Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
ACID COMPOSITION BASED ON LEONARDITE AND AMINO ACIDS
Field of the invention
This invention lies within the general field of biological products for
agriculture and it
especially refers to a composition based on leonardite.
State of the art
Leonardite is an organic material associated with lignite in which the process
of
transformation into coal has not terminated. It differs from damp peat because
of its
higher degree of oxidation. It is also called humalite or lignite.
Leonardite consists of humic substances including humic acids themselves,
notable for
1() their high molecular weight (up to 50,000 KD) and that are soluble in
alkaline ambits
but precipitate in acidic solutions, fulvic acids which generally have a
molecular weight
below 5,000 KD and soluble in acidic and alkaline ambits and humin.
Leonardite is insoluble in water and to be able to use it, its solubility must
be increased.
For this it is usually attacked with alkaline products such as NaOH, KOH or
similar to
obtain the relevant potassium, sodium, ammonia, etc, salts. The alkaline
attack
process is normally applied to obtain commercial products, whether solid or
liquid, but
these products are incompatible with acidic ambits since they quickly re-form
the
original humic acid, which precipitates forming flocculations that make the
application
of the product in the field difficult or impossible since they clog the
filters and nozzles in
the equipment. This technical problem is further complicated the more the
products that
are to be applied with it in the same field application since more precipitate
may be
produced as a consequence of the precipitation of the humates. Remembering
that,
generally, the field applications of phytosanitary products usually recommend
acidification, the need and at the same time the technical difficulty of
applying
traditional formulas of leonardite (humic acids) together with other
phytosanitary
products and/or nutrients is clear.
Another problem is the mixing (ready mixed or mixed in the field) with amino
acids or
products containing them, since their acidic pH makes them a potential cause
of
precipitation and flocculation for the reasons given above.
The properties of leonardite have been the subject of various research efforts
and
patent applications, such as patent applications CN103553761, W02013040403 and
1
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
EP0284339 which describe various compositions containing leonardite and other
compounds such as amino acids. However, they all have a basic pH derived from
the
treatment with alkali mentioned above, the problem remaining of the
incompatibility in
the mix with other acidic substances or in applications requiring an acidic
ambit.
It is therefore necessary to provide a composition based on leonardite that
includes
amino acids and that is stable and functional with an acidic pH without
producing the
precipitation of the amino acids or the humic acids as well as other
substances applied
to the mix when necessary.
Description of the invention
This invention solves the problems described in the state of the art since it
provides a
stable acid composition of leonardite, amino acids and surfactants that is
functional and
the components of which do not precipitate in the pre-prepared mix or in the
field mix
with other acidic substances.
Thus, in a first aspect, this invention refers to a composition (the
composition of this
invention from now on) that comprises: leonardite in dispersion, amino acids
and
surfactants. The composition is useful as a fertiliser, biostimulant and/or
nutrient.
In this invention, leonardite comprises between 50% and 90% w/w of the total
humic
substance (on dry base), preferably between 80% and 90% w/w of the total humic
substance (on dry base).
In this invention, surfactant is understood as any compound that can cause a
decrease
in surface tension or make hydrophobic substances such as humic acids
compatible
with water. Surfactants are classified according to their function in
surfactants,
dispersants, compatibilisers, wetting agents, etc. In this invention,
surfactants,
dispersants, wetting agents, compatibilisers, etc, will generally be
considered as
coformulants and mutually equivalent in the sense that they do not provide any
nutrient
substance or biostimulant.
In a more particular aspect, the composition of this invention comprises at
least one
surfactant selected from the ethoxylated fatty acids, polymeric surfactants,
sulphonates, hexitol esters or sulphocarboxylic type surfactants.
2
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
More especially, the composition of this invention comprises at least one
surfactant
selected from ethoxylated iso-alkyl polyglycol ether C3-C13, calcium
lignosulphonate,
polyethoxylated sorbitan laurate or sodium dioctylsulphosuccinate.
