Language selection

Search

Patent 2919526 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2919526
(54) English Title: SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING AND CORRECTING A PICK-UP OR DELIVERY ADDRESS
(54) French Title: SYSTEMES ET METHODES POUR PREDIRE ET CORRIGER UNE ADRESSE DE RAMASSAGE OU DE LIVRAISON
Status: Allowed
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G06Q 10/083 (2023.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SHAH, MILIN (United States of America)
  • ROUSH, MICHAEL (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: ROBIC AGENCE PI S.E.C./ROBIC IP AGENCY LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2016-01-29
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2016-07-30
Examination requested: 2016-01-29
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
14/609,570 United States of America 2015-01-30
14/609,890 United States of America 2015-01-30
14/609,914 United States of America 2015-01-30
14/610,023 United States of America 2015-01-30

Abstracts

English Abstract



Computer program products, methods, systems, apparatus, and computing entities

are provided for predicting and correcting addresses. In one embodiment, this
includes
applying exception rules to determine whether to generate an exception for an
address. If
an exception exists, there are various approaches for predicting or correcting
the
addresses.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CLAIMS

1. A method comprising:
for an address that generated an exception from the application of one or more

exceptions rules, determining whether a confidence level associated with the
address
satisfies a configurable threshold; and
responsive to determining that the confidence level associated with the
address
satisfies the configurable threshold, overriding the exception for the address
and indicating
that the item is to be picked up from or delivered to the address.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
determining whether a successful visit to the address has occurred; and
responsive to determining that a successful visit the address has occurred,
updating
the confidence level for the address.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
determining whether an unsuccessful visit to the address has occurred; and
responsive to determining that an unsuccessful visit the address has occurred,

updating the confidence level for the address.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
determining the number of successful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of successful visits to the address that
have
occurred, updating the confidence level for the address.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address that have
occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address
that
have occurred, updating the confidence level for the address.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the exception is selected from the group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.

46


7. The method of claim 1, wherein the confidence level is expressed a
percentage or a number.
8. An apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one memory
including program code, the at least one memory and the program code
configured to,
with the processor, cause the apparatus to at least:
for an address that generated an exception from the application of one or more

exceptions rules, determine whether a confidence level associated with the
address
satisfies a configurable threshold; and
responsive to determining that the confidence level associated with the
address
satisfies the configurable threshold, override the exception for the address
and indicate that
the item is to be picked up from or delivered to the address.
9. The apparatus claim 8, wherein the memory and program code are further
configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine whether a successful visit to the address has occurred; and
responsive to determining that a successful visit the address has occurred,
update
the confidence level for the address.
10. The apparatus claim 8, wherein the memory and program code are further
configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine whether an unsuccessful visit to the address has occurred; and
responsive to determining that an unsuccessful visit the address has occurred,

update the confidence level for the address.
11. The apparatus claim 8, wherein the memory and program code are further
configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine the number of successful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of successful visits to the address that
have
occurred, update the confidence level for the address.
12. The apparatus claim 8, wherein the memory and program code are further
configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine the number of unsuccessful visits to the address that have occurred;
and

47


responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address
that
have occurred, update the confidence level for the address.
13. The apparatus claim 8, wherein the exception is selected from the group

consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.
14. The apparatus claim 8, wherein the confidence level is expressed a
percentage or a number.
15. A computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory
computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code
portions
stored therein, the computer-readable program code portions comprising:
an executable portion configured to, for an address that generated an
exception
from the application of one or more exceptions rules, determine whether a
confidence
level associated with the address satisfies a configurable threshold; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining that the
confidence
level associated with the address satisfies the configurable threshold,
override the
exception for the address and indicate that the item is to be picked up from
or delivered to
the address.
16. The computer program product claim 15 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine whether a successful visit to
the
address has occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining that a
successful
visit the address has occurred, update the confidence level for the address.
17. The computer program product claim 15 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine whether an unsuccessful visit to
the
address has occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining that an
unsuccessful
visit the address has occurred, update the confidence level for the address.

48


18. The computer program product claim 15 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine the number of successful visits
to
the address that have occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining the number of
successful visits to the address that have occurred, update the confidence
level for the
address.
19. The computer program product claim 15 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine the number of unsuccessful
visits to
the address that have occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining the number of
unsuccessful visits to the address that have occurred, update the confidence
level for the
address.
20. The computer program product claim 15, wherein the exception is
selected
from the group consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing
address
information, and (c) changed address information.
21. The computer program product claim 15, wherein the confidence level is
expressed a percentage or a number.
22. A method comprising:
for a first address that generated an exception from the application of one or
more
exceptions rules, determining whether an automatic prediction to a second
address for the
first address has been successfully made, wherein (a) an item is to be picked
up from or
delivered to the first address and (b) the automatic prediction to the second
address for the
first address being successful is based at least in part on a visit to the
second address; and
responsive to determining that an automatic prediction to the second address
for
the first address has been successfully made, indicating that the item is to
be picked up
from or delivered to the second address instead of the first address.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the exception is selected from the
group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.

49


24. The method of claim 22 further comprising:
determining the number of successful visits to the second address that have
occurred; and
responsive to determining the number of successful visits to the second
address
that have occurred, updating a confidence level for the first address and
updating a
confidence level for the second address.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the confidence level for the first
address
is expressed a percentage or a number.
26. The method of claim 22 further comprising:
determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the second address that have
occurred; and
responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the second
address
that have occurred, updating a confidence level for the first address and
updating a
confidence level for the second address.
27. The method of claim 22 further comprising linking the first address and
the
second address.
28. An apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one memory
including program code, the at least one memory and the program code
configured to,
with the processor, cause the apparatus to at least:
for a first address that generated an exception from the application of one or
more
exceptions rules, determine whether an automatic prediction to a second
address for the
first address has been successfully made, wherein (a) an item is to be picked
up from or
delivered to the first address and (b) the automatic prediction to the second
address for the
first address being successful is based at least in part on a visit to the
second address; and
responsive to determining that an automatic prediction to the second address
for
the first address has been successfully made, indicate that the item is to be
picked up from
or delivered to the second address instead of the first address.



29. The apparatus of claim 28, wherein the exception is selected from the
group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.
30. The apparatus of claim 28, wherein the memory and program code are
further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine the number of successful visits to the second address that have
occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of successful visits to the second
address
that have occurred, update a confidence level for the first address and update
a confidence
level for the second address.
31. The apparatus of claim 30, wherein the confidence level for the first
address is expressed a percentage or a number.
32. The apparatus of claim 28 wherein the memory and program code are
further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine the number of unsuccessful visits to the second address that have
occurred; and
responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the second
address
that have occurred, update a confidence level for the first address and update
a confidence
level for the second address.
33. The apparatus of claim 28 wherein the memory and program code are
further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to link the
first address and
the second address.
34. A computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory
computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code
portions
stored therein, the computer-readable program code portions comprising:
an executable portion configured to for, a first address that generated an
exception
from the application of one or more exceptions rules, determine whether an
automatic
prediction to a second address for the first address has been successfully
made, wherein (a)
an item is to be picked up from or delivered to the first address and (b) the
automatic

51


prediction to the second address for the first address being successful is
based at least in
part on a visit to the second address; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining that an
automatic
prediction to the second address for the first address has been successfully
made, indicate
that the item is to be picked up from or delivered to the second address
instead of the first
address.
35. The computer program product of claim 34, wherein the exception is
selected from the group consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b)
missing
address information, and (c) changed address information.
36. The computer program product of claim 34 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine the number of successful visits
to
the second address that have occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining the number of
successful visits to the second address that have occurred, update a
confidence level for
the first address and update a confidence level for the second address.
37. The computer program product of claim 36, wherein the confidence level
for the first address is expressed a percentage or a number.
38. The computer program product of claim 34 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine the number of unsuccessful
visits to
the second address that have occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining the number of
unsuccessful visits to the second address that have occurred, update a
confidence level for
the first address and update a confidence level for the second address.
39. The computer program product of claim 34 further comprising an
executable portion configured to link the first address and the second
address.
40. A method comprising:
for an address that generated an exception from the application of one or more

exceptions rules indicating the absence of secondary address information,
automatically

52


determining whether one or more previous visits to the address have occurred
without the
secondary address information, wherein an item is to be picked up from or
delivered to the
address; and
responsive to determining that one or more previous visits to the address have

occurred without the secondary address information, indicating that the item
is to be
picked up from or delivered to the address without the secondary address
information.
41. The method of claim 40, wherein the exception is selected from the
group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.
42. The method of claim 40 further comprising:
determining the number of successful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of successful visits to the address that
have
occurred, updating a confidence level for the address.
43. The method of claim 40 further comprising:
determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address that have
occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address
that
have occurred, updating a confidence level for the address.
44. The method of claim 43, wherein the confidence level is expressed a
percentage or a number.
45. The method of claim 40, wherein the exception is selected from the
group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.
46. An apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one memory
including program code, the at least one memory and the program code
configured to,
with the processor, cause the apparatus to at least:
for an address that generated an exception from the application of one or more

exceptions rules indicating the absence of secondary address information,
automatically

53


determine whether one or more previous visits to the address have occurred
without the
secondary address information, wherein an item is to be picked up from or
delivered to the
address; and
responsive to determining that one or more previous visits to the address have

occurred without the secondary address information, indicate that the item is
to be picked
up from or delivered to the address without the secondary address information.
47. The apparatus of claim 46, wherein the exception is selected from the
group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.
48. The apparatus of claim 46, wherein the memory and program code are
further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine the number of successful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of successful visits to the address that
have
occurred, update a confidence level for the address.
49. The apparatus of claim 46, wherein the memory and program code are
further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine the number of unsuccessful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address
that
have occurred, update a confidence level for the address.
50. The apparatus of claim 49, wherein the confidence level is expressed a
percentage or a number.
51. The apparatus of claim 46, wherein the exception is selected from the
group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.
52. A computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory
computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code
portions
stored therein, the computer-readable program code portions comprising:
an executable portion configured to, for an address that generated an
exception
from the application of one or more exceptions rules indicating the absence of
secondary

54


address information, automatically determine whether one or more previous
visits to the
address have occurred without the secondary address information, wherein an
item is to be
picked up from or delivered to the address; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining that one or
more
previous visits to the address have occurred without the secondary address
information,
indicate that the item is to be picked up from or delivered to the address
without the
secondary address information.
53. The computer program product of claim 52, wherein the exception is
selected from the group consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b)
missing
address information, and (c) changed address information.
54. The computer program product of claim 52 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine the number of successful visits
to
the address that have occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining the number of
successful visits to the address that have occurred, update a confidence level
for the
address.
55. The computer program product of claim 52 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine the number of unsuccessful
visits to
the address that have occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining the number of
unsuccessful visits to the address that have occurred, update a confidence
level for the
address.
56. The computer program product of claim 55, wherein the confidence level
is
expressed a percentage or a number.
57. The computer program product of claim 52, wherein the exception is
selected from the group consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b)
missing
address information, and (c) changed address information.



58. A method comprising:
receiving an address associated with a customer;
responsive to receiving the address associated with the customer, applying one
or
more exception rules to determine whether an exception applies to the address;
determining that an exception applies to the address based at least in part on
the
application of the one or more exception rules; and
responsive to determining that the exception applies to the address,
predicting one
or more elements for the address.
59. The method of claim 58, wherein the one or more elements for the
address
are selected from the group consisting of (a) a street number, (b) a street
name, (c) a suite
type, and (d) a suite number.
60. The method of claim 58, wherein the exception is selected from the
group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.
61. The method of claim 58 further comprising:
determining the number of successful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of successful visits to the address that
have
occurred, updating a confidence level for the address.
62. The method of claim 58 further comprising:
determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address that have
occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address
that
have occurred, updating a confidence level for the address.
63. The method of claim 58, wherein the confidence level is expressed a
percentage or a number.
64. An apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one memory
including program code, the at least one memory and the program code
configured to,
with the processor, cause the apparatus to at least:

56


receive an address associated with a customer;
responsive to receiving the address associated with the customer, apply one or

more exception rules to determine whether an exception applies to the address;
determine that an exception applies to the address based at least in part on
the
application of the one or more exception rules; and
responsive to determining that the exception applies to the address, predict
one or
more elements for the address.
65. The apparatus of claim 64, wherein the one or more elements for the
address are selected from the group consisting of (a) a street number, (b) a
street name, (c)
a suite type, and (d) a suite number.
66. The apparatus of claim 64, wherein the exception is selected from the
group
consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b) missing address
information, and (c)
changed address information.
67. The apparatus of claim 64, wherein the memory and program code are
further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine the number of successful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of successful visits to the address that
have
occurred, update a confidence level for the address.
68. The apparatus of claim 64, wherein the memory and program code are
further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
determine the number of unsuccessful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address
that
have occurred, update a confidence level for the address.
69. The apparatus of claim 68, wherein the confidence level is expressed a
percentage or a number.
determine the number of unsuccessful visits to the address that have occurred;
and
responsive to determining the number of unsuccessful visits to the address
that
have occurred, update a confidence level for the address.

