Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Spec cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
CARBURIZATION SENSING METHOD
[Technical Field]
[0001]
The present invention relates to a method for sensing whether
carburization occurs or not in a test material such as a steel pipe or tube
by an electromagnetic testing such as an electromagnetic induction
testing and a magnetic flux leakage testing. In particular, the present
invention relates to a method with which a threshold value of an
electromagnetic test output value, which corresponds to a threshold value
of a carburized depth to be sensed, can be accurately determined and
thereby it is possible to accurately sense whether carburization occurs or
not.
[Background Art]
[0002]
It is known that among various steel materials, austenitic stainless
steel is susceptible to carburization. For example, a cracking tube, which
is used for the thermal decomposition reaction in an ethylene
manufacturing process of a petrochemical plant, is made of austenitic
stainless steel, and carburization occurs on its inner surface after being
used for long hours. Moreover, in the manufacturing process of the
cracking tube, carburization occurs when heat treatment is performed in
a poorly degreased condition. Since the occurrence of such carburization
1
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Spec cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
may cause a significant reduction of the life of the cracking tube, there is
a need for accurately sensing whether carburization occurs or not.
[0003]
For this reason, conventionally, an electromagnetic test such as an
electromagnetic induction test is carried out on a cracking tube installed
in a plant as a nondestructive inspection across the entire length of the
cracking tube at the time of periodic maintenance of the plant so that
whether carburization occurs or not is sensed based on the magnitude of
the output value thereof. Moreover, also in the manufacturing process of
cracking tube, whether carburization occurs or not is sensed by
performing an electromagnetic test across its entire length or by cutting
off both ends thereof and performing a microstructure observation.
[0004]
In the above described electromagnetic test, it is a general practice
that using a calculated calibration curve, which is a previously calculated
correspondence between a carburized depth and an electromagnetic test
output value, a threshold value of the electromagnetic test output value
corresponding to a threshold value of the carburized depth to be sensed is
determined in advance. Then, whether carburization occurs or not in a
test material is sensed based on a magnitude correlation between the
electromagnetic test output value obtained by performing the
electromagnetic test on the test material and the threshold value of the
electromagnetic test output value which is predetermined as described
above.
[0005]
2
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref" MI-0479-CA
In general, when calculating the above described calibration curve,
first, a plurality of carburized materials each of which is expected to have
a different carburized depth are prepared, and each carburized material
is subjected to an electromagnetic test to obtain an electromagnetic test
output value. Thereafter, each carburized material is cut off and
subjected to microstructure observation so that an actual carburized
depth of each carburized material, from which the electromagnetic test
output value has been acquired, is measured. Thereby, it is possible to
calculate a calibration curve which is a correspondence between the
carburized depth and the electromagnetic test output value.
[0006]
In this situation, since the carburized depth is affected by the
manufacturing history or the usage history of a cracking tube, a plurality
of carburized materials collected from one cracking tube having the same
history may have an equivalent carburized depth. In other words, a
plurality of carburized materials each having a different carburized depth
may not necessarily be collected from one cracking tube conveniently to
calculate the above described calibration curve. Therefore, it is a general
practice that to increase the possibility to collect carburized materials
having different carburized depths, carburized materials are collected
respectively from a plurality of cracking tubes, each of which has a
different history such as a manufacturing lot and a usage time, and are
subjected to the calculation of the calibration curve.
[0007]
3
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
As describe above, each carburized material to be subjected to the
calculation of calibration curve is collected from the respective ones of a
plurality of cracking tubes having different histories. Therefore, even if a
plurality of cracking tubes having the same constituents and dimensions
(outer diameter and inner diameter) in terms of the design specification
are selected, and each carburized material is collected from each of the
cracking tubes, the constituents and the dimension of the base metal of
each carburized material may vary. As a result, the electromagnetic
properties (electric resistance, etc.) of the base metal of each carburized
material may vary.
[0008]
In an electromagnetic testing such as an electromagnetic induction
testing, it is a general practice that an alternating current of from several
hundreds of Hz to several tens of kHz is applied depending on the wall
thickness of the material to be measured such that the penetration depth
of the alternating current is several times of the wall thickness.
Therefore, even assuming that carburization has not occurred in each
carburized material, the different electromagnetic properties of the base
metal of each carburized material lead to a different electromagnetic test
output value of each carburized material. That is, the electromagnetic
test output value when the carburized depth is 0 m (the reference point)
will vary from one carburized material to another. Thus, the accuracy of
the calibration curve, which is calculated by using the electromagnetic
test output values for which the reference point varies from one
carburized material to another, will be reduced according to the amount
4
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref. " MI-0479-CA
of deviation of each reference point. As a result, a problem arises in that
the accuracy of the threshold value of the electromagnetic test output
value, which is predetermined by using the calibration curve as described
above, will also be reduced, further leading to a decline of accuracy in
sensing whether carburization occurs or not.
