Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02817659 2016-07-05
PU050252A
ROUTE SELECTION IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
This application is a division of Canadian Serial No. 2,627,432 filed November
9, 2005.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to wireless networks and, in particular, to
wireless mesh
networks. Very specifically the present invention relates to processing of
route request
messages in on-demand routing protocols.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
On-demand routing protocols, for example, the Ad Hoc On-demand Distance Vector
(AODV) routing protocol defined by the MANET working group in IETF, use a
Route
Request and Route Reply mechanism to establish routes between two nodes in
wireless
mesh/ad hoc networks. When a source node wants to send data packets/frames to
a
destination node, the source node discovers the route to the destination by
flooding a Route
Request (RREQ) message over the network if the source node does not have and
needs a valid
route to the destination node. A reverse route back to the source is created
by the nodes in the
network as they receive and forward the RREQ. When a node receives a RREQ, the
receiving
node replies to this request by generating a Route Reply (RREP) message if
either: (1) the
receiving node is itself the destination, or (2) the receiving node has a
valid route to the
destination and the "destination only" (D) flag in the RREQ is NOT set. The
RREP is
forwarded in unicast to the source node through the established reverse route
and a forward
route to the destination in the intermediate nodes and eventually in the
source node is thus
created. The established routes expire if they are not used within a given
route lifetime.
In the AODV, the "destination only" flag of the RREQ message is set by the
source
node and is not changed by the intermediate nodes. If the "destination only"
flag is set in the
RREQ by the source node, the intermediate node does not respond to the RREQ
with a RREP
message even if the intermediate/receiving node has a valid route to the
destination node. It
forwards/re-floods the RREQ to its neighbors. Only the destination node
responds to this
RREQ. In this mode of operation, the route discovery latency may be large
although the up-
to-date best route between the source node and the destination node is
eventually discovered
in the process. Low latency is very important for real-time applications such
as voice and
video communications.
If the "destination only" flag is not set by the source node, then any
intermediate node
with a valid route to the destination node responds to the RREQ with an RREP
message. The
RREP message is sent back to the source node in unicast and establishes a
forward route to
1
CA 02817659 2013-05-31
PU050252A
the destination node. If the "Gratuitous RREP" ('G') flag in the RREQ is set,
this intermediate
node also unicasts a gratuitous RREP to the destination node so that the
destination node
learns of routes to the source node. However, in the AODV, if an intermediate
node does
generate a RREP (because the intermediate node has a valid route to the
destination node),
then the intermediate node discards the RREQ. With this approach, the source
node can
discover a route to the destination node more quickly because the source node
does not have
to wait for the destination node's reply. However, the best end-to-end route
may not be
discovered because the route cached in the intermediate node may not be the
best route to the
destination node. The metrics may have changed due to the dynamics of wireless
networks
making the cached route less desirable. That is, because of changes in the
network topology,
routing metric, etc. it is possible that the route cached in the intermediate
node may become
worse or that other routes with a better end-to-end metric may become
available making other
routes more desirable.
The problem solved by the present invention is how to use the RREQ and RREP
mechanism to quickly discover the best route between a source node and one or
more
destination nodes.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention discloses a method and system for processing/forwarding
Route
Request (RREQ) messages and generating Route Reply (RREP) messages in on-
demand
routing protocols, of which AODV is an example, so that the best route can be
discovered
without incurring significant route discovery delay/latency in wireless
mesh/ad hoc networks.
Specifically, when a source node wants to discover the route to a destination
node, the source
node floods the network with a RREQ message with the destination node
specified in the
destination list and the metric field initialized to 0. The RREQ message
contains a new flag
"Intermediate Reply (IR)" for each destination node. The source node sets the
flag
corresponding to the destination node in the RREQ when it initiates the RREQ
flooding to
discover a route to the destination node(s). During the RREQ flooding, the
first intermediate
node with a valid route to the destination node responds to the RREQ with an
RREP message.
