Language selection

Search

Patent 2864984 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2864984
(54) English Title: METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUBTERRANEAN BORE HOLE FRACTURE SIMULATION
(54) French Title: PROCEDES ET SYSTEMES POUR LA SIMULATION DE FRACTURES SOUTERRAINES DE TROU DE FORAGE
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01N 33/24 (2006.01)
  • C09K 8/00 (2006.01)
  • E21B 43/26 (2006.01)
  • G01N 33/28 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MURPHY, ROBERT J. (United States of America)
  • JAMISON, DALE E. (United States of America)
  • MILLER, MATTHEW L. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: PARLEE MCLAWS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2017-05-09
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2013-02-15
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2013-08-29
Examination requested: 2014-08-19
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2013/026419
(87) International Publication Number: WO2013/126287
(85) National Entry: 2014-08-19

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
13/401,651 United States of America 2012-02-21

Abstracts

English Abstract

Apparatus and methods for simulation of bore hole fractures are disclosed. A device (100) for simulating a fracture in a subterranean formation comprises a housing (110), an inlet (102) for directing a sample fluid to the housing (110), and a first disk (202A) and a second disk (202B) positioned within the housing (110). The second disk (202B) is movable relative to the first disk (202A) to form an adjustable gap (302) between the first disk (202A) and the second disk (202B) and the sample fluid flows through the adjustable gap (302). A common collector (216) receives at least a portion of the sample fluid that flows through at least one of the first disk (202A) and the second disk (202B). The apparatus and methods are particularly suitable for testing drilling fluids, lost circulation materials or wellbore strengthening materials. The disks can be porous disk, slotted disk or solid disks in order to represent different types of subterranean formation such as sandstones or shale.


French Abstract

L'invention se rapporte à un appareil et à des procédés de simulation de fractures de trou de forage. Un dispositif (100) pour simuler une fracture dans une formation souterraine comprend un corps (110), une entrée (102) pour la direction d'un échantillon de fluide dans le corps (110), et un premier disque (202A) et un second disque (202B) positionnés à l'intérieur du corps (110). Le second disque (202B) est mobile par rapport au premier disque (202A) pour former un écart ajustable (302) entre le premier disque (202A) et le second disque (202B) et l'échantillon de fluide s'écoule à travers l'écart ajustable (302). Un collecteur commun (216) reçoit au moins une partie de l'échantillon de fluide qui s'écoule par le premier disque (202A) et/ou le second disque (202B). L'appareil et les procédés sont particulièrement adaptés à des fluides pour sondages d'exploration, des matériaux de perte de circulation ou des matériaux de renforcement de puits de forage. Les disques peuvent être des disques poreux, des disques fendus ou des disques solides afin de représenter différents types de formations souterraines tels que des grès ou des schistes.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. A device for simulating a fracture in a subterranean formation
comprising:
a housing;
an inlet for directing a sample fluid to the housing;
a first disk and a second disk positioned within the housing;
wherein the second disk is movable relative to the first disk to form an
adjustable gap between the first disk and the second disk;
wherein the sample fluid flows through the adjustable gap;
a common collector;
wherein the common collector receives at least a portion of the sample fluid
that flows through at least one of the first disk and the second disk;
at least one of a spring and an actuator, wherein the at least one of the
spring and the
actuator applies a force to the second disk and wherein the force directs the
second disk
towards the first disk;
a displacement transducer coupled to the second disk, wherein the displacement
transducer detects a movement of the second disk relative to the first disk;
and
a force transducer, wherein the force transducer monitors a force exerted on
the
second disk.
2. The device of claim 1, wherein the first disk is immovable relative to
the housing.
3. The device of claim 1, wherein a spring applies the force to the second
disk; and a cell
cap coupled to the housing, wherein the cell cap compresses the spring.
4. The device of claim 1, further comprising an information handling
system, wherein
the information handling system at least one of regulates a force applied to
the second disk
and monitors movement of the second disk.
5. The device of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first disk and the
second disk is
selected from a group consisting of a porous disk, a slotted disk and a solid
disk.
6. A method for simulating subterranean operations comprising:
providing a Fracture Simulation Cell having a first disk, a second disk and a
common
collector;
14

wherein the second disk is movable relative to the first disk forming an
adjustable gap between the first disk and the second disk;
wherein the gap between the first disk and the second disk is adjusted using a

mechanism selected from the group consisting of at least one of a spring and
an actuator;
wherein the at least one of the spring and the actuator applies a force to the

second disk and the force directs the second disk towards the first disk;
wherein the common collector provides an outlet for flow of at least a portion

