Language selection

Search

Patent 2777449 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2777449
(54) English Title: LIQUEFIED INDUSTRIAL GAS BASED SOLUTION IN HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
(54) French Title: SOLUTION A BASE DE GAZ INDUSTRIEL LIQUEFIE POUR LE FRACTIONNEMENT HYDRAULIQUE
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C09K 8/70 (2006.01)
  • E21B 43/26 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LANCTOT-DOWNS, CAMILLE (Canada)
  • EPINEY, MICHEL (Canada)
  • LABERGE, FABRICE (Canada)
  • RASANAYAGAM, VASUHI (United States of America)
  • SUNDARAM, MEENAKSHI (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • L'AIR LIQUIDE - SOCIETE ANONYME POUR L'ETUDE ET L'EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE (France)
(71) Applicants :
  • L'AIR LIQUIDE - SOCIETE ANONYME POUR L'ETUDE ET L'EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE (France)
(74) Agent: LEDGLEY LAW
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2015-12-15
(22) Filed Date: 2012-05-17
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2013-11-17
Examination requested: 2012-05-17
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract



Hydraulic fracturing is commonly performed by injecting a liquid, gas or two-
phase
fluid down a well bore at sufficient pressure and flow rate to fracture the
subterranean formation. The fluid injected into the rock is typically a slurry
of water,
proppants, and chemical additives. At the end of the fracturing treatment, the
well is
commonly flushed with water, and the injected fluid is recovered and treated
to some
degree. Although the concentrations of chemical additives are very low, the
recovered fluid may be harmful due in part to hydrocarbon contamination.
The present invention presents a hydraulic fracturing treatment that is
substantially
free of water. Specifically, the present invention is a cryogenic subterranean

fracturing fluid, comprising a liquefied industrial gas and a first additive.
The
liquefied industrial gas may be liquefied carbon dioxide, liquefied nitrogen,
or a blend
of the two. The liquefied industrial gas mixture should be substantially free
of water.
In this context, substantially free of water means less than 10% water by
volume, or
preferably less than 5% water by volume. The first additive may be a biocide.
In
addition to the first additive, a proppant may be added to the fracturing
fluid. In
addition to the biocide and/or proppant, additional additives may be added to
the
liquefied industrial gas as required. Non-limiting examples of such additives
include
ozone, a friction reducer, an acid, a gelling agent, a breaker, a scale
inhibitor, a clay
stabilizer, a corrosion inhibitor, an iron controller, an oxygen scavenger, a
surfactant,
a cross-linker, a non-emulsifier, a pH adjusting agent, or any combination
thereof.


French Abstract

Le fractionnement hydraulique se fait généralement par linjection dun liquide, dun gaz ou dun fluide en deux phases, dans un trou de forage, à une pression et à un débit suffisants pour fractionner la formation souterraine. Le fluide injecté dans la roche est généralement constitué de boue deau, dagents de soutènement et dadditifs chimiques. À la fin du traitement de fractionnement, le puits est généralement rincé avec de leau, puis le fluide injecté est récupéré et traité à un certain degré. Bien que les concentrations dadditifs chimiques soient très faibles, le fluide récupéré peut être nocif, en partie à cause de la contamination par les hydrocarbures. La présente invention concerne un traitement de fractionnement hydraulique essentiellement exempt deau. Plus précisément, la présente invention représente un fluide de fractionnement souterrain cryogénique constitué dun gaz industriel liquéfié et dun premier additif. Le gaz industriel liquéfié peut être du dioxyde de carbone liquéfié, de lazote liquéfié ou un mélange des deux. Le mélange de gaz industriel liquéfié devrait être essentiellement exempt deau. Dans ce contexte, essentiellement exempt deau signifie un teneur en eau inférieure à 10 % par volume, ou préférablement inférieure à 5 % par volume. Le premier additif peut être un biocide. En plus du premier additif, un agent de soutènement peut être ajouté au fluide de fractionnement. En plus du biocide ou de lagent de soutènement, dautres additifs peuvent être ajoutés au gaz industriel liquéfié au besoin. Des exemples non limitatifs de tels additifs comprennent lozone, un réducteur de frottement, un acide, un gélifiant, un concasseur, un artitartre, un stabilisateur à largile, un inhibiteur de corrosion, un agent de contrôle du fer, un désoxygénant, un surfactant, un réticulant, un non-émulsifiant, un correcteur dacidité ou une combinaison connexe.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




