Language selection

Search

Patent 2840769 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2840769
(54) English Title: FAULT DETECTION AND SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUE FOR INVERTER BASED DISTRIBUTED GENERATORS (DG)
(54) French Title: DETECTION D'ANOMALIE ET TECHNIQUE DE GESTION DE COURANT DE COURT-CIRCUIT POUR GENERATEURS DISTRIBUES A BASE D'INVERSEURS
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H02J 13/00 (2006.01)
  • H02S 50/00 (2014.01)
  • G01R 31/52 (2020.01)
  • H02H 7/26 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • VARMA, RAJIV KUMAR (Canada)
  • RAHMAN, SHAH ARIFUR (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • VARMA, RAJIV KUMAR (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • VARMA, RAJIV KUMAR (Canada)
  • RAHMAN, SHAH ARIFUR (Canada)
(74) Agent: BRION RAFFOUL
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2015-06-09
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2013-03-14
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2014-06-20
Examination requested: 2013-11-29
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/CA2013/050202
(87) International Publication Number: WO2014/047733
(85) National Entry: 2013-11-29

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract



Systems, methods, and devices relating to fault detection and
short circuit current management support in power transmission
and distribution networks using multiple inverter based power
generation facilities. A fault detection process uses the
waveshape (or the rate of change of the current) of the
distributed generator output short circuit current to
determine if a trip signal is required to disconnect the
inverter based power generation facility from the transmission
and distribution network. The process operates on DGs such as
photovoltaic (PV) based solar farm. The present invention
applies to the entire 24-hour period operation of inverter
based DGs (e.g., solar farms, wind farms, fuel cell based DGs,
etc.).


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. A method for determining if a short circuit has occurred on
a power distribution and transmission network, the method
comprising:
a) determining a distributed generator output current
reading at a point of common coupling where a distributed
generator is coupled to said power distribution and
transmission network;
b) determining if at least one fault condition is
satisfied based on said current reading;
c) in the event said at least one fault condition is
satisfied, disconnecting said distributed generator from
said power distribution and transmission network;
wherein said method is executed at an inverter based
distributed generator facility.
2. A method according to claim I wherein said at least one
fault condition comprises a peak current magnitude being higher
than a predetermined safe peak value, said peak current
magnitude being a magnitude for a highest reading for said
current reading and said predetermined safe peak value being a
current value which is safe for said network.
3. A method according to claim I wherein said at least one
fault condition comprises a rate of increase of said current
value being greater than a predetermined safe rate of change
-28-

value, said predetermined safe rate of change value being a
value considered safe for said network.
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein said distributed
generator facility is a solar farm.
5. A method according to claim 1 wherein said distributed
generator facility is a wind farm.
6. A method according to claim 1 wherein said at least one
fault condition is selected from a group comprising:
- a peak current magnitude being higher than a
predetermined safe peak value, said peak current magnitude
being a magnitude for a highest reading for said current
reading and said predetermined safe peak value being a
current value which is safe for said network; and
- a rate of increase of said current value being greater
than a predetermined safe rate of change value, said
predetermined safe rate of change value being a value
considered safe for said network.
7. A method according to claim 1 wherein step c) comprises
simultaneously disconnecting an inverter, a power source and an
AC filter capacitor from said power distribution and
transmission network.
8. A method according to claim 1 wherein multiple distributed
generator output current readings are taken and each current
reading is used to determine if said at least one fault
condition is satisfied.
-29-

9. A method according to claim 8 wherein said multiple
distributed generator output current readings are synchronized.
10. Computer readable media having encoded thereon computer
executable instructions which, when executed, implements a
method for determining if a short circuit has occurred on a
power distribution and transmission network, the method
comprising:
a) determining a distributed generator output current
reading at a point of common coupling where a distributed
generator is coupled to said power distribution and
transmission network;
b) determining if at least one fault condition is
satisfied based on said current reading;
c) in the event said at least one fault condition is
satisfied, disconnecting said distributed generator from
said power distribution and transmission network.
11. Computer readable media according to claim 10 wherein said
at least one fault condition comprises a peak current magnitude
being higher than a predetermined safe peak value, said peak
current magnitude being a magnitude for a highest reading for
said current reading and said predetermined safe peak value
being a current value which is safe for said network.
12. Computer readable media according to claim 10 wherein said
at least one fault condition comprises a rate of increase of
said current value being greater than a predetermined safe rate
-30-

of change value, said predetermined safe rate of change value
being a value considered safe for said network.
13. Computer readable media according to claim 10 wherein said
at least one fault condition is one of:
- a peak current magnitude being higher than a
predetermined safe peak value, said peak current magnitude
being a magnitude for a highest reading for said current
reading and said predetermined safe peak value being a
current value which is safe for said network; and
- a rate of increase of said current value being greater
than a predetermined safe rate of change value, said
predetermined safe rate of change value being a value
considered safe for said network.
