Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 1337474 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 1337474
(21) Numéro de la demande: 1337474
(54) Titre français: METHODE DE SEPARATION ET DE FILTRATION D'UN GAZ ET D'UN LIQUIDE
(54) Titre anglais: METHOD FOR GAS-LIQUID SEPARATION AND FILTRATION
Statut: Périmé et au-delà du délai pour l’annulation
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • B01D 46/52 (2006.01)
  • B01D 46/24 (2006.01)
  • F01M 13/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • CORDES, HARRY D. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • PALL CORPORATION
(71) Demandeurs :
  • PALL CORPORATION (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 1995-10-31
(22) Date de dépôt: 1989-07-19
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Non

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
07/221,282 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 1988-07-19

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


An air filtering device and related method for
the removal of liquids and particulate matter from an
air stream such as may be used in an aircraft
environmental control system. The invention is
comprised of an inertial separator and a combination
coalescer and HEPA-rated filter preferably all
located in the same housing. Air entering the
housing flows into an inertial separator which
removes most of the entrained liquid from the air.
Substantially all of the remaining liquid is
eliminated by the coalescing element with the
coalescer functioning at least in part as an
evaporator due to the low saturation level of the air
flowing from the inertial separator. Biological and
other particulate removal is accomplished by the
subsequent passing of the air through the HEPA-rated
filter medium.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION TO WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A gas-liquid separating and filtering apparatus
comprising:
a) a housing having a separate gas inlet and gas outlet;
b) means for gas-liquid separation located within said
housing;
c) means for removing the separated liquid from said
housing;
d) an annular separating and filtering device downstream
from said separating means and within said housing
comprising:
i) a coalescing element having a surface area
promoting evaporation of coalesced liquid from said
coalescing element into the unsaturated gas flowing
therethrough; and
ii) a particulate filter in close proximity to and
downstream from said coalescing element.
2. The apparatus of Claim 1, wherein said annular filtering
device has said coalescing element as its outer element and
said particulate filter as its inner element.
3. The apparatus of Claim 2, wherein said means for gas-
liquid separation is an inertial separator.
4. The apparatus of Claim 3, wherein said particulate
filter is a HEPA-rated filter.
- 11 -

5. The apparatus of Claim 4, wherein said coalescing
element is a graduated pore Profile* element.
6. The apparatus of Claim 5, wherein said HEPA-rated filter
is a graduated pore Profile* element.
7. The apparatus of Claim 5, further comprising means for
removing coalesced liquid located on said apparatus in a
position that will allow it to be at its lowest point when
the structure onto which the apparatus is installed is
normally at rest.
8. A method for gas-liquid separation and removal of
particulate matter from a gas-liquid mixture comprising the
steps:
a) separating from the mixture substantially all liquid
aerosols above about 25 micrometers in diameter;
b) draining said separated liquid aerosols;
c) coalescing the remaining liquid aerosols with a
coalescing element;
d) evapoprating liquid from said coalescing element; and
e) filtering particulate matter from the gas stream
passing through the coalescing element.
9. The method of Claim 8, wherein the separating step (a)
is performed using an inertial separator.
* Trademark
- 12 -

10. The method of Claim 9, wherein the filtration step (e)
is performed using a HEPA-rated filter.
11. The method of Claim 10, wherein said coalescing element
is a graduated pore Profile* element.
12. The method of Claim 11, wherein said HEPA-rated filter
is a graduated pore Profile* element.
13. The method of Claim 11, wherein after step (d) any
coalesced liquid which did not evaporate is drained from the
coalescing element.
14. The apparatus of Claim 1, further comprising means for
providing supercooled gas to said gas inlet.
15. The method of Claim 8, wherein the evaporating step
comprises evaporating coalesced liquid from the coalescing
element into the gas stream passing through the coalescing
element.
* Trademark - 13 -

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


1 337474
METHOi F~R GAS-LIQUID
SEPARATION AND FILTRATION
The present invention relates generally to
devices and methods for the filtration of air or
other gaseous streams, this device and method being
particularly directed toward the removal of liquids
and particulate matter from the aforementioned
streams.
In many applications, it is desirable to use as
a feed stream air or other gaseous mixture that is
substantially free of any entrained liqulds as
aerosols and particulate matter, the presence of
these impurities often substantLally affecting the
efficiency of a device u~lng this feed stream. By
way of example, consider an oxygen concentrator, one
of the princlple elements in an oxygen generation
system used aboard some aircra~t. If the air
enterinq this concentrator is contaminated by liquid
aeFosols, concentrator efficiency may be lowered by
as much as thirty percent. ~iquid aerosols are also
suspected of causing the molecular aieve used in
oxygen ~eneration beds to dlsinteqrate, resulting in
early system ailure.
In vlew of t~e problems which may be encountered
when liquid aerosols are present, it has become
common practice to attempt to remove liquid aerosols
by first employing the use o a separator, this
device having the ability to remove the bul~ of
liquid aerosols entralned in the enterins air or ga~
stream. The finer aerosols, which follow the
streamlines of the gas and are not removed
efficiently by this means, are conducted to a
$~

~ 337474
coalescing medlum The coalescer is typically
located a varylng distance downstream from the
separator. On contact with the coalescer, the fine
aerosols form droplets on the medium. To the extent
any of these droplets become large enough to be
ineluenced by gravitational forces, such droplets
~all into a sump which may be drained as required.
It is also common ln aircraft systems to have an
ultra-fine filter medlum, such as a HEPA-rated f1lter
for particulate removal located downstream from the
coalescing medium. Theæe types of filters will also
fail or operate at a reduced level of efflc~ency if
contaminated by liquid aerosols. To preclude
possible contamlnation, there i9 a minlmum
recommended spacial separat~on to ~e used between the
coalescer and HEPA-rated filter. Alternatively,
others have placed two ~EPA-rated filters in ser~e~
and spaced so as to prevent liquld carryover by the
airstream.
Moreover, the previously described problems
associated with the presence of llquid aerosols can
become exacerbated if the gas being conducted from
the separator to the coalescing medium encounters an
environment which cools the ga~ to its dew point.
This cooling can result not only in the formation o~
additional aerosols, but can al~o result in liquid
aero601s passing through the coalescing medium while
still in the liquid phase, an effect which is
undesirable in certain applications, such as the
aircraft environment described previously.
Compounding the problems evident in the
approaches and systems described above, space and
weight efficiency are of considerable importance in
aircraft applications.

1 337474
In one aspect, the present invention provides a gas-
liquid separating and filtering apparatus comprising:
a) a housing having a separate gas inlet and gas outlet;
b) means for gas-liquid separation located within said
housing;
c) means for removing the separated liquid from said
housing;
d) an annular separating and filtering device downstream
from said separating means and within said housing
0 comprising:
i) a coalescing element having a surface area
promoting evaporation of coalesced liquid from said
coalescing element into the unsaturated gas flowing
therethrough; and
ii) a particulate filter in close proximity to and
downstream from said coalescing element.
The invention further provides a method for gas-liquid
separation and removal of particulate matter from a gas-
0 liquid mixture comprising the steps:a) separating from the mixture substantially all liquid
aerosols above about 25 micrometers in diameter;
b) draining said separated liquid aerosols;
c) coalescing the remaining liquid aerosols with a
5 coalescing element;
d) evapoprating liquid from said coalescing element; and
-- 3
B

- 1 337474
e) filtering particulate matter from the gas stream
passing through the coalescing element.
Preferred embodiments of the invention allow the removal
of all liquid aerosols contained in an air stream with an
extremely high degree of efficiency while minimizing not only
the space required for installation of a device embodying the
invention but also the weight of the device. In particular,
embodiments of the invention may remove liquid aerosols to
such a degree so as to permit the location of a coalescing
medium in
B - 3a -

1 337474
close proximity to a particulate filter ~edium, this arrangement
saving space without sacrificing any liquid removal efficiency.
Embodiments of the invention may also allow reduction in dry bulb
temperature of a gas stream (or increase in relative humidity)
that is experienced when effluent gas or air from a separator is
conducted to a coalescing medium.
FIGURE 1 is a top view of an inertial separator, the
separating means used in the preferred embodiment of the
invention;
FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectional view of the preferred
embodiment taken along line 2----2 of FIG. l;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged fragmentary view of the cover
fastening means; and
FIG 4 illustrates a sectional view of the coalescing medium,
particulate filter, and perforated support core assembly, taken
along line 4----4 of FIG. 2.
Although the structures with which this invention is
concerned may be operated in many different spatial orientations,
for the sake of

1 337474
convenience and clarity of description reference will
be made hereinafter to the top or bottom of the
various structural elements, meanlng, the top and
bottom as they are oriented in F~IG. 2. Also, while
the apparatus ~s useful for the separation and
filtration of llquids from any gaseous stream, the
invention realizes its greatest advantage in the
separation and filtration o~ an air-water stream and
therefore the preferred embodiment wlll be described
as such. However, it should be noted that I do not
intend to l~mit the inventlon to thls embodiment. On
the contrary, I intend to cover all alternatives,
modifications and equivalents as may be included
within the spirit ana scope of the invention as
defined by the appended cla$ms.
~ urning ~lrst to ~IG. 2, there is shown an air-
water separat~ng and f~ltering dev$ce embodying the
present invention compr1sing a housing with a
separate air inlet 11 and air outlet 12 , within this
housing an annular coalescing and filterlng device
compri~ing a coalescing medium 1~, a particulate
filter 15, perforated support core 16 and means ~or
removing the coalesced liquid from the housing 17.
The housing ~s comprised of a body 20 and a base
21. The base 21 ls detachably secured to the body by
fastening means, for example, a V-band and bolt 22.
The body 20 is divided lnto two main chambers,
an upper 30 and a lower chamber 31. The upper
chamber 30 has an air ~nlet 11 located tangential to
the side wall of the.chamber 30. The two chambers
are connected by a passageway 26 located within the
body 20.
The upper chamber 30, shown in FIG. 1, is
essentially cylindrical, being defined by the upper

~ -~37474
wall 23, side wall 24 and chamber partition 2~. ~his
~art3tlon is comprised of the aforementioned
passageway 26, the balance consisting of any material
impervious to air and liquids. ~Within this chamber
30 is housed an lnertial separator of known design
and construction. The dimensions of the chamber 30
are dependent upon the dPsign parameters of the
separator and, more generally, on the design of the
environmental control system itself. A mean~ for
draining the separated iiquid aerosols 29 from the
upper chamber is also provided.
The separated air leaves the upper chambec by
way of the passageway 26 and flows into the lower
chamber 31. The lower chamber is similarly
cylindrical in deslgn. The content of this chamber
is comprised of a coalesclng medium 14, a particulate
filter 15 downstream from and in close proximity to
the coalescing medium 14 and a perforated support
core 16.
In thi~ embodiment, the coalescing element i9
cylindrically shaped and located so as to form an
annular space between its outer surface and the inner
~all of the lower chamber 34. The partlcular
coalescing medium chosen i6 not essential to the
invention, however, it is contemplated that the
medium be both hydro-phobic and oleo-phobic so that
it ~esists wetting. An example of such a medium
would be a graduated pore Profile~ medium having the
properties descrlbed above.
The particulate filter 15 is also cylindrically
shaped and is located in close proximity to ~he
coalescing medium lq. The term "in close proximity
to" is defined, for the purposes oE this invention,
as placing the filter 15 adjacent to the coalescer 14

1 337474
or at any distance from the coalescer up to and
including the minimum recommended spatial separation
for prevention of liquid carryover. Regarding the
composition of the filter 15, t~e preferred
embodiment uses a ~EPA-rated medium, this being the
acronym for High Efficiency Particulate Airfilter.
Thls type of filter may be for example, a glass fiber
membrane having intimately distributed pores capable
of filtering large volumes of partlculate matter from
air passing therethrough. It ls contemplated that
the medium be pleated for high surface area removal
and operating efficiency. An alternate type of
filter that may be used successfully in this
application is a graduated pore Profile~ element.
The perforated support core 16 i5 positloned
downstream from the particulate filter 15 and adds
structural stability to the filter and coalescer.
Although there are no substantial limitations on
perforation size, the perforations must be sufficient
to allow the flow of air across the coalescln~ medium
filter and without any significant pressure drop
while still functioning as a support device.
Although the contemplated composition of the core 16
is metal, any type of material with sufficient
strength may be substituted.
The upper portlon of this coalescer, filter and
support core assembly i9 sealed by an end cap 40.
Anti-vibration vanes 41 extending radially from the
top of thi~ assembly to the inner wall of the lower
chamber 34 help hold the assembly in place.
A flow modifier 42 capable of directing the flow
of air entering the lower chamber ~1 into the annular
space defined by the outer surface of the coalescing
medium 14 and the inner wall of the lower chamber 34

1 337474
i8 positioned above the assembly. This allows air
enterlng the lower chamber 31 through the passageway
26 to be directed into the annular chamber to contact
with the coalescing medium 14. ~The air then passes
throu~h the particulate fllter 15, perforated support
core 16 and into a central chamber 50, this chamber
being defined by the end cap 40 and inner wall of the
perÇorated support core 16. The fully treated air
then ex$ts the chamber 50 and the housing by way of
an air outlet 12. A means for draining any coalesced
11quid which was not evaporated into the air is
located at the bottom of the annular space 17. To
effect high efficiency removal of any remaining
li~uids, the draining means should be located on the
apparatus in a position that w~11 allow it to be at
lts lowest point when the a~rcraft or other structure
into which the apparatus i9 installed is normally at
rest .
The two chambers houslng the separating
means 30 and coalescing medium 31 are located within
the same housing, thereby e;iminatlng any temperature
Yariations which might affect the air stream's
liquld-to-vapor content as it passes from the
separating means to the coalescing medium. Those
skilled in the art will appreciate the fact that
th~-~, in essence, allow~ uid removal to occur only
in the separating or upper 30 annular coalescing or
lower 31 chambers thereby eliminating the undesirable
result of prior systems which permitted removal o~
liquid while the air was in transport from separator
to coalescer. In other words, the humidity level of
the air is now able to be maintained at a constant
level as it is conducted from the separator to the
coalescing medium.

1 337474
The operating advantages of the dlsclosed device
at the coalesclng medium surface are also
significant. The fine liquld aerosols that are not
removed from the ai~ stream by ~he inertlal
separatlng means are virtually completely removed by
the coalescing medium. It has been found, however,
that removal is not accomplished entirely by the
known method of coalesclng, but in part by
evaporating the coalesced l$quid from the medium into
the air. To facilitate this process, the alr
entering the lower chamber 31 should be in a
supercooled condition before it reaches the
coalescing medlum. Upon contact with the medium, the
llquid~ will first coalesce, then evaporate into the
unsaturated air, thereby increasing the molsture
loadlng or humidity of the effluent air. Although
the total moistu~e content of the air may remain the
same, a phase change in the liquld is experienced.
This has the effect of assuring vlrtual complete
liquid aerosol removal, rendering unnecessary the
redundancy employed by prior systems in the liquid
removal area.
Explaining the previously described phenomenon
from a rate of flow perspective, in order to ensure
that the coalesced liquld passes downstream as a
vapor, the rate of liquid aerosols which are
deposlted on the coalescer should be equal to the
rate of water belng evaporated by the unsaturated air
stream. Recognizinq this, the rate of deposit of the
liquid aerosol~ on the coalesclng medium can be
controlled by providing the medium with sufficient
surface area to cause less than a threshold amount of
liquid to be collected per unit area per unit time.
By designing the coalescer to keep the amount of
liquld deposlted on it below this threshold level,

1 337~74
the partlculate fllter will not be contaminated by
any entrained liquids.
~ he aforementioned elimination of li~uid
aerosols by the coalescing mediùm also allows the
locating of the partlculate filter 15, such as a
HEPA-rated medium, in close proximity to the
coalescing medium 14 without the need or redundancy
due to liquid carryover. In the preferred
embodiment, the HEPA-rated filter 15 i~ located
adjacent to the coalescer lq, a very space efficient
configurat~on. Moreover, the redundancy found in
prior systems is reduced by eliminating the need for
separate housings for the coalescer and for the HEPA
f1lter, result1ng in both weight and space saving~.
The outside-in flow conflguration of the
coalescer/particulate fllter/pe~forated support core
assembly as described in the preerred embodiment
also saves space over prior systems.
While the preferred embodlment has placed the
coalescer/partlculate filter/support core assembly
within the same housing as the separating means, this
is only one embodiment of the invention. The
assembly may also be located downstream from the
separating means. However, the location of the
assembly should be such as to not allow the
temperature of the separated air leaving the
separator to reach its dew point before the air
contacts the coalesclng medium, ths bein~ an
important aspect of the invention. As an example,
the aforesaid assemb~y, after belng encased in an
appropriate houslng, may be mounted directly onto the
separating means, w~th an appropriate connection made
between the assembly's air inlet with the air out}et
of the separating means.
1 0

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : CIB en 1re position 2022-10-30
Inactive : CIB expirée 2022-01-01
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 2003-10-31
Lettre envoyée 2002-10-31
Accordé par délivrance 1995-10-31

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
TM (catégorie 1, 2e anniv.) - générale 1997-10-31 1997-09-18
TM (catégorie 1, 3e anniv.) - générale 1998-11-02 1998-09-18
TM (catégorie 1, 4e anniv.) - générale 1999-11-01 1999-09-16
TM (catégorie 1, 5e anniv.) - générale 2000-10-31 2000-09-19
TM (catégorie 1, 6e anniv.) - générale 2001-10-31 2001-09-18
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
PALL CORPORATION
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
HARRY D. CORDES
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Description 1995-10-30 11 390
Abrégé 1995-10-30 1 22
Revendications 1995-10-30 3 76
Dessins 1995-10-30 1 41
Dessin représentatif 2000-08-20 1 19
Avis concernant la taxe de maintien 2002-11-27 1 173
Correspondance reliée au PCT 1995-08-15 1 35
Correspondance de la poursuite 1993-02-24 3 91
Correspondance de la poursuite 1994-01-24 6 195
Demande de l'examinateur 1993-09-28 2 91
Demande de l'examinateur 1992-10-29 1 53