Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599
PCT/1JS2011/064374
BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Background
[0001] This patent is directed to a battery management system, and, in
particular,
to a battery management system for use with a healthcare delivery system, such
as a
healthcare delivery system including an infusion pump and pump controller.
[0002] Therapy, or treatment, for a medical condition may be
characterized in a
number of different ways. For example, therapy may be discussed in terms of
the
agent used to affect a change in the patient's condition, such as a drug or
radiation.
As another example, therapy may be discussed in terms of the mode or route of
administration.
[0003] Infusion therapy ¨ the intravenous delivery (i.e., delivery into a
vein) of
therapy ¨ is well known in the art. In its simplest form, infusion therapy may
be
carried out using a container or bag connected to a patient via a drip
chamber, an
administration set and a catheter. In such a system and according to such a
method,
fluid passes from the bag to the patient under the influence of gravity. In a
more
complex system, a pump or a cuff may be used to control the flow of the fluid
to the
patient.
[0004] When a pump is used, conventionally the pump is powered using a
mains
supply as the primary supply. The mains supply will typically be used to power
not
only the pump, but also a pump controller associated with the pump, which pump
controller may be programmed to provide individualized delivery of the medical
fluids from the container or bag to the patient. For example, the pump
controller may
be programmed to control the pump to provide a particular flow rate of the
fluid.
[0005] It is also typically the case that a battery power supply is
provided to
power the pump and pump controller for a limited period of time. The battery
power
supply may be included to limit the possibility that a failure of the mains
supply will
result in an interruption of the delivery of fluids to the patient. The
battery power
supply may also be included to permit the pump and pump controller to be moved
with the patient, during which time it may be impossible or impractical to
connect the
pump and pump controller to the mains supply, for example, patient transport
for test
procedures, bathroom visits, or prescribed ambulation to enhance recovery. It
is
- 1 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599
PCT/US2011/064374
frequently the case that patient transport of critical patients requires a
very high
assurance of battery operation duration, due to the life sustaining nature of
patient
infusions. Failure to meet battery operation duration in these situations may
lead to
life threatening situations, as can be observed in the FDA Manufacturer and
User
Facility Device Experience (-MAUDE") database.
[0006] Because it is expected that the battery power supply will only
have to
power the pump and pump controller for a limited period of time before the
pump and
pump controller are again coupled to the mains supply, these battery power
supplies
typically include one or more rechargeable batteries. When the pump and pump
controller are again coupled to the mains supply, a charger can be activated
to charge
the batteries back to their full charge. One advantage of using rechargeable
batteries
is that it is not necessary for the healthcare provider to change the
batteries after every
discharge cycle so that the battery power supply is at full charge capacity
for a
subsequent discharge cycle.
[0007] While rechargeable batteries have a longer standby life than
traditional,
non-rechargeable batteries, rechargeable batteries do have an expected
operational
life, which may be estimated in terms of years and/or numbers of
charge/discharge
cycles. Eventually, the rechargeable batteries will need to be replaced. In
addition,
over the operational life of the rechargeable battery, the charge capacity of
the battery
will decrease.
[0008] As set forth in greater detail below, the present disclosure sets
forth an
improved assembly embodying advantageous alternatives to the conventional
devices
and methods discussed above. In particular, the present disclosure addresses
the
significant unmet need in the area of battery management for portable devices
delivering critical therapies.
Summary
[0009] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a battery
management
system is provided for one or more batteries that are coupleable to a
healthcare
delivery system, the one or more batteries coupled to the healthcare delivery
system
when the healthcare delivery system is not coupled to an alternate power
supply. The
system includes a display unit, and a controller coupled to the display unit
and
programmed to determine when the healthcare delivery system is coupled to the
one
or more batteries, to control the display unit to display an initial number
- 2 -
corresponding to a time remaining on battery (TROB) when the healthcare
delivery
system is coupled to the one or more batteries, to determine if the TROB is
within a
reserve range extending up to a reserve range maximum, the reserve range
maximum
being less than a maximum TROB, to change the TROB according to an operational
state of the healthcare delivery system if the TROB is greater than the
reserve range
maximum, and to decrease the TROB without regard for the operational state of
the
healthcare delivery system if the TROB is less than the reserve range maximum.
