Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438 PCT/GB2012/000411
1
SURFACTANT ADDITIVES USED TO RETAIN PRODUCIBILITY WHILE
DRILLING
[0001] The present invention relates generally to hydrocarbon
production, and
more particularly to compositions and methods useful for drilling a well bore
in a
subterranean formation.
[0002] A variety of drilling fluids are used in the drilling of oil and
gas wells along
with other drilling fluid applications and drilling procedures. In rotary
drilling, drilling fluids
perform a variety of functions and possess a variety of characteristics.
Traditional drilling
fluids include drilling muds, or simply "muds." Drilling fluids are generally
used to carry
cuttings from beneath the drill bit, transport them through the annulus
between the drill string
and the well bore, and allow their separation at the surface while at the same
time cooling and
cleaning the drill bit. A drilling mud can also reduce friction between the
drill string and the
sides of the well bore while maintaining the stability of uncased sections of
the borehole.
[0003] Typical drilling fluids can be classified according to their base
fluid.
Water-based muds comprise an aqueous fluid as the continuous phase. Solid
particles can be
suspended in an aqueous fluid, and in some cases, oil can be emulsified in the
water.
Similarly, brine-based drilling fluids are water-based muds in which the
aqueous fluid is a
brine. Oil-based muds (OBM) are the opposite in that an oleaginous fluid
comprises the
continuous phase. Solid particles can be suspended in oil, and in some cases,
water or brine
can be emulsified in the oil. The oil continuous phase typically includes,
diesel, mineral oil,
esters, or alpha-olefins.
[0004] Drilling fluids typically contain additives that are used for
various purposes.
One common additive is a fluid loss additive, which may be used to prevent the
intrusion of
drilling fluids into the subterranean formation being penetrated and to form a
thin, low
permeability filter cake which temporarily seals pores and other openings in
the subterranean
formation. A filter cake is the residue deposited on a permeable surface such
as a
subterranean formation surface when a slurry, suspoemulsion, or suspension,
such as a
drilling fluid, is forced against the surface under pressure. A filter cake is
defined herein as a
combination of any added solids, if any, and drilled solids with the drilling
fluid. Filtrate is
commonly understood to be the liquid that passes through the surface, leaving
the filter cake
on the surface. Reduced hydrocarbon production can result from reservoir
damage when a
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438 PCT/GB2012/000411
2
poor filter cake allows deep filtrate invasion. In addition, a filter cake can
be difficult to
remove in some instances.
[0005] Thus, clean up of the formation after drilling into subterranean
formations
with drilling fluids such as water-based muds or OBMs can be an important step
in preparing
a well for production. Traditional techniques involve the use of one or more
secondary fluids
to remove or degrade the filter cake prior to producing the well or preparing
the well for use
as an injection well. As each treatment operation increases the complexity,
and thus the cost,
of drilling a well bore, more efficient filter cake and formation clean up is
desired to
maximize hydrocarbon recovery.
[0006] The present invention relates generally to hydrocarbon
production, and
more particularly to compositions and methods useful for drilling a well bore
in a
subterranean formation.
[0007] According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a
method
comprising: providing a drilling fluid comprising: an aqueous fluid; and a
surfactant; and
drilling a well bore in a subterranean formation comprising an oleaginous
fluid using the
drilling fluid, wherein the surfactant forms a micelle within the well bore;
and removing an
oil block in the formation.
[0008] According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a
method
comprising: providing a drilling fluid comprising: an aqueous base fluid; a
surfactant; a non-
polar fluid; and drilling a well bore in a subterranean formation comprising
an oleaginous
fluid using the drilling fluid, wherein the surfactant forms a micelle that is
capable of
removing an oil block and the subterranean formation has a retained
producibility greater
than about 20%.
[0009] According to another aspect of the invention there, there is
provided a
method comprising: providing a drilling fluid comprising: an aqueous base
fluid; and a
surfactant; and drilling a well bore in a subterranean formation that
comprises a pore throat;
and allowing the surfactant to remove an oil block, a water block, or both
from the pore
throat.
[0010] The features and advantages of the present invention will be
apparent to
those skilled in the art. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled
in the art,
such changes are within the scope of the invention.
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438 PCT/GB2012/000411
3
[0011] The
present invention relates generally to hydrocarbon production, and
more particularly to compositions and methods useful for drilling a well bore
in a
subterranean formation.
