Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
1
DEAERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEAERATION
Technical Field
The present invention relates to a system and a method for deaeration of a
liquid
food product.
Background
Within the field of packaging of liquid products deaeration is a well
established
concept and deaeration is included as an essential step in most processing
plants e.g. in
plants where liquid product is received as a bulk in a first end of the line
and delivered as
individual packaging containers in the other end of the line. Air (or oxygen)
may be
present in the liquid product for different reasons, the two main reasons
being that it is
dispersed or dissolved. Taking the example of milk, there will be some oxygen
in the
milk already before it has left the cow, and more oxygen will be mixed and
dissolve into
the milk at each processing step starting with the milking process itself.
The air and oxygen may result in several negative effects ranging from reduced
skimming efficiency in separators, cavitation in the product during
processing, fouling of
heating surfaces in pasteurizers, shortened product shelf life (due to
oxidation), etc.,
which are some reasons to why deaeration is a well-established processing
step.
To simplify the underlying theory, which obviously is well-established and
well-
known to the skilled person, the solubility of a gas such as oxygen or
nitrogen in a liquid
will depend of temperature and pressure. At lower temperatures more oxygen or
nitrogen
may be dissolved in the liquid than what is the case at a higher temperature,
i.e. the
saturation concentration is higher at a lower temperature. For pressure the
relationship is
reversed, the higher the pressure the higher the saturation concentration.
This simple
relationship establishes that in order to deaerate a liquid one or both of the
temperature or
the pressure may be altered. Also, it may be obvious that deaeration as such
is not
difficult to accomplish by simply dialing in the desired temperature and
pressure of a
particular saturation concentration in a vessel containing the liquid. In a
commercial
production line, however, the deaeration should allow treatment of thousands
of liters of
liquid product per hour with a requirement of being energy efficient which
renders the
theoretical approach of awaiting equilibrium to be reached inapplicable.
A deaeration method more commonly used in the main field of the present
invention is to make use of a vacuum deaeration in an expansion vessel
connected to
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
2
vacuum. The liquid is transported to the expansion vessel with a certain
temperature
which is some degrees above the boiling point at the pressure prevailing in
the expansion
vessel. When the liquid enters the vessel via a valve and the temperature and
pressure
conditions in the vessel causes it to instantly start boiling, a process
referred to as flash
boiling (flash or flashing in the following). The process results in that
liquid in vaporized
and that air is released from dissolved form during flashing. Liquid vapor
condense
against cooled areas in the vessel, while the released air is evacuated from
the vessel by
the vacuum pump, while the liquid exits through an opening in the bottom of
the vessel.
In order to increase the separation rate the liquid may enter the expansion
vessel in a
tangential direction, so as to induce a swirl.
Summary
To this end the present invention relates to a system for deaerating of a
liquid in
accordance with claim 1. Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent
claims.
A system for deaerating a liquid may comprise a separation vessel where
deaerated liquid is separated from gas, predominantly air; a liquid inlet to
the separation
vessel through which the liquid enters the separation vessel; a liquid outlet
from the
separation vessel through which a deaerated liquid exits the separation
vessel; and a gas
outlet through which the gas exits the separation vessel. The liquid inlet is
arranged at a
first end of the separation vessel and is configured to give the liquid
entering the
separation vessel a trajectory, and a stop plate is arranged in the trajectory
to abruptly
stop the propagation of liquid travelling along the trajectory. A pressure
difference
upstream or at the inlet may give the liquid such a velocity that a free jet
is formed as the
liquid enters the separation vessel. More specifically the liquid may have
been
pressurized to a pressure Po and depressurized to a pressure Pi prior to
entering the
separation vessel such as to stimulate a deaeration process and increase the
velocity of the
liquid entering the separation vessel.
The liquid outlet may be arranged at a second end of the separation vessel.
That
second end may in one or more embodiments be an end remote to or opposite to
the first
end where the liquid inlet is arranged.
To make full use of the positioning of the liquid inlet and outlet respective,
as
well as for other reasons, the separation vessel may have an elongated shape
in a
horizontal longitudinal direction.
In one or more embodiments the separation vessel may have a flattened cross
section in a horizontal cross direction, orthogonal to a horizontal
longitudinal direction.
