Language selection

Search

Patent 2918287 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2918287
(54) English Title: MEMBRANE SEPARATION OF OLEFIN AND PARAFFIN MIXTURES
(54) French Title: SEPARATION SUR MEMBRANE DE MELANGES D'OLEFINES ET DE PARAFFINES
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01J 47/12 (2017.01)
  • C08J 5/20 (2006.01)
  • C08L 29/10 (2006.01)
  • C08L 37/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FEIRING, ANDREW EDWARD (United States of America)
  • LAZZERI, JONATHAN (United States of America)
  • MAJUMDAR, SUDIPTO (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • COMPACT MEMBRANE SYSTEMS, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • COMPACT MEMBRANE SYSTEMS, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: PARLEE MCLAWS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2021-05-04
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2014-07-17
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2015-01-22
Examination requested: 2019-05-27
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2014/047096
(87) International Publication Number: WO2015/009969
(85) National Entry: 2016-01-13

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/847,899 United States of America 2013-07-18

Abstracts

English Abstract


- 25 -
ABSTRACT
A metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer is a copolymer minimally including
repeating units
of (i) a polymerized derivative of a perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable
monomer and (ii) a
strong acid highly fluorinated vinylether compound in which the acid moiety is
exchanged
with a cation of a Group 11 metal. Metal exchanged fluorinated ionomers are
readily soluble
and can be formed into thin, selectively gas permeable membranes by solution
deposition
methods. These membranes are suitable for separating olefins from gas
olefin/paraffin
mixtures. Good selectivity and transmembrane flux can be obtained without
humidifying the
membrane feed gas mixture.
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-10-13


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne un ionomère fluoré ayant subi un échange de métal, cet ionomère étant un copolymère comprenant au minimum des motifs répétitifs (i) d'un dérivé polymérisé d'un monomère perfluoré cyclique ou pouvant se cycliser et (ii) d'un composé de vinyléther hautement fluoré et fortement acide dans lequel le fragment acide est échangé par un cation de métal du groupe 11. Les ionomères fluorés ayant subi un échange de métal sont faciles à dissoudre et peuvent être mis sous la forme de membranes fines laissant passer sélectivement les gaz par le biais de procédés de dépôt de solution. Ces membranes sont appropriées pour effectuer une séparation entre les oléfines et les mélanges gazeux d'oléfines/paraffines. Une bonne sélectivité et un flux transmembranaire peuvent être obtenus sans humidifier le mélange gazeux fourni à la membrane.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 23 -
What is claimed is:
1. A gas separation membrane comprising a nonporous selectively permeable
membrane
layer of an ionomer which comprises repeat units A and B in which A is a
polymerized
derivative of perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable compound, and B has the
formula:
¨CF 2 ¨CF ¨
I
ORf¨X¨Y¨M
in which X is -S02- or -CO-, Y is 0 or -502(Rf*-, Rf and Rfl are each
independently
perfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkylether groups having 1-20 carbon atoms, and M
is a Group 11
metal ion;
wherein the perfluorinated cyclic or cylizable compound is selected from the
group consisting of
perfluoro-2,2-dimethy1-1,3-dioxole, perfluoro-2-methylene-4-methy1-1,3-
dioxolane), a
perfluoro(alkenyl vinyl ether), and 2,2,4-trifluoro-5-trifluoromethoxy-1,3-
dioxole.
2. The gas separation membrane of claim 1 wherein Rf is one or more of -
CF2CF2-,
-CF2CF(CF3)0CF2CF2-, or ¨(CF2)4-.
3. The gas separation membrane of claim 1 wherein M is silver.
4. The gas separation membrane of claim 1 wherein the ionomer comprises
repeat units
derived from one or more of chlorotrifluoroethylene, vinylidene fluoride, or
trifluoroethylene.
5. A method of separating one or more olefins from a mixture of said one or
more olefins
with one or more paraffins, comprising,
(A) providing one or more gas separation membranes from any one of claims 1
to 4,
(B) contacting a feed side of said one or more gas separation membranes
with said
mixture; and
Date recue/Date Received 2021-01-20

- 24 -
(C) applying a driving force to cause said one or more olefins to
preferentially
permeate relative to said one or more paraffins to a permeate side of said one
or more gas
separation membranes.
6. The method of claim 5 in which said mixture and said one or more olefins
that pemieate
are liquids.
7. The method of claim 5 in which said mixture and said one or more olefins
that pemieate
are gases.
8. The method of claim 6 in which the step of applying a driving force
comprises contacting
said permeate side with a sweep liquid.
9. The method of claim 7 in which the step of applying a driving force
comprises contacting
said permeate side with a sweep gas.
10. The method of claim 9 in which the sweep gas comprises an olefin, and
the one or more
olefins that permeate is at a lower pressure than the pressure of said
mixture.
11. The method of claim 5 wherein said mixture comprises a pair of
compounds selected
from the group consisting of (i) ethylene and ethane, (ii) propylene and
propane, and (iii) butene
and butane.
Date recue/Date Received 2021-01-20

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
- 1 ¨
MEMBRANE SEPARATION OF OLEFIN AND PARAFFIN MIXTURES
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the membrane separation mainly of olefin
hydrocarbons
from olefm/paraffin hydrocarbon mixtures. More particularly, the present
invention
relates to a type of a fluorinated polymeric membrane suitable for the
facilitated transport
separation of olefins from mixtures of olefins and paraffins in which a
facilitating moiety
is on the backbone of the polymeric membrane.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Olefin compounds, such as ethylene and propylene, are important raw materials
in
the current petrochemical industry. They are largely obtained from crude
petroleum by
high temperature thermal decomposition and purification processes. Paraffin
compounds,
such as ethane and propane are also produced by the thermal decomposition
steps. As a
result, olefin production usually produces a mixture of olefins and paraffins.
A
separation process of mixtures of olefins and paraffins is very frequently
needed to obtain
olefin purity suitable as raw material in subsequent end use processing. The
separation of
ethylene from mixtures with ethane is an exemplary process of extreme
industrial
importance that continues to this day.
Traditionally, fractional distillation has been used for such separations and
the
associated unit operations have many drawbacks, such as high energy
consumption, large
equipment costs, labor costs, safety concerns and the like. For example, to
separate
ethylene/ethane mixture, a typical distillation process reportedly can involve
using a
distillation column incorporating contact area equivalent to least 100
theoretical trays
operating at a high pressure of about 23 atm and sub-zero degree temperature.
In the
separation of propylene/propane, similar operation conditions at higher
temperatures are
also required.
Membrane technology has been considered to replace distillation for olefin-
paraffin separation. Commercially practical separation of many important
olefin/paraffin
mixtures, for example ethylene/ethane, has been difficult to accomplish using
selectively
permeable polymeric membranes. Traditional polymeric membranes cannot
discriminate

