Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
2~ i7~s
METHOD OF WEANI~G PIGLETS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVEN~ION
The present invention relates to livestock
feeds, in particular, it relates to enhancing
palatability of livestock feed through a coating.
Agriculture, in recent years, has become
extremely competitive with farmers having to closely
monitor costs and increase productivity. A great deal
of effort has been directed to increasing the nutritive
content of livestock feeds so that livestock will be
healthier, be more productive and/or gain weight faster.
However, increasing the nutritive value of feed does not
necessarily mean that livestock will find the feed more
palatable and eat the desired quantity of feed. Often
times, the feed must be made more palatable so that the
desired effects of the feed come to pass.
one method that is well known for increasing
palatability of food to both humans and animals is to
include a sugar in the food. One prime example of
increasing palatability of cereal-type foods is to
provide a sugar coating on the cereal. Examples of
coating compositions and methods for coating cereals are
described in the following patents:
Inventor P~nt No.
Bettman 2,607,691
Bettman 2,707,153
Lindow 2,824,009
Vollink 2,868,647
Green et al 3,094,947
Doan et al 3,184,316
Fast 3,318,706
Rasmusson 3,582,336
NcKown et al 3,615,676 .~*
. .
"
,. -, ' '' . : ~
- . .: , .
.. .
: . ~ .
;~Ql~
-2-
Inven~or Patent No.
Lyall et al 3,792,183
Lyall et al 3, 840,685
Lyall et al 3, 959,498
Olson et al 3,976,793
Keyser et al 4,038,422
Lutz 4,044,159
Cole, Jr. 4,061,790
Schade et al 4,079,151
Lugay et al 4,089,978
Gilbertson 4,089,984
Edwards 4,101,680
Stringer et al 4,104,406
Stringer et al 4,104,407
Gobble et al 4,178,392
Sharschmidt et al 4,211,800
Brown, Jr. et al 4,212,896
Minifie et al 4,267,703
Edwards 4,338,339
Furda et al 4,379,171
Van Hulle et al 4,409,250
Bonner et al 4,876,811
one example of a process for coating a cereal
is described in the Vollink U.S. Patent 2,868,647. The
Vollink patent describe~ a proce~ wherein a augar
solution is applied to the cereal body by simply pouring
onto the cereal body the sugar solution as the cereal
bodies are being tumbled in a horizontal rotating
cylinder, with tho sugar being distributed about the
cereal bodies as they are tumbling. Such sugar
solution~ contain as little as 1% sugar or as much as
84%, if sucro~e is the sugar o~ interest. The solution
is kept at a temperature range of 230F-250F and air is
.. .. .. . . .. . . . .
2~676~3
circulated to dry the coated cereal, the air being kept
on the order of 275F-350F.
Another method of applying a sugar ~olution to
produce a coating on a cereal is described in the Lyall
et al U.S. Patents 3,792,183, 3,840,685 and 3,959,489.
The Lyall et al patents describe a coating process
wherein an 80% sugar ~olution is dripped onto cereal
products in a Votator. The cereal products are then
dried separately at 200F-260F from about 20-28 minutes
in a vertical flow-type drier.
Sugar has also been incorporated into animal
feed to entice animals to eat the feed. One such feed
i8 disclosed in the Brown, Jr. et al U.S. Patent
4,212,896 wherein fully-inverted molasses at 7-l/2%-20%
by weight is included in the feed. Another such feed is
described in the Brown, Jr. et al U.S. Patent 4,162,336
which includes 7-1/2% to lS% of a monosaccharide
included throughout the feed.
The Stringer et al U.S. Patents 4,104,406 and
4,104,407 describe a proce6s which coats an expanded
animal food with a first layer of dextrin and a second
layer of fat, which inhibits hydration of the food when
water is added, thereby improving animal acceptance of
the food.
The ~ugay et al U.S. Patent 4,089,978
describes a process of coating a dog food with a coating
containing a reducing sugar, animal blood, yeast and fat
with lipase and protease in about 1%-5% by weight of the
animal food.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention includes a process for
enhancing the palatability to livestock of a dry
pelletized feed. The process includes applying an
. , . . , ~ , .
- ' - ~ .-,:: ,
'" i ~ , :
~ ~,
~67~
--4--
approximately 73-85% sucrose solution to dry feed
pellets to obtain a substantially uniformly coated
pellet having a maximum sucrose content of about 6.0% by
weight of the pellet. The sucrose solution ia applied
to the feed while the feed is in an agitated state. The
feed is kept in an agitated state until the coating
hardens to produce a free flowing coated product.
The present invention further includes a
method of feeding livestock, and especially young
livestock such as piglets. The method includes feeding
the coated feed of the present invention at least one
week prior to weaning. The method further includes
continuing to feed the livestock for at least one week
after weaning.
