Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
FLUID RHEOLOGY MEASUREMENT USING A FUNNEL
APPARATUS
BACKGROUND
Field of the Invention
[0001] Embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to apparatuses and
methods for
determining fluid rheology. More specifically, embodiments disclosed herein
relate
to apparatuses and methods for automatically determining fluid rheology at a
drilling
or waste injection location. Additionally, embodiments disclosed herein relate
to
apparatuses and methods for determining fluid rheology using Marsh funnels and
Simplex Method algorithms.
Background Art
[0002] When drilling or completing wells in earth formations, various fluids
typically
are used in the well for a variety of reasons. Common uses for well fluids
include:
lubrication and cooling of drill bit cutting surfaces while drilling generally
or drilling-
in (i. e., drilling in a targeted petroliferous formation), transportation of
"cuttings"
(pieces of formation dislodged by the cutting action of the teeth on a drill
bit) to the
surface, controlling formation fluid pressure to prevent blowouts, maintaining
well
stability, suspending solids in the well, minimizing fluid loss into and
stabilizing the
formation through which the well is being drilled, fracturing the formation in
the
vicinity of the well, displacing the fluid within the well with another fluid,
cleaning
the well, testing the well, transmitting hydraulic horsepower to the drill
bit, fluid used
for emplacing a packer, abandoning the well or preparing the well for
abandonment,
and otherwise treating the well or the formation.
[0003] Drilling fluid takes the form of a "mud," i.e., a liquid having solids
suspended
therein. The solids function to impart desired rheological properties to the
drilling
fluid and also to increase the density thereof in order to provide a suitable
hydrostatic
pressure at the bottom of the well.
[0004] Drilling fluids are generally characterized as thixotropic fluid
systems. That
is, they exhibit low viscosity when sheared, such as when in circulation (as
occurs
during pumping or contact with the moving drilling bit). However, when the
shearing
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
action is halted, the fluid should be capable of suspending the solids
contained therein
to prevent gravity separation. In addition, when the drilling fluid is under
shear
conditions and a free-flowing near-liquid, it must retain a sufficiently high
viscosity to
carry all unwanted particulate matter from the bottom of the well bore to the
surface.
The drilling fluid formulation should also allow the cuttings and other
unwanted
particulate material to be removed or otherwise settle out from the liquid
fraction.
This is also true for solid waste (i.e., drill cuttings) slurry injection
operations. That is,
the slurry must have adequate rheological properties to suspend and carry the
cuttings
and/or other solid particles to avoid settling and thus loss of injectivity of
the injection
well.
[0005] There is an increasing need for drilling fluids having the rheological
profiles
that enable wells to be drilled more easily. Drilling fluids having tailored
rheological
properties ensure that cuttings are removed from the wellbore as efficiently
and
effectively as possible to avoid the formation of cuttings beds in the well
which can
cause the drill string to become stuck, among other issues. There is also the
need
from a drilling fluid hydraulics perspective (equivalent circulating density)
to reduce
the pressures required to circulate the fluid, reducing the exposure of the
formation to
excessive forces that can fracture the formation causing the fluid, and
possibly the
well, to be lost. In addition, an enhanced rheological profile is necessary to
prevent
settlement or sag of the weighting agent in the fluid. If this occurs it can
lead to an
uneven density profile within the circulating fluid system which can result in
well
control (gas/fluid influx) and wellbore stability problems (caving/fractures).
[0006] In waste (e.g., drill cuttings) injection operations, if the cutting
slurry does not
have adequate solid suspension capacity, the solids (i.e., drill cuttings) may
settle out
of the slurry and accumulate at the bottom of the well, and the injection well
may
become inoperable from loss of injectivity. This can happen in a matter of
hours, and
therefore, real-time measuring of the slurry or fluid during drill cuttings or
solid waste
slurry injection operations should be considered when performing such
operations.
[0007] To obtain the fluid characteristics required to meet these challenges
the fluid
must be easy to pump, so it requires the minimum amount of pressure to force
it
through restrictions in the circulating fluid system, such as bit nozzles or
down-hole
2
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
tools. In other words the fluid must have the lowest possible viscosity under
high
shear conditions. Conversely, in zones of the well where the area for fluid
flow is
large and the velocity of the fluid is slow or where there are low shear
conditions, the
viscosity of the fluid needs to be as high as possible in order to suspend and
transport
the drill cuttings. This also applies to the periods when the fluid is left
static in the
hole, where both cuttings and weighting materials need to be suspended to
prevent the
settlement thereof. However, it should also be noted that the viscosity of the
fluid
should not continue to increase under static conditions to unacceptable
levels.
