Language selection

Search

Patent 2934867 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2934867
(54) English Title: CORROSION RESISTANT DUPLEX STEEL ALLOY, OBJECTS MADE THEREOF, AND METHOD OF MAKING THE ALLOY
(54) French Title: ALLIAGE D'ACIER DUPLEX RESISTANT A LA CORROSION, OBJETS CONSTITUES DE CELUI-CI ET PROCEDE DE FABRICATION DE L'ALLIAGE
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22C 38/40 (2006.01)
  • B01J 19/02 (2006.01)
  • B22F 3/15 (2006.01)
  • F28F 9/02 (2006.01)
  • F28F 21/08 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LARSSON, LINN (Sweden)
  • GULLBERG, DANIEL (Sweden)
  • KIVISAKK, ULF (Sweden)
  • OSTLUND, MARTIN (Sweden)
  • SCHEERDER, ALEXANDER ALEIDA ANTONIUS (Netherlands (Kingdom of the))
(73) Owners :
  • STAMICARBON B.V. (Netherlands (Kingdom of the))
(71) Applicants :
  • STAMICARBON B.V. (Netherlands (Kingdom of the))
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2023-07-11
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2014-12-23
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2015-07-02
Examination requested: 2019-10-16
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/NL2014/050902
(87) International Publication Number: WO2015/099530
(85) National Entry: 2016-06-22

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
13199704.1 European Patent Office (EPO) 2013-12-27

Abstracts

English Abstract

Disclosed is a Hot Isostatic Pressed ferritic-austenitic steel alloy, as well objects thereof. The elementary composition of the alloy comprises, in percentages by weight: C 0 - 0.05; Si 0 - 0.8; Mn 0 - 4.0; Cr more than 29 - 35; Ni 3.0 - 10; Mo 0 - 4.0; N 0.30 - 0.55; Cu 0 0.8; W 0 - 3.0; S 0 - 0.03; Ce 0 0.2; the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities. The objects can be particularly useful in making components for a urea production plant that require processing such as machining or drilling. A preferred use is in making, or replacing, liquid distributors as used in a stripper as is typically present in the high-pressure synthesis section of a urea plant.


French Abstract

L'invention porte sur un alliage d'acier ferritique-austénitique ayant subi une compression isostatique à chaud, ainsi que sur des objets constitués de celui-ci. La composition élémentaire de l'alliage comprend, en pourcentages en poids : 0 à 0,05 % de C ; 0 à 0,8 % de Si ; 0 à 4,0 % de Mn ; plus de 29 à 35 % de Cr ; 3,0 à 10 % de Ni ; 0 à 4,0 % de Mo ; 0,30 à 0,55 % de N ; 0 à 0,8 % de Cu ; 0 à 3,0 % de W ; 0 à 0,03 % de S ; 0 à 0,2 % de Ce ; le reste étant du Fe et des impuretés inévitables. Les objets peuvent être particulièrement utiles en fabrication de composants pour une installation de production d'urée qui nécessitent une opération telle qu'un usinage ou un perçage. La fabrication, ou le remplacement, de distributeurs de liquide, tels qu'utilisés dans une colonne d'extraction au gaz telle que typiquement présente dans la section de synthèse à haute pression d'une installation de production d'urée, est une utilisation préférée.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


81797887
CLAIMS:
1. Use of
an object obtained by subjecting a ferritic-austenitic steel alloy powder
to hot isostatic pressing, wherein the ferritic-austenitic steel powder
consists of, in
percentages by weight:
C 0-0.05;
Si 0-0.8;
Mn 0-4.0;
Cr 26-35;
Ni 3.0-10;
Mo 0-4.0;
N 0.30-0.55;
Cu 0-1.0;
W 0-3.0;
S 0-0.03;
Ce 0-0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities; as a construction material
for a component for a urea manufacturing plant, wherein the component is in
contact with a fluid selected from the group consisting of carbamate solutions
and
ammonia and carbon dioxide containing gases, and wherein the component
comprises one or more surfaces resulting from the object having been processed
by a
technique selected from the group consisting of machining, drilling, and
combinations thereof.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
36
2. The use according to claim 1, wherein the component is in contact with
the
fluid in the synthesis section of said plant under condensing conditions.
3. The use according to claim 1 or 2, wherein, in the ferritic-austenitic
steel
alloy, the austenite spacing, as determined on a sample by DNV-RP-F112,
Section 7, using the sample preparation according to ASTM E 3-01, is smaller
than
20 inn; and wherein the largest average austenite phase length/width ratio
selected
from the average austenite phase length/width ratio determined in three cross-
sections of a sample as needed, the cross-sections taken at three
perpendicular
planes of a sample is smaller than 5;
the average austenite phase length/width ratio being determined by the
following procedure:
i. preparing the cross-cuts surfaces of the sample;
ii. polishing the surfaces using diamond paste on a rotating disc with a
particle size of first 6 tim and subsequently 31.1m to create a polished
surface;
iii. etching the surfaces using Murakami's agent for up to 30 seconds at 20 C
thereby coloring the ferrite phase, the agent being provided by preparing a
saturated solution by mixing 30 g potassium hydroxide and 30 g K3Fe(CN)6 in
100 ml H20, and allowing the solution to cool down to room temperature before
use;
iv. observing the cross-cut surfaces in etched condition under an optical
microscope with a magnification selected such that phase boundaries are
distinguishable;
v. projecting a cross-grid over the image, wherein the grid has a grid
distance
adapted to observe the austenite-ferrite phase boundaries;
vi. randomly selecting at least ten grid crossings on the grid such that the
grid crossings can be identified as being in the austenite phase;
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
37
vii. determining, at each of the ten grid crossings, the austenite phase
length/width ratio by measuring the length and the width of the austenite
phase,
wherein the length is the longest uninterrupted distance when drawing a
straight
line between two points at the phase boundary, the phase boundary being the
transition from an austenitic phase to the ferrite phase; and wherein the
width is
defined as the longest uninterrupted distance measured perpendicular to the
length
in the same phase;
calculating the average austenite phase/width ratio as the numerical average
of the austenite phase length/width ratios of the ten measured austenite phase

length/width ratios.
4. The use according to claim 3, wherein the sample on which the
measurement
is performed has at least one dimension of greater than 5 mm.
5. The use according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the elementary
composition of the alloy consists of, in percentages by weight:
C 0-0.030;
Mn 0.8-1.50;
S 0-0.03;
Si 0-0.50;
Cr 28.0-30.0;
Ni 5.8-7.5;
Mo 1.50-2.60;
W 0-3.0;
Cu 0-0.80;
N 0.30-0.40;
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
38
Ce 0-0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities.
6. The use according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the elementary
composition consists of, in percentages by weight:
C 0-0.03;
Si 0-0.5;
Mn 0.3-1;
Cr 29-33;
Ni 3-10;
Mo 1.0-1.3;
N 0.36-0.55;
Cu 0-1.0;
W 0-2.0;
S 0-0.03;
Ce 0-0.2;
the remainder being Fe and unavoidable impurities, the ferrite content being
30-70% by volume.
7. The use according to any one of claims 3 to 6, wherein said austenite
spacing
is smaller than 15 pn.
8. The use according to any one of claims 3 to 6, wherein said austenite
spacing
is in the range of from 8-15 m.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
39
9. The use according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the component is
selected from the group consisting of a liquid distributor, a radar cone, a
valve, a
control valve, and an ejector.
10. The use according to claim 9, wherein said one or more surfaces are the

drilled holes of a liquid distributor.
11. Liquid distributor for a stripper in a urea manufacturing plant, the
liquid
distributor being an object as defined in any one of claims 1 to 9.
12. A plant for the production of urea, said plant comprising one or more
components made by subjecting an object as defined in any one of claims 1 to 9
to a
processing technique selected from the group consisting of machining, drilling
and
combinations thereof.
13. The plant according to claim 12, wherein the components are selected
from
the group consisting of liquid distributors, radar cones, valves, control
valves, and
ejectors.
14. The plant according to claim 13, comprising a high pressure urea
synthesis
section comprising a stripper, wherein the stripper comprises at least one
liquid
distributor according to claim 11.
15. A method of modifying an existing plant for the production of urea,
said plant
comprising one or more components selected from the group consisting of liquid