57


70. A computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory
computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code
portions
stored therein, the computer-readable program code portions comprising:
an executable portion configured to receive an address associated with a
customer;
an executable portion configured to, responsive to receiving the address
associated
with the customer, apply one or more exception rules to determine whether an
exception
applies to the address;
an executable portion configured to determine that an exception applies to the

address based at least in part on the application of the one or more exception
rules; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining that the
exception
applies to the address, predict one or more elements for the address.
71. The computer program product of claim 70, wherein the one or more
elements for the address are selected from the group consisting of (a) a
street number, (b) a
street name, (c) a suite type, and (d) a suite number.
72. The computer program product of claim 70, wherein the exception is
selected from the group consisting of (a) incorrect address information, (b)
missing
address information, and (c) changed address information.
73. The computer program product of claim 70 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine the number of successful visits
to
the address that have occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining the number of
successful visits to the address that have occurred, update a confidence level
for the
address.
74. The computer program product of claim 70 further comprising:
an executable portion configured to determine the number of unsuccessful
visits to
the address that have occurred; and
an executable portion configured to, responsive to determining the number of
unsuccessful visits to the address that have occurred, update a confidence
level for the
address.

58


75. The
computer program product of claim 70, wherein the confidence level is
expressed a percentage or a number.

59

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02919526 2016-01-29
CONCEPTS FOR ADDRESS PREDICTION OR CORRECTION
BACKGROUND
In picking up items from and delivering items to customers (e.g., consignors
and/or
consignees), carriers often rely on the address information/data provided by
the customers.
This address information/data can include errors and/or be incomplete. Current
solutions
determine whether the address information/data provided by the customer is
within
"range." That is, current solutions determine whether a number or a number
fractional is
within the specified range assigned to a given street, road, avenue, and/or
the like.
However, current solutions do not determine whether the provided address
information/data actually exists, whether any address information/data is
missing, and/or
whether the specified consignors/consignees have moved. Thus, a solution is
needed to
provide address information/data in the event of incorrect, incomplete, and/or
changed
address information/data.
BRIEF SUMMARY
In general, embodiments of the present invention provide methods, apparatus,
systems, computing devices, computing entities, and/or the like.
In accordance with one aspect, a method is provided. In one embodiment, the
method comprises (1) for an address that generated an exception from the
application of
one or more exceptions rules, determining whether a confidence level
associated with the
address satisfies a configurable threshold; and (2) responsive to determining
that the
confidence level associated with the address satisfies the configurable
threshold,
overriding the exception for the address and indicating that the item is to be
picked up
from or delivered to the address.
In accordance with another aspect, a computer program product is provided. The

computer program product may comprise at least one computer-readable storage
medium
having computer-readable program code portions stored therein, the computer-
readable
program code portions comprising executable portions configured to (1) for an
address
that generated an exception from the application of one or more exceptions
rules,
determine whether a confidence level associated with the address satisfies a
configurable
threshold; and (2) responsive to determining that the confidence level
associated with the
address satisfies the configurable threshold, override the exception for the
address and
indicate that the item is to be picked up from or delivered to the address.

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
In accordance with yet another aspect, an apparatus comprising at least one
processor and at least one memory including computer program code is provided.
In one
embodiment, the at least one memory and the computer program code may be
configured
to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to (1) for an address that
generated an exception
from the application of one or more exceptions rules, determine whether a
confidence
level associated with the address satisfies a configurable threshold; and (2)
responsive to
determining that the confidence level associated with the address satisfies
the configurable
threshold, override the exception for the address and indicate that the item
is to be picked
up from or delivered to the address.
In accordance with one aspect, a method is provided. In one embodiment, the
method comprises (1) for a first address that generated an exception from the
application
of one or more exceptions rules, determining whether an automatic prediction
to a second
address for the first address has been successfully made, wherein (a) an item
is to be
picked up from or delivered to the first address and (b) the automatic
prediction to the
second address for the first address being successful is based at least in
part on a visit to
the second address; and (2) responsive to determining that an automatic
prediction to the
second address for the first address has been successfully made, indicating
that the item is
to be picked up from or delivered to the second address instead of the first
address.
In accordance with another aspect, a computer program product is provided. The
computer program product may comprise at least one computer-readable storage
medium
having computer-readable program code portions stored therein, the computer-
readable
program code portions comprising executable portions configured to (1) for a
first address
that generated an exception from the application of one or more exceptions
rules,
determine whether an automatic prediction to a second address for the first
address has
been successfully made, wherein (a) an item is to be picked up from or
delivered to the
first address and (b) the automatic prediction to the second address for the
first address
being successful is based at least in part on a visit to the second address;
and (2)
responsive to determining that an automatic prediction to the second address
for the first
address has been successfully made, indicate that the item is to be picked up
from or
delivered to the second address instead of the first address.
In accordance with yet another aspect, an apparatus comprising at least one
processor and at least one memory including computer program code is provided.
In one
embodiment, the at least one memory and the computer program code may be
configured
to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to (1) for a first address that
generated an
2

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
exception from the application of one or more exceptions rules, determine
whether an
automatic prediction to a second address for the first address has been
successfully made,
wherein (a) an item is to be picked up from or delivered to the first address
and (b) the
automatic prediction to the second address for the first address being
successful is based at
least in part on a visit to the second address; and (2) responsive to
determining that an
automatic prediction to the second address for the first address has been
successfully
made, indicate that the item is to be picked up from or delivered to the
second address
instead of the first address.
In accordance with one aspect, a method is provided. In one embodiment, the
method comprises (1) for an address that generated an exception from the
application of
one or more exceptions rules indicating the absence of secondary address
information,
automatically determining whether one or more previous visits to the address
have
occurred without the secondary address information, wherein an item is to be
picked up
from or delivered to the address; and (2) responsive to determining that one
or more
previous visits to the address have occurred without the secondary address
information,
indicating that the item is to be picked up from or delivered to the address
without the
secondary address information.
In accordance with another aspect, a computer program product is provided. The

computer program product may comprise at least one computer-readable storage
medium
having computer-readable program code portions stored therein, the computer-
readable
program code portions comprising executable portions configured to (1) for an
address
that generated an exception from the application of one or more exceptions
rules
indicating the absence of secondary address information, automatically
determine whether
one or more previous visits to the address have occurred without the secondary
address
information, wherein an item is to be picked up from or delivered to the
address; and (2)
responsive to determining that one or more previous visits to the address have
occurred
without the secondary address information, indicate that the item is to be
picked up from
or delivered to the address without the secondary address information.
In accordance with yet another aspect, an apparatus comprising at least one
processor and at least one memory including computer program code is provided.
In one
embodiment, the at least one memory and the computer program code may be
configured
to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to (1) for an address that
generated an exception
from the application of one or more exceptions rules indicating the absence of
secondary
address information, automatically determine whether one or more previous
visits to the
3

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
address have occurred without the secondary address information, wherein an
item is to be
picked up from or delivered to the address; and (2) responsive to determining
that one or
more previous visits to the address have occurred without the secondary
address
information, indicate that the item is to be picked up from or delivered to
the address
without the secondary address information.
In accordance with one aspect, a method is provided. In one embodiment, the
method comprises (1) receiving an address associated with a customer; (2)
responsive to
receiving the address associated with the customer, applying one or more
exception rules
to determine whether an exception applies to the address; (3) determining that
an
exception applies to the address based at least in part on the application of
the one or more
exception rules; and (4) responsive to determining that the exception applies
to the
address, predicting one or more elements for the address.
In accordance with another aspect, a computer program product is provided. The

computer program product may comprise at least one computer-readable storage
medium
having computer-readable program code portions stored therein, the computer-
readable
program code portions comprising executable portions configured to (1) receive
an
address associated with a customer; (2) responsive to receiving the address
associated with
the customer, apply one or more exception rules to determine whether an
exception
applies to the address; (3) determine that an exception applies to the address
based at least
in part on the application of the one or more exception rules; and (4)
responsive to
determining that the exception applies to the address, predict one or more
elements for the
address.
In accordance with yet another aspect, an apparatus comprising at least one
processor and at least one memory including computer program code is provided.
In one
embodiment, the at least one memory and the computer program code may be
configured
to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to (1) receive an address
associated with a
customer; (2) responsive to receiving the address associated with the
customer, apply one
or more exception rules to determine whether an exception applies to the
address; (3)
determine that an exception applies to the address based at least in part on
the application
of the one or more exception rules; and (4) responsive to determining that the
exception
applies to the address, predict one or more elements for the address.
4

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)
Fig. 1 is an overview of a system that can be used to practice embodiments of
the
present invention.
Fig. 2 is an exemplary schematic diagram of a carrier/transporter computing
entity
according to one embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is an exemplary schematic diagram of a user computing entity according
to
one embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a flowchart illustrating operations and processes that can be used
in
accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
Figs. 5-9 represent exemplary input and output produced in accordance with
various embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Various embodiments of the present invention now will be described more fully
hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but
not all
embodiments of the inventions are shown. Indeed, these inventions may be
embodied in
many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments
set forth
herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will
satisfy
applicable legal requirements. The term "or" is used herein in both the
alternative and
conjunctive sense, unless otherwise indicated. The terms "illustrative" and
"exemplary"
are used to be examples with no indication of quality level. Like numbers
refer to like
elements throughout.
I. Computer Program Products, Methods, and Computing Entities
Embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in various ways,
including as computer program products that comprise articles of manufacture.
A
computer program product may include a non-transitory computer-readable
storage
medium storing applications, programs, program modules, scripts, source code,
program
code, object code, byte code, compiled code, interpreted code, machine code,
executable
instructions, and/or the like (also referred to herein as executable
instructions, instructions
for execution, computer program products, program code, and/or similar terms
used herein
interchangeably). Such non-transitory computer-readable storage media include
all
computer-readable media (including volatile and non-volatile media).
5

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
In one embodiment, a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium may include

a floppy disk, flexible disk, hard disk, solid-state storage (SSS) (e.g., a
solid state drive
(SSD), solid state card (SSC), solid state module (SSM), enterprise flash
drive, magnetic
tape, or any other non-transitory magnetic medium, and/or the like. A non-
volatile
computer-readable storage medium may also include a punch card, paper tape,
optical
mark sheet (or any other physical medium with patterns of holes or other
optically
recognizable indicia), compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disc-
rewritable (CD-RW), digital versatile disc (DVD), Blu-ray disc (BD), any other
non-
transitory optical medium, and/or the like. Such a non-volatile computer-
readable storage
medium may also include read-only memory (ROM), programmable read-only memory
(PROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable
programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory (e.g., Serial, NAND, NOR,

and/or the like), multimedia memory cards (MMC), secure digital (SD) memory
cards,
SmartMedia cards, CompactFlash (CF) cards, Memory Sticks, and/or the like.
Further, a
non-volatile computer-readable storage medium may also include conductive-
bridging
random access memory (CBRAM), phase-change random access memory (PRAM),
ferroelectric random-access memory (FeRAM), non-volatile random-access memory
(NVRAM), magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM), resistive random-access

memory (RRAM), Silicon-Oxide-Nitride-Oxide-Silicon memory (SONOS), floating
junction gate random access memory (FJG RAM), Millipede memory, racetrack
memory,
and/or the like.
In one embodiment, a volatile computer-readable storage medium may include
random access memory (RAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), static random

access memory (SRAM), fast page mode dynamic random access memory (FPM DRAM),
extended data-out dynamic random access memory (EDO DRAM), synchronous dynamic
random access memory (SDRAM), double information/data rate synchronous dynamic

random access memory (DDR SDRAM), double information/data rate type two
synchronous dynamic random access memory (DDR2 SDRAM), double information/data

rate type three synchronous dynamic random access memory (DDR3 SDRAM), Rambus
dynamic random access memory (RDRAM), Twin Transistor RAM (TTRAM), Thyristor
RAM (T-RAM), Zero-capacitor (Z-RAM), Rambus in-line memory module (RIMM), dual

in-line memory module (DIMM), single in-line memory module (SIMM), video
random
access memory (VRAM), cache memory (including various levels), flash memory,
register
memory, and/or the like. It will be appreciated that where embodiments are
described to
6

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
,
_
,
use a computer-readable storage medium, other types of computer-readable
storage media
may be substituted for or used in addition to the computer-readable storage
media
described above.
As should be appreciated, various embodiments of the present invention may
also
be implemented as methods, apparatus, systems, computing devices, computing
entities,
and/or the like. As such, embodiments of the present invention may take the
form of an
apparatus, system, computing device, computing entity, and/or the like
executing
instructions stored on a computer-readable storage medium to perform certain
steps or
operations. Thus, embodiments of the present invention may also take the form
of an
entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely computer program product embodiment,
and/or
an embodiment that comprises combination of computer program products and
hardware
performing certain steps or operations.
Embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to
block
diagrams and flowchart illustrations. Thus, it should be understood that each
block of the
block diagrams and flowchart illustrations may be implemented in the form of a
computer
program product, an entirely hardware embodiment, a combination of hardware
and
computer program products, and/or apparatus, systems, computing devices,
computing
entities, and/or the like carrying out instructions, operations, steps, and
similar words used
interchangeably (e.g., the executable instructions, instructions for
execution, program
code, and/or the like) on a computer-readable storage medium for execution.
For example,
retrieval, loading, and execution of code may be performed sequentially such
that one
instruction is retrieved, loaded, and executed at a time. In some exemplary
embodiments,
retrieval, loading, and/or execution may be performed in parallel such that
multiple
instructions are retrieved, loaded, and/or executed together. Thus, such
embodiments can
produce specifically-configured machines performing the steps or operations
specified in
the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations. Accordingly, the block
diagrams and
flowchart illustrations support various combinations of embodiments for
performing the
specified instructions, operations, or steps.
II. Exemplary System Architecture
Fig. 1 provides an illustration of an exemplary embodiment of the present
invention. As shown in Fig. 1, this particular embodiment may include one or
more
carrier/transporter computing entities 100, one or more items 102, one or more
networks
105, one or more vehicles 107, one or more user computing entities 110, one or
more
7