The present invention al80 includes a method
of increasing weight gain by feeding the coated feed of
the present invention to livestock.
~RI~ SCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The figure is a diagrammatical view of a
process of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention includes a process for
enhancing the palatability of a dry pelletized feed to
livestock. The present invention also includes a method
of feeding livestock, and in particular, feeding swine.
Additionally, the present invention includes a method of
increasinq weight gain, in particular, of swine, and
especially piglets.
Piglet~, starting at two weeks of age, are fed
the coated feed of the present invention and are
continued on such feeding upon weaning, until at least
four weeks of age. All references in the present
application to percentage concentration are by weight.
., , ~ , . .
. . ~ . .
~6~
-5-
The proce~s includes applying an approximately
73-85% sucrose solution and preferably an approximately
80% sucrose solution to a dry pelletized feed such that
a uniform coating is applied to the pelletized feed
having a sucrose content of about 6.0% or less. The
pelletized feed is coated in an agitated state until the
coating hardens.
Referring to the figure, a sucrose solution is
contained in a mixing tank 12. The mixing tank 12
includes an impeller for keeping the sucrose solution
mixed. Flavors are added to the solution. The solution
in the mixing tank is a super saturated solution having
a sucrose content in the range of 73-85% sucrose by
weight and preferably a concentration of approximately
80% sucrose. The temperature of the sucrose solution is
kept in a temperature range of 115F to 150F and
preferably in a temperature ranqe of 118F to 120F. It
is desirable to have as high a sucrose content as
possible thereby reducing the amount of water to as
little as possible. Water is needed to adhere the
sucrose to the dry pellet, however, too much water would
make the pellet too soft, and would give problems in
drying the pellet.
The sucrose solution is transported from the
mixing tank 12 by a circulating pump 14 and conduits 15,
16 and 18 to a plurality of dribble nozzles 20. A
recirculation line 22 provides a return for excess
sucrose solution that is not transported to the nozzles
20. A back pressure occurs in the line 18 duQ to the
pumping action of the pump 14 against the nozzles 20,
providing a constant pressure to the nozzle~, rQsulting
in a steady flow of solution through the nozzle~ 20.
The excess of the solution is recirculated through line
..
". ~ - : ~ - ~ .
,,.~ . ~- . . .
,
v~;
22 back into the mixing tank 12. A valve 23 i8 provided
to divert flow either back to the tank 12 or to the
nozzles 20.
The sucrose solution is applied to a base feed
in a mixing conveyor 24. The mixing conveyor 24 is an
auger-type conveyor with the base feed being metered
onto the auger from a hopper 2S. The nozzles 20 drip
the sucrose solution onto the base feed while the feed
is being moved along the conveyor in the general
direction of arrow 26 ~uch that the solution is applied
to the feed in an agitated state. The sucrose solution
is applied at a rate so that the coated feed has a
maximum of approximately 6.0% sucrose by weight with the
sucrose being entirely within the coating. Although
sucrose has been specifically mentioned, it will be
understood that other sweeteners or sugars are
includable within the present invention that produce an
equivalent level of sweetness in the coating.
The base feed used in the present invention is
a dry pelletized feed. The base feed i9 made of ground
corn, soybean aeal, dehulled rolled oats and dried whey.
Feeds using other oilseeds, such as rapeseed, sunflower,
cottonseed, peanut and flax seed, or other grains, such
as maize, oats, sorghum, wheat, barley and the like, are
also includable within the present invention. The feed
also includes various additives such as L-Lysine, Animal
Fat (preserved with BHA and citric acid), Dicalcium
Phosphate, Calcium Carbonate, Manganous Oxide, Ferrou~
Sulfate, Copper Sulfate, Cobalt Carbonate, Zinc Oxide,
Calcium Iodate, Sodium Selenite, Ethylenediamine
Dihydriodide, Vitamin A Palmitate and Acetate, D-
Activated Animal Sterol (source of Vitamin D3), Vitamin
E Supplement, Nenadione Dimethylpyrimidionl Bisulfite
; -7-
(source of Vitamin K), Riboflavin, Niacin Supplement,
Calcium Pantothenate, Choline Chloride, Vitamin B12
Supplement, Ethoxyquin (a preservative) and natural and
artificial flavor.
The dry feed in the present invention
preferably has a moisture content of approximately 10-
12%, and preferably the moisture content is
approximately 10~. When the coating solution is
applied, the coating adds another additional 1%
moisture. However, the 1% moisture added by the coating
is removed during subsequent drying of the coated
product.
