Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCMJS2014/028567
- 1 -
NORMALIZING PERFORMANCE DATA ACROSS INDUSTRIAL VEHICLES
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present disclosure relates in general to measurements of industrial
vehicle
usage, and in particular, to the measurement and normalization of industrial
vehicle work
for comparison and analysis.
BACKGROUND ART
Wireless strategies may be deployed by business operations, including
distributors,
retail stores, manufacturers, etc., to improve the efficiency and accuracy of
business
operations. Wireless strategies may also be deployed by such business
operations to avoid
the insidious effects of constantly increasing labor and logistics costs. In a
typical wireless
implementation, workers are linked to a management system executing on a
corresponding
computer enterprise via a mobile wireless transceiver. The wireless
transceiver may be
used as an interface to the management system to direct workers in their
tasks, e.g., by
instructing workers where and/or how to pick, pack, put away, move, stage,
process or
otherwise manipulate the items within the operator's facility. The wireless
transceiver
may also be used in conjunction with a suitable input device to scan, sense or
otherwise
read tags, labels or other identifiers to track the movement of designated
items within the
facility.
In order to move items about the operator's facility, workers often utilize
industrial
vehicles, including for example, forklift trucks, hand and motor driven pallet
trucks, etc.
However, disruptions in the operation of such materials handling vehicles
impact the
ability of the management system and corresponding wireless strategy to obtain
peak
operating efficiency. Moreover,
conventional enterprise software, including
corresponding management systems do not account for the industrial vehicles
required to
perform the work required to move the items about the operator's facility.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
According to aspects of the present disclosure, a method of normalizing
industrial
vehicle performance data is provided. The method comprises establishing at
least one
category associated with a distinct, measureable activity capable of being
performed by an
industrial vehicle. Each category is characterized by at least one parameter.
The method
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 2 -
also comprises electronically collecting data from an industrial vehicle
corresponding to
actual vehicle use, where the collected data satisfies the parameter defining
each category.
The method still further comprises accumulating the collected data according
to each
category. The method yet further comprises associating for each category, a
weighted
impact on work performed by that category as a function of energy consumed in
performing that work. The method also comprises providing an indication of the
work
performed by the industrial vehicle based upon the accumulated data.
According to further aspects of the present disclosure, a method of
normalizing
performance data for the operation of industrial vehicles is provided. The
method
produces a universal measurement for a unit of work, providing a way of
measuring and
evaluating the ability of an industrial vehicle to perform work. The universal
measurement also allows a way of comparing industrial vehicles against each
other, using
a standard unit of measure.
The method comprises measuring the horizontal movement of an industrial
vehicle
over a pre-determined interval and measuring the vertical movement of the
forks of the
industrial vehicle over the pre-determined interval. The method also comprises
summing
the horizontal movement and the vertical movement to a summed total. Still
further, the
method comprises deriving a work unit by dividing the summed total by a
standardizing
factor. For instance, the work unit may be defined as power expended per unit
of time,
measured in kilowatt hours.
According to yet further aspects of the present disclosure, a method of
normalizing
performance data of industrial vehicles is provided. The method comprises
identifying
distinct, measurable activities. The method also comprises identifying a
measure Yi...YN
as at least one of a time duration (ti . . tN) corresponding to each activity,
and a distance
(di . . dN) corresponding to each activity. The method also comprises
assigning a weight
(Xi . . . XN) to each activity to produce a weighted activity as A. = XõY.;
and calculating
total event cost (ECtotai) as
ECtotat = (AO
-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic of an illustrative operating environment in which
aspects of
the disclosure herein may be practiced;
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 3 -
FIG. 2 is a view of an operator in an industrial vehicle having a battery, a
battery
management system and an information linking device for wirelessly
communicating with
a computing environment, according to aspects of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a method for normalizing performance data for the
operation of industrial vehicles, according to various aspects of the present
disclosure;
FIG. 4 is an exemplary representation of a single category for industrial
vehicle
monitoring, according to aspects of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5 is an exemplary representation of a set of categories for industrial
vehicle
monitoring, according to aspects of the present disclosure;
FIG. 6 is a chart showing exemplary travel and lift operations plotted as
kilowatt
hours as a function of time, according to aspects of the present disclosure;
FIG. 7 is a chart plotting exemplary kilowatt hours as a function of time for
an
ideal compared to a measured response, according to aspects of the present
disclosure;
FIG. 8 is a schematic representation of the movement of a load in the
horizontal
and vertical directions, according to aspects of the present disclosure; and
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a computer system for executing computer-
readable
program code, according to various aspects of the present disclosure.
MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
According to various aspects of the present disclosure, approaches are
provided for
normalizing performance data for the operation of industrial vehicles. The
normalization
approaches herein may be used to translate performance data across operating
facilities
(e.g., warehouses), enterprise operations, industries, etc., by providing a
normalized
measure that is vehicle independent. As such, the normalized measure herein is
useful in
evaluating industrial vehicles based upon different manufacturers, makes,
models, etc.
In this manner, aspects of the present disclosure herein provide a
standardized
measure of work for an industrial vehicle. By normalizing industrial vehicle
work to a
standardized and consistent unit of measure, comparative analysis (cost,
efficiency or
both) may be performed for aspects such as fleet operation, operational
efficiency, team
efficiency, and industrial vehicle operation.
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 4 -
System Architecture
Aspects of the present disclosure comprise systems that enable industrial
vehicles
to wirelessly communicate with an application deployed in an enterprise
computing
environment. As used herein, an industrial vehicle is any equipment that is
capable of
moving or otherwise being moved about a work site. Exemplary industrial
vehicles
include materials handling vehicles, such as forklift trucks, reach trucks,
turret trucks,
walkie stacker trucks, tow tractors, hand operated pallet trucks, etc.