[0009]
Although various methods for sensing whether carburization occurs
or not have been proposed including ones which are not in the actual use
yet (for example, see JP3-253555A, JP62-6153A, JP4-145358A, JP6-
88807A, JP2000-266727A, JP2004-279054A, and JP2004-279055A), none
of these method is able to solve the above described problems.
[Summary of Invention]
[0010]
The present invention has been made in view of the above
described prior arts, and has its object to provide a carburization sensing
method with which a threshold value of an electromagnetic test output
value corresponding to a threshold value of a carburized depth to be
sensed can accurately be determined, and thereby whether carburization
occurs or not can accurately be sensed.
[0011]
In order to solve the above described problems, the present
invention is a method for sensing whether carburization occurs or not in a
test material by an electromagnetic test, the method being characterized
by including the following first to eighth procedures.
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specication, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
(1) First procedure
A material which has equivalent electromagnetic properties to
those of a test material and is not carburized is selected as a reference
material, and at least three magnetic materials each having a different
magnetic strength are attached to a target surface for carburization
sensing of the reference material.
(2) Second procedure
The magnetic strength of each magnetic material which is attached
to the reference material in the above described first procedure is
measured, and an electromagnetic test is performed on the above
described each magnetic material to acquire an output value thereof.
(3) Third procedure
Based on the measured magnetic strength values and the
electromagnetic test output values of the each magnetic material, which
are obtained in the second procedure, a correspondence between the
measured magnetic strength value and the electromagnetic test output
value is calculated.
(4) Fourth procedure
The magnetic strength is measured on a plurality of carburized
materials each having a different carburized depth.
(5) Fifth procedure
Based on the carburized depths and the measured magnetic
strength values of the each carburized material obtained in the fourth
procedure, a correspondence between the carburized depth and the
measured magnetic strength value is calculated.
6
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
(6) Sixth procedure
Based on the correspondence between the carburized depth and the
measured magnetic strength value obtained in the fifth procedure, a
threshold value of the measured magnetic strength value corresponding
to a threshold value of a carburized depth to be sensed is determined.
(7) Seventh procedure
Based on the correspondence between the measured magnetic
strength value and the electromagnetic test output value obtained in the
third procedure, a threshold value of the electromagnetic test output
value corresponding to the threshold value of the measured magnetic
strength value determined in the sixth procedure is determined.
(8) Eighth procedure
Whether carburization occurs or not in the test material is sensed
based on a magnitude correlation between the electromagnetic test
output value obtained by performing the electromagnetic test on the test
material, and the threshold value of the electromagnetic test output value
determined in the seventh procedure.
[0012]
According to the present invention, a correspondence between the
measured magnetic strength value and the electromagnetic test output
value is calculated by performing the first to the third procedures. Here,
"magnetic strength" as used in the present invention has a positive
correlation with the amount of ferrite (the area ratio of ferrite structure),
which is generally measured by using a ferrite meter. This ferrite meter
is an instrument to measure the amount of ferrite by applying an ultra-
7
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref MI-0479-CA
low frequency (less than 100 Hz) alternating magnetic field to the
material to be measured and taking advantage of the fact that magnetic
induction increases with ferrite included in the material to be measured.
Therefore, in the second procedure, when measuring the magnetic
strength of each magnetic material attached to the reference material,
using a ferrite meter which applies an alternating magnetic field of ultra-
low frequency thereto will result in a measured magnetic strength value
which is less likely to be affected by the electromagnetic properties of the
part of the reference material at which each magnetic material is
attached.
On the other hand, in the second procedure, the electromagnetic
test output value obtained by performing electromagnetic test on each
magnetic material attached to the reference material is likely to be
affected by the electromagnetic properties of the part of the reference
material to which each magnetic material is attached, since, as described
above, a high frequency alternating magnetic field is applied in the
electromagnetic test. In this way, although the electromagnetic test
output value of each magnetic material is affected by the electromagnetic
properties of the part of the reference material to which each magnetic
material is attached, since each magnetic material is attached to a single
reference material, its effect is uniform and is not likely to vary among
electromagnetic test output values of each magnetic material. Moreover,
since the reference material has equivalent electromagnetic properties to
those of the test material (the base metal of the test material), the
electromagnetic test output value of each magnetic material is affected to
8
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specication, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
an equivalent degree as in the case where the test material is subjected to
an electromagnetic test. That is, the reference points of the
electromagnetic test output values of the respective magnetic materials
are substantially equal to each other, and also substantially coincide with
the reference point of electromagnetic test output value of the test
material.
Therefore, in a correspondence between the measured magnetic
strength value obtained by performing the first to third procedures and
the electromagnetic test output value, although the electromagnetic test
output value is affected by the electromagnetic properties of the reference
material (electromagnetic properties of the test material), the reference
point thereof stays substantially fixed.
