Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
WO 2021/111423
PCT/1B2020/061581
1
Method and system for determining and controlling the separation distance
between a
working head of a laser processing machine and the surface of an object being
processed by
means of low coherence optical interferometry techniques
This invention relates to laser processing a material, preferably a metal
material, and
specifically to improving the control of laser processing a material, for
example for laser
cutting, drilling or welding said material, or the additive manufacture of
predetermined
structures of said material.
More specifically, the invention relates to a method and to a system for
determining the
separation distance between a working head in a machine for lase processing a
material and
the surface of the material, as specified in the preamble of claim 1 and of
claim 23.
According to another aspect, this invention relates to a machine for laser
processing a
material according to the preamble of claim 24, comprising a system for
determining the
separation distance between said working head and the surface of the material,
which system
is provided for carrying out the above-mentioned method.
In the description and the following claims, the term -material-, and "metal
material- in the
preferred embodiment, is used to identify any product, such as a plate or an
elongate profile
having either a closed cross section - for example a hollow circular,
rectangular or square
shape - or an open cross section - for example a flat cross section or an L-,
C- or U-shaped
section, etc. In additive manufacturing, the term -material" identifies the
raw material,
generally a powder, that is subjected to localized sintering or melting by
means of the laser
beam_
In industrial processes for processing materials, plates and metal profiles in
particular, the
laser is used as a thermal tool for a wide variety of applications that are
dependent on the
parameters relating to the interaction between the laser beam and the material
being
processed, in particular on the energy density per volume of incidence of the
laser beam on
the material, and on the interaction time.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
2
For example, by directing a low density of energy (of the order of tens of W
per mm2 of
surface) for a prolonged amount of time (in the range of seconds) on a metal
piece, a
hardening process occurs, while, by directing a high density of energy (of the
order of tens
of MW per mm2 of surface) for a time of femtoseconds or picoseconds on the
same metal
piece, a photoablation process occurs. In the intermediate range of increasing
energy density
and decreasing processing time, controlling these parameters makes it possible
to implement
welding, cutting, drilling, engraving, marking processes.
In several processes, including drilling and cutting processes, it is
necessary to generate a
flow of an assist gas in the processing region in which the laser beam
interacts with the
material, which has mechanical functions of driving the melt, or chemical
functions of
assisting with combustion, or even technological functions of shielding from
the
environment surrounding the processing region.
In additive processes, the material may, for example, be in the form of a
filament, or in the
form of a powder emitted from a nozzle on account of the flow of an assist
gas, or even may
alternatively be present in the form of a powder bed. The material is
therefore melted by
laser radiation, thus obtaining a three-dimensional mold following the re
solidification of said
material.
In the field of laser processing materials, laser cutting, drilling and
welding are processes
that may be carried out by the same machine, which is able to generate a
focused high-power
laser beam having a preset transverse power distribution in at least one
working plane of the
material, typically a laser beam having a power density of between 1 and 10000
kW/mm2,
and to control the direction and the position of incidence of the beam along
the material. The
difference between the various types of processing that may be performed on a
material is
substantially attributable to the power of the laser beam used and to the
interaction time
between the laser beam and the material subjected to processing.
Laser processing machines according to the prior art are shown in Fig. 1 and
2.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
3
Fig. 1 schematically shows a machine for industrial processes using a CO2
laser having an
optical path of the laser beam in air, which machine comprises an emission
source 10, such
as a CO2 laser generator that is adapted to emit a monomodal or multimodal
laser beam B,
and a plurality of reflective mirrors 12a, 12b and 12c that are adapted to
lead the laser beam
emitted by the emission source along an optical path for transporting the beam
towards a
working head indicated, as a whole, by 14, which is arranged near to a
material WP. The
working head 14 comprises an optical system 16 for focusing the laser beam,
generally
consisting of a focusing lens, which is adapted to focus the laser beam along
an optical axis
of propagation that impinges on the metal material. A nozzle 18 is arranged
downstream of
the focusing lens, through which nozzle the laser beam directed towards a
region of a
working plane of the material passes. The nozzle is adapted to direct a beam
of an assist gas
injected by a corresponding plant (not shown) towards the processing region on
the material.
The assist gas is used to control the execution of a processing process
(drilling or cutting) as
well as the quality of the process that is obtainable. For example, the assist
gas may comprise
oxygen that facilitates an exothermic reaction with a metal, such as the
oxidation of iron,
which generates various types of iron oxides by means of an exoenergetic
reaction, thereby
releasing energy into the material that contributes, together with the energy
released from
the laser beam, to maintaining a dynamic equilibrium of the process, thereby
making it
possible to increase the cutting speeds, or an inert gas such as nitrogen that
does not
contribute to the melting of the material, but carries out a propulsive
function of the molten
material itself, protects the (metal) material from unwanted oxidization at
the edges of the
processing profile, protects the working head from possible splashes of the
melt and may
also be used to cool the sides of the groove produced in the material, thereby
enclosing the
extension of the heat-affected zone.
Fig. 2 schematically shows an industrial processing machine comprising a laser
beam
launched in an optical fiber. This machine comprises an emission source 10,
such as a laser
generator that may launch a laser beam in a transport fiber, for example an
ytterbium-doped
fiber laser or a direct diode laser, which is adapted to emit a monomodal or
multimodal laser
beam, and an optical fiber guide 12d that is adapted to lead the laser beam
emitted by the
emission source towards the working head 14 arranged near to the material WP.
At the
working head, the laser beam emerging from the fiber with its divergence
controlled is
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
4
collimated by a dioptric collimation system 20 and reflected by a catoptric
system 22 before
being focused by means of an optical focusing system 16, generally consisting
of a focusing
lens, along an optical propagation axis that impinges on the material WP that
passes through
the emission nozzle 18.
As a first approximation, an ideal laser beam, that is a laser beam ideally
collimated in
parallel rays, downstream of the optical focusing system concentrates in a
focusing spot
having finite dimensions at the waist thereof. In general, in industrial
processing uses, the
optimum process condition is reached when a transverse position of the plane
corresponds
to the waist of the beam defined with precision, even to one tenth of a
millimeter, with
respect to the wall of the material on which the beam impinges and to the wall
of the material
from which the beam exits.
The distribution of the power density of a laser beam collimated normally is
typically of a
Gaussian shape with rotational symmetry in the case of a monomodal beam, that
is with
power concentrated around the longitudinal axis of the beam (Z axis) and
gradually
decreasing along a peripheral cover, or may be described as the envelope of
Gaussian
profiles having rotational symmetry in the event of a multimodal beam.
The use of beams of monomodal or multimodal laser radiation which can be
described in a
first approximation as being Gaussian, in the field of high-power applications
of the lasers
responds to technological control needs. In fact, a Gaussian beam is easily
described by small
parameters, and may be easily controlled in terms of its propagation along an
optical
transport path by an emission source at the head of a processing machine,
since it benefits
from the characteristic of propagating without modifying the power
distribution, and
therefore it may be described by means of a ray value and a divergence value
in conditions
of propagation in the far field (in which case it is possible to use a
geometrical optics
approximation). In conditions of propagation in the near field of the focused
beam, along a
working trajectory where the geometrical optics approximation does not matter,
the beam
however maintains the Gaussian shape of the power distribution in every cross
section
thereof
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
A laser beam comprising higher-order transverse modes has, in contrast, a non-
Gaussian
power distribution. These conditions are typically obtained by using dioptric
systems
(transmissive optical systems, that is lenses) or catoptric (reflective
optical systems, that is
mirrors), which modify the shape of the beam from a Gaussian distribution.
5
The control of the propagation direction or of the distribution shapes of the
transverse power
of the laser beam that differ from the Gaussian shape and possibly have
different symmetry
to the rotational symmetry in the processing region of the material, for
example in relation
to the controlled distribution of an assist gas or as a result of the
separation distance between
the working head and the material; of the working trajectory to be traveled
and of the type
of process to be carried out, is advantageous for the processing process. For
example, the
control of the power distribution of a laser beam, possibly by breaking the
rotational
symmetry of the beam, may make it possible to identify or expand the power
distribution
where necessary in relation to the separation distance between the working
head and the
material and to the working trajectory.
It is evident that the control of the propagation direction of the laser beam
or of the
distribution shape of the transverse power of the laser beam has to be as
precise and
repeatable as possible, so that the advantages indicated may be achieved. For
this reason, it
is necessary for the movement of the working head and the position of the
proximal end
thereof with respect to the material, that is the position of the laser beam
output ¨ and of the
nozzle for the outflow of the assist gas during processes that require this ¨
with respect to
the material, and in particular with respect to the point where the laser beam
impinges on the
material, are controlled with extreme precision and in real time on the basis
of the current
processing condition and of the current position along the working trajectory.