[0010] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a
healthcare
delivery system includes one or more batteries, a portable pump for use in
intravenous
delivery of medical fluids, the portable pump being coupleable to the one or
more
batteries, a display unit, an input unit, and a pump controller coupled to the
portable
pump, the display unit and the input unit, the pump controller programmed to
receive
an input from the input unit and to control the portable pump to enter an
operational
state according to the input received. The healthcare delivery system also
includes a
display unit, and a controller coupled to the display unit and programmed to
determine when the healthcare delivery system is coupled to the one or more
batteries,
to control the display unit to display an initial number corresponding to a
time
remaining on battery (TROB) when the healthcare delivery system is coupled to
the
one or more batteries, to determine if the TROB is within a reserve range
extending
up to a reserve range maximum, the reserve range maximum being less than a
maximum TROB, to change the TROB according to an operational state of the
healthcare delivery system if the TROB is greater than the reserve range
maximum,
and to decrease the TROB without regard for the operational state of the
healthcare
delivery system if the TROB is less than the reserve range maximum.
[0010a] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a battery
management system is provided for one or more batteries coupleable to a
healthcare
delivery system, the one or more batteries coupled to the healthcare delivery
system
when the system is not coupled to an alternate power supply, the battery
management
system comprising: a display unit; a controller coupled to the display unit
and
programmed: to detemiine when the healthcare delivery system is coupled to the
one
or more batteries, to control the display unit to display an initial number
corresponding to a time remaining on battery (TROB) when the healthcare
delivery
system is coupled to the one or more batteries, wherein the TROB is determined
- 3 -
CA 2821112 2018-03-14
according to a conservative modeling of the one or more batteries and the
healthcare
delivery system, to determine if the TROB is within a reserve range extending
up to a
reserve range maximum, the reserve range maximum being less than a maximum
TROB, to change the TROB according to an operational state of the healthcare
delivery system if the TROB is greater than the reserve range maximum, and to
decrease the TROB without regard for the operational state of the healthcare
delivery
system if the TROB is less than the reserve range maximum.
[0010b] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a
healthcare
delivery system is provided comprising: one or more batteries; a portable pump
for
use in intravenous delivery of medical fluids, the portable pump being
coupleable to
the one or more batteries; a display unit; an input unit; a pump controller
coupled to
the portable pump, the display unit and the input unit, the pump controller
programmed to receive an input from the input unit and to control the portable
pump
to enter an operational state according to the input received; and a battery
management system comprising a charger coupled to the one or more batteries
and a
controller coupled to the display unit, wherein the controller is programmed:
to
determine when the portable pump is coupled to the one or more batteries, to
control
the display unit to display an initial number corresponding to a time
remaining on
battery (TROB) when the portable pump is coupled to the one or more batteries,
wherein the TROB is determined according to a conservative modeling of the one
or
more batteries and the healthcare delivery system, to determine if the TROB is
within
a reserve range extending up to a reserve range maximum, the reserve range
maximum being less than a maximum TROB, to change the TROB according to an
operational state of the healthcare delivery system if the TROB is greater
than the
reserve range maximum, to decrease the TROB without regard for the operational
state of the healthcare delivery system if the TROB is less than the reserve
range
maximum, to activate the charger when the portable pump is coupled to a mains
voltage to charge the one or more batteries, and to increase the TROB either
by a first
increment or to the TROB maximum according to a recharge state of the one or
more
batteries.
- 3a -
CA 2821112 2018-03-14
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0011] It is believed that the disclosure will be more fully understood
from the
following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Some of
the figures may have been simplified by the omission of selected elements for
the
purpose of more clearly showing other elements. Such omissions of elements in
some
figures are not necessarily indicative of the presence or absence of
particular elements
in any of the exemplary embodiments, except as may be explicitly delineated in
the
corresponding written description. None of the drawings are necessarily to
scale.
- 3b -
CA 2821112 2018-03-14
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
[0012] Fig. 1 is a schematic view of a healthcare delivery system and a
battery
management system according to the present disclosure;
[0013] Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the battery management system of Fig.
1;
[0014] Fig. 3 is a flowchart of a method of managing discharge used by
the
battery management system according to Fig. 2; and
[0015] Fig. 4 is a block diagram of method of managing charging used by
the
battery management system according to Fig. 2.
Detailed Description of Various Embodiments
[0016] Although the following text sets forth a detailed description of
different
embodiments of the invention, it should be understood that the legal scope of
the
invention is defined by the words of the claims set forth at the end of this
patent. The
detailed description is to be construed as exemplary only and does not
describe every
possible embodiment of the invention since describing every possible
embodiment
would be impractical, if not impossible. Numerous alternative embodiments
could be
implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the
filing
date of this patent, which would still fall within the scope of the claims
defining the
invention.
