Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-1-
AMENDMENT-FREE SLUDGE COMPOSTING
RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional
Application Serial No. 61/145,239, entitled "MECHANICALLY ENHANCED
SLUDGE BIODRYING," filed on January 16, 2009, which is herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
The present invention is directed to the disposal of organic wastes through
composting and, more specifically, to composting systems for large scale
treatment of
industrial and municipal wastes.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Composting is a biological process of decomposition. Given adequate time
and the proper environmental conditions, microorganisms turn raw organic
matter
into stabilized products. The products of composting include carbon dioxide,
water,
and a complex form of organic matter called compost, which is especially
useful as a
soil amendment. For the purposes of this specification "compost" shall be
defined as
"a mixture of biodried, biostabilized biosolids." Parameters of importance in
composting process management are the available carbon to nitrogen ratio, the
moisture content, the oxygen content, and the temperature of the composting
material.
Carbon serves primarily as a food source for the microorganisms involved in
composting. Nitrogen is the primary constituent of protein which forms over
50% of
dry bacterial cell mass and is, therefore, necessary for protein synthesis and
the
optimal growth of microbial populations in composting matter. It is well known
in
the art that the preferred carbon-to-nitrogen ratio for composting is about 20
- 40 parts
carbon for each part nitrogen by weight (20:1 - 40:1). At lower ratios, the
excess
nitrogen supplied would be expected to be lost in the form of volatile
nitrogen
compounds, such as ammonia gas, and can cause undesirable odors or other
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-2-
environmental problems. Higher carbon-to-nitrogen ratios result in an
insufficient
supply of nitrogen for optimal microbial population growth, resulting in a
slow rate of
degradation.
The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio can be increased through the addition of
materials
high in carbon, such as fallen leaves, straw, woodchips, sawdust, bark, paper,
cardboard, and the like. These types of materials will herein be referred to
as
"traditional compost amendment materials," "amendment materials," or
"traditional
amendment materials." These types of materials are typically high in
cellulose. For
example, about 33 percent of most plant matter is cellulose (the cellulose
content of
cotton is 90 percent and that of wood is 50 percent.)
The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio can be decreased by the addition of materials
high in nitrogen, such as vegetables, coffee grounds, grass clippings, manure,
sewage,
or the like. Sewage, such as that which is commonly supplied as influent into
a
typical municipal wastewater treatment plant, is not significantly cellulosic,
containing little cellulose other than trace amounts due to undigested plant
material,
paper, or other such material present in the waste stream. As used herein, the
term
"non-cellulosic materials" will encompass materials which are substantially
non-
cellulosic, for example, sewage, and dewatered municipal wastewater sludge.
Also,
as used herein, the terms "sludge," "sewage sludge," "mixed sludge,"
"municipal
wastewater sludge" and the like will encompass both primary sludge (sludge
which
includes solids settled out, skimmed off the surface of influent wastewater in
a
primary clarifier, or otherwise mechanically separated from the wastewater
prior to
secondary treatment) as well as waste activated sludge (sludge which includes
solids,
including microorganisms, removed from a secondary treatment aeration basin or
other secondary treatment process) and combinations thereof.
In some locations, the availability of materials such as wood chips or waste
paper products, or other materials traditionally used as sources of carbon, or
as
bulking agents to add porosity to a feed mix for a composting operation, may
be
limited, or may be prohibitively expensive for use in composting operations.
These
types of materials may in some instances be preferably used for fuel for
heating or
energy production, for animal bedding, landscaping mulch, biofilter media, or
for
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-3-
other purposes. The availability of these traditional compost amendment
materials
may vary by season. For example, demand for wood chips for use as a fuel for
heating may increase in cold seasons in some locations. Sourcing,
transportation, and
storage expenses may also make the provision of cellulosic or other
traditional
compost amendment materials prohibitively expensive, especially if these
materials
are in short supply or not available proximate the composting operation.
Moisture content is another key parameter of composting material.
Microbially induced decomposition occurs most rapidly in liquid films found on
the
surfaces of organic particles. Whereas inadequate moisture content inhibits
bacterial
activity, excess moisture content can inhibit the aerobic process. Excess
water may
plug openings or open space in the material inhibiting permeation and movement
of
air (oxygen) into and (carbon dioxide) out of the composting material, with
the
consequence of formation of anaerobic conditions. This anaerobic activity can
produce undesirable odorous compounds, such as hydrogen sulfide or methane.
The
moisture content of a composting pile is typically related to the carbon-to-
nitrogen
ratio in that degradable materials that are high in carbon are typically
correspondingly
low in moisture; materials that are high in nitrogen are typically high in
moisture.
Excessive moisture content can also result in the leaching of essential
nutrients
from the composting pile, including phosphorus, potassium, and other trace
minerals,
which are essential to microbial metabolism. Although these nutrients are not
normally limiting, they must be present in adequate supplies for microbial
activity.
Oxygen content and temperature are important environmental parameters of
composting that fluctuate in response to microbial activity which consumes
oxygen
and generates heat. As microorganisms oxidize carbon for energy, oxygen is
used up,
and carbon dioxide is produced. Without sufficient oxygen the process will
become
anaerobic and produce odorous compounds such as volatile acids and reduced
sulfur
and nitrogen compounds. Oxygen content is also linked to moisture content in
that
excessive moisture content can reduce the available oxygen supply resulting in
anaerobic pockets within the composting pile. Oxygen can be provided to
microbes
in a composting pile through the introduction of air into the pile, given that
the pile
has sufficient porosity to permit the air to permeate the pile.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-4-
The temperature of a composting pile varies according to the type and size of
the microorganism community resident therein. Mesophilic microorganisms are
dominant from the initial stage of decomposition until the temperature rises
above
about 40 C and rapidly break down the soluble, readily degradable compounds.
The
mesophilic microorganisms become less competitive as the temperature rises
above
about 40 C, and thermophilic microorganisms take over.
As composting has become increasingly popular in recent years as a means for
recycling a variety of organic materials as part of municipal and industrial
solid waste
management programs, various composting technologies have been or are being
developed. These technologies include, for example, static pile composting,
windrow
composting, aerated windrow composting, and in-vessel composting employing
horizontal agitated bay reactors and vertical reactors. In such systems, cost
effectiveness and automation are typically desirable. Regarding cost, reducing
the
space required for a given throughput of composting material is a well
recognized
need in the industry. Composting operations employing windrows, for example,
are
thought to have an undesirably low ratio of composting materials throughput to
processing area square footage. In in-vessel and closed reactors, compost
material
may typically be mounded up to 20 feet high. This mounding, however, produces
technical difficulties regarding the adequacy of aeration in the reactor
vessel leading,
in some cases, to unacceptably large pockets of anaerobic activity within the
pile.
This anaerobic activity leads to the equally undesirable need for removal of
odorous
compounds from the reactor vessel environment before exhausting it to the
atmosphere.
Certain in-vessel composting systems, particularly those comprising open bays
within a building, have been used with excellent results. One system of this
type, the
IPSTM composting system, available from Siemens Water Technologies Corp.
(Warrendale, PA, USA), employs one or more automated agitators to thoroughly
mix
and aerate composting material in parallel bays. Starting at the discharge end
of an
open elongated composting bay, an agitator moves through the bed of composting
material toward the loading end of the bay. Typically, the agitator travels
through
each bay mixing the material and rearwardly displacing it from the loading end
of the
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-5-
bay toward the discharge end of the bay. In some agitator models, as the
agitator
progresses through the bay, a moveable member repeatedly repositions itself in
the
exhaust stream such that the distance of rearward displacement of composting
material is gradually increased to accommodate material which has had
progressively
less residence time in the bay and, accordingly, has experienced less
reduction in the
volume due to decomposition and moisture content reduction. An agitator of
this type
is described by Hagen et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,387,036 which is incorporated
herein
in its entirety by reference.
As demands on municipal composting systems increase, the capability of
treating larger volumes of composting material in relatively small reaction
vessels
becomes increasingly desirable. Accordingly, some existing systems having a
plurality of open horizontal bays, typically between about 6 and 10 feet wide
and up
to about 300 feet long have been excessively loaded forming composting beds of
increasing heights. A plurality of open bays are typically placed side by side
and can
be served by a single agitator. These systems can be used to compost a wide
variety
of materials, and the composting rate can typically be regulated to meet
varying
demand. When these large bays are at or near full capacity, however, the
action of the
rotating drum of the agitator tends to burrow through the composting pile as
the
agitator progresses through the bay. As the burrowing action continues, the
weight of
the undisplaced composting material can become sufficiently great to allow
large
quantities to suddenly collapse onto the rotating drum, thus slowing its
rotation and,
consequently, the agitator's progression through the bay. If a sufficient
quantity of
composting material collapses, the rotating mechanism can stall, resulting in
costly
delays while the unit is stopped, reversed, cleaned and/or repaired.
Furthermore, in a typical large scale composting operation, air contact along
with the rising heat produced by microbial action may combine to dry the upper
portion of the composting bed, forming a crust-like layer of composting
material near
the top of the composting bed. As the agitator travels through the bay, large
sections
of the crust remain intact for extended periods and then, suddenly, crack and
fall onto
the rotating drum, which increases the stalling frequency of the rotating
mechanism.
In order to reduce the stalling frequency of the rotating mechanism of
agitators
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-6-
used in some large scale composting operations, bridge breakers may be mounted
to
the agitator mechanism to assist in the breakup of the upper portion of the
composting
bed. These bridge breakers may comprise static or oscillating blades or other
displacement mechanisms which may displace the composting material above the
feeder, causing the material to fall substantially evenly onto the feeder,
thereby
preventing large amounts of composting material from suddenly collapsing onto
the
feeder which can result in overload conditions on the feeder drive mechanism.
Bridge
breakers of this type are described by Cole et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,906,436
which is
incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, in-vessel composting methods,
systems and apparatus are provided. The invention is applicable to the
composting of
a wide variety of materials, for example, organic wastes, including municipal
sewage
sludge and solid waste, yard wastes, shredded paper and magazines, as well as
a
number of industrial, commercial, and agricultural wastes.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure there is provided
a method of sludge biodrying. The method comprises providing a non-cellulosic
first
material, providing a compostable sludge, forming a mixed sludge consisting
essentially of the first material and the compostable sludge, introducing the
mixed
sludge into a composting bay, aerating the mixed sludge in the composting bay,
mechanically agitating the mixed sludge in the composting bay, providing
conditions
to facilitate a heating of the mixed sludge within the composting bay for a
period of
time sufficient to form a compost, and removing the compost from the
composting
bay.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the mixed sludge has a C:N ratio
of less than about 15:1 by weight when introduced into the composting bay.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the first material consists of
compost.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-7-
In accordance with one aspect, the method further comprises removing
particles below a predetermined size from the first material prior to forming
the mixed
sludge.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, providing a source of a
compostable sludge consists of providing a source of dewatered sewage sludge.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, providing conditions to
facilitate
a heating of the mixed sludge further comprises decomposing the mixed sludge
by a
digestive action of microorganisms.
In accordance with one aspect, the method further comprises removing
moisture from the mixed sludge.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, heating the mixed sludge
comprises heating the mixed sludge to a temperature for a time sufficient to
achieve
destruction of pathogens within the mixed sludge. Heating the mixed sludge may
comprise maintaining a temperature of the mixed sludge of at least about 55 C
for a
period of at least 72 hours. The time and temperature at which the mixed
sludge is
treated may satisfy the equation D = 131,700,000/100.14` where, D = time in
days; and
t = temperature in degrees Celsius.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, heating the mixed sludge
comprises heating the mixed sludge to a temperature for a time sufficient to
deactivate
pathogens within the mixed sludge.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, heating the mixed sludge
comprises heating the mixed sludge to a temperature sufficient for Vector
Attraction
Reduction. Heating the mixed sludge may further comprise heating the mixed
sludge
for a time sufficient for Vector Attraction Reduction. Heating the mixed
sludge may
comprise heating the mixed sludge to a temperature of at least about 40 C for
at least
14 days.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, a pH of the mixed sludge
introduced into the composting bay is less than about 7Ø The pH of the mixed
sludge introduced into the composting bay may be less than about 6Ø
In accordance with one aspect, the method further comprises providing a
portion of the compost removed from the composting bay as a combustible fuel.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
8-
In accordance with one aspect, the method further comprises forming the
sludge from pre-screened wastewater.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the mixed sludge is maintained
aerobically in the composting bay.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, agitating the mixed sludge
comprises displacing the mixed sludge in the composting bay in a direction
from a
first end of the composting bay to a second end of the composting bay.
In accordance with one aspect, the method further comprises sensing a
temperature of the mixed sludge at at least one position in the composting
bay. The
method may further comprise generating a signal in response to said
temperature.
The method may further comprise receiving said signal at a controller. The
method
may further comprise actuating a ventilation system to conduct air into the
mixed
sludge when the temperature thereof rises above a preset value. The method may
further comprise initiating an agitation of the mixed sludge when the
temperature
thereof falls below a preset value.
In accordance with one aspect, the method further comprises sensing a
moisture level of the mixed sludge at at least one position in the composting
bay. The
method may further comprise generating a signal in response to the moisture
level.
The method may further comprise receiving the signal at a controller. The
method
may further comprise adding moisture to the mixed sludge when the moisture
level
thereof falls below a preset value. The method may further comprise actuating
a
ventilation system to conduct air into the mixed sludge when the moisture
level
thereof rises above a preset value.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, there is
provided a method of sludge biodrying. The method comprises providing a carbon
containing first material, providing a nitrogen containing compostable sludge,
forming a mixed sludge consisting essentially of the first material and the
compostable sludge and having a C:N ratio of less than about 15:1 by weight,
introducing the mixed sludge into a composting bay, maintaining an average C:N
ratio of at least about 8:1 by weight in the mixed sludge in the composting
bay,
providing conditions to facilitate the formation of compost from the mixed
sludge,
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-9-
removing the compost from the composting bay, and recycling a portion of the
compost as the first material.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the first material consists of
heat
dried undigested sewage sludge.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the nitrogen containing
compostable sludge consists of dewatered sewage sludge.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the first material consists
essentially of a non-cellulosic material.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the first material consists of
compost removed from the composting bay.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, forming the compost comprises
aerating the mixed sludge in the composting bay, mechanically agitating the
mixed
sludge in the composting bay, providing conditions to facilitate a heating of
the mixed
sludge within the composting bay, and reducing a moisture content of the mixed
sludge within the composting bay.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the mixed sludge has a C:N ratio
of less than about 15:1 when introduced into the composting bay.
In accordance with one aspect of the method, the pH of the mixed sludge
introduced into the composting bay is less than about 7Ø The pH of the mixed
sludge introduced into the composting bay may be less than about 6Ø
In accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, there is
provided a composting facility. The composting facility comprises a composting
bay
configured to receive organic waste material and to hold the material while it
composts, the composting bay including a frame defining an interior of the
composting bay, a mixed sludge retained within the interior of the composting
bay
and having an average carbon to nitrogen ratio of less than about 15:1, a
compost
handling machine adapted to move along the frame and to extend into the
interior of
the composting bay to agitate the mixed sludge therein, a ventilation system
in
communication with the interior of the composting bay configured to
selectively
conduct air into the mixed sludge to ventilate the mixed sludge and to
facilitate
control of the temperature thereof, a transport system adapted to transport
compost
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-10-
from a discharge area of the composting bay to a mixing area, and a mixing
mechanism configured to mix a portion of compost transported from the
discharge
area of the composting bay with the organic waste material to form the mixed
sludge.
In accordance with one aspect of the composting facility, the ventilation
system comprises a temperature sensor located in the bay configured to sense
the
temperature of the mixed sludge and to generate a signal in response to the
temperature, and a control system connected to the temperature sensor
configured to
receive the signal and to actuate the ventilation system to conduct air into
the mixed
sludge when the temperature thereof rises above a preset value.
In accordance with one aspect of the composting facility, the ventilation
system maintains a desired temperature profile in the mixed sludge.
In accordance with one aspect, the composting facility further comprises an
odor control system. The odor control system may comprise at least one of an
ammonia scrubber and a biofilter.
In accordance with one aspect of the composting facility, the compost
handling machine is further adapted to move the mixed sludge through the
interior of
the composting bay.
In accordance with one aspect, the composting facility further comprises an
analyzer configured to analyze a portion of the mixed sludge and to indicate a
concentration of a specified element within the portion of the mixed sludge.
In accordance with one aspect, the composting facility further comprises a
moisture content analyzer configured to analyze the moisture content of
organic waste
material to be composted and output a first result indicative of the moisture
content of
the organic waste material. The moisture content analyzer may be further
configured
to analyze the moisture content of compost and output a second result
indicative of
the moisture content of the compost. The composting facility may further
comprise a
controller adapted to receive the first result and the second result output by
the
moisture content analyzer and to calculate and output a ratio of compost to
organic
matter to mix to form the mixed sludge based on the first result and the
second result.
In accordance with one aspect, the composting facility further comprises a
position sensor configured to monitor a position of the compost handling
machine.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-11-
The composting facility may further comprise a temperature sensor in thermal
communication with a section of the composting bay and configured to generate
a
signal in response to a temperature of the mixed sludge in the section, and a
control
system connected to the temperature sensor and to the position sensor and
configured
to receive a signal from the temperature sensor and from the position sensor
and to
actuate the ventilation system to conduct air into the mixed sludge in the
section when
the temperature of the mixed sludge therein is above a preset value and the
compost
handling machine is positioned in said section.
In accordance with one aspect, the composting facility further comprises a
humidity sensor configured to generate a signal in response to a level of
humidity in
the composting facility and a control system connected to the humidity sensor
and
configured to receive the signal from the humidity sensor and to actuate a
ventilation
fan based upon a comparison of the signal with a predetermined value. The
control
system may be further configured to receive a signal from a position sensor
configured to monitor a position of the compost handling machine and to
increase a
speed of the ventilation fan proximate a section of the composting bay when
the
compost handling machine is located in that section of the composting bay.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, there is
provided a method of facilitating a reduction in the consumption of a
cellulosic
amendment material in a composting operation. The method comprises providing
instructions for forming a mixed sludge consisting essentially of a carbon
containing
first material and a nitrogen containing compostable sludge and having a C:N
ratio of
less than about 15:1 and providing apparatus configured to maintain an average
C:N
ratio of at least about 8:1 for the mixed sludge once introduced into a
composting bay
and to maintain the mixed sludge under conditions to facilitate the formation
of
compost. In accordance with one aspect of the method, the first material is
the
compost.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the
drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in
various
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-12-
figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every
component
may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an in-vessel composting facility and system in
accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIGS. 2 and 3 are enlarged side elevation views of the agitator in the system
illustrated in FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a side view of an embodiment of an agitator mounted on a shuttle
and including an optional agitator cleaning apparatus;
FIG. 5 is a plan view generally showing the outline of a composting facility
in
accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 6 is an enlarged plan view of a portion of one bay of the composting
facility of FIG. 5, and in particular, showing a portion of the ventilation
system of the
facility;
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view taken along line VII--VII of FIG. 6, and also
showing details of the ventilation system;
FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view taken along line VIII--VIII of FIG. 7, and
illustrating a thermal sensor recessed in a frame of the composting bay;
FIG. 9 is a schematic drawing of a control circuit of the ventilation system
of
FIGS. 6-8;
FIG. 10 illustrates a computerized control system upon which one or more
embodiments of the present disclosure may be practiced;
FIG. 11 illustrates a storage system that may be used with the computerized
control system of FIG. 10 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the
present
disclosure;
FIG. 12 is a control algorithm for control of parameters related to methods in
accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 13 is a chart illustrating the effect of pH on the thermodynamically
stable
ratio of ammonia to ammonium;
FIG. 14 is a chart illustrating the effect pH and temperature on the
thermodynamically stable ratio of ammonia to ammonium;
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
- 13-
FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram of a process in accordance with an
embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 16 is a chart of temperature of a composting material vs. time at a
position in a charge of material in a composting bed as recorded during a test
performed in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 17 is a chart of the percent of dry solids in a composting material vs.
time
in a composting bed as recorded during a test performed in accordance with an
embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 18 is a chart of composting material pH vs. time in a composting bed as
recorded during a test performed in accordance with an embodiment of the
present
disclosure;
FIG. 19 is a chart of ammonia concentration in a composting material vs. time
in a composting bed as recorded during a test performed in accordance with an
embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 20 is a chart of temperature vs. time at multiple positions in a
composting
bed as recorded during a test performed in accordance with another embodiment
of
the present disclosure; and
FIG. 21 is a chart of the percent of dry solids vs. time in a composting bed
as
recorded during a test performed in accordance with another embodiment of the
present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
This invention is not limited in its application to the details of
construction and
the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or
illustrated in
the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being
practiced
or of being carried out in various ways. Also, the phraseology and terminology
used
herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as
limiting. The
use of "including," "comprising," or "having," "containing," "involving," and
variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter
and
equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-14-
It should be understood that directional terms employed herein are for ease of
reference. The term traverse is used to mean extending laterally (from side
wall to
side wall) generally perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of travel of
the agitator
in the bay. The terms compost bed depth (or simply bed depth), compost bed
height
(or simply bed height), and pile height are used interchangeably herein. Dry
solids
and volatile solids percentages are expressed herein on a weight percent
basis. Ratios
of materials and ratios of elemental components of materials are also
expressed herein
on a weight percent basis.
Disclosed herein is an agitator which will be described as moving forwardly
through a bed of composting material in a composting bay, generally meaning
from a
discharge end of the bay to a receiving end of the bay. Thus, the first
composting
material encountered by the agitator at the discharge end of the bay is
displaced
rearwardly from the bay, the in-vessel composting portion of the operation
having
been substantially completed for that portion of the bed. At the receiving end
of the
bay the agitator displaces the most recently received material rearwardly,
thereby
making space available in the bay for receiving fresh compostable material.
While the agitator of the present disclosure and an optional variable
displacement discharge provided by an optional regulator means of the agitator
can be
employed in a variety of applications within the scope of the present
disclosure, the
embodiments described in greater detail below are advantageously applied in
accordance with the IPSTm agitated multibay composting system, available form
Siemens Water Technologies of Corp. (Warrendale, PA, USA). Such embodiments
are modular, the basic module being an open horizontal bay, usually about 6 to
about
12 feet wide, and about 100 to about 300 feet long. A plurality of open bays
can be
placed side-by-side and served by a single agitator, although in some
embodiments,
multiple agitators may be utilized. A pass of the agitator through a bay
typically
requires about 1 to 2 hours, although this time may be greater or less than
this
depending on factors such as the density of the composting material bed. The
system
can be used to compost a wide variety of materials and the rate of composting
can be
regulated to meet varying levels of demand. The open bays may be readily
enclosed
within a building from which air can be exhausted directly to the atmosphere
or
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
- 15-
through odor-controlling biofilters, chemical scrubbers, or other means of
odor
control.
Referring now to FIGS. 1 to 3, an in-vessel composting system is shown
within a schematically illustrated enclosure building 10. The system comprises
multiple adjacent, parallel composting bays 12, 14, 16, and 20. The bays are
formed
by parallel upstanding concrete walls 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, and 34. Other
suitable bay
forming means will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art in view of
the
present disclosure. A bed of composting material 38 in each bay is seen to
have a
substantially uniform depth, although in some embodiments a depth of the bed
of
composting material may be non-uniform throughout a bay, for example,
decreasing
in height from a receiving to a discharge end of a bay. Typically, a bed depth
of about
five feet would be maintained in a six foot high composting bay. In some
embodiments, bay heights of seven or eight feet may be provided. In these
embodiments, the bed depth would typically be provided such that the top of
the bed
was approximately one foot below the top of the bay.
In a composting operation for composting a sewage sludge mix in accordance
with the present disclosure, the dry solids content of the composting material
generally will start at the receiving end of the bay at less than half by
weight of the
total material. For example, the composting material starting at the receiving
end of
the bay may include between about 30%-45% dry solids. This level of dried
solids
may facilitate adequate agitation of the mixed sludge in the composting bay
with
commercially available agitators, while utilizing an acceptably low amount of
amendment material. One skilled in the art will recognize, however, that a dry
solids
content of the composting material to be introduced into the receiving end of
the bay
may be adjusted to a desired level. For example, higher solids content may be
achieved by adding additional amendment or by performing action on the sludge
to
dry it additionally. A lower solids content could be achieved by adding less
amendment material or by adding (or not removing) moisture to the sludge.
The dry solids content preferably will have increased by the time the
composting material reaches the discharge end of the bay to more than 50%, for
example, up to 90%, depending upon the desired degree of dryness. One skilled
in
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-16-
the art will recognize, however, that a dry solids content of the composted
material
may be adjusted to a desired level, subject to constraints due to the biology
of the
microorganisms utilized to digest the composting material. If a higher degree
of
dryness is required, a longer composting time and or an increased amount of
aeration
may be utilized. If a lower degree of dryness is required, a shorter
composting time
may be utilized. Further, in embodiments where the composted material is
screened
after discharge from the bay to, for example, separate larger from smaller
particles, a
minimum dry solids content of around 50% may be desirable to facilitate the
screening process while not clogging the screen.
As further discussed below, in some embodiments of the present disclosure,
the height of the bed of composting material in the bay may be maintained at a
uniform level notwithstanding the loss of moisture from the composting
material. In
other embodiments, the height of the bed of composting material in the bay may
change with the age and/or the moisture content of the composting material in
a
particular portion of the bay.
Composting material in such composting operations may vary in residence
time in composting bays depending on factors such as a desired degree of
composting,
regulatory requirements, or process parameters. For example, composting
material in
such composting operations is in some embodiments resident in the composting
bay
for approximately 14-56 days. The composting material residence time may vary
depending upon, for example, the type of material to be composted, a desired
level of
breakdown of said material, a desired level of achieved moisture reduction in
said
material, an ambient temperature, or due to environmental regulations of a
region in
which the composting operation is performed. For example, in operations where
a
shorter residence time is desired, parameters such as agitation of the compost
may be
altered to increase the temperature of the composting material to achieve a
desired
level of moisture reduction within a shorter time period. In some embodiments,
an
agitator will pass through each bay once per day, with the potential for
skipping one
or more days per week if the composting facility is not in operation every day
of the
week, while in other embodiments agitation may be performed by running an
agitator
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-17-
through a bay on a less frequent basis, for example, once every two, three, or
four
days.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that material discharged from the bay
may require finished product curing. Material loaded into the composting bay
also
may be pretreated, for example, reduced in size by means of a chopper/shredder
and
the like to facilitate its processing in the bay. Post processing may include
screening
to remove wood chips or other larger sized components of the material, which
can be
recycled. The composting material also may be retained on-site for extended
periods.
In cold winter areas, for example, finished compost material suitable for use
as a soil
amendment or the like may be retained on the composting site during winter
months
when demand for such material is lower. Of course, those skilled in the art
are aware
of alternative types of beneficial re-use of the finished product of the
composting
operation.
Blowers 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44, at spaced locations along the bays, force air
45
up through the bed of composting material. Typically, a bay has multiple, for
example, three to six, aeration zones, one or more temperature sensors, and a
computer control feedback (1/0) response system, to maintain aerobic
conditions and
control composting temperatures. Recessed temperature sensors may be used.
Suitable such sensors are known to those skilled in the art. The particular
type of
blowers, number of aeration zones, type and/or number temperature sensors,
etc., may
be substituted and some of these elements may be eliminated without departing
from
the scope of various embodiments of the present disclosure. Further, the
composting
facility building 10 may have one or more ventilation fans or other air moving
devices
(not shown) in a ceiling or walls thereof for removing humid air from within
the
building.
In some embodiments, the temperature is maintained at a level of 550 C or
higher for three consecutive days to achieve pathogen destruction. In some
embodiments, the temperature in later portions of the bed (that is, closer to
the
discharge end of the bay) is maintained at temperatures below about 550 C, or
in other
embodiments, from about ambient room temperature (20 C) to about 45 C, for
good
bacteria efficiency in the composting process.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-18-
Requirements for the treatment of the composting pile to achieve a
regulatorily
acceptably "clean" compost may vary by jurisdiction. Current United States
Environmental Protection Agency regulations (US EPA 40 CFR 503, 2009) define
criteria for pathogen (including, but not limited to, e. coli) destruction for
sewage
sludge which is to be applied to agricultural land, forest, a public contact
site, a
reclamation site, a lawn, or a home garden. One criteria is that the sewage
sludge in
the composting pile be treated at a temperature in excess of 55 C (131 F)
for three
consecutive days to destroy pathogens within the composting pile. As used
herein, a
"day" is one continuous 24 hour period. Alternatively, the US EPA pathogen
destruction criteria can be met by treating the sludge at a time and
temperature
defined by the equation:
D = 131,700,000/100.14` where D=time in days and t=temperature in degrees
Celsius.
A further criteria which meets the requirements for pathogen destruction under
US EPA 40 CFR 503 is that either the density of fecal coliform in the sewage
sludge shall be less than 1000 Most Probable Number (MPN) per gram of total
solids
(dry weight basis), or the density of Salmonella sp. bacteria in the sewage
sludge shall
be less than three MPN per four grams of total solids (dry weight basis) at
the time the
sewage sludge is used or disposed, or at the time the sewage sludge is
prepared for
sale or give away in a bag or other container for application to the land.
Another criteria that may be required to be met in some jurisdictions for the
production of an acceptable compost product is the achievement of an
acceptable
level of Vector Attraction Reduction (VAR) - a reduction in the characteristic
of
sewage sludge that attracts rodents, flies, mosquitoes, or other organisms
capable of
transporting infectious agents. One criteria for sludge treatment that meets
the
requirements for VAR according to US EPA 40 CFR 503 for sewage sludge which
is to be applied to agricultural land, forest, a public contact site, or a
reclamation site,
a lawn, or a home garden, is that the sewage sludge is treated in an aerobic
process for
14 days or longer. During that time, the temperature of the sewage sludge must
be
higher than 40 C (104 F) and the average temperature of the sewage sludge
during
the 14 day period must be higher than 45 C (113 F).
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-19-
Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize that the particular
temperature
program, moisture content, residence time, etc. may be dictated by the
particular
composting operation and materials, and by applicable local, state and/or
federal
guidelines. Further, if operating in accordance with different goals (for
example, to
maximize drying or to minimize compost retention time) the time and
temperature
requirements for achieving a proper degree of composting may be different.
One embodiment of a level bed agitator 48, shown in enlarged side elevation
in FIGS. 2 and 3, comprises a main frame 50 adapted to ride on wheels 52 on
rails 53
on bay walls over the top of a composting bed as the agitator services the
composting
bed. The agitator travels in the direction of arrow 49 as it services the
composting
bed. Main frame 50 has power receiving means for operating the agitator,
including
preferably a power cable reel 54 which employs a hydraulic motor or like means
to
collect a power cable providing power to the agitator as it progresses toward
the
loading end of the bay. For this purpose, power cable reel 54 is rotatably
mounted
about a traverse axis by pinions 56.
The agitator further comprises a conveyor subassembly 60 pivotably mounted
to the main frame 50 at transversely spaced pinions 62. In FIG. 2 the conveyor
subassembly 60 is shown in its normal operating position. Preferably, lifting
means
are provided to lift the conveyor subassembly to a horizontal position, along
with the
feed drum mounted thereto, in preparing the agitator to be laterally (further
discussed
below) shuttled to the next bay and then moving the agitator to the discharge
end of
that next bay where it is again lowered to begin treatment of the composting
bed
therein. In FIG. 3 the agitator is shown mounted in a shuttle 36 which can
carry the
agitator laterally from bay to bay on rails 37.
In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, the conveyor subassembly has an
inclined plate 64 which extends upwardly and rearwardly from a lower return 66
to an
upper return 68 above the bay walls. The plate 64 has a width such that it
substantially crosses the full width of the bay. In some embodiments, the
length of
the conveyor from lower return 66 to upper return 68 is approximately 10 feet
to 13.5
feet. A set of transversely extending flights 70, extend transversely
substantially
equal in width to plate 64, being connected at opposite ends to spaced
locations along
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-20-
a pair of endless drive lines, preferably chains, driven over the upper and
lower
returns. Typically, the flights are spaced from each other approximately one
foot,
although different spacings may be utilized in different embodiments, for
example,
from about six inches to about two feet. In the embodiment illustrated, the
flights
travel upwardly in the direction of arrows 71 over inclined plate 64 on the
forward
side of subassembly 60. The flights push composting material upwardly over the
inclined plate 64 and discharge the same rearwardly airborne at the top of the
conveyor subassembly before returning down the back side of the conveyor
subassembly. In some embodiments, the flights are substantially continuous
across
the width of the plate with straight lengthwise outer edges across this width.
In
alternate embodiments, the flights may have one or more notches in the outer
lengthwise edges thereof. In some embodiments, the flights may be formed of
flat
plates with substantially parallel forward and rearward sides (the sides
perpendicular
to the movement of the flights), while in other embodiments, the flights may
have
beveled forward and/or rearward sides.
Generally, the conveyor subassembly is run at about 50-60 rpm, although it is
well within the ability of those skilled in the art to select a suitable speed
adapted to
particular composting operations. Alternative conveyor means for carrying
composting materials will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art in
view of the
present disclosure, including endless conveyor belts, augers, etc.
The conveyor subassembly receives composting material from the feed or
agitator drum 72. Accordingly, the lower return 66 of the conveyor subassembly
is
located in close proximity thereto. The agitator drum 72 is mounted to a drum
frame
74 carried by the conveyor subassembly 60. In the embodiment illustrated, the
drum
frame 74 comprises a pair of laterally spaced steel plate frame members on
opposite
sides of the conveyor subassembly. The agitator drum is mounted to the drum
frame
transversely for rotation about a horizontal drum axis 76 perpendicular to the
direction
of travel in the bay. Optionally, means are provided for clearing the lower
bay walls.
For example, scraper bars may be mounted to the agitator drum axle ends
outside the
plate steel frame members for rotation proximate the lower 1/2 of the bay
walls as the
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-21-
agitator moves forward. Similar scraper bars may be mounted to the outside
ends of
the lower mounting shaft of the conveyor.
The agitator drum has outwardly extending teeth 78 for shearing into the bed
of composting material in front of the agitator. The outwardly extending teeth
78 are
spaced over outside circumferential drum surface 79. Alternate embodiments may
employ protrusions such as blades instead of teeth 78 on the agitator drum,
recesses
rather than protrusions, or may include alternate types of, or in some
embodiments, no
protrusions. The agitator drum 72 rotates preferably in the direction of arrow
80.
Rotation of the agitator drum 72 feeds composting material to the conveyor
subassembly 60. Accordingly, the agitator drum preferably is substantially
laterally
coextensive with the conveyor subassembly and, thus, preferably extends
laterally
almost the full width of the bay. The agitator drum rotates within partial
drum
housing 82, which aids in controlling the flow of composting material and in
the
control of dust.
In accordance with an aspect of the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, the
optional adjustable composting material discharge regulator of the agitator
regulates
rearward displacement of the composting material by the conveyor subassembly.
The
adjustable composting material discharge regulator comprises a generally L-
shaped
discharge shroud 90 substantially laterally coextensive with the inclined
plate 64. The
discharge shroud is pivotably mounted about transverse pivot shaft 92 defining
a
horizontal shroud axis substantially parallel to the drum axis 76. Discharge
shroud 90
is spaced from the flights 70 as they pass over the upper return 68
sufficiently to allow
composting material to pass below it. As illustrated, discharge shroud 90 has
an
upper portion 94 at least partially covering the upper portion of the conveyor
subassembly, and a rearward portion 96 extending from the upper portion behind
the
conveyor.
The position of the discharge shroud is adjustable about the shroud axis as
the
agitator progresses through the composting bed in the bay. More specifically,
the
discharge shroud 90 is moveable between a closed position and a full open
position.
In the closed position (illustrated in solid lines) the rearward portion of
the discharge
shroud extends downwardly and forward to direct composting material forward of
the
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-22-
upper return 68. In progressively more open positions 96a-96c the rearward
portion
extends ever more rearwardly. In some embodiments, in the full open position
the
rearward portion 96 of the discharge shroud 90 does not significantly
interfere with
the rearward projection of composting material by the conveyor subassembly. In
some embodiments, full rearward airborne displacement of composting material
is
about 12 to 14 feet. In one embodiment, the shroud in the closed position
causes
composting material to fall forward of the upper return.
Alternative suitable discharge regulating means for regulating rearward
displacement of the composting material by the conveyor subassembly by
airborne
deflection will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the
foregoing
disclosure. Thus, for example, a baffle plate mounted for variable rearward
spacing
from the top of the conveyor subassembly, a variable sliding deck mounted at
the
bottom of a reversely rotating conveyor, variable angular disposition about a
traverse
pivot axis, or both, will enable rearward displacement regulation suitable for
certain
applications. Similarly, means for varying the angle of the conveyor
subassembly or
for telescoping the conveyor subassembly etc. will be understood to provide
alternatives suitable in particular applications for regulating rearward
displacement of
the composting material. Further, some embodiments may include no shroud 90,
baffle, or any other discharge regulating means for regulating rearward
displacement
of the composting material by the conveyor subassembly.
In some embodiments, a control system is provided for controlling the position
of the discharge shroud 90. Numerous suitable alternative control means will
be
readily apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the present
disclosure. In the
embodiment illustrated, one or more laterally spaced fluid-powered cylinders
98 are
attached at one end to the conveyor subassembly 60 and at the other end to the
discharge shroud 90.
Those skilled in the art will recognize from the foregoing disclosure that
adjustment of the position of the discharge shroud as the agitator progresses
forwardly
will control the location in the bay to which composting material is
discharged by the
agitator. Starting the discharge shroud in the closed position at the
discharge end of a
composting bay will enable development of a full depth bed at that end of the
bay,
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-23-
notwithstanding the decreased volume of the composting material due to
moisture or
volatile solid loss at that end. Controlling the degree to which the discharge
shroud is
opened as the agitator progresses forwardly in the bay will similarly maintain
development of a level bed behind the agitator. At the receiving end of the
bay, at the
end of the agitator's pass through the composting bed, in some embodiments,
the
shroud will be in the full open position in which it does not substantially
interfere
with the rearward displacement of composting material by the agitator. Such
full
rearward displacement is approximately 12 feet in some embodiments. There may,
of
course, be decreasing bed depth at the extreme ends of the bay.
The degree to which the discharge shroud is opened can be controlled by
suitable control means simply as a function of the forward distance traveled
by the
agitator in the bay. Either in addition to or in lieu of such control
function, sensors
may be provided for sensing the depth of the bed of composting material and
generating a bed depth signal corresponding thereto. In such embodiments, the
agitator comprises a controller adapted to control the position of the
discharge shroud
at least partially in response to the bed depth signal. Suitable sensors
include, for
example, a rotatable wheel mounted at the end of a pivotably mounted arm
extending
forwardly of the feed drum 72. The bed depth signal may be generated in such
embodiments as a function of the angle of the arm to a reference position. In
the
embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, sensor 102 of this type is illustrated,
comprising
arm 104 carrying at its forward end a rotatable wheel 106. Arm 104 is
pivotably
mounted at the top of drum housing 82. The sensor member 106 alternatively may
comprise a sonar signal transponder. The sensor may also, or alternatively,
employ
one or more electric eyes, or the like. Alternative suitable sensor means will
be
readily apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the present
disclosure. In
accordance with one embodiment, the depth of the composting bed is sensed
along the
length of the bay, this information being used to control the position of the
discharge
shroud during the next pass of the agitator through the composting bed. With
reference to recording the bed depth for the next run, this can be
accomplished by
simple computer, in some embodiments on-board the agitator, and is well within
the
ability of those skilled in the art given the present disclosure.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-24-
In some embodiments, a cleaning mechanism may be provided to remove
accumulated composting material from the drum of the agitator. For example, in
FIG.
4 the agitator is shown mounted in a shuttle 36 similar to the shuttle 36 of
FIG. 3 but
with the addition of a drum tine cleaning mechanism 100 mounted on the frame
of the
shuttle. When the agitator docks on the shuttle it will push in to a brush
board 110
mounted on a pivot arm connected to the shuttle by a pivot 112. The agitator
will be
programmed to have the drum spin for a fixed period of time until the drum
tines are
cleaned. A deflector shield 116 will ensure that material removed from the
drum
drops down to the floor inside the shuttle. The top end (the brush board end)
of the
cleaning mechanism is heavier than the bottom end, so the brush board 110 is
drawn
by gravity toward the drum. As the drum rotates (counter clock wise) it may
kick that
brush board away from the surface of the drum. The counterweight dampens the
return motion of the brush board toward the drum and controls how hard against
the
drum the brush lays, thus minimizing the potential for the brush board to slam
into
and inflict damage to the drum. In alternate embodiments, a spring and/or
shock
absorber could be used to dampen motion of the brush board. Once the shuttle
is
moved, this material can be pushed in to the bay loading zone by a loader.
Other
forms or arrangements of brushes, scrapers, and the like could be included in
addition
to, or as an alternative to the cleaning mechanism illustrated in FIG. 4.
A breaker bar 118, discussed above, is also illustrated in FIG. 4 mounted
behind the agitator drum. This breaker bar would be located above the agitator
drum
when the agitator drum was lowered into operational position in a composting
bay.
With reference to FIG. 5, ventilation system 124 is in communication with the
interiors of composting bays 12, 14, 16, and 20 and is provided to selectively
conduct
air into the compost in those bays to ventilate the compost and to help
control the
temperature thereof. In some embodiments, the temperature of the composting
material varies along the length of each bay, and ventilation system 24
includes a
multitude of sensors, schematically shown at 252 in FIG. 5, to actuate the
ventilation
system to conduct air selectively into different sections of the composting
bays to
maintain desired compost temperature profiles. In some embodiments, any or all
of
bays 12, 14, 16, and 20 may be equipped with one or more position sensors 254.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-25-
Position sensors 254 are adapted to monitor a position of an agitator present
in the
bays and communicate information regarding said position to an external
controller.
The sensors 254 may comprise electric eyes, sonar, ultrasound, or laser
distance
sensors, or other distance or position measurement sensors known in the art.
The
sensors 254 may be positioned at an end of the bays as illustrated in FIG. 5,
or in
some embodiments, may be included at multiple positions along the bays. In
some
embodiments, the position sensors 254 may be present on an agitator rather
than at a
fixed position within or at an end of a bay. In some embodiments, the
ventilation
system 124 is configured to activate a blower proximate to, or in some
instances,
directly below, an agitator in a bay if a temperature sensor 252 in that bay
proximate
the agitator registers a temperature that deviates from a desired temperature
or
temperature range and a position sensor 254 indicates that the agitator is
located in
that particular portion of the bay. This may lead to more efficient aeration
of the
composting material in the bay because as the agitator mixes the composting
material,
it becomes easier for air from a blower to enter into and aerate said
material.
Further, a controller may receive a signal from one or more position sensors
254 and alter a speed of a ventilation fan (e.g., start, stop, or increase or
decrease the
speed of the fan) when an agitator moves into a position proximate said
ventilation
fan. The controller may also receive a signal from one or more humidity
sensors (not
shown) to make a determination of whether the ventilation fan speed should be
altered. Starting a ventilation fan, or increasing a speed thereof when an
agitator is in
proximity to the ventilation fan will, in some embodiments, facilitate the
removal of
moisture from the building including the composting bays, and at the same time
will
facilitate keeping moisture from condensing back in to the compost or in an
aisle
between the bays where the aeration blowers may be situated.
With the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5, each bay 12, 14, 16, and 20
includes a plurality of, specifically five, sections referenced as a, b, c, d,
and e,
respectively; and ventilation system 124 comprises a multitude of subsystems
124a-t,
with each subsystem adapted to conduct air into a respective one of the bay
sections.
These bay sections do not overlap, and they may be slightly spaced from each
other. Thus, the first or "a" section of each bay comprises a forward portion
of the
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-26-
bay and extends for a first preset length, and the second or "b" section of
the bay is
located rearward of the first section of the bay and extends for a second
preset length.
Similarly, the third or "c" section of each bay is located rearward of the
second
section of the bay and extends for a third preset length, the fourth or "d"
section of the
bay is located rearward of the third section of the bay and extends for a
fourth preset
length, and the fifth or "e" section of the bay is located rearward of the
fourth section
of the bay and extends for a fifth preset length. In some embodiments, it is
unnecessary to ventilate the first few feet and the last few of each bay.
For instance, in one embodiment, the first ventilated section of each bay
starts
about twenty-five feet rearward of the front of the bay itself and is about
twenty-five
feet long, and the second section of each bay is also about twenty-five feet
long. The
third and fourth sections of each bay are each about thirty-five feet long,
and the fifth
section of each bay is also about thirty-five feet long and terminates about
five feet
before the end of the bay.
Ventilation subsystems 124a-e are provided to ventilate the composting
material in bay sections 12a-e respectively; and ventilation subsystems 124f-j
are
provided to ventilate the composting material in bay sections 14a-e
respectively.
Analogously, ventilation subsystems 124k-o are provided to ventilate the
composting
material in bay sections 16a-e respectively; and ventilation subsystems 124p-t
are
provided to ventilate the compost and bay sections 20a-e respectively.
The ventilation subsystems 124a-t are similar to each other; and only one,
subsystem 124a, will be described in detail herein. With particular reference
to FIGS.
6-8, subsystem 124a includes blower 44, feed line 256, header 260, a multitude
of
distribution lines 262, and at least one sensor 252. Blower 44 is employed to
selectively supply a source of air; and in particular, blower 44 has an
actuated state,
wherein it operates to provide the source of air, and an unactuated state,
wherein the
blower is not operating. In some embodiments, blower 44 includes a motor 264
that
is used to operate or drive the blower; and motor 264 is actuated and
deactivated,
respectively, to actuate and deactuate blower 44. Any suitable fan blower,
including
any suitable motor, may be used in ventilation system 124a. In some
embodiments,
blower motor 264 is an electrically operated motor.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-27-
Feed line 256 is connected to blower 254 to receive air therefrom; and feed
line 256 extends from blower 254 into bay section 12a, specifically, into the
floor
thereof. Header 260 is located in bay section 12a and is connected to feed
line 256 to
receive air therefrom. In some embodiments, header 260 is located within the
floor of
bay section 12a and extends parallel to the longitudinal axis of the bay,
along or
closely adjacent side wall 32, and line 256 is connected to header 260 about
midway
between the ends of the header. Distribution lines 262 are connected to header
260 to
receive air therefrom, and the distribution lines extend from the header
across bay
section 12a. Each distribution line has a multitude of top outlets 262a in
communication with the interior of bay section 12a to discharge air thereinto
from the
distribution line. In some embodiments, distribution lines 262 are parallel to
each
other, laterally extend across bay 12 and are uniformly spaced apart along the
entire
length of bay section 12a.
When blower 44 is activated, the blower forces air into feed line 256, and the
air is then conducted through that line and into and through header 260.
Header 260
conducts the air to distribution lines 262, and air is discharged from these
lines into
the composting material in bay section 12a via outlets 262a. In some
embodiments,
the top surfaces and outlets of distribution lines 262 are located at or
slightly below
the top level of the floor of bay section 12a. Moreover, in some embodiments,
the
size of outlets 262a are relatively small to prevent gravel and other debris
from falling
into lines 262 through these outlets.
Temperature sensor 252 of ventilation subsystem 124a is located in bay
section 12a to sense the temperature of composting material therein and to
actuate
ventilation subsystem 124a to conduct air into the composting material when
the
temperature thereof rises above a preset value, or in some embodiments, when
the
temperature falls below a preset value. In some embodiments, as shown in FIGS.
7
and 8, the frame of bay 12, specifically, side wall 32 thereof, defines a
recess 266
extending outwardly from the interior of the bay, and sensor 252 is located in
that
recess. With this arrangement, plate 268 is releasably connected to the frame
of bay
12, specifically, side wall 32 thereof, to hold sensor 252 in recess 266 and
to keep
composting material out of that recess. To help insure that sensor 252 is in
good
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-28-
thermal communication with the compost in bay section 12a, plate 268 may be
made
of a material having good thermal conductivity and the sensor 252 may be held
against and securely connected to that plate. Furthermore, recess 266 may be
filled
with a thermally insulating material 272 to help insulate sensor 252 from heat
generated outside of composting bay 12, and plate 268 may not touch side wall
32 to
inhibit the transfer of heat therefrom to sensor 252 via plate 268.
Sensor 252 may be used to control the operation of ventilation subsystems
124a in any suitable way, and FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram showing one such
control arrangement. Sensor 252 may comprise a thermocouple which produces an
electric output current having a magnitude dependent on the temperature of the
sensor. Sensor 252 is in some embodiments electrically coupled to a control
member
274, which compares current output from the sensor 252 to a set point value.
When
the magnitude of the current from sensor 252 rises above that set point (or in
some
embodiments, drops below that set point), control member 274 generates a
control
signal that is conducted to and actuates fan blower motor 264, and this motor
operates
fan 44 to provide air to bay section 12a. In some embodiments, the above-
mentioned
set point value is manually adjustable, or adjustable remotely through an
external
control system, allowing an operator to vary the temperature of the compost in
bay
section 12a at which ventilation subsystem 124a is actuated. Moreover, control
member 274 in some embodiments comprises a microprocessor programmed to
receive input data from sensor 252 and manual or remote input to adjust the
set point
value, and to actuate motor 264 when the temperature of the sensor rises above
(or in
some embodiment, drops below) that set point value.
With reference to FIG. 5, in some embodiments the feeder line of each
ventilation subsystem enters the respective bay section about midway along the
length
of that bay section, and the feeder lines to the "a," "b," "c," "d," and "e"
sections of
interior bays 14 and 16 pass below the feeder lines to the corresponding
sections of
outside bays 12 and 20. Thus, for instance, the feeder line to bay section 14a
extends
parallel to and approximately directly below the feeder line to bay section
12a.
As previously mentioned, the subsystems 124a-t are generally very similar.
However, in some embodiments, the temperature of the composting material in
each
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-29-
composting bay is allowed to vary along the longitudinal direction of the bay
(for
example, from one section "a," "b," "c," "d," or "e" to the next), and thus
the sensors
of the different ventilation subsystems actuate those subsystems at various
temperatures. Also, the set point of each sensor 252 can be independently
manually
or remotely adjusted, and in some embodiments, all of the ventilation
subsystems
124a-t employ a common controller 274 to receive the input signals from the
various
sensors of the ventilation subsystems and to actuate the fan motors thereof.
The preferred temperature variation of the composting material in each bay
depends on a number of factors, such as the moisture content of the composting
material and the type of organic waste in the composting material. By
controlling the
temperature and aeration of the composting material, microbial activity during
the
composting process can be increased to decrease the time required to produce
the
desired end product. In some embodiments, systems may also be provided for
introducing moisture into the composting material. The introduction of
moisture may
help to increase biological activity of microorganisms in composting material
to
increase the temperature thereof in instances where the composting material
had dried
to a degree sufficient to suppress the activity of the microorganisms. For
example,
under certain conditions, it may be preferred to maintain the temperature of
the
composting material in the first, second, third, fourth and fifth section of
each
composting bay, respectively, at 40 C, 56 C, 56 C, 45 C, and 40 C.
As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, it is not
necessary
that composting facility 10 include four composting bays, and the system may
be
provided with one or more bays, for example, eight bays or more. Further, the
specific dimensions of the composting bays are not critical, although in one
embodiment, each composting bay is approximately 180 feet long and the
interior of
the bay is about five and one-half feet deep and five and one-half feet wide.
Likewise, it is not necessary that five ventilation subsystems be used to
ventilate the
composting material in each bay, and one or more ventilation subsystems may be
used
with each bay. The specific number of ventilation subsystems used with a
particular
bay is determined principally by the extent to which it is desired to exercise
control
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-30-
over the temperature of the composting material along the length of the
composting
bay.
Moreover, it is not necessary that each ventilation subsystem be provided with
its own blower, and a single blower may be used to provide air for a
plurality, or for
all, of the ventilation subsystems. For instance, one common blower may be
used to
provide air for ventilation subsystems 124a-e. If this is done, valves may be
located
in that common blower or in the feed lines of the ventilation subsystems 124a-
e to
control air flow through those subsystems, and in particular so that air may
be
directed into each of the bay sections 12a, b, c, d, and e independent of
whether air is
also being conducted into any other of the bay sections.
A computerized controller 274 for embodiments of the composting system
disclosed herein may be implemented using one or more computer systems 300 as
exemplarily shown in FIG. 10. Computer system 300 may be, for example, a
general-
purpose computer such as those based on an Intel PENTIUM -type processor, a
Motorola PowerPC processor, a Sun U1traSPARC processor, a Hewlett-Packard
PA-RISC processor, or any other type of processor or combinations thereof.
Alternatively, the computer system may include specially-programmed, special-
purpose hardware, for example, an application-specific integrated circuit
(ASIC) or
controllers intended specifically for composting systems.
Computer system 300 can include one or more processors 302 typically
connected to one or more memory devices 304, which can comprise, for example,
any
one or more of a disk drive memory, a flash memory device, a RAM memory
device,
or other device for storing data. Memory 304 is typically used for storing
programs
and data during operation of the controller 274 and/or computer system 300.
For
example, memory 304 may be used for storing historical data relating to the
parameters of the composting matter or composting process over a period of
time, as
well as current sensor measurement data. Software, including programming code
that
implements embodiments of the invention, can be stored on a computer readable
and/or writeable nonvolatile recording medium (discussed further with respect
to FIG.
11), and then typically copied into memory 304 wherein it can then be executed
by
processor 302. Such programming code may be written in any of a plurality of
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-31 -
programming languages, for example, Java, Visual Basic, C, C#, or C++,
Fortran,
Pascal, Eiffel, Basic, COBAL, or any of a variety of combinations thereof.
Components of computer system 300 may be coupled by an interconnection
mechanism 306, which may include one or more busses (e.g., between components
that are integrated within a same device) and/or a network (e.g., between
components
that reside on separate discrete devices). The interconnection mechanism
typically
enables communications (e.g., data, instructions) to be exchanged between
components of system 300.
Computer system 300 can also include one or more input devices 308, for
example, a keyboard, mouse, trackball, microphone, touch screen, and one or
more
output devices 310, for example, a printing device, display screen, or
speaker.
Computer system may be linked, electronically or otherwise, to a sensor array
314,
which may comprise, for example one or more of sensors 252, 254, one or more
humidity sensors in the composting facility, and/or any other sensors utilized
in the
embodiments of the composting system disclosed herein. In addition, computer
system 300 may contain one or more interfaces (not shown) that can connect
computer system 300 to a communication network (in addition or as an
alternative to
the network that may be formed by one or more of the components of system
300).
According to one or more embodiments, the one or more output devices 310
may include one or more components, such as ventilation blowers 40-44,
agitator 48,
shuttle 36, compost conveyor systems (not shown), ventilation fans (not
shown),
and/or water pumps configured to introduce moisture into the composting bays
(not
shown) associated with embodiments of the composting system disclosed herein.
Alternatively, the sensors 252, 254, ventilation blowers 40-44, agitation
device 48,
shuttle 36, compost conveyor systems, water pumps, or any or all of these
components may be connected to a communication network that is operatively
coupled to computer system 300. For example, sensors 252 and 254 may be
configured as input devices that are directly connected to computer system
300,
ventilation blowers 40-44 and/or agitation device 48 may be configured as
output
devices that are connected to computer system 300, and any one or more of the
above
may be coupled to another computer system or component so as to communicate
with
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-32-
computer system 300 over a communication network. Such a configuration permits
one sensor to be located at a significant distance from another sensor or
allow any
sensor to be located at a significant distance from any subsystem and/or the
controller,
while still providing data therebetween.
As exemplarily shown in FIG. 11, controller 300 can include one or more
computer storage media such as readable and/or writeable nonvolatile recording
medium 402 in which signals can be stored that define a program to be executed
by
one or more processors 406 (such as processor 302). Medium 402 may, for
example,
be a disk or flash memory. In typical operation, processor 406 can cause data,
such as
code that implements one or more embodiments of the invention, to be read from
storage medium 402 into a memory 404 that allows for faster access to the
information by the one or more processors than does medium 402. Memory 404 is
typically a volatile, random access memory such as a dynamic random access
memory
(DRAM) or static memory (SRAM) or other suitable devices that facilitates
information transfer to and from processor 406.
Although computer system 300 is shown by way of example as one type of
computer system upon which various aspects of the invention may be practiced,
it
should be appreciated that the invention is not limited to being implemented
in
software, or on the computer system as exemplarily shown. Indeed, rather than
implemented on, for example, a general purpose computer system, the
controller, or
components or subsections thereof, may alternatively be implemented as a
dedicated
system or as a dedicated programmable logic controller (PLC) or in a
distributed
control system. Further, it should be appreciated that one or more features or
aspects
of the control system may be implemented in software, hardware or firmware, or
any
combination thereof. For example, one or more segments of an algorithm
executable
by controller 274 can be performed in separate computers, which in turn, can
be in
communication through one or more networks.
A control algorithm 500 that is executed by some embodiments of controller
274 and/or computer system 300 is schematically illustrated in FIG. 12. In
step 501
of this control algorithm, a signal from a sensor which includes an indication
of a
level or state of a parameter of interest is received by the controller 274
and/or
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-33-
computer system 300. For example, a signal including an indication of a
temperature
may be received from a temperature sensor 252, a signal including an
indication of a
position of an agitator may be received from a position sensor 254, or a
signal
including an indication of a level of humidity may be received from a humidity
sensor. In some embodiments, additional or alternative sensors which may
provide an
indication of a level or status of other types of parameters to the controller
274 and/or
computer system 300 may also be present in the composting system. For example,
in
some embodiments, chemical sensors which measure the concentration of one or
more chemicals or elements in the air in the composting facility or within the
composting material or finished compost may be utilized. Further, one or more
moisture sensors or moisture measurement systems may be provided which may
provide an indication of a moisture level in the composting material, incoming
sludge,
or finished compost. In some embodiments, these chemical and/or moisture
sensors
may be located within the composting facility and may perform instantaneous or
near
instantaneous measurements of the a concentration of one or more chemicals or
elements, or in some embodiments, continuous measurements, while in other
embodiments, the sensors may be located outside the composting facility and
may
periodically be provided with samples of air, composting material, or compost
for
analysis. The indication of the parameter received at step 501 is compared
against a
set point and/or against an acceptable range for the parameter in step 503 of
the
algorithm. If the parameter is within an acceptable range, no action is taken,
and the
algorithm returns to step 501. If the parameter is not within an acceptable
range, in
step 505 of the algorithm, an action may be initiated to bring the parameter
into an
acceptable range. For example, if a temperature sensor 252 indicates to the
controller
257 or computer system 300 that a temperature of composting material within a
composting bay is at a level which is outside an acceptable range, for example
above
a predefined set point, the controller 257 or computer system 300 may initiate
an
action resulting in the activation of an aeration blower or an agitator. The
action may
be initiated directly by the controller 257 or computer system 300, or in some
embodiments, the controller 257 or computer system 300 may provide an output
prompting an operator to initiate the action. In another example, if a
chemical sensor
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-34-
indicates that a chemical concentration, for example a level of a metal within
the
compost or composting material is unacceptably high, a warning may be issued
to an
operator, who may perform an action, such as altering the mix of materials
entering
the composting bay producing the unacceptably high level of metals in the
composting material or finished compost.
Composting systems may be supplemented by an odor control systems, for
example, the LO/PRO odor control system available from Siemens Water
Technologies Corp. (Warrendale, PA, USA). These odor control systems may in
some embodiments include chemical scrubbers. Biofilters may also be provided
in
some embodiments. The provision of odor control systems is sometimes desirable
because composting systems often generate various odors as a byproduct of the
biological breakdown of the composting material. The public's reaction to
unpleasant
composting odors may often be severe. The public is interested, sometimes
aggressively so, in odors which assault their sense of appropriate smells.
Thus, the
reduction of composting odors may be a desirable goal in some composting
facilities.
In contrast, operators of composting facilities are interested in odors of
composting as an indication of the microbiology within the composting
materials.
These odors may suggest how operational parameters may be affecting those
microbiological processes. For example, if odors characteristic of volatile
acids and
reduce sulfur compounds are detected, this may be an indication that a
composting
bed of material is not receiving sufficient aeration or agitation, and
contains areas
where anaerobic microbial digestion of the composting material is taking
place. In
contrast, ammonia odors may dominate in an aerobically composting material
bed.
Chemical characteristics associated with odors of composting materials are
related to, for example, aerobic conditions within the composting material,
the carbon
to nitrogen balance (the C:N ratio) of the composting material, oxygen
transfer
(related to porosity), pH of the composting material, and to some extent, the
chemical
composition of the materials being composted.
Furthermore, some wastes contain sulfur compounds which, during
composting in a deficiency of oxygen, generate odors of reduced sulfur
compounds.
Food waste or garbage tends to have sour odors due to the volatile organic
acids
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-35-
generated during collection and handling prior to composting. Odors of
composting
sewage sludge are likewise characteristic, and well-aerated systems smell
quite
different from poorly aerated systems.
Physical conditions such as age and temperature of composting material can
also impact odors. These odors change depending on the length of composting
time
and the extent to which the readily biodegradable materials have biodegraded.
In
some composting operations, during the initial week to ten days of composting,
odors
can be unpleasant. Subsequently, the composting material contains less
biodegradable materials. The composting microbiology has been transformed to
include a greater variety of microbes. Odors tend to be more soil-like.
Temperature of the composting material affects odors. Odors are basically
volatile liquids; they can evaporate. Some volatile liquids have objectionable
odors.
As the temperature of the composting material rises, these liquids evaporate
more
readily and are released into the atmosphere. Hot composting material will
have a
different odor than cold composting material.
It has been discovered that maintaining a relatively low pH of the composting
material facilitates the reduction in the formation of malodorous ammonia gas
from
nitrogen compounds within the composting material pile. The pH of the
composting
material pile varies according to the pH of the starting material used to form
the
composting material pile, as well as the pH of the byproducts of the
composting
process. As the pH drops (becomes more acidic), the volatile ammonia (NH3)
becomes protonated as ammonium (NH4), the nonvolatile odorless salt form of
the
chemical, as shown in FIG. 13. Thus, a composting material mix with a low pH
should exhibit less odors due to the release of ammonia during the composting
process than a composting material mix having a higher pH.
As noted earlier, the temperature of the composting material affects odor, but
will also change the proportion of ammonia (in un-ionized form) to ammonium.
As
temperatures increase, the proportion in the volatile ammonia form increases,
as
illustrated in FIG. 14. At any given temperature a lower pH would be required
to
suppress the creation of volatile ammonia (NH3) from ammonium (NH4+)
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-36-
Conventional composting operations typically add a structural amendment
such as wood chips, sawdust, or other traditional amendment materials to an
organic
material to be composted to increase the carbon concentration and to add
porosity to
the compost mix. Commercial composting operations have not previously been run
without the addition of some form of structural amendment to the organic
compostable material because the absence of a structural amendment tends to
cause
the compost mix to be heavy and dense, possess a high viscosity, and have low
porosity. These properties render the composting material difficult to
properly agitate
and aerate to maintain the biochemical processes to form a proper compost end
product. Further, in composting material mixes formed without some type of
structural amendment, especially in composting material mixes containing
sludge
from, for example, a municipal wastewater treatment plant, it has been
observed that
sludge tends to build up on the conveyor flights and other surfaces of the
agitator.
Low porosity of a composting material mix makes uniform aeration nearly
impossible, resulting in anaerobic spots, formation of malodorous volatile
acids, poor
composting, and little drying. The denser a composting material mixture is,
the more
difficult it is for a mechanical agitator to process it.
More power is required by an agitator to process a dense composting material
mix than a less dense mix. Also, composting material build-up on the agitator
due to
stickiness can increase power requirements, slow the agitator processing speed
and
capacity, and increase operator maintenance for cleaning the surfaces. Density
and
stickiness of a composting material mix are inversely related to the dry
solids content
of the mix. Thus, standard design recommendations for composting sludge
suggest
boundary conditions for minimum dry solids in the to-be-composted composting
material mix which may vary by season.
While these boundary conditions for the starting composting material mix are
related primarily to the thermodynamic properties of the mix, stickiness is
also a
concern. In general, an amendment used in the composting material mix helps
reduce
stickiness by increasing friability and structure of the mix.
It has been discovered that it is possible to effectively treat dewatered
municipal wastewater treatment plant (MWWTP) sewage sludge (also refereed to
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-37-
herein as biosolids, sludge biosolids, sludge cake, sludge, or cake) by
composting
(also referred to herein as biodrying) without the need for traditional
amendment
materials to be added to the undigested sludge prior to the composting
operation. It
was discovered that either dried undigested (i.e., non-composted) sludge or
processed
compost material produced from the composting procedure itself could both be
used
in pace of traditional amendment materials for the composting process form a
mixed
sludge suitable for composting. It was found that traditional amendment
materials
were not necessary to mix with the mixed sludge to form a suitable composting
mix.
Rather, the material added to the influent biosolid sludge could consist of
100%
recycled compost or 100% dried undigested biosolid sludge and still form a mix
which composted adequately. A process using 100% recycled compost to mix with
undigested influent biosolid sludge prior to composting utilizes no bulking
agent or
amendment other than material produced by the composting process itself, could
be
considered an "amendment-free" composting process. Composting mixes using
dried
undigested sludge or compost as substitutes for traditional amendment
materials were
found to be capable of being composted to achieve desired levels of heating
and
drying without undue stickiness or the formation of a significant amount of
objectionable odors.
During the initial startup of a composting operation, there may be no
processed compost available for mixing with incoming undigested sludge. Thus,
for
initial startup of a composting operation or facility, dried undigested sludge
could be
used for mixing with incoming dewatered sludge prior to introduction into the
composting bay. In some embodiments involving sludge derived from MWWTPs,
the dried solids content of the dewatered undigested sludge may be about 20%.
The
dry solids content of dried undigested sludge is in some embodiments from
about
50% to about 99%. The skilled artisan will recognize that the dry solids
content of
the dewatered sludge would vary depending upon the dewetting process, and
could be
adjusted to various levels as desired. The proportion of dried and dewatered
undigested sludge mixed could be selected to form a compostable mixture (a
mixed
sludge) of a desired dry solids content, for example, in some embodiments,
between
30%-45% dry solids. In some embodiments, traditional amendment material could
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-38-
also be mixed with the influent dewatered undigested sludge prior to (or in
other
embodiments, concurrent with or after) introduction into the composting bay.
The carbon to nitrogen ratio of the dried and dewatered undigested sludge mix
may, in some embodiments utilizing sludge derived from MWWTPs, be less than
15:1 by weight, for example, between about 8:1 and about 15:1 by weight. One
skilled in the art would appreciate that it might occasionally be desirable to
make
adjustments to the process for certain purposes that might bring the C:N ratio
of the
mixed sludge out of this range. This carbon to nitrogen ratio may be adjusted
to a
higher level if traditional woody or cellulosic types of amendment materials
are also
added to the sludge mixture.
For the reasons described above, the pH of the dried undigested sludge and
dewatered sludge mixture may in some embodiments be acidic, in some
embodiments
in a range of between about 5.0 and about 7Ø In other embodiments, the pH
may be
as high as about 9.0, although substantial odors may be generated when
composting a
mixed sludge with a pH at this level.
The mixture of died and dewatered undigested sludge could be composted in a
composting system as described above to form a finished compost. Parameters
such
as aeration timing and volume and agitation speed or frequency could be
adjusted
during the composting operation as described above to achieve a desired level
of dry
solids in the finished compost material, for example, in some embodiments,
between
about 50% and 100% dry solids. This finished compost would in some embodiments
be used to mix with additional influent dewatered undigested sludge to form a
compostable mix (a mixed sludge) without the addition of any other bulking
materials, carbon sources, or other forms of amendment.
In methods where traditional amendment material was mixed with incoming
dewatered undigested sludge biosolids during startup of the composting process
to
provide bulking agents and a rich source of carbon, this traditional amendment
material would be at least partially digested during the composting process.
During
subsequent runs of the composting operation, recycled finished compost would
in
some embodiments be used as the sole material mixed with incoming dewatered
undigested sludge biosolids introduced into the composting bays. This process
would
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-39-
result in the eventual microbial digestion of all of the traditional amendment
material
used during the composting operation startup phase as more dewatered
undigested
sludge biosolids were composted and recycled. The operation would then rely on
only finished compost for mixing with incoming dewatered undigested sludge
biosolids to form a composting mix for composting in the composting bays,
resulting
in an "amendment-free" composting process.
The amount of finished compost that is recycled to be mixed with incoming
dewatered sludge biosolids may vary depending upon the amount of dry solids in
the
dewatered sludge biosolids and in the finished compost and in the amount of
dry
solids desired in the mixed sludge to be composted. The amount of dry solids
in the
incoming dewatered sludge biosolids and in the finished compost may be
measured or
monitored by one of the methods described above. In some embodiments, more
than
about 50% of the finished compost would be recycled. Finished compost which is
not
recycled may be used in some embodiments for agricultural fertilizer, in other
embodiments be incinerated or used for combustible fuel, for example, as an
additive
to coal used in coal fired power plants. In further embodiments, the non-
recycled
compost may be disposed of in a landfill or by other means. Embodiments of the
present disclosure provide advantages to the landfill disposal of sewage
sludge in that
because the moisture level of the sewage sludge is decreased, the volume of
sludge for
disposal also is decreased, which results in less landfill area required for
the disposal
of the sludge. The non-recycled compost could also be used as a soil blended
material
suitable for use in landfill daily cover or closure operations.
An example of an overall process in accordance with the present disclosure is
illustrated in FIG. 15. As illustrated in FIG. 15, a source of wastewater 502,
for
example, a municipal sewage system, provides wastewater influent to a
wastewater
treatment plant 504. The wastewater influent would contain a low amount of
solids,
in some embodiments about 2% solids. At the wastewater treatment plant 504,
the
influent wastewater is dewatered using, for example, a belt filter press,
centrifuge,
hydrocyclone, or the like to form a dewatered sludge. The dewatered sludge is
transported to a composting facility 506, which in some embodiments may be
proximate or form a part of the wastewater treatment plant 504, and in other
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-40-
embodiments may be located at a distance from the wastewater treatment plant
504.
In the composting facility, the dewatered sludge is mixed with, for example,
finished
compost produced by previously composted material to form a mixed sludge, and
is
introduced into, for example, composting bays in the composting facility to be
processed to form a finished compost. A portion of this finished compost is
recycled
for mixing with additional incoming dewatered sludge. Compost which is not
used
for mixing with incoming dewatered sludge may be disposed of in a variety of
ways,
including, for example, incineration 508a, use as a fuel in a power plant
508b, or used
as a soil amendment for agricultural purposes 508c. Excess compost could also
be
buried in a landfill if desired.
The amount of volatile solids present in the composting mix would be
dependent upon the amount of volatile solids in the influent dewatered sludge,
the
amount of volatile solids in the material, for example, the dried undigested
sludge or
recycled compost, mixed with the influent dewatered sludge prior to
composting, and
the ratio of these components mixed together. The amount of volatile solids in
a
mixed sludge produced from the mixture of the influent dewatered sludge and
the
dried undigested sludge or recycled compost could be adjusted to a level to
promote a
desired level of microbial digestive activity that would provide sufficient
heat to result
in a desired level of dryness in the finished compost. In some embodiments, a
compostable mix would be formed by influent dewatered sludge and dried
undigested
sludge mixed together in a ratio of between about 2:1 and 4:1 by volume and
1:1 to
2:1 by weight, depending on the moisture content of the dewatered and the
dired
sludges. In other embodiments, a compostable mix would be formed by influent
dewatered sludge and recycled compost mixed together in a ratio of between
about
2:1 and 1:2 by weight.
In some embodiments, any or all of the influent dewatered sludge, the dried
undigested sludge, the mixed sludge, and the recycled compost would have a
volatile
solids content of between about 60% and about 95% depending, for example upon
the
makeup of the wastewater stream influent to the MWWTP.
Finished compost may be transported to a mixing area for mixing with influent
dewatered sludge biosolids in any of a number of ways. For example, in one
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-41-
embodiment, recycled compost may be transported to a mixing area manually or
with
the assistance of standard earth moving equipment such as backhoes, bulldozers
or
other conventional means. In further embodiments, an automated conveyor belt
system is utilized to transport finished compost from a discharge area at the
end of
one or more compost bays to the mixing area.
Mixing of the finished compost and the incoming dewatered sludge biosolids
may be accomplished in a number of ways. In one embodiment, the finished
compost
and the incoming dewatered sludge biosolids are manually mixed in the mixing
area
using, for example a skid steer loader or other conventional means. In another
embodiment, a mechanized commercial mixer, such as an auger, is used. In a
further
embodiment, the incoming dewatered sludge biosolids and the recycled finished
compost are introduced separately into a first portion of a composting bay,
and are
mixed by the action of a mechanical agitator as described above which travels
along
the composting bay to agitate the composting material.
In some embodiments, the finished compost is screened prior to being
recycled for mixing with incoming dewatered sludge biosolids. For example, the
smaller particles in the finished compost may be removed by screening until a
desired
amount of finished compost for recycling is attained. This may result in
providing a
compost material having an average particle size that is larger than the
average
particle size of the finished compost prior to screening to be used for
recycled mixing
with incoming dewatered sludge biosolids. A benefit of providing larger
particles of
finished compost for recycling is that the recycled compost/dewatered sludge
biosolid
mix may have a greater porosity than if the recycled compost were not screened
prior
to recycling. As described above, greater porosity (lower density) of the
composting
mix is often beneficial in that it is easier to agitate and/or aerate a more
porous
composting material mix versus a composting material mix with less porosity.
Examples of methods and materials which may be utilized in accordance with
the above disclosure will now be described by way of the following example.
Example
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-42-
In the following Example, a two phase test was performed to evaluate
composting (biodrying) in accordance with methods disclosed above. The test
took
place at a composting facility having four bays, each 67 meters (220 feet)
long, 2
meters (6.6 feet) wide and 1.83 meters (6 feet) deep. At the end of the bays
was a
common discharge pit into which material would fall when exiting each of the
bays.
Each bay had five independent aeration zones (A - E) and each aeration zone
had a
dedicated blower and wall-mounted thermocouple. The thermocouples were used
for
process monitoring. The blowers were controlled in timer mode. The facility
was
equipped with an IPSTm 30 HP Narrow Bay agitator similar to that described in
the
disclosure above.
The phases of this Example described below were completed in a location at a
time of year where temperatures averaged 21 C (70 F), with highs at about 26
C
(79 F) during a first month and an average temperature of 24 C (75 F), and
with
highs at about 28 C (83 F) during a second month.
Phase 1
Phase 1 of testing replicated conditions that might be present in a new
composting facility or a facility which did not have access to finished
compost for
mixing with influent sludge to form a mixed sludge to be composted. Instead of
finished compost, heat-dried undigested sludge was used to mix with influent
sludge
to form a mixed sludge for composting.
In phase 1, a mechanically enhanced sludge drying trial using MWWTP
sewage sludge was conducted. In this trial, undigested MWWTP sludge, which was
dewatered on a belt filter press to a solids concentration of about 25% was
blended
with heat-dried MWWTP sludge pellets to increase the solids content to a
target of
40% solids by weight. A goal of the phase 1 testing was to maximize the drying
of
the mixed sludge by maintaining aeration rates sufficient to hold temperatures
in the
range of from 25 C (greater than ambient temperature) to 45 C. During a 24
day
composting period, dry solids increased from approximately 43% to 88%. Odors
were minimal and not considered to be objectionable. Fecal coliform counts in
the
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-43-
dried compost ranged from 19 to 1,100 MPN per gram dry solids and averaged 500
MPN per gram dry solids.
A composting bay was first loaded with five charges of shredded green waste.
This material served as an insulating buffer as well as a wall to prevent the
mixed
sludge from tapering at the discharge end of the bay. Each charge occupied a
3.66
meter (approximately 12 foot) long segment of the bay; this is approximately
equal to
the distance the material is moved through the composting bay by the agitator
with
each agitation. Another of the goals of phase 1 of this testing was to assess
composting material bed height limitations. The mixed sludge was thus
maintained in
the composting bay with a bed height as high as possible.
To form the mixed sludge for use in the trial, heat dried undigested sludge
pellets (pellets) were mixed with undigested dewatered sludge cake (cake)
initially on
a concrete pad using a skid steer loader. Mixing of these two physically
different
materials worked well, though a substantial quantity of pellets remained free
and
unincorporated into the overall mixture. Both the blended mix and the free
pellets
were loaded into the charge zone of the bay. Subsequent mixes were prepared
using a
commercial auger mixer.
The mixed sludge consisted typically of a mix of about 3.5 wet tons of cake
(21.7% Dry Solids (DS), 90% Volatile Solids (VS), 4.6% Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
(TKN), pH 5.8, and a carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N) of 9) blended with 1.2 wet
tons
of pellets (94.3% DS, 84% VS, 5.7% TKN, pH 6.1. and C:N 8).
On day one, three cake/pellet charges were prepared and loaded into the bay.
Two runs of the agitator through the bay were performed after loading these
three
cake/pellet charges. The center charge of the three was sampled and tested
after these
two agitations, and had the following properties: 40.3% DS, 86.9% VS, 5.6%
TKN,
pH 5.4, and C:N 9. On day two, two more cake/pellet charges were loaded into
the
bay, and two more runs of the agitator through the bay were performed. In all,
five
charges of this cake/pellet mixture were loaded consecutively into the feed
end of the
composting bay. These charges were loaded as high as possible in the bay to
ensure
that the agitator would be subjected to worst case conditions with regard to
power
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-44-
demand as well as to determine if there were any biological limits related to
pile
height.
Additional charges of ground green waste were loaded behind the mixed
sludge to maintain pile height and to provide thermal insulation. The inside
three
cake/pellet mixed sludge charges were deemed the "target" charges and were
monitored for chemical changes. These center target charges were considered to
be
the most representative of mixed sludge that would be composted in an
amendment-
free biodrying process because the mechanical agitation process tended to
blend the
outer charges with other materials composting in the bay.
There were two process-related variables controlled during this testing:
aeration blower run time and agitation frequency.
Aeration blowers were run with a goal of drying the mixed sludge out to a
target of 65% dry solids as quickly as possible. In aeration zones A and B
(the first
75 ft or 23 m of the bay), as long as the compost temperature was at least 5
C greater
than the ambient temperature, the aeration blowers were set to run. This was
expected
to optimize the evaporative moisture loss potential. By day two of the
testing, the
target charges were able to maintain temperatures of 5 C above ambient due to
the
heat generated by the biological breakdown of the composting mixed sludge.
Therefore, the zone A and B blowers were set to run in cycles of 15 minutes on
and five minutes off, 24 hours per day. By the time the charges reached the
beginning
of zone C (at day five), the rate of drying observed made it was clear that
the material
would achieve the 65% solids target value within the next few days.
As it became clear that the initial target of achieving 65% dry solids in the
composting mix would be achieved, it was decided to operate the remaining
aeration
zones C - E in a manner to achieve an additional goal: to optimize compost
temperature to try and achieve the PFRP and/or VAR time-temperature standards
as
set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Aeration Blowers C -
E
(76 ft - 220 ft, or 23 m - 67 m) were subsequently set to operate at intervals
of five
minutes on and 30 minutes off.
Agitation of the composting mix was initially performed every other day except
Sunday when the facility did not operate. It was expected that operating in
this
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-45-
manner would allow maximization of the retention time in the bay to allow the
best
potential for drying without running the risk of excessive compaction due to
lack of
turning. After the target solids content of 65% was achieved on day nine,
daily
agitations were initiated to discharge the target charges as quickly as
possible and
move on to phase 2 testing.
Multiple charges were sampled and tested nine times during the 25 day
composting period.
Phase 1 Results and Discussion
Composting dewatered undigested sludge using heat-dried undigested sludge
in place of traditional amendment material was anticipated to manifest serious
problems related to odor, stickiness, low porosity, and mechanical challenges.
Anticipated problems also included poor drying during the composting process,
poor
compost quality, and poor heating, resulting in inadequate pathogen kill. The
fact that
none of these problems occurred during the course of this testing was
surprising.
Experience with composting facilities, operations, and materials suggested
that
handling and composting the sludge mixture would be difficult physically and
chemically. The low carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N) of 9 in the mixed sludge
introduced into the composting bay would ordinarily have resulted in
voluminous
losses of ammonia gas because of an excess of nitrogen relative to
biodegradable
carbon in the mix. In addition, dewatered sludge cake is ordinarily sticky,
non-
porous, and difficult to mechanically turn without the addition of traditional
amendment material.
A. Physical Properties of the Mix
1. Stickiness:
The sludge mixture displayed a surprisingly low degree of stickiness.
Examination of the mixtures in the current study showed that fine, short
fibers were
present in the mix. It was observed that undigested sewage sludge contains a
good
deal of paper fines, presumably from toilet tissue, among other sources.
Without
being bound to a particular theory, it is believed that these fibers may have
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-46-
contributed in a positive way to the low stickiness of the mix. The fibers
were too
short to bind large particles together, but were long enough to bind small
particles
together. That is, they contributed positively to the structure of the mix.
The fibers
also seemed to provide abrasiveness to the mix. This abrasive quality of the
observed
fibers appeared to clean the agitator tines and conveyor bed of the agitator
during
agitation, reducing adherence of the mix to the turning components.
2. Porosity:
For the phase 1 testing, the volume ratio of the 94% solids pellets to the 23%
solids sludge used to form the mixed sludge for composting was approximately
0.8:1.
Porosity of the composting material was maintained by agitation initially
twice a day
during charging the bay (days one and two), and then every other day
throughout the
trial period until the 65% solids target dryness was achieved (day 10). Once
this
target value was achieved, the target charges were agitated daily (with the
exception
of Sundays) to discharge them from the bay after 24 days. The heat-dried
pellets
tended to not absorb much moisture and remained recognizable throughout the
phase
1 test. However, the pellets did tend to stick on the outside of golf ball
size chunks of
the cake and to move around freely in the mix. Thus, the pellets enhanced the
structure of the composting mix, as well as reducing the stickiness of the
mix.
Qualitative indications such as low odors suggested aerobic conditions existed
within
the composting mix.
3. Heat:
The biochemical process produced more than adequate heat to effectively
achieve both drying and pathogen kill goals by managing the aeration strategy.
Regular agitation contributed in very significant ways to maintaining heat
output. The graph illustrated in FIG. 16, showing compost temperature as a
function
of composting time for charge four of the five charges composted during phase
1,
illustrates improved heat output (note the temperature spikes) with each
agitation.
This is due to the fact that the agitation process re-mixes and makes
available new
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-47-
food sources for the microbes in the composting sludge mix, re-energizing the
composting process.
4. Drying:
Good drying of the compost was achieved during phase 1.
An estimation of net energy expected from volatile solids loss due to the
biological activity within the composting mixed sludge during the phase 1
composting
process suggested that adequate energy should have been present to evaporate
additional water and achieve even higher moisture reduction than what was
observed.
However, the composting process is driven by biological activity, and the
microbes in
the composting mixed sludge require water to remain active. As the biodrying
process proceeds, microbial activity is slowed. So, drying was limited
biochemically
by the low moisture content achieved by the composting mix.
Drying was controlled by timed aeration blowers. Air flowing through the
compost removed both heat and moisture, as well as supplying oxygen for the
aerobic
microbes. In addition to the cooling effect of air flowing through the
compost, in
removing moisture, evaporation of water (an endothermic phase change) removed
heat.
For the first part of the phase 1 testing a goal was to achieve optimum drying
of the compost mix. A higher degree of aeration is more effective for
optimizing
drying of the composting mix than for maximizing temperature within the mix.
Air
flow through the composting mix was thus maximized and the blowers were set to
maintain compost temperatures at around 25 C to 40 C, with aeration
activated for
approximately 50% of the time when the compost temperature exceeded the
ambient
temperature by at least 5 C.
Blower run time was decreased during the later composting stages as the
composting mixed sludge cooled since the biological decomposition required
less
oxygen than would have been supplied by the blowers when operated at a rate
designed to optimize cooling of the composting mixed sludge.
FIG. 17 illustrates the effect of rapid composting (conversion of volatile
solids
into carbon dioxide, water, and heat) during the first week of composting
(days one -
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-48-
seven) on moisture loss and drying. After the first seven days, biological
activity
decreased as the biodegradable volatile solids were lost. This resulted in a
reduced
heat output and reduced rate of moisture loss. In this experiment, about 80%
DS was
achieved within 14 days, with maximum dryness (about 85% DS) reached in an
additional week. This is not to suggest, however, that maximum stability was
also
achieved. While the compost was adequately stabilized, the composting process
would ordinarily be expected to continue for several months at a lower rate as
moderated by fungal/bacterial mesophilic processes.
B. Chemical Properties of the Mix
1.Odors:
Odors produced by the composting process in phase 1 were unexceptional.
This suggested several things, but the most important was that adequate levels
of
oxygen were delivered to the composting material to maintain aerobic
conditions
therein. This indicated that the porosity of the mix was adequate. There was
initial
concern that the cake-pellet mix would be too sticky, the mix would possess
inadequate porosity, and odors indicative of anaerobic biological processes
would be
apparent. The porosity of the mix was, however, rendered adequate to avoid
these
concerns for the reasons discussed above.
2. Ammonia.
Ammonia odors during aeration were substantially lower than expected and
were unobjectionable. The carbon to nitrogen ratio of the compostable mix was
estimated at about C:N = 8. Previously accepted assumptions were that a C:N
ratio of
between 20 to 40 was required for a properly compostable blend of material.
Thus,
this mix was very rich in nitrogen. It was expected that such a mix would
release
some of the excess nitrogen as ammonia during the composting process. It is
believed
that the loss of volatile ammonia was limited by providing a pH less than 7 in
the
mixed sludge introduced to the composting bay. As pH of a mixed sludge drops,
(becomes more acid), volatile ammonia (NH3) becomes protonated as ammonium
(NH4), the nonvolatile odorless salt form of the chemical, as shown in FIG.
13. As
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-49-
discussed below, the pH of the composting mix was acidic for the initial
portion of the
testing period, which without being bound to a particular theory, most likely
contributed to the minimal amounts of ammonia odors observed.
As noted earlier, the temperature of the composting material affects odor. The
temperature of the composting mix will also change the proportion of ammonia
(in
un-ionized form) to ammonium in the mix. As temperatures decreases, the
proportion
of ammonia in the volatile ammonia form decreases, as illustrated in FIG 14.
Thus, as
the composting mixed sludge cooled over time, even though the pH increased, as
discussed below, the cooling of the composting mixture may have contributed to
a
reduction in the amount of ammonia gas released.
3. pH.
The combined undigested sludge mix tended to be acidic (with a pH of about
5.5), presumably due to the presence of volatile acids formed during
transmission of
sewage containing garbage grinder solids as well as other readily
biodegradable
constituents to the treatment facility. An indication of this was that the
dewatered
cake possessed a noticeable, sour, vinegary aroma.
The pH of the composting material is shown in FIG. 18, a graph of pH as a
function of composting time. During Phase 1, the pH of the composting mix
remained below seven for the initial week.
Thereafter, the pH increased to 7.5 to 8.0 due to biodegradation of the
volatile
acids into carbon dioxide and water, subsequently released by aeration and
agitation.
Even so, the majority of the ammonia remained fixed in the composting mix
because
at a pH less than eight, ammonia remains stable in the ammonium salt (NH4')
form.
The majority of ammonia released during a composting operation is typically
released
during the initial rapid composting phase. However, volatile ammonia loss in
this test
was not exceptional. Ammonia release appeared in fact to be less than in
conventional composting operations where traditional amendment materials had
been
used. The low initial pH apparently contributed to the retention of the
ammonia as
ammonium. Later in the process when the pH increased, ammonia release was not
exceptional as most of the readily biodegradable solids had already
biodegraded, and
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-50-
because the composting mixed sludge had cooled, reducing the potential for the
volatilization of ammonia.