14. A fault detector system for detecting short circuit faults
at a point of common coupling where an inverter-based
distributed generator couples to a power distribution and
transmission network, the system comprising:
- a circuit element for receiving a distributed generator
output current reading from said point of common coupling;
- a rate limiter circuit element for determining if a rate
of change of said output current reading is below a
predetermined safe rate of change value;
- a comparator for comparing an output of said rate limiter
with said predetermined safe rate of change value, said
-31-

comparator generating a trip signal in the event that said
predetermined safe rate of change value is exceeded.
15. A fault detector according to claim 14 further comprising:
- a magnitude comparator for comparing a magnitude of said
output current reading with a predetermined safe peak value,
said magnitude comparator generating said trip signal in the
event said predetermined safe peak value is exceeded by said
magnitude of said output current reading.
16. A fault detector according to claim 14 wherein said trip
signal, when generated, disconnects said distributed generator
from said power distribution and transmission network.
17. A fault detector according to claim 16 wherein said trip
signal, when generated, simultaneously disconnects an inverter
of said distributed generator, a power source, and an AC filter
of said distributed generator from said power distribution and
transmission network.
18. A fault detector according to claim 17 wherein said power
source is at least one solar panel.
19. A fault detector according to claim 17 wherein said power
source is at least one wind turbine.
-32-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
FAULT DETECTION AND SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT MANAGEMENT
TECHNIQUE FOR INVERTER BASED DISTRIBUTED GENERATORS
(DG)
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to inverter based
distributed power generation facilities. More
specifically, the present invention relates to
providing fault detection and short circuit current
management control for inverter based distributed
generators (DGs) in power transmission and
distribution networks.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Renewable energy based Distributed Generators (DGs),
such as photovoltaic solar and wind generators, are
receiving strong encouragement globally through
various incentive programs. Solar farms and wind
farms which generate power from few kW to several
hundred MW are being installed in both distribution
and transmission systems. Distributed generation power
sources connected at one or more locations within the
distribution system have brought new issues and
problems to existing power systems.
[0003] One of the major obstacles in existing electric power
systems is that the integration of more distributed
generators (DGs) to the network increases the short
circuit level significantly due to the contribution of
the DG to the fault. In general all forms of DG
- 1 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
contribute some increase to fault levels. The
connection of DGs to the distribution network could
therefore result in fault levels exceeding the design
limit of the network, particularly if the network is
already operating close to its design limit (i.e.,
with low fault level headroom). When fault level
design limits are exceeded, there is a risk of damage
to and failure of the equipment with consequent risk
of injury to personnel and interruption of supply
under short circuit fault conditions.
[0004] Faults (short circuits) are inevitable. Any power
system is expected to suffer several faults each year.
The number will depend on exposure to lightning and
damage from trees, as well as the age of the system's
components. When a short circuit fault occurs in the
distribution network, a short circuit current will
flow to the fault location. This short circuit current
is detected and cleared by existing protection
equipment, such as circuit breakers or fuses.
[0005] However, when fault levels go beyond the existing
design limits due to the connection of DGs, uprating
the capability of existing protection equipment such
as circuit breakers is the only option to increase the
fault level capabilities of the network. It is likely
that a large area of the network must be reworked in
such cases, making this an exorbitantly expensive
solution, particularly if transformers and cables or
overhead lines are also involved. Hence, utility
companies are limiting the connection of DGs into
their existing network, resulting in a loss of
opportunity to integrate more renewable energy
- 2 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
generation into the transmission and distribution grid
system.
[0006] Even though inverter based DGs, such as PV solar
farms, contribute far less short circuit current to
the network compared to conventional synchronous
generators, the short circuit contribution is
nevertheless considered unacceptable by many utility
companies as it may potentially damage their
transformers and circuit breakers, especially if there
are several DGs operating together.
[0007] Moreover, according to industry standards (e.g., IEEE-
1547 or UL-1741) regardless of fault level, DGs are
required to disconnect upon detection of fault on the
system. Conventional fault detection techniques based
on over-voltage, under-voltage and over-current
signals, which are used to operate the protective
circuit breakers and disconnect the DGs from the
network, are fast but yet not adequate to meet the
stringent requirement of utilities. Even a small
contribution of short circuit current may unacceptably
overload the circuit breakers. This means that the
detection of faults and disconnection of DGs from the
network should be done as quickly as possible.
[0008] In light of the above, there is a need for solutions
which mitigate if not overcome the shortcomings of the
prior art.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
- 3 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
[0009] The present invention provides systems, methods, and
devices relating to fault detection and short circuit
current management support in power transmission and
distribution networks using multiple inverter based
power generation facilities. A fault detection process
uses the wave-shape (the rate of change or the
magnitude)of the short circuit current to determine if
a trip signal is required to disconnect the inverter
based power generation facility from the transmission
and distribution network. The process operates on DGs
such as photovoltaic (PV) based solar farm. The
present invention applies to the entire 24-hour period
operation of inverter based DGs (e.g., solar farms,
wind farms, fuel cell based DGs, etc.).
