Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
- 1 -
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LEAKAGE FLUX TESTING
Field of application and prior art
[0001] The invention relates to a method for leakage
flux testing of ferromagnetic material to be tested for
detecting defects and to an apparatus, suitable for
carrying out the method.
[0002] Magnetic leakage flux methods are an important
component of quality control, both in the production
process and during the cyclically recurring testing of
the finished parts, in nondestructive testing in
respect of defects of semi-finished product and
finished parts. In relation to some bothersome
properties of the materials, such as roughness of the
surface or scale coating in the case of hot-rolled
products, magnetic leakage flux methods are less
sensitive than e.g. the eddy current method or
ultrasonic testing. As a result, there is a better
ratio between used signal and noise signal (S/N ratio),
as a result of which a more reliable fault detection is
facilitated.
[0003] In an apparatus for detecting defects by means
of leakage flux measurement, a test volume of the
object to be tested is magnetized by means of a
magnetizing device and scanned with the aid of at least
one magnetic-field-sensitive probe (leakage flux probe)
for detecting magnetic leakage fields caused by the
defects. In the process, there is a relative movement
in one scanning direction between the probe and the
surface of the material to be tested. During the
scanning, the probe is kept at a relatively small, but
finite testing distance from the surface of the
material to be tested. An individual probe passes over
a testing track, the width of which is determined by
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 2 -
the effective width of the probe transversely to the
scanning direction.
[0004] The magnetic flux or magnetic field generated
in the material to be tested by the magnetizing device
is distributed substantially homogenously in space in
material that is free from faults. In this case, there
are also no substantial magnetic field gradients in the
regions near the surface. Cracks and other defects,
such as e.g. shrink holes, inclusions, or other
inhomogeneities such as e.g. welding seams, etc., act
as regions of increased magnetic resistance, and so
field components in the vicinity of a defect are guided
around the defect and pushed out of the metal into the
region near the surface. The field components pushed
thereout are detected in the leakage flux method for
detecting the defects. In the case of a leakage flux
measurement, a defect is detectable if the field
components pushed out of the test object extend out to
the region of the probe and cause a change in the field
there which is sufficient for detection.
[0005] Depending on how the material to be tested is
magnetized, the leakage flux testing methods or testing
apparatuses are subdivided into methods or apparatuses
with DC field magnetization (DC leakage flux testing)
and methods or apparatuses with AC field magnetization
(AC leakage flux testing).
[0006] When pipes are tested, capturing of both outer
faults, i.e. faults or defects on the outer side of the
pipe, and inner faults, i.e. faults on the pipe inner
side and faults in the pipe wall, is sought after. To
this end, use is usually made of methods with DC field
magnetization (DC leakage flux testing). Here, a
substantial advantage of DC field magnetization is
used, specifically the great penetration depth, and so
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 3 -
it is also possible to capture inner faults and faults
in the pipe wall.
[0007] In the methods and apparatuses considered here,
use is made of a probe arrangement for carrying out the
testing, said probe arrangement having a probe array
with a multiplicity of magnetic-field-sensitive probes,
which are arranged next to one another in a first
direction (width direction). The electrical probe
signals, i.e. the electrical signals from the probes,
or signals derived therefrom, are evaluated together by
means of an evaluating device for qualifying the
defects. By using a probe array, the testing width
covered during a scanning process may be substantially
larger than the testing width covered by an individual
probe. Furthermore, the spatial resolution of the width
direction is determined by the probe width of the
individual probes. By using probe arrays, efficient
testing of test objects in a continuous method is
rendered possible.
[0008] When dimensioning the individual probes in
respect of the probe width thereof, there usually is
orientation on the basis of the so-called minimum fault
length. The minimum fault length is the fault length
(or defect length) above which the maximum amplitude of
the probe signal, i.e. the highest testing sensitivity,
and the maximum reproducibility are achieved. In the
relevant standards, probe widths of 30 mm, or of one,
or half a, minimum fault length, are specified, wherein
the minimum fault length may be e.g. 25 mm or 50 mm,
depending on standard. As a result of the reference to
the minimum fault length, it is possible to obtain a
good compromise between a number of probes which is as
small as possible with, at the same time, a probe array
which is as long or wide as possible (cost
optimization) and the maximum admissible probe width
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 4 -
(generally half the minimum fault length) considered to
be required for a good reproducibility of the defect
detection.
Problem and solution
[0009] It is an object of the invention to specify a
method and an apparatus for leakage flux testing, by
means of probe arrays, of ferromagnetic material to be
tested, which facilitate reliable testing in respect of
faults of different types of fault.
[0010] In the methods and apparatuses in accordance
with the claimed invention, the probe width of the
individual probes of a probe array is substantially
reduced in relation to conventional approaches. The
probe width is no longer oriented on the minimum fault
length but on the smallest leakage flux width to be
expected; the latter is substantially determined by the
distance between the probe and the material surface
(testing distance). A probe array with a local high
resolution in the width direction is provided.
Approximately one fifth of the testing distance is
considered to be a technically expedient lower limit
for the probe width. In the case of currently typical
testing distances in the range of a few tenths of a
millimeter up to approximately 2 mm, a lower limit of
the probe width of 0.1 mm is currently considered
expedient, and so - in accordance with alternative
phrasing - the probe width should lie in the range from
0.1 mm to 10 mm. In the case of probe widths of
individual probes of more than 10 mm, the sought-after
high spatial resolution of the individual probes may,
in general, no longer be fully achieved. Currently,
probe widths in the range from 0.5 mm to 3 mm appear
particularly advantageous.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 5 -
[0011] The evaluation of the probe signals comprises a
plurality of operations which are matched to one
another and which, in particular, are matched to the
probe arrangement with a high resolution in terms of
location or space.
[0012] In a mapping operation, signal information
representing the probe signal is linked to spatial
information representing the creation location of the
probe signal in a scanned surface region for each probe
signal. As a result, spatially dependent signal data
are formed. The mapping operation creates a unique
assignment between signal information and location
information and may serve as a basis for generating a
"map" of the respectively scanned surface region. By
way of example, signals of rotary encoders (angular
position encoders) and/or linear encoders of the
testing apparatus may be used to ascertain the location
information.