As is well known to those skilled in the art, these surfactants can be
promptly replaced
with surfactants with functions equivalent to those described, such as, for
example: Na
lauryl sulphate and its alkyl ester sulphates (wetting agent), sodium
lignosulphonate
and/or that of ammonia or similar (dispersants and wetting agents), sodium
and/or
calcium naphthalene sulphonate and polymeric substances derived from
naphthalene
sulphonate as well as alkyl derivatives (dispersants), ethoxylated and/or
propoxylated
fatty acids different to that used in these examples (wetting agents),
condensed ethoxy-
propoq chain polymers (dispersants and wetting agents), ethoxylated and/or
propoxylated oils (for example ethoxylated castor oil, wetting agent o
dispersant),
polymers acrylics (compatibiliser and/or dispersant), sodium sulphosuccinates
(wetting
agents), alkyl diphenyl ether sulphate salts (wetting agents), ethoxylated
and/or
propoxylated distyryl and tristyryl phenols and corresponding phosphate and/or
sulphate salts (dispersants)..
In another particular aspect, the amino acids in the composition of this
invention are
selected from acidic or neutral amino acids.
The amino acids in the composition of this invention may be incorporated as
free amino
acids or as any source of amino acids such as peptides or polypeptides,
preferably
from a source of amino acids containing at least 15-20% w/w such as free amino
acids,
preferably a value of 30-50% w/w. A minimum of 30-40% w/w expressed as total
amino
acids, preferably a value of 60-80% w/w.
In another particular aspect, the composition of this invention may also
comprise other
compounds such as excipients, adjuvants, gelling agents, defoamers and/or
preservatives.
In another particular aspect, the composition of this invention comprises a
gelling agent
more specifically the gelling agent is xantham gum.
In another particular aspect, the composition of this invention comprises a
defoamer,
more specifically the defoamer is silicone oil.
3
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
In a second aspect, this invention refers to a process (the process of this
invention from
now on) to obtain the composition of this invention that comprises the
following steps:
a) preparation of an initial aqueous solution containing the defoamer agent
and the
surfactants,
b) addition of the source of amino acids to the aqueous solution of step a),
c) addition of the leonardite,
d) dispersion of the leonardite,
e) milling (micronisation) by wet means of the dispersion obtained in d)
characterized in that the composition has an acidic pH comprised between 3 and
6 and
wherein step b), the addition of amino acids, may be made at any time, whether
before
the micronisation of the dispersion or after it.
In a particular aspect, the process of this invention comprises an additional
step of the
addition of excipients, adjuvants, gelling agents, defoamers and/or
preservatives after
the micronisation step.
In another particular aspect, the composition comprises humic acids and fulvic
acids
that are provided and maintained in their natural acid form, without causing
precipitation in the composition nor in formulations for application in the
field which
comprise the composition and which have a neutral or acidic pH.
In a more particular aspect of this invention, the pH of the composition is
comprised
between 3 and 4.5.
Description of the figures
Figure 1 shows the biostimulant effect of the compositions of this invention,
activity
similar to auxins, activity similar to gibberellins and activity similar to
cytokines. Panel A
shows the results for composition 1. Panel B shows the results for composition
3.
"b" indicates a 1:100 dilution of the composition; "a" indicates a 1:10000
dilution.
Detailed description of the invention
Example 1: composition and preparation procedure of the acid composition based
on
leonardite with acidic amino acids: composition 1:
Composition 1 was obtained as follows.
4
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
Firstly 0.63 kg/L of softened water was added as a dispersion medium, then
0.00220
kg/L of silicone oil emulsified in water was added. Then 0.00275 kg/L of
ethoxylated
iso-alkyl polyglycol ether 03-C13 (8MOET) was added as a surfactant agent.