[00131
Further, according to the present invention, by performing the
fourth and fifth procedures, a correspondence between the carburized
depth and the measured magnetic strength value is calculated. Here, for
example, "carburized depth" as used in the present invention can be
measured by cutting off each carburized material and performing
microstructure observation after measuring the magnetic strength, and
will not be affected by the electromagnetic properties of the base metal of
each carburized material.
On the other hand, in the fourth procedure, when measuring the
magnetic strength of each carburized material, if a ferrite meter that
applies an ultra-low frequency alternating magnetic field is used, the
measured magnetic strength value thereof is not likely to be affected by
9
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
the electromagnetic properties of the base metal of each carburized
material.
Therefore, the correspondence between the carburized depth and
the measured magnetic strength value obtained by performing the fourth
and fifth procedures is not likely to be affected by the electromagnetic
properties of the base metal of each carburized material, and thus by the
electromagnetic properties of the test material (the base metal of the test
material).
[00141
Further, according to the present invention, a threshold value of
the measured magnetic strength value corresponding to a threshold value
of the carburized depth to be sensed is determined by performing the
sixth procedure, and a threshold value of the electromagnetic test output
value corresponding to the threshold value of the measured magnetic
strength value, which is determined as described above, is determined by
performing the seventh procedure. That is, consequently, a threshold
value of the electromagnetic test output value corresponding to a
threshold value of the carburized depth to be sensed is determined in a
same fashion as in prior arts by performing the sixth and seventh
procedures.
In the present invention, however, in contrast to prior arts, first, in
the sixth procedure, a threshold value of the measured magnetic strength
value corresponding to a threshold value of the carburized depth to be
sensed is determined based on the correspondence between the
carburized depth and the measured magnetic strength value obtained in
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
=
Original Speccation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
the fifth procedure. Since the correspondence between the carburized
depth and the measured magnetic strength value obtained by the fifth
procedure is less likely to be affected by the electromagnetic properties of
the test material as described above, it is possible to accurately determine
a threshold value of the measured magnetic strength value corresponding
to the threshold value of the carburized depth to be sensed. Then, in the
seventh procedure, a threshold value of the electromagnetic test output
value corresponding to the threshold value of the measured magnetic
strength value determined in the sixth procedure is determined based on
the correspondence between the measured magnetic strength value and
the electromagnetic test output value obtained in the third procedure. In
the correspondence between the measured magnetic strength value and
the electromagnetic test output value obtained in the third procedure, as
described above, although the electromagnetic test output value is
affected by the electromagnetic properties of the test material, since its
reference point stays substantially fixed, it is possible to accurately
determine a threshold value of the electromagnetic test output value
corresponding to a threshold value of the measured magnetic strength
value.
Therefore, in the present invention, by performing the sixth and
seventh procedures, it is possible, in contrast to prior arts, to accurately
determine a threshold value of the electromagnetic test output value
corresponding to a threshold value of the carburized depth to be sensed.
[00151
11
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref MI-0479-CA
After performing the first to the seventh procedures, in the eighth
procedure, by sensing whether carburization occurs or not in the test
material based on the magnitude correlation between the electromagnetic
test output value obtained by performing the electromagnetic test on the
test material and the threshold value of the electromagnetic test output
value determined in the seventh procedure, it is possible to improve the
sensing accuracy.
[00161
It is noted that in the present invention, the first to the eighth
procedures need not necessarily be performed in this order, and for
example, it is also possible to first perform the fourth and the fifth
procedures, and then to perform the first to the third procedures.
[00171
In the above described first procedure, for example, any one of a
magnetic tape, a ferrite core which is inserted into a solenoid coil used for
electronic parts and flaw inspection, a cut out specimen of a magnetic
metal material such as iron may be attached to the above descried
reference material as the magnetic material.
[00181
Further, in the above described second and eighth procedures, it is
possible to perform an electromagnetic test by using a sensor that outputs
an absolute value signal or a sensor that outputs a differential signal.
The sensor that outputs an absolute value signal may be
exemplified by, for example, a configuration that includes a single
detection coil disposed near the test material and outputs a detection
12
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
signal at the detection coil, and a configuration that includes a pair of
detection coils, one of which is disposed near the test material and the
other is disposed near an object that serves as a standard, and outputs a
difference of detection signals at each detection coil. Moreover, the
sensor that outputs a differential signal may be exemplified by, for
example, a configuration that includes a pair of detection coils disposed
near the test material and outputs a difference between detection signals
at each detection coil.
[0019]
As so far described, according to the carburization sensing method
relating to the present invention, it is possible to accurately determine a
threshold value of the electromagnetic test output value corresponding to
a threshold value of the carburized depth to be sensed, and thereby
accurately sense whether carburization occurs or not.
[Brief Description of Drawings]
[0020]
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram to illustrate an outline
configuration of an eddy current test apparatus to be used for a
carburization sensing method relating to a first embodiment of the
present invention.
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram to illustrate the outline of an
example of a reference material to which magnetic materials are attached.
