Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
NON ADIABATIC 2-PHASE (LIQUID-LIQUID) POLYMERIZATION PROCESS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
Disclosed herein is the use of a non-adiabatic polymerization reactor that is
operated at pressures that allow the reaction fluid to exist in two liquid
phases in the
reactor. The 2-phase system can improve heat transfer to the cooling medium.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
While there are known uses of cooled (or non-adiabatic) reactors for solution
polymerization and there are known processes for polymerization in the
liquid/liquid
(L/L) region of the phase diagram the present invention seeks to combine the
two
approaches in new ways.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Some embodiments disclosed herein are continuous processes for
manufacturing a polyethylene polymer or copolymer in a liquid/liquid biphasic
non-
adiabatic reaction comprising the steps of
a. identifying the desired polymer or copolymer product;
b. charging a non-adiabatic reactor with starting materials and reactants
required to obtain the desired polymer or copolymer product;
c. adding a solvent selected from aliphatic cyclic, straight and branched C3-
12 hydrocarbon solvents that will facilitate formation of the liquid/liquid
biphase;
d. setting and maintaining the reaction temperature required to obtain the
desired polymer or copolymer product;
e. controlling the pressure to retain liquid/liquid biphase allowing for
optimized heat transfer to a cooling medium; and
1
CA 2969280 .26riliig-23-0019\2016019Canada docx
f. optionally monitoring at least one physical property of the
reaction
mixture to confirm the liquid/liquid biphasic reaction is being maintained
wherein the continuous process allows for heat transfer to the cooling medium
that is improved relative to a process for making the same polymer in a single
liquid phase.
Some embodiments disclosed herein are methods to improve the heat transfer
to the cooling medium in a continuous process for manufacturing a polyethylene
polymer or copolymer, the methods comprising
a. identifying the desired polymer or copolymer product;
b. charging a non-adiabatic reactor with starting materials and reactants
required to obtain the desired polymer or copolymer product;
c. adding a solvent selected from aliphatic cyclic, straight and branched C3_
12 hydrocarbon solvents that will facilitate formation of a liquid/liquid
biphase;
d. setting and maintaining the reaction temperature required to obtain the
desired polymer or copolymer product;
e. controlling the pressure in the non-adiabatic reactor to retain
liquid/liquid
biphase allowing for maximized heat transfer to a cooling medium; and
f. optionally monitoring at least one physical property of the reaction
mixture to confirm the liquid/liquid biphasic reaction is being maintained.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Steam Jacket as a function
of
reactor pressure. Cloud point pressures simulated from the PC-SAFT equation of
state are also provided. Note that the dotted lines on this plot are meant to
lead-the-
eye only and do not represent any data or theory.
2
9.92.8.0 20175Ez3-0319\2016019Canada.docx
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Other than in the operating examples or where otherwise indicated, all numbers
or expressions referring to quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions,
etc. used in
the specification and claims are to be understood as modified in all instances
by the
term "about." Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical
parameters
set forth in the following specification and attached claims are
approximations that can
vary depending upon the desired properties, which the present invention
desires to
obtain. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of
the doctrine
of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at
least be
construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by
applying ordinary
rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the
broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set
forth in the
specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical values,
however, inherently contain certain errors necessarily resulting from the
standard
deviation found in their respective testing measurements.
Also, it should be understood that any numerical range recited herein is
intended to include all sub-ranges subsumed therein. For example, a range of
"1 to
10" is intended to include all sub-ranges between and including the recited
minimum
value of 1 and the recited maximum value of 10; that is, having a minimum
value
equal to or greater than 1 and a maximum value of equal to or less than 10.
Because
the disclosed numerical ranges are continuous, they include every value
between the
minimum and maximum values. Unless expressly indicated otherwise, the various
numerical ranges specified in this application are approximations and are
subject to
the descriptions of the previous paragraph.