[0017] It should also be understood that, unless a term is expressly
defined in this
patent using the sentence "As used herein, the term ' is hereby defined to
mean..." or a similar sentence, there is no intent to limit the meaning of
that term,
either expressly or by implication, beyond its plain or ordinary meaning, and
such
term should not be interpreted to be limited in scope based on any statement
made in
any section of this patent (other than the language of the claims). To the
extent that
any term recited in the claims at the end of this patent is referred to in
this patent in a
manner consistent with a single meaning, that is done for sake of clarity only
so as to
not confuse the reader, and it is not intended that such claim term be
limited, by
implication or otherwise, to that single meaning. Finally, unless a claim
element is
defined by reciting the word "means" and a function without the recital of any
structure, it is not intended that the scope of any claim element be
interpreted based
on the application of 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph.
[0018] Fig. 1 illustrates a healthcare delivery system 50 according to
the present
disclosure. The healthcare delivery system 50 may be coupled to an AC mains
supply
52 via a plug 54, or the healthcare delivery system 50 may be coupled to one
or more
- 4 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
batteries 56. For example, the healthcare delivery system 50 may be coupled to
the
mains supply 52 while the system 50 is stationary, for example in a patient's
room.
Alternatively, the healthcare delivery system 50 may be coupled to the one or
more
batteries 56 when the system 50 is being moved with the patient, or when a
power
source, such as the mains supply 52, is not otherwise available (i.e., when
the system
50 is not coupled to an alternative power source).
[0019] The batteries 56 may be in the form of valve-regulated lead-acid
batteries
(such as #MD12020 available from Yuasa). As a consequence, unlike more
recently
designed batteries utilizing the Smart Battery specification, the state of
charge and
state of health of the batteries 56 is not readily determined by or available
to the user
of the batteries 56. The lack of information regarding the status of the
batteries 56
makes calculation of remaining charge more complicated because information
regarding the state of charge of the battery is not readily available. While
the
following system and method may have particular advantages when used with such
batteries, it will be recognized that the system and method may still be
advantageously used with other types of batteries as well.
[0020] Associated with the one or more batteries 56 is a battery
management
system 60. While the battery management system 60 is illustrated in Fig. 1 as
being
disposed in a common housing 62 with the batteries 56, this is simply one
embodiment according to the present disclosure. For example, the battery
management system 60 may be placed in a separate housing from the batteries
56, and
then that subassembly may be connected or otherwise associated with the
batteries 56.
[0021] As illustrated in Figs. I and 2, the battery management system 60
includes
a display unit 64. In the illustrated embodiment, the display unit 64 may be
utilized
by the system 50 as well to display information to the healthcare provider
other than
information relating to the batteries 56 or the battery management system 60.
However, according to other embodiments, the display unit 64 may be dedicated
to
the battery management system 60, and display only information relating to the
battery management system 60.
[0022] As also illustrated in Fig. 2, the battery management system 60
includes a
controller 66 coupled to the display unit 64. The controller 66 may include a
processor 68, memory 70 and in input/output interface 72. The memory 70 may be
in
form of read-only memory (ROM) and random access memory (RAM). The ROM
- 5 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599
PCT/US2011/064374
may take many different forms, including erasable programmable ROM (EPROM)
and electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM). In addition, for ease of
illustration, the interface 72 has been represented as an input/output
interface; it will
be recognized that the interface 72 could be in the form of separate devices,
one
dedicated for input and the other dedicated for output.
[0023] The controller 66 is programmed to carry out a battery management
method according to the present disclosure. In particular, the controller 66
may be
programmed to carry out discharge and recharge of the batteries 56 for which
only a
limited amount of information regarding the state of charge and state of
health of the
batteries 56 may be available, although it will be recognized that it could be
used for
other situations as well. This method for discharge and recharge of the
batteries 56
may operate according to a conservative modeling of the behavior of the
batteries 56
and the healthcare delivery device 50 (in particular, its power consumption),
although
it may operate without conservative modeling as well. Further, this method may
provide a value known herein as the time remaining on battery (TROB), which
value
is directly associated with the passage of time as determined by a clock
associated
with the controller 66 or clock function performed by the controller 66.
Accordingly,
the TROB may be referred to as deterministic, in that it uses a clock to
determine the
passage of time and associates the passage of time as measured by the clock
with the
ability of the battery to perform a particular operational state for a
particular amount
of time; this may be contrasted with existing systems that use a sensed
parameter of
the battery (such as voltage) to provide an estimate on battery life.
Moreover, the
method for discharge and recharge may seek to rigorously encourage user
behavior so
that the batteries 56 may be discharged and recharged in such a fashion that a
high
confidence (e.g., in excess of 90%, and according to certain embodiments, in
excess
of 95%) may be maintained when providing the user with a visual indication of
the
TROB in terms of units of time, such as hours, minutes or even seconds. Thus,
it
should be recognized that the TROB may be used in conjunction with the
conservative modeling according to certain embodiments and separately from the
conservative modeling according to other embodiments.