13
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram to represent an X signal and Y
signal outputted from the phase rotator, which is included in the eddy
current test apparatus shown in Figure 1, on an X-Y vector plane.
Figure 4 shows an example of the correspondence between a
measured magnetic strength value and an eddy current test output value,
which is calculated in the first embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 5 shows an example of the correspondence between a
carburized depth and a measured magnetic strength value, which is
calculated in the first embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 6 shows an example of the result of sensing whether
carburization occurs or not by a carburization sensing method relating to
the first embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 7 is a schematic diagram to illustrate the outline
configuration of an eddy current test apparatus to be used in the
carburization sensing method relating to the second embodiment of the
present invention.
Figure 8 is a schematic diagram in which an X signal and a Y signal
outputted from the phase rotator, which is included in the eddy current
test apparatus shown in Figure 7, are represented on an X-Y vector plane.
Figure 9 shows an example of the correspondence between the
measured magnetic strength value and the eddy current test output value
which are calculated in the second embodiment of the present invention.
14
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
Figure 10 shows an example of the result of sensing whether
carburization occurs or not by a carburization sensing method relating to
the second embodiment of the present invention.
[Description of Embodiments]
[0021]
Hereafter, referring to the appended drawings, embodiments of the
present invention will be described taking an example of a case in which
the test material a steel tube, and an eddy current test is performed as
the electromagnetic test.
[0022]
<First embodiment>
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram to illustrate an outline
configuration of an eddy current test apparatus to be used for a
carburization sensing method relating to a first embodiment of the
present invention.
As shown in Figure 1, an eddy current test apparatus 100 of the
present embodiment includes a detection sensor 1 and a signal processing
section 2.
[0023]
The detection sensor 1 is configured to apply an alternating
magnetic field to a steel tube P thereby inducing eddy current and detect
the eddy current induced in the steel tube P. To be specific, the detection
sensor 1 of the present embodiment includes an excitation coil that
applies an alternating magnetic field to the inserted steel tube P, and a
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specif cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref-'MI-0479-CA
single detection coil 11 that detects the eddy current induced in the
inserted steel tube P. The excitation coil and the detection coil 11 may be
provided separately, or the detection coil 11 may combine the function of
the excitation coil.
[0024]
The signal processing section 2 is configured to pass an alternating
current through the detection sensor 1 and sense whether carburization
occurs or not in the steel tube P (on the inner surface of the steel tube P)
based on a detection signal (an absolute value signal) outputted from the
detection sensor 1. To be specific, the signal processing section 2 of the
present embodiment includes an oscillator 21, an amplifier 22, a
synchronous wave detector 23, a phase rotator 24, an A/D converter 26,
and a determination section 27.
[0025]
The oscillator 21 supplies a high frequency alternating current to
the detection sensor 1 (specifically, the excitation coil of the detection
sensor 1). This causes an alternating magnetic field to be applied to the
steel tube P as described above, and eddy current is induced in the steel
tube P.
[0026]
An absolute value signal outputted from the detection sensor 1
(specifically, the detection coil 11 of the detection sensor 1) is amplified
by
the amplifier 22 and thereafter outputted to the synchronous wave
detector 23.
[0027]
16
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref" MI-0479-CA
The synchronous wave detector 23 performs synchronous wave
detection of the output signal of the amplifier 22 based on the reference
signal outputted from the oscillator 21. To be specific, a first reference
signal having the same frequency and the same phase as those of the
alternating current to be supplied to the detection sensor 1, and a second
reference signal of which phase is shifted by 900 from the phase of the
first reference signal are outputted from the oscillator 21 to the
synchronous wave detector 23. Then, the synchronous wave detector 23
separates and extracts a signal component (a first signal component) that
is in phase with the phase of the first reference signal and a signal
component (a second signal component) that is in phase with the phase of
the second reference signal. The separated and extracted first and
second signal components are outputted to the phase rotator 24,
respectively.
[0028]
The phase rotator 24 rotates (shifts) the phases of the first signal
component and the second signal component outputted from the
synchronous wave detector 23 by the same predetermined amount, and
outputs the first signal component as an X signal and the second signal
component as a Y signal to the A/D converter 26. It is noted that the X
signal and the Y signal that are outputted from the phase rotator 24
correspond to components of a signal waveform projected to the X axis
and the Y axis, respectively in an X-Y vector plane represented by two
mutually orthogonal axes (the X axis and Y axis), where the signal
waveform is so-called a Lissajous figure and used for flaw inspection (that
17
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
is, an absolute value signal waveform (to be precise, an absolute value
signal waveform after the amplification by the amplifier 22) of the
detection sensor 1 represented by a polar coordinate (Z, 0) where Z is
amplitude and 0 is phase).
[0029]
The A/D converter 26 performs A/D conversion of the output signal
of the phase rotator 24 and outputs it to the determination section 27.
