Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
200 ~ 879
1 FLUID DYNAMIC SHOE
BACKGROUND OF THE lN V~N'l'ION
This invention relates to footwear, and is
particularly suitable for athletic footwear.
Over the decades, a variety of shoe structures
have been devised for cushioning the impact of heel strike.
Many of these include the use of gaseous and/or li~uid
chambers in the shoe sole. Often these are complex and
costly, even to the point of being totally impractical.
Exemplary of these are:
U.S. Moore508,034 1893
U.S. Bascom586,155 1897
U.S. Tauber850,327 1907
U.S. Miller900,867 1908
U.S. Guy1,069,001 1913
U.S. Rosenwasser 1,517,171 1924
U.S. Rasmussen1,605,985 1926
U.S. Nathanson2,080,499 1937
U.S. Gouabault2,605,560 1952
-~ ~ 20 t'.S. Smith3,765,422 1973
U.S. Richmond et al 3,871,117 1975
U.S. Sgarlato4,100,686 1978
U.S. Krinsky4,211,236 1980
U.S. Cole et al 4,358,902 1982
U.S. Johnson et al 4,446,634 1984
U.S. Zona4,567,677 1986
G.B. Bolla2,050,145 1981
DE Linde2,303,384 1974
DE Cujovic2,460,034 1976
The prior concepts/structures for effecting
3~
cushioning typically extend over the forefoot and heel of
*
~,,, ~ ,
- ç
200 1 879
l the sole, either as one chamber extending the length of the
sole, or a heel chamber and a forefoot chamber connected by
passageways. The forefoot portion is normally provided to
receive fluid from the heel zone and then force the fluid
back to the heel zone by pressure of the forefoot during
foot roll and toeoff, in preparation for the next heel
strike. These structures with fluid action beneath the
forefoot allow the foot to flex laterally during foot roll
and toeoff, too often resulting in instability beneath the
lo foot so as to allow excessive pronation and/or supination
with consequent potential damage or in~ury, particularly to
the ankles and knees. Moreover, such devices do not
accommodate the different impact forces resulting from
different speeds of an activity, e.g. running vs. ~ogging.
Thus, while serving to lessen the problem of impact force,
they introduce the problem of instability.
Recent commercial embodiments of shoes for
cushioning impact include the use of a gel in the shoe soles
by one manufacturer, and of a pressurized air bladder in the
shoe soles by another manufacturer. Such devices do in fact
effect certain impact cushioning as has been determined by
testing. However, tests show that the impact absorption of
such devices, though beneficial, still exhibits sharp peak
impact loads considered undesirably high. Moreover, these
materials, being encapsulated under pressure and confined to
a finite space, are not considered effective in
accommodating different impact forces from persons of
different weight or running at different speeds.
Such structures act primarily like a spring such
that, following the impact of the foot, the subsequent shock
~ :::
200 1 879
1 tends to comes back and go right back up the person's heel.
Devices acting like a spring also tend to be
non-accommodating to different impact loads and rates of
impact. Thus, a shoe which nicely accommodates a slow gait
with proper cushioning could bottom out at a faster gait,
and a shoe accommodating a faster gait would tend to be too
stiff at a slower gait.
SUMMARY OF THE lNv~N-lION
This present invention attenuates impact
lo cushioning, yet using only the portion of the footwear
underlying the heel. The novel structure does not extend
beneath the forefoot to result in instability in the
footwear. The structure effectively attenuates impact of
heel strike beginning almost immediately, exten~ng impact
over a substantially increased time period and resulting in
a considerably lower peak impact load on the person's heel,
foot and leg. Even though confined to the heel, the novel
structure is capable of quickly returning to the preset
condition ready for the next heel strike. No fluid
rechAn1s under the forefoot is neCPSSAry or used to cause
this return action. Thus the foot roll and toeoff functions
remain stable.
The invention employs a special sealed heel
bladder defining a space divided into a rear heel chamber
positioned in the main heel strike area and a front heel
chamber. The rear heel chamber comprises about 60 percent
of the total volume. The front heel chamber comprises about
40 percent of the total volume. These chambers are divided
by a diagonal interior wall at an angle of 35 degrees to a
transverse line or plane (55 degrees to a longitudinal line
or plane) and having controlled flow orifice means which
-3-
:
200 t ~ 79
1 regulates rate of flow of a viscous liquid from the rearheel chamber to the front heel chamber upon heel strike,
accommodating persons of differing weight and differing
running speeds. The chambers are filled with a mixture of
viscous liquid and a gas, typically air. The volume of
viscous liquid is greater than the volume of the front heel
chamber. The volume of liquid is also about 80 to 90
percent of the total volume, with a gas such as air being 10
to 20 percent of the volume. The front heel chamber has
flexible resilient walls allowing limited expansion capacity
caused by temporary resilient bulging of the walls, creating
part of a return biasing force by the walls on the liquid
because of a greater pressure momentarily created in the
front heel chamber by flow thereinto of a greater amount of
liquid than the at-rest volume of the front heel chamber.