[0024] That is, according to conventional healthcare delivery devices
incorporating battery management, an indicator may be provided to the user of
the
healthcare delivery device to indicate that one of three statuses exist, such
as with
- 6 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599
PCT/US2011/064374
green, yellow and red lights. These three states may be determined according
to a
sensed voltage level across the batteries when the healthcare delivery system
50 is
being powered by the batteries. While the user may thus be able to
differentiate a
delivery device with fully charged batteries from a delivery device with
partially or
fully discharged batteries, such a system does not permit the user to
determine with
any degree of confidence the amount of time that the healthcare delivery
device may
be operated using the associated batteries. In fact, because the conventional
method
uses sensed voltages and because the voltages are dependent upon delivery rate
for
the associated healthcare delivery system (for example, a flow rate where the
system
includes a single or multi-channel pump), battery temperature, and the number
of
charge/discharge cycles already performed by the battery, the time when
various
alerts are provided may vary over the life of the battery. Under such
conditions, it
may not be possible to determine if the remaining power would permit movement
of
the patient and the associated healthcare delivery system (e.g., a pump and
pump
controller) from the patient's room to another area of the healthcare
facility, e.g., for
the administration of medical testing, during which time the healthcare
delivery
system would have to operate using the associated batteries.
[0025] To this end, the battery management system 60 (and in particular,
the
controller 66) is programmed to cause a display to provide a visual indication
of the
TROB on a display, such that the user may be able to compare the TROB with the
time required to transport a patient, for example, and make a determination if
the
transport can be attempted with the existing equipment or if other equipment
is
required. Moreover, the battery management system 60 may use a method that
causes
the user to use the batteries in such a fashion as to avoid behavior that
would stress
the batteries 56 to a point wherein the TROB displayed to the user could not
be relied
upon to a high confidence.
[0026] According to certain embodiments of the present disclosure then, a
controller 66 may be programmed to carry out a method that may include the
following actions, although as explained below, the method may include other
actions
as well. In particular, the controller 66 may be programmed to determine when
the
healthcare delivery system is coupled to the one or more batteries, to control
the
display unit to display an initial number corresponding to a TROB when the
healthcare delivery system is coupled to the one or more batteries, the TROB
being
- 7 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
determined according to a conservative modeling of the one or more batteries
and the
system, and to determine if the TROB is within a reserve range extending up to
a
reserve range maximum, the reserve range maximum being less than a maximum
TROB. The controller 66 may also be programmed to change the TROB according to
an operational state of the healthcare delivery system if the TROB is greater
than the
reserve range maximum, and to decrease the TROB without regard for the
operational
state of the healthcare delivery system if the TROB is less than the reserve
range
maximum.
[0027] By discharging the batteries according to a conservative modeling,
in
particular one that is conservative as to battery cycling (in numbers of
cycles),
temperature of discharge, and discharge voltage, the system 60 may provide for
one
or more of the following benefits. For example, a conservative modeling may
assist
in providing a TROB with high confidence. Moreover, by limiting the discharge
voltage, possible damage to the batteries may be avoided, or at least limited,
when
compared with a system 60 that permits the batteries 56 to be discharged to
the point
permitted by conventional systems.
[0028] Moreover, the battery management system 60 may also include
charger
unit 80 coupled to the controller 66 and couplable to the one or more
batteries 56.
The controller 66 may be further programmed to activate the charger when the
healthcare system is coupled to a mains voltage to charge the one or more
batteries,
and to increase the TROB either by a first increment or to the TROB maximum
according to a recharge state of the one or more batteries.
[0029] By carrying out the charging (or recharging, as the two terms will
be used
interchangeably herein unless context suggests otherwise) that provides for a
limited
number of discrete increases in the TROB, the system 60 may provide for one or
more
of the following benefits. A limited number of increases, or givebacks, to
TROB may
facilitate associating a high confidence with each phase of the recharging
process. By
providing only a limited number of givebacks, the system may also limit the
ability of
the user to continuously discharge and recharge the batteries, because the
user will be
unable to accurately estimate the TROB except at the limited number of
discrete
givebacks permitted by the system 60. Thus, this method encourages the user
not to
use the batteries 56 in a charge/discharge operating range where the resulting
charge
currents during recharge are high. Instead, the user is encouraged to keep the
- 8 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
healthcare delivery system coupled to the mains supply as often as possible.