Otherwise when the fluid needs to be circulated again, this can lead to
excessive
pressures that can fracture the formation or lead to lost time if the force
required to
regain a fully circulating fluid system is beyond the limits of the pumps.
[0008] In order to determine the rheology of a particular fluid, various field
techniques have been used. For example, viscometers have been used to
determine
the viscosity of fluids in the field; however, such methods of determining
viscosity are
often slow and require manual attention. Other times, drilling fluid engineers
or
injection engineers are dispatched to drilling or waste injection locations to
take
manual measurements of fluids used in a drilling or solid waste slurry
injection
operation in order to determine the properties of specific drilling fluids or
solid waste
slurries; however, such methods are often expensive and are not convenient for
real-
time measurement, depending on the drilling or injection location.
[0009] Accordingly, there exists a continuing need for apparatuses and methods
for
determining fluid rheology in real-time.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0010] In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to methods for
determining
fluid rheology, the methods including determining a first discharged volume or
weight of a fluid at a first time, determining at least a second discharged
volume or
weight of the fluid at a second time, and calculating fluid rheology based on
the
determined first and at least second discharged fluid volumes or weights at
the first
and second times.
3
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
[0011] In another aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a system for
determining fluid rheology including a Marsh funnel having a fluid inlet and a
fluid
outlet disposed in a housing, a measuring cup disposed in fluid communication
with
the fluid outlet of the Marsh funnel, a weight measurement device disposed
proximate the measuring cup and configured to determine a weight of the
measuring
cup, and a logic controller in operative communication with the Marsh funnel,
the
measuring cup, and the weight measurement device, wherein the logic controller
is
configured to determine the weight of the fluid in the measuring fluid at a
time
interval.
[0012] In another aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a method for
automated fluid rheology calculation at a drilling or injection location, the
method
including, injecting a fluid into a Marsh funnel of an automated fluid
rheology
system, wherein the automated fluid rheology system comprises the Marsh funnel
having an inlet and an outlet, a measuring cup in fluid communication with the
outlet, and a logic controller; opening the outlet of the marsh funnel;
determining a
first volume or weight of fluid that passed from the Marsh funnel into the
measuring
cup at a first time interval; determining a second volume or weight of a fluid
that
passed from the Marsh funnel into the measuring cup at a second time;
transmitting
the first and second volumes or weights at the respective first and second
time
intervals to the logic controller; and calculating fluid rheology for the
fluid based on
the transmitted first and second volumes or weights at the respective first
and second
time intervals.
[0013] In another aspect, embodiments of disclosed herein relate to a method
for
modeling fluid flow, the method including, inputting density and rheology
parameters; simulating fluid flow through a Marsh funnel, wherein the
simulating
includes, calculating a fluid height as a volume or weight of a fluid is
discharged;
calculating a velocity of the fluid corresponding to the calculated fluid
height;
calculating a time value for the velocity; determining funnel times
corresponding to
the simulated volumes or weights; and outputting the Marsh funnel times.
[0014] Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the
following description and the appended claims.
4
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0015] Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a Marsh funnel according to
embodiments of the present disclosure.
[0016] Figure 2 is a schematic representation of a fluid rheology measurement
system
according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
[0017] Figure 3 is a flow chart of a method for calculating Marsh funnel time
according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
[0018] Figure 4 is a schematic representation of a computer system according
to
embodiments of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0019] In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to
apparatuses
and methods for determining fluid rheology. In other aspects, embodiments
disclosed herein relate to apparatuses and methods for automatically
determining
fluid rheology at a drilling or waste injection location. In still other
aspects,
embodiments disclosed herein relate to apparatuses and methods for determining
fluid rheology using Marsh funnels and Simplex Method algorithms.
[0020] In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein allow the precise and
quantified
characterization of fluid rheology using measurement from a funnel. Fluid
rheology
measurement from funnels, such as a Marsh funnel, previously only provided a
quality check for fluid rheology. Quantified fluid rheology measurements are
often
made using rotational rheology apparatuses. However, embodiments of the
present
disclosure may allow for quantitatively obtaining the rheological parameters
from
funnel measurements.