The remainder of the return bias force is caused by
compression of any air in the front chamber. The resilient
biasing force causes effective return flow of liquid back to
the rear heel chamber when pressure is released from the
rear heel chamber during foot roll and toeoff by the runner,
so that the viscous liquid is again fully available in the
rear heel chamber for cushioning and attenuating the next
heel strike.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a side elevational view of a right foot
shoe incorporating this invention:
Fig. 2 is a bottom view of a left foot shoe
comparable to that in Fig. 1 and showing one possible type
of outer sole configuration;
Fig. 3 is a plan view of a left foot form of the
unique heel bladder insert for the midsole of this shoe:
--4--
200 ~ 879
1 Fig. 4 is a sectional view taken on plane IV-IV of
Fig. 3;
Fig. 5 is a side elevational view of the unit in
Fig. 3 shown with pressure applied to the rear heel chamber
as occurs during heel strike, causing the front heel chamber
to bulgingly expand to a volume greater than its at-rest
volume;
Fig. 6 is a diagrammatic perspective view of a
runner whose right heel iB under impact and whose left heel
is lifting;
Fig. 7 is a dlagram of the heel impact load force
pattern over a time interval, of a commercial gel-type pad
for footwear presently on the market;
Fig. 8 is a diagram of a heel impact load force
pattern over a time interval, of an air type pad for
footwear presently on the market; and
Fig. 9 is a diagram of a heel impact load force
pattern over a time interval, of a heel pad of the invention
herein.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
- 20
Referring now specifically to the drawings, the
shoe depicted in Figs. 1 and 2 is shown as an athletic shoe
primarily for running sport activities such as distance
running, ~ogging and court games. The shoe employs a
selected upper 12, a selected outsole 14, and a midsole 16.
In the rear of the midsole is retained the special bladder
structure depicted in Figs. 3-6. The special bladder
structure 18 is formed of a flexible polymeric material,
preferably polyethyl vinyl acetate, or polyurethane, or the
equivalent, having a wall thickness of approximately 1-2mm
and including an upper wall 20, a lower wall 22 spaced from
-5-
~ `Z
200 1 879
1 the upper wall, and a peripheral wall 24 comprising a medial
sidewall 24a, a lateral sidewall 24b, a diagonal front wall
24c and a convexly curved rear wall 24d. Front wall 24c is
at an angle of about 25 degrees to a line transverse to the
unit, with the lateral wall being longer than the medial
wall. The peripheral wall is integrally joined with the
- upper and lower walls to form an enclosed space or chamber.
Projecting from the front wall during the early formative
steps of this structural component is a temporary integral
filling tube 26. This enables a viscous liquid to be placed
in the internal enclosed space defined by this bladder.
This tube is later sealed off and severed from the finished
unit at the phantom lines indicated at 28 in Fig. 3
immediately ad;acent the bladder body itself. This
seal/sever function can be performed by heat and pressure if
the polymer is thermoplastic, or by other known alternate
techniques. It has been determined that the height of the
bladder body should be lOmm at the thickest, i.e., rear end
thereof. This thickness, when combined with the other
features of the structure achieves what is considered the
best combination of impact absorption over a range of
running speeds and over a range of runner weights.
An integral interior diagonal control wall
structure extends across the enclosed space. This is formed
25 by two J-shaped, mirror image elongated vertical openings 30
and 32 through the thickness of the insert, including the
upper wall and lower wall, to form ad~acent wall members.
This may be achieved by placing transverse J-shaped core
members in the mold when forming the bladder such that a
3Q double wall 30a and 32a is formed adjacent each of these
J-shaped openings 30 and 32 as indicated by the dotted lines
-6-
200 1 879
1 in Fig. 3. The curved ends of these J-shaped openings are
ad;acent to and spaced from each other and curve convexly
toward each other to form a venturi therebetween. The main
straight portions of these J-shaped elements extend
diagonally across the chamber, colinearly with each other,
leaving an opening at the outer ends, i.e. between the outer
ends of the control wall and the lateral and medial
sidewalls. The walls therefore define three flow control
openings 34, 36 and 38 therebetween for viscous fluid flow
lo as explained hereinafter. The lateral side opening 34, the
medial side opening 36 and the central opening 38 are each
preferably 3 to 4mm in width when employing a silicone fluid
having a viscosity of about 1000 centistokes. The height of
each opening is about 6 1/2mm.