[0012] While
some advantages are disclosed, not all advantages will be discussed
herein. It has been discovered that the use of a drilling fluid capable of
forming a micelle in-
situ can result in a retained producibility greater than other drilling
techniques. For example,
the use of a drilling fluid of the present invention can result in a retained
producibility that is
higher than that obtained by using a conventional drilling fluid along with
one or more post-
drilling treatments. As
used herein, "retained producibility" refers to the relative
permeability of a formation after exposure to a drilling fluid divided by the
permeability of
the formation prior to exposure to a drilling fluid. Permeability may be
determined by
flowing oil, gas, or water through an aloxide disk or natural core and
recording the
differential pressure required to flow at a specific rate. The disk or core is
then exposed to
the treatment fluid and a return permeability is obtained by again flowing
oil/gas/or water. In
some embodiments, the retained producibility may be greater than 100%, which
may indicate
that the permeability of the formation is higher after contact with the
drilling fluids of the
present invention described herein than the formation before contact with the
drilling fluid.
The ability to increase the permeability of the formation, or in a sense
stimulate the formation
using the drilling fluid, may represent one advantage of the present
invention. As used
herein, the term "drilling fluid" includes, but is not limited to, drilling
fluids, drill-in fluids,
and completion fluids. A "drill-in" fluid is generally a drilling fluid used
to drill the well
bore into producing portions of a subterranean formation so as to minimize
damage,
maximize production of exposed zones, and facilitate any necessary well
completion needed.
Unlike a drilling fluid, a drill-in fluid generally contains few solids, and
what solids it does
contain are often size controlled to minimize penetration or invasion into the
formation
matrix to avoid damaging the production formation. As used herein, a drilling
operation
includes, but is not limited to, a drilling operation, a drill-in operation,
an underbalanced
drilling operation, an overbalanced drilling operation, and any other drilling
operation for
subterranean purposes known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
[0013] In
general, a micelle is a round aggregate of amphipathic molecules (e.g.,
surfactants) that is usually dispersed in a liquid medium. In an aqueous
medium, the
hydrophilic head group of a micelle forms an outer shell which remains in
contact with the
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
4
surrounding solvent. Consequently, the hydrophobic tail regions are
sequestered within the
micelle centre. The process of forming micelles, micellization, occurs when
surfactants are
present above a critical micelle concentration. This concentration is the
concentration above
which micelles spontaneously form. The term "micelle" is defined to include
any structure
that minimizes the contact between the lyophobic ("solvent-repelling") portion
of a surfactant
molecule and the solvent, for example, by aggregating the surfactant molecules
into
structures such as spheres, cylinders, or sheets, wherein the lyophobic
portions are on the
interior of the aggregate structure and the lyophilic ("solvent-attracting")
portions are on the
exterior of the structure. These micelles may function, among other purposes,
to stabilize
emulsions (act as an "emulsifying micelle"), break emulsions, stabilize a
foam, change the
wettability of a surface, solubilize certain materials, and/or reduce surface
tension. When
used as a gelling agent, the molecules (or ions) of the surfactants used
associate to form
micelles of a certain micellar structure (e.g., rodlike, wormlike, vesicles,
etc., which are
referred to herein as "viscosifying micelles") that, under certain conditions
(e.g.,
- -
concentration, ionic strength of the fluid, etc.) are capable of, inter
alia, imparting increased
viscosity to a particular fluid and/or forming a gel. Certain viscosifying
micelles may impart
increased viscosity to a fluid such that the fluid exhibits viscoelastic
behavior (e.g., shear
thinning properties) due, at least in part, to the association of the
surfactant molecules
contained therein.
[0014]
Where energetically favorable, surfactants may form a reverse or an
inverse
micelle. In this case, the hydrophilic groups are sequestered in the micelle
core while the
hydrophobic groups extend away from the micelle centre. Typically, decreasing
polarity of
the solvent and/or decreasing the charge of hydrophilic groups creates a more
favorable
condition for forming reverse micelles.
[0015]
In addition, the use of a drilling fluid comprising a surfactant can be
used to
alter the wettability of the formation surface, remove oil and/or water
blocks, and alter the
wettability of a filter cake or, other fluid loss additive placed into the
subterranean formation
during drilling. The ability to alter the wettability of a filter cake can
improve the damage
remediation (filter cake destruction) when mineral acids, organic acids,
oxidizing agents,
water-soluble enzymes (e.g., catalysts), chelating agents and in situ acid
generators are
spotted into a well bore after or during the drilling process. Another
advantage of the drilling
fluids described herein is that the drilling fluid does not require any oil or
solvent in the
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438 PCT/GB2012/000411
formulation. As a result, the drilling fluids can have a higher loading
capacity for
incorporation of an oleaginous fluid or a non-polar fluid. As used herein, an
"oleaginous
fluid" refers to any fluid hydrocarbon including, but not limited to, oil,
natural gas, natural
gas condensates, and heavy oil components (e.g., asphaltenes).
[0016] A method according to the present invention comprises providing a
drilling
fluid and drilling a well bore in a subterranean formation comprising an
oleaginous fluid
using the drilling fluid. The drilling fluid is generally a water-based
drilling fluid that
comprises an aqueous fluid and a surfactant. Without being limited by theory,
it is believed
that the surfactant useful with the present invention can form an emulsifying
micelle with the
oleaginous fluid within the well bore. The drilling fluid may comprise a
surfactant or a
surfactant blend and often a surfactant-cosurfactant mixture, in which the co-
surfactant can
be a short amphiphilic substance such as an alcohol (e.g., propanol, butanol,
pentanol in their
different isomerization structures, as well as glycols, and ethoxyated and
propoxylated
alcohols or phenols).