[0021] The ability to characterize fluid rheology of drilling fluids may allow
fluids
used in drilling operations to be optimized for particular drilling
conditions. In
addition to drilling fluids, various other fluids are used during completion,
production, workover and waste injection operations. Thus, the ability to
characterize fluid rheology of various types of fluids associated with wells
may
increase the productivity and value of wells over the life of the wells. As
used
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
herein, fluids refer generally to any type of fluid or slurry that may be used
with a
well, including, but not limited to, drilling fluids, completion fluid,
workover fluids,
and solid waste injection slurries. Those of ordinary skill in the art will
appreciate
that other fluids, which may benefit from rheology optimization may also
benefit
from the apparatuses and methods disclosed herein.
[00221 Referring to Figure 1, a schematic representation of a standard API
(American
Petroleum Institute) Marsh funnel according to embodiments of the present
disclosure is shown. Generally, a Marsh funnel 100 is an inverted cone 101
with an
orifice tube connection (outlet) 102 located at the bottom of the cone 101.
Marsh
funnels typically have a top diameter 103 of approximately 152.4 mm with an
outlet
104 having a diameter of approximately 4.76 mm. Marsh funnel 100 may also have
a screen 105 near the top of cone 101 so that as fluids are injected into the
Marsh
funnel 100, solids that may block the flow of fluids through outlet 104 are
removed.
As fluids are initially injected into Marsh funnel 100, the fluids may be
filled to
particular height of cone 101, such as an initial fluid height 106. However,
the
invention is not limited to the above API-specific funnel dimensions.
[00231 Typically during use of a Marsh funnel 100, an engineer fills cone 101
to an
initial fluid height 106 while blocking the fluid from exiting cone 101
through outlet
104 with a finger. Then, while starting a manual stop watch, the engineer
removes
the finger from blocking outlet 104, and times the flow of fluid out of Marsh
funnel
100 until one quart of fluid exits outlet 104. The engineer then manually
stops the
stop watch and records the time it takes for one quart of fluid to exit Marsh
funnel
100 as a Marsh funnel viscosity.
[00241 Referring to Figure 2, a schematic representation of a fluid rheology
system
according to embodiments of the present disclosure is shown. In this
embodiment,
system 200 includes a Marsh funnel 201 and a measuring cup 202 disposed in a
housing 203. Marsh funnel 201 may be typical of the Marsh funnel 100 described
in
detail in Figure 1, or in alternate embodiments may include additional screens
(not
shown), be configured to house more fluid, or be a different dimension. As
illustrated, Marsh funnel 201 has an inlet 204 and an outlet 205, wherein
inlet 204 is
6
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
configured to receive a flow of fluids and outlet 205 is in fluid
communication with
measuring cup 202.
[0025] In certain embodiments, inlet 204 may be configured to received a flow
of
fluids from a fluid supply line 206, which transfers fluids from a fluid
mixing
location (not shown) or transfers fluids that have returned from the wellbore
(not
shown). Thus, the fluids received from fluid supply line 206 may be new or
used
drilling fluids, completion fluids, workover fluids or solid waste injection
slurries.
In certain embodiments the fluids may be transferred from fluid supply line
206 to
Marsh funnel 201 in batches, while in other embodiments, the flow of fluids
may be
substantially continuous. As such, properties of the fluids may be measured
substantially continuously or as required, such as in batches.
[0026] As the fluids enter Marsh funnel 201, the fluids are allowed to fill
the Marsh
funnel 201 to a certain height, such as an initial fluid height, or until a
predetermined
fluid level is reached. When the appropriate fluid level is reached, the flow
of fluids
into Marsh funnel 201 may be stopped by, for example, closing a valve on fluid
supply line 206. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the
valve may
be closed manually or automatically in response to a signal sent from system
200 to
a valve (not shown), such as an electro-mechanical valve.
[0027] After the Marsh funnel 201 is filled to an initial height, outlet 205
is opened,
and fluid in Marsh funnel 201 is allowed to flow from Marsh funnel 201 into
measuring cup 202. As outlet 205 is opened a timer may be started so that the
time
it takes for a particular volume of fluid to flow from Marsh funnel 201 to
measuring
cup 202 may be determined. As the fluid continues to flow from Marsh funnel
201
into measuring cup 202, additional time increments may be recorded and
associated
with a particular weight of fluid flowing out of Marsh funnel 201.