of a sample fluid;
directing a sample fluid into the Fracture Simulation Cell through an inlet;
monitoring of a change in width of the gap between the first disk and the
second disk;
wherein monitoring the change in width of the gap between the first disk and
the second disk comprises coupling the second disk to a displacement
transducer to monitor
movement;
monitoring a force exerted on the second disk, wherein a force transducer
monitors
the force exerted on the second disk; and
using the change in width of the gap between the first disk and the second
disk and
amount of force exerted on the second disk to evaluate performance of the
sample fluid.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the common collector is pressurized
before directing
the sample fluid into the Fracture Simulation Cell, wherein the pressurization
of the common
collector simulates pressure of fluids in spaces within a subterranean
formation.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising reducing pressure of the
sample fluid and
monitoring fluid flow from the common collector to the inlet.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein the sample fluid comprises material
selected from a
group consisting of Loss Circulation Materials, Wellbore Strengthening
Materials, and
chemical treatments.
10. The method of claim 6, further comprising heating at least one of the
sample fluid and
the Fracture Simulation Cell.
11. The method of claim 6, further comprising monitoring a force exerted on
at least one
of the first disk and the second disk.

12. The method of claim 6, wherein directing a sample fluid into the
Fracture Simulation
Cell comprises directing a plurality of fluids to the Fracture Simulation
Cell.
13. A fracture simulation cell comprising:
a housing;
a first disk and a second disk,
wherein the second disk is movable relative to the first disk, forming an
adjustable gap therebetween;
wherein the first disk and the second disk are placed in the housing;
at least one of a spring and an actuator, wherein the at least one of the
spring and the
actuator applies a force to the second disk and wherein the force directs the
second disk
towards the first disk;
a fluid inlet;
wherein the fluid inlet directs a sample fluid into the housing;
wherein the sample fluid is directed to the adjustable gap;
wherein a portion of the sample fluid may flow through at least one of the
first
disk and the second disk;
a fluid outlet;
wherein the fluid outlet directs the portion of the sample fluid out of the
housing;
means for applying a force to at least one of the first disk and the second
disk;
a displacement transducer coupled to the second disk,
wherein the displacement transducer monitors a movement of the second disk
relative to the first disk; and
a force transducer, wherein the force transducer monitors a force exerted on
the
second disk.
14. The fracture simulation cell of claim 13, wherein at least one of the
first disk and the
second disk is selected from a group consisting of a porous disk, a slotted
disk and a solid
disk.
16

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02864984 2016-08-04
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUBTERRANEAN BORE HOLE FRACTURE
SIMULATION
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Serial Number
13/401,651 filed
February 21, 2012.
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates to subterranean operations and, more
particularly, to
apparatus and methods for simulation of bore hole fractures.
Drilling operations play an important role when developing oil, gas or water
wells or when
mining for minerals and the like. During the drilling operations, a drill bit
passes through
various layers of earth strata as it descends to a desired depth. Drilling
fluids are commonly
employed during the drilling operations and perform several important
functions including, but
not limited to, removing the cuttings from the well to the surface,
controlling formation
pressures, sealing permeable formations, minimizing formation damage, and
cooling and
lubricating the drill bit.
When the drill bit passes through porous, fractured or vugular strata such as
sand, gravel,
shale, limestone and the like, the hydrostatic pressure caused by the vertical
column of the
drilling fluid exceeds the ability of the surrounding earth formation to
support this pressure.
Consequently, some drilling fluid is lost to the formation and fails to return
to the surface. This
loss may be any fraction up to a complete loss of the total circulating
drilling fluid volume. This
condition is generally known in the art as "Lost Circulation." Failure to
control Lost Circulation
increases drilling cost and can damage formation production capabilities.
The general practice is to add any number of materials to the drilling fluid
which act to
reduce or prevent the outward flow of the drilling fluid in a porous and or
fractured stratum by
sealing pores or cracks, thereby reducing or preventing Lost Circulation. The
materials used in
this process are commonly referred to as Lost Circulation Materials ("LCM")
and may be
particles or polymers. Some materials typically used as LCM include, but are
not limited to,
wood fiber, popped popcorn, straw, bark chips, ground cork, mica, ground and
sized minerals
and the like.
Further, a technique generally referred to as wellbore strengthening ("WS")
may be used to
effectively strengthen the walls of a wellbore to prevent fracturing due to
overpressure and the
subsequent Lost Circulation. This technique takes advantage of inadvertent
fractures from
normal drilling operations and deliberately induced fractures by sealing and
propping the
1

