Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2096426 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Brevet: (11) CA 2096426
(54) Titre français: PROCEDE ET COMPOSITION A BASE DE TERPENE ET D'ESTER MONOBASIQUE POUR ENLEVER DES CONTAMINANTS
(54) Titre anglais: PROCESS AND COMPOSITION FOR CLEANING CONTAMINANTS WITH TERPENE AND MONOBASIC ESTER
Statut: Durée expirée - au-delà du délai suivant l'octroi
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • C11D 07/50 (2006.01)
  • B08B 03/08 (2006.01)
  • B08B 03/10 (2006.01)
  • C11D 03/18 (2006.01)
  • C11D 03/20 (2006.01)
  • C11D 03/43 (2006.01)
  • C11D 07/24 (2006.01)
  • C11D 07/26 (2006.01)
  • C11D 11/00 (2006.01)
  • C23G 05/024 (2006.01)
  • C23G 05/032 (2006.01)
  • H05K 03/26 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • BOLDEN, PAUL L. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
  • HAYES, MICHAEL E. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
  • BRADDY, JOHN E. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(73) Titulaires :
  • PETROFERM INC.
(71) Demandeurs :
  • PETROFERM INC. (Etats-Unis d'Amérique)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré: 2002-01-29
(86) Date de dépôt PCT: 1991-11-29
(87) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 1992-06-11
Requête d'examen: 1998-09-08
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Oui
(86) Numéro de la demande PCT: PCT/US1991/008937
(87) Numéro de publication internationale PCT: US1991008937
(85) Entrée nationale: 1993-05-17

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
620,500 (Etats-Unis d'Amérique) 1990-11-29

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais


An industrial cleaning process in which a contaminant comprising soldering
flux and/or adhesive tape residue is removed
from a substrate contaminated therewith, for example, a printed circuit board
contaminated with rosin flux, comprising: (A) con-
tacting the substrate with a terpene-based cleaning composition which is
substantially free of water-soluble organic material, for
example, a surfactant, for a period of time sufficient to solubilize the
contaminant; (B) removing the composition and solubilized
contaminant from the substrate by contact with water having a temperature of
about 70 ÀF to about 140 ÀF (but preferably lower)
for a period of time of no longer than about 10 minutes to provide a substrate
having a contamination rating of no greater than
about 14 micrograms NaCl equivalent/square inch (MIL-P-28809A), and to thereby
form a mixture comprising the composition,
contaminant and water; and (C) separating the water from said mixture, the
separated water being substantially free of water-sol-
uble organic material and having a chemical oxygen demand of no greater than
about 1,000 ppm, and also a cleaning process uti-
lizing a cleaning composition comprising a major amount of a monobasic ester
to clean surfaces that are contaminated with an
organic residue.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


31
CLAIMS:
1. A method for removing an organic residue of soldering
flux from a metallic or plastic surface contaminated therewith
comprising:
(a) contacting the surface with a cleaning
composition consisting essentially of a substantially water-
insoluble monobasic acid ester present in an amount in excess
of 50 weight percent of the composition and having the formula:
RCOOR1
wherein R is an alkyl group having 8 to 16 carbon
atoms and R1 is an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms;
(b) maintaining the cleaning composition in contact
with the surface for a period of time at least sufficient to
solubilize the residue; and
(c) removing the cleaning composition and solubilized
residue from the surface.
2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said
composition is used to clean a plurality of parts having their
surfaces contaminated with said residue and wherein said
residue is dissolved by said composition and wherein said
dissolved residue builds up in concentration in said
composition as the composition is used to clean additional
parts and continuing to use said composition to clean
additional parts when the concentration of the dissolved
residue is 20 to 40 wt. %.
3. A method according to Claim 2 including continuing to
use said composition to clean additional parts when the
concentration of the dissolved residue is 20 to 30 wt. %.
4. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the monobasic
ester is methyl laurate, isopropyl laurate, methyl caprate, or
isopropyl myristate.
5. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said cleaning
composition further comprises another cleaning agent selected

32
from the group consisting of terpenes, esters, dibasic esters,
petroleum hydrocarbons, ketones, ethers and alcohols.
6. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said cleaning
composition consists essentially of 55 to 90 weight percent of
the monobasic ester and 10 to 45 weight percent of the other
cleaning agent.
7. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said cleaning
composition further comprises a surfactant.
8. A method according to Claim 7, wherein said
surfactant is present in said cleaning composition in an amount
of 2 to 20 weight percent of the composition.
9. A method according to Claim 8, wherein said
surfactant is present in said cleaning composition in an amount
of 8 to 12 wt. % of the composition.
10. A method according to Claim 7, wherein the ester is
methyl laurate, isopropyl laurate, methyl caprate or isopropyl
myristate and said surfactant is an ethoxylated alkyl phenol or
a detergent alcohol.
11. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said surface
is the surface of a printed circuitboard.
12. A method according to Claim 11 wherein the cleaned
surface has a contamination rating of no greater than 14
micrograms NaCl equivalent/square inch (MIL-P-28809A).

33
13. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said monobasic
ester has a flashpoint of greater than 100ÀF.
14. A method according to Claim 13, wherein said
monobasic ester has a flashpoint of greater than 200ÀF.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


dV0 92/09378 ~~ ~~ ~.~~.-~a ~b PCTI US91 /U8937
A PROCESS AND COMPOSITION FOR CLEANING CONTAMINANTS 4~ITH
TERPENE'AND MONOBASIC ESTER
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the removal of a residue from a
surface that is contaminated therewith, for example, to the
cleaning of deposits of soldering flux and/or other residues
from a substrate which is contaminated therewith. More
specifically, this invention relates to the use of a cleaning
composition containing an ester. This invention relates also
to the use of terpenes,.preferably in admixture with an ester,
in an improved cleaning process for removing contaminants such
as soldering flux and/or adhesive tape residue from a
substrate.
The invention will be described initially in connection
with its applicability to the cleaning of printed circuit
boards. Howevex, the invention has wider applicability,. as
described hereinbelow.
In the fabrication of printed circuit boards, it is known
to use soldering fluxes in order to ensure the firm, uniform
bonding thereto of solder which functions to adhere to the
boards components thereof. Such flux must be removed from the
finished board. If not removed, deposits~ of the flux, in even
trace or minute amounts, can cause the circuitry of the board
to fail. An example of a flux that is widely used in the

WO 92/09378 2
PCT/U591 /08937
fabrication of printed circuit boards is rosin flux, a materi~.,
which is~water insoluble.
Various types of materials have been proposed for cleaning
deposits of rosin flux from the surface of a printed circuit
board. Traditionally; chlorofluorocarbons (Cr~Cs) and other
hal,ogenated solvents, including chlo:cinacsa hydrocarbon
solvents, were used widely. I-~owever, these materials are not
presently favored because of environmental nrobl4ms that are
associated therewith. Examples of other cleaning materials for
removing deposits of rosin flu: from substrates cowt~mira~trc:
therewith include: (a) alkaline cleaning compounds such as
alkanol amines; (b) a mixture or N-meth~.O.-?-~~rr.-~1 ic! ::e -~:;r_; _-;
alkanol amine (U. S. Patent No. 4,270,130); (c) te-rpeno
compounds; and (d) dibasic acid esv.,ers (U,S, '~~~_ent ';(c.
4,934,391).
Although there are advantages and disadvantages associated
with the use of each of the aforementioned type cleaning
materials, the use of terpene compounds in cleaning printed
circuit boards of flux deposits has become more and more
popular because they possess a combination of unusually
desirable ,properties. The present invention is directed to an
improved process for cleaning printed circuit boards and other
substrates of deposits of soldering flux and/or other residues
with a terpene-based cleaning composition which optionally, but
preferably, includes an ester,
The present invention is directed also to the use of a
non-toxic, environmentally safe cleaning composition comprising
an ester and optionally other materials, for example, a
terpene.