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 2 ¨
well between ethylene and ethane with commercially attractive productivity
because
these compounds are similar in both molecular size and physical properties
that affect
selective permeability.
Facilitated transport membrane separation ("FTMS") has arisen as an effective
type of membrane process to separate olefins from paraffins. Mass transfer via
FTMS is
accomplished by traditional solution diffusion coupled with a selectivity-
enhancing
carrier mechanism. In early-developed, liquid state forms of FTMS, the carrier
is in a=
liquid on the surface or in the pores of a membrane serving to maintain the
liquid carrier
adjacent to the feed side or immobilized within the membrane. To transfer
across the
membrane, a component of the feed associates with the carrier to become a part
of the
liquid carrier phase. The component and carrier travel through the membrane as
a unit
under an appropriate driving force. They separate on the far side discharging
desired feed
component(s) into the permeate stream for an end use purpose.
For separations of olefin/paraffin mixtures, a typical liquid carrier is an
aqueous
solution containing a metal salt. Olefin components associate preferentially
with the
carrier by reversibly complexing with the metal of the salt. A complexed
olefin can
transfer across the liquid filled membrane with significantly higher
selectivity relative to
the undesired paraffin feed components, than can be achieved by the non-metal-
complexed olefin.
Liquid state FTMS functions for olefin/paraffin separations to an extent but
has
drawbacks. A principal flaw is gradual depletion of carrier that causes
permeance to
diminish with service time. Also, solvent or other moieties present in the
liquid carrier
that escape into the permeate stream need to be removed from the desired
product
components.
Among various techniques that have been reported to improve upon functionality
of liquid state FTMS is a solid state membrane process. Some developments in
this area
are summarized as follows.
In US patent 5015268 to Ho a solid homogeneous FTMS membrane is prepared
from a hydrophilic polymer such as polyvinyl alcohol. The membrane does not
have a
liquid carrier. A metal ion or metal salt capable of complexing with
aliphatically

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 3 ¨
unsaturated hydrocarbons, for example silver nitrate, is distributed
homogeneously in the
hydrophilic polymer. Preferably the polymer is crosslinked.
Kimura et al. in US patent 4318714 discloses FTMS using a polymeric ion
exchange membrane in which the polymer has electrostatically retained counter
ions
reversibly reactive to the gas molecules being separated. Example 4 describes
high
selectivity by pure component separation of ethylene and ethane by sulfonated
polyxylylene oxide ion exchange resin that was immersed in AgNO3 solution then
rinsed
in distilled water to remove residual AgNO3 solution and Ag+ ions. The feed
gases were
humidified to 90% relative humidity.
US 4614524 to Kraus used a membrane of halogenated olefin polymer with
pendant acid groups (i.e., Nafionl 415 ion exchange resin) that was
equilibrated with
AgNO3 to obtain selectivity between ethylene and ethane. Kraus teaches that
the
membrane must be plasticized with a polyhydric alcohol to effect separation.
Erilcsen et at. US 5191151 discloses a process for separating C2-C4 olefins
from
C1-C6 paraffins using a membrane of an ion exchange resin of
tetrafluoroethylene/
perfiuorovinylether sulfonated copolymer with Ag+ ion eschange. The membrane
is
prepared by certain specific ion exchange methods that includes steps of
converting the
poly(perfluorosulfonic acid) from protonic form to anionic -S03" form by
contacting with
an alkali metal solution, swelling the converted membrane in an alcohol, and
exchanging
a silver ion in the ionomer. For the membrane to separate olefin from
paraffin, the gas
mixture feed must be humidified.
The development of a facilitated transport separation membrane that provides
high selectivity and permeance in separating olefins from gas mixtures with
paraffins is
greatly desired. It is further desired to have such a membrane that functions
in
olefin/paraffin separation with little or no limitation of humidification of
the feed or
plasticization of the membrane. There is much need for an olefin/paraffin
membrane
separation process that maintains high selectivity and permeance for extended
durations.
A method of manufacturing consistently high quality facilitated transport
separation
membranes effective to separate olefins from mixtures with paraffins with both
high
selectivity and permeance is also much wanted.

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 4 ¨
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The novel metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer is a copolymer minimally
including two repeating unit types. These are the polymerized derivative of a
perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable monomer and a strong acid highly
fluorinated
vinylether compound in which the acid moiety is exchanged with a cation of a
Group 11
metals. Selected metal exchanged fluorinated ionomers are readily soluble and
can be
formed into thin, selectively gas permeable membranes by solution deposition
methods.
These membranes are suitable for separating olefins from olefin/paraffin
mixtures. Good
selectivity and transmembrane flux properties can be obtained without
humidifying the
membrane feed gas mixture.
Accordingly there is provided a solid state separation membrane comprising a
nonporous selectively permeable layer consisting essentially of a metal
exchanged
fluorinated ionomer comprising repeating units A and B in which A is a
polymerized
derivative of a perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable organic compound, and B
has the
formula
- CF2 - CF -
ORf- X - Y - M
in which X is SO2 or CO, Y is NSO2R? or 0, Rf and Rfl are each independently
perfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkylether groups having 1-20 carbon atoms, and M
is a Group
11 metal, and in which the ion exchanged fluorinated ionomer comprises m and n

fractions of total number of repeating units A and B respectively, each of m
and n being
greater than 0 and less than 1Ø
There is also provided a method of making a metal exchanged fluorinated
ionomer for use in membrane separation of olefins from paraffins, comprising
the steps
of: (A) providing a hydrolyzed copolymer comprising repeating units A being a
polymerized derivative of a perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable organic
compound and
repeating units B having the formula

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047696
¨5---
- CF2 - CF -
ORf- X - Y - H
in which X is SO2 or CO, Y is NSO2Rf I or 0, and Rf and Rf I are each
independently
perfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkylether groups having 1-20 carbon atoms, (B)
dissolving
the hydrolyzed copolymer in a liquid comprising a polar solvent to form a
polymer
solution, (C) providing a stoichometric excess of fine particles of a metal
salt of a Group
11 metal, (D) charging the fine particles of the metal salt to the polymer
solution and
agitating the polymer solution with intensity effective to maintain the
particles in a
uniform dispersion in the polymer solution for a duration effective to
exchange the Group
11 metal with the acid form copolymer thereby forming a metal exchanged
fluorinated
ionomer, (E) filtering the dispersion to remove substantially all residual
particles of the
metal salt and thereby providing a metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer
solution.
There is further provided a method of making a membrane for the separation of
olefins from a mixture with paraffins, comprising the steps of: (I) providing
a metal
= exchanged fluorinated ionomer solution produced by a method comprising
the following
steps (A) providing metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer comprising repeating
units A
and B in which A is a polymerized derivative of a perfluorinated cyclic or
cyclizable
organic compound, B has the formula
- CF2- CF -
ORf- X - Y M
in which X is SO2 or CO, Y is NSO2Rf I or 0, Rf and Rf I are each
independently
perfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkylether groups having 1-20 carbon atoms, and M
is a Group
11 metal, (B) dissolving the metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer in a liquid
comprising
a polar solvent to form a metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer solution, (II)
coating a
substrate with the metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer solution, and (III)
evaporating the
liquid from the metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer solution, thereby forming
membrane comprising a dry, solid state, nonporous layer of metal exchanged
fluorinated
ionomer.