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
payment computing entities 115, one or more external information/data source
computing
entities 120, one or more retailer computing entities 125, one or more mobile
computing
entities, and/or the like. Each of these components, entities, devices,
systems, and similar
words used herein interchangeably may be in direct or indirect communication
with, for
example, one another over the same or different wired or wireless networks.
Additionally,
while Fig. 1 illustrates the various system entities as separate, standalone
entities, the
various embodiments are not limited to this particular architecture.
1. Exemplary Carrier/Transporter Computing Entities
Fig. 2 provides a schematic of a carrier/transporter computing entity 100
according
to one embodiment of the present invention. In general, the terms computing
entity,
computer, entity, device, system, and/or similar words used herein
interchangeably may
refer to, for example, one or more computers, computing entities, desktops,
mobile
phones, tablets, phablets, notebooks, laptops, distributed systems, gaming
consoles (e.g.,
Xbox, Play Station, Wii), watches, iBeacons, proximity beacons, glasses, key
fobs, radio
frequency identification (RFID) tags, ear pieces, scanners, televisions,
dongles, cameras,
wristbands, kiosks, input terminals, servers or server networks, blades,
gateways, switches,
processing devices, processing entities, set-top boxes, relays, routers,
network access
points, base stations, the like, and/or any combination of devices or entities
adapted to
perform the functions, operations, and/or processes described herein. Such
functions,
operations, and/or processes may include, for example, transmitting,
receiving, operating
on, processing, displaying, storing, determining/identifying,
creating/generating,
monitoring, evaluating, comparing, and/or similar terms used herein
interchangeably. In
one embodiment, these functions, operations, and/or processes can be performed
on data,
content, information, and/or similar terms used herein interchangeably.
As indicated, in one embodiment, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
may
also include one or more communications interfaces 220 for communicating with
various
computing entities, such as by communicating data, content, information,
and/or similar
terms used herein interchangeably that can be transmitted, received, operated
on,
processed, displayed, stored, and/or the like.
As shown in Fig. 2, in one embodiment, the carrier/transporter computing
entity
100 may include or be in communication with one or more processing elements
205 (also
referred to as processors, processing circuitry, and/or similar terms used
herein
interchangeably) that communicate with other elements within the
carrier/transporter
8

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
computing entity 100 via a bus, for example. As will be understood, the
processing
element 205 may be embodied in a number of different ways. For example, the
processing
element 205 may be embodied as one or more complex programmable logic devices
(CPLDs), microprocessors, multi-core processors, coprocessing entities,
application-
specific instruction-set processors (ASIPs), microcontrollers, and/or
controllers. Further,
the processing element 205 may be embodied as one or more other processing
devices or
circuitry. The term circuitry may refer to an entirely hardware embodiment or
a
combination of hardware and computer program products. Thus, the processing
element
205 may be embodied as integrated circuits, application specific integrated
circuits
(ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), programmable logic arrays
(PLAs),
hardware accelerators, other circuitry, and/or the like. As will therefore be
understood, the
processing element 205 may be configured for a particular use or configured to
execute
instructions stored in volatile or non-volatile media or otherwise accessible
to the
processing element 205. As such, whether configured by hardware or computer
program
products, or by a combination thereof, the processing element 205 may be
capable of
performing steps or operations according to embodiments of the present
invention when
configured accordingly.
In one embodiment, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 may further
include or be in communication with non-volatile media (also referred to as
non-volatile
storage, memory, memory storage, memory circuitry and/or similar terms used
herein
interchangeably). In one embodiment, the non-volatile storage or memory may
include
one or more non-volatile storage or memory media 210, including but not
limited to hard
disks, ROM, PROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory, MMCs, SD memory cards,
Memory Sticks, CBRAM, PRAM, FeRAM, NVRAM, MRAM, RRAM, SONOS, FJG
RAM, Millipede memory, racetrack memory, and/or the like. As will be
recognized, the
non-volatile storage or memory media may store databases (e.g., address
cleansing
database, address formatting database, item/shipment database, historical
item/shipment
database, and/or the like), database instances, database management systems,
data,
applications, programs, program modules, scripts, source code, object code,
byte code,
compiled code, interpreted code, machine code, executable instructions, and/or
the like.
The term database, database instance, database management system, and/or
similar terms
used herein interchangeably may refer to a collection of records or
information/data that is
stored in a computer-readable storage medium using one or more database
models, such as
9

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
..
-
,
a hierarchical database model, network model, relational model,
entity¨relationship model,
object model, document model, semantic model, graph model, and/or the like.
In one embodiment, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 may further
include or be in communication with volatile media (also referred to as
volatile storage,
memory, memory storage, memory circuitry and/or similar terms used herein
interchangeably). In one embodiment, the volatile storage or memory may also
include
one or more volatile storage or memory media 215, including but not limited to
RAM,
DRAM, SRAM, FPM DRAM, EDO DRAM, SDRAM, DDR SDRAM, DDR2 SDRAM,
DDR3 SDRAM, RDRAM, TTRAM, T-RAM, Z-RAM, RIMM, DIMM, SIMM, VRAM,
cache memory, register memory, and/or the like. As will be recognized, the
volatile
storage or memory media may be used to store at least portions of the
databases, database
instances, database management systems, data, applications, programs, program
modules,
scripts, source code, object code, byte code, compiled code, interpreted code,
machine
code, executable instructions, and/or the like being executed by, for example,
the
processing element 205. Thus, the databases, database instances, database
management
systems, data, applications, programs, program modules, scripts, source code,
object code,
byte code, compiled code, interpreted code, machine code, executable
instructions, and/or
the like may be used to control certain aspects of the operation of the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 with the assistance of the processing element 205 and
operating
system. For example, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 may comprise
a learning
platform/module.
As indicated, in one embodiment, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
may
also include one or more communications interfaces 220 for communicating with
various
computing entities, such as by communicating data, content, information,
and/or similar
terms used herein interchangeably that can be transmitted, received, operated
on,
processed, displayed, stored, and/or the like. Such communication may be
executed using
a wired information/data transmission protocol, such as fiber distributed
information/data
interface (FDDI), digital subscriber line (DSL), Ethernet, asynchronous
transfer mode
(ATM), frame relay, information/data over cable service interface
specification
(DOCSIS), or any other wired transmission protocol. Similarly, the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 may be configured to communicate via wireless external
communication networks using any of a variety of protocols, such as general
packet radio
service (GPRS), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Code
Division
Multiple Access 2000 (CDMA2000), CDMA2000 1X (NRTT), Wideband Code Division

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
,
Multiple Access (WCDMA), Time Division-Synchronous Code Division Multiple
Access
(TD-SCDMA), Long Term Evolution (LTE), Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio
Access
Network (E-UTRAN), Evolution-Data Optimized (EVDO), High Speed Packet Access
(HSPA), High-Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA), IEEE 802.11 (Wi-Fi), Wi-Fi
Direct, 802.16 (WiMAX), ultra wideband (UWB), infrared (IR) protocols, near
field
communication (NFC) protocols, Wibree, Bluetooth protocols, wireless universal
serial
bus (USB) protocols, and/or any other wireless protocol.
Although not shown, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 may include
or
be in communication with one or more input elements, such as a keyboard input,
a mouse
input, a touch screen/display input, motion input, movement input, audio
input, pointing
device input, joystick input, keypad input, and/or the like. The
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 may also include or be in communication with one or more
output
elements (not shown), such as audio output, video output, screen/display
output, motion
output, movement output, and/or the like.
As will be appreciated, one or more of the carrier/transporter computing
entity's
100 components may be located remotely from other carrier/transporter
computing entity
100 components, such as in a distributed system. Furthermore, one or more of
the
components may be combined and additional components performing functions
described
herein may be included in the carrier/transporter computing entity 100. Thus,
the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can be adapted to accommodate a
variety of needs
and circumstances. As will be recognized, these architectures and descriptions
are
provided for exemplary purposes only and are not limiting to the various
embodiments.
2. Exemplary Vehicle
In various embodiments, the term vehicle 107 is used generically. For example,
a
carrier/transporter vehicle 107 may be a manned or an unmanned tractor, a
truck, a car, a
motorcycle, a moped, a Segway, a bicycle, a golf cart, a hand truck, a cart, a
trailer, a
tractor and trailer combination, a van, a flatbed truck, a vehicle, a drone,
an airplane, a
helicopter, a boat, a barge, and/or any other form of object for moving or
transporting
people and/or items (e.g., one or more packages, parcels, bags, containers,
loads, crates,
items banded together, vehicle parts, pallets, drums, the like, and/or similar
words used
herein interchangeably). In one embodiment, each vehicle 107 may be associated
with a
unique vehicle identifier (such as a vehicle ID) that uniquely identifies the
vehicle 107.
The unique vehicle ID (e.g., trailer ID, tractor ID, vehicle ID, and/or the
like) may include
11

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
characters, such as numbers, letters, symbols, and/or the like. For example,
an
alphanumeric vehicle ID (e.g., "AS") may be associated with each vehicle 107.
In another
embodiment, the unique vehicle ID may be the license plate, registration
number, or other
identifying information assigned to the vehicle 107.
Various computing entities, devices, and/or similar words used herein
interchangeably can be associated with the vehicle 107, such as a data
collection device or
other computing entities. In general, the terms computing entity, entity,
device, system,
and/or similar words used herein interchangeably may refer to, for example,
one or more
computers, computing entities, desktops, mobile phones, tablets, phablets,
notebooks,
laptops, distributed systems, gaming consoles (e.g., Xbox, Play Station, Wii),
watches,
glasses, iBeacons, proximity beacons, key fobs, RFID tags, ear pieces,
scanners,
televisions, dongles, cameras, wristbands, kiosks, input terminals, servers or
server
networks, blades, gateways, switches, processing devices, processing entities,
set-top
boxes, relays, routers, network access points, base stations, the like, and/or
any
combination of devices or entities adapted to perform the functions,
operations, and/or
processes described herein. The data collection device may collect telematics
data
(including location data) and transmit/send the data to the mobile computing
entity, the
mapping computing entity, and/or various other computing entities via one of
several
communication methods.
In one embodiment, the data collection device may include, be associated with,
or
be in wired or wireless communication with one or more processors (various
exemplary
processors are described in greater detail below), one or more location-
determining
devices or one or more location sensors (e.g., Global Navigation Satellite
System (GNSS)
sensors), one or more telematics sensors, one or more real-time clocks, a J-
Bus protocol
architecture, one or more electronic control modules (ECM), one or more
communication
ports for receiving telematics data from various sensors (e.g., via a CAN-
bus), one or more
communication ports for transmitting/sending data, one or more RFID
tags/sensors, one or
more power sources, one or more data radios for communication with a variety
of
communication networks, one or more memory modules 410, and one or more
programmable logic controllers (PLC). It should be noted that many of these
components
may be located in the vehicle 107 but external to the data collection device.
12

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
,
,
In one embodiment, the one or more location sensors, modules, or similar words

used herein interchangeably may be one of several components in wired or
wireless
communication with or available to the data collection device. Moreover, the
one or more
location sensors may be compatible with GPS satellites, such as Low Earth
Orbit (LEO)
satellite systems, Department of Defense (DOD) satellite systems, the European
Union
Galileo positioning systems, the Chinese Compass navigation systems, Indian
Regional
Navigational satellite systems, and/or the like. This data can be collected
using a variety of
coordinate systems, such as the Decimal Degrees (DD); Degrees, Minutes,
Seconds
(DMS); Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM); Universal Polar Stereographic
(UPS)
coordinate systems; and/or the like. Alternatively, triangulation may be used
in connection
with a device associated with a particular vehicle 107 and/or the vehicle's
operator and
with various communication points (e.g., cellular towers or Wi-Fi access
points)
positioned at various locations throughout a geographic area to monitor the
location of the
vehicle 107 and/or its operator. The one or more location sensors may be used
to receive
latitude, longitude, altitude, heading or direction, geocode, course,
position, time, and/or
speed data (e.g., referred to herein as telematics data and further described
herein below).
The one or more location sensors may also communicate with the mapping
computing
entity, the data collection device, mobile computing entity, and/or similar
computing
entities.
As indicated, in addition to the one or more location sensors, the data
collection
device may include and/or be associated with one or more telematics sensors,
modules,
and/or similar words used herein interchangeably. For example, the telematics
sensors
may include vehicle sensors, such as engine, fuel, odometer, hubometer, tire
pressure,
location, weight, emissions, door, and speed sensors. The telematics data may
include, but
is not limited to, speed data, emissions data, RPM data, tire pressure data,
oil pressure
data, seat belt usage data, distance data, fuel data, idle data, and/or the
like (e.g., referred
to herein as telematics data). The telematics sensors may include
environmental sensors,
such as air quality sensors, temperature sensors, and/or the like. Thus, the
telematics data
may also include carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (N0x), sulfur oxides
(S0x),
Ethylene Oxide (Et0), ozone (03), hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and/or ammonium (NI-
14) data,
and/or meteorological data (e.g., referred to herein as telematics data).
13