An effect of the flattened cross section may be that for a specific volume of
liquid in the
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
3
separation vessel the depth of the liquid may be reduced as compared to e.g. a
cylindrical
separation vessel (circular cross section). According to one or several
related
embodiments the separation vessel may have an oval or elliptic cross section
in a
horizontal cross direction, orthogonal to a horizontal longitudinal direction.
The liquid inlet may be arranged at about 65-80 % of a height, more
specifically
at 70-75 % of the height of the separation vessel.
To increase the efficiency of the system it may according to one or more
embodiments include a recovery system for deaerated liquid leaving through the
gas
outlet, wherein said recovery system guides the recovered liquid via a
recovery line back
to the deaerated liquid, upstream or downstream the liquid outlet. Such system
may
typically be used when foam formed as a result from the deaeration process
follows the
gas out of the separation vessel. The foam consists of liquid and gas, and it
is desirable to
recover the liquid rather than allowing for it to be wasted. In another
embodiment there
may be arranged a spray nozzle in a line leading from the gas outlet. The
spray nozzle
may be arranged to spray a liquid in towards the gas outlet, thus
extinguishing any foam
trying to escape through the gas outlet. The spray may in one or several
embodiment by a
hollow cone spray.
In one or more embodiment depressurization may realized by a throttling point
directly upstream the liquid inlet or a throttling point constituting the
liquid inlet, and in
related embodiments the pressure drop (P0-P1) may be about 2-3 bar.
The system as such may be configured to maintain a pressure Pi in the
separation vessel being above the boiling point of the liquid present in the
separation
vessel at prevailing liquid temperature.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic view of a deaerator system according to an embodiment of
the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a detail view of a portion of the deaerator system according to the
first
embodiment.
Fig. 3 is a schematic layout of an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a sectional view of an second embodiment of the present invention.
Description of Embodiments
A standard method for deaeration may involve the accomplishment of a flash
boil by subjecting the liquid to a pressure and temperature forcing it to
boil. A technique
which may be used in embodiment of the present invention is actually to
prevent the
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
4
liquid from flash boiling in that manner. In order to further elucidate that
aspect of
embodiments of the present invention some more explanation follows. The steps
of
pressurizing the liquid to a pressure above atmospheric, guiding the
pressurized liquid to
an upstream end of a nucleation valve, and lowering the pressure on a
downstream side of
the valve to a subatmospheric pressure, will cause gas bubble nucleation as
liquid passes
the throttling point (may be referred to as 'nucleation valve' to highlight
its function) as
the first step of the deaeration. Relying on the gas bubble nucleation as a
first step in the
deaeration process differs from prior art technique where flashing is the
predominant
effect utilized and the inventive method provides an energy efficient and time
efficient
deaeration method.
It may be preferred to form a free fluid jet with the nucleation valve.
Experimental results indicate that the formation of a high-velocity jet flow,
which in most
applications will be a turbulent jet flow, will enhance the deaeration. The
free jet flow is
preferably not restricted (e.g. directed into a wall). In this context it
should be noted that
the flow is contained in some sort of piping or similar, and that some part of
the formed
jet will interact to some degree with the walls of the piping. The core of the
jet will
however not interact to any significant degree with a constructional
delimitation of the
system. In embodiment of the present invention the jet may follow its
trajectory into a
stop plate arranged in the separation vessel. This will prevent the jet from
disturbing the
conditions in the separation vessel.
In many situations it may be preferred to inducing a pressure drop (a
depression)
over the nucleation valve. The pressure drop may in one or more embodiments
exceed
2 bar, and even exceed 3 bar. It may in other embodiment go up to an extreme
of around
4 bar or 5 bar. Experiments indicate that an increased pressure drop results
in an
increased deaeration efficiency. It is indeed possible to apply higher
pressures upstream
the valve (in order to increase the pressure drop) yet there are practical
constraints, e.g. in
terms of pump capacity and overall efficiency.
Also touched upon in the summary section is the step of controlling the
pressure
downstream the valve, e.g. in the separation vessel such that it remains above
or at the
saturation pressure of the liquid. This will eliminate the risk of flash
boiling on a larger
scale, and thus it may reduce energy consumption.