distributors, radar cones, valves, control valves, and ejectors,
the method comprising replacing one or more of the components by a
corresponding replacement component, said replacement component being an
object
as defined in any one of claims 1 to 8.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the replacement component is
subjected to a processing technique selected from the group consisting of
machining,
drilling and combinations thereof.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
17. The method according to claim 15 or 16, wherein the component to be
replaced is an object made from a ferritic-austenitic steel alloy having an
elementary composition as defined in any one of claims 1, 2, 4, and 5, and
subjected
to a processing technique selected from the group consisting of machining,
drilling
and combinations thereof.
18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the existing plant comprises
a
stripper the tubes and liquid distributors of which are made from said
ferritic-
austenitic alloy, the method comprising replacing the liquid distributors by
liquid
distributors according to claim 11.
19. A liquid distributor for a stripper in a urea manufacturing plant,
wherein the
liquid distributor is a ferritic-austenitic steel alloy component, wherein the
ferritic-
austenitic steel alloy consists of, in percentages by weight:
C 0 ¨ 0.05;
Si 0 ¨ 0.8;
Mn 0 ¨ 4.0;
Cr 26 ¨ 35;
Ni 3.0 ¨ 10;
Mo 0 ¨ 4.0;
N 0.30 ¨ 0.55;
Cu 0 ¨ 1.0;
W 0 ¨ 3.0;
S 0 ¨ 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
41
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities;
wherein the ferritic-austenitic steel alloy has an austenite spacing smaller
than 20 m as determined by DNV-RP-F112, Section 7, with sample preparation
according to ASTM E 3 ¨ 01; and wherein said alloy has a largest average
austenite
phase length/width ratio smaller than 5;
wherein the largest average austenite phase length/width ratio is determined
by determining the average austenite phase length/width ratio in three cross-
sections of a sample of the ferritic austenitic steel alloy to give three
average
austenite phase length/width ratios and selecting the largest one of said
three
average austenite phase length/width ratios;
wherein in each cross section the austenite phase length/width ratio is
determined by the following procedure:
i. preparing the cross-cuts surfaces of the sample;
polishing the surfaces using diamond paste on a rotating disc with a
particle size of first 6 jim and subsequently 3 gm to create a polished
surface;
iii. etching the surfaces using Murakami's agent for up to 30 seconds at
20 C thereby coloring the ferrite phase, the agent being provided by preparing
a
saturated solution by mixing 30 g potassium hydroxide and 30 g K3Fe(CN)6 in
100 ml H20, and allowing the solution to cool down to room temperature before
use;
iv. observing the cross-cut surfaces in etched condition under an optical
microscope with a magnification selected such that phase boundaries are
distinguishable;
v. projecting a cross-grid over the image, wherein the grid has a grid
distance adapted to observe the austenite-ferrite phase boundaries;
vi. randomly selecting at least ten grid crossings on the grid such that
the
grid crossings can be identified as being in the austenite phase;
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
42
vii. determining, at each of the ten grid crossings, the austenite phase
length/width ratio by measuring the length and the width of the austenite
phase,
wherein the length is the longest uninterrupted distance when drawing a
straight
line between two points at the phase boundary, the phase boundary being the
transition from an austenitic phase to the ferrite phase; and wherein the
width is
defined as the longest uninterrupted distance measured perpendicular to the
length
in the same phase; and
calculating the average austenite phase length/width ratio as the numerical
average of the austenite phase length/width ratios of the ten measured
austenite
phase length/width ratios.
20. The liquid distributor of claim 19, wherein the sample on which the
measurement is performed has at least one dimension of greater than 5 mm.
21. The liquid distributor of claim 19 or 20, wherein said austenite
spacing is
smaller than 15 pm.
22. The liquid distributor of any one of claims 19 to 21, wherein the
elementary
composition of the alloy consists of, in percentages by weight:
C 0 ¨ 0.030;
Mn 0.8 ¨ 1.50;
S 0 ¨ 0.03;
Si 0 ¨ 0.50;
Cr 28.0 ¨ 30.0;
Ni 5.8¨ 7.5;
Mo 1.50 ¨ 2.60;
W 0 ¨ 3.0;
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
43
Cu 0 ¨ 0.80;
N 0.30 ¨ 0.40;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities.
23. The liquid distributor of any one of claims 19 to 21, wherein the
elementary
composition consists of, in percentages by weight:
C 0 ¨ 0.03;
Si 0 ¨ 0.5;
Mn 0.3 ¨ 1;
Cr 29 ¨ 33;
Ni 3 ¨ 10;
Mo 1.0 ¨ 1.3;
N 0.36 ¨ 0.55;
Cu 0 ¨ 1.0;
W 0 ¨ 2.0;
S 0 ¨ 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the remainder being Fe and unavoidable impurities, the ferrite content
being 30-70 % by volume.
24. The liquid distributor of any one of claims 19 to 23, wherein said
liquid
distributor comprises drilled holes.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
44
25. A plant for the production of urea, said plant comprising one or more
components which are ferritic-austenitic steel alloy components, wherein the
components are selected from the group consisting of liquid distributors,
radar
cones, bodies of high pressure valves, bodies of high pressure control valves,
and
bodies of high pressure ejectors, wherein the ferritic-austenitic steel alloy
consists
of, in percentages by weight:
C 0 ¨ 0.05;
Si 0 ¨ 0.8;
Mn 0 ¨ 4.0;
Cr 26 ¨ 35;
Ni 3.0 ¨ 10;
Mo 0 ¨ 4.0;
N 0.30 ¨ 0.55;
Cu 0 ¨ 1.0;
W 0 ¨ 3.0;
S 0 ¨ 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities;
wherein, the ferritic-austenitic steel alloy has an austenite spacing smaller
than 20 m as determined by DNV-RP-F112, Section 7, with sample preparation
according to ASTM E 3 ¨ 01; and wherein said alloy has a largest average
austenite
phase length/width ratio smaller than 5;
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
wherein the largest average austenite phase length/width ratio is determined
by determining the average austenite phase length/width ratio in three cross-
sections of a sample of the ferritic austenitic steel alloy to give three
average
austenite phase length/width ratios and selecting the largest one of said
three
average austenite phase length/width ratios;
wherein in each cross section the austenite phase length/width ratio is
determined by the following procedure:
i. preparing the cross-cuts surfaces of the sample;
ii. polishing the surfaces using diamond paste on a rotating disc with a
particle size of first 6 gm and subsequently 3 inn to create a polished
surface;
iii. etching the surfaces using Murakami's agent for up to 30 seconds at
20 C thereby coloring the ferrite phase, the agent being provided by preparing
a
saturated solution by mixing 30 g potassium hydroxide and 30 g K3Fe(CN)6 in
100 ml H20, and allowing the solution to cool down to room temperature before
use;
iv. observing the cross-cut surfaces in etched condition under an optical
microscope with a magnification selected such that phase boundaries are
distinguishable;
v. projecting a cross-grid over the image, wherein the grid has a grid
distance adapted to observe the austenite-ferrite phase boundaries;
vi. randomly selecting at least ten grid crossings on the grid such that
the
grid crossings can be identified as being in the austenite phase;
vii. determining, at each of the ten grid crossings, the austenite phase
length/width ratio by measuring the length and the width of the austenite
phase,
wherein the length is the longest uninterrupted distance when drawing a
straight
line between two points at the phase boundary, the phase boundary being the
transition from an austenitic phase to the ferrite phase; and wherein the
width is
Date Reçue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
46
defined as the longest uninterrupted distance measured perpendicular to the
length
in the same phase;
calculating the average austenite phase length/width ratio as the numerical
average of the austenite phase length/width ratios of the ten measured
austenite
phase length/width ratios.
26. The plant of claim 25, comprising a high pressure urea synthesis
section
comprising a stripper, wherein said component is at least one liquid
distributor
comprised in said stripper.
27. The plant of claim 25, wherein said component comprises drilled holes.
28. The plant of any one of claims 25 to 27, wherein the sample on which
the
measurement is performed has at least one dimension of greater than 5 mm.
29. The plant of any one of claims 25 to 28, wherein said austenite spacing
is
smaller than 15 gm.
30. The plant of any one of claims 25 to 29, wherein the elementary
composition
of the alloy consists of, in percentages by weight:
C 0 ¨ 0.030;
Mn 0.8 ¨ 1.50;
S 0 ¨ 0.03;
Si 0 ¨ 0.50;
Cr 28.0 ¨ 30.0;
Ni 5.8¨ 7.5;
Mo 1.50 ¨ 2.60;
W 0 ¨ 3.0;
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
47
Cu 0 ¨ 0.80;
N 0.30 ¨ 0.40;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities.
31. The plant of any one of claims 25 to 29, wherein the elementary
composition
consists of, in percentages by weight:
C 0 ¨ 0.03;
Si 0 ¨ 0.5;
Mn 0.3 ¨ 1;
Cr 29 ¨ 33;
Ni 3 ¨ 10;
Mo 1.0 ¨ 1.3;
N 0.36 ¨ 0.55;
Cu 0 ¨ 1.0;
W 0 ¨ 2.0;
S 0 ¨ 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the remainder being Fe and unavoidable impurities, the ferrite content
being 30-70 % by volume.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
1
Title: CORROSION RESISTANT DUPLEX STEEL ALLOY, OBJECTS
MADE THEREOF, AND METHOD OF MAKING THE ALLOY
Field of the Invention
The invention pertains to corrosion resistant duplex steel (ferritic
austenitic steel) alloys. Particularly, the invention pertains to objects
made of said alloy, and to a process for producing said alloy. Further, the
invention pertains to a urea plant comprising components made from said
alloy, and to a method of modifying an existing urea plant.
Background of the invention
Duplex stainless steel refers to ferritic austenitic steel alloy. Such
steels have a microstructure comprising ferritic and austenitic phases. The
duplex steel alloy, to which the invention pertains, is characterized by a
high content of Cr and N and a low content of Ni. Background references
in this respect include WO 95/00674 and US 7,347,903. The duplex steels
described therein are highly corrosion resistant and can therefore be used,
e.g., in the highly corrosive environment of a urea manufacturing plant.
Urea (NH2CONH2) can be produced from ammonia and carbon
dioxide at elevated temperature (typically between 150 C and 250 C) and
pressure (typically between 12 and 40 MPa) in the urea synthesis section
of a urea plant. In this synthesis, two consecutive reaction steps can be
considered to take place. In the first step, ammonium carbamate is
formed, and in the next step, this ammonium carbamate is dehydrated so
as to provide urea, The first step (i) is exothermic, and the second step can
be represented as an endothermic equilibrium reaction (ii):
(i) 2NH3 + CO2 H2N ¨ CO ¨ ONH4
(ii) H2N ¨ CO ¨ ONH4<¨> H2N ¨ CO ¨NH2 H20