~~:~a~a~~~i
Wi './09378 3 PGT/US91/08937
Reported Developments
In the cleaning operation, deposits of soldering flux are
dissolved by the water-insoluble, liquid cleaner, for example,
terpene compounds as they are contacted therewith. A review of
the related art reveals that special consideration is given to
removing from the terpene-treated substrate the dissolved
contaminants that adhere thereto for those applications which
require that the substrate be highly cleaned. Thus, the
effective removal of the dissolved soldering flux and the
ter~ene solvent from the substrate in which the flux is
dissolved is an important aspect of the overall cleaning
process.
The basic patent on -the use of terpenes to clean printed
circuit boards of soldering flux is U.S. Patent No. 4,640,719,
assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. With
respect to the removal from the terpene-treated substrate of
dissolved flux and other contaminants, this patent teaches as
follows:
"Because they [terpene compounds) are almost
completely insoluble in water, however, the terpenes
cannot be directly flushed away by water.
Alternatively arid preferably, the terpene compounds
are combined with one or more terpene emulsifying
surfactants. The addition of such surfactants
facilitates removal of the terpenes from printed
wiring boards by rinsing with water, whereby the
terpenes are formed 'into oil-in-water emulsions."
(Column 3, lines 54-62)
The '719 patent discloses further that the terpene-based
composition. can include up to 40 wt.~ of the emulsifying
surfactant, with a preferred composition containing 10 wt.~ of
surfactant. Such surfactants are typically water-soluble
organic materials.
European patent application bearing publication number 0
354 027 A2 discloses cleaning compositions comprising a major
amount of selected cyclic terpenes, including para

~~'l)~nd~)
WO 92/09378 4 PCT/US91/08937
menthadienes, and a minor amount of terpene alcohol for use in
cleaning a variety of substrates, including circuit boards.
This patent discloses that the,compositions can include
surfactants and specifically states the following:
"It has been found helpful -to add surfactants to
solvent compositions which are to be used in
combination with a water rinse. It has been found
that the addition of the surfac'tan't to the cyclic
terpene mixture enhances the water rinsability of 'the
solvent composition. Further, it has been fo~,znd ~t:~a~t
in dealing with certwin types of soil, the addition
of a surfactant to the mixture of cyclic terpenes
enhances the ability of the cyclic ter_pena _~i;cts:_ a to
remove the soil from the substrate."
(Column 4, line 57 to Column 5, line 1)
This publication discloses further that the .s~~.-~~c~~-~.ts c
used in concentrations of from 0.1 to 10 -at.~,
Another patent which relates to the ramoval or soldering
flux from substrates such as printed circuit boards is iJ.S.
Patent loo. 4,867,800. The cleaning composition which is the
subject of this patent comprises a terpene compound and a
dibasic ester which has at least 2 wt.~ solubility in water at
25°C. This patent discloses that such compositions can be used
to achieve improved cleaning relative to the use of terpene-
based compositions that include emulsifying surfactants, which
the patentee refers to as an unnecessary, but optional
ingredient of his composition. The patent discloses also that
the terpene-treated surface is preferably rinsed with water,,
such as deionized water. In an exemplary embodiment disclosed
in the patent, the rinse water which was used in the cleaning
process had a temperature of about 150°F.
A common characteristic of each of the processes described
in the aforementioned publications is the required or preferred
use of water-soluble organic materials in combination with the
terpene constituent of the cleaning composition. While
considered essential to achieve high grade cleaning, the
presence.of such water-soluble organic materials leads to

~~G.'~~a~~.~i~ , ,
WO 92/09378 . 5 PCT/US91/08937
problems which are associated with other aspects of the overall
cleaning process.
One significant problem crops up in connection with
disposal of the rinse water that is generated during the
cleaning process. The amount of such rinse water can be
substantial, with some industrial applications using, far
example, two to five gallons of rinse water per minute of
operating time. For various industrial applications, it is
considered ideal to simply discharge the rinse water into the
local sewage system. However, as a result of the'use in the
craning composition of saater-soluble materials, such discharge
typically runs afoul of environmental standards which require
that the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the discharged water
be no greater than some defined value. For example, some
communities specify that the COD should be no greater than
about 1,000 ppm for industrial water that is discharged into
the local sewage system. There are other communities with even
higher standards, for example, CODs of no greater than about
300 ppm. However, in using cleaning compositions of the type
described above, the presence of the water-soluble materials
can,result 'in the rinse water having as much as 10,000 ppm or
more of COD. This indeed presents, a problem for the
fabricators of circuit boards inasmuch as it requires the
fabricators to adopt~additional steps to treat the water in a
manner such that environmental standards are met. This, of
course, increases the cost of the overall manufacturing
process. ~ ,
There are reports (unconfirmed) of the use of surfactant-
free, terpene-based compositions in applications for removing
solder fluxes from various types of substrates..' However, it
appears that, in such applications, the terpene-treated
substrate is rinsed with surfactant-containing water or
requires that the substrate be rinsed with either boiling water
or near boiling water. This, of course, is undesirable because

VVO 92/09378 ~~'l;d~~'~~~i ~ 6 PCT/T~S91/08937 _. ..
of the increased costs associated with the provision of energy
that is needed to heat the significant amounts of water that
are required for the rinsing operation.
zn view of exemplary shortcomings of the present state of
the art related to the use of terpene-based compositions to
clean soldering flux from the surfaces of printed circuit
boards, as described above, the present invention is directed
to an improved, more efficient and economical process tahich
avoids or significantly alleviates such shortcomings.
As mentioned briefly above, CFCs and other halogenac~ad
solvents which have been used widely as cleaning agents =o~
many years are no longer materials of choice because of their
detrimental erfects on the earth's stratospheric oaone .layer.
Species of these materials are perceived also to be
carcinogenic. Due to their environmental and health threats,
they are being phased out of production even though they have a
variety of properties which otherwise make them ideal cleaning.
agents. They are moderately good oil and grease solvents, they
have no flash points, they-evaporate quickly due to their high
vapor pressures, and some have low toxicity.
Alkaline cleaning compounds known as the alkanol amines,
usually in the form of monoethanolamine, have been used For
rosin flux removal as an alternative to the toxic halogenated
hydrocarbon solvents. These compounds chemically react with
rosin flux to form a rosin soap through the process of
saponification. Other organic substances such as surfactants
or alcohol derivatives may be added to these alkaline cleaning
compounds to facilitate the removal of such rosin soap. The
use of N-methyl-2-pryrrolidone in admixture with a water-
miscible alkanolamine is disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
4,276,186. Unfortunately, these compounds, like the water
soluble soldering fluxes, have a tendency to cause corrosion of
the surfaces and interfaces of printed wiring boards if they

~~:~ia~~.~
WO 92/0378 7 ' PCT/US91/08937
are not completely and rapidly removed during the fabrication
process.
Another material which has been identified as an
alternative to the use of halogenated solvents is the class of
compounds known as dibasic esters. The use of these materials
is desirable because they have relatively high flash points and
are not skin irritants. However, they have the disadvantage of
being modarat2ly water soluble. Water solubility is
undesirable because dissolved materials are difficult to
separate from the water when used in a process involving water
rinse (as _s usually the case). Thus, it is difficult to
dispose of -thv water .rinse generated in the cleaning process.
Closad-loop systems are relatively difficult and/or expensive
to install when the cleaning compound is substantially water
soluble. '
Even terpenes, which have been recognized as
environmentally acceptable alternatives to halogenated solvents
and which offer good performance in a wide range of cleaning
applications, have some disadvantages. They have an
objectionable odor, low.flash point, and a'tendency t'o irritate
skin, lungs and nasal passages.
Still another class of compounds in use is mineral spirits
or other petroleum distillates. These materials often have low
flash points, with high evaporative loses, and produce
dermatitis, headaches and nausea in use. Petroleum-distillates
also require frequent change-outs in use because their cleaning
power is greatly diminished with minor loadings of oil and
machine residues.
The present invention encompasses also the provision of a
cleaning process involving tie use of a cleaning agent which
has a combination of properties such that the agent is

CA 02096426 2000-12-O1
60382-1346
8
particularly suitable for safe and efficient use in a wide
variety of cleaning processes.
Summary of The Invention
In accordance with the present invention, it has been
found that a composition comprising a major amount of a
monobasic ester can be used effectively in a variety of
different types of cleaning applications which heretofore
involved the use of halocarbons, alkaline detergents, or other
cleaning agents as described above, the use of each of the
l0 aforementioned being accompanied by serious disadvantages. The
monobasic esters, which can be used to clean a variety of
surfaces, for example, metals, plastics, and electronic
assemblies, offer the advantage of water insolubility, low
toxicity, low skin irritation, high flash point and low odor.
Accordingly, there is provided, in accordance with
the present invention, a method for removing an organic residue
of soldering flux from a metallic or plastic surface
contaminated therewith comprising:(a) contacting the surface
with a cleaning composition consisting essentially of a
substantially water-insoluble monobasic acid ester presenting
an amount in excess of 50 weight percent of the composition and
having the formula:
RCOOR1
wherein R is an alkyl group having 8 to 16 carbon atoms and R1
is an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms; (B) maintaining
the cleaning composition in contact with the surface for a
period of time at least sufficient to solubilize the residue;
and (C) removing the cleaning composition and solubilized
residue from the surface.
Examples of monobasic esters that can be used in the
cleaning operation are methyl, ethyl, and isopropyl esters of
medium chain (about CB to about C18) monobasic acids.

'~'~.~:a~;~~,.~i
oVfO 92/09378 9 ~ PCf/US91/08937
The conditions under which the monobasic ester composition
are used can be typical of conditions used for other organic
cleaning solvents. They can be used, for example, at a.
temperature within the.range of room temperature to about 150°F
or higher and under conditions which involve a contact time of
about 1 to about 10 minutes. Conventional means can be used to
apply 'the monobasic ester composition to the soiled substrates,
for example, spray, agitated immersion, and soaking.
Use of the monobasic ester composition of the present
invention avoids disadvantages associated with the use of prior
. art compositions, as noted above. Use of a composition within
the scope of tha ~;xesemt invention offers the advantages of:
(a) good oil solvancy; (b) good solvency for solder fluxes; (c)
~cXC2ilerit .r,-~bili~i.y 'v0 rrmOVe lapping compounds, chips, grinding
residues and other solid materials from metal surfaces after
machining operations; (d) the ability to remove the solids even
though highly loaded with cutting oils; (e).extremely low
toxicity and skin irritance; (f) low odor or pleasing
fragrances; (g) high flash points; and (h) water insolubility.
Furthermore, the monobasic ester composition does not have a
harmful effect on the earth's stratospheric ozone layer and
they generally have a relatively low vapor pressure, and are,
therefore, less volatile, providing the advantage of lower
volatile organic compound (VOC) pollutant emissions than prior
art compositions.
In addition, there is provided in accordance with the
present invention an industrial cleaning process in which a
contaminant comprising soldering flux and/or adhesive tape
residue is removed from a substrate contaminated therewith
comprising:

WO 92/09378 ~ ~ ~~ rj l~ ~ ~i ~ 10 PCT/US91 /08937
(A) contacting the substrate with a terpene-based
cleaning composition which is substantially free of water-
soluble organic material for a period of time sufficient to
solubilize the contaminant;
(B) removing the composition and solubilized
contaminant.from the substrate by contact with water having a
temperature of about 70°F to about 140°F for a period of time
. of no longer than about 10 minutes to provide a substrate
having a contamination rating of no greater than about 14
micrograms NaC.l equivalent/square inch (MIL-P-28809A), and to
thereby form a mixture comprising the composition, contaminant
and taater; and
(C) separating the water from said mixture, 'the
separated water being substantially free of water-soluble
organic material and having a chemical oxygen demand of no
greater than about 1,000 ppm.
With respect to Step (A) above, the following procedure is
used to determine the content of water-soluble organic material
in a terpene-based composition: Equal volumes of water and the
~0 terpene-based composition are combined and allowed to separate
into two distinct phases or layers at about 70°F. To the
extent that the terpene-based composition contains water-
soluble organic material, it will migrate to the water layer.
The COD of the water layer is then determined according to
standard technique. When the water layer has a COD of no
greater than about 1,000 ppm, the terpene-based composition is
considered to be "substantially free of water-soluble organic
material"
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, it has
been found, contrary to the teachings of the prior art, that it
is possible to produce a highly clean surface by the use of a
terpen~-based cleaning composition which is free of or
essentially free of emulsifying surfactants and/or other water
soluble organic materials.

~,.~~)A~t~. lD
WO 92/09378 11 PCT/US91/08937
And such highly cleaned surfaces can be produced under
practical operating conditions, for example, at ambient
temperature or relatively low elevated temperature and within
times. and water contact conditions that are presently used in
industrial applications. And of great advantage is the fact
that the water collected from the cleaning process has a.
sufficiently low COD to enable it to be lawfully discharged to
a sewage system without purification or other treatment.
Alternatively, the collected water can be recycled for use in
10. the cleaning process, as~described hereinbelow.
With .respect to the high degree of cleaning that can be
achieved :ov use o~ -the :oresent invention, the present cleaning
process, including either the monobasic ester-based composition
or the tsrr~r,e-b,asad comrosition, can be used to produce levels
or residual comcaraination that are equal to or far below the
military requirement of 14 micrograms DIaCl equivalent/inz (MIL-
P-28809A) (seethe aforementioned '719 patent, column 7, lines
l8 to 32 for additional information concerning the evaluation '
of the degree of cleanliness of substrates based on the
involved military test). A specific example of the degree of
cleanliness that can be achieved by practice of the~present
invention is set forth in the Example section hereinbelow.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The Monobasic Ester Development
The cleaning composition of the present invention
comprises ~a major amount of a monobasic ester compound, that
is, the ester compound comprises in excess of 50 wt.~ of the
composition, based on the total weight of the composition. The
ester compound, which.is a liquid at room temperature, can be
represented by the following formula:
R-COOR,

~~p~i.)~~~JI ,
WO 92/U9378 12 PCT/US91/U8937
wherein R and Rlare hydrocarbon groups, which may be the same'1
or different, in which the sum of the carbon atoms in R and R1
is at least about 8. The hydrocarbon groups can be aliphatic
or. aromatic, substituted or unsubstituted. Examples of
aromatic groups include aryl groups, for example, phenyl and
benzyl. In preferred form, each of R and R1 is an alkyl group
with the total number of carbon atoms in R and R1 being no
greater than about 20. The alkyl groups can be straight or
branched chain and unsubstituted or substituted, for example,
with groups such as hydroxyl and ether groups. The cleaning
composition can comprise two or more of the monobasic esters.
Particularly preferred monobasic esters for use in the
practice of the present invention are those in which the -total
number of carbon atoms in R and R1 is ~tbou-t 9 to about 17, with
R being an al:~:~rl group having 1 to about 4 carbon atoms and Rl
being an alkyl group having about 8 to about 16 carbon atoms.
Particularly preferred monobasic esters are methyl laurate and
isopropyl laurate, with methyl caprate and isopropyl myristate'
being even more preferred. The preferred esters are excellent
solvents for a variety of different kinds of organic residues
that typically contaminate the surfaces of a variety of types
of materials.
Examples of-commercially available monobasic esters which
can be used in the practice of tkie present invention include:
methyl caprylate, methyl caprate, methyl laurate, methyl
palmitate, isopropyl myristate, isopropyl laurate and isopropyl
stearate.
It will be appreciated that a particular carboxylic
monobasic ester can be synthesized readily by available
methods. For example, monobasic esters can be prepared by
reacting an alkyl alcohol and a fatty acid, for example, a C1
to about a CB alkanol and about a C3 to wabout a C1~ fatty acid.

~'~.~ iW~:~~~
WO 9Z/09378 13 PCT/US91/08937
The insolubility of the ester is determined by the
following procedure which is conducted at about 70°F. Equal
volumes of water and the ester are combined and allowed to
separate into two distinct phases or layers. The chemical
oxygen demand (COD) of the water layer is then determined
according to standard technique. If the water layer has a COD
of no greater than about 5,000 ppm, the ester is considered to
be "substantially insoluble in water". Preferably the
solubility characteristics.of the ester are such that the water
layer has a COD of no greater 'than about 1,000 ppm - such
esters being referred to as "raat~r-insoluble".
Other preverred nrooertiss oc 'che ester are that it hare a
flash-point of greater than about 140°F, preferably greater
than about ?CO°F, and lo,a odor. In addition, the ester should
be non-irritating to Lhe s~ciri~and have good chemical stability.
The cleaning composition of the present invention can
comprise 100 wt.~ of the monobasic ester. However, there are'
applications in which it will. be advantageous to include other
materials in the composition, but in an amount less than 50
wt.~. For example, some types of residues can be removed more
readily by using, other cleaning agents, including, for example,
organic or inorganic solvents, in admixture with the monobasic
ester. In preferred form, such other cleaning agents should be
miscible with the monobasic ester. Examples of other cleahing
agents that can be used include terpenes, fox example, para-
menthadienes, dibaic esters, petroleum hydrocarbons, ketones,
ethers, and alcohols. Preferred cleaning agents for use in
combination with the monobasic ester are terpenes, ethers, and
alcohols.
For applications in which it is desirable to use another
' cleaning agent in combination with the monobasic ester, the
amount thereof can be selected based on the results desired.
For most applications, it is believed that the composition will

WO 92/09378 14
p~/U591 /08937
comprise about 55 to 90 wt.~ of the monobasic ester and about
to about 45 wt.~ of the other cleaning agent.
The organic-~based cleaning composition of the of the
present invention can include also a surfactant for promoting
5 the removal of residual cleaning composition and contaminate
from the substrate being cleaned. In some applications, the
presence of surfactant aids also in the cleaning of contaminate
from the substrate.
The surzactant can be a nonionic, anionic, cationic or
10 amphoteric surfactant. It is preferred to use a nonionic
surfactant, for axample, condensation products of alkylene
oxides, for example, ethylene oxide, with any of a variety of
hydrophobic ~~ Oivti2s, as are well known in 'the art . E::amples
oE~these prcducts are ethoxylated aliphatic alcohols,
ethoxylated alkylphenols, ethoYylated amines, amides, and the
like. Sulfated, sulfonated; phosphated and carboxylated
hydrophobes, such as alcohols, can also be used , as can the
salts of each. Particularly preferred surfactants are
ethoxylated aliphatic alcohols and their derivatives.
Examples of surfacatants that can be used are ethoxylated
nonylphenols having about 4 to about 10 ethylene oxide groups
and detergent alcohols, for example, those comprising about C9
to about C15 linear alcohols and about 3 to about 10 ethylene
oxide groups.
The proportion of surfactant comprising the composition
will vary, depending on the particular ester or combination of
esters used and the nature of the particular cleaning
application. Generally the surfactant will comprise about 2 to
about 20 wtl; of the composition. In a highly preferred
embodiment, the composition comprises a mixture of about 8 to
about l2 wt.% of surfactant arid about 88 to about 92 wt.l; of
monobasic ester.

~~~~~v~"~. ~,f
o~. i'S
i~VO 92/09378 15 ' , PC'f/US91 /08937
The ester cleaning composition of this invention can be
used in a wide variety of applications because the ester
cleaning agent is capable of dissolving a wide variety of
organic materials 'that typically contaminate substrates and it
is compatible (not harmful) with many 'types of materials that
comprise substrates that recuira cleaning. Thus, the ester-
based composition can be used in removing cutting oils,
greases, greasy dirt, solder fluxes, waxes, tape residues,
coolants, lubricants, lapping compounds, cuttings turnings,
chips and other machining residues prom machined parts and for
hard surface cleaning in general. They can be used
advantageously to clean metals,, _oiastics and electranic
assemblies.
The ester cleaning co~npo5ition. of the presewt invention
can be used in cleaning effectively printed circuit boards, as
well a~ any type of substrate which is contaminated with
soldering flux and/or other types of residue that typically
Contaminate the surfaces of printed circuit boards, for
example, adhesive tape residue, waxes and fingerprints. Thus,
printed wiring boards and other articles which require the use
of soldering flux in the making of mechanical,
electromechanical or electronic connections with metal can be
cleaned in accordance with the present invention. In the
fabrication of such articles, rosin soldering flux is used
widely. However, there also can be used other types of
soldering fluxes, including, for example, synthetic~activated
fluxes, organic acid-based fluxes and fluxes contained within
soldering paste.
With respect to the degree of substrate cleanliness that
can be achieved by the practice of the present invention,
levels of contamination that meet or are below the military
specification MIL-P-28809A requirement of 14 micrograms NaCl
equivalent/square inch can be achieved. The ester cleaning

W092/09378 '~~'~'~~'r''.~;''~~i~~ ...16 , IyCT/US91108937
composition has been used effectively to provide substrates
having a contamination level below about 10 micrograms NaCl
equivalent/square inch.
The contaminated surface should be contacted with the
cleaning.composition for a period of time sufficient to
solubilize the contaminant. The dime for effecting
solubilization will depend on the temperature of the cleaning
composition and 'the means by which it is applied. The
temperature of 'the composition can be like that typically used
for conventional Meaning compositions, for e;tample, room or
ambientwtemoerature (about 70°F) to about 150°F. For some
applications, ~Or ~::c~,T!IrJI e, tr7''d3S r°mOVal , eVen higher
temperatures can be used, for example, up to about 240QF.
Exemplary mYans '~r applying ~tre cleaning composition are
immersion, :orusW ng, and spraying, for example, spraying in air
or beneath the surface of the cleaning composition. It is
believed that spraying the cleaning composition onto the
substrate will be used most widely. For batch operations, '
typical contact times are about l to about 10 minutes. For
continuous operations, typical contact times are about 30
seconds to about 3 minutes:
The solubilized contaminant and residual cleaning
composition can be removed .from the substrate by any suitable
means, for example, by air blasting, rinsing with water or an
organic rinsing agent, or by wiping; for example, with an
absorbent material. It should be understood that,~for some
applications, it is not necessary to remove completely the
cleaning composition and the contaminate from the substrate.
In such an application, the cleaning composition is simply
allowed to drain from the surface.
Drying of the substrate is optional. If it is desired to
dry the surface, drying can be accelerated by the use of heat.
Forexample, the substrate can be dried in an oven and/or it

( r
W~ 92/09378 17 ' ' PCT/US91/08937
.:an be dried with forced air, for example, air heated to 100°F
or above.
In accordance with this invention, it has been found that
the monobasic ester cleaning composition can be used
effectively to clean a plurality of parts even after prolonged
use with build up in the composition of a relatively high
amount of dissolved organic contaminants that have been removed
from the treated parts. In one application, it was observed
that a bath of the cleaning composition continued to clean
effectively parts covered with an oily rnatsrial e~ren though 'che
bath contained about 40 wt.% of the dissolved organic residue.
Accordingly,,the present invention encom?~asses also the
continued use of the monobasic ester composition to clean
organic residues from the surfacas of .sLlJSt:ca'ces rorntactea
therewith as dissolved organic residue builds up in
concentration in the composition to a relatively high amount,
but preferably to an amount no greater than about 30 wt.%, and
more preferably to an amount of about 20 wt.~ (based on the
total.weight of the cleaning composition and the amount of
dissolved organic contaminant).
Examples of the Monobasic Ester Development
Examples which follow are illustrative of the present
invention. Comparative examples are set forth also.
The first example is a comparative example which shows the
use of CFC-113 (hereinafter "the CFC composition"), an example
of a prior art cleaning composition comprising 1,1,2-trichloro-
trifluoroethane. This comparative example is followed by an
example of the present invention showing the use of a cleaning
composition containing a monobasic ester to clean the same type
of machine parts as were cleaned by the use of CFC composition.
Example C-1

W092/09378 ;y1"°'.y.~L'~:~> 18 PCT/U591/08937
In machining operations during the manufacture of ''
component parts of automotive fuel injectors, the parts being
machined are subjected to statistical in-process quality
control measurements for dimensional conformity. The parts
were taken from the machine and swished by hand in a container
of the CFC composition to remove cutting oil, chips and
grinding residues. The chins and grinding residues settled to
the bottom of the container and -the cutting oil dissolved in
the CFC composition. uhe parts were blown off with a jet of
air to remove the residual CFC composition. The parts were
then placed in a laser gauge 't0 medSi:t-!'° dimensional Conformity.
Example 1
A cleaning compcsiticn comp.ri>nr 95 :.rt.> isopropyl
myristate and 5 ;.e':..=s of ;~~he:~ unidantif.'Led IT1U110ba57.C esters
(by-products of the manu=acturing process) hereafter "the ester
composition") was substituted for the CFC-113 composition. The
fuel injectors were taken from the machine and swished in the '
container of the ester composition. The machine operators were
in direct contact with the ester composition during this
cleaning operation. The chips and grinding residues settled to
the bottom of the container and the cutting oil dissolved in
the ester composition: The parts were blown off with a jet of
air to remove the residual ester composition and then placed in
the laser gauge to measure dimensional conformity.
The measurements in the laser'gauge were the same, and
performed in the same manner, as those associated with the
parts cleaned with the CFC composition. The ester composition
functioned as a drop-in replacement for the CFC composition,
with no harmful effects on the workers.
Since the flash point~of the ester composition of Example
1 is 285°F, the potential for explosion or fire was not present
as a result of the replacement. However, a very significant

WO 92/09378 19 ~ ' PGT/US91/08937
:ost saving was achieved in the replacement because there were
no significant evaporative Losses of the ester composition and
the time interval for change of the ester composition in the
container was extended by at least three times. The latter
advantage was realized because the ester composition continued
to remove the chips and grinding residues from the parts even
though the concentration of cutting oil in the ester
composition was more than three times greater 'than in the CcC
composition. 1~ further cost saving was achieved by arranging
for a blow-off station to catch the mist which was blown off
the parts after they were dipped in the ester composl~ion. The
captured mist was collected and the liquid was reused in the
cleaning process.
The next example is a' comparative eriampl a aha~,aing the rise
of a prior art, commercially available cleaning composicion
comprising mineral spirits. This comparative example is
followed by an example which also shows the use of the ester
composition of Example Z.
Example C-2
This example also involved the cleaning of components
parts of automotive fuel injectors. The parts were subjected
to various machining operations and then placed in the solvent
manifolds of HAPA Galvanotechnik washing machines where a
stream of mineral spirits (solvent) impinged on the parts to
remove the cutting oil, chips and grinding residues.. The chips
and grinding residues were filtered continuously from the
s.olvent~in the machine and. the cutting oil concentration built
up in the solvent as the solvent cycled through the machine.
The solvent was replaced in the machines twice per week during
operation. During the cleaning operation involving the use of
mineral spirits, the operators co;nplained of headaches, nausea
and dermatitis. '

W092/09378 ~9~~~.yi~~~t.~ 20 PCT/L1591/08937
Exam~ls 2
The mineral spirits used in the washing machines referred
to in Example C-2 was replaced with the ester composition of
Example 1. The fuel injectors ware cleaned in the same machine
cycles without complaints of headaches, nausea or dermatitis
from the machine operato.ts. The :risk of explosion or fire was
greatly reduced because the flash poiwt of the ester
composition is 285°F, as compared to 10~°F for the mineral
spirits. Furthermore, a drastic cost reduction was achieved
because the solvent change-out L:~equency in thG machines was
extended from twice per week :ror the mineral spirits to once
every two months for the ester_ composition. m'~is ;aas w~ua to
the ability of the ester composition to clean eTfectively even
though loaded with about 7.0 rt , =~ cuv ti ~g of 1 . . Cost savings
accred also from othal iacto:es, such as raduced disposal
costs, no evaporative losses and reduced machine down-time.
The.next example is a comparative example which shows the
use of a prior art; commercially available cleaning'composition
t~o clean transmission parts. The comparative example is
followed by an example of the present invention showing also
the effective use of a composition like that of Example 1. In
these examples, residual cleaning composition was removed from
the parts by blowing-with a jet of air.
Example C-3
, This example involved the cleaning of steel parts at the
site of.a warranty transmission rebuilder for the automotive
industry. The cleaning composition comprised mineral spirits
that was used in three different kinds of washing machines to
clean transmission parts before reassembly. The consumption of
the composition was at the rate of about 2,000 gallons per
week. Along with headaches and nausea, 168 cases of dermatitis
were reported during 12 months of use of the composition.

r
~4,~~a~~~i
WO 92/09378 21 PCT/US91/08937
'Example 3
The C-3 cleaning composition was replaced by the ester
composition of Example 1. The transmission parts were cleaned
with no reports of dermatitis, headaches or nausea. The
transmission parts were more effectively cleaned with the ester
composition as determined by the Sediment Test, a standard tact
used in the automotive transmission industry to evaluate
cleanliness. The Sediment Test values were reduced bv_ more
than 60~ when the ester composition was used in place of the C-
3 composition. The potential for fire or explosion was greatly
reduced because the flash point of the ester composition is
285°F, as compared to 108°F for the C-3 composition. The
consumption rate of the ester composition was 108 gallons per
week whereas that of the C-3 composition was 2,000 gallons ~,er
week. Even though 'the ester composition is more costly 'than
the C-3 composition, a cost savings of more than 58% was
achieved in the conversion.to the ester composition because of
its reduced rate of consumption. The reduced consumption of
the ester composition came about because it continued to clean
effectively even though loaded with about 15 wt.~ of residual
oil.
The next example is.a comparative example which shows the
use of a prior art, commercially available CFC composition
comprising about 94 wt.~ 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane and
about 6 wt.~ methanol to clean solder flux of the rosin type
from electrical parts. The comparative example is~followed by
an example which shows the use of a composition of the present
invention to clean the aforementioned type of parts.
Example C-4
In this example, parts for small rotary electrical
switches were made by soldering a small brass disk onto a small
brass shaft. The solder flux, which congealed and hardened at

CA 02096426 2000-12-O1
- 22 '
the solder joint, was removed from the resulting part using a
cleaning~composition comprising 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane,
that is, a halogenated solvent of the type that is associated
with ozone depletion. The parts were cleaned by immersing them
in the cleaning composition which was contained in a heated
ultrasonic vat equipped with a vented hood exhaust system. The
composition was removed by air drying.
Example 4
The composition of Example C-4 was replaced by a
composition comprising approximately 90 wt.% isopropyl
myristate and approximately 10 wt.% surfactant composition
(Tergitol~NP-4 (3.33 wt.%), Tergitol*NP-7 X1.66 wt.%), Macol*2
(1.66 wt.%), Cyclogol~SBDO (1.66 wt.%), and dipropylene glycol
(1.66 wt.%). The solder flux was removed from the parts every
bit as well with this composition as with the composition of
Example C-4. The residual ester-based composition was removed
from the parts by rinsing with tap water. No complaints of any
health or safety problems were reported in the conversion to
the use of the ester-based composition. Since the flash point
of the ester-based composition is 285°F, the potential for fire
or explosion was minimal. Very significant cost savings were
achieved in the conversion from the composition of Example C-4
to the ester-based composition.
The next example is a comparative example which shows the
use of a prior art, commercially available halogenated
hydrocarbon solvent to clean brass parts. The comparative
example is followed by an example which shows the use of a
composition like that of Example 4 above to clean the same type
of brass parts.
* Trade-mark

WO 92/09378 ~ 23 PCf/US91/08937
Example C-5
In this example, brass parts were fabricated by turning in
high production screw machines. The cutting oil, chips and
turnings, were removed from the fabricated parts in a vapor
degreaser using 1,1,1-trichloroethane. The composition was
removed from the brass parts by air drying.
Example 5
The cleaning process of Example C'-5 was changed to one
which provided for placing the fabricated parts from the screw
machines into wire mesh baskets and then dipping the baskQts of
parts repeatedly in a container of the cleaning composition
lilse the composition of Example 4. The composition efi~ctiv~lj
removed the cutting oil, chips and turnings from the parts.
The residual composition was removed from the parts by rinsing
with water. The ester-based composition was very well received
by the operators handling and using it. No.complaints of any
health or safety problems were reported. Cost savings in the
conversion were significant.
The next three examples are illustrative of the practice
of the present invention and show some additional applications
in which monobasic esters can be used effectively.
Example 6
Methyl laurate (1000 was used to clean small metal parts
of metal chips and cutting oils. The parts were dipped in the
methyl laurate, blasted with compressed air to remove excess
liquid and soils, and gauged with measuring instruments to
determine part dimensions. The results were deemed to be fully
satisfactory relative to the use of a conventional
chlorofluorocarbon (CFC-113).

v4a~r~i)~P4 ~) . .
WO 92/09378 2 4 pCT/US91 /08937
Example 7 '
In this example, soiled laboratory uniforms were dry
cleaned in a cleaning composition comprising 88 wt.% isopropyl
myristate, 12 wt.% of a surfactant mixture consisting of
Tergitol NP-4 (4 wt.%), Tergitol NP-7 (2% wt.%), ~Iacol 2 (2
wt.%), cyclogol SBDO (2 wt.%), and dipropylene glycol (2 wt. o).
Following the wash, the uniforms T.ver_e rinsed 5.n ~.Tate, _~fter
drying, the uniforms were found to be satisfactorily clean.
Example 8
In this example, a cleaning composition comprising the
methyl ester of capric acid was used ~to .r.l ea:n a ~.r; :~ter~ ..li r i~,
assembly which had been soldered using rosin ,:lu:c, mhe
cleaning performance was equivalewt to ;~~at~ owr='!::d rai.h a
terpene/surfactant mi.~ture (BICaCT~ EC-7"', 'aecroiQrm Inc.).
Thus,, monobasic esters are useful as cleaning agents.
They are capable of dissolving a variety of common contaminants
and offer the advantages indicated earlier relative to other
cleaning agents.
Terpene Development/Use of Monobasic Ester Preferred
An important characteristic of the present invention is
that it is capable of being used effectively in an industrial
cleaning process, as distinguished from a cleaning process that
is simply carried out on a laboratory scale or a pilot-plant
scale. The invention can be practiced in either a batch or
continuous cleaning process.
Although it is expected that the invention will be used
most widely in cleaning printed circuit boards, it has wider
applicability in that it can be used to clean any type of
substrate which is contaminated with soldering flux and/or
other types of residue that typically contaminate the surfaces

J o. .~ ~t
I~VO 92/09378 2 S PCT/U591 /08937
~f printed circuit boards, for example, adhesive tape residue,
waxes and fingerprints. Thus, printed wiring boards and other
articles which require the use of soldering flux in the making
of mechanical, electromechanical or electronic connections with
metal can be cleaned in accordance with the present invention.
In the fabrication of such articles, rosin soldering flux is
used widely. However, there also can be used other types of
soldering fluxes, including, for example, synthetic activated
fluxes, organic acid-based fluxes and fluxes contained within
soldering paste.
The terpene-based cleaning composition for use in the
practice of the present invention comprises at least about G0
wt.'k terpene, more preferably at least about 80 wt.~ terpene,
and most preferably about 85 to about 95 wt.'s terpene. The
composition can comprise about 100 wt.~ terpene, but preferably
is used in admixture with another constituent as described
hereinbelow.
The terpene for use in the practice of the present
invention is a terpene compound or a mixture of terpene
compounds that are substantially water-insoluble and that are
capable of dissolving the involved contaminants. The use of
such terpene to clean printed circuit boards and related types
of articles of contaminants is well known. For practice of the
present invention, the use of para-menthadienes is preferred,
with dipentenes being more preferred and limonene being most
preferred. Excellent results have been achieved utilizing a
mixture of terpene in which about 90 to about 95 wt.~ of the
mixture is limonene (the major portion being d'-limonene), with
the balance of the mixture being other terpene compounds.
A particularly preferred embodiment of the present
invention comprises a terpene-based composition which includes
also a monobasic ester, which is a material that is also
substantially water insoluble, as mentioned hereinabove. Such

W092/09378 ~ 26 PCT/US91/08937
esters generally comprise the reaction product of alkyl
alcohols and fatty acids, for example, Cl to about C6 alkanols
and about C8 to about C18 fatty acids. Preferabl~I C1 to C,
alcohols are used. Preferred monobasic esters are methyl
laurate, isopropyl laurate and methyl caprate.
The monobasic ester can comprise up to about -i0 ~;rt. o o
the terpene-based composition, but preferably comprises up to
about 20 wt.~, most preferably about 5 to about 15 ~frt. ~; of the
composition. Particularly good results having been achieved
with 'the use of about 10 wt. o of the ester.
It should be understood 'that a material r~i~y~r:~,nt fvon
monobasic ester (an optional, but preferred ing~:?di2l~'t) Can
also be included in the t2rpene-based cleaning composition.
Such material is desirably one which meets 'the COD standards
set forth herein. As mentioned above, the terpene-based
cleaning composition is substantially tree of water-soluble
material, that is, according to the procedure described above,
the COD of. the water phase of a two-phase mixture of equal
amounts of the terpene-based cleaning composition and water is
not greater than anbout 1000 ppm.
The contaminated surface should be contacted with the
cleaning composition for a period of time sufficient to
solubilize the contaminant. The time for effecting
solubilization will depend on the temperature of the cleaning
composition and the means by which it is applied. The
temperature of the composition can be like that typically used
for terpene-based compositions in applications of the present
type, for example, room or ambient temperature (about 70°F) to
about 150°F. Exemplary means for applying the cleaning
composition are immersion, brushing, and spraying, for example,
spraying in air.or beneath the surface of the cleaning
composition. It is believed that spraying the cleaning
composition onto the substrate will be used most widely. For

W~ 92109378 27 PGT/US91/08937
batch operations, typical contact times are about 3 to about 5
minutes. For continuous operations, typical contact times are
about 30 seconds to about 2 minutes.
The solubilized contaminant is removed from the terpene-
treated substrate by contact with water having a temperature of
about 70°F to about 140°F. Good and satisfactory results have
been obtained utilizing rinse water at room temperature.
Water=contact times of the type generally used in the art can
be used, for example, not longer than about 10 minutes.
Preferably, the water-contact time does not exceed about 5
minutes. Good results have been achieved with a contact time
of about t:ao minutes.
Conventional means can be used to apply the water. It is
believed that, for most applications, spraying the air-borne
substrate will be satisfactory and convenient. A spray
pressure of about 30 to about 50 psi is exemplary. Other means
for applying the water can be used also, for example,
ultrasonic water agitation.
After the solubilized contaminants have been removed from
the substrate, the substrate is dried. Typically, dryi~ig will
be accelerated by the'use bf heat. For example, the substrate
can be dried in an oven and/or it can be dried with forced air,
for example, heated to 100°F or above.
With respect to the degree of substrate cleanliness that
can be achieved by the practice of the present invention,
levels of contamination that meet or are below the military
specification MIL-P-28809A requirement of l4 micrograms NaCl
equivalent/square inch can be achieved. The invention has been
used effectively to provide substrates having a contamination
level below about l0 micrograms NaCl equiva.lent/square inch.

~~~~l~M~
WO 9i/09378 2 8 PCT/US91 /08937
It should be understood that such low levels of
contamination can be achieved without the use of a surfactant
in the water which is used to remove the solubilized
contaminant from the substrate: Indeed, the COD of such water
should be such as to meet the COD requirements set forth
herein. Deionized water is used preferably.
The.effluent produced by the cleaning process comprises a
liquid mixture of the terpene-based cleaning composition,
contaminant dissolved 'therein, and water. The liauid mi:,tu.r
may contain some solids, for example, minute pieces of ~oldey
and miscellaneous debris. The nature of 'the liquid rni;,cur~
produced in accordance with the present invention is auc;z -;.hit
the components thereof can be separated conveniently by
gravitational force. Thus, upon being fed to a settline~ tank
solids. precipitate from the mixture and the .liquid components
thereof stratify into a top layer comprising the wader
insoluble or immiscible liquids, that is, terpene and organic
materials dissolved therein, including contaminants, and an
aqueous bottom layer. The nature of the process is such that
the aqueous layer is substantially free of water-soluble
organic material,. that is, it has a COD of no greater than
about 1000 ppm. Indeed, the process of the present invention
can.be utilized effectively to provide an aqueous phase in
which.the COD thereof is about 300 ppm or less, for exempla,
no greater than about 150 ppm. And; this can be accomplished
without subjecting the water to any purifying steps or
dilution.
In separating the different phases of the liquid mixture,
the top organic layer can be simply drawn off. If desired, the
aqueous phase can then be discharged directly into the sewage
system, while meeting the COD demands imposed by the involved
governmental agency. If desired, the aqueous phase can be
recycled for reuse in the cleaning process. This will
generally involve the steps of filtration to separate solids

WO 92/09378 29 PCT/US91/08937
and ion exchange to remove undesirable inorganic materials, the
latter step being preceded by carbon adsorption (if necessary)
to remove organic materials that may adversely affect the ion
exchange step. Other means may be used to purify the water.
Other means can be used to separate the liquid phases of
the mixture, for example, centrifugation or by use of
appropriate membranes.
The terpene compounds can be treated for recycling or they
can be disposed of in an appropriate way, for example,
incineration. .
Examples of Terpene Develo ment
This example is illustrative of the practice of the
present invention.
Example A
A set of three identical printed circuit boards was fluxed
with a rosin soldering flux (ALPHA 627 flux sold by Alpha
Metals Inc. of Jersey City, New Jersey), wave soldered, and
then cleaned of the flux residue that was adhered to each of
the boards,
. The cleaning composition contained terpene which were
derived from orange peels and which comprised about 95 wt.~
limonene and 5 wt.~ of a mixture of other terpene compounds.
The cleaning composition was substantially free of water-
soluble organic materials. The boards were placed in the rack
of an industrial dishwasher (semi-aqueous cleaning module) sold
by Electronic Controls Design as Model 6307. The cleaning
operation involved spraying the boards for about 5 minutes with
the cleaning composition which was at roam temperature (about
75°F).

E~,~
WO 92/09378 ~~~j~~~~, 30 PCT/US91/08937
The terpene-treated boards were then rinsed with water ~c~
remove the cleaning composition and flux dissolved therein.
This was accomplished by subjecting the boards to a 1-minute,
20-second water wash in a continuous process carried out in an
Electrovert H-500 water rinse unit sold by Electrovert of
Arlington, Texas. The spray pressure was about 40
pounds/square inch. The temperature of the water was about
120°F. The water collected from the rinsing operation has a
COD well below 1000 ppm. Thereafter, each of the cleaned
boards was dried with hot air.
The cleanliness of each of the boards was evaluated :0<1
of an Omega meter 600 SPZD ionic testing device (sold by Alp~:a
Metals Inc.). The average for the three boards was a
contamination reading of only 9.3 micrograms NaCl
equivalent/square inch.
The next example is a comparative example which is
illustrative of a prior art process.
Exam~~le No . C-A
The same procedure as described in Example No. 1 above was
followed except that cleaning was effected with a composition
comprising 90 wt.~ of the terpene cleaning composition
described in Example 1 above and 10 wt.~ of a mixture of
emulsifying surfactants. The mixture comprised 50 wt.$ of an
ethoxylated sorbitan ester and 50 wt.~ of an ethoxylated linear
alcohol. The average for the three boards that were cleaned
was a reading of 9.4-micrograms NaCl equivalent/square inch -
essentially the same as that of the boards of Example No. 1.
However, the rinse water has a COD in excess of 5,000 ppm.

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2096426 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : Périmé (brevet - nouvelle loi) 2011-11-29
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2007-01-17
Inactive : Paiement correctif - art.78.6 Loi 2007-01-05
Inactive : Lettre officielle 2006-12-15
Inactive : Paiement correctif - art.78.6 Loi 2006-11-30
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Accordé par délivrance 2002-01-29
Inactive : Page couverture publiée 2002-01-28
Préoctroi 2001-10-31
Inactive : Taxe finale reçue 2001-10-31
Lettre envoyée 2001-06-07
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2001-06-07
Un avis d'acceptation est envoyé 2001-06-07
Inactive : Approuvée aux fins d'acceptation (AFA) 2001-05-25
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2000-12-01
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2000-06-01
Inactive : Renseign. sur l'état - Complets dès date d'ent. journ. 1998-11-04
Inactive : Acc. réc. RE - Pas de dem. doc. d'antériorité 1998-11-04
Inactive : Dem. traitée sur TS dès date d'ent. journal 1998-11-04
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 1998-09-08
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 1998-09-08
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1992-06-11

Historique d'abandonnement

Il n'y a pas d'historique d'abandonnement

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2001-10-03

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Les taxes sur les brevets sont ajustées au 1er janvier de chaque année. Les montants ci-dessus sont les montants actuels s'ils sont reçus au plus tard le 31 décembre de l'année en cours.
Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
Enregistrement d'un document 1993-06-03
TM (demande, 6e anniv.) - petite 06 1997-12-01 1997-10-20
Requête d'examen - générale 1998-09-08
TM (demande, 7e anniv.) - générale 07 1998-11-30 1998-10-21
TM (demande, 8e anniv.) - générale 08 1999-11-29 1999-10-19
TM (demande, 9e anniv.) - générale 09 2000-11-29 2000-10-04
TM (demande, 10e anniv.) - générale 10 2001-11-29 2001-10-03
Taxe finale - générale 2001-10-31
TM (brevet, 11e anniv.) - générale 2002-11-29 2002-10-03
TM (brevet, 12e anniv.) - générale 2003-12-01 2003-11-06
TM (brevet, 13e anniv.) - générale 2004-11-29 2004-10-07
TM (brevet, 14e anniv.) - générale 2005-11-29 2005-10-06
TM (brevet, 15e anniv.) - générale 2006-11-29 2006-11-06
2006-11-30
2007-01-05
TM (brevet, 16e anniv.) - générale 2007-11-29 2007-11-07
TM (brevet, 17e anniv.) - générale 2008-12-01 2008-11-19
TM (brevet, 18e anniv.) - générale 2009-11-30 2009-10-30
TM (brevet, 19e anniv.) - générale 2010-11-29 2010-11-23
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
PETROFERM INC.
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
JOHN E. BRADDY
MICHAEL E. HAYES
PAUL L. BOLDEN
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document. Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(aaaa-mm-jj) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Description 1994-05-20 30 1 272
Description 1995-08-16 30 1 272
Description 2000-11-30 30 1 221
Revendications 1994-05-20 4 126
Revendications 2000-11-30 3 88
Abrégé 1995-08-16 1 60
Revendications 1995-08-16 4 126
Rappel - requête d'examen 1998-07-29 1 129
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 1998-11-03 1 172
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 1998-10-06 1 114
Courtoisie - Certificat d'enregistrement (document(s) connexe(s)) 1998-10-06 1 114
Avis du commissaire - Demande jugée acceptable 2001-06-06 1 165
Correspondance 2001-10-30 1 40
Correspondance 1993-06-06 3 99
PCT 1993-05-16 13 379
Correspondance 2006-12-14 1 26
Correspondance 2007-01-16 1 14
Taxes 2010-11-22 1 34
Taxes 1996-08-12 1 45
Taxes 1995-08-01 1 48
Taxes 1994-08-01 1 44
Taxes 1993-05-16 1 35