[0028] The weight of the fluid in measuring cup 202 at a particular time may
also
be determined by a weight measurement device 207. As illustrated, weight
measurement device 207 may be a scale, load cell, or other device located
below
measuring cup 202. However, in other embodiments, weight measurement device
may be any other type of measuring device capable of determining a weight of a
fluid in measuring cup 202.
7
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
[0029] As the weight of the fluid in measuring cup 202 is recorded at a
particular time
interval, both the weight measurement (which may be converted into volume
using
density of the tested fluid) and the time may be transferred to logic
controller 208.
Logic controller 208 may be a programmable logic controller, data recording
device,
personal computer, or any other type of logic controller capable of receiving
data
from other components of system 200. As illustrated, logic controller 208 may
be
operatively connected to measuring cup 202 or weight measurement device 207
via
data transmission lines 209. Additionally, logic controller 208 may be
remotely
connected to a remote communication network via wired lines (not shown) or
through a wireless communication network 210.
[0030] Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that remote access
to logic
controller 208 may be achieved through, for example, modems, routers, or other
components capable of sending and receiving signals over a wired or wireless
network. Additionally, in certain embodiments, logic controller 208 may be
operatively connected to a drilling or waste injection management system, such
that
data may be sent and received therefrom. Logic controller 208 may also include
the
operative ability to process the data received from measuring cup 202, weight
measuring device 207, or other components of system 200. Such processing may
include calculating a fluid rheology of the fluid based on the measured fluid
volume
or weight and time calculations, according to the methods described in detail
below.
In still other embodiments, the data captured by logic controller 208 may be
transmitted to a remote processing location for determination of the fluid
rheology.
If the fluid rheology is determined at a remote location, the calculated
rheology may
be transmitted back to logic controller 208 and subsequently displayed.
Whether the
rheology is calculated locally or remotely, system 200 may have a display (not
shown) capable of displaying the raw data, calculated rheology, or other
aspects of
the measurement. For example, in certain embodiments, system 200 may include a
display that shows a drilling or injection engineer a plurality of
measurements taken
during the test or a plurality of calculations. Additionally, the display may
include a
touch screen, or be configured to receive user inputs, such that data or the
measurement may be manipulated by a user. Examples of user manipulation may
include inputting particular variables, modifying the measurement, instructing
8
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
system 200 to perform a calibration, or various other operations that may be
used in
determining fluid rheology. In still other embodiments, additional sensors,
such as
pressure, temperature, pycnometer (specific gravity) or flow rate sensors may
also
be operatively connected to logic controller 208, thereby allow for additional
variables that may affect fluid rheology to be determined.
[0031] After a first rheology is determined, system 200 may be cleaned, such
that
additional rheology measurements may be obtained. In order to clean system
200,
all fluid in Marsh funnel 201 may be transferred to measuring cup 202, whereby
the
fluid may be transferred out of system 200. Examples of removing fluid from
system 200 may include opening an outlet (not shown) in measuring cup 202,
thereby allowing the residual fluid to exit system 200. After the fluid has
been
removed from system 200, or in certain embodiments contemporaneous to removing
the fluid from system 200, a cleaning fluid may be injected into Marsh funnel
201
through cleaning fluid port 211. As the cleaning fluid enters Marsh funnel
201, the
fluid may be circulated in Marsh funnel 201, transferred to measuring cup 202,
and
then allowed to drain out, or be positively evacuated from measuring cup 202.
In
certain embodiments, the cleaning fluid may be vacuumed out of measuring cup
202
or a positive flow of air may be provide into Marsh funnel 201 or measuring
cup 202
to facilitate the evacuation of residual fluid and/or cleaning fluid. Examples
of
fluids that may be used to clean system 200 include water, surfactants, oils,
or other
types of cleaning fluid depending on the type of fluids being tested.
[0032] In certain embodiments, after system 200 is cleaned, system 200 may
require
calibration. Calibration of system 200 may occur by injecting a specific
volume of a
fluid with a known viscosity or rheology into Marsh funnel 201, and then
performing a test as described above. Depending on the embodiment, the
calibration
fluid may be water, an oil, or another fluid with known rheology and density
properties, and may be injected through cleaning fluid port 211, fluid supply
line
206, or through a calibration fluid port (not shown). After cleaning and/or
calibration, if required, a second fluid may be measured by repeating the
measurement steps detailed above.
