Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
;3
AN ASSEMBLY OF STRUCTURAL MODULES E`OR RETAINING WALLS AND
THE LIKE
sackqround of the Invent on
This invention relates generally to specially
configured prefabricated structural modules for employment
in the construction of walls. More particularly this
invention relates to that cla~s of wall wherein the
structural elements of the module form interior cavities or
cells in which granular material is deposited. This
enclosed ~ranular material, throuyh the action of friction
against the generally upright walls of the cells, adds its
own weight to that of the structural parts to form a mare
effective assembly.
The structural modules of the present invention are
intended to be used in combination with other ~imilar
modules arranged in horizontal rows and, according to the
height required o~ the structure, in additional ~uperposed
horizontal rows of modules each properly proportioned to
provide adequate stability to the a~embled tructure.
More particularly the present invention relates to
an improved prefabricated structural module of the ~eneral
type shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,877,236 and U.S. Pat. No.
4,372,091. These patents show ~tructural modules which,
.. ..
~:
:
. .
135~6
when assembled in combination laterally and vertically to
form a wall structure, create cellular cavitie~ to contain
fill material which acts in concert with the wall modules
to form a gravi~y wall. I'he principal distinction between
the referenced patents lies in the method utilized to
transfer the lateral components of forces acting upon the
walls.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,877,236 the lateral forc~s are
transmitted by interlocking contours located in the top and
bottom surfaces of the face panels. This detail is
effective for small to moderate lateral force~, but the
stresses induced in relatively thin face panels by high~
lateral stresses in high structures cannot be economically
resisted by these methods. U.S. Pat. No. 4,372,091 use~ a
standard mortise and tenon interlockin~ key located on the
arm connecting the front and rear faces. The lateral
forces in a wall constructed with these modules cause very
high bending stresses in the connecting arms, since the
mortise and tenon key~ form couples which are transmitted
to the face panels. The connecting arms must also resi~t
high vertical shear stresses caused by these couple~. The
bending and shear stresses so induced must be resisted
respectively by heavy longitudinal reinforcing steel and by
vertical steel usually in the form o~ stirrups. These
requirements add significantly to the cost of the modules
and hence to the final cost of the structure.
5i3
An object of the pre5ent invention is to provide a~
improvement over other prefabricated modules presently used
for wall struc~ures of this type, since the modules
described in this invention are configured in such a manner
as to conform more efficiently to the locations, directions
and patterns of stresses induced in the wall assembly by
the ~ill material within and by the exter~al load~ acting
upon the wall. By being positioned in such a manner as to
be able to accomodate more ef ficiently the loads imposed
upon it, the stability of the assembled structure is
increased. Moreover, both the intensity of the internal
stresses within the module, and the ~hysical size of the
individual modules are reduced. This more ef~ective
construction results in the use of less material in the
manufacture o~ the modules and, when used in a retaining
structure, requires less excavation of soil (and
consequently, less backfill material tG be placed) to place
the modules in the field and to complete the structure.
All th~sa factors combine to produce a much more economical
structure with improved ~tructural integrity.
.. . ~ ~ .
Sum~ar~ of the Invention
In order to accomplish the o~jectives of the present
invention, a precast structural module is configured as
follows: a front panel is provided which typically is of
generally rectangular configuration when viewed in front
elevation. A rear panel is located with its longitudinal
axis parallel to that of said front panel, and one or a
plurality of partition means ~onnect said front panel with
said rear panel. ~hen said modules are placed in lateral
conti~uity, the front panels and rear panels form two
opposite longitudinal sides of a cellular chamber, with
each partition means servin~ to connect the front panel
with the rear panel, and further ser~in~ to transversely
divide the chamber into smaller individual cells.
In a particularly advanta~eous form o~ the present
inve~tion, the partition mean~ are of a pronounced
generally trapezoidal ~hape ~hen viewed alo~g a horizontal
line parallel with the longitudinal a~is of the front
panel. (For the purpose of this application, the term
"trapezoidal" includes a parallelogram.) This trapezoidal
shape is such that, when the module is placed in its final
erected position within the assembled wall structure, the
rear panel of a module is situated at an el~vation
4 --
i3
considerably belo~ a plane extending from the upper edge of
the front panel at right angleq thereto, and the principal
axes of the partition means extend in a downward direction,
desirably at an angle of between 20 and 82 desrees from the
plane of the front panel. This results in the axas of the
partition means being more nearly perpendicular to the
direction of the resultant forces acting on the wall
modules. These forces represent the combined effects of
(a~ the lateral force caused by the material retained
behind the wall, and (b) the vertical gravity forces from
the modules themselves and from the fill enclosed within
the cellular cavities formed by the front and rear panels
and the partition means o~ the assembled modules.
In a wall where modules are stacked vertically, each
module beginning with the topmost module is acted upon by
its respective overturning and resisting forces and
subsequently transmi~s those ~orces to the contiguous
module(s) belo~ according to the details of the tranqfer
mechanism provided in the design. Such mechanisms have
heretofore consisted of commonly used interlocking means
such as mortise and tenon keys on connecting arms or
depended lips on the lower sur ace~ of the face panels.
The use of mortise and tenon keys in the partition means
results in very heavy bending ~tresses in the partition
means as well as high local shearing stres~es in the keys.
~6;~;i3
The use of depending lips in the face panels results in
exces~ively high shearin~ stresses and bending in the
weaker direction of the panel. This factor seriously
limits the useful height o~ the design since these stresses
when high cannot be resisted by any economically practical
thickness of face panel or depending lips.
Since concrete~ the material commonly ~sed in the
manufacture of wall modules, is relatively weak in tensile
strength, bending in concrete members must be resisted by
reinforcing material, usually steel, located longitudinall~
in the tension face of the member. A very significant
aspect o~ one form of the present invention is the ability
of the design to transmit the natural stresses of the
retained material and those of the resisting material
directly as compressive forcas, without relocating those
forces through excessive and inefficient use of expensi~e
reinforcin~ materials.