A diffusion reactor may be arranged after the nucleation valve. In the
diffusion
reactor, into which the free jet is directed, dissolved gas in the liquid will
diffuse from the
liquid into the gas bubbles. In the illustrated embodiment of the present
invention,
however, the jet is directed directly into the separation vessel. Still, not
removing the
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
possibility of having the diffusion reactor debouching directly into the
separation vessel,
in which gas phase is separated from liquid phase.
It is believed that the sudden pressure drop as such may be an important
feature,
yet it also seem beneficial to, in one or more embodiments of the present
invention,
5 control the pressure on the downstream side of the valve such that it is
lower than 0.1 bar.
This pressure Pi will vary with several conditions, such as temperature. In
more general
terms the pressure immediately after the valve may remain below 160 % of the
saturation
pressure for the liquid at the particular temperature, which may be true
several
embodiments of the present invention.
In one or more embodiments the pressure on the downstream side of the valve is
controlled such that the static pressure is above the saturation pressure,
while the lowest
dynamic pressure as the liquid passes the valve is below the saturation
pressure. As the
liquid passes the valve it will be accelerated to a high-velocity flow,
resulting in local
pressure reduction of the dynamic pressure. If the ambient static pressure is
close to
(above or at) the saturation pressure, the dynamic pressure may drop below the
saturation
pressure. This will cause local flash boiling, which is believed to facilitate
deaeration
further.
The system should suggestively include a pump for increasing the pressure in
the liquid on an upstream end of a nucleation valve, a vacuum pump for
reducing the
pressure on a downstream end of the pressure reducing valve and a control
system for
controlling the pumps.
Some portions of a system for processing a liquid will be described referring
to
Fig. 1, showing a very principle layout. The present invention may form part
of such a
system, though individual components may be replaced without departing from
the scope
of the invention as defined by the claims.
Starting at an upstream position, the system comprises a tank 2 or other
system for
holding or delivering the liquid to be processed. The system also comprises a
pump 4 for
increasing the pressure in the liquid, subjecting it to an elevated static
pressure PupsTREAm
such that it is forced downstream. The pump 4 may in one or more embodiments
be a
centrifugal pump, yet other alternatives may be feasible. Piping 6 guides the
liquid to the
first processing step, namely to the nucleation valve 8. Before describing
details of the
valve, some words about the arrangement downstream the valve should be
mentioned.
The piping 10 guiding the liquid following the nucleation valve 8 debouches in
a
separation vessel 12. In the present embodiment the separation vessel 12
comprises an
expansion vessel, connected to a vacuum pump 14 in an upper end, and connected
to an
evacuation system 16 for liquid in a lower end. Air and other gases resulting
from the
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
6
deaeration will be evacuated via the upper end, while deaerated liquid will be
pumped out
via the lower end of the vessel. To avoid evacuation of vaporized liquid the
upper end of
the vessel may comprise a condenser, condensing the vaporized liquid such that
it may
leave via the lower end instead. The vacuum pump 14 generates a lowered static
pressure
pressure PliowNsTREAm propagating to the downstream end of the nucleation
valve 8.
Returning to the nucleation valve 8, the increased static pressure upstream
the
valve will push the liquid towards the nucleation valve 8 and the lowered
static pressure
downstream the valve will pull the liquid, the relevant term to consider being
the pressure
drop over the valve 8, which may be defined as AP= Po ¨ Pi.
In the present embodiment Pi preferably corresponds to a pressure above the
vapor pressure at the residing temperature and for the fluid being processed,
such to avoid
flashing, partly since the generation of flash is energy consuming. To this
end it should be
mentioned that as the liquid passes the constriction of the valve it will
accelerate to a
significant velocity, which may cause the dynamic pressure to momentarily drop
below
the vapor pressure.
The rapid pressure drop "shocks" the liquid such that a homogenous nucleation
occurs, which is beneficial for deaeration. It has been confirmed in
experiments that the
momentary flash or cavitation in the valve 8 is beneficial from a deaeration
perspective.
Immediately after being homogenously nucleated the liquid enters the low
pressure
region downstream the valve in the form of a jet 18, which rapidly breaks up
such that the
liquid exposes a large surface area forming the interface between gas and
liquid.
Conditions beneficial for deaeration thus prevail downstream the valve. This
is
schematically illustrated in Fig. 2
The valve layout, e.g. in terms of exact shape of its nozzle orifice(s) is not
crucial,
yet some parameters seem to be valuable from an optimization standpont, and
two are
worth mentioning in particular: 1) The pressure drop should occur rapidly,
basically
instantly as the liquid passes the valve 8. This indicates that the valve
construction should
be non-complex, without any intricate tubing following or preceding the nozzle
orifice. 2)
After the pressure drop the resulting jet should be non-constraint, i.e. a
free jet should be
allowed to form and break up. This also indicates that a non-complex valve
construction
without intricate tubing following the orifice is advantageous. In one
embodiment the
valve may be of a type having a conical regulating plug with a lip seal. This
is a standard
type of valve and examples include the SPC-2 valve (Alfa Laval), which is a
sanitary
electro-pneumatic regulating valve for use in stainless steel pipe systems. A
simple hour-
glass shaped restriction will also due, at least during constant operating
conditions, yet a
controllable valve is preferred.
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
7
For the above reasons, a diffusion reactor 20 is arranged downstream the valve
8,
as part of the piping 10. The diffusion reactor 20 will enable turbulent
diffusion of the
dissolved gas in the liquid phase to the now existing and growing nuclei/gas
bubbles, and
it should have a construction not entailing a large pressure drop. In the
embodiment of
Fig. 2 the diffusion reactor 20 comprises a rectilinear pipe, having a
diameter such that it
does not interact with the formation of the previously mentioned jet 18.
Sooner or later as
the jet 16 breaks up the flow will diverge and interact with the walls of the
diffusion
reactor, and even a non-breaking jet would sooner or later impact on the lower
wall due
to gravity. The flow will continue towards the separation vessel 12, pulled by
the vacuum,
where it will be separated into a liquid flow and a gas flow. At some point
the jet will fill
the whole diameter of the diffusion reactor 20, the exact location depending
on pressure,
temperature, flow velocity, etc. In other embodiment the diffusion reactor is
removed and
the jet is directed straight into a separation vessel.
In the present embodiment the diffusion reactor 20 is arranged in a horizontal
direction. In a second embodiment the diffusion reactor may be arranged in a
vertical
direction, with the jet coming from above. With this arrangement the pressure
loss
generated by the diffusion reactor will be compensated by the effect of
gravity, reducing
the losses in the system. The diffusion reactor may be mounted in any
inclination
between vertical and horizontal without departing from the scope of the
present invention,
as defined by the claims.
In the text below some operating parameters for embodiments of the present
invention are listed, which may facilitate enablement for a skilled person.
The amount (or
rate) of liquid being processed may be in the order of up to about 100'000
1/h, though
smaller flows are possible, and in experiments conducted flows in the order of
6'0001/h
have been used. These rates are common within the field of the invention, and
details in
regard of pumps and such on the downstream side of the valve 8 will not be
discussed in
detail.
The pressure drop over the valve AP preferably exceeds 2 bar, and it is even
more
preferred that it exceeds 3 bar, and it may be as high as 4 bar or 5 bar.
There is no
technical problem in increasing AP even further yet the pump used to elevate
the pressure
will be increasingly expensive.
The temperature downstream the valve should preferably be lower than the flash
temperature (the boiling point at the prevailing pressure P1), such as -10 C
below flash
or -5 C or between those temperatures and the flash temperature. Temperatures
closer to
flash have been found to increase the deaeration efficiency. Flash boiling
will still have a
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
8
beneficial impact on the deaeration, yet experiments verify that it is not as
dramatic as for
prior art systems.
The length of the diffusion reactor, if used, may be about 100-200 cm, yet it
may
be even longer. A longer diffusion reactor will improve the deaeration
efficiency, yet it
may also increase pump losses, which is an unwanted feature. The diameter of
the
diffusion reactor may be about 5 cm (2" pipe) and it may be manufactured from
stainless
steel. In theory the diameter of the diffusion reactor would benefit from
being larger,
since it would result in lower pressure loss, yet due to parameters related to
working at
pressures close to vacuum may result in a tradeoff where the suggested
diameter is
beneficial. Smaller diameters may result in reduced deaeration efficiency,
supposedly due
to a shorter hold up time and an increased interaction between the jet (or
spray) and the
walls of the diffusion reactor, and due to increased pressure losses, e.g.
making the
pressure drop less abrupt.