In fact, it
is believed that when combined with the limitation of battery discharge
voltage
resulting from the use of conservative modeling, limiting the use of high
charge
currents may reduce battery damage by a significant amount, for example by
75%.
[0030] Having thus explained the healthcare delivery system 50, the
battery
management system 60, their interaction, and the operation of the battery
management system 60 in general terms, a more particularized discussion of the
structure and operation of the illustrated embodiment of the systems 50. 60 is
now
described, with reference to Figs. 1 and 2, and to Figs. 3 and 4 as well. In
particular.
Fig. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a method 150 for managing discharge of the
one
or more batteries 56 associated with the system 50, while Fig. 4 illustrates
an
embodiment of a method 250 for managing charging the one or more batteries 56.
[0031] The method 150 begins at block 152 with the determination by the
controller 66 that the healthcare delivery system 50 is coupled to the
batteries 56. The
controller 66 then makes an initial determination at block 154 if the TROB is
equal to
a minimum TROB. According to certain embodiments, the minimum TROB may be
zero minutes. According to other embodiments, the minimum TROB may be set to a
non-zero amount. However, if the determination is made at block 154 that the
TROB
is equal to the minimum TROB at block 154, the method proceeds to blocks 158
and
160, wherein the controller 66 activates an audible alarm 82 to notify the
user that the
TROB is equal to the minimum TROB, and controls the display 64 to display a
visual
alarm message to notify the use that the TROB is equal to the minimum TROB.
The
controller 66 may operate according to blocks 156 and 158 (which may be
performed
concurrently, rather than in series as illustrated) for a period of time,
which may be set
or determined in advance, for example 10 seconds. After the time period has
elapsed,
the controller 66 may cause the healthcare delivery system 50 to turn off or
power
down.
[0032] If the controller 66 determines instead that the TROB is not equal
to the
minimum TROB at block 154, the controller 66 may perform one or more
determinations wherein the TROB is compared against one or more ranges or
threshold values. Once the controller 66 has made the determination, the
controller
66 may permit (or limit) the ability of changes of the system 50 between
different
operational states to cause a change in the TROB, may cause an audible or
visual alert
- 9 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
to be provided to the user, or even cause the system 50 to turn off or power
down.
While the embodiment of the method illustrated in Fig. 3 may provide four such
range
or threshold determinations, it will be appreciated that not every embodiment
according to the present disclosure will include every such determination.
[0033] For example, the controller 66 operating according to the method
150 will
permit changes in the operational states of the system 50 to affect the TROB
if the
TROB is greater than a maximum value set for a particular range of values,
which
may be referred to herein as the reserve range. Above this range (or above
this
threshold value, the reserve range maximum), the method 150 may make further
determinations that dictate the nature of the information displayed or that
affect other
features of the operation of the system 50, but the battery management system
60 will
change the TROB according to an operational state of the system 50. Similarly,
within this range (or below the reserve range maximum), the method 150 may
make
further determinations that dictate the alerts provided or information
displayed, but
the battery management system 60 will decrease the TROB without regard for the
operational state of the healthcare delivery system. However, while the
illustrated
embodiment may provide for multiple threshold determinations, a single
threshold
determination may be made instead with respect to the reserve range according
to
other embodiments.
[0034] According to certain embodiments of the system 60 according to the
present disclosure, the TROB is determined with reference to one or more
equations
relating an effective battery capacity, a projected TROB (or PTROB), and the
reserve
range maximum with one or more tables that are the product of conservative
modeling of the batteries 56 and the system 50. For example, the controller 66
may
be programmed to determine an effective battery capacity (in percent) each
second
according to the following equation (Eqn. 1):
CAP = CAP ¨ PCF* (1/3600), where
CAP is the effective battery capacity (in excess of an amount required to
provide the reserve range capacity); and
PCF is an effective power consumption factor.