[0017] The aqueous fluid used in the drilling fluids of the present
invention can
comprises any suitable aqueous fluid known to one of ordinary skill in the
art. Suitable
aqueous fluids may include, but are not limited to, fresh water, saltwater
(e.g., water
containing one or more salts dissolved therein), brine (e.g., saturated
saltwater), weighted
brine (e.g., an aqueous solution of sodium bromide, calcium bromide, zinc
bromide and the
like), or any combination thereof. Generally, the aqueous fluid may be from
any source,
provided that it does not contain components that might adversely affect the
stability and/or
performance of the drilling fluids of the present invention. The density of
the aqueous base
fluid can be increased, among other purposes, to provide additional particle
transport and
suspension in the drilling fluids of the present invention as well as keep
formation fluids
back. Although an aqueous fluid can be used to form the micelles, it will be
appreciated that
other polar liquids such as alcohols and glycols, alone or together with an
aqueous fluid, may
also be used. The aqueous fluid can be present in the drilling fluid in an
amount ranging
from about 40 % to about 99.9 % by weight of the drilling fluid.
[0018] The drilling fluids of the present invention can comprise one or
more
surfactants. In general, a surfactant can include any surfactant capable of
forming a micelle
alone or in combination with a co-surfactant. Surfactants suitable for use
with the drilling
fluids of the present invention include, but are not limited to, non-ionic,
anionic, cationic and
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
6
amphoteric surfactants, any derivatives thereof, and any combination thereof.
Suitable non-
ionic surfactants include, but are not limited to, alkyl polyglycosides,
sorbitan esters, methyl
glucoside esters, amine ethoxylates, diamine ethoxylates, polyglycerol esters,
alkyl
ethoxylates, alcohols that have been polypropoxylated and/or polyethoxylated
or both, any
derivative thereof, or any combination thereof. The term "derivative," as used
herein refers
to any compound that is made from one of the identified compounds, for
example, by
replacing one atom in the listed compound with another atom or group of atoms,
or
rearranging two or more atoms in the listed compound. Suitable cationic
surfactants include,
but are not necessarily limited to, arginine methyl esters, alkanolamines,
alkylenediamides,
alkyl ester sulfonates, alkyl ether sulfonates, alkyl ether sulfates, alkali
metal alkyl sulfates,
alkyl or alkylaryl sulfonates, sulfosuccinates, alkyl or alkylaryl
disulfonates, alkyl disulfates,
alcohol polypropoxylated and/or polyethoxylated sulfates, taurates, amine
oxides, alkylamine
oxides, ethoxylated amides, alkoxylated fatty acids, alkoxylated alcohols,
ethoxylated fatty
amines, ethoxylated alkyl amines, betaines, modified betaines,
alkylamidobetaines,
quaternary ammonium compounds, any derivative thereof, and any combination
thereof.
Specific surfactants may include, but are not limited to, methyl ester
sulfonate, a hydrolyzed
keratin, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan
monostearate,
polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, linear alcohol alkoxylates, alkyl ether
sulfates,
dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid, linear nonyl-phenols, dioxane, ethylene oxide,
polyethylene
glycol, ethoxylated castor oils, dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine, sodium 441'
heptylnonyl)
benzenesulfonate, polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether, sodium dioctyl
sulphosuccinate,
tetraethyleneglycoldodecylether, sodium octlylbenzenesulfonate, = sodium
hexadecyl sulfate,
sodium laureth sulfate, ethylene oxide, decylamine oxide, dodecylamine
betaine,
dodecylamine oxide, any derivative thereof, or any combination thereof. Other
suitable
surfactants may include alkyl propoxy-ethoxysulfonate, alkyl propoxy-
ethoxysulfate,
alkylaryl-propoxy-ethoxysulfonate, a mixture of an ammonium salt of an alkyl
ether sulfate;
a cocoamidopropyl betaine surfactant; a cocoamidopropyl dimethylamine oxide
surfactant,
and sodium chloride; a mixture of an ethoxylated alcohol ether sulfate
surfactant, an alkyl or
alkene amidopropyl betaine surfactant, and an alkyl or alkene dimethylamine
oxide
surfactant; a mixture of an alpha-olefinic sulfonate surfactant and a betaine
surfactant; any
derivative thereof; and any combination thereof.