The present invention is not restricted to the use
of any particular material of construction, but concrete,
either plain or reinforced by metal embeded therein in the
usual way, is very suitable and advantageous. The
invention utilizes moct effectively and economically the
very ef~icient natural compreqsive strength of concrete.
o~
To a~fect this natural ability of concrete to
transmit stresses compressively, one precept of this
invention prescribes a variation of configurations of the
contact surfaces of vertically contiguous partition means,
each embodiment utilizing the advantages of a generally
sloped orientation of the contactsurfaces of the partition
means. In its simplest form, the contact surface consists
of a straight inclined plane oriented iR such a way that
the total resultant forces, overturning and resisting,
exerted by the upper module upon the lower module, occur at
such an angle that ordinary frictional forces between the
surfaces in contact more than compensate for any component
of the resultant force which may occur in a direction
parallel to said contact surfaces. Another form of this
invention utilizes a more positive engagement of contact
surfaces wherein alternate surfaces are angled with respec
to each other, presenting surfaces normal to a~y resulting
components of loading.
Descr}~S1C~ 9~ th~-Dra~ln~3
Figs. 1 and 2 are perspective views of advantageous
forms of structural modules incorporating features of the
invention.
i3
Figs. 3 and 4 are cross sectional and top plan views
respectively illustrating a module of the general type
shown in Fig. 1, with parallel front and rear panels.
Figs. 5 and 6 are fragmentary cross sectional and
plan views, similar to Figs. 3 and g, illustrating a
modification in which the rear panel is tilted at an acute
angle to the front panel.
Fig. 7 is a fragmentary perspective view of an
assembled retaining wall or the like utilizing structural
modulesaccording to the invention.
Fig. 8 is a perspective view of a base of a type
which may be used in connection with a wall assembly such
as that of Fig. 7.
Fig. 9 is a cross sectional view of a preferred form
of base module according to the invention having an
extended toe flange for increased resistance to overturn.
Fig. 10 illustrates a modified form of structural
module, having a notched-out area for reception of a
horizontal, earth-retaining slab.
Figs. 11 and 12 are cross sectional views
illustrating different advantageou~ construction techniques
utilizing the structural modules of the invention.
Fig. 13 is a diagrammatic illustration of a
structural wall utilizing the modules of the invention, for
force analysis purposes.
'`. '' :
~L2~ 53
Figs. 14 and 15 are cross sectional vie~s taken on
lines 14-14 and 15-15 of Fig. 16 illustrating advantageous
forms of construction for the tops o~ retaining walls or
the like.
Fig. 16 is a composite cross sectional view
illustrating the construction features of Figs. 14, 15.
Fig. 17 is a fragmenkary cross sectional view
illustrating another form of top structure for a retaining
wall or the like.
Fig. 18 is a cros sectional view generally on li~e
18-18 of Fig. 19.
Fig. 18a is a fragmentary cross sectional detail,
illustrating an advantageous form of connector for joining
a connecting panel to adjacent structural modules.
lS Fig. 19 is a top plan view of an arrangement for
joininq so-called half modules to adjacent structural
modules ~y means of an intermediate co~necting panel.
Fig. 20 is a perspective view of a modified form of
half module having an integral stabilizin~ ~-iab.
Fig. 21 is a ~ront elevational vie~ of a retai~ing
wall or the like constructed with structural modules
according to the invention.
Figs. 22 and 22A are front elevational views of
modified forms of retaining wall assembly or the like
incorpora~ing fille.r panels between adjacent, spacad
structural modules.
53
Figs. 23-26 are fragmentary cross sectional and top
plan views illustratin~ various arrangements ~or the
mounting and retention of filler panels in a wall assembly
of the type shown in Fig. 22.
Fig. 27 is a perspective view of an advantageous
form of drop-in panel, which may be used at the back of the
assembly or, more typically, as an intermediate vertical
panel.
Fi~s. 28-30 illustrate various view3 of an
arrangement for mountin~ of the drop-in panel in an
assembly of modules.
Figs. 31 and 32 are ~ragmentary views in ~erticai
cross section illustrating advantageous arrangements for
keying together ver~ically adjacent structural modules for
resistanceto shear.
Fig. 33 is a side elevation o~ an advantageous ~orm
of structural module, in which the front and rear panels
are generally at the same height, joi~ed by partition
elements stepped to provide a pluralitY of forward facing
abutment element~ for improved resistance to shear.
Fig. 34 is a cross sectional view o~ an assembly of
structural modules arranged with notched~out partition
panels and with adjacent structural modules being joined by
special keying blocks or ~labs.
Fig. 35 is a perspective view illustratin~ a further
modified form of the invention.
-- 10 --
~;~6~53
Fig. 36 is a cross sectional view of a retaining
wall or the like of the general type shown in Fig. 35.
Figs. 37 and 38 are enlarged, fragmentary cross
sectional views, illustrating details of thorough
retaining/supporting element incorporated in the assembly
of Fig. 36.
Figs. 39, ~0 are perspective views of special
configurations of base modules, for used in wall assemblies
such as shown in Figs. 35, 36.
Figs. 41 and 42 are cross sectional and top plan
views respectively of a modified structural module
configuration providing for aligned pairs of mortise
notches between vertically adjacent modules, for the
reception of keying elements.
Figs. 43 and 44 are cross sectional and top plan
viewsrespectively, similar to Figs. 41, 42, where the
module is provided with an inclined rear panel.
Fig. 45 is an end elevational view of a retaining
wall or the like constructed of various modified forms of
structural modules having advantageous load bearing
characteristics.
Figs. 46 and 47, together, constitute a cross
sectional view o~ a further modified form of retaining wall
assembly utilizing an advantageous form of interlocking
means between vertically adjacent modules.
s~
Fig. g8 is a cross sectional view taken on line
48-48 of Fig. 49.