3
CA 2 9 6 92 8 0 2017-o5-3019\2016019Canada.docx
All compositional ranges expressed herein are limited in total to and do not
exceed 100 percent (volume percent or weight percent) in practice. Where
multiple
components can be present in a composition, the sum of the maximum amounts of
each component can exceed 100 percent, with the understanding that, and as
those
skilled in the art readily understand, the amounts of the components actually
used will
conform to the maximum of 100 percent.
Cooled (or non-adiabatic) reactors for solution polymerization are known. An
increase in polymer concentration in a solution-phase polymerization process
reduces
the total amount of solvent circulating in the process for a given polymer
production
.. rate. This reduction in solvent flow can lead to significantly lower
capital and operating
costs in the process by reducing the equipment size and energy usage in the
distillation, purification and reactor feed areas of the plant that are used
to recycle the
solvent. One method to increase polymer concentration in such reaction
processes is
to utilize a non-adiabatic reactor with a heat exchanger. Reactors of this
type may also
provide greater product design flexibility.
There are some examples of processes for polymerization in the liquid/liquid
(L/L) region of the phase diagram used to decrease the viscosity of the
reaction
mixture, or used to allow for more efficient separation and recycling of
polymer
product from reusable solvent and monomer components of the reaction mixture.
We have advantageously found that, in some embodiments of this disclosure,
operating a non-adiabatic reactor under conditions that allow for retention of
two liquid
phases during the polymerization processes allows for improved heat transfer
and
improved efficiency in the overall process. In addition, in some embodiments,
the
processes show the added advantage of allowing for higher polymer
concentrations in
the solvents of choice.
4
CA 2 9 6 92 8 0 2017-o5-3019\2016019Canada.docx
In some embodiments, disclosed herein are continuous processes for
manufacturing a polyethylene polymer or copolymer in a liquid/liquid biphasic
non-
adiabatic reaction comprising the steps of
a. identifying the desired polymer or copolymer product;
b. charging a non-adiabatic reactor with starting materials and reactants
required to obtain the desired polymer or copolymer product;
c. adding a solvent selected from aliphatic cyclic, straight and branched C3-
12 hydrocarbon solvents that will facilitate formation of the liquid/liquid
biphase;
d. setting and maintaining the reaction temperature required to obtain the
desired polymer or copolymer product;
e. controlling the pressure to retain liquid/liquid biphase allowing for
optimized heat transfer to a cooling medium; and
f. optionally monitoring at least one physical property of the reaction
mixture to confirm the liquid/liquid biphasic reaction is being maintained
wherein the continuous process allows for heat transfer to the cooling medium
that is improved relative to a process for making the same polymer in a single
liquid phase.
Without wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that the heat exchanger
partially removes the heat generated by the polymerization reaction and
enables a
higher polymer concentration while maintaining the required reactor
temperature and
compositions to achieve the desired polymer architecture. While solution
polymerization reactors are typically operated in a region of the phase
diagram such
that a single homogeneous phase is present in the reactor, under the right
conditions,
the reactor pressure can be appropriately adjusted to allow phase separation
to occur
5
CA 2 9 6 92 8 0 2017-05-3019\2016019Canada.docx
and two liquid phases are formed in the reactor. Under certain conditions of
temperature and pressure, a polymer solution can phase separate into two
distinct
liquid phases, one if which is "lean" in dissolved polymer and one which is
"rich" in
dissolved polymer. Phase separation occurs at the lower critical solution
temperature
(LCST), also known as the "cloud point." Increasing the temperature, or
decreasing
the pressure at the cloud point leads to further phase separation. The cloud
point is
determined in part by the pressure, temperature, solution composition and
solvent
used for polymerization. It is believed that the separation of the polymer
within the
two phases can minimize the bulk viscosity of the reaction fluid by
essentially
extracting some of the polymer into the second liquid phase, and in addition,
allows for
more efficient heat transfer to the cooling medium relative to the single
phase
reaction.
Some advantages of some of the embodiments disclosed herein include
reducing the cost of the heat exchangers and associated process systems,
and/or
allowing for higher ethylene concentrations and subsequently polymer
production
rates for a given cooling duty than if the reaction fluid was maintained in a
single liquid
phase.
