t,.
VVO 92/19571 PCT/CA92/00171
~:~~~~8~
GAS GEIeTERATOR t
Field Of The Invention k ,
This invention relates to gas generatars, and further relates to fluid
dispensers which
dispense fluid by means of internally generated gas pressure acting on the
fluid.
Technalo~y Review
Devices for dispensing fluids (used herein to refer to any flowable liquid) by
means
of gas pressure generated chemically within the device, are well known. One
particularly useful type of the faregoing dispensing devices is the automatic
lubricator
of the type disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,671,386 to Orlitzky and LLS. Patent
4,023,648
to Orlitzky et al. Such devices allow automatic lubrication of equiprne~t over
prolonged periods of time without need of operator intervention following
installation. Another automatic lubricator using an electrochemical gas
generator is
disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,023,648 to Orlitzky et al. As shown in U.S. Patent
4;693,283 to Talas; such devices are readily adapted to dispensing other
fluids, such
as microbicides. In the devices of Orlitzky '386 and '648 gas is generated by
means
of an electrochemical reaction and the devices require an electrochemical cell
and
associated circuitry and, in the case of the device of the '386 patent, also
requires
batteries for power. Other automatic lubricators are described, for example,
in U.S.
Pat:rnts 3,842,939 and 3,430,731 to Satzinger. U.S. Patent 3,983,959 to
Satzinger
attempts to control varying dispensing rates from the devices of the '939 and
'731
patents by providing an appropriately covered bimetallic galvanic couple
intended to
provide a constant rate of gas generation at least at a constant temperature.
All of
the devices of the foregoing Satzinger patents produce potentially explosive
hydrogen
gas.
Uther fluid dispensing devices which use internally generated gas pressure
include
those disclosed in U.S. Patents Re. 32,383 to Banks; 3,718,236 to Reyner et
al.; and v
4,379,453 to Baron. Both the Banks and Reyner et al. patents describe aerosol
type
fluid dispensers which use carbon dioxide pressure generated from an '
acid/bicarbonate reaction to expel fluid. Some measure of control of gas
pressure is
SU~ST~TUTE S~f~~T.
WO 92/19571 PCT/CA92/00171 '''=
,;:
w
achieved by use of a plurality of recesses or pockets containing reagent and
which are
opened sequentially depending upon the amount of fluid which has been
dispensed.
Such devices require relatively complex mechanical construction to
ensure~successive
exposure of reagent. The Baron patent discloses a pliable infusion bag which
also
dispenses fluid by means of internally generated gas pressure, the required
pressure
being generated by reagents contained in frangible elements situated within
the bag.
However, the frangible elements must be broken by manual manipulation through
the
pliable bag as required.
A rate release controlling arrangement is also described in U.S. Patent
4,847,093 to
Ayer et al. wherein a gas generating reagent is surrounded by an osmotic rate
release
controlling wall in an attempt to provide relatively constant release of a
drug for up
to 12 to 14 hours at a relatively constant body temperature. U.S. Patent
4,640,44
discloses a portable injector which reacts two liquid solutions to produce
oxygen at
a rate which allows relatively constant injection of liquid over a period of
days at least
at a constant temperature.
In many fluid dispensing devices, such as the automatic lubricators described,
it is
best to have a relatively constant rate at which the fluid is expelled aver
long periods
of time (eg. many days, weeks or months), and which rate is not extremely
affected
by ambient temperature. This in turn requires a relatively constant rate of
gas
generation under the foregoing conditions. Many potentially useful gas
generating
reactions are known such as that disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,806,180 to Goetz
et al.
The Goetz patent reaction generates inert nitrogen gas by reacting an azide
with an
oxidant, but at an almost explosive rate. As seen from the above, many other
useful
gas generating reactions have required relatively complex device constructions
to
attain even limited control of gas generation rate at a constant temperature.
, a
Summary Of The Invention .,
The present invention then, provides gas generators as well as fluid
dispensing devices
using such gas generators. The gas generators have a liquid, and a solid
composition
comprising a first reagent which reacts with the liquid following contact with
it.
S lJ B ~'T I T lJ T E 51~ E E ~
WO 92/19571 PCT/CA92/00171
rr
1:;::,;
,;
~,~~~~~~~
Typically, the solid composition would be separated from the liquid but
positioned
within the gas generator so that it can be brought into contact therewith (by
i
;
movement of the liquid or solid composition). The use of a solid composition
is
essential in the present invention in order to maintain the reaction under
'mass
;.
transfer control' (as described later) to suppress the effect of varying
reagent
concentration on reaction rate in an otherwise homogeneous reaction system
and/or
to suppress the effect of temperature on reaction rate. The solid composition
may
generate gas upon contact with the liquid as a result of the first reagent.
reacting with
the liquid (i.e. the liquid itself is a second reagent) or a second reagent
carried by the
liquid. In the latter situation the second reagent may previously be dissolved
in the
liquid or the solid composition may also contain a second reagent such that
liquid
contact with the solid composition brings both reagents into contact with one
another.
The solid composition may either consist essentially of a suitable solid
reagent (eg.
stearylamine for a reaction of Equation 5 (below) or may additionally comprise
an ,
inert solid (eg. a hydrocarbon wax) in which the first reagent is dispersed.