9
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
[0033] Calculating Fluid Rheology Properties from Measured Marsh Funnel
Data
[0034] During operation, rheology of a particular fluid may be calculated by
determining a first discharged volume or weight of a fluid at a first time
interval and
determining a second discharged weight for the same fluid at a second time
interval.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the first and second
time
intervals may be spaced apart according to the type of fluid being tested, and
as
such, in certain aspects the time intervals may be seconds apart, while in
other
aspects, the time intervals may be several tens of seconds apart. After the
first and
second fluid volumes or weights at first and second respective time intervals
are
determined, the fluid rheology may be calculated. Those of ordinary skill in
the art
will realize that embodiments of the present application may determine two or
more
volumes or weights at respective time intervals, and the more data points
taken, the
more accurate the resultant model may become. Thus, a series of data points
may be
obtained and used in the calculation. In certain embodiments, substantially
continuous measurements may occur, thereby maximizing the number of data
points
obtained for a specific calculation. In certain embodiments, the measurements
may
occur in about one second intervals, however, in other embodiments,
measurements
may occur in fractions of a second or every few seconds.
[0035] In certain aspects, prior to calculating the fluid rheology, the first
and second
discharged fluid volumes or weights at respective time intervals may be
converted to
respective first and second heights in funnel. By converting the volumes and
weights to heights, the fluid rheology calculation may be implemented using
optimization algorithms, e.g. Simplex Method. Simplex Method may be used to
find the minima point of an objective function, thereby allowing for a more
accurate
calculation of fluid rheology. In accordance with embodiments of the present
disclosure, in certain embodiments, the objective function used in the fluid
rheology
calculation may be defined as average of the deviations between all the
calculate
times and the respective measured times:
I ~ N
F(b,n)
= 1 I{.f(b,n,vo)-.f(b,n,v;)-t;}Z (Eq. 1)
r=1 N i=1
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
where b is an intermediate variable, which is a function of rheological
parameters and
apparatus dimension parameters as defined in details in the following, n is a
power-
law index of the fluid, N is the number of measured height-time data points,
t, is the
measured time corresponding to h;, and t; is the calculated time corresponding
to same
h;. The intermediate variable b, function of consistency k and power-law index
n, is
defined by the equation:
b = 2k 3nn 1 )n rL, (Eq. 2)
C
where n is the power-law index and k is the consistency of power-law fluids, r
is the
radius of the Marsh funnel outlet, and L is the length of the Marsh funnel
outlet, as
shown in Figure 1.
[0036] The Marsh funnel time (called as Marsh funnel viscosity as well) of a
fluid is
defined as the time taken for a volume of fluid (traditionally one quart with
API
specifications), to be discharged out of funnel. The fluid volume in the cone
at any
fluid height can be calculated as:
V = 3 tg2 (a) [(h + x)3 - x3 j (Eq. 3)
where V is the fluid volume in the cone, h is the fluid height in the funnel,
tg(a) is the
angle defined in Figure 1, and x is the height of the virtual cone as
illustrated in Figure
1, and as calculated from:
X = d (Eq. 4)
2tg(a)
where d is the diameter of the outlet of the Marsh funnel.
[00371 With the above equations, finding b and n requires an optimization
algorithm
to fix b and n with which the calculated times best match measured times
corresponding to same respective fluid heights, said another way, to find b
and n that
results in minima of the objective function F(b,n). Thus, in order to
calculate the
fluid rheology properties b and n from the measured funnel data, the minima of
the
objective function F(b,n) and the corresponding coordinate (b,n) of the minima
point
must be determined. The coordinate (b,n) of the minima point may be calculated
11
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
according to measured height-time data, and after such calculations, the
consistency
k of the power-law fluids may be calculated according to Equation 2, above.
[0038] In certain embodiments, Simplex Method algorithm may be used to
determine
minima of objective function F(b, n) and the corresponding coordinate (b, n).
In
order to determine the minima point, in certain embodiments, initial vectors
(vertices
of initial simplex) X(i) = (xii, x2i) for a fluid are generated using random
function to
construct an initial simplex and calculate values for the function:
f i) = F(X(i)) (Eq. 5)
where i is defined as 1, 2, 3. The function is:
F(X(i))= F(xii, x2i) (Eq. 6)
where xi is b (i.e., an intermediate variable), and X2i is n, a power-law
index value, as
defined above. After X(i) is defined and the simplex is constructed, f i) is
computed.