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
In one embodiment, the ECM may be one of several components in
communication with and/or available to the data collection device. The ECM,
which may
be a scalable and subservient device to the data collection device, may have
data
processing capability to decode and store analog and digital inputs from
vehicle systems
and sensors. The ECM may further have data processing capability to collect
and present
telematics data to the J-Bus (which may allow transmission to the data
collection device),
and output standard vehicle diagnostic codes when received from a vehicle's J-
Bus-
compatible on-board controllers 440 and/or sensors.
As indicated, a communication port may be one of several components available
in
the data collection device (or be in or as a separate computing entity).
Embodiments of the
communication port may include an Infrared data Association (IrDA)
communication port,
a data radio, and/or a serial port. The communication port may receive
instructions for the
data collection device. These instructions may be specific to the vehicle 107
in which the
data collection device is installed, specific to the geographic area in which
the vehicle 107
will be traveling, specific to the function the vehicle 107 serves within a
fleet, and/or the
like. In one embodiment, the data radio may be configured to communicate in
accordance
with multiple wireless communication standards and protocols, such as UMTS,
CDMA2000, 1 xRTT, WCDMA, TD-SCDMA, LTE, E-UTRAN, EVDO, HSPA, HSDPA,
Wi-Fi, WiMAX, UWB, IR, NFC, Bluetooth, USB, Wibree, HomeRF, SWAP, and/or the
like. Similarly, the customer computing entity 110 may operate in accordance
with
multiple wired communication standards and protocols, such as those described
above
with regard to the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 via a network
interface 320.
3. Exemplary Item
An item/shipment 102 may be any tangible and/or physical object. Such
items/shipments 102 may be picked up and/or delivered by a
carrier/transporter. In one
embodiment, an item/shipment 102 may be or be enclosed in one or more
packages,
parcels, bags, containers, loads, crates, items banded together, vehicle
parts, pallets,
drums, the like, and/or similar words used herein interchangeably. Such items
102 may
include the ability to communicate (e.g., via a chip (e.g., an integrated
circuit chip), RFID,
NFC, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and any other suitable communication techniques,
standards, or
protocols) with one another and/or communicate with various computing entities
for a
variety of purposes. Further, such items 102 may have the capabilities and
components of
the described with regard to the carrier/transporter computing entities 100,
the items 102,
14

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
the networks 105, the vehicles 107, the user computing entities 110, the
payment
computing entities 115, the external information/data source computing
entities 120, the
retailer computing entities 125, mobile computing entities, and/or the like.
In this regard,
in some example embodiments, an item may communicate send "to" address
information/data, received "from" address information/data, unique identifier
codes,
and/or various other information/data. In one embodiment, each item may
include an
item/shipment identifier, such as an alphanumeric identifier. Such
item/shipment
identifiers may be represented as text, barcodes, tags, character strings,
Aztec Codes,
MaxiCodes, Data Matrices, Quick Response (QR) Codes, electronic
representations,
and/or the like. A unique item/shipment identifier (e.g., 123456789) may be
used by the
carrier to identify and track the item as it moves through the carrier's
transportation
network. Further, such item/shipment identifiers can be affixed to items by,
for example,
using a sticker (e.g., label) with the unique item/shipment identifier printed
thereon (in
human and/or machine readable form) or an RFID tag with the unique
item/shipment
identifier stored therein.
4. Exemplary User Computing Entities
A user may be an individual, a family, a company, an organization, an entity,
a
department within an organization, a representative of an organization and/or
person,
and/or the like¨whether or not associated with a carrier/transporter. A user
may be a
consignor, consignee, carrier/transporter operator/personnel, and/or the like.
Thus, the
terms user, customer, consignee, consignor, carrier/transporter
operator/personnel, and or
similar terms may be used herein interchangeably. A user computing entity 110
may
include one or more components that are functionally similar to those of the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100. Fig. 3 provides an illustrative
schematic
representative of a user computing entity 110 that can be used in conjunction
with
embodiments of the present invention. In general, the terms device, system,
computing
entity, entity, and/or similar words used herein interchangeably may refer to,
for example,
one or more computers, computing entities, desktop computers, mobile phones,
tablets,
phablets, notebooks, laptops, distributed systems, gaming consoles (e.g.,
Xbox, Play
Station, Wii), watches, glasses, iBeacons, proximity beacons, key fobs, radio
frequency
identification (RFID) tags, ear pieces, scanners, televisions, dongles,
cameras, wristbands,
wearable items/devices, kiosks, input terminals, servers or server networks,
blades,
gateways, switches, processing devices, processing entities, set-top boxes,
relays, routers,

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
network access points, base stations, the like, and/or any combination of
devices or entities
adapted to perform the functions, operations, and/or processes described
herein. User
computing entities 110 can be operated by various parties, including
carrier/transporter
operator/personnel (sorters, loaders, delivery drivers, network
administrators, and/or the
like). As shown in Fig. 3, the user computing entity 110 can include an
antenna 312, a
transmitter 304 (e.g., radio), a receiver 306 (e.g., radio), and a processing
element 308
(e.g., CPLDs, microprocessors, multi-core processors, coprocessing entities,
ASIPs,
microcontrollers, and/or controllers) that provides signals to and receives
signals from the
transmitter 304 and receiver 306, respectively.
The signals provided to and received from the transmitter 304 and the receiver
306,
respectively, may include signaling information in accordance with air
interface standards
of applicable wireless systems. In this regard, the user computing entity 110
may be
capable of operating with one or more air interface standards, communication
protocols,
modulation types, and access types. More particularly, the user computing
entity 110 may
operate in accordance with any of a number of wireless communication standards
and
protocols, such as those described above with regard to the
carrier/transporter computing
entity 100. In a particular embodiment, the user computing entity 110 may
operate in
accordance with multiple wireless communication standards and protocols, such
as
UMTS, CDMA2000, lxRTT, WCDMA, TD-SCDMA, LTE, E-UTRAN, EVDO, HSPA,
HSDPA, Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi Direct, WiMAX, UWB, IR, NFC, Bluetooth, USB, and/or the
like.
Similarly, the user computing entity 110 may operate in accordance with
multiple wired
communication standards and protocols, such as those described above with
regard to the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 via a network interface 320.
Via these communication standards and protocols, the user computing entity 110
can communicate with various other entities using concepts such as
Unstructured
Supplementary Service information/data (USSD), Short Message Service (SMS),
Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), Dual-Tone Multi-Frequency Signaling
(DTMF),
and/or Subscriber Identity Module Dialer (SIM dialer). The user computing
entity 110 can
also download changes, add-ons, and updates, for instance, to its firmware,
software (e.g.,
including executable instructions, applications, program modules), and
operating system.
According to one embodiment, the user computing entity 110 may include
location
determining/identifying aspects, devices, modules, functionalities, and/or
similar words
used herein interchangeably. For example, the user computing entity 110 may
include
outdoor positioning aspects, such as a location module adapted to acquire, for
example,
16

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
latitude, longitude, altitude, geocode, course, direction, heading, speed,
universal time
(UTC), date, and/or various other information/data. In one embodiment, the
location
module can acquire data, sometimes known as ephemeris data, by identifying the
number
of satellites in view and the relative positions of those satellites (e.g.,
using GPS). The
satellites may be a variety of different satellites, including LEO satellite
systems, DOD
satellite systems, the European Union Galileo positioning systems, the Chinese
Compass
navigation systems, Indian Regional Navigational satellite systems, and/or the
like. This
information/data can be collected using a variety of coordinate systems, such
as the DD;
DMS; UTM; UPS coordinate systems; and/or the like. Alternatively, the location
information can be determined by triangulating the user computing entity's 110
position in
connection with a variety of other systems, including cellular towers, Wi-Fi
access points,
and/or the like. Similarly, the user computing entity 110 may include indoor
positioning
aspects, such as a location module adapted to acquire, for example, latitude,
longitude,
altitude, geocode, course, direction, heading, speed, time, date, and/or
various other
information/data. Some of the indoor aspects may use various position or
location
technologies including RFID tags, indoor beacons or transmitters, Wi-Fi access
points,
cellular towers, nearby computing devices (e.g., smartphones, laptops) and/or
the like. For
instance, such technologies may include the iBeacons, Gimbal proximity
beacons,
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) transmitters, NFC transmitters, and/or the like.
These indoor
positioning aspects can be used in a variety of settings to determine the
location of
someone or something to within inches or centimeters.
The user computing entity 110 may also comprise a user interface (that can
include
a display 316 coupled to a processing element 308) and/or a user input
interface (coupled
to a processing element 308). For example, the user interface may be a user
application,
browser, user interface, interface, and/or similar words used herein
interchangeably
executing on and/or accessible via the user computing entity 110 to interact
with and/or
cause display of information from the carrier/transporter computing entity
100, as
described herein. The user input interface can comprise any of a number of
devices or
interfaces allowing the user computing entity 110 to receive data, such as a
keypad 318
(hard or soft), a touch display, voice/speech or motion interfaces, or other
input device. In
embodiments including a keypad 318, the keypad 318 can include (or cause
display of) the
conventional numeric (0-9) and related keys (#, *), and other keys used for
operating the
user computing entity 110 and may include a full set of alphabetic keys or set
of keys that
may be activated to provide a full set of alphanumeric keys. In addition to
providing input,
17

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
-
the user input interface can be used, for example, to activate or deactivate
certain
functions, such as screen savers and/or sleep modes.
The user computing entity 110 can also include volatile storage or memory 322
and/or non-volatile storage or memory 324, which can be embedded and/or may be

removable. For example, the non-volatile memory may be ROM, PROM, EPROM,
EEPROM, flash memory, MMCs, SD memory cards, Memory Sticks, CBRAM, PRAM,
FeRAM, NVRAM, MRAM, RRAM, SONOS, FJG RAM, Millipede memory, racetrack
memory, ancUor the like. The volatile memory may be RAM, DRAM, SRAM, FPM
DRAM, EDO DRAM, SDRAM, DDR SDRAM, DDR2 SDRAM, DDR3 SDRAM,
RDRAM, TTRAM, T-RAM, Z-RAM, RIMM, DIMM, SIMM, VRAM, cache memory,
register memory, ancUor the like. The volatile and non-volatile storage or
memory can
store databases, database instances, database management systems, data,
applications,
programs, program modules, scripts, source code, object code, byte code,
compiled code,
interpreted code, machine code, executable instructions, and/or the like to
implement the
functions of the user computing entity 110. As indicated, this may include a
user
application that is resident on the entity or accessible through a browser or
other user
interface for communicating with the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
and/or
various other computing entities.
In another embodiment, the user computing entity 110 may include one or more
components or functionality that are the same or similar to those of the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100, as described in greater detail above. As will be
recognized, these
architectures and descriptions are provided for exemplary purposes only and
are not
limiting to the various embodiments.
5. Exemplary Payment Computing Entities
In one embodiment, a payment computing entity 115 may include one or more
components that are functionally similar to those of the carrier/transporter
computing
entity 100, the user computing entity 110, the external information/data
source computing
entity 120, the retailer computing entity 125, and/or the like. For example,
in one
embodiment, each payment computing entity 115 may include one or more
processing
elements (e.g., CPLDs, microprocessors, multi-core processors, coprocessing
entities,
ASIPs, microcontrollers, and/or controllers), one or more display device/input
devices
(e.g., including user interfaces), volatile and non-volatile storage or
memory, and/or one or
more communications interfaces. For example, the user interface may be a user
18

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
application, browser, user interface, interface, and/or similar words used
herein
interchangeably executing on and/or accessible via the payment computing
entity 115 to
interact with and/or cause display of information from various other entities.
As will be
recognized, these architectures and descriptions are provided for exemplary
purposes only
and are not limiting to the various embodiments.
Payments may be in a variety of forms, such as via debit cards, credit cards,
direct
credits, direct debits, cash, check, money order, Internet banking, e-commerce
payment
networks/systems (e.g., PayPa1TM, Google Wallet, Amazon Payments), virtual
currencies
(e.g., Bitcoins), award or reward points, and/or the like. Such payments may
be made
using a variety of techniques and approaches, including through NFC
technologies such as
PayPass, Android Beam, Bluetooth low energy (BLE), and various other
contactless
payment systems. Further, such payment technologies may include PayPal Beacon,

Booker, Erply, Leaf, Apple Pay, Leapset, Micros, PayPal Here, Revel, ShopKeep,

TouchBistro, Vend, and/or the like.
6. Exemplary External Information/Data Source Computing Entities
In one embodiment, various entities may operate external information/data
source
computing entities 120. For example, external information/data source
computing entities
120 may store or have access to property records, tax records, phone number
directories,
criminal records, address databases, credit records (e.g., Experian, Dun &
Bradstreet
(D&B), Equifax, Trans Union, and/or the like), bank deed records, government
records
(including postal records), medical records, purchasing records (e.g., credit
card records),
product registration records, birth records, and/or the like. An external
information/data
source computing entity may include one or more components that are
functionally similar
to those of the carrier/transporter computing entity 100, the user computing
entity 110, the
payment computing entity 115, retailer computing entity 125, and/or the like.
For
example, in one embodiment, each external information/data source computing
entity 120
may include one or more processing elements (e.g., CPLDs, microprocessors,
multi-core
processors, coprocessing entities, ASIPs, microcontrollers, and/or
controllers), one or
more display device/input devices (e.g., including user interfaces), volatile
and non-
volatile storage or memory, and/or one or more communications interfaces. For
example,
the user interface may be a user application, browser, user interface,
interface, and/or
similar words used herein interchangeably executing on and/or accessible via
the external
information/data source computing entity 120 to interact with and/or cause
display of
19

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
-
,
information from various other entities. As will be recognized, these
architectures and
descriptions are provided for exemplary purposes only and are not limiting to
the various
embodiments.
7. Exemplary Retailer Computing Entity
In one embodiment, a retailer computing entity 125 may include one or more
components that are functionally similar to those of the carrier/transporter
computing
entity 100, the user computing entity 110, the payment computing entity 115,
the external
information/data source computing entity 120, and/or the like. A retailer may
provide
retail services, such as amazon.com, macys.com, dell.com, walmart.com,
apple.com,
staples.com, amazon.com, bestbuy.com, costco.com, alibaba.com, ebay.com,
netflix.com,
sears.com, AppleTV, Apple, Dish, Amazon Digital Services, AT&T U-verse, DIRECT

TV, Google Play, QVC, Xbox, Xbox 360, Xbox One, Wii, Wii U, PlayStation,
PlayStation 2, PlayStation, PlayStation 3, PlayStation 4, 3D0, GameCube,
Genesis,
Intellivision, Nintendo 64, and/or the like. In one embodiment, each retailer
computing
entity 125 may include one or more processing elements (e.g., CPLDs,
microprocessors,
multi-core processors, coprocessing entities, ASIPs, microcontrollers, and/or
controllers),
one or more display device/input devices (e.g., including user interfaces),
volatile and non-
volatile storage or memory, and/or one or more communications interfaces. For
example,
the user interface may be a user application, browser, user interface, and/or
similar words
used herein interchangeably executing on and/or accessible via the retailer
computing
entity 125 to interact with and/or cause display of information from various
other entities.
As will be recognized, these architectures and descriptions are provided for
exemplary
purposes only and are not limiting to the various embodiments.
III. Exemplary System Operation
Reference will now be made to Figs. 4-9. Fig. 4 is a flowchart illustrating
operations and processes that may be performed for address correction and
prediction.
And Figs. 6-9 represent exemplary input and output produced in accordance with
various
embodiments of the present invention.