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
fractures open. Consequently, the wellbore wall is compressed and a higher
pressure is required
to cause new cracks and further losses of drilling fluid.
In order to optimize the efficiency of drilling operations, LCM may be used in
conjunction
with Wellbore Strengthening Materials ("WSM"). In some instances, the WSM
particles may be
larger than the LCM particles. It is desirable to be able to simulate the
effect of LCM and/or
WSM particles on the formation in order to improve the efficiency of drilling
operations and
identify the LCM and/or WSM particles best suited for a given formation and
performance
criteria. Specifically, it is desirable to be able to test a carrier fluid's
ability to transport WSM or
LCM particles into a new fracture. Further, it is desirable to be able to test
the WSM's or LCM's
ability to remain in the fracture and prop it open to induce wellbore stress
in order to reduce Lost
Circulation.
2

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
SUMMARY
The present invention relates to subterranean operations and, more
particularly, to
apparatus and methods for simulation of bore hole fractures.
In one exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a device
for simulating
a fracture in a subterranean formation comprising: a housing; an inlet for
directing a sample fluid
to the housing; a first disk and a second disk positioned within the housing;
wherein the second
disk is movable relative to the first disk to form an adjustable gap between
the first disk and the
second disk; wherein the sample fluid flows through the adjustable gap; a
common collector;
wherein the common collector receives at least a portion of the sample fluid
that flows through at
least one of the first disk and the second disk.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a
method for
simulating subterranean operations comprising:
providing a Fracture Simulation Cell having
a first disk, a second disk and a common collector; wherein a gap between the
first disk and the
second disk is adjustable; wherein the common collector provides an outlet for
flow of at least a
portion of a sample fluid; directing a sample fluid into the Fracture
Simulation Cell through an
inlet; monitoring at least one of a change in width of the gap between the
first disk and the
second disk and amount of fluid flow through the common collector; and using
at least one of the
change in width of the gap between the first disk and the second disk and
amount of fluid flow
through the common collector to evaluate performance of the sample fluid.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure is directed to a
fracture
simulation cell comprising: a housing; a first disk and a second disk forming
an adjustable gap
therebetween; wherein the first disk and the second disk are placed in the
housing; a fluid inlet;
wherein the fluid inlet directs a sample fluid into the housing; wherein the
sample fluid is
directed to the adjustable gap; wherein a portion of the sample fluid may flow
through at least
one of the first disk and the second disk; a fluid outlet; wherein the fluid
outlet directs the portion
of the sample fluid out of the housing; means for applying a force to at least
one of the first disk
and the second disk; and means for monitoring movement of at least one of the
first disk and the
second disk.
The features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those
skilled in the
art from the description of the preferred embodiments which follows when taken
in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings. While numerous changes may be made by those
skilled in the
art, such changes are within the spirit of the invention.
3

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These drawings illustrate certain aspects of some of the embodiments of the
present
invention, and should not be used to limit or define the invention.
Figures 1 depicts a Fracture Simulation Cell ("FSC") in accordance with an
exemplary
embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 2 depicts a cross-sectional view of the FSC of Figure 1, with a gap
simulating a
closed fracture.
Figure 3 depicts a cross-sectional view of the FSC of Figures 1 and 2, with a
gap
simulating an open fracture.
Figure 4 depicts steps for simulating a fracture in a formation in accordance
with an
exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 5 depicts a FSC in accordance with a second embodiment of the present
disclosure.
While embodiments of this disclosure have been depicted and described and are
defined by
reference to example embodiments of the disclosure, such references do not
imply a limitation
on the disclosure, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The subject
matter disclosed is capable
of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and
function, as will occur to
those skilled in the pertinent art and having the benefit of this disclosure.
The depicted and
described embodiments of this disclosure are examples only, and not exhaustive
of the scope of
the disclosure.
4