The reagents and solid composition selected are so as to generate a gas for at
least
hours during which, at any elapsed time of the reaction, m in Equation 4 (see
below) has a value between about 0.5 to 1.3, and preferably 0.7 to 1.3.
Preferably,
20 the reaction has an m within the foregoing ranges when the reaction is
performed at
a constant temperature of some value between about -30°C to about
40°C. That is,
a reaction meets the foregoing criteria if m falls within the given range at
even a
single temperature within the temperature range, even if m may be outside the
range
at some other temperature (whether inside or outside the temperature range).
Further, where it is expected that the gas generator will be used in variable
ambient
i
temperature conditions and it is desired to decxease the effect of such
variable
temperature on gas volume generated (such as in automatic lubricators), the
reagents
are referabl selected such that the reaction has an "apparent activation
energy"
P Y
(represented by 'E' in this application, and essentially the activation energy
measured
without any compensation for reagent diffusion limitations as measured over a
temperature range of at least about 5°C to about 40°C) of no
greater than about 40
kJ/mole of gas produced and preferably less than about 30 kJ/mole.
SUBSTITUTE Si~~~T.
WO 92/19571 PCTlCA92/00171
-4- -
For many practical devices using the gas generators described, it is
preferable that the
reaction produces a volume of gas between about 0.1 and 100 mL per day at STP
(standard temperature and pressure of 0°C and 1 atmosphere). A fluid
dispensing
device of the present invention, such as an automatic lubricator, would
additionally
be provided with a fluid reservoir and a movable member which receives the gas
pressure and acts in response thereto to urge fluid through a fluid reservoir
outlet.
Drawings
Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the
Drawings,
in which:
Figures 1 to 9 are plots of gas generated versus elapsed time from gas
generators of
the present invention as described in Examples 1 to 9 below.
Detailed Description of Embodiments of the Invention
The present invention provides gas generators which are capable of generating
gas
at a relatively constant rate over long periods of time (eg. several days or
weeks, or
months), and which rate . has a reduced dependence on variations in ambient
temperature. This is accomplished through selection of reagents such that the
reaction rate order and apparent activation energy meet required constraints,
as
discussed in more detail below.
With regard to reaction rate order, typically, chemical reactions have a rate
which is
dependent upon reactant concentration (which typically decreases as the
reaction
proceeds thereby leading to decreased reaction rate), and ambient temperature.
This
dependence can typically be expressed as: . . '
Reaction Rate = kC" (Equation 1)
where C = concentration of reagent .
n = reaction order
k = reaction rate constant = Ae ~T
A = constant
E = activation energy of reaction
SU BSTtTUTE S H E ET
1.
WO 92/19571 PCT/CA92/0' '1
::.:
~~~~~~~
_5_ j
r
t.
R = universal gas constant
i
T = temperature i
.a.ccording to the "law of mass action" the order of typical chemical
reactibns is 1 or
higher i.e. "n" in equation 1 above equals "l." However, gas generation at
constant T~'
rate requires a reaction order of zero. For n = 0, Equation 1 can be
integrated for
the case of a gas generating reaction with the substitution of Equation 2 to
obtain
Equation 3 as follows:
C = a(V, - V) (Equation 2)
V = Yt (Equation 3)
where a = constant
V~= total gas volume available from stoichiometric reaction of the limiting
reagent
V = actual gas volume produced in the time 't' (at given, constant,
temperature and pressure)
t = time period of the reaction
Y = rate constant
Equation 3 (zero order reaction) shows an ideal relation between gas volume
and
time (gas volume increases linearly over elapsed time) which is difficult to
attain in
practical situations. Fc r the purpose of the present invention, it is
sufficient if:
V = Yt°' (Equation 4)
where m is between about 0.5 and 1.3, and is preferably between about 0.7 and
1.3
at a constant temperature of between about -30°C and 40°C. Gas
generating
apparatus of the present invention should preferably be able to produce gas in
accordance with Equation 4 for at least 20 hours, and preferably at least 100
hours,
at any constant temperature between about -30°C to about 40°C,
with an m between
about 0.5 and 1:3. Many gas producing reactions, such as that between an amine
and
nitrous acid, would be unsuitable if both reactants were in a liquid medium,
since
a:
they would be too rapid and exhibit too low an m value (i.e. lower than about
0.5).
However, both the overall rate of the reaction and the dependence of gas
volume on
time (i.e. the m value) can be limited by providing one of the reagents in a
solid
composition (either a reagent is itself a suitable solid or it is mixed with a
suitable
inert solid to form a solid matrix). It is believed that such limitation
occurs since,
with suitable solid compositions, such as those comprising waxes (eg.
hydrocarbon
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
WO 92/1951 PCT/CA92/Q0171
0 '.
- -6-
waxes), the reaction. rate is under the control of mass transfer
(specifically, the
reaction rate is limited by diffusion of reagent molecules in the liquid to
the solid
surface and/or into the solid composition, and not by the rate of the reaction
between
homogeneous reagents).