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 6 ¨
Also provided is a method of separating an olefin from a feed mixture of the
olefin with a paraffin comprising the following steps: (A) providing a
selectively
permeable membrane comprising a nonporous active layer consisting essentially
of a
metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer comprising repeating units A and B in
which A is a
polymerized derivative of a perfiuorinated cyclic or cyclizable organic
compound, B has
the formula
CF2 - CF -
I
ORf- X - Y - M
in which X is SO2 or CO, Y is NSO2Rf I or 0, Rf and Rf I are each
independently
perfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkylether groups having 1-20 carbon atoms, and M
is a Group
11 metal, (B) contacting a feed side of the selectively permeable membrane
with the feed
mixture, (C) applying a driving force for permeation of the feed mixture
through the
selectively permeable membrane, thereby causing the olefin to selectively
permeate to a
permeate side of the membrane, and (D) collecting an olefin-enriched permeate
product.
Yet further this invention provides a metal exchanged ionomer solution
comprising (I) a liquid solvent system comprising a polar solvent, and (II) a
metal
exchanged fluorinated ionomer comprising repeating units A and B in which A is
a
polymerized derivative of a perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable organic
compound, and B
has the formula
- CF2 - CF -
I
ORf- X - Y - M
in which X is SO2 or CO, Y is NSO2Rf I or 0, Rf and Rf1 are each
indefiendently
perfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkylether groups having 1-20 carbon atoms, and M
is a Group
11 metal, and in which the metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer is dissolved in
the liquid
solvent system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
This invention is directed to separating olefins from mixtures (ocrasionaly
herein,
"feed mixtures") of olefins with paraffins. "Olefins" refers to chemical
compounds

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 7 ¨
having at least one carbon-carbon double bond. Other functional groups, such
as ketone,
esters, or alcohols may also be present. Paraffins refers to chemical
compounds free from
carbon-carbon double bonds. Preferred olefins in this invention are mono-
saturated
hydrocarbons of the formula CnH2r, wherein n is 2 to 30. Preferred paraffins
are saturated
hydrocarbons of the formula CnH28+2 wherein n is 2 to 30 The invention is very
effective
for separating an olefin having a particular number of carbon atoms in the
range of 2-30=
from a feed mixture comprising that olefin and the paraffin that has the same
number of
carbon atoms. The feed mixture can include more olefins and paraffins than the
one
olefin and one paraffin that have the common particular number of carbon
atoms. Often
the feed mixture is in the gaseous state.
A glossary of abbreviations used in this disclosure is presented in Table I.
Table I Glossary
IEPP Group 11 metal ion-exchanged PDD/SEFVE
copolymer, e.g., PDD/SEFVE-M
PDD perfluoro-2,2-dimethy1-1,3-dioxole
SEFVE CF2=CFOCF2CF(CF3)0CF2CF2S02F
SEFVE-H CF2=CFOCF2CF(CF3)0CF2CF2S03H
POESF perfluoro(3-oxapent-4-ene)sulfonyl fluoride
CF2---CFOCF2CF2S02F
In various aspects this invention relates to novel methods of making and using
a
new metal ion exchange polymer, more specifically, a metal exchanged
fluorinated
ionomer. This ionomer comprises at least two types of repeating units "A" and
"B" in
random order with a generalized -[A].-[B],, backbone configuration. A is a
polymerized
derivative of a perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable organic compound. B is a
highly
polymerized derivative of a fluorinated vinylether compound in which the acid
moiety is
exchanged with a cation of Group 11 metals. With greater specificity, the
metal
exchanged fluorinated ionomer thus has a structure of formula (1)
- [ A ]. - [ CF2- CFI -
I (1)
ORf-X -Y - M
in which
A is the polymerized derivative of perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable organic
compound,

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 8 ¨
m and n are the respective fractions of total number of repeating units A and
the highly
fluorinated vinylether compound derivative in the ionomer,
X is SO2 or CO,
Y is NS021te or 0,
Rf and Rf I are each independently perfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkylether
groups having
1-20 carbon atoms, and
M is a Group 11 metal.
The metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer can be formed by several
copolymerization strategies. These involve copolymerizing appropriate
perfluorinated
cyclic or cyclizable organic compound monomers and highly fluorinated
vinylether
compound monomers selected to obtain desired repeating units A and B,
respectively.
Preferably the vinylether compound is perfluorinated. When X = SO2, it is
preferred to
polymerize the vinylether compound having structure as in formula (1) in which
the Y
moiety is P, as illustrated by the monomer SEFVE. The sulfonyl fluoride group
in the
resulting copolymer can be hydrolyzed and acidified to the acid form in which
OH
replaces F. The acidic hydrogen is then exchanged with a metal salt of M to
obtain the
metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer. In an alternate embodiment, the sulfonyl
fluoride
group of the resulting copolymer with X= SO2 can be reacted with a sulfonamide
of
structure HNSO2Rf1 to form copolymeric sulfonimide compound having structure
as in
formula (1) in which moiety Y is NSO2Rfl and moiety designated "M"is 1-1, The
acidic
hydrogen on nitrogen is then exchanged with a metal salt of M to obtain the
metal
exchanged fluorinated ionomer. When X = CO, it is preferred to polymerize the
monomer
of the vinylether compound in which moiety designated "Y" is methoxy group
OCH3.
The resulting polymer can be hydrolyzed and acidified to form the acid polymer
with X
=CO, Y = 0 and moiety designated "M" = H. The acidic hydrogen is then
exchanged
with a metal salt of M to obtain the metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer.
Another strategy calls for copolymerizing the perfluorinated cyclic or
cyclizable organic
compound monomer with the monomer that is the acid form of the highly
fluorinated
vinylether compound and then exchanging the terminal hydrogen atom of the Rf
or Rf I
group with M. It is also contemplated that the perfluorinated cyclic or
cyclizable organic
compound monomer can be copolymerized with comonomer being the metal ion

