Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
~ 1 6 i.5~ 3
1 --
CASE 4288/4381
"A METHOD OF DETERMINING THE BULK STRENGTH OF STRATA"
This invention comprises a technique of determining the bulk strength
of rocks encountered in boreholes.
In all mineral extraction methods it is extremely useful to
personnel involved in planning and working the extractions to be able
to determine not only the nature and depth of various minerals and
rocks but also their relative strength. Data pertaining to the relative
strengths of rocks likely to be encountered in a scheme of operations is
of importance on two accounts: firstly, in ensuring that necessary
support action is taken to enable the extraction to take place in a safe
environment, and secondly, that the extraction proceeds in the most
economically efficient manner.
In order to determine the nature of strata it has been the practice
for many years for boreholes to be drilled vertically from the surface
~ to determine the exact po6itions and materials of the strata. In coal
mining, boreholes may typically be up to 1~00 metres deep and have a
diameter of 0.25 metres.
Boreholes yield two types of rock samples: firstly, "cutting
samples" which are small fragments of rock produced by a tool which
completely grinds the rock away in producing the borehole; secondly,
continuous cylinders of core produced by a tool which cuts a narrow
.~ .
i 5 7 3
-- 2 --
annulus of rock away. Sincecoring is roughly twice the cost of rock-
bitting, a typical borehole may have the top section rock-bitted and
the subsequent portion of interest cores.
The materials produced by the coring method are used to give a
variety of infarmation, the most obvious of which is the precise nature
of the strata through which the coring tool has passed. Another import-
ant piece of information is the Fracture Index log (sometimes referred
to as Crack Density Log) which is derived from the core and which is
used to indicate the strength of the rock.
It is conventional to record from an examination of the core
sample the exact depth of every fracture in the core ~hen compiling a
Fracture Index Log. This affords the opportunity at a later date to
express the Fracture Inde~ as the number of fractures per unit length
over any chosen unit length (e.g., 40cm, 60cm, lOOcm, 200cm, etc.).
The Fracture Index Log may be used as the basis to produce other logs,
e.g., Rock Quality Designation (R.Q.D.~.
Once a borehole has been made further information can be obtained
relating to the strata by logging the borehole. One log which is often
obtained is a Neutron-Neutron log whilst another is a Caliper Log.
The Neutron-Neutron log is obtained by using a standard down-hole
geophysical tool. The equipment comprises a neutron source and a neutron
detector which are separated by a fixed distance characteristic of that
particular tool (hence short-spaced neu-tron-neutron, long-spaced neutron-
neutron, etc.) In principle the source continually emi-ts fast neutrons.
Neutrons lose more energy per collision when the nuclei with which they
collide have comparable mass. Hence the rate of energy loss (moderation)
of fast neutrons is proportional to the density of protons (which have
nearly the same mass as the neutrons). After the neutrons have been
573
-- 3 --
slowed (to so-called thermal energies), they may be captured by nuclei
which then emit high energy capture gamma rays.
The prime response of fast neutrons in the borehole environment
is to be slowed by interaction with hydrogen in combination with other
elements (mostly commonly with oxygen as water). Therefore, making the
detector respond to thermal neutrons (neutron-neutron tool) or alter-
natively capture gamma rays (neutron-gamma tool) gives an indication of
the amount of hydrogen present in the borehole environment which is
identified as a hydrogen index. The output of the detector is used to
produce a neutron or gamma log. Neutron logs are often scaled in counts
per second (c.p.s.) or American Petroleum Institute units (A.P.I.) or
Standard Neutron Units (S.N.U.) as is explained later. It is an object
of the present invention to provide an improved method of determining
the bulk strength of rock in a strata using a loggin~ technique.
According to a first aspect of the present invention a method of
determining the bulk rock strength of strata includes the steps of drill-
ing a borehole in strata, moving an instrument along the borehole and
determining a Hydrogen Index Log of the strata through which the instru-
ment passes, determining for the strata surrounding the hole the lithology
of the strata, progressively modifying the Hydrogen Index Log by a pre-
.
determined mathematical function (the calibration constant) for each
lithology group encountered in the borehole to produce a modified
Hydrogen Index Log and deriving therefrom the bulk rock strengths of
the strata through which the borehole was drilled.