[0039] As a second step, after f i) is computed, X(i) are ranked according to
the
calculated f i) values. For the purposes of this computation, f(R) is defined
as:
f(R) = F(X(R)) = max V o } (Eq. 7)
f(G) is defined as:
f G) = F(X(G))= max If(,) } (Eq. 8)
i#R
and f L) is defined as:
f L) = F(X(L))= min14) } (Eq. 9)
where X(L) and X(R) are defined as the best and worst vertex corresponding to
f L) and
f(R) respectively.
[0040] After determining X(R), X(G), and X(L), the third step is to reflect
X(R) to XT and
calculate F(XT):
XT = 2XF - X(R), where X. = 1 X (i) (Eq. 10)
2 i=1
i#R
12
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
[0041] At this point, the best and worst points (vertices) value are known, so
in a
fourth step, new vertices can be determined to replace the initial vertices
and a new
simplex may be defined as:
If F(XT) < f (L) then expand XT to XE and calculate F(XE), where XE = (1
+,u)XT - ,uXF
and 1.2 < ,u < 2Ø Under this situation, set X(R) = XE and f R) = F(XE) if
F(XE) < f L),
otherwise set X(R) = XT and f R) = F(XT);
Otherwise if F(XT) <- f (G) then set X(R) = XT and f (R) = F(XT);
Otherwise if F(XT) > f (G), then set X(R) = XT and f (R) = F(XT) unless F(XT)>
f (R).
Contract XT to XG and calculate F(Xc), where XG = A(R) + (1-2)XF and 0.0 < A <
1Ø Under this situation, if F(Xc) > f(R) then construct a new simplex with
new
vertices as X(,)=[X(I)+X(L)]/2, i = 1, 2, 3, and calculate new function values
f,) _
F(X(,)), otherwise set X(R) = Xc and f R) = F(Xc).
[0042] With the new simplex narrowing the best and worst values, steps two,
three,
and four may be repeated until a distance a of all of the vertices on the
simplex is
less than a defined tolerance, where:
3 3 2
1 1
a-.2 3 [f(1)]
2 3 ft) (Eq. 11)
=1
1
Thus, b and n that result in minima of the objective function F(b,n) may be
determined, and k may be calculated from above-determined b and n using
Equation
2, such that rheology properties of fluids may be determined according to
measured
funnel data. While the above methodology is specific to power-law fluids,
those of
ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that similar methodology may be
applied to,
for example, Newtonian fluids, Bingham plastic fluids, or Herschel-Bulkley
fluids.
[0043] Calculating Funnel Times at Different Discharged Fluid Volumes or
Weights
[0044] Additionally, embodiments of the present disclosure may provide Marsh
funnel fluid flow models, the models may be used to simulate fluid flow out of
a
Marsh funnel, such that funnel times corresponding to different discharged
volumes
13
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
or weights of fluids (or corresponding to different heights of fluid in cone
of a
funnel) may be predicted for fluids with known rheology parameters and
density.
[0045] Referring to Figure 3, a flow chart for modeling fluid flow and
calculating
Marsh funnel times is shown. In this embodiment, initially, a user inputs 301
fluid
parameters, such as density, rheological parameters, etc., for a fluid to be
modeled.
With the fluid parameters, the model may calculate 302 all fluid heights as
different
modeled volumes or weights of fluids are discharged out of the Marsh funnel.
In
order to calculate 302 the fluid heights, the simulation determines all
heights based
on the equation:
3-AV l3
h = (ho + X)3_ 3 - x (Eq. 12)
7r. tg 2 (a)
where x may be calculated using Equation 4, tg(a) is a apparatus parameter of
a
Marsh funnel, and AV is the volume of fluid to be discharged out of the
funnel. For
instance, h is 193.6 mm if AV is 946 cm3, ho is 279.4 mm, such as when using
an
API Marsh funnel. Thus, the Marsh funnel time for 1 quart of fluid volume
corresponds to the time when the fluid level in the funnel decreases from
279.4 mm
to 193.6 mm in height.