[0030]
The determination section 27 senses whether carburization occurs
or not on the inner surface of the steel tube P based on the output data of
the A/D converter 26 (that is, digital data obtained through A/D
conversion of X signal and Y signal. Hereafter, referred to as X signal
data and Y signal data). To be specific, the determination section 27 of
the present embodiment compares the inputted X signal data with a
threshold value Th3 which is predetermined and stored as described
below, and determines that carburization has occurred on the inner
surface of the steel tube P if the X signal data exceeds the threshold value
Th3, and that carburization has not occurred on the inner surface of the
steel tube P if the X signal data is within the threshold value Th3.
[0031]
Hereafter, the method for determining the above described
threshold value Th3 will be described.
When determining the above described threshold value Th3, the
first to the seventh procedures to be described below will be performed.
[0032]
18
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Spec cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
(1) First procedure
A material that has equivalent electromagnetic properties to those
of the steel tube P (the base metal of the steel tube P) which is the test
material and is not carburized is selected as a reference material P0. To
be specific, a steel tube having the same constituents and dimensions
(outer diameter and inner diameter) in terms of design specification as
those of the test material is selected as the reference material P0. Then,
at least three magnetic materials each having a different magnetic
strength are attached to a target surface for carburization sensing (the
inner surface in the present embodiment) of the reference material P0.
[00331
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram to illustrate the outline of an
example of a reference material PO to which magnetic materials are
attached. In the example shown in Figure 2, magnetic tapes M1 to M4
each having a different number of windings are used as the magnetic
material. Each magnetic tape M1 to M4 is inserted into a different
location on the inner surface of the reference material PO and attached
thereto.
[00341
(2) Second procedure
(2-1) Measurement of magnetic strength of magnetic material
Next, the magnetic strength of each magnetic tape M1 to M4 that is
attached to the reference material PO in the first procedure is measured.
To be specific, a ferrite meter is oppositely disposed to the outer surface of
the reference material PO corresponding to the part where each magnetic
19
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Spec cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref" MI-0479-CA
tape Ml to M4 is inserted and the magnetic strength (amount of ferrite)
of each magnetic tape Ml to M4 is measured by the ferrite meter.
[0035]
Table 1 shows an example of the result of measuring the magnetic
strength of each magnetic tape M1 to M4 that is attached to the reference
material PO as described above. It is noted that in the example shown in
Table 1, the magnetic strength is measured by using a ferrite meter
which applies an alternating magnetic field of 10 Hz to the reference
material P0.
[Table 1]
'M1a gne is tae Number of windings(T) Magnetic stren h Fe%)
M' 5 0.035
M2 10 0.045
M3 30 0.060
M4 50 0.067
[0036]
(2-2) Acquisition of eddy current test output value of magnetic
material
On the other hand, the above described eddy current test apparatus
100 is used to perform an eddy current test on the reference material PO
attached with magnetic tapes Ml to M4, and thereby eddy current test
output values of each magnetic tape M1 to M4 are acquired. Hereafter,
this procedure will be described with reference to Figures 1 and 3.
[0037]
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram to represent an X signal and Y
signal outputted from the phase rotator 24, which is included in the eddy
current test apparatus 100 shown in Figure 1, on an X-Y vector plane.
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Spec cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
When acquiring eddy current test output values of each magnetic
tape M1 to M4, first, in a state in which the reference material PO is not
inserted into the detection sensor 1, the balancing quantity of a balance
circuit (not shown) which is disposed in the preceding stage of the
amplifier 22 is adjusted such that the X signal and the Y signal become
zero (such that a spot corresponding to the front edge of a vector of which
X axis component and Y axis component are the X signal and the Y signal,
respectively is located at a balance point (an origin point) shown in Figure
3) so that the first signal component and the second signal component,
which are outputted from the synchronous wave detector 23, are zero,
respectively.
[00381
Next, a part of the reference material PO to which magnetic tapes
M1 to M4 are not attached is inserted into the detection sensor 1 and
halted thereat, and the amplification factor of the amplifier 22 and the
phase rotation amount of the phase rotator 24 are adjusted such that the
X signal is zero and the Y signal is a predetermined voltage (for example,
5V) (such that the front edge of a vector is located at the reference point
shown in Figure 3).
[00391
After the above described adjustment is performed in advance, the
reference material PO is moved in the axial direction such that each part
of the reference material PO to which the magnetic tapes M1 to M4 are
attached is successively inserted into the detection sensor 1 and is
successively halted with each part being inserted into the detection
21
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
sensor 1, so that X signal data and Y signal data corresponding to each
part are acquired. It is noted that as shown in Figure 3, although the
position of the front edge of the vector varies depending on the magnetic
strength of each magnetic tape Ml to M4, the amount of variation is
larger in the X axis direction than in the Y axis direction. For this
reason, in the present embodiment, X signal data out of the X signal data
and the Y signal data acquired as described above is used as the eddy
current test output value of each magnetic tape MI to M4.