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
2
In a typical urea production plant, the foregoing reactions are
conducted in a urea synthesis section so as to result in an aqueous solution
comprising urea. In one or more subsequent concentration sections, this
solution is concentrated to eventually yield urea in the form of a melt
rather than a solution. This melt is further subjected to one or more
finishing steps, such as prilling, granulation, pelletizing or compacting.
A frequently used process for the preparation of urea according to a
stripping process is the carbon dioxide stripping process, as for example
described in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Vol. A27,
1996, pp 333-350. In this process, the synthesis section is followed by one
or more recovery sections. The synthesis section comprises a reactor, a
stripper, a condenser and, preferably but not necessarily, a scrubber in
which the operating pressure is in between 12 and 18 114Pa, such as in
between 13 and 16 MPa. In the synthesis section, the urea solution leaving
the urea reactor is fed to a stripper in which a large amount of non-
converted ammonia and carbon dioxide is separated from the aqueous
urea solution.
Such a stripper can be a shell- and tube-heat exchanger in which
the urea solution is fed to the top part at the tube side and a carbon
.. dioxide feed, for use in urea synthesis, is added to the bottom part of the
stripper. At the shell side, steam is added to heat the solution. The urea
solution leaves the heat exchanger at the bottom part, while the vapor
phase leaves the stripper at the top part. The vapor leaving said stripper
contains ammonia, carbon dioxide, inert gases and a small amount of
water.
Said vapor is condensed in a falling film type heat exchanger or a
submerged type of condenser that can be a horizontal type or a vertical
type. A horizontal type submerged heat exchanger is described in
Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Vol. A27, 1996, pp 333-
350. The formed solution, which contains condensed ammonia, carbon
dioxide, water and urea, is recirculated together with the non-condensed
ammonia, carbon dioxide and inert vapor.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
3
The processing conditions are highly corrosive, particularly due to
the hot carbamate solution. In the past, this presented a problem in the
sense that the urea manufacturing equipment, even though made from
stainless steel, would corrode and be prone to early replacement.
This has been resolved, particularly by making the equipment, i.e.
the relevant parts thereof subjected to the mentioned corrosive conditions,
from a duplex steel described in WO 95/00674 (also known by the
trademark of Safurext). However, even though the foregoing reflects a
major advancement in urea production, a particular problem exists in the
stripper. A typical carbamate stripper comprises a plurality (several
thousand) of tubes. Through the tubes, a liquid film runs downwards
whilst stripping gas (typically CO2) runs upwards. Provisions are
generally made to ensure that all tubes have the same load of liquid so as
to have a flow of the liquid at the same speed. For, if the liquid does not
flow through all of the tubes at the same speed, the efficiency of the
stripper is reduced. These provisions comprise a liquid distributor,
generally in the form of a cylinder with small holes in it.
It has been experienced that the liquid distributors need a relatively
frequent replacement. Particularly, the size and shape of the holes
changes with time, apparently as a result of corrosion, despite the fact
that the liquid distributors are made from corrosion-resistant duplex steel
as mentioned above. Thus, the affected distributors result in a different
throughput of liquid in the stripper, as a result of which the desired equal
loading of the stripper's tubes is less efficient.
It is therefore desired in the art to provide a corrosion resistant
material that would provide the liquid distributors in the stripper with a
better corrosion endurance.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
4
Summary of the invention
In order to address one or more of the foregoing desires, the present
invention, in one aspect, provides a ferritic-austenitic steel alloy,
the elementary composition of which comprises, in percentages by
weight:
0 - 0.05;
Si 0 - 0.8;
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr 26 - 35;
Ni 3.0 - 10;
Mo 0 - 4.0;
0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 - 1.0;
W 0 - 3.0;
0 - 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities;
wherein the austenite spacing, as determined by DNV-RP-F112, Section 7,
using the sample preparation according to ASTM E 3 ¨01, is smaller than
20 gm, such as smaller than 15 gm, such as in the range of from 8- 15
on a sample; and wherein the largest average austenite phase
length/width ratio selected from the average austenite phase length/width
ratio determined in three cross-sections of a sample as needed, the cross-
sections taken at three perpendicular planes of a sample is smaller than 5,
such as smaller than 3, such as smaller than 2;
the average austenite phase length/width ratio being determined by the
following procedure:
i. preparing the cross-cuts surfaces of the sample;
ii. polishing the surfaces using diamond paste on a rotating disc with a
particle size of first 6 gm and subsequently 3 gm to create a
polished surface;

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
etching the surfaces using Murakami's agent for up to 30 seconds at
20 C thereby coloring the ferrite phase, the agent being provided by
preparing a saturated solution by mixing 30 g potassium hydroxide
and 30 g K3Fe(CN)6 in 100 ml H20, and allowing the solution to cool
5 down to room temperature before use;
iv. observing the cross-cut surfaces in etched condition under an optical
microscope with a magnification selected such that phase
boundaries are distinguishable;
v. projecting a cross-grid over the image, wherein the grid has a grid
distance adapted to observe the austenite-ferrite phase boundaries;
vi. randomly selecting at least ten grid crossings on the grid such that
the grid crossings can be identified as being in the austenite phase;
vii. determining, at each of the ten grid crossings, the austenite phase
length/width ratio by measuring the length and the width of the
austenite phase, wherein the length is the longest uninterrupted
distance when drawing a straight line between two points at the
phase boundary, the phase boundary being the transition from an
austenitic phase to the ferrite phase; and wherein the width is
defined as the longest uninterrupted distance measured
perpendicular to the length in the same phase;
viii. calculating the average austenite phase length/width ratio as the
numerical average of the austenite phase length/width ratios of the
ten measured austenite phase length/width ratios.
In one embodiment of the present invention the sample on which the
measurement is performed has at least one dimension, such as length,
width, or height, greater than 5 mm.
In another aspect, the invention presents a formed object obtainable
by subjecting a ferritic-austenitic alloy powder to hot isostatic pressing,
wherein the ferritic-austenitic alloy powder comprises, in percentages by
weight:
0 - 0.05;
Si 0 - 0.8;

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
6
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr 26 - 35;
Ni 3.0 - 10;
Mo 0 - 4.0;
N 0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 - 1.0;
W 0 - 3.0;
0 - 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities.
In yet another aspect, the invention relates to the use of a ferritic-
austenitic alloy as defined hereinabove or hereinafter as a construction
material for a component for a urea manufacturing plant, wherein the
component is intended to be in contact with a carbamate solution, and
wherein the components comprise one or more machined or drilled
surfaces.
In a still further aspect, the invention provides a method of
manufacturing an object of a corrosion-resistant ferritic-austenitic alloy,
the method comprising the steps of:
a. melting a ferritic-austenitic alloy comprising, in percentages by
weight:
0 - 0.05;
Si 0 - 0.8;
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr 26 - 35;
Ni 3.0 - 10;
Mo 0 - 4.0;
N 0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 - 1.0;
W 0 - 3.0;
0 - 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
7
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities;
b. atomizing the melt to produce a powder with a mean particle size in
the range of about 100-150 gm and a maximum particle size of
about 500 gm;
c. providing a mold defining the shape of the object to be produced;
d. filling at least a portion of the mold with the powder;
e. submitting said mold, as filled under d., to Hot Isostatic Pressing
(HIP) at a predetermined temperature, a predetermined pressure
and for a predetermined time so that the particles of said powder
bond metallurgically to each other to produce the object.
In a further aspect, the invention relates to a liquid distributor for a
carbamate stripper in a urea manufacturing plant, the liquid distributor
being an object as described above.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a plant for the production
of urea, said plant comprising a high pressure urea synthesis section
comprising a reactor, a stripper, and a condenser, wherein the stripper
comprises liquid distributors as described above.
In a still further aspect, the invention provides a method of
modifying an existing plant for the production of urea, said plant
comprising a stripper having tubes and liquid distributors made from a
corrosion-resistant ferritic-austenitic alloy comprising, in percentages by
weight:
0 - 0.05;
Si 0 - 0.8;
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr 26 - 35:
Ni 3.0 - 10;
Mo 0 - 4.0;
0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 - 1.0;
W 0 - 3.0;
0 - 0.03;