- 9 -
exchanged form of the highly fluorinated vinylether compound to directly yield
the metal
exchanged fluorinated ionomer.
Preferred Group 11 metals, M, are silver and copper.
Representative examples of the perfluorinated cyclic or cyclizable organic
compound
are perfluoro-2,2-dimethy1-1,3-dioxole ("PDD"), perfluoro-2-methylene-4-methy1-
1,3-
dioxolane ("PMD"), perfluoro (alkenyl vinylether) ("PFVE"), and 2,2,4-
trifluoro-5
trifluoromethoxy-1,3 dioxole ("TFMD"). PDD is preferred.
Representative examples of the highly fluorinated vinylether compound are
vinylethers containing sulfonyl fluoride such as SEFVE, CF2=CFOCF2CF2S02F and
CF2=CFOCF2CF2CF2CF2S02F, and vinylether carboxylates such as
CF2=CFOCF2CF(CF3)0CF2CF2CO2CH3. The preferred highly fluorinated vinylether
compound is SEFVE.
The ionomer can optionally include additional repeating units of polymerized
fluorinated compounds, with the proviso that repeating units A and B are also
present.
Representative of such additional repeating units are those of formula (1)
disclosed by
Watakabe et al. in US patent no. 7,220,508, and the polymerized monomers
chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE), vinylidene fluoride (VDF), trifluoroethylene
(TrFE), and
blends thereof A preferred metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer according to
this invention
is poly(PDD/SEFVE) sometimes preferred to as "IEPP" ionomer. It is a copolymer
of PDD
and SEFVE in which the fluorine atom of the terminal sulfonylfluoride group is
replaced by
an oxygen and a metal ion. The structure of IEPP ionomer is shown in formula
(2) below in
which 0< m< 1.0 and n = 1.0- m, and M= Ag.
F F
I IU 1
_____________________________ cF2 (2)
L L I
0 0 0cF2cF(cF3)0cFsT2s03m
'CF3 CF3
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-10-13

- 10 -
According to this invention silver metal ion exchanged ionomers of formula (2)
have
been discovered to provide excellent permeability and selectivity when used as
the active
layer of a selectively gas permeable membrane for the separation of olefins
from mixtures
with paraffins. Without wishing to be bound by a particular theory, it is
believed that the
silver facilitates the transport of the olefin. Other metal ions that may be
used include copper
and gold.
The proportions of repeating units A to repeating units B in the polymer
chain, i.e.,
m:n ratio, for highly effective selectively permeable ionomers can range
widely. Preferably
the mole fraction of repeat units B in the ionomer is at least about 0.05,
preferably at least
about 0.1, more preferably at least about 0.2, and most preferably at least
about 0.4. The
preferable mole fraction of repeat units B is at most about 0.5. The mole
fraction of repeat
units A is at least about 0.3 and, when no optionally additional fluorinated
compound
repeating units are present, will be an amount complementary to B totaling to

One embodiment of a method of making the novel ionomer involves multiple steps
generally beginning with copolymerizing A and B precursor monomers and then
hydrolyzing
the resulting polymer to replace terminal sulfonyl fluoride atoms with
hydrogen to produce
an acid form ionomer. For example in which IEPP ionomer is synthesized from
PDD and
SEFVE comonomers, the acid form precursor ionomer poly(PPD/SEFVE-H) has
structure as
shown in formula (3). Watakabe et al. US 7220508 discloses a procedure
suitable for making
this poly(PPD/SEFVE-H) precursor that is exemplified in US '508 Examples 1 and
2.
F F
1
CC ___________________________ cF,¨ CF (3)
L I \ im n
OCF2CF(CF3)0CF2CF2S03,H
CF3 CF3
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-10-13

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
- 11 ¨
Eriksen et al., US 5191151, discloses copolymerization of tetrafluoroethylene
("TFE") and SEFVE and methods of exchanging the sulfonic acid hydrogen ion
with a
Ag cation. Eriksen's methods involve many steps that include contacting the
TFE/SEFVE-H ionomer with an alkali metal solution to exchange the alkali metal
in the
ionomer, exposing the alkali exchanged ionomer to an alcohol to swell the
ionomer, and
then contacting the swollen alkali metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer with a
silver-
containing aqueous solution to obtain a silver exchanged ionomer. Additional
preferred
steps include separating the alkali metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer from
excess
alkali metal solution and heating the alkali metal exchanged fluorinated
ionomer to about
100-350 C for up to 3 hours prior to swelling, removing excess alcohol from
the swollen
alkali metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer, and removing excess silver
solution from the
silver exchanged ionomer. Erikson discloses that the silver exchanged
TFE/SEFVE
ionomer is useful for separating C2-C4 olefins from C1-C6 paraffins.
The present novel method provides a simpler and very efficient way to obtain
an
operative metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer for use in membranes having
superior
ability to separate olefins from mixtures with paraffins. This method starts
by dissolving
precursor poly(PDD/SEFVE-H) ionomer (formula (3)) in an appropriate solvent.
An advantageous feature of the novel metal exchanged fluorinated ionomers,
such
as PDD/SEFVE ("IEPP") ionomers and corresponding precursor acid form ionomers,
is
that they are soluble in liquid mixtures of fluorosolvents and common, non-
fluorinated,
polar solvents. Some of the novel metal exchanged fluorinated ionomers are
soluble in
liquid that consists essentially of polar solvents. In this context, the term
"consists
essentially of polar solvents" means that the solvent system exclusively
utilizes polar
solvents or optional other components, but is substantially free of very
fluorinated
solvents known and selected for ability to dissolve highly and perfluorinated
polymers.
The optional other components are usually in minor proportions, and do not
materially
affect the basic and novel characteristics of the invention.
The relative fractions of PDD and SEFVE monomers in the copolymer determine
whether a fluorosolvent is called for. Generally, metal exchanged fluorinated
ionomer
containing up to about 20 mole % polymerized SEFVE will be soluble in mixtures
of
fluorinated solvent and common polar solvent. IEPP containing more than about
20 mole

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 12 ¨
% SEFVE can dissolve in polar solvents alone. Accordingly, for many
compositions, use
of extraordinary and usually high priced fluorinated solvents is avoided.
Products such as
thin film membranes of IEPP metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer can be made at

reasonable cost using easily obtainable solvents by industry standard liquid
deposition
techniques such as dipping, spraying, roller coating, doctoring and the like.
Representative common polar solvents that are suitable to solubilize IEPP
copolymers include methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, ethyl chloride, methyl
chloride and
methylene chloride, dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, sulfolane, N,Nt-
dimethyl-
imidazolidinone, benzyl alcohol, phenol, cresol and the like.
Representative fluorosolvents that are primarily intended for solubilizing
fluorinated polymers and that are suitable for use in the novel process
include
perfluoroalkanes, such as perfluorohexane, perfluoroheptane and
perfluorooctane,
available from 3M Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota under the tradenames PF5060,