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
1. Receiving Information/Data
In one embodiment, the process may begin by receiving information/data. In one

embodiment, the information/data received can comprise address
information/data and or
name information/data, such as address information/data from a retailer,
carrier/transporter, and/or the like (e.g., third party) wishing to validate
the address
information/data. In another embodiment, the information/data may be
item/shipment
information/data associated with one or more items/shipments 102 to be
transported by a
carrier/transporter through the carrier's transportation and logistics network
(Block 400 of
Fig. 4). In the e-commerce context, receiving item/shipment information/data
can occur at
any point of an e-commerce transaction¨before, during, after, or as part of
the checkout
process; after an item is purchased; upon tender of the item/shipment 102 to
the
carrier/transporter; at one or more scan or inspection points in the carrier's
transportation
and logistics network; and/or the like. In other contexts, receiving the
item/shipment
information/data can occur upon the generation/creation of a label for an
item/shipment
102, upon tender of the item/shipment 102 to the carrier/transporter, at one
or more scan or
inspection points in the carrier's transportation and logistics network,
and/or the like. For
example, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can receive
item/shipment
information/data as part of a request to pick up one or more items/shipments
from a
consignor and/or to delivery one or more items to a consignee. As will be
recognized, a
variety of other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various
needs and
circumstances.
In one embodiment, a carrier/transporter may be a traditional
carrier/transporter,
such as United Parcel Service of America (UPS), FedEx, DHL, courier services,
the
United States Postal Service (USPS), Canadian Post, freight companies (e.g.
truck-load,
less-than-truckload, rail carriers, air carriers, ocean carriers, etc.),
and/or the like.
However, a carrier/transporter may also be a nontraditional
carrier/transporter, such as
Amazon, Google, Uber, ride-sharing services, crowd-sourcing services,
retailers, and/or
the like.
As will be described in further detail below, information/data may be
item/shipment information/data and comprise various other types of
information/data:
input information/data, intermediate information/data, pick-up
information/data, delivery
information/data, exception information/data, tracking information/data, item-
level
information/data, consignor information/data, consignee information/data, name

information/data, address information/data (including primary address
information/data
21

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
and secondary address information/data), billing information/data, and/or
similar words
used herein interchangeably. In one embodiment, this information/data may
comprise
details about the item/shipment 102 itself, such as the length, width, base,
radius, height,
cube/volume (e.g., cubic feet, cubic centimeters, etc.), and/or weight (e.g.,
pounds, grams,
etc.). The information/data may also include information/data about the type
of or contents
of the item/shipment 102, such as being of a special handling category. Such
information/data may be obtained from a scan or other inspection of the
item/shipment
102, including the scanning of a unique item/shipment identifier on the
item/shipment 102
which refers to additional information/data about the item/shipment 102.
Similarly, the
information/data may be captured when the item/shipment 102 is first received
by the
carrier/transporter (e.g., receiving an item for ingestion into the
transportation and logistics
network), from a user generating a label or unique identifier, automatic
detection using
various systems, manually input information/data, and/or the like.
In one embodiment, the information/data may comprise details about the service
level. Exemplary services levels may include Next Day Air, Overnight, Express,
Next Day
Air Early AM, Next Day Air Saver, Jetline, Sprintline, Secureline, 2nd Day
Air, Priority,
2nd Day Air Early AM, 3 Day Select, Ground, Standard, First Class, Media Mail,

SurePost, Freight, and/or the like. As will be recognized, various other
services levels are
contemplated within embodiments of the present invention.
In one embodiment, the information/data may include address information/data,
consignor information/data, consignee information/data, and/or name
information/data.
The address information/data may comprise the address of the consignor and/or
consignee
that can be parsed by an appropriate computing entity (e.g.,
carrier/transporter computing
entity 100, user computing entity 110, payment computing entity 115, external
information/data source computing entity 120, and/or the like). The address
information/data may include various elements: a number, a number fractional,
a pre-
directional, a pre-qualifier, a pre-type, a pre-article, a name, a post-
article, a suffix, a post-
qualifier, a post directional, a locker number, a suit type, a suite number, a
city, a state, a
province, a country, a region, a zip code, a postal code, a post office box
type, a post office
box number, a geocode, a longitude and a latitude, and/or the like. The
consignee
information/data, consignor information/data, and/or name information/data for
a person
may include various elements: a title, a given name, a surname, a suffix, a
nickname,
and/or the like. The consignee information/data, consignor information/data,
and/or name
22

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
information/data for an entity may include an entity name, entity designation,
and/or the
like.
Further, in one embodiment, the address information/data and/or each element
of
the address information/data can be associated with a confidence level. For
example, the
address information/data shown in Fig. 6 is associated with a 91 out of 100
confidence
level indicating that the address information/data is believed to be 91%
accurate.
Similarly, the name information/data and/or each element of the name
information/data
can be associated with a confidence level. For example, the address
information/data
shown in Fig. 7 is associated with a 91 out of 100 confidence level, and the
name
information/data is associated with a 97 out of 100 confidence level. As also
shown in Fig.
7, this may result in determining/identifying a combined confidence level of
94 out of 100
for the address information/data and name information/data¨which, in this
example, is
the average of the overall confidence level for the address information/data
and of the
overall confidence level for the name information/data. In addition to the
confidence levels
of Fig. 7, Fig. 8 further shows confidence levels for each populated name
element and
each populated address element. In example of Fig. 8, the overall confidence
levels are the
average of each of the populated element confidence levels. As will be
recognized, a
variety of other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various
needs and
circumstances. For example, any of a variety of indicators and scales can be
used as a
confidence level.
The information/data may also include tracking information/data (of various
"tracking events") corresponding to the location of the item/shipment 102 in
the
transportation and logistics network as indicated by the tracking events,
including one or
more origin entity and destination entity pairs. To reflect the item's
movement, an
item/shipment identifier associated with the item/shipment 102 may, for
example, be
scanned or otherwise electronically read at various points as the
item/shipment 102 is
transported through the carrier's transportation and logistics network. As
indicated, these
events may be referred to as tracking events. For the tracking events, an
item/shipment
identifier may be automatically scanned by a barcode or MaxiCode device, an
RFID
interrogator, a camera controller, a carrier/transporter employee using a user
computing
entity 110, and/or the like. In one embodiment, each time an item/shipment
identifier is
scanned or read, an appropriate device/entity can generate/create
information/data
associated with the tracking event and transmit the appropriate
information/data (e.g.,
item/shipment identifier, location and time of the scan or reading, event
type,
23

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
bundle/container, and/or the like) to the carrier/transporter computing entity
100 for
storage in the item/shipment database. That is, during the item's transit from
an origin to a
delivery location, intermediate information/data and other information/data
from tracking
events may be obtained at various waypoints for storage.
In one embodiment, the tracking information/data may include exception
information/data and/or delivery information/data. For instance, if there is a
problem or
exception to the normal handling procedures for an item/shipment 102,
exception
information/data may be obtained and stored. Exceptions may indicate when,
where,
and/or why a particular item/shipment 102 might not allow for pick-up or
delivery (e.g.,
incorrect primary address information/data, missing secondary
information/data,
consignee/consignor moved, and/or the like)¨flagging the address or
item/shipment for
further investigation/auditing. Delivery information/data may include
information/data
obtained about an item/shipment 102 when it is delivered to the consignee,
locker,
delivery location, and/or the like. For example, a delivery scan may be
accomplished by
the person or driver (e.g., carrier/transporter operator/personnel) making the
delivery via a
user computing entity 110 to record delivery information/data, such as the
date, time,
location, consignee identity, consignee signature, delivery location, and
other
information/data related to the delivery. As will be recognized, a variety of
other
approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and
circumstances.
2. Collecting Historical Item/Shipment Information/Data
Historical item/shipment information/data may be collected in a variety of
ways.
For example, carrier/transporter operator/personnel for the
carrier/transporter can visit
delivery locations (e.g., consignee locations) to deliver items/shipments 102
that have
been transported through the carrier's transportation and logistics network.
For instance,
upon arriving at a delivery location (e.g., locker, delivery address, and/or
the like) for an
item/shipment 102 to a consignee, carrier/transporter operator/personnel can
access
item/shipment information/data for the item/shipment 102 that includes the
consignee's
name and delivery location (e.g., delivery address)¨Mr. John Doe at 123 Main
Street,
Apartment 1A, Any Town, Georgia 30328. The carrier/transporter
operator/personnel can
access the item/shipment information/data for the item/shipment 102 via a user
computing
entity 110. The corresponding item/shipment information/data can be displayed
by the
user computing entity 110 for viewing by carrier/transporter
operator/personnel.
24

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
In the event an item/shipment 102 is successfully picked up or delivered,
carrier/transporter operator/personnel can input a corresponding entry (e.g.,
via a user
computing entity 110) indicating when, where, and/or from or to whom the
item/shipment
102 was picked up or delivered (along with various other information/data
regarding the
pick-up or delivery). This information/data can be stored by the historical
item/shipment
database indicating that an item/shipment 102 was picked up from or delivered
to the
listed consignor/consignee at the designated address. The entry can also
include what,
when, where, and/or from or to whom the item/shipment 102 was picked up or
delivered
(along with various other information/data regarding the pick-up or delivery).
The
historical item/shipment database can store entries/records for each pick-up
and/or
delivery by the carrier. By storing such entries/records, the historical
item/shipment
database can include historical information/data for items/shipments 102 that
were
successfully picked up from and/or delivered to any number of addresses,
consignees,
consignors, and/or the like. Using this information/data, the
carrier/transporter computing
entity 100 can determine/identify the number of successful or unsuccessful
pick-ups or
deliveries that have occurred at a given address (along with various other
information/data
regarding the pick-up or delivery). Further, the carrier/transporter computing
entity 100
can regularly, periodically, continuously, and or in response to certain
triggers update or
associate (e.g., determine/identify) one or more confidence levels with the
corresponding
address information/data and/or name information/data (e.g., via the learning
platform/module). For instance, the confidence levels determined/identified by
the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 may increase with successful pick-ups
or
deliveries by the carrier/transporter. As will be recognized, a variety of
other approaches
and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and circumstances.
In the event an item/shipment 102 is successfully picked up or delivered but
not
based on the provided item/shipment information/data, carrier/transporter
operator/personnel can correct/update the item/shipment information/data. For
instance,
carrier/transporter operator/personnel (e.g., operating a user computing
entity 110) can
input the corrected/updated name or address information/data. For example, if
carrier/transporter operator/personnel attempted to deliver an item/shipment
102 to John
Doe at 122 Main Street, Any Town, Georgia 30328, but the carrier/transporter
operator/personnel knew that John Doe actually lives at 123 Main Street,
Apartment 1A,
Any Town, Georgia 30328, and made the delivery accordingly, he/she (e.g.,
operating a
user computing entity 110) would input the address to which the item/shipment
102 was

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
actually delivered. The carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can then
receive and use
the information/data to track the item/shipment 102 as it is transported
though the carrier's
transportation and logistics network and update the item/shipment
information/data
accordingly. The carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can also save the
information/data in a historical item/shipment database and/or an exception
database. As
previously described, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can update
or associate
(e.g., determine/identify) one or more confidence levels with the
corresponding address
information/data and/or name information/data (e.g., via the learning
platform/module).
Similarly, in the event an item/shipment 102 is not successfully picked up or
delivered, carrier/transporter operator/personnel can input a corresponding
entry (e.g., via
a user computing entity 110) indicating when, where, and/or why the
item/shipment 102
was not successfully picked up or delivered (e.g., incorrect primary address
information/data, missing secondary address information/data,
consignee/consignor
moved, and/or the like). This information/data can be stored by the
item/shipment
database indicating that the item/shipment 102 was not successfully picked up
from or
delivered to the listed consignor/consignee at the designated address. As
indicated, the
entry can also include when, where, and/or why the item/shipment 102 was not
successfully picked up or delivered. The item/shipment database can store
entries/records
for each attempted pick-up and/or delivery by the carrier. Further, the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 can regularly, periodically, continuously, and or in
response to
certain triggers update or associate (e.g., determine/identify) one or more
confidence
levels with the corresponding address information/data and/or name
information/data (e.g.,
via the learning platform/module). For instance, the confidence levels
determined/identified by the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 may
decrease with
unsuccessful pick-ups or deliveries by the carrier/transporter. As will be
recognized, a
variety of other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various
needs and
circumstances.
3. Address Information/Data
As indicated, in one embodiment, the process may begin by receiving
information/data (Block 400 of Fig. 4). The information/data can comprise
item/shipment
information/data, address information/data, name information/data, and/or the
like. Thus,
the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can determine/identify the
address
information/data and/or name information/data in the received
information/data. Further,
26