81797887
8
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities; the method
comprising replacing the liquid distributors by liquid distributors as
described
above.
In another aspect, the invention provides use of an object obtained by
subjecting a ferritic-austenitic steel alloy powder to hot isostatic pressing,

wherein the ferritic-austenitic steel powder consists of, in percentages by
weight: C 0 - 0.05; Si 0 - 0.8; Mn 0 - 4.0; Cr 26 - 35; Ni 3.0 - 10; Mo 0 -
4.0; N
0.30 - 0.55; Cu 0 - 1.0; W 0 - 3.0; S 0 - 0.03; Ce 0 - 0.2; the balance being
Fe and
unavoidable impurities; as a construction material for a component for a urea
manufacturing plant, wherein the component is in contact with a fluid
selected from the group consisting of carbamate solutions and ammonia and
carbon dioxide containing gases, and wherein the component comprises one or
more surfaces resulting from the object having been processed by a technique
selected from the group consisting of machining, drilling, and combinations
thereof.
In another aspect, the invention provides liquid distributor for a
stripper in a urea manufacturing plant, the liquid distributor being an object

as described herein.
In a further aspect, the invention provides a plant for the production of
urea, said plant comprising one or more components made by subjecting an
object as described herein to a processing technique selected from the group
consisting of machining, drilling and combinations thereof.
In a further aspect, the invention provides a method of modifying an
existing plant for the production of urea, said plant comprising one or more
components selected from the group consisting of liquid distributors, radar
cones, valves, control valves, and ejectors, the method comprising replacing
one or more of the components by a corresponding replacement component,
said replacement component being an object as described herein.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-06-07

81797887
8a
In a further aspect, the invention provides a liquid distributor for a
stripper in a urea manufacturing plant, wherein the liquid distributor is a
ferritic-austenitic steel alloy component, wherein the ferritic-austenitic
steel
alloy consists of, in percentages by weight: C 0 ¨ 0.05; Si 0 ¨ 0.8; Mn 0 ¨
4.0;
Cr 26¨ 35; Ni 3.0 ¨ 10; Mo 0 ¨ 4.0; N 0.30 ¨ 0.5; Cu 0 ¨ 1.0; W 0 ¨ 3.0; S 0 ¨
0.03; Ce 0¨ 0.2; the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities; wherein the
ferritic-austenitic steel alloy has an austenite spacing smaller than 20 m as
determined by DNV-RP-F112, Section 7, with sample preparation according to
ASTM E 3 ¨ 01; and wherein said alloy has a largest average austenite phase
length/width ratio smaller than 5; wherein the largest average austenite
phase length/width ratio is determined by determining the average austenite
phase length/width ratio in three cross-sections of a sample of the ferritic
austenitic steel alloy to give three average austenite phase length/width
ratios
and selecting the largest one of said three average austenite phase
length/width ratios; wherein in each cross section the austenite phase
length/width ratio is determined by the following procedure: i. preparing the
cross-cuts surfaces of the sample; ii. polishing the surfaces using diamond
paste on a rotating disc with a particle size of first 6 gm and
subsequently 3 m to create a polished surface; iii. etching the surfaces
using
Murakami's agent for up to 30 seconds at 20 C thereby coloring the ferrite
phase, the agent being provided by preparing a saturated solution by mixing
g potassium hydroxide and 30 g K3Fe(CN)6 in 100 ml H20, and allowing the
solution to cool down to room temperature before use; iv. observing the cross-
cut surfaces in etched condition under an optical microscope with a
25 magnification selected such that phase boundaries are distinguishable;
v.
projecting a cross-grid over the image, wherein the grid has a grid distance
adapted to observe the austenite-ferrite phase boundaries; vi. randomly
selecting at least ten grid crossings on the grid such that the grid crossings

can be identified as being in the austenite phase; vii. determining, at each
of
30 the ten grid crossings, the austenite phase length/width ratio by
measuring
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-06-07

81797887
8b
the length and the width of the austenite phase, wherein the length is the
longest uninterrupted distance when drawing a straight line between two
points at the phase boundary, the phase boundary being the transition from
an austenitic phase to the ferrite phase; and wherein the width is defined as
the longest uninterrupted distance measured perpendicular to the length in
the same phase; and calculating the average austenite phase length/width
ratio as the numerical average of the austenite phase length/width ratios of
the ten measured austenite phase length/width ratios.
In a further aspect, the invention provides a plant for the production of
urea, said plant comprising one or more components which are ferritic-
austenitic steel alloy components, wherein the components are selected from
the group consisting of liquid distributors, radar cones, bodies of high
pressure
valves, bodies of high pressure control valves, and bodies of high pressure
ejectors, wherein the ferritic-austenitic steel alloy consists of, in
percentages
by weight: C 0 ¨0.05; Si 0 ¨ 0.8; Mn 0¨ 4.0; Cr 26¨ 35; Ni 3.0¨ 10; Mo 0 ¨
4.0; N 0.30¨ 0.55; Cu 0 ¨ 1.0; W 0 ¨ 3.0; S 0 ¨ 0.03; Ce 0 ¨0.2; the balance
being Fe and unavoidable impurities; wherein, the ferritic-austenitic steel
alloy has an austenite spacing smaller than 20gm as determined by DNV-RP-
F112, Section 7, with sample preparation according to ASTM E 3 ¨ 01; and
wherein said alloy has a largest average austenite phase length/width ratio
smaller than 5; wherein the largest average austenite phase length/width
ratio is determined by determining the average austenite phase length/width
ratio in three cross-sections of a sample of the ferritic austenitic steel
alloy to
give three average austenite phase length/width ratios and selecting the
largest one of said three average austenite phase length/width ratios; wherein
in each cross section the austenite phase length/width ratio is determined by
the following procedure: i. preparing the cross-cuts surfaces of the sample;
ii.
polishing the surfaces using diamond paste on a rotating disc with a particle
size of first 6 gm and subsequently 3 gm to create a polished surface; iii.
etching the surfaces using Murakami's agent for up to 30 seconds at 20 C
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
8c
thereby coloring the ferrite phase, the agent being provided by preparing a
saturated solution by mixing 30 g potassium hydroxide and 30 g K3Fe(CN)6 in
100 ml 1120, and allowing the solution to cool down to room
temperature before use; iv. observing the cross-cut surfaces in etched
condition
under an optical microscope with a magnification selected such that phase
boundaries are distinguishable; v. projecting a cross-grid over the image,
wherein the grid has a grid distance adapted to observe the austenite-ferrite
phase boundaries; vi. randomly selecting at least ten grid crossings on the
grid
such that the grid crossings can be identified as being in the austenite
phase;
vii. determining, at each of the ten grid crossings, the austenite phase
length/width ratio by measuring the length and the width of the austenite
phase, wherein the length is the longest uninterrupted distance when drawing
a straight line between two points at the phase boundary, the phase boundary
being the transition from an austenitic phase to the ferrite phase; and
wherein
the width is defined as the longest uninterrupted distance measured
perpendicular to the length in the same phase; calculating the average
austenite phase length/width ratio as the numerical average of the austenite
phase length/width ratios of the ten measured austenite phase length/width
ratios.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig.1 to Fig.5 are microscopic pictures of test specimens referred to in
Example 1.
Fig. 6 is a schematic drawing indicating the cross sections applied in
Examples 2 and 3.
Fig. 7 presents microscopic pictures of cross sections of samples subjected to

the corrosion test according to Example 2.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

81797887
8d
Detailed description of the invention
In a broad sense, the invention is based on the judicious insight that
the still occurring corrosion in the liquid distributors in a urea stripper,
is
affected by cross-cut end attack. This refers to corrosion taking place at a
surface created by making a cross-cut. This type of corrosion is different
from
other types of corrosion, such as fatigue corrosion (mechanical fatigue in a
chemical environment), chloride stress corrosion cracking, erosion corrosion
(particle abrasion in chemical environment), crevice corrosion or pitting
corrosion.
The inventors came to the surprising finding that by manufacturing
components from HIPed ferritic-austenitic alloy which alloy is defined
hereinabove or hereinafter, any cross cut surface created in the said
component either by drilling or machining operation will have reduced and/or
eliminated vulnerability to cross-cut end-attack.
The inventors also came to the surprising finding that the overall
weight loss of said components as a result of corrosion is significantly less
compared to identical components made of similar ferritic-austenitic steel
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-30

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
9
but not produced via the HIP method (i.e. via hot extrusion followed by
cold working). It has been found that the HIPed material will be isotropic
as to the distribution and shape of the phases (or microstructure). It will
be understood that the material is necessarily anisotropic on a microscale
due to the two-phase nature of the duplex steel. Also, in HIPed material, a
single grain is anisotropic due to its crystal structure. A large selection of

grains with random orientation will be isotropic on a meso- or macroscale.
These scales can be understood to relate to the size of the austenite
spacing. In a HIPed duplex component, said spacing is generally between
8-15 urn.
The ferritic-austenitic alloy and the objects, in the present invention
are obtainable by subjecting a ferritic-austenitic steel alloy powder to hot
isostatic pressing, wherein the ferritic-austenitic steel powder comprises,
in percentages by weight:
C 0 - 0.05;
Si 0 - 0.8;
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr 26 - 35:
Ni 3.0 - 10;
Mo 0 - 4.0;
0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 - 1.0;
W 0 - 3.0;
0 - 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities.
The alloy, and objects, so obtainable can be particularly
characterized with reference to the austenite spacing and average
austenite phase length/width ratio, as indicated above.
In the described experiments, inter alia, an optical microscope is
used for observing the cross-cut surfaces in etched condition of a sample.
The microscope can be any optical microscope suitable for metallographic