PF5070 and PF5080, respectively. Other representative fluorinated solvent
materials that
can be used include FluorinertTM FC-75 and FC-770 Electronic Liquids, and
NovecTM
HFE-7100, NovecTM HFE-7200, and NovecTM 7300 Engineered Fluids also from 3M.
Fluorinert FC-75 is a solvent of perfluorinated compounds primarily with 8
carbons,
believed to include 2-butyltetrahydrofuran. Fluorinert FC770 contains Cl-C3
perfluoro
N-alkyl morpholines among other perfluorinated compounds. Novec HFE-7100
includes
.. methyl nonafluoroisobutyl ether and methyl nonafluorobutyl ether. Novec HFE-
7200
includes ethyl nonafluoroisobutyl ether and ethyl nonafluorobutyl ether. Novec
7300
contains 1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)-pentane.
Further in the method of making the ionomer according to this invention, the
acid
form precursor PDD/SEFVE-H ionomer can be dissolved in merely ordinary polar
organic solvent, such as ethyl alcohol, provided that the mole fraction of
SEFVE
repeating units of the polymer is at least about 0.2. If the SEFVE repeating
unit mole
fraction is less, then either a specialty, fluorinated solvent or a blend of
polar organic and
fluorinated solvents can be used.
A subsequent step of the novel method calls for charging a solid metal salt
directly to the ionomer solution. The metal salt should be in fine particulate
form and
poorly soluble in the in the ionomer solution. By "poorly soluble" is meant
that the metal

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
salt solubility should be at most about 10 g/L, preferably at most about 5
g/L, more
preferably at most about 2 g/L and most preferably at most about 1 g/L. Great
preference
is given for the metal salt to be insoluble in the ionomer solution, that is,
at most about
0.01 g/l. The preferred metal suitable for the ion used with this is silver.
Silver salt of any
composition that satisfies the particule size and solubility criteria just
mentioned may be
used. Representative silver salt compounds include silver carbonate, cyanide,
diethyldithiocarbamate, iodate, nitrate, oxide, phosphate, sulfate, acetate,
bromide. The
solid silver may be heated prior to adding to adding to the solution to
facilitate exchange
reaction with the polymer. However, the salt temperature should not be raised
to a point
that adversely affects the polymer. With metal salt added solution should be
heated to
reflux temperature of the solution solvent to disassociate the metal ion from
the salt. By
way of example, when silver carbonate is the salt, reflux will release carbon
dioxide and
silver will associate with the polymer by ion exchange. Typically the
temperature is in
the range of about 30 -100 C. The ionomer/solvent solution should be agitated
effectively to maintain the silver salt in suspension. Typically ion exchange
occurs
within about an hour. Thereafter the solution can be cooled to room
temperature. The
excess solid silver salt is then filtered from the ionomer solution. Finally,
the polymer
can be isolated from the filtrate solution by evaporating the solvent using
heat and
vacuum.
In another aspect, the ionomer can be converted from acid to metal form by
contacting a solution of a soluble metal salt in an appropriate solvent that
is a non-solvent
for the ionomer being converted. Thus following exchange, the metal bearing
ionomer
precipitates. Then the dispersion is heated, cooled, and filtered and rinsed
to isolate
metal exchanged fluorinated ionomer from the solution. By way of example,
solid
ionomer can be dispersed in a salt solution of aqueous silver nitrate. The
dispersion is
heated, typically for up to several hours, cooled, filtered and the solids
rinsed with water
to yield silver-exchanged ionomer.
Both conversion methods described above involve heterogeneity of the polymer
and metal salt component phases. In the former, the polymer in solution
contacts a solid
form metal salt. In the latter, the solid polymer is contacted by soluble salt
in solution. A
main advantageous feature of these methods is that the metal is exchange into
the

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 14 ¨
ionomer is substantially complete without an excess of free metal salt present
in the
polymer product.
In another embodiment for making the novel polymer, the second monomer, e.g.,
SEFVE is initially hydrolyzed to acid form SEFVE-H. The hydrolyzed
intermediate is
then converted to the desired metal salt. The second monomer in metal salt
form can then
be polymerized with the acyclic or cyclizable fluorinated first monomer, e.g.,
PDD. A
polar fluorinated solvent, such as trifluoroacetic acid can be used to provide
a suitably
soluble reaction medium for the first monomer. The resulting polymer can be
isolated
from the polymerization mass and used to form a membrane without further
purification.
According to the above-described method metal of insoluble metal salt can be
exchanged with polymer in solution. This provides a further distinct advantage
that the
novel ion exchanged ionomer can be cast from solution to form a thin film
nonporous
selectively permeable gas separation membrane. Thus for example, after
filtering excess
silver carbonate, the IEPP ionomer solution can be formed into a membrane
without an
intermediate step of isolating the IEPP ionomer in solid form. All types of
conventional
solvent casting membrane formation techniques can be used. Typically the
solution is
deposited as a thin film onto a porous support, excess fluid is drained and
the wet IEPP
ionomer solution solvent is evaporated to produce a composite membrane. Any
type of
membrane support suitable for solvent deposition can be used, such as flat
sheet, pleated
sheet, spiral wound, ribbon tube, hollow fiber and the like.
The novel membranes with non-porous active selectively permeable layers of
IEPP are remarkably effective for separating olefins from mixtures with
paraffins. They
are especially useful for separating olefins and paraffins of similar
moleculas weight and
size that are difficult to segregate by conventional methods. The
extraordinary separation
performance is shown in Table II.
Another significant feature of the novel membrane compositions and processes
of
this invention is that humidifying the olefin/paraffin feed gas mixture and/or
the permeate
olefin enriched product is not necessary to achieve commercially productive
separation
performance. This is a departure from traditional membrane separation of
olefin/paraffin
mixtures typified by processes disclosed in Eriksen US 5191151 that call for
the presence
of water vapor in the gaseous streams of silver-exchanged ionomer membranes.