Referring now to the drawings and particularly to Fig. 1, an exemplary
computing
environment 10 is illustrated, which includes components that support wireless
communication capabilities. A plurality of industrial vehicles 12, such as
materials
handling vehicles (shown as forklift trucks for convenience of illustration),
each includes a
communications device that enables that industrial vehicle 12 to wirelessly
communicate
with a processing device, such as an industrial vehicle application server 14.
The
industrial vehicle application server 14 may further interact with a data
resource 16, e.g.,
one or more databases, data stores or other sources of information, to
facilitate interaction
with the industrial vehicles 12 as will be described in greater detail herein.
The computing environment 10 may further support additional processing devices
18, which may comprise for example, servers, personal computers, etc. One or
more of
the processing devices 18 may also communicate with the industrial vehicles 12
and/or the
industrial vehicle application server 14 across the computing environment 10.
The wireless communication architecture may be based upon a standard wireless
fidelity (WiFi) infrastructure, such as may he deployed using standard
802.11.xx wireless
networks for a communications protocol. However, any other suitable protocol
may
alternatively be implemented. In an exemplary WiFi implementation, one or more
wireless access points 20 may be utilized to relay data between a wireless
transceiver of
each industrial vehicle 12 and one or more wired devices of the computing
environment
10, e.g., the industrial vehicle application server 14.
Moreover, the computing environment 10 may be supported by one or more hubs
22 and/or other networking components that interconnect the various hardware
and/or
software processing devices, including for example, routers, firewalls,
network interfaces
and corresponding interconnections. The particular networking components
provided in
the computing environment 10 may thus be selected to support one or more
intranets,
extranets, local area networks (LAN), wide area networks (WAN), wireless
networks
-5 -
(WiFi), the Internet, including the world wide web, and/or other arrangements
for enabling
communication across the computing environment 10, either real time or
otherwise, e.g., via
time shifting, batch processing, etc.
Also, one or more computing devices may further communicate with a remote
server 30 across a network 32, such as the Internet. The remote server 30 may
comprise,
for example, a third party server (e.g., operated by the industrial vehicle
manufacturer) that
interacts with the industrial vehicles 12, the industrial vehicle application
server 14 and/or
other processing devices 18 of the computing environment(s) 10. The remote
server 30 may
further interact with a data resource 34, e.g., one or more databases, data
stores or
other sources of information.
Industrial Vehicle Data Collection
Referring to Fig. 2, an industrial vehicle 12 includes a communication device
referred to herein as an information linking device 38, a battery 40 comprised
of a
plurality of battery cells 42 and a battery monitor 44 that allows monitoring
of battery
characteristics, e.g., one or more of current, voltage, resistance,
temperature, water level,
etc.
The information linking device 38, the industrial vehicle 12, and the
corresponding
computer environment, e.g., as described with reference to FIG. 1, can
incorporate any of
the features and structures as set out in U.S. Pat. No. 8,060,400 to Wellman,
entitled "Fleet
Management System.
For instance, the information linking device 38 can include a display, a
transceiver for
wireless communication, e.g., with the application server 14, I/O, a processor
in data
communication with memory for storing collected data about the corresponding
industrial
vehicle and/or for implementing methods and processes as set out herein, etc.
In exemplary implementations, the information linking device 38 is coupled to
and/or
communicates with industrial vehicle system components via a suitable
industrial vehicle
network system, e.g., a vehicle network bus. The industrial vehicle network
system is any wired or wireless network, bus or other communications
capability that allows
electronic components of the industrial vehicle 12 to communicate with each
other. As an
example, the industrial vehicle network system may comprise a controller area
network (CAN)
bus, ZigBee, Bluetooth, Local Interconnect Network (LIN), time-triggered
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-01-22
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 6 -
data-bus protocol (TTP) or other suitable communication strategy. As will he
described
more fully herein, utilization of the industrial vehicle network system
enables seamless
integration of the components of the industrial vehicle information linking
device into the
native electronics including controllers of the industrial vehicle 12 and
optionally, any
electronics peripherals associated with the industrial vehicle 12 that
integrate with and can
communicate over the network system.
The battery monitor 44 communicates with the information linking device 38,
the
information server 14 or both. Moreover, the battery monitor 44 may be wired
to the
information linking device 38, or the battery monitor 44 may communicate with
the
information linking device 38 using a wireless technology such as Bluetooth,
etc. The
battery monitor 44 may include a processor in data communication with memory,
to
implement battery monitoring, battery data logging, for implementing methods
and
processes as set out herein, etc.
Moreover, the battery monitor 44 may interface with various sensors, such as a
current sensor, one or more temperature sensors, a water level sensor, voltage
sensor, etc.
to sample battery characteristics of interest. The results can be stored on
the battery
monitor itself. In alternative configurations, the samples can be communicated
to the
information linking device 38 for processing, storage, forwarding to the
information server
14, etc. In still further alternative implementations, the results can be
forwarded to the
information server 14, etc.
Normalization - the Unit of Work
Normalization approaches herein can be understood with reference to FIG. 3,
which illustrates a method 300 of normalizing industrial vehicle performance
data.
The method 300 comprises establishing, at 302, at least one category. Each
category is associated with a distinct, measureable activity capable of being
performed by
an industrial vehicle. Moreover, each category is characterized by at least
one parameter,
which is utilized to measure the corresponding activity. In this regard, the
method can
establish distinct, measurable, categories of industrial vehicle operation.
Examples of
categories may include travel distance, travel time, vertical lift distance
(i.e., fork raise and
fork lower operations), vertical lift time, etc.