What is claimed is:
Claim 1: A cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid, comprising a liquefied
industrial
gas, a first additive, and a proppant, wherein said liquefied industrial gas,
and said first
additive are substantially free of water.
Claim 2: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 1, wherein
there is
less than 5% water by volume.
Claim 3: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 1, wherein
said first
additive is a biocide.
Claim 4: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 3, further
comprising
at least a second additive.
Claim 5: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 4, wherein
there is
less than 5% water by volume.
Claim 6: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 4, wherein
said first
additive is introduced into said liquefied industrial gas prior to said
introduction into said
formation, and stored in admixed liquid form.
Claim 7: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 1, wherein
said
liquefied industrial gas is liquid carbon dioxide.
Claim 8: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 1, wherein
said
liquefied industrial gas is liquid nitrogen.
Claim 9: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 1, wherein
said
liquefied industrial gas is a combination of liquid carbon dioxide and liquid
nitrogen.
9



Claim 10: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 7, wherein
said first
additive is introduced into said liquid carbon dioxide In such a way as to
form miscible
liquid with liquid carbon dioxide.
Claim 11: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 8, wherein
said first
additive is introduced into said liquid nitrogen in such a way as to form
discrete, frozen
masses, thereby producing a slurry with the liquid nitrogen.
Claim 12: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 3, wherein
said
biocide is glutaraldehyde, quaternary ammonium chloride, tetrakis
hydroxymethyl-
phosphonium sulfate, or a combination thereof.
Claim 13: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 4, wherein
said
second additive comprises one or more of the following: ozone, a friction
reducer, an
acid, a gelling agent, a breaker, a scale inhibitor, a clay stabilizer, a
corrosion inhibitor,
an iron controller, an oxygen scavenger, a surfactant, a cross-linker, a non-
emulsifier, a
pH adjusting agent, or any combination thereof.
Claim 14: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, where
said cross-
linker is petroleum distillate, hydrotreated light petroleum distillate,
potassium
metaborate, triethanolamine zirconate, sodium tetraborate, boric acid,
zirconium
complex, borate salts, ethyleneglycol, methanol, or a combination thereof.
Claim 15: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, where
said non-
emulsifier is lauryl sulfate, isopronanol, ethylene glycol, or a combination
thereof.
Claim 16: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, where
said pH
adjusting agent is sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, acetic acid, sodium
carbonate, potassium carbonate, or a combination thereof.



Claim 17: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said acid
is hydrochloric acid.
Claim 18: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said
gelling agent comprises one or more of the following: guar gum, petroleum
distillate,
hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, methanol, polysaccharide blend,
ethylene glycol,
hydroxyethyl cellulose, or a combination thereof.
Claim 19: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said
breaker comprises one or more of the following: ammonium persulfate, magnesium

peroxide, magnesium oxide, calcium chloride, sodium chloride, or a combination

thereof.
Claim 20: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said
corrosion inhibitor comprises one or more of the following: isopropanol ,
methanol ,
formic Acid , acetaldehyde , N,N-dimethyl formamide, or a combination thereof.
Claim 21: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said
oxygen scavenger is ammonium bisulfate.
Claim 22: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said
surfactant is isopropanol.
Claim 23: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said clay
stabilizer comprises one or more of the following: choline chloride,
tetramethyl
ammonium chloride, sodium chloride, or a combination thereof.
Claim 24: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said
friction reducer comprises one or more of the following: polyacrylamide,
petroleum
distillate, hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, methanol, ethylene
glycol, or a
combination thereof.
11


Claim 25: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said scale
inhibitor comprises one or more of the following: ethylene glycol, copolymer
of
acrylamide and sodium acrylate, sodium polycarboxylate, phosphonic acid salt,
or a
combination thereof.
Claim 26: The cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid of claim 13, wherein
said iron
controller comprises one or more of the following: citric acid, acetic acid,
thioglycolic
acid, 2-hydroxy 1, 2, 3-propaneticoboxylic acid, sodium erythorbate, or a
combination
thereof.
Claim 27: A method of fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a
well bore
comprising: introducing cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid, comprising a
liquefied
industrial gas, a proppant, and at least a first additive into said formation.
Claim 28: A method of fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a
well bore
comprising: introducing cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid, comprising a
liquefied
industrial gas, a proppant, and at least a first additive into said formation,
wherein said
cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid is substantially free of water.
12

