Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2021215 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 2021215
(54) Titre français: DISPOSITIF ANTIRETOURNEMENT POUR GRUES MONTEES SUR CAMION ET AUTRES MACHINES DU MEME GENRE
(54) Titre anglais: OVERTURNING-PREVENTING DEVICE FOR CRANE TRUCKS AND SIMILAR MACHINES
Statut: Réputée abandonnée et au-delà du délai pour le rétablissement - en attente de la réponse à l’avis de communication rejetée
Données bibliographiques
Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


"OVERTURNING-PREVENTING DEVICE FOR CRANE TRUCKS AND
SIMILAR MACHINES"
Abstract
The overturning-preventing device (1) for crane
trucks (3) and similar machines is associated with the
self-propelled truck (6) of the crane truck (3) in
correspondence of the rear axle (8) of the same car, and
is substantially composed by a pair of plate means (20,
21) hinged to each other (22) in correspondence of one of
their edges. The necessary force in order to generate the
rotation of the plate means (20, 21) relatively to each
other is adjustable by means of suitable adjustment means
(28, 28A) which influence the minimum load transmitted by
the rear axle (8) to the ground. In case the overturning
torque is large, the rear portion of the self-propelled
truck (6) tends to lift, whilst the rear axle (8), thanks
to its own weight, tends to remain stably resting on the
ground, causing the plate means (20, 21) of the
overturning-preventing device (1) to divaricate. Such a divarica-
tion is used as a signal for enabling a circuit commanding the
load-lifting operations by the crane truck (3) to be discontinued.
The overturning-preventing device (1) is also suitable for applica-
tion to single-wheel-rear-axle crane trucks, with said rear axle
being either of heavy or of light type, as well as to lift trucks.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Overturning-preventing device (1) for crane
trucks (3) and similar machines, formed by a self-
propelled truck (6) supporting operating means, with said
truck (6) comprising a rear axle (2), the wheels (7) of
which are linked to each other by means of a wheel axle
(8) constrained to the truck (6) by means of vertical
elements (10), characterized in that it is interposed
between said vertical elements (10) of the rear axle (2)
and the truck (6), and comprises: first plate means (20)
integral with the vertical elements (10), second plate
means (21) integral with the truck (6), a hinge (22)
constraining, relatively to its own axis (26), said first
plate means (20) and said second plate means (21), with
said first plate means and said second plate means
enabling, as the above mentioned rotation occurs, means
(23) for discontinuing the operation of the crane (4).
2. Device according to claim 1, characterized in
that the wheels 7 are driving and steering wheels, and
the rotation axis (26) of the hinge (22) is always
perpendicular to the axis (27) of revolution of the
driving wheels (7).
3. Device according to claim 2, characterized in
that the relative rotation of said first plate means (20)
and said second plate means (21) is stopped at stroke end
by a limit bridge (24).
4. Device according to claim 1, characterized in
that it is associated to means (28A, 28B) for regulating
the minimum load transitted by the axle (8) to the
ground.
5. Device according to claim 4, characterized in

13.
that the means for adjusting the load transmitted by the
axle to the ground are formed by a lever system (28A)
comprising a power (33), a fulcrum (29) and a resistance
(32).
6. Device according to claim 5, characterized in
that said lever system (28A) is of third class, with the
fulcrum (29) being provided on either one of the vertical
elements (10), the power being transmitted to the lever
by a flange (33) linked to the first plate means (20),
the resistance being constituted by adjustable-intensity
elastic means (32).
7. Device according to claim 6, characterized in
that the power is transmitted by the flange (33) to the
lever (31) of the system (28A) in a point, the distance
of which from the fulcrum (29) is shorter than the
distance of said point from the resistance (32).
8. Device according to claim 4, characterized in
that the means (28B) for adjusting the minimum load
transmitted to the ground comprise compression-operating
elastic means (35) directly interposed between the first
plate means (20) and the second plate means (21).
9. Device according to claim 8, characterized in
that said elastic means are constituted by a pre-loaded
spring (35) positioned in the nearby of those edges of
the plate means (20, 21), which are opposite to the edges
of said plate means which are associated with the hinge
(22).
10. Device according to claim 9, characterized in
that the pre-load of said spring (35) can be adjusted by
means of screw means (36).
11. Device according to claim 1, characterized in

14.
that it can be applied to a single-wheel axle (37).
12. Device according to claim 11 and, 5,
characterized in that it is associated with the single-
wheel axle (37) together with means (28A, 28B) for
regulating the minimum load transmitted by the axle to
the ground.
13. Device according to claims 1 and, 5,
characterized in that it is applied to lift trucks.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


1. 2V2121~
"OVERTURNING-PREVENTING DEVICE FOR CRANE TRUCKS AND
SIMILAR MACHINES"
The present invention relates to an overturn;ng-
preventing device for crane trucks and s;miLar machines,
such as lift trucks, graders, and still other machines
formed by a self-propelLed truck supporting operating
means, with said truck compris;ng a rear axle, the wheels
of which are linked to each other by means of an axle
constrained to the truck by means of vertical elements.
The overturning risk is constantly present during
the operating steps of working machines, and, in
particular, of the crane trucks.
It ;s known that an overturning occurs when the
overturning torque, which causes it, exceeds determined
threshold values which are a function of the structure,
and of the we;ght of the crane truck.
Mechanical overturning-preventing devices are known,
which substantially provide for the crane truck-driving
operator to verify, moment by moment, the load condition,
on the basis of a suitable table which reports the
maximum allowed values of lifted load as a function of
the range reached by the crane.
Unfortunately, such devices are affected by the
shortcoming that they are only indicative of the
approaching of the danger condition, in that not always
the value of the lifted load can be exactly evaluated.
In such cases, in order that a reasonable safety can
be achieved, ;t ;s essential that the operator has
matured a meaningful experience both in estimating the
weight of the loads to be lifted, and in the use of the
specific machine he is controlling and that he, on the

- ~ 2- 2021215
basis of said experience is also capable of perceiv;ng
the danger premonitory signaLs, which are typical for
that particular crane truck type.
Other devices, develsped at a later t;me, are those
of electronic type.
Such devices, which are part;cularly complex,
expensive and delicate, are based on the pr;nciple
consisting in monitoring, by means of sensors installed
at one or more suitably selected points on the crane
truck structure, the value of the mechanical stresses
generated by the lifted load, so as to be able to
determine, at any time, the value of the overturning
torque generated by the same load.
The s;gnals detected by the one or more sensors are
processed by an on-board computer, which compares the
value of the overturning torque generated by the lifted
load, to the max;mum allowed torque value for that crane
truck.
In case the value of the overturning torque becomes
too similar to the value of the maximum allowed torque,
the electronic device signals the danger condition, and
stops the operation of the crane truck.
The electron;c dev;ces, bes;des being ~as already
said) complex, delicate, and consequently expensive, are
affected by the serious drawback that they give the
operators a safety feeling, which is not always
justified. In fact, the operators, aware of the fact that
the devices automatically interrupts, with rapidity and
precision, any dangerous operations, do not take very
much care in evaluating the dynamics of the lifting~
The lifting operation is carried out leaving to the
:.

3 20212~5
electronic dev;ce only the task of superv;s;ng ;t, and of
interrupt;ng ;t in the event it becomes dangerous.
~ut in case the device, owing to a large number of
reasons, does not operate, or is affected by operat;ng
anomalies, the accident is practically ;mmed;ate,
unavoidable, and, most t;mes, also with fatal
consequences.
Furthermore, often, both the presently used
mechanical and eLectronic devices do not suitably exploit
the lifting potential of the machine on which ~hey are
installed, due to a series of reasons, which we'll
illustrate very briefly, in that they are already well-
known by those sk;lled in the art.
As regards the mechan;cal devices, such a situation
is clearly purposeLy wished, in order to secure a safety
margin which is large enough for compensating for any
poss;ble ;naccurac;es ;n load s;tuat;on evaluat;on.
In case of electron;c devices, the missed full
exploitation of the power of the machine derives most
2û times by the fact that ow;ng to cost reasons onLy one
type of electron;c devices ;s manufactured, with the
ind;v;dual devices be;ng then adapted, with marginal
modif;cat;ons, to heavy-axle crane trucks, as well as to
l;ght-axle crane trucks.
~ut, as well-known, ;nasmuch as the rear axle of the
crane truck is in the opposite position relat;vely to the
position of the lifted Load, it has a major influence on
the usefuL load the same crane truck can lift; not tak;ng
th;s fact ;nto due account, ;s obviously to the
detriment, according to cases, either of the machine (in
case of a heavy-axLe mach;ne) or of the safety ~in case