The method 300 also comprises measuring, at 304, the actual usage of the
industrial vehicle, according to each category of operation. For instance, the
method 300
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 7 -
may electronically collect data from an industrial vehicle corresponding to
actual vehicle
use, where the collected data satisfies the parameter(s) defining each
category. This can
be accomplished, for instance, using the information linking device 38
connected to the
industrial vehicle 12, described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2. As noted in
greater detail
herein, the information linking device 38 can communicate with components,
e.g., vehicle
controllers, vehicle processors, sensors, monitors, encoders, etc., by
communicating across
a vehicle network bus. The information linking device 38 can also use
dedicated
input/output connections to interface with various sensors, encoders,
switches, and other
devices on the industrial vehicle. Thus, in the above example, the method maps
data types
that can be extracted from the industrial vehicle 12 by the information
linking device 38,
to the parameter(s) that define the category (or categories). During use of
the industrial
vehicle, the information linking device 38 extracts the data values
corresponding to the
data types that are mapped to parameters of the categories to generate the
underlying data
necessary to compute a unit of work, as described in greater detail herein.
The method at 304 may also accumulate the collected data according to each
category. Thus, as the industrial vehicle 12 is operated, the data associated
with each
category is accumulated to provide the ability to normalize the industrial
vehicle usage
across a range of operations. For instance, if a category is travel distance,
the parameter
may be an expression of distance. As such, as the industrial vehicle is
operated (e.g.,
throughout a shift), the total distance traveled is accumulated.
The method may wirelessly transmit the measured usage to a remote server at
304,
such as by using the information linking device 38 to communicate the
collected data to
the information server 14. In this regard, the accumulation may be carried out
at the
industrial vehicle or at the server. For instance, the industrial vehicle may
be configured
to send data to the server in batches, e.g., based upon a preset time interval
or otherwise.
In this situation, the server may accumulate the data. As another example, the
industrial
vehicle may be outside the range of the wireless infrastructure (e.g., within
a semi trailer
on a loading dock). As such, the information linking device on the industrial
vehicle may
accumulate usage data.
The method 300 also comprises associating, at 306, for each category, a
weighted
impact on the work performed by each category as a function of energy consumed
in
performing that work at 306.
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 8 -
The method 300 also comprises providing, at 308, an indication of the work
performed by the industrial vehicle. The particular manner in which the
indication is
provided, will likely depend upon the implementation. However, some examples
are
described in greater detail herein.
Working Examples:
Referring FIGS. 2, 3 and 4 generally, a simplified approach to categorizing
operations of an industrial vehicle into distinct, measureable activities (see
302 of FIG. 3)
is to define a single category, corresponding to "in use". For instance, the
illustrated "in
use" category 400 is a measure of when the industrial vehicle is operated.
This may
comprise travel operations, lift operations, other operations and combinations
thereof.
That is, any operation of use may be grouped into the single category.
In an illustrative implementation, the measure of actual vehicle usage may be
recorded by a communications device (e.g., information linking device 38)
monitoring
various industrial vehicle controllers, e.g., traction control, hydraulics
control, etc. through
the vehicle network bus to determine the total industrial vehicle use. The
information
linking device 38 may, for instance, communicate across a vehicle CAN bus to
determine
the total distance traveled, total time spent traveling, total distance that
forks of the
industrial vehicle are moved during lift operations, etc.
As used herein, lift operations correspond to the lift distance, e.g., to the
distance
that the forks move on the industrial vehicle. This may be raise only
operations, lower
only operations, or a combination of raising and lowering operations, as the
particular
application may dictate.
The singular in use measure may be expressed in an interval such as time
(e.g.,
minutes of use), in distance (e.g., feet traveled) or a combination of the
two. That is, the
"in use" implementation can be used to capture a measure of work that is done
by an
industrial vehicle.
As noted above with reference to FIG. 2, the industrial vehicle may also
include a
battery monitor 44. The battery monitor 44 can be used to measure power drawn,
current
drawn or other measures necessary to determine the energy consumed in order to
perform
the work measured by the information linking device 38.
By correlating the information collected by the information linking device 38
with
the battery usage history collected by the battery monitor 44, a measure of
the
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 9 -
performance of the industrial vehicle 12 may be derived based upon work
performed and
energy required to perform the measured work.
The basic concept of FIG. 4 can be expanded to comprehend multiple categories.
For instance, with reference to FIGS. 2, 3 and 5, an example is provided where
at least
four categories of industrial vehicle work are defined. The categories
conceptually define
"buckets" of productivity that split the activity of the industrial vehicle,
e.g., by time. For
instance, categorizing operations (see 302 of the method 300) may comprise
distinguishing lift operations from travel operations. In an illustrative
example, operations
may be more narrowly defined as "Travel Loaded" - travel operations while the
industrial
vehicle is traveling with a load; "Travel Unloaded" - travel operation while
the industrial
vehicle is traveling without a load; "Lift Loaded" - lift operations involving
a load; and
"Lift Unloaded" - lift operations not involving a load.
In an illustrative example, an encoder or other suitable device is utilized to
measure lift travel. The distance traveled by the industrial vehicle can be
measured using
odometer measurements (taking into account tire travel and slippage), location
tracking
systems, navigation systems, combinations of the above, etc.
Keeping with the above example, the communications device (information linking
device 38) on the industrial vehicle may be used to measure the actual usage
of the
industrial vehicle as a function of each category. For instance, in an
illustrative
implementation, the measure of actual vehicle usage may be recorded by the
information
linking device 38 monitoring various industrial vehicle controllers, e.g.,
traction control,
hydraulics control, etc., through the vehicle network bus to determine the
total industrial
vehicle use. The information linking device 38 may, for instance, communicate
across a
vehicle CAN bus to relevant native vehicle controllers to determine the total
distance
traveled, total time spent traveling, total distance that forks of the
industrial vehicle are
moved during lift operations, etc., for each category.
By way of example, the information linking device 38 may measure a travel
distance, where the travel distance is the distance traveled by the industrial
vehicle while
the industrial vehicle is being operated. The information linking device 38
may also
separately measure a lift distance, where the lift distance is the distance of
lift operations
performed by the industrial vehicle while being operated. Still further, the
information
linking device 38 may separately measure a travel time, where the travel time
is the time
required to travel the travel distance. Still further, the information linking
device may
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 10 -
separately measure a lift time, where the lift time is the time required by
the lift
operations. Still further, the above-categories can be further defined into
smaller
subcategories, such as travel with load, travel without load, lift with load
and lift without
load.