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02777449 2013-11-18
Serie 9189
LIQUEFIED INDUSTRIAL GAS BASED SOLUTION IN HYDRAULIC
FRACTURING
Technical Field
This invention relates to a method of fracturing subterranean formations
penetrated
by a well bore utilizing liquid carbon dioxide or liquid nitrogen as the
carrier for
chemicals and/or biocides instead of water.
Background
The treatment of subterranean formations penetrated by a well bore to
stimulate the
production of hydrocarbons therefrom or the ability of the formation to accept

injected fluids has long been known in the art. One of the most common methods
of
increasing productivity of a hydrocarbon-bearing formation is to subject the
formation
to a fracturing treatment. This treatment is effected by injecting a liquid,
gas or two-
phase fluid which generally is referred to as a fracturing fluid down the well
bore at
sufficient pressure and flow rate to fracture the subterranean formation. A
proppant
material such as sand, fine gravel, sintered bauxite, glass beads or the like
can be
introduced into the fractures to keep them open. The propped fracture provides
larger flow channels through which an increased quantity of a hydrocarbon can
flow,
thereby increasing the productive capability of a well.
A traditional hydraulic fracturing technique utilizes a water or oil-based
fluid to
fracture a hydrocarbon-bearing formation.
1

CA 02777449 2014-11-25
Serie 9189
Summary
The present invention is a cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid, comprising
a
liquefied industrial gas and a first additive. The liquefied industrial gas
may be
liquefied carbon dioxide, liquefied nitrogen, or a blend of the two. The first
additive
may be a biocide. The liquefied industrial gas mixture should be substantially
free of
water. In this context, substantially free of water means less than 10% water
by
volume, or preferably less than 5% water by volume. In addition to the first
additive,
a proppant may be added to the fracturing fluid. Non-limiting examples of a
biocide
include glutaraldehyde, quaternary ammonium chloride, tetrakis hydroxymethyl-
phosphonium sulfate, or a combination thereof. In addition to the biocide
and/or
proppant additional additives may be added to the liquefied industrial gas as
required. Non-limiting examples of such additives include ozone, a friction
reducer,
an acid, a gelling agent, a breaker, a scale inhibitor, a clay stabilizer, a
corrosion
inhibitor, an iron controller, an oxygen scavenger, a surfactant, a cross-
linker, a non-
emulsifier, a pH adjusting agent, or any combination thereof.
Non-limiting examples of a cross-linker include petroleum distillate,
hydrotreated
light petroleum distillate, potassium metaborate, triethanolamine zirconate,
sodium
tetraborate, boric acid, zirconium complex, borate salts, ethyleneglycol,
methanol, or
a combination thereof.
Non-limiting examples of a non-emulsifier include lauryl sulfate, isopronanol,

ethylene glycol, or a combination thereof. Non-limiting examples of a pH
adjusting
agent include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, acetic acid, sodium
carbonate, potassium carbonate, or a combination thereof.
Non-limiting examples of an acid include hydrochloric acid. Non-limiting
examples of
a gelling agent include one or more of the following: guar gum, petroleum
distillate,
hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, methanol, polysaccharide blend,
ethylene
glycol, hydroxyethyl cellulose, or a combination thereof.
2

CA 02777449 2014-11-25
Serie 9189
Non-limiting examples of a breaker include one or more of the following:
ammonium
persulfate, magnesium peroxide, magnesium oxide, calcium chloride, sodium
chloride, or a combination thereof.
Non-limiting examples of a corrosion inhibitor include one or more of the
following:
isopropanol , methanol , formic Acid , acetaldehyde, N,N-dimethyl formamide,
or a
combination thereof. Non-limiting examples of an oxygen scavenger include
ammonium bisulfate.
Non-limiting examples of a surfactant include isopropanol. Non-limiting
examples of
a clay stabilizer include one or more of the following: choline chloride,
tetramethyl
ammonium chloride, sodium chloride, or a combination thereof.
Non-limiting examples of a friction reducer include one or more of the
following:
polyacrylamide, petroleum distillate, hydrotreated light petroleum distillate,
methanol,
ethylene glycol, or a combination thereof.
Non-limiting examples of a scale inhibitor include one or more of the
following:
ethylene glycol, copolymer of acrylamide and sodium acrylate, sodium
polycarboxylate, phosphonic acid salt, or a combination thereof.
Non-limiting examples of an iron controller include one or more of the
following: citric
acid, acetic acid, thioglycolic acid, 2-hydroxy 1, 2, 3-propaneticoboxylic
acid, sodium
erythorbate, or a combination thereof.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided
a
cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid, comprising a liquefied industrial
gas, a first
additive, and a proppant, wherein said liquefied industrial gas, and said
first additive
are substantially free of water.
2a