4- 2~2~.210~
of a light-axle mach;ne).
The purpose of the present invention is to provide
an overturning-preventing device which is capable of
obviating all those shortcomings which der;ve from the
use of the above mentioned overturning-preventing
dev;ces, without thereby giving up the relevant
advantages.
Such purposes are achieved by the overturning-
prevent;ng device for crane trucks and similar mach;nes,
formed by a self~propelled truck supporting operating
means, with said truck compr;s;ng a rear axle, the wheels
of which are linked to each other by means of an axle
constrained to the truck by means of vertical elements,
characterized in that it is interposed between said
vertical elements of the rear axle and the truck, and
comprises: first plate means integral with the vertical
elements, second piate means integral with the truck, a
hinge constraining, relatively to its own axis, said
first plate means and said second plate means, with said
first plate means and said second plate means enabling,
as the above mentioned rotation occurs, means for
discontinuing the operation of the crane.
The advantages deriving from the device accord;ng to
the present invention are the following:
- safety in operation, insensitivenss to the faiLures,
simpleness and low cost of manufactur;ng and
operat;ons, typical for the mechanical devices;
- precision comparable to the precision of the electronic
devices;
- possibility of suitably exploiting, with full safety,
the maximum lifting potential offered by a whatever
. .

5 20212~
type of operating machine, whether ;t ;s a crane truck,
or another type of machine, whether of the heavy-rear-
axle or of the light-rear-axle type;
- possibility of adjusting the sens;tiv;ty of
;ntervention of the device;
- possib;lity of predetermining, according to
requ;rements, and by means of the same adjustment of
the sensitivity of intervention, the minimum load to be
transmitted ~y the axle to the ground before the device
stops the operations of the crane;
- possib;lity of applying the device to the single-wheel
axles also, whether of heavy or of light type~
The invent;on ;s illustrated for merely
illustrative, non-limitative purposes, ;n the f;gures of
the hereto attached drawing tables, where;n:
Figure 1 shows a schematic side v;ew of a crane
truck equ;pped with a device according to the invention;
Figure 2 shows a schematic rear view of the rear
axle of a heavy-rear-axle crane truck, with said rear
axle being equipped with an overturning-preventing device
according to the present invention;
Figure 3 shows a schematic view of the rear axle of
Figure 2, wherein the overturn;ng-preventing device is in
the cond;t;on of interruption of the lifting operation;
Figure 4 shows a schematic rear view of the rear
axle of a light-rear-axle crane truck, with said rear
axle being equipped with an overturning-preventing device
according to the invention;
Figure 5 shows a schematic view of the rear axle of
Figure 4, wherein the overturning-preventing device is in
the condition of interruption of the lif~ing operation;

6. 202121~
F;gure 6 shows a schematic rear view of the rear
axle of a heavy-rear-axle crane truck with single-wheel
rear axle, with said rear axle being equipped with an
overturning-preventing device according to the ;nvent;on;
F;gure 7 shows a schemat;c v;ew of the rear axle of
Figure 6, where;n the overturning~preventing device is in
the condit;on of ;nterruption of the lift;ng operat;on;
Figure 8 shows a schematic side view of the rear
axle of Figures 6 and 7.
Figure 9 shows a schematic rear view of the rear
axle of a light-rear-axle crane truck with single-wheel
rear axle, w;th said rear axle being equipped with an
overturning-preventing device accord;ng to the invent;on;
F;gure 10 shows a schematic v;ew of the rear axle of
Figure 9, wherein the overturning-preventing device is in
the cond;tion of interruption of the lifting operation;
Figure 11 shows a schematic side view of the rear
axle of Figures 9 and 10.
Referring to the above c;ted figures, and in
particular to Figures 1 through 5, the overturning-
preventing device, generally indicated by the reference
numeral 1, is integral part of a steering, driving rear
axle 2 of a crane truck 3. The crane truck 3 comprises a
crane 4, with a telescopic arm 5, const;tuting operating
means borne by a self-propelled truck 6.
The rear axle 2 comprises a wheel axle 8 with
relevant wheels 7, a differential 9, a pa;r of vertical
elements 10, the same overturning-preventing dev;ce 1, a
hinge 11, with a relevant rotation-limiting device 14, a
steering un;t 12, and a bearing-carrier sleeve 13
directly linked to the self-propelled truck 6.