The height of the bladder tapers from rear to
front, with the larger height at the rear and the smaller
height at the front as illustrated most specifically in Fig.
4. In the preferred embodiment, the overall height at the
rear of the bladder is lOmm as noted above, while the front
height is 7mm. This taper in the bladder assists in
enabling rapid return flow of liquid to the rear chamber,
the front chamber being smaller than the rear chamber.
Intermediate these two extremities, therefore, the
height is approximately 8 to 8 1/2mm. Since the polymeric
material forming the bladder is preferably approximately lmm
thick, the height of the openings 34, 36 and 38 thus is
approximately 4 to 6 1/2mm, for an overall cross sectional
area of 16 to 26 sq. mm for each passageway. Preferably the
height and width of each of the three is 4mm. The total
area of the three orifices forming the passage means is
---- about 48 to 78 sq. mm. The orifices should comprise 10 to
-7-
.f ~ ~
20 0 1 879
l 25 percent of the total cross sectional divider area between
the front and rear chambers. If the ratio of flow opening
is too large, or too small, the pad will tend to undesirably
act solely like a spring.
Most runners have heel first contact. Further,
runners who have heel first contact typically strike at the
lateral rear corner of the heel, with a subsequent foot
strike line of stress extending diagonally toward the
midpoint of the heel and then longitudinally forwardly
during foot roll to ultimate toeoff from the great toe.
The diagonal control wall structure separates the
sealed space underlying the heel into a rear heel chamber 40
and a front heel chamber 42. The control wall extends at an
angle basically normal to the foot strike line of stress
experienced by most persons (basically between the dots
along the left outer half of the phantom line in Fig. 3 that
represents the section IV-IV). The control wall is thus at
an angle of about 35 degrees to a line transverse of the
heel, and about 55 degrees to a longitudinal line bisecting
the heel structure.
Rear heel chamber 40 is purposely caused to be
substantially larger in volume than front heel chamber 42 by
location of the wall and taper of the structure. Optimally,
rear heel chamber 40 comprises 60 percent of the total
volume, while front heel chamber 42 comprises 40 percent of
the total volume. The quantity of viscous liquid in the
total space is greater than the volume of front heel chamber
42. The amount of viscous liquid is preferably sufficient
to fill approximately 80 to 90 percent of the total volume,
leaving 10 to 20 percent for a gas such as air. It is
important to always have a significant quantity of liquid in
-8-
2001 ~
the rear heel chamber at the time of heel impact. This is
aided by having an amount of total viscous liquid greater
than the volume of the front heel chamber. This i8 also
aided by having the front or forward chamber walls
resiliently flexible to bulge, such that momentarily the
amount of fluid in the forward chamber is greater than the
at-rest volume of the front chamber, thereby creating part
of the return bias force on the liquid due to the memory of
the polymer. Additional return bias force is caused by
momentary compression of air in the front chamber with
forced flow of the liquid into that chamber. Further, the
tapered construction enables the rear chamber to have the
desired greater volume as previously noted.
A shoe such as that depicted in Fig. 1 is
constructed using the selected upper, the selected outsole
and a midsole with a frontal portion preferably of ethylene
vinyl acetate (EVA), polyurethane or the equivalent, the
midsole including a peripheral portion extending around the
heel to form a pocket for receiving special bladder insert
18.
This construction specially attenuates the usual
sharp heel strike impact, lowering the peak load and
extending the load over a significant period of time. More
specifically, in a running race for example, the human foot
strikes the ground with a vertical force 2.5 to 3.0 times
body weight. In a 10 kilometer race, a runner weighing 175
pounds will strike the ground as many as 10,000 times, with
up to 525 pounds of force at each strike. This repeated
impact on the foot may cause lower extremity injuries such
3~ as shin splints, runner's knee, tendonitis and stress
fractures. Studies show that approximately 80 percent of
_g_
200 1 879
l all runners strike the ground heel first, such that
dampening of the heel strike can decrease the incidence of
overuse injuries caused by repeated impact, and also making
running more comfortable. Materials presently used for
midsole construction, e.g. typically ethylene vinyl acetate
(EVA), or sometimes polyurethane, do absorb impact to a
certain extent.
More recently, running shoe manufacturers have
attempted to solve the impact problems still r~in1ng with
EVA and polyurethane foams by using pressurized air or
encapsulated gels in the midsole. Because these materials
are encapsulated under pressure and confined to a finite
space, these devices tend to act merely like a type of
spring. Both materials are considered to have significant
limitations. More specifically, compressed air under the
sole of the foot can introduce instability allowing
overpronation or oversupination. Moreover, it tends to
result in the impact shock being returned to the foot. Gel
type materials are so viscous that under pressure such
become even stiffer until ultimately the vessel either
ruptures or the unit bottoms out. Both types tend to
accommodate only a particular weight runner and a particular
running speed/impact load.