Fig. 49 is a top plan view of a structural modl~le
according to the invention which is cast in individual
components and assembled before installation.
Fig. 50 is an enlar~ed fragmentary cross sectional
view taken on line 50-50 o~ Fig. 48.
Preferred Embodiments
Figures 1 through 6 illustrate some of the more
preferred embodiments of a module with trape~oidal
partition means. The modules comprise rectangular front and
rear panels, and trapezoidal partition elements, the upper
surfaces 4 and 5, andthe lower surfaces 6 and 7 of which
are arranged in ma~ching saw~ooth pattern capable of
positive unilateral interlockin~ of one module with another
when one of said modules is superposed upon another.
Figure 1 is a perspective view of a module 11 with a front
panel 1, a rear panel 2, and generally trapezoidal
partition elements 3. Usually, but not necessarily, there
are two spaced partition elements 3, panel-like in form.
At the intersection of the panels with the partition
elementc are fillets 9 which are placed accordins to usual
practice.
.. ~
;
~6~53
Figure 2 represents a similar module 13, specially
designed, however, for use at the base of a wall assembly.
The partition elements 3A, ordinarily trapezoidal, have
been, in this particular case, truncated to allow the
bottom surfaces thereof to lie along the plane of the
wall's foundation. The rear panel 8 is shown in a special
configuration more suitable for a base module, where its
plane is perpendicular to the plane of the partition means
3A and approximately perpendicular to the plane of the
front panel 1. The rear panel 8, as shown, ha~ a marked
advantage when used as an element of a base module. Its
horizontal ori&ntation forms a shelf which positively -
captures the force from the weight of the fill above it,
and is located approximately at the center of action of the
resultant force combinin~ the vertical gravity loads with
the lateral overturning loads. It is capable of behaving
as a spread ~ooting distributing the loads from the
superposed modulesabove, and from the fill they contain.
The rear panel of any module may be either
substantially perpendicular to the front panel, a~ in
Figure 2, substantially parallel with the front panel, as
in Figures 3 and 4, or inclined at an acute angle with
respect to the plane of the front panel, depending upon the
particular purpose to which it is to be applied. When a
smaller module is to be used below a larger module, at the
05;3
~ase of the wallr a rear panel 8 which is substantially
perpendicular to the front panel 1 of the module i5
especially beneficial. When it is desired to use the rear
panels to assist in transferring weight between modules,
such as in a bridge abutment, it is preferred that the rear
panels 10 be parallel with the front panel 1 (Fig. 3) so
the rear panels can be readily aligned. When it is desired
to increase the forces resisting overturning it is
beneficial to tilt the rear panel 2 at an acute angle with
the front panel 1, with its upper ed~e farther away from
the front panel, as illustrated in Figures S and 6, so as
to increase the amount of fill captured, and to reduce-
simultaneously the lateral pressure exerted by the retained
material behind the module.
Figure 3 clearly shows a cross sectional view of one
of many sawtooth patterns made accordin~ to the invention.
A plurality of surfaces 4 and 5 form the upper sawtooth
edge and a plurality of surfaces 6 and 7 form the lower
matching sawtoothedge. In one form of the invention,
surfaces 4 and 6 do not come in contact with each other,
and the component, parallel to the ~lane of the front
panel, of the resultant of all forces acting upon the
module, is carried by the front and rear panels and
transmitted to the front and rear panels of the lower
module at the panels' respective contact surfaces. The
- 14 -
,
;3
component, perpendicular to the plane of the front panel,
of the resultant of all forces acting upon the superposed
module is transmitted from contact surface 7 to contact
surface 5 of the supporting module and is carried by the
partition ~eans 3 of the supporting module. In a preferred
form o~ the invention, all surfaces 6 and 7 come in contact
with their respective matching surfaces 4 and 5 and each
surface bears a proportionate amount of the component,
perpendicular to the contact surface, of the resultant of
all forces acting upon the module. In a further preferred
form of the invention, the modules are constructed to
dimensions which prevent the transmission of major forces
from one face panel (i.e. front or rear panels 1, 2 or 1,
10) to another. This feature minimizes the occurrence of
cracking in said panels.
Figures 5 and 6 show in side view and plan view the
rear panel 2 tilted in a manner which increase~ the force
i-t receives from the bin-action effect of the fill within
the cells of the module while at the ~ame time reducing the
lateral force it receives from the retained material. It
produces an additionalbenefit when modules of the ~ame
dimensions are stacked, one upon the other, by creating a
protruding top surface which captures the beneficial
downward force of retained material located in a ~one above
the protruding parts of the module. For the tilting to be
- 15 -
53
worthwhile, the back panel 2 should be at least about 8
degrees with respect to the front panel.
Figure 7 shows a perspective view of an assembly of
modules arranged laterally in horizontal rows with
additional horizontal rows of modules superposed above.
The assembly as seen in Figure 7 is of a wall structure
viewed from the rear. The assembly of front panels 1 form
the exterior face of the wall structure. The rear panels 2
are shown at an acute angle with respect to the plane of
the front panels. With the exception of the base modu~e,
each superposed module is shown with its partition means of
lesser width than the partition means of the module upon
which it is supported. Thi~ method of stacking is also
shown in cross-sectional view in Figure 11 and repre ents
the standard method of stacking when constructing a modular
gravity retaining wall. As shown in Figure 7 the base
module i5 a form of the new module with its bottom portion
truncated to con~orm to the plane of the subgrade. The
base module is of smaller width than the module directly
superposed on it because the heel of the wall is the bottom
edge of the rear panel of the module resting on the base
unit and is substantially at the elevation of the base
module's subgrade.
- 16 -
.
Figure 8 shows a solid base. This type of base may
be used for smaller walls where the extra material used
would be less expensive than the cos~ of forming the empty
cells.