7 ~21~1~
In the depicted case the vertical elements 10 are
rig;d, but they could be constituted as ~ell by
traditional leaf springs or sp;ral springs associated
with shock absorbers in case the h;nge 11 ;s replaced by
5a r;gid l;nk.
The rotation-limiting device 14, which limits the
rotation of the hinge 11, compr;ses a pa;r of horizontal
arms 15 bear;ng adjust;ng screw means 16.
The steering un;t 12 ;s composed by at least one
10hydraul;c cylinder 18 interposed between the self-
propelled truck 6 and the rear axle 2, and acting on sa;d
rear axle through at least one lever element 17 ;ntegral
w;th a shaft 19 protrud;ng from the sleeve 13, and the
axis of wh;ch co;nc;des with the steering ax;s 25. The
15shaft 19 is linked through the h;nge 11 to the
overturning-prevent;ng dev;ce 1.
The overturning-preventing device 1 compr;ses f;rst
plate means 20 and second plate means 21, linked along
one of the;r edges by means of a h;nge 22, the rotat;on
20ax;s 26 of wh;ch is perpend;cular to the revolution ax;s
27 of the wheels 7.
The edges of the plates oppos;te to the edges
engaged by the h;nge Z2 are connected w;th means for
interrupt;ng the operat;on of the crane 4, wh;ch are
25const;tuted by a sw;tch 23 and a relevant electr;cal
c;rcuit not shown in the figures, w;th these latter means
be;ng enabled by the rotat;on of the f;rst plate means 20
and of the second plate means 21 relatively to the h;nge
22.
30The rotat;on of the plate means 2û and 21 around the
h;nge 22 ;s l;m;ted by a br;dge element 24 wh;ch, in case
. . .- - . . -

8 2~212~
of need, is capable of supporting the weight of the wheel
axle 8, of the wheels 7, of the vert;cal elements 10,
and, obviously~ of the second plate means 21.
The overturning-preventing device 1 operates
associated w;th means 28A, 28~ for adjusting the minimum
load transmitted by the axle to the ground.
The adjustment means 28A and 28~ are of two types,
according to whether the axle is of light type, or of
heavy type. By "light axle", an axle type ;s meant, the
weight of which, relatively to the structure of the crane
truck, does not contribu~e to a considerable extent to
generate the couple which opposes the overturning couple.
The light-axle crane trucks are generally the long-wheel-
base crane trucks, which therefore counteract the
overturning couple by mainly exploiting the geometric
characteristics of their self-propelled truck, rather
than exploiting the axle mass characteristics.
On the contrary, by "heavy axle" a type of axle is
meant, the weight of which, relatively to the structure
of the crane truck, contributes to a major extent to
generate the torque opposing the overturning torque.
The heavy-axle crane trucks are generally
characterized by their short wheel base, wh;ch gives them
a h;gh manageability, but lim;ts the;r l;ft;ng
potent;aL;t;es.
The rotation-limiting device 28A ~F;gures 2 and 3)
;s part;cularly suitable for applicat;on to heavy axles,
where;n the weight of the axle should be exploited as
extensively as possible, of course within the safety
limits, in order to generate the torque opposing the
overturning torque, whilst the rotation-limiting device
. - . -~ - .,

9. 2~2~2~
28B (F;gures 4 and 5) is, on the contrary, better suited
for be;ng applied to light axles, on the we1ght of wh;ch
one should not rely in order to ;ncrease the torque
oppos;ng the overturning torque.
The device 28A comprises a fulcrum 29, integral with
either one of the vert;cal elements 10, poss;bly through
a connecting rod 30, a lever 31, an adjustable-pre-load
spr;ng 32 and a flange 33 interposed between the lever 31
and the f;rst plate elements 20.
The configuration taken by the device Z8A is the
configuration of a third class lever, wherein the power
derives from the flange 33, the res;stance is constituted
by the adjustable-pre-load spring 32, and the fulcrum is
in 29.
On the contrary, the device 28B comprises a housing
34, positioned ;n correspondence of those edges of the
plate means 20, 21 which are opposite to the edges
assoc;ated with the hinge 22, ;ntegral w;th the first
plate means 20, ;nside which a spr;ng 35 ;s housed, which
applies a pressure on the second p!ate means 21. The
spr;ng 35 operates by compression, and is pre-loaded by
means of screw means 36.
Ouring the lifting operations carried out by the crane 4, the
overturing torque generates on the rear axle 2 a force F, verti-
cally directed from bottom to the top, which causes the first plate
means 20 to separate from the second plate means 21, due to the
effect of the rotation of the same plate means around the
ax;s 26 of the hinge 22. Such a separat;on enables the
means wh;ch command the ;nterrupt;on sf the operat;on of
the crane 4, const;tuted by the switch 23 and the
relevant c;rcu;t.