CA 02777449 2014-11-25
Serie 9189
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided
the
cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid wherein said first additive is
introduced into
said liquefied industrial gas prior to said introduction into said formation,
and stored
in admixed liquid form.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided
the
cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid wherein said first additive is
introduced into
said liquid carbon dioxide In such a way as to form miscible liquid with
liquid carbon
dioxide.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided
the
cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid wherein said first additive is
introduced into
said liquid nitrogen in such a way as to form discrete, frozen masses, thereby

producing a slurry with the liquid nitrogen.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided
a
method of fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a well bore
comprising:
introducing cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid, comprising a liquefied
industrial
gas, a proppant, and at least a first additive into said formation.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided
a
method of fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a well bore
comprising:
introducing cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid, comprising a liquefied
industrial
gas, a proppant, and at least a first additive into said formation, wherein
said
cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid is substantially free of water.
Description of Preferred Embodiments
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. While
particular
embodiments of the present invention have been described, it would be obvious
to
those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be
made.
2b

CA 02777449 2014-11-25
Serie 9189
The scope of the claims should not be limited by the embodiments set forth in
the
description, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with
the
specification as a whole.
It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual
embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve

the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and
business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to
another.
Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be
complex
2c

CA 02777449 2013-11-18
Serie 9189
and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those
of
ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
A hydraulic fracture is formed by pumping the fracturing fluid into the
wellbore at a
rate sufficient to increase pressure downhole to exceed that of the fracture
gradient
of the rock. The rock cracks and the fracture fluid continues farther into the
rock,
extending the crack still farther, and so on. Operators typically try to
maintain
"fracture width", or slow its decline, following treatment by introducing a
proppant
into the injected fluid, a material, such as grains of sand, ceramic, or other
particulates, that prevent the fractures from closing when the injection is
stopped.
Consideration of proppant strengths and prevention of proppant failure becomes

more important at deeper depths where pressure and stresses on fractures are
higher. The propped fracture is permeable enough to allow the flow of
formation
fluids to the well. Formation fluids include gas, oil, salt water, fresh water
and fluids
introduced to the formation during completion of the well during fracturing.
The location of one or more fractures along the length of the borehole is
strictly
controlled by various different methods which create or seal-off holes in the
side of
the wellbore. Typically, hydraulic fracturing is performed in cased wellbores
and the
zones to be fractured are accessed by perforating the casing at those
locations.
The fluid injected into the rock is typically a slurry of water, proppants,
and chemical
additives. Additionally, gels, foams, and compressed gases, including
nitrogen,
carbon dioxide and air can be injected.
Various types of proppant include silica sand, resin-coated sand, and man-made
ceramics. These vary depending on the type of permeability or grain strength
needed. The most commonly utilized proppant is silica sand. However, proppants
of
uniform size and shape, such as a ceramic proppant, is believed to be more
effective. Due to a higher porosity within the fracture, a greater amount of
oil and
natural gas is liberated. Sand containing naturally radioactive minerals is
sometimes
used so that the fracture trace along the wellbore can be measured.
3

CA 02777449 2013-11-18
Serie 9189
Chemical additives are applied to tailor the injected material to the specific
geological situation, protect the well, and improve its operation, though the
injected
fluid is approximately 98-99.5% water, varying slightly based on the type of
well. The
composition of injected fluid is sometimes changed as the fracturing job
proceeds.
Often, acid is initially used to scour the perforations and clean up the near-
wellbore
area. Afterward, high pressure fracture fluid is injected into the wellbore,
with the
pressure above the fracture gradient of the rock. This fracture fluid contains
water-
soluble gelling agents (such as guar gum) which increase viscosity and
efficiently =
deliver the proppant into the formation. As the fracturing process proceeds,
viscosity
reducing agents such as oxidizers and enzyme breakers are sometimes then added

to the fracturing fluid to deactivate the gelling agents and encourage
flowback. The
proppant's purpose is primarily to provide a permeable and permanent filler to
fill the
void created during the fracturing process.
At the end of the job the well is commonly flushed with water (sometimes
blended
with a friction reducing chemical) under pressure. Injected fluid is to some
degree
recovered and is managed by several methods, such as underground injection
control, treatment and discharge, recycling, or temporary storage in pits or
containers while new technology is being developed to better handle wastewater
and improve reusability. Although the concentrations of the chemical additives
are
very low, the recovered fluid may be harmful due in part to hydrocarbons
picked up
from the formation.
Hydraulic fracturing equipment used in oil and natural gas fields usually
consists of a
slurry blender, one or more high pressure, high volume fracturing pumps
(typically
powerful triplex, or quintiplex pumps) and a monitoring unit. Associated
equipment
includes fracturing tanks, one or more units for storage and handling of
proppant,
high pressure treating iron, a chemical additive unit (used to accurately
monitor
chemical addition), low pressure flexible hoses, and many gauges and meters
for
flow rate, fluid density, and treating pressure. Fracturing equipment operates
over a
4

CA 02777449 2013-11-18
Serie 9189
range of pressures and injection rates, and can reach up to 100 megapascals
(15,000 psi) and 265 litres per second (9.4 cu ft/s) (100 barrels per minute).
The present invention is a cryogenic subterranean fracturing fluid, that
includes at
least a liquefied industrial gas and a first additive. The liquefied
industrial gas may
be liquefied carbon dioxide, liquefied nitrogen, or a blend of the two. Other
liquefied industrial gases may be included in a mixture, but the primary
components
will be liquefied carbon dioxide or liquefied nitrogen. The liquefied
industrial gas
mixture should be substantially free of water. In this context, substantially
free of
water means less than 10% water by volume, or preferably less than 5% water by
volume. In addition to the first additive, a proppant may be added to the
fracturing
fluid.
As discussed above, in hydraulic or gas fracturing, a number of additives are
routinely added as the particular site requires. In the present invention, the
first
additive may be a biocide. The biocide may be any chemical known to one of
ordinary skill in the art. Non-limiting examples of such biocides include
glutaraldehyde, quaternary ammonium chloride, tetrakis hydroxymethyl-
phosphonium sulfate, or a combination thereof.
In addition to the first additive, a proppant may be added to the fracturing
fluid. Any
proppant known in the art may be used. Non-limiting examples of such proppants
include quartz sand, aluminum balls, walnut shells, glass beads, plastic
balls,
ceramic, and resin-clad sand.
In addition to the biocide and/or proppant, a second additive, or additional
additives,
may be added to the liquefied industrial gas as required. Any additional
additives
known in the art may be added. Non-limiting examples of such additives include

ozone, a friction reducer, an acid, a gelling agent, a breaker, a scale
inhibitor, a clay
stabilizer, a corrosion inhibitor, an iron controller, an oxygen scavenger, a
surfactant,
a cross-linker, a non-emulsifier, a pH adjusting agent, or any combination
thereof.
5

CA 02777449 2013-11-18
Serie 9189
The combination of liquefied industrial gas, proppant, biocide and any
additional
additives should be substantially free of water.
The additives may be introduced into the liquefied industrial gas prior to the
introduction into said formation, and stored in admixed liquid form. The
additives
may introduced into the liquid nitrogen in such a way as to form discrete,
frozen
masses, thereby producing a slurry with the liquid nitrogen. The additives may
be
introduced into the liquid carbon dioxide in such a way as to form miscible
liquid with
the liquid carbon dioxide.
Any cross-linker known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to the
liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such cross-linkers include
petroleum distillate, hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, potassium
metaborate,
triethanolamine zirconate, sodium tetraborate, boric acid, zirconium complex,
borate
salts, ethylene glycol, methanol, or a combination thereof.
Any non-emulsifier known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to
the
liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such non-emulsifiers
include non-
emulsifiers lauryl sulfate, isopronanol, ethylene glycol, or a combination
thereof.
Any pH adjusting agent known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed,
to the
liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such pH adjusting agents
include
is sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, acetic acid, sodium carbonate,
potassium
carbonate, or a combination thereof.
Any acid known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to the
liquefied
industrial gas. A non-limiting example of such an acid is hydrochloric acid.
6