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail
herein. In the
interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation may be
described in this
specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any
such actual
embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions may be made to achieve
the specific
implementation goals, which may vary from one implementation to another.
Moreover, it will
be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-
consuming, but would
nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art
having the benefit of
the present disclosure.
For purposes of this disclosure, an information handling system may include
any
instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute,
classify, process, transmit,
receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect,
record, reproduce, handle, or
utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business,
scientific, control, or other
purposes. For example, an information handling system may be a personal
computer, a network
storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape,
performance,
functionality, and price. The information handling system may include random
access
memory ("RAM"), one or more processing resources such as a central processing
unit ("CPU")
or hardware or software control logic, ROM, and/or other types of nonvolatile
memory.
Additional components of the information handling system may include one or
more disk drives,
one or more network ports for communication with external devices as well as
various input and
output ("I/O") devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a video display. The
information
handling system may also include one or more buses operable to transmit
communications
between the various hardware components.
For the purposes of this disclosure, computer-readable media may include any
instrumentality or aggregation of instrumentalities that may retain data
and/or instructions for a
period of time. Computer-readable media may include, for example, without
limitation, storage
media such as a direct access storage device (e.g., a hard disk drive or
floppy disk drive), a
sequential access storage device (e.g., a tape disk drive), compact disk, CD-
ROM, DVD, RAM,
ROM, electrically erasable programmable read-only memory ("EEPROM"), and/or
flash
memory; as well as communications media such wires, optical fibers,
microwaves, radio waves,
and other electromagnetic and/or optical carriers; and/or any combination of
the foregoing.
The terms "couple" or "couples," as used herein are intended to mean either an
indirect or
direct connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that
connection may be
through a direct connection, or through an indirect electrical connection via
other devices and
5

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
connections. The term "upstream" as used herein means along a flow path
towards the source of
the flow, and the term "downstream" as used herein means along a flow path
away from the
source of the flow. The term "uphole" as used herein means along the
drillstring or the hole from
the distal end towards the surface, and "dovvnhole" as used herein means along
the drillstring or
the hole from the surface towards the distal end.
It will be understood that the term "oil well drilling equipment" or "oil well
drilling
system" is not intended to limit the use of the equipment and processes
described with those
terms to drilling an oil well. The terms also encompass drilling natural gas
wells or hydrocarbon
wells in general. Further, such wells can be used for production, monitoring,
or injection in
relation to the recovery of hydrocarbons or other materials from the
subsurface. This could also
include geothermal wells intended to provide a source of heat energy instead
of hydrocarbons.
The present invention relates to subterranean operations and, more
particularly, to
apparatus and methods for simulation of bore hole fractures.
Turning now to figure 1, a Fracture Simulation Cell ("FSC") in accordance with
an
exemplary embodiment of the present invention is generally denoted with
reference numeral
100. The FSC 100 may include a housing with a fluid inlet 102 that supplies
fluids containing
LCM and/or WSM particles to the FSC 100 from a source 104. In one exemplary
embodiment,
the source 104 may be a Permeability Plugging Apparatus ("PPA") available from
Fann
Instrument Company, of Houston, Texas. In one exemplary embodiment, the source
104 may
include a pressure or heat generation mechanism that may be used to pressurize
and/or heat the
sample fluid before it is delivered through the inlet 102. The structure and
operation of such heat
or pressure generation mechanisms are well known to those of ordinary skill in
the art and will
therefore not be discussed in detail herein. The flow of the sample fluid from
the source 104
through the inlet 102 may be regulated by a valve 106. In one exemplary
embodiment, the FSC
100 may be heated to a regulated test temperature before introducing the
sample fluid. The FSC
100 housing may further include a cell cap 108, a cell body 110 and filtrate
top to bottom
connection 112 to ensure pressure consistency on both sides of the filtrate
medium.
The structure and operation of the FSC 100 will now be discussed in further
detail in
conjunction with Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 depicts a cross-sectional view of
the FSC 100 of
Figure 1, with a gap simulating a closed fracture. Inside the FSC 100, disk
holders may hold two
disks 202A, 202B that simulate the formation. As discussed in more detail
below, the disks
202A, 202B may be porous, slotted or solid depending on the nature of the
formation that is to
be simulated. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present
invention, both disks
202A. 202B may be flat, porous, ceramic disks. Further, as would be
appreciated by those of
6