Once
dissolved, 0.00110 kg/L of the preservative 1,2,benzisothiazolin-3-one was
added,
which dissolved, and then 0.02752 kg/L of calcium lignosulphonate was added as
a
surfactant agent. 0.24221 kg/L of leonardite was then added and once dispersed
by
mechanical stirring, the leonardite was micronised in the wet phase in a
horizontal ball
mill. As a source of humic and/or fulvic acids, this source and quantity
provided a total
of 170 g/L of the total humic substance to the final formula in its original
form of humic
and/or fulvic acids.
Once the leonardite had been micronised, 0.15380 kg/L of the protein
hydrolyzate was
added as a source of free amino acids, which supplied a total of 65 g/L of
free amino
acids to the final formula. Once dissolved, 0.00220 kg/L of silicone oil
emulsified in
water was added. 0.00220 kg/L of water and 0.04150 kg/L of a gelling agent
were then
added; in this case an aqueous dispersion of 2.70% xantham gum was added and
finally 0.04150 kg/L of water was added.
Table 1 shows the components of composition 1. As the composition was
prepared, its
pH was measured as also shown in Table 1.
Table 1: acid composition 1 based on leonardite with acidic amino acids
Quantity of pH of pH of
Compound finished product
compound mixture
Softened water 0.62733 7.67 7.75
Silicone oil emulsified in water 0.0022 7.8 7.85
lso-alkyl polyglycol ether C3-C13 or
0.00275 7.82 8.2
ethoxylated fatty acid C3-C13 8MOET
1,2, benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.0011 9.4 9.3
Calcium lignosulphonate 0.02752 8.7 9.2
Leonardite, humalite or lignite 0.24221 3.78 3.88
Vegetable protein hydrolyzate 0.1538 3.6 3.5
Silicone oil emulsified in water 0.0022 n/a 3.52
Water 0.0022 n/a 3.5
5
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
2.7% aqueous dispersion of xantham gum. 0.0415 7.67 3.8
Water 0.0415 n/a 3.8
Example 2: composition and preparation procedure of the acid composition based
on
leonardite with acidic amino acids: composition 2
Composition 2 was obtained as follows.
Firstly 0.63 kg/L of softened water was added as a dispersion medium, then
0.00220
kg/L of silicone oil emulsified in water was added and then 0.1538 kg/L
protein
hydrolyzate was added which supplied a total of 65 g/L of free amino acids to
the final
formula.
0.00275 kg/L of ethoxylated iso-alkyl polyglycol ether C3-C13s 8MOET was then
fo added as a surfactant agent; once dissolved, 0.00110 kg/L of
1,2,benzisothiazolin-3-
one was added and then 0.02752 kg/L of calcium lignosulphonate which also
acted as
a surfactant agent.
0.24221 kg/L of leonardite was added as a source of humic and/or fulvic acids,
which
supplied a total of 170 g/L of humic substance to the final formula in its
original form of
humic and/or fulvic acids. Once dispersed, the leonardite was micronised with
the
same procedure as in example 1 and once the leonardite had been micronised,
0.00220 kg/L of silicone oil emulsified in water was added. 0.00220 kg/L of
softened
water and 0.04150 kg/L of 2.70% xantham gum aqueous dispersion were then added
and finally 0.04150 kg/L of water was added to complete the formula.
.. As in example 1, as the composition was prepared, its pH was measured as
also
shown in Table 2.
Table 2: acid composition 2 based on leonardite with acidic amino acids
Quantity of
pH of
Compound finished product pH of
compound mixture
Softened water 0.62733 7.67 7.73
Silicone oil emulsified in water 0.00220 7.80 7.82
Vegetable protein hydrolyzate 0.15380 3.60 3.57
6
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
Iso-alkyl polyglycol ether 03-C13 or ethoxylated 0.00275 7.82 3.55
fatty acid C3-C13 8MOET
1,2, benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.00110 9.40 3.60
calcium lignosulphonate 0.02752 8.70 3.63
Leonardite, humalite or lignite 0.24221 3.78 3.58
Silicone oil emulsified in water 0.00220 n/a 3.52
Water 0.00220 n/a 3.50
2.7% aqueous dispersion of xantham gum. 0.04150 7.67 3.80
Water 0.04150 n/a 3.80
Example 3: composition and preparation procedure of the acid composition based
on
leonardite with neutral amino acids: composition 3
Composition 3 was obtained as follows.