The RREP message is sent in unicast towards the source node and thereby
quickly establishes
a temporary forward route to the destination. Thus, the source node can use
this temporary
forward route to send data packets/frames with a low route discovery
delay/latency. The first
intermediate node resets/clears the "IR" flag in the RREQ message and forwards
the updated
RREQ message downstream towards the destination node. Since the "IR" flag in
the RREQ
2
CA 02817659 2013-05-31
PU050252A
has been reset, the downstream intermediate nodes would not respond to this
RREQ and only
propagate it even if the downstream intermediate nodes have a valid route to
the destination
node(s). The RREQs eventually reach the destination node(s). The destination
node(s) can
select the best route/path based on the end-to-end metrics and send a new RREP
back to the
source node to establish the best route between the source node and this
destination node. If
the best path is different from the temporary forward path that was
established via the RREP
from the intermediate node, the source node will switch to the best path once
the best path is
established.
A system and method for discovering a route between a source node and a
destination
node in a wireless network including setting an intermediate reply flag of an
route request
message by the source node, flooding the wireless network with the route
request message
and responding to the route request message with a route reply message by a
first intermediate
node having a valid route to the destination node, are described. The system
and method then
updating the route request message and re-flooding the wireless network with
the route
request message. The responding act said responding act thereby establishes a
temporary
forward route between the source node and the destination node of the wireless
network.
Also described are a system and method for discovering a best route in which
case the route
reply message becomes a first route reply message. The system and method for
discovering a
best route includes selecting by the destination node the best route between
itself and the
source node based on cumulative metrics received in route request messages
received by the
destination node, creating a further route reply message and unicasting the
further route reply
message to the source node. If the temporary forward route is the best route
then the further
route reply message serves as a confirmation and if the temporary forward
route is not the
best route then the further route reply message serves to establish the best
route upon receipt
of the further route reply message by the source node.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention is best understood from the following detailed
description when
read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The drawings include the
following
figures briefly described below:
Fig. 1 is an exemplary RREQ message format.
Fig. 2 is schematic diagram of a wireless mesh network in accordance with the
principles of the present invention.
3
CA 02817659 2013-05-31
PU050252A
Fig. 3 is schematic diagram of a wireless mesh network in accordance with the
principles of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a flowchart of an on-demand routing protocol showing where the
present
invention is used.
Fig. 5 is a flowchart of the method of the present invention.
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of a node in accordance with the principles of the
present
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
When a source node/mesh point wants to send data packets/frames to some
destination
node, it checks its routing table for a route. If there is a valid route, it
transmits the
packets/frames to the next hop specified in the routing table for this
destination node. If there
is no valid route, the source node initiates route discovery by flooding a
Route Request
(RREQ) message over the wireless mesh/ad hoe network. The data packets/frames
may have
originated in/with the node or from the stations associated with the node if
the node is a
wireless access point. It is possible that a source node needs to discover
routes/paths to
multiple destination nodes. The source node may disseminate a RREQ for each of
destinations or, to reduce the routing overhead, flood the network with a
single RREQ
message having a list of multiple destination node addresses embedded therein.
Fig. 1 is an exemplary RREQ message format with other formats possible. The
RREQ
message contains, for example, the origination/source node address, the
originator's sequence
number, the destination node address and the destination sequence number (or
the number of
destinations and the list of destination addresses and their sequence
numbers), the RREQ ID,
the message ID, the message length, the time-to-live (TTL), the hop count, the
routing metric,
the flags, and other information. Besides the flags "Destination Only" ('D')
and "Gratuitous
RREP" ('G'), a new flag, called "Intermediate Reply" (IR) flag herein, is
contained in the
RREQ message. 'D' and 'G' flags are carried as a legacy of the conventional
AODV. These
two flags are not set/used by the source node and are ignored by the
intermediate and
destination nodes. One alternative embodiment is that the RREQ message does
not contain 'D'
and 'G' flags at all. If the RREQ message carries a list of destination
addresses, then multiple
"Intermediate Reply" flags are included in the RREQ message, each
corresponding to a
destination address. When the source node wants to discover a route to one or
more
destination addresses, it sets the "Intermediate Reply" (IR) flag(s)
corresponding to the
4
CA 02817659 2013-05-31
PU050252A
destination address(es). It should be noted that the destination node
address(es) can be internet
protocol (IP) address(es) or layer 2 (media access control - MAC) address(es).
To adapt to
changes in network conditions and to maintain the best metric route between
nodes, each
active source node may optionally flood the wireless mesh/ad hoc network with
a periodic
RREQ message (maintenance RREQ) for the destination address(es) with which it
is
communicating. The "IR" flag in the maintenance RREQ is not set. The
intermediate and
destination nodes process the maintenance RREQ following the same rules as are
used to
process a non-maintenance RREQ in the discovery phase.