There is no abrupt pressure drop as the liquid passes from the diffusion
reactor 20
into the separation vessel 12, in which the separation process initiated in
the nucleation
valve 8 is finalized. The separation vessel 12 may therefore be of quite
rudimentary
design as compared to prior art systems where flashing takes place in the
expansion
vessel. Further, since flash boiling is avoided to a large extent, the amount
of vapor is
reduced, resulting in that less energy has to be spent on condensing the
vapor.
All components of the system being in contact with the product should be made
from food grade material or approved for use when processing foodstuff.
The pressure in the liquid upstream the nucleation valve, as well as the flow
through the nucleation valve may be controlled by the nucleation valve 8 and
the pump 4,
i.e. a frequency regulated pump, and for these purposes the pump 4 may also
comprise a
control valve (not shown).
If the temperature of the liquid upstream the nucleation valve 8 is
controlled, this
may be effected by means of a heat exchanger.
The pressure downstream the nucleation valve 4 is controlled by pressure
regulation of the separation vessel 12.
The temperature of the liquid downstream the nucleation valve 4 is normally
not
controlled in situations where no flash boiling occurs. The pressure in the
separation
vessel 12 may be used to control the temperature, if so desired.
In Fig. 3 there is shown a general layout of a device 100 involving an
embodiment
of the present invention. Several of the components shown in Fig. 3 are
optional, so it
actually corresponds to a number of embodiments. Starting from the upstream
position
the product to be deaerated is fed through a feed line 102, shown to the left
in the drawing.
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
9
The pressure Po may generally be elevated in the feed line 102, compared to
atmospheric
in general and compared to a first pressure Pi inside the separation vessel
104 in
particular. In fact, the first pressure Pi inside the separation vessel 104
very low typically
residing in an area of 0-10 C above the boiling point (again meaning that if
the
temperature of the liquid in the separation vessel increased by 0-10 C the
liquid would
start to boil). Preferably the pressure Pi may be 0-5 C above the boiling
point, or the
lower part of the interval may even vary between 0.1-1 C above the boiling
point to
ensure that no boiling occurs. A nucleation valve 106 or, using a more general
expression,
an expansion valve 106 separates the feed line 102 from the separation vessel
104, and as
the product passes the expansion valve 106 it will experience a sudden
pressure drop
from Po to Pi, inducing a flash boil or to the generation of gas bubbles, thus
causing an
abrupt start of deaeration. As the product enters the separation vessel the
partly deaerated
product 108 will collect at the bottom of the separation vessel 104 while the
released
gases 110 will reside in the remaining part of the vessel 104. An interface
surface is
depicted by a delimiter line 112. The deaerated product 108 will be pumped out
through
an exit 114 at the bottom of the vessel 104 and the gases will be evacuated
through an
arrangement 116 in the top of the separation vessel. The arrangement 116 may
suggestively be driven by a vacuum pump (not shown) arranged downstream. The
arrangement 116 may in the present embodiment merely comprising a pipe
extending
from the separation vessel 104.
A side effect of the quite violent deaeration process is that considerable
amounts
of foam, indicated at 118, may be generated, a side effect that is unwanted
for several
reasons, as previously mentioned in the background section. Extinguishing of
the foam
may merely imply that the foam is separated from the rest of the product flow,
yet in
most cases it is desired to extinguish the foam such as to capture the product
bound
thereto. If foam leaves the separation vessel trough the arrangement 116, the
gases and
bubbles enter a foam extinguisher (not shown). This foam extinguisher bursts
the bubbles
118 and separates the gas from the product, according to any method known in
the art. It
is preferred that the arrangement 116 is provided with thermal insulation 130
such that
the temperature of the foam 118 does not drop. The gas continues towards the
vacuum
pump, the path indicated with V, while the product follows the path R, a
return line 122
bringing it back to a position downstream the exit 114 from the separation
vessel 104.
The return line 122 may debouch downstream the exit 114 yet upstream a pump
124 used
to pump the deaerated liquid onward in the process. A vortex breaker 132 may
be
arranged downstream the exit 114 to prevent any vortex from being generated
inside the
separation vessel 104. A simple design for a vortex breaker is a pipe segment
having a
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
pair of baffle plates in a cross arrangement in the longitudinal direction
thus creating four
longitudinal compartments. There are other more or less elaborate designs for
vortex
generators which could be used.
In another embodiment the return line 122 comprises either of a return valve
or, a
5 pump (such as a liquid ring pump), ensuring that the liquid level in the
return line 122 is
controlled. Another alternative, which may be used in combination with the
other ones or
as a solitary solution is to use an ejector to entrain the liquid from the
return line 122 in a
downstream direction. The liquid used to feed the ejector may be collected
downstream
the pump 124 and in applications where the pressure downstream the pump 124 is
10 sufficient no further feed means are necessary. In other embodiments the
need of a
regulation valve or a feed pump may be called for to provide an adequate feed
to the
ejector 134.
Turning back to features more directly connected to the present invention a
stop
plate 138 is arranged in the separation vessel 104. In the embodiment of Fig.
3 the stop
plate 138 is schematically suspended from the upper portion of the separation
vessel 104,
yet it may instead or also be suspended in other manner, such as from the side
walls or
the bottom portion, or combinations thereof. The stop plate 138 may cover a
smaller
portion of the space above the liquid surface, or a larger portion thereof. In
any case the
stop plate 138 is arranged in the projected trajectory of the jet of fluid
being injected into
the separation vessel 104. A typical distance for the stop plate may be about
20-30 cm
from the inlet, and the size of the stop plate will obviously vary with
distance from the
inlet and the shape of the jet. In another embodiment the outlet 114 is
arrange close to the
end remote to the end in which the inlet is arranged. In this way the length
of separation
vessel available for separation is maximized. The liquid outlet is arranged in
the bottom
of the separation vessel, and in that embodiment of the invention the outlet
is arranged as
remote to the liquid inlet while still being at a lowest level on the bottom
of the separation
vessel.
In Fig. 4 a sectional view of a separation vessel is shown. The sectional view
illustrates an elliptic cross sectional shape of the separation vessel. The
elliptic shape is
one example of a flattened cross sectional shape that may be used according to
one
embodiment of the present invention. In a general meaning the term "flattened"
refers to
that, looking at the cross section, the width is larger than the height. The
separation vessel
may thus have other shapes than elliptic without departing from the
definition, yet elliptic
or rectangular with curved corners or another shape which may withstand forces
generated by the pressure difference between the atmospheric pressure outside
the
separation vessel and the low pressure Pi inside the separation vessel. The
inlet 102 is
CA 02925718 2016-03-30
WO 2015/044079
PCT/EP2014/070111
11
arranged at about 75% of the height of the separation vessel to ensure that
there is no
detrimental interference between the injected liquid and the liquid already
present in the
separation vessel. Examples of detrimental interference could be aeration of
the liquid or
excessive generation of foam.
For obvious reasons there are similarities between the present invention
according
to any of its embodiments and the prior art, at least in terms of the result
to be achieved.
However, a fundamental difference is that while the background art focuses on
affecting
the conditions at some location after the valve, most commonly the pressure
and
temperature in the expansion vessel, the present invention by one or more
embodiments
starts by focusing on affecting how the fluid transitions from the conditions
upstream the
valve to the conditions downstream the valve, and on processing of the liquid
prior to it
reaching the separation vessel. Some parameters to adjust are the pressure
upstream the
valve and the pressure downstream the valve. In this way the pressure drop
over the valve
may be controlled. The dimensions of the restriction in the valve will in turn
affect the
flow velocity through the valve and thus the transition time. Subjecting the
fluid to an
instantaneous and significant pressure drop will induce nucleation.
Experiments reveal
that the nucleation of (gas) bubbles occurs in the entire volume of the fluid,
i.e. a
homogenous nucleation, and that it therefore facilitates an efficient
deaeration. For one or
more embodiments of the present invention it is preferred that even if the
equilibrium
pressure and temperature downstream the valve are such that the fluid does not
flash, the
minimum pressure caused by the restriction still will induce cavitations in
the fluid,
which also will facilitates deaeration.