The apparent activation energy of a reaction is related to the degree to which
reaction rate will vary with temperature. For example, in the case of a
reaction of
type:
W + Z ---> Products
the rate in a single homogeneous phase (eg. in a water solution] follows the
kinetic
law of equation 5 below:
Rate = k(W]"'(Z]Z equation ~
where k = reaction rate constant
[W]= concentration of W (more accurately=activity of W]
(Z]= concentration of Z (more accurately=activity of Z]
w,z= reaction orders with respect to W and Z.
The effect of temperature on the reaction rate is determined by the
sensitivity of the
reaction rate constant 'k' to temperature through the Arrhenius equation,
equation
6 below:
k = Aexp[-E/RT] equation 6
where A = a constant called the 'frequency factor'.
E = activation energy
R = universal gas constant.
T -- absolute temperature
For most chemical reactions E > about 40 kJ/mole so that an increase of about
10
degrees K in teri~perature around room temperature will roughly double the
value of
'k' and hence double the reaction rate. However, when one of the reactants W
or .
Z is in a separate phase, then the reaction can only occur after the reactants
reach
each other by diffusion to the phase boundary or 'interface'. For example, if
W is in .
a liquid solution and Z is in a solid immersed in tr.:, solution of W then the
reaction
can only occur after W reaches Z by diffusion through the liquid.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
WO 92/19571 PCTlCA92/a0171 v'
,;
_7_
Following the example for w=z=1 the rate of reaction at the surface of the
solid is
now determined by the concentration of W in the liquid at the interface and
the
concentration of 2 in the solid, as in equation 7: k
Reaction rate at surface = k[W);[Z) equation 7
where k=reaction rate constant
[W);= concentration of W at interface
(ZJ = concentration of Z in solid surface
Also the rate of diffusion of W through the mobile phase is called the rate of
mass
transfer of W and is given by equation 8 below:
Rate of mass transfer of W = K([W]b - [W];] equation 8
where K =mass transfer coefficient
(W]h=concentration of W in bulk of liquid phase
[W];=concentration of W at the interface
The mass transfer coefficient 'K' is related to the reactant diffusivity
approximately
through equation 9:
K = D/t equation 9
where D = diffusion coefficient of W in liquid phase.
t = thickness of the stagnant liquid boundary 'diffusion layer' adjacent the
interface.
For a process of mass transfer with chemical reaction occurring at steady
state:
Rate ~ of mass transfer of W - rate of chemical reaction of W.
equation 10
Making the assumption that reaction orders w and z are both 1 (which
simplifies the
algebra and in any event does not affect the substance of the results below),
and also
assuming that the activity of solid 'Z' at the solid/liguid interface is
constant, then
equation 7 and equation 8 can be combined through equation 10 to give equation
11: ,
Rate of mass transfer with chemical reaction =
kK[W]b[Z]/(K+ k[Z]) equation 11
This is equivalent to the process rate per unit interface area. a
It will be seen that equation 11 has two limiting cases:
1. If K > > k[Z) then eqn 11 becomes:
Process rate = k[W]b~Z~ equation 12
SUBSTITUTE SHEET.
i
w::..
dV0 92/19571 PCT/CA92/001?1
t...::a~: .
_ _
Equation 12 implies that the process rate is controlled by pure chemical
kinetics. In this case the effect of temperature on process rate will be the
same as that in a homogeneous reaction (equation 5). That is E> 'about 40
kJ/mole with a 100% increase in rate due to 10°C increase in
temperature
(see Rase, H.F., Chemical Reactor Design for Process Plants, John Wiley and
Sans, 1977, p.503-504, p.131-132 and Hammett, L.P., Introduction to the Study
of Physical Chemistry, MeGraw Hill, 1952, p.188).
2. If K <.< k(Z] then eqn 11 becomes:
Process rate = K(V~J]b equation 13
Equation 13 implies that the process rate is controlled purely by mass
transfer
of W to the interface. In this case the effect of temperature on the process
rate ~ is determined by the effect of temperature on 'K' the mass transfer
coefficient. As is known, the apparent activation energy for pure mass
transfer control is E < approx 20 kJ/mole and an increase of 10 degrees raises
'K' by about 10-30% due to the effect of temperature on diffusion coefficient
and the density and viscosity of the liquid (see Rase and Hammett references
given above). Thus the rate of a process under mass transfer control is much
less sensitive to temperature changes than that of a process under kinetic
control.
As seen from limiting case 2 above, the effect of temperature on reaction rate
can
also be controlled for a given reaction by providing conditions which limit
the
magnitude of K (i.e. by mass transfer control). The present invention
accomplishes
this by providing a first reagent in the form of a suitable solid composition
(eg. such
as the first reagent being dispersed in an inert solid), and a second reagent
disposed
to lie brought' into contact with the first reagent by a suitable liquid (the
second
reagent typically being dissolved in the liquid). As a result, diffusion of
the secona '
reagent to the first reagent is limited. It will be appreciated that for some
reactions
the value of k(Z] may be of the same order as that of K and the reaction
therefore . ,
proceeds under mixed kinetic and mass transfer control. In such cases the
apparent
activation energy is roughly in the range 20 < E < 40 kJ/mole, and the
reaction rate
is constrained, but not controlled by mass transfer. ~ Far the purposes of the
present
invention, an acceptable value of E, the apparent activation energy, is below
about
SlJ BSTiTUTE S~ E ET
WO 92119571 PCT/CA92/00171
~:::.-
~',: ,:
,.
.. g '
s
40 kJ/mole which corresponds to less than a 100P/o increase in rate for a 10
°C
increase in temperature, or below about 30 kJ/mole which corresponds to about
50%
increase in rate for a 10 °C increase in temperature. Lower values of E
are preferred ,
for fluid dispensing devices of the present invention so that the influence of
a
temperature upon reaction rate is further reduced.
Bearing the above considerations in mind, there are basically two situations
in which
gas generators of the present invention may be used. These are constant or
variable
ambient temperature. Variables, such as reagent concentration, should be
controlled
for each of those situations as described below:
Constant Temperature
Referring to equation 11, at a constant temperature, regardless of the
controlling
mechanism, the rate of gas generation will vary with [W]b, [Z] and K. To
obtain a
constant rate of gas generation at constant temperature the value of [W]6 can
be held
nearly constant by providing W through a buffered chemical equilibrium (eg.
involving hydrogen ion from a weak acid). Also, if the solid Y dissolves
completely
on reaction, then (Z] is automatically held constant until all the solid is
consumed.
The foregoing assumes pure solid Z or uniform distribution of solid Z in the
solid
matrix. Alternatively, it is possible that the distribution of Z in an inert
solid could
be varied to control the rate of gas generation - and thus achieve m=1. The
value
of 'K' depends on fluid dynamic conditions which can be held nearly constant
and on '
the thickness of the 'diffusion layer'. For a pure solid reactant the
diffusion layer
thickness should be nearly independent of the dissolution of reactant and the
rate of
gas generation at constant temperature will be independent of time (zero
order) as '
desired. This case probably corresponds to Example 1 below in which pure solid
3
1;. .
stearylamine is used.
For a solid reactant mixed uniformly in an inert . olid matrix the thickness
of the
diffusion layer 't' will increase as the solid reactant is consumed and a
porous layer
of inert material develops between the solid reactant and the bulls solution.
As 't'
increases 'K' decreases, so the rate of gas generation at constant temperature
falls
SU~STITIJTE Sh~EE'T
r.._.. ....::::.- ~.v... ~~~ ~.'.: 'v' ':~..:~-':..n.:,~.:~.~.... ,~;..~'. '
:'~;..~. ' :'. .,'..'~ :'m.:,., '-"a..e~ '~. .~ ~": v',...,~:;..'... " , ,., ;
, .,~.. .~.. ;..._ "'. .~.: ,';w,:'..-'-'~t -..'~~..,.. , ;,;..
wo 9zm9s~~ PcricA~z~oolm
- -10-
with time. This case of the shrinking reactant core probably corresponds to
each
temperature in Examples 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 below. The magnitude of this
diffusion
effect will depend on the fraction of reactant in the solid matrix and on"the
solid
surface/solid volume ratio (i.e. the shape of the solid composition). The
value of 'm'
measured in those examples probably contains the foregoing 'shrinking core'
effect
and could be manipulated by changing reactant fraction and surface/volume
ratio.
For example, the low 'm' of 0.4 obtained with carbon dioxide in the example 7
below
is likely due to the high dilution of calcium carbonate by wax - the volume
fraction
of calcium carbonate in that example was only 0.13.
It will be appreciated that it is possible to approximate zero order kinetics
if the
extent to which the reagents are consumed is kept low (eg. less than about
lOr/o of
the limiting reagent). However, to accomplish this requires large excesses o~
reagents
which is impractical in many situations, such as in automatic lubricators. Gas
generators of the present inventian should exhibit low order kinetics for at
least
about 10P/o of the limiting reagent, and preferably for at least about
30°'/0 of the
limiting reagent.
Variable Temperature .
It will be seen from Equation 11 that as the temperature changes the rate of
gas
generation will vary with (W]b,[Z], K and k. By maintaining (W]b and [Z]
nearly
constant as described above, the rate will be essentially sensitive only to
variation in
K and k. Where a reaction is selected which falls under kinetic control within
the i
temperature range, then 'E' will be high (i.e., E > approximately 40 kJ/mole)
and ,
hence the reaction rate will be very sensitive to temperature changes. Such a
case
probably corresponds to Example 1 below since the reaction of stearylamine is
. ~
relatively slow. A similar situation occurs in Examples 4 and 8 below probably
;
because the rate of reaction of methylamine hydrochloride is relatively low at
high ,
pH (i.e., pH>7.5 approx.).
However, if a reaction is selected which remains under pure mass transfer
control
throughout the temperature range of interest then 'E' will be less than about
20
SUBSTITUTE SHE~~
a ~.: -.v;... v.:::.~..., . w... r ':;:. .-. ., ,. ~ .' ~. ~ ~.. ;. , :: ~. .
,. ~,,.w,, , ~.. ~ ~ - . '
WO 92/19571 PC. lCA92/00171
~<';::
:.,
~~~~~~J
-11-
kJ/mole and the change in rate should be of the order of 1-3Ulo per °C.