[0040]
(3) Third procedure
Next, based on the measured magnetic strength values (see Table
1) and the eddy current test output values of each magnetic tape MI to
M4 obtained in the above described second procedure, a correspondence
between the measured magnetic strength value and the eddy current test
output value as shown in Figure 4 is calculated. It is noted that the eddy
current test output value of the example shown in Figure 4 is a value
obtained by performing an eddy current test by supplying an alternating
current of 1 kHz to the detection sensor 1.
[0041]
In the correspondence (see Figure 4) between the measured
magnetic strength value and the eddy current test output value, which is
obtained by performing the first to the third procedures described above,
although the eddy current test output value will be affected by the
electromagnetic properties of the reference material PO (the
22
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Speccation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
electromagnetic properties of the steel tube P which is the test material),
the reference point thereof (see Figure 3) stays substantially fixed.
[0042]
(4) Fourth procedure
On the other hand, the magnetic strength is measured on a
plurality of carburized materials each having a different carburized depth.
To be specific, a plurality of steel tubes (carburized materials) which are
expected to have respectively different carburized depths on the inner
surface are prepared. Then, similarly as in the case in which the
magnetic strength of each magnetic tape M1 to M4 attached to the
reference material PO is measured in the above described second
procedure, a ferrite meter is disposed oppositely to the outer surface of
the carburized material and the magnetic strength (ferrite value) of each
carburized material is measured by the ferrite meter. It is noted that, as
the carburized material, it is preferable to select a steel tube which is
identical in the dimensions (outer diameter and inner diameter) in terms
of design specification to the reference material P0. Since this will
facilitate the matching of the distance between the ferrite meter and the
carburized material with the distance between the ferrite meter and the
inner surface of the reference material PO in the second procedure, the
measurement condition for the magnetic strength in the second and the
fourth procedures is more likely to be constant, and thus it is expected to
achieve improved measurement accuracy.
[0043]
23
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref MI-0479-CA
Then, actual carburized depth of each carburized material is
measured by cutting off each carburized material of which magnetic
strength has been measured, and performing microstructure observation
thereof.
[00441
Table 2 shows an example of the result of measuring the carburized
depth and the magnetic strength of each carburized material as described
above. It is noted that the magnetic strength shown in Table 2 is
measured by using the same ferrite meter as used in the measurement of
the example shown in Table 1 described above.
[Table 21
!Carburized material Carburized depth ( m)) Magnetic strength (z'el,;)
Nail 0 0.05
Not 0 0.04
No3 5 0.15
No4 15 0.19
[00451
(5) Fifth procedure
Next, based on the carburized depths and the measured magnetic
strength value of each carburized material (see Table 2) obtained in the
above described fourth procedure, a correspondence between the
carburized depth and the measured magnetic strength value as shown in
Figure 5 is calculated.
[00461
The correspondence (see Figure 5) between the carburized depth
and the measured magnetic strength value obtained by performing the
above described fourth and fifth procedures is less likely to be affected by
24
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Spec cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref MI-0479-CA
the electromagnetic properties of the base metal of each carburized
material, and therefore by the electromagnetic properties of the steel tube
P (the base metal of the steel tube P) which is the test material.
[0047]
(6) Sixth procedure
Next, based on the correspondence (see Figure 5) between the
carburized depth and the measured magnetic strength value obtained by
the above described fifth procedure, a threshold value Th2 of the
measured magnetic strength value corresponding to a threshold value
Thl of the carburized depth to be sensed is determined. In the example
shown in Figure 5, supposing that the threshold value Thl of the
carburized depth to be sensed is Thl = 0 ( m), the threshold value Th2 of
the measured magnetic strength value corresponding to this is given as
Th2 = 0.05 (Fe%).
[0048]
(7) Seventh procedure
Lastly, based on correspondence between the measured magnetic
strength value and the eddy current test output value (see Figure 4)
obtained in the above described third procedure, the threshold value Th3
of the eddy current test output value corresponding to the threshold value
Th2 of the measured magnetic strength value determined in the sixth
procedure is determined. In the example shown in Figure 4, the
threshold value Th3 of the eddy current test output value corresponding
to the threshold value Th2 = 0.05 (Fe%) of the measured magnetic
strength value determined as described above is given as Th3 = -1 M.
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
[0049]
As described so far, the threshold value Th3 is determined and, as
described above, is stored in the determination section 27 in advance.
[00501
It is noted that performing the sixth and the seventh procedures
will result in that the threshold value Th3 of the eddy current test output
value corresponding to the threshold value Thl of the carburized depth to
be sensed is determined, as in prior arts.