Figure 9 shows a base module 14 with the lower
exterior edge of its front panel extended a substantial
distance. This module, by extending the pivot point 48
about which the wall assembly could rotate, increases
substantially the wall's resistance to such rotation. This
improvement is particularly effective for walls with
trapezoidal partition means and/or lowered rear panels.~
In the analysis of a modular retaining ~all for
stabilit~ against overturning, when the wall is one in
which module-~ of different size or shape occur in any
vertical stack, it is necessary to investigate the
stability of the structure above each possible pivot
point. It i5 readily apparent ~rom Figure 11 that the
inclined trapezoidal shape of the partition means and
lowered position of the rear panel results in several
advantages. It substantially lowers the center of gravity
of each cf the stacked modules and likewise lowers the
center of gravity of the granular material enclosed within
each of the cells of the modules. In that part of a wall
in which the rear face is stepped toward the front face as
- 17 -
- '
5~
the courses progress upward, the trapezoidal shape of the
partition means also lowers the center of gravity of the
retained material trapped above the protruding rear portion
of the modules.
The inclined trapezoidal shape of the partition
elements and the lowered position of the rear panel has
another important effect on the behavior of the modular
wall. In the analysis of the complete wall, when
investigating the tendency of the bottommost module course
to overturn about the toe, or to slide along the base, the
lowered position of the rear panel has no effect, either
beneficial or detrimental. However, when analyzing the
stability of the individual courses above the bottom
course, the advantages of the new design are substantial.
Referring to Figure 13, if we perform an overturning
analysis about point 39, the pivot point of a typical
module llC, which lies in an arbitrarily chosen upper
course of the wall, the improvements become evident. The
resultant of those forces causing overturning, as well as
the resultant of those force~ affecti~g resistance to
overturning, are substantially lowered in elevation.
Although the overall magnitude of the overturning force is
increased, its effectiveness nevertheless is reduced. At
the same time, both the magnitude and the effectiveness of
the beneficial resisting forces are increased.
~2~ ii3
To illustrate in more detail the effect of a lowered
r~ar panel on the behavior of the ~orce tending to cause
overturning, refer to Figure 13. In the analysis of a
standard wall built according to the present state of the
art, the rear panel ~5 is,within the tolerances of usual
wall ~atters and construction accuracies, at the same
elevation as the front panel. This condition is
illustrated by the dashed lines in Fi~ure 13. Taking the
summation of moments about pivot point 39 the lateral
overturning force 41 caused by the retained material above
the heel ~0 acts at an elevation approximately one-third
the distance from the elevation of the heel 40 to the
surface ~4 of retained material, In contrast, in the
analysis of the wall built according to the teachings of
the present invention shown by solid lines in Figure 13,
when we take the summation of moments about the same pivot
point 39, the lateral overturning force now consists of the
combined effects of the same overturning force 41, plus the
overturning force 43 due to the additional volume of
retained material between point 40 and the new heel 42.
The additional ~orce 43, although increasing the total
horizontal force against the wall, actually has a
stabilizing effect since its line of action lies below the
elevation of the pivot point 39. Thus the total effective
overturning moment is in fact reduced, and the size and
-- 19 --
weight o~ the wall structure includi~g module llC and those
modules above it may be reduced in size, thereby affecting
a more economical construction.
In the analysis of overturning conditions for the
entire wall it is necessary to evaluate moments about the
base at pivot point 47 (representing the pivot point
location in a standard wall~. Since the heel 46 of the
entire wall is at the same elevation a~ pivot point 47,
there is no bene it from the trapezoidal partition mean ,
and the overturning condition is the -qame for the standard
wall and for the wall according to the invention. When the
base module is fabricated with its lower edge extended
forward from the face, forming the pivot point at 48 (see
Figs. 9, 11), overturning moments are rPduced, and
resisting moments are increased.
Figure 12 illustrates an as embly of modules
according to the invention axranged in a more beneficial
sequence of sizes. In this type of stacking, the rear
panel 2a of module llA, which extends farthe t away from
the front panel, is located a substantial distance above
the elevation of the base module 14. The rear panel 2A
acts to protect each of the rear panels beneath it from the
full effects of the retained material. The overall effect
is to reduce substantially the amount of material used to
- 2~ -
.: : . '
~L2~2~S3
construct the wall and to require substantially less
material (e.g. earth) to be removed prior to construction.
A wall with less required height can be bullt using the
same principle, in which case module llB might be the
farthest extending module with all superposed modules of
smaller size.
Figures 11 and 12 also show the location of an
auxiliary feature which is detailed in Fi~ure 10. This is
a prefabricated slab or plank 49 which can be placed
between contact surfaces 4 and 6 of superposed partition
elements. To incorporate the slab49 in an a sembled
structure, either or both surfaces 4, 6 must be molded in
such a manner that adequate space is allowed. If the
proper space is allowed, the partition means will behave
the same as it would without the space, bu~ an additional
heneficial action is obtained. The slabs ~9, extending
into the fill material contained in the cells of the
modules, form shelf-like members which engage the weight of
~ill materi~l above in a more positive manner than does the
bin-action against vertically extending panels and
partitions.
Thus, the slab 4g increases the ability of the fill.
material to act in concert with the cellular wall
structure. Slab 49 may be made to span bet~een adjacent
- 21 -
. ,
,:,
..
~2~2~3
partition means or to cantilever from both sides of a
partition means. The most preferred method would be to
span between two or more partition means and to cantilever
at each end, reaching approximately half the distance to
the next partition means.