[0013] In a matrix-forming operation, the spatially
dependent signal data (or signal data derived
therefrom) are stored in fields or elements, assigned
with the correct location, of a basis matrix. Here,
deviating from a conventional definition of a matrix
from mathematics (two-dimensional
rectangular
arrangement of elements in rows and columns), the term
"matrix" denotes an n-dimensional array of elements,
where n is greater than or equal to two. Hence, a
matrix within the meaning of the application may have
more than two dimensions, for example three or four. In
the broadest sense, the matrix provides an assignment
between location information, signal information and,
possibly, further information to parameters which
influence the method and the results thereof.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 6 -
[0014] A first dimension of the basis matrix
represents signal information, which
contains
information about the leakage flux measured at a
specific location of the surface of the material to be
tested. This signal information may be specified as a
scalar variable or as a vector variable. By way of
example, the signal amplitude or a selected component
of the leakage flux may be considered as scalar
variable, which component may represent, for example,
the normal component or a tangential component of the
measured leakage flux. The signal information may also
represent the complete vector of the leakage flux (Bx-,
By- and Bz-component).
[0015] A second dimension of the basis matrix
represents a position in the first direction, i.e. in
the width direction of the probe array (transversely to
the scanning direction). If a dedicated channel is
assigned to each probe of the probe array, the position
in the first direction may also be specified by the
channel number.
[0016] A third dimension of the basis matrix
represents a position in the scanning direction. This
direction may be perpendicular to the first direction
or be aligned at a more or less acute angle in relation
thereto.
[0017] Further dimensions are also possible. By way of
example, forming a multidimensional arrangement of
elements or fields, in which the magnetic flux density
is stored as a vector depending on probe, location in
the passage direction and lift off (testing distance),
would be conceivable. Then, the matrix forms a special
form of a tensor for arrays, in which the probes are
arranged as described.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 7 -
[0018] The basis matrix or the field information
contained in the individual elements or fields serves
as a basis, for the further operations of the
evaluation. Here, at least one evaluating operation is
carried out, in which spatially dependent signal data
from at least two fields of the basis matrix, directly
or indirectly adjacent to one another in a (virtual)
evaluating direction, are linked to one another using
at least one evaluating algorithm.
[0019] Therefore, this evaluation works with the "map"
of the surface region represented in the basis matrix
in order to evaluate the information contained in the
basis matrix, or in the fields or elements thereof,
according to one or more criteria. Here, the probe
information from one of the individual probes of the
probe array is evaluated together with the probe
information from at least one further probe, adjacent
in the evaluating direction, of the probe array, and/or
an adjacent testing track. Here, it is possible to take
into account that the conditions between two locations
situated closely adjacent to one another on the
material to be tested, which are scanned by probes
which are situated closely adjacent to one another,
generally do not have a discontinuous jump, and so a
mutual dependence of the probe signals may be taken
into account.
[0020] This evaluation may be carried out within
probes of the same probe array. If a plurality of probe
arrays are provided, the probes of which scan the same
or mutually adjacent testing tracks, the evaluation may
also operate in a probe-array-overarching manner such
that the signals from probes of different probe arrays
are evaluated together with an assignment with the
correct location.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 8 -
[0021] The probe width of the individual probes is
substantially smaller than half a minimum fault length,
i.e. significantly smaller than what was previously
conventional. As a result, testing with a high spatial
resolution is rendered possible, at least in the first
direction. Nevertheless, standard defects, which are
represented by the minimum fault length, may be found
at least as well as previously since a wider effective
probe width adapted to the minimum fault length may
also be created or simulated where necessary as a
result of the common evaluation of the probe signals of
adjacent probes and/or testing tracks. However,
moreover, it is also possible to reliably find and
identify further defects, for which conventional
testing methods and apparatuses were "blind" or
"visually deficient" (i.e. less sensitive).
[0022] Preferably, bipolar signal information is used
when forming the basis matrix, i.e. "raw" signal
information from non-rectified probe signals. As a
result, the evaluation may also make use of information
which would be lost by rectification.
[0023] All probes of a probe array may be arranged
next to one another in a single straight row in the
first direction (width direction). The effective widths
of adjacent probes may overlap on account of the finite
testing distance. It is also possible to subdivide the
probes into two (or more) mutually parallel rows and
arrange these offset to one another in the width
directions in such a way that the probes sit "in gaps".
As a result, a coverage without gaps of the entire
width to be tested is possible in the width direction.
[0024] In particular, Hall probes or MR probes (probes
which use a magnetoresistive effect for magnetic field
detection, e.g. GMR (giant magnetoresistance), AMR
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 9 -
(anisotropic magnetoresistance), CMR
(colossal
magnetoresistance) or TMR (tunnel magnetoresistance))
or inductive probes (in particular coils) or any other
type of magnetic-field-sensitive probes may be
considered as probes.
[0025] In order, where possible, only to process those
signals in the subsequent signal processing which may
in fact have relevance for the testing situation,
provision is made in some variants of the method for
pre-filtering of the probe signals in the apparatus,
carried out before the mapping operation, by means of a
band-pass filter with adjustable limit frequencies.
Here, a lower limit frequency is set to a lowest
frequency of the probe signals to be expected and an
upper limit frequency is set to a highest frequency of
the probe signals to be expected. As a result, coarse
pre-filtering is possible. The limit frequencies may be
adjusted depending on the pass-over speed of the probe,
the testing distance, the smallest and largest fault
width and fault depth to be detected, optionally on the
wall thickness (in the case of pipes), and possibly on
other boundary conditions. As a result, the testing may
be matched to specific testing conditions, some sources
of disturbance are removed from the signals and the
relevance of the further processed signals is
increased. By way of example, low-frequency signal
components which carry no information relevant to the
material to be tested during the testing situation may
be removed by suitable pre-selection of a lower limit
frequency. By way of example, the highest limit
frequency may be set in such a way that frequencies
which are higher than those frequencies which typically
originate from small cracks on the surface of the
material to be tested are filtered out. From
experience, it is said frequencies of small cracks
which provide the highest relevant frequency
components.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 10 -
[0026] In some embodiments, the evaluation of the
signals may be optimized specifically for different
fault types. In some embodiments, provision is made for
filtering by means of one or more band-pass filters
with adjustable limit frequencies carried out after the
mapping operation, said filtering depending on the
fault type, wherein a lower limit frequency of a band-
pass filter is set to a lowest frequency of the probe
signals and an upper limit frequency of the band-pass
filter is set to a highest frequency of the probe
signals, respectively to be expected for a
predetermined fault type. Hence, fault-type-dependent
band-pass filtering is undertaken. Each one of these
filtering processes opens up a specific fault type
path, wherein the subsequent evaluation steps within a
fault type path are specific to the respective fault
type. Fault type data, which make available a fault
catalog in respect of the fault types, may be stored in
a memory of the apparatus. By way of example, a fault-
type catalog may contain the following fault types:
outer fault, inner fault (e.g. in the case of pipes),
bores with different diameters, peel faults, oblique
faults with different orientations across the first
direction and the second direction, bottom splashes,
shrink holes, casting powder inclusions, etc.