According to the method relating to the present embodiment,
however, first in the sixth procedure, based on the correspondence
between the carburized depth and the measured magnetic strength value
as shown in Figure 5, a threshold value Th2 of the measured magnetic
strength value corresponding to a threshold value Thl of the carburized
depth to be sensed is determined. Since the correspondence between the
carburized depth and the measured magnetic strength value as shown in
Figure 5 is not likely to be affected by the electromagnetic properties of
the steel tube P, which is the test material, as described above, it is
possible to accurately determine the threshold value Th2 of the measured
magnetic strength value corresponding to the threshold value Thl of the
carburized depth to be sensed. Then, in the seventh procedure, based on
the correspondence between the measured magnetic strength value and
the eddy current test output value as shown in Figure 4, a threshold
value Th3 of the eddy current test output value corresponding to the
threshold value Th2 of the measured magnetic strength value is
determined. In the correspondence between the measured magnetic
26
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Speccation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
strength value and the eddy current test output value as shown in Figure
4, although the eddy current test output value is affected by the
electromagnetic properties of the steel tube P which is the test material
as described above, since the reference point thereof stays substantially
fixed, it is possible to accurately determine the threshold value Th3 of the
eddy current test output value corresponding to the threshold value Th2
of the measured magnetic strength value.
Therefore, in the method relating to the present embodiment, by
performing the sixth and the seventh procedures, it is possible, in
contrast to prior arts, to accurately determine the threshold value Th3 of
the eddy current test output value corresponding to the threshold value
Thl of the carburized depth to be sensed.
[0051]
The determination section 27 compares the eddy current test
output value (X signal data) which is inputted from the A/D converter 26
with the threshold value Th3, and if the eddy current test output value
exceeds the threshold value Th3 (if it is less than -1 V in the example
shown in Figure 4), determines that a carburization has occurred on the
inner surface of the steel tube P. On the other hand, if the eddy current
test output value is within the threshold value Th3 (if it is not less than -
1 V in the example shown in Figure 4), the determination section 27
determines that carburization has not occurred on the inner surface of
the steel tube P. As described above, in the method relating to the
present embodiment, since the threshold value Th3 of the eddy current
test output value which serves as the criterion for determining whether
27
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
carburization occurs or not is determined more accurately than in prior
arts, it is possible to accurately sense whether carburization occurs or not.
[00521
Figure 6 shows an example of the result of sensing whether
carburization occurs or not of the steel tube P which is the test material
by using the threshold value Th3 that is determined as described above.
As shown in Figure 6, it is seen that by using the threshold value Th3 as
the determination criterion, it is possible to accurately sense whether
carburization occurs or not.
[00531
<Second embodiment>
In the carburization sensing method relating to the present
embodiment, the configuration of the eddy current test apparatus to be
used is different from that of the first embodiment. Because of this,
although the procedure of acquiring the eddy current test output value of
the magnetic material is different from that of the first embodiment,
other procedures are the same as those of the first embodiment.
Hereafter, description will focus on points different from the first
embodiment.
[00541
Figure 7 is a schematic diagram to illustrate the outline
configuration of an eddy current test apparatus to be used in the
carburization sensing method relating to the second embodiment of the
present invention.
28
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
As shown in Figure 7, the eddy current test apparatus 100A of the
present embodiment also includes a detection sensor 1A and a signal
processing section 2A, as with the eddy current test apparatus 100 of the
first embodiment.
[00551
The detection sensor IA of the present embodiment is also
configured to induce eddy current by applying an alternating magnetic
field to the steel tube P and to detect the eddy current induced in the
steel tube P. However, a specific configuration of the detection sensor 1A
is different from the detection sensor 1 of the first embodiment. The
detection sensor IA of the present embodiment includes an excitation coil
that applies an alternating magnetic field to the steel tube P inserted
therethrough, and a pair of detection coils 11 a and llb that detect the
eddy current induced in the steel tube P that is inserted therethrough.
The detection sensor IA is configured to output a difference between
detection signals at each detection coils 1la and l lb (a differential
signal).
The excitation coil and detection coils I la and lib may be provided as
separate bodies, or the detection coils l la and l lb may combine the
function of the excitation coil.
[00561
The signal processing section 2A is configured to pass an
alternating current through the detection sensor lA and sense whether
carburization occurs or not in the steel tube P (on the inner surface of the
steel tube P). To be specific, the signal processing section 2A of the
present embodiment includes a high-pass filter 25 that removes
29
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specification, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref MI-0479-CA
predetermined low frequency components from an X signal and a Y signal
outputted from the phase rotator 24, and outputs them to an A/D
converter 26. Since the signal processing section 2A of the present
embodiment has the same configuration as that of the signal processing
section 2 of the first embodiment excepting that it includes the high-pass
filter 25, detailed description thereof will be omitted herein.
[00571
The determination section 27, which is included in the signal
processing section 2A of the present embodiment, as well compares the X
signal data inputted from the A/D converter 26 with the threshold value
Th3 that is predetermined and stored, and if the X signal data exceeds
the threshold value Th3, it determines that carburization has occurred on
the inner surface of the steel tube P, and if the X signal data is within the
threshold value Th3, it determines that carburization has not occurred on
the inner surface of the steel tube P.
[00581
Hereafter, the method for determining threshold value Th3 in the
present embodiment will be described.