Firstly 0.63 kg/L of softened water was added as a dispersion medium and then
0.00110 kg/L of silicone oil emulsified in water was added. 0.00551 kg/L of
ethoxylated
iso-alkyl polyglycol ether C3-C13 was added as a surfactant agent. Once
dissolved,
0.00165 kg/L of the preservative 1,2,benzisothiazolin-3-one was added, which
dissolved. In this case, 0.00551 kg/L of calcium lignosulphonate as a
surfactant,
0.01376 of polyethoxylated sorbitan laurate and 0.01376 kg/L of a solution of
sodium
dioctylsulphosuccinate were added.
Then 0.33579 kg/L of leonardite was added as a source of humic and/or fulvic
acids,
which supplied a total of 250 g/L of humic substance to the final formula in
its original
form of humic and/or fulvic acids. After dispersion by mechanical stirring,
wet
micron isation was carried out in a horizontal ball mill.
0.05031 kg/L of a mixture of amino acids, peptides and polypeptides was added
as a
source of amino acids, providing a total of 45 g/L of amino acids, peptides
and
polypeptides to the final formula. 0.00110 kg/L of silicone oil emulsified in
water was
then added, followed by 0.00110 kg/L of softened water and 0.05400 kg/L of
2.70%
xantham gum aqueous dispersion and finally 0.03200 kg/L of water was added to
complete the formula.
7
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
The pH of the composition as the components of the composition were added is
shown
in Table 3.
Table 3: acid composition 3 based on leonardite with neutral amino acids
Quantity of
pH of pH of
Compound finished product
compound mixture
(kg/L)
Softened water 0.62953 7.48 7.58
Silicone oil emulsified in water 0.0011 7.8 7.77
'so-alkyl polyglycol ether C3-C13 or 0.00551 7.86 7.81
ethoxylated fatty acid C3-C13 8MOET
1,2, benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.00165 9.5 9.44
Calcium lignosulphonate 0.00551 8.47 9.38
Polyethoxylated sorbitan laurate 0.01376 7.6 9.21
Sodium dioctylsulphosuccinate solution 0.01376 7.48 9.23
Leonardite, humalite or lignite 0.33579 3.81 3.84
Mixture of amino acids, peptides and 0.05031 7.15 3.82
polypeptides
Silicone oil emulsified in water 0.0011 n/a 3.83
Water 0.0011 n/a 3.81
2.7% aqueous dispersion of xantham gum. 0.054 7.71 3.85
Water 0.032 n/a 3.84
Example 4: composition and preparation procedure of the acid composition based
on
leonardite with neutral amino acids: composition 4
Composition 4 was obtained as follows.
Firstly 0.63 kg/L of softened water was added as a dispersion medium and then
0.00110 kg/L of silicone oil emulsified in water was added followed by 0.05031
kg/L of
the source of amino acids, peptides and polypeptides, providing a total of 45
g/L of
peptides and polypeptides to the final formula.
Then, 0.00551 kg/L of ethoxylated iso-alkyl polyglycol ether C3-C13 was added
as a
surfactant agent and once dissolved, 0.00165 kg/L of the preservative
1,2,benzisothiazolin-3-one was added, which dissolved, followed by adding
0.00551
kg/L of calcium lignosulphonate as a surfactant agent. 0.01376 of
polyethoxylated
8
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
sorbitan laurate and 0.01376 kg/L of a solution of sodium
dioctylsulphosuccinate were
then added. Then 0.33579 kg/L of leonardite was added as a source of humic
and/or
fulvic acids which supplied a total of 250 g/L of humic substance to the final
formula in
its original form of humic and/or fulvic acids. After dispersion by mechanical
stirring,
wet micronisation was carried out in a horizontal ball mill.