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969
PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 15 ¨
Optionally according to this invention the feed and/or permeate gas mixtures
may be
humidified. With humidification this invention has been discovered to provide
far
superior separation performance of olefins from paraffins than is obtained by
comparable
conventional membrane processes.
EXAMPLES
This invention is now illustrated by examples of certain representative
embodiments thereof; wherein all parts, proportions and percentages are by
weight unless
otherwise indicated. All units of weight and measure not originally obtained
in SI units
have been converted to SI units. Unless otherwise indicated, pressure values
recited
throughout this disclosure are gage pressures, i.e., relative to atmospheric
pressure.
Example 1: Forming silver-exchanged PDD-SEFVE copolymer
Into a glass pressure tube were placed 4.88g PDD, 17.84 g SEFVE, 5 mL 2,3-
dihydrodecafluoropentane (Vertrel XF specialty fluid, DuPont Wilmington,
Delaware),
and lmL initiator solution in Vertrel XF of hexafluoropropylene oxide (HFPO)
dimer
peroxide made from reaction of CF3CF2CF20CF(CF3)CF0 with basic hydrogen
peroxide.
The tube was cooled to -78 C in a dry ice/isopropanol bath, evacuated and
filled with
nitrogen 3 times. The glass tube was sealed, allowed to warm to room
temperature in a
water bath. The reaction mixture was agitated by shaking overnight. The tube
was
opened to ambient air and 20 mL acetone was added into the mixture. After
stirring for
15 minutes, the liquid was decanted and 20 mL fresh acetone was added. After
stirring
for 15 minutes, the liquid was again decanted and the solid residue was
transferred to a
watch glass. Drying in an oven at 100 C overnight yielded 6.3 g of white,
solid
PDD/SEFVE copolymer product.
The PDD/SEFVE copolymer was hydrolyzed with KOH dissolved in a
water/ethanol mixed solvent solution, filtered from solution, and then
immersed in an
aqueous nitric acid solution, drained and re-immersed to convert to the acid
form of the
polymer. The acid form polymer was then filtered and rinsed with deionized
water and
dried under vacuum to obtain poly(PDD/SEFVE-H) copolymer.

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 20151009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 16 ¨
Poly(PDD/SEFVE-1-1) copolymer (4.9 g) was dissolved in 50 ml of ethyl alcohol
at room temperature, i.e., about 25 C. While stirring the solution 1.0 g
Ag2CO3 powder
was added to obtain a suspension. The suspension was heated close to the
boiling point
of ethyl alcohol and refluxed for 1 hour. The suspension was then cooled to
room
temperature and then filtered to remove residual solid Ag2CO3 from the
solution. The
filtrate solvent was evaporated by oven drying at 100 C for 1 hour to yield
4.0 g dry
yellow granules of IEPP(Ag+) silver exchanged copolymer.
The copolymer thus produced is acceptable for practical uses. However, this
process can entrain reduced silver not bound to the polymer chain. To recover
that
reduced silver metal back to polymeric ionic silver, the following optional
additional
steps can be performed. The yellow granules can be repetitively rinsed with
dilute
hydrogen peroxide and water and re-filtered to obtain a white powder of
copolymer.
Example 2 Making a membrane of silver-exchanged PDD-SEFVE polymer
An IEPP(Ag+) copolymer having about 60 mole % PDD repeating units and about
40 mole % SEFVE repeating units was made by a procedure as in Ex. 1. The
copolymer
was dissolved at room temperature in a solution of 70 wt% isopropyl alcohol
and 30 wt%
Novec 7300 fluid to make 1.2 wt% polymer solution. An asymmetrically porous
sheet of
polyacrylonitrile (PAN) microfiltration membrane was dipped into the polymer
solution.
The wet sheet was removed and held vertically to drain the excess liquid. The
copolymer-coated membrane was then dried in an oven at 100 C overnight to form
a non-
porous composite membrane.
Examples 3-5 Separation of propane and propylene using IEPP(Ag+) membranes
Several PAN substrate membranes coated with IEPP(Ag+) having different ratios
of PDD:SEFVE were made by a procedure substantially as described in Ex. 2.
Each
membrane was placed in a permeation test cell. A dry gas mixture of 80 wt%
propane
and 20 wt% propylene was fed at 69 kPa (10 psi) to one side of the cell at a
flow rate of
200 standard cm3 ("sec") per min. maintained by mass flow controllers. The gas
mixture
permeated the nonporous membranes and permeate stream flow was measured by a
bubble flow meter. Nitrogen gas was swept across the permeate side of the
membrane at
rates in the range of 25-200 scc/min. Concentrations of the propane and
propylene in the

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 17 ¨
permeate were determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis
using a
Nicolet 6700 FTIR analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham MA) equipped
with a
2 m gas cell path length. Flow rates were adjusted such that stage cut (i.e.,
flow of
permeate relative to flow of feed) was maintained below 10%. Permeance was
calculated
.. for each component independently using the log mean partial pressure
difference across
the membrane. Selectivity was calculated as the ratio of propylene permeance
to propane
permeance. Resulting data is presented in Table II.
Examples 6 and 7
The procedures of Ex. 4 and 5 were repeated except that the feed and sweep
streams were bubbled through water at room temperature at flow rates in the
range of 25-
200 scc/min. The humidified streams produced increased permeance as seen by
results
presented in Table II.
Table II
SEFVE in Propane Propylene Propylene
IEPP(Ag+) Permeance Penneance to Propane
(mole %) (GPU) (GPU) Selectivity
Ex. 3 20 0.5 11 22
Ex. 4 30 0.2 6.8 34
Ex. 5 40 0.2 16 80
Ex. 6 30 307 41
Ex. 7 40 215 72
Example 8 Forming silver-exchanged sulfonimide copolymer
A copolymer was synthesised from a 100:200 PDD:SEFVE mole ratio
comonomer feed mixture. Into a glass beaker was placed 2 g of the PDD/SEFVE
copolymer, 0.43 g of trifluoromethylsulfonamide CF3S02NH2, 100 mL Novec HFE
7200
fluorinated solvent, 50 mL tetrahydrofuran and 0.72 g of triethylamine. The
mixture was
stirred at 70 C for 24 hours. Thereafter solvents were evaporated leaving a
granular
product. A copious quantity of water was added to the product that was then
filtered.
The solid product was immersed in 10 mL of 3N aqueous hydrochloric acid and
stirred
for 3 hours. After filtering, the product was again water washed, filtered,
and dried under
vacuum to yield 1.8 g PDD/SEFVE-imide copolymer with repeating unit A of
polymerized PDD and repeating unit B of CF2-CF(OCF2CF(CF3)0CF2CF2S02NHS02
.. CF3).