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the present
disclosure is not limited to
any specific disk geometry. Specifically, the disks 202A, 202B may be
circular, square or
rectangular. It may be desirable for each disk to only be used for a single
test in order to obtain
the best results. In accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure,
one of the disks
may be fixed while the other one may be movable. In the example embodiment
illustrated in
Figure 2, the top disk 202A is fixed while the bottom disk 202B is spring
loaded.
The force applied by the springs 204 forces the bottom disk 202B towards the
top disk
202A in order to press the two disks together. In one embodiment, the springs
204 may be
Bellville springs. Accordingly, the top disk 202A and the bottom disk 202B are
operable to form "
an adjustable gap therebetween. The width of the adjustable gap may increase
or decrease as the
bottom disk 202B moves relative to the top disk 202A. The applied force
holding the disks
202A, 202B together simulates the resistance of the subterranean formation to
the development
of fractures in the formation. Similarly, the stiffness of the springs 204
simulates the stiffness of
the formation. In one embodiment, cell cap 108 may be screwed in or out of the
FSC 100 in
order to load the disks 202A, 202B. Specifically, the amount of force pressing
the disks 202A,
202B together may be controlled by the screw on cell cap 108 with the cell cap
108 compressing
the springs 204 as it is screwed into the FSC 100. Accordingly, the bottom
disk holder 206
which controls the movement of the bottom disk 202B is pressed in place by the
springs 204 but
is free to move against the springs 204. As the bottom disk holder 206 moves,
it will also move
the bottom disk 202B relative to the upper disk 202A. The top disk 202A may be
held in place
by a top disk holder 208. In one embodiment, the top disk holder 208 may be
removable but is
held stationary against one end of the cell body 110.
The movement of the bottom disk holder 206 and the bottom disk 202B may be
detected
and monitored by a displacement transducer such as a Linear Variable
Differential Transformer
("LVDT"). As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art,
although a LDVT is
disclosed herein, other means may be used to monitor the movement of the
bottom disk holder
206. For instance, in other embodiments, laser or capacitive displacement
sensors may be used
to monitor movement of the bottom disk holder 206. In one embodiment, as shown
in Figure 2,
the displacement transducer (not shown) may be connected to a rod 210 that is
coupled to the
bottom disk holder 206 and/or the bottom disk 202B and extends out from the
FSC 100 through
a seal 212. In another exemplary embodiment (not shown), the displacement
transducer may be
placed within the FSC 100 and directly connected to the disk holder 206 or the
disk 202B.
One or more seals 214 are placed around the disk holders 206, 208 and isolate
the cavities
between and around the disks 202A, 202B. Additional seals may be provided
around the disk
7

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
holder shafts and the cell cap 108 to prevent leakage of fluids from the FSC
100. Passages in the
disk holders 206, 208 allow fluid flowing through the disks 202A, 202B to be
collected by a
common collector 216. The common collector 216 may be pressurized by means of
a receiver
(not shown) to simulate the pressurized fluid in the spaces within a
subterranean formation's
pores.
In operation, a sample fluid flows through the inlet 102 into the FSC 100. As
the sample
fluid flows into the FSC 100, a portion of the sample fluid will enter the
adjustable gap between
the disks 202A, 202B. In embodiments with disks 202A, 202B having holes,
slots, or pores, at
least a portion of the sample fluid may pass through the holes, slots, or
pores of the disks 202A,
202B to the common collector 216. In one embodiment, the fluid that passes
through the top
disk 202A and the bottom disk 202B may be collected and measured separately.
In certain
embodiments, the pressure of the fluid that passes through the top disk 202A
and the bottom disk
202B may be maintained separately by separate collectors and receivers (not
shown).
In one embodiment, before performing a test using the FSC 100, the cavities
and pores
inside the FSC 100 may be prefilled with a simulated formation pore fluid to
more accurately
represent actual conditions of the formation. When performing the test, the
valve 106 may be
opened and the sample fluid begins to flow from the source 104 towards the FSC
100 through
the inlet 102. Once the pressure of the sample fluid exceeds the simulated
pore pressure, some
of the sample fluid will flow through the porous disks 202A, 202B through the
common
collector 216 and into the receiver (not shown).
The amount of sample fluid that flows through the porous disks can be
determined by
measuring the displaced simulated formation pore fluid that collects in the
receiver (not shown)
through the common collector 216. The volume of fluid that passes through the
porous disks
202A, 202B is an indication of the sealing efficiency of the sample fluid. If
the disks 202A,
202B are sealed by the LCM/WSM and the pressure of the sample fluid is raised
high enough,
the movable disk holder 206 is forced against the springs 204 with enough
force to overcome the
preload force of the springs 204. As a result, the bottom disk holder 206
moves, opening a gap
or simulated fracture between the two disks 202A, 202B. A portion of the
sample fluid, the
filtrate, flows through the gap, through the disks 202A, 202B, and out of the
housing to the
common collector 216. Typically, the filtrate is stripped of many solids
initially present in the
sample.
As discussed above, in certain embodiments, the disks 202A, 202B may be solid
disks
simulating impermeable formations. When using solid disks, no fluid may flow
through the
disks 202A, 202B and to the common collector 216. Further, as would be
appreciated by those
8