Thus, it can be seen that dissemination of non-maintenance and maintenance
RREQ
messages in a wireless mesh/ad hoc network results in establishing/updating a
reverse route to
the originator (source node) of the RREQ at the intermediate nodes and the
destination nodes.
Dissemination of non-maintenance RREQ messages also triggers RREP messages
from the
destination nodes and probably the intermediate nodes. Dissemination of
maintenance RREQ
messages triggers RREP messages from the destination nodes.
When an intermediate or destination node receives an RREQ message, it creates
a
reverse route to the source node or updates its current reverse route if the
RREQ message
passed through a route/path that offered a better metric than the current
reverse route to the
source node. It should be noted that each node may receive multiple copies of
the same RREQ
message (originating with the same source node and having the same RREQ ID),
each RREQ
message traversing a different path from the source node to the
receiving/intermediate/destination node. If a reverse route is created or
modified or this is the
"first copy" of a RREQ message, the RREQ message is forwarded (re-flooded). A
"first copy"
is used herein to mean that this copy of this RREQ message is the first copy
or time that this
receiving/intermediate/destination node has received or seen this particular
RREQ message
identified by its originator address and RREQ ID. When an intermediate node
forwards an
RREQ message, the metric field in the RREQ message is updated to reflect the
cumulative
metric of the route to the RREQ's source node from the intermediate node.
Furthermore, if the
"IR" flag for a destination node in the destination node list of the received
RREQ message is
set and the intermediate node has a valid route to the destination node, the
intermediate node
responds to the RREQ message with a route reply RREP message. This route reply
message is
sent to the source node in unicast and establishes a forward path to the
destination node. The
source node can then use this route to send data frames/packets to the
destination node
immediately. If the intermediate node responds to the RREQ message with an
RREP message
for a destination node in the RREQ destination node list, it resets/clears the
"IR" flag for this
CA 02817659 2013-05-31
PU050252A
destination node in the RREQ message before re-flooding the network with the
updated
RREQ message. The reason to reset the "IR" flag after a RREP message is sent
is to suppress
any RREP messages from the downstream intermediate nodes. Only the first
intermediate
node with a valid route to the destination node along the route traversed by
the RREQ
message flooding replies with an RREP message for this destination node. If
the "IR" flag for
a destination is reset/cleared in the RREQ message, an intermediate node
should not respond
with an RREP message even if it has a valid route to the destination node.
After creating/establishing or updating a reverse route to the source node,
the
destination node sends a unicast RREP message back to the source node.
Intermediate nodes
create forward routes to the destination node(s) upon receiving the RREP
message, and also
forward the RREP message toward the source node. When the source node receives
the
RREP message, it creates a forward route to the destination node. If the
destination node
receives further RREQ messages with better metrics, then the destination node
updates its
route to the source node to the new route and also sends a new RREP message
back to the
source node along the updated route. The new RREP message establishes a better
(updated)
forward route from the source node to the destination node in the intermediate
nodes and
eventually the source node. Once this better forward route is established, the
source node uses
it to send data. Eventually, a bidirectional, best end-to-end metric route is
established between
the source node and destination node. Using this approach, the source node can
quickly obtain
a route to the destination node that is established with the RREP message
replied to by the
intermediate node with a valid route to the destination node. If this route is
not the best end-
to-end metric route between the source node and destination node, the route is
updated to the
best route thereafter.
Referring now to Fig. 2, which depicts the flooding of the wireless mesh/ad
hoc
network with the Route Request (RREQ) message and the intermediate node B,
with a valid
route to the destination node E, responding to the RREQ message with an RREP
message.
Consider an example in which source node A attempts to discover a route to
destination node
E. Source node A floods Route Request (RREQ) messages with the "IR" flag set
in the
wireless mesh/ad hoc network. Assume that intermediate node B already has a
valid route B-
C-D-E to the destination node E. When intermediate node B receives the RREQ,
it creates a
reverse route to the source node from which it receives the RREQ as the next
hop (source
node A) of the reverse route/path. Intermediate node B responds to the RREQ
with a unicast
RREP because it has a valid route to the destination E and the "IR" flag in
the RREQ is set.
