Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
ID-2500
~0 ~ ~7 ~ ~
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field
The invention relates to aperture correction
techniques in the television art, and particularly to an
improved aperture corrector circuit employing a gateable
"coring" technique for removing the objectionable noise and
low amplitude components emphasized during conventional
aperture correction processes.
Prior Art
In scanning processes employing a scanning spot
or aperture, such as in the field of television, some fine
detail information is lost due to the Einite size of the
scanning spot or aperture, as well as other optically associ.-
ated losses, such as caused by lens aberrations, surface
dirt, etc. The loss, or smear, is generally symmetrical in
space and thus, in the waveform, is symmetrical in time. It
follows that conventional aperture loss correctors provide
non-linear means for sharpening the video detail (luminance)
transitions, without losing symmetry, i.e., for distorting
~ 20 the transfer characteristics of the signal in a manner to
I attenuate low amplitude components more than high amplitude
components. However, since the aperture correction process
increases the amplitudes of higher frequency components rela-
tive o the low frequency components, it also increases the
relative amplitude of noise without increasing the signal
magnitude. Consequently, the signal-to-noise ratio of the
video signal is deteriorated rather than enhanced.
- 3 -
ID-2500
Typical aperture correction systems may be found in
the articles "Elorizontal Aperture Equalization", A. N. Thiele,
Proceedings I.R.E.E. Australia, November, 1969, "Improved
Signal Processing Techniques For Color Television sroadcasting",
R. H. McMann, Jr. et al, Journal of the SMPTE, Vol. 77, ~arch,
1968; and "A Determination of Optimum Number of Lines in a
Television System", R. D. Kell et al, RCA Review, Vol. 5,
July, 1940.
A further technique, known generally in the art as
"coring", may be employed to remove the objectionable noise
generated by the aperture correction process, wherein "coring"
may thus be defined as a process for removal of the objection-
able noise due to the high frequencies emphasized during the
luminance enhancement of the video signals. Such a coring
technique typically provides a clipping network, within the
video detail signal path, defined by a pair of diodes which
clip the positive and negative going signals of the aperture
correction signal in response to a selected bias applied to
the diodes. The clipped signal and the initial aperture cor-
rection signal are then recombined to provide a resultingaperture correction signal with improved noise characteristics.
An example of such a coring system may be found in the Parts
Lists Schematics Manual for the BC-230B Studio Color Camera
System, Ampex Corporation, Redwood City, California. However,
the above prior art noise reduction technique provides an
artificially generated transition which, when applied to the
aperture correction signal, causes severe distortion thereof,
thereby detracting from the sharpness of the video picture.
7~
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a system for removing
objectionable low amplitude components from aperture
correction signals generated via video signal generatin& ~ -
means, comprising the combination of; time delay means
integral with the video signal generating means and
responsive to luminance transitions in the video signals;
gateable coring means including gate means operably coupled
to the time delay means and responsive to the luminance
transitions for generating gating signals separate from the
aperture correction signals and having time periods which
are in phase coherence with and encompass respective trans-
itions~ wherein the gating signals enable the gate means to
pass only those selected portlons of the aperture correction
signals in the region of the transitlons which do not contain
the objectionable low amplitude components; and the gating
signals have a frequency response different than the frequency ~
response of the aperture correction signals, wherein the
gating signals generate a cutoff in the region of the peak
amplitude response at the upper limit of the system passband.
The inventive combination provides an improved ~;
aperture correction/coring means for enhancing the transistions
corresponding to luminance variations, while removing the
objectionable noise and low amplitude components caused by
the aperture correction process. The invention also circum-
vents the problem of distortion of the transitions inherent
in the prior art coring technique of previous mention.
In a particular embodiment, a tapped delay line is ~,
employed in oonjunction with an associated video detail signal
generator means to generate a conventional aperture correction
signal along the video detail path. The tapped delay line is
further selectively coupled to detector/gating circuit means - ~;
to provide a predetermined gate signal, along the respective
mb/ - ~ - 5 -
. . :.. -- . :: ~ . I .. . . . . .
'7~
gating path formed by the latter means, in response to video
detail transitions representing luminance variations. More
particularly, the gate signal generated by the detector/gating
circuit means comprises a gate pulse having a selected time
period and a selected phase coherence relative to the waveform
of the aperture correction signal corresponding to a video
detail transition. The time period and the phase coherence
of the gate pulse are generally defined by the tapped delay
line. The gate pulse is introduced to a gate means which
also receives the conventional aper~ure correction signal
from the video signal generator means. The gate means is
enabled in response to the gate pulse to generate an improved
output vldeo detail signal whlch contains not only the trans-
ltion enhancement provlded by the aperture correctLon process,
but also the obJectionable nolse cancellation provided by
the detection/gati~g process.
. ~'':
;~ ' ' " '
.- .';,'~
' ~; '
.'', ,;~ .,:
~:; ", . .
,
mb/r' , - 5a - `
"' ~ . ' .
ID-2500
When video detail transitions are not present in the video
signal introduced to the tapped delay line, or are low
enough in amplitude such as is defined by noise, the gate
means is disabled.
The amplitude response versus frequency of the
gating signal follows a l-cosine curve where the output is
equal to l-Cos (time delay of line x ~) radians. If the
video detail transitions have frequency components, for a
given amplitude, in the very low frequency region, or in
the upper frequency region around 7.2 megaHertz, the gate
means likewise is not enabled, and the amplitude response
of the improved, output video detail signal will display severe
attenuation at the corresponding low and high frequencies
outside the passband.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
. _
FIGURE 1 is a block diagram illustrating the
aperture correction/gateable coring circuit system of the
invention combination.
FIGURE 2 is a block diagram illustrating in more
detail an embodiment of the combination of FIGURE 1.
FIGURES 3A-3H are a series of waveforms in the
time domain, which are generated at various points alon~
the circuit of FIGURE 2, and represent the theoretical
operation of the invention combination.
FIGURES 4, 5 and 6 are waveforms in the frequency
domain, which represent the frequency response of the
s~stem of FIGURE 2.
-- 6
ID-2500
9~ ~
D_SCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIGURE 1, a typical input video detail
signal Ei ~ provided here via yenerator 10, is introduced to
time delay means, generally represented by the dashed block
and numeral 12, and comprising any of various configurations
of terminated or unterminated delay lines and/or filter
circuits in various possible combinations. Examples of the
time delay means are illustrated hereinafter; it suffices
here to note that the time delay means provides at least one
pair of selectively delayed waveforms El and E2 to a video
detail signal generator means 14 along a video detai.l signal
path, and at least one pair of selectively delayed waveforms
El and E3 to detection means 16. The detection means 16
provides a waveform E7 to a gate generator means 18 to define
therewith a gating signal path.
The video detail signal generator means 14 provides
a waveform E5, which defines a conventional aperture correction
signal, to gate means 20, which is enabled via a gating pulse
waveform E8 applied thereto along the gating signal path from
the gate generator means 18. When enabled, gate means 20
passes the waveform E5 to provide a waveform Eg to adder means
22, which also receives the waveform El from the time delay
means 12 via a selected trim delay 24. The waveform Eg con-
tains the high frequency information which complements the
aperture losses of the original signal but has the objection-
able noise and low amplitude components removed. The added
waveforms ~1 and E9 comprise the enhanced output video signal
in a monochrome television system, or the waveform Eg can be
made available for delivery to an encoder means (not shown)
.~ 30 as an additional luminance input in a typical color television
processing system.
_ 7 _
ID~2500
It may be seen that the video detail signal en-
hancing circuitry of FIGURE 1 provides a time delay means
which provides waveforms having a preselected relationship
in response to luminance transitions of selected amplitude
and bandwidth in the input video detail signal. As previously
mentioned, the waveforms have a selected time and phase re-
lationship determined by the specific implementation and
associated application of the system within the overall
television system. Specific relationships are furthe:r
described in subsequent FIGURES 2-6. The signal applied
to the video detail signal generator means 14, is the con-
ventional aperture correction signal for sharpening the
luminance transition signal, and upon which noise cancel-
lation is to be per~ormed via the gateable coring process
in accordance with the invention combination. The gateable
coring process is initiated via the waveforms applied ~rom
the time delay means 12 to the detection means 16, which
determines the gating pulse waveform E8 characteristics.
The aperture correction signal E5 is.thus selectively enabled
in response to the gating signal path to remove the objection-
able noise and low amplitude components.
To illustrate, FIGURE 2 depicts one embodiment of
the invention and FIGURES 3A-3H illustrate the waveforms Ei
through EoUt generated at various points along the embodiment.
The time delay means 12 comprises a pair of unterminated delay
lines 26, 28 which represent, in essence, a tapped delay line.
The generator 10 applies the input video detail signal Ei
to the time delay means 12, via an impedance matching resistor
30 coupled to the sending end of the delay lines 28, 26 The
end delay 26 is not terminated, and the character:istic impedance
-- 8 --
ID-2500
'79~
of the lines is matched to the resistance of resistor 30.
The delay line 26 is coupled at its open far end to the
positive input of a differential amplifier 32, wherein the
line 26 and amplifier 32 form a conventional aperture cor-
5 rection circuit which sharpens the incoming luminance transi-
tions. The negative input to the amplifier 32 is coupled
to the tap between delay lines 28, 26. The input vicleo
detail signal Ein is also applied to the negative input of
a differential amplifier 34 via resistor 30, with the positive
lO input coupled to the open far end of the delay lines 28, 26.
Thus waveforms El and E2 are applied to the amplifier 3~ and
waveforms El and E3 are applied to amplifier 3~.
By way of example, the delay of delay line 28 is
56 nanoseconds (nsea.) while that of line 26 is 8~ nsec.
15 Thus the period oE the step on waveform E2 (FIG. 3B) when
Ein defines a luminance transition, is 168 nsec., which is
the time taken for the incoming transition to travel to the
end of delay line 28 (i.e., the beginning of delay line 26),
and to return to the junction of lines 28 and 26. Waveform
20 El ~FIG. 3A) is the video detail transition of given rise
time. Waveforms El and E2 are subtracted in the differential
amplifier 32, and the resultant output is the waveform E5
(FIG. 3C). The amplitude response resulting from this sub-
traction corresponds to the aperture correction signal, and
25 follows a l-cosine law with frequency, where E5 = l-cosine
(delay of line 26 times ~) radians. The amplitude response
i9 shown in the frequency response curve of FIG. 4, wherein
amplitude response is plotted against frequency. For a 84 nsec.
delay, the amplitude peak in the frequency response occurs
30 at 5.95 megaHertz (MHz). The waveform E5 is the conventional
_ 9 _
ID-2500
7~
aperture correction signal which contains the emphasized high
frequency noise due to -the luminance transition sharpening
process, as shown in FIG. 3C. It is this noise which is re-
moved via the gateable coring process of the invention
combination.
To this end, the tapped delay lines 28, 26, provide
the waveform E3 with a step period of twice ~he delay of the
total delay lines 26 and 28, i.e., 280 nsec. (FIG. 3D). Note
that in this example, the ~ating signal path) waveform E6
~FIG. 3E) is in phase coherence with the waveform E5 ~FIG. 3C).
When the waveform E3 is subtracted from waveform El via the
differential amplifier 34, the resultan-t waveform E6 tFIG. 3E)
is generated which also follows a l-cosine law as depicted
in FIGURE 5, which is thus the frequency response curve showing
the amplitude response versus the frequency of the waveform E6.
The signal E6 (for given amplitudes) produces no output at
ve~y low frequencies, maximum output at 3.6 MHz, and no output
at twice the frequency "peak'l, or 7.2 MHz.