In some embodiments, the methods disclosed herein improve the heat transfer
to the cooling medium in a continuous process for manufacturing a polyethylene
polymer or copolymer and the methods comprise the steps of
a. identifying the desired polymer or copolymer product;
b. charging a non-adiabatic reactor with starting materials and
reactants required to obtain the desired polymer or copolymer
product;
6
CA 2969280 2017-05-30
319\2016019Canada.docx
c. adding a solvent selected from aliphatic cyclic, straight and
branched C3-12 hydrocarbon solvents that will facilitate formation
of a liquid/liquid biphase;
d. setting and maintaining the reaction temperature required to
obtain the desired polymer or copolymer product;
e. controlling the pressure in the non-adiabatic reactor to retain
liquid/liquid biphase allowing for maximized heat transfer to a
cooling medium; and
optionally monitoring at least one physical property of the reaction mixture
to
confirm the liquid/liquid biphasic reaction is being maintained.
Work on the pilot plant scale has demonstrated that polymerization in the
liquid/liquid (L/L) region under adiabatic conditions has very little (if any)
impact on the
polymer that is produced despite the presence of two liquid phases.
Designing a non-adiabatic (cooled) reactor presents some challenges,
including maintaining sufficient heat transfer between the reaction fluid and
the cooling
medium.
As the reactor pressure is reduced below the cloud point, higher ethylene
concentrations can be used due to improved heat transfer to the cooling
medium, and
subsequently polymer production rates can be achieved for the same total
solution
rate (TSR or total mass flow to the reactor). This can be attributed to the
change in the
phase behavior as the pressure is reduced, changing from a single liquid
phase, to 2-
liquid phases, one polymer rich, and one solvent rich. As seen in the Table,
the nature
of each of these phases varies with pressure, becoming more enriched in
polymer and
solvent, respectively, as the pressure is reduced. This can lead to changes in
the
density and viscosity of the two liquid phases.
7
CA 2969280 2017-05-30319\2016019Canada.docx
The change in the phase behavior can be detected through in-line optical
measurements, such as near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. As the pressure is
reduced
below the cloud point, the polymer solution will change from a transparent
solution to
a cloudy suspension, leading to increased light scattering, demonstrated by a
-- dramatic increase in the NIR-baseline. In addition, the changes in phase
behavior can
be detected using viscosity measurements, or through monitoring agitator
torque to
confirm the reaction is maintained in a liquid/liquid state.
The combination of the changes in the physical properties of the reaction
fluid
allows for improved heat transfer (cooling), and higher ethylene
concentrations. Figure
-- 1 shows an initial increase in the overall heat transfer coefficient is
observed as the
steam jacket pressure is reduced below the value that is required to maintain
adiabatic operation, while maintaining a constant pressure in the reactor. The
heat
transfer coefficient then increases gradually as the reactor pressure is
reduced, while
maintaining a constant steam jacket pressure. When the reactor pressure is
reduced
-- below the cloud point and the second liquid phase is formed in the reactor,
there is
marked increase in the heat transfer coefficient.
A continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) - also known as (but not limited
to) a
mixed or mixed flow reactor, back-mixed reactor, or constant flow stirred tank
reactor
(CFSTR) - is one of three typical classification methods for reactor design
and
-- modeling. The other two are a batch or semi-batch reactor (BR) and a plug
flow
reactor (PFR). As the name implies, a BR in its ideal form has its reactants
injected at
the beginning with the reaction taking place for the required period of time
at which
point the products are withdrawn. The BR chemical composition varies in time
but is
uniform throughout the reactor at any instant in time. A PFR is a continuous
flow
-- reactor typically tubular in geometry with a continuous injection of
reactants at one
end and products withdrawn at the other end. The PFR has a continuously
varying
8
CA
docx
chemical composition through its length. A CSTR in its ideal realization is a
well stirred
tank with reactants continuously injected in one location and products
withdrawn
continuously in another location. The chemical composition within the reactor
is
uniform in space and time and equal to the chemical composition at the exit.
No real reactor is exactly represented by either of a CSTR, BR or PFR. These
classifications are used to model in the ideal sense how a chemical reactor
behaves
or operates. A real reactor will be best represented conceptually by one of
these three
reactor types for the purposes of modeling and general understanding of their
operation. The descriptions of the ideal reactor types do not necessarily
describe the
1.0 physical or geometric realization of a reactor. A CSTR can be a typical
tank or
reaction volume stirred by an impeller rotating at some speed; however, any
configuration that is well mixed throughout its reaction volume with a
continuous
injection of reactants and withdrawal of products is within the category of
CSTR. For
example, a reactor composed of flow loop with sufficient circulation and
internal
.. mixing to be essentially uniform is classified as a CSTR. This loop may be
composed
of pump(s) or fluid motive driver(s) and any combination of piping, static
mixers or
tanks. All three reactors can operate with liquid, gas or multi-phase (for
example,
solid-liquid, liquid-liquid or liquid-gas). A CSTR as defined here can operate
adiabatically or non-adiabatically.
In an adiabatic process, there is no transfer of heat: enthalpy is constant.
In the
adiabatic polymerization of ethylene, the reaction temperature is therefore
governed
by the ethylene concentration in the feed, the conversion in the reactor and
the
composition of the fluid. In a non-adiabatic reactor, the reaction temperature
is
controlled additionally through either the addition or removal of heat from
the process.
In some embodiments the reactor is an agitated reactor. In some embodiments
the reactor is an agitated reactor selected from stirred tank, batch, plug
flow, loop
9
CA 2969280 2017-05-30D19\2016019Canada.docx
reactor static mixer, and static mixer in a loop. The solution polymerization
process
may be conducted in a stirred "reactor system" comprising one or more stirred
tank
reactors or in a mixed loop and stirred tank reactor system. The CSTR reactors
may
be cylindrical or spherical. The agitator may be selected from the group
consisting of
auger agitators, anchor agitators, radial blade turbine, pitched blade
turbine, hydrofoil
impeller, or a hybrid impeller comprising one or more of these elements. In
some
embodiments the reactor is a single reactor. In some embodiments the reactor
is a
dual reactor system. In some embodiments the reactor is at least a dual
reactor. The
reactors may be in tandem (series) or parallel operation. In some embodiments
of a
dual tandem reactor system, the first polymerization reactor preferably
operates at
lower temperature.
In some embodiments of a dual reactor system comprising a first reactor and a
second reactor. In some embodiments the first reactor is selected from tube
reactors,
CSTR, and PFR. In some embodiments the first reactor is a non-adiabatic
reactor. In
.. some embodiments the second reactor is a non-adiabatic reactor. In some
embodiments, the second reactor is selected from adiabatic tube, CSTR and PF.
The residence time in each reactor will depend on the design and the capacity
of the reactor. Generally the reactors should be operated under conditions to
achieve
a thorough mixing of the reactants. In addition, in some embodiments from 20
to
60 wt% of the final polymer is polymerized in the first reactor, with the
balance being
polymerized in the second reactor. Solution phase reactors produce a single or
substantially single phase product a polymer solution typically of one or more
C3 to
C12 alkanes.
Solution processes for the polymerization and copolymerization of ethylene are
well known in the art. In some embodiments the solvent used in the
polymerization
processes is selected from aliphatic cyclic, straight and branched C3-12
hydrocarbon
CA 2969280 2017-05-30)19\2016019Canada.docx
solvents. In some embodiments the solvent used in the polymerization processes
is
selected from pentane, methyl pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclopentane,
cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane and hydrogenated naphtha, Isopar E and mixtures
thereof. In some embodiments the solvent used in the polymerization processes
is
selected from hexane, cyclohexane, decane, heptane, isohexane, and dodecane
and
mixtures thereof. In other embodiments the solvent is selected from
methylpentane,
cyclopentane, cyclohexane, hexane and mixtures thereof.