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, when a
porous formation is
simulated using porous disks 202A, 202B flow of the sample fluid from the
adjustable gap
between the disks 202A, 202B to the common collector 216 may leave a filter
cake behind that
may plug or partially plug the pores in the disks 202A, 202B. In order to
accurately simulate a
desirable formation, the disks 202A, 202B may be selected to have pore throat
sizes similar to
the size of the pores in the desirable formation being simulated.
Figure 3 depicts a cross-sectional view of the FSC 100 of Figures 1 and 2,
with an
adjustable gap simulating an open fracture 302 between the disks 202A, 202B.
If the pressure of
the sample fluid is subsequently lowered, the springs 204 try to reclose this
gap or simulated
fracture between the porous disks 202A, 202B. However, the LCM/WSM left in the
fracture
302 resists the re-closure of the fracture 302. How far the fracture 302 opens
and the degree to
which the fracture 302 is held open on depressurization is determined by
examining the
displacement of the moveable disk 202B which may be measured by the
displacement
transducer. In one embodiment, the test cycle may be repeated to determine if
more LCM/WSM
may be deposited in the fracture 302.
Figure 4 depicts steps for simulating a fracture in a formation in accordance
with an
exemplary embodiment of the present invention. At step 402, the springs 204
are loaded.
Specifically, an initial normal stress may be imposed by compressing the
springs 204 to some
preload value representing the formation strength. In one exemplary
embodiment, the springs
204 may be loaded by tightening the cell cap 108. Further, the stiffness of
the springs 204 may
be selected so that it simulates the formation stiffness. Next, at step 404,
the pressure of the
filtrate receiver through the common inlet 216 may be adjusted. The pressure
in the filtrate
receiver simulates the formation pore pressure. At step 406, a sample fluid
may be directed to
the FSC 100 through the inlet 102. Specifically, the valve 106 may be opened
permitting flow of
the sample fluid from the source 104 to the FSC 100 through the inlet 102. For
instance, if the
disks 202A, 202B are porous and the sample fluid includes LCM, then the LCM
may seal the
pores in the disks which represent the pores of the simulated formation. Once
the pressure of the
sample fluid is high enough, the disks 202A, 202B are forced apart, creating a
gap 302 which
simulates a fracture. The changes in the gap between the disks 202A, 202B may
be used to
evaluate the performance of the sample fluid. Specifically, the changes in the
gap width may be
used to determine the effectiveness of the sample fluid for its intended
purpose when utilized in
conjunction with a fracture in a subterranean formation as simulated by the
FSC. For example,
an LCM that is easily crushed may allow the crack to mostly close when the
sample pressure is
lowered. Accordingly, an LCM that is easily crushed would offer little value
as a WSM.
9

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
Because in the exemplary embodiment of Figures 1-3 the upper disk 202A is
fixed, the
changes in the fracture width may be monitored by monitoring the movement of
bottom disk
202B. Accordingly, the motion of the bottom disk 202B is sensed by a
displacement transducer
that may be connected to the protruding rod 210 or positioned within the FSC
100. When the
pressure of the sample fluid is reduced, the springs 204 try to close the
fracture 302 by pushing
the bottom disk 202B up towards the upper disk 202A. The closing force at any
position may be
calculated from the spring constant of the springs 204, receiver and sample
pressures, and the
measured bottom disk 202B displacement.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the FSC
100 may
be heated to a desired temperature to simulate the formation temperature. In
one embodiment, a
custom heat jacket may be used to heat the FSC 100.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the
configuration of the disks
may be varied depending on the type of formation and fracture being simulated.
For instance,
the porous disks 202 may be replaced with non-porous disks in order to
simulate non-porous
formations. Other disk configurations may similarly be utilized to simulate
different, desirable
formation conditions. For instance, the disks 202 may be two permeable disks,
two impermeable
disks, two slotted disks (e.g., simulating a large existing crack in the
formation), combination of
permeable and slotted disks, combination of disks with different surface
textures or combinations
of permeable, impermeable and slotted disks. Specifically, in certain
embodiments, the surface
texture of the disks 202 on the surfaces forming the adjustable gap may be
altered to simulate
different types of cracks in various formations. Therefore, in certain
embodiments, it may be
desirable to control the surface texture of the disks 202A, 202B in a
repeatable manner in order
to provide a more accurate simulation of a particular formation. In one
exemplary embodiment,
a slightly conical impermeable disk may be combined with a permeable disk or a
slotted disk. In
another exemplary embodiment, tilted permeable or impermeable disk
combinations may be
used to simulate a crack with a taper. In yet another exemplary embodiment,
permeable or
impermeable disks with repeatable irregular or regular recessed cavities may
be utilized to
simulate fractures in vugular formations. In another exemplary embodiment, the
disks 202 may
be pre-spaced so that they have an initial gap therebetween.
Figure 5 depicts a FSC in accordance with a second embodiment of the present
disclosure
denoted generally with reference numeral 500. In accordance with the second
embodiment of the
present disclosure, a mechanical or a hydrolytic actuator may be used to exert
force and control
the position of the movable disk holder 206 (and the movable disk 202B).
Specifically, the
movable disk holder 206 may be coupled to a motor drive connection 502 through
a ball screw

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
504. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the
benefit of this
disclosure, the ball screw 504 may translate the rotational motion of the
motor drive connection
502 into linear motion. In one embodiment, the motor drive connection 502 may
be a Servo
Motor Drive Connection. The linear motion generated by the ball screw 504 may
then be used
to move the movable disk holder 206 and the disk 202B and control the gap
between the disks
202A, 202B. A force transducer 506 may be used to monitor the force exerted on
the movable
disk holder 206 and/or the movable disk 202B. The operation of the remaining
portions of the
FSC 500 are the same as that of the FSC 100 discussed above, and will
therefore not be
discussed in detail.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the
benefit of this
disclosure, replacing the springs 204 with an actuator permits a more precise
control and
monitoring of the simulated fracture width, opening and closing rate, applied
preload force and
the closure force.
In one embodiment, the motor that drives the motor drive connection 502 and
controls the
force exerted on the movable disk holder 206 may be controlled by an
information handling
system 508. The information handling system may be communicatively coupled to
the FSC 500
through a wired or wireless communication system. Use of such communication
systems is well
known to those of ordinary skill in the art and will therefore not be
discussed in detail herein. In
one embodiment, the information handling system 508 may regulate system
parameters such as
the force exerted on the movable disk holder 206 and the bottom disk 202B, the
temperature of
the FSC 100, 500, the temperature of the sample fluid, or other system
criteria discussed in detail
above in order to simulate desired wellbore conditions. In one embodiment, the
information
handling system 508 may include a user interface, allowing the user to specify
the different
system parameters. Moreover, the information handling system 508 may monitor
the movement
of the moveable disk holder 206 and the bottom disk 202B in response to the
sample fluid flow
through the FSC 100, 500. By monitoring the movement of the bottom disk holder
206 and the
disk 202B, the information handling system may keep track of the changes in
the width of the
adjustable gap between the disks 202A, 202B. In one embodiment, the data
reflecting the
movement of the bottom disk 202B and/or the gap between the two disks 202A,
202B may be
stored by the information handling system in a computer-readable media and be
used to evaluate
the performance of a sample fluid over a set time period.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the
benefit of this
disclosure, an FSC in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure
may have a
number of applications. For instance, in one embodiment, the FSC may be
modified to permit
11

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
WO 2013/126287 PCT/US2013/026419
introduction of multiple fluids in order to simulate wellbore treatment
processes. Specifically,
the inlet 102 may be replaced by a plurality of inlets each supplying a
different fluid to the FSC.
In another exemplary embodiment, the FSC may have a single inlet with a valve
used to select
which of the plurality of desirable fluids flows through the inlet. Each of
the fluids may be
conditioned to a different temperature and pressure if desirable to simulate
specific conditions.
Moreover, in addition to testing LCM and WSM carrying fluids, the FSC may be
utilized
for testing and characterization of chemical treatments used in subterranean
operations such as,
for example, cement and polymers that harden in place. Specifically, in
certain subterranean
applications chemical treatment may be used to replace and/or compliment the
use of
LCM/WSM materials. For instance, once desired cracks are created in a
formation, chemical
treatments may be used to prop the cracks open. It is therefore desirable to
simulate the
interaction of chemical treatments with the formation. Accordingly, the sample
fluid directed to
the FSC may be a chemical treatment fluid. The FSC 100, 500 may then be used
to analyze the
performance of the chemical treatment using similar methods as those described
above.
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the
FSC may
be modified to apply shear to the fracture face by flowing one or more fluids
across the fracture
face by means of a circulation loop and pump and an outlet port for the sample
roughly opposite
the sample inlet port (not shown). Once introduced, the sample would flow
between the disk
pair, out the sample outlet port, through the pump which induces and controls
the flow rate, and
back to the FSC sample inlet port.
In some embodiments, the FSC may be utilized to simulate swabbing situations
to test for
unplugging. Specifically, when performing drilling operations, the pressure in
the vvellbore may
be reduced by moving pipe, wireline tools, seals and other equipment up the vv-
ellbore. If the
pressure is sufficiently reduced, fluids may flow from the formation into the
wellbore through
the fractures and towards the surface. This is referred to as swabbing.
Swabbing is generally
undesirable as it may lead to kicks and/or wellbore stability problems.
Accordingly, the FSC
may be utilized to simulate swabbing situations by first forming an LCM plug
in a simulated
fracture between disks 202A, 202B, regulating the force applied to the movable
disk holder 206,
and manipulating the pressure at the inlet 102 and the common collector 216 to
simulate
swabbing under specific wellbore conditions.
In one exemplary embodiment, FSCs in accordance with the present disclosure
may be
utilized to simulate long formation cracks. Specifically, a plurality of disk
pairs may be arranged
so that the sample fluid flows through them in sequence to simulate long
formation cracks. In
one embodiment, two or more FSCs may be connected in series by adding a port
to each cell
12