81797887
examinations. The magnification is selected so that phase boundaries are
distinguishable. The skilled person will normally be able to assess whether
phase boundaries are visible, and will thus be able to select the appropriate
magnification. According to DNV RP F112, a magnification should be selected
5 such that 10-15 micro-structural units are intersected by each line (a
straight
line drawn through the image). A typical magnification is 100x-400x.
In the experiments, a cross-grid is projected over the image, wherein the
grid has a grid distance adapted to observe the austenite-ferrite phase
boundaries. Typically, 20-40 grid crossings are provided.
10 The ferritic-austenitic steel alloy can be made in accordance with the
disclosures in WO 05/00674 or US 7,347,903. The skilled reader will be able to

produce the steel alloys with reference to these disclosures.
The elementary composition of the ferritic-austenitic steel alloy is
generally as defined hereinabove or hereinafter.
Carbon (C) is to be considered rather as an impurity element in the
present invention and has a limited solubility in both ferrite and austenite
phase. This limited solubility implies that a risk for carbide precipitations
exists at too high percentages, with decreased corrosion resistance as a
consequence. Therefore, the C-content should be restricted to maximally 0.05
wt%, such as maximally 0.03 wt%, such as maximally 0.02 wt%.
Silicon (Si) is used as a desoxidation additive at steel manufacture.
However, too high Si content increases the tendency for precipitations of
intermetallic phases and decreases the solubility of N. For this reason the Si

content should be restricted to max. 0.8 wt%, such as max. 0.6 wt%, such as in
the range of from 0.2-0.6 wt%, such as max 0.5 wt%.
Manganese (Mn) is added to increase the solubility of N and for
replacing Ni as an alloying element as Mn is considered to be austenite-
stabilizing. Suitably, a Mn content of between 0 and 4.0 wt% is chosen, such
as
between 0.8-1.50 wt%, such as 0.3-2.0 wt%, such as 0.3-1.0 wt%.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-06-07

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
11
Chromium (Cr) is the most active element for increasing the
resistance against most types of corrosion. At urea synthesis the Cr
content is of great importance for the resistance, wherefore the Cr content
should be maximized as far as possible out of a structure stability point of
view. In order to attain sufficient corrosion resistance in the austenite, the
Cr content should be in the range of from 26-35 wt%, such as in the range
of from 28-30 wt%, such as in the range of from 29-33 wt%. In an
interesting embodiment of the invention, the Cr content is more than 29%,
such as more than 29-33, such as more than 29 to 30. In another
interesting embodiment, the Cr content is more than 29.5%, such as more
than 29.5-33, such as more than 29.5 to 31, such as more than 29.5 to 30.
Nickel (Ni) is mainly used as an austenite stabilizing element and
its content should be kept as low as possible. An important reason for the
bad resistance of austenitic stainless steels in urea environments with low
contents of oxygen is supposed to be their relatively high content of Ni. In
the present invention, a content of from 3-10 wt% Ni is required, such as
3-7.5 wt% Ni, such as 4-9 wt%, such as 5-8 wt%, such as 6-8 wt.%, in order
to attain a ferrite content in the range of from 30 - 70% by volume.
Molybdenum (Mo) is used to improve the passivity of the alloy. Mo
together with Cr and N are those elements that most effectively increase
the resistance against pitting and crevice corrosion. Further, Mo
diminishes the tendency for precipitations of nitrides by increasing the
solid solubility of N. However, too high content of Mo involves the risk of
precipitations of intermetallic phases. Therefore, the Mo content should be
in the range of from 0 to 4.0 wt%, such as of from 1.0 to 3 wt%, such as of
from 1.50 to 2.60 wt%, such as of from 2-2.6 wt.%.
Nitrogen (N) is a strong austenite former and enhances the
reconstitution of austenite. Additionally, N influences the distribution of
Cr and Mo so that higher content of N increases the relative share of Cr
and Mo in the austenite phase. This means that the austenite becomes
more resistant to corrosion, also that higher contents of Cr and Mo may be
included into the alloy while the structure stability is maintained.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
12
However, it is well known that N suppresses the formation of intermetallic
phase, also in fully austenitic steels. Therefore, N should be in the range of

from 0.30 to 0.55 wt%, such as of from 0.30 to 0.40 wt%, such as of from
0.33 to 0.55 wt%, such as of from 0.36 to 0.55 wt%.
Copper (Cu) improves the general corrosion resistance in acid
environments, such as sulfuric acid. However, high content of Cu will
decrease the pitting and crevice corrosion resistance. Therefore, the
content of Cu should be restricted to max. 1.0 wt%, such as max. 0.8 wt%.
In an interesting embodiment of the invention, the Cu content particularly
.. is maximally 0.8%.
Tungsten (W) increases the resistance against pitting and crevice
corrosion. But too high content of W increases the risk for precipitation of
intermetallic phases, particularly in combination with high contents of Cr
and Mo. Therefore, the amount of W should be limited to max. 3.0 wt%,
such as max. 2.0 wt%.
Sulfur (S) influences the corrosion resistance negatively by the
formation of easily soluble sulfides. Therefore, the content of S should be
restricted to max. 0.03 wt%, such as max. 0.01 wt%, such as max. 0. 005
wt%, such as max. 0.001 wt%.
Cerium may be added to the ferritic-austenitic alloy in percentages
up to max. 0.2 wt%.
The ferrite content of the ferritic-austenitic alloy according to the
present invention is important for the corrosion resistance. Therefore, the
ferrite content should be in the range of from 30% to 70 % by volume, such
as in the range of from 30 to 60 vol.%, such as in the range of from 30 to 55
vol.%, such as in the range of from 40 to 60 vol.%.
When the term "max" is used, the skilled person knows that the
lower limit of the range is 0 wt% unless another number is specifically
stated.
According to the present invention, another composition comprises,
in percentages by weight:

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
13
C max. 0.03;
Mn 0.8 - 1.50;
S max. 0.03;
Si max. 0.50;
Cr 28 - 30;
Ni 5.8 - 7.5;
Mo 1.50 - 2.60;
Cu max. 0.80;
N 0.30 - 0.40;
W 0 ¨ 3.0;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
and the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities;
Yet another composition according to the present invention
comprises, in percentages by weight:
C max. 0.03;
Si max. 0.8; such as 0.2 - 0.6;
Mn 0.3 - 2; such as 0.3 - 1;
Cr 29 - 33;
Ni 3 ¨ 10; such as 4 - 9; such as 5 - 8; such as 6-8;
Mo 1 - 3; such as 1 - 1.3; such as 1.5 - 2.6; such as 2-2.6;
N 0.36 - 0.55;
Cu max. 1.0;
W max. 2.0;
S max. 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the remainder being Fe and unavoidable impurities, the ferrite
content being 30-70 % by volume, such as in the range of from 30 to 60
vol.%, such as in the range of from 30 to 55 vol.%, such as in the range of
from 40 to 60 vol.%.
In an interesting embodiment, the invention refers to a ferritic-
austenitic steel alloy, the elementary composition of which consists of, in
percentages by weight:

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
14
= 0 - 0.05;
Si 0 - 0.8;
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr more than 29 - 35;
Ni 3.0 - 10;
Mo 0 - 4.0;
= 0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 ¨ 0.8;
W 0 - 3.0;
S 0 - 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities;
wherein the austenite spacing, as determined on a sample by DNV-
RP-F112, Section 7, using the sample preparation according to ASTM E 3-
01, is smaller than 20 gm; and wherein the largest average austenite
phase length/width ratio selected from the average austenite phase
length/width ratio determined in three cross-sections of a sample as
needed, the cross-sections taken at three perpendicular planes of a sample
is smaller than 5;
the average austenite phase length/width ratio being determined by
the following procedure:
i. preparing the cross-cuts surfaces of the sample;
polishing the surfaces using diamond paste on a rotating disc
with a particle size of first 6 gm and subsequently 3 gm to create a
polished surface;
etching the surfaces using Murakami's agent for up to 30
seconds at 20 C thereby coloring the ferrite phase, the agent being
provided by preparing a saturated solution by mixing 30 g potassium
hydroxide and 30 g K3Fe(CN)6 in 100 m11120, and allowing the solution
to cool down to room temperature before use;

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
iv. observing the cross-cut surfaces in etched condition under an
optical microscope with a magnification selected such that phase
boundaries are distinguishable;
v. projecting a cross-grid over the image, wherein the grid has a
5 grid distance adapted to observe the austenite-ferrite phase boundaries;
vi. randomly selecting at least ten grid crossings on the grid
such that the grid crossings can be identified as being in the austenite
phase;
vii. determining, at each of the ten grid crossings, the austenite
10 phase length/width ratio by measuring the length and the width of the
austenite phase, wherein the length is the longest uninterrupted distance
when drawing a straight line between two points at the phase boundary,
the phase boundary being the transition from an austenitic phase to the
ferrite phase; and wherein the width is defined as the longest
15 uninterrupted distance measured perpendicular to the length in the same
phase;
calculating the average austenite phase length/width ratio as the
numerical average of the austenite phase length/width ratios of the ten
measured austenite phase length/width ratios;
and wherein the sample on which the measurement is performed
has at least one dimension greater than 5 mm.
In an embodiment hereof, the elementary composition comprises, in
percentages by weight:
0 - 0.030;
Mn 0.8 - 1.50;
0-0.03;
Si 0 - 0.50;
Cr more than 29 - 30.0;
Ni 5.8 - 7.5;
Mo 1.50 - 2.60;
W 0 - 3.0
Cu 0 - 0.80;

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
16
N 0.30-0.40
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance Fe and unavoidable impurities.
In a further embodiment the elementary composition comprises, in
percentages by weight:
C 0 - 0.03;
Si 0 - 0.5;
Mn 0.3 - 1;
Cr more than 29 - 33;
Ni 3 ¨ 10;
Mo 1.0 - 1.3;
N 0.36 - 0.55;
Cu 0 ¨ 0.8;
W 0 - 2.0;
S 0 - 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the remainder being Fe and unavoidable impurities.
In an interesting embodiment the invention providesan object
obtainable by subjecting a ferritic-austenitic steel (duplex steel) alloy
powder to hot isostatic pressing, wherein the duplex steel powder
comprises, in percentages by weight:
C 0 - 0.05;
Si 0 - 0.8;
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr more than 29 - 35;
Ni 3.0 - 10;
Mo 0 - 4.0;
N 0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 ¨ 0.8;
W 0 - 3.0;
S 0 - 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
17
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities;
Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) is a technique known in the art. As the
skilled person is aware, for the duplex steel alloy to be subjected to hot
isostatic pressing, it has to be provided in the form of a powder. Such
powder can be created by atomizing hot alloy, i.e. by spraying the hot alloy
through a nozzle whilst in a liquid state (thus forcing molten alloy through
an orifice) and allowing the alloy to solidify immediately thereafter.
Atomization is conducted at a pressure known to the skilled person as the
pressure will depend on the equipment used for performing atomization.
Preferably, the technique of gas atomization is employed, wherein a gas is
introduced into the hot metal alloy stream just before it leaves the nozzle,
serving to create turbulence as the entrained gas expands (due to heating)
and exits into a large collection volume exterior to the orifice. The
collection volume is preferably filled with gas to promote further
turbulence of the molten metal jet.
The D50 of the size distribution of the particles is usually of from 80-
130 gm.
The resulting powder is then transferred to a mold (i.e. a form
defining the shape of an object to be produced). A desired portion of the
mold is filled, and the filled mold is subjected to Hot Isostatic Pressing
(HIP) so that the particles of said powder bond metallurgically to each
other to produce the object. The HIP method according to the invention is
performed at a predetermined temperature, below the melting point of the
ferritic austenitic alloy, preferably in the range of from 1000-1200 C. The
predetermined isostatic pressure is > 900 bar, such as about 1000 bar and
the predetermined time is in the range of from 1-5 hours.
In accordance with the invention, the HIP process according to the
present disclosure may also be followed by heat treatment, such as
treating the obtained object at a temperature range of from 1000-1200 C
for 1-5 h with subsequent quenching.
At least part of the mold is to be filled, depending on whether or not
the entire object is made in a single HIP step. According to one

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
18
embodiment, the mold is fully filled, and the object is made in a single HIP
step. After the HIP, the object is removed from the mold. Usually this is
done by removing the mold itself, e.g. by machining or pickling.
The form of the object obtained is determined by the form of the
mold, and the degree of filling of the mold. Preferably, the mold is made
such as to provide the desired end-shape of the object. E.g., if a tubular
liquid distributor is to be made, the mold will serve to define a tube. The
aforementioned holes to be made into the liquid distributor can be suitably
made by drilling afterwards. Without wishing to be bound by theory, the
inventors believe that due to the isotropy of the specific HIP material as
defined hereinabove or hereinafter, the holes will be as corrosion-resistant
as the rest of the duplex alloy parts.
Thus, the present HIP method may be descibed accordingly:
In a first step, a form (mould, capsule) is provided defining at least
a portion of the shape or contour of the final object. The form is typically
manufactured from steel sheets, such as carbon steel sheets, which are
welded together. The form may have any shape and may be sealed by
welding after filling of the form. The form may also define a portion of the
final component. In that case, the form may be welded to a pre-
manufactured component , for example a forged or cast component. The
form does not have to have the final shape of the final object.
In a second step, the powder as defined hereinabove or hereinafter
is provided. The powder is a prealloyed powder with a particle
distribution, i.e. the powder comprises particles of different sizes, and a
particle size below 500 urn.
In a third step, the powder is poured into the form defining the
shape of the component. The form is thereafter sealed, for example by
welding. Prior to sealing the form, a vacuum may be applied to the powder
mixture, for example by the use of a vacuum pump. The vacuum removes
the air from the powder mixture. It is important to remove the air from
the powder mixture since air contains argon, which may have a negative
effect on ductility of the matrix.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
19
In a fourth step, the filled form is subjected to Hot Isostatic
Pressing (HIP) at a predetermined temperature, a predetermined isostatic
pressure and a for a predetermined time so that the particles of the alloy
bond metallurgical to each other. The form is thereby placed in a heatable
pressure chamber, normally referred to as a Hot Isostatic Pressing-
chamber (HIP-chamber).
The heating chamber is pressurized with gas, e.g. argon gas, to an
isostatic pressure in excess of 500 bar. Typically, the isostatic pressure is
above 900 ¨ 1100 bar, such as 950-1100 bar, and most preferably around
1000 bar. The chamber is heated to a temperature that is selected to below
the melting point of the material. The closer the temperature is to the
melting point, the higher is the risk for the formation of melted phases in
which brittle streaks could be formed. However, at low temperatures, the
diffusion process slows down and the HIP:ed material will contain residual
.. porosity and the metallic bond between materials become weak.
Consequently, the temperature is in the range of 1000-1200 C, preferably
1100-1200 C, and most preferably around 1150 C. The form is held in the
heating chamber at the predetermined pressure and the predetermined
temperature for a predetermined time period. The diffusion processes that
take place between the powder particles during HIP:ing are time
dependent so long times are preferred. Therefore the duration of the HIP-
step, once said pressure and temperature has been reached, is in the range
of 1-5 hours.
After HIP:ing the form is stripped from the consolidated component.
The final product may after the stripping be heat treated.
In this respect the invention, in another embodiment, relates to a
method of manufacturing an object of a ferritic-austenitic alloy,
comprising the steps of:
a) providing a form defining at least a portion of the shape of
said object; providing a powder mixture comprising in percentages by
weight:
0 - 0.05;

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
Si 0 - 0.8;
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr more than 29 - 35;
Ni 3.0 - 10;
5 Mo 0 - 4.0;
0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 ¨ 0.8;
W 0 - 3.0;
0 - 0.03;
10 Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities;
b) filling at least a portion of said form with said powder mixture;
c) subjecting said form to hot isostatic pressing at a predetermined
temperature, a predetermined isostatic pressure and for a predetermined
15 time so that the powder particles bond metallurgically to each other.
It will be understood that the objects made in accordance with the
invention as described hereinbefore and hereinafter are not limited to
liquid distributors. In fact, the ferritic-austenitic alloy as defined
hereinabove or hereinafter and the HIP method as described hereinabove
20 or hereinafter may also be used to manufacture any suitable object which
needs to fulfill the same requirements as mentioned hereinabove or
hereinafter. The added benefit of the present invention will be particularly
enjoyed in the event of objects that are to be used in a highly corrosive
environment and that, similar to the aforementioned liquid distributors,
.. contain surfaces that are prone to cross-cut end-attack.
A particular highly corrosive environment is that of the high
pressure synthesis section in a urea production plant. As discussed, one of
the parts in such a synthesis section where the present invention finds
particularly good usage, are the liquid distributors used in the stripper.
However, the present invention can also advantageously be used to
manufacture other components for the same type of synthesis section.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
21
These other components include radar cones amongst others. This
refers to the use of radar for the measurement of liquid level in a urea
reactor or in the high pressure stripper. These radar level measuring
systems are equipped with a radar cone which is exposed to the corrosive
environment prevailing in the said applications. The radar cone itself
represents a machined surface that can thus be further improved in
respect of corrosion-resistance, by being made in accordance with the
present invention.
Yet another area of application in urea plants is the body of high
pressure (control) valves or the body of a high pressure ejector. In order to
produce the bodies of the high pressure (control) valve or high pressure
ejector from corrosion-resistant ferritic-austenitic steel, machining,
drilling, or a combination thereof is required. Accordingly, also these parts
are vulnerable to cross cut end attack.
Thus, the invention, in this aspect, relates to the use of an object
according to the invention as described above, or as produced by a method
as described above, as a construction material for a component for a urea
manufacturing plant. Therein the component is intended to be in contact
with a carbamate solution, and comprises one or more machined surfaces.
Said use as a construction material, in one embodiment, is realized
by making the object according to the invention such that it largely, or
exactly, has the shape of the component for which it is to be used.
Typically, as in the case of liquid distributors (or also in radar cones, and
in respect valve bodies), this may mean that the shape is predetermined,
.. and that only holes have to be drilled into the object as produced by HIP.
Alternatively, the object produced is just a block (or any other indifferent
shape), upon which the desired final component can be made by employing
various machining techniques, such as turning, threading, drilling, sawing
and miffing, or a combination thereof, such as milling or sawing followed
by drilling. This can be particularly suitable in the event that the final
component has a relatively simple shape, such as a valve body.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
22
The invention, in a further aspect, also pertains to the
aforementioned components. Particularly, this refers to a component
selected from the group consisting of a liquid distributor, an instrument
housing exposed to corrosive liquid, such as a radar cone, a valve body or
body of an ejector. Preferably, the invention provides a liquid distributor
for a carbamate stripper in a urea manufacturing plant, the liquid
distributor being an object in accordance with the invention as defined
above, in any of the described embodiments, or as produced by the above
process of the invention, in any of the described embodiments.
It will be understood that the invention provides particular benefits
for the construction of urea plants. In this aspect, the invention thus also
pertains to a plant for the production of urea. Said plant comprises a high
pressure urea synthesis section comprising a reactor, a stripper, and a
condenser, wherein the stripper comprises liquid distributors according to
the invention as described hereinbefore. Similarly, the invention provides
urea plants comprising one or more other components obtainable by
subjecting corrosion resistant duplex steel, particularly as defined above,
to HIP. Such components particularly are radar cones or bodies of (control)
valves as well as ejectors.
The urea plant can be a so-called grass-roots plant, i.e. one built as
new. However, the invention also finds particular usage, with great
benefit, when it comes to modifying an existing plant for the production of
urea, especially where the existing plant has been made such as to employ
corrosion-resistant duplex steel in those parts, notably in the high-
.. pressure synthesis section of such a plant, that come into contact with
highly corrosive carbamate, under the highly corrosive conditions under
which the plant is operated. The HIPed ferritic-austenitic steel alloy as
defined hereinabove or hereinafter cannot only be used in an existing
plant which is constructed in conventional fully austenitic stainless steels
but also in plants constructed using high reactive materials such as
titanium or zirconium.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
23
In this respect, the present invention provides a method of
modifying an existing plant for the production of urea, said plant
comprising a stripper, the tubes and liquid distributors of which are made
from a corrosion-resistant fenitic-austenitic steel comprising, in
percentages by weight:
0 - 0.05;
Si 0 - 0.8;
Mn 0 - 4.0;
Cr 26 - 35;
Ni 3.0 - 10;
Mo 0 - 4.0;
0.30 - 0.55;
Cu 0 - 1.0;
W 0 - 3.0;
S 0 - 0.03;
Ce 0 ¨ 0.2;
the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities; the method comprising
replacing the liquid distributors by liquid distributors according to the
invention as described hereinbefore or hereinafter, i.e. obtainable by
subjecting corrosion resistant duplex steel, particularly as defined above,
to Hot Isostatic Pressing. In a similar aspect, the invention also pertains
to modifying such an existing urea plant, by replacing any desired
component made of corrosion-resistant ferritic-austenitic steel by a
component as described in accordance with the present invention. This
particularly refers to components comprising one or more machined
surfaces, and preferably selected from the group consisting of a liquid
distributor, a radar cone, and a valve body.
It is expressly foreseen that the invention, in all of its aspects as
described hereinbefore, including but not limited to the use as a
construction material for a component for a urea manufacturing plant and
including but not limited to the method of modifying an existing plant for
the production of urea, can be realized with reference to all of the

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
24
embodiments mentioned for the elementary composition of the ferritic-
austenitic alloy as described hereinbefore, or hereinafter.
The foregoing plants are described with reference to its main high-
pressure synthesis section components. The skilled person is fully aware of
which components are generally present in such plants, and how these
components are placed relative to each other and in connection with each
other. Reference is made to Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial
Chemistry, Vol 37, 2012, pp 657 ¨ 695.
Where in this description embodiments are discussed, combinations
of such embodiments, also if discussed separately, are expressly foreseen
according to the invention.
The invention is further illustrated with reference to the non-
limiting figures and examples discussed hereinafter. In the Examples, a
ferritic-austenitic alloy is subjected to hot isostatic pressing (HIP)
generally as follows:
In a first step, a form is provided. The form, also referred to as mold
or capsule, defines at least a portion of the shape or contour of the final
object. The form can be made of steel sheets, e.g. steel sheets which are
welded together.
In a second step, the alloy as defined hereinabove or hereinafter in
is provided in the form of a powder mixture. It is to be understood that the
powder mixture comprises particles of different sizes.
In a third step, the powder mixture is poured into the form that
defines the shape of the object. In a forth step, the filled form is subjected
to HIP at a predetermined temperature, a predetermined isostatic
pressure and for a predetermined time so that the particles of the alloy are
bound metallurgically to each other.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
Example 1
In this Example, samples of ferritic-austenitic alloys are provided which
have been produced by different production methods. The samples are
5 subjected to an investigation of their microstructure.
Five samples were selected. Four samples were of the grade Safurex, and
one additional was of the grade SAF 2507 (ex Sandvik) produced by the
HIP method. A list of the samples can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1 - List of the samples used in the investigation
Sample Grade Product Production method
1 SAF 2507 Bar 0 70 mm HIP
2 Safurex Bar o 60 mm HIP
3 Safurex Tube 25x2.5 mm Pilgered
4 Safurex Bar o 120 mm Rolled
5 Safurex Tube 37x6 mm Extruded
Metallographic specimens were prepared from the mentioned samples.
The specimens were prepared according to ASTM E 3 -01 [1] (preparation
method 2 for harder materials was used). Three sections were cut from
each sample in different directions; transverse section, radial longitudinal
section, and tangential longitudinal section according to the suggested
designation mentioned in ASTM E 3. The specimens were etched for up to
30 seconds in modified Murakami's reagent, thereby coloring the ferrite
phase. The etchant was prepared by mixing 30 g KOH and 30 g K3Fe(CN)6
in 60 ml H20, and was left to cool down to room temperature (20 C) before
use.
Sample 2 was prepared according to the following non-limiting example.
The alloy as defined hereinabove or hereinafter is gas atomised to form
spherical powder particles that are sieved to a size below 5001tm.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
26
The prealloyed powder is poured into a form consisting of welded sheet
metal. A vacuum is drawn in the filled mould after which the mould is
sealed by welding. Thereafter the mould is placed in a heatable pressure
chamber, i.e. Hot Isostatic Pressing-chamber (HIP-chamber). The heating
chamber was pressurized with argon gas to an isostatic pressure 1000 bar.
The chamber was heated to a temperature of about 1150 C and the sample
was held at that temperature for 2 hours. After HIP:ing the HIPed
component is heat treated at a temperature providing the desired phase
balance which can be obtained in a phase diagram of the alloy. The heat
treatment is performed for 2 hours followed by immediate quenching in
water. After heat treatment the mould is removed by machining.
Three different measurements were performed on the prepared specimens;
1. Austenite spacing according to DNV-RP-F112, section 7 (2008) [2].
The picture was oriented with the direction of elongation
horizontally and the lines at which the measurements were made
where oriented vertically in the picture.
2. Austenite spacing ratio, defined as the ratio between the austenite
spacing measured parallel to the elongation direction and the
austenite spacing measured perpendicular to the elongation
direction (the normal procedure is to measure austenite spacing
perpendicular to the direction of elongation). The measurements
were performed according to DNV-RP-F112 with the deviation that
only one frame was used on each specimen.
3. Average austenite phase length/width ratio. The average austenite
phase length/width ratio was measured according to the following
procedure;
a. The type of frame used for austenite spacing (DNV-RP-F112)
was used.
b. A cross-grid was projected over the image to produce between
20 and 40 grid crossings.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
27
C. 10 of the grid crossings were randomly selected so that the
grid crossing could be clearly identified as being in the
austenite phase.
d. For each of the 10 crossings, for each of the 10 phases the
austenite phase/width ratio was determined by measuring
the length and the width of the austenite phase, wherein the
length is the longest uninterrupted distance when drawing a
straight line between two points at the phase boundary
(wherein the phase boundary is the transition from a ferritic
to austenitic phase or vice versa); and the width is defined as
the longest uninterrupted distance measured perpendicular
to the length in the same phase.
e. The average phase austenite length/width ratio was
calculated as the numerical average of the austenite phase
length/width ratio of the 10 measured austenite phase
length/width ratios.
The magnifications and grid distances that were used for the
measurements on the different metallographic specimens are given in
Table 2.
The method described above may also be used for measuring the ferritic
phase and the ferritic-austenitic phase. If e.g. the ferritic-austenitic phase

was used in the method as described above, a result of the same
magnitude as the one disclosed in Table 2 would be obtained.
30

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
28
Table 2. Magnifications and grid distances
Sample Mag. 1. Aust. Sp. 2. Aust. Sp. R. 3. Av. Aust.
LAAT R.
1 200x 90 m H 90 m, V 60 m 70 m, 28
points
2 200x 90inn H 90 m, V 60um 70pn, 28
points
3 400x 45 m H 451.tm, V 30 m 35jim, 28
points
4 100x 180pm H 180 m, V 120 m 140 m, 28 points
200x 90um H 90 m, V 60 rn 701.tm, 28 points
For each of the samples 1 to 5, a picture from each of the metallographic
specimen is shown in, respectively, Figures 1 to 5. Therein, in each figure,
5 three pictures
are shown (top, middle, and bottom), corresponding to the
above-mentioned sections (transverse section, radial section and
tangential longitudinal section).
The austenite spacing was measured on four frames, with a minimum of
50 measurements on each frame. The austenite spacing was measured
perpendicular to the direction of elongation when applicable. On all
specimens the austenite spacing was measured vertically in the frame.
The orientation of the frames relative to the microstructure was in all
cases identical with what can be seen in the pictures presented in Figs.1 to
5. The average values from the measurements are presented in Table 3.
The austenite spacing ratio was calculated by dividing the austenite
spacing measured in perpendicular directions. First the austenite spacing
was measured vertically in the picture which corresponds to perpendicular
to the elongation in the same way as for the normal austenite spacing
measurement. Then the austenite spacing was measured horizontally in
the same pictures which correspond to parallel to the direction of
elongation. The results from the vertical measurements can be seen in
Table 4, and the results from the horizontal measurements can be seen in
Table 5