[0035] The effective capacity is initially set equal to 100% for a fully
charged
battery. The effective power consumption factor is determined based on
conservative
modeling for the batteries 56 and the healthcare delivery system 50. While the
- 10 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
effective power consumption factor may be represented in a number of forms,
the
factor is provided in tabular form according to certain embodiments. with a
different
factor being determined for each of a limited number of delivery ranges. For
example, where the system 50 is an infusion pump and pump controller, the
following
table may be used for a single channel pump:
Single Channel Pump
Infusion Rate PTROB PCF
(ml/hr) (hrs) (l/PTROB)
801-1200 3.0 0.333
401-800 3.5 0.2857
101 ¨ 400 4.0 0.25
0-100 4.5 0.222
[0036] Alternatively, the following table may be used for a multi-channel
pump:
Triple Channel Pump
Infusion PTROB, PTROB, PTROB, PCF, PCF, PCF,
Rate 1 chan 2 chans 3 chans 1 chan 2 chan 3 chan
Range (hrs) (hrs) (hrs) (1 / (1 / (11
(ml/hr) PTROB) PTROB) PTROB)
801-1200 2.0 1.25 0.75 0.5 0.8 1.33
401-800 2.5 1.5 1 0.4 0.667 1
251 - 400 2.75 1.75 1.25 0.3636 0.571 0.8
0-250 3.0 2.0 1.5 0.333 0.5 0.667
[0037] in preparing this table, the modeling included the following
assumptions
regarding the operation of the batteries 56 and the system 50, wherein power
consumption was maximized while battery capacity was minimized:
1. A conventionally low ambient temperature (15C) was assumed to
maximize consumption:
2. A conventionally low operating temperature for the battery (38C) was
assumed to minimize capacity;
3. A conventionally high number of charge/discharge cycles (e.g., 50-70) was
assumed to minimize capacity;
4. The highest flow rate in each range was assumed to maximize
consumption; and
5. The charge/discharge cycle with a final discharge voltage of 11V was
assumed to minimize capacity.
- 11-
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
[0038] In addition, the modeling assumed that adequate battery capacity
would
be reserved to provide for operation of the system 50 during the period of
time
previously referred to as the reserve range. For this period, additional
assumptions
were made to maximize consumption, including:
1. All channels (where multi-channel) operating at highest delivery (flow)
rate; and
2. The display unit 64 operating at 50% backlight (normally assumed to be
operating at 10% backlight).
[0039] Based on knowledge of the effective battery capacity (CAP), a
current
TROB may be determined using the following equation (Eqn. 2):
CTROB = PTROB''CAP + RRM, where
CTROB is the current TROB;
PTROB is a projected TROB obtained from the tables provided above,
according to the delivery rate (e.g., flow rate) then provided by the system
50;
CAP is the effective battery capacity; and
RRM is the reserve range maximum (in this case, 30 minutes).
[0040] Assuming then that the controller 66 determines at block 154 that
the
TROB is not equal to the minimum TROB (e.g., zero minutes), then the method
150
may continue to block 162, where the controller 66 determines if the TROB
exceeds a
first threshold amount. If the TROB exceeds this first threshold amount, then
the
method 150 proceeds to block 164, and the controller 66 causes the display
unit 64 to
display a visual warning to the user that the system 50 is operating on
battery power.
This may also be accompanied by an audible alert according to certain
embodiments.
The method 150 then proceeds to block 166 where the controller 66 causes the
display
unit 64 to provide a numerical, visual indication of the number of hours of
battery life
remaining. While this visual indicator may be decremented every second or
minute,
the controller 66 may instead determine that the indicator should only be
changed
only once per hour.
[0041] After performing block 166, the controller 66 programmed according
to
the method 150 may make a determination at block 168 as to whether the system
50
has received an input from the user representative of a decision to change the
operational state of the system 50. For example, where the system 50 is a
medical
fluid delivery system including a pump and a pump controller, the user may
enter a
- 12 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
new infusion program with a higher or lower infusion rate than that presently
provided by the system 50. If the determination is made at block 168 that the
input
has been received, the system 60 may receive data regarding the operational
state
change at block 170, and may change the TROB in keeping with the operational
state
change at block 172. That is, if a change to a higher flow rate is programmed,
then
the TROB may be decreased, while a change to a lower flow rate may result in
an
increase in TROB.
[0042] On the other hand, if the controller 66 determines at block 162
that the
TROB is less than the first threshold amount (e.g., one hour), then the
controller 66
determines at block 174 if the TROB is less than a second threshold amount, in
particular the reserve range maximum. As one example, the reserve range
maximum
may be set to thirty minutes. If the controller determines that the TROB is
not less
than the reserve range maximum, the controller 66 continues to block 176.
[0043] At block 176, the controller 66 causes the display unit 64 to
display a
visual warning to the user that the system 50 has entered a range of limited
battery
power (e.g., TROB between one hour and thirty minutes). This may also be
accompanied by an audible alert according to certain embodiments. The method
150
then proceeds to block 178 where the controller 66 causes the display unit 64
to
provide a numerical, visual indication of the number of hours of battery life
remaining
(e.g., one hour). While this visual indicator may be decremented every second
or
minute, the controller 66 may instead determine that the indicator should only
be
displayed only once.
[0044] After performing block 178, the controller 66 programmed according
to
the method 150 may make a determination at block 180 as to whether the system
50
has received an input from the user representative of a decision to change the
operational state of the system 50, similar to block 168. If the determination
is made
at block 180 that the input has been received, the system 60 may receive data
regarding the operational state change at block 182, and may change the TROB
in
keeping with the operational state change at block 184.
