i.e.
only one half of one percent.
Example 7 fuel characteristics :
Characteristic , Unit
Density Kg/rd 844.9
KV, 40 C cSt 2.519
KV, 20 C cSt 3.935
= Cetane number 55.4
Sulphur A (Iv /w) 0.0005
Fuel distillation parameters
1BP C 179.9
10% C 211.6
50% C 252.3
95% C 337.1
FBP C 353.6
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
43
The use of the iron neodecanoate salt in an amount providing the reference
fuel with an iron
content of 6 ppm (weight/weight) caused a drop in torque of 15.3 % over the
course of a
twenty hour test. Given the excellent fuel baseline result, this greatly-
increased injector
fouling can be clearly attributed to the addition of the iron salt. Thus,
whilst known to be
effective as a regeneration additive, the iron salt demonstrated the secondary
problem of
causing or promoting fouling tendency in the modern diesel injector.
In contrast, a further test using Polymer 10 of the invention in place of the
iron salt, to the
same fuel iron content of 6 ppm weight/weight, resulted in a drop in torque of
only 3.5 % over
the course of the twenty hour test. Thus, the polymer of the invention showed
less than one
quarter of the adverse impact on torque, when compared to the iron salt,
measured at the same
fuel iron concentration. This clearly points to the polymer of the invention
having a greatly-
reduced tendency to cause or promote injector fouling.
The skilled person will appreciate that other injector fouling tests known in
the art could also
suitably be used to demonstrate injector fouling tendency. Thus, for example,
conventional
tests based on the Peugeot XUD-9 diesel engine, and which measure the deposit
build-up on
the injector directly via an assessment of air-flow loss through the injectors
after a period of
engine operation on test fuel, can also be used to demonstrate the benefits of
the present
invention.
Example 8 ¨ demonstration of the polymer's ability to regenerate a particulate
trap
The polymer concentrate prepared in Example 6 (to a concentrate iron level of
7.3 % weight)
was investigated for its ability to promote the regeneration of a diesel
exhaust particulate trap
in an engine test environment.
In summary, a Volkswagen 1.9 litre TDi (turbocharged diesel) engine was used
carrying an
exhaust system fitted with a particulate trap. The engine was experimentally
modified by
fitting an engine head running a common rail fuel injection system, to
represent future engine
design and to permit post-injection of fuel for comparative test purposes.
This engine was
used to compare the regeneration efficiency of the 7.3 % wt polymer
concentrate against the
known regeneration additive iron neodecanoate. In each of a series of
comparable, controlled
experiments, the engine was run firstly without regeneration additive to load
the trap to a pre-
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
44
determined level of soot, and thereafter run with the selected additive to
determine that
additive's ability to promote the combustion of that collected quantity of
soot in the trap.
Between each test, the trap was cleaned of soot, and the fuel line pre-flushed
with the next test
fuel sample, to ensure no carry-over effects between experiments. The results
consistently
showed the polymer example of the invention to be equivalent in function to
iron
neodecanoate for regenerating the trap.
In detail, the test engine was fitted with an exhaust system particulate trap
comprising a
silicon carbide filter medium. The first (soot loading) phase of each
experimental run was
achieved by running the engine on modern, low sulphur diesel fuel (having a
sulphur content
of less than 10 ppm by weight, per weight of fuel) at operating conditions of
2500 rpm
(revolutions per minute) and 3 bar BMEP, until the target accumulated
particulate density (a
mass of 8 g particulate per litre of trap volume) had been collected in the
trap (as determined
by weight gain of the trap over the soot loading phase).
Regeneration tests were thereafter carried out under two alternative sets of
conditions, each of
which generated a controllable exhaust gas temperature of 450 C upstream of
the trap, i.e. a
temperature well below the spontaneous ignition temperature of collected soot
in a catalyst-
free environment. The first set of conditions involved the engine being run at
2500 rpm and
sufficiently high load to raise the exhaust gas temperature (as measured
upstream of the
particulate trap) to the required 450 C. The second, alternate set of
conditions involved the
post-injection of fuel direct into the combustion chamber at a point on the
engine cycle at
which combustion cannot occur, leading to an increase in the exhaust gas
temperature as a
consequence of local combustion. This post-injection was controlled to the
level resulting in
an exhaust gas temperature of 450 C upstream of the trap.
Regeneration tests of 10 minutes duration were carried out under each set of
conditions using
fuel doped either with iron neodecanoate, or with the 7.3 % wt polymer
concentrate of the
invention, in each case the respective additive being doped to the level
contributing either 3
ppm weight or 10 ppm weight of iron, per weight of fuel. In this way, the
performance of the
additives could be compared at two equal iron concentrations. In each case,
the resulting
regeneration of soot manifested itself in a weight loss from the soot-loaded
trap, which was
thereafter presented as the percentage of loaded soot which had been burned
off by the effect
of the respective additive at 450 C.
CA 02678087 2009-08-13
WO 2008/116553
PCT/EP2008/001835
The results of the tests are shown in the Table below. The iron neodecanoate
tests were run in
duplicates; in two comparisons (no.s 2 and 4, at 10 ppm iron), it can be seen
that the result for
the polymer lies within the spread of the two neodecanoate tests, whilst in
the other two
comparisons (no.s 1 and 3, at 3 ppm iron), the result for the polymer lies
above both
5 neodecanoate test results.
Regeneration Test results :
Comparison Test (iron concentration) Iron Polymer of the
No. neodecanoate invention
1 Post injection (3 ppm iron) 7.6 and 12.2
% 13.4 %
2 Post injection (10 ppm iron) 21.8 and 36.6 % 28.0 %
3 Load increase (3 ppm iron) 6.4 and 7.3 % 10.1 %
4 Load increase (10 ppm iron) 18.0 and 24.4 % 21.2 %
The polymer of the invention thus compares favourably with an existing iron-
based additive
10 for regeneration performance, whilst providing a superior balance of
physical properties
(namely better fuel stability, reduced injector fouling tendency and lower
viscosity in
concentrate form) permitting its more effective use as an additive for both
bulk fuel and on
board applications.