In certain implementations, lift, while generally describing vertical
movement, can
be further sub-divided into raising operations (movement against the direction
of gravity)
and lowering operations (movement in the direction of gravity). As such,
raising
operations may affect usage differently from lowering operations. Also, it
should be
appreciated that vehicle idle time may also contribute a different usage
amount when
1() considered along with the other recited movements. In other words, even
when the
vehicle is not traveling or lifting (raising or lowering), there still exists
a nominal drain on
the battery that results from the vehicle simply being in an operational
state, but not
moving. Further clarification is provided below with reference to a specific
example.
Some industrial vehicles enable "blending", which is the simultaneous
performance
of two or more features that define work. An example of blending is the
simultaneous
performance of a lifting operation with a travel operation, etc. Blending may
define one or
more additional categories, e.g., a category for each class of blending. Thus,
the
capabilities of the particular industrial vehicle, and the desired
complexity/resolution of
the method 300 will be used to determine the number of categories. In this
regard, the
listing of categories of FIG. 4 and FIG. 5 are by way of simplified
illustration of concepts,
which are not presented by way of limitation.
Moreover, as noted above, the battery monitor 44 may he utilized for
extracting
information from a battery coupled to the industrial vehicle so as to measure
actual energy
consumed by the industrial vehicle over the travel and/or over the lift
operations (for each
category). As such, the battery monitor facilitates associating for each
category, a
weighted impact on work performed by that category as a function of energy
consumed in
performing that work. In this regard, the battery monitor 44 may be replaced
by one or
more sensors, e.g., a current sensor, voltage sensor, temperature sensor, or
combination
thereof, in data communication with the information linking device 38 or a
suitable data
capture device.
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 11 -
Actual or Estimated
As noted in greater detail herein, the industrial vehicle 12 includes a
battery
monitor 44 that is capable of sampling battery characteristics, e.g., current
drawn from the
battery during use. As such, the industrial vehicle's use of energy as a
function of work
can be based upon actual measurements. Alternatively, the industrial vehicle's
use of
energy as a function of work can be based upon an assigned parameter. The
assigned
parameter may be implemented as a programming variable assigned by a remote
server, a
value stored within the information linking device 38 or information server
14, etc. Such
an arrangement may be useful, for instance, where an industrial vehicle does
not have a
battery monitor 44. Moreover, estimated and/or actual energy use may be static
or
dynamic. Also, the estimated and/or actual energy use may be task dependent.
Regardless, in illustrative implementations herein, work performed by the
industrial
vehicle is measured in power expended per unit of time. An example comprises
kilowatt
hours (kWh). The use of kilowatt hours allows for the normalization of energy
usage as a
function of work.
Cost of Work
Aspects of the present disclosure herein contemplate that work performed by an
industrial vehicle corresponds in general, to the amount of energy transferred
by the
industrial vehicle acting through a distance, e.g., net force times a change
in distance. In
this regard, one approach to defining a weighted impact on work performed by a
category
as a function of energy consumed in performing that work, is to express the
weighted
impact as a cost.
According to aspects of the present disclosure, a work measure (i.e., weighted
impact) is defined, that is expressed as power expended per unit of time,
e.g., kilowatt
hours. To determine kilowatt hours of use, the wattage (in watts) times the
hours used
divided by 1000 provides kilowatt hours. In practice, the battery voltage is
known or
measureable, and is multiplied by the various measured current draws over time
by the
battery monitor 44 to compute power in watts. In other examples, power can be
calculated
in other ways, e.g., using load resistance and current, load resistance and
voltage, etc.
To further reduce the calculation to a measure of financial cost (cost in
dollars), the
computed usage in kilowatt hours is multiplied by cost per kilowatt hour. 'Me
cost value
may vary, e.g., based upon the cost to acquire the energy (to charge the
battery for
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 12 -
instance). The cost per kilowatt hour may fluctuate based upon geographic
location, day,
season and any number of other factors. However, all such factors are
identifiable or
discoverable to the system.
Moreover, the cost can be further characterized. For instance, because both
time
and distance measurements are available, the system can consider the cost as a
function of
distance. By way of example, the system can further characterize work per unit
distance,
e.g., kWh/ft.
Static Assignment
Various aspects of the present disclosure assign a static baseline value to
each
defined category of operation. That is, each category can be given a relative
weighted
impact on work, e.g., weighted impact on the work to energy ratio (and in
turn, cost) due
to the amount of energy used. Keeping with the above example, of both travel
and lift
operations, each with load and without load, a static assignment can be made
to associate a
cost per category. In a non-limiting but illustrative example, Travel Unloaded
may be
assigned a first cost, e.g., 10 kWh/ft. Travel Loaded may be assigned a second
cost, e.g.,
15 kWh/ft. Lift Unloaded can be assigned a third cost, e.g., 20 kWh/ft.
Moreover, Lift
Loaded can be assigned a fourth cost, e.g., 25 kWh/ft. Of course, the above is
merely
illustrative, and any assigned static amount can be assigned.
Dynamic Assignment
The values used for the weighted impact on work when the industrial vehicle is
loaded may be dependent upon the weight of the load being carried. Any number
of
techniques may be employed to account for load weight. For
instance, static
approximations can be used. Alternatively, a baseline static value can be
used, as
supplemented by a dynamic contribution that accounts for the weight of the
load. As
further alternatives, the categories can be defined granularly to include many
buckets, each
bucket holding a load or range of loads. Still further a correction, graduated
scale, etc.
may be used. For dynamic loading, there is an increased demand in the quantity
of data
required to accurately track the dynamic load as compared to the static
implementation.
However, the information linking device 38 and/or battery monitor 44 may have
sufficient
bandwidth to capture the quantity of required data to implement dynamic
compensation.