[0027] In some embodiments, a particularly high user-
friendliness and high specificity in the detection of
faults is given by virtue of the number of band-passes
for the fault-type-dependent filtering being
configurable such that the apparatus or the method may
be ideally matched to a specific testing situation.
Preferably, three, four, five, six or more band-pass
filters with different limit frequencies are used for
the filtering which is dependent on the fault type.
Compared to conventional methods and apparatuses, the
capability of distinction is significantly increased
thereby, said conventional methods and apparatuses
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 11 -
substantially only having been able to distinguish
between inner faults (resulting in lower frequencies)
and outer faults (resulting in higher frequencies)
during pipe testing.
[0028] Opening up different fault path types for the
evaluation may also take place in other phases of the
evaluating process, in particular on the basis of
spatially dependent signal data which are stored in the
fields of the basis matrix.
[0029] As mentioned previously, the basis matrix or
the field information contained in the individual
fields of the basis matrix serves as a basis for
further operations of the evaluation.
[0030] Preferably, one or more evaluation operations
which are designed as filtering operations of spatially
dependent signal data over a predetermined number of
mutually adjacent fields in a predetermined evaluating
direction are carried out. Here, in particular, the
term "filtering operation" should comprise those
operations with which specific constituents or features
may be removed from a signal, for example specific
frequency components or noise. Here, it is possible, in
principle, to carry out evaluating operations in
evaluating directions, in principle any evaluating
directions, of the basis matrix with any filters which,
however, are particularly suitable for the fault
detection in respect of their (one or more) limit
frequencies. The filtering operations include, in
particular, operations with a low-pass characteristic
(low-pass filtering), operations with a high-pass
characteristic (high-pass filtering) and operations
with a band-pass characteristic (band-pass filtering),
wherein, in principle, the band-pass filtering may be
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 12 -
considered to be a combination of high-pass filtering
and low-pass filtering with specific limit frequencies.
[0031] In some embodiments, provision is made for an
evaluation operation to comprise a smoothing operation
of spatially dependent signal data over a predetermined
number of mutually adjacent fields in an evaluating
direction (smoothing direction). Here, smoothing to
each of its neighbors is possible for each field
content. By way of example, there are eight direct
neighbors for each field not lying on the edge in the
case of a two-dimensional basis matrix. In principle,
any algorithm with a low-pass characteristic for
reducing the dynamics comes into question for the
smoothing operation. By way of example, the smoothing
operation may be forming a (weighted or unweighted)
moving average or low-pass filtering. Forming a
(weighted or unweighted) sum may also be used as a
smoothing operation.
[0032] The evaluating direction of the smoothing
operation may correspond to the first direction, i.e.
the direction in which the probes of a probe array lie
next to one another. In this way, the signal
information of two or more probes lying next to one
another may be smoothed (optionally also in a probe-
array-overarching manner). Smoothing may be carried out
over a plurality of channel numbers. If statistical
noise is present, such smoothing may improve the
signal-to-noise ratio. The number of signals or probes
or testing tracks over which a smoothing operation is
intended to be carried out may be predetermined. The
selected number of probes or testing tracks over which
integration is carried out determines the "effective
probe width" which may be generated thereby. By way of
example, the number may be from two to ten, but may
possibly also be more than 10, for example in the range
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 13 -
between 10 and 30. As a result of this, it is possible
to adapt the testing characteristic to a minimum fault
length.
[0033] Alternatively, or additionally, it is also
possible for the evaluating direction of an evaluating
operation to correspond to the second direction, which
extends perpendicular to the first direction in which
the probes lie next to one another. The second
direction may, either exactly or approximately,
correspond to the scanning direction and corresponds to
the time axis of the test. In particular, the
evaluating operations which may be carried out in the
second direction include the aforementioned filtering
operations, which also include the smoothing operation.
[0034] In particular, it is also possible to carry out
fault-type-dependent band-pass filtering in the second
direction. Optionally, this may replace the
aforementioned fault-type-dependent filtering occurring
outside of the basis matrix. One or more band-pass
filters with adjustable limit frequencies, which are
respectively matched to a specific fault type, may also
be realized within the scope of this band-pass
filtering in the second direction.
[0035] It is known that the level of leakage flux
signals of a fault reduces the more the fault deviates
from the (in view of the testing ideal) orthogonal
position in relation to the main magnetization
direction. As a result, oblique faults may not be
identified during the testing or may be assessed
incorrectly in respect of the size and relevance
thereof. Method and apparatus in accordance with the
claimed invention are able to supply meaningful test
results, even in the case of oblique faults. To this
end, provision is made in some embodiments for the
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 14 -
evaluating direction in at least one evaluating
operation to correspond to an oblique direction which
extends transversely in relation to the first direction
and transversely in relation to the second direction.
Evaluations in different oblique directions
representing different angular positions for an oblique
fault are also possible.
[0036] In order to take account of the influence of
the oblique position of the fault in relation to the
main magnetization direction, provision is preferably
made of an oblique fault compensating operation, in
which an angle difference between an oblique fault
direction and a field line direction of the
magnetization field is determined and spatially
dependent signal data of an oblique fault are corrected
by a compensation factor dependent on the angle
position. Here, there may be support from relationships
determined empirically or analytically or in
calibration procedures, which relationships, for
example, may be stored in a lookup table of a memory in
the apparatus.
[0037] Particular variants of the method in the
apparatus are characterized by
automatically
ascertaining the angle position of oblique faults
extending in an oblique direction which extends
transversely in relation to the first direction and
transversely in relation to the second direction. These
methods may facilitate an optimized oblique fault
detection without a priori knowledge about the oblique
positions to be expected.