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
7
[0019] Suitable surfactants may also include polymeric surfactants, block
copolymer surfactants, di-block polymer surfactants, hydrophobically modified
surfactants,
fluoro-surfactants, and surfactants containing a non-ionic spacer-arm central
extension and an
ionic or nonionic polar group. The non-ionic spacer-arm central extension may
be the result
of polypropoxylation, polyethoxylation, or a mixture of the two, in non-
limiting
embodiments.
[0020] The amount of surfactant included in the drilling fluid may be based on
a
number of factors including, but not limited to, the type of aqueous fluid,
the temperature of
the formation, the particular surfactant or surfactant blend used, and the
type of optional
additives included. In an embodiment, the surfactant is present in the
drilling fluid in an
amount of from about 0.01% to about 20% by weight of the drilling fluid.
[0021] A drilling fluid may comprise a co-surfactant. As used herein, a
"co-
surfactant" refers to a compound that participates in aggregation of molecules
into a micelle
but does not aggregate on its own. Suitable co-surfactants useful with the
drilling fluids of
the present invention include, but are not limited to, alcohols, glycols,
phenols, thiols,
carboxylates, sulfonates, pyrollidones, any derivative thereof, and any
combination thereof.
Preferably, an alcohol useful as a co-surfactant may have from about 3 to
about 10 carbon
atoms. Suitable alcohols can include, but are not limited to, t-butanol, n-
butanol, n-pentanol,
n-hexanol, 2-ethyl-hexanol, propanol, and sec-butanol. Suitable glycols can
include, but are
not limited to, ethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, propylene glycols, and
triethylene glycol.
In an embodiment, a co-surfactant may be included in the drilling fluids of
the present
invention in an amount ranging from about 0.001% to about 20% by weight of the
drilling
fluid.
[0022] As an advantage of the drilling fluids of the present invention,
a solvent is
not required as a component of the drilling fluid. As a result of not having
an organic
solvent, the drilling fluids can have a higher loading capacity for
incorporation of an
oleaginous fluid or a non-polar fluid. In an embodiment, typical solvents that
are not
required in the present invention may comprise a terpene-based solvent, an
alkyl acid ester of
a short chain alcohol, an aryl acid ester of a short chain alcohol, benzene,
toluene, xylene, or
any other solvents known to one of ordinary skill in the art for use in a well
bore.
[0023] The in-situ fluid can contain a non-polar fluid. The non-polar
fluid can
comprise a variety of additives useful for drilling a well bore in a
subterranean formation.
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438 PCT/GB2012/000411
8
The drilling fluid of the present invention can form a micelle and/or
emulsifier with one or
more non-polar fluids to allow the transportation of the non-polar fluids into
the subterranean
formation as part of a substantially homogenous drilling fluid. The drilling
fluids may then
be capable of delivering at least a portion of the non-polar fluid to a
desired location within
the subterranean formation during drilling. Without being limited by theory,
it is believed
that the drilling fluid may be contacted with a non-polar fluid comprising a
lubricant to form
a micelle which contains the non-polar fluid in its core. When the drilling
fluid is used to
drill a well bore, the lubricant can aid in the lubrication of the drill bit.
Any number of non-
polar fluids may be used to form an emulsifying micelle for delivery to the
subterranean
formation during drilling. A non-polar fluid can form an emulsifying micelle
with the
surfactant in addition to the surfactant being able to form an emulsifying
micelle with an
oleaginous fluid within the subterranean formation. As noted above, the
drilling fluids of the
present invention do not require a solvent or other non-polar liquid. As a
result, the drilling
fluids may comprise a higher capacity for the non-polar fluid additives and/or
the oleaginous
fluid.
[0024] Suitable additives can include lubricants, which may include a
synthetic
fluid including, but not necessarily limited to, ester-based fluids,
paraffins, isomerized
olefins, mineral oils, and any combination thereof
[0025] Optionally, the drilling fluids may comprise additional additives
such as
fluid loss control agents, degradable fluid loss agents, foaming agents,
viscosifying polymers,
emulsion stabilizers, antifreeze agents, emulsion destabilizers, biocides,
algaecides, pH
control additives, oxygen scavengers, clay stabilizers, weighting agents, and
the like or any
other additive that does not adversely affect the drilling fluid. Optional
additives may be
included in the drill-in fluids in an amount in the range of about 0.001% to
about 10% by
weight of the drill-in fluid composition. One of ordinary skill in the art
with the benefit of
this disclosure will recognize that the compatibility of any given additive
should be tested to
ensure that it does not adversely affect the performance of the consolidating
agent emulsion.