[0045] Proceeding further, if the controller 66 determines at block 174
that the
TROB is less than the reserve range maximum, then the method 150 continues to
block 186, wherein a determination is made with reference to a third threshold
amount
(e.g., five minutes). This comparison is made to permit a phased progression
of alerts
- 13 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
to the user; according to alternative embodiments, it may not be desired or
necessary
to make the third threshold comparison, or the subsequent fourth comparison
also
illustrated. However, to afford the user a phased progression of alerts to
limit the
chances for surprise, multiple thresholds may be established.
[0046] If the controller determines at block 186 that the TROB is within
the
range of five to thirty minutes, then the method 150 continues to block 188,
where the
controller 66 causes the display unit 64 to display a visual warning to the
user that the
system 50 has entered a range of low battery power (e.g., TROB between five
minutes
and thirty minutes). This may also be accompanied by an audible alert
according to
certain embodiments. The method 150 then proceeds to block 190 where the
controller 66 causes the display unit 64 to provide a numerical, visual
indication of
the number of minutes of battery life remaining (e.g., thirty minutes). While
this
visual indicator may be decremented every minute, the controller 66 may
instead
determine that the indicator should only be displayed in five minute
increments.
[0047] After performing block 190, the controller 66 programmed according
to
the method 150 may make a determination at block 192 as to whether the system
50
has received an input from the user representative of a decision to change the
operational state of the system 50, similar to block 168. If the determination
is made
at block 192 that the input has been received, the system 60 may still receive
data
regarding the operational state change at block 194. However, because the
healthcare
delivery system 50 is operating in the reserve range, the controller 66 will
not change
the TROB in keeping with the operational state change at block 196. Instead,
the
controller 66 continues to decrement the TROB without regard for the
operational
state of the healthcare delivery system. The controller 66 will continue to
provide
TROB to the user irrespective of the operational state of the healthcare
delivery
system 50 while the TROB is within the reserve range.
[0048] If the determination is made that the TROB is less than the third
threshold
at block 186, the method 150 continues to a determination with respect to a
fourth
threshold at block 198. At this point, the controller 66 determines if the
TROB is
greater than a reserve range minimum, which may be set to be zero minutes as
illustrated. If the TROB is greater than the reserve range minimum, then the
method
150 continues to block 200.
- 14 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
[0049] At block 200, the controller 66 causes the display unit 64 to
display a
visual warning to the user that the system 50 has entered a range of depleted
battery
(e.g., TROB between zero minutes and five minutes). This may also be
accompanied
by an audible alert according to certain embodiments. The method 150 then
proceeds
to block 202 where the controller 66 causes the display unit 64 to provide a
numerical,
visual indication of the number of minutes of battery life remaining (e.g.,
five
minutes). While this visual indicator may be decremented in amounts less than
a
minute, such as in seconds, the controller 66 may instead determine that the
indicator
should only be displayed in one minute increments.
[0050] After petforming block 202, the controller 66 programmed according
to
the method 150 may make a determination at block 204 as to whether the system
50
has received an input from the user representative of a decision to change the
operational state of the system 50, similar to block 168. If the determination
is made
at block 192 that the input has been received, the system 60 may still receive
data
regarding the operational state change at block 206. However, because the
healthcare
delivery system 50 is operating in the reserve range, the controller 66 will
not change
the TROB in keeping with the operational state change at block 208. Instead,
the
controller 66 continues to decrement the TROB without regard for the
operational
state of the healthcare delivery system. The controller 66 will continue to
provide
TROB to the user irrespective of the operational state of the healthcare
delivery
system 50 while the TROB is within the reserve range.
[0051] The method 150 continues on to block 210 when the determination is
made at block 198 that the reverse range minimum is met (e.g., the TROB is
equal to
zero minutes). In such a case, the controller 66 could simply begin to turn
off or
power down the healthcare delivery system 50. However, according to the
illustrated
embodiment, the controller 66 operating according to the method 150 may
instead be
programmed to provide one final five minute period before final power down of
the
healthcare delivery system 50.
[0052] Accordingly, the controller 66 would control the display unit 64
to display
a visual warning to the user that the system 50 has entered a shutdown period
(e.g.,
TROB has reached zero minutes). This may also be accompanied by an audible
alert
according to certain embodiments. The controller 66 may also cause the display
unit
64 to provide a numerical, visual indication of the number of minutes of
battery life
- 15 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
remaining (e.g., five minutes). While this visual indicator may be decremented
in
amounts less than a minute, the controller 66 may instead determine that the
indicator
should only be displayed in one minute increments. The controller 66 may also
stop
any currently running infusions at block 214.
[0053] The controller 66 programmed according to the method 150 may then
make a determination at block 216 as to whether the system 50 has received an
input
from the user representative of a decision to change the operational state of
the system
50, similar to block 168. If the determination is made at block 216 that the
input has
been received, the system 60 may still receive data regarding the operational
state
change at block 218. However, because the healthcare delivery system 50 is
operating in the shutdown range, the controller 66 prevents the system 50 from
carrying out the programmed change. Instead, the controller 66 continues to
decrement the TROB without regard for the operational state of the healthcare
delivery system, and prohibits operation of the healthcare delivery system 50.
The
controller 66 will continue to provide TROB to the user irrespective of the
operational
state of the healthcare delivery system 50 while the TROB is within the
shutdown
range.
[0054] Once the controller 66 determines that the end of the shutdown
range has
been reached (e.g., five minutes have elapsed) at block 222, the controller 66
proceeds
to shutdown the healthcare delivery system 50 at block 224.
[0055] Turning next to Fig. 4, the method 250 for charging the batteries
56
begins at block 252. At block 252, the controller 66 determines if the
healthcare
delivery system 50 is being powered using the mains supply. If the controller
66
determines that the healthcare delivery system 50 is not powered by the mains
supply
(e.g., the system 50 is coupled to the batteries 56, or the batteries have
discharged and
the system 50 is shutdown), then the controller 66 does not proceed with the
method
250. However, if the controller 66 determines that the system 50 is coupled to
the
mains supply, then the controller 66 programmed according to the method 250
proceeds to block 254.
[0056] At block 254, the controller 66 determines if the TROB is greater
than the
reserve range maximum (e.g., thirty minutes). If the TROB is not greater than
the
reserve range maximum, then the method 250 continues to block 256; if it is.
then the
method 250 continues to block 258.
- 16 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599 PCT/US2011/064374
[0057] Continuing then to block 256, as a first precaution, the
controller 66
determines at block 256 if the voltage of the batteries 56 has dropped below
11V. If it
has, then the controller 66 will not change the TROB until a determination is
made at
block 258 that the battery is fully charged. Until then, even though the
batteries 56
are still charging using the charger 80, the display unit 64 will not change
in
accordance with the state of recharge of the batteries 56. If the controller
66
determines at block 256 that the voltage 56 has not dropped below liv, then
the
method 250 continues to block 260.
[0058] As a second precaution, the controller 66 deten-nines at block 260
if the
charger 80 has been coupled to the mains supply for more than a threshold
period of
continuous time, for example thirty consecutive minutes. If the charger 80 has
not
been coupled to the mains for more than thirty consecutive minutes, the method
250
does not continue to block 262, where a determination is made whether the
charge
current through the batteries 56 is below a first current threshold. In fact,
if the
charger 80 is decoupled from the mains supply before thirty consecutive
minutes have
elapsed, the controller 66 may restart the charging method 250 at block 252
when it
detects that the charger 80 has be recoupled to the mains supply. When the
controller
66 determines that the charger 80 has been coupled to the mains for more than
thirty
minutes, then the method proceeds to block 262.
[0059] At block 262, the controller 66 determines if the charge current
is below a
first current threshold. The first current threshold is representative of a
first charge
condition in the batteries 56. The method 250 does not continue until the
charge
current through the batteries 56 drops below the first current threshold. Once
the
charge current does drop below the first current threshold, the controller 56
controls
the display unit 64 at block 264 to display one or more numerals
representative of a
first recharge amount, which may be equal to the reserve range maximum
according
to certain embodiments including the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 4. The
method
250 then continues to block 258.
[0060] The controller 66 determines if the charge current is below a
second
current threshold at block 258. The second current threshold is representative
of a
second charge condition in the batteries 56. According to the illustrated
embodiment,
the second charge condition may correspond to the full charge condition of the
batteries 56, although this need not be the case according to other
embodiments.
- 17 -
CA 02821112 2013-06-10
WO 2012/082599
PCT/US2011/064374
Once the charge current drops below the second charge condition, then the
method
250 continues to block 266, and the controller 56 controls the display unit 64
at block
266 to display one or more numerals representative of a second recharge
amount,
which may be equal to the full charge condition according to certain
embodiments
including the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 4. The controller 66 programmed
according to the method 250 may then set the effective battery capacity to
100%.
[0061] The system 60 and the methods 150, 250 may provide such advantages
as
detailed above, and other advantages in addition.
- 18 -