[0038] In one variant of automatically ascertaining
the angle position of oblique errors, the fields of the
basis matrix are evaluated automatically over a
plurality of oblique directions in different evaluating
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 15 -
directions within a predeterminable angle range and the
oblique direction in which a maximum mean signal
amplitude (taking into account the angular dependence)
occurs is ascertained, taking into account the known
angular dependence, which e.g. is stored in a table, of
the signal amplitude on oblique faults. This oblique
direction then corresponds to the alignment or angle
position of the oblique fault. That is to say, when
automatically ascertaining the angle position, certain
predeterminable angle ranges may be scanned
automatically at predeterminable increments in order to
ascertain the oblique direction in which an oblique
fault is aligned.
[0039] By way of example, elongate, metallic material
to be tested may have disturbance zones caused by
production or caused by processes, said disturbance
zones usually extending in the longitudinal direction
of the material to be tested or under a small angle to
the longitudinal direction. By way of example, seams of
welded pipes or wall thickness deviations caused by
stretch-reducing mills, so-called inner polygons, may
impair testing by virtue of these disturbance zones
generating signal components which impair the defect
testing. In embodiments of the method and the
apparatus, such problems may be suppressed by virtue of
at least one evaluating operation being a difference-
forming operation, in which a difference between
spatially dependent signal data of two fields of the
basis matrix lying in a difference-forming direction
and at a difference distance from one another is
ascertained. This option for eliminating interference
from signals is yet to be explained in more detail
below on the basis of exemplary embodiments.
[0040] Here, it is possible, for example, for the
difference-forming direction to correspond to the first
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 16 -
direction. As a result of this, it is possible, for
example, to mask the signals arising from longitudinal
seams in pipes in the case of rotating test systems. It
is also possible for the difference-forming direction
to extend obliquely to the first direction. As a result
of this, it is possible to mask signals which, for
example, are caused by longitudinal seams with a
certain amount of twist. It is possible to carry out a
plurality of difference-forming operations in different
difference-forming directions and/or over different
difference distances in order to remove the signal
components of disturbances with different causes and
hence improve the desired defect characterization. It
is also possible for the direction of one or more
disturbance sources to be identified automatically and
for the difference-forming operation to be applied to
these directions.
[0041] In one variant, the difference distance is
matched to the minimum fault length predetermined for
the respective process, wherein the difference distance
lies between the minimum fault length and five times
the minimum fault length. As a result of this, it is
possible to obtain a compromise between an optimum
disturbance signal suppression (this demands a
difference distance that is as large as possible as a
matter of principle) and obtaining the fault
information (this demands a difference distance of the
order of the minimum fault length as a matter of
principle and is dependent on fault type).
[0042] Suitable devices are provided at the apparatus
for leakage flux testing in order to carry out the
individual method steps. After digitizing the probe
signals which are initially present in analog form, the
individual method steps may be realized by suitable
modules of evaluation software.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 17 -
[0043] Indicating defects, marking defective
positions, etc., may be realized in a manner similar to
conventional testing methods and testing apparatuses.
Brief description of the drawings
[0044] Further advantages and aspects of the invention
are explained below on the basis of the figures. In the
figures:
[0045] Figure 1 shows partial systems of an exemplary
embodiment of an apparatus for leakage flux testing of
ferromagnetic material to be tested, comprising a
rotating partial system (figure 1A) and a stationary
partial system (figure 1B);
[0046] Figure 2 shows fault¨type-specific leakage flux
fields at a section through a pipe;
[0047] Figure 3 shows details in respect of
configuring the probe arrangement for a rotating
partial system in accordance with one exemplary
embodiment;
[0048] Figure 4 shows details in respect of
configuring the probe arrangement for a stationary
partial system in accordance with one exemplary
embodiment;
[0049] Figure 5 shows details in respect of
configuring the probe arrangement for a rotating
partial system in accordance with the prior art (SdT);
[0050] Figure 6 shows an exemplary embodiment of an
evaluating device;
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 18 -
[0051] Figure 7 shows signals in the case of a
smoothing operation by forming an average in the case
of longitudinal fault testing (figure 7A) and
transverse fault testing (figure 7B);
[0052] Figure 8 shows an example for a basis matrix in
the case of a rotating system in figure 8A, wherein
signal data from non-rectified probe signals are
entered in the individual fields, and a diagram in
figure 8B, in which the longitudinal position (channel
number) is plotted along the x-axis and the signal
amplitude A of the individual signals from the
individual channels is plotted along the y-axis;
[0053] Figure 9 shows the same matrix as in figure 8A
in figure 9A after forming a moving average over five
probe widths in each case and the corresponding
smoothed signal amplitudes in figure 9B;
[0054] Figure 10 shows illustrations corresponding to
the illustrations from figure 8 for an oblique fault
detection with forming an average in an oblique
direction;
[0055] Figure 11 shows illustrations corresponding to
the illustrations from figure 9 for an oblique fault
detection after forming the average in the oblique
direction;
[0056] Figure 12 shows an evaluation of oblique faults
in different evaluation directions; and
[0057] Figure 13 shows signal curves in the case of a
difference-forming operation, with figure 13A and
figure 13B showing signals of two probes of a rotating
system lying at a difference distance from one another
and figure 13C showing the difference signal.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 19 -
Detailed description of the exemplary embodiments
[0058] Below, exemplary embodiments of the claimed
invention are explained on the basis of an apparatus
for leakage flux testing of ferromagnetic material to
be tested, in the form of hot-rolled ferromagnetic
pipes in a continuous method. The apparatus is
configured for the detection of defects or inadequacies
or imperfections of different types and may, for
example, reliably detect rolling faults both on the
pipe inner side (inner fault) and on the pipe outer
side (outer fault). In so doing, it is possible to
reliably find and characterize longitudinal faults
(faults with the main direction of extent parallel to
the pipe longitudinal axis) and transverse faults
(faults with the main direction of extent in the
circumferential direction or perpendicular to the pipe
longitudinal axis) and oblique faults (transversely to
the longitudinal direction and to the circumferential
direction).