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 13 -
Task Profiles/Usage Profiles
According to aspects of the present disclosure, the categories can be utilized
to
evaluate energy in terms of predetermined tasks, e.g., based upon task
profiles (also
referred to herein as usage profiles). For instance, in a warehouse operation,
work may be
measured by a factor such as "pallets moved". However, tasks may also comprise
measures over a shift, day, week, replenishment operation, pick operation,
etc.
Moreover, the system can track actual compared to ideal numbers and measure
how efficiently an executed task associated with a task profile is performed.
In this
regard, an average kWh/ft value can be established (ideal, measured or both)
per industrial
vehicle, based upon task profiles.
For instance, a task profile may specify that for a given industrial vehicle
(or type
of industrial vehicle/fleet of industrial vehicles, plant location, or other
logical grouping) a
put away profile has a first weighted impact on work (i.e., cost), e.g., 23.2
kWh/ft. A
second task profile, e.g., a replenish profile has a second cost, e.g., 22.7
kWh/ft. Another
task profile has a third cost, e.g., 13.8 kWh/ft, and yet another task
profile, e.g., a transport
profile, has a fourth cost, e.g., 11.6 kWh/ft. Of course, any number of task
profiles with
different costs may be provided by an implementation of the systems and
methods set out
herein.
Referring to FIG. 6, a chart 600 illustrates via exemplary data, kWh as a
function
of total lift distance 602. The chart 600 also illustrates kWh as a function
of time for total
distance traveled 604. By evaluating kWh over time, trends and useful data can
be
extracted.
For instance, the chart illustrates that at tO, the industrial vehicle was
stationary.
The industrial vehicle began traveling as noted by 604 having a non-zero value
between tO
and ti. At ti, the kWh as a function of total lift distance 602 spikes, levels
off then
subsides by t2. This informs an analyst that a put away was likely being
performed. Also,
total distance traveled 604 is non-zero at the initial time that the total
lift distance 602
begins to spike. Because the total distance traveled 604 is non-zero, it can
be presumed
that a blending operation was being perfoimed. From t2 to t3, the travel
distance is non-
zero, indicating travel of the industrial vehicle. However, the lift distance
is zero,
indicating that the industrial vehicle has not engaged in a lift operation.
Referring to FIG. 7, a chart 700 illustrates an example measurement 702 of
actual
work in kWh performed by an industrial vehicle as a function of time. The
chart 700 also
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 14 -
illustrates a first ideal curve 704 (Max curve) representing operation of the
industrial
vehicle in an ideal manner where energy usage is maximized in favor of
potentially (but
not necessarily) increasing worker productivity. For instance, operating the
industrial
vehicle along the first ideal curve 704 may correspond to operation of the
industrial
vehicle at its maximum capability, thus maximizing the potential of the
industrial vehicle
to get work done, e.g., move pallets.
The chart 700 also includes a second ideal curve 706 (Min curve) representing
operation of the industrial vehicle in an ideal manner where energy usage is
minimized,
potentially (but not necessarily) at the reduction of worker productivity. For
instance,
operating the industrial vehicle along the second ideal curve 706 may
correspond to
operation of the industrial vehicle in a manner that minimizes use of energy.
The area between the example measurement 702 and the first ideal curve 704,
and
the area between the example measurement 702 and the second ideal curve 706,
represent
opportunity for improvement. More particularly, the area between the first
ideal curve 704
and the example measurement 702 represents an opportunity for an operator to
improve
worker productivity by better taking advantage of the capabilities of the
industrial vehicle,
e.g., to move more pallets in a given timeframe. The area between the second
ideal curve
706 and the example measurement 702 represents an opportunity for an operator
to
improve energy conservation. This may be accomplished, e.g., through more
efficient use
of blending, traveling with a load lower on the forks, etc.
Thus, the availability of improvement opportunity is the integral of the Max
(ideal)
usage over time (t) minus the integral of the actual usage as a function of
time (t) in order
to improve productivity opportunity (PO). Likewise, the availability of
improvement
opportunity is the integral of the Actual usage over time (t) minus the
integral of the Min
usage as a function of time (t) in order to improve energy opportunity (EO).
In this
regard, the selection of the proper sampling rate is necessary to achieve the
desired
resolution of performance and measure.
The above chart 700 also demonstrates that opportunities exist to optimize
industrial vehicle utilization based upon a customized profile. For instance,
it may be that
a particular implementation does not want to fully maximize energy consumption
(Max
curve) or energy conservation (Min curve). As such, a customized energy
profile can be
created that follows a path intermediate to the first ideal curve 704 and the
second ideal
curve 706. Moreover, multiple energy profiles may be created, each for a
desired purpose.
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 15 -
Still further, a system such as that described more fully herein can capture
the actual
operator energy use, and create a usage profile that can be compared to a
customized
profile. As yet another example implementation, multiple energy profiles may
be
available to the operator. The industrial vehicle operator can then select an
energy profile
that is suitable for the operator and/or operator assigned tasks. For
instance, the operator
can be first shown their actual energy usage. Based upon knowing their actual
energy
usage, the operator may have the opportunity to select among one or more
energy profiles.
This information can be utilized for assessments of energy use compared to
worker
productivity, examples of which are set out in greater detail herein.
Efficiency Assessments
According to aspects of the present disclosure, the assessment of operations
and
operation efficiency can be carried out in an efficient and organized manner.
For instance,
the unit of work discussed more fully herein, may be used to implement a
warehouse
management system that is standardized to the industrial vehicle. That is, by
measuring
the work performed by each industrial vehicle, data is naturally collected as
a matter of
normal operation. According to aspects of the present disclosure, pre-
determined tasks
can he utilized against which standardized measures of each industrial vehicle
work is
measured (e.g., on an individual vehicle basis). 'Phis allows the measurement
of work
required by various industrial vehicles to perform activities, such as put-
aways, picks, etc.
Thus, the normal job of an industrial engineer with a stop watch and a clip
board is
replaced with an accurate, automatic, continuous data collection device. The
analyst
simply allows the industrial vehicles to do their jobs and allow the data to
be collected.
Once collected, the analyst can evaluate the collected data to perform any
necessary
operations optimizations that are desired.
Operational Productivity
According to aspects of the present disclosure herein, operational
productivity can
be evaluated. More particularly, the unit of work described herein allows for
a vehicle-
driven standard for measuring performance. Thus, a standard of measure can be
customized to each particular industrial vehicle. By customizing the standard
to the truck,
any factors unique to the industrial vehicle can be normalized out of an
analysis, so that
activities such as performance measures related to the operation of the
industrial vehicle
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 16 -
can be more accurately evaluated. For example, an operator using an older
truck is not
penalized in a performance assessment due solely to the truck. Rather, the
normalized
capabilities of the truck serve as a benchmark for gauging the performance of
operations
involving the industrial vehicle.
As a few additional illustrative examples, in evaluating operation
productivity, the
cost of inputs to a productivity calculation, divided by the revenue of output
should be less
than a maximum acceptable productivity ratio. Using the techniques herein,
various
productivity metrics can be realized. For instance, a ratio can be measured,
representing
the total time spent on the industrial vehicle while using the vehicle for
productive work.
As another example, time required to perform certain tasks can be evaluated.
This may be
an inverse relationship to pallets moved for a given time period. Moreover,
the efficiency
of the industrial vehicle itself can be evaluated (e.g., kWh as a function of
work
completed/tasks completed.
Still further, aspects of the present disclosure herein allow an analysis of
the cost of
operation in terms of compensation, the cost of energy to perform work (e.g.,
in dollars per
kWh), etc.
Universal Units of Work - Work unit (W.U.)
According to aspects of the present disclosure, a method of normalizing
performance data for the operation of industrial vehicles, comprises defining
a universal
unit of work. A universal unit of work may be determined by measuring the
total
horizontal movement of an industrial vehicle over a pre-determined interval
and
measuring the total vertical movement of the forks of the industrial vehicle
over the pre-
determined interval. The universal unit of work is further defined by summing
the total
horizontal movement and the total vertical movement to a summed total and
dividing the
summed total by a standardizing factor.
The universal unit of work may be used with the other approaches herein. For
instance, a method may define a plurality of categories, each category
corresponding to a
predefined task, as described in the examples discussed with FIGS. 3 and 4.
Moreover,
the universal unit of work may be used with predefined tasks, e.g., using the
task profiles
described more fully herein. This allows standardized measures of varying
degrees of
granularity. For instance, industrial vehicles can be compared down to the
measure of a
work unit. Alternatively, comparisons can be made by category, e.g., travel
with a load,
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 17 -
travel without a load, lift with a load, lift without a load, blending, etc.
Still further,
comparisons can be made for particular tasks (usage profiles) such as picks,
replenishments, pallet movement, etc. Still further, comparisons can be made
on
operators, teams, shifts, fleets, industrial vehicles, and other desired
measures.
Referring to FIG. 8, the Work unit is a mechanism for normalizing performance
data across warehouses, operations and industry-vertical database categories.
Let X = Total Horizontal Travel Distance Loaded (e.g., in feet)
Let Y = Total Vertical Lift Distance Loaded (e.g., in feet)
Let E (X,Y)/Z = Total Work units (W.U.). Here, Z is the standardizing factor.
That is, Z is an arbitrary number selected to normalize the summation to a
reasonable
number for convenience of manipulation of the unit of work. In an illustrative
implementation, Z=100. Thus, as a few illustrative examples:
1 W.U. = 100 feet moved with a load in either / both directions;
W.U.= 80 feet traveled loaded + 20 feet lifted loaded;
1 W.U. = 100 feet traveled loaded + 0 feet lifted loaded.
The W.U. may be utilized to evaluate the cost of operation by dividing cost by
the
W.U. that was determined to derive cost/W.U. The W.U. can he used with the
categories
described above with reference to FIGS. 3-7. For instance, the W.U. can be
computed for
each category, and the calculated W.U. for each category can be applied to
determine cost
of operations.
Management
According to various aspects of the present disclosure, the unit of work
herein, can
be utilized to create management standards based upon a combination of dynamic
tasks
(i.e., tasks centered around the industrial vehicle), static tasks (i.e., non-
dynamic tasks not
utilizing the industrial vehicle), or combination of dynamic and static tasks.
Thus, using
the unit of work described herein, warehouse management systems, labor
management
systems, etc., can shift to a vehicle-centered focus. Moreover, tasks can be
characterized
in the management system, which are normalized by the industrial vehicle. For
instance,
vehicles for tasks such as pick and put away operations may be allocated based
upon the
cost per vehicle to complete each operation in order to drive cost of fleet
ownership down.
Still further, factors that may ultimately affect the performance of an
industrial vehicle,
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 18 -
e.g., battery condition, tire diameter, tire wear, hydraulic pump motor
efficiency, operation
of the industrial vehicle, etc. can be fleshed out using the industrial
vehicle comparisons.
Analyst Dashboard
As noted above with regard to Fig. 1 and FIG. 2, the information linking
device 38,
the battery monitor 44 or both, can communication collected information to a
remote
server, e.g., server 14. This allows the server to explore the collected data
to generate
reports, displays, etc. In an illustrative implementation, a (near) real-time
dashboard
displays information about the work being performed by a fleet of industrial
vehicles.
For instance, a dashboard may reside on an analyst or manager computer screen
desktop to allow the analyst to monetize the opportunities for improvement in
the
operation of the managed industrial vehicle fleet, to prioritize activities
and take action.
In general, an analyst can use the above-described data to answer queries such
as
"which opportunities represent the largest savings and highest priority";
"what actions are
required to take to realize savings", etc. The analyst can start off by
measuring relative
performance. For instance, a database (e.g., local site's application specific
database or a
broad vertical database of a manufacturer, such as database 34 of FIG. 1) of
warehouse
performance is utilized to identify opportunities for reducing operational
waste (cost) by
comparing a site (environment) performance to performance in their industry.