Such a
situation corresponds to Example 3 below, in which the chemical reaction of
i
methylamine hydrochloride is relatively fast at pH = 6.5, and the volume
fraction
solid reactant in the matrix is about 0.43.
S
In some situations, the gas generation may go under 'mixed control' where both
kinetics and mass transfer are of the same order of magnitude. Such a
situation
probably corresponds to the reaction of Example 2 below, which is the same as
Example 3 except the volume fraction of solid reactant in the matrix is
increased to
approximately 0.59. The decreased dilution by wax lowers the mass transfer
barrier
to reaction of methylamine hydrochloride.
In summary from the above:
1. At fixed temperature a constant rate of gas generation can be obtained
using
a pure solid reactant with a buffered liquid reactant (or possibly excess
liquid
reactant, although such an approach will lead to increased size of the gas
generator).
2. At fixed temperature the rate of gas generation from a solid reactant in an
inert matrix will normally decrease with time. If m > 1 then rate increases
with
time. This effect can be controlled by manipulating variables such as the
concentration of the reactant in the solid composition and the surface/volume
ratio of the solid to achieve about 0.5 < m < about 1.3.
3. With varying temperature the variation of rate of gas generation with
temperature can be controlled to useful limits (i.e. E<40 and preferably <30
kJ/mole of gas produced) if the gas generation occurs under mass transfer
constraint. Such constraint caa be achieved by choosing a first reagent which,
.:;
when contacted with the liquid under homogeneous conditions, would produce
gas at a rate many times greater than required for a particular purpose (eg.
such as in a fluid dispensing device), and providing it in the form of a solid
composition (either by dispersing the first reagent in an inert solid or
otherwise providing the reagent in solid form, such as a suitable solid
derivative) to bring the reaction under mass transfer constraint. That is, a
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
-12-
system preferably with k[Z] > > K or at least k[Z].~=K for all temperatures at
which the gas generator is to be used.
Mass transfer control, versus constraint, can be achieved by increased
dilution
of the reagent in the solid composition with inert solid - but this leads to
decreased 'm' due to the shrinking core effect discussed above. It is possible
that the distribution of solid reactant in the inert matrix could be varied,
as
discussed above, to overcome this problem. Furthermore, the extent of
reagent dilution is also constrained by the size limitations of practical gas
generators. in practice the solid composition chosen will compromise between
the sensitivity to temperature and the uniformity of gas generation rate
(within
the constraints of gas generator dimensions required for any particular
purpose, much as that for an automatic lubricator). The criteria of 0.5 < m <
1.3
and E<40 or preferably <30 kJ/mole define the extent of this compromise.
i5 Thus, a combination of solid and liquid reagents is irhosen that gives k[Z)
approximately equals [K] so that E<40k3/mole or preferably k[Z]>K so that
E < 30 k3/mole.
From the above discussion and the examples below, it will be seen that the
extent of
dilution of the solid reactant by inert solid [e.g., wax), the solid surface
area and solid
shape can be varied to affect the absolute rate of gas generation and the
values' of the
parameters 'm' and 'E'. Additional variables that can be adjusted to affect
performance of the gas generator:
i. The concentration of the liquid phase source reactant(s), E.g., sodium
nitrite
in most of our examples or acid in the carbonate/carban dioxide example.
ii. The pH of the liquid, which determines the concentration of active
reaction ,
species in the liquid such as nitrous acid or hydrogen ion in our examples.
This occurs through the chemical equilibria in solution. Liquid pH is . .
controlled by addition of acid/base buffers like potassium hydrogen phosphate.
It is preferable to have excess buffer present in a separate phase [e.g. as a
solid) to maintain the liquid phase pH as buffer is consumed in the reaction.
5
...y'.
... . , .:. .. . . . . . , .. .. .
WO 92/19571 PCT/CA92/00171 e.
~~~~~~e~
3
I
iii. The nature of the antifreeze added to the liquid (eg. dimethyl sulfoxide
("DMSO") or ethylene glycol). These can be adjusted to vary mass transfer
i
and kinetic parameters as well as the solution freezing point. Also the
polarity
~.
of the antifreeze may affect the rate at which the liquid penetrates the
solid,
with lower polar ity liquids tending to penetrate non-polar solids (such as
waxes) at a greater rate than more polar liquids.
iv. The concentration of water in the liquid phase may also affect the rate of
reaction.
v. It is preferred that the products of reaction dissolve in the liquid to
leave the
solid reactant accessible to the liquid reactant through the pores of the
inert
solid matrix.
vi. Size of particles of the first reagent dispersed in the inert solid.