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
29
The austenitic spacing ratio between the measurements made parallel and
perpendicular to the elongation of the microstructure is shown in Table 6.
The results from the austenitic phase length/width ratio measurements
are presented in Table 7. The results are presented as the average
austenitic phase length/width ratio where the value is a numerical
average of ten measurements for each metallographic specimen.
The austenite spacing measurements show that the HIPed materials have
similar austenite spacing in the three directions and in that sense is more
isotropic than for instance the tube products.
The austenite spacing ratio shows that the HIPed materials have a more
isotropic microstructure (1)hase distribution) than conventionally made
Safurex.
The results of the average austenite phase length/width ratio
measurements show that metallographic specimens with an isotropic
phase distribution, such as the HIPed and transversal specimens all
exhibit values below 3. Specimens with an anisotropic distribution have
values above 3 and in many cases higher than that.
Table 3. Results from austenite spacing measurements
Sample Type Transverse Radial Tangential
longitudinal longitudinal
1 HIP 2507 9.9 8.6 9.0
2 HIP 9.6 8.9 9.8
3 Pilgered 5.4 3.7 7.3
4 Rolled bar 24.9 23.8 24.0
5 Extruded 8.9 8.2 14.4

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530 PCT/NL2014/050902
Table 4. Results from austenite spacing measurements (vertical)
Sample Type Transverse Radial Tangential
longitudinal longitudinal
1 HIP 2507 9.1 8.1 9.7
2 HIP 10.6 9.4 9.4
3 Pilgered 4.7 3.6 5.6
4 Rolled bar 27.4 27.5 32.4
5 Extruded 10.5 8.3 15.8
5
Table 5. Results from austenite spacing measurements
(horizontal)
Sample Type Transverse Radial Tangential
longitudinal longitudinal
1 HIP 2507 9.1 9.7 9.5
2 HIP 10.6 9.3 9.5
3 Pilgered 4.1 20.3 29
4 Rolled bar 25.8 122.5 96.7
5 Extruded 10.6 40.1 43.2
15

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530 PCT/NL2014/050902
31
Table 6. Results from the measurements made parallel and
perpendicular to the elongation of the microstructure
Sample Type Transverse Radial Tangential
longitudinal longitudinal
1 HIP 2507 1.00 1.20 0.98
2 HIP 1.00 0.99 1.01
3 Pilgered 0.87 5.64 5.18
4 Rolled bar - 0.94 4.45 2.98
Extruded 1.01 4.83 2.73
5
Table 7. Average austenite phase length/width ratio. The values
are numerical averages from 10 measurements for each specimen.
Sample Type Transverse Radial Tangential
longitudinal longitudinal
1 HIP 2507 1.7 2.1 1.8
2 HIP 1.8 1.8 1.7
3 Pilgered 2.4 20.0 8.9
4 Rolled bar 2.5 4.7 8.0
5 Extruded 1.9 10.9 4.5
Example 2
Two test samples were provided of steel of grade Safurex. The samples,
representing a typical construction as used in liquid distributors, were half
rings with three holes drilled in it.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
32
Sample 2HIP was made by a HIP process in accordance with the
invention. Sample 2REF was made conventionally by hot extrusion from a
bar material, followed by cold pilgering to form a pipe.
The samples were subjected to a Streicher corrosion test. The Streicher
test is known in the art as a standardized test for determining the
corrosion resistance of a material (ASTM A262-02: Standard Practices for
Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless
Steels; practice B: Sulfate-Sulfuric Acid Test).
Subsequently, micro preparations were obtained from the samples. In
these samples, the austenite spacing (according to DNV-RP-F112) and the
austenite length/width ratio were determined in two directions
perpendicular to each other. The latter is shown in Fig. 6. Therein:
L= longitudinal direction (rolling or pilgering direction)
T= Transfer direction (perpendicular to rolling or pilgering direction)
Cross area 1 (CA1) is perpendicular to T direction
Cross area 2 (CA2) is perpendicular to L direction
The results are given in Table 8 with reference to weight reduction and
selective attack of the material. The HIPed material of the invention
shows a substantially lower weight-loss, and a substantially lower
selective attack.
In Fig. 7 microscopic pictures are shown of cross section area 1 (CA1) for:
(a) sample 2HIP;
(b) sample 2REF.
The pictures clearly show that sample 2HIP has hardly been visibly
affected by the test conditions, whilst sample 3REF has considerable
damage.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530 PCT/NL2014/050902
33
Table 8
Streicher Test Sample 2111P Sample 2REF
Austenite spacing ( m): CA 1 13.08 - STD 8.68 81.00 STD 59.60
Austenite spacing (ium): CA 2 10.98 -STD 8.05 11.91 STD 7.23
Weight loss (gr/m2/hr) 0.44 0.73
Selective Attack ( m) max 4 (fig 7a) max 160 (fig 7b)
.. Example 3
Two samples were prepared as in Example 2.
Sample 3HIP was made by a HIP process in accordance with the
.. invention. Sample 3REF was made conventionally by hot extrusion from a
bar material, followed by cold pilgering to form a pipe.
The samples were subjected to conditions as typically encountered in urea
production. Accordingly, the samples were submerged in a solution
.. containing urea, carbon dioxide, water, ammonia, and ammonium
carbamate. The conditions were as follows:
N/C ratio: 2.9
Temperature: 210 C
Pressure: 260 Bar
Exposure time: 24 Hours
Oxygen content: <0.01 %
Subsequently, micro preparations were obtained from the samples as in
Example 2. In these samples, the austenite spacing (according to DNV-RP-
F112) and the austenite length/width ratio were determined in two
directions perpendicular to each other, again as shown in Fig.6.

CA 02934867 2016-06-22
WO 2015/099530
PCT/NL2014/050902
34
The results are given in Table 9 with reference to weight reduction and
selective attack of the material. The HIPed material of the invention
shows a substantially lower weight-loss, and no selective attack.
Table 9
Ammonium carbamate test Sample 3HIP Sample 3REF
Austenite spacing (pm): CA 1 1.672 26.025
Austenite spacing (jam): CA 2 1.414 4.454
Weight loss (gr/m2/hr) 0.22 0.67
Selective Attack (p.m) none max 30

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2934867 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2023-07-11
(86) PCT Filing Date 2014-12-23
(87) PCT Publication Date 2015-07-02
(85) National Entry 2016-06-22
Examination Requested 2019-10-16
(45) Issued 2023-07-11

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

Last Payment of $210.51 was received on 2023-12-11


 Upcoming maintenance fee amounts

Description Date Amount
Next Payment if standard fee 2024-12-23 $347.00
Next Payment if small entity fee 2024-12-23 $125.00

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2016-06-22
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2016-10-11
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2016-12-23 $100.00 2016-12-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2017-12-27 $100.00 2017-12-12
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2018-12-24 $100.00 2018-12-11
Request for Examination 2019-12-23 $800.00 2019-10-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2019-12-23 $200.00 2019-12-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2020-12-23 $200.00 2020-12-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2021-12-23 $204.00 2021-12-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2022-12-23 $203.59 2022-12-12
Final Fee $306.00 2023-05-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2023-12-27 $210.51 2023-12-11
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
STAMICARBON B.V.
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2016-06-23 5 168
Examiner Requisition 2021-02-08 3 189
Amendment 2021-06-07 26 800
Description 2021-06-07 38 1,534
Claims 2021-06-07 14 360
Examiner Requisition 2021-08-04 4 245
Amendment 2021-12-01 24 766
Description 2021-12-01 38 1,530
Claims 2021-12-01 14 359
Examiner Requisition 2022-03-03 4 203
Amendment 2022-06-30 22 696
Description 2022-06-30 38 2,199
Claims 2022-06-30 13 524
Final Fee 2023-05-10 5 149
Cover Page 2023-06-08 1 36
Abstract 2016-06-22 1 62
Claims 2016-06-22 5 161
Drawings 2016-06-22 6 1,689
Description 2016-06-22 34 1,285
Cover Page 2016-07-18 1 35
Request for Examination 2019-10-16 2 94
Claims 2016-07-27 7 167
International Preliminary Examination Report 2016-06-23 11 420
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) 2016-06-22 2 75
International Preliminary Report Received 2016-06-22 11 397
International Search Report 2016-06-22 3 94
Declaration 2016-06-22 4 173
National Entry Request 2016-06-22 3 68
Amendment 2016-07-27 9 238
PCT Correspondence 2016-07-29 3 110
Electronic Grant Certificate 2023-07-11 1 2,527