In contrast,
there is a risk of focusing the laser power in an undesirable working plane in
the thickness
of the material as well as to use a pressure of the assist gas that ¨ at the
surface of the material
¨ is excessive or insufficient.
For these reasons, in the field of laser processing, it is desirable to be
able to accurately
determine the separation distance between the working head, that is the
proximal end of the
working head with respect to the material, and the surface of said material.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
6
When processes on metal materials, it is known to use capacitive sensors
provided to detect
the change in electric capacitance between the metal end of the working head,
for example
the aperture in the nozzle, and the surface of the material.
Such a solution is given in Fig. 3 as an example. The figure shows a working
head 14
according to one embodiment of the prior art, which is arranged at a
separation distance d
from the material WP being processed, and an associated electronic unit EUC
for controlling
the process. The laser beam generated by the emission source, transported to
the working
head 14 by means of an optical path in air having multiple reflections or in
an optical fiber,
is collimated towards the optical focusing system along the optical
propagation axis in a
direction of incidence on the material being processed and emerges from a beam
output 32,
preferably at or downstream of protective glass (not shown) that is adapted to
protect the
focusing system from possible splashes of the melt.
The expression "beam output" in the following description indicates the
portion of the
working head from which the processing laser beam emerges into open air, i.e.
propagates
outside the volume of the head towards the material being processed, and may
be the end
portion of the optical focusing system or a protective structure thereof, or
the tapered end of
a nozzle for supplying a flow of assist gas for applications that require the
supply of gas to
the process. This portion may be considered to be the distal portion of the
working head,
having as a reference the entire machine, or as the end proximal to the
material being
processed, and these terms will be equally used in the description.
Movement actuator means 40 are coupled to the processing head 14 and are
controlled by
the unit ECU for controlling the process by means of servomotors 42, in order
to control the
mechanical parameters of the process, for example to control the movement of
the working
head along the degrees of freedom given thereto by the specific embodiment of
the machine
in order to follow a programmed working trajectory T on the material being
processed, in
particular for the movement along the Z axis towards and away from the
material on the
basis of its profile or the processing profile. Means (not shown) are also
provided for
mechanically adjusting the optical focusing system in order to calibrate the
position of the
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
7
system transversally to the beam propagation direction (X-Y axis) and in the
beam
propagation direction (Z axis).
A capacitive sensor associated with the working head 10 is indicated by 44 and
is configured
to detect the variation in electrical capacitance between the end 32 of the
working head that
is proximal to the material, here the aperture in the nozzle that coincides
with the laser beam
output, and the surface of the material WP, placed at a reference potential.
The electrical
capacitance signal detected by the sensor 44 is processed by an associated
computer module
22 programmed to determine the separation distance between the working head
and the
material on the basis of the value for the acquired electrical capacitance,
having knowledge
of the parameters of the machine and the process, and is forwarded therefrom
to the unit
ECU for controlling the process in order to control the movement of the
working head using
feedback.
This technique is disadvantageously not applicable when processing materials
that are not
metal.
This also lacks accuracy since the capacitive effect is not only produced
locally between the
laser beam output and the corresponding point of incidence on the material,
but also as a
result of the large surfaces of the working head and of the material near to
the laser beam
output and to the point of incidence. In the event of significant curves
(positive or negative)
in the surface of the material near to edges or in the event where the working
head approaches
the material in directions that are not orthogonal to the local surface, it is
necessary to run
calculaticmal algorithms for compensating for the measurements, which
algorithms are rather
onerous in computational terms and which are, in any case, not able to
completely
compensate for the complexity of the configurations that may be encountered in
reality.
This invention is aimed at providing a method for determining the separation
distance
between the working head of a machine for laser processing a material and the
surface of
said material, which method is accurate and robust, that is not affected by
effects linked to
the shape of the material on which the machine operates or to the processing
conditions, for
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
8
example the relative speed and the direction of translation of the working
head with respect
to the material.
An additional object of this invention is to provide a method for determining
the separation
distance between the working head of a machine for laser processing a material
and the
surface of said material in a large range of measurable distances without
jeopardizing the
measurement accuracy.
According to this invention, these objects are achieved on account of a method
for
determining the separation distance between a processing head of a machine for
laser
processing a material and the surface of said material, which method has the
features
mentioned in claim 1.
Specific embodiments form the subject matter of the dependent claims, the
contents of which
are to be understood to be an integral part of the present description.
This invention also relates to a system for determining the separation
distance between a
working head of a machine for laser processing a material and the surface of
said material,
which system has the features mentioned in claim 23.
The invention also relates to a machine for laser processing a material, which
comprises a
system for determining the separation distance between said working head and
the surface
of the material, which system is configured to carry out the above-mentioned
method.
In summary, this invention is based on the application of the principles of
optical
interferometry.
The term "optical interferometry" indicates a plurality of techniques that
make use of the
phenomenon of the interference between a measurement optical beam and a
reference optical
beam, which beams are superimposed and generate interference fringes. The
theory of
optical interferometry in coherent light is well known and is used for the
relative comparison
between distances, without, however, being able to give univocal absolute
measurement
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
9
information for said distances, for example in the event of a temporary
interruption of the
optical signal.
This invention is inspired by the consideration that an absolute distance
measurement may
be carried out in the optical domain by using a low coherence interferometry
technique. Low
coherence interferometry is a simple technique for measuring distances between
a probe and
a target with high precision, and is based on the comparison between the
distance travelled
by a measurement optical beam that propagates from a source to a detector
assembly and, in
this path, is emitted by the probe and back-reflected by the target, and the
distance travelled
by a reference optical beam that propagates from the source to the detector
assembly across
a reference path tuned to the measurement path in a known nominal distance
condition
between the probe and the target.
In low coherence interferometry, the measurement and reference optical beams
are generated
by low coherence sources, for example LEDs or super luminescent diodes, and
the
interference fringes between the above-mentioned beams only appear when the
respective
optical paths - or lengths of optical paths - correspond, the optical path
being defined as the
sum of the products between the geometric lengths and the respective
refractive indices
within each portion along the entire optical path traveled - that is when the
length of the
measurement path corresponds to the length of the reference path within the
coherence
length range. Assuming that the length of the reference path is known, it is
possible to derive
the length of the measurement path by detecting the presence of the envelope
of the
interference fringes with a resolution of the order of the coherence length
that is typically in
the micrometers range (from 5 urn to 100 urn).
This technique is particularly robust with regard to the optical noise since
the light coming
from other sources or from said laser processing process incoherently adds up
to the
interferometric signal without altering the pattern of interference fringes.
The measurement
is applied locally at the point at which the measurement optical beam is
directed and is
independent from the morphology of the surroundings. This also allows for
precise absolute
measurements of the distance in a distribution that is substantially coaxial
with the laser
process.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
Advantageously, the low coherence interferometry technique with the detection
of the
pattern of interference fringes in the space domain is the most promising and
more efficient
in terms of operative flexibility for the objects of this invention, compared
with the detection
5 in the time domain or the frequency domain.
In fact, in low coherence interferometry with the detection in the time
domain, the pattern of
interference fringes is detected by a photodiode or by an array of
photodiodes, or by a similar
acquisition screen, by adapting the length of the reference path in order to
reach a condition
10 where the lengths of the reference path and of the measurement path
correspond except for
a tolerance of the order of the coherence length. In this case, the limitation
on the range of
available measurements is associated with the adaptation of the length of the
reference path,
which - for example - is carried out by means of the translation of a back-
reflecting element
that is arranged along the above-mentioned path, it being possible for the
translational spatial
range of the back-reflecting element of the reference path to be between a few
microns up
to several millimeters, the size of the translational range being to the
detriment of the
actuation speed or of the operational complexity.
Although the technique of detection in the time domain is rather simple to
carry out and
makes it possible to easily achieve the correspondence between the absolute
optical lengths
of the measurement path and of the reference path, this is, however,
unsuitable for
implementation for applications in which the course of an industrial process
is measured in
real time. In fact, for a dynamic measurement, the length of the reference
path has to be
continuously modulated to find the condition in which it cot iesponds with
the length of the
current measurement path, which condition causes the appearance of the pattern
of
interference fringes. This may be obtained by means of various types of
control devices,
including refractive index modulators or fast-acting mechanical actuators, for
example
piezoelectric actuators; however, these types of devices are rather expensive
and very
delicate since they have to operate at a much faster actuation speed than the
sampling rate
for measuring the distance, which is typically above kHz, a condition that
often may not be
obtained easily, especially in the range of large displacements.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
11
A different detection technique is based on the Fourier transform relationship
between the
spectral density function and the cross-correlation of the measurement and
reference beams,
by means of which it is possible to extract the differential distance
measurement in real space
from the spectral profile of the wavelengths of the two interfering beams. In
this way,
mechanical actuators are not required to align the length of the reference
path with the length
of the measurement path. A single spectral acquisition of the superimposed
measurement
and reference beams is possible using a diffraction grating and a focusing
lens downstream
thereof for projecting the spectral distribution of the interfering beams on a
linear sensor
device, for example a video camera. The spectrum of the two interfering beams
shows a
periodic modulation, and the periodicity (frequency) of this modulation in the
wavelength
space varies with the difference between the optical lengths of the
measurement path and of
the reference path. An algorithm for calculating the Fourier transform, for
example an FFT
algorithm, is applied in order to extract the measurement of the signal
intensity peak in
relation to the difference between the optical paths in real space.
This technique also requires high-quality optical elements that have to be
aligned with
extreme precision and fast sensors for acquiring the signals. Furthermore,
back-reflecting
signals may determine artifacts in the measurement and the sensitivity of the
acquisition may
be reduced by the presence of self-correlation signals, in particular in the
case of highly
reflective surfaces. In order to calculate the absolute distances, it is
necessary to rapidly
process the signals on the basis of the execution of FFT algorithms, which
require specific
computational instruments.
Unlike the low coherence interferometiy techniques in the time domain, in
which a scan of
the lengths of the reference path is temporally distributed, and in the
frequency domain, in
which the comparison information between the length of the measurement path
and the
reference path is encoded in the wavelength space, the low coherence
interferometry
technique with the detection in the space domain combines the two previous
techniques and
makes it possible to directly visualize the outcome of the measurement in real
space,
rendering a rapid acquisition thereof possible by means of an economical
device such as an
image sensor, for example a linear sensor.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
12
In the typical design of a low coherence interferometric system with the
detection in the
space domain, the measurement and reference beams impinge, superimposed, on
the sensor
means surface from different directions, and the surface of the sensor means
is directly
adapted to detect the pattern of interference fringes that arises from this
superimposition. In
this configuration, a spatial variation in the measurement optical path with
respect to the
reference optical path is directly displayed on the sensor means as a result
of the mutual
angle of inclination of the two beams. Therefore, the measurement of the
difference between
the length of the measurement optical path and the length of the reference
optical path may
be simply extracted by detecting the position of the pattern of the
interference fringes on the
sensor means, the extension of the pattern of the interference fringes in the
linear dimension
of the sensor means being of the order of the coherence length of the optical
radiation of the
beams.
In the low coherence interferometry technique with the detection in the space
domain, the
length of the optical path of each beam that obliquely impinges on the common
region of
incidence of the sensor means varies linearly with the position along the
illumination axis of
the sensor means, therefore the difference between the measurement and
reference optical
paths also varies linearly. The pattern of interference fringes appears in a
specific linear
range of the image acquired by the sensor means, which corresponds to the
condition in
which the optical lengths of the measurement path and the reference path are
equal within
the coherence length of the optical radiation, while, in the other regions of
the sensor means,
the beams are incoherently superimposed. By detecting the position of the
envelope of the
pattern of interference fringes along the linear extension of the sensor
means, it is possible
to extract the particular length of the measurement path.
This measure is only limited by the conditions in which the envelope of the
pattern of
interference fringes forms within the illumination region of the sensor means,
that is within
the sensitive region of the photodetector devices that form the sensor means.
The
measurement range is determined by the inclination of the beams on the region
of incidence,
or better still by the angle of incidence therebetween, and ¨ with the same
inclination of the
beams - from the minimum of the number of photodetectors or photodetection
regions (also
referred to as pixels of the sensor means), which are illuminated by the
superimposed beams
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
13
and the overall number of photodetectors of the sensor arrangement, or from
the minimum
number of regions (pixels) that have to be illuminated in order to demodulate
the pattern of
the interference fringes with respect to the overall number of regions
(pixels) available on
the sensor means. Under common conditions comprising a sensor arrangement
having
several thousand photodetectors, a measurement range of several tenths of
millimeters may
be obtained before the appearance of an aliasing effect of the interference
fringes. However,
the inventors have demonstrated that the presence of the aliasing effect of
the pattern of
interference fringes does not limit the measurement but in fact may be used to
increase the
range of measurable distances, as will be described in more detail below. In
fact, this system
of sub-sampling is reflected in an effective demodulation of the fringe
pattern at lower spatial
frequencies, the demodulation being obtained in an analogous way directly at
the level of
the photodetectors of the interferometric sensor arrangement without the need
to interpose
additional elements.
Advantageously, the adoption of an interferometry technique with the detection
in the spatial
domain makes it possible to take accurate distance measurements using a static
system of
measurement and reference optical paths and for each individual acquisition or
sampling of
the spatial distribution of the optical radiation of the superimposed
measurement and
reference beams, which impinge on the sensor means. In order to provide a
system of this
kind, standard optical elements are exclusively necessary, and the signals
emitted by the
sensor means are processed on the basis of simple calculation algorithms,
which is therefore
not computationally onerous. With this technique, the drawbacks of the
detection technique
in the frequency domain, that is the presence of autocorrelation signal
components, the
artifacts at negative frequencies and the reduction in sensitivity at high
values for the
measurable di stances are al so overcome.
According to the invention, the application of the considerations set out
above to a machine
for laser processing a material, in particular for laser cutting, drilling or
welding or additive
manufacturing, is achieved by means of the arrangement of an interferometric
system
comprising a measurement optical path that is integrated, at least in part, in
the working
head, and a reference optical path associated with the measurement optical
path, which may
also be integrated in the working head or outside thereof, wherein the
measurement optical
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
14
path emerges from the measurement head in the region of the output for the
beam or more
generally at the end of the head that is proximal to the surface of the
material being
processed.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be presented in more
detail in the
following detailed description of one embodiment thereof, given by way of non-
limiting
example, with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 and 2 are examples of laser processing machines according to the prior
art
Fig. 2c
Fig. 3 shows schematic example of a working head of a laser machine near to a
material being processed and related control means, according to the prior
art;
Fig. 4 is a schematic view of the configuration of a linear low coherence
interferometric system with spatial detection;
Fig. 4b is a schematic view of the variation in the lengths of the measurement
and
reference optical paths with respect to the relative point of incidence, on an
illumination axis
of a sensor arrangement, of the pattern of interference fringes;
Fig. 4c is a schematic view (top graph) of the variation in the difference
between the
lengths of the measurement and reference optical paths with respect to the
relative point of
incidence, on an illumination axis of a sensor arrangement, of the pattern of
interference
fringes, and the identification of a pattern of interference fringes on the
illumination axis of
the sensor arrangement in a condition in which the optical lengths of the
measurement and
reference paths are equal (bottom graph);
Fig. 5 is a simplified diagram of a system for determining the separation
distance
between a working head of a machine for laser processing a material and the
surface of the
material, which is the subject matter of the invention;
Fig. 6 schematically shows the path of the processing laser beam and of the
low
coherence measurement optical beam in a working head according to a simplified
embodiment of the working head;
Fig. 7 is a detail of the relative position of the processing laser beam and
of the
measurement low coherence optical beam at the output of the working head, in a
cutting or
drilling region of the material;
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
Fig. 8 is a graph showing the trend of the contrast or visibility value for
the simulated
pattern of interference fringes as a function of the ratio between the spatial
frequency of said
pattern of interference fringes and the spatial frequency of the
photodetectors in a linear
arrangement of photodetectors along the illumination axis of the sensor
arrangement of the
5 pattern of interference fringes;
Fig. 9a is a graph showing a dependency relationship between the result of the
interferometry reading, expressed in terms of difference in optical length
between the
measurement optical path and the reference optical path, and the pressure of
an assist gas,
used, for example, in a laser cutting process, which forms along a portion
ofthe measurement
10 optical path, for a predetermined separation distance between the
working head and the
surface of the material;
Fig. 9b is a graph showing a dependency relationship between the result of the
interferometry reading, expressed in terms of the change in the local position
of a surface of
an optical element for protecting or delimiting the chamber of the assist gas
along the
15 measurement beam, and the trend (increasing, decreasing) of the pressure
of the assist gas;
Fig. 10a is a diagram showing a main signal indicative of the identification
of the
pattern of interference fringes along the illumination axis of the sensor
arrangement as a
function of the separation distance between the working head and the material,
and
corresponding additional multiplexed signals indicative of the identification
of respective
additional patterns of interference fringes along the illumination axis of the
sensor
arrangement, which result from an additional measurement or reference optical
path being
traveled along, having a geometric length that differs from the geometric
length of the main
measurement or reference optical path, which includes at least one partial
back-reflection at
the surface of an optical element interposed along the optical path of the
processing laser
beam;
Fig. 10b is an exemplary calibration curve that represents the trend of the
peak of the
signal indicative of a main pattern of interference fringes as a function of
the separation
distance between the working head and the material; and
Fig. 10c shows a series of graphs representing a measurement conducted during
a
cutting process.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
16
Fig. 1 to 3 have been described previously with reference to the prior art and
the contents
thereof are referred to here as long as they are common to the controlled
production of a
processing machine in order to carry out a method according to the teaching of
this invention.
Fig. 4a is a schematic view of the configuration of a low coherence
interferometric system
with linear spatial detection. A measurement collimated beam of optical
radiation, indicated
by M, and a reference collimated beam of the same optical radiation, indicated
by R, impinge
so as to be superimposed on a common region of incidence C of a sensor
arrangement S. at
a predetermined angle of incidence a, where they form a pattern of
interference fringes F,
the extension of which on the common region of incidence is of the order of
the coherence
length of the optical radiation. The width of the measurement collimated beam
of optical
radiation and the width of the reference collimated beam of optical radiation
are preferably
of such a size so as to substantially illuminate the entire sensor
arrangement. In order to
increase the intensity and the contrast of the signal detected, the beams may
be concentrated
on the sensor in the direction that is perpendicular to the illumination axis,
for example by
means of a cylindrical focusing lens.
The sensor arrangement S comprises, for example, an arrangement of
photodetectors along
at least one illumination axis of the region of incidence (x axis in the
figure).The arrangement
of photodetectors is a linear or bidimensional arrangement of photodetectors,
preferably a
linear arrangement. The illumination axis of the region of incidence is
determined by the
intersection between the plane defined by the angle of incidence of the
measurement beam
M and of the reference beam Rand the sensor surface of said sensor
arrangement.
In Fig. 4b, the graph schematically shows the variation in the lengths p of
the measurement
and reference optical paths, referring to the initial incident wavefront of
the respective
measurement and reference beams on the common region of incidence of the
sensor
arrangement S, in the typical configuration in which the two incident beams
are symmetrical
on the sensor arrangement. The x-axis indicates the position or x coordinate
along the
illumination axis of the photodetector arrangement. Reference numeral pl
indicates the
additional length of a first optical path, for example the measurement optical
path of the
measurement optical radiation beam M, with respect to the initial point of
incidence of the
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
17
wavefront of the measurement beam M at a first end of the common region of
incidence C,
xi, which is the origin of the measurement axis. Reference numeral p2
indicates the
additional length of a second optical path, for example the reference optical
path of the
reference optical radiation beam R, with respect to the initial point of
incidence of the
wavefront of the reference beam R at a second end of the common region of
incidence, x?,
which is opposite the first. Reference numeral Ap indicates the difference
between the
additional lengths of the two paths, pl - p2, which is zero at the middle
coordinate of the
sensor arrangement, and varies from a value Apxi at the end xi of the common
region of
incidence to a value Apx2 at the end x2 of the common region of incidence.
1 0
In Fig. 4c, the top graph shows the curve Ap that corresponds to the graph in
Fig. 2b, and the
bottom graph shows the identification of a pattern of interference fringes F
on the
illumination axis (x) of the sensor arrangement S that occurs when the optical
lengths of the
measurement and reference paths are equal. The envelope of the pattern of
interference
fringes F is indicated with hatching, and the particular difference App
between the additional
lengths of the paths of the measurement and reference optical beams is
associated with the
coordinate of the envelope peak, xp, by means of the upper graph.
Pm and PR indicate the measurement and reference paths, the overall lengths of
which may
be expressed as Pm = P1 + pl and PR = P2 + p2, where P1 is the optical length
of the
measurement optical path from the low coherence optical radiation source to
the first
wavefront incident on the sensor arrangement, and P2 is the optical length of
the reference
optical path from the same low coherence optical radiation source to the first
wavefront
incident on the sensor arrangement, and is preferably constant. It is possible
to consider P1
to be composed of Phead Dstandoff, where P - head .S i the length of the
optical path upstream and
inside the working head, including a first portion between the low coherence
optical
radiation source and the end of the working head that is proximal to the
material WP being
processed (for example, the laser beam output 32) and a second portion between
the above-
mentioned proximal end of the working head (for example, the laser beam output
32) and
the sensor arrangement S. which portions have a particular predetermined and
invariant
geometric length, and Dstandoff is the separation distance in open air between
the end of the
working head that is proximal to the material WP being processed and the
surface of said
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
18
material. P2 is the optical length of the reference optical path, which is
equivalent to the
optical length of the measurement optical path in a nominal operating
condition, indicated
in the following as P 'nom, wherein the distance between the proximal end of
the working
head (for example, the laser beam output 32) and the surface of the material
WP corresponds
to a predetermined nominal separation distance Dstandoff nom.
The difference in optical length between the measurement optical path and the
reference
optical path is represented mathematically as:
PM-PR
and the interference fringes appear in thc condition in which this is zero,
that is:
Pm - PR = 0
a relationship that may be broken down as:
P1 +pl - (P2 +p2) = 0
which may be written again as:
Phead + Dstandoff + pl - P2 - p2 = 0
from which the following is deduced:
Phead Dstandoff - P2 + Ap = 0
Phead + Dstandoff - P1 nom + Ap = 0
Phead + Dstandoff Phe ad - Dstandoff nom ¨ 0
Ap = Dstandoff nom - Dstandoff
that is the difference between (a) the current separation distance between the
working head
and the surface of the p material in the processing region, Dstandoff, and (b)
the nominal
separation distance, standolf_nom, is equal to the difference between the
additional lengths of
the measurement optical path and of the reference optical path.
Therefore, a current separation distance between the working head 14 and the
surface of the
material WP that is different from the nominal separation distance, determined
by a
difference in optical length between the measurement optical path and the
reference optical
path, is attributable to a difference between the additional lengths of the
measurement optical
path and of the reference optical path, therefore to a movement of the pattern
of interference
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
19
fringes along the illumination axis x of the sensor arrangement S with respect
to a nominal
position, for example the median plane of said sensor arrangement S.
It is noted that, in a laser cutting or drilling application involving a flow
of assist gas, the
end of the working head that is proximal to the material being processed is
generally the end
portion of the assist gas nozzle, while in a welding or additive manufacturing
application in
which gas is not supplied, the end of the working head that is proximal to the
material being
processed is generally the processing laser beam output.
In the application that forms the subject matter of the invention, the length
of the reference
optical path is set so as to correspond to the length of the measurement
optical path at a
preset nominal separation distance between the working head and the surface of
the material
in the processing region, and the difference between (a) the current
separation distance
between the working head and the surface of the material in the processing
region and (b)
the predetermined nominal separation distance results from the difference in
length between
the measurement optical path and the reference optical path, which may be
identified on the
basis of the position of the pattern of interference fringes along the
illumination axis of the
region of incidence of the sensor arrangement S. Advantageously, a middle
position of the
pattern of interference fringes along the illumination axis corresponds to
said preset nominal
separation distance. Alternatively, an end position of the pattern of
interference fringes along
the illumination axis may correspond to a null nominal separation distance
between a nozzle
and the material being processed, which is equivalent to the contact between
the nozzle that
constitutes the proximal end of the head and the material, thereby allowing
the separation
distance therebetween to only increase, and therefore the pattern of
interference fringes
exclusively moves towards the opposite end of the illumination axis.
With reference to the bottom graph in Fig. 4c, the position xp of the pattern
of interference
fringes along the illumination axis is the intrinsic position of the envelope
of the intensity of
the optical radiation of said pattern of interference fringes, and this
intrinsic position of the
envelope of the intensity of the optical radiation of said pattern of
interference fringes is -
for example - the position of the peak or maximum intensity of the envelope of
the optical
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
radiation, or the middle position of the photodetectors weighted with the
optical intensity of
the fringe envelope.
The detection of the fringe envelope may be carried out by means of optical
intensity profile
5 demodulation techniques, for example by applying a band-pass spatial
filter, or high-pass
and low-pass filters in a sequence, so as to reveal the only signal components
corresponding
to the spatial frequency of the interference fringes. For example, in a first
step of processing
the optical intensity data, the optical intensity detected by a matrix of
sensors is integrated
in the direction that is perpendicular to the development direction of the
interference fringe,
10 for example for columns of a matrix of sensors oriented so as to receive
a pattern of vertically
aligned interference fringes (this operation is not required if the sensor
arrangement is a
linear arrangement of photodetectors on which the beams are focused by means
of a
cylindrical lens). Subsequently, the signal generated by the photodetectors is
normalized
with respect to a background signal, for example extracted from an image
devoid of
15 interference fringes. Therefore, a high-pass spatial filter is applied,
for example to 1/5 of the
photodetector spatial frequency in order to remove the baseline and to
maintain the pattern
of interference fringes. Since, in this way, a signal is obtained that
oscillates around zero,
the absolute value of the signal is extracted and therefore a low-pass spatial
filter is applied,
for example to 1/25 of the photodetector spatial frequency in order to extract
the envelope
20 of the pattern of interference fringes. The position of the pattern of
the interference fringes
is lastly obtained by detecting the position of the envelope of the fringe
pattern by seeking
the maximum thereof or by comparing the envelope with a predetermined model
function
(for example a Gaussian function) and extracting the peak of the model
function.
Fig. 5 shows an example diagram of a system for determining the separation
distance
between a working head 14 of a machine for laser processing a material WP and
the surface
of said material, which forms the subject matter of the invention, in
accordance with an
embodiment that is currently preferred.
In the figure, 100 indicates a low coherence optical radiation source suitably
having linear
polarization, such as an LED or a super luminescent diode, for example which
operates in
the visible or near-infrared wavelength range. The optical radiation emitted
by the source
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
21
100, downstream of a suitable optical isolator 120, is injected into an
optical waveguide, for
example an optical fiber 140, and carried to a beam splitter 160 that is
adapted to generating
a measurement optical radiation beam M, which is routed on a measurement
optical path Pm,
and a reference optical radiation beam R that is routed on a reference optical
path PR.
The measurement optical path Pm and the reference optical path PR are guided
paths and
include optical guides (for example optical fibers) that are adapted to
maintain the same
polarization of the beam along the entire path.
The measurement optical path Pm is led to the working head 14 of a machine for
laser
processing a material as described above, and emerges from there towards the
material WP
being processed, on which it impinges. The region where the measurement beam M
is output
corresponds to the region of the measurement head, it being intended for the
distance of said
measurement head from the above-mentioned material to be measured, for example
the
opening in the nozzle for supplying the flow of assist gas or the laser beam
output.
The reference optical path PR is instead led to a reflective return element
180, preferably by
interposing an optical density filter 200, an optical dispersion compensation
element 220, a
214 plate 240 and a focusing lens 260. The optical reflective element 180 is
arranged along
the reference optical path such that the optical length of this path from the
beam splitter 160
to the optical reflective element 180 corresponds to the optical length of the
measurement
optical path from the beam splitter 160 to the (reflective) surface of the
material WP being
processed in an operating state in which said surface is at the preset nominal
separation
distance Dstandott_nom from the working head, that is from the end of the
working head that is
proximal to the material, such as the opening in the nozzle for the assist gas
or the beam
output.
The measurement and reference optical paths Pm, PR are formed such that the
optical
radiation travels along these paths in both directions, heading back to the
beam splitter 160
after being reflected at the surface of the material WP being processed and at
the reflective
optical element 180, respectively. In the reference optical path PR, the
double passage of the
reference beam R through the 214 plate 240 brings about a 90 rotation of the
linear
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
22
polarization of the beam, which thereby assumes a linear polarization that is
orthogonal to
the linear polarization of the measurement beam M. The beam splitter 160
therefore
performs a recombination of the measurement optical beam and of the reference
optical
beam and directs them, superimposed, along a detection optical path PD (common
to a
portion of the measurement optical path and to a portion of the reference
optical path)
towards the sensor arrangement S.
Both the measurement and reference optical beams are led through a cylindrical
focusing
lens 280, which is adapted to focus the collimated beam in just one direction,
in particular
the direction orthogonal to the illumination axis of the sensor arrangement,
with the aim of
concentrating the signal along this axis, thereby optimizing the illumination
of the
photodetectors, and arrive at a polarizing beam splitter 300 that performs the
separation of
the measurement optical beam M from the reference optical beam R on the basis
of their
polarization, directing the first thereof towards a first reflective element
MI and the second
thereof towards a second reflective element M2; in this last case, by
interposing a V2 plate
320 that is adapted to restore the original polarization. On account of this
configuration, the
first and the second reflective element Ml, M2 direct the measurement optical
beam and the
reference optical beam towards the sensor arrangement S, respectively, and
more precisely
towards the common region of incidence of the sensor arrangement, at an angle
of incidence
a.The angle of incidence a may advantageously be controlled within a preset
range of values
when the system is formed such that the reflective elements M1 and M2 are
respectively
moveable in translation along the axis of propagation of the relative optical
beam and in
rotation about an axis that is normal with respect to the incidence plane
(dashed position in
the figure).
As described above, the sensor arrangement S comprises a plurality of
photodetector
devices, each of which is adapted to emit a particular signal representative
of the optical
intensity incident thereon, and these signals are transmitted, as a whole, to
processing means
350 configured for identifying a pattern of interference fringes F that forms
on the common
region of incidence C of the sensor arrangement by acquiring the overall
incident optical
power of the superimposed measurement optical beam and reference optical beam.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
23
Preferably, the measurement optical path and the reference optical path
comprise
corresponding optical elements, and in particular the reference optical path
comprises a
reflective return element, the reflective and optical diffusion properties of
which correspond
to the reflective and optical diffusion properties of the surface of the
material interposed in
the measurement optical path as much as possible. Optical attenuator means
and/or optical
dispersion means may be provided if need be, which are adapted to balance out
the intensity
and the chromatic dispersion of the reference optical radiation reflected by
said reflective
return element with regard to the intensity of the measurement optical
radiation reflected by
the material being processed.
0
By means of the system in Fig. 5 or equivalent systems, a method is carried
out for
determining the separation distance between the working head 14 of a machine
for laser
processing a material and the surface of the material WP in the processing
regions defined
along a predetermined working trajectory T followed by the processing laser
beam emitted
by the head.
The method comprises generating a measurement beam of low coherence optical
radiation
M that is led towards a processing region through the working head 14, and -
reflected or
diffused by the surface of the material WP in the processing region - is led
through the
working head 14 towards the sensor arrangement S in a first direction of
incidence.
When processing metal materials, it is possible to assume that the measurement
optical beam
is reflected or diffused at the first surface of the material. In certain
cases, for example
welding or additive manufacturing processes, instead of the surface of the
solid to be welded
(or of the substrate), it is necessary to measure the distance from the
surface of the molten
pool, which represents the first surface of the molten metal. The internal sub-
surface layers
of the material generate signals in non-metal and semi-transparent materials
(ceramics,
plastics, biological tissues, etc.), or in painted metals.
The measurement optical radiation beam M in particular travels along a
measurement optical
path from the source 100 to the sensor arrangement S, which includes two
portions having a
particular predetermined and invariant geometric length, respectively a first
portion between
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
24
the source 100 and the end of the working head 14 that is proximal to the
material WP, and
a second portion between the end of the working head 14 that is proximal to
the material WP
and the sensor arrangement S.
A reference beam R of said low coherence optical radiation is generated by the
same source
100, which beam is led towards the sensor arrangement S in a second direction
of incidence,
at a predetermined angle of incidence with respect to the first direction of
incidence of the
measurement beam M. The reference beam R travels along a reference optical
path PR having
an optical length that is equivalent to the optical length of the measurement
optical path Pm
in the nominal operating state, in which the distance between the working head
14 and the
material WP corresponds to the predetermined nominal separation distance
Dstandoff nom.