[0010] In a first aspect, the present invention provides a
method for determining if a short circuit has occurred
on a power distribution and transmission network, the
method comprising:
a) determining a current reading at a point of
common coupling where a distributed generator
is coupled to said power distribution and
transmission network;
b) determining if at least one fault condition
is satisfied based on said current reading;
c) in the event said at least one fault
condition is satisfied, disconnecting said
distributed generator from said power
distribution and transmission network;
wherein said method is executed at an inverter based
distributed generator facility.
- 4 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
[0011] In a second aspect, the present invention provides
computer readable media having encoded thereon
computer executable instructions which, when executed,
implements a method for determining if a short circuit
has occurred on a power distribution and transmission
network, the method comprising:
a) determining a current reading at a point of
common coupling where a distributed generator
is coupled to said power distribution and
transmission network;
b) determining if at least one fault condition
is satisfied based on said current reading;
c) in the event at least one fault condition
is satisfied, disconnecting said distributed
generator from said power distribution and
transmission network.
[0012] In a third aspect, the present invention provides a
fault detector system for detecting short circuit
faults at a point of common coupling where an
inverter-based distributed generator couples to a
power distribution and transmission network, the
system comprising:
- a circuit element for receiving an output
current reading from said point of common
coupling;
- a rate limiter circuit element for
determining if a rate of change of said output
current reading is below a predetermined safe
rate of change value;
- 5 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
- a comparator for comparing an output of said
rate limiter with said predetermined safe rate
of change value, said comparator generating a
trip signal in the event said predetermined
safe rate of change value is exceeded.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] The embodiments of the present invention will now be
described by reference to the following figures, in
which identical reference numerals in different
figures indicate identical elements and in which:
FIGURE 1 shows a system block diagram of an embodiment
of the present invention;
FIGURE 2 shows a detailed PV solar farm schematic
illustrating the features in conventional solar farm
circuitry;
FIGURE 3 shows a circuit diagram illustrating the
circuitry of a PV solar farm;
FIGURES 4a-4b show circuit diagrams illustrating the
circuitry of a fault detector according to one
implementation of the invention;
FIGURE 5 shows a flowchart detailing the steps in a
method according to one aspect of the invention;
FIGURES 6a-6d show the instantaneous current at point
of common coupling (PCC) during short circuit events
under differing circumstances;
- 6 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
FIGURE 7 shows the instantaneous current at point of
common coupling (PCC) during load switching event;
FIGURE 8a-8c illustrate the instantaneous current at
point of common coupling (PCC) during short circuit
events under differing circumstances; and
FIGURE 9 is a flowchart detailing the steps in a
generalized method according to another aspect of the
invention.
[0014] The figures are not to scale and some features may be
exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular
elements while related elements may have been
eliminated to prevent obscuring novel aspects.
Therefore, specific structural and functional details
disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting
but merely as a basis for the claims and as a
representative basis for teaching one skilled in the
art to variously employ the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0015] The terms "coupled" and "connected", along with their
derivatives, may be used herein. It should be
understood that these terms are not intended as
synonyms for each other. Rather, in particular
embodiments, "connected" may be used to indicate that
two or more elements are in direct physical or
electrical contact with each other. "Coupled" may be
used to indicate that two or more elements are in
either direct or indirect (with other intervening
elements between them) physical or electrical contact
- 7 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
with each other, or that the two or more elements co-
operate or interact with each other (e.g. as in a
cause and effect relationship).
[0016] The disclosed embodiments herein are merely exemplary,
and it should be understood that the invention may be
embodied in many various and alternative forms. For
purposes of teaching and not limitation, the
illustrated embodiments are directed to a method of
fault detection and short circuit current management
in a DG system using a solar farm inverter or any
other inverter based power generation facility.
[0017] The use of solar farm inverters and wind farm
inverters is applicable regardless of the following:
= Type and configuration of inverter, e.g., 6
pulse, 12 pulse, multilevel, etc;
= Type of semiconductor switches used, e.g., gate
turn-off thyristor (GTO), insulated gate bipolar
transistor (IGBT), etc;
= Type of firing methodology used, e.g., pulse
width modulation (PWM), sinusoidal pulse width
modulation (SPWM), hysteresis control, phase
locked loop (PLL) based, etc;
= Methodology of controller design, e.g., pole
placement, lead lag control, genetic algorithm
based control, etc;
= Choice of auxiliary control signals, e.g., local
signals such as line current magnitude, active
power flow, local bus frequency, remote signals
- 8 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
such as phasor measurement unit (PMU) acquired
signals, etc.
[0018] The present invention seeks to provide systems,
methods, and devices which provide a rapid solution
for controlling and reducing the short circuit current
from inverter based distributed generators, and which
support the addition of distributed generators (solar,
wind, etc.) and other conventional generators to the
power system without requiring the expensive uprating
of existing protection equipment.
[0019] The present document refers to a photovoltaic (PV)
solar farm. However, the skilled artisan will
understand that the present invention is not limited
to this type of solar based power generation system,
but can be used with any distributed power generation
source where a voltage inverter is utilized.
