Language selection

Search

Patent 2710038 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2710038
(54) English Title: VITAL SOLID STATE CONTROLLER
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF DE COMMANDE D'ETAT SOLIDE VITAL
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G05B 9/03 (2006.01)
  • B61L 13/04 (2006.01)
  • B61L 29/30 (2006.01)
  • G05B 19/05 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BALDWIN, DAVID (United States of America)
  • ASHRAF, AHTASHAM (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CENTRAL SIGNAL, LLC (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • CENTRAL SIGNAL, LLC (United States of America)
(74) Agent: AVENTUM IP LAW LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2015-11-10
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2007-12-26
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2008-07-03
Examination requested: 2012-12-20
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2007/088849
(87) International Publication Number: WO2008/080169
(85) National Entry: 2010-06-18

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/871,609 United States of America 2006-12-22
60/884,930 United States of America 2007-01-15

Abstracts

English Abstract



A vital programmable logic device (VPD) is provided having at least two
microprocessors. The VPD is configured
to provide failsafe operation of a vital control system while operating in a
closed circuit environment. In at least one embodiment of
the present invention, railroad grade crossing signals are controlled by the
VPD.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de logique programmable vital (VPD) ayant au moins deux microprocesseurs. Le VPD est configuré pour permettre un fonctionnement sans défaut d'un système de commande vital tout en fonctionnant dans un environnement en circuit fermé. Dans au moins un mode de réalisation de la présente invention, des signaux de passage à niveau sont commandés par le VPD.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims
1. An
apparatus comprising a vital processing device coupled to a railroad signaling
device coupled to a railroad track, the vital processing device configured to
receive an
input signal set comprising one or more input signals representing one or more
conditions
on the railroad track, the vital processing device comprising:
a first controller device configured to perform a first logic process using
the input
signal set to generate a first controller device output signal;
a second controller device configured to perform the first logic process using
the
input signal set to generate a second controller device output signal; and
health check apparatus configured to perform integrity testing of the first
and
second controller devices;
wherein the first and second controller devices do not share components
affording
alternative energy or logic paths;
further wherein the vital processing device sets the railroad signaling device
to a
railroad signaling device safest condition if at least one of the following
occurs:
failure of one or more components of the vital processing device;
integrity testing failure by the first controller device;
integrity testing failure by the second controller device; and
further wherein, when the first and second controller devices both pass
integrity
testing, and when there is no component failure within the vital processing
device, the
first and second controller device output signals are identical, are a
function of the input
signal set, and are used to control the railroad signaling device;
a first dedicated relay driver circuit coupled to receive the first controller
device
output signal, wherein the first dedicated relay driver circuit enables a
current generating
a first discrete DC voltage signal when the first controller device output
signal is high and
further wherein the first dedicated relay driver circuit prevents current flow
to generate
any DC voltage signal when the first controller device output signal is low;
and
a second dedicated relay driver circuit coupled to receive the second
controller
device output signal, wherein the second dedicated relay driver circuit
enables a current
generating a second discrete DC voltage signal when the second controller
device output
14

signal is high and further wherein the second dedicated relay driver circuit
prevents
current flow to generate any DC voltage signal when the second controller
device output
signal is low;
wherein the first and second discrete DC voltage signals are required to
produce a
current flow and voltage differential to energize a relay in the railroad
signaling device;
further wherein the first dedicated relay driver circuit comprises an emitter
follower transistor configuration, and further wherein the second dedicated
relay driver
circuit comprises an emitter follower transistor configuration.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first and second controller devices
are:
a pair of duplicate microprocessors;
a pair of duplicate programmable devices;
two microprocessors programmed to perform duplicate logic processing;
two programmable devices programmed to perform duplicate logic processing; or
identical, distinct logic devices.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first dedicated relay driver
circuit comprises
an opto-isolator configuration, and further wherein the second dedicated relay
driver
circuit comprises an opto-isolator configuration.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the vital processing device is further
comprising
a third controller device coupled to the first and second controller devices,
wherein the
third controller device performs one or more of the following:
controlling housekeeping functions for the first and second controller
devices;
permitting communications with a computer external to the vital processing
device;
permitting communications with one or more other vital processing devices;
providing a user interface to control one or more of the following:
setting vital processing device timing parameters;
logging in to the vital processing device;
changing vital processing device authorization;