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 18 ¨
The PDD/SEFVE-imide (0.5 g) was mixed in 10 rnL water with 85 mg of silver
carbonate powder and stirred about 12 hours to exchange silver ions for
protons. The
solid product was filtered and washed with water after which 10 mL of 10 wt%
hydrogen
peroxide was added. The mixture was stirred for 24 hours, then filtered and
the solid
silver-exchanged PDD/SEFVE-imide ionomer was washed with water, and dried
under
vacuum. A coating solution of 2 wt% of the silver-exchanged PDD/SEFVE-imide
ionomer dissolved in 30 wt% Novec HFE 7300/70 wt% isopropyl alcohol mixture
was
prepared. The solution was coated by the procedure as in Ex. 2 onto a PAN
microporous substrate to form a membrane. The membrane was tested (Ex. 8a) by
permeating a 20 wt% propylene/80 wt% propane gas mixture at 60 psi (414kPa)
using the
procedure described in Exs. 3-5. Selectivity was calculated from measurements
of
component permeances. The permeation procedure was repeated (Ex. 8b). Results
are
shown in Table III.
Example 9 Ethylene and Ethane Pure Gases Permeated Through PDD-SEFVE-Ag+
membrane fabricated with mixed solvent solution
A PDD/SEFVE-silver exchanged ionomer was prepared as in Ex. 1. A 2 wt%
solution of this ionomer in a 30 wt% Novec FIFE 7300/70 wt% isopropyl alcohol
solvent
mixture was coated on a PAN substrate to fabricate a membrane as described in
Ex. 2.
The membrane was evaluated by permeating pure ethylene and ethane gases
separately in
duplicate trials (9a, 9b) at the same pressure. A second membrane of same
composition
was also prepared and the same evaluation was repeated at lower pressure (9c).
Results .
are presented in Table III.
Example 10 Ethylene/Ethane Permeation Through PDD-SEFVE-VF2-Ag+ Membrane
Fabricated with Mixed Solvent Solution
The procedure of Example 9 was repeated except that the copolymer that was
silver exchanged had composition produced from a 21.4 mole % PDD/ 57.2 mole %
SEFVE/21.4 mole % vinylidene fluoride (VF2), i.e.,100:267:100 mole ratio, feed

mixture. The membrane was tested by separately permeating pure ethylene and
ethane
gases at three different membrane feed pressures. Results are presented in
Table III.

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 19 ¨
Example 11 Propylene/Propane Separations with PDD-POESF-Ag+ membrane
The copolymer synthesis procedure of Ex. 1 was repeated except that the highly
fluorinated vinylether compound monomer was perfluoro(3-oxapent-4-ene)sulfonyl

fluoride "POESF" (SynQuest Laboratories Inc. Alachua, FL), to provide a silver
exchanged ionomer based on 100:200 PDD:POESF reactant mole ratio. A membrane
of
this ionomer was fabricated by a procedure similar to Ex. 2. The membrane was
mounted
into a permeation test cell. A gas mixture of 80 vol.% propane/20 vol. %
propylene was
humidified to 80% relative humidity ("RH") by bubbling through water at about
24 C and
then fed into the cell in contact with the feed side of the membrane. A
similarly 80% RH
humidified, nitrogen sweep gas stream of 300 mL/min at 2.8 kPa (0.4 psi) was
blown
through the cell on the permeate side. Duplicate trials (11a, 1 lb) were
conducted and
separation results are presented in Table III.
Example 12 Ethylene/Ethane Separations with PDD/SEFVE-Ag+ membrane
A membrane of PDD/SEFVE copolymer with silver counter ion was fabricated as
in Ex. 2. A 10 vol.% ethylene/90 vol.% ethane gas mixture was separated by the
membrane in duplicate trials. Results are shown in Table III.
Example 13 Propylene/Propane Membrane Separations with PDD-SEFVE-VF2-Ag+
membrane fabricated with mixed solvent solution
A membrane of PDD-SEFVE-VF2-Ag+ copolymer was prepared as in Ex. 10.
The membrane was used in several trials of separating propylene/propane gas
mixtures.
In each of these trials, a humidified nitrogen sweep gas stream of 300 mL/min
was
blown through the permeate side of the membrane at 2.8 kPa (0.4 psi). Humidity
of the
sweep for trials 13a - 13c were respectively 87%,77%, and 81% RH,
respectively. Feed
gas mixtures were 10 C, 15 C, and 23 C, and were humidified to 85%, 84% and
81% RH,
in trials 13a-13c, respectively. Data is presented in Table III.
Example 14 Olefin/Paraffin Facilitated Transport Membrane Separation with
Condensable Sweep Gas
A membrane was fabricated as in Example 2, and used in successive trials of
separating a 414 kPa (60 psi) pressurized, 10 vol.% propylene/90 vol.%
propane, room

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969 PCT/US2014/047096
¨20 ¨
temperature gas mixture. Various sweep gas configurations were employed' in
the trials.
In trial 14a, the feed mixture was not humidified. The vapor above a sealed
tank of water
was admitted via a transfer line to the permeate chamber of the test cell and
drawn across
the permeate side of the membrane under vacuum of 6.7 kPa (50 Ton) absolute
pressure
as a sweep gas. Trial 14b was the same except that the transfer line closed
such that the
permeate side was maintained under dry vacuum and the feed was not humidified.
For
trial 14c, a humidified nitrogen gas sweep blown through the permeate side of
the
membrane cell at 2.8 kPa (0.4 psi) was used and the feed mixture was also
humidified.
Data are presented in Table III.
Ex. 14c demonstrates that excellent olefin-to-paraffin selectivity and olefin
permeance is obtained with a facilitated transport membrane according to this
invention.
Due to the inert gas from the sweep stream, the permeate stream usually would
need
further separation in additional unit operations to remove the inert gas and
become
suitable for practical use as a chemical process raw material. By comparison,
Ex. 14a
provides equivalent high olefin-to-paraffin selectivity and moderately lower
yet
remarkably high olefin perrneance. However, this configuration presents the
likely more
significantly advantageous feature that the sweep stream contains no non-
condensable
vapor component, such as nitrogen or other inert gas. Consequently, no non-
condensable
vapor component other than olefm and paraffin is present in the permeate. By
"non-
condensable" is meant that the vapor component does not substantially
completely
condense from the gas state at upon exposure to temperature in the range of
about -40 C
to about 0 C and absolute pressure in the range of about 1.3 kPa (lOrnmlig) to
about 101
kPa (760 mmHg). Consequently highly enriched olefin product can be relatively
simply
obtained by merely processing the humid permeate stream through a low
temperature
condenser to condense and drain entrained water vapor. An additional
separation of non-
hydrocarbon inert sweep compound from the olefin enriched permeate is thus
avoided.
The effect of water vapor in the sweep of Ex. 14a is seen by comparison with
Ex.
14b. With a dry vacuum sweep the permeance is reduced by about 50%. However,
olefin-to paraffin selectivity is about the same as in Exs. 14a. Thus the
novel membrane
continues to be excellent for discriminating between olefin and paraffin.
Without
wishing to be bound by a particular theory, the high olefin transfer rate with
water vapor