In Figures 14, 15 and 16 there are shown two methods
of constructing the tops of walls. The top-most front
panel shown is a cantilevered panel 17 or 18 with offset
arms 20 set vertically behind the ~ront panel 1 o~ a
module. The vertical load ~rom the panel is transmitted to
the top of the front panel 1 by bottom surface 19 of the
offset shoulder. Horizontal loads against the top portion
of the cantilevered panel are resisted by cantilever action
of the panel with the re~training thrustsupplied by thrust
blocks. Two forms of thrust blocks are shown. In Figure
14 the thrust block is shown in the form o~ a plug 21,
which may be prefabricated or cast in place, and which
extends rearward to the inner face of the rear panel 10.
In Figure 15 the thrust block 16 is attached to the
partition means 3, either integrally or by connectin~
means.
Figure 16 is a cross-sectional view looking ~orward
at the rear faces of the cantilevered panel and of the
front panel. The left portion of Figure 16 shows the
~2~
construction as in Figure 14, while the right portion of
Figure 16 shows the construction as in Figure 15. The
rightmost partition means shown in Figure 16 is shown
prepared to receive a cantilevered panel. Cantilevered
panels are more economical to construct than are cellular
modules and may be shaped for special applications such as
parapets and may include special shapes as for traffic
barriers. Cantilevered panels are able to protrude further
above the finished grade and their top edge may be
fabricated at an angle with respect to the horizontal to
conform to a specified grade (See Figs. 21, 22).
Cantilevered panels 17 may be used in lieu of a top module
in ~7alls whether or not parapets are required.
Figure 17 illustrates a top unit 23 in the form of a
V-shaped cantilever. This unit also may be used in lieu of
a top module where a parapet is not re~uired, as shown in
Figuresll, 12 and 47, or it may be used as shown in Figure
17 where it is indicated as a parapet with an integral
traffic barrier. The vertical and horizontal loads from
unit 23 are transmitted to the top module by ribs 26
fabricated along the soffit of the inclined slab 24. Ribs
26 are fabricatad with contact surfaces 6 and 7 which
conform to the contour of the tops of partition means 3 of
modules 11. Thus ~hese forces are transmitted in the same
manner as they are from superposed module to supporting
~2~ ;i3
module in a basic wall structure with a sawtooth pattern in
the joints of the partition means. Resistance to
overturning is provided to the top unit 23 by the weight of
fill supported by slab 24. Whenever it is desired to
provide additional stability to unit 23, the slab 24 may be
extended as indicated by 25. Since extending slab 24
causes the edge to descend deeper into the fill as well as
rearward, it can be seen that the V-shape of unit 23 is
more effective than an L-shaped unit would bs. The
V-shaped unit also allows more space for underground
structures such as utility structures.
Figures 17 and 18 show prefabricated rear slabs 32,
33 and 34. Slab 32 is planar while slab 33 has a depending
flange and slab 34 has an ascending flange. Slabs 3~, 33
and 34 are able to positively engage the retained material
above them in a location which is the most beneficial, the
rear of the module.
Figure 21 shows a front elevation of a wall
assemblyusing modules 11 and cantilevered panels 17. The
modules are arranged to stagger the vertical joints so that
each superposed module, where possible, is supported by two
different modllles in the course below it. To accomplish
this pre~erred interlocking pattern, the partition means
are spaced apart at virtually twice the distance from the
-- 2g --
~2~2~3
partition means to the lateral edge of the front panel 1 of
modules ll. The center lines 35 of a Eew adjacent
partition means are shown. As can be seen, this spacing
allows all the partition means to occur in continuous
planes from top to base as required in the invention, and
al~o allow~ the lateral edges o~ the front panels
essentially to touch.
It is often necessary in the construction of a wall
to provide continuous vertical joints at certain locations
such as: expansion joints, turning points where the
direction of the wall changes, locations where it is
desirable to change horizontal joint elevations, and
settlement joints where there is a significant change in
the expected settlement of a foundation. Such a joint 60
is shown in Figure 21. Because of the pattern where each
module overhangs half o~ a module immediately below it, it
i~ necessary to provide half-modules 12 adjacent to the
joint in alternating courses as indicated.
Figure 20 shows a half-module 12. Since the module
possesses only one partition means, it i~ nece~sary to
provide alaterally stabilizing mechanism. On~ such
mechanism is shown in Figure 20. A slab 30 dimensioned to
bear on a contact surface 4 is cantilevered from the
half-module's partition means 3. A gusset panel 31 is
- 25 -
a
~Z~3
provided for ri~idity and strenyth. In the full size
module 11 adjacent to the half-module 12, one of the
eontact surfaces 6 is cast at a hi~her elevation than is
normal to provide for the thickness of slab 30. When slab
30 is locked between the partition means of two modules,
half-module 12 is laterally stabilized against rotation.
An alternate method of lateral stabilization is
illustrated in Figures 18 and 19 where a lateral diaphragm
panel 27, generally vertically di~posed, is provided to
span between the partition means of the half-module to the
nearest partition means of the adjacent module. The
diaphragm panel 27 is connected to the partition means by
threaded inserts 28 and connectors 29, of a type similar to
those shown in Figure 18A.
Figure 22 shows a new and improved arrangement i~
the assembly of cellular module~ llS. Partition means are
spaced as shown by center lines 35, except that, in the
arrangement in Fiyure 22, the spacing between the partition
elements is substantially greater than twice the distance
from thP partition elements to the lateral edge of the
front panels lS. This pattern results in significant
benefits. When the partition means are erected in vertical
alignment with the left partitionmeans of each superposed
module llS supported by the right partition means of the
- 26 -
~62~i3
module below it, and the right partition means supported by
the left partition means below it, a substantial space is
left between adjacent front panels lS and adjacent rear
panels. This space is filled by a drop-in face panel 36
between front panels and a drop-in panel 51 at the rear of
the space between modules. Panel 51 may be parallel to the
front panels or set at an angle thereto. The rear drop-in
panel may be secured by a device such as the detail of
bearing surface and ribs shown in Figures 28, 29 and 30.
The ribs 54 shown in Figure 29 may be tilted to accomodate
an inclined drop-in panel 51. Thi~ unique arrangment
increases the face area of the wall approximately 50
percent per module. The improved arrangement of modules
shown in Figure 22 may also he used with equal advantage in
the assembly of modules with non-trapezoida:L partition
means.
Since it is more economical to fabricate and place
the planar panels 36 and to strengthen the modules for the
additional loading, than to construct additional modules
for the equivalent area, the cost savings realized are
substantial. Planar panels have an additional advantage in
that they may be cast flat and therefore are less expensive
to mold, easier to cast with textured surface 36T or in
bas-relief as are panels lT of modules llS. The panels may
be recessed behind the front panels lS as are drop-in
- 27 -
~'
.::
D5i3
panels 36R or may protrude forward of the front panels lS
as do drop-in panels 36P. These treatments produce
decorative shadows on the face of the wall and improve the
appearance of the structure, especially in the case of
large face areas. Shadow effects may also be produced by
texturing or casting three dimensional patterns on the
front panels lS of the modules llS as shown in Figure 22.
A similar effect may be obtained in front panels 1 of
modules 11 (Fig. 21).
Figure 22 shows variou~ aesthetic improvements which
may be used to interrupt the monotony of a wall surface,
especially one o~ relatively large area. The pattern of
front panels shown in Figure 22 may be changed in various
other ways to improve appearance. One such method, shown
in Fig. 22A, would be to cast the front panel~ 101 in the
form of parallelogram~ (as seen when viewed in front
elevation) preserving horizontal top and bottom edges. If
alternate front panels were first right-leaning and then
léft-leaning, the space created between them would be in
the form of a trapezoid in the plane of the front panels.
Figure 22A shows a front elevation of a wall with
parallelogram-shaped front panels 101 and trapezoidal
filler panels 102 secured in a manner similar to that
holding drop-in panels 36F, 36P, 36R and 36T in Figures 22
through 26.
- 28 -
. . ~ '
,-
)53
Methods of securing the drop-in panels are shown in
Figures 23, 24, 25 and 26. A recessed drop-in panel 36R is
shown in cross sectional view in Figure 23 and in sectional
planview Fi~ure 24. It is supported vertically on the top
surface of front panel lS, is restrained from moving
rearward during erection by lugs 37, and is further
supported laterally before and after the fill is placed
inside the cell, by the shear-transfer joints 50. Figures
25 and 26 show a similar method of securing a drop-in
panel. In the example shown a flush drop-in panel 36F, is
temporarily secured rearwardly by loose dowel3 38 placed in
matchiny holes cast in the partition means.
In certain large modules, it may be desirable to
include one or more dividing intermediate panels behind the
front panel to improve the ability of the cel~ular
structure to capture the weight of the fill material. Such
panels may be either parallel to or inclined with respect
to the front panel and may be either cast integrally with
the modules or of drop-in design. An improved form of
drop-in panel 51 is shown in Fig. 27 and is provided with
tapered bearing surfaces 52 which rest on matching tapered
bearing surfaces 53 located in notched brackets on the
sides of the partition maans of selected modules. The
panel 51 is restrained laterally by the ribs 54 which
extend almost the full height of the panels. The detail
- 29 -
2~53
shown provides for efficient lateral restraint and transfer
of vertical loading. Drop-in panel 51 may also be used as
a drop-in rear panel in walls assembled as shown in
Figure 22.
It is more beneficial to capture the weight of the
fillmaterial at the rear of a module than to capture an
equivalent weight of fill material at the front of the
module because of the difference in moment arm. By movin~
a drop-in panel located between the front panel and rear
panel of a module rearwardly or by tilting it so that its
top is closest to the front panel and its bottom i5 closest
to the rear of the module, the bin-action o~ the rear cell
formed by the panel i5 improved while the bin-action of the
cell forward of the panel is reduced. Hence overall
stability of a module can he improved by proper placing and
tilting of the drop-in panels.
When the rear panel of a module is located
sufficiently forward of the rear panels of modules below so
that the tilting of the rear panel has no effect on the
magnitude or direction of the overturning force exerted by
the retained material against the entire wall structure,
then it is appropriate to tilt the panel forward so as to
cause the direction of the force exerted by th~ retained
material against the rear panel of this module to be
- 30 -
: .. ..
~L2~53
located at a more vertical angle and to be greater in
magnitude. These forces can be translated into improved
resisting moments for the overall wall structure. Further,
the forward tilting of the rear panel of a module
superposed above a module of a longer partition means
improves the bin-action at the rear of the larger module
below.
Figure 33 shows a further embodiment of the
inventionwhere the partition meanq 3 is predominantly
trapezoidal, with its upper and lower surfaces arranged in
a sawtooth pattern, but the rear panel 10 is approximately
at the same level as the front panel 1. Its contact
surfaces 5 and 7 are positioned to engage mutually with
similar modules above and below. Surfaces 4A and 6A may be
located to bear against matching surface~ of similar
modules above and below, or they may be located, so as to
avoid contact with each other when it is desired that the
vertical load be transferred ~rom front panel to front
panel and from rear panel to rear panel. Any module
constructed according to the detail shown is able to
interlock with and above an~ other module of the same or
larger front-to-rear width. This ability will mark~dly
decrease the variations in models and significantly reduce
inventory requirements for stock piling and adju~tments to
molds during manufacture com~ared with ordinary mortise and
- 31 -
S3
tenon interlocked modules in use. Since the re~ultant
force acting upon a module is always directed toward the
front panel, it is not necessary to have two-way
interlocking keys. This condition of a one-direction
lateral loading allows the use of the sawtooth pattern
shown in Figure 33 and also the pattern shown in Figures 1
through 9, etc. The uses of these and similar patterns
results in improved bearing and shear behavior because
significantly more area for bearing and shear resistance
can be furnished, when compared with existing mortise and
tenon, depending lip, or tongue and groove interlock~ for
wall modules.
Figure 34 shows three cellular modules with
generally rectangular partition means 55, one superpo~ed
upon another. It is not material to the invention whether
the modules transmit vertical loads from panel to panel or
from partition means to partition means. ~hat is provided
is a system for the transference of lateral forces between
modules which allows any size module to be superposed above
any similar module regardless of the supporting module's
relative size (smaller or larger) without any change in the
location of the mortises 56. This ability permits a type
of stacking arrangement, similar to that shown in Figs. 36
and 46, where module sizes increa~e and then decrea~e
progressively at each superposed course. The lateral
- 3~ -
~26~ 5~3
forces are transferred by keys 57 which engage a s~ngle
opposing pair of mortises 56 as shown also in Figure 32, or
by elongated slab-like keys 58 which span from one
partition ~eans to an adjacent one, performing the
additional function of capturing the fill material more
positively. Figure 31 shows a detail of one embodiment of
such a member. Wherever a rear panel 10 occurs over or
under a mortise in the vertically contiguou~ module,
bearing blocks 59 can be provided in the case of
panel-bearing modules.
Figures 35 through 47 illustrate modules and
assemblies of modules which utilize the principle~ set
forth in the invention. The trapezoidal partition means is
represented init-~ simplest form, an inclined bearing
surface. In Figure 35 an assembly o~ modules 61 i5 shown.
Module 61 comprises a front panel 1, and a non-parallel
rear panel 2 connected by a plurality of trape~oidal
partition elements 63. As set forth in the teachings of
the invention the longitudinal (principal~ axes of the
partition elements 63 are inclined at an acute angle from
the plane of the front panel such that the upper contact
sur~ace 64 and the lower contact surface 65 are dispo~ed at
an angle which is substan~ially normal to the line of
action of the resultant force representin~ all loads being
transferred from superposed module to supporting module.
- 33 -
;:
~L~6~53
Specifically, the principal axes of the partition elements
extend downward and rear~ard at an angle of between 20 and
82 degrees from the plane of the front panel 1, such that
the upper edge of the rear panel 2 lies substantially below
a plane extending from the upper edge of the front panel,
and at right angles thereto. As represented in Figure~ 41,
42, 43 and 44, the superposed module is held in place
during erection of the assembly by a surface 66
perpendicular to the front panel in the zone of the
intersection of the partition elements 63 with the front
panel 1. As soon as a course of modules is loaded with
fill material inside its cells and a commensurate ~uantity
of retained m~terial, the resultant loading i~
substantially normal (within the angle o~ friction between
surfaces 64 and 65) to the resultant load being transferred
from module to module.
Figure 36 illustrates an end view in cross-section
of a wall as3embly of modules 61. The assembly uses the
béneficial pattern of module sizes described earlier in
this specification where module sizes vary, starting at the
base of the wall, from small to larger to smaller as the
courses progress upwardly. This pattern is shown here to
illustrate the facility with which different sizeq of
modules 61 fit one above the other in any sequence without
special fabrication. This greatly simplifies the number of
- 34 -
~2~i26~!~3
different shape variations which must be fabricated or
carried in inventory.
Figures 37 and 38 show special closure slabs which
may be incorporated in a wall assembly constructed o~
module~ similar to module 61. On the top surface of a
module which does not support a larger module, the exposed
top of the cells containing fill material may be, if
desired, covered by a closure slab 67. If a smaller module
is superposed, the additional width exposed may be covered
by adding one or a plurality of closure slab~ 68. Closure
slab 67 is formed to contain a depending portion 67A which
fits between adjacent partition elements and which engages
the surface of the rear panel which faces the inside of the
module. Closure slab 68 ma~ be rectangular in cross-
section.
In some cases it may be desira~le to close the open
space at the bottom of a module which overhangs its
s-upporting module. Closure slab 69, shown in Figure 38,
fits between adjacent partition elements at the bottom of a
module and accomplishes this task. A recessed keyway 70 is
provided in rear panel 2A to support the rearmost edge 69A
of the slab while the opposite edge 69B is supported on the
top surface of the lower module's rear panel.
- 35 -
" ; .. :.
5^3
Figures 39 and 40 show two possible configurations
of base modules 62, 72 f~r wall assemblie~ using module
61. The base module 62 is simply a module 61 truncated at
the bottom to lie along the subgrade of the wall. Base
modul~ 72 shown in Figure 40 is similar to base module 62
but the exterior bottom surface of the front panel has been
extended substantially forward to move the pivot point,
about which an entire wall assembly tends to rotate, to a
more beneficial location.
Figure~ 41 and 42 sho~ a module 61 with a vertical
rear panel 10 and with mortises 56 provided in the upper
and lower edges of the partition elements 63A. These
mortises are dimensioned to accept a keying block 57 or
slab 58 similar to those illustrated in Fi~ure~ 31, 32 and
34. ~ey 57 is shown in Figure 41 but a slab 5~ may be used
with equal facility. .T~e purpose of the key is to secu~e
the position of the blocks during assembly and until the
lateral force from the retained material is allowed to
act. Figures 43 and 4~ show a similar type o~ module but
with an inclined rear panel.
Figure 45 illustrates several keyin~ mechanisms
which may be used to secure a superposed module. Joint 73A
i~ secured by depending keys in the front and rear panels
which mate wîth keyways in the top of the front panel and
- 36 -
in the tops of the generallY trapesoidal partition means of
the lower module. Joint 73~ is secured by a wedge-shaped
protrusion and matching recess. Joint 73C is secured by
one or a plurality of key locks (may be a shelf-like member
58) which fit in recesses (such as mortises) placed in
contraposition in the contact surfaces of ver~ically
contiguous modules. Joint 73D and 73E are secured by
standard mortise and tenon keys. In joint 73D the tenons
extend upward while in 73E the tenons extend downward into
their mating mortises. Joint~ 73F are planer contact
surfaces which are secured during erection by a reversal in
the direction of inclination of the contact surfaces in the
zone of the intersection of the partition means with the
front panel. This reversal of the incline of the surfaces
at the face of the wall ~downward toward the front) would
provide the additional benefit of decreasing the quantity
of water likely to seep through the joint ~rom the exterior
surface of the wall. Figure 45 is intended only as a
composite drawing of representative means to secure the
modules.