A sufficient amount of time for the coating to
dry and harden iB needed. Drying of the product is
dependent on time, temperature and humidity. During
this time, moisture from the coating is absorbed into
the pellet, leaving a crystalline sucrose hard coating
on the surface of the pellet. The coated feed is, for
the most part, drisd in the mixing conveyor 24 using
ambient air. It has been found that ambient air in a
range of 30F to 90F is sufficient to dry the product
to a point ao that the product is a free-flowing feed.
However, since drying is not only time and temperature
dependent, but also humidity dependent, it may be
desirable to convey the product to an additional piece
of apparatus such as a feed cooler 28. The feed cooler
28 i8 also operated at ambient temperature. The feed
cooler 28 ia well-known in the art and is used to add
more drying time to insure proper drying and hardening
of the coating prior to placing the feed in baga.
once thQ coating has hardened, that is, the
sucrose has cryatallized on the aurface of the feed
pellet, the coated product has the same handling
, .
:, .,
..
2~7~
-8-
characteristics as a non-coated feed. In addition, the
coated product of the present invention includes at
least 20% fewer fines than a non-coated feed, the fines
being incorporated into the sucrose solution when wet
and affixed thereto as the moisture leaves the sucrose
solution and the coating hardens. Incorporation of the
fines into the coating is quite important since the base
feed of the present invention includes fragmentized
particles, the majority of which are 1-3 mm in diameter
and made from a pelletized product. It will be
appreciated that such type of a base feed includes a
great amount of fines which are undesirable, both from
a processing standpoint and from a yield standpoint.
The coating of the present invention was
compared to a commercially-available non-coated product
having essentially the same type of feed composition.
The non-coated product and the coated product both have
the following composition:
Dehulled Rolled Oats 10.7
Ground Shelled Corn 36.5
Soybean Meal 27.4
Whole Dried Whey 13.4
Fat Base 9.4
Minerals, Vitamins
~ Antibiotic 2.6
100.O
The non-coated feed also included
approximately 10% sucrose mixed with the above
ingredient~. The coated feed did not contain any
sucrose within the feed, but only in the coating, the
, ~ - . . . ~ , . . , -, . .
. .. . . ...
.~
" '
7~3
g_
coated feed containing approximately 6~ sucrose by
weight.
In addition, the coated feed of the present
invention included one-third less flavoring ingredients
than the non-coated feed.
Both feeds were fed to piglets starting at two
weeks of age and continuing on until four weeks of age
when all the piglets were switched to an entirely
different feed. At two weeks of age, the piglets were
fed either the coated feed of the present invention or
the non-coated feed on a per litter basi~, with the
litters being randomly chosen as to which feed was used.
A total of 140 piglets were included in the first week
of the trial. During the first week of this evaluation,
the piglets were kept with the sows.
At three weeks of age, the piglets were ranked
by weight as much as possible and assigned on that basis
and on a sex basis to 24 individual pens along with the
type of feed fed in the prior week. The 72 most
uniformly weighted piglets were kept in the remainder of
the trial, which included 36 piglets fed the coated feed
during the first week and 36 piglets feed the non-coated
feed during the first week.
The pens were divided into three blocks
(horizontal location within a room) with each block
containing four pens with two pens located at a top
level and two pens located at a bottom level. Three
blocks were located in one room (Room 1) of thQ nursery
and three blocks were located in another room (Room 2)
of the nursery. The coated and non-coated feeds were
provided to the piglet~ in the following arrangement:
... . .. . .
;; : ~
-lo- 2~ .'7~
Table 1
C = Coated
N = Non-Coated
Block 1 Block 2 Block 3
Room 1 Top Level 1c 3~ 5~ 7c 9c 11~
Bottom Level 2c 4~ 6~ 8c 1ON 12C
Room 2 Top Level 13c 15~ 17~ l9c 21C 23~
Bottom Level 14~ 16C 18~ 20C 22~ 24C
Numbers Refer To Pen Numbers
The piglets were fed the non-coated or the
coated feed for one week in their pens. Thereafter, all
piglets were fed an entirely different non-coated feed
for a four week period.
The average daily weight gain of the piglets
in each pen was recorded, along with the daily feed
intake in that pen. The data from the piglets in each
pen being fed the coated feed was then averaged, along
with the feed intake, and the daily weight gain of the
piglet~ in each pen being fed the non-coated feed was
also averaged along with the daily feed intake. An
efficiency value was obtained by taking the value of the
average daily feed intake and dividing that by the
average daily woight gain.
The data was analyzed to determine whether
location of the piglets at a top level pen versus a
bottom level pen; horizontal location within each room
(block); or whether the pens being located in different
rooms had any effect on feed intake or daily weight
gain. It wa~ determined that location of the pens
within the room (pen levels or block), had no
significant effect on daily weight gain or daily feed
~ . , . .. - .
- ~ , : . .