A particular reaction type which would be useful in gas generators for fluid
dispensing devices, such as automatic lubricators, is that described by Taylor
(Journal
of the Chemical Society 1928, pages 1099 to 1105) for the reaction of primary
amines
with nitrous acid to produce inert nitrogen according to the following
reaction:
RNHZ + HNOZ ----? Nz + ROH + Hz0 (Equation I4)
where R represents an alkyl group
which reaction was shown to follow the equation:
Reaction rate = kC,(Cz)z
where:
k = reaction rate constant
C, = concentration of primary amine reagent
i
CZ = concentration of nitrous acid reagent
Such a reactioh order under homogeneous conditions is clearly unsuitable for .
generating gas at a constant rate, even at a fixed temperature, because the
reaction
order 'n' is too high. However, where one of the reagents, such as the amine,
is in
the form of a solid or is dispersed in an inert solid (i.e. one that is not
substantially
altered during the gas generating reaction), such as a hydrocarbon wax, the
reaction
can be brought under mass transfer control with m between about 0.5 and 1.3 as
previously described, and in properly constructed cases with E < about 40
kJ/mole
and preferably <about 30 kJ/mole of gas generated.
SIJ~STITUTE SHEET
WO 92119571 PCT/CA92/00171
,.. . ..:.,..
...
-14-
has generating formulations of the present invention are described in the
Examples.
The m and E values are calculated from the experimental results obtained from
the
following gas generating systems. Where E is not given, it has not been
deCermined.
In Examples 1-5 the first reagent is contained in solid cylindrical plugs 1 em
diameter
by 5 cm long, although other shapes and sizes are possible. In some cases the
solid
composition consists of the pure reagent (e.g. stearylamine) and in other
cases the
reagent is mixed into an inert (i.e. nonreagent) solid such as paraffin wax.
The inert
solid serves to dilute the reagent and control the reaction rate by limiting
access of
a second reagent in the solution. Examples 1 to 4 demonstrate the generation
of
nitrogen by the reaction of Equation 14 above. It will be appreciated that gas
generators of the present invention could produce nitrogen by means of
reactions
other than that of Equation 14, using similar principles in selecting a solid
composition and liquid. For example, nitrogen is generated by the gas
generator of
Example 5 using the reaction of an azide with an oxidant. Further, gas
generators
of the present invention could also generate other gases, such as carbon
dioxide,
using similar principles of selecting suitable solid compositions and liquids.
Example 1
-..-
Solid Composition - Two 5 cm long by 1 cm diameter stearylamine cylinders.
Liquid Reagent - a solution prepared by mixing 12 mL dimethyl sulphoxide
(present as an antifreeze), 8 mL water, 5.3 gram potassium
hydrogen phthalate (a pH buffer) and 2.0 gram sodium nitrite.
The solid and liquid reagents were placed in a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask
connected to
a gas burette. The flask and burette were kept in an oven at 42°C for
one month and
the volume of gas generated was recorded at intervals during this period.
Figure 1
is a plot of gas volume (corrected to standard conditions of 0°C and 1
atm absolute . ,
,_
pressure) observed versus time. Initial and final solution pH's were 6.3 and
6.2
respectively. The 'm' figure of merit value for this composition was 0.83. .
A further trial was performed using the same composition except that dimethyl
sulfoxide was replaced with ethylene glycol (12 mL) and gas generation
measured at
room temperature. 100 mL of gas were produced in 300 hours with 'm'= about
0.7.
SU BSTlTIJTE SHEET
w~ 9zm9sm ~cric~,9aiool~~
~:'.
~~~~~b~J
-15-
Thus, changing the antifreeze component increased the reaction rate. This may
he
due to the difference in polarity between the two antifreeze components.
Example 2
Solid composition - One S cm long by 1 em diameter cylinder prepared by
freezing
1.4 grams of molten paraffin wax (melting point 6S °C) mixed
with 2.8 grams of powdered methylamine hydrochloride.
Liquid Reagent - A solution of 12 mL ethylene glycol (added as an antifreeze),
8
mL water, 2 grams sodium nitrite, S grams potassium hydrogen
phosphate and ~ M potassium hydroxide added dropwise to pH
6.5. Note that the potassium hydrogen phosphate does not
dissolve completely in this mixture (this helps maintain a
constant pH buffer activity as the reaction proceeds).
1S Three experiments were run in parallel at temperatures of -30, +S and
+40°C
respectively. As in Example l, the volume of gas generated was measured for
each
run over a period of 800 hours. The results are shown in Figure 2. The 'm'
figure
of merit value from the -30, +S and +40°C experiments respectively was
found to be
1.23, 0.79 and O.SS respectively. Figure of merit value E was found to be 27
kJ/mole
of gas produced.
In the calculation of E in the Examples of this application, the lowest value
of m is
used in each case since better statistical fits are obtained from the data. To
illustrate
the calculation of E, the following data are generated: ~
2S
Temperature (°C) -30 +S +42
Reaction order parameter m 1.23 0.79 O.SS t:
u.
a
Rate constant Y 0.012 1.43 23
Pseudo-rate constant X 0.012 0.90 O.SS
obtained for m=1.23
Correlation coefficient 0.99 0.92 0.76
Activation energy from X and T E=7.4 k.T/mole
u~S'~ITIJT~ 5~'~ET,
S
~O 92/19571 PCT/CA92/00171 ''
(~~:r:; :.
~~~~~8~ __ ;.
-16-
Pseudo-rate constant X 0.91 5.3 23
obtained for ma0.55
Correlation coefficient 0.93 0.98 0.99'
Activation energy from X and T E=27 k~/mole
Note: X is a pseudo-rate constant equivalent to 'Y' in equation 4 above but
based
on 'm' assumed constant for all temperatures. Y is the constant of equation 4
above
based on the listed value of 'm' for each temperature.