Figures 46 and 47 show an assembly of wall modules
71 which are keyed in a manner which provides additional
benefits. Each module 71 has the rearmost portion o~ its
partition means displaced upwardly to form a pair of
interlocking surfaces when the module is placed in vertical
- 37 -
~2~ 53
contiguity with a similar module 71. Interlocking surface
74 is on the top of each partition means 77, and
interlocking surface 75 is on the bottom of each partition
means 77 except the partition means of the smalles~ module,
which is too small to contain surface 75. The interlocking
surfaces 74 for the top edge all occur at the same distance
from the front panel 1 for each size module 71, except the
smallest. Likewise the interlocking surfaces 75 on the
bottom edge all occur at the same distance from the front
panel 1 for each size module 71, except the smallest. The
interlocking surfaces 79 and 75 could be placed at the same
distance from the front panel 1 allowing them to mate
directly, but in the as3embly illustrated in Figures 46 and
47, surface 75 is placed a substantial distance forward
(toward ~ront panel 1) of sur~ace 74. This separation of
the mating surfaces allows the placement o~ a slab 76 which
spans between adjacent partition means, and which produces
substantial benefits to the wall structure. The slabs 76
impart additional overturning resistance to the wall. When
slabs 76 occur behind a superposed module they direct the
overturning force in a more do~nward direction which is
beneficial in effect.
When slabs 76 occur within the cells of a wall
assembly they very efficiently engage the forces pre~0nt in
the fillmaterial and transfer these forces to the partition
- 38 -
.
S3
means upon which they are supported. Since the slabs 76
are oriented in the same direction as the joints between
partition means, they are substantially normal to the
direction of the forces in the fill material and therefore
very effective. Figure 47 shows how top unit 23, shown
also in Figure 17, may be used effectively in combination
with modules 71.
Figures 48 through 50 show a module 88,
substantially the same a~ module 11 or 71, wherein each
element of the module, front panel 81, rear panel 82, and
partition means 83, is fabricated separately and
subsequently assembled using a plurality of fastening means
which, in the example illustrated, are i~terengaging
threaded elements. In the method illustrated a female
threaded insert 78 is cast integrally in one o~ the
module's main elements, and the element with which it is to
be connected is cast with a cylindrical hole to receive the
male threaded fastener 79. The threaded elements 78 and 79
are positioned to ali~n correctl~ with each other when the
module's main elements are properly positioned with respect
to each other. When desired, pockets 80 can be provided in
one or both of the module's elements to allow access in
securing the threaded fastening means. It is desirable to
restrict stresses in fasteners of the type illustrated to
tensile stress. Ther0fore, other means must be provided to
05~
transfer shear in any direct,ion in which is may possibly
occur. In the example showna mortise and tenon shear
transfer interlock is designed to function in two planes.
Shear may be transferred laterally in either direction by
t~e compression of the edge of partition means against the
ribs 84, cast on the inside of the front and rear panels.
Shear, in a direction parallel with the ribs 84, is
transferred by a mortise 86 and tenon 87 cast between the
position of the ribs 84.
Some of the advantages of casting the module
elements separately are: simpler and more economical mold
requirements (most elements may be ca~t in a horizontal
plane), better adaptability to mass production methods,
less waste when one of the elements is damaged during
fabrication, in shipping, or in erection, and simpler and
smaller inventory of useable elements since the element~
can be mutually interchanged. A cosmetically damaged front
panel may be substituted for a rear panel i~ the connecting
threaded elements and shear transfer keys are kept in
matching locations. A structurally damaged element can be
discarded with relatively little financial loss.
It will usually be economically advantageous to
assemble the segmental module 88 away from the erection
site. In order to be able to handl~ safel~ a non-integral
- 40 -
. .. ~" :' . .
~62~5,~
module it is advisable to provide a stiffenin~ diaphra~m to
prevent lateral warping of the unit such as would occur if
a change were allowed to occur in the angle, measu~ed in a
horizontal plane, betweenthe partition elements and the
front and raar panels. One method of stiffening is shown
in Figures 48 and 49 wherein a slab 89 is placed between
the partition means during assembly o the module. In the
example illustrated, vertical and horizontal shear is
transferred through a tenon 90 cast at the end of slab 89.
Tenon 90 ~its with minimal clearances into a mortise 91
cast in the body of the partition means 83. A plurality of
fastening means, threaded connectors are shown, hold the
shoulders 92 at the end~ of slab 89 firmly against the~
sides of partition means 83 and affect a rigid diaphragm
action. An alternative method o~ sti f f ening is to attach
gussets at the inter~ections of the partition means 83 with
front panel 81 and rear panel 82. One gusset in each o~
two diagonally opposite corners would be the minimum
requirement. The gussets should be connected by threaded
connectors and shear transfer keys in a manner similar to
the connection of lab 89.
Modules, whose partition means carry the principal
wall loads and which transfer these loads directly to
partition means upon which they bear, are more readily
constructed of separately cast elements becau~e the
53
stresses required to be transferred at the connecting
joints are minimal and the joint is therefore simpler and
more economical. For this reason embodiments of this
invention which have partition means which bear directly
upon one another are particularly advantageous.
It should be understood, of course, that the
specific forms of the invention herein illustrated and
described are intended to be representative only, as many
modifications thereof may be made without departing from
the clear teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly,
reference should be made to the following appended claims
in determining the full scope of the invention.
- 42 -
:
.