Then 0.00110 kg/L of silicone oil emulsified in water was added and then
0.00110 kg/L
of softened water and 0.05400 kg/L of 2.70% xantham gum aqueous dispersion
were
added and finally 0.032 kg/L of water was added for the final adjustment of
the
contents.
As in the previous examples, Table 4 shows the pH of the composition as the
components were added.
Table 4: acid composition 4 based on leonardite with neutral amino acids.
Quantity of
pH of
Compound finished product pH of
compound mixture
(kgIL)
Softened water 0,62953 7.48 7.58
Silicone oil emulsified in water 0.0011 7.8 7.77
Mixture of amino acids, peptides and 0,05031 7.15 7.04
polypeptides
Iso-alkyl polyglycol ether C3-C13 or
0.00551 7.86 7.84
ethoxylated C3-C13 fatty acids 8MOET
1,2,benzisothiazolin-3-one 0,00165 9.5 9.38
Calcium lignosulphonate 0.00551 8.47 9.33
Polyethoxylated sorbitan laurate 0,01376 7.6 9.15
Sodium dioctylsulphosuccinate solution 0.01376 7.48 9.12
Leonardite, humalite or lignite 0.33579 3.81 3.79
Silicone oil emulsified in water 0.0011 n/a 3.8
Water 0.0011 n/a 3.78
2.7% aqueous dispersion of xantham gum. 0.054 7.71 3.72
9
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
Water 0.032 nia 3.73
As can be seen in the above four examples, some of the compositions had an
alkaline
pH because of their nature but the pH of the general composition remained
acid. On
the other hand, the addition of amino acids with acidic or neutral pH did not
affect the
other components of the composition and neither did they affect the amino
acids.
Accelerated stability tests were carried out after preparing the compositions
in the
examples. A sample of each composition was kept at 54 C for 14 days (official
CIPAC
MT 46.3 method) and their aspect checked after the test, its fluidity
remaining unaltered
compared to the sample at room temperature and not creating deposits or phase
separations. It is important to note that stability is an important parameter
to be taken
into account since, as is well known to those skilled in the art, aqueous
liquid
formulations based on humic acids usually have stability problems that
generate
rheological type problems (modification of the viscosity, typically a very
high increase)
or aspect related problems (phase separations and sedimentation) that make
their
handling and application in the field difficult or even impossible.
This problem is worsened when considering a ready-mixed formulation such as
those
presented herein involving the co-existence of humic and fulvic acids in a
high
concentration with other nutrient substances nutrients such as amino acids in
an acidic
environment.
It was also found that the final pH of the formulation was unaltered, showing
that the
chemical forms of the humic substance (leonardite) in the formula continued to
be
acidic and that no salification occurred.
Example 5: use of the composition of this invention as a biostimulant.
To check the biostimulant effect of the compositions in this invention, a bio
test was
carried out in which the activity was measured by applying the Audus methods
(1972)
updated by Nardi and collaborators (Nardi et al, 1996; Ertani et al, 2013;
Pizzeghello et
al, 2013).
The auxin-like (IAA-like), gibberellin-like (GA-like) and cytokine-like (CK-
like) activities
were tested for each product by applying four dilutions of the formula (1:10,
1:100,
1:1000, 1:10000) with three biological replicas and three technical replicas.
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
For each dilution the hormone-like activities were measured for 180 seeds and
a total
of 720 seeds for each hormonal activity and product, weighting the results
compared to
a control in sterile water and another applying synthetic reference hormones
(IAA,
indoleacetic acid, for the auxin-like effect, GA3, gibberellic acid, for the
gibberellin-like
effect and BAP, benzylaminopurine, for the cytokine-like effect).
The results (Figure 1) were validated with the Duncan test (10.05) and SPSS
software.