The measurement beam M and the reference beam R are superimposed on the common
region of incidence C of the sensor arrangement S along a preset illumination
axis. The
position of a pattern of interference fringes F between the measurement beam M
and the
reference beam R along the illumination axis on the common region of incidence
C is
detected by the processing means 350 and makes it possible, as described
above, to
determine the difference in optical length between the measurement optical
path Pm and the
reference optical path PR, which is indicative of the difference between (a)
the current
separation distance between the working head 14 and the surface of the
material WP in the
processing region, and (b) the preset nominal separation distance.
The method may be carried out in real time during a process in order to
determine the
separation distance between the working head and the current processing
regions on the
material, but also before or after the process, for example to qualify a piece
to be processed
or a process that has been carried out.
With reference to Fig. 6 and 7, an exemplary embodiment of the path of the
processing laser
beam B and of the measurement optical beam M inside the working head and the
relative
position of the processing laser beam B and of the measurement optical beam M
in a cutting
or drilling portion of the material WP.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
Fig. 6 shows a reflective element that deflects the laser beam, such as a
dichroic mirror,
indicated by DM, which deflects the optical axis of propagation of the
processing laser beam
B from a head-entering direction to a direction of incidence on the material
WP being
processed. This is a configuration that is adopted in one embodiment of the
working head
5 comprising a lateral laser beam input. In this embodiment, the
measurement optical radiation
beam M is directed towards the measurement region of the material - passing
through the
dichroic mirror DM without substantial deflection - by means of a reflective
optical scanning
system SM, or folding mirror, the inclination of which is controlled, for
example
piezoelectrically, on the basis of the absolute value and of the direction of
the rate of
10 advancement of the working head along the working trajectory in order to
control the
position in which the measurement point intercepts the surface. Downstream of
the reflective
optical scanning system SM there is arranged a focusing lens FL, and therefore
it is possible
to control the position H in which the measurement point intercepts the
surface of the
material. As may be seen in the figure, the propagation direction of the
measurement beam
15 may be controlled by the inclination of the reflective optical scanning
system SM so as not
to be coaxially superimposed on the processing laser beam B, but to be
different therefrom.
A person skilled in the art will understand that a "dual" or "opposite"
configuration is also
possible, in which a dichroic mirror is provided, which is transparent to the
processing laser
beam but reflects the measurement beam coming from a lateral input.
Advantageously, in a machine for laser cutting, drilling or welding a material
or for the
additive manufacture of three-dimensional structures by means of a laser, in
which the
machine comprises a working head containing a nozzle for supplying a flow of
an assist gas
arranged near the material, the measurement optical radiation beam is led
through the nozzle
and directed towards a measurement region of the material that is coaxial with
the current
processing region or is in the vicinity of the current processing region,
preferably in front
thereof in accordance with the working trajectory.
Advantageously, in a machine for laser welding a material or for the additive
manufacture
of three-dimensional structures by means of a laser, in which the machine
comprises a
working head containing an output for the high-power processing laser beam,
downstream
of an optical system for focusing the laser beam, which system is arranged
near to the
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
26
material, the measurement optical radiation beam is led through the above-
mentioned beam
output and directed towards a measurement region of the material that is
coaxial with the
current processing region or is in the vicinity of said current processing
region, preferably
behind it in accordance with the working trajectory.
The incidence of the measurement beam M coaxially with the processing laser
beam B is
suitably used, for example, to assess the drilling depth, the welding height
and/or depth and
the height of the structured material during additive manufacture. The
incidence of the
measurement beam M in a set-back position with respect to the processing
region is used to
verify the welding quality or additive depositions. The incidence of the
measurement beam
M in a forward position with respect to the processing region is used for the
early
measurement of the separation distance of the head from the material during
cutting and
welding, or to identify the morphology of the surface of the material after
the spatial scan,
for example in order to track the welding joint along the working trajectory.
The latter
configuration is shown by way of example in Fig. 7, where N indicates the
nozzle for
supplying the assist gas, B indicates the processing laser beam incident in a
current
processing region of the material WP where a cutting operation is in progress
according to a
trajectory indicated by the arrow, which forms a groove G, and M indicates the
measurement
beam. In a cutting operation, the arrangement of the measurement beam M
coaxially with
the processing beam B would render the measurement extremely uncertain, since
it would
be taken at the cutting edge, where the wall of the groove in the material has
a profile that
may not be controlled, which depends on numerous processing parameters.
Improvements to the invention will be described in the present description
that follows.
Advantageously, in the configuration in which the measurement and reference
beams
impinge on the common region of incidence of the sensor arrangement S, the
angle of
incidence a is controlled and extends to such an extent that the spatial
frequency of the
pattern of interference fringes is greater than the spatial frequency of the
photodetectors in
order to increase the range of measurable distances.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
27
It is known in the art that, assuming that the measurement and reference beams
propagate as
plane waves, the total light intensity as a function of the x coordinate along
the illumination
axis of the sensor arrangement S, that is in the plane of the angle of
incidence, may be
approximated as:
Itat (JOi 12 2 v/III21.-y(.2)1 (c)s(ktx)
where It and /2 are the intensities of the respective beams and kf is the
wavenumber or spatial
frequency of the pattern of interference fringes. With the angles of incidence
of the
measurement beam and of the reference beam with respect to the normal to the
sensor
arrangement indicated as ad and a2, the spacing between the interference
fringes is given by
,47T 0
ki ) -4-- siu(oe.2)
and therefore a greater angle of inclination brings about a greater frequency
of the pattern of
interference fringes, and therefore a greater interference fringe density on
the sensor
arrangement.
According to the prior art, in order to respect the Nyquist sampling criterion
and to avoid the
phenomenon of aliasing or sub-sampling, the spatial frequency of the
photodetectors,
corresponding to the sampling pixel spatial frequency on the sensor
arrangement, indicated
by ic,õ has to be at least two times greater than the frequency of the pattern
of interference
fringes kj; that is the kj / kj, ratio would have to be smaller than 0.5.
The information relating to the difference in optical paths may be directly
extracted from the
position of the envelope of the pattern of interference fringes in the
intensity profile of the
optical radiation incident on the sensor arrangement. Np indicates the number
of
photodetector devices of the sensor arrangement that are illuminated by both
the
superimposed measurement beam and reference beam; the maximum path difference
that
may be measured is therefore
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
28
A ¨
AtY L.
,t
=
Kla
whereby the measurement range is directly proportional to the number of
illuminated
photodetectors of the superimposed beams, which is a consequence of the
resolution of the
sensor arrangement and of the dimensions of the beams. The increase in the
range of
differences between the measurable paths is therefore obtainable by increasing
the number
of photodetector devices, which could introduce greater costs when forming the
sensor
arrangement and greater expenses when processing the signals originating
therefrom. The
above-mentioned range of measurable differences is also directly proportional
to the kf / icp
ratio between the frequency of the pattern of interference fringes and the
spatial frequency
of the photodetectors. The kf / kp ratio is dependent on the angle of
incidence between the
measurement and reference beams and on the spatial dimensions of the
photodetectors; it is
therefore necessary to achieve a balance between the inclination of the beams
and the number
of illuminated photodetectors.
The inventors have noted that, depending on the wavelength and the coherence
length of the
low coherence optical radiation used, several tens of interference fringes are
typically visible
in a pattern of interference fringes that forms in the common region of
incidence of the sensor
arrangement. Acquiring a high number of interference fringes across a wide
measurement
range while respecting the Nyquist criterion requires a large number of
photodetectors,
which brings about an excessive acquisition of information, since only the
position of the
envelope of the pattern of interference fringes is relevant for determining
the difference
between the measurement and reference paths. As a result, the inventors have
explored the
possibility of demodulating the patterns of interference fringes at smaller
and smaller spatial
frequencies, which are obtainable with greater and greater incidence angles
between the
measurement beam and the reference beam, such that the frequency of the
pattern of
interference fringes becomes greater than the spatial frequency of the
photodetectors - a
condition that brings about the occurrence of the aliasing phenomenon.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
29
Taking into consideration a constant number of photodetectors, this approach
makes it
possible to increase the measurement range without losing information, simply
at the cost of
a reduced contrast of the interference fringes since a plurality of fringes
are detected by a
single photodetector.
It may be proven from the prior art that the contrast v of the interference
fringes is dependent
on the aliasing factor kf/ ki, according to the relationship:
V :a: Isinc.(1.kf
and is zero at integer multiples of the spatial frequency of the
photodetectors kp, as shown in
Fig. 8.
Advantageously, in order to have a locally maximum contrast, the spatial
frequency of the
pattern of interference fringes has to be greater than the spatial frequency
of the
photodetectors and different from the multiples of the spatial frequency of
the
photodetectors, preferably close to a half-integer multiple of said spatial
frequency of the
photodetectors.
In fact, as is clear from the graph in Fig. 8, which shows the trend, as a
continuous line, of
the contrast v between interference fringes, which trend is calculated as a
function of the
kfikp ratio, the local maxima are close to the half-integer multiples of the
spatial frequency
of the photodetectors, but with a rapid decline in the maximum contrast
(qualitatively
indicated in the figure by the non-continuous line).
Advantageously, it is possible to select angles of incidence between the
measurement beam
and the reference beam so as to obtain a kf/ kp ratio that is equal to
approximately 1.5 (or
approximately 2.5, approximately 3.5, etc.).
The invention described above may also be improved as described in the
following.
In general, the propagation characteristics of the measurement optical
radiation beam are
influenced by the physical parameters (temperature, pressure, mechanical
deformation) of
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
the transmission means in which said beam propagates, essentially since the
refractive index
of the transmission means may vary depending on these parameters.
In a machine for laser cutting, drilling or welding a material or for the
additive manufacture
5 of three-dimensional structures by means of a laser, comprising a working
head bearing a
nozzle for supplying a flow of assist gas, which wants to determine the
distance between the
nozzle and the material being processed, the measurement optical radiation
beam is made to
propagate through the nozzle. Therefore, the propagation characteristics of
the measurement
beam are influenced by the pressure of the assist gas.
Fig. 9a shows a dependency relationship between the result of the
intcrfcrometry reading,
expressed in terms of difference in optical length between the measurement
optical path Pm
and the reference optical path PR, and the pressure of an assist gas, which
forms along a
portion of the measurement optical path (typically in the chamber of the
nozzle for supplying
the assist gas), for a predetermined separation distance between (the nozzle
of) the working
head and the surface of the material of 1 mm. As can be seen from the
experimental values
conducted in two measurements and from the interpolation curve that is
discontinuous in
portions, the dependency is virtually linear.
In order to improve the accuracy of the method of the invention, the
determination of the
difference in optical length between the measurement optical path and the
reference optical
path may therefore preferably be based on a normalized optical length of the
measurement
optical path, which length is calculated from the geometric length and from a
normalized
refractive index of the portion of said measurement optical path that passes
through the
chamber of the assist gas, or the nozzle. The normalized refractive index is
calculated as a
function of the pressure of the assist gas in said chamber, according to a
predetermined
nominal dependency relationship between the refractive index of the assist gas
and the
pressure of said gas.
For these reasons, the pressure of the assist gas in the assist gas chamber of
the nozzle may
be directly detected by pressure sensors facing said chamber, or this may be
derived
indirectly from a measurement of the change in the local position of a surface
of an optical
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
31
element for protecting or delimiting the chamber of the assist gas along the
axis of the
measurement beam, according to a predetermined nominal relationship between
the position
of the surface of said optical element relative to a particular predetermined
nominal position
and the pressure of the assist gas.
The measurement of the change in the local position of said surface of the
optical element is
determined, for example, as a function of the difference in length between (a)
a
supplementary measurement optical path referring to said optical element,
including at least
one of (i) a first portion between the source of the measurement beam and the
optical element
on a first surface on which said measurement beam impinges with partial back-
reflection
and (ii) a second portion between the surface of the material being processed
and the optical
element on a second surface on which said measurement beam impinges with
partial back-
reflection, and (b) a particular supplementary reference optical path having
an optical length
that is equal to the optical length of the supplementary measurement optical
path of said
optical element in a nominal operating state that includes partial back-
reflection of the
measurement beam at said first or second surface of said optical element when
this is in a
predetermined nominal position along the axis of the processing laser beam,
for a
predetermined reference pressure value for the assist gas in the assist gas
chamber of the
nozzle.
Fig. 9b shows a dependency relationship between the result of the
interferometric reading,
expressed in terms of change in the local position of a surface of an optical
element for
protecting or delimiting the chamber of the assist gas along the axis of the
measurement
beam, and the trend (increasing, decreasing) for the pressure of the assist
gas in the above-
mentioned chamber. The curve A represents the change in the local position of
a surface of
the optical element for protecting or delimiting the chamber of the assist gas
as the pressure
inside the chamber increases. The curve B represents the change in the local
position of a
surface of the optical element for protecting or delimiting the chamber of the
assist gas as
the pressure inside the chamber decreases.
In more general terms, the determination of the difference in optical length
between the
measurement optical path and the reference optical path may be based on a
nornialized
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
32
optical length of the measurement optical path, which is calculated from the
geometric length
and from a normalized refractive index of the transmission means of said
measurement
optical path, or of a transmission means of a portion of said measurement
optical path, which
refractive index is calculated on the basis of the temperature of said portion
of the optical
path according to a predetermined nominal relationship.
Alternatively or in combination with the above, the determination of the
difference in optical
length between the measurement optical path and the reference optical path may
be based
on a normalized optical length of the measurement optical path which is
calculated from the
normalized geometric length and from a refractive index of a material
transmission means
of a portion of said measurement optical path, in which the normalized
geometric length is
calculated on the basis of the mechanical deformation of said material
transmission means
according to a predetermined nominal relationship.
Even more advantageously, the technique that forms the subject matter of the
invention
makes it possible to determine a disturbance in the current optical length of
at least one
portion of the measurement optical path with respect to the current optical
length of a
corresponding portion of the reference optical path, and to correct the value
determined for
the separation distance between the working head and the surface of the
material on the basis
of said disturbance, for example by subtracting the disturbance measurement
from the
measurement of the processing distance (possibly after applying a correction
factor). The
disturbance forms, for example, as a result of the change in at least one
physical parameter
of the transmission means within which the measurement optical path extends.
For these reasons, the measurement beam that impinges on the sensor
arrangement S
comprises at least one measurement calibration beam that results from a
measurement
calibration optical path being traveled along, in which the measurement beam
is reflected or
diffused by at least one back-reflecting surface of a static optical element
interposed along
the measurement optical path, and in which the reference beam that impinges on
the sensor
arrangement S comprises a particular reference calibration beam that results
from a reference
calibration optical path being traveled along, which has an optical length
that is equivalent
to the optical length of the measurement calibration optical path in a nominal
calibration
CA 03160503 2022- 6- 2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
33
operating state in which the geometric length and the refractive index of the
transmission
means of the measurement calibration optical path are equal to the geometric
length and to
the refractive index of the transmission means of the reference calibration
optical path within
a predetermined tolerance range. The static optical element may, for example,
be the optical
focusing system 16 of the laser beam.
The determination of the disturbance in the current optical length of at least
one portion of
the measurement optical path includes the following steps:
¨ Superimposing the measurement calibration beam and the reference
calibration beam
on a common region of incidence of the sensor arrangement S along the
illumination
axis;
¨ Detecting the position of a pattern of interference fringes between the
measurement
calibration beam and the reference calibration beam along the illumination
axis in
the common region of incidence; and
- Determining a difference in optical length between the measurement
calibration
optical path and the reference calibration optical path ¨ indicative of a
difference
between (a) the geometric length of the measurement calibration optical path
and the
geometric length of the reference calibration optical path, and/or (b) the
refractive
index of the measurement calibration optical path and the refractive index of
the
reference calibration optical path ¨ respectively on the basis of the position
of the
pattern of interference fringes along the axis of illumination of the region
of
incidence. The difference in optical length between the measurement
calibration
optical path and the reference calibration optical path is indicative of the
above-
mentioned disturbance in the current optical length of at least one portion of
the
measurement optical length.
In the event that the position of the pattern of interference fringes is
detected, a
predetermined reference position of the pattern of interference fringes ¨
corresponding to
the condition in which the optical length of the measurement and reference
calibration
optical paths arc equal ¨ may, purely by way of non-limiting example, be a
middle position
or an end position along the illumination axis of the photodetectors.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
34
Another solution for increasing the measurable difference range between the
lengths of the
measurement and reference paths by means of the technique that forms the
subject matter of
the invention is to make use of partial back-reflections at the surfaces of at
least one optical
element interposed along the optical path of the processing laser beam and of
the
measurement optical radiation beam, or to make use of reference optical paths
having
predetermined lengths that differ from the length of the main reference
optical path.
In one embodiment, the measurement beam that impinges on the sensor
arrangement S
comprises a main measurement beam that results from a main measurement optical
path
being traveled along, with reflection from the surface of the material in the
processing region,
and transmission through each optical clement interposed along the optical
path of the high-
power processing laser beam, and at least one additional multiplexed
measurement beam
that results from an additional measurement optical path being traveled along,
with reflection
from the surface of the material being processed and which has a greater
geometric length
than the geometric length of the main measurement optical path, for example
since it
includes at least one partial back-reflection at the surface of an optical
element interposed
along the optical path of the high-power processing laser beam and of the
measurement
optical radiation beam.
In this embodiment, the method of the invention is based on the detection of
the position of
an additional pattern of interference fringes on the common region of
incidence C of the
sensor arrangement S, determined by the interference between the additional
measurement
beam and the reference beam. The additional pattern of interference fringes
comprises, for
example, a peak or maximum intensity of the envelope of the optical radiation
that is
different from, for example lower than, the peak or maximum intensity of the
envelope of
the optical radiation of the main pattern of interference fringes between the
main
measurement beam and the reference beam, or (ii) an intrinsic position of the
intensity
envelope of the optical radiation that is different from the intrinsic
position of the intensity
envelope of the optical radiation of the main pattern of interference fringes,
in the case in
which it appears at the same time as the main pattern of interference fringes.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
Fig. 10a is a graph showing the signals emitted by the photodetectors along
the illumination
axis of the sensor allangement S (vertical axis), which signals are indicative
of the intensity
of the envelope of the pattern of interference fringes that forms on the
common region of
incidence. In particular, the figure shows the interferometric signals and
therefore the spatial
5 position of the pattern of interference fringes along the illumination
axis (vertical axis) as a
function of the separation distance between the working head and the material
facing it
(horizontal axis). For example, such a graph may be generated in a calibration
step by
providing a fixed length of the reference optical path and continuously
varying the relative
position between the working head and the surface of the material - that is
the separation
10 distance of the working head from the surface of the material - along
the z axis, and by
acquiring interferometric signal readings as a function of predetermined
discrete values for
the separation distance.
The figure shows the acquisition of a strong interferometric signal in the
aliasing state and
15 the translation of the envelope of the pattern of interference fringes
over a range of
approximately 2 mm (corresponding to approximately 1500 pixels) according to
an
approximately linear trend of the peak of the signal indicative of the pattern
of interference
fringes, shown in Fig. 10b. The sensitivity may be defined as the separation
distance
corresponding to the dimensions of a photodetector or pixel of the region of
incidence, in
20 this case 1.5 um/pixel. The translation of the envelope of the pattern
of interference fringes
over the entire illumination axis of the sensor arrangement makes it possible
to determine a
separation distance between the working head and the surface of the material
of from
approximately 0.25 mm to approximately 2 mm.
25 In the circled regions, corresponding additional multiplexed signals are
marked that are
indicative of the identification of respective additional patterns of
interference fringes along
the illumination axis of the sensor arrangement, which result from an
additional
measurement or reference optical path being traveled along, which has a
geometric length
that is greater than the geometric length of the main measurement or reference
optical path,
30 which includes at least one partial back-reflection at the surface of an
optical clement
interposed along the optical path of the processing laser beam.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
36
In the case in which several separate operating ranges are not facing or
superimposed on the
sensor arrangement but are separated to a sufficient degree in order to
alternatively show the
respective interference fringes, the selection of the pattern of interference
fringes is
automatic, as a result of reaching a separation distance between the working
head and the
material in which only one of the main measurement beam and the additional
measurement
beam interferes with the reference beam so as to produce a pattern of
interference fringes
that falls on the surface of the sensor arrangement S.
In the previous condition, a difference in optical length is therefore
determined between the
additional measurement optical path and the reference optical path, which is
indicative of a
difference between (i) the current separation distance between the working
head and the
surface of the material in the processing region, and (ii) the predetermined
nominal
separation distance as a function of the position of the additional pattern of
interference
fringes along the illumination axis of the region of incidence.
In a different embodiment, the reference beam that impinges on the sensor
arrangement S
comprises a main reference beam that results from a main reference optical
path being
traveled along and at least one additional multiplexed reference beam that
results from an
additional reference optical path being traveled along, which has a different
geometric length
to the geometric length of the main reference optical path.
In this embodiment, the method of the invention is based on the detection of
the position of
an additional pattern of interference fringes on the common region of
incidence of the sensor
arrangement S. determined from the interference between the measurement beam
and the
additional reference beam.
In this case, too, the additional pattern of interference fringes comprises,
for example, a peak
or maximum intensity of the envelope of the optical radiation that is
different from, for
example lower than, the peak or maximum intensity of the envelope of the
optical radiation
of the main pattern of interference fringes between the main measurement beam
and
reference beam, or (ii) an intrinsic position of the intensity envelope of the
optical radiation
that is different from the intrinsic position of the intensity envelope of the
optical radiation
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
37
of the main pattern of interference fringes, in the event that it appears at
the same time as the
main pattern of interference fringes.
In the event that several separate operating ranges are not facing or
superimposed on the
sensor arrangement, but are separated to a sufficient degree in order to
alternatively show
the respective interference fringes, the pattern of interference fringes is
selected in order to
select the additional reference path.
In the above condition, a difference in optical length is therefore determined
between the
measurement optical path and the additional reference optical path, which is
indicative of a
difference between (i) the current separation distance between thc working
hcad and the
surface of the material in the processing region, and (ii) the predetermined
nominal
separation distance as a function of the position of the additional pattern of
interference
fringes along the illumination axis of the region of incidence.
As can be understood from Fig. 10a, a sensor arrangement S having an
illumination axis
having a smaller extension, for example half the extension adopted for the
measurements in
question, would, however, permit the detection of the separation distance
between the
working head and the surface of the material in the same range of values, 0.25-
2 mm, relying
on the signal reading that is indicative of the main pattern of interference
fringes in a first
range and on the signal reading that is indicative of the additional pattern
of interference
fringes in a second range.
Fig. 10c shows a series of graphs representing a measurement carried out
during a cutting
process, in the example a process of cutting a square incision having a width
of 40 mm in a
flat plate made of mild steel having a thickness of 3 mm, operating with the
working head at
a nominal distance from the plate that may vary between 1.3 and 1.2 mm during
the process.
The top graph shows the trend over time of a series of process parameters. In
particular, the
curves indicated as V, and Vy represent the translational speed of the cutting
head in the
orthogonal directions x and y on the cutting plane, the curve indicated as PL
represents the
optical intensity of the processing laser beam and the curve Pr represents the
pressure of the
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/1B2020/061581
38
assist gas. The middle graph shows the trend measured for the real separation
distance
between the working head and the piece. The bottom graph shows the trend over
time of the
interference fringes obtained by means of the detection technique in the space
domain.
The accurate determination of the separation distance between the working head
and the
surface of the material in a processing region, be it a current processing
region or a
calibration processing region, suitably allows the unit ECU for controlling
the process of the
laser processing machine to also use feedback for the correction or the
control of the
processing distance or other processing parameters, for example acting on the
movement
actuator means 40 in ordcr to control the movement of the working head, for
example along
the Z axis towards or away from the material, as a function of the result of
the interferometric
measurement, for example for keeping the distance between the working head and
the
material around a predetermined value as a function of a predetermined
processing project.
This is particularly useful for improving the efficiency of a cutting process,
for example.
Alternatively or in addition, the determination of the separation distance
between the
working head and the surface of the material allows the unit ECU for
controlling the process
to use feedback to control the movement of the working head along the axes
alternative to
the Z axis by acting on the movement actuator means 40, after spatial
scanning, for example
in order to maintain the trajectory of the working head along a predetermined
path adapted
to the morphology of the surface being processed, therefore also with movement
in
translation or an inclination with respect to the surface. This is
particularly useful for
optimizing a welding process, for example as a result of tracking a welding
joint.
It is noted that the design proposed in the above discussion for this
invention is of a purely
exemplary nature and does not limit this invention. An expert in the field
will be able to
easily implement this invention in various embodiments, which do not depart
from the
principles set out here and therefore fall under the present patent.
This is particularly applicable with regard to the possibility of using
different low coherence
optical radiation wavelengths to those cited, or measurement and reference
optical paths
having interposed optical elements that are different from those illustrated
in Fig. 5 purely
by way of non-limiting example.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
WO 2021/111423
PCT/IB2020/061581
39
Of course, without prejudice to the principle of the invention, the
embodiments and the
implementation details may be modified greatly with respect to what has been
described and
illustrated purely by way of non-limiting example, without thereby departing
from the scope
of protection of the invention defined by the attached claims.
CA 03160503 2022- 6-2