[0026] A drilling fluid may comprise a fluid loss control agent for
minimizing the
loss of the drilling fluid into the subterranean formation. Suitable fluid
loss control agents
may include, but are not limited to, calcium carbonate, hematite, ilmenite,
magnesium
tetroxide, manganous oxide, iron carbonate, magnesium oxide, barium sulfate,
and mixtures
thereof. Additional suitable fluid loss control agents may comprise sized
salts. These sized
CA 02803584 2014-07-24
9
salts may be dissolved with undersaturated water when desired. Suitable salts
may include,
but are not limited to, NaCl, KC1, NaBr, KBr, HCOOK, HCOONa, CaCI, CaBr2,
ZnBr2 and
combinations thereof. Fluid loss control agent generally comprises particles
that may have a
variety of individual sizes. Generally speaking, the particle size
distribution of the fluid loss
control agent must be sufficient to bridge across and seal the desired opening
downhole. For
example, if the pore throats (i.e., very small openings) on a portion of a
subterranean
formation are to be bridged, then it would be beneficial to use a fluid loss
control agent with
smaller particle size distribution. A suitable size distribution for this type
of application
would range from about 0.1 microns to about 200 microns.
[0027] The drilling fluids used in the present invention may comprise a
degradable
fluid loss control agent. Degradable fluid loss control agents are used to,
among other things,
control leak off into a formation. Suitable degradable fluid loss control
agents generally
comprise degradable polymers including, but not limited to, polysaccharides,
chitins,
chitosans, proteins, aliphatic polyesters, poly(lactides), poly(glycolides),
poly(c-
caprolactones), poly(hydrooxybutyrates), poly(anhydrides), aliphatic
polycarbonates,
poly(orthoesters), poly(amino acids), poly(ethylene oxides), polyphoshazenes,
and mixtures
thereof. In other embodiments, the drilling fluid may comprise degradable,
hydratable gel
particulates that can be broken down with breakers or through a change in pH;
suitable
degradable, hydratable gel particulates are described in U.S. Pat. No.
5,680,900.
[0028] The drilling fluid may further comprise a foaming agent. As used
herein, the
term "foamed" also refers to co-mingled fluids. In certain embodiments, it may
be desirable to
reduce the amount of aqueous fluid that is required in the drilling fluid
(e.g., in water
sensitive subterranean formations). Various gases can be used for foaming the
drilling fluids
of this invention, including, but not limited to, nitrogen, carbon dioxide,
air, methane, and
mixtures thereof. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of this
disclosure will be
able to select an appropriate gas that may be used for foaming the drill-in
fluids of the present
invention. Suitable foaming agent surfactants may include, but are not limited
to, betaines,
amine oxides, methyl ester sulfonates, alkylamidobetaines such as
cocoamidopropyl betaine,
alpha-olefin sulfonate, trimethyltallowammonium chloride, C8 to C22
alkylethoxylate sulfate
and trimethylcocoammonium chloride. Other suitable foaming agents and foam
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
stabilizing agents may be included as well, which will be known to those
skilled in the art
with the benefit of this disclosure.
[0029] The drilling fluid used in the present invention may further
comprise a
weighting agent. Weighting agents are used to, among other things, increase
the fluid density
and thereby affect the hydrostatic pressure exerted by the fluid. Examples of
suitable
weighting agents include, but are not limited to, potassium chloride, sodium
chloride, sodium
bromide, calcium chloride, calcium bromide, ammonium chloride, zinc bromide,
zinc
formate, zinc oxide, and mixtures thereof.
[0030] A drilling fluid may comprise an antifreeze agent to lower the
freezing
point of the drilling fluid. Other additives may be suitable as well as might
be recognized by
one skilled in the art with the benefit of this disclosure.
[0031] The drilling fluids may be prepared using any method known to one of
ordinary skill in the art. One suitable method may comprise combining the
aqueous fluid and
the surfactant to form a drilling fluid. Any optional additives can then be
added to the
drilling fluid prior to introduction of the fluid into a subterranean
formation.
[0032] The drilling fluids may be used to drill into any portion of a
subterranean
formation including, but not limited to, a producing zone along a well bore.
In an
embodiment, a method of drilling a well bore through a subterranean formation
comprises
providing a drilling fluid comprising an aqueous fluid and a surfactant, and
using the drilling
fluid to drill at least a portion of a well bore into a subterranean formation
comprising an
oleaginous fluid using the drilling fluid, wherein the surfactant forms an
emulsifying micelle
with the oleaginous fluid within the well bore. The drilling fluid may be used
to drill at least
a portion of a well bore into the production zone of a subterranean formation.
[0033] In some embodiments, at least a portion of the oleaginous fluid may be
a
heavy hydrocarbon such as a tar, or asphaltene. In these embodiments, the
drilling fluid may
help remove at least a portion of the heavy hydrocarbons from the subterranean
formation. In
general, heavy hydrocarbons tend to form deposits on the casing and/or
production
equipment during drilling and production of the well. While not intending to
be limited by
theory, it is believed that the formation of an emulsifying micelle with the
oleaginous fluid
comprising a heavy hydrocarbon may limit or prevent the heavy hydrocarbon from
forming
deposits as the encapsulation of the oleaginous fluid may limit or prevent it
from contacting
the sides of the well bore and/or any process equipment.