[0059] In one embodiment, two partial systems are
integrated in a multi-testing block. A rotating partial
system is provided for longitudinal fault testing, the
fundamental principle of which is explained on the
basis of figure 1A. A stationary partial system with a
ring-shaped arrangement comprising a plurality of
sensor arrays distributed around the circumference of
the arrangement, for example in accordance with the
arrangement in figure 1B, is provided for transverse
fault testing. The partial systems are arranged in
succession in the passage direction of the pipe,
wherein the sequence may be arbitrary. In other
embodiments not depicted in any more detail, a single
system may suffice, for example a single rotating
system.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 20 -
[0060] The rotating partial system has a rotating head
with a ring yoke RJ which rotates around the material
PR to be tested and which has pole shoes PS aligned
radially in relation to the test object surface at
diametrically opposite points, with magnetization
windings MW being attached to said pole shoes. As a
result, a magnetic flux or magnetic field MF (DC field)
is generated in the interior of the test object, the
field lines of which extend in the circumferential
direction of the test object, i.e. perpendicular to the
longitudinal direction of the pipe. Testing heads are
respectively arranged on the rotor in the
circumferential direction between the pole shoes, said
testing heads each containing one or more probe arrays
SA, with each probe array comprising a multiplicity of
individual probes. The ring yoke together with the pole
shoes and the testing heads rotates with rotational
speeds between approximately 60 and approximately
1200 min-1 during testing, depending on the type of
probes. The pipe to be tested is simultaneously moved
forward in the passage direction with a testing speed
(e.g. up to 3 m/s or more). Here, the testing heads
slide along the pipe surface and scan the latter
without gaps along a helical path. The probes SO of the
probe array are arranged within the testing heads at a
small testing distance AB from the surface GB of the
material to be tested, wherein said testing distance
may be of the order, for example, of 0.2 mm to 1 mm
(cf. figure 3). As a result of the magnetic field lines
extending in the circumferential direction, this
testing is particularly sensitive to longitudinal
faults LF-A on the outer side of the pipe and
longitudinal faults LF-I on the inner side of the pipe,
which disturb the magnetic flux in the circumferential
direction to maximum extent and, as a result thereof,
generate strong leakage flux fields (figure 2).
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 21 -
[0061] In the case of the stationary system (figure
1B) for transverse fault testing, use is made of a DC
field magnetization device (not depicted in any more
detail) which generates a magnetic field MF in the
longitudinal direction of the passing-through pipe. Two
rings of probe arrays with probe arrays SA arranged in
gaps in the circumferential direction are arranged
around the test object in a ring-shaped manner and scan
the test object in the longitudinal direction thereof
during the continuous testing. Since the magnetic flux
extends in the longitudinal direction, it is disturbed
particularly strongly by transverse faults on the outer
side (QF-A) and transverse faults on the inner side
(QF-I), said faults extending in the circumferential
direction, such that this arrangement has high testing
sensitivity for transverse fault testing.
[0062] The electric signals SIG of the probes of the
probe arrays, i.e. the probe signals, are fed to a
common evaluating device in which the qualification of
the defects is carried out.
[0063] Each type of faults causes certain, fault-type-
specific leakage flux fields, the properties of which
may be identified from the signal form and the
frequencies contained in the signal. By way of example,
figure 2 shows a section through a pipe perpendicular
to the longitudinal direction and the magnetic field
lines of the magnetization field MF extending in the
circumferential direction. An outer fault LF-A
extending in the longitudinal direction generates a
leakage flux field SF-A which is relatively tightly
concentrated in the vicinity of the outer fault. By
contrast, an inner fault LF-I with the same dimensions
extending in the longitudinal direction generates a
locally strongly smeared or widened or broadened
leakage flux field SF-I with a lower amplitude on the
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 22 -
outer side of the pipe. Typical signal forms of the
probe signals when a probe passes over in the
circumferential direction are shown above the leakage
flux fields in each case. Here, the y-axis corresponds
to the signal amplitude A and the x-axis corresponds to
the time t or the location during the circulation of
the probe. It can immediately be identified that the
outer fault causes a probe signal with higher frequency
signal components than an inner fault. As a result, it
is plausible to be able to detect, identify and, where
necessary, distinguish different fault types by, inter
alia, the frequency spectrum of the probe signals
generated in each case.
[0064] Figures 3 and 4 are now used to explain details
for configuring the probe arrangements for the rotating
system (figure 3) and the stationary system (figure 4).
The probe arrangement SA-R for the rotating system has
a multiplicity of nominally identical individual probes
S01, SO2 etc., which form a probe array SA and are
arranged in a straight line along a first direction R1
extending parallel to the longitudinal axis of the
pipe. The probe array SA is installed in a testing
head. In the case of a rotating system, the probe
arrangement moves as a whole around the test object in
the circumferential direction of the test object, along
a second direction R2 which extends perpendicular to
the first direction R1. As a result of the longitudinal
movement of the test object PR occurring at the same
time, each one of the individual probes 501, SO2 scans
a relatively narrow testing track PS, which extends
around the test object in a spiral form, with the
testing track extending at an angle to the first
direction and to the second direction. Together, all
probes of the probe array scan a relatively high
testing width with a multiplicity of testing tracks
which are parallel to one another.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 23 -
[0065] The shown outer longitudinal fault LF-A is a
standard defect with a minimum fault length ML defined
for this test, said minimum fault length being 25 mm in
the exemplary case. The probe widths SB of the
individual probes 501, SO2 etc. are only a fraction of
the minimum fault length in the first direction. In the
exemplary case, the probe width measured in the first
direction R1 lies in the range between 0.5 mm and 3 mm,
which in this case corresponds to the range between 50%
of the testing distance and approximately two to three
times the testing distance.
[0066] A corresponding arrangement emerges in the
probe arrangement SA-T for transverse fault testing
(cf. figure 4). The probe arrangement SA-T has a
multiplicity of individual probes S01, SO2, etc., which
are arranged next to one another in a row in the first
direction R1, the first direction in this case
corresponding to the circumferential direction of the
material PR to be tested. The probe arrangement is
stationary while the material to be tested moves
parallel to the longitudinal direction thereof such
that the probe array scans the test object surface in a
scanning direction corresponding to the second
direction R2 which is perpendicular to the first
direction R1. Here too, each individual probe covers a
relatively narrow testing track PS, with the totality
of the testing tracks in the circumferential direction
resulting in a many times larger testing width of the
probe arrangement. The magnetic field MF extending in
the longitudinal direction of the pipe is pushed out of
the test object material at a transverse fault QF-A and
detected by means of the probes of the probe array SA.