6
CA 02817659 2016-07-05
PU050252A
The RREP establishes a forward route to destination node E in source node A.
As soon as
source node A creates the route/path to destination node E with the RREP from
intermediate
node B, source node A can start sending data packets/frames to destination
node E via route
A-B-C-D-E. Intermediate node B resets the "IR" flag in the RREQ message and
forwards it
further. The reason to reset the "IR" flag is to limit responses to the RREQ
flood to only the
first intermediate node with a valid path to the destination node. The other
intermediate nodes
downstream, e.g. C and D, need not reply to this RREQ with a RREP because the
"IR" flag is
not set. Assume that intermediate nodes F, G and H do not have valid routes to
the destination
node E. When intermediate nodes F, G and H receive the flooded RREQ messages,
they
create the reverse route to the source node A with the node from which each of
the
intermediate nodes F, G and H receives the RREQ as the next hop of the reverse
route. Each
of the intermediate nodes F, G and H then forwards the RREQ messages further.
In this example, destination node E receives two copies of this RREQ each
traversing a
different path: A-B-C-D-E, A-F-G-H-E. Assuming that the two RREQs reached
destination
node E in the following order: A-B-C-D-E and then A-F-G-H-E, destination node
E first
creates a route to source node A through intermediate node D as soon as
destination node E
receives the RREQ along route/path A-B-C-D-E. At this point, the reverse route
to the source
node A has been established in intermediate nodes B, C and D. Destination node
E sends a
RREP along the route E-D-C-B-A. The RREP just refreshes the route A-B-C-D-E.
If there are
any other destination node(s) in the RREQ destination list, for example, node
I, destination
node E removes itself from the destination list and then forwards the RREQ
further (e.g., on
to node I). If there are no other destination node(s) in the RREQ's
destination list, then the
RREQ is not forwarded.
Referring now to Fig. 3, which depicts a wireless local area mesh network
showing the
destination node E reply a RREP (1) upon receiving the RREQ through A-B-C-D-E
and sends
a new RREP (2) to establish a better forward route/path after receiving the
RREQ through A-
F-G-H-E. When destination node E receives the RREQ that came along A-F-G-H-E,
destination node E determines that this RREQ came along a path with a better
metric to A
than the temporary forwarding route/path A-B-C-D-E. Therefore, destination
node E
modifies/updates the next hop from intermediate node D to intermediate node H
and updates
the metric. Destination node E then sends a unicast RREP back to source node A
through
intermediate node H, as well updating and forwarding the RREQ if there are one
or more
other destination node(s) in the RREQ destination list. The RREP establishes
the route to
source node A via the intermediate nodes H, G and F. When source node A
receives this
7
CA 02817659 2015-05-25
PU050252A
RREP, it modifies/updates the next hop for destination node E from
intermediate node B to
intermediate node F. The route to destination node E is changed to A-F-G-H-E.
Referring now to Fig. 4, which is a flowchart for processing an RREQ message.
When a node receives an RREQ message, it first creates/establishes or updates
a reverse
route to the previous hop from which the node received the RREQ message if
necessary at
410. The intermediate/receiving node may then create or update the reverse
route to the
originator of the RREQ as follows. If a reverse route to the originator of the
RREQ message
does not exist in the routing table or is invalid at 415 and 420, it is
created or updated. The
next hop in the routing table for the reverse route for the RREQ originator
becomes the
previous hop (the node from which the RREQ message was received). If a valid
reverse
route to the RREQ originator exists, the source sequence number in the RREQ
message is
compared to the sequence number of the route entry in the routing table at 425
for the reverse
route. If the sequence number in the RREQ message is older, it is dropped and
no further
processing is done at 445. Otherwise, the current reverse route to the
originator is modified
if the new metric is better than the metric of the current route to the
originator in the routing
table at 430. The new metric is defined as the metric in the RREQ message plus
the link
metric between the node from which it received RREQ message and itself. If the
new metric
is not better than the metric of the current reverse route in the routing
table entry, but the
source sequence number in the RREQ is greater (newer) than the sequence number
in the
routing table for the reverse route at 435, the intermediate node checks
whether the optional
processing functions of hysteresis and best candidate route caching are
supported by the
mesh network at 450. If these optional processing functions are not supported,
the reverse
route to the RREQ originator is updated at 455. When a reverse route is
created or modified,
the sequence number in the routing table for the reverse route is set to the
source sequence
number in the RREQ message, the next hop becomes the node from which the RREQ
message was received, the metric is set to the new metric, and the hop count
is set to one
more than the hop count in the RREQ message.