According to a second aspect of the present invention a method
of determining ths bulk rock strength of strata includes the steps of
drilling a borehole in strata, moving an instrument along the borehole
and determining a Neutron-Neutron Log of the strata through which the
the instrument passes, determining for the stra-ta surrounding the hole
~ 1 6~57 ~
the lithology of -the strata, progressively modifying the Neutron-Neutron
Log by a predetermined mathematical function (the calibration constant)
for each lithology group encountered in the borehole to produce a modi-
fied Neutron-Neutron Log and deriving therefrom an indication of the
bulk rock strengths of the s-trata through which the borehole was drilled.
The bulk rock strength Z can be given.in the form;
Z = - ~ b
where a and b are derived calibration constants for each lithological
group or sub-division of a group and x is the Neutron-Neutron log. It
will be appreciated that the Bulk Rock Strength log may be considered
as being effectively a synthesized Fracture Index (or Crack Density) log.
The above form of the relationship is not fundamental to the
technique - any polynomial of the form Z = f(x) (or other mathematical
function) which can be fitted to the data can be used and the appropri-
ate calibration constants determined - there is no reason why different
polynomials should not be fitted to different lithology groups or sub-
divisions. An inverse relationship is expressed only for simplicity's
sake.
The Neutron-Neutron log (or neutron-gamma) tool response is
contributed to by the drilling mud within the borehole in addition to
material within the borehole wall. The drilling mud contribution is
partly controlled by borehole diameter. Variation in borehole diameter
(rugosity) therefore may partly contribute to the Neutron-Neutron-tool
response variation. The rugosity is measured by logging the borehole
with a caliper log which follows the contours of the borehole and gives
an output which is directly related to the width of the borehole. Rugo-
sity may, in part, be related to lithological type and in this situation
the effect of varying rugosity in the calculation of a bulk rock strength
- log from the Neutron-Neutron log is already accomodated by deriving the
1 1 6 .~57 3
calibration constants of the above equation for each lithology group.
However, rugosity may vary independently of lithology and therefore
the bulk rock s-trength log could be derived from a mathematical relation-
ship in which bulk rock strength is both a function of Neutron-~eutron
response and caliper value. This may simply be achieved by obtaining
the calibration constants of the above equation as a func-tion of caliper
value. Thus, if required, the method can include the further step of
using a caliper log to provide information to correct for borehole rugo-
sity when deriving the bulk strength log.
The lithology of the strata which the borehole encounters may
be obtained from a Fracture Index log of the core, this is preferably
obtained by visual examination of core produced in forming the borehole
although it may be obtained by a geologist's interpretation of (other)
conventional down~hole geophysical logs or by computer processing of
(other) conventional down-hole geophysical logs.
The bulk rock strength log may be also derived from a neutron-
gamma log. The Neutron-Neutron or Neutron-Gamma log is preferably
filtered and a filtering factor may be applied to the Fracture Index log
for the purpose of establishing calibration constants.
The method may include the further step of applying a filtering
factor to the lithology log with the provision that the filtering factor
may only smooth over continuously similar sections of a particular sub-
group, and with the further provision that any lithology units contami-
nated as a result of the smoothing process are eliminated from calcula-
tions of the calibration constants.
In order that the invention may be readily understood two applica-
tions of the method thereof to the logging of the borehole will now be
described, by way OI example only, with reference to the eight charts
in the accompanying drawings. In the drawings the first aspect of the
~181573
-- 6 --
invention is shown in rela-tion to Figures 1 - ~ in whic'n:
Figure 1 shows a plot of -the ~ydrogen Index log against depth;
Figure 2 shows a plot of the Crack Density or Fracture Index log
against depth;
Figure 3 is a plot of the Hydrogen Index log of Figure 1 against
the Crack Density log of Figure 2, for one lithology group; and
Figure 4 is a plot of the Bulk Rock Strength, obtained by modi-
fying the Hydrogen Index log according to this invention, super-imposed
on the Fracture Index log for the purposes of comparison.