[0046] If weights (instead of volumes) of a fluid flowing out of a Marsh
funnel are
measured, the corresponding fluid volumes may be calculated from the measured
fluid weights with the measured density using the equation:
AV= OW (Eq. 13)
P
where AW is the weight of fluid flowing out a funnel at corresponding time, p
is
density of the tested fluid.
[0047] After all heights for the fluid are calculated 302, velocities of fluid
flowing out
of the funnel corresponding to the calculated heights are iteratively
calculated 303.
In order to determine the velocities, the following Newtonian iterative
function may
be used:
v(nz+i) = v(n,) - f wpm)/ (Eq. 14)
14
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
where m is the iteration step. In order to iteratively calculate 303
corresponding
velocities at various heights, the following equations may be used:
f (v(m))= a(v(m))2 +b(v(m))n -c(h+L) (Eq. 15a)
f' (v(m)) = 2av(m) + nb(v(m))"-' (Eq. 15b)
where a and c are functions of density of the tested fluid, defined as:
a = - p (Eq. 16)
C = pg (Eq. 17)
where p is density of the tested fluid and g is the gravity acceleration.
After the iterative calculation 303 of velocities at various heights, the
corresponding
time functions may be calculated. A specific funnel time corresponding to a
particular height h may be expressed as:
t = g(b,n,vo)-g(b,n,v) (Eq. 18)
where t is the Marsh funnel time, vo is the fluid velocity corresponding to
the initial
fluid height h0, and v is a fluid velocity corresponding to any specific fluid
height h.
[00481 In order to calculate 304 time functions values at different
velocities, the time
function is defined. In one embodiment, the time function for power-law fluids
may
be defined as:
4tg2 (a)
g(b, n, v) = 1 2 a 3 v 5 + a2b n+ 4vn+3 + 2ab 2 n+ I v2n+I + b 3 n v3n-1
d2 Lc3 5 n+3 2n+1 3n-1
1 (L - x)2 n vn_i
2(L - x) 2 a 2 v 3 + ab n+ 2vn+1 + b 2 n vJ 2n-1 + 2av + b
- C
c2 13 n+1 2n-1 c n-1
(Eq. 19)
When n=1, the above time function becomes:
4tg2 (a) 1 2 3 5 2 n+ 4 n+3 + 2ab 2 n+ I 2n+1 + b 3 n 3n-1
g(b,n,v)= d2 c3 Cs a v +a b n+3 v 2n+lv 3n-1 v
2 L-x 2 2 3 n+2 n+1 2 n 2n-1 L-x 2
( ) a v + ab v + b v + {2av + bn ln(v)]
13 n+1 2n-1 ] c
c2
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
(Eq. 20)
When n=112, the time function is expressed as:
g(b,n,v)= 4tg2(a) 1 2a3v5 +a2bn+4vn+3 +2ab2 n+1 v2n+1 +b3 n v3n-1 d 2 31 c [5
n+3 2n+1 3n-1
2(L -x) 2a2v3+abn+2vn+1+b2nln(v) +(L-x)2 2av+b n vn-1
2 3 n+l 1 c ( n-1
C C
J
(Eq. 21)
When n=113, the time function is:
g(b,n,v)= 4tg2(a) s 2 a 3 v 5 +a2bn+4vn+3 +2ab2 n+1 v2n+1 +b3nln(v)J
d c [5 n+3 2n+1
2(L - x) 2 a 2 v 3 + ab n+ 2vn+1 + b 2 n v2n-1 + (L - x)2 2av + b n vn_1
-c2 D ~ C2 [3 n+1 2n-1 c n-1
(Eq. 22)
where vo is the fluid velocity corresponding to the initial fluid height ho,
and v is a
fluid velocity at another specific fluid height h. Those of ordinary skill in
the art will
appreciate that in other embodiments, other methods may be used to determine
funnel
velocities for specific heights.
[00491 With calculated 304 time function values at different velocities
corresponding
to different fluid heights, Marsh funnel times corresponding to various
volumes or
weights of discharged fluids may be calculated 305. Thus, Marsh funnel times
corresponding to different heights (and discharged volumes or weights as well)
may
be determined by Equation 18, above.
[00501 When the Marsh funnel time is calculated 305, the time may be output
306.