Ammonia/ammonium concentration in the composting mixed sludge varied in
a chemical pattern similar to pH, as illustrated in FIG. 19, a chart of
ammonia/ammonium concentration in the composting mixed sludge as a function of
composting time. Typically, in well aerated composting material, pH will be
initially
lower due to the presence of volatile acids or carbon dioxide formed during
the
aerobic/facultative composting process. With longer composting time, readily
biodegradable volatile solids (including the sour smelling volatile acids) are
diminished (biodegraded) substantially and aeration supplied for cooling will
remove
not only heat but also carbon dioxide. Loss of carbon dioxide, an acidic gas,
tends to
result in a higher pH in the compost mix.
Phase 2
Phase2 of testing replicated conditions that might be observed during ongoing
operations in an amendment-free composting facility where compost was used in
place of traditional amendment materials for mixing with incoming sludge to
form a
mixed sludge for composting.
In a second phase of the trial, pellets and compost discharged from the
compost bay during phase 1 of the trial was blended with dewatered cake to
produce a
mixed sludge with about 40% solids. Aeration was managed to achieve pathogen
killing temperatures as the major objective while also achieving adequate
drying. The
material was retained in the bay for an average of 18 days. During this
retention time,
the solids content rose from about 41% to about 68%. Temperatures were
maintained
in a range of from about 40 C to at least 55 C for 13 days, with
temperatures
exceeding 55 C for 8 consecutive days; this was more than sufficient
time/temperature to meet the United States Environmental Protection Agency
requirement for pathogen kill of three days at above 55 C (PFRP). Consistent
with
this, the fecal coliform counts in the dried compost product were consistently
well
below the 1,000 MPN per gram dry solids US EPA requirement.
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-51 -
With the success of being able to effectively dry the cake/pellet mix in phase
1, the test was re-run with the primary intent of trying to achieve both
dryness and
adequate temperatures for PFRP and VAR. Also, the dried mixture from the phase
1
testing was recycled to mix with the dewatered sludge, as opposed to using
dried
sludge pellets, as this would be more representative of steady state operation
of an
amendment-free composting facility. Due to the speed with which the material
dried
in phase 1, the initial target blend ratio was set to achieve a wetter 40%
solids content
mixture with the intention of keeping the compost active longer.
The mixed sludge used for phase 2 of the study consisted of a mix of the dried
finished compost product from the phase 1 (recycle) mixed with fresh cake. The
recycle included particles significantly larger in size than the heat-dried
sludge pellets
used in phase 1 - the recycle particles were approximately 20 mm in diameter
on
average vs. about 6 mm in diameter on average for the heat-dried sludge
pellets. The
larger diameter particles were expected to at least initially provide for good
porosity
of the composting mix. Some heat-dried sludge pellets from phase 1 were still
visible
in the recycled compost as well. Mixing was done both in the mechanical mixer
and
on the floor without issue.
The blended mixed sludge consisted of a 1:1 mix based on volume of cake
(21.7% DS, 90% VS, 4.6% TKN, pH 5.8, and C:N 9) and recycle (88% DS, 82.9%
VS, 5.5% TKN, pH 7.5, and C:N 8).
On each of days one through three of Phase 2, one cake/recycle charge per day
was prepared and loaded into the bay. So, in all, three charges of this
cake/recycle
mixture were loaded consecutively into the feed end of the bay. As with the
Phase 1
test, additional charges of ground green waste were loaded behind the three
cake/recycle charges in the composting bay to maintain pile height and provide
thermal insulation. The middle charge (charge two) was deemed the "target"
charge
and was monitored for chemical changes. The middle charge was sampled and
tested
after one agitation and had the following properties: 41.9% DS, 84.1% VS, 5.2%
TKN, pH 7.0, and C:N 9.
Aeration blowers were run primarily to optimize the chance of achieving
PRFP (3 days at or above 55 C) and VAR (14 days at or above 40 C) compliance
as
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-52-
early as possible, with drying of the composting mix being a secondary goal.
For
aeration zone A (the first 40 ft of the bay), the blower was cycled at three
minutes on
and 15 minutes off. As illustrated in FIG. 20, by day three, the target
charges were
able to achieve and maintain temperatures in excess of 550 C. PFRP was
achieved by
day 5 (end of zone A). Solids content of charge two had increased from 41% to
53%
during these first five days. In aeration zones B & C (40 ft - 110 ft) the
blower cycle
time was reduced to three minutes on and 30 minutes off to further reduce the
rate of
drying in an attempt to keep the compost active as long as possible. By about
day
nine (123 ft or 38 m in to bay) the solids content of the target charge was
>60% and
the temperature had started to fall off. Therefore, the remaining aeration
blowers D
and E (116 ft - 220 ft or 35 m - 67 m) were run at 15 minutes on and five
minutes off
to optimize the drying process.
Agitation was performed every day except Sunday, when the testing facility
did not operate. This was done to take advantage of the temperature increase
associated with the agitation process (see FIG. 16) consistent with trying to
achieve
PFRP and VAR retention time in the bay to allow the best potential for drying.
With
this frequency of agitation, PFRP was achieved, VAR was effectively achieved,
and
also the target dryness of 65% DS was achieved within 18 days in the bay.
Phase 2 Results and Discussion
A. Physical Properties of the Mix
1. Stickiness:
No signs of increased stickiness of the phase 2 mixture compared to the phase
1 mixture were evident. As in phase 1, qualitative indications, such as low
odors,
suggested aerobic conditions existed within the composting materials.
2. Porosity:
For the phase 2 testing, the volume ratio of the 88% solids phase 1 recycle
material to the 22% solids sludge used to form the mixed sludge for composting
was
approximately 1:1. As described above, the size gradation of phase 2 material
was
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-53-
significantly larger than the heat-dried pellets used in phase 1. The use of a
larger
sized mixing material contributed to greater porosity of the mixed sludge in
phase 2
versus the mix of phase 1.
Since it was shown in phase 1 that good drying could easily be achieved,
agitation was performed every working day (six days/wk) to maintain good
porosity
of the composting material. The heat-dried pellets from the phase 1 recycle
remained
recognizable in phase 2 mix until about day nine (midpoint) of the testing.
3. Agitator Amperage Draw:
There were some concerns that the agitator would struggle mechanically as it
moved through the target charges. Typically, the agitator requires the least
amount of
power to provide agitation of composting mixed sludge at the discharge end of
the
bay where the composting mixed sludge is driest, shallowest and least dense
and
requires more power to agitate the composting mixed sludge near the front of
the bay
where the composting mixed sludge is deeper, denser, and wetter.
There was significant pile height drop (approximately 50%) from the inlet to
the outlet of the bay. This drop in compost pile height is consistent with
most
properly run active composting processes wherein the height of the compost
pile
decreases as moisture is removed. The agitator amperage draw was measured
throughout the length of the bay multiple times during both test phases. Non-
working
amperage draw was 25 - 30 amps. Normal working amperage draw ranged from 35 -
45 amps. There was approximately a 10% (five amps) average increase noticed as
the
agitator moved through the target charges at the front of the bay. This could
have
been due to the height of the material, as the bays were loaded as high as
possible to
maximize agitator effort. The agitator amperage draw remained within the
acceptable
limits of the 30 HP (22.5 KW) agitator motor. By day three of each of the test
phases,
there was no significant increase in the amperage draw as the agitator moved
through
the target charges. The 30 HP (22.5 KW) agitator, serving a bay with a cross
sectional area of less 39.4 ft2 (3.7 m2), has a much lower power to area ratio
@ 0.76
3o HP/ft2 (6.1 KW/m2) than standard 50 HP @ 1.08 HP/ft2 (8.1 KW/m2) and 100 HP
@
1.25 HP/ft2 (10 KW/m2) IPS agitators currently offered by Siemens Wastewater
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-54-
Technologies Corp. Therefore, this testing indicated that standard IPS
agitators
should have more than adequate power to process this type of composting
material.
4. Heat:
During Phase 2, the aeration protocol (process aeration blower on time) was
adjusted (minimized) to maximize temperatures achieved while also attempting
to
achieve reasonable drying of the composting materials. The temperature of
charges
one-three was recorded during the course of the Phase 2 testing. The
temperatures
recorded are illustrated in FIG. 20. As can be seen from FIG. 20, during this
part of
the study, US EPA pathogen killing temperatures (three consecutive days at or
above
550 C) were achieved. As previously noted, US EPA VAR temperature requirements
were nearly achieved; (13 days at or above 40 C, rather than 14 days).
Nonetheless,
the average temperature during the 13 days plus the 14th non-conforming day
averaged over 550 C. It is expected that extending the time in which the
composting
material maintained a temperature at or over 40 C could have been
accomplished
readily with minor adjustment of moisture, aeration strategy, and compost
retention
time in the bays.
5. Drying:
Good drying of the compost was achieved during phase 2.
During phase 2, the compost temperature was managed by reducing aeration
blower on-time to enhance pathogen kill. As a consequence, lower aeration
rates
resulted in less cooling of the compost, thereby conserving moisture,
retaining heat,
and generating pathogen killing temperatures. Nonetheless, the finished
compost still
achieved 68% DS during the three weeks' composting period.
B. Chemical Properties of the Mix
1.Odors:
Odors produced by the composting process in phase 2 were ordinary. This
suggested several things, but the most important was that oxygen was getting
into the
compost in a sufficient volume to maintain aerobic conditions therein, which
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-55-
indicated that the porosity of the mixed sludge was adequate. This was
expected due
to the greater porosity of the mixed sludge used in phase 2 versus that used
in phase 1.
2. Ammonia.
Like in phase 1, ammonia odors during aeration were substantially lower than
originally expected and were unobjectionable. The factors discussed above with
reference to phase 1, for example the low pH of the composting mixture ad the
rapid
drying of the mixture, likely contributed to the release of malodorous ammonia
gasses
being less than originally expected.
Results Summary
The major objectives of this agitated bed composting study were to 1)
investigate mechanically enhanced biodrying of dewatered undigested primary
and
waste activated sludge, and 2) to explore the potential to use heat dried
sludge pellets
as amendment. The effort succeeded on both counts.
Problems anticipated were excessive odors, stickiness, low porosity, and poor
drying. None of these problems were observed. The low C:N ratio of the
compostable mix (C:N < 10) would normally have released a good deal of ammonia
from the composting mix during the composting process. What was observed was
that the undigested cake had a pH as low as 5.5. The low pH tended to hold any
ammonia formed microbiologically as ammonium, a non-volatile, odorless entity.
Even though the pH of the compost increased gradually during the test, ammonia
release was not exceptional. Without being bound by a particular theory, it is
believed that ammonia release was suppressed as the composting material pH
increased because as the pH of the material increased, the dryness also
increased,
which decreased the amount of biological activity that could have generated
ammonia.
Stickiness was limited by the physical composition of the cake and the mix.
The undigested cake contained fine, but readily observable paper fibers. These
fibers
were believed to help contribute structure to the mix, and also to help clean
exposed
surfaces on the agitator. In addition, the two mm diameter dried sludge
pellets
CA 02749752 2011-07-14
WO 2010/083428 PCT/US2010/021219
-56-
utilized in place of traditional amendment material in Phase 1 tended to
adhere to the
surface of chunks of cake when broken up, keeping these chunks apart, or at
least not
sticking together. As a result, the mix, which was agitated twice a day for
two days
and later only once in three days in phase 1 testing, did not collapse into
low porosity
material. Air flow through the material was adequate and associated moisture
loss
was readily observed by steam rising from the beds.
Biochemical heat produced by the composting process was adequate to both
achieve good drying and achieve PFRP and VAR temperatures. In phase 2, a
temperature of over 55 C was maintained for at least three consecutive days.
While
the temperature exceeded 40 C for only 13 days, the average of the 14 day
time
period exceeded 40 C. Heat generated evaporated and vented moisture from the
compost. The pellet amended cake was dried from about 22% solids to about 80%
solids during the 24 day phase 1 composting period and from 40% solids to
greater
than 65% solids during the 18 day Phase 2 test.
Thus, the test of mechanically enhanced biodrying using heat dried sludge
pellets or recycled dried sludge compost as a substitute for traditional
amendment
material while composting dewatered undigested primary and waste activated
sludge
was successful. These two trials documented that, for this composting
technology and
for the ambient temperatures during the period of the year that the testing
was
performed, biodrying is not only possible but may be very successful.
The reading of the foregoing description of certain preferred embodiments by
those skilled in the art will bring to mind various possible alterations and
modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention. It is intended
that the
following claims include all such alterations and modifications within the
true scope
of the invention.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this
invention, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and
improvements
will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations,
modifications, and
improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to
be within
the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description
and
drawings are by way of example only.