The point where when determining the above described threshold
value Th3, the above described first procedure (the procedure of attaching
magnetic tapes M1 to M4 to a reference material P0) is performed is the
same as in the first embodiment. Moreover, in the above described
second procedure, the point where the procedure of measuring the
magnetic strength of each magnetic tape Ml to M4 attached to the
reference material PO by a ferrite meter is performed is the same as in
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Spec cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
the first embodiment. By performing the above described procedures, it
is possible to obtain the result as shown in Table 1 described above.
[0059]
In the present embodiment, however, the content of the procedure
of acquiring the eddy current test output value of each magnetic tape Ml
to M4 attached to the reference material PO in the above described second
procedure is different from that of the first embodiment. Hereafter, this
different procedure will be described with reference to Figures 7 and 8.
[0060]
Figure 8 is a schematic diagram in which an X signal and a Y
signal outputted from the phase rotator 24, which is included in the eddy
current test apparatus 100A shown in Figure 7, are represented on an X-
Y vector plane.
When acquiring eddy current test output values of each magnetic
tape Ml to M4, first, the reference material PO is halted in a state where
a part of the reference material PO to which the magnetic tapes Ml to M4
are not attached is being inserted both through the detection coils 1la
and 1 lb of the detection sensor 1, and the balancing quantity of a balance
circuit (not shown) disposed in the preceding stage of the amplifier 22 is
adjusted such that the X signal and the Y signal become zero (such that a
spot corresponding to the front edge of a vector of which X axis component
and Y axis component are the X signal and the Y signal, respectively is
located at a balance point (an origin point) shown in Figure 8) so that the
first signal component and the second signal component, which are
outputted from the synchronous wave detector 23, are zero, respectively.
31
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Specication, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref-'M1- 0479-CA
[0061]
Next, after the reference material PO is drawn out from the
detection coils I la and llb, the reference material PO is moved in the
axial direction again, and the amplification factor of the amplifier 22 and
the phase rotation amount of the phase rotator 24 are adjusted such that
a signal waveform (an end portion signal shown in Figure 8), which is a
locus of the spot obtained when the end of the reference material PO
successively passes through the detection coils I la and l lb, is
substantially symmetrical with respect to the Y axis, and the Y axis
component becomes a predetermined voltage (for example, 5 V).
[0062]
After performing the above described adjustment in advance, the
reference material PO is moved in the axial direction such that each part
of the reference material PO to which the magnetic tapes M1 to M4 are
attached is successively inserted into the detection sensor 1 to acquire X
signal data and Y signal data corresponding to each part. It is noted that
as shown in Figure 8, although the front edge position of a vector varies
with a balance point being as a reference point depending on the
magnetic strength of each magnetic tape Ml to M4, the amount of
variation is larger in the X axis direction than in the Y axis direction.
For this reason, in the present embodiment as well, out of the X signal
data and the Y signal data which are acquired as described above, the X
signal data is used as the eddy current test output value of each magnetic
tape M 1 to M4.
[0063]
32
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Spec cation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref MI-0479-CA
The point where after the procedure of acquiring the eddy current
test output value of each magnetic tape M1 to M4 attached to the
reference material PO is performed as described above, the above
described third procedure (the procedure of calculating the
correspondence between the measured magnetic strength value and the
eddy current test output value) is performed is the same as in the first
embodiment. Figure 9 shows an example of the correspondence between
the measured magnetic strength value and the eddy current test output
value which are calculated in the present embodiment. It is noted that
the eddy current test output value shown in Figure 9 is the value
obtained by performing the eddy current test by supplying an alternating
current of 10 kHz to the detection sensor 1A.
[0064]
The point where when determining the threshold value Th3 of the
present embodiment, besides the procedures as described above, the
above described fourth procedure (the procedure of measuring the
magnetic strength on a plurality of carburized materials), the fifth
procedure (the procedure of calculating the correspondence between the
carburized depth and the measured magnetic strength value), the sixth
procedure (the procedure of determining the threshold value Th2 of the
measured magnetic strength value corresponding to the threshold value
Th1 of the carburized depth to be sensed), and the seventh procedure (the
procedure of determining the threshold value Th3 of the eddy current test
output value corresponding to threshold value Th2 of the measured
magnetic strength value) are performed is the same as in the first
33
CA 02753424 2011-08-23
Original Speccation, Claims, Abstract and Drawings
Our Ref' MI-0479-CA
embodiment. In the example shown in Figure 9, the threshold value Th3
of the eddy current test output value corresponding to the threshold value
Th2 of the measured magnetic strength value Th2 = 0.05% (Fe%) is given
as Th3 = 2.5 M.
[0065]
Figure 10 shows an example of the result of sensing whether
carburization occurs or not of a steel tube P which is the test material by
using the threshold value Th3 obtained as described above. It is revealed
as shown in Figure 10 that by using the threshold value Th3 as the
determination criterion, it is possible to accurately sense whether
carburization occurs or not.
34