The polymerization temperature in a conventional slurry or solution process is
from about 80 to about 300 C (preferably from about 80 to about 120 C for
slurry
io polymerization and from about 120 to about 250 C for solution
polymerizations). As is
illustrated in the Examples, in some embodiments, the polymerization
temperature for
the solution process disclosed herein can be above 160 C. The upper
temperature
limit will be influenced by considerations which are well known to those
skilled in the
art, such as a desire to maximize operating temperature to reduce solution
viscosity,
.. while still maintaining good polymer properties. Increased polymerization
temperatures generally reduce the molecular weight of the polymer.
In other embodiments of the present disclosure, the polymerization temperature
in the non-adiabatic reactor can be between about 100 C and about 240 C, or
about
120 C and about 240 C, or between about 130 C and about 220 C, or between
about
200 and about 300 C, or between about 220 to about 250 C.
In other embodiments of the present disclosure, when the reactor system
comprises at least a first and a second reactor, the first reactor may be
operated at
temperatures between 100 C and 170 C or between 150 C and 160 C or between
100 C and 160 C. In some embodiments the second reactor may be operated at
temperatures between 150 C and 250 C, or between 150 C and 240 C, or between
175 C and 190 C. In some embodiments, the temperature of the first reactor is
11
CA 2969280 2017-05-30)19\2016019Canada.docx
between 100 C and 170 C, or between 120 C and 170 C and the temperature of the
second reactor is between 150 C and 230 C, or between 150 C and 240 C.
One example of a reaction process is a "medium pressure process," meaning
that the pressure in the reactor is preferably less than about 6,000 psi
(about 41,000
kiloPascals or kPa). Pressures can range from about 10,000 to about 40,000
kPa, or
from about 2,000 to about 3,000 psi (about 14,000¨ about 21,000 kPa), or from
400
to about 3,000 psi (about 2,800 ¨ about 22,000 kPa). In other embodiments of
this
disclosure, the pressure in the non-adiabatic reactor is between 2 MPaa and 17
MPaa,
or between 4 MPaa and 12 MPaa, or between 2 MPaa and 8 MPaa, or between 8 MPaa
and 17 MPaa.
To facilitate operation of the non-adiabatic reactor to maintain two liquid
phases, as described herein, the solvent and the pressure are selected
appropriately
based on the operator's desired product. One of skill in the art is aware and
able to
select the appropriate starting reaction materials and the reactor temperature
to make
the target product.
Suitable monomers for copolymerization with ethylene include C3-20 mono- and
di-olefins. Example comonomers include C3-12 a-olefins which are unsubstituted
or
substituted by up to two C1-6 alkyl radicals, C8-12 vinyl aromatic monomers
which are
unsubstituted or substituted by up to two substituents selected from C1-4
alkyl radicals,
C4-12 straight chained or cyclic diolefins which are unsubstituted or
substituted by a C1-
4 alkyl radical. Illustrative non-limiting examples of such alpha-olefins are
one or more
of propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-octene and 1-decene, styrene,
alpha
methyl styrene, and the constrained-ring cyclic olefins such as cyclobutene,
cyclopentene, dicyclopentadiene norbornene, alkyl-substituted norbornes,
alkenyl-
substituted norbornes and the like (e.g. 5-methylene-2-norbornene and 5-
ethylidene-
2-norbornene, bicyclo-(2,2,1)-hepta-2,5-diene).
12
CA 2969280 2017-05-30D19 \2016019Canada.dOCX
Co- and ter-polymers of ethylene, and one or more copolymerizable monomers
can also be prepared using the methods described herein. In one embodiment
such
polymers will contain about 50 to about 75 weight % ethylene, preferably about
50 to
60 weight % ethylene and correspondingly from 50 to 40 weight % of propylene.
A
portion of the monomers, typically the propylene monomer, may be replaced by a
conjugated diolefin. The diolefin may be present in amounts up to 10 weight %
of the
polymer although typically is present in amounts from about 3 to 5 weight %.