The present invention attenuates the impact of
heel strike over a significant time period while lowering
the peak force such that, although the impact of a fast
runner typically occurs in about 20 milliseconds, the
present invention attenuates the impact to decrease its peak
force and extend it over a longer time period. Yet the unit
~ 3~ returns to preset condition ready for the next heel strike.
Moreover, it does this without fluid being introduced
--10--
~, ~
f~
200 1 879
beneath the entire foot, such that instability is not
introduced during foot roll and toeoff action.
Silicone fluid is employed preferably because it
is temperature stable, viscosity constant and nontoxic, as
well as an excellent dampener. As noted, the viscosity
employed is preferably about 1000 centistokes for an orifice
to wall factor in the range of 10 to 25 percent, preferably
about 20 percent. The preferred range is 1000 to 1250
centistokes. Above 1250 it tends to become too viscous for
optimum forward and return flow actions. Below about 800,
it tends to be too fluid for normal running events of
average sized person in the structure depicted. If the
lower viscosity liquid is employed, the area of flow through
the control wall should be decreased also, and vice versa.
The structure demonstrates a capacity to
accommodate different impact forces resulting from different
weights of runners and/or different speeds of running. The
flow of viscous llquid is regulated by the force applied.
Therefore, the same structure can be used in footwear for
persons of various weight and for various type events and
speeds of running.
In action, as the typical runner's heel strikes at
the junction of the lateral side and the convex rear wall,
-- and moves along the strike line of stress diagonally
forwardly toward the center of the heel, the top wall of the
rear chamber is flexibly depressed so that the silicone
liquid is forced under pressure through the three flow
control orifices to the front heel chamber in a controlled
manner. Increased liquid in forward chamber 42 causes the
forward chamber walls, particularly its top wall 20, to
3Q
temporarily resiliently bulge as in Fig. 5, thereby creating
--11--
- ~ ~
200 1 879
1 a return pressure. As the foot strike line of stress moves
to the center and then forwardly, the strike impact is
attenuated, decreasing the peak force load considerably from
what it would otherwise be, and extending the time period of
the strike load. This occurs entirely beneath the heel. As
the foot proceeds through its typical foot roll and toeoff
stages, pressure is released from the rear heel chamber,
pressure is momentarily applied to the top of the front heel
chamber, and the bulging resilient wall of the front heel
chamber applies further pressure, so that pressurized fluid
in the front heel chamber flows back through the three
orifices into the rear chamber, causing the unit to be
prepared for the next foot strike. This return action
occurs even though there is no forefoot chamber to force it
back. The impact attenuation is considered markedly
superior to present competitive cushioning units.
Figs. 7, 8 and 9 illustrate laboratory static
impact tests on two prior inserts and the present pad. As
noted, the peak load is lower and the load time is extended
using the novel structure in Figs. 3-5.
The present combination results in a dual acting
response during use, with the greater effect from controlled
hydrodynamic viscous flow between the rearward and forward
heel chambers and a smaller spring action effect in the
heel. Thus, if a runner is moving at a relatively slow
pace, not only is the impact force low but also the velocity
of each impact striking is slow. This results in a large
bladder deflection and flow of liquid from the rear chamber
to the front chamber. But, at a fast running pace, the
bladder will act as a much stiffer member. This may be
visualized by consideration of a bicycle pump. If small
-12-
'''' -- ' I-- :
20Q ~ 879
l force is slowly applied to the pump, the air in the chamber
readily flows in volume through the restricted outlet. But,
if force is rapidly applied to the pump, sudden resistance
to flow through the orifice will be experienced, with slow
flow to the front chamber. Comparably, the faster paced
runner applying sudden impact to the rear chamber of the
novel bladder will result in substantial resistance to flow
through the restricted flow area to the front chamber.
Thus, the novel pad accommodates varying speeds
and different size runners. It's a stiffer cushion when
running fast, and a softer cushion when running slow.
Moreover, the viscous flow causes the impact shock to move
to the forward chamber, rather than back to the foot.
Yet, when the foot rolls, the viscous fluid flows
back to the rear chamber ready for the next impact.
It is conceivable that certain minor variations
could be made in the novel structure within the scope of the
concept presented. It is intended that the invention is not
to be limited to the specific preferred embodiment
illustrated, but only by the appended claims and the
reasonably equivalent structures to those defined therein.
-13-