At 470, if a reverse route to the source node was created or modified, or the
RREQ
message was the first copy of a new RREQ message (the RREQ ID was not seen
from the
source before) at 420 and 440, the RREQ forwarding and RREP generation routine
described
herein is executed at 475. There may be other cases when the RREQ forwarding
and RREP
generation routine described herein is executed by a node. For example, in
some best
candidate route caching method, the RREQ messages may be stored in a wait
queue with a
8
CA 02817659 2016-07-05
PU050252A
timer during the candidate route caching. When the wait queue timer expires,
the RREQ
forwarding and RREP generation routine is executed.
The source node may send periodic maintenance RREQ messages to refresh its
active
forward and reverse routes. Each time the source sends a maintenance RREQ
message is
called a route refresh round. It is possible that nodes already having the
best reverse route to
the source node receive a RREQ message with a newer sequence number but a
worse metric
route to the source node before receiving the RREQ message through the current
best metric
route. Additionally, the copy of RREQ message propagated along the current
best metric
route may be lost during the flooding. These events may result in route
flapping. To reduce
route flapping and select the best route during each route refresh round, a
type of hysteresis
and best candidate route caching mechanism may be used. If it is determined at
450 that the
hysteresis and best candidate route caching option is implemented by a mesh
network, an
intermediate node updates the routing table and modifies the reverse route if
the source
sequence number in the RREQ message is greater (newer) than the sequence
number in the
routing table entry by a value greater than a threshold. Otherwise, the
reverse route may be
cached as a potential candidate alternative route at 465.
If the node subsequently learns that the current reverse route has degraded
and becomes
worse than the candidate reverse route, it is able to change to the candidate
route
learned earlier in the same refresh round. The present invention describes a
method and
system to forward an RREQ message and generate an RREP message for discovering
the best
route without incurring a large route discovery delay/latency in wireless mesh
networks. The
method of the present invention works with or without hysteresis and best-
candidate/alternative route caching.
Referring now to Fig. 5, which is a flowchart depicting the RREQ forwarding
and
RREP generation method of the present invention, a node determines if it is a
destination
node, i.e. if one or more address of the node (self_addr) matches the
requested destination
addresses in the destination list of the RREQ message rreq.dest at 505. It
should be noted
that a node itself may have multiple addresses or it may be a proxy for the
other nodes. For
example, a node may be an access point and generate/manage routing messages on
behalf of
legacy stations associated with it (a proxy for the stations). The
functionality for this case is
similar to the situation when a node has multiple addresses. The destination
addresses of
associated stations may be treated as alias addresses for the access point. A
node is a
destination node if one or more of the addresses specified in the RREQ message
destination
list belong to it or one of the nodes using it as the proxy. When a node
receives a RREQ
9
CA 02817659 2016-07-05
PU050252A
message in which the destination node is that of the node proxied by it, it
should process the
RREQ message as if the destination node address is its own address.
Furthermore a node may
be a destination node for a requested addresses in the RREQ message
destination list, but the
intermediate node for another requested address in the RREQ message
destination list.
If one or more address of the node matches the requested destination addresses
in the
destination list of the RREQ message, the node generates and sends unicast
RREP message to
the originator of the RREQ message for these matched destination addresses at
510. A
destination node removes its own/proxied address(s) from the RREQ message
destination list
at 515. After that, if there are no remaining requested addresses in the RREQ
message
destination list at 520, the RREQ message is discarded at 525. If the node is
not a destination
node for any requested address in the RREQ message destination list (505) or
there are other
requested destination addresses in the RREQ message destination list other
than the addresses
of the node, i.e. the node is an intermediate node for one or more addresses
in the RREQ
message destination list, the node checks the remaining addresses in the RREQ
message
destination list as follows. Assume that rreq.dest[i] represents the (i+l)th
address in the RREQ
message destination list. The node initializes an index (e.g., i) at 545 and
checks rreq.dest[i],
i.e. the first address in the RREQ message destination list to determine if
there is an active
forward route to the destination node represented by rreq.dest[i] at 550. If
an intermediate
node has an active route to the destination, the route to the destination node
is valid (555), the
sequence number at least as great as that indicated in the original RREQ
message (560) and
the "Intermediate Reply (IR)" flag is set (570), the intermediate node
generates an RREP
message for this requested destination address at 575 and sends the generated
RREP message
in unicast to the originator of the RREQ message along the current reverse
route. The "IR"
flag for this requested destination in the RREQ message is reset at 580. The
node increments
the index (for example, by one) and checks if there are any additional
addresses in the RREQ
message destination list at 590. If there are any additional addresses in the
RREQ message
destination list then execution of the above-described loop repeats starting
at 550. That is, the
loop is repeated if an RREP message needs to be sent for next requested
destination. The loop
is repeated until all the addresses in the RREQ message destination list have
been checked.