The
resulting polymer may have a composition comprising from 40 to 75 weight % of
ethylene, from 50 to 15 weight % of propylene and up to 10 weight % of a diene
lo .. monomer to provide 100 weight % of the polymer. Preferred but not
limiting examples
of the dienes are dicyclopentadiene, 1,4-hexadiene, 5-methylene-2-norbornene,
5-
ethylidene-2-norbornene and 5-vinyl-2-norbornene, especially 5-ethylidene-2-
norbornene and 1,4-hexadiene.
In another embodiment the resulting polymer may comprise not less than about
50, or not less than about 75 weight A of ethylene and up to about 50, or
less than 25
weight % of one or more copolymerizable monomers. In some embodiments the
comonomers are C3-8 alpha olefins such as 1-butene, 1-hexene and 1-octene.
The monomers may be dissolved/dispersed in the solvent either prior to being
fed to the reactor (or for gaseous monomers the monomer may be fed to the
reactor
so that it will dissolve in the reaction mixture). Prior to mixing, the
solvent and
monomers may be purified to remove potential catalyst poisons such as water,
oxygen and other polar impurities. The feedstock purification follows standard
practices in the art, e.g. molecular sieves, alumina beds and oxygen removal
catalysts
are used for the purification of monomers. The solvent itself as well (e.g.
methyl
pentane, cyclohexane, hexane or toluene) is preferably treated in a similar
manner.
The feedstock may be heated or cooled prior to feeding to the reactor.
13
c"A'2969-286-;26.14=7001 9 \2016019Canada.docx
In some embodiments, the catalyst components may be premixed in the
solvent for the reaction or fed as separate streams to the reactor. In some
instances
premixing it may be desirable to provide a reaction time for the catalyst
components
prior to entering the reaction.
One embodiment of this disclosure provides a solution olefin polymerization
process comprising i) preparing a procatalyst using the processes described
herein
above; ii) adding the procatalyst with a solvent selected from C3-12 alkanes
to one or
more reactors in series or in parallel configuration together with ethylene
and
optionally one or more comonomers selected from C3-8 comonomers, hydrogen to a
reactor; and iii) adding an aluminum alkyl activator to the reactor in a molar
ratio of
about 1 to about 10 relative to the amount of procatalyst.
The polymerization processes may also use an aluminum alkyl activator
selected from R4yAIOR531, trialkyl aluminum compounds and MAO.
In some embodiments the procatalyst is pre-formulated and added directly to
the reactor.
In other embodiments the polymerization process using the procatalysts
described herein results in a polymer with the same density but with a higher
Mw at
any polymerization temperature than the Mw obtained for a polymer prepared
using a
procatalyst disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5589555.
The catalysts useful in the processes disclosed herein are selected from
Ziegler Natta catalysts, metallocene, or non-metallocene single site
catalysts, or any
combination of these catalysts in the various reactors being used in the
reactor
system.
In some embodiments the reactor hold-up time is from about 30 seconds to
about 1 hour. In other embodiments the reactor hold-up time is from about 30
seconds to about 30 minutes. In other embodiments the reactor hold-up time is
from
14
32L8j0 "201=2300 19 \ 201 601 9Ca n ad a .d o cx
about 30 seconds to about 5 minutes. In other embodiments the reactor hold-up
time
is from about 1 minute to about 5 minutes.
Another embodiment of this invention provides a polyethylene polymer or
copolymer having a density from about 0.857 g/cc to about 0.970 g/cc. Another
embodiment of this invention provides a CDB150octene greater than or equal to
about
50. Another embodiment of this invention provides a polymer with a MWD (Mw/Mn)
from about 3 to about 8. Yet another embodiment of this invention provides
substantially flat comonomer distribution within the final polymer product.
Substantially flat comonomer distribution means that a plot of the branch
content as a
function of molecular weight as plotted on a GPC curve would give a line that
is not
more than about 15 off horizontal.