The second aspect of the invention is illustrated with reference
to Figures 5 - 8 in which:
Figure 5 shows a plot of the Neutron-Neutron log against depth;
Figure 6 shows a plot of the Fracture Density log against depth;
Figure 7 is a plot of the Neutron-Neutron log of Figure 1 against
the Crack Density lo8 of Figure 2, for one lithology group; and
Figure 8 is a plot of the Bulk Rock Strength and fracture density.
- Bulk Rock Strength is obtained by modifying the Neutron-Neutron log
according to this invention, superimposed on the synthetic Fracture
Density log for the purposes of compariscn.
The basic technique applied in both aspects of the invention are
the same. Initially a borehole was drilled vertically from the surface
- through strata known to contain coal measures to the depth of 1100 metres.
The first 400 metres were drilled by rock-bitting where the drill carried
a drill bit which ground away at the material which was continuously
flushed away to the surface. Below 400 metres drilling was continued
by a coring drill which ground out an annulus of rock which was flushed
to the surface but retained a core of material in the barrel of the drill.
This barrel was periodically withdrawn to the surf-ace for examination and
removal of the core. A distance log was kept of the position of the drill
~ . .
I l 61 57 ~
-- 7 --
in the borehole so that the nature of the material produced by the
coring technique could be directly identified with the location of the
strata.
The lithology of the strata was then classified by visual inspec-
-tion. A series of numbers was then accorded to the materials of the
strata according, in this example only, to the fGllowing sub~divisions:
LITHOLOGY LITHOLOGY NUMBER
COAL
M/S S.M. 2
M/S SL. SILTY 2
S/D. M/S. S.M. 3
S/D. M/S. SL. SILTY 3
M/S. SILTY 4
M/S SILTY WITH IRONSTONE BANDS 5
SILTS FINE GR. 5
SILTS MED. GR. 5
SILTS COARSE GR. 6
SAND FINE GR. 6
SAND MED. GR. 6
- SAND COARSE GR. 7
GRIT 7
CONGLOM 7
(M/S - Mudstone)(S/E = Seatearth) (S.M. = smooth)
(SL. = sli8htly)
(GR. = grain size)
- The lithology log was then entered into a computer at the chosen
basic sampling interval of 20 cm in these samples, using the relevant
lithology numbers.
It will be appreciated that, once obtained, the lithological
1 1 ~1 57 3
-- 8 --
constants or numbers shown can be applied, with modifications if
necessary, to other boreholes in the same or other locali-ties.
Once the borehole has been drilled it can be logged by slowly
winching a device from the bottom of the borehole surface whils-t
recording the variations in electrical signals which the device trans-
mits to surface recording instruments via the (dual purpose) winching
cable.
Examples of various types of geophysical logs are given in a
paper entitled, "Exploration 2000", by R.H. Hoare in "The Mining
Engineer~, August 1979, Pages 131 - 140.
The logs taken were, in the first example, a ~ydro~en Index log
and in the second example a Neutron-Neutron log, both obtained by wind-
ing a Neutron-Neutron log device down -the borehole and logging the
Neutron-Neutron tool response from 400 metres downwards to give the
logs shown in Figures 1 and 5. In these figures the ordinate of Figure
1 gives the Hydrogen Index and of Figure 5 the Neutron-Neutron response.
The Hydrogen Index ordinate is on a scale of 1-100 and that of the Neutron-
Neutron log of O to 400 while the abscissa of both logs gives the depth
in metres.
Once obtained the appropriate log was then entered into a com-
puter at the chosen basic sampling interval of 20 cm.
In order to determine the calibration constants the Fracture Index
log was then entered into the computer at the chosen basic sampling
interval of 20 cm. These logs are shown respectively in Figures 2 and 6
plotted against the depth in metres.