[0020] The present invention relates to fault detection and
short circuit current management of inverter based
distributed generators. Through the inventive control,
the inverter based distributed generators will
disconnect the PV inverter permanently in response to
short circuit fault in the network for a period of
time while the fault is cleared. The time duration for
which the inverter based DGs are disconnected will be
determined by the amount of time required to clear the
fault and the power conditions of the transmission and
distribution network.
[0021] The present invention provides a rapid fault detection
technique - the technique monitors the rate of rise of
current and the current magnitude using an auxiliary
fault detector controller. The auxiliary fault
- 9 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
detector monitors the inverter current output to
detect the fault and operates the IGBT switches to
disconnect the PV inverter quickly before the rated
output current of the inverter is exceeded. As a
result, the quick disconnection of the DG is capable
of preventing the rise of the short circuit current.
This can alleviate the problem of fault level when
more DGs are integrated to the network as mentioned
earlier.
[0022] The present invention offers a less expensive solution
to the issue of limiting short circuit currents from
inverter based distributed generators, as no
additional expensive equipment is required.
Implementation of the fault detection and short
circuit current management control in the DG inverters
can create new opportunities for additional connection
of distributed generators and other conventional
generators that may have been previously denied
permission to connect due to short circuit current
limitations.
[0023] The present invention applies to the entire 24-hour
period operation of inverter based DGs. These DGs may
take the form of solar farms, wind farms, fuel cell
based DGs, or any other inverter based distributed
generators.
[0024] Figure 1 is a single-line representative diagram of an
exemplary system (10) in which the invention may be
practiced. In a typical distribution network a power
generation facility (20) through transformers (30) is
coupled to a power transmission and distribution
network (40). The power transmission and distribution
- 10 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
network (40) is equipped with protection equipment
such as circuit breakers (50). At the other end of the
network (40) is a load (60) coupling to the load bus
(70). For simplicity, the loads (60) on the system
(40) are combined together, which may be a separate
power system, or an industrial complex with a variety
of devices that may include induction motors.
[0025] When a short circuit fault (80) occurs in the
distribution network (40), a short circuit current
(90) will flow to the fault location (80). Both
existing power generators (20) and distributed
generators, for example PV solar farm (100), will
contribute to the short circuit current (90). The
inverter based power generation facility (100) couples
to the network (40) at the point of common coupling
(110). The power generation facility (100) is equipped
with existing power generation modules and a fault
detection and short circuit current management
auxiliary controller (120).
[0026] Figure 2 is a detailed PV solar farm (100) schematic,
using as a voltage sourced inverter (130) with a DC
bus capacitor (140). The voltage sourced inverter
(130) is realized by utilizing six semiconductor
switches (here, IGBTs). It may be understood that
there are several types/configurations of voltage
sourced converters/inverters. However, the invention
applies to any type/configuration of the inverter. The
inverter (130) is connected to the network (40)
through interfacing series inductors (150) and a step-
up transformer (160). The point at which the PV solar
farm is connected to the power transmission network
(40) is termed as the point of common coupling (110).
- 11 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
The currents injected/delivered by the PV solar farm
(100) are denoted as iSF,a, iSF,b and isp,c.
[0027] Referring to Figure 3, a block diagram of a PV solar
farm circuitry according to one aspect of the
invention is illustrated. The PV solar system (100) is
comprised of PV modules (170) that generate direct
current (DC) power from the solar irradiation, which
is converted into alternating current (AC) power with
the help of inverter (130). The AC filter (180) at the
output of the inverter (130) maintains the power
quality whereas the DC link capacitor (140) maintains
the DC voltage on the DC side of the inverter (130).
[0028] The inverter (130) is a voltage sourced converter that
is comprised of IGBT switches and associated snubber
circuits. Each phase (a, b and c) has a pair of IGBT
devices that converts the DC voltage into a series of
variable width pulsating voltages, using the
sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) technique.
The gating signals (gtl, gt2, gt3, gt4, gt5, gt6) of
the IGBT switches are generated from a conventional
inverter controller (190). The conventional inverter
controller (190) uses two current control loops to
control the active and reactive power at the inverter
output. The controller 190 also deals with the
regulation of DC link voltage by taking three phase
current signals from the inverter output as feedback
signals to the controller.
[0029] The conventional PV solar farm only controls the
reactive power output of the inverter such that it can
perform unity power factor operation along with the DC
link voltage control. The switching signals for the
- 12 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
inverter (130) switching are generated through two
current control loops as noted above. The upper
current control loop regulates the reactive power. Qref
is only proportional to Id which sets the reference
/d_rer for the upper control loop. On the other hand,
the lower current control loop regulates the DC link
voltage through two proportional-integral (PI)
controllers (PI-2 and PI-3) according to the set point
voltage provided by the maximum power point tracking
(MPPT), as well as injects all the available real
power to the network (40). To generate the proper IGBT
switching signals (gtl, gt2, gt3, gt4, gt5, gt6), the
direct-quadrature components (md and mq) of the
modulating signal are converted into three phase
sinusoidal modulating signals and compared with a high
frequency fixed magnitude triangular wave or carrier
signal.
[0030] Figure 4(a) shows a block diagram of the auxiliary
fault detection and short circuit current management
controller (referred to hereafter as the fault
detector) according to one aspect of the present
invention. Figure 4(a) is provided to illustrate the
concept of the fault detector.
[0031] The fault detector (200) has three separate channels
to measure three phase instantaneous inverter output
currents (Io_a, ILb, Io_c) at the PCC. These channels
help detecting both symmetrical and asymmetrical
faults such as for example, single line to ground
fault, two lines to ground fault, etc. For each one of
the three channels, the phase instantaneous inverter
output currents are passed through a low pass filter
(270) to reject all the higher order frequencies due
- 13 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
to solar inverter injection, feeder capacitor
switching or transformer energization. The filtered
current is passed through two parallel paths in each
channel -- one path is through a slope detector
(d/dt) (265) and the other path is through a magnitude
detector III (295). The slope detector (265) is
comprised of a comparator which compares the
derivative of the PV system current (to determine the
slope) and compares this slope with the reference
slope (d/dt)max. Similarly, the magnitude detector
(295) is comprised of a comparator which compares the
magnitude of the PV system current (III) with a
reference value IIImax, the peak magnitude of
instantaneous rated current. The output of these
detectors goes high only if either of the monitored
values, (d/dt) or III exceeds their corresponding
reference values, (d/dt)max or IIImax. The outputs of
the detectors referred here as 'trigger signals' are
passed through an OR gate (298). The OR gate output
signal is then applied to the RS flip-flop (300) to
hold the trigger signal once it goes high. It is noted
that during a transient event (such as the load
switching, transformer energization, capacitor
switching etc.), if a current transient is not
completely filtered out in the low pass filter (270),
it can cause a high d/dt for a very short period of
time. This high d/dt may generate an undesirable
trigger signal leading to a shutdown of the PV solar
system. To avoid this situation, a time delay (310) in
the clock signal of the RS flip-flop (300) is
introduced. The time delay prevents the above-
described spurious trigger signals (generated due to a
transient) from passing through the RS flip-flop.
- 14 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
[0032] Finally, the triggering signals from all the channels
are passed through a digital 'OR' gate (315) to ensure
that the output triggering signal, 'PVIso', becomes
high whenever a fault is detected with any of the
phase signals. Alternatively 'DCIso' (320) becomes low
due to the detection of a fault with any of the phase
signals. Of course, the NOT gate at end of the
circuit which produces the DCIso signal is optional
and depends on whether the receiving circuit operates
on a positive or negative logic.
[0033] Figure 4(b) shows one implementation of the above
fault detector on a commercially available
electromagnetic transients simulation software
PSCAD /EMTDCTm. The implementation is provided only as
an example. Similar implementations are also possible
using other similar commercially available software
packages.
[0034] Figure 4(b) is divided in two sections: Section-A
(210) and Section-B (220). There are three identical
channels corresponding to the phase a (/0_), phase b
(/0_1,), and phase c (1-) currents. The channel
corresponding to phase a is described in detail below.
[0035] The fault detector uses a synchronization section
labeled as Section-A (210). In this section the
current signals, /0õ., monitored at the PCC as
explained earlier is passed through a low pass filter
(270). To avoid false operation of the fault detection
module due to a start up transient of the solar farm,
a time delay (typically 1 sec) is added through a
comparator (230). The output of the comparator becomes
high after this preset time delay of 1 sec.
- 15 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
[0036] It is preferred that a zero crossing synchronization
be performed prior to transmitting the filtered
current signal to the input of section-B (220). This
synchronization ensures that the section-B operation
will start only from the zero crossing instants of the
current I. If the zero crossing synchronization is
not performed, the slope detector (265) in section-B
will see a sudden jump in current or, alternatively, a
high rate of rise of current, both of which will
generate a false triggering signal. To synchronize
with the zero crossing of current, a D flip-flop (250)
is used at the output of the comparator (230). The
clock signal of the D flip-flop (250) is twice the
fundamental frequency. The clock signal to the D
flip-flop is implemented through a zero crossing
detector (240) of the input signal /0...a. The clock
frequency is twice that of fundamental frequency so
that the synchronization can occur at either of the
two positive going or negative going zero crossings.
When the comparator (230) output becomes high after I
sec, the output of the D flip-flop (250) waits for the
zero crossing of the current signal /0...a. Until this
time the output of the D flip-flop remains zero and no
current signal passes to section B. Once the
synchronization with zero crossing is accomplished,
the current signal from section-A is transmitted to
Section-B.
[0037] The synchronized signals from Section-A are passed
through two parallel paths in section-B in each
channel as explained above. In the EMTDCTm/PSCAD
software, the first rate limiter (260) replicates the
input signal as long as the rate of change of the
- 16 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
input (d/dt) does not exceed the specified threshold
limit indicated by 'Ref Rate'. Therefore, the output
of the rate limiters is based on the slope of the
input signal. During a system fault, the rate of
change of the input current (d/dt) becomes more than
the threshold limit.
[0038] The threshold limit can be determined approximately
with the magnitude of (d/dt) of the rated current as
shown in the following expression. For a current
i= smolt, the threshold limit is given by
!di! koilm
= ........................................................... = (1)
140
where, Im is the peak magnitude of instantaneous
inverter current, k is an arbitrarily selected
tolerance constant based on the utility requirements
(typically 1.0 - 1.06) and o is the angular frequency
of the current.
[0039] Meanwhile, the threshold limit of the second rate
limiter (255) is set to a very high value such that
the second rate limiter can unconditionally replicate
the input current signal at its output. As a result,
by comparing the signals from the two rate limiters,
the comparator acting as 'Slope Detector' (265) can
generate a trigger signal at its output if Im> Im rated =
In other words, when the actual rate of rise of
current is more than the permissible rate of rise of
current, a trigger signal is generated. Note that, to
eliminate potential comparisons with negative signals,
absolute value Ix' detectors (280) are used with the
outputs of both rate limiters.
- 17 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
[0040] For the other path, the 'Magnitude Detector' (295)
compares the magnitude of the instantaneous current
signal with the rated instantaneous peak current
magnitude or with the maximum allowable instantaneous
peak current magnitude. This maximum allowable
instantaneous peak current magnitude is the rated
magnitude multiplied by the tolerance constant.
[0041] The outputs of the Slope detector (265) and Magnitude
Detector (295) are then passed through OR gate (298)
and R-S flip-flop (300) to generate the triggering
signal 'PVIso'. The PVIso signal thus becomes high
when either the rate of rise of current exceeds the
acceptable limit or when the instantaneous current
magnitude exceeds the rated or maximum allowable
current of the inverter.
[0042] Referring back to Figure 3, it is understood from the
conventional controller configuration (190) that the
inverter transfers power through IGBT switching.
Hence, once the triggering signal (320) is generated
upon detection of a fault, the triggering signal (320)
is used to immediately stop the gating signal of the
inverter as shown by the 'DCIso' label in the
conventional inverter controller (190) (see right side
of box labeled 190). As a result, the PV solar
inverter (130) is able to stop the power transfer from
the PV modules (170) to the grid (40) within few
hundred micro-seconds upon detection of any
symmetrical or asymmetrical fault on the network (40).
It is noted that once the gating signal is stopped,
the DC voltage across the capacitor (140) increases
due to the PV module (170) current. According to the
current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of the PV module
- 18 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
(170), the current output gradually decreases with the
increase of voltage at the output of the PV module
(170) and, eventually, stops at the rated open circuit
voltage of the PV module (170). However, to reduce the
DC voltage stress across each IGBT valve or switch,
the same triggering signal (320) is used to open a
solid state DC breaker and prevent the voltage rise
across the DC link capacitor (140) as shown again by
the 'DCIso' label in the PV module (170). In addition,
this triggering signal (320) is used to isolate the AC
filter (180) capacitor by switching off the back to
back connected gate turn off (GTO) thyristor, as shown
by the 'DCIso' label in the AC filter (180) module.
This is done to prevent an undesired ringing effect
between the filter capacitors and network inductances.
This oscillatory ringing effect mainly arises due to
the absence of a sufficient damping resistor in the
filter (180) design.
[0043] The operation of the fault detection and short circuit
current management controller and the logic followed
by the circuitry illustrated in Figs. 4 (a) and (b),
is illustrated by the flowchart shown in Figure 5. The
process begins as the PV inverter starts (330). The
power generation facility is operating in its regular
power generation mode, with the controller input
signal set as 'DCIso' high, which is the normal
operation mode. The fault detector monitors the three
phase (a, b, c) instantaneous inverter output currents
1-g_c) at the PCC (340). The input signals of
the fault detector are delayed by 1 second to avoid
inverter startup transients (350). Once the currents
are stabilized, it enters the synchronization process
- 19 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
(360). The main synchronization is performed by the
zero crossing threshold detectors that trigger the
clock signal of the D-type flip-flop at zero crossings
of the AC signals. At this point, the power generation
facility generates power with a synchronized fault
detector (370).
[0044] The fault detector continuously monitors the PV output
current at the PCC, detecting the onset of faults in
the grid (380). The rapid fault detection process is
based on the waveshape of the DG inverter current. The
rate of rise of current and the peak magnitude of the
inverter current are utilized to detect the occurrence
of the fault.
[0045] The next step in the operation mode is the fault
determination (390). This step (390) checks if the
rate of rise of the current exceeds a predetermined
value or if the peak current magnitude exceeds the
rated peak value. If either of these conditions is
met, a short circuit is predicted to occur. If the
short circuit fault is predicted to occur (400) (i.e.
the rate of rise of the current is larger than a
preset value or the peak current magnitude is larger
than the rated peak value), the output triggering
signal, 'PVIso' becomes high and the corresponding
'DCIso' signal becomes low. From the circuit
illustrated in the Figures, if the 'DCIso' signal
becomes low, it immediately stops the gating signals
of the inverter, disconnects the DC link capacitor,
and isolates the AC filter capacitor (410). Therefore
the PV solar farm or any other inverter based power
generation facility disconnects permanently (420)
- 20 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
until the fault clears and the system operation is
resumed.
[0046] If the rate of rise of the current is smaller than a
preset value and the peak current magnitude is smaller
than the rated peak value, the current remains within
the inverter ratings even during short circuit fault
events (430). The trigger signal 'PVIso' remains low
and the corresponding 'DCIso' signal remains high.
Hence, the power generation facility continues to
generate power with the synchronized fault detector as
desired (370).
[0047] The significant benefits provided by the above
embodiment can be further illustrated using the
examples in Figures 6, 7 and 8. As a demonstration of
the robustness of the auxiliary fault detection and
short circuit current management controller, several
cases of the operational mode is presented below.
[0048] Figures 6a-6d show the instantaneous current at the
point of common coupling (PCC) during short circuit
events. As highlighted in Fig. 6 (a) if the solar farm
is operating at rated power and the fault detector is
inactive, the rated current of the inverter is
exceeded, resulting in an unacceptably high current
for utility companies. The dashed line in Figure 6a
represents the rated current of the inverter, which,
in a current example is set at 0.25 kA. With the use
of the fault detector the short circuit is sensed
immediately and a trip signal is issued. This stops
the gating signals of the inverter. The current
output from the inverter stops immediately without
exceeding the rated peak as shown in Figs. 6 (b) and
- 21 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
(c), which are for fault occurrence at the current
peak and non-peak instants, respectively. It is noted
that, while simulating the fault, a high frequency
switching spike is observed in EMTDC/PSCAD simulation
studies shown in the waveforms of Figures 6 (a), (b)
and (c). This is due to the mismatch between
simulation time step (1 psec) and the plotting time
step (10 psec). This spike can be eliminated by using
the same time step for both simulation and plotting
time step. Setting a lower simulation time step gives
a precise output but requires a large amount of
computer memory to plot at the same time step. This
lower simulation time step crashes the simulation most
of the time while a higher simulation time step has
the lack of accuracy. Therefore, the aforementioned
settings are considered as acceptable settings to
explain the concept of the fault detector by ignoring
the high frequency spike in all the simulation results
presented here.
[0049] When the fault current contribution remains within the
inverter rated limit, the fault detector does not
issue any trip signal that eventually allows the solar
farm to remain online and deliver current to the grid
as demonstrated in Fig. 6 (d). It is noted that the
fault detector is capable of handling the short
circuit current in a timely manner regardless of the
type of fault (symmetric or asymmetric) and the
location of the fault on the distribution system
(nearby or at a remote location).
[0050] Figure 7 shows the instantaneous current at the point
of common coupling (PCC) during a load switching
event. As highlighted, if load switching current
- 22 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
contribution remains within the inverter rated limit,
the fault detector does not issue any trip signal
regardless of whether the load switching took place
nearby or at a remote location. Therefore, the fault
detector can distinguish between large load switching
current contribution and short circuit fault current
contribution.
[0051] Figures 8a-8c show the instantaneous current at the
point of common coupling (PCC) during short circuit
events. In one preferred embodiment of the present
invention it can be observed that the use of a very
small value of a damping resistor in the AC filter
creates a ringing effect after the PV solar inverter
is disconnected upon the detection of fault. This
ringing phenomenon is illustrated in the current
waveform in Fig. 8 (a). This ringing effect is
undesirable as it can be several orders of magnitude
larger than the rated current of the inverter. By
applying a triggering signal from the fault detector
which simultaneously disconnects the PV solar inverter
and the AC filter capacitor, the ringing effect is
eliminated. The effect of this simultaneous
disconnection is shown in the waveform of Fig. 8 (b).
Alternatively, the ringing effect can be eliminated by
the use of a comparatively large damping resistor in
the AC filter, the effects of which are shown in Fig.
8 (c). In that case, the isolation of filter capacitor
from the AC filter is not needed to eliminate the
ringing effect.
[0052] The process according to one aspect of the invention
maybe viewed more generally as detailed in the
flowchart of Figure 9. The process begins at step
- 23 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
500, that of initiating the system. This step
includes synchronizing the fault detector inputs.
Step 510 is that of monitoring the DG output current
at the PCC. Step 520 is that of checking for a fault
condition. The fault condition may be that the rate
of rise of the output current is above a predetermined
value. Alternatively, the fault condition may be that
the peak current magnitude is above the peak rating.
Or, as in the fault detector noted above, the fault
condition could be either of these conditions. If the
fault condition is not satisfied, then the logic
returns to step 510. In the event the fault condition
is satisfied, the DG is disconnected from the power
distribution and transmission network (step 530).
[0053] Referring back to Figure 3, it should be clear that
the auxiliary fault detection and short circuit
current management controller is not part of the PV
solar farm but that existing PV solar farms can be
easily retrofitted with such a controller. In fact,
the auxiliary fault detector controller detailed above
only uses a maximum of three inputs to the PV solar
farm to deliver the 'DCIso' trigger signal. Because of
this, conventional PV solar farms can be easily
retrofitted with the auxiliary fault detector
controller. This provides the owners and operators of
inverter based power generation facilities with the
advantages of the present invention as described
above.
[0054] It should be also noted that all the proposed
embodiments and capabilities of the invention can be
achieved for any type of power distribution or power
transmission network, be it of radial type or meshed
- 24 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
type. The process detailed in Figures 5 and 9 may be
implemented in hardware using hardwired discrete
components as in the embodiment detailed above.
Alternatively, the process may be implemented as
software which runs on a generalized CPU interfacing
with power electronics components.
[0055] The embodiments of the invention may be executed by a
computer processor or similar device programmed in the
manner of method steps, or may be executed by an
electronic system which is provided with means for
executing these steps. Similarly, an electronic memory
means such as computer diskettes, CD-ROMs, Random
Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM) or similar
computer software storage media known in the art, may
be programmed to execute such method steps. As well,
electronic signals representing these method steps may
also be transmitted via a communication network.
[0056] Embodiments of the invention may be implemented in any
conventional computer programming language. For
example, preferred embodiments may be implemented in a
procedural programming language (e.g., "C") or an
object-oriented language (e.g., "C++", "java", "PHP",
"PYTHON" or "C#"). Alternative embodiments of the
invention may be implemented as pre-programmed
hardware elements, other related components, or as a
combination of hardware and software components.
[0057] Embodiments can be implemented as a computer program
product for use with a computer system. Such
implementations may include a series of computer
instructions fixed either on a tangible medium, such
as a computer readable medium (e.g., a diskette, CD-
- 25 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
ROM, ROM, or fixed disk) or transmittable to a
computer system, via a modem or other interface
device, such as a communications adapter connected to
a network over a medium. The medium may be either a
tangible medium (e.g., optical or electrical
communications lines) or a medium implemented with
wireless techniques (e.g., microwave, infrared or
other transmission techniques). The series of computer
instructions embodies all or part of the functionality
previously described herein. Those skilled in the art
should appreciate that such computer instructions can
be written in a number of programming languages for
use with many computer architectures or operating
systems. Furthermore, such instructions may be stored
in any memory device, such as semiconductor, magnetic,
optical or other memory devices, and may be
transmitted using any communications technology, such
as optical, infrared, microwave, or other transmission
technologies. It is expected that such a computer
program product may be distributed as a removable
medium with accompanying printed or electronic
documentation (e.g., shrink-wrapped software),
preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM
or fixed disk), or distributed from a server over a
network (e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web). Of
course, some embodiments of the invention may be
implemented as a combination of both software (e.g., a
computer program product) and hardware. Still other
embodiments of the invention may be implemented as
entirely hardware, or entirely software (e.g., a
computer program product).
- 26 -

CA 02840769 2013-11-29
Attorney Docket No. 1131P004W001
[0058] A person understanding this invention may now conceive
of alternative structures and embodiments or
variations of the above all of which are intended to
fall within the scope of the invention as defined in
the claims that follow.
- 27 -

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2015-06-09
(86) PCT Filing Date 2013-03-14
(85) National Entry 2013-11-29
Examination Requested 2013-11-29
(87) PCT Publication Date 2014-06-20
(45) Issued 2015-06-09

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $347.00 was received on 2024-01-19


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if standard fee 2025-03-14 $347.00
Next Payment if small entity fee 2025-03-14 $125.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $800.00 2013-11-29
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2013-11-29
Application Fee $400.00 2013-11-29
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2015-03-16 $100.00 2013-11-29
Final Fee $300.00 2015-03-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 3 2016-03-14 $100.00 2016-02-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 4 2017-03-14 $100.00 2016-11-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 5 2018-03-14 $200.00 2018-03-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2019-03-14 $200.00 2019-03-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2020-03-16 $200.00 2020-03-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2021-03-15 $204.00 2021-03-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2022-03-14 $203.59 2022-03-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2023-03-14 $263.14 2023-02-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2024-03-14 $347.00 2024-01-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
VARMA, RAJIV KUMAR
Past Owners on Record
RAHMAN, SHAH ARIFUR
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Maintenance Fee Payment 2021-03-05 1 33
Maintenance Fee Payment 2023-02-27 1 33
Description 2013-11-29 27 883
Claims 2013-11-29 5 143
Abstract 2013-11-29 1 18
Claims 2014-12-18 5 152
Drawings 2013-11-30 15 248
Representative Drawing 2014-07-04 1 11
Cover Page 2014-07-04 1 46
Cover Page 2015-05-19 1 46
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-12-18 10 284
Prosecution-Amendment 2013-11-29 22 435
Assignment 2013-11-29 13 265
PCT 2013-11-29 9 485
Correspondence 2014-03-14 1 22
Correspondence 2014-04-25 2 48
Correspondence 2014-04-30 1 12
Correspondence 2015-03-26 1 41
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-06-19 2 95