lo. ~21~1~
In case the force F acts on a rear axle 2 equipped
w;th a wheel axle 8 of heavy type (Figures 2, 3), the
load-adjustment means 28A acts, by using the weight of
the wheel axle 8, ;n the sense of preventing the plate
S means 20 and 21 from separating from each other, for
values of the force F, which are smaller than a certain
threshold limit, which is a function of the pre-load
g;ven to the spr;ng 32, which anyway can never be such as
to allow the axle 8 to rise relativeLy to the ground,
1û with the practical exclusion of the device 1.
When the intensity of the force F exceeds the
threshold l;m;t - which is a function of the pre-Load
given to the spring 32 -, the elasticity of the same
spring makes it possible the lever 31 to rotate
relatively to the fulcrum 29, and the pLate means 20 and
21 to consequently rotate relatively to the axis 26 of
the hinge 22, with the consequent tripping of the switch
23.
In case the force F acts, on the contrary, on a rear
axle 2 equipped with a wheel axle 8 of Light type, the
means28B for the adjustment of the load acts in the sense
of favouring the plate means 20 and 21 to separate from
each other, with such a separat;on occurr;ng as a
function of the pre-load of the spring 35 and of the same
force F; however, the pre-load given to the spring 35 can
never be such as to cause the plate means 20, 21 to
spontaneously separate from each other.
It is important to observe that, ;n order that the
overturn;ng-preventing device 1 may operate correctly, it
;s necessary that the rotat;on axis 26 of the h;nge 22 ;s
always perpendicular to the revolution ax;s 27 of the
.. . . , ~ . ~ .

2121~
wheels 7, ;n case to such wheels a dr;v;ng torque ;s
appl;ed.
Should ;t be not so, the react;on torque, deriving
from the driv;ng torque transmitted to the ground by the
same wheels, would tend to disturb the correct operation
of the overturning-prevent;ng device, by turning into an
additional one of those torques which act on the same
device, by increas;ng or decreasing the level of
intervention of said dev;ce, according to the direction
of revolution of the same driv;ng torque.
The overturn;ng-preventing device 1 can be also used
on s;ngle-wheel-axle crane trucks, whether of l;ght, or
of heavy type, as shown in Figures 6 through 11.
For the sake of simpl;c;ty, ;n sa;d F;gures 6
through 11, the elements equal to such elements as
;llustrated ;n the preceding Figures 1 through 5 are
marked by the same reference numerals.
The single-wheel axle 37, whether of l;ght or of
heavy type, ;s conventionally associated with a drive
unit comprising a motor means 38 and a transmission 39
act;ng on the s;mgle rear wheel 7. The overturning-
preventing dev;ce (1~ can be f;nally also appl;ed to l;ft
trucks, ;n th;s case too the r;sk being avo;ded that sa;d
l;ft trucks may overturn ow;ng to wrong lifting
operations.

Dessin représentatif
Une figure unique qui représente un dessin illustrant l'invention.
États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Le délai pour l'annulation est expiré 1994-01-18
Demande non rétablie avant l'échéance 1994-01-18
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 1993-07-16
Inactive : Demande ad hoc documentée 1993-07-16
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1992-01-17
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 1991-03-15
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 1991-03-15

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
1993-07-16
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
VALLA S.P.A.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
ROBERTO MASO
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Page couverture 1992-01-17 1 11
Revendications 1992-01-17 3 64
Abrégé 1992-01-17 1 24
Dessins 1992-01-17 4 87
Description 1992-01-17 11 297
Dessin représentatif 1999-06-29 1 10
Taxes 1992-06-18 1 30