The original incoming RREQ message is checked to determine if the time-to-live
(TTL) value is greater man 1 at 530. If the ITL value is greater than one,
then the information
in the original RREQ message is updated, including decreasing the TTL value in
the outgoing
RREQ message, for example, by one at 535. The source sequence number, metric
and hop
CA 02817659 2013-05-31
PU050252A
count are also set to the corresponding information in the updated route entry
for the source at
535. The updated RREQ message is forwarded at 540.
Notice that a destination node may possess/proxy one or more address and an
intermediate node may have valid route(s) to one or more destination
addresses. An RREQ
message may carry one or more destination addresses in its destination address
list. A
processing/intermediate/destination node may satisfy the above conditions and
send an RREP
message for multiple requested addresses in the RREQ message destination list.
If a node
sends an RREP message for multiple destinations, it may send multiple RREP
messages, one
for each destination, or it may send a single aggregated RREP message with
multiple
destination addresses in the address list.
Fig. 6 is a block diagram illustrating the details of a node 600 of the
present invention.
The node includes a link quality and load measurement module 605, a routing
metric
calculation module 610, a route selection module 615 and a communications
module 620. The
link quality and load measurement module 605 measures the quality and the load
of the
link/channel to each of its neighbors. It provides the measurement results to
the routing metric
calculation module 610 so that the routing metric calculation module 610 can
determine the
link cost/metric to each of its neighbors. Note that a node may have multiple
neighbors,
multiple radio interfaces, and multiple physical/logical channels/links. All
of them need to be
measured. The routing metric calculation module 610 of each node uses the
measurements
made by the link quality and load measurement module along with other
information to
calculate the routing metric for each node with which it communicates. The
routing metric is
updated periodically. The route selection module 615 determines/selects a
route/path to
forward/communicate data to a destination node based on the calculated routing
metrics.
Route selection module 615 exchanges the routing control messages and data
with other nodes
in the mesh network via the communications module 620. It should be noted that
a node may
have one or more radio communication interfaces and other communication
interfaces. It is
understood that the route selection module may actually be made up of several
smaller units
or combined with other modules herein described. It is further understood that
the processes
described herein (especially with respect to Figs. 3 and 4) may be software,
hardware,
firmware or any combination thereof executed in or by the route selection
module.
It is to be understood that the present invention may be implemented in
various forms
of hardware, software, firmware, special purpose processors, or a combination
thereof, for
example, within a mobile terminal, access point, or a cellular network.
Preferably, the present
invention is implemented as a combination of hardware and software. Moreover,
the software
11
CA 02817659 2013-05-31
PU050252A
is preferably implemented as an application program tangibly embodied on a
program
storage device. The application program may be uploaded to, and executed by, a
machine
comprising any suitable architecture. Preferably, the machine is implemented
on a computer
platform having hardware such as one or more central processing units (CPU), a
random
access memory (RAM), and input/output (I/O) interface(s). The computer
platform also
includes an operating system and microinstruction code. The various processes
and functions
described herein may either be part of the microinstruction code or part of
the application
program (or a combination thereof), which is executed via the operating
system. In addition,
various other peripheral devices may be connected to the computer platform
such as an
additional data storage device and a printing device.
It is to be further understood that, because some of the constituent system
components
and method steps depicted in the accompanying figures are preferably
implemented in
software, the actual connections between the system components (or the process
steps) may
differ depending upon the manner in which the present invention is programmed.
Given the
teachings herein, one of ordinary skill in the related art will be able to
contemplate these and
similar implementations or configurations of the present invention.
12