Prior to establishing the calibration constants a filtering factor
is applied to the Hydrogen Index Log, the Neutron-Neutron log and the
Fracture Index Log before cross-plotting. Filtering has been effected by
smoothing over a number (L) of basic sample intervals such that:
~ ~ 61573
L = 1 no ~moothing, raw data at basic sampling
interval of 20 cm.
L = 3 smoothed over 40 cm., i.e., 20 x (L-l) cm.
L = 7 smoothed over 120 cm.
L = 21 smoothed over 400 cm.
This amounts to simple running average smoothing, other forms of filter-
ing could equally well be applied.
For the particular lithology group or sub-division under exami-
nation in this example a range of 'L' values is used in both the Hydrogen
Index/Fracture Index crossplots and the Neutron-Neutron/Fracture Index
cross plots and the best relationship is selected (by at least square
fit or by "eyeball"). The range of litholo y groups is arbitrary, the
number and ran~e of groups can be varied to suit different geological
environments and to obtain the most accurate calibration constants.
It is important to note that although large 'L' values smooth
the Hydro~en Index, the Neutron-Neutron and Fracture Index logs, they
must not be permitted to smooth together different lithology sub-groups
for calibrations. Consequently, large 'L' values operate only on the
Hydrogen IndexJ Neutron-Neutron response and Fracture Index for continu-
ously similar sections of that lithology sub-group - any lithology
units 'contaminated' as a result of the smoothing process are eliminated
from calculation of the calibration constants.
Figure 3 shows a cross-plot of Hydrogen Index and Fracture Index
for a specific lithological group including only the points uncontami-
nated by the smoothing process.
For the compilation of Bulk Rock Strength (z) - the Hydrogen
Index log is amended at each lithology sub-group according to the cali-
bratlon coefficients a and b:
z = ax + b
573
-- 10 --
In both examples during the compilation of Bulk Rock Strength (z)
all lithology group 1 (coal) are removed from consideration and replaced
in the final printed log by "bars". This is preferred because (a) coal
is hydrocarbon and therefore responds significantly differently on the
respective log to the other Coal Measure rocks; (b) the mechanical
strength of coal is well established and presents no engineering diffi-
culties and (c) the convention of displaying coal horizons in the finished
Bulk Rock Streng-th log as "bars" has some value in the case of strati-
graphic identification in the finished Bulk Rock Strength log.
Figures 4 and 8 show a display of derived Bulk Rock Strength A
superimposed on the synthetic Fracture Index B. The intermediate "bars"
C are coal. The 'L' value used in Figures 4 and 8 is 21. The identity
between the logs A and B indicates in each example the accuracy of the
invention. The Bulk Rock Strength log, which in these examples is a
synthesi~ed Fracture Index (Crack Density) log can readily be used to
produce other rock quality and/or strength logs (e.g., R.Q.D.).
It will be appreciated from the foregoing that an accurate Bulk
Rock Strength log can be readily computed from either the Hydrogen Index
or the Neutron-Neutron log and a lithology log and that a set of calibra-
tion constants has been derived which relates to the Coal Measure rocks.For use in sedimentary environments other than Coal Measure rocks, a
relevant set of calibration constants can be derived from a suitable
borehole by compiling a conventional Fracture Index log.
In these examples Fracture Indices has been used as the reference
or basis for the process of deriving a Bulk Rock Strength log from a
Hy~rogen Index log and a Neutron-Neutron log. The Fracture Index log
is not crucial to the process of deriving a Bulk Rock Strength log from
either a Hydrogen Index or a Neutron-Neutron log. The principle of this
invention is that for purposes of calibration a Bulk Rock Strength log
.
l l ~157~
11 --
can be derived from a Hydrogen Index or a Neutron-Neutron log usir.g any
rock strength, rock quality or rock property log. A tolerable (although
inferior) Bulk Rock Strength log can even be derived from either a
Hydrogen Index or a Neutron-Neutron log using no calibration constants
or additional rock quality log, that is to say that the Neutron-Neutron
log alone represents a crude Bulk Rock Strength log.
The use of the invention thus enables an accurate indication of
strength to be obtained more easily and speedily than hitherto.