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can parse the address
information/data and/or
name information/data to determine/identify the number, the number fractional,
the pre-
directional, the pre-qualifier, the pre-type, the pre-article, the name, the
post-article, the
locker number, the suffix, the post-qualifier, the post directional, the
locker number, the
suit type, the suite number, the city, the state, the province, the country,
the region, the zip
code, the postal code, the post office box type, the post office box number,
the geocode,
the longitude and the latitude, the title, the given name, the surname, the
suffix, the
nickname, and/or the like (Block 405 of Fig. 4).
In one embodiment, with the parsed address information/data and/or name
information/data, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can apply one
or more
exception rules to determine/identify whether any exceptions apply to the
address and/or
name (Block 410 of Fig. 4). The exception rules can be used to
determine/identify whether
an address might not allow for pick-up or delivery (e.g., incorrect primary
address
information/data, missing secondary information/data, consignee/consignor
moved, and/or
the like)¨flagging the address or item/shipment for further
investigation/auditing. In one
embodiment, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can apply one or more
exception
rules using a variety of techniques and approaches. For instance, the
exception rules can
be applied in parallel or in sequence. In one embodiment, if applied in
sequence and the
address information/data is confirmed as being valid/accurate, the remaining
exception
rules are not necessarily applied to the address information/data. In another
embodiment,
all of the exception rules can be applied irrespective of the outcome of
applying other
exception rules. In one embodiment, applying the exception rules may be used
to
determine/identify whether the address information/data and/or name
information/data are
incorrect, such as having an incorrect number or street name and matching
consignee.
Further, applying the exception rules may be used to determine/identify
whether any of the
address information/data (e.g., secondary address information/data) is missing
or
incomplete. Still further, applying the exception rules may be used to
determine/identify
whether the listed consignor for a pick-up or consignee for a delivery has
moved. In the
following example, the address information/data for the item/shipment 102
indicates that
the pick-up or delivery address of the item/shipment 102 is 122 Main Street,
Any Town,
Georgia 30328, and the consignor/consignee is John Doe.
27

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
In one embodiment, each exception rule or set of exception rules can be set to

"ON" or "OFF" (e.g., the ON or OFF can be used to indicate whether a rule is
set to
execute or not). Further, each exception rule or set of exception rules may
define a firing
order (e.g., execution or processing order). The firing order may define the
order or
sequence in which the exception rules or sets of exception rules should fire,
be applied, be
executed, and/or similar words used herein interchangeably. Additionally or
alternatively,
the exception rules or sets of exception rules can fire, be applied, or be
executed
simultaneously. Further, the exception rules or sets of exception rules may be
conditional.
That is, certain exception rules or sets of exception rules may only fire if
certain
conditions are met. Further, in one embodiment, in addition to applying the
exception
rules, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can update or associate
(e.g.,
determine/identify) one or more confidence levels with the corresponding
address
information/data and/or name information/data (e.g., via the learning
platform/module).
For instance, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can modify the
confidence levels
based at least in part on the whether one or more exceptions are
generated/created as a
result of application of the exception rules (applying, firing, executing the
exception
rules). As will be recognized, a variety of other approaches and techniques
can be used to
adapt to various needs and circumstances.
4. Incorrect Address Information/Data Exception Rules
In one embodiment, an appropriate computing entity (applying, firing,
executing
the exception rules) can generate/create an exception if a pick-up or delivery
has not been
successfully completed to the address (e.g., pick-up or delivery location)
indicated in the
address information/data (Block 415 of Fig. 4) or if one or more corresponding
confidence
levels are below a configurable threshold (e.g., 75%). Generally,
generating/creating an
exception may indicate that (when, where, and/or why) an address for a
particular
item/shipment 102 might not allow for pick-up or delivery (e.g., incorrect
primary address
information/data and/or the like). Thus, generating/creating an exception can
flag the
address or item/shipment 102 for further investigation/auditing. In one
embodiment, to do
so, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can determine/identify
whether the
carrier/transporter (or other carriers or entities) has ever picked up an
item/shipment 102
from or delivered an item/shipment 102 to the address indicated in the address

information/data. This may be based on all or portions of the address
information/data,
such as only using the number of the street address and/or name of the street.
For example,
28

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
this determination/identification may require an exact match or a
substantially similar
match (e.g., taking into account match of all or portions of the available
address
information/data including available numbers, number fractionals, pre-
directionals, pre-
qualifiers, pre-types, pre-articles, names, post-articles, locker numbers,
suffixes, post-
qualifiers, post directionals, suit types, suite numbers, cities, states,
provinces, countries,
regions, zip codes, postal codes, post office box types, post office box
numbers, geocodes,
longitudes and latitudes, titles, given names, surnames, suffixes, nicknames,
and/or the
like). To make this determination/identification, the carrier/transporter
computing entity
100 can query a historical item/shipment database (with records/entries of
successful and
unsuccessful pick-ups and deliveries (e.g., visits) for a configurable time
period and/or
confidence levels) to determine/identify whether any successful pick-ups or
deliveries
have been completed at 122 Main Street, Any Town, Georgia 30328. In a
particular
example, this may include determining/identifying whether any successful pick-
ups or
deliveries have been completed to John Doe at 122 Main Street, Any Town,
Georgia
30328¨using the consignor's or consignee's name information/data in addition
to the
address information/data. If no successful pick-ups or deliveries have been
completed to
122 Main Street, Any Town, Georgia 30328 (based on the historical
item/shipment
database), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can create/generate an
exception
for the pick-up or delivery at the address (Block 415 of Fig. 4).
In one embodiment, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (applying,
firing,
executing the exception rules) can generate/create an exception if the address
indicated in
the address information/data is not determined/identified as being
valid/accurate by one or
more external information/data source computing entities 120 (Block 415 of
Fig. 4). As
previously indicated, the external information/data source computing entities
120 may
store or have access to property records, tax records, phone number
directories, criminal
records, address databases, credit records, bank deed records, government
records
(including postal records), medical records, purchasing records, product
registration
records, birth records, and/or the like. By storing or having access to such
information/data, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can request
that one or more
external information/data source computing entities 120 determine/identify
whether the
address indicated in the address information/data is valid/accurate. To make
this request,
the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can communicate with one or more
external
information/data source computing entities 120 (e.g., via one or more
application
programming interfaces (APIs)) and provide the address information/data to one
or more
29

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
external information/data source computing entities 120. In a particular
example, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can provide 122 Main Street, Any
Town, Georgia
30328 (and/or John Doe's name) as the address information/data to one or more
external
information/data source computing entities 120. Responsive to such requests,
the one or
__ more external information/data source computing entities 120 can
validate/confirm the
address information/data. To validate/confirm the address information/data,
the external
information/data source computing entities 120 can search property records,
tax records,
phone number directories, criminal records, address databases, credit records,
bank deed
records, government records (including postal records), medical records,
purchasing
__ records, product registration records, birth records, and/or the like to
determine/identify
whether the address information/data is valid/accurate (e.g., whether it is an
actual address
or John Doe's actual address). For instance, an external information/data
source
computing entity 120 may search a county's tax records for 122 Main Street,
Any Town,
Georgia 30328 to determine/identify whether it is a valid/accurate address
based on the tax
__ records. Similarly, an external information/data source computing entity
120 may search a
county's tax records for property owners named John Doe to determine/identify
addresses
associated with any property owners named John Doe. As will be recognized, a
variety of
different approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and
circumstances. If one or more of the external information/data source
computing entities
__ 120 determine/identify that the address is valid/accurate, the external
information/data
source computing entities 120 can provide a notification to the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 regarding the same. However, if the one or more external
information/data source computing entities 120 determine/identify that the
address is not
valid/accurate or are unable to determine/identify whether the address is
valid/accurate,
__ the external information/data source computing entities 120 can provide a
notification to
the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 regarding the same. In the event
the address is
not valid/accurate, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can
create/generate an
exception for the specific address (Block 415 of Fig. 4).
In one embodiment, if no exceptions exist for a given address (e.g.,
exceptions for
__ a pick-up or delivery), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can
allow for normal
pick-up or delivery of the item/shipment and electronically indicate the same
(Block 435
of Fig. 4). In contrast, if an exception exists for a given address (e.g.,
pick-up or delivery),
the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can initiate one or more audit
processes of the

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
,
address information/data (Block 420 of Fig. 4). As will be recognized, a
variety of other
approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and
circumstances.
5. Missing Address Information/Data Exception Rules
In one embodiment, an appropriate computing entity (applying, firing,
executing
the exception rules) can generate/create an exception for addresses missing
secondary
address information/data) or if one or more corresponding confidence levels
are below a
configurable threshold (e.g., 63 out of 100). As indicated,
generating/creating an exception
may indicate that (when, where, and/or why) an address for a particular
item/shipment 102
might not allow for pick-up or delivery (e.g., missing secondary
information/data and/or
the like). Thus, generating/creating an exception can flag the address or
item/shipment 102
for further investigation/auditing. For example, if an address for an
item/shipment 102
does not have any secondary address information/data (e.g., apartment numbers,
suite
numbers, and/or the like), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
(applying, firing,
executing the exception rules) can generate/create an exception if a
configurable threshold
(e.g., number, percentage, character, and/or the like) of successful pick-ups
or deliveries to
the address (e.g., pick-up or delivery location) have included secondary
address
information/data (Block 415 of Fig. 4). For any successful pick-ups or
deliveries to the
address indicated in the address information/data (123 Main Street, Any Town,
Georgia
30328), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can determine/identify
whether the
address information/data included secondary address information/data. The
secondary
address information/data may include as apartment numbers, suite numbers,
and/or the
like.
To make this determination/identification, the carrier/transporter computing
entity
100 can query a historical item/shipment database and/or external data sources
(e.g., with
records/entries of successful and unsuccessful pick-ups and deliveries (e.g.,
visits) for a
configurable time period and/or confidence levels) to determine/identify
whether any
successful pick-ups or deliveries have been completed at 123 Main Street, Any
Town,
Georgia 30328. For any successful pick-ups or deliveries at 123 Main Street,
Any Town,
Georgia 30328, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can
determine/identify
whether and/or how many of the successful pick-ups or deliveries included
secondary
address information/data as part of the address information/data. Then, if a
configurable
threshold (e.g., number, percentage, character, and/or the like) of successful
pick-ups or
deliveries included secondary address information/data and the address
information/data
31

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
,
for the pick-up or delivery does not include secondary address
information/data, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can create/generate an exception for
the pick-up
or delivery at the address (Block 415 of Fig. 4). In one example, the
configurable
threshold may be 80% of the successful pick-ups or deliveries with a minimum
of five
successful pick-ups or deliveries. For instance, the carrier/transporter
computing entity
100 can determine/identify whether 80% (e.g., the configurable threshold) of
the
successful pick-ups or deliveries included secondary address information/data
as part of
the address information/data and create/generate an exception if the address
for a pick-up
or delivery does not include secondary address information/data. In another
example, the
configurable threshold may be seven successful pick-ups or deliveries. As will
be
recognized, such configurable thresholds (e.g., numbers or percentages) may
vary to adapt
to different needs and circumstances.
In one embodiment, certain items/shipments 102 may be able to be picked up or
delivered without secondary address information/data¨even if secondary address
information/data is part of the address. For instance, if carrier/transporter
operator/personnel picking up or delivering an item/shipment 102 know the
location of the
consignor or consignee (or the learning platform/module determines/identifies
that
previous deliveries or pick-ups have been made without the secondary address
information/data), the item/shipment 102 may be able to be picked up or
delivered
regardless of the address indicated in the address information/data. By way of
example,
assume that John Doe frequently receives items/shipments 102 at 123 Main
Street,
Apartment 1A, Any Town, Georgia 30328. The frequency may lead to
carrier/transporter
operator/personnel becoming familiar with Mr. John Doe and knowing where to
pick up or
deliver his items/shipments 102 and/or the learning platform/module
determining/identifying that previous deliveries or pick-ups have been made
without the
secondary address information/data. In such an example, the configurable
threshold for the
number of successful pick-ups or deliveries may be satisfied based on the
knowledge and
experience of carrier/transporter operator/personnel without necessarily being
reflected in
the historical item/shipment database. The same may hold true for large or
well-known
businesses or regular customers, such as pick-ups or deliveries to The Home
Depot,
Amazon Returns, and/or the like. Thus, the knowledge and experience of
carrier/transporter operator/personnel (and/or determinations/identifications
of the learning
module) may overcome inaccurate or incomplete address information/data. The
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can make such
determination/identifications
32