The waveform E6 is applied to a frequency doubler
36 and thence to a detector 38. The components 34, 36 and 3B
comprise, in essence, the detection means 16 of FIGURE 1, and
may comprise a linear integrated circuit type MC-1330 fabricated
by Motorola. The frequency doubler 36 and detector 38 thus may
define a wideband detection means, which provides the waveform
E7 (FIG. 3F) corresponding to the incoming transition waveform
E . Note in this example, that the period of waveform E7 is
wider than the total period of the desired aperture correction
signal waveform E5; i.e., the waveform E7 begins prior to waveform
E5 a time period equal to delay line 28, and ends after E5 a
time period also equal to the delay of delay l.ine 28. Thus the
gating signal totally encompasses, and is in phase coherence
with, the aperture correction signal E5.
-- 10 --
ID-2500
791~
The waveform E7 is then clipped above a pre-selected
threshold 41 as shown in FIGURE 5, via a threshold clipper
circuit 40, which generates thus the gating pulse waveform
E8 (FIG. 3G), while removing the objectionable noise and low
amplitude components depicted by curve 43, which also follows
a l-cosine law. The positive period of th~ waveform E8 enables
a gating amplifier 42 (corresponding to gate means 20 of
FIGURE 1) to selectively pass the waveform E5, i.e., the
aperture correction signal, to an adding amplifier 44, as
waveform Eg (FIG. 3H). The waveform Eg comprises the improvçd
gated aperture correction signal, which is enhanced with ob-
jectionable noise removed, in accordance with the invention.
The video transition signal El is delayed via the trim delay
2~ to account for delays in the gating signal path, and is
added to the waveform Eg via the adding amplifier 46, to
provide a monochrome television system signal E t.
When luminance transitions El are not present at
the system input, or are low enough in amplitude, as in the
case of noise, and are below the level 41 (FIGURE 5) of the
threshold clipper circuit 40, the gating amplifier 42 is
disabled and waveform E9 is not passed. In addition, if the
luminance transitions have frequency components (for a given
amplitude) that are in the very low frequency region (FIGURE 5)
or in the upper frequency region around 7.2 M~z, they will not
enable the gated amplifier 42, and the resultant amplitude
response of waveform Eg will display severe attenuation (cutoff)
at the corresponding lo~ and high frequencies outside the pas~-
band of the system (FIGURE 6). Ergo, tha objectionable high
frequency noise in the luminance transitions of gradual change
(i.e., in the "flat" field area) of a television picture is
removed by the gateable coring process.
- 11 -
ID-2500
7~
It may be seen that the system of FIGURE 2 is
particularly adapted for use in a horizontal aperture
correction and noise coring system, which determines the
delay line time delays. In a horizontal correction system
it is necessary to predetermine the beginning of a luminance
transition so as not to pre-distort the shape of the cor-
rection signal to be derived from that transition. Accord-
ingly, early detection is provided in FIGURE 2 by the
selection of relative delay line times, whereby the gating
signal path waveform E6 begins prior to, and ends after,
the aperture correction signal E5. In addition, the wave-
forms are in phase coherence, i.e., symmetrical about the
center of the transition, as shown in the FIGURES 3A-3H.
However, the system o the invention combination
may also be employed in vertical aperture correction proces-
ses, with delay line times corresponding to the rate of the
vertical resolution, that is, the period of one television
line. In vertical correction schemes the early detection
feature may not be desired, however phase coherence is re-
quired. However, operation of the gateable coring processin conjunction with the aperture correction process is as
described relative to the systems of FIGURES 1 and 2.
Examples oE the vertical and/or horizontal enhancing tech-
niques and implementation therefor are shown in the McMann,
Jr. article of previous mention, and are therefore not further
described herein.
The delay lines 26, 28 of FIGURE 2 may be replaced
by other means for providing selected delay times such as,
for example, filter networks. Combinations of delays from
such networks provide frequency response curves which comple-
ment a Gaussian loss rather than follow the l-cosine law of
- 12 -
ID-2500
r;j~ 3~
previous mention. In addition, combinations of delay lines
and filter networks may be employed. Examples of using such
filter networks, delay lines, and/or cornbinations thereof
are shown in the Thiele article of previous mention, and
thus are not further described herein.
obviously, terminated delay lines may be employed
in place of the open ended lines shown in FIGURE 2, wherein
the replacement is generally well known in the art and not
described herein.