CA 02777449 2013-11-18
Serie 9189
Any gelling agent known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to the

liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such gelling agents include
guar
gum, petroleum distillate, hydrotreated light petroleum distillate, methanol,
polysaccharide blend, ethylene glycol, hydroxyethyl cellulose, or a
combination
thereof.
Any breaker known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to the
liquefied
industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such breakers include ammonium
persulfate, magnesium peroxide, magnesium oxide, calcium chloride, sodium
chloride, or a combination thereof.
Any corrosion inhibiter known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed,
to the
liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such corrosion inhibitor
include
isopropanol , methanol , formic Acid , acetaldehyde, N,N-dimethyl formamide,
or a
combination thereof.
Any oxygen scavenger known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to
the
liquefied industrial gas. A non-limiting example of such a corrosion inhibitor
is
ammonium bisulfate.
Any surfactant known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to the
liquefied
industrial gas. A non-limiting example of such a surfactant is isopropanol.
Any clay stabilizer known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to
the
liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such clay stabilizer
include
choline chloride, tetramethyl ammonium chloride, sodium chloride, or a
combination
thereof.
Any friction reducer known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to
the
liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such friction reducer
include
7

CA 02777449 2013-11-18
Serie 9189
polyacrylamide, petroleum distillate, hydrotreated light petroleum distillate,
methanol,
ethylene glycol, or a combination thereof.
Any scale inhibiter known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to
the
liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such scale inhibitor
include
ethylene glycol, copolymer of acrylamide and sodium acrylate, sodium
polycarboxylate, phosphonic acid salt, or a combination thereof.
Any iron controller known to one skilled in the art may added, as needed, to
the
liquefied industrial gas. Non-limiting examples of such iron controller
include citric
acid, acetic acid, thioglycolic acid, 2-hydroxy 1, 2, 3-propaneticoboxylic
acid, sodium
erythorbate, or a combination thereof.
This invention also includes a method of fracturing a subterranean formation
penetrated by a well bore comprising: introducing cryogenic subterranean
fracturing
fluid, comprising a liquefied industrial gas, a proppant, and at least a first
additive
into said formation.
8

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2777449 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2015-12-15
(22) Filed 2012-05-17
Examination Requested 2012-05-17
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2013-11-17
(45) Issued 2015-12-15

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $347.00 was received on 2024-05-06


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if standard fee 2025-05-20 $347.00
Next Payment if small entity fee 2025-05-20 $125.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $800.00 2012-05-17
Application Fee $400.00 2012-05-17
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2012-10-16
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2012-10-16
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2012-10-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2014-05-20 $100.00 2014-04-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2015-05-19 $100.00 2015-04-24
Final Fee $300.00 2015-09-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 4 2016-05-17 $100.00 2016-05-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 5 2017-05-17 $200.00 2017-05-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2018-05-17 $200.00 2018-05-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2019-05-17 $200.00 2019-05-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2020-05-19 $200.00 2020-05-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2021-05-17 $204.00 2021-05-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2022-05-17 $254.49 2022-05-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2023-05-17 $263.14 2023-05-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2024-05-17 $347.00 2024-05-06
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
L'AIR LIQUIDE - SOCIETE ANONYME POUR L'ETUDE ET L'EXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2012-05-17 1 23
Description 2012-05-17 8 328
Claims 2012-05-17 5 150
Cover Page 2013-10-29 1 36
Abstract 2013-11-18 1 37
Description 2013-11-18 8 312
Claims 2013-11-18 4 137
Description 2014-11-25 11 415
Claims 2014-11-25 4 135
Cover Page 2015-11-24 1 47
Correspondence 2012-05-31 1 23
Assignment 2012-05-17 4 111
Correspondence 2012-08-08 2 74
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-05-16 3 141
Assignment 2012-10-16 15 669
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-05-26 2 74
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-11-18 28 986
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-11-25 18 597
Final Fee 2015-09-30 2 77