CA 02918287 2016-01-13
WO 2015/009969
PCT/US2014/047096
¨ 21 --
sweep is thought to be due to water-motivated, enhanced facilitated transfer
activity
within the membrane. Higher olefin permeance has been known to occur in
facilitated
transfer membranes in which the feed is humidified, such as in Ex. 14c. That
was
understood to result from water molecules being drawn into the membrane with
the
permeating feed. Comparison of 14a and 14b suggests that unexpected moisture
vapor
contact only on the permeate side of the membrane is able to engender some
enhanced
facilitated transfer activity within the membrane such that significantly
higher olefin
permeance is achieved.
Another advantage of humidifying only sweep on the permeate side is that the
feed stream need not be humidified and, consequently, the retentate stream
contains only
a small amount of water vapor. The water vapor transferring through the
membrane from
the humidified permeate sweep stream to enter the retentate will thus be less
than occurs
when using a humidified feed stream.
Although specific forms of the invention have been selected in the preceding
disclosure for illustration in specific terms for the purpose of describing
these forms of
the invention fully and amply for one of average skill in the pertinent art,
it should be
understood that various substitutions and modifications which bring about
substantially
equivalent or superior results and/or performance are deemed to be within the
scope of
the following claims.

=
0
=
= 1.4
(11
=
Tableffi
Mem- . = Mem- Mem-
Olefin to 42,
Mem- brane Mem- Mem- brane brane
Olefin Paraffin Paraf
= brane A brane brane Other Other
Feed type Feed Gas Per- Per- fin
A repeat feed 13 repeat feed repeat feed Olefin Paraffin
0/P Pressure meance meance Selec
unit mole% unit mole% unit mole% "0" "P"
vol/vol psi (kPa) (GPU) (GPU) tivity
E. 8a PDD 33.3 .SEFVE- 66.7 . =C3116 C3.118 20/80 mix 60(414)
182.7 11.9 12.6
imide
Ex. 8b PDD 33.3 SEFVE- 66.7 C3H6
C311,3 20/80 mix 60 (414) 113.0 7.8 13.9
imide
Ex. 9a PDD 33.3 SEFVE 66.7 C2H4
C2116 pure gases 60(414) 204.6 24.3 8.4
Ex. 9b PDD 33.3 SEFVE 66.7 C2114
C2116 pure gases 60(414) 134.4 9.7 13.9
Ex. 9c PDD 33.3 SEFVE 66.7 C2H4
C2116 pure gases 30(207) 2453 15.7 15.6
Ex. 10a PDD 21.4 SEFVE 57.2 VF2 21.4 C21-
14 = C2116 pure gases 30(207) 388.4 21.0 18.5 rs.)
Ex. 10b PDD 21.4 SEFVE 57.2 VF2 21.4 C2H4 C2H6
pure gases 45 (310) 303.4 25.9 11.7
Ex. 10c PDD 21.4 SEFVE 57.2 VF2 21.4 C2H4 C2146
pure gases 60(414) 238.9 26.5 9.0
Ex. ha PDD 33.3 POESF 66.7 C3116 C3113 20/80 mix 60 (414)
298.3 11.9 25.2
Ex. lib PDD 33.3 POESF 66.7 C3H6 C3118 20/80 mix 60(414)
224.4 7.8 28.8
Ex. 12a PDD 33.3 SEFVE 66.7 C2114 C2116 10/90 mix 45 (310)
294.6 1.9 156.8
Ex. 12h PDD 33.3 SEFVE 66.7 G2114 C2116 10/90 mix 45 (310)
2513 23 110.7
Ex. 13a PDD 21.4 SEFVE 57.2 VF2 . 21.4 C3H6 C3118
20/80 mix 60(414) 35.3 2.6 13.8
Ex. 13b PDD 21.4 SEFVE 57.2 VF2 21.4 C3H6 C3118
20/30 mix 60 (414) 48.0 2.5 19.0
Ex. 13c PDD 21.4 SEFVE 57.2 VF2 21.4 C3116 C3113
20/80 mix 60(414) 101.4 3.4 30.0
Ex. 14a PDD 333 SEFVE = 66.7 . C3116 C3113 10/90 mix 60(414)
147.2 3.3 .. 44.3
Ex. 14b PDD = 33.3 SEFVE 66.7 C3116 C3118 10/90 mix 60(414)
603 1.3 45.1
Ex. 14c PDD 33.3 SEFVE 66.7 C31-16 C3118 10/90 mix 60(414)
219.3 4.4 49.5
c)
a-5
)tV
=

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2918287 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2021-05-04
(86) PCT Filing Date 2014-07-17
(87) PCT Publication Date 2015-01-22
(85) National Entry 2016-01-13
Examination Requested 2019-05-27
(45) Issued 2021-05-04

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $210.51 was received on 2023-05-31


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if small entity fee 2024-07-17 $125.00
Next Payment if standard fee 2024-07-17 $347.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2016-01-13
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2016-01-13
Application Fee $200.00 2016-01-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2016-07-18 $50.00 2016-06-29
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2017-07-17 $50.00 2017-07-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2018-07-17 $50.00 2018-06-25
Request for Examination $400.00 2019-05-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2019-07-17 $100.00 2019-07-02
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2020-07-17 $100.00 2020-06-22
Final Fee 2021-06-23 $153.00 2021-03-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2021-07-19 $204.00 2021-06-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2022-07-18 $203.59 2022-06-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2023-07-17 $210.51 2023-05-31
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
COMPACT MEMBRANE SYSTEMS, INC.
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Examiner Requisition 2020-07-30 5 258
Amendment 2020-10-13 20 707
Change to the Method of Correspondence 2020-10-13 15 555
Claims 2020-10-13 2 54
Abstract 2020-10-13 1 15
Examiner Requisition 2020-11-23 3 135
Amendment 2021-01-20 8 229
Claims 2021-01-20 2 57
Description 2020-10-13 22 1,174
Final Fee 2021-03-16 3 84
Cover Page 2021-04-15 1 34
Electronic Grant Certificate 2021-05-04 1 2,527
Abstract 2016-01-13 1 56
Claims 2016-01-13 8 287
Description 2016-01-13 30 1,465
Cover Page 2016-02-26 1 34
Maintenance Fee Payment 2017-07-06 1 33
Request for Examination 2019-05-27 1 35
International Preliminary Examination Report 2016-01-14 11 424
Claims 2016-01-14 3 123
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) 2016-01-13 2 76
International Search Report 2016-01-13 1 53
National Entry Request 2016-01-13 16 643