Language selection

Search

Patent 2685651 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2685651
(54) English Title: FAIL-SAFE SYSTEM AND TEST MODULE, NOTABLY FOR USE IN A RAILROAD SIGNALING SYSTEM
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE SECURITE ET MODULE D'ESSAI CONCU, NOTAMMENT, POUR UN SYSTEME DE SIGNALISATION DE CHEMIN DE FER
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G1R 31/00 (2006.01)
  • B61L 1/20 (2006.01)
  • B61L 7/10 (2006.01)
  • G1R 1/20 (2006.01)
  • G1R 31/27 (2006.01)
  • G1R 31/327 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • IMHOFF, RICHARD (France)
(73) Owners :
  • THALES
(71) Applicants :
  • THALES (France)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2009-11-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2010-05-18
Examination requested: 2014-10-17
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
0806446 (France) 2008-11-18

Abstracts

English Abstract


A fail- safe system, notably for use in a railroad signaling system,
comprising a test module with a photovoltaic coupler able to charge a
capacitor. The energy stored in the capacitor provides power supply to a
circuit under test. Advantageously, means of measuring a state of charge of
the capacitor make it possible to quantify current leaks from the circuit
under
test.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


11
CLAIMS
1. A system including a fail-safe function comprising at least one
circuit test module, the test module comprising at least one circuit power
supply means, the power supply means comprising an insulated photovoltaic
coupler able to charge an energy storage means, able to be discharged into
the circuit under test, the testing of the circuit comprising at least one
first
phase of charging the energy storage means and a second phase of
discharging the energy storage means.
2. The fail-safe system as claimed in claim 1, wherein it also
comprises means of measuring a state of charge of the energy storage
means.
3. The fail-safe system as claimed in claim 2, wherein measured
state of charge is a time representative of the discharge time of the energy
storage means.
4. The fail-safe system as claimed in claim 2, further comprising
warning means activated if a predetermined threshold value is crossed by
measured state of charge.
5. The fail-safe system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said energy
storage means is a capacitor.
6. The fail-safe system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said at least
one component under test is at least one switch.
7. The fail-safe system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said at least
one component under test is at least one switch of field-effect transistor
type.
8. A railroad signaling system comprising a fail--safe system as
claimed in claim 1.

12
9. An electrical circuit test module, which comprises at least one
power supply means comprising an insulated photovoltaic coupler able to
charge an energy storage means, able to be discharged into the electric
circuit.
10. The electrical circuit test module as claimed in claim 9, which
also comprises means of measuring a state of charge of the energy storage
means.
11. The test module as claimed in claim 9, wherein the energy
storage means is a capacitor.
12. The test module as claimed in claim 10, wherein the energy
storage means is a capacitor.
13. A railroad signaling system including a fail-safe function,
comprising at least one network of interconnected switches, able to control
the power supply to a load, wherein each of the switches of the network is
associated with a test module as claimed in claim 9.
14. The railroad signaling system as claimed in claim 13, wherein
said at least one network of interconnected switches controlling the load
comprises two networks of switches of P-channel field-effect transistor type
and N-channel field-effect transistor type, each of the networks comprising
two parallel branches, each of the parallel branches comprising two switches
of P-channel field-effect transistor type or two switches of N-channel field-
effect transistor type, each of the networks being connected between the
positive terminal or negative terminal of a battery and one of the terminals
of
the load.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02685651 2009-11-16
FAIL-SAFE SYSTEM AND TEST MODULE, NOTABLY FOR USE IN A
RAILROAD SIGNALING SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the invention
The present invention relates to a fail-safe system and also relates
to a test module. It applies notably to railroad signaling devices.
Intrinsically safe or fail-safe systems are necessary in all devices
where the malfunctioning of one of their components or circuits can have
1o consequences for the safety of persons. Such is the case for devices used
in
applications such as railroad signaling, but also in aeronautical
instrumentation, nuclear power station control instrumentation, equipment
used in the petrochemical industry, in medical instrumentation, and so on. In
such devices, no anomaly, whatever it may be, should lead to the
transmission of more permissive information than that provided in normal
operation. Thus, it is necessary for the equipment implemented to be able to
handle their functions without the safety characteristics of their components
being able to be compromised. To this end, there are standards applicable to
safety devices such as the standard IEC 61508 -"Functiona! safety of
2o electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems", or
indeed for the specific example of railroad equipment, the standard
EN 50129 - "Safety related electronic systems for signaling".
It is notably necessary, in the case of electronic devices, for any
failure of any key component to be able to be diagnosed within the shortest
possible time, in order for corrective actions to be taken. To this end, it is
possible to carry out periodic tests on the devices. However, such tests often
have the drawback of being intrusive, inasmuch as they require energy
power supply for inputs or outputs of the device or certain of its components.
Furthermore, it is essential to check that such tests cannot lead to positive
results despite the failure of a component.
2. Discussion of the background