The lower correlation coefficients obtained with m=1.23 indicate this gives a
poorer
fit to the data. Also, a plot of log(X) versus 1/T for m=1.23 shows a poor fit
to the
Arrhenius equation (see equation 6 above). The value of E=7.4 kJ/mole was
found
by statistically fitting the values of X to the Arrhenius equation. This value
of E is
unreliable since the correlation coefficient in this fit was only 0.29. Thus E
is taken
to be about 27 kJ/mole.
Example 3
Solid composition - One. 5 cm long by 1 cm diameter cylinder prepared by
freezing
1.9 grams of molten paraffin wax (melting point 65 °C) mixed
with 2.1 grams of powdered methylamirie hydrochloride.
Liquid Reagent - A solution of 12 mL ethylene glycol, 8 mL water, 2 grams
sodium nitrite, 5 grams potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 5
M potassium hydroxide to pH 6.5.
As in Example 1, the volume of gas generated was measured at 5°C and
40°C for a
1 month run. Figure of merits "m" were found to be 0.83 at 5°G and 0.51
at 40°C.
Figure of merit "E" was found to be 9.7 kJ/mole of gas produced. Figure 3 is a
plot _ .
of gas volume versus time for Example 3.
Example 4 '
Solid composition - One 5 cm long by 1 cm diameter cylinder prepared by
freezing
1.4 grams of molten paraffin wax (melting point 65 °C) mixed
S1U BST1TUTE Sf~ EET
~r~:T. .~:!:. .. . ~...y,. '.:,:. . .~:...:' _',~~;.~~.. ~;a.~..... ..,... ,
.;,....,..",. ~. . ~ .~.';.,~v:. ~'... ~. :,,. .,.,. ''.:. ~.. ......, ~~..~::
.~...~.~~..' ..
WO 92/19571 PC'1f'/CA92/00171
~.~~~~u~ , ,
. .
.. -17-
with 2.8 grams of powdered methylamine hydrochloride.
Liquid Reagent - A solution of 12 mL ethylene glycol, 8 mL water, 2 grams
sodium nitrite, 5 grams potassium dihydrogen phosphate and ~
i
M potassium hydroxide added dropwise to pH 8Ø ; ~v
As in Example 1, the volume of gas generated at 5°C was measured over a
period of '
600 hours. The results are shown in Figure 4 and the figure of merit "m" was
found
to be 1Ø
Example 5
Solid composition - One 5 cm long by 1 cm diameter cylinder prepared by
freezing
2.3 grams of molten paraffin wax (melting point 65 °C) mixed
with 2.8 grams of powdered sodium perborate (which acts as an
oxidant).
Liquid Reagent - A solution of 12 mL ethylene glycol, 8 mL water, 1.1 grams
sodium azide, 0.1 grams potassium thiocyanate, 0.3 grams
potassium iodide (potassium thiocyanate and potassium iodide
are catalysts for the reaction of the azide) and 1.0 grams
potassium bicarbonate (as pH buffer).
As in Example 1, the volume of gas generated at 5°C was measured over a
period of
700 hours. The results are shown in Figure 5 and the figure of merit "m" was
found
to be 0.5.
a
Example 6
First reagent Calcium citrate 21.2 gram
composition
Second reagent Manganese dioxide 0 . 6 5 g r a m
composition boric acid 6.9 gram
SU~S'TITUTE SHEET
;:,., :.:..
vV0 92!19571 PCl'/CA92/00171 . F ~';';'
' ~_;;.. . : ,
_18_ j
- E
Both reagents in this Example are sparingly soluble solid powders which are
mixed
in a paste with a liquid consisting of~:
DMSO 18 mL,.
Water 12 mL
As in Example 1, the gas generation is measured for 500 hours with results as
in
Figure 6.
The gas generated by this reaction is carbon dioxide:
Mn02 + 10 H$C60, -----> 9 MnH6C6O, + 13 Hz0 + 6COz
citric acid manganese citrate
Reaction rate parameter from Fig. 6 m = 0.91
While the gas generator of Example 6 gave a constant rate of gas generation,
the
reagents were bulky and produced only about 10 mL of gas in 500 hours. Thus, a
gas
generator constructed according to the above is considered impractical for
devices
such as automatic lubricators. However the principles of the current invention
could
be applied by those skilled in the art to provide superior carbon dioxide
generating
devices.
Example 7 ~ .
First reagent Calcium carbonate 4.5 gram
composition Paraffin wax 13.4 gram
f
The wax is melted, mixed with powdered calcium carbonate
then frozen to a solid plaque of about 6 cm diameter and O.S
cm thick.
Second reagent
composition
Acetic acid 5.4 gram
DMSO 11 mL
Water 6 mL
SIJgSTITUTE SHEET.
,.
r. ~ .~
:,
,.:. .. :..: ::.:. ::: :v: :; :.. :~ .:. ~..v. :.::~. .~v :: ... , .,
;.: ...::~..: .. ~.,...:. .S.~~.. ,. ...,.....7 ~... ... . . ,..: .; . ~.; ..