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438 PCT/GB2012/000411
11
[0034] A method of drilling a well bore through a subterranean formation can
comprise providing a drilling fluid comprising: an aqueous base fluid; a
surfactant; a non-
polar fluid; and drilling a well bore in a subterranean formation comprising
an oleaginous
fluid using the drilling fluid, wherein the surfactant forms an emulsifying
micelle with at least
the non-polar fluid.
[0035] The drilling fluid disclosed herein can be used to alter the
wettability of a
filter cake and/or the subterranean formation. When a filter cake and/or the
formation face is
oil wet, compatibility problems can arise for certain completion operations,
such as water
injection and gravel packing. By altering the wettability of a filter cake
and/or the formation
face to be more water wet, the filter cake may be more compatible with
injection water and
brine-based gravel pack carrier fluids. In addition, a water wetting filter
cake can be more
easily removed with an aqueous-based clean-up fluid (e.g., a fluid comprising
mineral acids,
organic acids, oxidizing agents, water-soluble enzymes, and in-situ acid
generators) if
necessary.
[0036] A method of drilling a well bore through a subterranean formation can -
--
comprise providing a drilling fluid comprising: an aqueous base fluid, a
surfactant, and
drilling a well bore in a subterranean formation. The drilling fluid can
increase the water
wettability of the subterranean formation by contacting the subterranean
formation during
drilling. The drilling fluid can also comprise a fluid loss control agent, the
fluid loss control
agent forms a layer disposed on the subterranean formation and the water
wettability of the
fluid loss control agent is increased.
[0037] A water block generally refers to a condition caused by an
increase in water
saturation in the near-well bore area. A water block can form when the near-
well bore area is
exposed to a relatively high volume of filtrate from the drilling fluid. The
increased presence
of water may cause any clay present in the formation to swell and cause a
reduction in
permeability and/or the water may collect in the pore throats, resulting in a
decreased
permeability due to an increased capillary pressure and cohesive forces.
Similarly, an oil
block generally refers to a condition in which an increased amount of oil
saturates the area
near the well bore. Due to the wettability of the subterranean formation and
the resulting
capillary pressure, the oil may reduce the permeability of the subterranean
formation to the
flow of fluids, including oil and water. The treatment fluids and methods
described herein
may be used to remove a water or oil block by removing at least a portion of
the water and/or
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
12
oil in the near well bore area, and/or altering the wettability of the
subterranean formation.
This may directly or indirectly lead to reduced capillary pressure in the
porosity of the
formation. Reduced capillary pressure may lead to increased water and/or oil
drainage rates.
As will be appreciated, improved water-drainage rates should allow a reduction
in existing
water blocks, as well as a reduction in the formation of water blocks.
[0038] A method of drilling a well bore through a subterranean formation can
comprise providing a drilling fluid comprising an aqueous base fluid; and a
surfactant; and
drilling a well bore in a subterranean formation that comprises a pore throat;
and allowing the
surfactant to remove at least a portion of an oil block and/or a water block
from the pore
throat.
[0039] To facilitate a better understanding of the present
invention, the following
examples of certain aspects of some embodiments are given. In no way should
the following
examples be read to limit, or define, the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
- - [0040] In order to demonstrate the retained producibilitY and
various other
properties of the drilling fluids of the present invention, three samples
labeled Sample 1,
Sample 2, and Sample 3 were prepared and tested using a sandstone core plug to
measure the
retained producibility. In the samples, ALDACIDE G is a biocide commercially
available
from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. of Houston, Texas, OXYGONTm is an
organic acid
salt used as an oxygen scavenger, commercially available from Halliburton
Energy Services,
Inc. of Houston, Texas, and CFS-511 is an ester-based surfactant commercially
available
from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. of Houston, Texas. The samples were
prepared
according to the formulations shown in Table 1. A mixture of the lauryl
amidopropyl betaine
and butanol at a mole ratio of about 1:5.5 was included in the mixture.
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
13
TABLE 1
Sample Formulations
Component Sample 1 Sample 2. Sample 3
Aqueous Base Fluid
Balance to produce
Water (bbl) L (0.99 bbl) 157.4 L (0.904) 143.7 (0.868) 138.0
total
NaBr (lbs) kg (105.3) 47.8
KC1 (lbs) kg (42.4) 19.2 (26.3)
11.9
NaC1 (lbs) kg (43.4) 19.2 (26.3)
11.9
NaHCO3 (mg/L) 285
CaC12 2H20 (mg/L) 1246
MgC12 2H20 (mg/L) 6,174
Na2SO4 (mg/L) 4,551
KC1 (mg/L) 147
NaCl (mg/L) 3,990
Additives
ALDACIDE G (lbs)
(0.25) 0.11 (0.25) 0.11 (0.25) 0.11
kg
OXYGON (lbs) kg (0.3) 0.05 (0.1) 0.05 (0.1)
0.05
Lauryl amidopropyl
betaine & butanol (0.005) 0.79 (0.005) 0.79
(0.005) 0.79
(bbl) L
CFS-511 (bbl) L (0.005) 0.79 (0.005) 0.79
(0.005) 0.79
[0041] The samples were tested according to the following procedure. A
Berea
Sandstone core was vacuum saturated using a synthetic Azeri formation water.
The synthetic
Azeri formation water had a salt content as shown in Table 2.
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438 PCT/GB2012/000411
14
TABLE 2
Synthetic Formation Water Salt
Concentrations
Component Concentration
NaHCO3 (mg/L) 3,359
CaC12 . 2H20 (mg/L) 331
MgC12. 2H20 (mg/L) 110
KCI (mg/L) 80
NaC1 (mg/L) 19,044
Na2SO4 (mg/L) 22
BaC12 . 21120 (mg/L) 21
SrCl2 . 6H20 (mg/L) 24
[0042] The core was loaded into a sealed permeameter and pressurized to (1,000
pounds per square inch ("psi")) 6895 KPa. The permeameter allows flow through
the core in
two directions, the first defined as the treatment direction and the opposite
direction defined
as the production direction. The core was heated to 158 F (70 C) and a 3447
KPa (500 psi)
backpressure was applied. SOLTROLID (a non-volatile isoparaffin available from
Chevron
Phillips Chemical Company L.P. of Woodlands, Texas) was flowed through the
core at a
constant rate of 2 milliliter ("mL") per minute in the production direction
until a stable
pressure drop and permeability were observed. The initial permeability of the
core was taken
as this value. About 10 pore volumes of Sample 1 were then passed through the
core in the
injection direction. SOLTROL was then allowed to flow through the core in the
production
direction and the returned permeability was measured. This value was used to
calculate the
retained producibility of the core. .
[0043] At least about 10 pore volumes of synthetic Azeri formation water
was
used to flow through the core in the production direction to help return the
core to its starting
condition. The process was repeated starting with flowing SOLTROL through the
core at
2 mL per minute in the production direction to measure the initial
permeability in order to
measure the results with Sample 2 and Sample 3. After all the samples were
run,
SOLTROL was allowed to flow through the core in the production direction. The
measurements were performed using the same core. The retained producibility
was measured
as the retained producibility when the SOLTROL was allowed to flow back
through the
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
core in the production direction and when the synthetic formation water was
allowed to flow
back through the core in the production direction. The results of the retained
producibility
are shown in Table 3.
TABLE 3
Retained Producibility Results
Retained Producibility with
Retained Producibility with
Sample Synthetic Formation Water
SOLTROL Flowback
Flowback
Sample 1 136% 128%
Sample 2 135% 102%
Sample 3 100% 107%
[0044]
Based on these results it can be seen that the retained producibility was
greater than 100% for_both the SOLTROL flowback and the synthetic formation
water
flowback. In an embodiment, the retained producibility would be measured using
the values
obtained upon flowing formation water through the formation, which would be
most closely
simulated by the synthetic formation water flowback value.
[0045]
Comparative examples were prepared without the additive (i.e., identical
samples without the emulsifying lauryl amidopropyl betaine & butanol
additives). These
samples showed retained producibilities between 35% and 75%. As would be
evident to one
of ordinary skill in the art, the use of the drilling fluid according to the
present invention
allows for an improved retained producibility relative to conventional
drilling fluids.
EXAMPLE 2
[0046] A
variety of surfactant packages were tested against comparative
solvent/surfactant treatment fluids using 150 IAD Crab Orchard sandstone cores
according to
the procedure described in Example 1 above. The samples were labeled Samples 4
through
Sample 10. The samples comprising a surfactant according to the present
invention included
Sample 4 comprising decylamine oxide and octyl pyrollidone, Sample 5
comprising
dodecylamien betaine and butanol, and Sample 6 comprising dodecylamine oxide.
Comparative samples included Sample 7 comprising an emulsified
terpene/surfactant
combination such as a combination of terpene and an ethoxylated alcohol which
is available
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
16
as "GASPERM 10000" available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. of
Houston, Texas;
Sample 8 comprising a terpene solvent and a surfactant which is available as
"MA-844"
available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. of Houston, Texas; Sample 9
comprising a
potassium chloride brine alone; and Sample 10 comprising a traditional
amphoteric surfactant
tallow amidopropyl betaine. The resulting retained producibilities are shown
in Table 4.
TABLE 4
Retained Producibility Results
Sample Retained Producibiliq
Sample 4 80%
Sample 5 100%
Sample 6 100%
Sample 7 60%
Sample 8 40%
Sample 9 30%
Sample 10 20%
EXAMPLE 3
[0047] In this Example, various non-microemulsion surfactants were
tested for
their stimulative effect. A base fluid ("BARADRIL-NTM" commercially available
from
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.) was prepared according to the formulation
shown in Table
below. Some of the key components include a defoamer ("BARA-DEFOAMO"
commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.), xanthan gum
polymer ("N-
VISO" commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.), starch
product ("N
DRILTM HT PLUS" commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services,
Inc.), pH
buffer ("BARABUFO" commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services,
Inc.), and
bridging agent ("BARACARB 5" and "BARACARB 25" commercially available from
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.). This base fluid formulation was then
modified by adding
a specific surfactant. In each case, approximately 0.5 to 1 volume % of the
base fluid was
replaced with different stimulation surfactants, including a
demulsifier/wetting agent ("CFS-
461" commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.), flow-back
surfactants
("PRODUCT 6191" commercially available from Champion Technologies and "MORFLO
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
17
III" commercially available from AlczoNobel). All fluids were hot rolled for
16 hours at
65.6 C (150 F) and allowed to cool to room temperature before testing.
[0048] The testing procedure was as follows. Berea sandstone cores were
drilled 1
y2" diameter, >2" length from the same block. The average oil permeability was
approximately 70 mD. The cores were dried for >16 hours in an oven at 101.7 C
(215 F).
The weight, diameter and length of the dry core were noted. The core was then
saturated in 5
wt-% NaC1 brine under vacuum for 2 hours after which the weight of the
saturated core was
measured. The pore volume was calculated from the dry/saturated weights. Next,
the brine
saturated core was loaded into an ARPII return permeameter. The confining
pressure was
raised to about 6895 KPa (1000psi) while the temperature was set to about 93.3
C (200 F).
SOLTROL was then flowed in at 4mL/min until the permeability was stabilized
(initial
permeability). Damaging fluid was displaced to the face of the core and the
fluid was run at
447 KPa (500psi) of differential pressure for 2 hours using dynamic
filtration. SOLTROLC
was then flowed again at 4mL/min until the permeability stabilized (final
permeability).
[0049] The ratio of the final and initial permeability was recorded as
the regain
permeability, shown below in Table 6. The average regain permeability of the
three tests
runs using the BARADRIL-N fluid without any surfactant additive was 84%. This
baseline
value was used to compare the "stimulative" effect of the different
surfactants. Product 6191
and MorFloIII showed minor improvements in regain permeability while CFS-461
showed a
10% increase in regain permeability.
[0050] This Example illustrates, among other things, the stimulative
effects of
general surfactants under simulated downhole conditions.
TABLE 5
9.5 ppg BARADRIL-N NaC1/KC1
Fluid Formulations
Water (bbl) L (0.913) 145.2
KC1 (ppb) Kg/L (20) 0.057
NaC1 (ppb) Kg/L (59) 6.168
BARA-DEFOAM (ppb) Kg/L (0.175) 4.99 x 104
N-VIS (ppb) Kg/L (1.25) 3.57 x 10-3
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
18
N DRILHT PLUS (ppb) Kg/L (6) 0.017
BARABUF (ppb) Kg/L (1) 2.85 x 10-3
BARACARB 5 (ppb) Kg/L (32) 0.091
BARACARB 25 (ppb) Kg/L (8) 0.023
TABLE 6
Fluid Additive Regain
permeability, %
BARADRIL-N, no surfactant additive 84
BARADRIL-N w/ 1 vol-% Product 6191 86
BARADRIL-N w/ 1 vol-% CFS-461 96
BARADRIL-N w/ 1 vol-% MorFlo III 89
[0051] Therefore, the present invention is well-adapted to attain the
ends and
advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. The
particular embodiments
disclosed above are illustrative only, as the present invention may be
modified and practiced
in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art
having the benefit of
the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details
of construction
or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is
therefore evident
that the particular illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered,
combined, or
modified and all such variations are considered within the scope of the
present invention.
While compositions and methods are described in terms of "comprising,"
"containing," or
"including" various components or steps, the compositions and methods can also
"consist
essentially of' or "consist of' the various components and steps. All numbers
and ranges
disclosed above may vary by some amount. Whenever a numerical range with a
lower limit
and an upper limit is disclosed, any number and any included range falling
within the range is
specifically disclosed. In particular, every range of values (of the form,
"from about a to
about b," or, equivalently, "from approximately a to b," or, equivalently,
"from
approximately a-b") disclosed herein is to be understood to set forth every
number and range
encompassed within the broader range of values. Also, the terms in the claims
have their
plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the
patentee.
Moreover, the indefinite articles "a" or "an," as used in the claims, are
defined herein to mean
one or more than one of the elements that it introduces. If there is any
conflict in the usages
of a word or term in this specification and one or more patents or other
documents that may
CA 02803584 2012-12-20
WO 2012/150438
PCT/GB2012/000411
19
be incorporated herein by reference, the definitions that are consistent with
this specification
should be adopted.