In some embodiments the polymer has less than about 10 ppm calculated
residual metal from the active catalyst in the resulting polymer. In other
embodiments
the polymer has less than about 8 ppm calculated residual metal from the
active
catalyst in the resulting polymer. In other embodiments the polymer has less
than
about 3 ppm calculated residual metal from the active catalyst in the
resulting
polymer.
In some embodiments the polymer has less than about 120 ppm calculated
residual halogen in the resulting polymer. In other embodiments the polymer
has less
than about 100 ppm calculated residual halogen in the resulting polymer. In
other
embodiments the polymer has less than about 60 ppm calculated residual halogen
in
the resulting polymer.
Another embodiment of this invention provides a polymer as described herein
above for use in fabrication methods selected from extrusion, injection
molding,
thermoforming, and rotational molding.
CA 2 9 6 92 8 0 2017-05-3019 \2016019Canada docx
Another embodiment of this invention provides a polymer as described herein
above for use in a plastic articles such as films, fibers, molded or
thermoformed
articles such as drums and agricultural spray tanks, and pipe coatings.
The present invention will further be described by reference to the following
examples. The following examples are merely illustrative of the invention and
are not
intended to be limiting. Unless otherwise indicated, all percentages are by
weight.
EXAMPLES
Table la displays the results of the experiments carried out on a pilot plant
scale. Poly(ethylene) homopolymer and poly(ethylene-co-1-octene) copolymer
were
prepared in a CSTR equipped with a steam jacket to control reaction
temperature.
After an adiabatic baseline was established, the steam jacket temperature was
reduced by reducing the pressure of the steam. As the steam jacket temperature
was
reduced, the reaction temperature also decreased as the steam jacket acted as
a
cooler. The ethylene concentration in the feed to the reactor was then
increased until
the initial adiabatic reaction temperature was re-established for the lower
steam jacket
pressure. The reaction pressure was then reduced, at a constant steam jacket
temperature and the ethylene concentration in the feed was adjusted to
maintain a
constant reactor temperature while monitoring the heat transfer to the steam
jacket at
an approximately constant temperature difference between the reactor and
jacket.
Hydrogen is added to the reactor for the polymerization (lppm, for the
copolymer, and
27 ppm for the homopolymer). The amount of hydrogen was varied slightly to
offset
any shifts that were seen in the MI owing to changing the ethylene
concentration in
the reactor.
The data shows that, for the case of liquid-liquid polymerizations, in which
the
reaction pressure is maintained below the cloud point, the heat transfer
improves
significantly. For example, for the case of an ethylene homopolymer, operating
the
16
CA 2969280 2017-05-30319 \2016019Canada.dOCX
reaction in liquid-liquid state lead to an enhancement in the overall heat
transfer
coefficient from 177.2 W/m2K to 340.6 W/m2K, an increase of 92%.
17
CA '2969280 201:7=0536)19\2016019Canada docx
P TABLE 1a
g
2 Process conditions for ethylene octene copolymer products 1A to 1E and
homopolymer products 2A to 2F, as well as phase
" c,
composition data from thermodynamic simulations
,
,
, _________
Product Product Product Product Product Product Product Product Product
Product Product
,
#1A #113 #1C #1D #1E #2A
#2B #2C #2D #2E #2F
Catalyst
Ziegler- Ziegler- Ziegler- Ziegler- Ziegler- Ziegler- Ziegler- Ziegler-
Ziegler- Ziegler- Ziegler-
Natta Natta Natta Natta Natta Natta
Natta Natta Natta Natta Natta
SM
SM (predo SM SM SM SM SM SM SM SM SM
(predomi minatel (predomi (predomi (predomi (predomi (predomi (predomi
(predomi (predomi (predomi
Solvent nately 2- y 2- nately 2- nately 2- nately 2-
nately 2- nately 2- nately 2- nately 2- nately 2-
nately 2-
methyl- methyl- methyl- methyl- methyl- methyl- methyl- methyl- methyl- methyl-
methyl-
pentane) pentan pentane) pentane) pentane) pentane) pentane) pentane) pentane)
pentane) pentane)
e)
MI Target 1.00 0.15
10.0 1.5
Density Target 0.9200
0.0015 0.9635 0.0015
Connonomer 1-octene 1-
1-octene 1-octene 1-octene NA NA
NA NA NA NA
octene
Reactor
Pressure 16.1 16.1 12.1 8.1 7.1 16.1
16.1 13.1 11.1 9.1 8.1
(MPaa)
Steam Jacket
Pressure 1524 670 670 670 670 2817
650 668 691 648 636
(kPaa)
Reactor
Temperature 185.9 187.3 186.9 185.5 185.4 206.4
205.9 204.7 205.8 206.6 206.0
( C)
18
H:\Julie Heinrich\2016019\2016019Canada.docx
Factor
E Oyle ne /0 in 12.40 13.50 13.70 13.70 14.50 14.65
16.65 16.65 17.50 18.00 18.00
f 2ed (wt%)
F';'::loud
- 8.1 8.1 8.0 7.8 7.7 12.6
12.9 12.4 12.5 12.5 12.5
(1Paa)
PReactor - 8.0 8.0 4.1 0.3 -0.6 3.5
3.2 0.7 -1.4 -3.4 -4.3
PCIoud (MPa)
Overall
Cooling UA NA 195.5 245.8 286.1 460.2 NA
177.2 221.2 315.3 335.8 340.6
(W/m2K)
Improvement
NA NA 26 46 135 NA NA
24 78 89 92
in UA (%)
To gain further insight into the impact of phase behavior on non-adiabatic
polymerization, thermodynamic simulations were
performed using the PC-SAFT EOS implemented in VLXE. The results of this
investigation are also summarized in Table lb and lc.
19
H:\Julie Heinrich\2016019\2016019Canada.docx
.3" TABLE 2b
0
phase composition data from thermodynamic simulations
Phase 1 (simulation)
Product Product Product Product Product Product Product Product Product
Product Product
#1A #16 #1C #1D #1E #2A
#2B #2C #2D #2E #2F
mass fraction 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00
1.00 1.00 0.76 0.59 0.53
Density
(g/cm3)
0.5600 0.5610 0.5640 0.5367 0.5408
0.5396 0.5406 0.5333 0.5396 0.5515 0.5571
volume
fraction 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00
1.00 1.00 0.74 0.51 0.42
Ethylene
(wt%) 1.24 1.35 1.37 1.37 1.40 1.34
1.88 1.66 1.63 1.50 1.42
Octene
(wt%) 5.69 6.21 6.30 6.30 6.53 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
methylpentane
(wt%) 80.86 7.91 78.81 78.81 75.62 85.40
83.40 83.40 77.92 71.10 68.33
polymer (wt%) 12.21 13.32 13.52 13.52 16.45 13.26
14.72 14.94 20.45 27.40 30.25
H:\Julie Heinrich\2016019\2016019Canada.docx
P TABLE 3c
g
phase composition data from thermodynamic simulations
, Phase 2 (simulation)
,
,
0
,
Product Product Product Product Product Product Product Product Product
Product Product
0
#1A #16 #1C #1D #1E #2A
#213 #2C #2D #2E #2F
mass fraction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.41 0.47
Density
(g/cm3) NA NA NA NA
0.4956 NA NA NA 0.4806 0.4649 0.4582
volume
fraction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.49 0.58
Ethylene
(wt%) NA NA NA NA 1.73 NA
NA NA 2.14 2.23 2.23
Octene (wt%) NA NA NA NA 7.52 NA
NA NA 0.00 0.00 0.00
methylpentane
(wt%) NA NA NA NA 89.68 NA NA NA 97.08 97.44 97.53
polymer (wt%) NA NA NA NA 1.07 NA
NA NA 0.78 0.34 0.23
21
I-1:\Julie Heinrich\2016019\2016019Canada.docx