: . ~... ,. .. , . . .. . . .. . .. . .. . ....',. .... .-. .. .'. ~. ...~..
... ... ... .n..,..,......
WO 92/19571 PCT/CA92/00171
i: ::.
~~~~~~~~
-19-
i
1
As in Example l, the gas volume generated at room temperature (15 to 21
°C) was
measured for 100 hours with results in Figure 7. This reaction produced carbon
3
dioxide:
CaCO~ + 2CH,COOH -----> Ca(CH3C00)z + COz + HZO
Reaction rate parameter from Fig. 7 m = 0.4
The low value of m makes the Example 7 reaction and conditions unsuitable in
gas
generators of the present invention. However, the initial reaction was fast so
that the
low 'm' may be attributable to the high dilution of calcium carbonate by wax
(/.e. the
shrinking core effect discussed above), and increasing the calcium carbonate
concentration may increase 'm' to an acceptable value.
Examt~le 8
Reactant Methylamine hydrochloride 2.1 gram
Paraffin wax (MP 65°C) 1.9 gram
The wax is melted, mixed with powdered methylamine hydrochloride
then frozen to a solid plug 5 cm long by 1 cm diameter.
Co-reactant A solution of:
Ethylene glycol 12 mL
water 8 mL
sodium nitrite 2 grams
potassium dihydrogen phosphate 5 grams
5 M potassium hydroxide to pH = 7.5
As ~in Example 3, two experiments were run in parallel at temperatures
respectively
+5 and +42 °C. The gas generation data are in Figure 8 and the reaction
z.
parameters were:
Temperature (°C) +5 . +42
pH initial 7.5 7.5
final 7.0 7.1
~UBST1TUTE S~E~T
Reaction rate parameter "m" 1.3 0.73
Reaction rate constant 0.31 5.4
Calculated E with m = 0.73 E = 59 kJ/mole
for both temperatures.
The gas generator of Example 8 provided good values of m, and is useful . as a
gas
generator of the present invention. However, it should preferably be used only
in
situations where a fairly constant temperature is expected, since the value of
E
obtained indicates the reaction to be under kinetic control. Such a high E
value may
be due to the high pH. A similar trial with pH =8 also gave E>40 kJ/mole.
Example 9
Reactant Methylamine hydrochloride 2.1 grams
Paraffin wax 1.9 grams
The wax is melted, mixed with powdered methylamine hydrochloride
then frozen to a solid plug 5 cm long by 1 cm diameter.
Co-reactant A solution of:
propylene glycol 12 mL
water 8 mL
sodium nitrite 2 grams
potassium dihydrogen phosphate 5 grams
5 M potassium hydroxide to pH= 7.5
As in Example 1, the volume of gas generated at +5 °C was measured over
a period
of 500 hours with results in Figure 9.
r
i
Reaction rate parameter "m" - 0.53
a
This Example uses essentially the same parameters as in Example 8, except that
changing the antifreeze from ethylene to propylene glycol resulted in the
reaction rate
being increased by about a factor of 4.
Example 1 then, shows gas production at a relatively constant rate from a
solid
composition consisting essentially of the pure first reagent, stearylamine.
Examples
SUBSTITUTE SLWEET
WO 92/19571 PCT/C~i,92/00171
~.~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3
.a a '~ v ..
-21 -
2, 3 and 4 shave gas production at controlled rate fram methylamine
hydrochloride
dispersed in an inert solid, paraffin wax. Example 5 shows the use of
different
reagents. Examples 2 and 3 show how dispersing highly reactive if~ethylaminc
hydrochloride in the inert paraffin wax, can control the rate of gas
generation and
reduce the effect of temperature on the rate of gas gencratian. Examples 2,4,8
and
9 show how the rate of gas generation can be controlled by manipulating the
liduid
composition. It is expected that the rate of gas generation can be controlled
by other
variations in liduid composition such as the type and amount of organic
component
and the amount of water.
It is also expected that the gas generating reactions of the above Examples
can also
be used in a gas generator for a fluid dispensing apparatus, such as an
automatic
lubricator. In such an apparatus, provision would be made to bring the liquid
into
contact with the solid composition when it is desired to start gas generation
to result
in fluid being urged from a fluid reservoir. Similarly, the gas generating
reactions
described could be used in other fluid dispensers.
Modifications to the specific embodiments of the invention described above are
possible. For example, it may, in many cases be possible to interchange the
location
of the first and second reagents. That is either one could be in the solid
composition
and the other one in the liquid. This would, of course, be subject to possible
problems such as decomposition of a reagent over time. For example, in the
case of
perborate salts, it is expected that in solution they would likely decompose
over time
and accordingly, for many devices such as fluid dispensers which would
normally be
stored for a period of time, the perborate salt should preferably be in the
solid
composition. It is also conceived to disperse both the first and second
reactant, in
solid form, in an inert solid matrix so that gas generation occurs when the
solid
,..
matrix contacts a suitable liquid. Further modifications to the present
invention arc,
of course, possible. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to the
above
described embodiments.
~. ~ ~ ~r -'?A ~1
BST1~'l~T~ SHEET.
SU
