Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
Fracture Detection and Localization Using Acoustic Reflections
Cross-Reference to Related Applications
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application
No. 62/261125
and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/261087, both filed November 30, 2016.
Background of the Disclosure
[0002] In recent years there has been very strong demand for fracture
imaging and fracture
counting methods, largely driven by shale fracturing drilling ("fracking") and
completions design
for lateral shale wells. Because of this demand, attention has turned to
acoustic measurements,
and especially microsonic techniques. Locating and imaging fractures is used
in the process of
locating hydrocarbons and, if found, optimizing the completions processes.
Those fractures can
be difficult to detect for a variety of reasons, including mud type and the
condition of the
fracture. For instance, a fracture may be an open facture or it may be one
that has healed and
therefore has relatively low acoustic contrast relative to adjacent
formations. Electrical
resistivity tools have been used to locate fractures, but they are useful only
in certain wellbore
environments and therefore have limited applicability.
Summary
[0003] An acoustic array includes an acoustic transmitter and acoustic
receivers radially or
longitudinally offset from the acoustic transmitter. The acoustic array is
disposed in a wellbore
penetrating a subsurface formation. An acoustic signal is broadcast using the
transmitter and a
portion of the emitted signal is reflected by a reflector and received by the
receivers. At least
one of the receivers that receives the reflection is located on the same side
of the reflector as the
transmitter. The presence or absence of fractures in the subsurface formation
is inferred based
on the received acoustic signal. Inferences are based on travel times and/or
coherency of the
received signals. Images can be made and fracture orientations determined.
Frequencies in the
sonic or ultrasonic range may be used. Measurements may be made while-drilling
or while
performing post-drilling operations. Processing may be done in real-time or
post-processing
may be performed on recorded data.
1
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
[0004] This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that
are further
described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to
identify key or
essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be
used as an aid in limiting
the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0005] The present disclosure is best understood from the following
detailed description
when read with the accompanying figures. It is emphasized that, in accordance
with the standard
practice in the industry, various features are not drawn to scale. In fact,
the dimensions of the
various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of
discussion. Embodiments
are described with reference to the following figures. The same numbers are
generally used
throughout the figures to reference like features and components.
[0006] Figure 1A is schematic drawing of a sonic or acoustic tool disposed
in a wellbore
penetrating or traversing a subsurface formation, in accordance with the
present disclosure.
[0007] Figure 1B shows a pressure wave from the transmitter propagating
towards the
receiver array, in accordance with the present disclosure.
[0008] Figure 1C shows that the pressure wave propagating through the
formation creates
pressure waves in the wellbore fluid measured by the receivers in the receiver
array, in
accordance with the present disclosure.
[0009] Figure 1D shows that these formation waves will continue beyond the
fracture, in
accordance with the present disclosure.
[0010] Figure 1 E shows that the reflection from the fracture will
propagate towards the
transmitter and also create pressure waves in the wellbore fluid measured by
the receivers in the
receiver array, in accordance with the present disclosure.
[0011] Figure 2 illustrates the results of Stoneley wave reflection at a
fracture compared to a
pulse echo ultrasonic image of the borehole wall, in accordance with the
present disclosure.
2
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
, Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
[0012] Figure 3 is a flowchart for using an acoustic array to infer the
presence or absence of
fractures in a subsurface formation, in accordance with the present
disclosure.
Detailed Description
[0013] It is to be understood that the following disclosure provides many
different
embodiments, or examples, for implementing different features of various
embodiments.
Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to
simplify the present
disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be
limiting. In
addition, the present disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters
in the various
examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and
does not in itself dictate
a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations
discussed. Moreover, the
formation of a first feature over or on a second feature in the description
that follows may
include embodiments in which the first and second features are formed in
direct contact, and may
also include embodiments in which additional features may be formed
interposing the first and
second features, such that the first and second features may not be in direct
contact.
[0014] Some embodiments will now be described with reference to the
figures. Like
elements in the various figures may be referenced with like numbers for
consistency. In the
following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an
understanding of various
embodiments and/or features. However, it will be understood by those skilled
in the art that
some embodiments may be practiced without many of these details and that
numerous variations
or modifications from the described embodiments are possible. As used here,
the terms "above"
and "below", "up" and "down", "upper" and "lower", "upwardly" and
"downwardly", and other
like terms indicating relative positions above or below a given point or
element are used in this
description to more clearly describe certain embodiments. However, when
applied to equipment
and methods for use in wells that are deviated or horizontal, such terms may
refer to a left to
right, right to left, or diagonal relationship, as appropriate. It will also
be understood that,
although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various
elements, these
elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to
distinguish one
element from another.
3
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
, Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
[0015] The terminology used in the description herein is for the purpose of
describing
particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. As used in the
description and
the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" are intended to
include the plural
forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will also be
understood that the
term "and/or" as used herein refers to and encompasses any and all possible
combinations of one
or more of the associated listed items. It will be further understood that the
terms "includes,"
"including," "comprises," and/or "comprising," when used in this
specification, specify the
presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or
components, but do not
preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers,
steps, operations,
elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
[0016] As used herein, the term "if' may be construed to mean "when" or
"upon" or "in
response to determining" or "in response to detecting," depending on the
context. Similarly, the
phrase "if it is determined" or "if [a stated condition or event] is detected"
may be construed to
mean "upon determining" or "in response to determining" or "upon detecting
[the stated
condition or event]" or "in response to detecting [the stated condition or
event]," depending on
the context.
[0017] Any wave propagation will result in a reflection when it encounters
an impedance
contrast. Wellbore fractures represent an impedance contrast to propagating
pressure waves
created by acoustic tools. The detection of waves propagating towards a
transmitter can be used
to detect fractures and determine their locations relative to the measurement
point using the
arrival time and velocity of the reflected waves.
[0018] A system and method to detect various fracture types, in many
operating conditions,
is disclosed. The effects of a fracture can be detected by an acoustic array
as it moves near the
fracture. The acoustic array comprises a transmitter and one or more receivers
distributed either
radially or axially along a tool body and displaced from the transmitter by a
fixed distance. The
transmitter is configured to transmit at a fixed or variable rate, while the
receivers are monitored
(i.e., sampled in synchronization with the transmission). The one or more
acoustic receivers can
be optimally arranged to detect a reflected portion of the transmitted
acoustic signal while
4
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
discriminating against the acoustic signal from the transmitter itself. In the
embodiments
described herein, fractures may be detected using reflections from the
fracture.
[0019] In one embodiment, an acoustic array detection system comprises a
transmitter and
two or more receivers mounted on a tool collar. The detection system is run
downhole such as
during drilling operations or during a post-drilling measurement operation.
The transmitter will
"fire", creating a refracted signal in the formation that is detected by the
receivers. Multiple
receivers can be used - one embodiment comprises four receivers.
[0020] In one embodiment a downhole tool disposed in a wellbore comprises a
pressure
transmitter and a multitude of pressure receivers (for example, piezoceramic
components)
arranged such that energy in the form of pressure waves will propagate from
the transmitter,
through the formation, and past the receivers. This tool may be used to
determine the velocity of
the waves that travel through the formation using a variety of methods such as
cross-correlation,
slowness time coherence (STC), Nth root stack (e.g., used in the resolution of
STC), Hilbert
semblance (i.e., where correlation is computed from the envelope of the
waveforms), or first
motion. Coherency processing, such as STC, is generally used as it may provide
a superior
measurement. Semblance may be based on STC or correlation and may be computed
using
known techniques. Semblance and coherency may be used interchangeably and may
both refer
to the degree of correlatedness between a series of waveforms.
[0021] STC is known in the art. Stated very simply, it produces a 2-
dimensional array of
coherency (velocity or its reciprocal, slowness, vs. arrival time) by
comparing waveforms from
an array of receivers. This is traditionally produced for positive velocities,
i.e., waves traveling
away from the transmitter. The other processing techniques mentioned above are
also generally
known and meant as examples of possible processing techniques, not as an
exhaustive list.
While STC is used in the descriptions below, it is meant to be an example and
not limiting.
[0022] However, STC processing may also be used to aid in detecting
fractures. Using STC
results calculated for negative velocities, we can identify waves traveling
toward the transmitter.
These waves show up as peaks in the STC plane. These coherency peaks mirror
the
corresponding peaks in the positive STC results, as the waves travel in the
same medium and
therefore at the same speed. Those positive velocity STC results can be used
to guide the search
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
, Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
for negative velocity peaks since the negative velocity peaks may be lower in
both energy and
coherence. Once a reflection is identified in the STC results, the location of
the reflector
(fracture) can be determined by the product of the wave velocity and its
arrival time at the
respective receiver.
[0023] As stated above, fractures represent an impedance contrast to a
propagating wave.
Some portion of the energy in a pressure wave will be reflected as it
encounters this impedance
contrast and some portion will propagate across. These proportions are a
function of the contrast
ratio. The embodiments described herein rely upon the fact that these
reflections will propagate
back toward the source. Thus, in all embodiments at least one receiver will be
on the same side
of the acoustic impedance contrast giving rise to the reflection as the
transmitter.
[0024] As a portion of the refracted signal, which is often referred to as
a formation
headwave, propagates away from the transmitter along the formation/fluid
interface of a
wellbore, some energy effectively refracts back into the borehole where it is
detected by the
receivers. The time delay between the received signals at different receivers
and the amplitudes
of those signals can be very useful in determining certain formation
properties. For example,
formation headwave compressional and shear wave component travel times can be
used to infer
formation characteristics or properties that can be very useful for developing
efficient well
completion strategies. Such rock properties may include, but are not limited
to, Young's
modulus, Poisson's ratio, and bulk modulus.
[0025] Fractures often exist in reservoir formations. It is of interest to
know where they
intersect the borehole, and, if possible, to determine characteristics of the
fractures, including
aperture (width) and strike (orientation). Using acoustic techniques,
fractures can be detected
because they perturb or affect a headwave that encounters them. For example, a
fracture may
cause an incoming signal to reflect. That is, at least some of the energy is
re-directed in different
directions. However, not all the energy is reflected. Some may continue to
propagate as a
formation headwave along the borehole wall. The energy propagating along the
interface as a
headwave is constantly refracting back (i.e., "leaking") into the borehole at
some critical angle
that depends on the acoustic velocity of the fluid and the acoustic velocity
of the formation (at
the particular point where the energy leaves the formation and enters the
fluid), in accordance
6
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
, Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
with Snell's Law. The leaked energy may be detected by the receivers. Stated
in a slightly
different way, at each fracture, a portion of the energy may be reflected (for
example, as a
compressional headwave, a shear headwave, or some other interface wave), and a
portion may be
transmitted or passed through the fracture (again, as a compressional
headwave, a shear
headwave, or some other type of interface wave). At least some of that energy
refracted into the
borehole travels to and is detected by the receivers. Thus, at least some of
both portions
(reflected and transmitted) of the incident energy ultimately returns to the
wellbore where it is
detected by the receivers. The detected signal can be either attenuated (i.e.,
signal amplitude at
one receiver is less than amplitude of same signal at another receiver) or
poorly correlated.
[0026] This can be extended to localization within the array through the
processing of
receiver subarray information. A "receiver subarray" is one or more contiguous
receivers
representing a subset of the full array. If a fracture lies between Receiver
RXn and Receiver
RXn+i, then the reflection will be present in the STC analysis that includes
RX1 through RXn but
not in RXn+i and beyond.
[0027] Figures lA ¨ lE are schematic drawings of a sonic or acoustic tool
disposed in a
wellbore penetrating or traversing a subsurface formation. As shown in Figure
1A, the tool has a
transmitter 102 and a plurality of receivers 104. An example fracture 106 in
the formation is
shown. While only one fracture is shown for illustration and discussion, there
may be many
fractures present.
[0028] Figures lA ¨ lE also show the time domain progression of an original
wave and its
reflection. Specifically, Figure 1A shows a tool in proximity to a formation
containing a
fracture. Figure 1B shows a pressure wave from the transmitter propagating in
the general
direction of the receivers. Figure 1C shows that the pressure wave propagating
through the
formation creates pressure waves in the wellbore fluid measured by the
receivers. Figure 1D
shows that these formation waves will continue beyond the fracture. Figure 1E
shows that the
reflections from the fracture will propagate in the formation in the general
direction of the
transmitter and also create pressure waves in the wellbore fluid measured by
the receivers.
[0029] An alternative embodiment to detect fractures is to plot the
variable density log
(VDL) at individual or multiple receiver locations as the fracture is
approached and the reflection
7
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
traverses the array in the opposite direction of the wavefront travelling from
the transmitter. The
VDL display format will show the reflection signal moving across the array as
depth is
increased. A VDL is plotted at successive depths at each receiver. The
reflection location
patterns may be recognized as the fracture is approached. The wavefront can be
separated into
dovvngoing and upgoing wavefronts using suitable processing technique. Figure
2 illustrates the
results of Stoneley wave reflection (a type of interface wave) at a fracture
compared to a pulse
echo ultrasonic image of the borehole wall.
[0030] The left column of Figure 2 shows a VDL plot of waveforms resulting
from the
detected Stoneley waves. Note the events that appear as linear patterns - the
VDL shows two
such events: an upper event and a lower event. In the record shown, each event
shows signal
(i.e., the reflected waveforms) being detected at various times (horizontal
axis, increasing to the
right) as the receiver location (vertical axis, increasing downward) changes
in the wellbore and
relative to the fracture. The signal arrives sooner as the receiver gets
closer to the fracture. The
reason for this is the reflection does not travel as far as the receiver gets
closer to the fracture.
The linear appearance of the events or wavelets is the pattern that identifies
the reflector, in this
case a fracture. Each fracture location corresponds to the station location
and the particular
azimuth in the wellbore where the linear pattern approaches or intersects the
earliest arrival of
the reflected wave at the receiver.
[0031] The right column of Figure 2 is a pulse echo log. It shows, in a two-
dimensional
display, azimuthal scans of a wellbore at various wellbore depths. That is,
the vertical axis is
wellbore depth (increasing downward) and the horizontal axis is the azimuthal
or circumferential
span of the wellbore from zero to 360 degrees, where 360 degrees corresponds
to zero degrees.
The fracture locations shown in the pulse echo log correlate closely with the
fracture locations
determined from the linear reflection patterns. That is, the pulse echo log
shows fractures
located at the same two (upper and lower) measurement stations.
[0032] An acoustic signal can be broadcast from a plurality of locations
that are depth-wise
or azimuthally distinct. The acoustic data acquired from those various
locations can be used to
produce one or more images of the wellbore. The acoustic data may particularly
be used to
8
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
produce one or more images of a reflector proximate the wellbore such as a
fracture. The
orientation of such a fracture can be determined using the produced images.
[0033]
Formation bed boundaries can also present an impedance contrast leading to a
reflection. These can be differentiated from fractures by noting an associated
change in
formation bulk properties such as the formation velocity at the same location.
[0034]
The techniques disclosed herein can be performed downhole (for example, while
drilling or reaming) or post-processed with recorded waveform data. Fracture
detection is
independent of mud type. Healed and conductive fractures and axial fractures
can be detected,
without regard to the borehole wall rugosity. Also, no nuclear sources are
used. Since these
embodiments are applicable independent of frequency, various frequencies can
be used for the
transmitted signal, which may range from the sonic (approx. 20Hz ¨ 20KHz) to
the ultrasonic
(>20KHz) frequencies. As used herein and particularly in the claims, the terms
"acoustic" and
"sonic" mean relating to or using sound or pressure waves, wherein "sound" or
"pressure wave"
refers to vibrations that travel through one or more tangible media that
support the wave. The
embodiments described herein may be used with any form of conveyance (e.g.,
wireline, drill
string, coiled tubing, etc.).
[0035]
Figure 3 is a flowchart showing one possible embodiment. In this embodiment,
an
acoustic array comprising an acoustic transmitter and one or more acoustic
receivers radially or
longitudinally offset from the acoustic transmitter is provided (302). The
acoustic array is
disposed in a wellbore penetrating a subsurface formation (304). An acoustic
signal is broadcast
using the acoustic transmitter (306). At least one of the one or more acoustic
receivers receives a
reflected portion of the acoustic signal reflected by a reflector in the
subsurface formation,
wherein the at least one receiver is located on the same side of the reflector
as the acoustic
transmitter (308), and the presence of the reflector in the subsurface foi __
!nation is inferred based
on the received acoustic signal (310).
[0036]
In some embodiments, when a fracture is encountered between two receivers, the
fracture causes a modification in the signal from one receiver to the next.
The signal is modified
in at least two ways. The first is a simple reduction in magnitude, from one
receiver to the next.
This can be detected by monitoring magnitudes of the received signals. An
anomaly in the
9
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
magnitudes indicates a fracture between the receivers. The second way is a
distortion of the
coherency of the waveform. Coherency refers to the phase difference and
frequency of two
waves. Coherency can be evaluated using, for example, a slowness time
coherence (STC)
algorithm, which is used to measure the travel time of a formation signal as
it travels to the
various receivers. If one or more of the receiver signals is distorted by the
effects of a fracture,
and in particular by the detection of a reflection travelling back from the
fracture, the semblance
can be distorted.
[0037] Figure 4A illustrates the effect on STC for the shear component for
multiple sectors
or orientations of an axial array in a highly fractured area of the borehole.
The plots on the left
are computed from an axial array oriented in sector 2 (horizontal) and the
plots on the right are
from sector 5 (vertical). The shear coherency in the horizontal sector is
distorted and in the
vertical sector it disappears altogether.
[0038] Figure 4B is an ultrasonic pulse echo borehole image showing
fractures. The
ultrasonic image shows the characteristic fracture pattern in a highly laminar
formation. The V-
shaped lines are the fractures.
[0039] Figures 5A ¨ 5F were produced using actual waveform data. Those data
were taken
in an area of a borehole where there is minimal fracturing. The shear
component is readily
resolved in the waveforms plot (Figure 5A) and the STC plot (Figure 5B).
Figure 5A shows four
different waveforms for the same signal. Actually, there are two overlaying
sets of four different
waveforms. One set is raw (unfiltered) data and the other set is filtered. The
filtered data were
used in the coherency/semblance computations of Figures 5B and 5C. The signal
moves across
the array, uninterrupted by fractures. The waveforms show a high degree of
similarity or
coherence for the shear component (see Figure 5C).
[0040] Figures 6A-6F were also produced using actual waveform data. Those
data were
taken from the same borehole as above, but in an area where fractures are
encountered. The
fracture effects are readily apparent in the waveforms plot (Figure 6A) and
the STC plot
(Figure 6B).
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
, Attorney Docket No. 1S15.0986-US-NP
[0041] In particular, note the differences between Figures 5A and 6A. The
waveforms of
Figure 6A are slightly misaligned (whereas in Figure 5A they are not), as can
occur when some
of the waveforms are phase-shifted or distorted by some anomaly on the path;
that is, when
something has disturbed the coherency between the receivers. Also compare
Figures 5B/5C and
Figures 6B/6C, respectively. There is a peak at approximately 120 gsec/ft in
Figure 5B/5C. The
high coherency identifies the shear component. In Figure 6B/6C, however, there
is very little
coherency and even a trough at 120 ttsec/ft. Similar effects are observed on
Figures 5D and 6D
(which are the same image) and Figures 5F and 6F (which are the same plots),
with the block
arrows indicating the corresponding particular region of the wellbore being
investigated.
[0042] At the depth indicated by the block arrow in Figures 5D and 5E there
is no particular
evidence of fracturing. In particular, Figure 5D plots semblance vs. depth,
and shows no
indications of fracturing. Figure 5E shows a pulse echo ultrasonic image of
the region of the
borehole of Figure 5A. Such borehole images often show fractures in the
borehole when present,
but in the portion of the wellbore being investigated here, there are none.
[0043] The fractures generally appear as a dark line across the image,
resembling a crack in
the borehole wall. Figure 6E, which is the same wellbore image as in Figure
5E, shows such a
fracture, as indicated by the block arrow in Figure 6E. The corresponding lack
of coherency is
shown in Figure 6D (which is the same image as Figure 5D) by the block arrow
in Figure 6D.
[0044] Figures 7A and 7B show the reaction of an oriented shear measurement
to a fracture.
Figure 7A shows the ultrasonic pulse echo plot of Figures 5E and 6E. A
fracture is apparent at
6479. The 16 plots to the right (Figure 7B) show shear slowness computed at
individual tool
orientations, 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees width each. (The first eight plots
are the same as
Figures 5F and 6F.) The effects on the shear slowness is observed at the
fracture; it shows an
abrupt discontinuity as the sensor array traverses the fracture. These
discontinuities are due to
poor semblance correlation of the shear signals across the array. The pattern
of the shear
slowness discontinuity also matches that of the fracture.
[0045] The techniques disclosed herein can be performed downhole (for
example, while
drilling or reaming) or post-processed with recorded waveform data. Fracture
detection is
independent of mud type. Healed and conductive fractures and axial fractures
can be detected,
11
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
, Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
without regard to the borehole wall rugosity. Also, no nuclear sources are
used. Various
frequencies can be used for the transmitted signal, ranging from the sonic to
the ultrasonic.
[0046] Figure 8 is a flowchart showing one possible embodiment. In this
embodiment, an
acoustic array comprising an acoustic transmitter and one or more acoustic
receivers radially or
longitudinally offset from the acoustic transmitter is provided (502). The
acoustic array is
disposed in a wellbore penetrating a subsurface formation (504). An acoustic
signal is broadcast
using the acoustic transmitter (506). The acoustic signal emitted by the
acoustic transmitter is
received by the one or more acoustic receivers (508), and the presence or
absence of fractures in
the subsurface formation is inferred based on the received acoustic signal
(510).
[0047] Some of the methods and processes described above, including
processes, as listed
above, can be performed by a processor. The term "processor" should not be
construed to limit
the embodiments disclosed herein to any particular device type or system. The
processor may
include a computer system. The computer system may also include a computer
processor (e.g., a
microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or general purpose
computer) for
executing any of the methods and processes described above.
[0048] The computer system may further include a memory such as a
semiconductor
memory device (e.g., a RAM, ROM, PROM, EEPROM, or Flash-Programmable RAM), a
magnetic memory device (e.g., a diskette or fixed disk), an optical memory
device (e.g., a CD-
ROM), a PC card (e.g., PCMCIA card), or other memory device.
[00491 Some of the methods and processes described above, as listed above,
can be
implemented as computer program logic for use with the computer processor. The
computer
program logic may be embodied in various forms, including a source code form
or a computer
executable form. Source code may include a series of computer program
instructions in a variety
of programming languages (e.g., an object code, an assembly language, or a
high-level language
such as C, C++, or JAVA). Such computer instructions can be stored in a non-
transitory
computer readable medium (e.g., memory) and executed by the computer
processor. The
computer instructions may be distributed in any form as a removable storage
medium with
accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped
software), preloaded
12
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
, Attorney Docket No. 1S15.0986-US-NP
with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed
from a server or
electronic bulletin board over a communication system (e.g., the Internet or
World Wide Web).
[0050] Alternatively or additionally, the processor may include discrete
electronic
components coupled to a printed circuit board, integrated circuitry (e.g.,
Application Specific
Integrated Circuits (ASIC)), and/or programmable logic devices (e.g., a Field
Programmable
Gate Arrays (FPGA)). Any of the methods and processes described above can be
implemented
using such logic devices.
[0051] The foregoing outlines features of several embodiments so that those
skilled in the art
may better understand the aspects of the present disclosure. Those skilled in
the art should
appreciate that they may readily use the present disclosure as a basis for
designing or modifying
other processes and structures for carrying out the same purposes and/or
achieving the same
advantages of the embodiments introduced herein. Those skilled in the art
should also realize
that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the scope of the present
disclosure, and that
they may make various changes, substitutions, and alterations herein without
departing from the
scope of the present disclosure.
[0052] The Abstract at the end of this disclosure is provided to comply
with 37 C.F.R.
1.72(b) to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical
disclosure. It is
submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or
limit the scope or
meaning of the claims.
[0053] While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternatives and
modifications
will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These
and other
alternatives are considered equivalents and within the scope of this
disclosure and the appended
claims. Although only a few example embodiments have been described in detail
above, those
skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are
possible in the example
embodiments without materially departing from this invention. Accordingly, all
such
modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure
as defined in the
following claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to
cover the structures
described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural
equivalents, but also
equivalent structures. Thus, although a nail and a screw may not be structural
equivalents in that
13
CA 02949485 2016-11-24
Attorney Docket No. IS15.0986-US-NP
a nail employs a cylindrical surface to secure wooden parts together, whereas
a screw employs a
helical surface, in the environment of fastening wooden parts, a nail and a
screw may be
equivalent structures. It is the express intention of the applicant not to
invoke 35 U.S.C. 112,
paragraph 6 for any limitations of any of the claims herein, except for those
in which the claim
expressly uses the words 'means for' together with an associated function.
14