. .:
~ . :, ; . . . . , ~ . .; . . :
.. . .
intake. However, a room difference was found to be
significant as it concerned weight gain and daily feed
intake. Better ventilation in one room than the other
was determined to be the cause of the difference between
the two rooms. This difference was taken into account
in evaluating the data.
The following tables include data on the
average daily weight gain (ADG) (lbs. per head per day),
the average daily feed intake (ADF) (lbs. per head per
day) and an efficiency rating (F/G). The closer the
efficiency rating is to 1.0, the more feed is translated
into weight gain by the piglets.
Table 2
Data from the first week of the trial.
(first week after weaning)
Feed
Non-Coated Coated
ADG .32 ADG .41
Room 1 ADF .40 ADF .45
F/G 1.25 F/G 1.10
ADG .25 ADG .31
Room 2 ADF .31 ADF .36
F/G 1.24 F/G 1.16
ADG .29 ADG .36
Average ADF .35 ADF .41
F/G 1.24 F/G 1.14
,
~' ' - ' '
-
~0~:i7~!~
-12-
Tablç 3
Data collected from three weeks of age
(second week of trial) to eight weeks of age,
with the piglets being fed the same feed
(non-coated) after four weeks of age.
Feed
Non-Coated Coated
ADG .87 ADG .98
Room 1 ADF 1.30 ADF 1.38
F/G 1.50 F/G 1.42
ADG .82 ADG .85
Room 2 ADF 1.18 ADF 1.20
F/G 1.44 F/G 1.44
ADG .85 ADG .91
Average ADF 1.24 ADF 1.29
F/G 1.47 F/G 1.41
~ s clearly shown in Tables 2 and 3, the
piglets preferred the coated feed of the present
invention as compared to the non-coated feed.
Surprisingly, the coated feed was chosen, although the
non-coated feed had a higher sucrose content, 10%, as
compared to 6% of the present invention.
A further result of the trial, as i8 shown in
Tables 2 and 3, is that piglets fed the coated feed of
the present invention had a higher average daily weight
gain (ADG).
A still further surprisinq result that is
shown in Tables 2 and 3 is the higher feed efficiency
(F/G) of the coated feed of the present invention as
compared to the non-coated feed. Of particular interest
are the results of Table 3, which show that even though
all of the piglets were fed the same non-coated feed at
,-
-13- 20~67~
age week four through age week eight, the piglets that
were originally fed the coated feed of the present
invention continued their more efficient feed usage.
Applicant's do not understand this phenomena except that
the data of Table 3 shows a statistical difference
between average daily weight gain (ADG) and feed
efficiency usage (F/G) between the two feeds that are
compared in the table.
Table 40
Average daily gain of piglets offered coated
or non-coated feed during one week prior to
separation from 80W and first day after
#eparation from 80W-
5
Starter
Item Non-Coated Coated
ADG, lb.
One Week Prior
to Separation .48 .54
First Day After
Separation -.49 -.33
Table 4 shows a further added feature of
feeding piglets the coated feed of the present
invention. In Table 4, the average daily weight gain
during the week prior to separation from the sow
~weaning), the piglets fed the coated feed of the
present invention gained more than one-half pound while
piglets fed the non-coated feed gained slightly 1Q88
than one-half pound. The data of particular interest is
the first day after separation from the sow. The
piglets fed the non-coated feed lost almost one-half
pound while the piglet# that were fed the coated feed
- ~
.:. ~ . ~ : , .
-14- 20167~
lost approximately one-third pound. The first day after
weaning presents a traumatic experience to the piglets.
However, piglets fed the coated feed of the present
invention lose significantly less weight during thi~
first day.
The coated feed of the present invention
showed an average daily feed intake that was a 38.6%
improvement over the average daily feed intake of the
non-coated feed. Table 5, set forth below, shows data
collected from approximately two weeks of age to weaning
which occurs at three weeks of age.
Table S
Non-Coated Feed Coated Feed
Number of
sows/litters
evaluated 59 54
Feed Consumption
(gm/piglet/day) 32.27 44.75
.
Improvement (%) --- 38.60
In a further comparison of the coated feed of
the present invention to the non-coated feed, a three-
day intake of ten three-week old weaned swine was
recorded. The awine were offered a choice of consuming
the coated feed of the present invention or the non-
coated feed. AB clearly indicated in Table 6 set forth
below, the young swine clearly prefer the coated feed of
the present invention.
. ~ : , : , :
.. .. . : . . ~ -
. . . .
-15- ~ 0
Table 6
3-Day Intake (lbs) Ratio
Coated Feed 104.4
1 : 1 . 51
Non-Coated Feed69.1
-
Although the present invention has been
described with reference to preferred embodiments,
workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes
may be made in form and detail without departing from
the spirit and scope of the invention.
,
. ,:
