Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 1330628 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 1330628
(21) Numéro de la demande: 1330628
(54) Titre français: ACIERS INOXYDABLES AUSTENITIQUES DE DECOLLETAGE A FAIBLE TENEUR DE CARBONE AVEC AZOTE OFFRANT UNE USINABILITE AMELIOREE ET UNE RESISTANCE A LA CORROSION
(54) Titre anglais: LOW CARBON PLUS NITROGEN FREE-MACHINING AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS WITH IMPROVED MACHINABILITY AND CORROSION RESISTANCE
Statut: Périmé et au-delà du délai pour l’annulation
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • C22C 38/44 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/40 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/60 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • HASWELL, WALTER T., JR. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
  • PINNOW, KENNETH E. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
  • ECKENROD, JOHN J. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
  • RHODES, GEOFFREY O. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION
(71) Demandeurs :
  • CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 1994-07-12
(22) Date de dépôt: 1987-08-19
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
910,239 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 1986-09-19

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


ABSTRACT
A low carbon plus nitrogen, free-machining, austenitic
stainless steel having improved machinability and excellent cor-
rosion resistance. The steel composition in weight percent is
carbon plus nitrogen up to about 0.06, chromium 16 to 20, nickel
6 to 14, manganese up to 0.60, sulfur 0.15 to 0.50, silicon up to
about 1, phosphorus up to about 0.20, molybdenum up to about 1
and balance iron.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


The embodiments of the invention in which an
exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as
follows:
1. A low carbon plus nitrogen, free-machining,
austenitic stainless steel having improved machinability
and excellent resistance to corrosion in acid soft drink
syrups, especially in the passivated condition, said steel
consisting essentially of, by weight percent
carbon plus nitrogen up to about 0.05
chromium 16 to 20
nickel 6 to 14
manganese up to 0.60
sulfur 0.15 to 0.50
silicon up to about 1
phosphorus up to about 0.20
molybdenum up to about 1.0
and remainder iron except for incidental
impurities.
2. The steel of claim 1 having carbon plus nitrogen
up to about 0.04.
3. The steel of claim 1 or 2 having from about 0.75
to 3.00 copper.

4. The steel of claim 1 or 2 having 1.00 to 2.50
copper.
5. A low carbon plus nitrogen, free-machining,
austenitic stainless steel having improved machinability
and excellent resistance to corrosion in acid soft drink
syrups, especially in the passivated condition, said steel
consisting essentially of, by weight percent
carbon plus nitrogen up to about 0.05
chromium 17 to 19
nickel 8 to 11
manganese up to 0.50
sulfur 0.15 to 0.50
silicon up to about 1
phosphorus up to about 0.20
and remainder iron except for incidental
impurities and wherein the maximum manganese to sulfur
ratio is 1 to 1.
6. The steel of claim 5 having carbon plus nitrogen
up to about 0.04.
7. The steel of claim 5 or 6 having from about 0.75
to 3.00 copper.
16

8. The steel of claim 5 or 6 having from 1.00 to
2.50 copper.
9. Machined austenitic stainless steel fittings and
articles characterized by having improved machinability
and resistance to corrosion in acid soft drink syrups,
especially in the passivated condition, said fittings and
articles consisting essentially of, by weight percent
carbon plus nitrogen up to about 0.05
chromium 16 to 20
nickel 6 to 14
manganese up to 0.60
sulfur 0.15 to 0.50
silicon up to about 1
phosphorus up to about 0.20
molybdenum up to about 1
and remainder iron except for incidental
impurities.
10. The machined austenitic stainless steel fittings
and articles of claim 9 having carbon plus nitrogen up to
about 0.04.
11. The machined austenitic stainless steel fittings
and articles of claim 9 or 10 having from about 0.75 to
3.00 copper.
17

12. The machined austenitic stainless steel fittings
and articles of claim 9 or 10 having from 1.00 to 2.50
copper.
13. Machined austenitic stainless steel fittings and
articles characterized by having improved machinability
and improved resistance to corrosion in acid soft drink
syrups especially in the passivated condition, said
fittings and articles consisting essentially of, by weight
percent
carbon plus nitrogen up to about 0.05
chromium 17 to 19
nickel 8 to 11
manganese up to 0.50
sulfur 0.15 to 0.50
silicon up to about 1
phosphorus up to about 0.20
molybdenum up to 1
and remainder iron except for incidential
impurities and wherein the maximum manganese to sulfur
ratio is 1 to 1.
14. The machined austenitic stainless steel fittings
and articles of claim 13 having carbon plus nitrogen up to
about 0.04.
18

15. The machined austenitic stainless steel fittings
and articles of claim 13 or 14 having from about 0.75 to
3.00 copper.
16. The machined austenitic stainless steel fittings
and articles of claim 13 or 14 having 1.00 to 2.50 copper.
19

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


~ 3 3 ~ & .2 3
1 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
..
Conventional resulfurized free-machininq austenitic stain-
less steels such as AISI Type 303 generally do not have suffi-
cient corrosion resistance to allow them to be used in applica-
tions for acid soft drink or beverage syrups withoutsignificantly affecting the flavor of these products. The prob-
lem largely relates to the fact that the manganese or
manganese-rich sulfides present in Type 303 are readily attacked
- in acid ~oft drink or beverage syrups. As a result of this
attack, the local environment is 80 changed that the stainless
steel adjacent to the mangane~e or manganese-rich sulfides cor-
rodes, thereby releasing both sulfide and metal ions into the
syrUps and causing odor or ta~te problems. Passivating
free-machiing austenitic stainless steels such as ~ISI Type 303
in nitric acid solutions can minimize this diffic~lty by removing
most of the manganese or manganese-rich sulfides from the sur-
faces of the articles machined from these steels before they are
placed in service. However, the general corrosion resistance of
the stainless steel matrix of AISI Type 303 i8 of~en insuffi-
cient, even in the absence of substantial sulfide dissolution, toavoid changes in the quality or taste of the beverage syrups.
Thus, to improve the corrosion reæistance of free-machining
austenitic stainless steels in acid beverage syrups, the use of a
more corrosion resistant free-machining additive along with im-
provements in the general corrosion resistance of the steel ma-
trix in acid beverage syrups are necessary.
. r~ ;~
. -1-
.
~,
. ~
~ ~''~ .` ' ' ' ~ '
~ :

3 ~
l In this respect, U.S. Patent 3,902,398 discloses that the
corrosion resistance of resulfurized free-machining austenitic
stainless steels can be significantly improved in acid beverage
syrups by restricting their manganese content to a maximum of
about 0.50% and by controlling the manganese to sulfur ratio such
that chromium or chromium-rich sulfides are formed instead of
manganese or manganese-rich sulfides. Chromium sulfides are more
corrosion resistant than are manganese or manganese-rich sulfides
in acid beverage syrups, and improve machinability but not nearly
to the same extent as manganese or manganese-rich sulfides. AB
al~o disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,902,398, the loss in
machinability related to the replacement of manganese or
manganese-rich sulfides by chxomium sulfides can be partly offset
by lowering the carbon conten1: of such steels to below about-
lS 0.~35%.
In accordance with the pxesent invention, the machinabi~ityof low-carbon resulfurized austenitic stainless steels containing
chromium or chromium-rich sulfides can be substantially improved
:
- by controlling their carbon plus ni~rogen content to lower than
conventional levels. It has further been discovered~that the
addition of copper, which is known to improve the màchinability
o~ other austenitic stainless steels, not only improves the
machinability of these low-manganese free-machining austenitic
stainless steels, but also significantly improves their corrosi~n
resistance in acid soft drink and beverage syrups. Thus, it is
,
possible tc substantially impr~ve the machinability of
-2-
. . ..
- ' :

1 free-machining austenitic stainless steels containing chromium or
chromium-rich sulfides by lowering their carbon plus nitrogen
content b~low conventional levels, and to further improve their
machinability and especially their resistance to corrosion in
acid soft drink or beverage syrups by increasing their copper
. content within closely controlled limits.
OBJECTS OF T~E INVENTION
It is accordingly a primary ob~ect of the present invention
to provide a chromium-nickel, free-machining austenitic stainless
steel having improved machinability and high re~istance to corro-
sion, especially in ac~d ~oft drink or beverage syrup~.
An additional object o~ the invention is to provide 2
chromium-nickel-copper bearing austenitic stainless havinq im-
proved machinability and substantially better corrosion re~
tance, especially in acid soft drink and beverage syrup~.
Another object of this invention is to provide machined
chromium-nickel austenitic stainless steel fittings and articles
with improved machinability and high corrosion resistance,.espe-
cially in acid soft drink and beverage syrups.
Yet another object of this invention is to provide machined
chromium-nickel-copper au~enitic ~tainless steel fi~tings and
articles with substantially improved machinability and excellent
corrosion resistance, especially in acid soft drink and beverage
~yrups.
.
- -3-
.
i :,.- ,'
~;`. '.- ~, ,:''
~ ~ . .
. ~ . . ,
, ~

i~ 1 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with this invention, it has been discovered
that the machinability of chromium-nickel austenitic stainless
steels containing chromium or chromium-rich sulfides and with
low-manganese up to 0.50% can be greatly improved by reducing
their carbon plus nitrogen contents below conventional levels.
In this regard, total car~on plus ni~rogen in combination at low
levels in accordance with the invention is more effective than
either low carbon or nitrogen alone. In addition, it has been
discovered that the addition of copper to these steels in con-
trolled amounts not only improves machinability, but more impor-
tantly significantly improves their corrosion resistance, partic-
i~
. ularly in the passivated condltion, in acid soft drink syrups.
The improvements in machinability achie~ed by reducing carbon
plus nitrogen content are obtained both at residual and elevated
copper contents. However, the greatest improvements in
. machinability as well as in the resistance to corrosion in acid
soft drinks are obtained with the copper bearing steels o~ this
.~ invention.
The steels of this invention have particul~r ad~antage in
the application of fittings and articles used for handling and
di~pensing acid soft drin~ syrups. With these steels, the
decrease in machinability normally associated with the repla~e-
ment of manga~ese or manganese-rich sulfides by chromium or
chromium-rich sulfides is offset by the lower than conventional
oarbon plus nitrogen contents and by the additiion of copper.
__ -4-

Further, the copper bearing steels of this invention exhibit much
better corrosion resistance in acid soft drink syrups, which is
an additional advantage over prior art steels used in these
applications.
In their broad composition range, the steels and machined
fittings and articles of this invention consist essentially of
the following elements, by weight percent:
carbon plu5 nitrogen - up to about 0.05%
chromium - 16 to 20
nickel - 6 to 14
manganese - up to 0.60
sulfur - 0.15 to 0.50
phosphorus - up to 0.20~
silicon - up to 1~ -
. 15 molybdenum - up to 1%
:~ iron - balance, except for incidental impurities
Carbon and nitrogen are normally present in the steels of
this invention, but to obtain the desired improvements in
.~. machinability, it is essential in the steels of this invention to
20 control the total carbon plu8 nitrogen levels below about 0.06
~ and preferably below about 0.05 or 0.04~.
-~ In general, about 16 to 20% chromium and preferably 17 to
19~ chromium is required in the steels of this invention to
~btain the required degree of corrosion resistance in acid soft
~ 25 drink syrups and to adjust for the amount of chromium involved in
'Js the formation of chromium or chromium-rich sulfides.
.
.
-5-
, . .
:
'Y` `:
.`~
~, .
:

-P i3~2~
Q'.
1 About 6 to 14~i and preferably 8 to 11% nickel are required
in the steels of this invention to obtain an austenitic
microstructure and to minimuze austenite transformation during
processing operations at ambient temperature.
A maximum of about 0.60% manganese is required to minimize
the formation of manganese or manganese-rich sulfides which are
known to have an adverse effect on corrosion resistance in acid
soft drink syrups and still permit the use of low cost scrap re-
vert melting practices. In applications where maximum resistance
; to corrosion in acid soft drinks is required, the manganese con-
tent must be controlled below about 0.50 and the maximum manga-
nese to sulfur ratio is 1 to 1.
A minimum of about 0.15 and a maximum of about 0.50% of sul-
fur are needed in the steels of this invention to obtain the
desired degree of machinability.
Copper in amounts of about 0.75 to 3.00 and preferably in
the amounts of 1.00 to 2.50 is very useful for increasing the
stability of the austenite, for improving the machinability, and
particularly for increasing the corrosion resistance of the
i ~iteels of this invention in acid soft drink syrups.
~¦ Molybdenum is not necessary in the stels of this invention,
but may be used in amounts up to about 1 perFent for improving
general corrosion resistance.
Silicon and phosphorus, may be present in amounts up to
~5 about 1% and 0.20%, respectively, in the steels of this inven-
tion. The remainder of the composition is esisentially irorl,
i .
1 -6- j
!
. . .
, ,~
.,. ~

~f . . . . .
1 ~ 3
l except ~or incidental impurities usually associated with the pro- -
duction of stainless steels and except for up to 0.01% boron
which may be added to improve hot workability.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF TH~ INVENTION AND
SPECIFIC EXAMPLES
To demonstrate the invention and specifically the heretofore
undisclosed effect~ of low carbon plu3 nitrogen and copper in
accordance with the invention on machinability and corrosion re-
sistance, fourteen 50-pound laboratory heats were vacuum induc-
tion melted and cast into ingots. The ingots were heated to
2200~F and hot forged to l-l/4-inch octagonal haped bars and air
cooled. The bar~ in turn were annealed by heating to 1950F,
holding at l950~F for one hour, ~nd then wster quenching. Sam-
p~e~ from these bar~ were ~achined to o~e inch sguare by four
inch long specimens for drill machinability testing.
..
' : , , ' ,
~ .. .
-7-
'`'~
-
. ~ ~ ~

-`? . ~ . -
'` "''`'` l~a~2~
~ ~ u~ ~ O a~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~r
-~ ~ o o o o o o a~ o ,l o o ,~
. ~ Z ~ ~ ~ u~ r- I` O ~ ~r
1~: + oo oooo_10000000
~ oo oooooooc~oooo
~ o ~ o o ~ ~ N t~ I N ~
;`.~ O Zloo ~loooocsoooooo
~c .a .. ............
00 00000000~00
.
. ~ . ~ ~ C~ ~ N N ~ N r~
U
00 000000
a
~ ~ ~r~
~ ~ - .-----.-....... -. -
~ ~_ oO oOoooooooooo
'.3 P; O
~rl ~D O U- ~ N ~ C~l N C'~l ~ ~
I ~ul ~ o co OD ~ 0 C~ 00 Cl~ CO ~ ~ 0
. _~ ~
. 1~
Q
. I _
. l Zl oo 000000~00000
I ~
. 1 8
, "
l ~ oo ooooooooooo~
lo
I ~1 ~ O N ~
l t,ql . ....... ~.... ~
1 00 C~ooooooOooOo
I
O a~ O N ~1 o u~ IJ~ O)
. o N ~ ~ C~ N ~ N ~ tr5 t~ ~ ~ ~ N
' . ~ P~l 00 000000000000
~3 OC~ OOOOC:IOOOOOOO
~1
~ ' ~
C~ r~ o ~ t~ ~ o u) ~
. ~ - 00 000000000000
~ ..
.1 ' . ~ ~ ~3 ~ O ~- O _I CO O ~ ~
C.)l 00 000000000000
OO OoOOOOOOooC~O
. ~ , .
h
: ' ~ ~ 0
~ ~ o o o o o ~ ~ o o
I Z ~ p
;~

~3~$,~
1 Table I lists the resulting chemical compositions of the
laboratory ~eats. Other than variations in carbon, nitrogen,
mangane~e, molybdenum and copper, all the alloys are essentially
0.40 percent sulfur, 18 percent chromium, 10 percent nickel,
5 free-machining austenitic stainless steels.
~ he machinability of the experimental alloys-of Table I was
evaluated using the aforementioned test specimen and a drill
machinabilty test. In the drill machinability test, the total
time taken to drill a ~pecified number of holes to a speclfied
depth in the material to be evaluated i5 compared to the total
time to drill the same number of holes to the same.~depth in a
material having known, establlshed machining characteristics.
The ratio between the time taken to drill ths established mate-
rial and the time taken to drill the-test material multiplied by
100 provides a drill machinab:Llity rating (DMR) for ~he test
material. Specific condition~ used for these tests were as fol-
lows:
Drills - 1/4 inch diameter high speed steel ~obber bit~
Drill Speed - 405 revolutions per minute
Load on Driil - 14.2 pound~
. Break-in ~ole Depth - 0.1 inch
~imed ~ole Depth - 0.3 inch
Drill Machinability , Time to drill established steel X 100
Rating (DMR) Time to.drill test steel
Reat number V506 containing 0.079 percent carbon plus nitro-
-'S gen, about the concentrations of these elements in a typical
~9~

s~ ~
~;
1 steel of this type, was assigned a DMR of 100. Thus, steels
:~! having DMR values of greater than 100 have better drill
machinability than conventional, typical steels of this type; and
values less than 100, poorer drill machinability. Also, increas-
S ing DMR values indicate improved drill machina~ility.
$able I presents the results of one drill machinability
t-sting of the laboratory steels. Allowing for some experimental
scatter in the data and considering the steel~ containing about
0.30 percent copper and 0.025 to 0.106 percent carbon plus nitro-
gen, i.e., heat number V489, V505, V560, V603, V603A, V506, and
~ V541, it is clearly evident that lowering the total combination.~
of carbon plus nitrogen content of the steel results in improved
drill machinability. Steels within the scope of the invention,
i.e., heat number V489, V505, V560, and V603, ail display im-
proved machinability compared to heat number V506.
- The data in Table I also show that heat numbers V560 and
V603, which have similar carbon plus nitrogen contents of about
0.05~, have similar drill machinability despite the fact that ~he
carbon contents of the heats are respectively below and above the
critical value of 0.035% specified in U.S. Patent 3,9Q2,398 ~or
stainless steels of this type. A like result is obtained when
comparing the drill machinability of heats V506 and V603A, which
have similar carbon plus nitrogen contents of about 0.075~ and
~carbon contents respecti~ely below and above the critical value
of 0.035~ specified in the above patent. ~hus, carbon plus
-10-
. .,
:~

`~ 3 ~
~ 1 nitroQen conten~ is more critical than carbon csntent in regard
:~,
to the machinability of the low man~anese austenitic stainless
}i
:3~ steels of this invention.
At an equivalent carbon plus nitrogen content, adding at
least 1.24 percent copper to the invention steels result~ in
still further improvemets in machinability as illustrated by heat
numbers V508, ~507, V564, V567, and V565. A molybdenum addition
to heat number V568 appear~ to have essentially no effect on
drill machinability when compared to heat number V567 containi~g
a similar amount of copper but less molybdenum and slightly less
carbon plu~ nitrogen.
An empirical test in a commercial acid soft drink syrup sold
under the registered tradename SPRITE was conducted to compare
the corrosion resistance of heat numbers V505, VS06, V562, V507,
V508, V564, and V565 with those disclosed in U.S. Patent J
3,902,348, and AISI Type 303 stainless. In this test, six-inch
lengths of the bars produced from these stainless steels and the
-AISI Type 303 were miiled to the bar centers in order to obtain
chip~ that were representative of the entire bar cross section.
Ten grams o~ both as-machined and passivated ~50% nitric acid
. ~ .
plu5 2% sodium dichromate) chips were then immersed in 50
milllliters lml) of SPRITE syrup (pH-3) for five days. During
this period of exposure, hydrogen sulfide (~ S) gas generation
was monitored with moistened lead acetate teQt paper. The color
change.s.in the lead acetate paper, if any, were xeco~ded and
.
. . ..
~ ~.- ~;
.
.
. .

1 3 ~ 3 ~ ~ 8
. .,
''? 1 rated visually in regard to the degree of H S evolution according
i~ to the following system: 0 - None, 1 - very light, 2 - light, 3
moderate, 4 - heavy, 5 - very heavy. Also, at the end of the
five day test period, the syrups were s~parated from the chips
S and diluted to 200 ml with deionized water. The dilute syrups
were then analyzed for iron, manganese, nickel, chromium and cop-
per ions. The results of all the soft drink syrup tests are
given in Table II.
. ' ,
.
.-'
,
-12-
. .. ~ . , -, ~ ~ . -
` ~
~ ~ : .-:

3 ~
; ~
o
.~ ~ I P ' ~ wo ~ ~
_I oo ~ u~u~u~r~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ O~ l ~ O
~; O c~ ls, )I ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ 3
~.- ~ ~ ,~ a3 ~ _~ ~ ~ u o ~
~o~ . ~ ~ ~ WU~ o
~1 ,~n ~
~ _ N
i~ 1~ . ~ .
., ~ ~
~V ~:
00 ~ t: '~O . O O O O O O C~
Q~ 1: ~a
t.~ ~ P~
roP; . ~,
. . #1~ ~ ~ ~ I U~
.
.C 8~P S
i~ ~ ~ Ooooooooln ' C ~
al ~ ~ ~o ~ o
' ~ ~¢ ~_ I I O
. ~ . . - o
.~ ~ ~ o~ ~ U O
. C ~ ~N 1` t~`J N 0
`~, tl~ O O O ~ O ~1 0 C
: O rl O a
~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ 0 ~
:-~ ~0 ~ ~0 ~1 0
' E~ :ZI ooooo oo~ ~
.- I ~ ~ o
w ~
. : ~ ~ o ~
~ ~ 1 t,q~
. ~ O oooooooo .~ ~ ~
~ @1 6
. . O oo~ o~o E~~o~,o
. . u 51 ~ ~ ~ r' ~ ~ H
: ;~
: 0000000
:. . . 10~ ~ _~
'.'7 Z ~ ~ U
.i~ + oooooooo
.. j, u ........ " ~ a~
'i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
, ~
.~i ~ E~ O O U~ O O ~
~ . P Z ~ '7 ~
~' ..
'~'~'`:'.. ' ' '
i ~
'.;, :' .'.~ : ' . . ' ' ' . , ' ~, . ,:

3 J i~ f~ ~
1 The results of the lead acetate paper monitoring of H S gen-
eration and of the syrup analyses indicate that increasing ~he
copper content of the low manganese-chromium-nickel,
free-machining stainless steels of this invention to above about
0.75% and particularly from 1.26 to 2.29~ siqnificantly improves
their resistance to corrosion in SPRITE soft drink syrup, espe-
cially in the passivated condition. This effect of copper is
most clearly evidence by heat numbers V507, V564, and V565 which
contain 1.26, 1.79, and 2.29% copper, respectively, and which
show essentially no H S evolution during testing and signifi-
cantly less contamination of the SPRITE soft drink syrup than do
similar steels with residual copper, such as ~eat V506, and much
less than AISI Type 303, as represented by heat number A-15596.
Thus, the low carbon plus nitrogen, low manganese, copper bearing
austenitic stainless steels of this invention exhibit much better
resistance to corrosion in acid soft drink syrups than do prior
art steels of this general type.
. ~ ,
. .. .
' ' ' . .
. -14-
:
,

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 1330628 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 1998-07-13
Lettre envoyée 1997-07-14
Accordé par délivrance 1994-07-12

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORPORATION
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
GEOFFREY O. RHODES
JOHN J. ECKENROD
KENNETH E. PINNOW
WALTER T., JR. HASWELL
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Page couverture 1995-08-28 1 30
Revendications 1995-08-28 5 149
Abrégé 1995-08-28 1 24
Dessins 1995-08-28 1 12
Description 1995-08-28 14 586
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 1997-10-21 1 178
Taxes 1996-07-17 1 45
Correspondance de la poursuite 1992-06-26 13 334
Correspondance reliée au PCT 1994-04-19 1 47
Demande de l'examinateur 1992-03-13 1 61
Correspondance de la poursuite 1991-01-04 2 60
Demande de l'examinateur 1990-09-07 1 42