CA 02864984 2014-08-19
=
WO 2013/126287
PCT/US2013/026419
opposite the sample inlet port to allow the sample fluid to flow from one FSC
to the next FSC in
sequence to analyze the performance of the sample fluid at different positions
along the
simulated long formation crack.
Finally, in another exemplary embodiment, the FSC may be utilized to test long
term
stability or degradability of filter cakes and plugs formed in the apparatus.
For instance, once
LCM materials are introduced into the FSC the device may be held at a desired
temperature to
simulate field conditions. Measurements may then be obtained over time to
monitor the
performance of the filter cakes and plugs formed in the simulated crack. For
instance, a stable
WSM would keep the simulated crack open.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the
benefit of this
disclosure, although the present application discloses an arrangement with a
movable bottom
disk and a fixed top disk, the present disclosure is not limited to that
arrangement. For instance,
in another exemplary embodiment, the top disk may be movable while the bottom
disk is fixed.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the top disk and the bottom disk may be
both movable
and may be used in conjunction to create the adjustable gap.
Accordingly, the apparatus and methods disclosed herein incorporate a
simulated fracture
that can be opened and closed under simulated wellbore conditions and measure
parameters that
can be used to predict wellbore performance.
Therefore, the present invention is well-adapted to carry out the objects and
attain the ends
and advantages mentioned as well as those which are inherent therein. While
the invention has
been depicted and described by reference to exemplary embodiments of the
invention, such a
reference does not imply a limitation on the invention, and no such limitation
is to be inferred.
The invention is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and
equivalents in form and
function, as will occur to those ordinarily skilled in the pertinent arts and
having the benefit of
this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of the invention are
exemplary only,
and are not exhaustive of the scope of the invention. Consequently, the
invention is intended to
be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims, giving full
cognizance to
equivalents in all respects. The terms in the claims have their plain,
ordinary meaning unless
otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee.
13

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2017-05-09
(86) PCT Filing Date 2013-02-15
(87) PCT Publication Date 2013-08-29
(85) National Entry 2014-08-19
Examination Requested 2014-08-19
(45) Issued 2017-05-09

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $263.14 was received on 2023-11-14


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if small entity fee 2025-02-17 $125.00
Next Payment if standard fee 2025-02-17 $347.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $800.00 2014-08-19
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2014-08-19
Application Fee $400.00 2014-08-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2015-02-16 $100.00 2015-02-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2016-02-15 $100.00 2016-01-29
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2017-02-15 $100.00 2016-12-05
Final Fee $300.00 2017-03-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 5 2018-02-15 $200.00 2017-11-28
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2019-02-15 $200.00 2018-11-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2020-02-17 $200.00 2019-11-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2021-02-15 $200.00 2020-10-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2022-02-15 $203.59 2022-01-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2023-02-15 $254.49 2022-11-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2024-02-15 $263.14 2023-11-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2014-08-19 1 74
Claims 2014-08-19 3 105
Drawings 2014-08-19 4 82
Description 2014-08-19 13 727
Representative Drawing 2014-08-19 1 28
Cover Page 2014-11-05 1 55
Claims 2016-08-04 3 126
Description 2016-08-04 13 731
PCT 2014-08-19 3 127
Assignment 2014-08-19 14 455
Correspondence 2014-10-14 21 651
Correspondence 2014-10-28 1 21
Correspondence 2014-10-28 1 28
Fees 2015-02-10 1 33
Correspondence 2015-11-12 40 1,297
Fees 2016-01-29 1 33
Examiner Requisition 2016-03-03 3 227
Amendment 2016-08-04 26 1,138
Final Fee 2017-03-21 2 64
Representative Drawing 2017-04-11 1 15
Cover Page 2017-04-11 1 55