Here too, the probe width SB of the individual probes,
as measured in the first direction R1, is only
approximately 0.5 mm to 3 mm, while the outer
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 24 -
transverse fault QF-A has the minimum fault length of
25 mm provided for the test.
[0067] The probe widths which are reduced in relation
to the prior art (SdT) are elucidated on the basis of
figure 5, in which a conventional probe array SA-C with
three individual probes SO-C for a conventional
rotating testing system is shown in the same testing
situation as in figure 3. The individual probes are
dimensioned in conventional fashion, and so the probe
width SB-C thereof in the first direction (longitudinal
direction of the pipe) corresponds to approximately 50%
of the minimum fault length ML, i.e. the test fault
length of the outer longitudinal fault LF-A (25 mm).
[0068] While the extent of the probe width in
conventional systems is guided by this minimum fault
length, the probe width of the individual probes in
exemplary embodiments of the invention is guided by the
smallest leakage flux width to be expected, which,
inter alia, is determined by the testing distance of
the probe from the material surface. The novel probe
arrangements are able to scan the test object surface
with a substantially higher spatial resolution than
conventional probe arrangements for comparable
purposes. As a result of suitable signal processing or
evaluation of the probe signals, faults with the
minimum fault length may nevertheless be detected with
at least comparable testing sensitivity, with,
additionally, numerous further evaluation possibilities
and numerous other detection options emerging.
[0069] In order to ease the understanding of the
subsequent embodiment, figure 6 shows a block diagram
of the evaluating device AW for the entire evaluation
of probe signals in one embodiment, with the individual
components representing individual steps of the signal
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 25 -
evaluation and/or components of the evaluating device.
Shown in an exemplary manner are paths for probe
signals from two probes S01, SO2, with a corresponding
path being provided for each probe.
[0070] The probe signals from the first probe 501
initially pass through gain matching VS before they are
pre-filtered in a pre-filtering device VF. Here, the
signal components of each individual probe are filtered
by a band pass, the limit frequencies of which are set,
or may be set, to the lowest and highest frequency of
the leakage flux signals to be expected, depending on
the probe passing speed, the testing distance from the
material surface, the wall thickness and the smallest,
and largest, fault width to be detected. By means of
the coarse pre-filtering, it is possible to filter out
signal components which are clearly irrelevant, and so
the following evaluation is simplified.
[0071] The bipolar signals which were pre-filtered by
the band-pass filtering are then converted into digital
signal information, or digitized, by an analog-digital
filter unit DIG.
[0072] A subsequent mapping unit MAP is configured to
link the signal information linked to the probe signal
to spatial information in relation to the creation
location of the probe signal for each probe signal. To
this end, the mapping unit processes, inter alia,
signals from linear encoders TRANS and rotary encoders
ROT. By way of example, the information about the
rotational position of the rotating system is
ascertained by means of a rotary encoder in order to
identify the position of a probe when generating the
associated signal at the circumference of the test
object. Linear encoders serve to identify the
corresponding position in the longitudinal direction of
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 26 -
the test object. Then, spatially dependent signal data
SDO are available at the output of the mapping unit,
said signal data being processed further during the
subsequent evaluation operations.
[0073] The magnetic-field-sensitive probes, which may
be constructed with, for example, coils, Hall sensors
or the like, preferably capture the normal component of
the leakage flux. Alternatively, or additionally, it is
also possible to capture the tangential component of
the leakage flux or the complete vector of the leakage
flux (Bx-, By- and Bz-component).
[0074] The mapping device MAP is followed by fault¨
type-dependent band passes FTYP for fault¨type-
dependent band-pass filtering. These facilitate
filtering of each individual probe signal, or the
corresponding spatially dependent signal data, in
accordance with predeterminable limit frequencies which
may be set in accordance with the signal frequency to
be expected for the various fault types (for example
longitudinal or transverse faults, outer/inner faults,
bores with different diameters, natural faults such as
peels, etc.). In the apparatus, the number of band
passes is configurable, i.e., it may be matched in an
ideal manner to the testing situation where necessary.
Even though figure 6 only shows two band passes for
fault type A (FT-A) and fault type B (FT-B), it is
possible to provide substantially more than two fault¨
type-dependent band passes with corresponding filtering
options in order to undertake specific filtering for a
multiplicity of faults.
[0075] All subsequent evaluation operations may be
undertaken separately for each fault type such that a
fault-type-specific signal evaluation is obtained.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 27 -
[0076] In the exemplary case, a matrix-forming unit
MAT, in which a matrix-forming operation is carried
out, follows in the signal flow of the evaluating
device. In the matrix-forming operation, the spatially
dependent signal data, or signal data derived
therefrom, which were also filtered in a fault¨type-
dependent manner in the example in case, are stored in
fields, assigned with the correct location, of a basis
matrix. To this end, provision can be made of a
specific storage region of a memory of the evaluating
device.
[0077] In the exemplary case, a multidimensional basis
matrix comprising the leakage flux values (or
corresponding data) and the spatial coordinates thereof
(or corresponding data) is generated from the pre-
filtered leakage flux signals for each band pass, i.e.
for each fault type. In the exemplary case, the
information taken into account when forming the matrix
may be divided into three dimensions (cf. figures 8 to
12).
[0078] The first dimension contains the signal
information in the form of an amplitude of the leakage
flux signal. Here, the non-rectified bipolar signal
information is taken into account. By way of example,
it is possible to store only the normal component of
the leakage flux or only the horizontal component of
the leakage flux or else the complete leakage flux
vector with Bx-, By- and Bz-components and keep it for
the further evaluation.
[0079] The location information is encoded in the
second dimension and in the third dimension. By way of
example, the longitudinal position LP of the creation
location of the leakage flux value on the material to
be tested is stored in the second dimension. In the
case of a rotating system, the resolution here lies in
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 28 -
the region of a probe width of an individual probe. In
the case of the stationary system, the resolution in
relation to the longitudinal position corresponds to
the scanning frequency which is matched to the maximum
frequency of the band pass underlying the matrix.
[0080] The third dimension corresponds to the
circumferential position UP of the creation location of
the leakage flux value. Here, the resolution in the
rotating system corresponds to the scanning frequency
which is matched to the maximum frequency of the band
pass underlying the matrix, while the resolution in the
circumferential direction in the case of the stationary
system corresponds to a probe width of an individual
probe.
[0081] It is possible to carry out different
evaluating operations using the spatially dependent
signal data within the basis matrices. Some examples
are explained below.
[0082] After the preceding band-pass filterings, the
signals of the individual probes contain the sought-
after use information within the frequency regions to
be processed further, possibly superposed by
disturbance information which, for example, is traced
back to the surface roughness which is not critical to
the function thereof. In order to improve the
reliability of the evaluation results, it is possible,
for example, to carry out a smoothing operation over a
predetermined number of mutually adjacent fields of a
basis matrix.
[0083] Figures 7 to 9 are used to explain how forming
a moving average may improve the quality of the signals
to be processed further. To this end, the evaluating
device of figure 6 comprises an average forming unit
MW. To this end, figure 7 shows, in figure 7A, the
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 29 -
process of forming an average over three individual
probe signals, which each indicate the normal component
of the leakage flux during longitudinal fault testing.
Figure 7B shows the corresponding individual probe
signals in the case of transverse fault testing. It is
possible to identify that the signals SG smoothed by
forming an average have a better signal-to-noise ratio
than the initial signals.
[0084] Figure 8A shows an example of a basis matrix BM
for a rotating system, in which signal data from non-
rectified (bipolar) probe signals are entered into the
individual fields. The signal data are symbolized by
signed numbers. The second dimension of the basis
matrix, specifically the longitudinal position LP of
the creation location of the respective signal, is
plotted in the horizontal direction. The third
dimension, specifically the circumferential position
UP, is plotted in the direction perpendicular thereto.
In the example of a rotating testing system, the
longitudinal position LP corresponds to the channel
number of the individual probes of the probe array. The
circumferential position UP correlates with the time
axis of testing. Figure 8B shows the channel number,
i.e. the longitudinal position LP, along the x axis,
while the signal amplitude A of the individual signals
(curves) of the individual channels is plotted on the
y-axis.
[0085] Figure 9A shows the same matrix as in figure
8A, but after forming a moving average over five probe
widths in each case. Figure 9B shows the corresponding
smoothed signal amplitudes.
[0086] Forming the average is carried out in such a
way that a moving average is formed over a configurable
number of probe tracks within a basis matrix. In the
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 30 -
shown example of a rotating system, the average is
formed in the longitudinal direction of the pipe, i.e.
parallel to the pipe axis. In a stationary system, the
smoothing direction or evaluation direction would be
identical to the transverse direction of the pipe. To
the extent that the noise occurs stochastically in the
individual probe tracks, for example due to uniformly
distributed surface roughness of the test object, the
signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio improves as a result of
this averaging over e.g. five probes. This is
immediately identifiable by comparing figures 8B and
9B.
[0087] As an alternative or in addition to forming a
moving mean, in which the sum of the signal amplitudes
of the captured individual probes is divided by the
number of captured individual probes, forming a sum
would also be possible; in this case, the division by
the number of detected probes would be dispensed with.
Other evaluations with a low-pass characteristic, for
example low-pass filtering, are also suitable, as a
matter of principle, to achieve smoothing of the probe
signals and hence a reduction in the dynamics. In
general, it is also possible to apply different types
of filtering, convolutions or correlations over a
plurality of probe tracks.
[0088] The number of testing tracks underlying the
averaging or filtering is configurable in some
embodiments. If necessary, the number may be selected
differently for each evaluation channel. In the
exemplary case, it is guided by the minimum fault
length of the respective evaluation channel for a
specific fault type. Here, the minimum fault length is
the fault length from which the maximum amplitude, i.e.
the highest testing sensitivity, is reached. In
contrast to conventional testing systems, in which the
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 31 -
probe width is fixedly predetermined by the minimum
fault length, the minimum fault length is now
configurable in the proposed system for each type of
fault. Inter alia, this results in the advantage that
this improves the reproducibility of faults which are
shorter than the minimum fault length. This improvement
emerges independently of the length of the faults and
independently of a possible overlap of the probes.
[0089] The evaluation is not restricted to evaluating
directions extending parallel or perpendicular to the
axis of the test object. Rather, it is also possible
within a basis matrix to form moving averages or summed
values or other values, which are establishable by
combined evaluations of spatially dependent signal
data, at any angle position transversely to the
longitudinal direction and circumferential direction.
In the shown exemplary embodiment, the number of
evaluation channels and the angle position thereof are
configurable. Alternatively, or additionally, it is
also possible to predetermine whole angle regions and
angle increments within angle regions in the testing
apparatus. The evaluation software then ascertains the
moving averages or summed values or other values for
all configurable angle positions or for each individual
step within a predetermined angle range.
[0090] The evaluation channels serve to capture
oblique faults at any angle position. In a testing
apparatus which combines a rotating system with a
stationary system, angle positions from -45 (so-called
"left-hand faults") to +45 (so-called "right-hand
faults") of the pipe longitudinal axis may preferably
be set or ascertained with the rotating system. Then,
the stationary system may e.g. ascertain angle
positions with -45 to +45 deviation from an ideal
transverse fault (fault in the circumferential
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 32 -
direction). Hence, faults in all orientations may
reliably be found in the case of combined testing with
rotating systems and stationary systems.
[0091] By way of example, automatic ascertaining of
the angle position of a fault may be carried out by
virtue of the signal maxima within the angle range
being ascertained after ascertaining the moving
averages (or summed values) for the individual angle
steps. What is additionally taken into account in the
exemplary embodiment is that a characteristic and
calculable signal drop emerges as a result of an
increasing oblique position of a fault relative to the
profile of the field lines of the magnetization field.
This is because it is well known that the height of a
leakage flux signal reduces the further the fault or
the orientation of the fault deviates from the ideal
orthogonal position in relation to the main
magnetization direction. This signal drop may be
compensated by virtue of the signals being amplified
dependent upon the configured or found angle position.
Alternatively, or additionally, it is also possible for
the thresholds at which a signal amplitude is
considered to be indicative for a defect to be set
lower than in the case of pure longitudinal faults or
transverse faults. This oblique fault compensation is
taken into account when forming the average for oblique
faults, for example by virtue of this being carried out
before or after the actual formation of the average
such that, during the average formation, comparable
signal amplitude values are combined with one another
by calculation.
[0092] For explanatory purposes, figure 10A shows an
illustration corresponding to figures 8A and 9A of an
oblique fault (shaded in gray) which lies at -45 in
relation to the longitudinal direction and transverse
direction ("left-hand fault"). Figure 10B shows the
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 33 -
corresponding signal amplitudes A prior to forming the
average. Figure 11A shows the same basis matrix, but
after forming the moving average over 5 probe widths in
the -45 direction in each case. Figure 11B shows the
corresponding smoothed signal amplitudes.
[0093] Figure 12 is used to show, in an exemplary
manner, that forming an average (or a different type of
evaluation) for oblique faults may be carried out in a
plurality of different oblique directions, i.e. also in
those directions which deviate by more or less than 45
from a longitudinal direction or circumferential
direction. In general, this therefore allows an angle-
dependent evaluation of the signal amplitudes to be
carried out by way of the spatially dependent signal
data of the basis matrix.
[0094] Elongate, metallic material to be tested may
have disturbance zones caused by production and/or
caused by processes, said disturbance zones usually
extending in the longitudinal direction of the material
to be tested or under small angles obliquely to the
longitudinal direction. By way of example, the
disturbance zones may be the longitudinally extending
welding seam in the case of welded pipes. Systematic
wall thickness deviations, so-called inner polygons,
may occur in pipes which run through a stretch-reducing
mill. Such systematic material inhomogeneities may lead
to disturbance signals which impair the defect testing.
The signals from these direction-oriented disturbance
zones may be suppressed by means of a so-called
difference operation in one embodiment. To this end, a
difference-forming unit DIFF is provided in the
apparatus from figure 6, said difference forming unit
undertaking interference elimination after the fault¨
type-dependent filtering and forming the matrices, but
before forming the moving averages or summed values.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 34 -
[0095] For the purposes of explaining the principle,
figure 13 shows, in 13A, the probe signal from a first
probe S01, including the signal SN of a welding seam,
in the case of a rotation between 0 and 360 . Figure
13B shows the signal from the seventh probe S07 of a
probe array over the same angle range, wherein the
signal SN of the welding seam occurs at the same angle
position but, in addition, the signal SF of a fault may
be identified at approximately 100 . Figure 13C shows a
difference signal curve DSV, in which the signal of the
first probe SO1 was subtracted from the signal of the
seventh probe SO7 in a difference-forming operation. It
is possible to identify that the same signal of the
welding seam occurring in both signals disappears when
the difference is formed and also that the noise
amplitude is reduced, while the signal SF of the fault
is maintained. Hence, very efficient disturbance
suppression is possible by forming a difference.
[0096] When using probe arrays with a small probe
width, i.e. in the case of high resolution leakage flux
testing, it is now possible to set the difference
basis, i.e. the difference distance between the probes
used for forming the difference, to the optimum
difference distance for the respective fault type in
small increments with a resolution of one probe track
width. To this end, the difference-forming unit
contains an adjusting device for adjusting the
difference distance. An optimum difference basis is
found when the difference distance is selected to be as
small as possible so that small deviations in the
longitudinal alignment of the sources of disturbance do
not impair the suppression of the disturbance signals
too strongly. On the other hand, the difference basis
should be greater than the typical fault length of the
respective evaluation channel because otherwise forming
the difference may reduce the maximum possible averages
or summed values of the fault lengths which are typical
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 35 -
for the respective evaluation channel. Here, the
typical fault length is the sum of the probe track
widths when calculating the moving averages.
[0097] In the apparatus from figure 6, the various
evaluating operations are followed by the fault
detection, which is carried out by means of a fault
detection unit DET, e.g. by comparing the incoming
signals with predeterminable thresholds (threshold
comparison). In a subsequent decision unit ENT, a
decision is made according to predetermined criteria as
to whether a relevant defect is present, which defect
may then, for example, be marked by means of a color on
the test object in a subsequent marking unit.
[0098] Furthermore, it is possible to configure, or
automatically ascertain, in addition, arbitrary further
angle positions for the difference operation in the
exemplary embodiment of the testing apparatus such that
it is possible to suppress not only the disturbance
zones extending in the longitudinal direction, but also
signals of sources of disturbance which extend
obliquely, in the respective evaluation channels.
[0100] In the described evaluation of the difference
formation, the signs of the leakage flux signals are
observed and maintained in the present case. As a
result, phase information arises, from which the
position of the fault on the test material may be
reconstructed. It is also possible to form a plurality
of difference values. In one example, a signal train is
ascertained in the transportation direction of the
material to be tested and a signal train is ascertained
counter to this transportation direction. Subsequently,
the mean value of the two differences is formed. This
results in a signal maximum at the original spatial
position of the fault and two signals to the left and
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 36 -
right thereof with in each case half the signal
amplitude. Hence, a more accurate
position
determination of the fault is also possible during
difference operation.
[0101] Numerous further variants are possible. By way
of example, it is possible to use not a rectified
leakage signal but a peak-to-peak value within a search
path for evaluating the fault depth. This results in an
improvement in the reproducibility of, predominantly,
faults with frequencies in the vicinity of the band-
pass limits.
[0102] The options described here for evaluating probe
signals with the aid of a basis matrix may also be used
in conjunction with other probe types for non-
destructive electromagnetic material testing. By way of
example, signals from eddy current probes or ultrasonic
probes may be processed further in an analogous manner.
In accordance with a more general phrasing, the
following is therefore also disclosed:
[0103] A method for electromagnetic testing of
material to be tested for detecting defects, in which a
surface of the material to be tested is scanned by
means of a probe arrangement for capturing
electromagnetic fields caused by defects, said probe
arrangement comprising a probe array with a
multiplicity of probes arranged next to one another in
a first direction and held at a finite testing distance
from the surface of the material to be tested during
the testing, and
electrical probe signals are evaluated by means of an
evaluating device for qualifying the defects,
characterized in that an evaluation of the probe
signals comprises the following steps:
a mapping operation, in which signal information
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
- 37 -
representing the probe signal is linked to spatial
information representing the creation location of a
probe signal for each probe signal in order to form
spatially dependent signal data,
a matrix-forming operation, in which the spatially
dependent signal data (or signal data derived
therefrom) are stored in fields, assigned with the
correct location, of a basis matrix, and
at least one evaluating operation, in which spatially
dependent signal data from at least two fields of the
basis matrix, (directly or indirectly) adjacent to one
another in an evaluating direction, are linked to one
another using at least one evaluating algorithm.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-07-26