Conclusions from the results:
¨ Auxin-like effect: the products tested for examples 1 and 3, applied to a
dilution
of 1:100 show an auxin-like (IAA-like) effect on the plant equivalent to that
induced in the control where IAA was applied in a concentration of 0.1 ppm.
¨ Gibberellin-like effect: the products tested for examples 1 and 3 showed
no
gibberellin-like (GA-like) effect.
¨ Cytokine-like effect: of the products tested, for examples 1 and 3, only
example
3, when a dilution of 1:10000 was applied, showed a cytokine-like (CK-like)
response on the plant, equivalent to that induced in the control where BAP was
applied in a concentration of 2 ppm.
Example 6: use of the composition of this invention as a fertiliser.
To check the fertiliser effect of the compositions of this invention a field
test was carried
out on various crops in which the result of the cultivation was compared with
the
compositions of the invention and the same crops in which the compositions of
the
invention were not used.
It was found that in some of the tests, mixes were made in the field with
other
phytosanitary products without signs of any type of problems, thus confirming
the
functional aspect for the "tank-mix" use of the compositions reported.
Test on crop of nectarines, Big Top variety, in Valdivia (Badajoz). The crop
consisted of
four blocks of 70 m2 with a planting grid of 5 m x 2.8 m. Fertigation was used
with
composition 1 of the invention (example 1) with 40 minutes' irrigation. Three
doses of 5
kg/ha of composition 1 of this invention were applied with 10 days between
doses, the
11
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
total dosage in the cycle being 15 L/ha. Table 5 shows the result of the test;
as can be
seen, composition 1 had an important effect on the average weight of the fruit
obtained
after the treatment.
Table 5: effect of composition 1 on the naphthalene crop ¨ result on fruit.
AVERAGE AVERAGE
2nd CROP WEIGHT PRESSURE
CALIBRE OF BRIX
(kg/ha) OF FRUIT FRUIT (mm) (pounds)
(9)
CONTROL 14,873 147.97 66.56 9.55 10.68
COMPOSITION 1 16,773 151.81 66.77 10.11 11.07
Statistical treatment: LSD All-Pairwise Comparisons Test, Alpha 0.05.
Test on tomato crop, H-8810 variety, with a planting grid of 30,000 plants/ha,
in
Marisma Lebrija (Seville), drip irrigation. Fertigation was used with
composition 1 of the
invention (example 1) with 90 minutes' irrigation. A first dose of 5 L/ha was
applied with
a second dose of 2.5 Uha after three weeks, the total dosage in the cycle
being 7.5
L/ha. Table 6 shows the results of the test which confirmed that the use of
composition
1 had an important effect on the increased weight of the complete plant and
the
average weight of the root.
Table 6: effect of composition 1 on the tomato crop
AVERAGE WEIGHT OF THE COMPLETE AVERAGE WEIGHT OF THE
PLANT (g) ROOT (g)
CONTROL 71.97 6.93
COMPOSITION 1 112.59 12.34
Statistical treatment for the average weight of the complete plant: LSD All-
Pairwise
Comparisons Test, Alpha 0.05, standard error: 11,445, C.V.: 20,90.
Statistical treatment for the average weight of the root: LSD All-Pairwise
Comparisons
Test, Alpha 0.05, standard error: 1,5391, C.V.: 22,99.
Test on dry farming of common wheat, Valbona variety, with a seed dose of 200
kg/ha,
in Arahal (Seville), with a field size of 6700 m2. Composition 3 was used
(example 3) in
foliar application with the use of 200 L/ha of liquid. A single dose was
applied of 1.5
L/ha. For the treatment, composition 3 (example 3) was mixed with 20%
metsulphuron-
1 2
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
methyl w/w, post-emergency herbicide with a dosage of 37.5 g/ha, 20%
fluroxypyr,
post-emergency herbicide with a dosage of 375 cc/ha, alkyl polyglycol (ether)
20% w/v,
adherent surfactant with a dosage of 450 cc/ha.