Methods of outputting 306 the Marsh funnel time may include a graphical
representation, numerical model, graphical model, or through other methods of
displaying data known to those of skill in the art. The model may be used to
simulate fluid flow of various types of fluids, and may be modified to
simulate
Newtonian fluids or any other non-Newtonian fluids such as Bingham plastic
fluids,
or Herschel-Bulkley fluids etc.
16
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
[00511 In certain embodiments, two fluids may be modeled, and the results of
the
fluids may be displayed to a drilling or injection engineer. In such an
embodiment,
the fluid properties for the fluids may be used to select a particular fluid
for a
drilling or injection operation, or in other embodiments, may be used to
modify one
or more of the modeled fluids. The modification of the fluids may include
adding
additional components to the fluid, conditioning the fluid, diluting the
fluid, or
otherwise processing the fluid such that an optimum fluid rheology property
may be
achieved. In order to achieve an optimized fluid rheology property for a
particular
application, a fluid may be simulated, the simulated results output, then the
fluid
may be modified, the modified fluid may be resimulated, and the results
output. In
such an embodiment, the results of the modeling may be reviewed by a fluids
engineer in selecting an optimized fluid, or an optimized fluid may be
automatically
selected based on the modeled results. In either embodiment, the optimized
fluid
may subsequently be used in a drilling, completion, workover, or injection
operation.
[00521 Embodiments of the invention may be implemented on virtually any type
of
computer regardless of the platform being used. For example, as shown in
Figure 4,
a computer system (400) includes one or more processor(s) (402), associated
memory (404) (e.g., random access memory (RAM), cache memory, flash memory,
etc.), a storage device (406) (e.g., a hard disk, an optical drive such as a
compact
disk drive or digital video disk (DVD) drive, a flash memory stick, etc.), and
numerous other elements and functionalities typical of today's computers (not
shown). The computer (400) may also include input means, such as a keyboard
(408), a mouse (410), or a microphone (not shown). Further, the computer (400)
may include output means, such as a monitor (412) (e.g., a liquid crystal
display
(LCD), a plasma display, or cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor). The computer
system
(400) may be connected to a network (414) (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a
wide
area network (WAN) such as the Internet, or any other similar type of network)
via a
network interface connection (not shown). Those skilled in the art will
appreciate
that many different types of computer systems exist, and the aforementioned
input
and output means may take other forms. Generally speaking, the computer system
17
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
(400) includes at least the minimal processing, input, and/or output means
necessary
to practice embodiments of the invention.
[0053] Further, those skills in the art will appreciate that one or more
elements of the
aforementioned computer system (400) may be located at a remote location and
connected to the other elements over a network. Further, embodiments of the
invention may be implemented on a distributed system having a plurality of
nodes,
where each portion of the invention (e.g., data repository, signature
generator,
signature analyzer, etc.) may be located on a different node within the
distributed
system. In one embodiment of the invention, the node corresponds to a computer
system. Alternatively, the node may correspond to a processor with associated
physical memory. The node may alternatively correspond to a processor with
shared
memory and/or resources. Further, software instructions to perform embodiments
of
the invention may be stored on a computer readable medium such as a compact
disc
(CD), a diskette, a tape, a file, or any other computer readable storage
device.
[0054] Advantageously, embodiments of the present disclosure may provide for
the
simulation of Marsh funnel fluid flow, thereby allowing for fluid flow models
to be
used to calculate fluid rheology for fluids used in drilling. Such simulation
methods
may be used to calculate Marsh funnel times for fluids with given rheology
parameters and density and may thus be used to simulate fluid flow in Marsh
funnels
for Newtonian, Power-Law and Bingham plastic or Herschel-Bulkley fluids.
[0055] Also advantageously, the methods disclosed herein may allow drilling or
injection engineers the ability to compute rheology properties for fluids from
measured funnel times. Such methods may thus allow fluids used in drilling or
injection to be optimized for a particular drilling, completion, workover, or
solid
waste slurry injection operation.
[0056] Additionally, the methods disclosed herein may allow engineers to
determine
rheology properties without requiring the engineers to define initial rheology
parameter values. As such, even for fluids without known parameters, rheology
properties may be calculated.
[0057] While the present disclosure has been described with respect to a
limited
number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this
disclosure,
18
CA 02776917 2012-04-04
WO 2011/044308 PCT/US2010/051730
will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from
the
scope of the disclosure as described herein. Accordingly, the scope of the
disclosure
should be limited only by the attached claims.
19