Monetization of the delta between actual performance and the benchmarked
performance
from the historical databases (customer's data or industry data) can be
implemented.
Monetization of opportunities helps managers prioritize their focus.
An exemplary dashboard may show, for example, a main cost rollup charting cost
per unit work of a fleet of industrial vehicles over a period of time.
Thresholds can be set
where the cost/unit work is too high, thus triggering an alert. Approaches
such as that
above, provide an opportunity in identifying money that has been spent in the
operation
(for example, cost per hour of operators that have been driving industrial
vehicles). A
second opportunity is lost time, measured in terms of money (for example,
excessive non-
productive time spent on the industrial vehicles).
Specific Example
Having described various embodiments, this disclosure provides a specific
example in an effort to more clearly describe how the above-described
embodiments may
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 19 -
be implemented. It should, however, be appreciated that this specific example
is a non-
limiting example and is only provided for purposes of clarity.
By way of example, presume that a 3 ton (2,721 Kilogram) unloaded forklift
truck
that is located in a center of a 5,000-foot-by-5,000-foot (1524 meter x 1524
meter)
warehouse will be used to carry a 2000 pound (907 Kilogram) pallet from a
three-foot-
high shelf (0.91 meter shelf) on a first location of the warehouse to an eight-
foot-high
shelf (2.44 meter shelf) at a second location of the warehouse. For
simplicity, presume
that only orthogonal paths are permitted (e.g., 90-degree left turns, 90-
degree right turns,
180-degree U-turns, straight-line paths, etc.). With these presumptions, the
example
calculation would proceed as follows.
The unloaded forklift proceeds northbound from the center of the warehouse,
and
travels 25 feet (7.62 meters). This unloaded, northbound travel draws 50
amperes of
current from a 36 volt, 600 amp-hour battery over the course of 0.2 minutes.
When the
unloaded forklift reaches the northern stopping point, it makes a 90-degree
turn toward the
east. This 90-degree turn draws 25 amperes of current from the battery over
0.1 minutes.
The unloaded forklift then travels eastbound 25 feet (7.62 meters) until it
reaches the
destination where the pallet resides. This eastbound travel draws 50 amperes
of current
from the battery over 0.2 minutes.
To the extent that the pallet is located on a three-foot-high shelf (0.91
meter shelf),
the forklift raises its forks three feet (0.91 meter) and moves forward to
place the forks
underneath the pallet and slightly raise the now-loaded forks. This lifting
operation draws
100 amperes of current over 0.2 minutes. The now-loaded forklift makes a 180-
degree U-
turn, drawing 50 amperes of current from the battery over 0.1 minutes. The
forks are
lowered three feet (0.91 meter) to ground level, drawing 10 amperes of current
over 0.1
minutes. The lowering operation draws less current than the raising operation,
since the
work is being done along the direction of gravity rather than against the
direction of
gravity.
For this example, other traffic in the warehouse causes the now-loaded
forklift to
remain stationary (or idles) for 2 minutes, for which 10 amperes of current
are drawn due
to the idle time. Because the forklift is still in operation, idling draws
some nominal
amount of current from the battery.
Having made the U-turn, the loaded forklift travels 50 feet (15.24 meters)
westbound, thereby drawing 150 amperes from the battery over 0.7 minutes. From
this
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 20 -
example, the loaded forklift draws more current and moves more slowly than the
unloaded
forklift. Upon reaching the western stopping point, the loaded forklift makes
a 90-degree
southward turn, which draws 50 amperes over 0.3 minutes. Thereafter the loaded
forklift
travels southbound 50 feet (15.24 meters) to its final destination where the
pallet is to be
unloaded. This southbound travel draws 150 amperes over 0.7 minutes.
having reached the southwest destination, the loaded forklift raises its forks
slightly above eight feet (2.44 meter), which is the height of the shelf on
which the pallet
must be deposited. That lifting operation draws 200 amperes over 0.2 minutes.
This
raising operation with the pallet draws more current than the raising
operation without the
pallet, since more energy is needed to raise loaded forks than unloaded forks.
The pallet is placed on the shelf, and the now-unloaded forklift moves
backward
10 feet (3 meters) while concurrently lowering its forks from eight feet (2.44
meter) to
ground level (for a total linear distance of 12.8 feet/3.9 meters). In other
words, having
unloaded the pallet, the unloaded forklift performs a blended operation
(concurrently
traveling and lowering of forks). This blended operation draws 25 amperes of
current over
0.1 minutes.
Thus, in this specific example, the total event cost (or the cost of the
entire
sequence of events) of this operation is 31,320 kWh. This event cost was
expended over
the course of 4.9 minutes and over a total distance of 176.8 feet (53.89
meters).
Should more information than simply the total event cost be desired, then the
total
event cost can be further weighted or modified to extract those numbers. For
example, in
a very simple example, the total event cost can be divided by the total linear
distance
traveled by the forklift to provide the event cost per unit distance (i.e.,
kWh/ft) or event
cost per unit time (i.e., kWh/min). So, for this particular example, the event
cost per unit
distance would be 177.1 kWh/ft and the event cost per unit time would be
6391.8
kWh/min.
As noted above, each distinct operation (e.g., idle, unloaded travel, loaded
travel,
unloaded raising, loaded raising, unloaded lowering, loaded lowering, turning,
etc.) results
in a different current draw on the battery. In other words, each distinct
operation results in
a different usage cost. As such, one may wish to know more than simply the
coarse
kWh/ft or kWh/min. For those types of specifics, one may assign a distinct
weighting
factor that corresponds to each distinct task to properly reflect the actual
energy cost for
those distinct tasks. For example, from experimental measurement data, a
higher weight
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 21 -
can be assigned to loaded raising of the forks than unloaded lowering of the
forks, and yet
another weight to vehicle idling, etc. By assigning weighting factors
indicative of each
distinct task, the system can more-accurately estimate the total energy cost
associated with
a predefined task. Also, this weighting factor may take into consideration the
weight of a
particular vehicle (e.g., hand operated pallet truck may be assigned a lower
weight than an
industrial forklift truck, since one would require more current than the
other).