initiating data log collection;
device data logging and retrieval;
displaying logic states;
displaying one or more vital processing device states;
setting vital processing device operating parameters;
providing memory for storing data regarding the vital processing device.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein each input signal is a vital railroad
track relay
signal.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first and second controller devices
are
configured to provide independent and redundant processing of the input signal
set.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the railroad signaling device comprises
at least
one of the following: a railroad track crossing warning device; a preemption
signal
device; a railroad track traffic status indicator, wayside signals, power
switch control
device, directional movement logic.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the health check apparatus comprises a
pair of
health check lines coupling the first controller device coupled to the second
controller
device, and further wherein integrity testing comprises at least one of the
following:
monitoring independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first controller
device
and independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second controller device;
comparing independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first controller
device
and independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second controller device;
identifying a problem with at least one of the first and second controller
devices
using independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first controller device
and
independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second controller device.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the railroad signaling device comprises
at least
one of the following: a railroad track crossing warning device; a preemption
signal
16

device; a railroad track traffic status indicator, wayside signals, power
switch control
device, directional movement logic.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the first and second controller
devices are:
a pair of duplicate microprocessors;
a pair of duplicate programmable devices;
two microprocessors programmed to perform duplicate logic processing;
two programmable devices programmed to perform duplicate logic processing; or
identical, distinct logic devices.
11. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the first and second controller
devices are
configured to provide independent and redundant processing of the input signal
set.
12. An apparatus comprising a vital processing device coupled to a railroad
signaling
device coupled to a railroad track, the vital processing device configured to
receive an
input signal set comprising one or more input signals representing one or more
conditions
on the railroad track, the vital processing device comprising:
a first controller device configured to perform a first logic process using
the input
signal set to generate a first controller device output signal;
a second controller device configured to perform the first logic process using
the
input signal set to generate a second controller device output signal; and
health check apparatus configured to perform integrity testing of the first
and
second controller devices;
wherein the first and second controller devices do not share components
affording
alternative energy or logic paths;
further wherein the vital processing device sets the railroad signaling device
to a
railroad signaling device safest condition if at least one of the following
occurs:
failure of one or more components of the vital processing device;
integrity testing failure by the first controller device;
integrity testing failure by the second controller device; and
17

further wherein, when the first and second controller devices both pass
integrity
testing, and when there is no component failure within the vital processing
device, the
first and second controller device output signals are identical, are a
function of the input
signal set, and are used to control the railroad signaling device;
wherein the health check apparatus comprises a pair of health check lines
coupling the first controller device coupled to the second controller device,
and further
wherein integrity testing comprises at least one of the following:
monitoring independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first
controller device and independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second
controller device;
comparing independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first controller
device and independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second controller
device;
identifying a problem with at least one of the first and second controller
devices using independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first
controller
device and independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second controller
device.
13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the vital processing device is
further
comprising a third controller device coupled to the first and second
controller devices,
wherein the third controller device performs one or more of the following:
controlling housekeeping functions for the first and second controller
devices;
permitting communications with a computer external to the vital processing
device;
permitting communications with one or more other vital processing devices;
providing a user interface to control one or more of the following:
setting vital processing device timing parameters;
logging in to the vital processing device;
changing vital processing device authorization;
initiating data log collection;
device data logging and retrieval;
18

displaying logic states;
displaying one or more vital processing device states;
setting vital processing device operating parameters;
providing memory for storing data regarding the vital processing device.
14. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein each input signal is a vital railroad
track relay
signal.
15. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the first and second controller
devices are
configured to provide independent and redundant processing of the input signal
set.
16. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the railroad signaling device
comprises at least
one of the following: a railroad track crossing warning device; a preemption
signal
device; a railroad track traffic status indicator, wayside signals, power
switch control
device, directional movement logic.
17. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the first and second controller
devices are:
a pair of duplicate microprocessors;
a pair of duplicate programmable devices;
two microprocessors programmed to perform duplicate logic processing;
two programmable devices programmed to perform duplicate logic processing; or
identical, distinct logic devices.
19

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02710038 2014-11-18
VITAL SOLID STATE CONTROLLER
[0001] The present invention relates to supervisory control systems. More
specifically the
present invention relates to an improved and cost effective vital programmable
logic controller
system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Conventional programmable logic controllers (PLC) are prevalent in
various
industries since they can provide a means for intelligently controlling, among
other things,
mechanical and electrical processes. Consistency and reliability of specific
types of PLCs affects
their use within process control applications. It is common for known PLCs to
be sufficiently
functional for a variety of uses, including traffic control, production and
assembly lines, and
electromechanical machinery control. However, PLCs have not been deemed
suitable for use in
railroad signal systems based in part upon the non-vital nature of known PLCs.
[0003] Railroad grade crossings often involve motor vehicle traffic that cross
railroad
tracks, the situs of which is notorious for motor vehicle-train collisions. A
variety of warning
systems intended to warn vehicle operators of approaching trains have employed
two major
warning systems. These major warning systems include an audible signal sent
from the train itself
and a visual warning signal located at the site of the grade crossing. The
visual warning system
almost always includes passive markings (road signs, roadway painted markings,
etc.), but active
markings (drop down gates, flashing lights, etc.) are not always employed.
[0004] Visual railroad signaling device functionality is often governed by
national and/or
local governing body signaling standards. By example, within the United
States, any device
designed for railroad signal service must conform to established federal,
state and railroad signal
standards for design and operation of the signaling devices. It is often the
case that an audible
signal and/or passive warning methods are not sufficient to provide a motor
vehicle operator with
sufficient time to avoid a collision. In the case of those crossings that do
not have an active vital
and preemptive visual warning system, the likelihood of a collision is
increased significantly. It is
therefore advantageous to provide an active vital and preemptive visual
warning system. However,
it is cost prohibitive for every grade crossing to have an active vital and
preemptive warning
1

CA 02710038 2014-11-18
system that adheres to the local signaling standards. It is advantageous to
provide a cost effective
active vital and preemptive warning system.
[0005] Railroad signal standard practice for the design and function of signal
systems is
based upon the concept of a vital system. A vital system is often
characterized as being failsafe and
consistent with the closed circuit principle. A signal design is failsafe if
the failure of any element
of the system causes the system to revert to its safest condition. Operation
at the safest condition is
often activation of the warning system. In the case of railroad signal
systems, failsafe design
requires that if any element of the active system cannot perform its intended
function that the
active crossing warning devices will operate and continue to operate until the
failure is repaired. In
the case of railroad wayside signal systems, failsafe design requires that if
any element necessary
to the safe and proper operation of the system cannot perform its intended
function that the system
will revert to the safest condition, i.e. a red signal indicating stop or
proceed at restricted speed
according to rules is in effect. A signal design is in conformance with the
closed circuit principle
when the components of the system do not share elements which could afford
alternative energy or
logic paths, as these elements would violate the failsafe principle. It would
be highly advantageous
to employ cost effective and failsafe vehicle detection systems using
microprocessors or PLCs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005.1] According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided
an apparatus
comprising a vital processing device coupled to a railroad signaling device
coupled to a railroad
track, the vital processing device configured to receive an input signal set
comprising one or more
input signals representing one or more conditions on the railroad track, the
vital processing device
comprising:
a first controller device configured to perform a first logic process using
the input signal set
to generate a first controller device output signal;
a second controller device configured to perform the first logic process using
the input
signal set to generate a second controller device output signal; and
health check apparatus configured to perform integrity testing of the first
and second
controller devices;
wherein the first and second controller devices do not share components
affording
alternative energy or logic paths;
2

CA 02710038 2014-11-18
further wherein the vital processing device sets the railroad signaling device
to a railroad
signaling device safest condition if at least one of the following occurs:
failure of one or more components of the vital processing device;
integrity testing failure by the first controller device;
integrity testing failure by the second controller device; and
further wherein, when the first and second controller devices both pass
integrity testing,
and when there is no component failure within the vital processing device, the
first and second
controller device output signals are identical, are a function of the input
signal set, and are used to
control the railroad signaling device;
a first dedicated relay driver circuit coupled to receive the first controller
device output
signal, wherein the first dedicated relay driver circuit enables a current
generating a first discrete
DC voltage signal when the first controller device output signal is high and
further wherein the first
dedicated relay driver circuit prevents current flow to generate any DC
voltage signal when the first
controller device output signal is low; and
a second dedicated relay driver circuit coupled to receive the second
controller device
output signal, wherein the second dedicated relay driver circuit enables a
current generating a
second discrete DC voltage signal when the second controller device output
signal is high and
further wherein the second dedicated relay driver circuit prevents current
flow to generate any DC
voltage signal when the second controller device output signal is low;
wherein the first and second discrete DC voltage signals are required to
produce a current
flow and voltage differential to energize a relay in the railroad signaling
device;
further wherein the first dedicated relay driver circuit comprises an emitter
follower
transistor configuration, and further wherein the second dedicated relay
driver circuit comprises an
emitter follower transistor configuration.
[0005.2] According to another aspect of the present invention, there is
provided an
apparatus comprising a vital processing device coupled to a railroad signaling
device coupled to a
railroad track, the vital processing device configured to receive an input
signal set comprising one
or more input signals representing one or more conditions on the railroad
track, the vital processing
device comprising:
a first controller device configured to perform a first logic process using
the input signal set
to generate a first controller device output signal;
a second controller device configured to perform the first logic process using
the input
signal set to generate a second controller device output signal; and
2a

CA 02710038 2014-11-18
health check apparatus configured to perform integrity testing of the first
and second
controller devices;
wherein the first and second controller devices do not share components
affording
alternative energy or logic paths;
further wherein the vital processing device sets the railroad signaling device
to a railroad
signaling device safest condition if at least one of the following occurs:
failure of one or more components of the vital processing device;
integrity testing failure by the first controller device;
integrity testing failure by the second controller device; and
further wherein, when the first and second controller devices both pass
integrity testing,
and when there is no component failure within the vital processing device, the
first and second
controller device output signals are identical, are a function of the input
signal set, and are used to
control the railroad signaling device;
wherein the health check apparatus comprises a pair of health check lines
coupling the first
controller device coupled to the second controller device, and further wherein
integrity testing
comprises at least one of the following:
monitoring independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first controller
device
and independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second controller device;
comparing independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first controller
device
and independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second controller device;
identifying a problem with at least one of the first and second controller
devices
using independently generated, timed heartbeats of the first controller device
and
independently generated, timed heartbeats of the second controller device.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] Preferred embodiments of the invention are described below with
reference to the
following accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only.
Throughout the
following views, reference numerals will be used in the drawings, and the same
reference numerals
will be used throughout the several views and in the description to indicate
same or like parts.
Fig. 1 shows a block diagram of the vital processing device (VPD) in
accordance with at
least one embodiment of the invention.
2b

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
Fig. 2 is an alternative embodiment block diagram of the VPD of Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a schematic block diagram representing the device output control in
accordance
with at least one embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a flow diagram of a health check protocol in accordance with at
least one
embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 5 is a graphical representation of a system input/output schema in
accordance with at
least one embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 6 is a timing diagram representing a state of the system based upon the
input and
output of the system, in accordance with at least one embodiment of the
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0007] Referring to Figs. 1-2. In one aspect of the invention, a vital solid
state processing
device (VPD) 10 is provided. The device 10 includes a first controller 12,
second controller 14, a
first vital input 16, a second vital input 18, a third vital input 20, an
optional fourth vital output
22, a first vital output 24, a second vital output 26, a third vital output
28, an optional fourth vital
output 30, a health check line 32 and a third controller 34. Alternatively,
greater than 3 vital
input and vital output lines can be employed. The number of vital inputs and
vital outputs is
determined by the specific application requirements, and can be greater than
about 3 inputs and 3
outputs depending upon the specific use requirements of the device 10. The
device can be
configured to provide independent and redundant processing of input states
thereby configured
such that the VPD output is not logically high if any hardware or component in
the path between
the output and the associated input is damaged, missing, or otherwise
nonfunctional.
[0008] The device 10 also includes a communication port 36, memory module 38,
real
time clock (RTC) 40, battery 42 for back up power, a user interface 44, a
radio module 46, GPS
module 48, and a Bluetooth module 50 operably connected to the third
controller 34, and
alternatively operably connected to the first controller 12, second controller
14, or a combination
of the three controllers 12, 14, 34.
3

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
[0009] The inputs 16, 18, 20, and 22 represent signals received from vital
railroad relays
(not shown) or alternative signal sources. Railroad relays are often existing
devices connected to
most railroad tracks. The relays are located near railroad grade crossings and
can be utilized for
active grade crossing warning systems. The device 10 outputs 24, 26, 28, 30
represent the vital
outputs from the system 10 to system devices (not shown) such as, by example,
drive relays and
warning signals, which can include active grade crossing devices. In the
system 10 default
position, the grade crossing devices (not shown) are not activated when the
outputs 22, 24, 26 are
energized. Any of the outputs 24, 26, 28, 30 can be assigned to provide an
output which
corresponds to the health check line 32. Alternatively, the controllers 12,
14, 34 can be suitable
microprocessors known within the art.
[0010] The two independent controllers 12, 14 of the system independently
receive the
same vital inputs 16, 18, 20, 22 and execute the timing functions, resulting
in the outputs 24, 26,
28, 30. The controllers 12, 14 are completely redundant. In an alternative
embodiment, the
controllers 12, 14 can be logically redundant while having the capability to
perform non-
redundant processes. In yet another alternative embodiment, the system 10 can
have more than
two redundant controllers, and by example have three or four redundant
controllers. The third
controller 34 is operably connected to the first and second controllers 12, 14
and is configured to
execute and control the housekeeping functions of the system 10. By example,
housekeeping
functions can include system data logging to memory 38, external communication
and various
other system functions. The third controller 34 is operably connected to and
in communication
with the GPS module 48 and Bluetooth module 50. Access to the system 10 can be
password
protected in order to prevent unwarranted access. The controllers 12, 14, 34
each can be a single
processor package, or alternatively be multiple processors. Alternatively, the
system 10 can
provide redundant processing of all vital inputs and complementary control of
vital outputs (Fig.
2), the device 10 being configured for vitality.
[0011] The user interfaces with the system 10 by providing input to the system
via the
interface 44. The user can choose to set the device timing parameters, login
to the device, change
the device authorization, initiate data log collection, display the logic
states or display the state of
4

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
the device. The interface 44 provides the user the ability to select varying
operation parameters
of the system 10 depending upon the particular characteristics of the
signaling devices or grade
crossing for which it serves. The memory module 38 can be used to store logged
data identifying
vital timing states. The communication devices 36, 46, 48, 50 can be employed
to show real
time device activity and remotely retrieve logged data, in addition to other
interface connectivity
purposes with the device 10.
[0012] The VPD 10 can be operably connected to a computer or suitable
computing
device (not shown) through communication port 36. A user can access the device
10 through the
computer's graphical user interface, allowing the user to access various
parameters and system
functions of the device 10. By example, the user can, among other functions,
login into the
device, change access authorization, initiate data collection and logging,
download device data
logs, display the logic states of the device 10, access current or historical
data states of the
device 10, change device clock and view device data logs. Communication with
the system 10
can be configured through the communication port 36, which by example, can be
a USB port, an
Internet port, or a file writer. System users can select operation parameters
of the system 10
depending upon the particular application program and system applications.
Logged data,
including vital timing states, can be saved to the memory module 38. Multiple
VPDs 10 can
communicate with each other through the communication means 36, 46, 48, 50, as
well as
through a hardwire connection. Communication between VPDs 10 can include
system data
sharing and coordinated operation of devices 10, which can be operably
connected to one or
more networks.
[0013] Referring to Figure 3, the output of microprocessor 12 controls a
dedicated relay
driver circuit 60 that provides positive referenced energy to the positive
terminal of the output
30. The output of microprocessor 14 controls a dedicated relay driver circuit
62 that provides
negative referenced energy to the negative terminal of output 30. Should the
VPD 10 application
program make output 30 directly dependent upon the condition of input 16, the
following
conditions are employed: 1) Input 16 is connected to the first microprocessor
12 and to the
second microprocessor 14 and the intervening components and connections are
functional. The

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
components and connections from input 16 to microprocessor 12 are independent
of the
connections from input 16 to microprocessor 14 to maintain fill redundancy. 2)
Microprocessor
12 executes the same application program as microprocessor 14. 3) The
operating clock of
microprocessor 12 coincides with the operating clock of microprocessor 14 and
the operating
clock of microprocessor 14 coincides with the operating clock of
microprocessor 12. 4) The
positive relay driver circuit 60 and terminal of output 30 are connected to
microprocessor 12. The
negative relay driver circuit and terminal of output 30 is connected to
microprocessor 14.
Damage to or failure of any component in the input or output circuit of either
microprocessor or
the failure of either of the microprocessors will result in no energy at
output 30 regardless of the
status of input 16. Output 30 will be energized only if input 16 is energized
and the VPD 10 is
operating properly.
[0014] In an alternative embodiment, an output 24, 26, 28, 30 can represent a
signal to a
preemption signal device (not shown). When the output 24, 26, 28, 30 is de-
energized the
preemption signal device is activated. Preemptive signal devices include, by
example, flashing
light signals and other methods to warn motor vehicle operators that grade
crossing signals will
shortly be activated. The preemption signal devices are activated based upon a
timing protocol
that is predetermined by the system 10 user. Grade crossings are located in a
wide variety of
locations and under varying circumstances. Grade crossings can be in close
proximity to
alternate vehicle intersections, grade crossings can be located at varying
distances from each
other, and the location of the crossing can be with in an area of the railroad
tracks that
consistently has high or low speed locomotives.
[0015] In an alternative embodiment, a system output represents a signal to a
crossing
control device, by example, this can include mechanical devices for impeding
vehicle traffic and
flashing light signals used to prevent vehicles from traveling across a grade
crossing when a
locomotive is approaching. The control devices are representative of active
warning systems
known in the art. Active warning systems that impede traffic from traveling
through the crossing
are not utilized at all railroad grade crossings. At least one embodiment of
the present invention
6

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
provides a cost effective and novel system that will provide a solution for
placing active
preemptive warning systems at crossings that are currently limited to passive
warning systems.
[0016] A VPD 10 application program can provide multiple independent and
programmable timers convenient to systems control applications. A timer
example application in
which the condition of an assigned output corresponding to a specific input is
delayed by either a
predetermined or user selected value for the purpose of eliminating the
unwanted effects of
intermittent interruption of the input signal are contemplated. A further
example is a timer
application in which the condition of the assigned output(s) corresponding to
specific inputs or
sequential input changes, is maintained for a specific period or interrupted
after a specific period.
The period length can be either a programmed fixed variable or a user input
variable.
[0017] Alternatively, the VPD 10 application program can identify and process
sequential input changes to control conditions of assigned outputs. By
example, the application
compares the sequential status of two or more inputs to determine the
condition of an assigned
output. This feature allows the VPD 10 to provide a logical output that
corresponds to directional
movement of a vehicle, such as a locomotive or motor vehicle.
[0018] The VPD 10 can be configured to provide vital control for any control
system
application. The VPD 10 can be configured to provide single vital input
control of multiple vital
outputs. The VPD 10 can also be configured to allow a user to specify the
sequence, delay,
dependence or independence of controlled outputs. There is no limit to the
number of software
timers or alarms that can be defined. The VPD 10 utilizes redundant
microprocessors 12, 14,
each running the same application and each checking the health of the other
processor to ensure
integrity and vitality. The application program assigns the condition of
specific outputs to be
dependent upon the condition of specific inputs. The application program
incorporates timers and
sequential logic to define the input -output relationship. Each output
provides a discrete positive
and negative. Each output is hardware independent and electrically isolated
from every other
output. Each microprocessor receives identical information from each input and
each
7

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
microprocessor executes the same application program logic. Furthermore, the
output of
microprocessor 12 is identical to the output of the microprocessor 14.
[0019] In at least one embodiment of the present invention, the VPD 10 can be
programmed by the user for a particular application through use of a Ladder
Logic based
programming Integrated Development Environment (IDE). The IDE provides
advanced ladder
logic editing, compiling, debugging, assembly and program download features.
The editor, or
system user, can provide a set of configurable blocks which can be arranged
into a ladder logic
program. These blocks can include Normally Open, Normally closed, Timers,
Counters, Set,
Reset, Single Output Up, Single Output Down, Data Move, Data Comparison, Data
Conversion,
Data Display, Data Communication and Binary Arithmetic tools. The editor also
provides rich
editing and ladder formatting tools. The compiler checks for syntax errors in
the ladder program
and generates mnemonics in case there are no syntax errors. The Assembler
converts the program
into a device specific hex file which is downloaded into the device using the
program
downloader built into the IDE. The ladder logic programming can also offer
advanced debugging
features for this dual controller based vital processing device. It can be
configured for step by
step debugging with real-time updates on the ladder blocks.
[0020] Now referring to Figure 4, an embodiment of the VPD 10 input and output

scheme is provided. From the VPD start position 64 the health check protocol
is initiated at step
66. If the health check is not confirmed then all outputs are de-energized at
step 68. As a result
of the outputs being de-energized the safest state of the VPD 10 occurs, and
energy to any vital
device controlled by any of the VPD 10 is removed. Deactivation of the VPD
outputs in the event
of a failed VPD health check 66 is consistent with the failsafe principles of
the VPD 10.
Subsequently, the VPD 10 identifies whether any input 16, 18, 20, 22 is
energized at step 70. The
application program is executed 72 and outputs are energized 74 consistent
with the condition of
the inputs mediated by the program logic. The VPD 10 then loops back to the
health check step
66.
8

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
[0021] One system output 26 represents the result of the health check protocol
that is
executed by each of the controllers 12, 14. Output 26 is dedicated to vital
relays with the purpose
of indicating system 10 vitality. The controllers check the operations
parameters through a health
check monitor 32. The health check protocol is designed to monitor and
compares the clock
frequencies for each of the controllers. In the event that the clock
frequencies of the two
controllers are not consistent, the health check protocol causes the output 26
to become de-
energized. Alternatively, if the monitoring function of the health check
protocol identifies a
problem with one or both of the controllers then output 26 is de-energized. In
most situations the
health check parameters are satisfied and output 26 remains energized. In the
present
embodiment, the health check is constantly maintained by the redundant
controllers 12, 14 by
exchanging precisely timed heartbeats.
[0022] In an alternative embodiment, a health-check protocol is executed
separately by
two independent microprocessors 12, 14. The health check protocol is
configured to monitor and
compare the clock frequencies for each of the controllers 12, 14, 34. In the
event that the clock
frequencies of the two controllers are not consistent, the health check
protocol causes one of the
designated vital outputs to become de- energized. Alternatively, if the
monitoring function of the
health check protocol identifies a problem with one or both of the
microprocessors then health
check output is de-energized. During normal system 10 operating conditions,
the health check
parameters are satisfied and the health check output remains energized. In the
present
embodiment, the health check is constantly maintained by the redundant
controllers 12, 14 by
exchanging precisely timed heartbeats.
[0023] Now referring to Figure 5, an embodiment of the VPD 10 health check
scheme is
described. The microprocessors 12 and 14 exchange an independently generated,
precisely timed
heartbeat clock which can have a time period of 1 second. The health check
protocol is designed
to keep check on the performance of timers and events that form the basis of
any operational
logic of an application. Delays and variations in timers' execution can result
in compromise of
the device vitality. Various hardware, software and environmental conditions
pertaining to the
device can result in timer variations and hence the dual redundant nature of
the design of the
9

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
VPD 10 is configured to address and counter such discrepancies. A Master timer
in each
microprocessor is used to update the heartbeat and other program timers
simultaneously. Any
shift in the Master timer will result in proportional drift in the heartbeat
timer as well as other
program timers. Both microprocessors will monitor this drift and upon
exceeding a defined limit
will generate a fault condition. Accurate timer operations ensure vital device
operation.
[0024] In an alternative embodiment, the VPD 10 has an onboard GPS module for
providing location, speed and direction of travel information. The
microprocessor 34 requests the
information from the GPS receiver through a communication port 36 (by example,
serial RS232)
and forwards it to the microprocessors 12 and 14. The information about speed,
location and
travel direction can be used by in a number of ways by the device depending on
the application at
hand. Bluetooth module 50 provides authenticated short range two way
communication with a
laptop, PDA, Smartphone, keypad or alternative mobile computing device. The
Radio module 46
can be used for communication with a remote device, another VPD or other
devices
communicating on the same radio band. A graphical user interface discussed
earlier can be used
for changing the VPD 10 parameters. This user interface can be used on a
laptop as well as a
PDA or a Smartphone through the Bluetooth module 50 for parameter updates. A
commercially
available Bluetooth keypad/keyboard can be paired up with the VPD Bluetooth
module 50 to
provide user input options for a certain application.
[0025] In an alternative embodiment, the system 10 is configured to provide
advance pre-
emption and crossing signal control logic from the same track relay circuit.
The system 10
further provides multiple independent and programmable loss of shunt timers in
a single device.
Additionally, the system 10 provides directional logic and programmable
release timer functions
in a single device.
[0026] Now referring to Figure 6, an alternative embodiment of the timing
function is
depicted. The user can select from several timing functions, rather than a pre-
selected timing
function. By example, a first timing function is a delay timer for output 24,
which delays the

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169
PCT/US2007/088849
operation of a crossing control with respect to the operation of preemption
signals. An output
delay timer is initiated by one of two situations, when input 16 or input 24
are de-energized.
Upon the completion of the delay timer, output 24 is de-energized. The
duration of this timer is
user programmable and can be dependent upon a specific type of crossing. By
example, a track
section can receive fast moving trains, therefore it is necessary to delay the
crossing control
device for a shorter period of time than a track section that can receive
slower moving trains. In
an alternative embodiment, the system 10 can dynamically adjust the delay
duration based upon
the information received from the track relays on the inputs 16, 18, 20.
[0027] A second timing function can include an input interrupt delay timer.
When any
de-energized input is energized, an input interrupt delay timer that is
dedicated to that specific
input is initiated. The duration of this timer can be user programmable to
increase the
adaptability of the system. Regarding the timer, the input change is not
processed until the timer
has elapsed.
[0028] A third timing function can include an input sequence delay output
timer. Upon
the failure of either microprocessor to pass the health check protocol, energy
is removed from all
outputs. A sequence delayed output timer is initiated when inputs have been de-
energized in two
specific sequences: input 18, then input 16 de-energized followed by input 18
energized; or input
18, then input 20 de-energized followed by input 18 energized. Once the
sequence delayed
output timer is initiated output 24 and output 26 are energized upon
reenergizing input 18.
The sequence delay output timer can be user programmable.
[0029] During the operation of the sequence delay output timer the system will
function
as follows: input 20 and input 18 are energized and input 16 is de-energized.
Output 24, output
26 and output 28 are also energized. Alternatively, input 16 and input 18 are
energized and input
20 is de-energized and output 16, output 18 and output 20 energized. Upon the
completion of the
sequence delay output timer, if input 16 or input 20 is de-energized, then
output 24 and output 26
11

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169 PCT/US2007/088849
are immediately de-energized. If all inputs are energized before completion of
the sequence
delay timer, output 24 and output 26 remain energized.
[0030] In an alternative embodiment of the system 10, isolated vital input and
output
relay terminals are included. This will allow for the system 10 to be retrofit
into pre-existing
grade crossings.
[0031] In at least one embodiment, the vital timing device 10 can be
configured with at
least four vital inputs and four vital outputs. The number of inputs is
greater than the number of
outputs, as each vital output has an associated input as a feedback to check
the actual operation
of the device attached to the corresponding output. The device has a small
time window to
confirm the agreement between a Vital Output and the associated feedback
Input. Alternatively
the device has less than four inputs and less than four outputs. In an
alternative embodiment
there are greater than four inputs and greater than 4 outputs.
[0032] In at least one embodiment of the present invention, the system 10 is
designed for
a railroad signal environment to perform vital signal functions. The primary
application for the
device is to enable the use of a single conventional track relay circuits to
provide advance pre-
emption of highway traffic light signals and initiate operation of highway-
railroad grade crossing
signals. In this application, the system 10 enhances the operational safety of
the conventional
circuit by providing vital loss of shunt timer function for each track relay
input. The system 10
provides train movement directional logic, thereby eliminating at least two
vital railroad relays
and provides a vital directional logic release timer function which causes the
crossing signals to
operate should the receding track relay circuit fail to recover within a
predetermined time
following a train movement. In an alternative embodiment, the system 10 can be
configured for a
variety of control systems. By example, the system 10 can be configured for
roadway motor
vehicle traffic control systems. In yet another alternative embodiment, the
system 10 can be
configured for control systems not associated with vehicle detection, but
where a cost effective
vital logic controller system is advantageous.
12

CA 02710038 2010-06-18
WO 2008/080169
PCT/US2007/088849
[0033] Where traffic light signal preemption is necessary, any conventional
signal track
circuit or motion sensor is adequate to simultaneous preemption of the traffic
light signals with
the activation of the railroad crossing signals. Where it is desired for motor
vehicle traffic light
signal preemption to begin in advance of the operation of the railroad
crossing signals, the only
device available which also provides motion sensing features is a constant
warning device with
auxiliary programmable modules. As a result, the conversion from simultaneous
to advance
traffic signal preemption requires replacement of the motion sensor with a
grade crossing
predictor. The system 10 provides another solution. If the system 10 is
controlled by the motion
detector relay, the VPD can be programmed to provide a fixed amount of delay
prior to the
interrupt of the vital output which controls the operation of the railroad
crossing signals. The
system 10 vital output controlling the traffic light signals would initiate
preemption as soon as
the motion detector relay input is removed from the system 10. Railroad rules
require that trains
stopped or delayed in the approach to a crossing equipped with signals can not
occupy the
crossing until the signals have been operating long enough to provide warning
(GCOR, 5th Ed. ¨
6.32.2). Because of this rule the VPD provides a feature for advance
preemption of traffic light
signals that is not available from constant warning devices: advance
preemption time, that is, the
time between the initiation of traffic light signal preemption and operation
of crossing signals is a
constant and always the same regardless of train position. Constant warning
devices do not
provide this feature. When a train is delayed or stopped or reverses direction
and then resumes
approach to the crossing at a distance from the crossing that is at or less
than the programmed
required warning time for the crossing signals, as calculated by the constant
warning device
traffic light signal preemption is simultaneous. If the distance from the
train to the crossing
exceeds the crossing programmed warning time calculation the amount of advance
preemption
time is reduced proportional to the distance of the train from the crossing
when it resumes its
approach.
[0034] It is specifically intended that the present invention not be limited
to the
embodiments and illustrations contained herein, but include modified forms of
those
embodiments including portions of the embodiments and combinations of elements
of different
embodiments as come within the scope of the following claims.
13

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2015-11-10
(86) PCT Filing Date 2007-12-26
(87) PCT Publication Date 2008-07-03
(85) National Entry 2010-06-18
Examination Requested 2012-12-20
(45) Issued 2015-11-10
Deemed Expired 2019-12-27

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Reinstatement of rights $200.00 2010-06-18
Application Fee $400.00 2010-06-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2009-12-29 $100.00 2010-06-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2010-12-29 $100.00 2010-12-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2011-12-28 $100.00 2011-12-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2012-12-27 $200.00 2012-12-17
Request for Examination $800.00 2012-12-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2013-12-27 $100.00 2013-10-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2014-12-29 $100.00 2014-11-19
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2015-07-21
Final Fee $150.00 2015-07-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2015-12-29 $100.00 2015-11-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2016-12-28 $100.00 2016-10-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2017-12-27 $125.00 2017-12-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2018-12-27 $125.00 2018-12-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CENTRAL SIGNAL, LLC
Past Owners on Record
ASHRAF, AHTASHAM
BALDWIN, DAVID
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2010-09-20 1 39
Abstract 2010-06-18 1 60
Claims 2010-06-18 4 113
Drawings 2010-06-18 6 94
Description 2010-06-18 13 726
Representative Drawing 2010-06-18 1 14
Description 2014-11-18 15 814
Claims 2014-11-18 6 246
Representative Drawing 2015-10-16 1 12
Cover Page 2015-10-16 1 40
PCT 2010-06-18 10 438
Assignment 2010-06-18 5 148
Prosecution-Amendment 2012-12-20 1 45
Correspondence 2013-01-15 2 52
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-06-05 3 110
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-11-18 14 581
Final Fee 2015-07-21 2 57