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
2
There are a large number of fail-safe solutions known to those
skilled in the art, notably in the railroad signaling industry. It is, for
example,
possible, for digital circuit inputs, to use solutions for designing circuits
with
enhanced reliability, such as Colpitts oscillators. In this same field, it is
possible to secure digital circuit outputs by using networks of relays with
interdependent contacts.
Nevertheless, such solutions do present drawbacks. On the one
hand, the complexity of the electronic fail-safe circuits results in high
development and production costs. On the other hand, when
1o electromechanical relays are used, the latter offer a limited number of
operation cycles, or a limited lifespan imposing tests that are close together
in time and the preventive replacement of these relays during maintenance
procedures. It should be noted that these drawbacks can adversely affect the
exhaustivity of the tests; furthermore, excessively intrusive tests often
result
in disturbances to the operation of the devices under test that can represent
threats to their safety.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One purpose of the invention is to overcome the abovementioned
problems, by proposing a fail safe system that is capable of providing safe
and effective power supply to the components or circuits under test or even
to test circuits, and that does not compromise the operation of the devices in
which they are integrated. Another advantage of the invention is linked to the
low volume required for its implementation in devices, and to the low cost of
the latter, while providing an optimum level of safety. Furthermore, the
system according to the invention makes it possible to diagnose current leaks
originating from the components or circuits under test, in order to initiate
the
use of backup devices if redundancies have been provided, or even trigger
alerts, repair operations if necessary, and quite simply trigger measures to
maximize safety, such as, for example, a signal prompting the trains to stop,
all of these actions being, for example, controlled by a central control
system.
Finally, another advantage of the invention is that it can be applied equally
to
the testing of inputs or outputs of components or circuits under test.
To this end, the subject of the invention is a system including a fail
safe function comprising at least one circuit test module, the test module

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
3
comprising at least one circuit power supply means, the power supply means
comprising an insulated photovoltaic coupler able to charge an energy
storage means able to be discharged into the circuit under test, which can be
a component or even a test circuit.
In one embodiment of the invention, the system also comprises
means of measuring a state of charge of the energy storage means,
determining a state of charge indicator.
In one embodiment of the invention, the state of charge indicator is
a time representative of the discharge time of the energy storage means.
In one embodiment of the invention, the system also comprises
warning means that are activated if a predetermined threshold value is
crossed by said state of charge indicator.
In one embodiment of the invention, the system is characterized in
that the energy storage means is a capacitor.
In one embodiment of the invention, the system is characterized in
that said at least one component under test is at least one switch.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the switch is of field-
effect transistor type.
Another subject of the invention is a railroad signaling system
comprising a fail-safe system as described hereinabove.
Another subject of the invention is an electrical circuit test module,
comprising at least one power supply means comprising an insulated
photovoltaic coupler able to charge an energy storage means, able to be
discharged into the electric circuit.
In one embodiment of the invention, the test module may further
comprise means of measuring a state of charge of the energy storage
means.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the energy storage
means is a capacitor.
Another subject of the invention is a railroad signaling system
including a fail-safe function, comprising at least one network of
interconnected switches, able to control the power supply to a load, wherein
each of the switches of the network is associated with a test module as
described hereinabove.

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
4
In one embodiment of the invention, the railroad signaling system
is noteworthy in that said at least one network of interconnected switches
controlling the load comprises two networks of switches of P-channel field-
effect transistor type and N-channel field-effect transistor type, each of the
networks comprising two parallel branches, each of the parallel branches
comprising two switches of P-channel field-effect transistor type or two
switches of N-channel field-effect transistor type, each of the networks being
connected between the positive terminal or negative terminal of a battery and
one of the terminals of the load.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other features and advantages of the invention will become
apparent from reading the description, given by way of example, given in light
of the appended drawings that represent:
- figure 1, the circuit diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the
invention applied to the power supply for a circuit under test;
- figure 2, the circuit diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the
invention applying to the detection of leak currents originating from a
component or circuit under test;
- figures 3A and 3B, the circuit diagram of an exemplary embodiment
of the invention applying to the measurement of leak currents on an
actuator of N-channel field-effect transistor type (hereinafter
designated MOSFET) and of P-channel MOSFET type respectively;
- figure 4, the circuit diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the
invention applying to a network of actuators of P- and N-channel
MOSFET type;
- figure 5, the circuit diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the
invention applying to the protection of the input of a circuit.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Figure 1 shows the circuit diagram of an exemplary fail-safe
system 100 according to the invention applied to the power supply for a
circuit under test or a test circuit, not shown in the figure. This circuit
under
test is connected to input terminals 107 and 108. The system according to
the invention includes a photovoltaic coupler 101, comprising a light-emitting

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
device 102 and a photovoltaic cell 103 optically coupled but electrically
insulated from one another. The photovoltaic coupler 101 is connected
between a first switch 104 and a reference potential. The switch 104, for
example an actuator, is connected to an energy source, for example a
5 voltage loaded by a resistor that is not represented. The photovoltaic
coupler
101 constitutes an energy source, its power being limited by the properties
inherent to this component. For example, the maximum voltage at the
terminals of the cell is limited to 10 volts, and the output current is of the
order of a few microamperes. A capacitor 106 is connected between the
terminals of the photovoltaic cell 103, for example via a diode 109. This
capacitor typically offers a capacitance of the order of a microfarad. The
diode 109 makes it possible to protect the anode of the photovoltaic cell 103
from returned electrical current. The capacitor 106 is connected to the
circuit
under test by the input terminals 107 and 108. A second switch 105 is
connected between a first armature of the capacitor 106 and a first terminal
107. The second terminal 108 is connected to the second armature of the
capacitor 106. The operation of the system can be broken down into three
separate phases described hereinbelow:
- A first phase of charging the capacitor 106. In this first phase, the
first switch 104 is closed and the second switch 105 is open. The
power delivered by the photovoltaic cell 103 is then stored in energy
form in the capacitor 106. The duration of the first phase, of the order
of a few seconds, is predetermined so as to ensure that the capacitor
106 is fully charged.
- A second phase of discharging the capacitor 106. In this second
phase, the first switch 104 is open and the second switch 105 is
closed. During a time period of the order of a few milliseconds for
example, the energy stored in the capacitor 106 is used to feed the
circuit under test. The output impedance of the circuit 100 is such
that the disturbance with respect to the circuit under test is of short
duration, and thus has no impact on the correct operation of the
circuit under test, or indeed this impact can easily be eliminated, for
example by means of appropriate filters known to those skilled in the
art, without in any way prejudicing the functionality of the circuit
under test.

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
6
- In a third phase, the first switch 104 is open, as is the switch 105.
The system is then inactive, and when a new test must be carried
out, the sequence can recommence with the first phase. It should be
noted that the third phase is optional, the system being able to return
to the first phase immediately after the end of the second phase if
necessary.
One advantage of the invention is that the power delivered by the
photovoltaic coupler 101 is limited, and cannot corrupt the circuit under test
and compromise safety, even in the eventuality of the switches 104 and 105
1o remaining closed for a long time.
Figure 2 shows the circuit diagram of an exemplary fail-safe
system 200 according to the invention, applied to the detection of current
leaks in a circuit under test that is not represented, connected in parallel
with
a capacitor 106. This circuit under test usually behaves as an open circuit.
Figure 2 differs from figure 1 in that a resistor 208, in parallel with the
capacitor 106, represents the current leakage resistance in the circuit under
test. Furthermore, the input terminals 107 and 108 are connected to a current
measuring device 207. The operation of the system can be broken down into
two distinct phases described hereinbelow:
- A first phase of charging the capacitor 106. In this first phase,
the duration of which is predetermined to ensure that the capacitor
106 is fully charged, the first switch 104 is closed and the second
switch 105 is open. The capacitor 106 is charged, in the same way
as previously described with reference to figure 1. This time, if a
leak is present in the circuit under test, the leak resistance 208
absorbs a portion of the electrical power, and the capacitor 106
can be charged only partially.
- A second phase of discharging the capacitor 106. In this
second phase, the first switch 104 is open and the second switch
105 is closed; thus, the capacitor 106 is discharged into the
measuring device 207. This device can, for example, comprise
means for measuring the voltage at the terminals of the capacitor
106, or even means for measuring a capacitor discharge time, or
even a time at the end of which the voltage at the terminals of the

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
7
capacitor passes below a predetermined threshold. Obviously,
other means of estimating the charge of the capacitor can be
envisaged.
Figure 3A shows the circuit diagram of a fail-safe system 300
according to the invention, applied by way of example to the detection of leak
currents in a switch 310 of N-channel MOSFET type. A first photovoltaic
coupler 320 comprising a light source 321 coupled to a photovoltaic cell 322
is used as energy source for the switch 310. The light emitter 321 is
connected to an energy source via a first switch 305, and to a reference
potential. The positive terminal of the photovoltaic cell 322 is connected to
the gate of the MOSFET switch 310. The negative terminal of the cell 322 is
connected to the drain of the MOSFET switch 310. A second photovoltaic
coupler 101 comprising a light emitter 102 coupled to a photovoltaic cell 103
is used as energy source for charging a capacitor 106. The light emitter 102
is connected to an energy source via a second switch 104, and to the
reference potential. The positive terminal of the photovoltaic cell 103 is
connected to a diode 109. The diode 109 is connected to the source of the
MOSFET switch 310 via a diode 323. The diodes 109 and 323 protect the
photovoltaic cell 103 against returned current. The diode 109 is furthermore
connected to the first armature of a capacitor 106. The negative terminal of
the photovoltaic cell 103 is connected to the second armature of the
capacitor 106. The source of the MOSFET switch 310 is furthermore
connected to an input 311, the drain to an output 312. The drain is
furthermore connected to a current measuring device 313, in this example
consisting of a resistor 314 connected to the primary of a Schmitt trigger
photocoupler 315. The secondary of this photocoupler is connected to a test
output 330. The operation of the system can be broken down into two distinct
phases described hereinbelow:
- In a first phase, the first switch 305 and therefore the MOSFET
switch 310 are open, and the second switch 104 is closed. Thus,
in a manner similar to that described above with reference to
figure 2, the second photovoltaic coupler 101 charges the
capacitor 106, for a predetermined duration to ensure that the
latter is fully charged. Assuming that the MOSFET switch 310

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
8
presents current leaks, the charge of the capacitor 106 can be
only partial.
- In a second phase, the second switch 104 is open and the first
switch 305 is closed. The MOSFET switch 310 is then closed. In
this example, the output 330 is temporarily active, for a duration
dependent on the electric current passing through the resistor 314.
Thus, a leak current in the actuator 310 is reflected in a duration of
the active state of the photocoupler 315 that is less than a
predetermined threshold. Obviously, other types of known devices
able to determine a state of charge of the capacitor 106 can be
envisaged.
Figure 3B is similar to figure 3A. It relates to the case where the
component under test is a P-channel MOSFET type switch 340. The
description given with reference to figure 3A applies to figure 3B, except for
the fact that the positive terminal of the photovoltaic cell 322 of the first
coupler 320 is connected to the source of the MOSFET switch 340. The
negative terminal of the cell 322 is connected to the gate of the MOSFET
switch 340.
Figure 4 shows the circuit diagram of one embodiment of the
invention, applied by way of example to a secured control system comprising
P- and N-channel MOSFET type switches. A system 400 according to the
invention comprises two networks 410 of four modules 401, 402, 403 and
404 fed by a battery and connected to a load 440. The input of the network
410 is connected to the positive terminal of the battery via a disconnecting
relay 412 and a fuse 413. The input of the network 410 is furthermore
connected to two parallel branches, each of them comprising two modules
connected in series. A first parallel branch comprises the first module 401,
in
this example a system comprising a switch of N-channel MOSFET type as
represented in figure 3A, in series with the second module 402, comprising a
P-channel MOSFET type switch as represented in figure 3B, the second
module being mounted in series with a protection diode 420. Two switches
S11 and S12 are connected between the input of the network 410 and the
input of the first module 401. The first switch S11 is connected between the

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
9
input of the network 410 and a terminal of the second switch S12. The other
terminal of the second switch S12 is connected to the negative terminal 414
of the battery. The output of the first module 401 is connected to the input
of
the second module 402. The output of the second module 402 is connected
to a first terminal 430 of the load 440. A second parallel branch comprises
the third module 403, in this example a system comprising a switch of P-
channel MOSFET type as represented in figure 3B, in series with the fourth
module 404, comprising a switch of N-channel MOSFET type as represented
in figure 3A, the fourth module being mounted in series with a protection
diode 420. Two switches S21 and 322 are connected between the input of
the network 410 and the input of the third module 403. The first switch S21 is
connected between the input of the network 410 and a terminal of the second
switch S22. The other terminal of the second switch S22 is connected to the
negative terminal 414 of the battery. The output of the third module 403 is
connected to the input of the fourth module 404. The output of the fourth
module 404 is connected to the first terminal 430 of the load 440. A second
terminal 431 of the load 440 is connected to the input of a second network
410, the output of which is connected to the negative terminal 414 of the
battery. Each of the modules 401, 402, 403 and 404 presents an input 311,
an output 312, a first switch 305 and a second switch 104, and a test output
330, according to the descriptions given with reference to figures 3A and 3B.
Each of these modules is thus able to be tested independently of the other
modules. Thus, any failure of one of the devices forming this system can be
diagnosed rapidly.
Figure 5 shows the circuit diagram of one embodiment of the
invention applied by way of example to the testing of the input of an
electrical
system. Such a fail-safe system according to the invention comprises a
circuit 520 and a test module 510. Advantageously, the test module 510 is
integrated in the circuit 520. The input 521 of the circuit 520 is tested by
the
test module 510. The input 521 is connected to a first switch 524 via a
protection diode 523. The first switch 524 is furthermore connected to a
Zener diode 526. The Zener diode 526 is intended to supply a voltage
threshold to the primary of a Schmitt trigger coupler 527. The secondary of
this coupler is connected to an output 528. The primary of the coupler 527 is

CA 02685651 2009-11-16
linked to a reference potential 522. A line resistance 529 is connected to the
diode 526, just upstream of the latter. A resistor 525 sets the input
impedance. The test module 510 is similar to the systems described above
with reference to the preceding figures. This test module therefore comprises
5 a photovoltaic coupler 101 used as an energy source for charging a capacitor
106. The photovoltaic coupler 101 comprises a light emitter 102 connected to
an energy source via a second switch 104, and to the reference potential.
The light emitter 102 is coupled to a photovoltaic cell 103. The positive
terminal of the photovoltaic cell 103 is connected to a diode 109. The diode
10 109 is connected to the first armature of a capacitor 106. The negative
terminal of the cell 103 is connected to the second armature of the capacitor
106. The latter is furthermore connected to a first terminal of the resistor
525.
The first armature of the capacitor 106 is furthermore connected to the first
terminal of a third switch 501. The second terminal of the switch 501 is
connected to the second terminal of the resistor 525 via a protection diode
502. The operation of the system can be broken down into two distinct
phases described hereinbelow:
- In a first phase, the third switch 501 is open; thus, the test
module 510 is disconnected from the circuit 520. The first switch
524 is closed. Thus, the input 521 is read and transmitted to the
output 528. The second switch 104 is closed, therefore the
capacitor 106 is charged.
- In a second phase, the second switch 104 is open. The first
switch 524 is open, and the output 528 becomes inactive. The
third switch 501 is closed, so the capacitor 106 is discharged into
the circuit 520. The result of this is a pulse on the output 528.
Measuring means, not represented here, can be used to
characterize this pulse. For example, by measuring the duration of
the pulse, it is possible to detect the increase in the resistance
525, and a modification of the input voltage threshold, conditioned
by the Zener diode 526.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2020-01-01
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2017-05-10
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2017-05-10
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2016-11-16
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2016-05-09
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-11-09
Inactive: Report - No QC 2015-11-02
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-02-27
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-02-27
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-02-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-11-27
Letter Sent 2014-11-05
Request for Examination Received 2014-10-17
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2014-10-17
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2014-10-17
Inactive: IPC expired 2014-01-01
Inactive: IPC removed 2013-12-31
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2011-09-20
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2010-06-14
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2010-05-18
Inactive: Cover page published 2010-05-17
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-04-20
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2010-04-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-04-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-04-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-03-26
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-03-26
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2010-03-25
Inactive: Office letter 2010-03-22
Letter Sent 2010-03-22
Inactive: Single transfer 2010-02-18
Inactive: Declaration of entitlement - Formalities 2010-02-18
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2009-12-18
Application Received - Regular National 2009-12-12

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2016-11-16

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2015-10-23

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - standard 2009-11-16
Registration of a document 2010-02-18
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2011-11-16 2011-10-24
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2012-11-16 2012-10-25
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2013-11-18 2013-10-29
Request for examination - standard 2014-10-17
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2014-11-17 2014-10-27
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2015-11-16 2015-10-23
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THALES
Past Owners on Record
RICHARD IMHOFF
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2011-09-19 11 509
Claims 2011-09-19 2 74
Description 2009-11-15 10 493
Abstract 2009-11-15 1 10
Claims 2009-11-15 2 65
Drawings 2009-11-15 4 51
Representative drawing 2010-04-20 1 5
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2010-03-21 1 102
Filing Certificate (English) 2010-03-24 1 157
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2011-07-18 1 113
Reminder - Request for Examination 2014-07-16 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2014-11-04 1 176
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2016-06-19 1 163
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2016-12-27 1 172
Correspondence 2009-12-17 1 17
Correspondence 2010-02-17 2 32
Correspondence 2010-03-21 1 14
Examiner Requisition 2015-11-08 3 220