After 6 days from the application of composition 3, no symptoms of
phytotoxicity were
seen in any of the plants in the crop tested. Table 7 shows the results of
this test. As
can be seen, the use of composition 3 gave an increase of 3.30% in production
compared to the control crop. It also had an important effect on the number of
ears and
their weight and on protein.
Table 7: effect of composition 3 on common wheat crop.
CROP No of WEIGHT OF SPECIFIC
PROTEIN
(kg/ha) EARS/m2 EARS/ m2 WEIGHT
CONTROL 5,113 566 842 82.25 12.45
COMPOSITION 3 5,282 629 976 82.63 12.23
Statistical treatment: LSD All-Pairwise Comparisons Test, Alpha 0.05.
Test on maize crop, PR33Y72 variety (Pioneer) in a plantation in Guadalperales
(Badajoz) with drip irrigation, with two doses of 2.5 L/ha of composition 3
(example 3).
Volume of liquid: 330 L/ha. For the example, composition 3 was mixed with
2.25%
foramsulphuron, post-emergency herbicide, with a dosage of 2.5 L/ha, 4.4%
tembotrione w/v (44 g/l) with a dosage of 1.5 L/ha containing isoxadifen ethyl
(antidote)
2.2% w/v (22 g/L), post-emergency herbicide.
In the second application, composition 3 was mixed with 1.8% w/v of
Abamectina,
insecticide, with a dosage of 1 L/ha.
No symptoms of phytotoxicity were seen in the crop after 7 days from the first
application nor 7 days after the second application. Table 8 shows the results
of this
test; as can be seen, the use of composition 3 gave a significant increase in
the
average weight of the complete plant.
Table 8: effect of composition 3 on maize crop.
AVERAGE WEIGHT OF THE AVERAGE HEIGHT
(cm)
COMPLETE PLANT (g)
CONTROL 354.9 153.5
COMPOSITION 1 426.2 154.25
13
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
Statistical treatment: LSD All-Pairwise Comparisons Test, Alpha 0.05, standard
error
for the average weight of the plant: 10,306, C.V.: 3.33 and standard error for
the
average height of the plant: 1.2255, C.V.: 3.11.
Test on dry farming of barley, Volley variety, in La Mudarra (Valladolid),
with a single
dose of 1.5 Uha of composition 3 (example 3). Volume of liquid: 153.1 L/ha.
For the
treatment composition 3 (example 3) was mixed with 2-4 D acid 60% w/v, EC,
post-
emergency herbicide, with a dosage of 0.6 L/ha.
At no time were symptoms of phytotoxicity seen in the crop. Table 9 shows the
results
of this test. As can be seen, the use of composition 3 gave an increase of
26.05 % in
113 production compared to the control crop.
Table 9: effect of composition 3 on barley crop.
CROP (kg/ha) No OF EARS/m2 WEIGHT OF EARS/ m2
CONTROL 2,284 537 288
COMPOSITION 3 2,879 560 348,3
Statistical treatment: LSD All-Pairwise Comparisons Test, Alpha 0.05.
References
Nardi S., Concheri G. and G. Dell'Agnola (1996) Biological activity of humus.
In: Humic
Substances in Terrestrial Ecosystems, A. Piccolo (ed.), Elsevier Science
Publishers
B.V., The Netherlands, pp. 361-406.
Ertani A, Pizzeghello D, Baglieri A, Cadili V, Tambone F, Gennari M, Nardi S.
(2013).
Humic-like substances from agro-industrial residues affect growth and nitrogen
assimilation in maize (Zea mays L.) plantlets. Journal of Geochemical
Exploration,
ISSN: 0375-6742, doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.10.001.
Pizzeghello D, Francioso 0, Ertani A, Muscolo A, Nardi S. (2013).
lsopentenyladenosine and cytokinin-like activity of different humic
substances. Journal
of Geochemical Exploration, ISSN: 0375-6742, doi:
10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.10.007.
14
CA 2976597 2019-02-12