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
based on the identity of the carrier/transporter operator/personnel. For
instance, if Worker
A successfully made a pick-up or delivery, the carrier/transporter computing
entity will
not necessarily impute Worker A's knowledge on Work B if Work B covers Worker
A's
route. In these examples, the successful pick-ups or deliveries may indicate
that secondary
address information/data is not necessary because of the skill of the
carrier/transporter
operator/personnel based on the number of successful pick-ups and/or
deliveries (e.g.,
visits) and/or previous successful pick-ups or deliveries as
determined/identified by the
learning module. Thus, in these cases, the carrier/transporter computing
entity 100 may
determine/identify that secondary address information/data is not necessary to
successfully
complete a pick-up or delivery as the historical database might not include
secondary
address information/data for the successful pick-ups or deliveries.
In one embodiment, if no exceptions exist for a given address (e.g.,
exceptions for
a pick-up or delivery), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can allow
for normal
pick-up or delivery of the item/shipment 102 and electronically indicate the
same (Block
435 of Fig. 4). In contrast, if an exception exists for a given address, the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 can initiate one or more audit processes of the address
information/data (Block 420 of Fig. 4). As will be recognized, a variety of
other
approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and
circumstances.
6. Changed Address Information/Data Exception Rules
In one embodiment, an appropriate computing entity (applying, firing,
executing
the exception rules) can generate/create an exception if name information/data
and/or
address information/data for a pick-up or delivery is stored as a record or
entry in a
moved/changed database. As indicated, generating/creating an exception may
indicate that
(when, where, and/or why) an address for a particular item/shipment 102 might
not allow
for pick-up or delivery (e.g., consignee/consignor moved and/or the like).
Thus,
generating/creating an exception can flag the address or item/shipment 102 for
further
investigation/auditing. For example, a moved/changed database may store or
have access
to records/entries of customers (consignors/consignees) who have moved within
a
configurable time period. The configurable time period may be three months,
six months,
nine months, twelve months, and/or the like. The configurable time period may
vary to
adapt to various needs and circumstances. The moved/changed database may also
have
access to external information/data source computing entities 120 that can
provide
information/data regarding customer moves, such as property records, tax
records, phone
33

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
number directories, criminal records, address databases, credit records, bank
deed records,
government records (including postal records), medical records, purchasing
records,
product registration records, birth records, other publicly available sources,
and/or the like.
In one embodiment, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can query a
__ moved/changed database using name information/data and/or address
information/data to
determine/identify whether a record/entry exists for the name information/data
and/or the
address information/data. This may be based on all or portions of the name
information/data and/or all or portions of the address information/data. If a
record/entry
exists for the name information/data and/or the address information/data, the
__ carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can create/generate an exception
for the pick-up
or delivery at the address (Block 415 of Fig. 4). As will be recognized, a
variety of other
approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and
circumstances.
In one embodiment, if no exceptions exist for a given address (e.g.,
exceptions for
a pick-up or delivery), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can allow
for normal
__ pick-up or delivery of the item/shipment 102 and electronically indicate
the same (Block
435 of Fig. 4). In contrast, if an exception exists for a given address, the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 can initiate one or more audit processes of the address
information/data (Block 420 of Fig. 4). As will be recognized, a variety of
other
approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and
circumstances.
7. Address Audits
In one embodiment, if no exceptions exist for a given address (e.g.,
exceptions for
a pick-up or delivery), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can allow
for normal
pick-up or delivery of the item/shipment 102 and electronically indicate the
same (Block
__ 435 of Fig. 4). In contrast, if an exception exists for a given address
(e.g., exceptions for a
pick-up or delivery), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can
initiate one or more
audit processes (e.g., primary audits and/or second audits) of the address
information/data
and/or name information/data (Block 420 of Fig. 4). The audits may be fully
automated,
semi-automated, manual, combinations thereof, and/or the like.
a. Primary Audit: Predicting Correct Address Information/Data
In one embodiment, a primary auditing of address information/data and/or name
information/data may comprise the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
(e.g., via the
learning platform/module) automatically predicting the address
information/data for
34

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
addresses with one or more exceptions (Blocks 420, 422, 430, and 435 of Fig.
4).
Continuing with the above example, assume the carrier/transporter computing
entity 100
created/generated an exception for a pick-up or a delivery to 122 Main Street,
Any Town,
Georgia 30328, because it determined/identified that no successful deliveries
or pick-ups
have occurred at 122 Main Street, Any Town, Georgia 30328¨John Doe's actual
residential address is 123 Main Street, Apartment 1A, Any Town, Georgia 30328.
In one embodiment, as part of a primary audit process to predict the correct
address
information/data for a pick-up or delivery, the carrier/transporter computing
entity 100
(e.g., via the learning platform/module) can determine/identify one or more
confidence
levels associated with the address information/data and/or name
information/data. In one
embodiment, if one or more confidence levels satisfy (e.g., meet or exceed)
one or more
configurable confidence levels, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
(e.g., via the
learning platform/module) can predict that the identified address
information/data is
correct (Block 422 of Fig. 4) and override the exception¨allowing the
corresponding
pick-up or delivery and electronically indicating the same. Similarly, if one
or more
confidence levels do not satisfy (e.g., do not meet or exceed) one or more
configurable
confidence levels, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the
learning
platform/module) can determine/identify that the identified address
information/data is not
correct. In this example, the address 122 Main Street, Any Town, Georgia 30328
is not yet
associated with any confidence levels. Thus, as this part of the primary audit
process, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module)
determines/identifies that the identified address information/data is not
correct. As will be
recognized, a variety of other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt
to various
needs and circumstances.
In one embodiment, as part of a primary audit process to predict the correct
address
information/data for a pick-up or delivery, the carrier/transporter computing
entity 100
(e.g., via the learning platform/module) can determine/identify whether there
have been
any previous predictions for the address information/data and/or name
information/data. In
such cases, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the
learning
platform/module) determine/identify the previous predictions for the address
information/data and/or name information/data and determine/identify whether
they were
successful or unsuccessful. If previous successful predictions have been
recorded, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can
make/initiate/instruct the same prediction for the address information/data in
future

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
occurrences. This example, assumes that no previous predictions have occurred
for this
address information/data and/or name information/data. This, in effect, links
potentially
incorrect address information/data and/or name information/data to potentially
correct
address information/data and/or name information/data (e.g., see Fig. 9). As
will be
recognized, a variety of other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt
to various
needs and circumstances.
In one embodiment, as part of the primary audit process to predict the correct

address information/data for a pick-up or delivery, the carrier/transporter
computing entity
100 (e.g., via the learning platform/module) can determine/identify whether
pick-ups or
deliveries to the same or similar consignor/consignee have occurred on the
same or a
similar street, within address ranges on the same or a similar street, within
the same zip
code, within the same city or town, at the same entity name (e.g., The Home
Depot),
within a zone of confidence around the provided address information/data,
within a
geofence around the provided address information/data, and/or the like. In
this example,
the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can
search the historical item/shipment database for pick-ups or deliveries to
John Doe on
Main Street in Any Town, Georgia, for example, or 50 street address numbers
of 122 on
Main Street in Any Town, Georgia (e.g., 72-172). This would result in the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module)
determining/identifying that one or more pick-ups and/or deliveries (e.g.,
visits) have
taken place for a Mr. John Doe at 123 Main Street, Apartment 1A, Any Town,
Georgia
30328. The carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can also determine/identify the various confidence levels
associated
with the Mr. Doe's address as shown in Figs. 6-8. If within the configurable
threshold, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can
predict that the pick-up or delivery for 122 on Main Street in Any Town,
Georgia, is
actually for 123 Main Street, Apartment 1A, Any Town, Georgia 30328. As will
be
recognized, a variety of other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt
to various
needs and circumstances.
In one embodiment, with the predicted address information/data, an appropriate
computing entity (e.g., carrier/transporter computing entity 100, user
computing entity
110, payment computing entity 115, external information/data source computing
entity
120, and/or the like) can update/correct the item/shipment information/data to
reflect the
predicted address information/data. In the context of an e-commerce
transaction prior to
36

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
purchase, the customer can be notified and/or prompted to confirm the
predicted address
information/data. In the context of a third party requesting validation of
address
information/data and/or name information/data, the carrier/transporter
computing entity
100 (e.g., via the learning platform/module) can provide the predicted address
information/data and/or name information/data. In the context of an
item/shipment 102
that is already in the carrier's transportation and logistics network,
carrier/transporter
operator/personnel sorting items or loading delivery vehicles can scan the
item/shipment
identifier (e.g., user computing entity 110) for the item/shipment 102. In
certain
embodiments, this may include electronically indicating that a new label
(and/or
item/shipment identifier) needs to be affixed to the item/shipment 102 at some
point
during handling of the item/shipment 102 within the carrier's transportation
and logistics
network. In such a case, the item/shipment 102 can then be transported and
delivered with
the new label by the carrier and delivered without requiring an in-person
signature.
In one embodiment, if address information/data has been predicted, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can allow for pick-up or delivery of
the
item/shipment 102 and electronically indicate the same (Block 435 of Fig. 4).
However,
even if there are no predictions for the address information/data, the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 can allow for pick-up or delivery of the item/shipment
102 and
electronically indicate the same (Block 435 of Fig. 4). In certain
embodiments, this can
allow carrier/transporter operators/personnel with an opportunity to attempt
the pick-up or
delivery and allow the learning module to track the result (and
determine/identify a
confidence level). In either case, the carrier/transporter computing entity
100 can store
information/data in the historical item/shipment database (with
records/entries of
successful and unsuccessful pick-ups and deliveries (e.g., visits) for a
configurable time
period and/or confidence levels) indicating whether the item/shipment 102 was
successfully picked up or delivered and/or assign or update the appropriate
confidence
levels correspondingly.
Moreover, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can update or associate
the
potentially incorrect address information/data and/or name information/data
with the
predicted or potentially correct address information/data and/or name
information/data.
This, in effect, links potentially incorrect address information/data and/or
name
information/data to potentially correct address information/data and/or name
information/data (e.g., see Fig. 9). The carrier/transporter computing entity
100 (e.g., via
the learning platform/module) can also determine/identify whether the
predicted address
37

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
information/data was correct or incorrect based on whether the pick-up or
delivery was
successful or unsuccessful, whether feedback was received from
carrier/transporter
operators/personnel, and/or the like. Further, the carrier/transporter
computing entity 100
(e.g., via the learning platform/module) can then update the one or more one
or more
confidence levels with the address information/data and/or name
information/data (e.g.,
via the learning platform/module) based on the same. As previously discussed,
the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can use
various factors to update the confidence levels¨such as primary or secondary
audits,
signatures being obtained for pick-ups or deliveries, successful pick-ups or
deliveries,
unsuccessful pick-ups or deliveries, carrier/transporter operators/personnel
being within a
zone of confidence at pick-up or delivery locations of previous successful
pick-ups or
deliveries, corrective input from carrier/transporter operators/personnel,
customer
feedback, claims for unsuccessful pick-ups and/or deliveries (e.g., visits),
and/or the like.
As will be recognized, a variety of other approaches and techniques can be
used to adapt
to various needs and circumstances.
b. Primary Audit: Predicting Missing Address Information/Data
In one embodiment, a primary auditing of address information/data and/or name
information/data may comprise the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
(e.g., via the
learning platform/module) automatically predicting the missing or potentially
missing
address information/data for addresses with one or more exceptions (Blocks
420, 422, 430,
and 435 of Fig. 4). Continuing with the above example, assume the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 created/generated an exception for a pick-up or a
delivery to 123
Main Street, Any Town, Georgia 30328, because it determined/identified that it
was
missing secondary address information/data¨John Doe's actual residential
address is 123
Main Street, Apartment 1A, Any Town, Georgia 30328.
In one embodiment, as part of a primary audit process to predict the
missing/incomplete address information/data for a pick-up or delivery, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can
determine/identify one or more confidence levels associated with the address
information/data and/or name information/data. In one embodiment, if one or
more
confidence levels satisfy (e.g., meet or exceed) one or more configurable
confidence
levels, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module)
can predict that the identified address information/data is not
missing/incomplete (Block
38

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
422 of Fig. 4) and override the exception¨allowing the corresponding pick-up
or delivery
and electronically indicating the same. Similarly, if one or more confidence
levels do not
satisfy (e.g., do not meet or exceed) one or more configurable confidence
levels, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can
determine/identify that the secondary address information/data is
missing/incomplete. In
this example, there may be multiple addresses associated with 123 Main Street,
Any
Town, Georgia 30328, but only one at that same address associated with Mr.
John Doe. In
such a case, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the
learning
platform/module) can predict that the missing/incomplete address
information/data is
Apartment 1A. As will be recognized, a variety of other approaches and
techniques can be
used to adapt to various needs and circumstances.
In one embodiment, as part of a primary audit process to predict the correct
address
information/data for a pick-up or delivery, the carrier/transporter computing
entity 100
(e.g., via the learning platform/module) can determine/identify whether there
have been
any previous predictions for the address information/data and/or name
information/data. In
such cases, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the
learning
platform/module) determine/identify the previous predictions for the address
information/data and/or name information/data and determine/identify whether
they were
successful or unsuccessful. If previous successful predictions have been
recorded, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can
make/initiate/instruct the same prediction for the address information/data in
future
occurrences. Thus, the next time there is a pick-up or delivery for Mr. John
Doe that is
missing/incomplete his secondary address information/data, the
carrier/transporter
computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning platform/module) will
determine/identify the
previous prediction. This, in effect, links potentially missing/incomplete
address
information/data and/or name information/data to one or more predicted address

information/data and/or name information/data (e.g., see Fig. 9). As will be
recognized, a
variety of other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various
needs and
circumstances.
In one embodiment, as part of the primary audit process to predict the correct
address information/data for a pick-up or delivery, the carrier/transporter
computing entity
100 (e.g., via the learning platform/module) can determine/identify whether
pick-ups or
deliveries have occurred to the same address without secondary address
information/data.
In this example, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the
learning
39

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
platform/module) can search the historical item/shipment database for pick-ups
or
deliveries to 123 Main Street in Any Town, Georgia, for example. This would
result in the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module)
determining/identifying that one or more pick-ups and/or deliveries (e.g.,
visits) have
taken place for to 123 Main Street, Any Town, Georgia 30328, without secondary
address
information/data. This, for instance, may be because the location is an
apartment complex
that allows deliveries to residents at the office. In such a case, the
secondary address
information/data may not be necessary for a successful delivery. Thus, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can
predict that the item/shipment can be picked up or delivered without the
secondary address
information/data. The same may hold true for large or well-known businesses or
regular
customers, such as pick-ups or deliveries to The Home Depot, Amazon Returns,
and/or the
like. As will be recognized, a variety of other approaches and techniques can
be used to
adapt to various needs and circumstances.
In one embodiment, with the predicted address information/data, an appropriate
computing entity (e.g., carrier/transporter computing entity 100, user
computing entity
110, payment computing entity 115, external information/data source computing
entity
120, and/or the like) can update/correct the item/shipment information/data to
reflect the
predicted address information/data as previously described if necessary. The
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can update or associate any
missing/incomplete
address information/data and/or name information/data with the predicted
address
information/data and/or name information/data. The carrier/transporter
computing entity
100 (e.g., via the learning platform/module) can also determine/identify
whether the
predicted address information/data was correct or incorrect based on whether
the pick-up
or delivery was successful or unsuccessful, whether feedback was received from
carrier/transporter operators/personnel, and/or the like. The address
information/data can
also be updated by customers via web/phone/other channels. For example, once
the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) identifies
a problem with address information/data, the carrier/transporter computing
entity 100
(e.g., via the learning platform/module) can indicate a web tracking exception
and allow
for customer updates as well.

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
Further, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can then update the one or more one or more confidence levels
with the
address information/data and/or name information/data (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) based on the same. As will be recognized, a variety of other
approaches
and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and circumstances.
In one embodiment, if address information/data has been predicted, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can allow for pick-up or delivery of
the
item/shipment 102 (Block 435 of Fig. 4). However, even if there are no
predictions for the
address information/data, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can
allow for pick-
up or delivery of the item/shipment 102 (Block 435 of Fig. 4). In certain
embodiments,
this can allow carrier/transporter operators/personnel with an opportunity to
attempt the
pick-up or delivery and allow the learning module to track the result (and
determine/identify a confidence level). In either case, the
carrier/transporter computing
entity 100 can store information/data in the historical item/shipment database
(with
records/entries of successful and unsuccessful pick-ups and deliveries (e.g.,
visits) for a
configurable time period and/or confidence levels) indicating whether the
item/shipment
102 was successfully picked up or delivered and/or assign or update the
appropriate
confidence levels correspondingly.
c. Primary Audit: Predicting Moved/Changed Address Information/Data
In one embodiment, a primary auditing of address information/data and/or name
information/data may comprise the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
(e.g., via the
learning platform/module) automatically predicting address information/data
for
exceptions as a result of being determined/identified in a moved/changed
database (Blocks
420, 422, 430, and 435 of Fig. 4). Continuing with the above example, assume
the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 created/generated an exception for a
pick-up or a
delivery to 123 Main Street, Apartment 1A, Any Town, Georgia 30328, because it

determined/identified that Mr. John Doe at that address moved based at least
in part on a
moved/changed database.
In one embodiment, as part of a primary audit process to predict the correct
address
information/data for a pick-up or delivery, the carrier/transporter computing
entity 100
(e.g., via the learning platform/module) can determine/identify whether there
have been
any previous predictions for the address information/data and/or name
information/data or
whether the customer has updated/changed his or her address information/data.
In such
41

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
,
cases, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module)
determine/identify the previous predictions or corrections for the address
information/data
and/or name information/data and determine/identify whether they were
successful or
unsuccessful. If previous successful predictions or corrections have been
recorded (e.g.,
linked), the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the learning
platform/module) can make/initiate/instruct the same prediction or correction
for the
address information/data in future occurrences and/or update any confidence
levels. Thus,
the next time there is a pick-up or delivery for Mr. John Doe at the address
listed in the
moved/changed database, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g.,
via the
learning platform/module) can determine/identify the previous prediction or
correction and
update the item/shipment information/data in the same manner. This, in effect,
links
moved/changed address information/data and/or name information/data to the
predicted or
corrected address information/data (e.g., see Fig. 9). As will be recognized,
a variety of
other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and
circumstances.
In one embodiment, with the predicted address information/data, an appropriate
computing entity (e.g., carrier/transporter computing entity 100, user
computing entity
110, payment computing entity 115, external information/data source computing
entity
120, and/or the like) can update/correct the item/shipment information/data to
reflect the
predicted or corrected address information/data as previously described if
necessary. The
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can update or associate any
moved/changed
address information/data and/or name information/data with the predicted
address
information/data. The carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the
learning
platform/module) can also determine/identify whether the predicted or
corrected address
information/data was correct or incorrect based on whether the pick-up or
delivery was
successful or unsuccessful, whether feedback was received from
carrier/transporter
operators/personnel, and/or the like. Further, the carrier/transporter
computing entity 100
(e.g., via the learning platform/module) can then update the one or more one
or more
confidence levels with the address information/data and/or name
information/data (e.g.,
via the learning platform/module) based on the same. As will be recognized, a
variety of
other approaches and techniques can be used to adapt to various needs and
circumstances.
In one embodiment, if address information/data has been predicted or
corrected,
the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can allow for pick-up or delivery
of the
item/shipment 102 (Block 435 of Fig. 4). Similarly, if there are no
predictions or
corrections for the address information/data, the carrier/transporter
computing entity 100
42

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
can allow for pick-up or delivery of the item/shipment 102 (Block 435 of Fig.
4). In either
case, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can store information/data
in the
historical item/shipment database (with records/entries of successful and
unsuccessful
pick-ups and deliveries (e.g., visits) for a configurable time period)
indicating whether the
item/shipment 102 was successfully picked up or delivered.
d. Secondary Audit: Correcting Address Information/Data and/or Name
Information/Data
In one embodiment, a secondary auditing of an address with an exception may
comprise automatically contacting the consignor and/or consignee of the
item/shipment
102 to request corrected item/shipment information/data (Blocks 420, 425, 430,
and 435 of
Fig. 4). For example, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 may store
or have access
to various customer (e.g., consignee and/or consignor) profiles comprising
communication
preferences regarding items/shipments 102 to be picked up or delivered. For
example, the
communication preferences may provide customers (e.g., consignors and/or
consignees)
with the ability to electronically communicate with the carrier/transporter at
various stages
of the pick-up and/or delivery process. The customer (e.g., consignee and/or
consignor)
profiles can identify one or more communication formats for communicating with
the
customer. The communication formats may include text messages (e.g., SMS
and/or
MMS), email messages, voice messages, and/or a variety of other messages in
various
communication formats. In addition to identifying one or more communication
formats,
customer (e.g., consignee and/or consignor) profiles may identify the
corresponding
electronic destination addresses to be used in providing information regarding

items/shipments 102 to be picked up and/or delivered. For instance, for text
messages, the
customer may provide one or more cellular phone numbers. For email messages,
the
customer may provide one or more email addresses. And for voice messages, the
customer
may provide one or more cellular or landline phone numbers. Additionally, in
one
embodiment, validation operations can be performed with respect to each input
destination
address¨to ensure their accuracy. In one embodiment, the carrier/transporter
computing
entity 100 can automatically generate one or more messages requesting
information/data
regarding an item/shipment 102 to be picked up or delivered in compliance with
the
customer's communication preferences. Similarly, the carrier/transporter
computing entity
100 can automatically transmit the one or messages to the electronic
destination addresses
in compliance with the customer's communication preferences. For example, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 may generate/create and transmit an
email
message to John Doe's (or the consignor) email address and a text message to
John Doe's
43

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
(or the consignor) cellular phone requesting his correct street address or
apartment
number. In one embodiment, the customer (e.g., operating a user computing
entity 110)
can respond to the messages/notifications with necessary information. This
approach
allows the carrier/transporter and the customer (e.g., consignor and/or
consignee) to
interact with one another to determine/identify the updated/corrected address
information/data. As will be recognized, a variety of other approaches and
techniques can
be used to adapt to different needs and circumstances¨some of which are
further
described in U.S. Appl. No. 14/025,893, which is hereby incorporated in its
entirety by
reference.
In one embodiment, with the updated/corrected address information/data, an
appropriate computing entity (e.g., carrier/transporter computing entity 100,
user
computing entity 110, payment computing entity 115, external information/data
source
computing entity 120, and/or the like) can update/correct the item/shipment
information/data to reflect the updated/corrected address information/data. In
the context
of an e-commerce transaction prior to purchase, the customer can be notified
and/or
prompted to confirm the updated/corrected address information/data. In the
context of a
third party requesting validation of address information/data and/or name
information/data, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 (e.g., via the
learning
platform/module) can provide the corrected/updated address information/data
and/or name
information/data. In the context of an item/shipment 102 that is already in
the carrier's
transportation and logistics network, carrier/transporter operator/personnel
sorting items or
loading delivery vehicles can scan the item/shipment identifier (e.g., user
computing entity
110) for the item/shipment 102. In response, a user computing entity 110 can
provide the
carrier/transporter operator/personnel with an indication that the address
information/data
for the item/shipment 102 has been updated/corrected. In certain embodiments,
this may
include electronically indicating that a new label (and/or item/shipment
identifier) needs to
be affixed to the item/shipment 102. The item/shipment 102 can then be
transported and
delivered with the new label by the carrier and delivered without requiring an
in-person
signature.
In one embodiment, if address information/data has been updated/corrected, the
carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can allow for pick-up or delivery of
the
item/shipment 102 (Block 435 of Fig. 4). Similarly, if there are no
updates/corrections to
the address information/data the carrier/transporter computing entity 100 can
allow for
pick-up or delivery of the item/shipment 102 and electronically indicate the
same (Block
44

CA 02919526 2016-01-29
435 of Fig. 4). In either case, the carrier/transporter computing entity 100
can store
information/data in the historical item/shipment database (with
records/entries of
successful and unsuccessful pick-ups and deliveries (e.g., visits) for a
configurable time
period and/or confidence levels) indicating whether the item/shipment 102 was
successfully picked up or delivered.
As will be recognized, a variety of other approaches and techniques can be
used to
adapt to various needs and circumstances. In various embodiments, one
technical
advantage this approach includes is actually determining/identifying and
providing the any
missing/incomplete or incomplete secondary address information/data¨instead of
simply
assuming the address information/data is accurate because it is in range.
IV. Conclusion
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein
will
come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain
having the benefit
of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated
drawings.
Therefore, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to be limited to
the specific
embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are
intended to be
included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are
employed
herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for
purposes of
limitation.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(22) Filed 2016-01-29
Examination Requested 2016-01-29
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2016-07-30

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $210.51 was received on 2023-12-05


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if small entity fee 2025-01-29 $100.00
Next Payment if standard fee 2025-01-29 $277.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $800.00 2016-01-29
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2016-01-29
Application Fee $400.00 2016-01-29
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2018-01-29 $100.00 2018-01-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2019-01-29 $100.00 2019-01-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2020-01-29 $100.00 2020-01-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2021-01-29 $200.00 2020-12-21
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2022-01-31 $203.59 2022-01-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2023-01-30 $203.59 2022-12-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2024-01-29 $210.51 2023-12-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Examiner Requisition 2020-01-16 11 636
Amendment 2020-05-14 29 1,233
Description 2020-05-14 48 2,573
Claims 2020-05-14 7 283
Drawings 2020-05-14 9 196
Examiner Requisition 2021-08-19 20 1,414
Amendment 2021-12-20 30 1,470
Description 2021-12-20 48 2,612
Claims 2021-12-20 8 338
Examiner Requisition 2022-05-25 7 344
Amendment 2022-08-02 38 2,210
Amendment 2022-08-02 4 145
Description 2022-08-02 48 3,636
Claims 2022-08-02 12 778
Examiner Requisition 2023-05-11 5 255
Abstract 2016-01-29 1 9
Description 2016-01-29 45 2,608
Claims 2016-01-29 14 524
Drawings 2016-01-29 9 159
Representative Drawing 2016-07-04 1 15
Cover Page 2016-09-15 1 41
Examiner Requisition 2017-09-15 6 290
Amendment 2017-10-02 15 577
Description 2017-10-02 47 2,516
Claims 2017-10-02 6 204
Amendment 2017-11-16 3 76
Amendment 2018-01-05 3 77
Examiner Requisition 2018-08-13 5 280
Amendment 2019-02-12 16 614
Description 2019-02-12 48 2,570
Claims 2019-02-12 7 254
Examiner Requisition 2024-02-13 4 161
Interview Record with Cover Letter Registered 2024-04-05 1 22
Amendment 2024-04-11 5 151
New Application 2016-01-29 8 234
Examiner Requisition / Examiner Requisition 2017-02-03 4 214
Amendment 2017-04-04 9 291
Description 2017-04-04 45 2,443
Claims 2017-04-04 4 133
Amendment 2023-07-18 43 2,056
Description 2023-07-18 53 4,064
Claims 2023-07-18 12 779