Taking all of these factors into account, it is mathematically possible to
assign a
universal unit of work (W.U.), as described above, which permits an equivalent
comparison between the hand operated pallet truck and the industrial forklift
truck. In
other words, the universal unit of work would effectively allow comparisons of
vehicles
and tasks that were previously difficult (if not impossible) without the W.U.
By way of example, using the specific forklift example, the total event cost
(EC,otai) may be calculated according to the following equations:
EC.' =1(A.)
n=1 [Eq. 1],
where All = Xntõ, with An representing a weighted activity, Xi, representing a
weight, and ti,
representing a time-duration during which each corresponding activity is being
performed.
From Eq. 1, a normalized event cost (ECnorm) can be calculated as:
E
ECtotai C =
nor N
E( tn )
n = I [Eq. 2],
Should one wish to scale the normalized event cost with a scaling factor (S),
then Eq. 2
can simply be multiplied by the scaling factor (S).
In another example, rather than using time as a baseline, the total event cost
(ECtotal) may be calculated using distance as a baseline. So, in Eq. 1, An =
Xndn, with An
representing a weighted activity, Xõ representing a weight, and dn
representing a distance
that corresponds to the activity that is being performed. From this, the
normalized event
cost (ECnorm) can be calculated as:
ECtot:i
EC =
norm N
E(
¨ I [Eq. 31,
Again, should one wish to scale the normalized event cost with a scaling
factor (S), then
Eq. 3 can simply be multiplied by the scaling factor (S).
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 22 -
Since each activity or task expends a different amount of energy (e.g.,
raising
loaded forks expends more energy than lowering unloaded forks, etc.), and
since each
different type of vehicle expends a different amount of energy for the same
task (e.g.,
forklift expends more energy than hand pallet mover, etc.), the weight is a
function of both
vehicle type and activity type (e.g., unloaded traveling, loaded traveling,
unloaded turning,
loaded turning, unloaded raising, loaded raising, unloaded lowering, loaded
lowering,
blended combination of activities, etc.) and a combination of vehicle type and
activity
type.
The specific numbers (e.g., amperes of current drawn, minutes traveled, weight
of
the pallet, truck weight, type of truck, etc.) are only used as examples, and
these numbers
may be different based on actual measurements, more-detailed specifications,
etc. Also, it
should be appreciated that experimental results from varying vehicles, tasks,
and
conditions can be used to refine weighting factors that are used to derive the
universal
W.U.
Referring to FIG. 9, a schematic of an exemplary computer system having
computer readable program code for executing aspects described herein with
regard to the
preceding FIGURES. The computer system can be in the server computer 14, the
information linking device 38, the battery monitor 44, combinations thereof,
etc.
The computer system 900 includes one or more microprocessors 910 that are
connected to memory 920 via a system bus 930. A bridge 940 connects the system
bus
930 to an I/O Bus 950 that links peripheral devices to the microprocessor(s)
910.
Peripherals may include storage 960, such as a hard drive, removable media
storage 970,
e.g., floppy, flash, CD and/or DVD drive, I/O device(s) 980 such as a
keyboard, mouse,
etc. and a network adapter 990. The memory 920, storage 960, removable media
insertable into the removable media storage 970 or combinations thereof,
implement
computer-readable hardware that stores machine-executable program code for
implementing the methods, configurations, interfaces and other aspects set out
and
described herein.
Still further, the exemplary computer system may be implemented as an
apparatus
for normalizing industrial vehicle performance data, which may comprise a
processor
(e.g., microprocessor 910) coupled to a memory (e.g., memory 920, storage 960,
removable media insertable into the removable media storage 970 or
combinations
thereof), wherein the processor is programmed to normalize industrial vehicle
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 23 -
performance data by executing program code to perform one or more of the
methods set
out herein.
The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computer program
product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage
medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for
causing a
processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.
The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain
and
store instructions for use by an instruction execution device, e.g., the
system described
with reference to FIG. 9. Thus, a computer readable storage medium, as used
herein, is
not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or
other freely
propagating electromagnetic waves through a transmission media.
Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to
respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage
medium or to
an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example,
the Internet, a
local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network.
Aspects of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to
flowchart
illustrations and/or block diagrams. Each block of the flowchart illustrations
and/or block
diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or
block diagrams,
can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program
instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer,
special
purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a
machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the
computer or
other programmable instruction execution apparatus, create a mechanism for
implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block
diagram block or
blocks. In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block
may occur
out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in
succession may, in
fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be
executed in
the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be
noted that
each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and
combinations of blocks
in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by
special purpose
hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or
combinations of
special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
CA 02900352 2015-08-05
WO 2014/144240
PCT/US2014/028567
- 24 -
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable
medium that when executed can direct a computer, other programmable data
processing
apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the
instructions
when stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture
including
instructions which when executed, cause a computer to implement the
function/act
specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular
aspects
only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the
singular forms
"a", "an" and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless
the context
clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms
"comprises" and/or
"comprising," when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated
features,
integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude
the presence
or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations,
elements,
components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, material s, acts, and equivalents of any means
or step
plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any
disclosed structure,
material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed
elements as
specifically claimed. The description of the present disclosure has been
presented for
purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive
or limited to
the disclosure in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will
be apparent to
those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit
of the
disclosure. The aspects of the disclosure herein were chosen and described in
order to best
explain the principles of the disclosure and the practical application, and to
enable others
of ordinary skill in the art to understand the disclosure with various
modifications as are
suited to the particular use contemplated.
Having thus described the disclosure of the present application in detail and
by
reference to embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and
variations are
possible without departing from the scope of the disclosure defined in the
appended
claims.
What is claimed is:
